The result was keep. Consensus is he meets notability required for a politician. Admin Note unrelated to closing decision, AfD is not cleanup. The sources were identified prior to this discussion and could have been added as part of normal editorial process. Star Mississippi 15:22, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
No reliable source and even citations referenced to the article. Unless citations are presented to support each statement of the article within this discussion, it can't be tolerated to keep as article. The Supermind ( talk) 20:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is that sourcing does not exist to build an article. Should someone want this for draft space work, just ping me. Star Mississippi 14:47, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP: NFSOURCES; found nothing in a WP:BEFORE search and no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator ( talk) 17:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:48, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 20:53, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Biography of a senior police figure who had a long career with various posts. He doesn’t seem to have won any awards, held any clearly notable positions or otherwise done anything that would qualify him for inclusion. Mccapra ( talk) 21:24, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
22:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:43, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. —ScottyWong— 01:34, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
This article appears to be a violation of WP:NOTADVERT. The article creator, Fatima.Innovative has been involved in a UPE sockfarm, according to thier Sockpuppets Investigation archives. The awards present do not appear to be significant enough for WP:ANYBIO nor WP:NJOURNALIST. The sources also appear to easily fail WP:NBASIC and I cannot find sources online that indicate that this criteria is passed. Therefore, I believe the page should be deleted. — Mhawk10 ( talk) 23:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:41, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 16:36, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
The article was tagged as WP:G11. In looking at the article, I felt that the only real notability for Martin was his company. Being a billionaire in and of itself does not confer notability. So I redirected the article to the company, but the author reverted that, so here we are. Bbb23 ( talk) 22:50, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Slightly early, but conensus is clear. Star Mississippi 16:37, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Bild is not an rs per this RSN discussion. Otherwise inadequate sourcing that isn’t good enough for a blp. Fails gng ans pornbio Spartaz Humbug! 22:16, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 22:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Lack of sources here is painful for a blp. Pornbio is no more as this article should be as there is a significant failure to meet the gng and ent. Spartaz Humbug! 22:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 22:26, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Porn biography that fails to meet the gng or ent. Pornbio has long been depreciated and the sourcing here is inadequate to meet the standard demanded for blps. Spartaz Humbug! 21:56, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Strip Me?. RL0919 ( talk) 22:28, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Article only has primary sources. I couldn't find anything through Google search that establishes notability per WP:NSONG. ArcticSeeress ( talk) 20:56, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 16:38, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
From previous AfDs on football matches this year, we have a very high bar for notability. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bremer SV 0–12 FC Bayern Munich and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liverpool F.C. 1–2 Grimsby Town F.C. (2001) for example. Yes, those matches had stats databases and basic match reports to verify them but there was no indication of historic significance, much like this match up for AfD today. There is no evidence of any WP:LASTING notability here or any WP:GEOSCOPE - was this match covered widely across the globe and is it continually revisited, even many decades later? I can't see anything to suggest this. I appreciate that this game led to Tunisia qualifying for their first World Cup but there is no notability guideline that means we need to keep an article just because it led to a team qualifying for a major tournament.
References fail to show significant coverage in line with WP:GNG and the topic is adequately covered in 1978 FIFA World Cup qualification (CAF) and Egypt–Tunisia football rivalry among other places and there is no reason to have a WP:NOTSTATS-violating article on this match. I did do a quick WP:BEFORE search to see if I could find some detailed coverage of this game but it was just stats databases like the ones cited already. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:51, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is against keeping this as a separate article. There is also no consensus for merging, but a brief entry in Hypothetical astronomical object could be easily created from available sources if anybody is so inclined. Sandstein 09:05, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Fsils WP:NEO, based a single paper in The Astrophysical Journal published in August 2021. All pop-sci coverage, such as the other two references in this article, is about the same study. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 20:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Snowing, despite 60 degree temps in NYC today. Star Mississippi 16:41, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
We don't -- and shouldn't -- have an article on Lux girls. We certainly shouldn't have one for Lux Girls in Pakistan or any other country. The references are the expected tabloid coverage DGG ( talk ) 20:07, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 17:17, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
promotional article by obvious undeclared coi editor (presumably paid) for the firm. It's a routine lawfirm, and most of the work shown here is just "advised so and so," not notable cases. Almost all the references are from the firm's web site, or are case reports, or mere notices. Part of a promotional effort for one of the firm's principals, see next AfD request. DGG ( talk ) 19:23, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect all to Polygon#Naming. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 18:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Many of these polygons are not notable enough to have their own page. The reliable source coverage is basically a row in each of two or three tables; there is nowhere near significant coverage. The content of these pages is essentially all a massive megafork of content that is either already at Dihedral group or Petrie polygon, etc., or can be added to an appropriate page. It is completely unnecessary for it to be split out with these formulaic details for every possible number of sides. The dissections are beautiful but WP:NOTGALLERY and we can put some of them at Zonogon. Suggest Redirect to Polygon#naming.
