The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Generic police chief of mid-size city arguably falls under WP:NPOL and notability is not shown. Souces are insubstantive and routine local announcements. Reywas92 Talk 14:12, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Pittsburgh Police Chief. Daniel ( talk) 11:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Generic police chief of mid-size city arguably falls under WP:NPOL and notability is not shown. Heck, he was acting police chief for less than three weeks so I'm baffled why my redirect to Pittsburgh Police Chief was reverted. Souces are routine and local. Reywas92 Talk 14:14, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:50, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 11:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Generic police chief of mid-size city arguably falls under WP:NPOL and notability is not shown. Was chief for less than a year and souces are routine and local. Reywas92 Talk 14:16, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:49, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 11:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Lack of sufficient notability Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 15:00, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:46, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 11:26, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
This promotional autobiography does not meet notability guidelines WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. There is not enough SIGCOV in RS to support an article. I was able to find one review online in addition to review that is in the article refs. Other sources in the article either don't mention him or are a simple name-check or photo caption. His work is not included in any notable museum collections, it is not widely cited by his peers, has not contributed a new concept, theory or technique, nor a widely known body of work. He has had some exhibits, which is what artists do - make and show work WP:MILL. All else found in a BEFORE was user-submitted or social media. It seems like a self-promotional effort WP:PROMO especially given that there is an external link that goes to the "Terrance Graven Employment Website" where you can hire him to do a job for you. The link has since been removed [1] on Dec. 10. Netherzone ( talk) 19:49, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 11:26, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Current sourcing includes only very brief mentions of this residence. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage. Was deprodded with the rationale, "Most students, academics, researchers as well as interested parties of the History of native aristocracy and archaeology find this content much useful." Which isn't a valid reason to have an article. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 18:48, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Hog Farm Talk 20:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The award is the lowest rank of the order /info/en/?search=Order_of_the_Federal_Republic and I can find nothing else that might possible amount to notability DGG ( talk ) 17:46, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 17:26, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable school. Just sourced with a related source.Fails WP:NSCHOOL, WP:SIGCOV and WP:ORG. A search just points to listings and WP-forks. The Banner talk 16:57, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 04:22, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Another indiscriminate ( WP:INDISCRIMINATE) collection of trivia (definitely WP:Listcruft, failing WP:LISTN, verifiability, and WP:NOSTATS. Not a single source present in the list (all are footnotes). The topic is not notable, and thus should be deleted. – Kavyansh.Singh ( talk) 09:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
ASTIG😎 (
ICE T •
ICE CUBE)
16:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
ASTIG😎 (
ICE T •
ICE CUBE)
16:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources .... Throughout this entire discussion or in the list-article, I don't see any source discussing the topic to be notable. So I don't understand how it clearly passes WP:NLIST. The sources in the article are merely verifying the entries, which doesn't makes the list notable. However, I'll appreciate if you can provide with reliable sources which discuss "List of presidents of the Philippines" on basis of their province. Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh ( talk) 14:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
there is no present consensus for how to assess the notability of more complex and cross-categorization lists (such as "Lists of X of Y"). I would be interested to know how this passes NLIST. Do you have any sources which discuss "List of presidents of the Philippines" based on their province? Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh ( talk) 17:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Article was created without going through AFC process and likely by someone affiliated with the topic. There are no notable or third-party sources. Lectrician1 ( talk) 15:19, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Footballer who has never played at WP:FPL level or senior international level and the article makes no claim to notability. Google News only has passing mentions in local match reports and a Swiss search yielded nothing better. German Wikipedia has an article on him with only one semi-decent source. This talks about his cameo appearance for Albania U21 and accuses him of using it as a stunt to get into the Switzerland U20 team but doesn't contain any significant detail on Ndau himself at all and seems to be just using him to make a point. Regardless, one semi-decent source does not demonstrate WP:GNG, which generally calls for multiple sources. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:42, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
I cannot see any real claim to notability. And if all the irrelevant guff was removed, there would hardly be anything left, not that that is strictly relevant TheLongTone ( talk) 13:41, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
