This is Belbury's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 250 days |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Hello, what does this mean? 2A02:C7C:74AD:AF00:6524:AAF2:BF99:20F0 ( talk) 17:47, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Please will you state that this account is not an alternative account for Owen Blacker? I ask because this account is 7 years old yet you have created only 18 articles though you have made 1000 s of edits. Those article coincide with OBs declared interests. Your logs for the last few days show a striking pattern of you editing when OB does not. And most of all of course your joint interest in me. If you would state that there is no connection it would be a great relief to me. NoorStores ( talk) 11:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
This is in response to the warning message you left on my talk page. I am just a sensitive person, and it seems I cannot win no matter what I do. I love game shows, and I figure good faith editing should be used, but whatever. Smh. I did add sources (albeit incorrectly formatted I will agree to that, and I was told the website I used in particular wasn't allowed, and that's fine. I can find other sources etc. The article was also revered by another Wikipedian I believe due to the incorrect refs and that's fine etc. and I was still going to revise that article, the sources were still correct/not myth information on the Hurl game show page, but still). I take a break from Wiki for personal reasons, for a couple of weeks, and come back to that. Smh. If it wasn't for the fact I'm scared to edit that article again, due to a false edit war claim, I would revise it now. But I need to stay away from that article for the time being on principle, because again I don't want the false edit war claims, and I'm going to take a deep breath and calm myself down smh. I have to defend myself/give my side of the story. It's just if I didn't leave this message on your talk page it seems I'm being defiant. If I defend myself, give my side of it; I cannot win, and again, it comes across that I'm also being defiant it could come across that way etc. and yeah you know what I'm sorry, but now I'm almost kinda scared to edit on Wiki now, as good faith needs to be used between Wikipedians. I apologize if this came across harshly, but yeah. I'm sorry. ☼Phrasia☼ ( talk) 02:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Due to possible shock audience response, the show was very short lived.to a single press release put out prior to the show starting. Belbury ( talk) 09:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
its as much as art as i guess a straight line. i mean a big corporation using llms for a contest has got to be newsworthy Slinkyw ( talk) 22:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
References
Dear @ Belbury
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to address the recent Sockpuppet investigation that was initiated concerning my Wikipedia account. I would like to provide some context and clarification regarding the circumstances that led to this investigation.
First and foremost, I want to stress that I am not a Sockpuppet. I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia for a considerable period of time, and I am genuinely committed to upholding the principles of integrity and transparency within the community.
Recently, I have been more actively engaged in contributing to Wikipedia, particularly in relation to articles such as Baryl Vanneihsangi & Sultan Salahuddin Owaisi. During this time, I encountered challenges in sourcing appropriate images for these articles. In an effort to address this, I attempted to upload publicly available images directly to Wikimedia Commons for use in the articles. Unfortunately, I was unaware of the specific copyright concerns surrounding these images, which led to their removal.
In light of these events, I am reaching out to you to communicate my genuine intentions and seek your understanding. I acknowledge that my recent activities on Wikimedia Commons may have raised concerns, but I assure you that I am approaching my contributions with sincerity and good faith. It is important for me to emphasize that I am still in the process of familiarizing myself with the intricacies of Wikimedia Commons, and I am open to learning from experienced editors like yourself.
I kindly request your assistance and guidance in navigating these challenges. I am eager to rectify any inadvertent missteps and ensure that my future contributions align with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Your support and mentorship would be invaluable to me as I strive to contribute positively to the community.
I genuinely appreciate your attention to this matter and the opportunity to discuss it further. I am eager to address any concerns and clarify any doubts that may have arisen.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely, Zuck28 ( talk) 21:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Dracula, Frankenstein, and The Wolf Man are considered the big three from the classic age of horror films right? WaseWislown ( talk) 17:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Just to be clear on connections, because I don't want to have this be some secret household teamup, Doctawein is my fiancé, who mentioned this, and I stepped in because I've edited a lot more (as you can probably tell). Don't want to give a false consensus. I've been getting him into Wikipedia gradually, as one does with people you're in a relationship with. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 17:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Template:Upscaled images has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rejoy2003( talk) 17:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
So, the account I found was @b2coull (with the video here), not @billycoullofficial. The two accounts seem to be the same guy, based on images of him in various news articles about this event. The b2coull account also has videos with him talking, whereas billycoullofficial only has three posts and nothing since August of last year. If you in fact think that the account you cited is the only real one, I would like to hear your line of thinking. Schiffy ( Speak to me| What I've done) 15:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
I hope you're happy for making my life hell. Always reporting my accounts and getting me banned. After I worked all night on improving a page, not getting a single bit of a sleep to do it, you come and revert everything and ban me. Yes. I am a sockpuppet. I have a mental health disorder and I won't stop my dream of editing and improving Wikpedia. I am only 18 years old and feel like my life is over when you report my accounts and revert all my changes. All that hard work. For nothing. I didn't sleep this morning because I was worried you'd come along and revert everything and ruin every inch of me. I got up and instantly checked because I know you like to cause me such dismay and ruin my life. You have been ruining my life ever since 2020.
