Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< December 10 December 12 >

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Vehicle recycling. The nominator having concurred with the proposal for merge and all outstanding !votes being to merge, I'm going ahead and closing this as a "speedy merge" variant of SK1. The Bushranger One ping only 02:02, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Cash for cars

Cash for cars (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable topic, already covered by vehicle recycling. JackFromReedsburg ( talk | contribs) 23:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. JackFromReedsburg ( talk | contribs) 23:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. JackFromReedsburg ( talk | contribs) 23:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 16:05, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Cherokee Capital Fair

Cherokee Capital Fair (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Not PROD'able because it was PROD'd and de-PROD'd in 2009. Source provided is a single line in a citizen-written encyclopedia (check their about page), with nothing substantive and non-local found on a search. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 23:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 16:15, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Factorization of the mean

Factorization of the mean (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a real term. The two references are about debris flows but don't appear to use the term "factorization of the mean". A previous version of the article claims the term was introduced in 2012 (after both references were published) by Pudasaini, an author who the article creator was blatantly promoting through their edits. Google hits are all about "Factorization of the mean X" (like "Factorization of the mean activity coefficients"). power~enwiki ( π, ν) 22:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 22:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 16:15, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Why Does Popcorn Pop?

Why Does Popcorn Pop? (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a notable book. No sources in the article and coverage found is the standard book sellers, GoodReads, etc; plus citations in the "Uncle John's Bathroom Reader" series. No substantial coverage. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 22:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 22:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 17:57, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Hypermuseum

Hypermuseum (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to entirely consist of original research. I've been able to look through about half of the citations, which are hard to follow up on due to the lack of hyperlinks or page numbers, and have not found the phrase "hypermuseum" or any derivation thereof in any of the sources that I have been able to track down. Searching on Google Scholar, there are a fair number of hits for "Hypermuseum", but the concept described in those articles is completely distinct from the definition given here: the former appears to be a virtual museum platform ( [1]), whereas this article describes hypermuseums as museums that are architectural masterpieces in their own right. There may be some content here worth using somewhere on Wikipedia, but as written the article appears to coin a new term from whole cloth, which isn't acceptable. signed, Rosguill talk 22:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 22:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 22:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. I have encountered much difficulty trying to access the sources cited in the article, and in the sources I was able to gain access to, there was no mention of the concept of a hypermuseum. This is the only source I could find which even mentioned the concept. Therefore, this article at best describes an obscure, coined research term which ought to be deleted per WP:NEO and WP:OR. As an alternative to deletion, it may be possible for some of the useful information in the article to be selectively merged to an appropriate title such as museum architecture. However, much of the information in the article is couched in the terms of a hypermuseum (which as mentioned falls within WP:NEO, and as such the passages probably need a fundamental rewrite before they could be usable. Unless someone is willing to perform the merge, or otherwise demonstrate widespread usage of the term in the academia / news, my delete vote stays. -- Dps04 ( talk) 13:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per WP:NEO and because this is an essay full of OR. Mccapra ( talk) 06:30, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete appears to fail on WP:NOR and WP:NEO and has WP:NPOV issues. KylieTastic ( talk) 17:20, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

JRJR Networks

JRJR Networks (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is/was (status unknown following bankruptcy) a holding company for some MLM firms, including Longaberger Baskets. This was a no-consensus close in 2014 and other than some coverage of the 2018 struggles of its constituent orgs, there's nothing since that time that would establish notability of the parent company. Coverage appears limited to name drops and nothing significant. StarM 19:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. StarM 19:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. StarM 19:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:25, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: No significant coverage. My assertion is if the only significant coverage is that of a closure, it still isn't significant. Additional issues with the article exist including a reliance on mostly Press Releases for sources and links to their subsidiaries, if it were to be kept should be a WP:TNT situation (I still vote delete and stay that way.) ~RAM ( talk) 09:51, 14 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Like the nom the references I find are related to Longaberger Baskets, which does not provide notability for the subject of the article. I don't see any claims in the article the lead me to believe there is anything to meet WP:GNG Jeepday ( talk) 18:03, 16 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete sources are dead links, unrelated or PR - a quick google fails to show notability - so fails WP:ORG/ WP:GNG. KylieTastic ( talk) 17:24, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. blatant hoax — Kusma ( t· c) 11:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Devira Faradiba

Devira Faradiba (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This one looks like a hoax as well. I can find no record of such a player for Fiorentina. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG unless this can be reliably sourced. Spiderone 18:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 18:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as an article about her book ( Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters) which according to this discussion is the notable topic here. If that is not done, the article can be renominated. Sandstein 21:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Abigail Shrier

Abigail Shrier (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reasons for listing:

  1. The article does not appear to independently establish notability of the subject to create a WP:BLP.
  2. The sole claim to notability appears to be controversy surrounding the publication of the book Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters; as such, the policy Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#People_notable_for_only_one_event applies. "The general rule is to cover the event, not the person."

While there may eventually be enough WP:RS coverage regarding the book and the book's controversy, right now there are very few viable sources for even that. IHateAccounts ( talk) 18:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:53, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:53, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • keep I dont agree that all sources are surrounding the book and that this is about an event. She also has in depth coverage about her and discussions of the "transgender" subject. There are sources from WSJ and Chicago Tribune, which are very credible publications. It pass [WP:GNG]]. Peter303x ( talk) 21:27, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Can you clarify which specific sources you believe pass WP:RS? One of the Wall Street Journal articles only mentions her in passing as having once been interviewed on Joe Rogan's podcast, the other is a non- WP:RS opinion column. Likewise, the Chicago Tribune article is an opinion column and does not pass WP:RS. None of these three establish notability. IHateAccounts ( talk) 21:45, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
@ Philafrenzy: In order to address your claims that even "the book is notable due to the significant in depth coverage of it in reliable sources", we need you to indicate which sources you believe those are. Peter303x was good enough to indicate their belief that the WSJ and Chicago Tribune sources qualified above, and I have addressed those directly. Can you please provide the sources you believe qualify, so that these can be checked? IHateAccounts ( talk) 00:19, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Shrier is only notable for this book, and there are not enough WP:RS to discuss her without introducing a bias. Bravetheif ( talk) 23:55, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep or merge into an article about the book. The book has received a lot of coverage and debate, and a number of the references in the article specifically mention Shrier in the headline (The Sunday Times, Media Matters for America, The Orion, Chicago Tribune). Abbyjjjj96 ( talk) 17:44, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: The book is clearly notable, with coverage from Gay City News, The Christian Post, Chicago Tribune and Psychology Today. There is no currently existing article about the book, so we can't merge it, but if people want to rename & shift the article's focus to be about the book, I think that would be fine. — Toughpigs ( talk) 18:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, rename, and shift topic to book. Most of the sourcing is primarily about the book, not about Shrier, and WP:BLP1E strongly suggests that we should not focus on Shrier when she is only notable for publishing a notable book. Gbear605 ( talk) 18:16, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Rename and restructure to be about the book. I don't see that the author meets the notability standard at all. Right now this is an article about a book trying to cram itself into a BLP framework. Crossroads -talk- 05:32, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment Under WP:AUTHOR (which includes journalists) a person is likely to be notable if they have created a "significant or well-known work" which this seems to be as there is consensus the book is notable, and it has been the subject of "multiple independent periodical articles or reviews" which her book has. The public will not understand how a book can be notable but not its author - particularly where it is so clearly aligned with her personal views - and will want to learn more about the author. Philafrenzy ( talk) 13:26, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply

KEEP. Why does something controversial need to be deleted? Another indication of the insanity of our times. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.184.15.46 ( talk) 20:01, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The question isn't about whether or not to talk about it but whether to move it into a separate article for the book. ~ El D. ( talk to me) 20:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Create an article for the book, return for discussion afterwards - the book is clearly notable, creating an article for it first and then AfDing the BLP would give a clear basis to understand what else is mentioned in RSes besides the book. ~ El D. ( talk to me) 20:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. The book is notable for its extreme controversy. But it isn't a significant monument; it's having a moment. She isn't really notable outside of the one book (on which an article should probably be written). This is at best a case of WP:TOOSOON. Some of the sources cited are articles of her own authorship even! FalconK ( talk) 04:11, 17 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 18:43, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Prisdo Aun Dhaifullah

Prisdo Aun Dhaifullah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Genuinely struggling to find any evidence of notability for this person; the sources in the article don't mention him at all. Getting Wikipedia mirrors and little else when searching online. Appears to fail WP:BASIC and WP:GNG by a long way. Could this be a hoax? Spiderone 18:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 18:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 18:42, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Toyoji Takahashi

Toyoji Takahashi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL. While he was selected for the 1936 Summer Olympics team, he did not appear in a match. Lettler hello • contribs 18:38, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Lettler hello • contribs 18:38, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Lettler hello • contribs 18:38, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 18:45, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:CSD#G7. Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 11:25, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Transition (2020)

Transition (2020) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable film, the only marginally decent source, The Hindu is actually just PR gibberish, presumably submitted to the paper given the lack of byline. Praxidicae ( talk) 18:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 18:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 18:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 18:00, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Clyde, Imperial County, California

Clyde, Imperial County, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Dunes, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Frink, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Iris, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Mesquite, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Pope, Imperial County, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Ruthven, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Tortuga, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

To try to save some time, we have a series of sidings/points on the ex-SP line through the desert of California. They all have more or less identical articles, and on the map they all look the same: a rail line (now double-tracked) running along side a road, usually with a distinctive pattern of berms to channel flash flood runoff, and nothing else whatsoever except the desert floor and very spare vegetation. It is hard to imagine that any of these could ever have been settlements. Mangoe ( talk) 18:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 18:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 18:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 18:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Holidaze: The Christmas That Almost Didn't Happen

Holidaze: The Christmas That Almost Didn't Happen (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find zero independent coverage of this – no reviews, nothing. Indeed, the article is so sparse in content, I can't even tell if this ever aired on television, or is a simply direct-to-video offering. Regardless, the article has been unsourced for over a decade, and I can't find any independent coverage of it (i.e. a WP:GNG fail), so there is zero evidence that this topic is notable enough for an article. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 16:54, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 16:54, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 16:54, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs ( talk) 17:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 18:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Bertram, California