A three and a half minute short film on YouTube with no apparent significant coverage. I can't see any claim to passing any of the criteria at WP:NFILM nor any coverage outside of social media that would allow a passing of WP:GNG. This article is written by Christopher Sammut who also happens to be the director, writer, producer and lead actor for this film; a case of undisclosed WP:COI - whilst this is not a reason for deletion in itself, it certainly doesn't help its cause. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Per this, this and this AFD, these is no need for this page. The page fails WP:NOTEVERYTHING in that it's not encyclopedic with stubs about every possible diaspora group in the world. No relations page to merge to. Geschichte ( talk) 10:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Survived previous AFD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:59, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Per this, this and this AFD, these is no need for this page. The page fails WP:NOTEVERYTHING in that it's not encyclopedic with stubs about every possible diaspora group in the world. No relations page to merge to. Geschichte ( talk) 10:44, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:58, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:10, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
His 177 minutes of football almost a decade ago is only a very, very weak presumption of WP:GNG. An Indonesian source search yields only passing coverage of namesakes and nothing about this particular Dudi. Searching through Google, I only found a passing mention in Bola. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:08, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted (CSD G11) ( log) by Blablubbs. (non-admin closure) firefly ( t · c ) 11:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NBIO or otherwise demonstrate notability - coverage does not appear to be independent of subject or significant. Is also largely written to be promotional. firefly ( t · c ) 11:08, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Footballer made a handful of appearances in 2012 totalling less than 3 matches in terms of game time then subsequently disappeared with no sign of an ongoing career. Clear consensus at Masayo Sato AfD and Asuka Nose AfD as well as several others that a weak passing of WP:NFOOTBALL is insufficient when WP:GNG is comprehensively failed. Searches of Didi Paroy and Didi Gento Paroy in Indonesian sources yield absolutely nothing useful at all. The best that I can find in Google is a passing mention in Tribun News, which is not even close to significant coverage. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. North America 1000 17:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
I found this one paragraph review. At first I thought that this review was reliable, but it's a self-published website. Fails WP:NF. SL93 ( talk) 02:51, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
10:40, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
I would have CSD'd this. but cannot find the original deletion (so it may have been CSD's the last time, I know it was deleted). No evidence of any notability (still). Slatersteven ( talk) 10:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
It should really be snow close now. Slatersteven ( talk) 16:06, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Being FIFA listed and refereeing a couple of minor finals is not enough to keep an article on a referee in lieu of passing WP:GNG; see deletion discussions for Michael Kennedy (referee), Angelo Nardi (referee), Ronald Gutiérrez (referee) and several others from the past 12 months that clearly show consensus towards the need for significant coverage.
Searches of "مختارامالو" return zero useful coverage and only direct Wikipedia mirrors. Searches of "Mokhtar Amalou" come up with nothing better than basic stats pages like World Football and Playmaker Stats. His World Referee page does contain some info but it's not clear where it comes from. According to this, World Referee takes emails from people if unsure about a referee so it's likely that the World Referee is entirely user submitted information and therefore unreliable.
It's also worth noting that the creator of this article is an WP:SPA clearly here only to promote Amalou; see warnings at User talk:Zombrito. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:17, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America 1000 17:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
I couldn't find any significant coverage. Not even one review. Non-notable album. SL93 ( talk) 23:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
23:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
09:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Geostub made by Spokane Ball yt who was blocked for creating similarly poorly-sourced stubs. This one fails WP:GEOLAND which requires populated places to either be legally recognized or have sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. Please don't just add a GEONAMES entry as a ref; community consensus has consistently been against using such databases to establish legal recognition or GNG. – dlthewave ☎ 18:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
09:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America 1000 16:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
This page is nothing more than a dictionary definition, and I see no way that it possibly could be anything more than that. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 06:27, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
07:48, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
08:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Given the nature of this split, and the fact that the now blocked (but non-sock) position was rebutted without response, and lacked any reasoning on why the sources would be sufficient, and both other keeps were weak, a clear Keep would seem unwarranted. Nosebagbear ( talk) 15:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Does not meet GNG. No independent sources. Searching finds some coverage in the local Morristown newspaper and many passing mentions. Overall, just routine coverage. MB 03:17, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion: previously PRODded.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
07:47, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
08:54, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
could not find any coverage for its English or French name. The festival website www.imagesante.org seems dead and just links to advertising. LibStar ( talk) 04:08, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
