The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:37, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
I would like to hear opinions on the Ozone Action Day article and whether is should be deleted.
This article is really bad, and I am not sure it is worth the effort to reform it.
Much of the existing text has nothing to do with Ozone Action Days and is about ozone and it's detrimental effects on humans and worker safety concerns. We already cover those topics in better articles at Ozone and Indoor air quality.
I suspect Ozone Action Days are a US-only thing, as nothing in other countries is mentioned. I would expect this article to say what triggers declaration of an Ozone Action Day, and how many days per year are named Ozone Action Days in sample cities. But nothing about that.
Plus the article is really poorly written. I don't mind working on that, but I think if Wikipedia is going to address Ozone Action Days we should just add a paragraph or two to Smog
Carax ( talk) 23:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Article created by a COI editor and promoted from AFC by a now-indefblocked sockpuppet; subject is non-notable chocolatier with insufficient in-depth coverage in reliable sources. BD2412 T 23:17, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:47, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd like to see more feedback on the articles found by CT55555 and whether they establish some level on notability or are just, as BD2412 implies, PR drivel.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:05, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Lorraine, Quebec. Liz Read! Talk! 23:52, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Previously prodded, and challenged. Article is unreferenced, and the organization is not notable. This is for a town of approx. 10,000 residents north of Laval, Quebec. The Council does not meet the general notability guideline. PK T(alk) 18:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:43, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Sources: City Charter (Bill 125); Proceedings of the Council; List of Council Members established by the City. At the very least, the content about how the city was founded and the first mayor could be merged. Jumpytoo Talk 03:39, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider whether it is better to delete this article or merge/redirect it to another one.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:02, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:54, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. The first refs that should address notability are simply gossip-column tittle-tattle. Nothing reliable that speaks to notability. Other refs "demonstrate" that she has got engaged. Fails WP:GNG by a very wide margin Velella Velella Talk 16:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:42, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:01, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Lots of Reddit, self-published fan references backing up v. questionable content ("one of the first gay films", despite films about male homosexuality being around since 1919, at least). There may be some indication of notability, but frankly I think it's a good idea to delete this article and start over, if needs be. QueenofBithynia ( talk) 22:34, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:50, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Disputed draftification. WP:ADMASQ. Fails WP:NCORP 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:05, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:57, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Article been on the cat:nn list for 10+ years. No coverage except social media. Refs are 404. Fails WP:SIGCOV. No coverage. scope_creep Talk 22:56, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Alternatively, this can be restored to Draft space where it can be improved and worked on. Liz Read! Talk! 23:59, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails GNG and WP:NBUSINESSPERSON - LinkedIn type article Paul W ( talk) 17:54, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Femke (
talk)
18:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:53, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 12:55, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Only passing mentions in sources mostly for awards received. Does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV Hughesdarren ( talk) 08:34, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
08:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:43, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I hate to relist discussions a third time but I'm not convinced that the award this individual won is a major award or that the sources are very reliable. It would be helpful to hear from more editors about the specifics of the sourcing here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:46, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Guidon Games. Liz Read! Talk! 22:36, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable substub that's probably a PROD candidate, but it's possible that BOZ or Guinness323 could find some refs. No refs are provided whatsoever, there's seemingly a mention on Books, but it's another game (see BGG entry) with Frank Lantz as the designer. The low number of ratings on BGG, just 6, perhaps also indicates its obscurity, but with no refs here or online per a BEFORE search, this is non-notable and doesn't even have a claim of notability. VickKiang ( talk) 22:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear. Though the article creator has tried to make the case, no one else was swayed. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 21:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
i fail to see how she's a notable actress, she's only held very, very minor, mostly unnamed roles or roles in non-notable productions. The claims about winning best actress come from non-notable awards as well. There is no in depth coverage of her to be found and the bulk of the sources here are absolutely unreliable or completely primary like her own CV. PRAXIDICAE🌈 22:09, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Really?
The majority of the article's body is pulled from those reliable sources, which are all dedicated to her (see the ref list). The citations for Actors Access are mainly credits. I don't know if Voyage LA is a paid site. I have no problem removing it. Can you verify that? -- James26 ( talk) 02:18, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions; the reliance on an interview and information from the subject means there is limited independent support for WP:BASIC notability. The second source is Meet Andrea Hickey (VoyageLA, Aug 6, 2020) which is an interview without secondary context or commentary. This style of promotional content appears to be part of the editorial policy of VoyageLa:
"As you browse through our stories you’ll notice that many of our interviews aren’t as polished as you’ll find elsewhere in the media. That’s intentional [...] Accordingly our mission is to build a platform that fosters collaboration and support for small businesses, independent artists and entrepreneurs [...]"The third source is from Belmont University, where Hickey graduated from in 2010, i.e. Andrea Hickey ’10 Finds Success as Actress in Los Angeles (June 15, 2021), so this is not an independent source, in addition to its reliance on quotes from Hickey. The fourth source in the article leads to "resumes.actorsaccess.com//one_page_resume.cfm" but I only get a message stating "The page you have attempted to view is private." However, given that it appears to be a resume, it does not appear to be the kind of independent, secondary sourcing needed to help support notability per the guidelines, and it is used to support the existence of minor film festival awards. The fifth source is an event announcement that does not mention her and would not support notability if it did. The sixth source is also from Belmont University, which as noted above, is not independent per the guidelines and cannot support notability. The TV Guide source suggested in this discussion also does not appear to help support notability, including because it does not indicate support for WP:NACTOR by demonstrating significant roles in multiple notable productions. My online search found another promotional interview that reminded me of the VoyageLA interview, ( Meet Andrea Hickey: Actress, Shoutout Arizona, August 10, 2020) and this is also a Voyage Group publication (e.g.