Batch nomination, picking out the most egregious examples with no independent content. In case you don't like deciphering prefixes, these are 48 (main), and 50, 64, 70, 80, 90, 96:
Danstronger ( talk) 18:49, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to NFL playoffs#NFL playoff appearances. Sandstein 08:58, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
A content-fork of List of NFL franchise post-season streaks - a blank-and-redirect was reverted. There is some other trivia here (each team's longest ever streak of consecutive 7-win seasons) - I don't think that needs to be on the encyclopedia at all, but it certainly shouldn't be on this page. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 18:04, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Whether to merge or redirect this somewhere has no consensus here and would need a more in-depth discussion, as it seems to be controversial. Sandstein 20:59, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Proposed/non-existent railway station. Subject doesn't exist and may never exist. The subject has never been the topic of any significant coverage. The sources which support the text (and the only sources I can find after significant searches) include this PowerPoint presentation (where the text reads "Potential Station at Kylemore" and nothing else), this politician's press release (where again we have four words "new station at Kylemore"), this news story (again where the subject is barely mentioned in passing), and this webpage/article (where the subject is discussed in a little more depth, but mainly/only to confirm that the subject does not exist beyond a notional concept and is not planned or funded as part of ANY transport dev project). The subject falls well below any reasonable WP:SIGCOV threshold. In a "flip" of the WP:EXIST essay, the scant sources just confirm that the subject DOESN'T exist. And do not support notability. Guliolopez ( talk) 17:37, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 20:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable translator not coming close to meeting WP:GNG. Surprised this is here since 2008. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 17:26, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 20:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. Found nothing in a WP:BEFORE search and no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator ( talk) 17:16, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 20:53, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
The page has been draftified twice 1 2, which makes this the third time the article has been created. As AfD is the listed method of dispute resolution over draftification ( WP:DRAFTOBJECT), I am listing it here – this seems to still be unfit for mainspace. Giraffer ( talk· contribs) 16:55, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no remaining deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 05:04, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:SOURCES. I found this link from Variety on my WP:BEFORE search. It needs more coverage in order to be eligible. The Film Creator ( talk) 16:45, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 20:53, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable baseball player. Fbdave ( talk) 15:23, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 20:53, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable compilation album by a non-notable record label. Fails NALBUM, no significant coverage or other indication of notability. Lennart97 ( talk) 15:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Toys "R" Us#Mascot. RL0919 ( talk) 21:18, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Reviewed as a part of New Page patrol. No indication of wp:notability for a stand-alone article. No wp:notabiliy- suitable sources (actually there are no sources at all) I would have just converted to a redirect but it looks like this has already been done many times before. North8000 ( talk) 15:06, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is she's not yet notable. I will draftify at the suggestion of LiAnna_(Wiki_Ed) as there's no reason not to. Star Mississippi 14:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable sculptures. The best press mention for her is this NYT article, but it is a trivial mention. Bbarmadillo ( talk) 14:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW keep as satisfies WP:NPOL as a state representative. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 ( talk) 03:13, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable Ethiopian academic. I failed to find high quality press mentions at reliable sources for him. Bbarmadillo ( talk) 14:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:52, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Biography of a mayor, not properly sourced as passing WP:NPOL #2. To be fair, this was created at a time when our inclusion criteria for mayors was "inherently notable if the city has crossed the 50K bar in population", but that was deprecated several years ago -- in 2021, the notability bar for mayors requires a substantial and well-sourced article that establishes the significance of their mayoralty by addressing specific things they did, specific projects they spearheaded, specific effects they had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. But this basically just documents that he existed as mayor, and is referenced entirely to primary sources that aren't support for notability at all, which is exactly the kind of article about a mayor that caused us to deprecate the old "50K = free pass" standard. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the referencing from having to be considerably better than this. Bearcat ( talk) 18:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
10:16, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:55, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:34, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NORG due to lack of depth in coverage. It is a privately owned stadium owned by a legislator. It is a commercial org too. All stadiums are companies too. Venkat TL ( talk) 11:54, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America 1000 11:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
extensive promotional articles, as typical for performers--even minor performers like her, with no major roles to her credit and no awards. DGG ( talk ) 04:14, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
06:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:46, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per relatively low participation. North America 1000 11:44, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Biography of a mayor, not properly sourced as passing WP:NPOL #2. To be fair, this was created at a time when our inclusion criteria for mayors was "inherently notable if the city has crossed the 50K bar in population", but that was deprecated several years ago -- in 2021, the notability bar for mayors requires a substantial and well-sourced article that establishes the significance of their mayoralty by addressing specific things they did, specific projects they spearheaded, specific effects they had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. But this basically just documents that he existed as mayor, and is referenced entirely to primary sources that aren't support for notability at all, which is exactly the kind of article about a mayor that caused us to deprecate the old "50K = free pass" standard. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the referencing from having to be considerably better than this. Bearcat ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
10:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:37, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Limited participation and no agreement. Note that WP:G12 could still be pursued if copyright violations are proved. RL0919 ( talk) 21:27, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
This fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage in independent mainstream media. Given sources only give passing mentions. Venkat TL ( talk) 06:47, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
10:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:36, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 11:40, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
the topic of this article Fails wikipedia Notability , there is NO evidence of Notability Samat lib ( talk) 10:18, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:35, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:53, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Lists it's facebook page as a source. Reads like a corporate blurb. Kleuske ( talk) 11:16, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Simione001 ( talk) 10:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:03, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm not seeing much in the way of independent sources that would satisfy WP:GNG. Clarityfiend ( talk) 10:25, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:05, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
No indication of notability per WP:BASIC or WP:NMUSIC. –– FormalDude talk 09:59, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is that subject is notable and there's sourcing well beyond the needs of BLP. Copyvio, if proven to be present, can be dealt with editorially/via rev del. Star Mississippi 15:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio - Earwig reports copyvio from 4 sources. Page creator blocked indef for extensive and repeated copyright violations. Page is not likely to get repaired. Whiteguru ( talk) 09:45, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't meet software notability guidelines. Couldn't find multiple reliable third-party sources on the topic -- it's mostly user-submitted reviews or brief mentions. Citing ( talk) 17:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
*Keep I was able to find
a product review by Venturebeat, which is considered a reliable source. It has also received coverage from
a Polish news source and is the subject of
this research study. The software has also been included in several manuals:
[9],
[10],
[11],
[12],
[13]. This passes
WP:NSOFT.
Heartmusic678 (
talk) 15:28, 1 December 2021 (UTC) I change my vote to Delete
Heartmusic678 (
talk)
11:04, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk)
08:45, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There are some valid concerns raised about inclusion and naming, but there is no conensus to delete this list. Equally, there isn't a strong consensus present to keep the material, however a no consensus defaults to the content being kept. Star Mississippi 16:10, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
A list of one entry is not a list, this list article seems pointless, wikipedia is not a directory. Article fails WP:NLIST. Govvy ( talk) 14:26, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk)
08:38, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. —ScottyWong— 07:51, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY. A clear case of WP:ONEEVENT. BlameRuiner ( talk) 21:24, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: 5 keeps claiming gng is met, four delete / merges on the grounds that whilst he has clearly received widespread coverage internationally for being the oldest player the is a case of
WP:ONEEVENT. Need a clearer consensus, would be useful to provide sources for the claim that he has also received coverage for his "notable stage business".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Fenix down (
talk)
23:39, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Missvain (
talk)
04:24, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Fenix down (
talk)
08:22, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. —ScottyWong— 07:52, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
This is, and really always should be, a dictionary definition, not an encyclopedia article. Qwirkle ( talk) 07:54, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
This article relies heavily on a single source (United States Conference of Catholic Bishops document on the Book of Revelation). The article makes selections from this document. Article fails GNG, it is copy and paraphrase of one document and its chapters cited 27 times. Whiteguru ( talk) 07:50, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Moved to mainspace without the required AfC. Coverage is based on company-sponsored press-releases. Bbarmadillo ( talk) 07:39, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:54, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Procedural nomination after speedy deletion was overturned at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2021 November 19. Daniel ( talk) 06:44, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
I also removed to duplicate references from the article. Geschichte ( talk) 11:36, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
07:28, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
WP:NEO, only the subject of one study, no indication that is a notable topic. Secondary pop-science coverage is reporting on the same study. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 05:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
At first glance this mostly-unsourced article seems like something that could be improved by simply adding sources, but a deeper look shows that the prohibited activities are either not unique to transit (smoking, solicitation, vagrancy, disorderly conduct), unremarkable (audio devices, mobile phones, space considerations) or better covered elsewhere (photography, eating and drinking, bicycles). I just don't see the potential for a coherent or useful article here. – dlthewave ☎ 05:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Minor road junction - I can find basically no coverage for this particular Six Mile Corner. There's a road junction and bait shop near Lake Sakakawea that I turned up more coverage about, but I don't think the bait shop/junction there is notable either. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Hog Farm Talk 05:32, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