08:50, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 10:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Effectively unreferenced for over a decade (IMDb doesn't count, and neither does their "official site"). Subject apparently has a three-year acting career consisting almost entirely of bit parts. This might be the same Erika Schaefer who later appeared in various episodes of Million Dollar Listing Los Angeles, which would actually be a better case for notability, but a source would be required for this connection. BD2412 T 07:41, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:19, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Includes:
This book series, including all its individual entries, appears to be a failure of WP:NBOOK. All of these articles consist of plot only and are completely unsourced, and I cannot find significant coverage on either the series as a whole or any of the books; the closest it gets is small magazine mentions like this one, but no substantial reviews. Nothing on the (redlinked) author either. Lennart97 ( talk) 21:13, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Missvain (
talk)
01:27, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
07:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 10:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
not notable local festival, all mentions are just mentions, not a discussions, so has no significant coverage. article doesn't cite any sources. Artem.G ( talk) 06:54, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 10:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unable to find significant coverage of the subject of this WP:BLP. A before search returns a lot of routine coverage, as this driver has competed in events which are themselves notable; but the coverage of those events never seems to include more than a passing mention of this driver. This Checkered Flag article is probably the closest I found to significant coverage in an independent source. Some sources, such as this article from the Italian edition of Motorsport.com initially looked promising, but on closer inspection I believe they are probably press releases and thus cannot be used to establish notability. HumanBodyPiloter5 ( talk) 06:53, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The subject of the article is not notable. The subject's references are exclusively news articles about a candidacy for the NYC Mayor on a minor party line. Yousef Raz ( talk) 06:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Governor of New York. Francisca Villar is not African American. Lenora Fullani is affiliated with Columbia University which listed the subject’s accomplishment on their Instagram accounts and in their voter guide distributed to students. Barnard College which is reference 5, would not publish inaccurate information. Reference “11” is a resolution passed by the Virginia state senate commemorating the life of the subject’s father-in-law and discusses the subject’s family and ties to the Democratic Party, including Henry L. Marsh and United States Senate Timothy Michael Kaine. Locating more information about the age of subject and names of parents and spouse. Subject is running for Lieutenant governor of New York. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reboot40 ( talk • contribs) 20:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 16:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Military department doesn't seem to meet WP:NCORP- lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:45, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
A 1960s aerial is good enough to show the catenary poles, but there are no buildings, and topos going almost back to the construction of the line show no more than one, presumably the station. Probably the passing siding was the main reason for the spot, as the area is extremely barren. No sign of a town. Mangoe ( talk) 05:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2021 Indian Air Force Mil Mi-17 crash. The overall consensus herein is to redirect to 2021 Indian Air Force Mil Mi-17 crash. North America 1000 16:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
It's proposed he's notable for surviving a crash.. WP:NOTNEWS DGG ( talk ) 04:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
It’s a bit unusual but I’d say delete — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Frankiethesexaddict (
talk •
contribs)
05:31, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
*I have struck this now-blocked, not HERE user's contribution because it contains no sources and no intelligible reasoning.— S Marshall T/ C 14:54, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Not currently notable in his own right, as a crash survivor or otherwise. He might still die of his injuries as well. This article is simply unnecessary at present. WP Ludicer ( talk) 05:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
{{
R to article without mention}}
for that. I can recall
Priyanka Reddy Rape Case where this has been followed. --
Ab207 (
talk)
12:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
fails WP:NCORP -- no substantial 3rd party sources DGG ( talk ) 04:57, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unusually good topo history for the area makes it quite clear that this was a 4th class post office in a residence, the same farm/orchard property that, with changes over the years, still sits on the west side of the road as in the oldest topo from the 1910s. There was no town here. Mangoe ( talk) 04:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Can't find any reliable sources covering this band. Of the existing references, three are just directory listings from Discogs, which isn't considered an RS. Both of the remaining two are dead links. Looking at archived versions, we can see that one is to IDN Music, which seems to be another directory type site. It has a smattering of reviews on the page, but none seem to be from reliable sources, or even sources that still exist. They look like transient zines or random individuals. The second is from industrial.org, and it looks like a blog post from another random person. This page is little more than a redundant discography. — Torchiest talk edits 04:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The place names DB says it was named by a Milwaukee Road VP, so yes, it's a rail location. The topos show that at some point it was a junction, but what they don't show is any settlement. Searching containing two national capitals generates a lot of clutter but nothing particularly helpful. Mangoe ( talk) 04:18, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Star Mississippi 02:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Invalid disambig page: only 2 items, per WP:MOSDAB in such cases we use redirect (in this case to surname page) with hatnote to the second page
Loew Galitz (
talk) 03:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Withdrawn.
