![]() |
The result was redirect to Nonbinary gender#Definitions and identity. If there are details from this page that editors want to add to the target article, the history is available. RL0919 ( talk) 23:54, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
This topic fails WP:GNG, WP:CFORK, and WP:MEDRS.
WP:GNG is not met because there are not multiple reliable, secondary sources giving significant coverage to the topic. My own search for sources bears this out. Sources are all trivial coverage, being WP:DICDEFs at best, or are self-published sources ( WP:SPS).
Reliable sources also do not treat this as a distinct topic from Non-binary gender and often simply name-drop the term (along with a quick definition) along other terms for non-binary gender. Thus, this article is a content fork ( WP:CFORK) of Non-binary gender.
Gender identity and transgender (including non-binary) health are medical topics; yet no sources exist that meet WP:MEDRS that discuss this as a distinct topic. Compare the 182 PubMed results for non-binary with the 3 for bigender. Of those 3, the first two do not meet GNG, let alone MEDRS; the 3rd is setting out an untested hypothesis in a hypothesis journal and so is clearly unacceptable under MEDRS.
Here is an analysis of the sources currently in the article:
The first AfD, in 2007, offers no convincing rebuttal against deletion. There are 10 Keep votes and 1 Delete; but 5 of the Keep votes are just WP:ITEXISTS, 1 is just saying it's WP:INTERESTING, 1 is WP:ITEXISTS coupled with links to sources that merely "mention" the term, 1 is based entirely on dead links, and 2 are just "per" votes. Examining the sources put forth, I find 11 that are dead links, one that is just a dicdef, these two which are paywalled, but there is no mention in the title and beginning portion, so probably not significant coverage, one which is just more dicdefs and name-drops, and one which is just a name drop. -Crossroads- ( talk) 23:00, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was WP:SNOW delete. BD2412 T 00:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
I think this fails WP:BLPCRIME. It reads as a coatrack or attack page, and I do not think we need it. Guy ( help!) 22:41, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Image used in article was uploaded by an already-tagged sockpuppet of blocked User:Qualitee123. Clearly a case of WP:CSD#G5. ~ mazca talk 23:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Disputed PROD. Unremarkable residential street with no claim to fame and few usable sources. Sounder Bruce 21:21, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Notable street locally. Believed to be one of if not the only cobbled road left of its kind locally and possibly far and wide. Has featured in the news etc and more sources will be out there somewhere. Created as a stub as it’s a work in progress. sources. User:Stoneh18 21:21, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was WP:SNOW delete. BD2412 T 03:13, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
A list of one-time characters, fails WP:NOT#PLOT and redundant to Fawlty Towers#Episodes, where the plot and the guest stars are covered. There is precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of one-time The Simpsons characters that such lists are nonnotable. – sgeureka t• c 20:32, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Spartaz Humbug! 17:46, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Non notable author and journalist who has no in-depth coverage in reliable sources. A WP:BEFORE shows subject of article isn’t notable at least not now. Celestina007 ( talk) 19:12, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. No objections or other input after two relists, so treating like an expired WP:PROD. WP:REFUND applies. RL0919 ( talk) 23:57, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NAUTHOR. Coverage that might meet WP:GNG is based on the Telegraph India article, which I do not think is independent and the prabhatkhabar.com article (for the latter, I have not registered and I cannot read Hindi). The remainder of the sources are either dead links or are blogs.
The Ford campaign doesn't help establish notability - people 'participated in huge numbers' because 'gratification of Rs 1 lakh also acted as a bait for the people across the social media platforms to participate in the campaign.'
The Padma Shri nomination doesn't help establish notability - anyone can nominate anyone. I can't see that Aikat comes even close to the selection criteria which call for 'distinguished and exceptional achievements/service' and 'a lifetime of achievement'.