"we’ve grown to almost a dozen cities, generated millions of page views and helped tens of thousands of entrepreneurs and creatives share their stories."). Beyond the lack of independent and secondary content available from the Voyage Group productions to support notability, the apparent promotional purpose of these publications indicate they are little more than press releases and not suitable for supporting encyclopedic content. Overall, the limited independent biographical information available from sources is not particularly in-depth and detailed, so there is not much available to combine per WP:BASIC into an article about this subject at this time. Beccaynr ( talk) 18:24, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
"Independent of the subject" excludes works produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it, and she is affiliated with the university she attended and graduated from. This guideline also includes in footnote 5,
Works produced by the subject, or those with a strong connection to them, are unlikely to be strong evidence of notability, and the Belmont sources are interview-based and seem to promote her and the university, which also seems to weigh against support for notability per WP:NOT policy, which excludes WP:PROMO. Beccaynr ( talk) 18:56, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. No blame attaches for not knowing this, but current consensus is that all validly described recent taxa at species or higher level are treated as notable for purposes of having a standalone article. No benefit in keeping this open any longer. ( non-admin closure) -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 16:41, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Does Wikipedia need an article about every existing species? FAdesdae378 ( talk · contribs) 21:27, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMMA. His highest ranking by Fight Matrix is 133th in the world welterweight rankings. Also never previously appeared in any of Sherdog's rankings. As I stated in the previous deletion discussion, he also fails WP:GNG, none of the coverage demonstrated in that discussion was significant. ♡RAFAEL♡( talk) 20:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
20:26, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:03, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Article reads like a promotional piece for a radio presenter who appears to have done nothing notable other than appear on the radio (and also advertises her therapy business). This is content suitable for a radio fan site but not an encyclopedia. Flip Format ( talk) 20:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Keep: No it doesn't. It has independent references and there's no issue with notability. And it doesn't advertise her therapy business. And I have removed some of the more advertising elements, not that there were any in the first place. Rillington ( talk) 12:42, 7 August 2022 (UTC).
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
20:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:37, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Article about a distinctly non-notable local radio and nightclub DJ who once appeared on an episode of a daytime cookery TV show. Flip Format ( talk) 20:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
20:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:37, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:40, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:36, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:35, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:36, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:33, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:35, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:30, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:35, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:28, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:35, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:26, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:34, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:34, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subjectis required. I have looked for significant coverage of this individual and I have simply been unable to find it, so this article should be deleted in line with WP:DEL-REASON#8, which is to say that it fails to satisfy any of the relevant notability guidelines. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:32, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
seems like a WP:BLP1E, she's not notable under WP:NPOL and the only coverage is currently from a potential crime, though it isn't significant enough to warrant an article. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:19, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
I suspect, frankly, that this was created in an attempt to misuse Wikipedia as a "name and shame her for doing a bad thing" platform instead of an encyclopedia.indeed and the scary part is that it was created by an administrator who should absolutely know better wrt BLPs. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:31, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
See maintenance tags: pure, in-universe fancruft sourced entirely from official Disney blogs and fansites. Just Another Cringy Username ( talk) 20:11, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Modussiccandi (
talk)
18:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Notability has not been established with WP:RS. Amigao ( talk) 17:53, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Carmen Sandiego (video game series). Eddie891 Talk Work 19:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
From what I can see, fails WP:N. Mobile game released under Verizon Wireless store for non-smartphones. Unable to find any English sources on the topic other than the official news post on MarketScreener. Perhaps deserves passing mention on Carmen Sandiego (video game series). Skipple ☎ 17:47, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:42, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:35, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:33, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:25, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:32, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Unanimous & policy based support to keep. (non-admin closure) KSAWikipedian ( talk) 18:55, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
At this rate, every single death row individual in Singapore will be getting his own article. This, like the other articles, is an extreme example of WP:NOTNEWS. Kingoflettuce ( talk) 17:02, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
One should not assume that a wealth of coverage necessarily translates into notability in an encyclopedic sense. The subject had a tragic life, and may his memory be a blessing, but I do not believe that WP:LASTING has been convincingly shown here. A textbook case of WP:NOTNEWS IMO. Kingoflettuce ( talk) 16:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Events are also very likely to be notable if they have widespread (national or international) impact and were very widely covered in diverse sources, especially if also re-analyzed afterwards...