Bertram, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

"Located on the Southern Pacific Railroad" and little other text translates to "isolated siding and not a settlement", as usual. There's still a pair of passing sidings here beside the Salton Sea, but plainly not a settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 16:35, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 16:40, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 16:40, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nielsen Pearson. Missvain ( talk) 18:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The Nielsen Pearson Band

The Nielsen Pearson Band (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM. Was deprodded with the rationale, "article seems good enough to pass WP:NALBUM with the sources indicated." Ref #1 is not independent. Ref #3 is mainly about Meat Loaf, which the band appeared with at a concert, and has exactly a single sentence about the band, zero about this album. Ref #4 is simple listing with some of the recording personnel, not an in-depth review. Ref #4 is the only source which is more than a single line about the album, and is a short blurb about the album, not an in-depth review. Onel5969 TT me 16:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 16:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. The title confused me, I was wondering why a band was included in the Albums and songs AfD category. But then I saw that "The Nielsen Pearson Band" is the name of the album, which I find rather strange (the name of the actual band is simply "Nielsen Pearson", which on the contrary, sounds like a person's name to me). But anyways, I fully agree with nom and I couldn't find anything reliable about this album, only the standard youtube videos, streaming links, retail sites, short blurbs and blogs. GhostDestroyer100 ( talk) 11:38, 16 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to the band article at Nielsen Pearson. The album is non-notable in its own right, but its title could be a search term for someone seeking the album OR the band, since it looks like the band tried to get fancy with a cryptic album title. So there's no harm if a search ends up at the band's article. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 17:35, 16 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note - Just to make things even more complicated, the band's second album had another poorly-considered title: Nielsen/Pearson (note the clever slash). That album article has also been tagged for notability, though it did generate a hit single. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 17:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 18:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Acolita, California

Acolita, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An extremely isolated siding in the middle of a vast wasteland. Mangoe ( talk) 16:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 16:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 16:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 18:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Ladylike (web series)

Ladylike (web series) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

ZERO reliable sources. Searches are hampered by the commonality of the name, but could not find enough to show it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 16:14, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 17:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:37, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Alexey Kryukov (historian)

AfDs for this article:
Alexey Kryukov (historian) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article makes no claim about his work that would indicate he is in any way a notable academic. The sourcing is totally inadequate for a biography of a living person and does not pass GNG. A search for more information on him turned up no substantial sources that would overcome these drawbacks John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 15:25, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 15:25, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Amir Joy

Amir Joy (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability. I am unable to verify the claims about being "the" (or "a") Egyptian boxing champ or competing in the Olympics qualifications, and I can't find reliable independent sources about him as a writer either. "Theupcomingco" doesn't look like a reliable source, they are "interviews" with standard questions by an obscure site, no actual reporting is done. The other are booksellers and primary sources. Fram ( talk) 15:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Fram ( talk) 15:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. Fram ( talk) 15:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Fram ( talk) 15:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete: I can't find any evidence of a boxer by that name and the references provided do nothing towards satisfying GNG. – 2. O. Boxing 15:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Possibly ( talk) 16:58, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:37, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Tambo, California

Tambo, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another passing siding in the middle of an agricultural area. Mangoe ( talk) 14:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 14:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 14:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Goodrich Community Primary School

Goodrich Community Primary School (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources talking about the subject in significant detail found in a WP:BEFORE search. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. SK2242 ( talk) 14:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. SK2242 ( talk) 14:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SK2242 ( talk) 14:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Zack Friedman

Zack Friedman (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page reads like a resume. It is rarely neutral, and feels exactly like one of the many articles for creation that gets declined every day. It was created in 2012 when, I assume, the standard of "qualifying for a Wikipedia article" was less enforced. Zack Friedman does NOT show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. The sources are all from organizations affiliated with Zack Friedman, or are simply proof of his existence. He just doesn't meet the standard of "notable." Bizmilk3 ( talk) 02:18, 4 December 2020 (UTC)— Bizmilk3 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply

Comment respectably, this is a fake account named Bizmilk that created this deletion page. This person is personally attacking Mr. Friedman with a personal agenda and stating false statements. After updating this article, I noticed that this author says untrue things like not having reliable secondary sources when there are many like cnbc, bloomberg and many others. Just sayin.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:39, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:40, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:40, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Comment the article definitely over-relies on primary sources. One source which looked promising was the last reference, but it's dead, hopefully someone can rescue it. I did a quick Google search, I couldn't find much. Hmanburg ( talk) 13:11, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 14:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Advertisement. Should this businessman eventually be notable per independent sources, the text as is is so non-neutral, best delete for now. Leo Breman ( talk) 16:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Pure WP:PROMO material better suited for his LinkedIn profile. KidAd talk 21:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Agree this doesn't fit current standards. It doesn't seem like neutral information/sources even exist User:lex9000 2:41, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:TNT and WP:NOTRESUME. In theory, giving a TEDx talk can count towards notability, but is not automatic. Bearian ( talk) 15:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. Rescued some sources here and fixed the broken link. Removed some biographical info and any language that didnt appear neutral. Sources now include Newsweek, CNBC, Business Insider, Jewish Business News plus Success Magazine and Publishers Weekly. None of these sources appear to be linked to him in any way, and are therefore independent, major secondary sources. comment added by Terjar12 ( talk • contribs) 23:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC) — Terjar12 reply
  • Comment respectably, this is a fake account named Bizmilk that created this deletion page. This person is personally attacking Mr. Friedman with a personal agenda and stating false statements. After updating this article, I noticed that this author says untrue things like not having reliable secondary sources when there are many like cnbc, bloomberg and many others. Just sayin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terjar12 ( talk • contribs)
  • Delete. This is a guy who has gone to school and had a few jobs, just like millions of other people. Being profiled a couple times and writing op-eds is not notable. FalconK ( talk) 04:18, 17 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Jhimli Roy

Jhimli Roy (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON; no significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:FILMMAKER. GSS  💬 13:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS  💬 13:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS  💬 13:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:37, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Mahesh Savani

Mahesh Savani (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Repeatedly recreated over and over again. Has been deleted as WP:G11 only yesterday but got created again last night. PROD was contested without reason. Concern was Fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC and any other applicable guideline. Significant WP:COI concern. Also see Maheshbhai Savani. Spiderone 13:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:31, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:31, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Harbor Pointe Credit Union

Harbor Pointe Credit Union (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can find anything to show this passes WP:ORG, created by a single purpose account with undisclosed WP:COI as they appear to work in th subjects marketing dept (from name matching), with no sources after 4 years KylieTastic ( talk) 13:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 13:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Isabelle Reine

Isabelle Reine (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Virtually zero in-depth coverage, so she fails WP:GNG, and doesn't pass WP:MUSICBIO. Onel5969 TT me 13:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 13:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - This may be an autobiography or a COI creation by a promo-only editor, as the article creator, Beeb28, seems to only work on articles/drafts promoting her, her songs or her record company Beeb Music. Netherzone ( talk) 14:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - I really wonder how articles like this get through the AfC process. There is a committed team of volunteers there, helping new Wikipedia editors write articles with proper formatting and grammar and presentation. And yet somehow nobody on that team does a basic notability check? Or as I have seen argued a few times, an author sends their AfC article to mainspace prematurely, in which case the AfC team needs tougher oversight processes. As for Ms. Reine, I wish her luck as she launches her music career, and she is surely pounding away at the usual self-created streaming and social media services to spread the word. But she has no significant and reliable media coverage to come anywhere close to the requirements for musical notability. Charitably it is too soon for an article; less charitably this is another attempted promotion. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 14:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
      • Comment - User:Doomsdayer520 - This article was not approved by AFC. This article was in AFC, and was then moved into article space twice by the author, not by AFC reviewers, and was moved back into draft space once by a New Page Reviewer. There is an incorrect tag on such articles, which states that they were approved in AFC, which actually means that they were in AFC and were moved into article space. The tag may also correctly be on articles that were accepted, but where the script did not finish cleanup. In this case the tag is incorrect. Robert McClenon ( talk) 15:44, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Note to others - I have been convinced elsewhere that this glitch in the AfC process is not particularly common and it was unfair of me to imply that it happens a lot. Some of us are discussing possible procedural ideas elsewhere. Now back to the discussion at hand... --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 23:14, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - I disagree with the notion that the sources are not sourced well enough. everything is located there. I see countless articles with little or zero sources at all and they are there forever. I also disagree with the implication that I wrote this article with the intent to self promote. I am a fan of the artist and I was doing it to help out the artist and fans I have no direct connection with the artist. so i don't appreciate that accusation. Beeb28 14:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - Netherzone, "seems to only work on articles/drafts promoting her, her songs or her record company Beeb Music" is not true, firstly I again want to make clear I am a fan with no direct connection and that I wrote things based on the internet. my username was in reference to the artist because I like the music. I have worked on quite a few other musical wikis like Keith Tippet and Gordian Knot. The reason why it seems like I have only worked on one topic is I was working on connecting everything together for a seamless experience if anyone came onto the page Beeb28 15:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beeb28 ( talk • contribs)
  • I did not make the direct accusation against Beeb28 (though I do think the article's writing style is too promotional), but I think we can accept Beeb28's claims of good faith. However, that still accomplishes nothing for the musician's notability, which is what needs to be discussed here. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 15:35, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • @ Beeb28: thank you for your comments, and for your interest in Wikipedia and your efforts here. WP is an encyclopedia, it's not a venue for promoting non-notable content just because one is a fan. That is what websites, social media or sites like LinkedIn, etc. are for. In my comment below, I've linked some things (as have the editors above) - these may be helpful in familiarizing you with some of WP's policies and guidelines. Regarding my comment about a possible autobio or COI, it struck me as quite odd that your username pretty much matches the name of her music company, however, I'll take your word for it that you are not a directly connected editor. Netherzone ( talk) 15:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
I'd also like to note my delete vote includes all the other crap related to this in mainspace, which has since been moved to draft by the creator, to avoid continued tendetious editing. Praxidicae ( talk) 13:51, 14 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Praxidicae, "delete with fire yikes" this is a very inflammatory remark. I appreciate everyone else being civil with the process but you are not. I'm not a veteran wikipedia user so I make mistakes Beeb28 16:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment to User:Beeb28 - Harry S. Truman said, "If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen." Robert McClenon ( talk) 22:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment - There are other deletion techniques used in AFD besides fire, such as silver bullets. Robert McClenon ( talk) 22:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • @ Beeb28: Could you please explain why all of the files you uploaded to Commons in relation to this artist, her music and her record company are credited to you as "own work" and with either Isabelle Reine or Beeb Music credited as the "Author"? Thank you. Netherzone ( talk) 16:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Hi yes I put the artist's name and/or label in the copyright section. and I had emailed the label for permission to use the images. I'm not used to Wikipedia so i don't exactly know how to use commons. I have since changed it to fix the error. Thanks Beeb28 17:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
@ Beeb28: If I'm not mistaken, you need to send that email regarding licencing permissions to OTRS at Commons, if you have not already done so. Editors, please correct me if I'm wrong about that. Netherzone ( talk) 20:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
@ Netherzone: You are right. The permissions granted by the owner should be sent for review which takes up to 2 weeks. Also the guys at the OTRS do not accept permission sent from generic email accounts, they require an official verifiable email account. Less Unless ( talk) 22:35, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
-- Cabayi ( talk) 10:43, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment to User:Cabayi - The last six pages in your list are drafts. Deletion of drafts is considered at MFD, and my guess is that the drafts would not be deleted if a request were made to delete them. Notability is not considered at MFD, because one of the uses of draft space is for a subject that does not currently meet notability, and are normally not deleted simply for COI. Drafts are typically deleted for disruptive editing, and we haven't seen disruptive editing here. If you want to comment on the drafts to recommend that they be rejected, that is all right. Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:39, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply
But, as you've already pointed out, it's one " walled garden of articles about this artist and her works." I believe WP:NOTBURO & WP:NOTSUICIDE apply. Cabayi ( talk) 18:53, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep. The nominator has withdrawn the nominator. Clear consensus to keep, and only delete !vote is simply a "Per nom" argument. ( non-admin closure) Foxnpichu ( talk) 20:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Mike Lomax