The creator of the biography has been blocked as a sock. I believe the article is simply promo. Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 09:56, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Zalaki. Please feel free to merge anything useful Spartaz Humbug! 17:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
This article seems to be similar to Zalaki. The places Zalki and Zalaki which are mentioned in respective articles belong to Karnataka. Abishe ( talk) 09:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 11:26, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Many problems with this article, including almost no notability. Apples&Manzanas ( talk) 21:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 11:27, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Non notable DJ & radio personality who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. Celestina007 ( talk) 19:37, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 23:59, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable MMA fighter. Has none of the 3 top tier fights required to meet WP:NMMA. His biggest wrestling accomplishment was being a division 2 champion, but that doesn't meet WP:NCOLLATH. Coverage is primarily the usual coverage of a pro fighters--results and promoting an upcoming fight. The only unusual coverage is the article on him being pronounced dead when he tried to cut too much weight too fast in college, but I don't think that's enough to meet the GNG. The only thing that's changed since the article was previously deleted was that he's won more Bellator fights, but that doesn't meet any notability standards. Sandals1 ( talk) 19:24, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 23:58, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
He has none of the three top tier fights required to meet WP:NMMA. Coverage does not seem to meet the GNG--it's fight results or promoting an upcoming fight. Sandals1 ( talk) 19:14, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 23:57, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Non notable MMA fighter with no top tier fights and WP:NMMA requires 3. Nothing to show she's notable as a judoka to meet WP:MANOTE. Routine sports reporting does not meet the GNG. Sandals1 ( talk) 19:07, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete, but I am moving this to Draft:Lyla June Johnston to allow RebeccaGreen the opportunity to engage in proposed improvements. BD2412 T 03:22, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL & WP:POLITICIAN & WP:GNG. Johnston is a political candidate and does not hold any other public office. Lefcentreright Talk (plz ping) 19:05, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable entrepreneur, no coverage and single claim to notability is founding companies with notable people. Praxidicae ( talk) 18:41, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus that GEOFEAT is met as a listed building that was unchallenged. (non-admin closure) Britishfinance ( talk) 00:15, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Does not meet general notability guidelines. Barkeep Chat 18:22, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Subject meets core GNG with SIGCOV in several material RS. (non-admin closure) Britishfinance ( talk) 00:20, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Delete - fails all notabliity requirements. As per WP:POLOUTCOMES, simply running in an election does not result in notability, regardless of who one's main opponent is. Mr Milani was not elected as an MP. Although he is a local borough councillor, this level of politics is too low level for notability. As per WP:POLITICIAN, a politician must be at least of a subnational (province/state-wide) level to warrant notability. Mr Milani is not a member of the London Assembly (which is county-wide), so fails notability on these grounds too. His only other position of authority - VP of student development at the NUS - is again low-level. Were he NUS president, that would be different, but this position just doesn't seem notable enough for an article. FirefoxLSD ( talk) 18:19, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Tone 09:12, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet the notability guideline for organisations or the general notability guideline. The article has one reliable source that discusses the group in depth; the others are variously primary sources, unreliable sources, or contain only passing mentions or no mentions at all. I haven't been able to find significant coverage elsewhere. (Previously prodded and deprodded.) – Arms & Hearts ( talk) 17:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Keep. Given the sort of organisation it is there are enough independent sources. Rathfelder ( talk) 10:14, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Keep. The organization does meet the notability guideline for organisations.
The result was keep. ..... But prune it or the next discussion might well conclude its not maintainable Spartaz Humbug! 17:48, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Wikpedia is not an indiscriminate list of things. Some of these books are notable and have their own articles. Most of them are not. There is no criteria to determine what should be on the list. ... discospinster talk 17:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. And trim Spartaz Humbug! 17:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Wikpedia is not an indiscriminate list of things. Some of these books are notable and have their own articles. Most of them are not. There is no criteria to determine what should be on the list. ... discospinster talk 17:32, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 18:24, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable film maker and actor. Has done a few short films. No in-depth coverage in the news. Nothing here to warrant a standalone article on Wikipedia. FitIndia Talk Commons 17:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 23:55, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:LISTN, too specific of a topic to warrant an article and borders on original research. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources. Thus, it doesn't meet our notability guideline for inclusion as an article on Wikipedia and should be deleted. Pretty simple. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:53, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 09:12, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Only claim of notability is coordinated the building of tallest water tank mural in India. Listed sources have only passing mentions. Subject does not meet WP:ARTIST. Jikaoli Kol ( talk) 16:37, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 00:05, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a person notable only as president of a university student union. (In India, naturellement.) As always, this is not an "inherently" notable role that guarantees a person a Wikipedia article just because he exists, but the article is not showing or sourcing a credible reason why he could be considered more notable than the norm -- not all of the sources here are about him at all, as some just glancingly mention his name in the process of being primarily about other things or people, and the few that are genuinely about him don't add up to enough coverage to get him over WP:GNG in lieu of having to pass WP:NPOL on a more notable political role. Bearcat ( talk) 16:18, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 18:28, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY. Recreated after PROD deletion. BlameRuiner ( talk) 16:03, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. BD2412 T 05:10, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
After the completion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of broadcasters for Green Bay Packers home games in Milwaukee, BornonJune8 created this article. I immediately removed the portion of the new article that was copied and pasted from the now deleted List of broadcasters for Green Bay Packers home games in Milwaukee (see diff).
Regarding the topic at hand, the Green Bay Packers played a few home games in Milwaukee, Wisconsin for 60 years, primarily due to the fact that Green Bay, Wisconsin is a small market for an NFL team. Milwaukee provided a larger stadium and the ability to reach more people. However, after Lambeau Field was expanded in the 1990s, the need for Milwaukee games decreased, with all home games moving back to Lambeau Field in 1994. The team still draws a large number of fans and market share from the Milwaukee area.
