The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Recreation by same editor of deleted page Daniel Otter. The previous AfD found the BLP of this boxing promoter did not meet notability standards. MrsSnoozyTurtle ( talk) 22:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 05:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Two aviation incidents combined into one article and neither is notable. Military and general aviation crashes are very common and unless they have a WP notable on board not notable. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:33, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Military and general aviation crashes are very common and unless they have a WP notable on board not notableUnless they otherwise pass WP:GNG, as you know being a long-time editor. And this does. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was draftify There seems to be a consensus that this material is not fit for mainspace. If folks want to work on it and submit it through AFC or to merge material in it to Iran–United States relations, they are free to do so. Deor ( talk) 20:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
This is some weird fork of or variation on Iran–United States relations, which has a very extensive chronological history of the relations between the two countries.
This new "timeline by leader" though has a series of "events" which have in many cases nothing to do with the US or Iran-US relations, and adds nothing to the already existing article. At best, if some completely different contents are meant, it belongs in draft. Otherwise it is better simply deleted. Fram ( talk) 16:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Comment all of timeline's in wikipedia created after a main articles like Timeline of the 2020 United States presidential election so there is 2020 United States presidential election.-- Reza Amper ( talk) 15:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. The policy-based arguments for deletion, combined with the source analysis in line with the requirements for GNG which was never refuted, means the consensus exists in this discussion to delete. Daniel ( talk) 05:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable "alternative analysis" writer. All of the sources mention the subject in passing at best, except for an interview with a far-right magazine. Only claim to fame was editing a book by Anatoliy Golitsyn. Google search brought up nothing further, considering this guy is alleged to have been an economic adviser to Margaret Thatcher. Jdcooper ( talk) 00:47, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Can’t find enough significant coverage from the references or a BEFORE search for this to meet WP:GNG. SK2242 ( talk) 05:34, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 01:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Can’t find any significant coverage of this - fails WP:GNG. SK2242 ( talk) 05:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable journal associated with the predatory published ScopeMed. Fails WP:NJOURNALS Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 18:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 01:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:AUTHOR. Lettler hello • contribs 03:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
This article is based on concepts introduced in a predatory journal ( http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.linguistics.20140301.03.html) published by one of the worst predatory publisher (SA Pub). Most of the references [1-8] only mentions Cook's scholarship in passing, or are from Cook themselves. Everything else [9+] are 'context' reference pertaining to the V and T part of the T-V distinction, and do not establish notability.
The only source that critically evaluates the NVT framework is [9], which does mention it positively.
I'm not a linguist, but the notability of this concept doesn't seem to be established by the current references, and my google searches don't come up with much. I'm myself leaning delete here, and I'm nominating this so this article's notability can be properly vetted. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 18:03, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
REPLY: This statement [This article is based on concepts introduced in a predatory journal ...] is incorrect. The article is based on "N-V-T, a framework for the analysis of social dynamics in address pronouns", Chapter 1, pp 13-34, in "The Social Dynamics of Pronominal Systems", Paul Bouissac (Ed.), John Benjamons, 2019, Hardbound ISBN 978902720318 and e-Book ISBN 9789027262547
REPLY: This comment [The only source that critically evaluates ...] refers to a book review. There are also references in works relating to a variety of languages, namely English (2) Maicol Formentelli and John Hajek, Indonesian (3)Ester Jakindo, Ilza Mayuni and Yumma Rasyid, Lithuanian (4)Gintare Pavilaiciute, Portuguese(5) Aline Bazenga and Spanish (6) Leanne Schreurs.
REPLY: This comment [I'm not a linguist, but the notability ...] reveals lack of understanding. The linguistic notability of the N-V-T framework of analysis can be better understood, even by someone who is not a linguist, if you refer to references (9) to (24) that list problems found by several scholars throughout the years/decades solution for which is not provided by the T-V distinction but is enabled by the N-V-T model, i.e. answer to the need for the following to be taken into account: a neutral, unmarked approach; types and roles of nominal T and V; grades of T and v; a 'default' form; semantic ambiguities and covert meanings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maria M Cook ( talk • contribs) original comments
REPLY: (Your 2019 chapter is a follow up...)
REPLY: (As for my own personal lack of understanding...)
REPLY: (That someone mentioned issues with "VT"...)
REPLY: (There's, so far, one book review that mentions is positively.)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Maria M Cook ( talk • contribs)
REPLY: (This article is based on concepts introduced in a predatory journal...)
REPLY: (Most of the references [1-8] only mention...)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Maria M Cook ( talk • contribs) original comments
The result was keep. Consensus is that Geo Swan has improved the article sufficiently such that deletion would not be appropriate. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
He was the superintendent of a local school district. This is not enough for notability, and there is no special coverage. He had a school named after him, but having a school named after you is not a sign of notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
When Bartsch started, the University was a small religious college, and cash poor. The School of Professional Studies used distance education, correspondence, and its students were not religious students. If I am reading the documents correctly, many of his students were teachers, working teachers, experienced older teachers, upgrading their credential at a time when older teachers had been able to get a teacher's certificate without finishing a Bachelor's Degree, who wanted to keep up in pay and promotion with younger and more qualified teachers, who had to earn a Bachelor's degree before they applied for Teacher's College.
If I read the source documents properly, this small religious college's expansion to a student body of 10,000 wouldn't have been possible if it hadn't been for the revenue from the distance education to secular students that Bartsch introduced.
So, I suggest that boosts his Deanship to the level where he measures up to ACADEMIC. That is why I left a keep.
FWIW he did serve a partial term as Acting President of the University. Geo Swan ( talk) 21:27, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Notability is not inherited and therefore the consensus is this doesn't meet GNG. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:SOLDIER. Lettler hello • contribs 03:09, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
2. The a) Newsweek article I link to above devoted to him, and
b) the tv station KCRA coverage linked to in that article (and even excluding c) the Marine Corps Times coverage of the fellow which we know exists because it is quoted from but I cannot see), and
d) this LA Times article, [10] and
e) this San Francisco Chronicle article, [11] and
f) this Gold Country Media article, [12] and
g) this National Review article that has a few paragraphs on him, [13]
taken together amply satisfy GNG hands down. And make me puzzle as to how they were missed by nom. It also raises the question as to whether they were therefore not considered by the above delete voters, who had reason to believe a before search was done by nom. This is not a close call. 2603:7000:2143:8500:FCFA:1BCC:C5C7:7ED0 ( talk) 09:30, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Autobiographical (creator = "Yamy") WP:BLP of an actor, not reliably sourced as passing WP:NACTOR. As always, every actor is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because he exists -- the notability test requires some evidence of distinction, such as notable acting awards and/or the reception of enough media coverage about him and his performances to clear WP:GNG. But the roles listed here as his most notable ones aren't really significant ones: in both Yamaska and Les Beaux malaises he had minor guest roles, and in La Job (the Quebec version of The Office) he was the Chris Finch/Todd Packer equivalent, counting as a recurring but not starring role. So none of these roles are "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from actually having to clear GNG on his sourcing -- but when I found the article, its only "references" were primary sources that aren't support for notability, such as his own self-published website and his (deadlinked) profile on the website of his agent. And while the French article is longer, it isn't appreciably better sourced; four of its six footnotes are still bad primary sources, and the only two that are actually real media are a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article that isn't about him and a very short blurb in Quebec's equivalent to TV Guide -- so that still isn't enough coverage to get him over GNG, and we can't salvage this just by copying those sources over. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have a lot more and better references than this. Bearcat ( talk) 21:47, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus verging on keep. Daniel ( talk) 03:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
I am concerned we may be dealing with a WP:HOAX, perhaps not intentional, but still a WP:TNT-able mess. First. This article about an alleged German WWII conspiracy group doesn't have a German Wikipedia article (one was deleted in 2005 and never recreated since: [14] which is a major WP:REDFLAG). Second, most of the article is not properly sourced, and the current sources appear very weak OR don't mention the topic (for example, Shirer's book is certainly reliable, but it does not seem to mention "Schwarze Kapelle" at all [15]). I couldn't locate a single shciolary paper (GScholar) dealing with this topic. It is mention in passing in some books, but none of the books I see is particularly reliable. Now, some digging reveles the existence of a movie ( The Black Chapel, Geheimaktion schwarze Kapelle a European 1959 political thriller film based on the novel Die schwarze Kapelle by Olav Herfeldt. What I am worried here is that some amateur historian confused that novel for a fact, and that error got repeated in some later works. Now, granted, I can find supposedly reliable historians like Bernard Wasserstein mentioning this organization briefly in their books (ex. [16]) but again, I am majorly concerned that no such book cites a reliable source, and no academic, peer reviewed journal article discusses it at any length. In other words, the topic has dubious notability but worse, it may be a hoax or a mistake that has been repeated by misled historians here and there. Note also that a number of books cite Herfeldt's work [17] despite it being described as a novel. Strangely enough, our article doesn't even mention him or his work. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:26, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
what I am worried here is that some amateur historian confused that novel for a factoh geez it's H-45 all over again... - The Bushranger One ping only 06:20, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Wollenberg was a professional historian, not an amateur. Andrew🐉( talk) 10:20, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Dabei konnten wir auf eine Erkenntnis zurückgreifen, die der Bremer Historiker und Pädagogikwissenschaftler Jörg Wollenberg schon 1994 mitgeteilt hat: Die Gestapo stilisierte nicht nur die Freundeskreise um die Ehepaare Schulze-Boysen und Harnack zur »Roten Kapelle«, sondern gab auch der »Schwarzen Kapelle« der Oppositionsgruppe in der Wehrmacht-Abwehr ihren Namen.