Mike Lomax (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only claim to notability is from technically passing WP:NFOOTBALL for playing 12 minutes of professional football for Macclesfield; a totally inconsequential substitute appearance. I could find no evidence of being able to pass WP:GNG from this appearance alone or from his subsequent amateur career. There is a growing consensus that footballers that only just pass NFOOTY can and should be deleted if GNG is comprehensively failed. These were the best secondary sources that I could find [2] [3] [4] [5]. Spiderone 12:54, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:55, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:55, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:55, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Sean Walsh (producer)

Sean Walsh (producer) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded with the rationale fails WP:NOTABLE, but the edit summary did not state the article was being PRODDED, so here we are. I didn't see the sort of coverage to indicate a pass of WP:GNG or I guess WP:NCREATIVE(?), the link in the article that purports to be "Sean Walsh featured in the Sydney Morning Herald" is really just a passing mention of him, which seems to be the best coverage. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:45, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:45, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Harish Ahuja

Harish Ahuja (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable entrepreneur who fails to satisfy our notability criteria. They lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence fail GNG. WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO are also not satisfied. A before search turns up unreliable self written pieces such as this and announcements Celestina007 ( talk) 12:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Comment The example link above, this, was not written by the article subject. - Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 12:43, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 12:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 12:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 12:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 12:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 12:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment — Are you sure you wouldn’t want to use the AFC process until you understand policies? You just cited both CREATIVE & NACADEMIC for a businessman and If I may ask how does that work? You also agreed that the subject of the article lacked significant coverage which is required by GNG and yet you !voted a keep? Anyway it would be counter intuitive if an article creator !voted to delete his own article. Furthermore please see both WP:COI & WP:PAID. Celestina007 ( talk) 07:44, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply
My message on your talk page copying here: Respected Celestina007, Greetings of the day! First of all, I acknowledge your review and every action on the subject page. I am here to seek your advice. After your observations, I have revised many parts of the page. Kindly guide me if it is workable now or I should give up?  Thank you and best regards RAJIVVASUDEV ( talk) 06:58, 12 December 2020 (UTC) RAJIVVASUDEV ( talk) 08:33, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:07, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Daisuke Uchijima

Daisuke Uchijima (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is essentially the same case as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shun Sato (footballer, born 1990), only this footballers played 3 league games for the same club, not 1 game. At least 70 AFD discussions (with more being added every week) say that this is not enough because of the WP:GNG fail. Geschichte ( talk) 12:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:19, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 15:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Shinya Yamagishi

Shinya Yamagishi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is essentially the same case as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shun Sato (footballer, born 1990), only this footballers played 3 league games for the same club, not 1 game. At least 70 AFD discussions (with more being added every week) say that this is not enough because of the WP:GNG fail. Geschichte ( talk) 12:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 15:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Park Myung-eun

Park Myung-eun (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is essentially the same case as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shun Sato (footballer, born 1990), only this footballers played 4 league games for the same club, not 1 game. At least 70 AFD discussions (with more being added every week) say that this is not enough because of the WP:GNG fail. Geschichte ( talk) 12:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:22, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:22, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 15:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Hiroto Takahashi

Hiroto Takahashi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is essentially the same case as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shun Sato (footballer, born 1990), only this footballers played 3 league games for the same club, not 1 game. At least 70 AFD discussions (with more being added every week) say that this is not enough because of the WP:GNG fail. Geschichte ( talk) 12:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 18:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Jihene Ben Jazia

Jihene Ben Jazia (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible COI article of a non notable entrepreneur and social media influencer who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of her thus fails to satisfy GNG & doesn’t satisfy WP:ANYBIO also. A before search reveals nothing imperative or of relevance to GNG. Celestina007 ( talk) 11:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 11:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 11:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 11:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 11:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 11:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 11:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 17:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete nothing close to notable. For those readers like me who were under informed about Tunisia, Mahdia has over 60,000 people. Small fishing villages are normally under 2,000, and that may still be bigger then they are in some people's minds. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:32, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Jihene Ben Jazia is notable in the middle east and tunisia for both her work as a stylist and an influencer. She was featured in several sources: vogue arabia, business news (please see the references in the article) and exposed at tunisia fashion week 2019. Requested changes have been done: Mahdia not being a small village, maison atypik brand to reflect it in a more simple way, carrier to show only experiences that had an impact on her being a stylist. PS: Here I am trying to contribute on north africa subjects coverage (history, design & architecture). This is my first article from scratch and I am willing to contribute more, your feedback will be valuable to me. I vote that this article remains; please let me know if there is any other modification or clarification needed. zamsinus ( talk)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. postdlf ( talk) 15:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply

List of songs recorded by Olly Murs

List of songs recorded by Olly Murs (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Olly Murs discography covers (or should cover) the same ground. Clarityfiend ( talk) 09:55, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 10:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 10:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 10:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. A discography refers to albums, EPs and singles released on vinyl, CD and latterly?, which is the area covered by the OM Discography, whereas this is a list of songs recorded by, and would include songs from the albums (omitted on the discography) and could include unreleased songs, uncredited (but referenced) performances on other people's recordings. Many artists have both and unless your argument is that the Olly Murs list of songs recorded is not substantive, then the list should remain. -- Richhoncho ( talk) 11:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - Aside from being a Featured List, which in itself suggest that it is a viable and useful page otherwise concern would have been raised about it during the reviewing, the Discography page covers albums and singles, i.e. commercial releases, not songs and songwriters. I was the first editor to produce an FL of songs for Rihanna, and subsequently I've done many more for the worlds most famous and successful artists, and other editors have followed and expanded on that blueprint for other artists too, on which many I worked with them on them too. Lists existed prior to the first FL, but not in a maintained or special format, for years prior. The point is that there are now dozens of lists like this, why is this one being singled out for possible deletion? The reason for deletion is pretty weak, bordering on baseless, as you could say this about any list or associated page/article. It's not a valid reason. Not being substantive would be valid for one album, perhaps for only two albums, but Murs has released five albums worth of material as well as many non-album songs and other releases.  —  Calvin999 11:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I was expecting to see just a low-grade list of songs, with nothing else, but htis is a Featured List. Probably best to start with the process to get it removed from the FL list first, if you think it does not meet the FL criteria, instead of going for a delete. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - Usually not fond of lists like these, but this one is well sourced and covered. Foxnpichu ( talk) 20:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Withdraw nomination. "Uncle." Clarityfiend ( talk) 23:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:08, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Delhi School of Excellence

Delhi School of Excellence (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

School does not appear to pass WP:NORG, I cannot find any sources and the article does not currently show notability Garnarblarnar ( talk) 08:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 08:44, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 08:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 08:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Linear Sphere

AfDs for this article:
Linear Sphere (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band. GhostDestroyer100 ( talk) 07:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Second nomination of this article. The first was back in 2014 when the result was "no consensus". One of the users, who is very likely a COI/SPA editor really protested to keep the article, and he said that they are notable because they have been covered by Sea of Tranquility and they have a Metal Archives entry and they have an otherwise blank Allmusic page... I laughed my freaking butt off. First off, Sea of Tranquility is not a reliable source. Second, Metal Archives isn't reliable either, and btw, they have every metal band in the world there, even the ones that were active for one year and they released an EP or demo...so it's not a big deal to have a MA entry. Third, a blank Allmusic page is not a RS either. The band page has to contain a biography to be considered notable, and the album page must contain a staff-written review, and not just a track listing and user reviews. With this out of the way, this is a non-notable progressive metal band. The article is tagged with multiple issues, including notability, which is never a good sign. And the sourcing is dreadful. The only thing that is reliable is the Metal Storm review, because it was written in 2012 and Metal Storm after 2009 counts as reliable. The other sites are not even close to be reliable - Metal Archives, blank Allmusic page, the official site of the band and some blogs whose domain has been long expired or they simply display an error message, and the few that are available do not look reliable, because as I said, they are blogs. During a Google search I couldn't find anything better, therefore I am highly doubtful of this band's notability. So yeah, just another non-notable band. GhostDestroyer100 ( talk) 07:29, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 ( talk) 07:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 ( talk) 07:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 10:28, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