I do not believe that the notability of the topic meets our WP:GNG, specifically lacking significant coverage about the specific topic as a whole (obviously a lot of sources mention or even discuss the fact that the Packers played in Milwaukee). Even if there is some notability about this subject, this information is already contained within numerous articles, none of which has become so big to necessitate a WP:CONTENTFORK into a new article. Further reinforcing this fact, BornonJune8, per their edit summary creating this article, copied text from Borchert Field, List of Green Bay Packers stadiums, Milwaukee Badgers, List of Green Bay Packers broadcasters, Sports in Milwaukee, Packers Radio Network, Milwaukee Mile, Marquette Stadium, and Milwaukee County Stadium.
Information about the Packers' time in Milwaukee should be properly covered in the following articles: History of the Green Bay Packers, List of Green Bay Packers stadiums, and Green Bay Packers, among a few others. A content fork on this topic is too specific to be justified. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:02, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
@ Gonzo fan2007: You come across sounding like you're tooting your own personal horn when you bring up the argument that there's no need for an article like this since you already contributed heavily to an separate article on the list of stadiums that the Packers have played in. Again, that's fine on its own, but it doesn't go into other areas of interest like the exact dates each season and the teams that they played against in Milwaukee. Bare in mind, that you're all but required in Wikipedia to add in the Edit summary Attribution: content in this section was copied... to indicate when you forked the content from elsewhere on Wikipedia. BornonJune8 ( talk) 12:13, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. G5 and G11 – bradv 🍁 16:19, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
well after a deep research i have witnessed that this child actually run those businesses . Do a research on those names , On Instagram it can be seen that he owns them. 2 of the business are only on instagram with over 200k audience of the business pages
This article appears to be largely a hoax promoting a 17 year old social media influencer. Many of the reference links are broken. Several others refer to someone else of the same name who appeared in a movie 8 years ago, when the subject of the article was only 9 years old. Many of the other links are puff pieces with no verifiability, like the Medium piece from an account that's done nothing else claiming he's won a photography competition but giving no details or information about said competition. Several other links to articles on entrepreneurs & such don't mention him at all. Many of the pieces that are valid links and do mention him only date to October of this year and are just short puff mentions, mostly by the same person. Plus the article is in broken English and entirely promotional in tone. All in all it's hard to see that he meets WP:GNG, at the very least this needs a complete re-write and severe scrutiny for claims and links re verifiability. JamesG5 ( talk) 15:26, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:52, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable entertainer. None of the sources are in depth coverage and nothing else exists that I can find that would support his inclusion in Wikipedia. It's obvious paid editing and PR spam. Praxidicae ( talk) 15:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 16:00, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Article about a lawyer even though apparently having some impressive achievements in the area of law in Africa. There is not enough coverage to really bring her over WP:GNG. The references given in the article and found are biographies from sites she does work for. McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 14:03, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Races and nations of Warhammer Fantasy. Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:54, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Most Warhammer races are already deleted, redirecting to Races and nations of Warhammer Fantasy, and nothing suggests this piece of fancruft deserves to stay around. Usual failure of GNG/NFICTION/PLOT with nothing but a PRIMARY source (and not even a footnote, just a general reference). The only merit this piece has is an example of the earliest era fancruft on Wikipedia, but that's pretty much about the same value as most stuff in the Wikipedia:BJAODN. Nothing salvageable here, I am afraid. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Eldar (Warhammer 40,000). Tone 09:13, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
No idea why this is not under Dark Eldar, which would be a more common name, but anyway this is beyond fixing. Nothing here suggests this piece of fancruft deserves to stay around. Usual failure of GNG/NFICTION/PLOT with nothing but a PRIMARY source or two. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 09:13, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
After removing all unreliable sources from the article, there are no sources in this. I did a check for sources online as well, and found no published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO as a non-notable journalist. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 12:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Races and nations of Warhammer Fantasy#Elves. RL0919 ( talk) 16:02, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Most Warhammer races are already deleted, redirecting to Races and nations of Warhammer Fantasy, and nothing suggests this piece of fancruft deserves to stay around. Usual failure of GNG/NFICTION/PLOT with nothing but a PRIMARY source or two. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 16:04, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Danny Edwards never played for Port Vale or appeared in any professional football match. Soccerbase erroneously credits him with the appearance data for Paul Edwards for that season. The BBC report on that "debut" match is also inaccurate, Sky Sports correctly names Paul. Echetus Xe 11:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:56, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
An individual event at an u18 championship doesn't get enough attention to warrant an article. The championship as a whole is notable enough, but not everything that happened there. Fram ( talk) 11:22, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 16:06, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Only a single article other than the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is listed. In my opinion, this page isn't necessary and can easily be replaced with a hatnote on the primary topic's article. Vaporgaze ( talk) 10:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 17:57, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