Loew Galitz (
talk)
22:39, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete per consensus. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 08:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable WP:FRINGE content, padded in an apparent effort to make it looks more significant within the Whacko-American community than it actually is. Orange Mike | Talk 02:57, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
"writing about a mode of thinking, rather than describing specific beliefs as independent objects of study", I'm not 100% certain what that very creative language means, but it's not a standard of inclusion. Feoffer ( talk) 23:38, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
This current article can't even factually establish that Kennedy had an interest in UFOsThat's not a standard for inclusion. The article on Bigfoot can't even factually establish Bigfoot exists, because he don't. This is bollucks, but it's notable bollocks, with three different TV shows dedicated the premise and more books than you can count. Feoffer ( talk) 21:42, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. A redirect can be recreated as part of the normal editing process. Hog Farm Talk 15:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unsourced article about a seemingly small-batch beverage, {{u| Squeeps10}} { Talk} Please ping when replying. 01:25, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Lacks independent coverage. Sources are advertorial/PR pieces. KH-1 ( talk) 01:23, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Poor WP:BEFORE on my part, next time I’ll do more digging. ( non-admin closure) WikiJoeB ( talk) 17:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Article about a Scottish footballer who appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT. The search for his full name (Robert Blaikie McEwan) turns up largely irrelevant results, with the only result matching his exact name being a Wikipedia mirror [11]. A search for only "Robert McEwan scottish footballer" turned up yet another Wikipedia mirror [12]. If the article is to be believed, and Robert really is an association football player, WP:NFOOTBALL is not met here.
Although the "Senior career" section in Robert's Infobox does state that he's played for teams notable enough for a Wikipedia article, it is unsourced and probably won't ever be - refer to the above findings.
Additionally, the sources presented in the article do not support notability:
Source one is a supposed link to his page at the English National Football Archive, which doesn't establish notability, as their homepage states that "The database of the National Football Archive...ensures that every player is uniquely identified."
Additionally, the archive's critertion for inclusion is, to put it lightly, extremely lenient: "The criterion for entry in the database is that the club concerned is a member of the Football League or Premier League in the season concerned. If that criterion is met, the database then contains the results of all that club's games in League and Cups. The first season of the database is 1888-89. " This is a violation of WP:SPORTCRIT, which specifically states that "Trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may be used to support content in an article, but it is not sufficient to establish notability. This includes listings in database sources with low, wide-sweeping generic standards of inclusion, such as Sports Reference's college football and basketball databases."
Source two isn't even a source. It's a reference reading: "Whiteford/ McEwan Family History, researched by Alastair Robert McEwan".