This is across the river from Bristol, and the situation is essentially the same, with two small twists. First, there;s a sort of suburban community southeast of the historical siding/station (the line has been taken up since), but a trip back through the topos show the two have no connection. Second, it would be awfully nice if the articles related what the sources actually said. In this case, it turns out that Horlicks is not really "a type of hot drink": it is "a brand of malted milk", which is also what the article on the foodstuff says as well. In this case it makes no real difference, but really, we do have some obligation towards accuracy. In any case, it's just another non-notable siding/station. Mangoe ( talk) 05:29, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
This is actually the site of the Scoria Point Overlook in Theodore Roosevelt National Park. Normally, I'd just redirect it, but I can find no evidence that this actually known as Scoria Point Corner, the overlook is simply known as Scoria Point. As this is not a correct name for the place, it should be simply deleted. Hog Farm Talk 05:22, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per relatively low participation. North America 1000 11:35, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Biography of a mayor, not properly sourced as passing WP:NPOL #2. To be fair, this was created at a time when our inclusion criteria for mayors was "inherently notable if the city has crossed the 50K bar in population", but that was deprecated several years ago -- in 2021, the notability bar for mayors requires a substantial and well-sourced article that establishes the significance of their mayoralty by addressing specific things they did, specific projects they spearheaded, specific effects they had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. But this basically just documents that he existed as mayor, and is referenced entirely to primary sources that aren't support for notability at all, which is exactly the kind of article about a mayor that caused us to deprecate the old "50K = free pass" standard. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the referencing from having to be considerably better than this. Bearcat ( talk) 18:41, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
23:50, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
04:30, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 05:16, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
There is no sources from any news company, and nothing here that point's to it being notable. Lectrician2 ( talk) 04:20, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 11:11, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable student short film. Article was created by an WP:SPA, who also created a page about the producer, Robert Tutak, which has been deleted twice. The sources include one 220-word capsule review, not by a professional film critic, but by a sub-editor of a lifestyle magazine who "loves telling stories through makeup" (in case you're wondering, she doesn't say anything about the makeup in the film). That's the only independent source.
The Clermont-Ferrand International Short Film Festival is a notable festival, but the page there is a stock description by the filmmakers. It doesn't show that the film was nominated for or received any award there. bdnews24.com is a primary source interview with the director. The trailer on YouTube and its Facebook page are not independent. The remaining sources are non-notable film festival sites or their partners. WP:MOSFILM advises discretion when mentioning festival awards because of the proliferation of film festivals and "award mills". No better sources found through the usual searches, in English and Bengali. Does not meet WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. Worldbruce ( talk) 02:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
04:04, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. —ScottyWong— 07:53, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
We're out of the plains here, so no grain elevators, but that doesn't mean there aren't plenty of sidings pretending to be "unincorporated communities" This one's typical: the "few homes" appear to be one house with a barn and nearly a mile away, another house. That hasn't changed since 1960, and I find nothing saying things were different earlier. Mangoe ( talk) 03:35, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:13, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
There is nothing notable about this alleged crime. It is a routine homicide and fails WP:NCRIME. It does not warrant a Wikipedia article. WWGB ( talk) 03:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to Architecture of Chicago. Mostly already done. Sandstein 08:59, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
This location is now a Baptist church. Page doesn't appear relevant, now, unless the building itself should have a page. Twowrites ( talk) 03:07, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
List of Hotels in Sudan by State
Incomplete list that does not satisfy the notability criteria for stand-alone lists or the criteria for stand-alone lists. Most of the items in the list are unreferenced and therefore unverifiable. This article was moved from article space to draft space once, and has been moved back to article space with no change except 'by state' added to the title without changing the content. Moving it back to draft space again would be move-warring, so letting the community decide. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 10:06, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Subject of the article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them a before search turns up nothing cogent, he is a musician but no criterion from WP:MUSICBIO is met, all refs used in the article are sourced predominantly to unreliable or user generated sources Celestina007 ( talk) 00:00, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:07, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Subject fails to meet notability. Very little coverage of the subject outside of passing mentions as a former "second in command" of Combat 18, "alleged leader" of the White Wolves etc. What little info there is on the subject can be merged into those two articles, if it is not present there already. ToeSchmoker ( talk) 17:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Survived
previous VFD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:04, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is he meets notability required for a politician. Admin Note unrelated to closing decision, AfD is not cleanup. The sources were identified prior to this discussion and could have been added as part of normal editorial process. Star Mississippi 15:22, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