The article can be better merged with Logitech. I don't think there is a need to have a separate article. Abishe ( talk) 07:16, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:59, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Non notable organization that does not qualify for inclusion per WP:NCORP. Celestina007 ( talk) 09:40, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete copyvio. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 05:49, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Non notable percussion tutor who does not satisfy WP:GNG. Celestina007 ( talk) 09:35, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 23:52, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Company that offers shell company registration. The sources in the article are mostly self-published, non-reliable or based on interviews and other PR. The only other source I could find is this German Vice article which explains how the process works with the subject as an example but there does not appear to be sufficient significant coverage to pass WP:CORP or WP:GNG. Regards So Why 09:15, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 07:15, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Not meeting WP:NMODEL or WP:GNG. Winning a non-notable beauty pageant is not enough to warrant a standalone article. Could not find any kind of substantial coverage on the subject. Passing mentions in reputable sources are not enough to demonstrate notability. Hitro talk 06:31, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 06:15, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable academic per WP:TEACHER. This administrator (educationalist?) is not inherently notable for serving as a headmaster for a secondary school. KidAd ( talk) 06:10, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Paul Atreides. RL0919 ( talk) 06:18, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
This mess of an article (it is effectively a List of various things named Muad'Dib (an animal, a person, a religious term) also fails GNG/NFICTION/PLOT. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 06:20, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
None of those characters seem to have been subject to any literary analysis. Some of them redirect to articles that have been redirected to List of Dune secondary characters, where this could be merged, but I am not sure if that list is notable either. There is also List of Dune secondary characters. At the very least we don't need three separate lists of Dune characters, one at most should be enough. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:23, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Dune (franchise)#Plot arc. RL0919 ( talk) 06:22, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional planet with no evidence of passing GNG. PRIMARY sources, PLOT only content. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 09:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
There doesn't seem to be anything besides press releases about this online or in books. Also, while it doesn't have much to do with deletion, there seems to have been some COI editing on the article recently. TheAwesome Hwyh 03:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to John C. Malone. RL0919 ( talk) 06:24, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Single sentence article, basically just a quote from one person from a long time ago. Reference leads to a website called manta.com, instead of the Advertising Age editorial it's supposed to; the Manta website seems to some kind of Yellow Pages/business listing site. Article has been largely unedited since creation 9 years ago. Mirza Ahmed ( talk) 04:01, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Spartaz Humbug! 18:02, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Software appears to be NN. I am not able to locate the two supposed references in the article or see how in-depth they cover it, nor are they particularly reliable. Further searches for sources turn up only sales links: [10], nothing relevant at all [11], or only brief, trivial mentions [12]. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:59, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:01, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources and fails WP:GNG. I should note that a WP:BEFORE shows subject has been discussed in passing but never in detail nor with in-depth. Celestina007 ( talk) 03:12, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 06:27, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Another minor event from Tolkien verse's Silmarillion, not in movies or such. PRIMARY sources, PLOT only, fails GNG. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:38, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:18, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG; was previously deleted and does not seem more notable now. -- NL19931993 ( talk) 02:32, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:18, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO & does not satisfy WP:42. Celestina007 ( talk) 02:18, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 09:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails
WP:CORP. Specifically there is no evidence of
WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources. The only instance of coverage in a potentially reliable source was run-of-the-mill/routine coverage in a single Bloomberg article of the stock-market price increasing when the name of the company changed. There is coverage in the Daily Express, but per
WP:RSP the Daily Express is not considered a reliable source. Whilst the company is listed on AIM, this is not a major stock exchange comparable to NYSE and as such this is not a
WP:LISTED case.
Additionally, the article fails WP:PROMO as it is clearly promotional in content and was created by an apparent potential WP:COI account that has primarily edited articles related to Clem Chambers and his companies. There is no point in the edit history that is free of these WP:PROMO issues so WP:TNT applies. FOARP ( talk) 16:58, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I appreciate people may have been busy roasting turkeys and peeling sprouts, but I think the discussion has run out of steam. (Like the sprouts). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:19, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
To quote an earlier edit by Shhhnotsoloud, "this disambiguation page disambiguates no titles". Everything on the page would normally go under 'See also' as possible misspellings. A search for articles containing 'Spindal' brings up a couple of minor, partial-title mentions. Leschnei ( talk) 14:14, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 06:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Non notable actress failing WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR & not satisfying WP:42 Celestina007 ( talk) 01:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Return of the Mack#Nevada version.. Barkeep49 ( talk) 01:22, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Non notable DJ failing WP:GNG & WP:ANYBIO Celestina007 ( talk) 01:26, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:20, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources and fails WP:GNG, WP:42 & WP:SINGER Celestina007 ( talk) 01:22, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Michig ( talk) 08:14, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Sources are weak and the article has too much unnecessary information to make it seem like the subjects are more notable than they are. One such example of this is the list of awards, most of which are lesser notable awards. Andise1 ( talk) 00:37, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted per WP:G5. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 01:37, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
I don't believe this person meets GNG. Most citations seem self-published. CookieMonster755 ✉ 00:04, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was redirect to Nonbinary gender#Definitions and identity. If there are details from this page that editors want to add to the target article, the history is available. RL0919 ( talk) 23:54, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
This topic fails WP:GNG, WP:CFORK, and WP:MEDRS.