The result was keep. There is a clear consensus that the article meets the notability guidelines and therefore that it should be kept. (non-admin closure) Jack Frost ( talk) 05:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Promotional article about a private venture capital firm that clearly fails WP:NCORP. FalconK ( talk) 06:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Pretty much per Sandstein; some of the more recent comments are more substantive, but some aren't. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Since this is a Star Wars topic I am skipping a PROD and going directly to AfD. Unlike some other SW vehicles, landspeeder is hardly a household name. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement; it's an element of the background that few noticed, so there is even no plot summary, just some information from niche (and WP:PRIMARY and/or not independent, so not sufficient for establishing any notability) Star Wars books for die hard fans like Star Wars Complete Vehicles New Edition. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar, a passing mention here and there is the best I could see, and nothing seems in-depth or reliable. I do wonder if some sort of a merge with the Speeder bike (not a very good article, neither, but slightly more recognizable as a name, I think?) could save some of the content here, otherwise a redirect to List of Star Wars air, aquatic, and ground vehicles might be the best alternative to outright deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Not going to relist this again given minimal input through two 7-day periods. No prejudice to a renomination if so desired in the immediate future. Daniel ( talk) 05:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBOOK Sungodtemple ( talk) 13:46, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to Dolomites Gold Cup Race. Daniel ( talk) 05:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate article since 2013(!), merge with Dolomites Gold Cup Race. Mike Peel ( talk) 21:06, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE that I was able to find. The article has not been improved since 2015. Kolma8 ( talk) 21:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Pointless and poorly referenced list of entirely non-notable people. This doesn't list all, or even most, mayors that this town has ever had -- the town was incorporated in 1858, which means it's had mayors for 163 years, but this list only names a random selection of six of them and sources just two of those six, and the sources are a self-published resolution on the city's own website, a user-generated and unreliable family genealogy, and a local history book authored by one of the mayors. This is also a small town with a population of just 8K now, which means its mayors get no "inherent" notability freebies just for existing as mayors -- and as for how well-maintained the article is, the "current" mayor named here isn't even the actual incumbent anymore. So there's really no point in maintaining a woefully incomplete and badly-sourced list of people who wouldn't qualify for Wikipedia articles anyway. Bearcat ( talk) 20:23, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 20:16, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Fraudulent sourcing (the reliable sources are not about this person), the rest are black hat spam sources. The claims of hit singles are not correct and the subject did not create the track "Smells Like drill spirt". Insignificant number of plays on YouTube and Spotify. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. (Not a soft-deletion as a BLP.) Daniel ( talk) 05:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a dancer, not reliably sourced as passing our notability criteria for dancers. The notability claim here essentially boils down to the fact that she exists, rather than that she's achieved anything that would qualify as a noteworthy distinction or honour, and the referencing is entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability, such as the self-published websites of venues where she's performed and an event calendar listing, rather than media coverage analyzing her significance. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to be referenced much, much better than this. Bearcat ( talk) 20:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
No credible claim of significance. A7 tag removed by first-time editor. Sources are primary, witten by ghostwriters in stead of reporters and deprecated per WP:FORBESCON Vexations ( talk) 20:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Though he appears to have been the lead on Chandrashekhar (TV series), doing a search for his name and that title only yields passing mentions at Tellychakkar, an entertainment site, i.e. not a vetted news source. Similar lack of references searching his name with other show titles. So, fails WP:GNG, and with one major role, seems to fail WP:NACTOR as well.
Note for anyone else researching, that there are probably many Karan Sharmas in Indian entertainment. Karan Sharma (TV actor) exists as well, so please consider if you have the correct one. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 19:13, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Two competing policies being at war with each other can't be solved out at AfD. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
One of many cricket articles that fail WP:GNG big time. After four other AfDs on cricket players I started ended all in "redirect" ( 1 2 3), 4), I redirected some other articles with the same lack of individual notability. This was reverted for being "pointy disruption" by the article creator. So I'll nominate them for AfD instead, with no objection from my side to either deletion or redirection. I nominate them individually, as it may turn out that, despite my searches for sources, some of these can be shown to be actually notable. Fram ( talk) 13:58, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Tried to clean up this advertising, but decided to nominate for the deletion. Fails WP:NCORP. There are some press mentions like this one at The Australian Financial Review, but it looks like the article is based mainly on company-sponsored press-releases. Bbarmadillo ( talk) 19:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NPROF. Associate professor with middling cites on Scholar. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED from parents Janet Yellen and George Akerlof. AleatoryPonderings ( ???) ( !!!) 18:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Early topos label this "Kern Lake Ranch", and it's obviously a ranching/farming establishment on every topo and aerial since, sitting in the same rectangle of land and surrounded by fields, and still there today as a J G Boswell facility of some sort. Not a community, and I see no notability as a farm/ranch. Mangoe ( talk) 18:37, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) HistoricalAccountings ( talk) 13:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG as a one-time recipient of the Navy Cross. Lettler hello • contribs 16:42, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
This edit: [26] by User:7&6=thirteen pasted a swathe of discussion from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry F. Bauer onto this discussion, I suggest s/he fixes it. Mztourist ( talk) 04:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
+redirect to USS Ault. Having a US destroyer named after you is not a major distinction, and the Navy Cross, while a major award, is not at the level where anyone is going to write 6,000+ articles to cover all recipients. What it says in the ship article is sufficient. Mangoe ( talk) 04:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The sole claim to notability Clamage's documentaries have been repeatedly featured in national venues, such as the prestigious New York Film Festival, winning him numerous top prizes. is unsourced, and I cannot find any evidence to verify the claim. The references in the article are mostly primary sources establishing family ties, but it does not appear his films were notable StarM 17:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete per G4. Salted per AFD discussion. — CactusWriter (talk) 00:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Current sources doesn't pass WP:GNG Cuoxo ( talk) 16:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. I'm not persuaded by the argument that any single source is sufficient to meet the GNG, particularly a short death notice. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The only coverage I could find was the brief New York Times obit cited in the article, which isn't enough to establish GNG. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:42, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
many years ago [...] the NYT published short death notices; the consensus here suggests these shorter pieces are not an assertion of notability. I don't see how this can be considered anything other than a short death notice. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
WP:BIO1E of a person notable only for having had a minor local street renamed after him following his death. This is not significant enough to make him permanently notable for the purposes of an international encyclopedia -- a very large percentage of all streets everywhere (not all, certainly, but a lot) are named after local people for one reason or another, so this can't be an automatic notability freebie for every single person who ever had a street named after them. It would take a lot more evidence of sustained international significance, passing the ten year test, to make him notable enough for permanent inclusion in an international encyclopedia. Bearcat ( talk) 16:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. I'm not seeing sufficient sourcing to back up the keep comment, but if this is a TOOSOON situation and new (reliable) sourcing pops up, hit me up for an undelete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Not notable artist, has only 200K subs on YT and is only famous for making GD music, and some complete paragraphs have no sources 🔥 Lightning Complex Fire🔥 19:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
There are already two versions in draft space Draft:RUNIXX INFO TECH and Draft:RUNIXX INFO TECH PVT. LTD. so no point in sending a third, almost identical version, there. In my opinion, this isn't eligible for WP:A7 as being multinational is a claim of significance. The company exists and is registered but I can't see it passing WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. A very, very new business that is potentially trying to use Wikipedia to gain exposure.
I think a deletion discussion is now required. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY. BlameRuiner ( talk) 15:31, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable footballer that has never played at professional level. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL according to Tribuna and the Soccerway source in the article. A Greek search yielded nothing and I only found a passing mention and another passing mention elsewhere. Looks like a WP:GNG fail. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:14, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE, Wikipedia is not an IMdB mirror.
Spanish article has a book listed that is just a "dictionary of Argentine films" and 2 "reviews" that have no citations, so I can't verify their authenticity. So, none of those satisfy WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 ( talk) 14:04, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jack Frost ( talk) 06:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability since June 2017. PROD removed because "deprodding -- while article lacks sources, description if taken at face value would pass NFILM and so requires further investigation; sources are likely in Thai", but I found nothing of merit (even in the other language Wikipedia articles). Donaldd23 ( talk) 13:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Article created by someone with clear WP:COI, see Talk:Emmanuel Adewole. None of the alleged appearances, all unsourced, would qualify him for WP:NFOOTBALL. Despite what the article says, El Raja were not in the top tier of Egypt at the point of Adewole signing, as they were relegated the season before, see 2013–14 Egyptian Premier League. The only reliable database that this guy features on is Football Database, which has zero appearances recorded. The entire article is supported only by routine pieces like this, which do nothing for WP:GNG.
During my WP:BEFORE search, I found this Q&A and some passing mentions here, here and here. His career as an agent doesn't yet rise to passing GNG either. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Evi Edna Ogholi. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
the topic of this article Fails Wikipedia Notability rules , NO CHARTS , it also Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC there is No evidence of Notabiliy Samat lib ( talk) 12:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Despite the extended back-and-forth on this page, I do not see where those advocating to keep this have demonstrated evidence of notability, either via WP:GNG or some other criterion. Vanamonde ( Talk) 00:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
the topic of this article fails Wikipedia Notability Guldlines , the topic has no significant coverage on independent relieble sources , most of the sources are self publish , press released , No evidence of Notability, it Fails Wikipedia Notability WP:GNG. NCORP -- the only 2 Notable musicians that appears on this article was never signed to this record label before they came to limlight, fame, or success ,.. for example .. King_Wadada was signed to Miracle day music wish he won the kora award in 2010 -- Evi_Edna_Ogholi was signed to polydor records in late 1988 at her time of success ,... the topic of this article Fail wikipedia Notability , WP:GNG. NCORP -- there is No evidence of Notability regarding the topic of this article , NOthing to talk about ,; King_Wadada was signed to MIRACLE DAY MUSIC wish gave him Kora award in 2010 [1] [2] , Evi_Edna_Ogholi was signed to POLYDOR RECORDS and PREMIER RECORDS in late 1988 wish brought her to fame through her song :: HAPPY BIRTHDAY in late 1990 [3] : NO evidence of Notability about the topic of this article , LUCKY DUBE was never signed to this unknown record label , after the Kora award 2010 , King_Wadada has is own personal record label AUSTINE PETERI RECORD [4] The topic of this article appears to be unknown record label with No evidence of Notability and the topic of this article and his author is bringing the question of UPE to the table , this Unknown Record label Enorecords LLC was never founded in 1960, there is No single musician. that was signed to this unknown record label Enorecords LLC in 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 , even 2010, Enorecords LLC is a subject of WINNING JAH ; who seems to be the owner and founder of OBALAND MAGAZINE , Enorecords LLC , OBALAND AWARDS , Samat lib ( talk) 18:49, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