No reliable source and even citations referenced to the article. Unless citations are presented to support each statement of the article within this discussion, it can't be tolerated to keep as article. The Supermind ( talk) 20:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is that sourcing does not exist to build an article. Should someone want this for draft space work, just ping me. Star Mississippi 14:47, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP: NFSOURCES; found nothing in a WP:BEFORE search and no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator ( talk) 17:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:48, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 20:53, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Biography of a senior police figure who had a long career with various posts. He doesn’t seem to have won any awards, held any clearly notable positions or otherwise done anything that would qualify him for inclusion. Mccapra ( talk) 21:24, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
22:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:43, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. —ScottyWong— 01:34, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
This article appears to be a violation of WP:NOTADVERT. The article creator, Fatima.Innovative has been involved in a UPE sockfarm, according to thier Sockpuppets Investigation archives. The awards present do not appear to be significant enough for WP:ANYBIO nor WP:NJOURNALIST. The sources also appear to easily fail WP:NBASIC and I cannot find sources online that indicate that this criteria is passed. Therefore, I believe the page should be deleted. — Mhawk10 ( talk) 23:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:41, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 16:36, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
The article was tagged as WP:G11. In looking at the article, I felt that the only real notability for Martin was his company. Being a billionaire in and of itself does not confer notability. So I redirected the article to the company, but the author reverted that, so here we are. Bbb23 ( talk) 22:50, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Slightly early, but conensus is clear. Star Mississippi 16:37, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Bild is not an rs per this RSN discussion. Otherwise inadequate sourcing that isn’t good enough for a blp. Fails gng ans pornbio Spartaz Humbug! 22:16, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 22:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Lack of sources here is painful for a blp. Pornbio is no more as this article should be as there is a significant failure to meet the gng and ent. Spartaz Humbug! 22:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 22:26, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Porn biography that fails to meet the gng or ent. Pornbio has long been depreciated and the sourcing here is inadequate to meet the standard demanded for blps. Spartaz Humbug! 21:56, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Strip Me?. RL0919 ( talk) 22:28, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Article only has primary sources. I couldn't find anything through Google search that establishes notability per WP:NSONG. ArcticSeeress ( talk) 20:56, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 16:38, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
From previous AfDs on football matches this year, we have a very high bar for notability. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bremer SV 0–12 FC Bayern Munich and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liverpool F.C. 1–2 Grimsby Town F.C. (2001) for example. Yes, those matches had stats databases and basic match reports to verify them but there was no indication of historic significance, much like this match up for AfD today. There is no evidence of any WP:LASTING notability here or any WP:GEOSCOPE - was this match covered widely across the globe and is it continually revisited, even many decades later? I can't see anything to suggest this. I appreciate that this game led to Tunisia qualifying for their first World Cup but there is no notability guideline that means we need to keep an article just because it led to a team qualifying for a major tournament.
References fail to show significant coverage in line with WP:GNG and the topic is adequately covered in 1978 FIFA World Cup qualification (CAF) and Egypt–Tunisia football rivalry among other places and there is no reason to have a WP:NOTSTATS-violating article on this match. I did do a quick WP:BEFORE search to see if I could find some detailed coverage of this game but it was just stats databases like the ones cited already. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:51, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is against keeping this as a separate article. There is also no consensus for merging, but a brief entry in Hypothetical astronomical object could be easily created from available sources if anybody is so inclined. Sandstein 09:05, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Fsils WP:NEO, based a single paper in The Astrophysical Journal published in August 2021. All pop-sci coverage, such as the other two references in this article, is about the same study. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 20:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Snowing, despite 60 degree temps in NYC today. Star Mississippi 16:41, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
We don't -- and shouldn't -- have an article on Lux girls. We certainly shouldn't have one for Lux Girls in Pakistan or any other country. The references are the expected tabloid coverage DGG ( talk ) 20:07, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 17:17, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
promotional article by obvious undeclared coi editor (presumably paid) for the firm. It's a routine lawfirm, and most of the work shown here is just "advised so and so," not notable cases. Almost all the references are from the firm's web site, or are case reports, or mere notices. Part of a promotional effort for one of the firm's principals, see next AfD request. DGG ( talk ) 19:23, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect all to Polygon#Naming. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 18:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Many of these polygons are not notable enough to have their own page. The reliable source coverage is basically a row in each of two or three tables; there is nowhere near significant coverage. The content of these pages is essentially all a massive megafork of content that is either already at Dihedral group or Petrie polygon, etc., or can be added to an appropriate page. It is completely unnecessary for it to be split out with these formulaic details for every possible number of sides. The dissections are beautiful but WP:NOTGALLERY and we can put some of them at Zonogon. Suggest Redirect to Polygon#naming.