WP:GNG is not met because there are not multiple reliable, secondary sources giving significant coverage to the topic. My own search for sources bears this out. Sources are all trivial coverage, being WP:DICDEFs at best, or are self-published sources ( WP:SPS).
Reliable sources also do not treat this as a distinct topic from Non-binary gender and often simply name-drop the term (along with a quick definition) along other terms for non-binary gender. Thus, this article is a content fork ( WP:CFORK) of Non-binary gender.
Gender identity and transgender (including non-binary) health are medical topics; yet no sources exist that meet WP:MEDRS that discuss this as a distinct topic. Compare the 182 PubMed results for non-binary with the 3 for bigender. Of those 3, the first two do not meet GNG, let alone MEDRS; the 3rd is setting out an untested hypothesis in a hypothesis journal and so is clearly unacceptable under MEDRS.
Here is an analysis of the sources currently in the article:
The first AfD, in 2007, offers no convincing rebuttal against deletion. There are 10 Keep votes and 1 Delete; but 5 of the Keep votes are just WP:ITEXISTS, 1 is just saying it's WP:INTERESTING, 1 is WP:ITEXISTS coupled with links to sources that merely "mention" the term, 1 is based entirely on dead links, and 2 are just "per" votes. Examining the sources put forth, I find 11 that are dead links, one that is just a dicdef, these two which are paywalled, but there is no mention in the title and beginning portion, so probably not significant coverage, one which is just more dicdefs and name-drops, and one which is just a name drop. -Crossroads- ( talk) 23:00, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was WP:SNOW delete. BD2412 T 00:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
I think this fails WP:BLPCRIME. It reads as a coatrack or attack page, and I do not think we need it. Guy ( help!) 22:41, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Image used in article was uploaded by an already-tagged sockpuppet of blocked User:Qualitee123. Clearly a case of WP:CSD#G5. ~ mazca talk 23:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Disputed PROD. Unremarkable residential street with no claim to fame and few usable sources. Sounder Bruce 21:21, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Notable street locally. Believed to be one of if not the only cobbled road left of its kind locally and possibly far and wide. Has featured in the news etc and more sources will be out there somewhere. Created as a stub as it’s a work in progress. sources. User:Stoneh18 21:21, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was WP:SNOW delete. BD2412 T 03:13, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
A list of one-time characters, fails WP:NOT#PLOT and redundant to Fawlty Towers#Episodes, where the plot and the guest stars are covered. There is precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of one-time The Simpsons characters that such lists are nonnotable. – sgeureka t• c 20:32, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Spartaz Humbug! 17:46, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Non notable author and journalist who has no in-depth coverage in reliable sources. A WP:BEFORE shows subject of article isn’t notable at least not now. Celestina007 ( talk) 19:12, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. No objections or other input after two relists, so treating like an expired WP:PROD. WP:REFUND applies. RL0919 ( talk) 23:57, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NAUTHOR. Coverage that might meet WP:GNG is based on the Telegraph India article, which I do not think is independent and the prabhatkhabar.com article (for the latter, I have not registered and I cannot read Hindi). The remainder of the sources are either dead links or are blogs.
The Ford campaign doesn't help establish notability - people 'participated in huge numbers' because 'gratification of Rs 1 lakh also acted as a bait for the people across the social media platforms to participate in the campaign.'
The Padma Shri nomination doesn't help establish notability - anyone can nominate anyone. I can't see that Aikat comes even close to the selection criteria which call for 'distinguished and exceptional achievements/service' and 'a lifetime of achievement'.