The result was draftify. There seems to be a consensus this article is not ready for the mainspace. A redirect can be created in the interim if desired, and this decision does not mean the article can't be moved back to the mainspace if circumstances change. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:05, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
This page was nominated for PROD by Let'srun ( talk · contribs) using an incorrect procedure, and then deprodded without comment by Snickers2686 ( talk · contribs). The rationale was:
– LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 15:49, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Person is not notable and is no longer a nominee after the seat [at the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York] he was nominated to was nullified by the previous seatholder, David Hurd, withdrawing his senior status.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:26, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. The only delete vote was was lack of significant coverage. However with other comments and changes made, I believed that this issues has been addressed. (non-admin closure) KSAWikipedian ( talk) 18:52, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC, could not find significant coverage. Doesn't seem to have much success. At time of nomination, only source for this 12-year old article is a database. starship .paint ( exalt) 14:33, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:48, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NFILM ( The movie is Kannada in this page I myself source Tried to add but I didn't find any source for this movie) PravinGanechari ( talk) 12:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:41, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of DC Comics characters: L. Looks like a plausible search term so I'm choosing to redirect this page. If you believe it should be redirected to a different target, please discuss this on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 22:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Topic fails WP:GNG. There don't appear to be any substantial reliable sources talking about the character, only minor mentions and unreliable fluff articles like CBR. TTN ( talk) 14:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
No sources presently in the article, none to be found that would establish notability. Thus fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. -- LordPeterII ( talk) 14:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G4. Recreated, per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehrali Gasimov Ged UK 15:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
promotional article about a non-notbale business person. i fail to see how being an honorary consul makes anyone notable and he doesn't appear to meet any other criteria for inclusion PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:08, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Our country is one of the most famous policies of Azerbaijan. You can find it by searching on google. It is also an honorary console. 15:16, 12 August 2022 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.244.124.194 ( talk)
It is also an honorary console.✨that's the point✨ PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Mehrali Gasimov is one of the respected politicians in Azerbaijan. He has enough merits to Azerbaijan and Ukraine Republics. It is worth to mention that he was responsible to evacuate 360 Ukrainian citizens from Kabul and bring them to Azerbaijan in 2022 as a result of the revolution in Afghanistan. In addition, he organized the evacuation of more than 15,000 Azerbaijanis with Ukrainian citizenship to various European countries during the war with Russia. 17:06, 12 August 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.244.124.194 ( talk)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:28, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Democrat Spring appears to be just that: A spring. Topo maps show the name next to a few buildings dating back to the 1930s, but there's no evidence that this is an actual settlement, let alone a notable one. There were surprisingly many newspaper hits, but they were almost all examples of "democrat" and "spring" appearing next to each other for various unrelated reasons. – dlthewave ☎ 13:01, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate article. "Muslim Mojahedin" is a generic term used for describing People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (and also used for describing other groups). Source consensus is undoubtedly clear about that. Fad Ariff ( talk) 11:59, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:58, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:SINGER and WP:GNG PravinGanechari ( talk) 09:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:35, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
WP:BEFORE done and I can see no good reason why this article should be a WP:REDIRECT to Temptation Island (TV series). While the citations advanced here may well indicate that there is a person of this name, in my opinion this article fails any number of tests for notability including but limited to WP:NACTOR As always, please do prove me wrong Shirt58 ( talk) 11:05, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:07, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
No indication of independent notability (secondary or third-party sources); all references I can find seem to be affiliated with the subject.
QueenofBithynia (
talk)
10:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:15, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Indexed nowhere selective. No independent sources. Fails WP:NJOURNALS and WP:GNG Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 09:59, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. After article improvements, character deemed significant enough for standalone article. (non-admin closure) ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 19:42, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
I've prodded it a while ago with "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. ". PROD was removed without any rationale offered by a user since topic banned from deprodding. We then held a merge discussion that ended with no consensus ( Talk:List_of_The_Walking_Dead_(TV_series)_characters#Merge_secondary_chacters_with_little_reception_here). Given the reception here is still a single sentence, I think it's time for an AfD, with my recommendation being a redirect to the List of The Walking Dead (TV series) characters. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:20, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
09:28, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Scalpel. DatGuy Talk Contribs 07:50, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Purely a one-line dicdef for 16 years, with no apparent potential for improvement. BD2412 T 05:12, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
References
Darcyisverycute ( talk) 15:56, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
09:22, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 12:56, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. HeinzMaster ( talk) 22:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Vacating my closure of no consensus and relisting for further input or an admin closure.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ––
FormalDude
talk
04:47, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
09:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:14, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable singer who doesn't satisfy any criterion from WP:SINGER. The sources cited are all paid spam sources, making them unusable for Wikipedia.-- Umakant Bhalerao ( talk) 09:18, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Delete – Lol no, the sources aren't just problematic because they are WP:SPONSORED, but because two of them are even written by the article subject themself, Mahan Ahmadi. So much for independence... *facepalm*. Nothing else can be found on Google either. -- LordPeterII ( talk) 22:00, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. No need to let this play out, as the sole author has agreed for draftification, with the agreement of the nominator and one other person. (non-admin closure) — Bilorv ( talk) 08:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Article doesn't have citations, makes no note of notability. A new author is working on this article so it should be sent to draft and if nothing comes of it the article can be deleted. Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝) 07:18, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete. Self-promotion written by User talk:Imranhosen1997, deleted per {{ db-g11}}. – Athaenara ✉ 09:46, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Autobio with no evidence of notability, significant coverage in RS not found ( t · c) buidhe 06:47, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