FC Madohi

FC Madohi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails verification, possible WP:HOAX. The one external link was to a page about AD Dili Oeste and not "FC Madohi". The only non-wiki-mirror found is an RSSSF page, which I'm concerned is citing this article. Neither the "Presidente Cup" or "Madohi Stadium" appear anywhere other than this article. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 07:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 07:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 07:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 07:28, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 11:03, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Comment: this team does in fact appear to exist, per this article, so I don't think it's a hoax. Nonetheless, existing doesn't make this team notable and it fails the notability guidelines so I'm happy to nom for delete. ser! ( let's discuss it). 16:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte ( talk) 12:00, 17 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Hawley, California

Hawley, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A rail junction, not a town. THat's what the topos say, and that's what is there now. Mangoe ( talk) 20:32, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mhhossein talk 07:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Shazia Wajahat

Shazia Wajahat (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP does not meet WP:NBIO- coverage is passing mentions, lacks evidence of major roles. MrsSnoozyTurtle ( talk) 20:55, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:57, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:57, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:57, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:58, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mhhossein talk 07:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 18:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Alex Joss

Alex Joss (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability concerns for this dominoes player. I can't find any details about the baz.ch article (not in archive.org), and while FIDO's site is down, [8] confirms that a person of this name won the 2007 title. I have found virtually no other information; a very short 2007 article that says that the world championship was among 80 people is it. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep -- JHunterJ ( talk) 15:56, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Aadu Puli Attam (disambiguation)

Aadu Puli Attam (disambiguation) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough content. All links have been transferred to the hatnote at Lambs and Tigers. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Arnab Jan Deka

Arnab Jan Deka (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article seems both to be blatantly promotional ( G11) and also to fail to indicate significance of its subject. References are not convincing, too. Nalbarian ( talk) 06:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 07:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 07:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 07:01, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 07:02, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

IlohaMail

IlohaMail (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability issues for this email system. I don't see any substantive coverage on Google search, just boilerplate for an Ubuntu package and some security vulnerabilities. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:11, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Michael Hardy

Michael Hardy (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable cricket player. Played one first-class match, no non-statistical (or wiki-mirror) coverage found. Not to be confused with Michael Yardy. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete unless more indepth (non-routine) coverage can be found. Nothing seemed to be available online. Fram ( talk) 08:45, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to List of D. R. Jardine's XI cricketers, which would need to be created. StickyWicket ( talk) 11:39, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete; fails all basic notability standards including SPORTBASIC. No significant coverage; only sources are all-inclusive databases. wjemather please leave a message... 11:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - the complete failure of WP:GNG far surpasses the skin of teeth passing of WP:NCRIC Spiderone 16:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Another extremely minor sportsperson who would have a place on a specialist Fandom site, but not this one. RobinCarmody ( talk) 21:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete or redirect to a suitable list, although I'm not sure in this case that this solution is as suitable. I can find one very brief reference to him in an Oundle history paper and he's not mentions in the relevant public schools sections of Wisden from 1946 or 1947, although he appears in the stats in the 46 edition (14 wickets at 21 - third or fourth on the Oundle list for the 45 season). I can't find a Wisden obit and The Times didn't write a report on the first-classmatch he played in (but was writing about Eton v Harrow at the same time...). Specialist Oundle or TA sources might turn up something a bit more of course, but I think we're going to struggle here to find anything effective in terms of sourcing. I'm not sure that his work as an author will meet that criteria either, assuming it's the same person. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 07:28, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete WP:NSPORTS says "Trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may be used to support content in an article, but it is not sufficient to establish notability. This includes listings in database sources with low, wide-sweeping generic standards of inclusion, such as Sports Reference's college football and basketball databases." This has only that. Reywas92 Talk 08:50, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment. Once this is deleted, as seems very likely, might the name "Michael Hardy" usefully redirect to the country musician whose article is linked in the hatnote, who has this name but is only known by his surname? Seems reasonable if there is (in one very large country at least, even if scarcely anywhere else) a more notable person of this name. RobinCarmody ( talk) 23:31, 17 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - does not pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 01:26, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte ( talk) 08:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Amber Yang

Amber Yang (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not yet notable. Placement of one of the multiple Forbes 30 under 30 lists is not a reliable indicator of anything, , nor is a second-place finish in a high school science fair DGG ( talk ) 06:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. No effort made at the article, deleted. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 06:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Microsoft Office 2022

Microsoft Office 2022 (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CRYSTALBALL. Microsoft Office 2022, as it currently stands, is only a rumor. SMB9 9thx my edits! 06:02, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment. This article has been repeatedly tagged for CSD, but due to insistence from the author (by edit warring over tags), I think AfD is the best way to end this. If you disagree with me, go ahead and close this AfD. SMB9 9thx my edits! 06:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Cream Cutie

Cream Cutie (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable product. Appeared on Dragon's Den in 2008, but no other coverage. Appears to be defunct now, but I'm not entirely sure. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:52, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:52, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:52, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Snowracer

Snowracer (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Google test only finds the Stiga Snowracer, no sources for this band. The content of this article could easily be merged to Martin Landquist. 162.208.168.92 ( talk) 05:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:19, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:19, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. No sources, no discography cited, really short article...and it has been sitting here for 12 years. They have no sewiki entry either. The only thing that indicates some notability is the members, but this can be included in any of their articles. No separate article needed for this. GhostDestroyer100 ( talk) 12:56, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Chris Jeon

Chris Jeon (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E. Coverage is only for the single event of war tourism in the Libyan Civil War, there does not appear to be any followup coverage in the last 9 years, and his role in the war was exceedingly minor. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Libya-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete total failure of the not news, one event, and the third criteria we need to add "not human interest", which is basically if all the articles on someone are human interest pieces they are normally not notable. Also in cases like this multiple articles may more reflect chournalism than anything else. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:01, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Pirates Basketball Club

Pirates Basketball Club (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable amateur basketball team. I have no idea what the "CMG Competition" is. Their website and social media pages exist, but I find no other coverage. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 04:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 04:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 04:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Ramirez, California

Ramirez, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another railroad-siding-not-a-settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 04:39, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 04:45, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 04:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

High Street, Melbourne

High Street, Melbourne (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A couple of streets that happen to share a name, unclear why they are described together or at all, with no assertion of notability or significant coverage about the streets among the many in the city. Reywas92 Talk 04:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Reywas92 Talk 04:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Reywas92 Talk 04:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Per WP:GEOROAD there is absolutely zero notability or historical or cultural significance and "Metropolitan Route 24" apparently does not have an article to merge to. The article is attempting to advance notability on two different streets. Otr500 ( talk) 01:26, 16 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Venture-X

Venture-X (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails verification. I find nothing about this online (most results are about a coworking space called Venture X), and the only reference, "Smygazine", only has results of this page and OCR errors, suggesting that it may not exist either. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 04:29, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 04:29, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 04:29, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 02:11, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Amitava Chakravorty

Amitava Chakravorty (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While he seems to be an emerging figure in a key political party of India, he fails WP:Politician. Created by a single purpose account WP:SPA Palmsandbeaches ( talk) 03:18, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Delete Not notable as per WP:Politician, may be deleted Pinakpani ( talk) 06:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 02:11, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Mello, California

Mello, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A siding which served some sort of grain-processing business, judging from the remains one can see on Streetview. Mangoe ( talk) 03:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 02:10, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Dantoni, California

Dantoni, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It was and is an orchard, and in the past was also the SW end of a passing siding on a SP branch abandoned back in the early 1970s. I found this report of some labor unrest but seeing as how I don't have a book source for it, it couldn't have been very notable. Mangoe ( talk) 03:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 02:03, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Alicia, California

Alicia, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Due to label drift on the topos the GNIS coords are now in the middle of a suburban neighborhood, but going back far enough on the topos shows this was yet another isolated rail spot having nothing to do with any present settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 02:44, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 05:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Caroline Mark Home

Caroline Mark Home (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GEOFEAT. While listed on the National Register of historic places in the 80's, reviewing the nomination states it is only of local significance for architecture. There is no recent coverage per the WP:GNG. ~RAM ( talk) 02:01, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Withdrawn by nominator despite my feelings on this lacking notability with the NRHP article, I will withdraw given TheCatalyst31's additional sources. ~RAM ( talk) 05:55, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. ~RAM ( talk) 02:01, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jared Isaacman. Missvain ( talk) 02:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Harbortouch

AfDs for this article:
Harbortouch (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted page with no notability. Fails WP:CORP. Potential candidate for speedy deletion per WP:CSD#G4 ~RAM ( talk) 01:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ~RAM ( talk) 01:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 02:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 02:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 02:00, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Base4 (software)

Base4 (software) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sources and none found for this defunct software product. Article makes no claims of notability. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 01:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 01:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 02:00, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The Kappa Delta Sorority House at Washington State University

The Kappa Delta Sorority House at Washington State University (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be notable. Not on the National Register of Historic Places, just near one. Sources that mention the house appear to be either by Kappa Delta sorority, or by Washington State University. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fraternities and sororities-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 00:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Mastertrader

Mastertrader (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about a defunct online stockbroker. Article reads promotionally for Greg Capra, the site's founder. I can't find any substantial coverage, though there is a trivial mention in Day Trading for Dummies. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Of note, the NY Times article cited in the wiki page is at [11], and mentions Capra but not Mastertrader. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Although I could not find info that it is defunct, the current website is not about a brokerage, but about a consulting and training company. I also could not find much info online to justify a keep for this. As it is it lacks significant coverage and does not meet notability. Expertwikiguy ( talk) 01:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete The notability claims in the article are mostly along the lines of "one of the" (many). My google did not find anything to meet WP:GNG Jeepday ( talk) 00:50, 17 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:42, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The Nightmares

The Nightmares (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable band. Article has existed since 2008, but was recently hijacked to be about a different non-notable band from Wales; I can find minimal coverage of other non-notable bands of this name ( [12] [13]) but nothing whatsoever about a band of this name from the Czech Republic; could be a WP:HOAX. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
  1. ^ "About – Shahi". Retrieved 2020-12-12.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2020_December_11&oldid=995075754"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< December 10 December 12 >

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Vehicle recycling. The nominator having concurred with the proposal for merge and all outstanding !votes being to merge, I'm going ahead and closing this as a "speedy merge" variant of SK1. The Bushranger One ping only 02:02, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Cash for cars

Cash for cars (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable topic, already covered by vehicle recycling. JackFromReedsburg ( talk | contribs) 23:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. JackFromReedsburg ( talk | contribs) 23:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. JackFromReedsburg ( talk | contribs) 23:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 16:05, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Cherokee Capital Fair

Cherokee Capital Fair (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Not PROD'able because it was PROD'd and de-PROD'd in 2009. Source provided is a single line in a citizen-written encyclopedia (check their about page), with nothing substantive and non-local found on a search. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 23:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 16:15, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Factorization of the mean

Factorization of the mean (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a real term. The two references are about debris flows but don't appear to use the term "factorization of the mean". A previous version of the article claims the term was introduced in 2012 (after both references were published) by Pudasaini, an author who the article creator was blatantly promoting through their edits. Google hits are all about "Factorization of the mean X" (like "Factorization of the mean activity coefficients"). power~enwiki ( π, ν) 22:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 22:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 16:15, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Why Does Popcorn Pop?