The creator of the biography has been blocked as a sock. I believe the article is simply promo. Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 09:56, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Zalaki. Please feel free to merge anything useful Spartaz Humbug! 17:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
This article seems to be similar to Zalaki. The places Zalki and Zalaki which are mentioned in respective articles belong to Karnataka. Abishe ( talk) 09:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 11:26, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Many problems with this article, including almost no notability. Apples&Manzanas ( talk) 21:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 11:27, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Non notable DJ & radio personality who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. Celestina007 ( talk) 19:37, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 23:59, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable MMA fighter. Has none of the 3 top tier fights required to meet WP:NMMA. His biggest wrestling accomplishment was being a division 2 champion, but that doesn't meet WP:NCOLLATH. Coverage is primarily the usual coverage of a pro fighters--results and promoting an upcoming fight. The only unusual coverage is the article on him being pronounced dead when he tried to cut too much weight too fast in college, but I don't think that's enough to meet the GNG. The only thing that's changed since the article was previously deleted was that he's won more Bellator fights, but that doesn't meet any notability standards. Sandals1 ( talk) 19:24, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 23:58, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
He has none of the three top tier fights required to meet WP:NMMA. Coverage does not seem to meet the GNG--it's fight results or promoting an upcoming fight. Sandals1 ( talk) 19:14, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 23:57, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Non notable MMA fighter with no top tier fights and WP:NMMA requires 3. Nothing to show she's notable as a judoka to meet WP:MANOTE. Routine sports reporting does not meet the GNG. Sandals1 ( talk) 19:07, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete, but I am moving this to Draft:Lyla June Johnston to allow RebeccaGreen the opportunity to engage in proposed improvements. BD2412 T 03:22, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL & WP:POLITICIAN & WP:GNG. Johnston is a political candidate and does not hold any other public office. Lefcentreright Talk (plz ping) 19:05, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable entrepreneur, no coverage and single claim to notability is founding companies with notable people. Praxidicae ( talk) 18:41, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus that GEOFEAT is met as a listed building that was unchallenged. (non-admin closure) Britishfinance ( talk) 00:15, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Does not meet general notability guidelines. Barkeep Chat 18:22, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Subject meets core GNG with SIGCOV in several material RS. (non-admin closure) Britishfinance ( talk) 00:20, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Delete - fails all notabliity requirements. As per WP:POLOUTCOMES, simply running in an election does not result in notability, regardless of who one's main opponent is. Mr Milani was not elected as an MP. Although he is a local borough councillor, this level of politics is too low level for notability. As per WP:POLITICIAN, a politician must be at least of a subnational (province/state-wide) level to warrant notability. Mr Milani is not a member of the London Assembly (which is county-wide), so fails notability on these grounds too. His only other position of authority - VP of student development at the NUS - is again low-level. Were he NUS president, that would be different, but this position just doesn't seem notable enough for an article. FirefoxLSD ( talk) 18:19, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Tone 09:12, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet the notability guideline for organisations or the general notability guideline. The article has one reliable source that discusses the group in depth; the others are variously primary sources, unreliable sources, or contain only passing mentions or no mentions at all. I haven't been able to find significant coverage elsewhere. (Previously prodded and deprodded.) – Arms & Hearts ( talk) 17:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Keep. Given the sort of organisation it is there are enough independent sources. Rathfelder ( talk) 10:14, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Keep. The organization does meet the notability guideline for organisations.
The result was keep. ..... But prune it or the next discussion might well conclude its not maintainable Spartaz Humbug! 17:48, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Wikpedia is not an indiscriminate list of things. Some of these books are notable and have their own articles. Most of them are not. There is no criteria to determine what should be on the list. ... discospinster talk 17:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. And trim Spartaz Humbug! 17:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Wikpedia is not an indiscriminate list of things. Some of these books are notable and have their own articles. Most of them are not. There is no criteria to determine what should be on the list. ... discospinster talk 17:32, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 18:24, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable film maker and actor. Has done a few short films. No in-depth coverage in the news. Nothing here to warrant a standalone article on Wikipedia. FitIndia Talk Commons 17:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 23:55, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:LISTN, too specific of a topic to warrant an article and borders on original research. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources. Thus, it doesn't meet our notability guideline for inclusion as an article on Wikipedia and should be deleted. Pretty simple. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:53, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 09:12, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Only claim of notability is coordinated the building of tallest water tank mural in India. Listed sources have only passing mentions. Subject does not meet WP:ARTIST. Jikaoli Kol ( talk) 16:37, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 00:05, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a person notable only as president of a university student union. (In India, naturellement.) As always, this is not an "inherently" notable role that guarantees a person a Wikipedia article just because he exists, but the article is not showing or sourcing a credible reason why he could be considered more notable than the norm -- not all of the sources here are about him at all, as some just glancingly mention his name in the process of being primarily about other things or people, and the few that are genuinely about him don't add up to enough coverage to get him over WP:GNG in lieu of having to pass WP:NPOL on a more notable political role. Bearcat ( talk) 16:18, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 18:28, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY. Recreated after PROD deletion. BlameRuiner ( talk) 16:03, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. BD2412 T 05:10, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
After the completion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of broadcasters for Green Bay Packers home games in Milwaukee, BornonJune8 created this article. I immediately removed the portion of the new article that was copied and pasted from the now deleted List of broadcasters for Green Bay Packers home games in Milwaukee (see diff).
Regarding the topic at hand, the Green Bay Packers played a few home games in Milwaukee, Wisconsin for 60 years, primarily due to the fact that Green Bay, Wisconsin is a small market for an NFL team. Milwaukee provided a larger stadium and the ability to reach more people. However, after Lambeau Field was expanded in the 1990s, the need for Milwaukee games decreased, with all home games moving back to Lambeau Field in 1994. The team still draws a large number of fans and market share from the Milwaukee area.