This person isnt notable, and the only sources available belong to Anastasiou Obermallen ( talk) 03:31, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, for some reason, the PRODder, de-PROD'd this article so it is not eligible for Soft Deletion and the discussion will be open at least for another week.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:29, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable reality television contestant; competed on, but did not win, Survivor. Competed in non-notable beauty pageants. Bgsu98 ( talk) 03:10, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:27, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
vanity press book , with no RS reviews. Self published books can be in rare cases be notable , but they need much stronger evidence than goodreads, youtube and another author's personal website. DGG ( talk ) 04:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Delete votes just stated that the editor couldn't find sources while a Keep vote did find sources. Liz Read! Talk! 05:54, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:08, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Halos. Editors who would like to consider a different redirect target can have a discussion on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 05:18, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Mass-created by Carlossuarez46 ( talk · contribs) in violation of WP:MEATBOT: non-existent village apparently invented by an ancient author in confusion with Alea (Arcadia) and/or Halos. Prod contested. Avilich ( talk) 02:03, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Redirect to Halos, as the apparent error in Stephanus is already mentioned there. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 03:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Redirect per Ficaia. We already have a disambiguation for the more generic search term Alea, which could (and should) be adjusted to explain the redirect. And as for the redirect having two targets: I doubt even many people are searching for the actual ancient Arcadia by explictily typing "Alea (Thessaly)" into the search field, and then get annoyed when they don't end up on "Alea (Arcadia)". I mean... how. -- LordPeterII ( talk) 21:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is not a consensus about the redirect target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:49, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to University of Oregon#Academics. As the AFD closer, I'm selecting the option of redirecting this article as only one Delete statement gives any deletion rationale (and that includes the weak deletion nomination statement). Liz Read! Talk! 00:19, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
No outside sources - Wiseoleman17 ( talk) 01:16, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:43, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. There are only four reliable sources I was able to find on the web (and they’ve been cite). Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 03:32, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Ivory Coast women's international footballers. Clear consensus not to have a standalone; redirect acceptable as WP:ATD - plausible search term. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 03:01, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Few to no outside sources. Not notable. - Wiseoleman17 ( talk) 01:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Delete - There is insufficient notability for this college to warrant its own article. I do not see sufficient original content worth merging into University of Oregon. MaxnaCarta ( talk) 03:05, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. As the nominator is now voting "Keep", and the one "Delete" comment offers no rationale, I'm treating this as a withdrawn nomination and closing this as "No consensus". Liz Read! Talk! 06:43, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Few outside sources. Not a notable school. Info can be added to main article. -- Wiseoleman17 ( talk) 01:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:43, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable minor political candidate. Only held hyper-local office, and coverage is minor and generally routine. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Curbon7 ( talk) 02:42, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NBIO. This looks like an effort specifically to create a promotional articles. Almost all the refs are misleading, mentioning her employer (Ozwald Boateng) but not her. The few that do mention her are very minor or mostly quotations. Lack of in-depth independent coverage. MB 02:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:27, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:39, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:25, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:39, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:22, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:19, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:18, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Netherlands women ODI cricketers. It is not substantially contested here that the kind of sources required by WP:GNG have not been found after two weeks of searching. That being the case, the "keep" opinions are so weak that they have to be discounted: they use arguments now rejected by community consensus, i.e., that playing at a certain level of sports automatically establishes notability. That the nominator is a blocked sockpuppet invalidates their opinion, but not that of the other participants in this AfD. Sandstein 09:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources as required by WP:SIGCOV. The sole source is a statistical database only. Sistorian ( talk) 19:58, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting by request
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:09, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. It is not substantially contested here that the kind of sources required by WP:GNG have not been found after two weeks of searching. That being the case, the "keep" opinions are so weak that they have to be discounted: they use arguments now rejected by community consensus, i.e., that playing at a certain level of sports automatically establishes notability. A redirect closure per WP:ATD is also not possible because nobody has proposed a redirect target. Sandstein 08:26, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources as required by WP:SIGCOV. The sole source is a statistical database only. Sistorian ( talk) 19:47, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Blue Square Thing, the Cricinfo discussion is anything but significant because it is simply statistics dressed in prose clothing. The only non-statistical information it provides, other than what is already in the article, is West having been on the MCC ground staff, which is hardly significant. I presume you could add the statistical information to the information box, as seems to be the usual practice. If you intend to expand the article using statistics only, albeit in prose form, then I do not think that will comply with WP:NOT (in the section labelled WP:NOTSTATS) and the article will still lack significant coverage because "multiple sources are generally expected".
If there is more information in histories of the Middlesex club then by all means include it. As I understand things, though, the article must cite reliable sources and cannot be left in a "before we go and look" scenario. I am still new to this, I must point out, so please explain if I am misunderstanding the process in any way. Thank you.
Sistorian ( talk) 21:27, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
The sole source is a statistical database only. That is patently not the case. Not only have you not looked to check if there are any other sources about West - which is strongly encouraged - you haven't checked the source which was in the article. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 18:08, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting by request. I'll let another admin close this AFD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:06, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:37, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
I would like to hear opinions on the Ozone Action Day article and whether is should be deleted.