Source three: the book in question [13] is simply a book covering player records from 1888-1939. As it is only available in print and not online (the reference doesn't cite where in the book his name is mentioned, either) I do not know the extent as to which he is covered, if at all, in the book, but this would be a fail of WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT regardless. The book does not focus on McEwan. WikiJoeB ( talk) 01:11, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:26, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. No embassies, agreements, level of trade is described as "negligible". One leaders meeting at the side of a summit. LibStar ( talk) 01:05, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
I don't believe she meets WP:NCYCLING. She hasn't been a member of a UCI Women's Team. LibStar ( talk) 00:49, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Notability concerns. Only sourced to IMDb since the article was created in 2007. Other than IMDb and a short Turner Classic Movies biography, I have found literally no coverage of him, not even an obituary. User:力百 (alt of power~enwiki, π, ν) 00:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Dimension. ✗ plicit 03:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
No coverage about nine-dimensional space, just "n-dimensional space". Other articles like 9-cube are probably also unnecessary, but those have clear redirect targets (such as Hypercube); I'm not sure where (other than Dimension) this could redirect to. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 00:08, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Generic police chief of mid-size city arguably falls under WP:NPOL and notability is not shown. Souces are insubstantive and routine local announcements. Reywas92 Talk 14:12, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Pittsburgh Police Chief. Daniel ( talk) 11:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Generic police chief of mid-size city arguably falls under WP:NPOL and notability is not shown. Heck, he was acting police chief for less than three weeks so I'm baffled why my redirect to Pittsburgh Police Chief was reverted. Souces are routine and local. Reywas92 Talk 14:14, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:50, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 11:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Generic police chief of mid-size city arguably falls under WP:NPOL and notability is not shown. Was chief for less than a year and souces are routine and local. Reywas92 Talk 14:16, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:49, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 11:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Lack of sufficient notability Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 15:00, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:46, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 11:26, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
This promotional autobiography does not meet notability guidelines WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. There is not enough SIGCOV in RS to support an article. I was able to find one review online in addition to review that is in the article refs. Other sources in the article either don't mention him or are a simple name-check or photo caption. His work is not included in any notable museum collections, it is not widely cited by his peers, has not contributed a new concept, theory or technique, nor a widely known body of work. He has had some exhibits, which is what artists do - make and show work WP:MILL. All else found in a BEFORE was user-submitted or social media. It seems like a self-promotional effort WP:PROMO especially given that there is an external link that goes to the "Terrance Graven Employment Website" where you can hire him to do a job for you. The link has since been removed [1] on Dec. 10. Netherzone ( talk) 19:49, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 11:26, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Current sourcing includes only very brief mentions of this residence. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage. Was deprodded with the rationale, "Most students, academics, researchers as well as interested parties of the History of native aristocracy and archaeology find this content much useful." Which isn't a valid reason to have an article. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 18:48, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Hog Farm Talk 20:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The award is the lowest rank of the order /info/en/?search=Order_of_the_Federal_Republic and I can find nothing else that might possible amount to notability DGG ( talk ) 17:46, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 17:26, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable school. Just sourced with a related source.Fails WP:NSCHOOL, WP:SIGCOV and WP:ORG. A search just points to listings and WP-forks. The Banner talk 16:57, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 04:22, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Another indiscriminate ( WP:INDISCRIMINATE) collection of trivia (definitely WP:Listcruft, failing WP:LISTN, verifiability, and WP:NOSTATS. Not a single source present in the list (all are footnotes). The topic is not notable, and thus should be deleted. – Kavyansh.Singh ( talk) 09:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
ASTIG😎 (
ICE T •
ICE CUBE)
16:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
ASTIG😎 (
ICE T •
ICE CUBE)
16:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources .... Throughout this entire discussion or in the list-article, I don't see any source discussing the topic to be notable. So I don't understand how it clearly passes WP:NLIST. The sources in the article are merely verifying the entries, which doesn't makes the list notable. However, I'll appreciate if you can provide with reliable sources which discuss "List of presidents of the Philippines" on basis of their province. Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh ( talk) 14:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
there is no present consensus for how to assess the notability of more complex and cross-categorization lists (such as "Lists of X of Y"). I would be interested to know how this passes NLIST. Do you have any sources which discuss "List of presidents of the Philippines" based on their province? Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh ( talk) 17:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Article was created without going through AFC process and likely by someone affiliated with the topic. There are no notable or third-party sources. Lectrician1 ( talk) 15:19, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Footballer who has never played at WP:FPL level or senior international level and the article makes no claim to notability. Google News only has passing mentions in local match reports and a Swiss search yielded nothing better. German Wikipedia has an article on him with only one semi-decent source. This talks about his cameo appearance for Albania U21 and accuses him of using it as a stunt to get into the Switzerland U20 team but doesn't contain any significant detail on Ndau himself at all and seems to be just using him to make a point. Regardless, one semi-decent source does not demonstrate WP:GNG, which generally calls for multiple sources. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:42, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