I do not believe that the notability of the topic meets our WP:GNG, specifically lacking significant coverage about the specific topic as a whole (obviously a lot of sources mention or even discuss the fact that the Packers played in Milwaukee). Even if there is some notability about this subject, this information is already contained within numerous articles, none of which has become so big to necessitate a WP:CONTENTFORK into a new article. Further reinforcing this fact, BornonJune8, per their edit summary creating this article, copied text from Borchert Field, List of Green Bay Packers stadiums, Milwaukee Badgers, List of Green Bay Packers broadcasters, Sports in Milwaukee, Packers Radio Network, Milwaukee Mile, Marquette Stadium, and Milwaukee County Stadium.
Information about the Packers' time in Milwaukee should be properly covered in the following articles: History of the Green Bay Packers, List of Green Bay Packers stadiums, and Green Bay Packers, among a few others. A content fork on this topic is too specific to be justified. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:02, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
@ Gonzo fan2007: You come across sounding like you're tooting your own personal horn when you bring up the argument that there's no need for an article like this since you already contributed heavily to an separate article on the list of stadiums that the Packers have played in. Again, that's fine on its own, but it doesn't go into other areas of interest like the exact dates each season and the teams that they played against in Milwaukee. Bare in mind, that you're all but required in Wikipedia to add in the Edit summary Attribution: content in this section was copied... to indicate when you forked the content from elsewhere on Wikipedia. BornonJune8 ( talk) 12:13, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. G5 and G11 – bradv 🍁 16:19, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
well after a deep research i have witnessed that this child actually run those businesses . Do a research on those names , On Instagram it can be seen that he owns them. 2 of the business are only on instagram with over 200k audience of the business pages
This article appears to be largely a hoax promoting a 17 year old social media influencer. Many of the reference links are broken. Several others refer to someone else of the same name who appeared in a movie 8 years ago, when the subject of the article was only 9 years old. Many of the other links are puff pieces with no verifiability, like the Medium piece from an account that's done nothing else claiming he's won a photography competition but giving no details or information about said competition. Several other links to articles on entrepreneurs & such don't mention him at all. Many of the pieces that are valid links and do mention him only date to October of this year and are just short puff mentions, mostly by the same person. Plus the article is in broken English and entirely promotional in tone. All in all it's hard to see that he meets WP:GNG, at the very least this needs a complete re-write and severe scrutiny for claims and links re verifiability. JamesG5 ( talk) 15:26, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:52, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable entertainer. None of the sources are in depth coverage and nothing else exists that I can find that would support his inclusion in Wikipedia. It's obvious paid editing and PR spam. Praxidicae ( talk) 15:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 16:00, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Article about a lawyer even though apparently having some impressive achievements in the area of law in Africa. There is not enough coverage to really bring her over WP:GNG. The references given in the article and found are biographies from sites she does work for. McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 14:03, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Races and nations of Warhammer Fantasy. Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:54, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Most Warhammer races are already deleted, redirecting to Races and nations of Warhammer Fantasy, and nothing suggests this piece of fancruft deserves to stay around. Usual failure of GNG/NFICTION/PLOT with nothing but a PRIMARY source (and not even a footnote, just a general reference). The only merit this piece has is an example of the earliest era fancruft on Wikipedia, but that's pretty much about the same value as most stuff in the Wikipedia:BJAODN. Nothing salvageable here, I am afraid. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Eldar (Warhammer 40,000). Tone 09:13, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
No idea why this is not under Dark Eldar, which would be a more common name, but anyway this is beyond fixing. Nothing here suggests this piece of fancruft deserves to stay around. Usual failure of GNG/NFICTION/PLOT with nothing but a PRIMARY source or two. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 09:13, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
After removing all unreliable sources from the article, there are no sources in this. I did a check for sources online as well, and found no published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO as a non-notable journalist. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 12:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Races and nations of Warhammer Fantasy#Elves. RL0919 ( talk) 16:02, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Most Warhammer races are already deleted, redirecting to Races and nations of Warhammer Fantasy, and nothing suggests this piece of fancruft deserves to stay around. Usual failure of GNG/NFICTION/PLOT with nothing but a PRIMARY source or two. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 16:04, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Danny Edwards never played for Port Vale or appeared in any professional football match. Soccerbase erroneously credits him with the appearance data for Paul Edwards for that season. The BBC report on that "debut" match is also inaccurate, Sky Sports correctly names Paul. Echetus Xe 11:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:56, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
An individual event at an u18 championship doesn't get enough attention to warrant an article. The championship as a whole is notable enough, but not everything that happened there. Fram ( talk) 11:22, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 16:06, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Only a single article other than the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is listed. In my opinion, this page isn't necessary and can easily be replaced with a hatnote on the primary topic's article. Vaporgaze ( talk) 10:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 17:57, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