This article is really bad, and I am not sure it is worth the effort to reform it.
Much of the existing text has nothing to do with Ozone Action Days and is about ozone and it's detrimental effects on humans and worker safety concerns. We already cover those topics in better articles at Ozone and Indoor air quality.
I suspect Ozone Action Days are a US-only thing, as nothing in other countries is mentioned. I would expect this article to say what triggers declaration of an Ozone Action Day, and how many days per year are named Ozone Action Days in sample cities. But nothing about that.
Plus the article is really poorly written. I don't mind working on that, but I think if Wikipedia is going to address Ozone Action Days we should just add a paragraph or two to Smog
Carax ( talk) 23:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Article created by a COI editor and promoted from AFC by a now-indefblocked sockpuppet; subject is non-notable chocolatier with insufficient in-depth coverage in reliable sources. BD2412 T 23:17, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:47, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd like to see more feedback on the articles found by CT55555 and whether they establish some level on notability or are just, as BD2412 implies, PR drivel.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:05, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Lorraine, Quebec. Liz Read! Talk! 23:52, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Previously prodded, and challenged. Article is unreferenced, and the organization is not notable. This is for a town of approx. 10,000 residents north of Laval, Quebec. The Council does not meet the general notability guideline. PK T(alk) 18:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:43, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Sources: City Charter (Bill 125); Proceedings of the Council; List of Council Members established by the City. At the very least, the content about how the city was founded and the first mayor could be merged. Jumpytoo Talk 03:39, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider whether it is better to delete this article or merge/redirect it to another one.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:02, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:54, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. The first refs that should address notability are simply gossip-column tittle-tattle. Nothing reliable that speaks to notability. Other refs "demonstrate" that she has got engaged. Fails WP:GNG by a very wide margin Velella Velella Talk 16:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:42, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:01, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Lots of Reddit, self-published fan references backing up v. questionable content ("one of the first gay films", despite films about male homosexuality being around since 1919, at least). There may be some indication of notability, but frankly I think it's a good idea to delete this article and start over, if needs be. QueenofBithynia ( talk) 22:34, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:50, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Disputed draftification. WP:ADMASQ. Fails WP:NCORP 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:05, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:57, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Article been on the cat:nn list for 10+ years. No coverage except social media. Refs are 404. Fails WP:SIGCOV. No coverage. scope_creep Talk 22:56, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Alternatively, this can be restored to Draft space where it can be improved and worked on. Liz Read! Talk! 23:59, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails GNG and WP:NBUSINESSPERSON - LinkedIn type article Paul W ( talk) 17:54, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Femke (
talk)
18:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:53, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 12:55, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Only passing mentions in sources mostly for awards received. Does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV Hughesdarren ( talk) 08:34, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
08:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:43, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I hate to relist discussions a third time but I'm not convinced that the award this individual won is a major award or that the sources are very reliable. It would be helpful to hear from more editors about the specifics of the sourcing here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:46, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Guidon Games. Liz Read! Talk! 22:36, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable substub that's probably a PROD candidate, but it's possible that BOZ or Guinness323 could find some refs. No refs are provided whatsoever, there's seemingly a mention on Books, but it's another game (see BGG entry) with Frank Lantz as the designer. The low number of ratings on BGG, just 6, perhaps also indicates its obscurity, but with no refs here or online per a BEFORE search, this is non-notable and doesn't even have a claim of notability. VickKiang ( talk) 22:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear. Though the article creator has tried to make the case, no one else was swayed. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 21:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
i fail to see how she's a notable actress, she's only held very, very minor, mostly unnamed roles or roles in non-notable productions. The claims about winning best actress come from non-notable awards as well. There is no in depth coverage of her to be found and the bulk of the sources here are absolutely unreliable or completely primary like her own CV. PRAXIDICAE🌈 22:09, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Really?
The majority of the article's body is pulled from those reliable sources, which are all dedicated to her (see the ref list). The citations for Actors Access are mainly credits. I don't know if Voyage LA is a paid site. I have no problem removing it. Can you verify that? -- James26 ( talk) 02:18, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions; the reliance on an interview and information from the subject means there is limited independent support for WP:BASIC notability. The second source is Meet Andrea Hickey (VoyageLA, Aug 6, 2020) which is an interview without secondary context or commentary. This style of promotional content appears to be part of the editorial policy of VoyageLa:
"As you browse through our stories you’ll notice that many of our interviews aren’t as polished as you’ll find elsewhere in the media. That’s intentional [...] Accordingly our mission is to build a platform that fosters collaboration and support for small businesses, independent artists and entrepreneurs [...]"The third source is from Belmont University, where Hickey graduated from in 2010, i.e. Andrea Hickey ’10 Finds Success as Actress in Los Angeles (June 15, 2021), so this is not an independent source, in addition to its reliance on quotes from Hickey. The fourth source in the article leads to "resumes.actorsaccess.com//one_page_resume.cfm" but I only get a message stating "The page you have attempted to view is private." However, given that it appears to be a resume, it does not appear to be the kind of independent, secondary sourcing needed to help support notability per the guidelines, and it is used to support the existence of minor film festival awards. The fifth source is an event announcement that does not mention her and would not support notability if it did. The sixth source is also from Belmont University, which as noted above, is not independent per the guidelines and cannot support notability. The TV Guide source suggested in this discussion also does not appear to help support notability, including because it does not indicate support for WP:NACTOR by demonstrating significant roles in multiple notable productions. My online search found another promotional interview that reminded me of the VoyageLA interview, ( Meet Andrea Hickey: Actress, Shoutout Arizona, August 10, 2020) and this is also a Voyage Group publication (e.g.