Why Does Popcorn Pop? (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a notable book. No sources in the article and coverage found is the standard book sellers, GoodReads, etc; plus citations in the "Uncle John's Bathroom Reader" series. No substantial coverage. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 22:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 22:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 17:57, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Hypermuseum

Hypermuseum (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to entirely consist of original research. I've been able to look through about half of the citations, which are hard to follow up on due to the lack of hyperlinks or page numbers, and have not found the phrase "hypermuseum" or any derivation thereof in any of the sources that I have been able to track down. Searching on Google Scholar, there are a fair number of hits for "Hypermuseum", but the concept described in those articles is completely distinct from the definition given here: the former appears to be a virtual museum platform ( [1]), whereas this article describes hypermuseums as museums that are architectural masterpieces in their own right. There may be some content here worth using somewhere on Wikipedia, but as written the article appears to coin a new term from whole cloth, which isn't acceptable. signed, Rosguill talk 22:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 22:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 22:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. I have encountered much difficulty trying to access the sources cited in the article, and in the sources I was able to gain access to, there was no mention of the concept of a hypermuseum. This is the only source I could find which even mentioned the concept. Therefore, this article at best describes an obscure, coined research term which ought to be deleted per WP:NEO and WP:OR. As an alternative to deletion, it may be possible for some of the useful information in the article to be selectively merged to an appropriate title such as museum architecture. However, much of the information in the article is couched in the terms of a hypermuseum (which as mentioned falls within WP:NEO, and as such the passages probably need a fundamental rewrite before they could be usable. Unless someone is willing to perform the merge, or otherwise demonstrate widespread usage of the term in the academia / news, my delete vote stays. -- Dps04 ( talk) 13:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per WP:NEO and because this is an essay full of OR. Mccapra ( talk) 06:30, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete appears to fail on WP:NOR and WP:NEO and has WP:NPOV issues. KylieTastic ( talk) 17:20, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

JRJR Networks

JRJR Networks (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is/was (status unknown following bankruptcy) a holding company for some MLM firms, including Longaberger Baskets. This was a no-consensus close in 2014 and other than some coverage of the 2018 struggles of its constituent orgs, there's nothing since that time that would establish notability of the parent company. Coverage appears limited to name drops and nothing significant. StarM 19:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. StarM 19:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. StarM 19:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:25, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: No significant coverage. My assertion is if the only significant coverage is that of a closure, it still isn't significant. Additional issues with the article exist including a reliance on mostly Press Releases for sources and links to their subsidiaries, if it were to be kept should be a WP:TNT situation (I still vote delete and stay that way.) ~RAM ( talk) 09:51, 14 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Like the nom the references I find are related to Longaberger Baskets, which does not provide notability for the subject of the article. I don't see any claims in the article the lead me to believe there is anything to meet WP:GNG Jeepday ( talk) 18:03, 16 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete sources are dead links, unrelated or PR - a quick google fails to show notability - so fails WP:ORG/ WP:GNG. KylieTastic ( talk) 17:24, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. blatant hoax — Kusma ( t· c) 11:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Devira Faradiba

Devira Faradiba (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This one looks like a hoax as well. I can find no record of such a player for Fiorentina. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG unless this can be reliably sourced. Spiderone 18:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 18:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as an article about her book ( Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters) which according to this discussion is the notable topic here. If that is not done, the article can be renominated. Sandstein 21:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Abigail Shrier

Abigail Shrier (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reasons for listing:

  1. The article does not appear to independently establish notability of the subject to create a WP:BLP.
  2. The sole claim to notability appears to be controversy surrounding the publication of the book Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters; as such, the policy Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#People_notable_for_only_one_event applies. "The general rule is to cover the event, not the person."

While there may eventually be enough WP:RS coverage regarding the book and the book's controversy, right now there are very few viable sources for even that. IHateAccounts ( talk) 18:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:53, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:53, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • keep I dont agree that all sources are surrounding the book and that this is about an event. She also has in depth coverage about her and discussions of the "transgender" subject. There are sources from WSJ and Chicago Tribune, which are very credible publications. It pass [WP:GNG]]. Peter303x ( talk) 21:27, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Can you clarify which specific sources you believe pass WP:RS? One of the Wall Street Journal articles only mentions her in passing as having once been interviewed on Joe Rogan's podcast, the other is a non- WP:RS opinion column. Likewise, the Chicago Tribune article is an opinion column and does not pass WP:RS. None of these three establish notability. IHateAccounts ( talk) 21:45, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
@ Philafrenzy: In order to address your claims that even "the book is notable due to the significant in depth coverage of it in reliable sources", we need you to indicate which sources you believe those are. Peter303x was good enough to indicate their belief that the WSJ and Chicago Tribune sources qualified above, and I have addressed those directly. Can you please provide the sources you believe qualify, so that these can be checked? IHateAccounts ( talk) 00:19, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Shrier is only notable for this book, and there are not enough WP:RS to discuss her without introducing a bias. Bravetheif ( talk) 23:55, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep or merge into an article about the book. The book has received a lot of coverage and debate, and a number of the references in the article specifically mention Shrier in the headline (The Sunday Times, Media Matters for America, The Orion, Chicago Tribune). Abbyjjjj96 ( talk) 17:44, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: The book is clearly notable, with coverage from Gay City News, The Christian Post, Chicago Tribune and Psychology Today. There is no currently existing article about the book, so we can't merge it, but if people want to rename & shift the article's focus to be about the book, I think that would be fine. — Toughpigs ( talk) 18:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, rename, and shift topic to book. Most of the sourcing is primarily about the book, not about Shrier, and WP:BLP1E strongly suggests that we should not focus on Shrier when she is only notable for publishing a notable book. Gbear605 ( talk) 18:16, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Rename and restructure to be about the book. I don't see that the author meets the notability standard at all. Right now this is an article about a book trying to cram itself into a BLP framework. Crossroads -talk- 05:32, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment Under WP:AUTHOR (which includes journalists) a person is likely to be notable if they have created a "significant or well-known work" which this seems to be as there is consensus the book is notable, and it has been the subject of "multiple independent periodical articles or reviews" which her book has. The public will not understand how a book can be notable but not its author - particularly where it is so clearly aligned with her personal views - and will want to learn more about the author. Philafrenzy ( talk) 13:26, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply

KEEP. Why does something controversial need to be deleted? Another indication of the insanity of our times. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.184.15.46 ( talk) 20:01, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The question isn't about whether or not to talk about it but whether to move it into a separate article for the book. ~ El D. ( talk to me) 20:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Create an article for the book, return for discussion afterwards - the book is clearly notable, creating an article for it first and then AfDing the BLP would give a clear basis to understand what else is mentioned in RSes besides the book. ~ El D. ( talk to me) 20:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. The book is notable for its extreme controversy. But it isn't a significant monument; it's having a moment. She isn't really notable outside of the one book (on which an article should probably be written). This is at best a case of WP:TOOSOON. Some of the sources cited are articles of her own authorship even! FalconK ( talk) 04:11, 17 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 18:43, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Prisdo Aun Dhaifullah

Prisdo Aun Dhaifullah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Genuinely struggling to find any evidence of notability for this person; the sources in the article don't mention him at all. Getting Wikipedia mirrors and little else when searching online. Appears to fail WP:BASIC and WP:GNG by a long way. Could this be a hoax? Spiderone 18:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 18:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 18:42, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Toyoji Takahashi

Toyoji Takahashi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL. While he was selected for the 1936 Summer Olympics team, he did not appear in a match. Lettler hello • contribs 18:38, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Lettler hello • contribs 18:38, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Lettler hello • contribs 18:38, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 18:45, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:CSD#G7. Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 11:25, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Transition (2020)

Transition (2020) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable film, the only marginally decent source, The Hindu is actually just PR gibberish, presumably submitted to the paper given the lack of byline. Praxidicae ( talk) 18:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 18:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 18:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 18:00, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Clyde, Imperial County, California

Clyde, Imperial County, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Dunes, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Frink, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Iris, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Mesquite, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Pope, Imperial County, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Ruthven, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Tortuga, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

To try to save some time, we have a series of sidings/points on the ex-SP line through the desert of California. They all have more or less identical articles, and on the map they all look the same: a rail line (now double-tracked) running along side a road, usually with a distinctive pattern of berms to channel flash flood runoff, and nothing else whatsoever except the desert floor and very spare vegetation. It is hard to imagine that any of these could ever have been settlements. Mangoe ( talk) 18:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 18:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 18:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 18:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Holidaze: The Christmas That Almost Didn't Happen

Holidaze: The Christmas That Almost Didn't Happen (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find zero independent coverage of this – no reviews, nothing. Indeed, the article is so sparse in content, I can't even tell if this ever aired on television, or is a simply direct-to-video offering. Regardless, the article has been unsourced for over a decade, and I can't find any independent coverage of it (i.e. a WP:GNG fail), so there is zero evidence that this topic is notable enough for an article. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 16:54, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 16:54, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 16:54, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs ( talk) 17:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 18:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Bertram, California