The article can be better merged with Logitech. I don't think there is a need to have a separate article. Abishe ( talk) 07:16, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:59, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Non notable organization that does not qualify for inclusion per WP:NCORP. Celestina007 ( talk) 09:40, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete copyvio. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 05:49, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Non notable percussion tutor who does not satisfy WP:GNG. Celestina007 ( talk) 09:35, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 23:52, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Company that offers shell company registration. The sources in the article are mostly self-published, non-reliable or based on interviews and other PR. The only other source I could find is this German Vice article which explains how the process works with the subject as an example but there does not appear to be sufficient significant coverage to pass WP:CORP or WP:GNG. Regards So Why 09:15, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 07:15, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Not meeting WP:NMODEL or WP:GNG. Winning a non-notable beauty pageant is not enough to warrant a standalone article. Could not find any kind of substantial coverage on the subject. Passing mentions in reputable sources are not enough to demonstrate notability. Hitro talk 06:31, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 06:15, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable academic per WP:TEACHER. This administrator (educationalist?) is not inherently notable for serving as a headmaster for a secondary school. KidAd ( talk) 06:10, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Paul Atreides. RL0919 ( talk) 06:18, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
This mess of an article (it is effectively a List of various things named Muad'Dib (an animal, a person, a religious term) also fails GNG/NFICTION/PLOT. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 06:20, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
None of those characters seem to have been subject to any literary analysis. Some of them redirect to articles that have been redirected to List of Dune secondary characters, where this could be merged, but I am not sure if that list is notable either. There is also List of Dune secondary characters. At the very least we don't need three separate lists of Dune characters, one at most should be enough. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:23, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Dune (franchise)#Plot arc. RL0919 ( talk) 06:22, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional planet with no evidence of passing GNG. PRIMARY sources, PLOT only content. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 09:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
There doesn't seem to be anything besides press releases about this online or in books. Also, while it doesn't have much to do with deletion, there seems to have been some COI editing on the article recently. TheAwesome Hwyh 03:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to John C. Malone. RL0919 ( talk) 06:24, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Single sentence article, basically just a quote from one person from a long time ago. Reference leads to a website called manta.com, instead of the Advertising Age editorial it's supposed to; the Manta website seems to some kind of Yellow Pages/business listing site. Article has been largely unedited since creation 9 years ago. Mirza Ahmed ( talk) 04:01, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Spartaz Humbug! 18:02, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Software appears to be NN. I am not able to locate the two supposed references in the article or see how in-depth they cover it, nor are they particularly reliable. Further searches for sources turn up only sales links: [10], nothing relevant at all [11], or only brief, trivial mentions [12]. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:59, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:01, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources and fails WP:GNG. I should note that a WP:BEFORE shows subject has been discussed in passing but never in detail nor with in-depth. Celestina007 ( talk) 03:12, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 06:27, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Another minor event from Tolkien verse's Silmarillion, not in movies or such. PRIMARY sources, PLOT only, fails GNG. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:38, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:18, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG; was previously deleted and does not seem more notable now. -- NL19931993 ( talk) 02:32, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:18, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO & does not satisfy WP:42. Celestina007 ( talk) 02:18, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 09:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails
WP:CORP. Specifically there is no evidence of
WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources. The only instance of coverage in a potentially reliable source was run-of-the-mill/routine coverage in a single Bloomberg article of the stock-market price increasing when the name of the company changed. There is coverage in the Daily Express, but per
WP:RSP the Daily Express is not considered a reliable source. Whilst the company is listed on AIM, this is not a major stock exchange comparable to NYSE and as such this is not a
WP:LISTED case.
Additionally, the article fails WP:PROMO as it is clearly promotional in content and was created by an apparent potential WP:COI account that has primarily edited articles related to Clem Chambers and his companies. There is no point in the edit history that is free of these WP:PROMO issues so WP:TNT applies. FOARP ( talk) 16:58, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I appreciate people may have been busy roasting turkeys and peeling sprouts, but I think the discussion has run out of steam. (Like the sprouts). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:19, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
To quote an earlier edit by Shhhnotsoloud, "this disambiguation page disambiguates no titles". Everything on the page would normally go under 'See also' as possible misspellings. A search for articles containing 'Spindal' brings up a couple of minor, partial-title mentions. Leschnei ( talk) 14:14, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 06:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Non notable actress failing WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR & not satisfying WP:42 Celestina007 ( talk) 01:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Return of the Mack#Nevada version.. Barkeep49 ( talk) 01:22, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Non notable DJ failing WP:GNG & WP:ANYBIO Celestina007 ( talk) 01:26, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:20, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources and fails WP:GNG, WP:42 & WP:SINGER Celestina007 ( talk) 01:22, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Michig ( talk) 08:14, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Sources are weak and the article has too much unnecessary information to make it seem like the subjects are more notable than they are. One such example of this is the list of awards, most of which are lesser notable awards. Andise1 ( talk) 00:37, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted per WP:G5. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 01:37, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
I don't believe this person meets GNG. Most citations seem self-published. CookieMonster755 ✉ 00:04, 18 December 2019 (UTC)