I cannot see any real claim to notability. And if all the irrelevant guff was removed, there would hardly be anything left, not that that is strictly relevant TheLongTone ( talk) 13:41, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
A three and a half minute short film on YouTube with no apparent significant coverage. I can't see any claim to passing any of the criteria at WP:NFILM nor any coverage outside of social media that would allow a passing of WP:GNG. This article is written by Christopher Sammut who also happens to be the director, writer, producer and lead actor for this film; a case of undisclosed WP:COI - whilst this is not a reason for deletion in itself, it certainly doesn't help its cause. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Per this, this and this AFD, these is no need for this page. The page fails WP:NOTEVERYTHING in that it's not encyclopedic with stubs about every possible diaspora group in the world. No relations page to merge to. Geschichte ( talk) 10:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Survived previous AFD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:59, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Per this, this and this AFD, these is no need for this page. The page fails WP:NOTEVERYTHING in that it's not encyclopedic with stubs about every possible diaspora group in the world. No relations page to merge to. Geschichte ( talk) 10:44, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:58, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:10, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
His 177 minutes of football almost a decade ago is only a very, very weak presumption of WP:GNG. An Indonesian source search yields only passing coverage of namesakes and nothing about this particular Dudi. Searching through Google, I only found a passing mention in Bola. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:08, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted (CSD G11) ( log) by Blablubbs. (non-admin closure) firefly ( t · c ) 11:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NBIO or otherwise demonstrate notability - coverage does not appear to be independent of subject or significant. Is also largely written to be promotional. firefly ( t · c ) 11:08, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Footballer made a handful of appearances in 2012 totalling less than 3 matches in terms of game time then subsequently disappeared with no sign of an ongoing career. Clear consensus at Masayo Sato AfD and Asuka Nose AfD as well as several others that a weak passing of WP:NFOOTBALL is insufficient when WP:GNG is comprehensively failed. Searches of Didi Paroy and Didi Gento Paroy in Indonesian sources yield absolutely nothing useful at all. The best that I can find in Google is a passing mention in Tribun News, which is not even close to significant coverage. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. North America 1000 17:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
I found this one paragraph review. At first I thought that this review was reliable, but it's a self-published website. Fails WP:NF. SL93 ( talk) 02:51, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
10:40, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
I would have CSD'd this. but cannot find the original deletion (so it may have been CSD's the last time, I know it was deleted). No evidence of any notability (still). Slatersteven ( talk) 10:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
It should really be snow close now. Slatersteven ( talk) 16:06, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Being FIFA listed and refereeing a couple of minor finals is not enough to keep an article on a referee in lieu of passing WP:GNG; see deletion discussions for Michael Kennedy (referee), Angelo Nardi (referee), Ronald Gutiérrez (referee) and several others from the past 12 months that clearly show consensus towards the need for significant coverage.
Searches of "مختارامالو" return zero useful coverage and only direct Wikipedia mirrors. Searches of "Mokhtar Amalou" come up with nothing better than basic stats pages like World Football and Playmaker Stats. His World Referee page does contain some info but it's not clear where it comes from. According to this, World Referee takes emails from people if unsure about a referee so it's likely that the World Referee is entirely user submitted information and therefore unreliable.
It's also worth noting that the creator of this article is an WP:SPA clearly here only to promote Amalou; see warnings at User talk:Zombrito. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:17, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America 1000 17:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
I couldn't find any significant coverage. Not even one review. Non-notable album. SL93 ( talk) 23:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
23:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
09:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Geostub made by Spokane Ball yt who was blocked for creating similarly poorly-sourced stubs. This one fails WP:GEOLAND which requires populated places to either be legally recognized or have sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. Please don't just add a GEONAMES entry as a ref; community consensus has consistently been against using such databases to establish legal recognition or GNG. – dlthewave ☎ 18:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
09:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America 1000 16:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
This page is nothing more than a dictionary definition, and I see no way that it possibly could be anything more than that. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 06:27, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
07:48, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
08:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Given the nature of this split, and the fact that the now blocked (but non-sock) position was rebutted without response, and lacked any reasoning on why the sources would be sufficient, and both other keeps were weak, a clear Keep would seem unwarranted. Nosebagbear ( talk) 15:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Does not meet GNG. No independent sources. Searching finds some coverage in the local Morristown newspaper and many passing mentions. Overall, just routine coverage. MB 03:17, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion: previously PRODded.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
07:47, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
08:54, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