Bertram, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

"Located on the Southern Pacific Railroad" and little other text translates to "isolated siding and not a settlement", as usual. There's still a pair of passing sidings here beside the Salton Sea, but plainly not a settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 16:35, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 16:40, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 16:40, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nielsen Pearson. Missvain ( talk) 18:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The Nielsen Pearson Band

The Nielsen Pearson Band (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM. Was deprodded with the rationale, "article seems good enough to pass WP:NALBUM with the sources indicated." Ref #1 is not independent. Ref #3 is mainly about Meat Loaf, which the band appeared with at a concert, and has exactly a single sentence about the band, zero about this album. Ref #4 is simple listing with some of the recording personnel, not an in-depth review. Ref #4 is the only source which is more than a single line about the album, and is a short blurb about the album, not an in-depth review. Onel5969 TT me 16:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 16:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. The title confused me, I was wondering why a band was included in the Albums and songs AfD category. But then I saw that "The Nielsen Pearson Band" is the name of the album, which I find rather strange (the name of the actual band is simply "Nielsen Pearson", which on the contrary, sounds like a person's name to me). But anyways, I fully agree with nom and I couldn't find anything reliable about this album, only the standard youtube videos, streaming links, retail sites, short blurbs and blogs. GhostDestroyer100 ( talk) 11:38, 16 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to the band article at Nielsen Pearson. The album is non-notable in its own right, but its title could be a search term for someone seeking the album OR the band, since it looks like the band tried to get fancy with a cryptic album title. So there's no harm if a search ends up at the band's article. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 17:35, 16 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note - Just to make things even more complicated, the band's second album had another poorly-considered title: Nielsen/Pearson (note the clever slash). That album article has also been tagged for notability, though it did generate a hit single. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 17:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 18:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Acolita, California

Acolita, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An extremely isolated siding in the middle of a vast wasteland. Mangoe ( talk) 16:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 16:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 16:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 18:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Ladylike (web series)

Ladylike (web series) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

ZERO reliable sources. Searches are hampered by the commonality of the name, but could not find enough to show it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 16:14, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 17:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:37, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Alexey Kryukov (historian)

AfDs for this article:
Alexey Kryukov (historian) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article makes no claim about his work that would indicate he is in any way a notable academic. The sourcing is totally inadequate for a biography of a living person and does not pass GNG. A search for more information on him turned up no substantial sources that would overcome these drawbacks John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 15:25, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 15:25, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Amir Joy

Amir Joy (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability. I am unable to verify the claims about being "the" (or "a") Egyptian boxing champ or competing in the Olympics qualifications, and I can't find reliable independent sources about him as a writer either. "Theupcomingco" doesn't look like a reliable source, they are "interviews" with standard questions by an obscure site, no actual reporting is done. The other are booksellers and primary sources. Fram ( talk) 15:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Fram ( talk) 15:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. Fram ( talk) 15:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Fram ( talk) 15:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete: I can't find any evidence of a boxer by that name and the references provided do nothing towards satisfying GNG. – 2. O. Boxing 15:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Possibly ( talk) 16:58, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:37, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Tambo, California

Tambo, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another passing siding in the middle of an agricultural area. Mangoe ( talk) 14:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 14:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 14:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Goodrich Community Primary School

Goodrich Community Primary School (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources talking about the subject in significant detail found in a WP:BEFORE search. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. SK2242 ( talk) 14:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. SK2242 ( talk) 14:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SK2242 ( talk) 14:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Zack Friedman

Zack Friedman (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page reads like a resume. It is rarely neutral, and feels exactly like one of the many articles for creation that gets declined every day. It was created in 2012 when, I assume, the standard of "qualifying for a Wikipedia article" was less enforced. Zack Friedman does NOT show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. The sources are all from organizations affiliated with Zack Friedman, or are simply proof of his existence. He just doesn't meet the standard of "notable." Bizmilk3 ( talk) 02:18, 4 December 2020 (UTC)— Bizmilk3 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply

Comment respectably, this is a fake account named Bizmilk that created this deletion page. This person is personally attacking Mr. Friedman with a personal agenda and stating false statements. After updating this article, I noticed that this author says untrue things like not having reliable secondary sources when there are many like cnbc, bloomberg and many others. Just sayin.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:39, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:40, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:40, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Comment the article definitely over-relies on primary sources. One source which looked promising was the last reference, but it's dead, hopefully someone can rescue it. I did a quick Google search, I couldn't find much. Hmanburg ( talk) 13:11, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 14:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Advertisement. Should this businessman eventually be notable per independent sources, the text as is is so non-neutral, best delete for now. Leo Breman ( talk) 16:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Pure WP:PROMO material better suited for his LinkedIn profile. KidAd talk 21:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Agree this doesn't fit current standards. It doesn't seem like neutral information/sources even exist User:lex9000 2:41, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:TNT and WP:NOTRESUME. In theory, giving a TEDx talk can count towards notability, but is not automatic. Bearian ( talk) 15:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. Rescued some sources here and fixed the broken link. Removed some biographical info and any language that didnt appear neutral. Sources now include Newsweek, CNBC, Business Insider, Jewish Business News plus Success Magazine and Publishers Weekly. None of these sources appear to be linked to him in any way, and are therefore independent, major secondary sources. comment added by Terjar12 ( talk • contribs) 23:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC) — Terjar12 reply
  • Comment respectably, this is a fake account named Bizmilk that created this deletion page. This person is personally attacking Mr. Friedman with a personal agenda and stating false statements. After updating this article, I noticed that this author says untrue things like not having reliable secondary sources when there are many like cnbc, bloomberg and many others. Just sayin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terjar12 ( talk • contribs)
  • Delete. This is a guy who has gone to school and had a few jobs, just like millions of other people. Being profiled a couple times and writing op-eds is not notable. FalconK ( talk) 04:18, 17 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Jhimli Roy

Jhimli Roy (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON; no significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:FILMMAKER. GSS  💬 13:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS  💬 13:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS  💬 13:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:37, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Mahesh Savani

Mahesh Savani (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Repeatedly recreated over and over again. Has been deleted as WP:G11 only yesterday but got created again last night. PROD was contested without reason. Concern was Fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC and any other applicable guideline. Significant WP:COI concern. Also see Maheshbhai Savani. Spiderone 13:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:31, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:31, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Harbor Pointe Credit Union

Harbor Pointe Credit Union (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can find anything to show this passes WP:ORG, created by a single purpose account with undisclosed WP:COI as they appear to work in th subjects marketing dept (from name matching), with no sources after 4 years KylieTastic ( talk) 13:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 13:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Isabelle Reine

Isabelle Reine (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Virtually zero in-depth coverage, so she fails WP:GNG, and doesn't pass WP:MUSICBIO. Onel5969 TT me 13:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 13:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - This may be an autobiography or a COI creation by a promo-only editor, as the article creator, Beeb28, seems to only work on articles/drafts promoting her, her songs or her record company Beeb Music. Netherzone ( talk) 14:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - I really wonder how articles like this get through the AfC process. There is a committed team of volunteers there, helping new Wikipedia editors write articles with proper formatting and grammar and presentation. And yet somehow nobody on that team does a basic notability check? Or as I have seen argued a few times, an author sends their AfC article to mainspace prematurely, in which case the AfC team needs tougher oversight processes. As for Ms. Reine, I wish her luck as she launches her music career, and she is surely pounding away at the usual self-created streaming and social media services to spread the word. But she has no significant and reliable media coverage to come anywhere close to the requirements for musical notability. Charitably it is too soon for an article; less charitably this is another attempted promotion. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 14:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
      • Comment - User:Doomsdayer520 - This article was not approved by AFC. This article was in AFC, and was then moved into article space twice by the author, not by AFC reviewers, and was moved back into draft space once by a New Page Reviewer. There is an incorrect tag on such articles, which states that they were approved in AFC, which actually means that they were in AFC and were moved into article space. The tag may also correctly be on articles that were accepted, but where the script did not finish cleanup. In this case the tag is incorrect. Robert McClenon ( talk) 15:44, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Note to others - I have been convinced elsewhere that this glitch in the AfC process is not particularly common and it was unfair of me to imply that it happens a lot. Some of us are discussing possible procedural ideas elsewhere. Now back to the discussion at hand... --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 23:14, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - I disagree with the notion that the sources are not sourced well enough. everything is located there. I see countless articles with little or zero sources at all and they are there forever. I also disagree with the implication that I wrote this article with the intent to self promote. I am a fan of the artist and I was doing it to help out the artist and fans I have no direct connection with the artist. so i don't appreciate that accusation. Beeb28 14:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - Netherzone, "seems to only work on articles/drafts promoting her, her songs or her record company Beeb Music" is not true, firstly I again want to make clear I am a fan with no direct connection and that I wrote things based on the internet. my username was in reference to the artist because I like the music. I have worked on quite a few other musical wikis like Keith Tippet and Gordian Knot. The reason why it seems like I have only worked on one topic is I was working on connecting everything together for a seamless experience if anyone came onto the page Beeb28 15:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beeb28 ( talk • contribs)
  • I did not make the direct accusation against Beeb28 (though I do think the article's writing style is too promotional), but I think we can accept Beeb28's claims of good faith. However, that still accomplishes nothing for the musician's notability, which is what needs to be discussed here. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 15:35, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • @ Beeb28: thank you for your comments, and for your interest in Wikipedia and your efforts here. WP is an encyclopedia, it's not a venue for promoting non-notable content just because one is a fan. That is what websites, social media or sites like LinkedIn, etc. are for. In my comment below, I've linked some things (as have the editors above) - these may be helpful in familiarizing you with some of WP's policies and guidelines. Regarding my comment about a possible autobio or COI, it struck me as quite odd that your username pretty much matches the name of her music company, however, I'll take your word for it that you are not a directly connected editor. Netherzone ( talk) 15:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
I'd also like to note my delete vote includes all the other crap related to this in mainspace, which has since been moved to draft by the creator, to avoid continued tendetious editing. Praxidicae ( talk) 13:51, 14 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Praxidicae, "delete with fire yikes" this is a very inflammatory remark. I appreciate everyone else being civil with the process but you are not. I'm not a veteran wikipedia user so I make mistakes Beeb28 16:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment to User:Beeb28 - Harry S. Truman said, "If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen." Robert McClenon ( talk) 22:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment - There are other deletion techniques used in AFD besides fire, such as silver bullets. Robert McClenon ( talk) 22:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • @ Beeb28: Could you please explain why all of the files you uploaded to Commons in relation to this artist, her music and her record company are credited to you as "own work" and with either Isabelle Reine or Beeb Music credited as the "Author"? Thank you. Netherzone ( talk) 16:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Hi yes I put the artist's name and/or label in the copyright section. and I had emailed the label for permission to use the images. I'm not used to Wikipedia so i don't exactly know how to use commons. I have since changed it to fix the error. Thanks Beeb28 17:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
@ Beeb28: If I'm not mistaken, you need to send that email regarding licencing permissions to OTRS at Commons, if you have not already done so. Editors, please correct me if I'm wrong about that. Netherzone ( talk) 20:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
@ Netherzone: You are right. The permissions granted by the owner should be sent for review which takes up to 2 weeks. Also the guys at the OTRS do not accept permission sent from generic email accounts, they require an official verifiable email account. Less Unless ( talk) 22:35, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
-- Cabayi ( talk) 10:43, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment to User:Cabayi - The last six pages in your list are drafts. Deletion of drafts is considered at MFD, and my guess is that the drafts would not be deleted if a request were made to delete them. Notability is not considered at MFD, because one of the uses of draft space is for a subject that does not currently meet notability, and are normally not deleted simply for COI. Drafts are typically deleted for disruptive editing, and we haven't seen disruptive editing here. If you want to comment on the drafts to recommend that they be rejected, that is all right. Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:39, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply
But, as you've already pointed out, it's one " walled garden of articles about this artist and her works." I believe WP:NOTBURO & WP:NOTSUICIDE apply. Cabayi ( talk) 18:53, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep. The nominator has withdrawn the nominator. Clear consensus to keep, and only delete !vote is simply a "Per nom" argument. ( non-admin closure) Foxnpichu ( talk) 20:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Mike Lomax