Batch nomination, picking out the most egregious examples with no independent content. In case you don't like deciphering prefixes, these are 48 (main), and 50, 64, 70, 80, 90, 96:
Danstronger ( talk) 18:49, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to NFL playoffs#NFL playoff appearances. Sandstein 08:58, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
A content-fork of List of NFL franchise post-season streaks - a blank-and-redirect was reverted. There is some other trivia here (each team's longest ever streak of consecutive 7-win seasons) - I don't think that needs to be on the encyclopedia at all, but it certainly shouldn't be on this page. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 18:04, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Whether to merge or redirect this somewhere has no consensus here and would need a more in-depth discussion, as it seems to be controversial. Sandstein 20:59, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Proposed/non-existent railway station. Subject doesn't exist and may never exist. The subject has never been the topic of any significant coverage. The sources which support the text (and the only sources I can find after significant searches) include this PowerPoint presentation (where the text reads "Potential Station at Kylemore" and nothing else), this politician's press release (where again we have four words "new station at Kylemore"), this news story (again where the subject is barely mentioned in passing), and this webpage/article (where the subject is discussed in a little more depth, but mainly/only to confirm that the subject does not exist beyond a notional concept and is not planned or funded as part of ANY transport dev project). The subject falls well below any reasonable WP:SIGCOV threshold. In a "flip" of the WP:EXIST essay, the scant sources just confirm that the subject DOESN'T exist. And do not support notability. Guliolopez ( talk) 17:37, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 20:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable translator not coming close to meeting WP:GNG. Surprised this is here since 2008. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 17:26, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 20:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. Found nothing in a WP:BEFORE search and no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator ( talk) 17:16, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 20:53, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
The page has been draftified twice 1 2, which makes this the third time the article has been created. As AfD is the listed method of dispute resolution over draftification ( WP:DRAFTOBJECT), I am listing it here – this seems to still be unfit for mainspace. Giraffer ( talk· contribs) 16:55, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no remaining deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 05:04, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:SOURCES. I found this link from Variety on my WP:BEFORE search. It needs more coverage in order to be eligible. The Film Creator ( talk) 16:45, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 20:53, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable baseball player. Fbdave ( talk) 15:23, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 20:53, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable compilation album by a non-notable record label. Fails NALBUM, no significant coverage or other indication of notability. Lennart97 ( talk) 15:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Toys "R" Us#Mascot. RL0919 ( talk) 21:18, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Reviewed as a part of New Page patrol. No indication of wp:notability for a stand-alone article. No wp:notabiliy- suitable sources (actually there are no sources at all) I would have just converted to a redirect but it looks like this has already been done many times before. North8000 ( talk) 15:06, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is she's not yet notable. I will draftify at the suggestion of LiAnna_(Wiki_Ed) as there's no reason not to. Star Mississippi 14:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable sculptures. The best press mention for her is this NYT article, but it is a trivial mention. Bbarmadillo ( talk) 14:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW keep as satisfies WP:NPOL as a state representative. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 ( talk) 03:13, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable Ethiopian academic. I failed to find high quality press mentions at reliable sources for him. Bbarmadillo ( talk) 14:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:52, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Biography of a mayor, not properly sourced as passing WP:NPOL #2. To be fair, this was created at a time when our inclusion criteria for mayors was "inherently notable if the city has crossed the 50K bar in population", but that was deprecated several years ago -- in 2021, the notability bar for mayors requires a substantial and well-sourced article that establishes the significance of their mayoralty by addressing specific things they did, specific projects they spearheaded, specific effects they had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. But this basically just documents that he existed as mayor, and is referenced entirely to primary sources that aren't support for notability at all, which is exactly the kind of article about a mayor that caused us to deprecate the old "50K = free pass" standard. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the referencing from having to be considerably better than this. Bearcat ( talk) 18:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
10:16, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:55, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:34, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NORG due to lack of depth in coverage. It is a privately owned stadium owned by a legislator. It is a commercial org too. All stadiums are companies too. Venkat TL ( talk) 11:54, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America 1000 11:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
extensive promotional articles, as typical for performers--even minor performers like her, with no major roles to her credit and no awards. DGG ( talk ) 04:14, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
06:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:46, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per relatively low participation. North America 1000 11:44, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Biography of a mayor, not properly sourced as passing WP:NPOL #2. To be fair, this was created at a time when our inclusion criteria for mayors was "inherently notable if the city has crossed the 50K bar in population", but that was deprecated several years ago -- in 2021, the notability bar for mayors requires a substantial and well-sourced article that establishes the significance of their mayoralty by addressing specific things they did, specific projects they spearheaded, specific effects they had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. But this basically just documents that he existed as mayor, and is referenced entirely to primary sources that aren't support for notability at all, which is exactly the kind of article about a mayor that caused us to deprecate the old "50K = free pass" standard. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the referencing from having to be considerably better than this. Bearcat ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
10:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:37, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Limited participation and no agreement. Note that WP:G12 could still be pursued if copyright violations are proved. RL0919 ( talk) 21:27, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
This fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage in independent mainstream media. Given sources only give passing mentions. Venkat TL ( talk) 06:47, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
10:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:36, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 11:40, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
the topic of this article Fails wikipedia Notability , there is NO evidence of Notability Samat lib ( talk) 10:18, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:35, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:53, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Lists it's facebook page as a source. Reads like a corporate blurb. Kleuske ( talk) 11:16, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Simione001 ( talk) 10:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:03, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm not seeing much in the way of independent sources that would satisfy WP:GNG. Clarityfiend ( talk) 10:25, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:05, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
No indication of notability per WP:BASIC or WP:NMUSIC. –– FormalDude talk 09:59, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is that subject is notable and there's sourcing well beyond the needs of BLP. Copyvio, if proven to be present, can be dealt with editorially/via rev del. Star Mississippi 15:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio - Earwig reports copyvio from 4 sources. Page creator blocked indef for extensive and repeated copyright violations. Page is not likely to get repaired. Whiteguru ( talk) 09:45, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't meet software notability guidelines. Couldn't find multiple reliable third-party sources on the topic -- it's mostly user-submitted reviews or brief mentions. Citing ( talk) 17:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
*Keep I was able to find
a product review by Venturebeat, which is considered a reliable source. It has also received coverage from
a Polish news source and is the subject of
this research study. The software has also been included in several manuals:
[9],
[10],
[11],
[12],
[13]. This passes
WP:NSOFT.
Heartmusic678 (
talk) 15:28, 1 December 2021 (UTC) I change my vote to Delete
Heartmusic678 (
talk)
11:04, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk)
08:45, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There are some valid concerns raised about inclusion and naming, but there is no conensus to delete this list. Equally, there isn't a strong consensus present to keep the material, however a no consensus defaults to the content being kept. Star Mississippi 16:10, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
A list of one entry is not a list, this list article seems pointless, wikipedia is not a directory. Article fails WP:NLIST. Govvy ( talk) 14:26, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk)
08:38, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. —ScottyWong— 07:51, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY. A clear case of WP:ONEEVENT. BlameRuiner ( talk) 21:24, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: 5 keeps claiming gng is met, four delete / merges on the grounds that whilst he has clearly received widespread coverage internationally for being the oldest player the is a case of
WP:ONEEVENT. Need a clearer consensus, would be useful to provide sources for the claim that he has also received coverage for his "notable stage business".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Fenix down (
talk)
23:39, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Missvain (
talk)
04:24, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Fenix down (
talk)
08:22, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. —ScottyWong— 07:52, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
This is, and really always should be, a dictionary definition, not an encyclopedia article. Qwirkle ( talk) 07:54, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
This article relies heavily on a single source (United States Conference of Catholic Bishops document on the Book of Revelation). The article makes selections from this document. Article fails GNG, it is copy and paraphrase of one document and its chapters cited 27 times. Whiteguru ( talk) 07:50, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Moved to mainspace without the required AfC. Coverage is based on company-sponsored press-releases. Bbarmadillo ( talk) 07:39, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:54, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Procedural nomination after speedy deletion was overturned at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2021 November 19. Daniel ( talk) 06:44, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
I also removed to duplicate references from the article. Geschichte ( talk) 11:36, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
07:28, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
WP:NEO, only the subject of one study, no indication that is a notable topic. Secondary pop-science coverage is reporting on the same study. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 05:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
At first glance this mostly-unsourced article seems like something that could be improved by simply adding sources, but a deeper look shows that the prohibited activities are either not unique to transit (smoking, solicitation, vagrancy, disorderly conduct), unremarkable (audio devices, mobile phones, space considerations) or better covered elsewhere (photography, eating and drinking, bicycles). I just don't see the potential for a coherent or useful article here. – dlthewave ☎ 05:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Minor road junction - I can find basically no coverage for this particular Six Mile Corner. There's a road junction and bait shop near Lake Sakakawea that I turned up more coverage about, but I don't think the bait shop/junction there is notable either. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Hog Farm Talk 05:32, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