could not find any coverage for its English or French name. The festival website www.imagesante.org seems dead and just links to advertising. LibStar ( talk) 04:08, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
08:50, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 10:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Effectively unreferenced for over a decade (IMDb doesn't count, and neither does their "official site"). Subject apparently has a three-year acting career consisting almost entirely of bit parts. This might be the same Erika Schaefer who later appeared in various episodes of Million Dollar Listing Los Angeles, which would actually be a better case for notability, but a source would be required for this connection. BD2412 T 07:41, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:19, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Includes:
This book series, including all its individual entries, appears to be a failure of WP:NBOOK. All of these articles consist of plot only and are completely unsourced, and I cannot find significant coverage on either the series as a whole or any of the books; the closest it gets is small magazine mentions like this one, but no substantial reviews. Nothing on the (redlinked) author either. Lennart97 ( talk) 21:13, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Missvain (
talk)
01:27, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
07:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 10:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
not notable local festival, all mentions are just mentions, not a discussions, so has no significant coverage. article doesn't cite any sources. Artem.G ( talk) 06:54, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 10:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unable to find significant coverage of the subject of this WP:BLP. A before search returns a lot of routine coverage, as this driver has competed in events which are themselves notable; but the coverage of those events never seems to include more than a passing mention of this driver. This Checkered Flag article is probably the closest I found to significant coverage in an independent source. Some sources, such as this article from the Italian edition of Motorsport.com initially looked promising, but on closer inspection I believe they are probably press releases and thus cannot be used to establish notability. HumanBodyPiloter5 ( talk) 06:53, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The subject of the article is not notable. The subject's references are exclusively news articles about a candidacy for the NYC Mayor on a minor party line. Yousef Raz ( talk) 06:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Governor of New York. Francisca Villar is not African American. Lenora Fullani is affiliated with Columbia University which listed the subject’s accomplishment on their Instagram accounts and in their voter guide distributed to students. Barnard College which is reference 5, would not publish inaccurate information. Reference “11” is a resolution passed by the Virginia state senate commemorating the life of the subject’s father-in-law and discusses the subject’s family and ties to the Democratic Party, including Henry L. Marsh and United States Senate Timothy Michael Kaine. Locating more information about the age of subject and names of parents and spouse. Subject is running for Lieutenant governor of New York. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reboot40 ( talk • contribs) 20:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 16:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Military department doesn't seem to meet WP:NCORP- lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:45, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
A 1960s aerial is good enough to show the catenary poles, but there are no buildings, and topos going almost back to the construction of the line show no more than one, presumably the station. Probably the passing siding was the main reason for the spot, as the area is extremely barren. No sign of a town. Mangoe ( talk) 05:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2021 Indian Air Force Mil Mi-17 crash. The overall consensus herein is to redirect to 2021 Indian Air Force Mil Mi-17 crash. North America 1000 16:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
It's proposed he's notable for surviving a crash.. WP:NOTNEWS DGG ( talk ) 04:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
It’s a bit unusual but I’d say delete — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Frankiethesexaddict (
talk •
contribs)
05:31, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
*I have struck this now-blocked, not HERE user's contribution because it contains no sources and no intelligible reasoning.— S Marshall T/ C 14:54, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Not currently notable in his own right, as a crash survivor or otherwise. He might still die of his injuries as well. This article is simply unnecessary at present. WP Ludicer ( talk) 05:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
{{
R to article without mention}}
for that. I can recall
Priyanka Reddy Rape Case where this has been followed. --
Ab207 (
talk)
12:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
fails WP:NCORP -- no substantial 3rd party sources DGG ( talk ) 04:57, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unusually good topo history for the area makes it quite clear that this was a 4th class post office in a residence, the same farm/orchard property that, with changes over the years, still sits on the west side of the road as in the oldest topo from the 1910s. There was no town here. Mangoe ( talk) 04:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Can't find any reliable sources covering this band. Of the existing references, three are just directory listings from Discogs, which isn't considered an RS. Both of the remaining two are dead links. Looking at archived versions, we can see that one is to IDN Music, which seems to be another directory type site. It has a smattering of reviews on the page, but none seem to be from reliable sources, or even sources that still exist. They look like transient zines or random individuals. The second is from industrial.org, and it looks like a blog post from another random person. This page is little more than a redundant discography. — Torchiest talk edits 04:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The place names DB says it was named by a Milwaukee Road VP, so yes, it's a rail location. The topos show that at some point it was a junction, but what they don't show is any settlement. Searching containing two national capitals generates a lot of clutter but nothing particularly helpful. Mangoe ( talk) 04:18, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Star Mississippi 02:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Invalid disambig page: only 2 items, per WP:MOSDAB in such cases we use redirect (in this case to surname page) with hatnote to the second page
Loew Galitz (
talk) 03:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Withdrawn.
Loew Galitz (
talk)
22:39, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete per consensus. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 08:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable WP:FRINGE content, padded in an apparent effort to make it looks more significant within the Whacko-American community than it actually is. Orange Mike | Talk 02:57, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
"writing about a mode of thinking, rather than describing specific beliefs as independent objects of study", I'm not 100% certain what that very creative language means, but it's not a standard of inclusion. Feoffer ( talk) 23:38, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
This current article can't even factually establish that Kennedy had an interest in UFOsThat's not a standard for inclusion. The article on Bigfoot can't even factually establish Bigfoot exists, because he don't. This is bollucks, but it's notable bollocks, with three different TV shows dedicated the premise and more books than you can count. Feoffer ( talk) 21:42, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. A redirect can be recreated as part of the normal editing process. Hog Farm Talk 15:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unsourced article about a seemingly small-batch beverage, {{u| Squeeps10}} { Talk} Please ping when replying. 01:25, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Lacks independent coverage. Sources are advertorial/PR pieces. KH-1 ( talk) 01:23, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Poor WP:BEFORE on my part, next time I’ll do more digging. ( non-admin closure) WikiJoeB ( talk) 17:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Article about a Scottish footballer who appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT. The search for his full name (Robert Blaikie McEwan) turns up largely irrelevant results, with the only result matching his exact name being a Wikipedia mirror [11]. A search for only "Robert McEwan scottish footballer" turned up yet another Wikipedia mirror [12]. If the article is to be believed, and Robert really is an association football player, WP:NFOOTBALL is not met here.
Although the "Senior career" section in Robert's Infobox does state that he's played for teams notable enough for a Wikipedia article, it is unsourced and probably won't ever be - refer to the above findings.
Additionally, the sources presented in the article do not support notability:
Source one is a supposed link to his page at the English National Football Archive, which doesn't establish notability, as their homepage states that "The database of the National Football Archive...ensures that every player is uniquely identified."
Additionally, the archive's critertion for inclusion is, to put it lightly, extremely lenient: "The criterion for entry in the database is that the club concerned is a member of the Football League or Premier League in the season concerned. If that criterion is met, the database then contains the results of all that club's games in League and Cups. The first season of the database is 1888-89. " This is a violation of WP:SPORTCRIT, which specifically states that "Trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may be used to support content in an article, but it is not sufficient to establish notability. This includes listings in database sources with low, wide-sweeping generic standards of inclusion, such as Sports Reference's college football and basketball databases."
Source two isn't even a source. It's a reference reading: "Whiteford/ McEwan Family History, researched by Alastair Robert McEwan".
Source three: the book in question [13] is simply a book covering player records from 1888-1939. As it is only available in print and not online (the reference doesn't cite where in the book his name is mentioned, either) I do not know the extent as to which he is covered, if at all, in the book, but this would be a fail of WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT regardless. The book does not focus on McEwan. WikiJoeB ( talk) 01:11, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:26, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. No embassies, agreements, level of trade is described as "negligible". One leaders meeting at the side of a summit. LibStar ( talk) 01:05, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
I don't believe she meets WP:NCYCLING. She hasn't been a member of a UCI Women's Team. LibStar ( talk) 00:49, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Notability concerns. Only sourced to IMDb since the article was created in 2007. Other than IMDb and a short Turner Classic Movies biography, I have found literally no coverage of him, not even an obituary. User:力百 (alt of power~enwiki, π, ν) 00:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Dimension. ✗ plicit 03:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
No coverage about nine-dimensional space, just "n-dimensional space". Other articles like 9-cube are probably also unnecessary, but those have clear redirect targets (such as Hypercube); I'm not sure where (other than Dimension) this could redirect to. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 00:08, 9 December 2021 (UTC)