Mike Lomax (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only claim to notability is from technically passing WP:NFOOTBALL for playing 12 minutes of professional football for Macclesfield; a totally inconsequential substitute appearance. I could find no evidence of being able to pass WP:GNG from this appearance alone or from his subsequent amateur career. There is a growing consensus that footballers that only just pass NFOOTY can and should be deleted if GNG is comprehensively failed. These were the best secondary sources that I could find [2] [3] [4] [5]. Spiderone 12:54, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:55, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:55, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:55, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Sean Walsh (producer)

Sean Walsh (producer) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded with the rationale fails WP:NOTABLE, but the edit summary did not state the article was being PRODDED, so here we are. I didn't see the sort of coverage to indicate a pass of WP:GNG or I guess WP:NCREATIVE(?), the link in the article that purports to be "Sean Walsh featured in the Sydney Morning Herald" is really just a passing mention of him, which seems to be the best coverage. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:45, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:45, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Harish Ahuja

Harish Ahuja (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable entrepreneur who fails to satisfy our notability criteria. They lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence fail GNG. WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO are also not satisfied. A before search turns up unreliable self written pieces such as this and announcements Celestina007 ( talk) 12:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Comment The example link above, this, was not written by the article subject. - Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 12:43, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 12:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 12:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 12:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 12:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 12:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment — Are you sure you wouldn’t want to use the AFC process until you understand policies? You just cited both CREATIVE & NACADEMIC for a businessman and If I may ask how does that work? You also agreed that the subject of the article lacked significant coverage which is required by GNG and yet you !voted a keep? Anyway it would be counter intuitive if an article creator !voted to delete his own article. Furthermore please see both WP:COI & WP:PAID. Celestina007 ( talk) 07:44, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply
My message on your talk page copying here: Respected Celestina007, Greetings of the day! First of all, I acknowledge your review and every action on the subject page. I am here to seek your advice. After your observations, I have revised many parts of the page. Kindly guide me if it is workable now or I should give up?  Thank you and best regards RAJIVVASUDEV ( talk) 06:58, 12 December 2020 (UTC) RAJIVVASUDEV ( talk) 08:33, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:07, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Daisuke Uchijima

Daisuke Uchijima (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is essentially the same case as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shun Sato (footballer, born 1990), only this footballers played 3 league games for the same club, not 1 game. At least 70 AFD discussions (with more being added every week) say that this is not enough because of the WP:GNG fail. Geschichte ( talk) 12:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:19, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 15:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Shinya Yamagishi

Shinya Yamagishi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is essentially the same case as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shun Sato (footballer, born 1990), only this footballers played 3 league games for the same club, not 1 game. At least 70 AFD discussions (with more being added every week) say that this is not enough because of the WP:GNG fail. Geschichte ( talk) 12:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 15:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Park Myung-eun

Park Myung-eun (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is essentially the same case as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shun Sato (footballer, born 1990), only this footballers played 4 league games for the same club, not 1 game. At least 70 AFD discussions (with more being added every week) say that this is not enough because of the WP:GNG fail. Geschichte ( talk) 12:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:22, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:22, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 15:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Hiroto Takahashi

Hiroto Takahashi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is essentially the same case as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shun Sato (footballer, born 1990), only this footballers played 3 league games for the same club, not 1 game. At least 70 AFD discussions (with more being added every week) say that this is not enough because of the WP:GNG fail. Geschichte ( talk) 12:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 18:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Jihene Ben Jazia

Jihene Ben Jazia (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible COI article of a non notable entrepreneur and social media influencer who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of her thus fails to satisfy GNG & doesn’t satisfy WP:ANYBIO also. A before search reveals nothing imperative or of relevance to GNG. Celestina007 ( talk) 11:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 11:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 11:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 11:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 11:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 11:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 11:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 17:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete nothing close to notable. For those readers like me who were under informed about Tunisia, Mahdia has over 60,000 people. Small fishing villages are normally under 2,000, and that may still be bigger then they are in some people's minds. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:32, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Jihene Ben Jazia is notable in the middle east and tunisia for both her work as a stylist and an influencer. She was featured in several sources: vogue arabia, business news (please see the references in the article) and exposed at tunisia fashion week 2019. Requested changes have been done: Mahdia not being a small village, maison atypik brand to reflect it in a more simple way, carrier to show only experiences that had an impact on her being a stylist. PS: Here I am trying to contribute on north africa subjects coverage (history, design & architecture). This is my first article from scratch and I am willing to contribute more, your feedback will be valuable to me. I vote that this article remains; please let me know if there is any other modification or clarification needed. zamsinus ( talk)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. postdlf ( talk) 15:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply

List of songs recorded by Olly Murs

List of songs recorded by Olly Murs (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Olly Murs discography covers (or should cover) the same ground. Clarityfiend ( talk) 09:55, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 10:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 10:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 10:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. A discography refers to albums, EPs and singles released on vinyl, CD and latterly?, which is the area covered by the OM Discography, whereas this is a list of songs recorded by, and would include songs from the albums (omitted on the discography) and could include unreleased songs, uncredited (but referenced) performances on other people's recordings. Many artists have both and unless your argument is that the Olly Murs list of songs recorded is not substantive, then the list should remain. -- Richhoncho ( talk) 11:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - Aside from being a Featured List, which in itself suggest that it is a viable and useful page otherwise concern would have been raised about it during the reviewing, the Discography page covers albums and singles, i.e. commercial releases, not songs and songwriters. I was the first editor to produce an FL of songs for Rihanna, and subsequently I've done many more for the worlds most famous and successful artists, and other editors have followed and expanded on that blueprint for other artists too, on which many I worked with them on them too. Lists existed prior to the first FL, but not in a maintained or special format, for years prior. The point is that there are now dozens of lists like this, why is this one being singled out for possible deletion? The reason for deletion is pretty weak, bordering on baseless, as you could say this about any list or associated page/article. It's not a valid reason. Not being substantive would be valid for one album, perhaps for only two albums, but Murs has released five albums worth of material as well as many non-album songs and other releases.  —  Calvin999 11:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I was expecting to see just a low-grade list of songs, with nothing else, but htis is a Featured List. Probably best to start with the process to get it removed from the FL list first, if you think it does not meet the FL criteria, instead of going for a delete. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - Usually not fond of lists like these, but this one is well sourced and covered. Foxnpichu ( talk) 20:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Withdraw nomination. "Uncle." Clarityfiend ( talk) 23:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:08, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Delhi School of Excellence

Delhi School of Excellence (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

School does not appear to pass WP:NORG, I cannot find any sources and the article does not currently show notability Garnarblarnar ( talk) 08:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 08:44, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 08:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 08:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Linear Sphere

AfDs for this article:
Linear Sphere (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band. GhostDestroyer100 ( talk) 07:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Second nomination of this article. The first was back in 2014 when the result was "no consensus". One of the users, who is very likely a COI/SPA editor really protested to keep the article, and he said that they are notable because they have been covered by Sea of Tranquility and they have a Metal Archives entry and they have an otherwise blank Allmusic page... I laughed my freaking butt off. First off, Sea of Tranquility is not a reliable source. Second, Metal Archives isn't reliable either, and btw, they have every metal band in the world there, even the ones that were active for one year and they released an EP or demo...so it's not a big deal to have a MA entry. Third, a blank Allmusic page is not a RS either. The band page has to contain a biography to be considered notable, and the album page must contain a staff-written review, and not just a track listing and user reviews. With this out of the way, this is a non-notable progressive metal band. The article is tagged with multiple issues, including notability, which is never a good sign. And the sourcing is dreadful. The only thing that is reliable is the Metal Storm review, because it was written in 2012 and Metal Storm after 2009 counts as reliable. The other sites are not even close to be reliable - Metal Archives, blank Allmusic page, the official site of the band and some blogs whose domain has been long expired or they simply display an error message, and the few that are available do not look reliable, because as I said, they are blogs. During a Google search I couldn't find anything better, therefore I am highly doubtful of this band's notability. So yeah, just another non-notable band. GhostDestroyer100 ( talk) 07:29, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 ( talk) 07:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 ( talk) 07:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 10:28, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