https://www.discogs.com/King-Wadada-Omnipotent-God/release/10853617 Sources of the official song's album cover worldwide is here; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HixdBMQwzk0 In case of Evi Edna Ogholi: She is officially signed to Enorecords LLC like King Wadada. the first EP released under the company was successful, selling two million copies and still ongoing. https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2020/12/18/enorecords-records-sales-of-over-2-million-copies-of-evi-edna-ogholi-cd-units/ This Day https://leadership.ng/popular-italian-pianist-set-for-africa-tour/ on Leadership (newspaper) Album; https://music.apple.com/us/album/peace-and-love/1531240905?i=1531240906 Video clips signing of Evi ( https://www.obalandmagazine.com/2020/07/29/breaking-news-africa-most-popular-birthday-song-is-set-for-remix-by-evi-edna-ogholi/ (Obaland Magazine) Sources i searched, about Enorecords llc's music legend and now President of the Enorecords LLC company Wining Jah is also very notable, his songs sold and charted. all his albums released by Enorecords llc.their songs had charted on Itunes https://www.naijapals.com/music/EndTime_Winning_Jah-75551 (reliable music website). He was described as the Nigeria King of Reggae, Superstar in over 20 printed , and most inluential reggae musician from Nigeria. All sources from reliable Newspapers. Newspapers: https://punchng.com/reggae-is-not-dead-winning-jah/, https://www.vanguardngr.com/2019/12/winning-jah-west-africa-celebrates-nigerias-most-influential-reggae-superstar/,https://www.premiumtimesng.com/entertainment/music/248390-reggae-star-winning-jah-announces-release-new-album.html, One of the artists also leading a national campain: https://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/11/stop-arresting-marijuana-smokers-winning-jah-advices/, Can you imagine, one of the artistes also sold 650,000 units in 1990; https://tidal.com/browse/artist/7155782, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324349727_INFLUENCE_OF_AFRICAN_ORAL_TRADITION_IN_WINNING_JAHS_REGGAE_MUSIC, https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8848309/, https://www.iriemag.com/respect-winning-jah/, https://books.google.it/books?id=yNcftAEACAAJ&dq=Winning+Jah&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjv4vGIpqfuAhUK_KQKHd0SB-QQ6AEwAHoECAAQAg User:NOTICE501 ( talk) 05:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
174.254.192.208 ( talk) 05:18, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
(Video source) https://www.facebook.com/officialenorecordsllc/videos/632975364264586, Congratulation comments on the successful sales by her ex husband Emma Ogosi and other folowers on Facebook (facebook page-source) https://www.facebook.com/officialenorecordsllc/photos/a.126457848889074/234698291398362, (Newspaper source) The sucess of her return, Evi Edna Ogholi's new suceess,: https://guardian.ng/news/winning-jah-celebrates-vulnerable-children-on-47th-birthday-success-of-ep/, (Newspapers) https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2020/12/18/enorecords-records-sales-of-over-2-million-copies-of-evi-edna-ogholi-cd-units/ King Wadada signed a record distribution and management deal with Enorecords LLC. The only popular song of King Wadada was released by Enorecords LLC, King Wadada doesn't have other booking site or artist roaster than Enorecords llc website online. (Sources) https://enorecordsllc.com/book-artists/, https://enorecordsllc.com/. King Wadada's debut and only popular album "Ominipotent God" containing the song he is known for "Holy Holy" was released, produced and arranged by Enorecords llc, then Enorecords SNC and Winning Jah, who is also the managing director of the record company. (Source musicbrainz) https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/e823910e-b39b-4332-b761-9cd6466c409e (Copyrite source) Below this video are the copyrite company informations of King Wadada. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQ7P-FGk_yw Lucky Dube and his official Lucky Dube band signed management deal with Enorecords LLC even before he passed on (VIDEO SOURCE) https://www.facebook.com/101635651371294/videos/754631018366983 Evi Edna Ogholi is officially recently signed to Enorecords LLC and immediately archieved another global success. (Video source ) ( https://www.facebook.com/officialenorecordsllc/videos/632975364264586) Evi Ogholi signing a record deal with Enorecords llc. (reliable national print newspapers Source) about Evi Edna Ogholi's and Enorecords llc: https://nigeriastandardnewspaper.com/ng/breaking-silence-after-25-years-on-world-music-stage-africas-queen-of-reggae-evi-edna-ogholi-ready-for-international-collaboration-with-akon-senegalese-born-americas-grammy-award-winner-eur/ Evi Edna Ogholi also said it again on BBC News Pidgin during her interview, that Enorecords LLC is her new record label : (Video source) https://www.facebook.com/bbcnewspidgin/videos/2829927173953395 Evi Edna Ogholi's newest EP on Amazon by Enorecords LLC: https://www.amazon.de/-/en/Evi-Edna-Ogholi/dp/B08HR6KNZY/ref=sr_1_127?dchild=1&keywords=Evi+Edna+Ogholi&qid=1611092607&s=dmusic&search-type=ss&sr=1-127 Recently on Leadership_(newspaper) Enorecords LLC was described as a Nigeria giant label (News source Newspaper) https://leadership.ng/popular-italian-pianist-set-for-africa-tour/ User:NOTICE501 ( talk) 23:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Miracle day music was a tour management and event organiser, not a record label, like he did to late Majeck Fashek, Miracle day music doesn't have a single track or a music catlog anywhere online. King Wadada never released a song , EP, or Album under the unknown Miracle Day Music. Miracle day music did not make King Wadada win Kora Award in 2010, he was only a talent hunt. The song "Holy Holy" is owned by Enorecords LLC licenced to Enorecords even before the Kora Award winning. The album "Ominipotent God" was the debut and only album of King Wadada, produced and arranged under Enorecords LLC. The song was an extract from the released Album in 2017 by Enorecords LLC. The "Holy Holy" single which took King Wadada to Kora Award nomination was owned legally by Enorecords, contact soundexchange for a better understanding. An artist can be signed to 100 record labels, depends on what agreement. Enorecords LLC is the only record label King Wadada officially signed to. Here is Miracle Day music Official YouTube channel, no King Wadada materials like Holy Holy, Ominipotent God, No Booking website of King Wadada . [13].A record label deal varies from Booking, recording deal, promotional deal, distribution deal, and many more, Miracle Day music was only a tour management, Enorecords LLC was the only official record label he signed to, produced his songs and not the unknown Miracle Day Music.King Wadada has various names on each single online King Wadada Entertainment and many more, but released by other people. not a label, like show case singles. The sucess of King Wadada was extablished by Enorecords LLC. Evi Edna Ogholi had been famous before officially signing five years contract with Enorecords LLC in 2020, agreed, but that was 30 years ago she left Premiere records, she took 20 years break from the music scene and recently signed to Enorecords LLC with an upfront payment, read newspapers and watch her on BBC Pidgin, Splash Fm Ibadan [14]. After signing with Enorecords LLC, she released a sucessful EP selling 2 million units and received an endorsement as the Ambassador of Hope and Peace from Aid People Change Nigeria NGO. I'm a Nigerian and i watch and read newspapers daily, you stated on your Users page that you are a Moroccan and you see Nigerian national newspapers as not reliable? articles sources i used were newspaper prints not mere mentions, i think i watch this artistes on TV more than you. Enorecords LLC is a famous company, we grew up hearing and watching their artists on NTA TV. Lucky Dube sources have been posted in my previious links, my sources are reliable and i will like you to write about their current status, my links have spoken. You can write the article in your own way, i'm only writing as a volunteer on Wikipedia, like i wrote before, i also have my E books to read. User:NOTICE501 ( talk) 22:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
[16] . Very clear, it wasn't because King Wadada signed to Miracle day music that gave him Kora Awards, as you stated your comments repeatedly. (2) No record label offers any minimum artist services professionally without the artiste previous agreement, MOU, contracts carrying his or her signatory, otherwise it could be defined as criminal activities. You and me don't know the exact date they had their confidential signatories and duration of services or what type of record deal, King Wadada signed to Enorecords to have all over his songs in their official platforms. Unknown miracle day music was never writen on his album covers or stated as Royalty company and copyrites. Why? if the only copyrite owner to the song which brought him to limelight was "Holy Holy" owned by Enorecords LLC under all copyrite database online and production credits on King Wadada's album covers, means he was signed to Enorecords llc. Kindly read about Record label services , this will help you understand that the Enorecords LLC is a notable company. I advice you to write the article better than how i did it, kindly don't delete without a reasonable motive or rather don't vandalise it. Let's also observe the blog links you sent as repeated sources, which stated;
"For some time you were off the music scene, what happened? "I was with a record label called Miracle Day Music. We had a three year contract. They couldn’t play their part, so I had to wait till the contract elapsed. Now, the contract has elapsed, so I can work with anybody. Besides, as a spiritual man, I was in the spirit, preparing myself and now I’m back with fresh material for the people." King Wadada's replied" this was in 2014 and Kora Award was in 2010, meaning Miracle day music wasn't the brain behind his success. [17]. You personally used it as a source and now you see the truth is here. Enorecords LLC certainly had recording , publishing, licensing, booking deals contract with him, probably the gigs and event deal was handled temporarily by the unknown Miracle Day Music, which never released a single music catlog on Allmusic.com, Discogs, Musicbrainz and others. We need reliable sources that describes Miracle day music as a record label in Nigeria and when was it founded? The song "Holy holy" was produced, arranged, recorded, licenced before King Wadada's performance at Kora Award by Enorecords LLC, the copyrite date wasn't disclosed. Only officially released annual songs could get nomination at Kora Awards or Grammy, see their websites.The song was printed on CD and in 2017 it went on digital download, that does not signified that the song was produced in 2017, from my research . Both of us are interested in Enorecords llc credits in King Wadada's past fame, this is our argument here and likely a question ? as Wikipedians. Answer is, Enorecords LLC produced the only hit song "Holy Holy" and the complete debut album which made him got nominated and also won Kora Award, he has won several awards after Kora Awards. which Miracle day music seems to be a temporary King Wadada's tour agent. Logically, a mucian, or artist don't get nominated without a previous released music, like no farmer works without a cutlass or a tractor. Let's be sincere here, We don't intend writing articles on Wikpedia from Nigeria, without reliable news sources. Holy holy Song could be physically distributed and registered before getting nominated, in 2010. From your sources, Enorecords llc finally published Digital platform version of his albums, the song has only one album cover from 2010 until date with Enorecords, writen clearly. Another good example was when Evi Edna Ogholi released he popular song "Happy Birthday" in 1988, it wasn't on digital plaforms, it was lately published online by her former record distributor premier records recently, thanks [18] User:NOTICE501 ( talk) 04:50, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
User:NOTICE501 ( talk) 22:34, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
WP:GNG Kindly read Wikipedia guidelines before you comment at AfDs. You probably don't know how things work here. Do you? The fact that an article is probably poorly written is usually not a valid reason for deletion, especially if the subject of the article is notable like this Enorecords LLC. In addition, the DELETE nomination was tagged by an identified sockpuppet on Wikipedia. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tony_Tetuila. See links here; /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rymzo .Kindly stop misleading Wikipedia users please. Here is an extract of your negative activities and vandalism on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Contributions/Samat_lib&dir=prev&target=Samat_lib User:NOTICE501 ( talk) 10:31, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was No consensus / redirect. There is no consensus about the filmmaker. There is consensus to not keep the film (split between delete and merge, which I implement as a redirect). This is mostly for lack of discussion about the reasons for the filmmaker's notability or lack thereof. Another discussion may therefore be needed about the filmmaker. Sandstein 08:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a filmmaker and an article about his film, both referenced entirely to either glancing namechecks of his and/or the film's existence in sources that aren't about them, or
primary sources that aren't support for notability at all. The notability claim here is that his film won or was nominated for short film awards at second-tier film festivals like Saguenay, Cinéfest Sudbury and Clermont-Ferrand -- but
WP:NFILM does not extend an automatic notability freebie to just every single film award that exists, but instead requires major awards that get broad media coverage (e.g. Oscars, Canadian Screen Awards or top-tier film festivals like Cannes, Berlin or TIFF.) The question of whether an award makes its winners encyclopedically notable or not is determined by how wide and broad the award's media coverage is or isn't: awards that get widely reported as national or international news count as notability makers, while awards that get little or no attention outside their own local catchment area, so that you have to rely on either the local newspaper or the award's own self-published website about itself to source the claim, do not.
It would be different if he and the film could actually be shown to clear
WP:GNG on their sourceability, but just winning minor awards at film festivals of only regional prominence is not "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to be sourced better than this. Obviously no prejudice against recreation in March if it makes the
Canadian Screen Award for Best Live Action Short Drama and/or
Prix Iris for Best Live Action Short Film shortlists, but Saguenay and Cinéfest aren't enough.