"we’ve grown to almost a dozen cities, generated millions of page views and helped tens of thousands of entrepreneurs and creatives share their stories."). Beyond the lack of independent and secondary content available from the Voyage Group productions to support notability, the apparent promotional purpose of these publications indicate they are little more than press releases and not suitable for supporting encyclopedic content. Overall, the limited independent biographical information available from sources is not particularly in-depth and detailed, so there is not much available to combine per WP:BASIC into an article about this subject at this time. Beccaynr ( talk) 18:24, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
"Independent of the subject" excludes works produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it, and she is affiliated with the university she attended and graduated from. This guideline also includes in footnote 5,
Works produced by the subject, or those with a strong connection to them, are unlikely to be strong evidence of notability, and the Belmont sources are interview-based and seem to promote her and the university, which also seems to weigh against support for notability per WP:NOT policy, which excludes WP:PROMO. Beccaynr ( talk) 18:56, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. No blame attaches for not knowing this, but current consensus is that all validly described recent taxa at species or higher level are treated as notable for purposes of having a standalone article. No benefit in keeping this open any longer. ( non-admin closure) -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 16:41, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Does Wikipedia need an article about every existing species? FAdesdae378 ( talk · contribs) 21:27, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMMA. His highest ranking by Fight Matrix is 133th in the world welterweight rankings. Also never previously appeared in any of Sherdog's rankings. As I stated in the previous deletion discussion, he also fails WP:GNG, none of the coverage demonstrated in that discussion was significant. ♡RAFAEL♡( talk) 20:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
20:26, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:03, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Article reads like a promotional piece for a radio presenter who appears to have done nothing notable other than appear on the radio (and also advertises her therapy business). This is content suitable for a radio fan site but not an encyclopedia. Flip Format ( talk) 20:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Keep: No it doesn't. It has independent references and there's no issue with notability. And it doesn't advertise her therapy business. And I have removed some of the more advertising elements, not that there were any in the first place. Rillington ( talk) 12:42, 7 August 2022 (UTC).
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
20:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:37, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Article about a distinctly non-notable local radio and nightclub DJ who once appeared on an episode of a daytime cookery TV show. Flip Format ( talk) 20:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
20:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:37, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:40, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:36, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:35, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:36, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:33, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:35, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:30, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:35, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:28, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:35, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:26, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:34, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:34, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subjectis required. I have looked for significant coverage of this individual and I have simply been unable to find it, so this article should be deleted in line with WP:DEL-REASON#8, which is to say that it fails to satisfy any of the relevant notability guidelines. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:32, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
seems like a WP:BLP1E, she's not notable under WP:NPOL and the only coverage is currently from a potential crime, though it isn't significant enough to warrant an article. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:19, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
I suspect, frankly, that this was created in an attempt to misuse Wikipedia as a "name and shame her for doing a bad thing" platform instead of an encyclopedia.indeed and the scary part is that it was created by an administrator who should absolutely know better wrt BLPs. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:31, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
See maintenance tags: pure, in-universe fancruft sourced entirely from official Disney blogs and fansites. Just Another Cringy Username ( talk) 20:11, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Modussiccandi (
talk)
18:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Notability has not been established with WP:RS. Amigao ( talk) 17:53, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Carmen Sandiego (video game series). Eddie891 Talk Work 19:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
From what I can see, fails WP:N. Mobile game released under Verizon Wireless store for non-smartphones. Unable to find any English sources on the topic other than the official news post on MarketScreener. Perhaps deserves passing mention on Carmen Sandiego (video game series). Skipple ☎ 17:47, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:42, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:35, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:33, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:25, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:32, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Unanimous & policy based support to keep. (non-admin closure) KSAWikipedian ( talk) 18:55, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
At this rate, every single death row individual in Singapore will be getting his own article. This, like the other articles, is an extreme example of WP:NOTNEWS. Kingoflettuce ( talk) 17:02, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
One should not assume that a wealth of coverage necessarily translates into notability in an encyclopedic sense. The subject had a tragic life, and may his memory be a blessing, but I do not believe that WP:LASTING has been convincingly shown here. A textbook case of WP:NOTNEWS IMO. Kingoflettuce ( talk) 16:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Events are also very likely to be notable if they have widespread (national or international) impact and were very widely covered in diverse sources, especially if also re-analyzed afterwards...
The result was draftify. There seems to be a consensus this article is not ready for the mainspace. A redirect can be created in the interim if desired, and this decision does not mean the article can't be moved back to the mainspace if circumstances change. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:05, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
This page was nominated for PROD by Let'srun ( talk · contribs) using an incorrect procedure, and then deprodded without comment by Snickers2686 ( talk · contribs). The rationale was:
– LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 15:49, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Person is not notable and is no longer a nominee after the seat [at the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York] he was nominated to was nullified by the previous seatholder, David Hurd, withdrawing his senior status.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:26, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. The only delete vote was was lack of significant coverage. However with other comments and changes made, I believed that this issues has been addressed. (non-admin closure) KSAWikipedian ( talk) 18:52, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC, could not find significant coverage. Doesn't seem to have much success. At time of nomination, only source for this 12-year old article is a database. starship .paint ( exalt) 14:33, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:48, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NFILM ( The movie is Kannada in this page I myself source Tried to add but I didn't find any source for this movie) PravinGanechari ( talk) 12:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:41, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of DC Comics characters: L. Looks like a plausible search term so I'm choosing to redirect this page. If you believe it should be redirected to a different target, please discuss this on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 22:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Topic fails WP:GNG. There don't appear to be any substantial reliable sources talking about the character, only minor mentions and unreliable fluff articles like CBR. TTN ( talk) 14:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
No sources presently in the article, none to be found that would establish notability. Thus fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. -- LordPeterII ( talk) 14:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G4. Recreated, per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehrali Gasimov Ged UK 15:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
promotional article about a non-notbale business person. i fail to see how being an honorary consul makes anyone notable and he doesn't appear to meet any other criteria for inclusion PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:08, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Our country is one of the most famous policies of Azerbaijan. You can find it by searching on google. It is also an honorary console. 15:16, 12 August 2022 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.244.124.194 ( talk)
It is also an honorary console.✨that's the point✨ PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Mehrali Gasimov is one of the respected politicians in Azerbaijan. He has enough merits to Azerbaijan and Ukraine Republics. It is worth to mention that he was responsible to evacuate 360 Ukrainian citizens from Kabul and bring them to Azerbaijan in 2022 as a result of the revolution in Afghanistan. In addition, he organized the evacuation of more than 15,000 Azerbaijanis with Ukrainian citizenship to various European countries during the war with Russia. 17:06, 12 August 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.244.124.194 ( talk)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:28, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Democrat Spring appears to be just that: A spring. Topo maps show the name next to a few buildings dating back to the 1930s, but there's no evidence that this is an actual settlement, let alone a notable one. There were surprisingly many newspaper hits, but they were almost all examples of "democrat" and "spring" appearing next to each other for various unrelated reasons. – dlthewave ☎ 13:01, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate article. "Muslim Mojahedin" is a generic term used for describing People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (and also used for describing other groups). Source consensus is undoubtedly clear about that. Fad Ariff ( talk) 11:59, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:58, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:SINGER and WP:GNG PravinGanechari ( talk) 09:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:35, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
WP:BEFORE done and I can see no good reason why this article should be a WP:REDIRECT to Temptation Island (TV series). While the citations advanced here may well indicate that there is a person of this name, in my opinion this article fails any number of tests for notability including but limited to WP:NACTOR As always, please do prove me wrong Shirt58 ( talk) 11:05, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:07, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
No indication of independent notability (secondary or third-party sources); all references I can find seem to be affiliated with the subject.
QueenofBithynia (
talk)
10:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:15, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Indexed nowhere selective. No independent sources. Fails WP:NJOURNALS and WP:GNG Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 09:59, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. After article improvements, character deemed significant enough for standalone article. (non-admin closure) ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 19:42, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
I've prodded it a while ago with "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. ". PROD was removed without any rationale offered by a user since topic banned from deprodding. We then held a merge discussion that ended with no consensus ( Talk:List_of_The_Walking_Dead_(TV_series)_characters#Merge_secondary_chacters_with_little_reception_here). Given the reception here is still a single sentence, I think it's time for an AfD, with my recommendation being a redirect to the List of The Walking Dead (TV series) characters. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:20, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
09:28, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Scalpel. DatGuy Talk Contribs 07:50, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Purely a one-line dicdef for 16 years, with no apparent potential for improvement. BD2412 T 05:12, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
References
Darcyisverycute ( talk) 15:56, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
09:22, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 12:56, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. HeinzMaster ( talk) 22:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Vacating my closure of no consensus and relisting for further input or an admin closure.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ––
FormalDude
talk
04:47, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
09:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:14, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable singer who doesn't satisfy any criterion from WP:SINGER. The sources cited are all paid spam sources, making them unusable for Wikipedia.-- Umakant Bhalerao ( talk) 09:18, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Delete – Lol no, the sources aren't just problematic because they are WP:SPONSORED, but because two of them are even written by the article subject themself, Mahan Ahmadi. So much for independence... *facepalm*. Nothing else can be found on Google either. -- LordPeterII ( talk) 22:00, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. No need to let this play out, as the sole author has agreed for draftification, with the agreement of the nominator and one other person. (non-admin closure) — Bilorv ( talk) 08:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Article doesn't have citations, makes no note of notability. A new author is working on this article so it should be sent to draft and if nothing comes of it the article can be deleted. Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝) 07:18, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete. Self-promotion written by User talk:Imranhosen1997, deleted per {{ db-g11}}. – Athaenara ✉ 09:46, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Autobio with no evidence of notability, significant coverage in RS not found ( t · c) buidhe 06:47, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