This is across the river from Bristol, and the situation is essentially the same, with two small twists. First, there;s a sort of suburban community southeast of the historical siding/station (the line has been taken up since), but a trip back through the topos show the two have no connection. Second, it would be awfully nice if the articles related what the sources actually said. In this case, it turns out that Horlicks is not really "a type of hot drink": it is "a brand of malted milk", which is also what the article on the foodstuff says as well. In this case it makes no real difference, but really, we do have some obligation towards accuracy. In any case, it's just another non-notable siding/station. Mangoe ( talk) 05:29, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
This is actually the site of the Scoria Point Overlook in Theodore Roosevelt National Park. Normally, I'd just redirect it, but I can find no evidence that this actually known as Scoria Point Corner, the overlook is simply known as Scoria Point. As this is not a correct name for the place, it should be simply deleted. Hog Farm Talk 05:22, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per relatively low participation. North America 1000 11:35, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Biography of a mayor, not properly sourced as passing WP:NPOL #2. To be fair, this was created at a time when our inclusion criteria for mayors was "inherently notable if the city has crossed the 50K bar in population", but that was deprecated several years ago -- in 2021, the notability bar for mayors requires a substantial and well-sourced article that establishes the significance of their mayoralty by addressing specific things they did, specific projects they spearheaded, specific effects they had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. But this basically just documents that he existed as mayor, and is referenced entirely to primary sources that aren't support for notability at all, which is exactly the kind of article about a mayor that caused us to deprecate the old "50K = free pass" standard. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the referencing from having to be considerably better than this. Bearcat ( talk) 18:41, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
23:50, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
04:30, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 05:16, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
There is no sources from any news company, and nothing here that point's to it being notable. Lectrician2 ( talk) 04:20, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 11:11, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable student short film. Article was created by an WP:SPA, who also created a page about the producer, Robert Tutak, which has been deleted twice. The sources include one 220-word capsule review, not by a professional film critic, but by a sub-editor of a lifestyle magazine who "loves telling stories through makeup" (in case you're wondering, she doesn't say anything about the makeup in the film). That's the only independent source.
The Clermont-Ferrand International Short Film Festival is a notable festival, but the page there is a stock description by the filmmakers. It doesn't show that the film was nominated for or received any award there. bdnews24.com is a primary source interview with the director. The trailer on YouTube and its Facebook page are not independent. The remaining sources are non-notable film festival sites or their partners. WP:MOSFILM advises discretion when mentioning festival awards because of the proliferation of film festivals and "award mills". No better sources found through the usual searches, in English and Bengali. Does not meet WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. Worldbruce ( talk) 02:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
04:04, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. —ScottyWong— 07:53, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
We're out of the plains here, so no grain elevators, but that doesn't mean there aren't plenty of sidings pretending to be "unincorporated communities" This one's typical: the "few homes" appear to be one house with a barn and nearly a mile away, another house. That hasn't changed since 1960, and I find nothing saying things were different earlier. Mangoe ( talk) 03:35, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:13, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
There is nothing notable about this alleged crime. It is a routine homicide and fails WP:NCRIME. It does not warrant a Wikipedia article. WWGB ( talk) 03:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to Architecture of Chicago. Mostly already done. Sandstein 08:59, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
This location is now a Baptist church. Page doesn't appear relevant, now, unless the building itself should have a page. Twowrites ( talk) 03:07, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
List of Hotels in Sudan by State
Incomplete list that does not satisfy the notability criteria for stand-alone lists or the criteria for stand-alone lists. Most of the items in the list are unreferenced and therefore unverifiable. This article was moved from article space to draft space once, and has been moved back to article space with no change except 'by state' added to the title without changing the content. Moving it back to draft space again would be move-warring, so letting the community decide. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 10:06, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Subject of the article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them a before search turns up nothing cogent, he is a musician but no criterion from WP:MUSICBIO is met, all refs used in the article are sourced predominantly to unreliable or user generated sources Celestina007 ( talk) 00:00, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:07, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Subject fails to meet notability. Very little coverage of the subject outside of passing mentions as a former "second in command" of Combat 18, "alleged leader" of the White Wolves etc. What little info there is on the subject can be merged into those two articles, if it is not present there already. ToeSchmoker ( talk) 17:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Survived
previous VFD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:04, 4 December 2021 (UTC)