Bearcat (
talk)
22:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
It's all written like an ad and I cannot find much notable coverage. Also, under 1000 results come up on Google for them -- unlikely there're many sources anyone's missing ( https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Ski+Patrol%22+%22Ian+Lowery%22), DemonDays64 ( talk) 03:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America 1000 15:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
A mini refinery without a notability. Used mainly for promotion of the company which declared insolvency 6 years ago. Although I have cleaned it up and managed to find some references, I am not sure if it is enough for WP:NCCORP. Beagel ( talk) 20:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
This article definitely fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. – Cupper52 Discuss! 12:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is a clear consensus that, despite the outcome of the recent deletion discussion, the current article meets the threshold of notability and therefore should be kept (non-admin closure) Jack Frost ( talk) 06:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Article doesn't meet WP:BLP conditions for notability; fails WP:GNG. Radio Adept ( talk) 12:23, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Recommending WP:SALT. This article was nominated for deletion earlier this month, with an overwhelming consensus of Delete; however, the page was re-created in its entirety just a couple weeks after page deletion. This is a repeat of previous such behavior, when the article was deleted with overwhelming consensus in November 2018, then re-created in its entirety just 3 days later. Radio Adept ( talk) 16:05, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per relatively low participation. North America 1000 15:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article is full of unsourced entries. It did not meet WP:GNG. The mother, article, Miss Grand International was deleted several times. Here's the link for the AfD. Richie Campbell ( talk) 00:20, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
A particularly egregious case of synthesis in the GNIS compilation, as, according to the maps which are the supposed source, "Wible" and "Wible Orchards" were at two different locations, and the current label is at neither of these. "Wible" is the rail location, and it's the usual passing siding and presumably station with no obvious town around it. At some point a complex of factory-ish buildings got erected a short ways to the NE, and on these maps, Wible goes away and the complex is labelled "Wible Orchards". I can't tell exactly when these buildings were replaced by huge grocery store now occupying the location. but at any rate the GNIS compilers decided to move the label another block north. So we have three separate spots: a NN rail spot, a literal fruit processing plant, and a location that nobody but GNIS apparently ever called "Wible" anything. I see no reason to keep this. Mangoe ( talk) 15:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL as has never played in a match between two teams in fully professional leagues; he is currently playing in the third tier of Romania so is not likely to play in such a game soon either. In terms of coverage, the best available seems to be a routine announcement, a name check and a transfer rumour. Does not look to pass WP:GNG. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:24, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NFOOTBALL; has not played in a game between two sides in fully professional leagues according to Playmaker Stats, Soccerway and GSA. The Timorese league is not fully professional so his 25 mins for them in the AFC Cup doesn't count towards NFOOTBALL. He also looks to fail WP:GNG as the only coverage I could find was this article, which says that he was the best goalkeeper in the Timorese second tier. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:47, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ultimately, the creator is no longer interested in it, some of the handful of "keep" !votes were concerned about what title it should have and how it is structured. If anyone would like the page userfied, please let me know. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
This is an unnecessary list that seems to only seems to add the performances of certain pieces of Busoni's. There is no reason to have List of compositions by Ferruccio Busoni and List of adaptations by Ferruccio Busoni along with this seemingly useless list. Why? I Ask ( talk) 22:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
any composition by Busoni keeping repertoire after the composer's death is eligible for inclusion.– confused, what is meant by "keeping repertoire"? And how is a single recording by Groschopp (who doesn't even have a WP article) mean that the work is now considered "repertoire"—is this all it takes, one recording after the composer's death? If this is the case, then every piece by Chopin, Beethoven, Mozart etc. would be considered repertoire, which seems to defeat the purpose of the word. Aza24 ( talk) 09:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
to the existing listing with recordings— "with recordings" not "to recordings", Smerus can correct me if I'm wrong but I believe he's referring to the comp list as the existing listing, and suggesting we add the column with recordings to it, which is what I was saying. Aza24 ( talk) 23:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
No indication of passing GNG or NBIO. All sources used in the article are glorified press releases or interviews or not about him at all. The tone in some parts of the article is also blatantly promotional. Article history reveals that a SPA hijacked a disambiguation page and then renamed it. M4DU7 ( talk) 08:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Hog Farm Talk 06:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Not enough significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. SK2242 ( talk) 08:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 09:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
A run of the mill poker website. Not one of the references used in the article covers the website significantly and independently. Very likely to be a case of COI editing. M4DU7 ( talk) 08:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG - The only reliable independent sources were My Jewish Learning, YU Torah, and Jewish Holidays, and those weren't actually super relevant to his career. The other sources pulled from were a school newspaper known as the Shalhevet Boiling Point, several about the author sections from Urim Publications, the actual amazon page of a book, and other sources that don't prove notability. Further searches find no other possible sources that mention him in any meaningful way. I chose not to notify the creator of the article of this discussion, not only because the creator has a clear conflict of interest, and not only because they pushed this article through after it was rejected from AfC for complete plagiarism of a non-notable and unreliable source, but because they have been blocked for sockpuppetry at two proposed speedy deletions of this article. I don't see reason to keep this article. I could be wrong, and that Yitzchak Etshalom is actually notable and these sources barely pass him through GNG. It's close. But I personally believe this article should be deleted - there's an argument to be made that Rabbi Etshalom is accomplished and should be notable, but I don't believe he is right now. Theleekycauldron ( talk) 07:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The post was kind of long, and I don't want to fearmonger, but we should probably keep watch for further sockpuppetry if the creator finds out. The past two usernames had to do with jewish culture and being a bookworm, so i don't know I guess keep a look out? Theleekycauldron ( talk) 07:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Also, don't about the author sections on the websites of publishers he signed with count as a clearly paid source, or at least a compromised one? Theleekycauldron ( talk) 08:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Requesting comment from Bearian ( talk · contribs), Adamant1 ( talk · contribs), and buidhe ( talk · contribs) - thoughts on this discussion, and also a comment on possible sockpuppetry from the two users below? Take a look at the page history, the contested speedy deletions, the grammar usage I want to know your thoughts. Theleekycauldron ( talk) 19:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable organization, sourced mainly to its own defunct website and some local news blurbs: fails WP:NORG. An affiliate of Georgia Republican Party; could be redirected there. Reywas92 Talk 06:50, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of unreleased songs recorded by Lana Del Rey. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
WP:FANCRUFT and WP:OR. An unreleased song that has not been commercially available. Has not even charted. Most of the article reads like it fits better in a Lana Del Rey-specific fan wiki. HĐ ( talk) 06:38, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of unreleased songs recorded by Lana Del Rey. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
For an unreleased song, this reads like original research. No indication of notability ( WP:NSONGS). Plus, since this is "unreleased", does it make it factual that it is a recorded song that has been commercially released? I doubt that the song is of encyclopedic value.+ HĐ ( talk) 06:33, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. I'm going with "soft delete" because although three editors have participated, none of them suggesting keeping the article, there's also not a general air of "yes, we should unquestionably delete this" from two of them. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:09, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
A single-sentence stub tagged for notability since...deep breath...August 2006. WP:BEFORE was inconclusive, which is why I'm taking it here rather than prodding -- it doesn't seem impossible there might be an article buried in here -- but man, is that a bad look, and the 'inconclusive' in question is leaning rather 'delete with prejudice'. Vaticidalprophet ( talk) 05:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Go South Coast. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 20:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Can’t find any significant coverage - fails WP:GNG. SK2242 ( talk) 05:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 20:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Can’t find any significant coverage - fails WP:GNG. SK2242 ( talk) 05:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Comment Impossible to search on as name just brings up loads of books about buses of yesteryear. Maybe some history that maybe notable as an new operator back in dereg days and running vintage buses as they were then, but without any new refs I lean to delete. Davidstewartharvey ( talk) 08:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Advertising or publicity. Also wp:crystal. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 05:24, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Has only one review, and the other two potential sources barely talk about it specifically. Dronebogus ( talk) 14:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Comment you didn’t provide a reason why. Dronebogus ( talk) 15:33, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 06:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Lacks WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV Jenyire2 ( talk) 05:11, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Article clearly needs work, but there is rough agreement that the subject satisfies our notability criteria. — The Earwig ⟨ talk⟩ 19:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails both WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG. The references used in the article are all primary. I can't find any significant independent coverage online, or any other evidence of notability. Lennart97 ( talk) 23:36, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect ( Beyoncé Pulse to Beyoncé#Endorsements and partnerships and Heat Rush to Heat (perfume)#Heat Rush). There is consensus these topics lack sufficient sourcing to be independently notable. I chose these redirect targets because they have existing discussion of the topics while the manufacturer's article has none. — The Earwig ⟨ talk⟩ 19:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
I am nominating this lot of articles for deletion because it reads like WP:PROMOTION. The description of the perfume is derived from primary sources and lack third-party coverage. The promotion part is straight-up news report and WP:INDISCRIMINATE, which Wikipedia is not. The only notable thing is that it was endorsed by Beyonce. HĐ ( talk) 04:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 06:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
What was notable was the political ad she was featured in. Not her, individually. I'd argue the ad could possibly be notable enough to be spun-off from 2006 United States Senate election in Tennessee (though, this may not be neccessary), but she, herself, is not notable enough to warrant an article. SecretName101 ( talk) 03:19, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. G7. Already deleted by Fastily. StarM 02:53, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The crime he committed gained some brief coverage when the trial happened, but there is no evidence in the article or to be added that Fanis Shaikhutdinov was otherwise notable. BLP1E cases can be controversial, so here rather than PROD. StarM 01:31, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is that the arguments for meeting WP:GNG trump the other specific guidelines. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Only notable for being promoted to acting chief after the storming of the Capitol. I did find a few sources about her prior to 2021, but they were not substantial. I also don't believe that Chief of the Capitol Police is an inherently notable position. WP:BLP1E Natg 19 ( talk) 01:01, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to Texas v. Pennsylvania. Daniel ( talk) 02:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Though this Supreme Court case was notable, and many of the participants are notable individuals, this list of participants is not a notable topic, as the Supreme Court case was thrown out, and there have not been any consequences for these House members. The participants are mentioned in passing in Texas_v._Pennsylvania#Participants, and full lists can be found in the citations.
The topic of listing out these participants was discussed in Talk:Texas_v._Pennsylvania/Archive_1#Lists_of_"participants", but was never resolved, so I am bringing this page to AfD for a wider discussion. Natg 19 ( talk) 00:42, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
:@ AleatoryPonderings, Reywas92, Masem, Feoffer, DolyaIskrina, Soibangla, Love of Corey, Goethean, and Herbfur: (users involved in the previous discussion)
The result was delete and redirect to List of political parties in Nepal. Daniel ( talk) 02:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
No indication of significance. No sourcing since it was created in 2004. On a search, I found one government report that indicates it existed, but nothing that indicates it was ever successful, or even notable for being unsuccessful. Fails WP:GNG. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 00:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 06:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Lacks proper sourcing, fails GNG. Iamreallygoodatcheckers ( talk) 03:45, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Yogananda Pittman, acting chief of Capitol Police, acted out of "an abundance of caution following an external security threat under the bridge on I-295 at First and F Streets," and ordered a shutdown of the Capitol complex, according to a statement from Capitol Police.
Acting Capitol Police Chief Yogananda Pittman on Thursday said that "permanent fencing" is needed at the Capitol to prevent a repeat of the recent deadly riot ...
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Recreation by same editor of deleted page Daniel Otter. The previous AfD found the BLP of this boxing promoter did not meet notability standards. MrsSnoozyTurtle ( talk) 22:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 05:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Two aviation incidents combined into one article and neither is notable. Military and general aviation crashes are very common and unless they have a WP notable on board not notable. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:33, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Military and general aviation crashes are very common and unless they have a WP notable on board not notableUnless they otherwise pass WP:GNG, as you know being a long-time editor. And this does. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was draftify There seems to be a consensus that this material is not fit for mainspace. If folks want to work on it and submit it through AFC or to merge material in it to Iran–United States relations, they are free to do so. Deor ( talk) 20:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
This is some weird fork of or variation on Iran–United States relations, which has a very extensive chronological history of the relations between the two countries.
This new "timeline by leader" though has a series of "events" which have in many cases nothing to do with the US or Iran-US relations, and adds nothing to the already existing article. At best, if some completely different contents are meant, it belongs in draft. Otherwise it is better simply deleted. Fram ( talk) 16:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Comment all of timeline's in wikipedia created after a main articles like Timeline of the 2020 United States presidential election so there is 2020 United States presidential election.-- Reza Amper ( talk) 15:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. The policy-based arguments for deletion, combined with the source analysis in line with the requirements for GNG which was never refuted, means the consensus exists in this discussion to delete. Daniel ( talk) 05:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable "alternative analysis" writer. All of the sources mention the subject in passing at best, except for an interview with a far-right magazine. Only claim to fame was editing a book by Anatoliy Golitsyn. Google search brought up nothing further, considering this guy is alleged to have been an economic adviser to Margaret Thatcher. Jdcooper ( talk) 00:47, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Can’t find enough significant coverage from the references or a BEFORE search for this to meet WP:GNG. SK2242 ( talk) 05:34, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 01:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Can’t find any significant coverage of this - fails WP:GNG. SK2242 ( talk) 05:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable journal associated with the predatory published ScopeMed. Fails WP:NJOURNALS Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 18:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 01:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:AUTHOR. Lettler hello • contribs 03:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
This article is based on concepts introduced in a predatory journal ( http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.linguistics.20140301.03.html) published by one of the worst predatory publisher (SA Pub). Most of the references [1-8] only mentions Cook's scholarship in passing, or are from Cook themselves. Everything else [9+] are 'context' reference pertaining to the V and T part of the T-V distinction, and do not establish notability.
The only source that critically evaluates the NVT framework is [9], which does mention it positively.
I'm not a linguist, but the notability of this concept doesn't seem to be established by the current references, and my google searches don't come up with much. I'm myself leaning delete here, and I'm nominating this so this article's notability can be properly vetted. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 18:03, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
REPLY: This statement [This article is based on concepts introduced in a predatory journal ...] is incorrect. The article is based on "N-V-T, a framework for the analysis of social dynamics in address pronouns", Chapter 1, pp 13-34, in "The Social Dynamics of Pronominal Systems", Paul Bouissac (Ed.), John Benjamons, 2019, Hardbound ISBN 978902720318 and e-Book ISBN 9789027262547
REPLY: This comment [The only source that critically evaluates ...] refers to a book review. There are also references in works relating to a variety of languages, namely English (2) Maicol Formentelli and John Hajek, Indonesian (3)Ester Jakindo, Ilza Mayuni and Yumma Rasyid, Lithuanian (4)Gintare Pavilaiciute, Portuguese(5) Aline Bazenga and Spanish (6) Leanne Schreurs.
REPLY: This comment [I'm not a linguist, but the notability ...] reveals lack of understanding. The linguistic notability of the N-V-T framework of analysis can be better understood, even by someone who is not a linguist, if you refer to references (9) to (24) that list problems found by several scholars throughout the years/decades solution for which is not provided by the T-V distinction but is enabled by the N-V-T model, i.e. answer to the need for the following to be taken into account: a neutral, unmarked approach; types and roles of nominal T and V; grades of T and v; a 'default' form; semantic ambiguities and covert meanings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maria M Cook ( talk • contribs) original comments
REPLY: (Your 2019 chapter is a follow up...)
REPLY: (As for my own personal lack of understanding...)
REPLY: (That someone mentioned issues with "VT"...)
REPLY: (There's, so far, one book review that mentions is positively.)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Maria M Cook ( talk • contribs)
REPLY: (This article is based on concepts introduced in a predatory journal...)
REPLY: (Most of the references [1-8] only mention...)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Maria M Cook ( talk • contribs) original comments
The result was keep. Consensus is that Geo Swan has improved the article sufficiently such that deletion would not be appropriate. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
He was the superintendent of a local school district. This is not enough for notability, and there is no special coverage. He had a school named after him, but having a school named after you is not a sign of notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
When Bartsch started, the University was a small religious college, and cash poor. The School of Professional Studies used distance education, correspondence, and its students were not religious students. If I am reading the documents correctly, many of his students were teachers, working teachers, experienced older teachers, upgrading their credential at a time when older teachers had been able to get a teacher's certificate without finishing a Bachelor's Degree, who wanted to keep up in pay and promotion with younger and more qualified teachers, who had to earn a Bachelor's degree before they applied for Teacher's College.
If I read the source documents properly, this small religious college's expansion to a student body of 10,000 wouldn't have been possible if it hadn't been for the revenue from the distance education to secular students that Bartsch introduced.
So, I suggest that boosts his Deanship to the level where he measures up to ACADEMIC. That is why I left a keep.
FWIW he did serve a partial term as Acting President of the University. Geo Swan ( talk) 21:27, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Notability is not inherited and therefore the consensus is this doesn't meet GNG. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:SOLDIER. Lettler hello • contribs 03:09, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
2. The a) Newsweek article I link to above devoted to him, and
b) the tv station KCRA coverage linked to in that article (and even excluding c) the Marine Corps Times coverage of the fellow which we know exists because it is quoted from but I cannot see), and
d) this LA Times article, [10] and
e) this San Francisco Chronicle article, [11] and
f) this Gold Country Media article, [12] and
g) this National Review article that has a few paragraphs on him, [13]
taken together amply satisfy GNG hands down. And make me puzzle as to how they were missed by nom. It also raises the question as to whether they were therefore not considered by the above delete voters, who had reason to believe a before search was done by nom. This is not a close call. 2603:7000:2143:8500:FCFA:1BCC:C5C7:7ED0 ( talk) 09:30, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Autobiographical (creator = "Yamy") WP:BLP of an actor, not reliably sourced as passing WP:NACTOR. As always, every actor is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because he exists -- the notability test requires some evidence of distinction, such as notable acting awards and/or the reception of enough media coverage about him and his performances to clear WP:GNG. But the roles listed here as his most notable ones aren't really significant ones: in both Yamaska and Les Beaux malaises he had minor guest roles, and in La Job (the Quebec version of The Office) he was the Chris Finch/Todd Packer equivalent, counting as a recurring but not starring role. So none of these roles are "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from actually having to clear GNG on his sourcing -- but when I found the article, its only "references" were primary sources that aren't support for notability, such as his own self-published website and his (deadlinked) profile on the website of his agent. And while the French article is longer, it isn't appreciably better sourced; four of its six footnotes are still bad primary sources, and the only two that are actually real media are a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article that isn't about him and a very short blurb in Quebec's equivalent to TV Guide -- so that still isn't enough coverage to get him over GNG, and we can't salvage this just by copying those sources over. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have a lot more and better references than this. Bearcat ( talk) 21:47, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus verging on keep. Daniel ( talk) 03:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
I am concerned we may be dealing with a WP:HOAX, perhaps not intentional, but still a WP:TNT-able mess. First. This article about an alleged German WWII conspiracy group doesn't have a German Wikipedia article (one was deleted in 2005 and never recreated since: [14] which is a major WP:REDFLAG). Second, most of the article is not properly sourced, and the current sources appear very weak OR don't mention the topic (for example, Shirer's book is certainly reliable, but it does not seem to mention "Schwarze Kapelle" at all [15]). I couldn't locate a single shciolary paper (GScholar) dealing with this topic. It is mention in passing in some books, but none of the books I see is particularly reliable. Now, some digging reveles the existence of a movie ( The Black Chapel, Geheimaktion schwarze Kapelle a European 1959 political thriller film based on the novel Die schwarze Kapelle by Olav Herfeldt. What I am worried here is that some amateur historian confused that novel for a fact, and that error got repeated in some later works. Now, granted, I can find supposedly reliable historians like Bernard Wasserstein mentioning this organization briefly in their books (ex. [16]) but again, I am majorly concerned that no such book cites a reliable source, and no academic, peer reviewed journal article discusses it at any length. In other words, the topic has dubious notability but worse, it may be a hoax or a mistake that has been repeated by misled historians here and there. Note also that a number of books cite Herfeldt's work [17] despite it being described as a novel. Strangely enough, our article doesn't even mention him or his work. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:26, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
what I am worried here is that some amateur historian confused that novel for a factoh geez it's H-45 all over again... - The Bushranger One ping only 06:20, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Wollenberg was a professional historian, not an amateur. Andrew🐉( talk) 10:20, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Dabei konnten wir auf eine Erkenntnis zurückgreifen, die der Bremer Historiker und Pädagogikwissenschaftler Jörg Wollenberg schon 1994 mitgeteilt hat: Die Gestapo stilisierte nicht nur die Freundeskreise um die Ehepaare Schulze-Boysen und Harnack zur »Roten Kapelle«, sondern gab auch der »Schwarzen Kapelle« der Oppositionsgruppe in der Wehrmacht-Abwehr ihren Namen.
The result was keep. There is a clear consensus that the article meets the notability guidelines and therefore that it should be kept. (non-admin closure) Jack Frost ( talk) 05:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Promotional article about a private venture capital firm that clearly fails WP:NCORP. FalconK ( talk) 06:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Pretty much per Sandstein; some of the more recent comments are more substantive, but some aren't. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Since this is a Star Wars topic I am skipping a PROD and going directly to AfD. Unlike some other SW vehicles, landspeeder is hardly a household name. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement; it's an element of the background that few noticed, so there is even no plot summary, just some information from niche (and WP:PRIMARY and/or not independent, so not sufficient for establishing any notability) Star Wars books for die hard fans like Star Wars Complete Vehicles New Edition. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar, a passing mention here and there is the best I could see, and nothing seems in-depth or reliable. I do wonder if some sort of a merge with the Speeder bike (not a very good article, neither, but slightly more recognizable as a name, I think?) could save some of the content here, otherwise a redirect to List of Star Wars air, aquatic, and ground vehicles might be the best alternative to outright deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Not going to relist this again given minimal input through two 7-day periods. No prejudice to a renomination if so desired in the immediate future. Daniel ( talk) 05:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBOOK Sungodtemple ( talk) 13:46, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to Dolomites Gold Cup Race. Daniel ( talk) 05:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate article since 2013(!), merge with Dolomites Gold Cup Race. Mike Peel ( talk) 21:06, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE that I was able to find. The article has not been improved since 2015. Kolma8 ( talk) 21:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Pointless and poorly referenced list of entirely non-notable people. This doesn't list all, or even most, mayors that this town has ever had -- the town was incorporated in 1858, which means it's had mayors for 163 years, but this list only names a random selection of six of them and sources just two of those six, and the sources are a self-published resolution on the city's own website, a user-generated and unreliable family genealogy, and a local history book authored by one of the mayors. This is also a small town with a population of just 8K now, which means its mayors get no "inherent" notability freebies just for existing as mayors -- and as for how well-maintained the article is, the "current" mayor named here isn't even the actual incumbent anymore. So there's really no point in maintaining a woefully incomplete and badly-sourced list of people who wouldn't qualify for Wikipedia articles anyway. Bearcat ( talk) 20:23, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 20:16, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Fraudulent sourcing (the reliable sources are not about this person), the rest are black hat spam sources. The claims of hit singles are not correct and the subject did not create the track "Smells Like drill spirt". Insignificant number of plays on YouTube and Spotify. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. (Not a soft-deletion as a BLP.) Daniel ( talk) 05:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a dancer, not reliably sourced as passing our notability criteria for dancers. The notability claim here essentially boils down to the fact that she exists, rather than that she's achieved anything that would qualify as a noteworthy distinction or honour, and the referencing is entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability, such as the self-published websites of venues where she's performed and an event calendar listing, rather than media coverage analyzing her significance. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to be referenced much, much better than this. Bearcat ( talk) 20:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
No credible claim of significance. A7 tag removed by first-time editor. Sources are primary, witten by ghostwriters in stead of reporters and deprecated per WP:FORBESCON Vexations ( talk) 20:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Though he appears to have been the lead on Chandrashekhar (TV series), doing a search for his name and that title only yields passing mentions at Tellychakkar, an entertainment site, i.e. not a vetted news source. Similar lack of references searching his name with other show titles. So, fails WP:GNG, and with one major role, seems to fail WP:NACTOR as well.
Note for anyone else researching, that there are probably many Karan Sharmas in Indian entertainment. Karan Sharma (TV actor) exists as well, so please consider if you have the correct one. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 19:13, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Two competing policies being at war with each other can't be solved out at AfD. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
One of many cricket articles that fail WP:GNG big time. After four other AfDs on cricket players I started ended all in "redirect" ( 1 2 3), 4), I redirected some other articles with the same lack of individual notability. This was reverted for being "pointy disruption" by the article creator. So I'll nominate them for AfD instead, with no objection from my side to either deletion or redirection. I nominate them individually, as it may turn out that, despite my searches for sources, some of these can be shown to be actually notable. Fram ( talk) 13:58, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Tried to clean up this advertising, but decided to nominate for the deletion. Fails WP:NCORP. There are some press mentions like this one at The Australian Financial Review, but it looks like the article is based mainly on company-sponsored press-releases. Bbarmadillo ( talk) 19:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NPROF. Associate professor with middling cites on Scholar. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED from parents Janet Yellen and George Akerlof. AleatoryPonderings ( ???) ( !!!) 18:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Early topos label this "Kern Lake Ranch", and it's obviously a ranching/farming establishment on every topo and aerial since, sitting in the same rectangle of land and surrounded by fields, and still there today as a J G Boswell facility of some sort. Not a community, and I see no notability as a farm/ranch. Mangoe ( talk) 18:37, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) HistoricalAccountings ( talk) 13:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG as a one-time recipient of the Navy Cross. Lettler hello • contribs 16:42, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
This edit: [26] by User:7&6=thirteen pasted a swathe of discussion from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry F. Bauer onto this discussion, I suggest s/he fixes it. Mztourist ( talk) 04:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
+redirect to USS Ault. Having a US destroyer named after you is not a major distinction, and the Navy Cross, while a major award, is not at the level where anyone is going to write 6,000+ articles to cover all recipients. What it says in the ship article is sufficient. Mangoe ( talk) 04:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The sole claim to notability Clamage's documentaries have been repeatedly featured in national venues, such as the prestigious New York Film Festival, winning him numerous top prizes. is unsourced, and I cannot find any evidence to verify the claim. The references in the article are mostly primary sources establishing family ties, but it does not appear his films were notable StarM 17:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete per G4. Salted per AFD discussion. — CactusWriter (talk) 00:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Current sources doesn't pass WP:GNG Cuoxo ( talk) 16:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. I'm not persuaded by the argument that any single source is sufficient to meet the GNG, particularly a short death notice. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The only coverage I could find was the brief New York Times obit cited in the article, which isn't enough to establish GNG. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:42, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
many years ago [...] the NYT published short death notices; the consensus here suggests these shorter pieces are not an assertion of notability. I don't see how this can be considered anything other than a short death notice. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
WP:BIO1E of a person notable only for having had a minor local street renamed after him following his death. This is not significant enough to make him permanently notable for the purposes of an international encyclopedia -- a very large percentage of all streets everywhere (not all, certainly, but a lot) are named after local people for one reason or another, so this can't be an automatic notability freebie for every single person who ever had a street named after them. It would take a lot more evidence of sustained international significance, passing the ten year test, to make him notable enough for permanent inclusion in an international encyclopedia. Bearcat ( talk) 16:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. I'm not seeing sufficient sourcing to back up the keep comment, but if this is a TOOSOON situation and new (reliable) sourcing pops up, hit me up for an undelete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Not notable artist, has only 200K subs on YT and is only famous for making GD music, and some complete paragraphs have no sources 🔥 Lightning Complex Fire🔥 19:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
There are already two versions in draft space Draft:RUNIXX INFO TECH and Draft:RUNIXX INFO TECH PVT. LTD. so no point in sending a third, almost identical version, there. In my opinion, this isn't eligible for WP:A7 as being multinational is a claim of significance. The company exists and is registered but I can't see it passing WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. A very, very new business that is potentially trying to use Wikipedia to gain exposure.
I think a deletion discussion is now required. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY. BlameRuiner ( talk) 15:31, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable footballer that has never played at professional level. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL according to Tribuna and the Soccerway source in the article. A Greek search yielded nothing and I only found a passing mention and another passing mention elsewhere. Looks like a WP:GNG fail. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:14, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE, Wikipedia is not an IMdB mirror.
Spanish article has a book listed that is just a "dictionary of Argentine films" and 2 "reviews" that have no citations, so I can't verify their authenticity. So, none of those satisfy WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 ( talk) 14:04, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jack Frost ( talk) 06:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability since June 2017. PROD removed because "deprodding -- while article lacks sources, description if taken at face value would pass NFILM and so requires further investigation; sources are likely in Thai", but I found nothing of merit (even in the other language Wikipedia articles). Donaldd23 ( talk) 13:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Article created by someone with clear WP:COI, see Talk:Emmanuel Adewole. None of the alleged appearances, all unsourced, would qualify him for WP:NFOOTBALL. Despite what the article says, El Raja were not in the top tier of Egypt at the point of Adewole signing, as they were relegated the season before, see 2013–14 Egyptian Premier League. The only reliable database that this guy features on is Football Database, which has zero appearances recorded. The entire article is supported only by routine pieces like this, which do nothing for WP:GNG.
During my WP:BEFORE search, I found this Q&A and some passing mentions here, here and here. His career as an agent doesn't yet rise to passing GNG either. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Evi Edna Ogholi. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
the topic of this article Fails Wikipedia Notability rules , NO CHARTS , it also Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC there is No evidence of Notabiliy Samat lib ( talk) 12:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Despite the extended back-and-forth on this page, I do not see where those advocating to keep this have demonstrated evidence of notability, either via WP:GNG or some other criterion. Vanamonde ( Talk) 00:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
the topic of this article fails Wikipedia Notability Guldlines , the topic has no significant coverage on independent relieble sources , most of the sources are self publish , press released , No evidence of Notability, it Fails Wikipedia Notability WP:GNG. NCORP -- the only 2 Notable musicians that appears on this article was never signed to this record label before they came to limlight, fame, or success ,.. for example .. King_Wadada was signed to Miracle day music wish he won the kora award in 2010 -- Evi_Edna_Ogholi was signed to polydor records in late 1988 at her time of success ,... the topic of this article Fail wikipedia Notability , WP:GNG. NCORP -- there is No evidence of Notability regarding the topic of this article , NOthing to talk about ,; King_Wadada was signed to MIRACLE DAY MUSIC wish gave him Kora award in 2010 [1] [2] , Evi_Edna_Ogholi was signed to POLYDOR RECORDS and PREMIER RECORDS in late 1988 wish brought her to fame through her song :: HAPPY BIRTHDAY in late 1990 [3] : NO evidence of Notability about the topic of this article , LUCKY DUBE was never signed to this unknown record label , after the Kora award 2010 , King_Wadada has is own personal record label AUSTINE PETERI RECORD [4] The topic of this article appears to be unknown record label with No evidence of Notability and the topic of this article and his author is bringing the question of UPE to the table , this Unknown Record label Enorecords LLC was never founded in 1960, there is No single musician. that was signed to this unknown record label Enorecords LLC in 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 , even 2010, Enorecords LLC is a subject of WINNING JAH ; who seems to be the owner and founder of OBALAND MAGAZINE , Enorecords LLC , OBALAND AWARDS , Samat lib ( talk) 18:49, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