This person isnt notable, and the only sources available belong to Anastasiou Obermallen ( talk) 03:31, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, for some reason, the PRODder, de-PROD'd this article so it is not eligible for Soft Deletion and the discussion will be open at least for another week.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:29, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable reality television contestant; competed on, but did not win, Survivor. Competed in non-notable beauty pageants. Bgsu98 ( talk) 03:10, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:27, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
vanity press book , with no RS reviews. Self published books can be in rare cases be notable , but they need much stronger evidence than goodreads, youtube and another author's personal website. DGG ( talk ) 04:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Delete votes just stated that the editor couldn't find sources while a Keep vote did find sources. Liz Read! Talk! 05:54, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:08, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Halos. Editors who would like to consider a different redirect target can have a discussion on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 05:18, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Mass-created by Carlossuarez46 ( talk · contribs) in violation of WP:MEATBOT: non-existent village apparently invented by an ancient author in confusion with Alea (Arcadia) and/or Halos. Prod contested. Avilich ( talk) 02:03, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Redirect to Halos, as the apparent error in Stephanus is already mentioned there. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 03:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Redirect per Ficaia. We already have a disambiguation for the more generic search term Alea, which could (and should) be adjusted to explain the redirect. And as for the redirect having two targets: I doubt even many people are searching for the actual ancient Arcadia by explictily typing "Alea (Thessaly)" into the search field, and then get annoyed when they don't end up on "Alea (Arcadia)". I mean... how. -- LordPeterII ( talk) 21:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is not a consensus about the redirect target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:49, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to University of Oregon#Academics. As the AFD closer, I'm selecting the option of redirecting this article as only one Delete statement gives any deletion rationale (and that includes the weak deletion nomination statement). Liz Read! Talk! 00:19, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
No outside sources - Wiseoleman17 ( talk) 01:16, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:43, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. There are only four reliable sources I was able to find on the web (and they’ve been cite). Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 03:32, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Ivory Coast women's international footballers. Clear consensus not to have a standalone; redirect acceptable as WP:ATD - plausible search term. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 03:01, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Few to no outside sources. Not notable. - Wiseoleman17 ( talk) 01:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Delete - There is insufficient notability for this college to warrant its own article. I do not see sufficient original content worth merging into University of Oregon. MaxnaCarta ( talk) 03:05, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. As the nominator is now voting "Keep", and the one "Delete" comment offers no rationale, I'm treating this as a withdrawn nomination and closing this as "No consensus". Liz Read! Talk! 06:43, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Few outside sources. Not a notable school. Info can be added to main article. -- Wiseoleman17 ( talk) 01:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:43, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable minor political candidate. Only held hyper-local office, and coverage is minor and generally routine. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Curbon7 ( talk) 02:42, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NBIO. This looks like an effort specifically to create a promotional articles. Almost all the refs are misleading, mentioning her employer (Ozwald Boateng) but not her. The few that do mention her are very minor or mostly quotations. Lack of in-depth independent coverage. MB 02:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:27, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:39, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:25, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:39, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:22, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:19, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:18, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Netherlands women ODI cricketers. It is not substantially contested here that the kind of sources required by WP:GNG have not been found after two weeks of searching. That being the case, the "keep" opinions are so weak that they have to be discounted: they use arguments now rejected by community consensus, i.e., that playing at a certain level of sports automatically establishes notability. That the nominator is a blocked sockpuppet invalidates their opinion, but not that of the other participants in this AfD. Sandstein 09:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources as required by WP:SIGCOV. The sole source is a statistical database only. Sistorian ( talk) 19:58, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting by request
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:09, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. It is not substantially contested here that the kind of sources required by WP:GNG have not been found after two weeks of searching. That being the case, the "keep" opinions are so weak that they have to be discounted: they use arguments now rejected by community consensus, i.e., that playing at a certain level of sports automatically establishes notability. A redirect closure per WP:ATD is also not possible because nobody has proposed a redirect target. Sandstein 08:26, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources as required by WP:SIGCOV. The sole source is a statistical database only. Sistorian ( talk) 19:47, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Blue Square Thing, the Cricinfo discussion is anything but significant because it is simply statistics dressed in prose clothing. The only non-statistical information it provides, other than what is already in the article, is West having been on the MCC ground staff, which is hardly significant. I presume you could add the statistical information to the information box, as seems to be the usual practice. If you intend to expand the article using statistics only, albeit in prose form, then I do not think that will comply with WP:NOT (in the section labelled WP:NOTSTATS) and the article will still lack significant coverage because "multiple sources are generally expected".
If there is more information in histories of the Middlesex club then by all means include it. As I understand things, though, the article must cite reliable sources and cannot be left in a "before we go and look" scenario. I am still new to this, I must point out, so please explain if I am misunderstanding the process in any way. Thank you.
Sistorian ( talk) 21:27, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
The sole source is a statistical database only. That is patently not the case. Not only have you not looked to check if there are any other sources about West - which is strongly encouraged - you haven't checked the source which was in the article. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 18:08, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting by request. I'll let another admin close this AFD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:06, 12 August 2022 (UTC)