So well done. Everyone hates me and wants me dead on here now. Hope you're happy with what you've done to me and my mental state. I was still in secondary when I got banned from Wikipedia in 2020. Yes, I was in secondary school! I made mistakes and I'm not perfect. I'm not a monster and just want to live my dream.
Lam312321321 2A0A:EF40:E6B:8001:204A:6C98:376E:51B3 ( talk) 16:39, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prince Charles Cinema, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cinema.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:03, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Hey! Hello. You say: <<Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. I have reverted your edit.>>
So, why don't you check this?
I rechecked it all 5 days in a row. And I myself corrected every word in this formulation. Do you have any criticism of my wording or remarks on the topic? 95.25.77.155 ( talk) 14:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
@ Belbury
Good idea moving the warning labels into a table. Thank you for your contribution! Are you interested in adding 3 example images, one for each label? eximo ( talk) 18:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music of Dance Dance Revolution until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Loyalmoonie ( talk) 19:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Apologies, didn't notice that the version I was working off on Hannah Schmitz left out the primary sources tag you had added. Not sure why I didn't see an edit conflict warning. Thanks for putting it back. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 14:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Stop reverting my edits on Sinapali 2A0A:EF40:E11:A701:24E0:98E:952E:EE38 ( talk) 10:12, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
I've added your talk page to the p-block list of the IP range. Favonian ( talk) 11:26, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Hii , Belbury
I need to talk about the wikiproject we are assigned under that me and 4 more people including Dhanya Suthar (whose edit you removed ) ,would add some "false awakening" related paragraphs from articles published in pubmed about it which might include protoconsciousness theory , and actually Dhanya forgot to add about reference to his paragraph but please it is a humble request that don't remove those edit , we will surely add citations and references accordingly , but this wikipage is pre decided to edit , and if you don't allow our topics to be displayed it might lead to unwanted consequences for future , so please don't delete those edits , we would edit appropriately, nothing will be wrong which we would add so please co-operate. Rathod Dharmarajsinh ( talk) 11:01, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, so they can just do that. Belbury ( talk) 11:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
You marked FA's wikipage under education that is so good , thank you for that. Rathod Dharmarajsinh ( talk) 02:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Hii Belbury
Dhruv my groupmate added about hypothesis and with reference then why did you remove it? He is last to edit in our project then we can submit our project and I will add some final touch in it to confirm that wikipedia policies are not violated so please before removing it add a msg to me so I can edit any inappropriate mistake by Dhruv. Rathod Dharmarajsinh ( talk) 06:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 12:22, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
I saw how you reverted my contribute to the gallery on the WTC 1973-2001 page. Thank you for telling me the images are copyright but I just want to say I got around 10 images from NIST releases, which says "Public domain mark 1.0".
I can agree that I did upload some images found from elsewhere, which are probably copyright. But is it okay if I add the NIST images since they are not copyright.
-Varenimo Varenimo ( talk) 22:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
I saw you removed my skiing photo. I guess I'm not photo-worthy for the Wikipedia article about ski goggles and helmet 🤣
Maybe my next goal should be to become a professional skier, so I look more professional on camera! Félix An ( talk) 02:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
I received your message about Johnny Somali and your removal of an edit on his wiki page, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a "neutral point of view."
Johnny Somali is known for spreading false information without substantial evidence. The claim of him being a "Somali child pirate" lacks credible support and appears to be part of his persona as an online celebrity and troll.
It's essential to provide accurate and honest information to prevent readers from believing such unfounded claims about his background. Bluenosezulu ( talk) 19:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Ismael says that he was a Somali child soldier, which is not inaccurate.
I made this image and I can do and post whatever I want with it, the DeviantArt post is from MY account..
Thank you! RUI Thomas Fan ( talk) 20:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Michael Myers (Halloween) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 🥒 Greenish Pickle!🥒 ( 🔔) 05:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
This is Belbury's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 250 days |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Hello, what does this mean? 2A02:C7C:74AD:AF00:6524:AAF2:BF99:20F0 ( talk) 17:47, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Please will you state that this account is not an alternative account for Owen Blacker? I ask because this account is 7 years old yet you have created only 18 articles though you have made 1000 s of edits. Those article coincide with OBs declared interests. Your logs for the last few days show a striking pattern of you editing when OB does not. And most of all of course your joint interest in me. If you would state that there is no connection it would be a great relief to me. NoorStores ( talk) 11:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
This is in response to the warning message you left on my talk page. I am just a sensitive person, and it seems I cannot win no matter what I do. I love game shows, and I figure good faith editing should be used, but whatever. Smh. I did add sources (albeit incorrectly formatted I will agree to that, and I was told the website I used in particular wasn't allowed, and that's fine. I can find other sources etc. The article was also revered by another Wikipedian I believe due to the incorrect refs and that's fine etc. and I was still going to revise that article, the sources were still correct/not myth information on the Hurl game show page, but still). I take a break from Wiki for personal reasons, for a couple of weeks, and come back to that. Smh. If it wasn't for the fact I'm scared to edit that article again, due to a false edit war claim, I would revise it now. But I need to stay away from that article for the time being on principle, because again I don't want the false edit war claims, and I'm going to take a deep breath and calm myself down smh. I have to defend myself/give my side of the story. It's just if I didn't leave this message on your talk page it seems I'm being defiant. If I defend myself, give my side of it; I cannot win, and again, it comes across that I'm also being defiant it could come across that way etc. and yeah you know what I'm sorry, but now I'm almost kinda scared to edit on Wiki now, as good faith needs to be used between Wikipedians. I apologize if this came across harshly, but yeah. I'm sorry. ☼Phrasia☼ ( talk) 02:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Due to possible shock audience response, the show was very short lived.to a single press release put out prior to the show starting. Belbury ( talk) 09:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
its as much as art as i guess a straight line. i mean a big corporation using llms for a contest has got to be newsworthy Slinkyw ( talk) 22:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
References
Dear @ Belbury
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to address the recent Sockpuppet investigation that was initiated concerning my Wikipedia account. I would like to provide some context and clarification regarding the circumstances that led to this investigation.
First and foremost, I want to stress that I am not a Sockpuppet. I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia for a considerable period of time, and I am genuinely committed to upholding the principles of integrity and transparency within the community.
Recently, I have been more actively engaged in contributing to Wikipedia, particularly in relation to articles such as Baryl Vanneihsangi & Sultan Salahuddin Owaisi. During this time, I encountered challenges in sourcing appropriate images for these articles. In an effort to address this, I attempted to upload publicly available images directly to Wikimedia Commons for use in the articles. Unfortunately, I was unaware of the specific copyright concerns surrounding these images, which led to their removal.
In light of these events, I am reaching out to you to communicate my genuine intentions and seek your understanding. I acknowledge that my recent activities on Wikimedia Commons may have raised concerns, but I assure you that I am approaching my contributions with sincerity and good faith. It is important for me to emphasize that I am still in the process of familiarizing myself with the intricacies of Wikimedia Commons, and I am open to learning from experienced editors like yourself.
I kindly request your assistance and guidance in navigating these challenges. I am eager to rectify any inadvertent missteps and ensure that my future contributions align with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Your support and mentorship would be invaluable to me as I strive to contribute positively to the community.
I genuinely appreciate your attention to this matter and the opportunity to discuss it further. I am eager to address any concerns and clarify any doubts that may have arisen.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely, Zuck28 ( talk) 21:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Dracula, Frankenstein, and The Wolf Man are considered the big three from the classic age of horror films right? WaseWislown ( talk) 17:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Just to be clear on connections, because I don't want to have this be some secret household teamup, Doctawein is my fiancé, who mentioned this, and I stepped in because I've edited a lot more (as you can probably tell). Don't want to give a false consensus. I've been getting him into Wikipedia gradually, as one does with people you're in a relationship with. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 17:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Template:Upscaled images has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rejoy2003( talk) 17:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
So, the account I found was @b2coull (with the video here), not @billycoullofficial. The two accounts seem to be the same guy, based on images of him in various news articles about this event. The b2coull account also has videos with him talking, whereas billycoullofficial only has three posts and nothing since August of last year. If you in fact think that the account you cited is the only real one, I would like to hear your line of thinking. Schiffy ( Speak to me| What I've done) 15:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
I hope you're happy for making my life hell. Always reporting my accounts and getting me banned. After I worked all night on improving a page, not getting a single bit of a sleep to do it, you come and revert everything and ban me. Yes. I am a sockpuppet. I have a mental health disorder and I won't stop my dream of editing and improving Wikpedia. I am only 18 years old and feel like my life is over when you report my accounts and revert all my changes. All that hard work. For nothing. I didn't sleep this morning because I was worried you'd come along and revert everything and ruin every inch of me. I got up and instantly checked because I know you like to cause me such dismay and ruin my life. You have been ruining my life ever since 2020.
So well done. Everyone hates me and wants me dead on here now. Hope you're happy with what you've done to me and my mental state. I was still in secondary when I got banned from Wikipedia in 2020. Yes, I was in secondary school! I made mistakes and I'm not perfect. I'm not a monster and just want to live my dream.
Lam312321321 2A0A:EF40:E6B:8001:204A:6C98:376E:51B3 ( talk) 16:39, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prince Charles Cinema, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cinema.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:03, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Hey! Hello. You say: <<Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. I have reverted your edit.>>
So, why don't you check this?
I rechecked it all 5 days in a row. And I myself corrected every word in this formulation. Do you have any criticism of my wording or remarks on the topic? 95.25.77.155 ( talk) 14:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
@ Belbury
Good idea moving the warning labels into a table. Thank you for your contribution! Are you interested in adding 3 example images, one for each label? eximo ( talk) 18:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music of Dance Dance Revolution until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Loyalmoonie ( talk) 19:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Apologies, didn't notice that the version I was working off on Hannah Schmitz left out the primary sources tag you had added. Not sure why I didn't see an edit conflict warning. Thanks for putting it back. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 14:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Stop reverting my edits on Sinapali 2A0A:EF40:E11:A701:24E0:98E:952E:EE38 ( talk) 10:12, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
I've added your talk page to the p-block list of the IP range. Favonian ( talk) 11:26, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Hii , Belbury
I need to talk about the wikiproject we are assigned under that me and 4 more people including Dhanya Suthar (whose edit you removed ) ,would add some "false awakening" related paragraphs from articles published in pubmed about it which might include protoconsciousness theory , and actually Dhanya forgot to add about reference to his paragraph but please it is a humble request that don't remove those edit , we will surely add citations and references accordingly , but this wikipage is pre decided to edit , and if you don't allow our topics to be displayed it might lead to unwanted consequences for future , so please don't delete those edits , we would edit appropriately, nothing will be wrong which we would add so please co-operate. Rathod Dharmarajsinh ( talk) 11:01, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, so they can just do that. Belbury ( talk) 11:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
You marked FA's wikipage under education that is so good , thank you for that. Rathod Dharmarajsinh ( talk) 02:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Hii Belbury
Dhruv my groupmate added about hypothesis and with reference then why did you remove it? He is last to edit in our project then we can submit our project and I will add some final touch in it to confirm that wikipedia policies are not violated so please before removing it add a msg to me so I can edit any inappropriate mistake by Dhruv. Rathod Dharmarajsinh ( talk) 06:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 12:22, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
I saw how you reverted my contribute to the gallery on the WTC 1973-2001 page. Thank you for telling me the images are copyright but I just want to say I got around 10 images from NIST releases, which says "Public domain mark 1.0".
I can agree that I did upload some images found from elsewhere, which are probably copyright. But is it okay if I add the NIST images since they are not copyright.
-Varenimo Varenimo ( talk) 22:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
I saw you removed my skiing photo. I guess I'm not photo-worthy for the Wikipedia article about ski goggles and helmet 🤣
Maybe my next goal should be to become a professional skier, so I look more professional on camera! Félix An ( talk) 02:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
I received your message about Johnny Somali and your removal of an edit on his wiki page, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a "neutral point of view."
Johnny Somali is known for spreading false information without substantial evidence. The claim of him being a "Somali child pirate" lacks credible support and appears to be part of his persona as an online celebrity and troll.
It's essential to provide accurate and honest information to prevent readers from believing such unfounded claims about his background. Bluenosezulu ( talk) 19:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Ismael says that he was a Somali child soldier, which is not inaccurate.
I made this image and I can do and post whatever I want with it, the DeviantArt post is from MY account..
Thank you! RUI Thomas Fan ( talk) 20:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Michael Myers (Halloween) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 🥒 Greenish Pickle!🥒 ( 🔔) 05:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)