https://www.discogs.com/King-Wadada-Omnipotent-God/release/10853617 Sources of the official song's album cover worldwide is here; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HixdBMQwzk0 In case of Evi Edna Ogholi: She is officially signed to Enorecords LLC like King Wadada. the first EP released under the company was successful, selling two million copies and still ongoing. https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2020/12/18/enorecords-records-sales-of-over-2-million-copies-of-evi-edna-ogholi-cd-units/ This Day https://leadership.ng/popular-italian-pianist-set-for-africa-tour/ on Leadership (newspaper) Album; https://music.apple.com/us/album/peace-and-love/1531240905?i=1531240906 Video clips signing of Evi ( https://www.obalandmagazine.com/2020/07/29/breaking-news-africa-most-popular-birthday-song-is-set-for-remix-by-evi-edna-ogholi/ (Obaland Magazine) Sources i searched, about Enorecords llc's music legend and now President of the Enorecords LLC company Wining Jah is also very notable, his songs sold and charted. all his albums released by Enorecords llc.their songs had charted on Itunes https://www.naijapals.com/music/EndTime_Winning_Jah-75551 (reliable music website). He was described as the Nigeria King of Reggae, Superstar in over 20 printed , and most inluential reggae musician from Nigeria. All sources from reliable Newspapers. Newspapers: https://punchng.com/reggae-is-not-dead-winning-jah/, https://www.vanguardngr.com/2019/12/winning-jah-west-africa-celebrates-nigerias-most-influential-reggae-superstar/,https://www.premiumtimesng.com/entertainment/music/248390-reggae-star-winning-jah-announces-release-new-album.html, One of the artists also leading a national campain: https://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/11/stop-arresting-marijuana-smokers-winning-jah-advices/, Can you imagine, one of the artistes also sold 650,000 units in 1990; https://tidal.com/browse/artist/7155782, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324349727_INFLUENCE_OF_AFRICAN_ORAL_TRADITION_IN_WINNING_JAHS_REGGAE_MUSIC, https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8848309/, https://www.iriemag.com/respect-winning-jah/, https://books.google.it/books?id=yNcftAEACAAJ&dq=Winning+Jah&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjv4vGIpqfuAhUK_KQKHd0SB-QQ6AEwAHoECAAQAg User:NOTICE501 ( talk) 05:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
174.254.192.208 ( talk) 05:18, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
(Video source) https://www.facebook.com/officialenorecordsllc/videos/632975364264586, Congratulation comments on the successful sales by her ex husband Emma Ogosi and other folowers on Facebook (facebook page-source) https://www.facebook.com/officialenorecordsllc/photos/a.126457848889074/234698291398362, (Newspaper source) The sucess of her return, Evi Edna Ogholi's new suceess,: https://guardian.ng/news/winning-jah-celebrates-vulnerable-children-on-47th-birthday-success-of-ep/, (Newspapers) https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2020/12/18/enorecords-records-sales-of-over-2-million-copies-of-evi-edna-ogholi-cd-units/ King Wadada signed a record distribution and management deal with Enorecords LLC. The only popular song of King Wadada was released by Enorecords LLC, King Wadada doesn't have other booking site or artist roaster than Enorecords llc website online. (Sources) https://enorecordsllc.com/book-artists/, https://enorecordsllc.com/. King Wadada's debut and only popular album "Ominipotent God" containing the song he is known for "Holy Holy" was released, produced and arranged by Enorecords llc, then Enorecords SNC and Winning Jah, who is also the managing director of the record company. (Source musicbrainz) https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/e823910e-b39b-4332-b761-9cd6466c409e (Copyrite source) Below this video are the copyrite company informations of King Wadada. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQ7P-FGk_yw Lucky Dube and his official Lucky Dube band signed management deal with Enorecords LLC even before he passed on (VIDEO SOURCE) https://www.facebook.com/101635651371294/videos/754631018366983 Evi Edna Ogholi is officially recently signed to Enorecords LLC and immediately archieved another global success. (Video source ) ( https://www.facebook.com/officialenorecordsllc/videos/632975364264586) Evi Ogholi signing a record deal with Enorecords llc. (reliable national print newspapers Source) about Evi Edna Ogholi's and Enorecords llc: https://nigeriastandardnewspaper.com/ng/breaking-silence-after-25-years-on-world-music-stage-africas-queen-of-reggae-evi-edna-ogholi-ready-for-international-collaboration-with-akon-senegalese-born-americas-grammy-award-winner-eur/ Evi Edna Ogholi also said it again on BBC News Pidgin during her interview, that Enorecords LLC is her new record label : (Video source) https://www.facebook.com/bbcnewspidgin/videos/2829927173953395 Evi Edna Ogholi's newest EP on Amazon by Enorecords LLC: https://www.amazon.de/-/en/Evi-Edna-Ogholi/dp/B08HR6KNZY/ref=sr_1_127?dchild=1&keywords=Evi+Edna+Ogholi&qid=1611092607&s=dmusic&search-type=ss&sr=1-127 Recently on Leadership_(newspaper) Enorecords LLC was described as a Nigeria giant label (News source Newspaper) https://leadership.ng/popular-italian-pianist-set-for-africa-tour/ User:NOTICE501 ( talk) 23:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Miracle day music was a tour management and event organiser, not a record label, like he did to late Majeck Fashek, Miracle day music doesn't have a single track or a music catlog anywhere online. King Wadada never released a song , EP, or Album under the unknown Miracle Day Music. Miracle day music did not make King Wadada win Kora Award in 2010, he was only a talent hunt. The song "Holy Holy" is owned by Enorecords LLC licenced to Enorecords even before the Kora Award winning. The album "Ominipotent God" was the debut and only album of King Wadada, produced and arranged under Enorecords LLC. The song was an extract from the released Album in 2017 by Enorecords LLC. The "Holy Holy" single which took King Wadada to Kora Award nomination was owned legally by Enorecords, contact soundexchange for a better understanding. An artist can be signed to 100 record labels, depends on what agreement. Enorecords LLC is the only record label King Wadada officially signed to. Here is Miracle Day music Official YouTube channel, no King Wadada materials like Holy Holy, Ominipotent God, No Booking website of King Wadada . [13].A record label deal varies from Booking, recording deal, promotional deal, distribution deal, and many more, Miracle Day music was only a tour management, Enorecords LLC was the only official record label he signed to, produced his songs and not the unknown Miracle Day Music.King Wadada has various names on each single online King Wadada Entertainment and many more, but released by other people. not a label, like show case singles. The sucess of King Wadada was extablished by Enorecords LLC. Evi Edna Ogholi had been famous before officially signing five years contract with Enorecords LLC in 2020, agreed, but that was 30 years ago she left Premiere records, she took 20 years break from the music scene and recently signed to Enorecords LLC with an upfront payment, read newspapers and watch her on BBC Pidgin, Splash Fm Ibadan [14]. After signing with Enorecords LLC, she released a sucessful EP selling 2 million units and received an endorsement as the Ambassador of Hope and Peace from Aid People Change Nigeria NGO. I'm a Nigerian and i watch and read newspapers daily, you stated on your Users page that you are a Moroccan and you see Nigerian national newspapers as not reliable? articles sources i used were newspaper prints not mere mentions, i think i watch this artistes on TV more than you. Enorecords LLC is a famous company, we grew up hearing and watching their artists on NTA TV. Lucky Dube sources have been posted in my previious links, my sources are reliable and i will like you to write about their current status, my links have spoken. You can write the article in your own way, i'm only writing as a volunteer on Wikipedia, like i wrote before, i also have my E books to read. User:NOTICE501 ( talk) 22:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
[16] . Very clear, it wasn't because King Wadada signed to Miracle day music that gave him Kora Awards, as you stated your comments repeatedly. (2) No record label offers any minimum artist services professionally without the artiste previous agreement, MOU, contracts carrying his or her signatory, otherwise it could be defined as criminal activities. You and me don't know the exact date they had their confidential signatories and duration of services or what type of record deal, King Wadada signed to Enorecords to have all over his songs in their official platforms. Unknown miracle day music was never writen on his album covers or stated as Royalty company and copyrites. Why? if the only copyrite owner to the song which brought him to limelight was "Holy Holy" owned by Enorecords LLC under all copyrite database online and production credits on King Wadada's album covers, means he was signed to Enorecords llc. Kindly read about Record label services , this will help you understand that the Enorecords LLC is a notable company. I advice you to write the article better than how i did it, kindly don't delete without a reasonable motive or rather don't vandalise it. Let's also observe the blog links you sent as repeated sources, which stated;
"For some time you were off the music scene, what happened? "I was with a record label called Miracle Day Music. We had a three year contract. They couldn’t play their part, so I had to wait till the contract elapsed. Now, the contract has elapsed, so I can work with anybody. Besides, as a spiritual man, I was in the spirit, preparing myself and now I’m back with fresh material for the people." King Wadada's replied" this was in 2014 and Kora Award was in 2010, meaning Miracle day music wasn't the brain behind his success. [17]. You personally used it as a source and now you see the truth is here. Enorecords LLC certainly had recording , publishing, licensing, booking deals contract with him, probably the gigs and event deal was handled temporarily by the unknown Miracle Day Music, which never released a single music catlog on Allmusic.com, Discogs, Musicbrainz and others. We need reliable sources that describes Miracle day music as a record label in Nigeria and when was it founded? The song "Holy holy" was produced, arranged, recorded, licenced before King Wadada's performance at Kora Award by Enorecords LLC, the copyrite date wasn't disclosed. Only officially released annual songs could get nomination at Kora Awards or Grammy, see their websites.The song was printed on CD and in 2017 it went on digital download, that does not signified that the song was produced in 2017, from my research . Both of us are interested in Enorecords llc credits in King Wadada's past fame, this is our argument here and likely a question ? as Wikipedians. Answer is, Enorecords LLC produced the only hit song "Holy Holy" and the complete debut album which made him got nominated and also won Kora Award, he has won several awards after Kora Awards. which Miracle day music seems to be a temporary King Wadada's tour agent. Logically, a mucian, or artist don't get nominated without a previous released music, like no farmer works without a cutlass or a tractor. Let's be sincere here, We don't intend writing articles on Wikpedia from Nigeria, without reliable news sources. Holy holy Song could be physically distributed and registered before getting nominated, in 2010. From your sources, Enorecords llc finally published Digital platform version of his albums, the song has only one album cover from 2010 until date with Enorecords, writen clearly. Another good example was when Evi Edna Ogholi released he popular song "Happy Birthday" in 1988, it wasn't on digital plaforms, it was lately published online by her former record distributor premier records recently, thanks [18] User:NOTICE501 ( talk) 04:50, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
User:NOTICE501 ( talk) 22:34, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
WP:GNG Kindly read Wikipedia guidelines before you comment at AfDs. You probably don't know how things work here. Do you? The fact that an article is probably poorly written is usually not a valid reason for deletion, especially if the subject of the article is notable like this Enorecords LLC. In addition, the DELETE nomination was tagged by an identified sockpuppet on Wikipedia. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tony_Tetuila. See links here; /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rymzo .Kindly stop misleading Wikipedia users please. Here is an extract of your negative activities and vandalism on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Contributions/Samat_lib&dir=prev&target=Samat_lib User:NOTICE501 ( talk) 10:31, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was No consensus / redirect. There is no consensus about the filmmaker. There is consensus to not keep the film (split between delete and merge, which I implement as a redirect). This is mostly for lack of discussion about the reasons for the filmmaker's notability or lack thereof. Another discussion may therefore be needed about the filmmaker. Sandstein 08:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a filmmaker and an article about his film, both referenced entirely to either glancing namechecks of his and/or the film's existence in sources that aren't about them, or
primary sources that aren't support for notability at all. The notability claim here is that his film won or was nominated for short film awards at second-tier film festivals like Saguenay, Cinéfest Sudbury and Clermont-Ferrand -- but
WP:NFILM does not extend an automatic notability freebie to just every single film award that exists, but instead requires major awards that get broad media coverage (e.g. Oscars, Canadian Screen Awards or top-tier film festivals like Cannes, Berlin or TIFF.) The question of whether an award makes its winners encyclopedically notable or not is determined by how wide and broad the award's media coverage is or isn't: awards that get widely reported as national or international news count as notability makers, while awards that get little or no attention outside their own local catchment area, so that you have to rely on either the local newspaper or the award's own self-published website about itself to source the claim, do not.
It would be different if he and the film could actually be shown to clear
WP:GNG on their sourceability, but just winning minor awards at film festivals of only regional prominence is not "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to be sourced better than this. Obviously no prejudice against recreation in March if it makes the
Canadian Screen Award for Best Live Action Short Drama and/or
Prix Iris for Best Live Action Short Film shortlists, but Saguenay and Cinéfest aren't enough.
Bearcat (
talk)
22:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
It's all written like an ad and I cannot find much notable coverage. Also, under 1000 results come up on Google for them -- unlikely there're many sources anyone's missing ( https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Ski+Patrol%22+%22Ian+Lowery%22), DemonDays64 ( talk) 03:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America 1000 15:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
A mini refinery without a notability. Used mainly for promotion of the company which declared insolvency 6 years ago. Although I have cleaned it up and managed to find some references, I am not sure if it is enough for WP:NCCORP. Beagel ( talk) 20:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
This article definitely fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. – Cupper52 Discuss! 12:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is a clear consensus that, despite the outcome of the recent deletion discussion, the current article meets the threshold of notability and therefore should be kept (non-admin closure) Jack Frost ( talk) 06:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Article doesn't meet WP:BLP conditions for notability; fails WP:GNG. Radio Adept ( talk) 12:23, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Recommending WP:SALT. This article was nominated for deletion earlier this month, with an overwhelming consensus of Delete; however, the page was re-created in its entirety just a couple weeks after page deletion. This is a repeat of previous such behavior, when the article was deleted with overwhelming consensus in November 2018, then re-created in its entirety just 3 days later. Radio Adept ( talk) 16:05, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per relatively low participation. North America 1000 15:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article is full of unsourced entries. It did not meet WP:GNG. The mother, article, Miss Grand International was deleted several times. Here's the link for the AfD. Richie Campbell ( talk) 00:20, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
A particularly egregious case of synthesis in the GNIS compilation, as, according to the maps which are the supposed source, "Wible" and "Wible Orchards" were at two different locations, and the current label is at neither of these. "Wible" is the rail location, and it's the usual passing siding and presumably station with no obvious town around it. At some point a complex of factory-ish buildings got erected a short ways to the NE, and on these maps, Wible goes away and the complex is labelled "Wible Orchards". I can't tell exactly when these buildings were replaced by huge grocery store now occupying the location. but at any rate the GNIS compilers decided to move the label another block north. So we have three separate spots: a NN rail spot, a literal fruit processing plant, and a location that nobody but GNIS apparently ever called "Wible" anything. I see no reason to keep this. Mangoe ( talk) 15:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL as has never played in a match between two teams in fully professional leagues; he is currently playing in the third tier of Romania so is not likely to play in such a game soon either. In terms of coverage, the best available seems to be a routine announcement, a name check and a transfer rumour. Does not look to pass WP:GNG. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:24, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NFOOTBALL; has not played in a game between two sides in fully professional leagues according to Playmaker Stats, Soccerway and GSA. The Timorese league is not fully professional so his 25 mins for them in the AFC Cup doesn't count towards NFOOTBALL. He also looks to fail WP:GNG as the only coverage I could find was this article, which says that he was the best goalkeeper in the Timorese second tier. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:47, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ultimately, the creator is no longer interested in it, some of the handful of "keep" !votes were concerned about what title it should have and how it is structured. If anyone would like the page userfied, please let me know. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
This is an unnecessary list that seems to only seems to add the performances of certain pieces of Busoni's. There is no reason to have List of compositions by Ferruccio Busoni and List of adaptations by Ferruccio Busoni along with this seemingly useless list. Why? I Ask ( talk) 22:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
any composition by Busoni keeping repertoire after the composer's death is eligible for inclusion.– confused, what is meant by "keeping repertoire"? And how is a single recording by Groschopp (who doesn't even have a WP article) mean that the work is now considered "repertoire"—is this all it takes, one recording after the composer's death? If this is the case, then every piece by Chopin, Beethoven, Mozart etc. would be considered repertoire, which seems to defeat the purpose of the word. Aza24 ( talk) 09:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
to the existing listing with recordings— "with recordings" not "to recordings", Smerus can correct me if I'm wrong but I believe he's referring to the comp list as the existing listing, and suggesting we add the column with recordings to it, which is what I was saying. Aza24 ( talk) 23:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
No indication of passing GNG or NBIO. All sources used in the article are glorified press releases or interviews or not about him at all. The tone in some parts of the article is also blatantly promotional. Article history reveals that a SPA hijacked a disambiguation page and then renamed it. M4DU7 ( talk) 08:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Hog Farm Talk 06:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Not enough significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. SK2242 ( talk) 08:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 09:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
A run of the mill poker website. Not one of the references used in the article covers the website significantly and independently. Very likely to be a case of COI editing. M4DU7 ( talk) 08:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG - The only reliable independent sources were My Jewish Learning, YU Torah, and Jewish Holidays, and those weren't actually super relevant to his career. The other sources pulled from were a school newspaper known as the Shalhevet Boiling Point, several about the author sections from Urim Publications, the actual amazon page of a book, and other sources that don't prove notability. Further searches find no other possible sources that mention him in any meaningful way. I chose not to notify the creator of the article of this discussion, not only because the creator has a clear conflict of interest, and not only because they pushed this article through after it was rejected from AfC for complete plagiarism of a non-notable and unreliable source, but because they have been blocked for sockpuppetry at two proposed speedy deletions of this article. I don't see reason to keep this article. I could be wrong, and that Yitzchak Etshalom is actually notable and these sources barely pass him through GNG. It's close. But I personally believe this article should be deleted - there's an argument to be made that Rabbi Etshalom is accomplished and should be notable, but I don't believe he is right now. Theleekycauldron ( talk) 07:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The post was kind of long, and I don't want to fearmonger, but we should probably keep watch for further sockpuppetry if the creator finds out. The past two usernames had to do with jewish culture and being a bookworm, so i don't know I guess keep a look out? Theleekycauldron ( talk) 07:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Also, don't about the author sections on the websites of publishers he signed with count as a clearly paid source, or at least a compromised one? Theleekycauldron ( talk) 08:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Requesting comment from Bearian ( talk · contribs), Adamant1 ( talk · contribs), and buidhe ( talk · contribs) - thoughts on this discussion, and also a comment on possible sockpuppetry from the two users below? Take a look at the page history, the contested speedy deletions, the grammar usage I want to know your thoughts. Theleekycauldron ( talk) 19:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable organization, sourced mainly to its own defunct website and some local news blurbs: fails WP:NORG. An affiliate of Georgia Republican Party; could be redirected there. Reywas92 Talk 06:50, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of unreleased songs recorded by Lana Del Rey. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
WP:FANCRUFT and WP:OR. An unreleased song that has not been commercially available. Has not even charted. Most of the article reads like it fits better in a Lana Del Rey-specific fan wiki. HĐ ( talk) 06:38, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of unreleased songs recorded by Lana Del Rey. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
For an unreleased song, this reads like original research. No indication of notability ( WP:NSONGS). Plus, since this is "unreleased", does it make it factual that it is a recorded song that has been commercially released? I doubt that the song is of encyclopedic value.+ HĐ ( talk) 06:33, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. I'm going with "soft delete" because although three editors have participated, none of them suggesting keeping the article, there's also not a general air of "yes, we should unquestionably delete this" from two of them. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:09, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
A single-sentence stub tagged for notability since...deep breath...August 2006. WP:BEFORE was inconclusive, which is why I'm taking it here rather than prodding -- it doesn't seem impossible there might be an article buried in here -- but man, is that a bad look, and the 'inconclusive' in question is leaning rather 'delete with prejudice'. Vaticidalprophet ( talk) 05:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Go South Coast. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 20:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Can’t find any significant coverage - fails WP:GNG. SK2242 ( talk) 05:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 20:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Can’t find any significant coverage - fails WP:GNG. SK2242 ( talk) 05:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Comment Impossible to search on as name just brings up loads of books about buses of yesteryear. Maybe some history that maybe notable as an new operator back in dereg days and running vintage buses as they were then, but without any new refs I lean to delete. Davidstewartharvey ( talk) 08:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Advertising or publicity. Also wp:crystal. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 05:24, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Has only one review, and the other two potential sources barely talk about it specifically. Dronebogus ( talk) 14:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Comment you didn’t provide a reason why. Dronebogus ( talk) 15:33, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 06:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Lacks WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV Jenyire2 ( talk) 05:11, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Article clearly needs work, but there is rough agreement that the subject satisfies our notability criteria. — The Earwig ⟨ talk⟩ 19:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails both WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG. The references used in the article are all primary. I can't find any significant independent coverage online, or any other evidence of notability. Lennart97 ( talk) 23:36, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect ( Beyoncé Pulse to Beyoncé#Endorsements and partnerships and Heat Rush to Heat (perfume)#Heat Rush). There is consensus these topics lack sufficient sourcing to be independently notable. I chose these redirect targets because they have existing discussion of the topics while the manufacturer's article has none. — The Earwig ⟨ talk⟩ 19:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
I am nominating this lot of articles for deletion because it reads like WP:PROMOTION. The description of the perfume is derived from primary sources and lack third-party coverage. The promotion part is straight-up news report and WP:INDISCRIMINATE, which Wikipedia is not. The only notable thing is that it was endorsed by Beyonce. HĐ ( talk) 04:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 06:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
What was notable was the political ad she was featured in. Not her, individually. I'd argue the ad could possibly be notable enough to be spun-off from 2006 United States Senate election in Tennessee (though, this may not be neccessary), but she, herself, is not notable enough to warrant an article. SecretName101 ( talk) 03:19, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. G7. Already deleted by Fastily. StarM 02:53, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The crime he committed gained some brief coverage when the trial happened, but there is no evidence in the article or to be added that Fanis Shaikhutdinov was otherwise notable. BLP1E cases can be controversial, so here rather than PROD. StarM 01:31, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is that the arguments for meeting WP:GNG trump the other specific guidelines. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Only notable for being promoted to acting chief after the storming of the Capitol. I did find a few sources about her prior to 2021, but they were not substantial. I also don't believe that Chief of the Capitol Police is an inherently notable position. WP:BLP1E Natg 19 ( talk) 01:01, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to Texas v. Pennsylvania. Daniel ( talk) 02:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Though this Supreme Court case was notable, and many of the participants are notable individuals, this list of participants is not a notable topic, as the Supreme Court case was thrown out, and there have not been any consequences for these House members. The participants are mentioned in passing in Texas_v._Pennsylvania#Participants, and full lists can be found in the citations.
The topic of listing out these participants was discussed in Talk:Texas_v._Pennsylvania/Archive_1#Lists_of_"participants", but was never resolved, so I am bringing this page to AfD for a wider discussion. Natg 19 ( talk) 00:42, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
:@ AleatoryPonderings, Reywas92, Masem, Feoffer, DolyaIskrina, Soibangla, Love of Corey, Goethean, and Herbfur: (users involved in the previous discussion)
The result was delete and redirect to List of political parties in Nepal. Daniel ( talk) 02:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
No indication of significance. No sourcing since it was created in 2004. On a search, I found one government report that indicates it existed, but nothing that indicates it was ever successful, or even notable for being unsuccessful. Fails WP:GNG. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 00:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 06:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Lacks proper sourcing, fails GNG. Iamreallygoodatcheckers ( talk) 03:45, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Yogananda Pittman, acting chief of Capitol Police, acted out of "an abundance of caution following an external security threat under the bridge on I-295 at First and F Streets," and ordered a shutdown of the Capitol complex, according to a statement from Capitol Police.
Acting Capitol Police Chief Yogananda Pittman on Thursday said that "permanent fencing" is needed at the Capitol to prevent a repeat of the recent deadly riot ...