FC Madohi

FC Madohi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails verification, possible WP:HOAX. The one external link was to a page about AD Dili Oeste and not "FC Madohi". The only non-wiki-mirror found is an RSSSF page, which I'm concerned is citing this article. Neither the "Presidente Cup" or "Madohi Stadium" appear anywhere other than this article. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 07:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 07:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 07:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 07:28, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 11:03, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Comment: this team does in fact appear to exist, per this article, so I don't think it's a hoax. Nonetheless, existing doesn't make this team notable and it fails the notability guidelines so I'm happy to nom for delete. ser! ( let's discuss it). 16:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte ( talk) 12:00, 17 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Hawley, California

Hawley, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A rail junction, not a town. THat's what the topos say, and that's what is there now. Mangoe ( talk) 20:32, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mhhossein talk 07:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Shazia Wajahat

Shazia Wajahat (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP does not meet WP:NBIO- coverage is passing mentions, lacks evidence of major roles. MrsSnoozyTurtle ( talk) 20:55, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:57, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:57, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:57, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:58, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mhhossein talk 07:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 18:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Alex Joss

Alex Joss (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability concerns for this dominoes player. I can't find any details about the baz.ch article (not in archive.org), and while FIDO's site is down, [8] confirms that a person of this name won the 2007 title. I have found virtually no other information; a very short 2007 article that says that the world championship was among 80 people is it. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep -- JHunterJ ( talk) 15:56, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Aadu Puli Attam (disambiguation)

Aadu Puli Attam (disambiguation) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough content. All links have been transferred to the hatnote at Lambs and Tigers. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Arnab Jan Deka

Arnab Jan Deka (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article seems both to be blatantly promotional ( G11) and also to fail to indicate significance of its subject. References are not convincing, too. Nalbarian ( talk) 06:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 07:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 07:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 07:01, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 07:02, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

IlohaMail

IlohaMail (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability issues for this email system. I don't see any substantive coverage on Google search, just boilerplate for an Ubuntu package and some security vulnerabilities. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:11, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Michael Hardy

Michael Hardy (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable cricket player. Played one first-class match, no non-statistical (or wiki-mirror) coverage found. Not to be confused with Michael Yardy. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 06:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete unless more indepth (non-routine) coverage can be found. Nothing seemed to be available online. Fram ( talk) 08:45, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to List of D. R. Jardine's XI cricketers, which would need to be created. StickyWicket ( talk) 11:39, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete; fails all basic notability standards including SPORTBASIC. No significant coverage; only sources are all-inclusive databases. wjemather please leave a message... 11:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - the complete failure of WP:GNG far surpasses the skin of teeth passing of WP:NCRIC Spiderone 16:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Another extremely minor sportsperson who would have a place on a specialist Fandom site, but not this one. RobinCarmody ( talk) 21:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete or redirect to a suitable list, although I'm not sure in this case that this solution is as suitable. I can find one very brief reference to him in an Oundle history paper and he's not mentions in the relevant public schools sections of Wisden from 1946 or 1947, although he appears in the stats in the 46 edition (14 wickets at 21 - third or fourth on the Oundle list for the 45 season). I can't find a Wisden obit and The Times didn't write a report on the first-classmatch he played in (but was writing about Eton v Harrow at the same time...). Specialist Oundle or TA sources might turn up something a bit more of course, but I think we're going to struggle here to find anything effective in terms of sourcing. I'm not sure that his work as an author will meet that criteria either, assuming it's the same person. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 07:28, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete WP:NSPORTS says "Trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may be used to support content in an article, but it is not sufficient to establish notability. This includes listings in database sources with low, wide-sweeping generic standards of inclusion, such as Sports Reference's college football and basketball databases." This has only that. Reywas92 Talk 08:50, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment. Once this is deleted, as seems very likely, might the name "Michael Hardy" usefully redirect to the country musician whose article is linked in the hatnote, who has this name but is only known by his surname? Seems reasonable if there is (in one very large country at least, even if scarcely anywhere else) a more notable person of this name. RobinCarmody ( talk) 23:31, 17 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - does not pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 01:26, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte ( talk) 08:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Amber Yang

Amber Yang (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not yet notable. Placement of one of the multiple Forbes 30 under 30 lists is not a reliable indicator of anything, , nor is a second-place finish in a high school science fair DGG ( talk ) 06:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. No effort made at the article, deleted. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 06:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Microsoft Office 2022

Microsoft Office 2022 (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CRYSTALBALL. Microsoft Office 2022, as it currently stands, is only a rumor. SMB9 9thx my edits! 06:02, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment. This article has been repeatedly tagged for CSD, but due to insistence from the author (by edit warring over tags), I think AfD is the best way to end this. If you disagree with me, go ahead and close this AfD. SMB9 9thx my edits! 06:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Cream Cutie

Cream Cutie (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable product. Appeared on Dragon's Den in 2008, but no other coverage. Appears to be defunct now, but I'm not entirely sure. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:52, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:52, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:52, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Snowracer

Snowracer (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Google test only finds the Stiga Snowracer, no sources for this band. The content of this article could easily be merged to Martin Landquist. 162.208.168.92 ( talk) 05:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:19, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:19, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. No sources, no discography cited, really short article...and it has been sitting here for 12 years. They have no sewiki entry either. The only thing that indicates some notability is the members, but this can be included in any of their articles. No separate article needed for this. GhostDestroyer100 ( talk) 12:56, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Chris Jeon

Chris Jeon (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E. Coverage is only for the single event of war tourism in the Libyan Civil War, there does not appear to be any followup coverage in the last 9 years, and his role in the war was exceedingly minor. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Libya-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete total failure of the not news, one event, and the third criteria we need to add "not human interest", which is basically if all the articles on someone are human interest pieces they are normally not notable. Also in cases like this multiple articles may more reflect chournalism than anything else. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:01, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Pirates Basketball Club

Pirates Basketball Club (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable amateur basketball team. I have no idea what the "CMG Competition" is. Their website and social media pages exist, but I find no other coverage. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 04:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 04:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 04:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Ramirez, California

Ramirez, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another railroad-siding-not-a-settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 04:39, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 04:45, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 04:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

High Street, Melbourne

High Street, Melbourne (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A couple of streets that happen to share a name, unclear why they are described together or at all, with no assertion of notability or significant coverage about the streets among the many in the city. Reywas92 Talk 04:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Reywas92 Talk 04:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Reywas92 Talk 04:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Per WP:GEOROAD there is absolutely zero notability or historical or cultural significance and "Metropolitan Route 24" apparently does not have an article to merge to. The article is attempting to advance notability on two different streets. Otr500 ( talk) 01:26, 16 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Venture-X

Venture-X (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails verification. I find nothing about this online (most results are about a coworking space called Venture X), and the only reference, "Smygazine", only has results of this page and OCR errors, suggesting that it may not exist either. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 04:29, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 04:29, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 04:29, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 02:11, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Amitava Chakravorty

Amitava Chakravorty (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While he seems to be an emerging figure in a key political party of India, he fails WP:Politician. Created by a single purpose account WP:SPA Palmsandbeaches ( talk) 03:18, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Delete Not notable as per WP:Politician, may be deleted Pinakpani ( talk) 06:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 02:11, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Mello, California

Mello, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A siding which served some sort of grain-processing business, judging from the remains one can see on Streetview. Mangoe ( talk) 03:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 02:10, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Dantoni, California

Dantoni, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It was and is an orchard, and in the past was also the SW end of a passing siding on a SP branch abandoned back in the early 1970s. I found this report of some labor unrest but seeing as how I don't have a book source for it, it couldn't have been very notable. Mangoe ( talk) 03:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 02:03, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Alicia, California

Alicia, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Due to label drift on the topos the GNIS coords are now in the middle of a suburban neighborhood, but going back far enough on the topos shows this was yet another isolated rail spot having nothing to do with any present settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 02:44, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 05:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Caroline Mark Home

Caroline Mark Home (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GEOFEAT. While listed on the National Register of historic places in the 80's, reviewing the nomination states it is only of local significance for architecture. There is no recent coverage per the WP:GNG. ~RAM ( talk) 02:01, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Withdrawn by nominator despite my feelings on this lacking notability with the NRHP article, I will withdraw given TheCatalyst31's additional sources. ~RAM ( talk) 05:55, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. ~RAM ( talk) 02:01, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jared Isaacman. Missvain ( talk) 02:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Harbortouch

AfDs for this article:
Harbortouch (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted page with no notability. Fails WP:CORP. Potential candidate for speedy deletion per WP:CSD#G4 ~RAM ( talk) 01:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ~RAM ( talk) 01:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 02:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 02:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 02:00, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Base4 (software)

Base4 (software) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sources and none found for this defunct software product. Article makes no claims of notability. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 01:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 01:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 02:00, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The Kappa Delta Sorority House at Washington State University

The Kappa Delta Sorority House at Washington State University (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be notable. Not on the National Register of Historic Places, just near one. Sources that mention the house appear to be either by Kappa Delta sorority, or by Washington State University. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fraternities and sororities-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 00:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Mastertrader

Mastertrader (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about a defunct online stockbroker. Article reads promotionally for Greg Capra, the site's founder. I can't find any substantial coverage, though there is a trivial mention in Day Trading for Dummies. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Of note, the NY Times article cited in the wiki page is at [11], and mentions Capra but not Mastertrader. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Although I could not find info that it is defunct, the current website is not about a brokerage, but about a consulting and training company. I also could not find much info online to justify a keep for this. As it is it lacks significant coverage and does not meet notability. Expertwikiguy ( talk) 01:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete The notability claims in the article are mostly along the lines of "one of the" (many). My google did not find anything to meet WP:GNG Jeepday ( talk) 00:50, 17 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:42, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The Nightmares

The Nightmares (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable band. Article has existed since 2008, but was recently hijacked to be about a different non-notable band from Wales; I can find minimal coverage of other non-notable bands of this name ( [12] [13]) but nothing whatsoever about a band of this name from the Czech Republic; could be a WP:HOAX. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
  1. ^ "About – Shahi". Retrieved 2020-12-12.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2020_December_11&oldid=995075754"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE