![]() |
The result was delete. A redirect can be created at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 10:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I don't think elementary schools are intrinsically notable. Even if they are, this subject has little evidence of existence, let alone fulfillment of WP:GNG. Its Facebook page has 0 likes, and it is only MENTIONED in passing in other Wikipedia pages. Mr. Guye ( talk) 23:46, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:37, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Article is contested. Listed at AFD to determine consensus. Cloud9shopper ( talk) 23:38, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro ( talk) 03:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Insufficient indication of notability. The only proven claim to fame is that he's part of Street Radio (although I also have some questions about the notability of that subject, but that's another discussion), but notability is not inherited; J. Math needs to be notable in his own right to have an article. Nothing else in this article has any references to back it up, and even if it did, it wouldn't do that much to indicate notability. The only potentially good source currently on this article is the Vibe Magazine mention; however, I actually looked up the August 2008 issue of Vibe, and Street Radio gets only the briefest of brief mentions in that issue (page 46) -- certainly not enough to indicate notability. I did some thorough searching but I really couldn't find any other credible/verifiable sources indicating that J. Math might be notable. IagoQnsi ( talk) 04:17, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
KEEP Page has been updated with many new sources and information regarding the issues raised above. J. Math's main point of notability is that as a songwriter for notable artists like 50 Cent, Wu-Tang Clan, Cam'ron, Rick Ross, Wu-Tang Clan, Styles P, and many more. He is credited as such on multiple major label albums that have placed on Billboard charts internationally, which I have updated the page with. He is also credited as such for the RIAA gold certified album "Strength and Loyalty" by Bone Thugs-n-Harmony.
Another point of notability is that he often is credited with other roles, specifically A&R and mixing engineer, and has been integrally involved with many major label or notable independent label releases, including 2Pac, Wu-Tang Clan, and Styles P. I updated the page with these credits and included many online sources, while using the liner notes from these albums to confirm. I also found interviews with J. Math and included a couple quotes regarding the development of these albums. Kairaba ( talk) 05:22, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Kairaba
KEEP I'm not sure why above user thinks the subject of this article fails
WP:MUSBIO. This notability standard clearly states that "Musicians or ensembles (this category includes bands, singers, rappers, orchestras, DJs, musical theatre groups, instrumentalists, etc.) may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria:" and then it lists 12 different points of notability. The article says someone may be notable if they meet at least 1 criteria, and I have shown that the subject of the article meets at least 4 of those 12. I will list them and their satisfactions here for convenience.
1. Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself
- I referenced an article from Vibe Magazine which is entitled "Reasons why hip-hop isn't dead". That article goes on to list only 5 notable producers/composers of which J. Math is one. - I referenced an a full page article in Scratch Magazine that significantly covers J. Math by name as well as some history around his career. - I referenced a hiphopdx.com article that heavily reference and quotes J. Math. - I referenced a sohh.com article that heavily reference and quotes J. Math.
2. Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart.
- I updated the page with Billboard charts (Top 200, Hot 100) that list J. Math as a composer on at least 5 different songs by notable artists, such as 2Pac, Wu-Tang Clan, and G-Unit.
3. Has had a record certified gold or higher in at least one country.
- I updated the page to reflect that J. Math is listed as a composer on the RIAA gold certified album "Strength and Loyalty" by Bone Thugs-n-Harmony.
11. Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network.
- J. Math is listed as a composer on G-Unit's "I Like The Way She Do It", which was in heavy rotation on national radio and the music video aired regularly on MTV.
Kairaba ( talk) 16:51, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Kairaba Duplicate keep !voye. Struck off Nordic Nightfury 10:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) clpo13( talk) 19:53, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Unsourced stub with barely-paraphrased web content. Will be covered in Off-road tire (which I'm working on), barring further deletionism. Jergling ( talk) 22:25, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:51, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete and Salt as this has been restarted despite, not only a speedy G11 before, but an AfD Delete close last year with clear consensus, and there's literally nothing better from this article from when it was last deleted, searches unsurprisingly found triviality, and that's exactly what the listed sources are, either trivial PR or republished PR interviews, no actual substance. Also, the last AfD showed there was paid advertising contributions from advertising-only accounts which seems to be a viable option in this current case. Regardless of publications listed, it's all still in fact PR advertising, and some of the publications classify it themselves by either explicitly saying so or otherwise in similar form. SwisterTwister talk 22:15, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
An article about two teams that have met just four times in their history; see WP:NRIVALRY as to why this is not worthy of its own article. Furthermore, an internet search reveals that the rivalry does exist but there is certainly nothing to suggest a wider WP:GNG pass. The article consists entirely of original research also. Spiderone 22:03, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. North America 1000 00:18, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Organization stub unref since 2009
Staszek Lem (
talk)
21:53, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
This article has been tagged as failing to meet Wikipedia's standards for four years now; little has been done to address these issues. I don't believe that this 'rivalry' warrants its own article; the teams haven't met that many times; I can find very little coverage on the internet other than trivial mentions and coverage from unreliable blogs and forums. The article is almost entirely original research. Also see WP:NRIVALRY; rivalries are not inherently notable and WP:GNG needs to be met independently. Spiderone 21:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. The article is now supported by more than one reliable source, which appears to have been the main concern for the delete !voters. ( non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 18:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm not sure this list is notable enough to warrant it's own article. It might be, but I'd like to see what other folks opinions are. Kaldari ( talk) 21:37, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America 1000 00:14, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable conservation non-profit worker. No reliable sources to be found. Google has him showing up as being quoted in a few pages related to birding, but not enough to be non-trivial under WP:GNG. TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete and WP:SALT both Sukuma calendar and Sukuma Calendar. Note that after this close I have also nominated Draft:Sukuma Calendar for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sukuma Calendar. North America 1000 00:21, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Previously deleted at Sukuma Calendar as a blatant hoax. See also Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard/Archive 51#Sukuma Ancient Salt Technology, about related articles created by the same user. Cordless Larry ( talk) 19:06, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:03, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete. WP:BLP, referenced entirely to primary sources except for a single glancing namecheck of his existence in a news article that isn't about him, of a single-market radio and television personality. As always, merely existing as a local media personality is not an automatic inclusion freebie -- it would be enough if he could be sourced over WP:GNG for it, but there is no automatic presumption of notability just because he exists if there's this little sourcing to support it. Bearcat ( talk) 18:47, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete: as non-notbale. Completely fails GNG, few credentials and no indication of a successful career. I am sorry she/they had a short life but, just as with any other category, not all drag queens are equally notable. Quis separabit? 18:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete: no significant sources. Staszek Lem ( talk) 21:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. consensus DGG ( talk ) 18:37, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
unremarkable journalist. fails WP:JOURNALIST criteria Domdeparis ( talk) 18:31, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- thats debatable, Im updating the article including quite some references to his work œæœ( Rinotova ( talk) 13:40, 22 November 2016 (UTC))
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
makes no claims of notability Domdeparis ( talk) 18:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Band does not meet the WP:BAND criteria they haven't been launched yet and the project does not seem notable as yet. Domdeparis ( talk) 18:12, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:MUSBIO notability cirteria Domdeparis ( talk) 17:46, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:08, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
unremarkable and profoundly promotional. Even the photo is inappropriate IMHO. fails WP:BLP conditions Domdeparis ( talk) 17:42, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn as passing WP:PROF#C5. ( non-admin closure) Nsk92 ( talk) 21:58, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NACADEMIC criteria Domdeparis ( talk) 17:04, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 01:12, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:Music and seemingly WP:GNG. Found three interviews: http://www.reelscotland.com/interview-paul-leonard-morgan-on-scoring-dredd/ http://coolmusicltd.com/composers/paul-leonard-morgan/ http://www.dewolfemusic.com/page/Paul_Leonard_Morgan 2 of which are for commercial ventures he is involved with.
additional issues unrelated to deletion: Almost reference less. Set up by SPA, has had copyvio issues from COI editors in the past (admittedly immediately reverted). Rayman60 ( talk) 16:56, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 23:37, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
I failed to find significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources to support notability. The speedy was declined but the subject fails to pass WP:GNG. GSS ( talk) 16:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:14, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable journalist who fails WP:GNG and WP:NJOURNALIST. Article appears to be autobiographical or at least have some conflict of interest based on the creator's username. Google search only returned Facebook hits for me, and Google News brought up no sources on the individual. TonyBallioni ( talk) 16:46, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:24, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The company founded by User:Spurkait, whose autobio article is now also at Afd, this Nettech has also been edited by banned sockpuppeteer account User:Maqs1231, whose article Nettech Ltd is also at Afd as part of a WP:Walled garden of spam articles. As for this Nettech, while it may well be a legitimate and worthwhile training provider, neither the copious references on the article nor what I find through my own search amount to enough significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:08, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 13:45, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
This article has only two cited sources and relatively biased content, out of tone with the rest of the wiki. 141.114.194.83 ( talk) 04:05, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 23:33, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
This person does not seem to meet WP:GNG. being a future board member of Deutsche Telekom is not sufficient I believe. Domdeparis ( talk) 14:56, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) LibStar ( talk) 01:14, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:BIO. keep !voters need to actually demonstrate not notability beyond inherent notability. The one source provided although detailed is written by his daughter so cannot be considered independent of the subject. LibStar ( talk) 14:52, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedily deleted as created by a block-evading editor. (It was also close to be speedily-deletable as promotion.) The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 21:10, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
there are no sources backing up the claim as being "official" none found on the web Domdeparis ( talk) 14:26, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 17:51, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Blatant hoax, no Google hits outside false positives and Wikipedia mirrors. Especially the train-killing anecdote sounds like an obvious joke. Speedy deletion deprodded purely because the article is 10 years old (which does not seem a great argument). Even if not a hoax, there is no claim of notability whatsoever, as the subject seems like a random fascist who achieved nothing in his life, but given the tone of the article especially in its early version [5], the lack of sources, the lack of Google hits, the history of its IP creator who later tried to create a further hoax through WP:AFC ( [6]), there is little doubt it is a hoax. Cavarrone 13:29, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. While there are concerns being voiced about whether the sources located bestow WP:N, I do not see a consensus to delete the article. Joyous! | Talk 01:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable website without a single reliable source giving in-depth coverage of them. Links to their website have been actively spammed here for a long time by throw-away IPs on a considerable number of articles, and it was when doing an external link search (looking for more spam links) that I found the article. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 19:23, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I believe the reason McGeddon gave in his removed PROD is valid; "Fails WP:BASIC with no secondary sources". The sources given seem to only be links to the radio stations mentioned in the article, without indicating how they are relevant to this person. Article seems to be an autobiography for promotional purposes. 331dot ( talk) 12:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
If you tell me how to add secondary sources then I will add them. The page is not for promotional reasons at all it's to highlight achievements in the radio industry over the past 15 years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigbailey0012 ( talk • contribs) 12:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. I'm trying to change username but have no idea what the instructions are telling me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigbailey0012 ( talk • contribs) 12:19, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Lets have a chat? no idea how to but I am trying to resolve every issue you are throwing at me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigbailey0012 ( talk • contribs) 12:34, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Wrong forum - AfD is not the place to propose a merge, and deletion is incompatible with merging. Michig ( talk) 10:45, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Not a notable product, many news articles about it are actually press releases. Suggest merging anything usable into Kerio Technologies Shritwod ( talk) 09:03, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Wrong forum - AfD is not the place to propose a merge, and deletion is incompatible with merging. Michig ( talk) 10:46, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Not a notable product, many news articles about it are actually press releases. Suggest merging anything usable into Kerio Technologies Shritwod ( talk) 09:03, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Wrong forum - AfD is not the place to propose a merge, and deletion is incompatible with merging. Michig ( talk) 10:46, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Not a notable product, many news articles about it are actually press releases. Suggest merging anything usable into Kerio Technologies Shritwod ( talk) 09:03, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:29, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Rail cruft - refs mainly point to Flickr/original research blog posts etc. Non notable company, only interested in rail related leasing. Nordic Nightfury 07:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. JohnCD ( talk) 17:53, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:BLP, WP:CREATIVE. Could not find any reliable sources online. Mr. Guye ( talk) 04:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NEOLOGISM. Mr. Guye ( talk) 03:53, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
This article about a living person is in clear violation of COI policies, as described for instance in WP:PSCOI. It was plainly written by its subject, as you can see in the history, and it is laid out like a CV. I’ve mentioned all this in the talk page and gotten no response. Eflatmajor7th ( talk) 15:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. consensus DGG ( talk ) 18:40, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Prod removed by creator. Many refs that proves that company exists, but no refs to show notability. Cannot find reliable sources to show notability. There are several sources in the article but most of them are primary sources; the rest do not appear in-depth enough to indicate notability. Cannot find any coverage of the site itself. -- Darth Mike (talk) 15:54, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the feedback but I can assure you as the creator the intention of this piece isn't promotional, but to provide details on the long history of the business using Gizmodo as base structure to create the page. I will look to add a section on coverage with details on breaking news & additional notable sources. Will post here as soon as this has been updated, any further advice & guidance is greatly appreciated. — Coast123 ( talk) 9:30, 10 November 2016 (GMT)
1. Two sentences that shows it exists. 2. Own site. First party. 3. Not about site, about culture clashes. 4. Three sentences that shows it exists. 5. A line in a chart (it exists). 6. Linked-In profile 8. Short paragraph that says it exists. 9. It exists. 11. Looks like a paid advertisement. 12. Own site. First party. 13. Three sentences that shows it exists. Of the two left, 7 and 10, they're both just interviews with the creator. Not independent from the subject matter. -- Darth Mike (talk) 13:48, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy G11 by Ritchie333. czar 19:51, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Article seems promotional. Mr. Guye ( talk) 03:11, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. While several participants believe the article(s) should be deleted based on WP:NOSTATS, several others pointed to very similar articles that had been improved to the point of...encyclopedia-ness... Even the user who made the original nomination changed his mind. Joyous! | Talk 01:42, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages because they all fail the same criteria:
Delete all. See change of vote below. (Information is more readily available in specialist online cricket sites and should not be repeated here per
WP:NOTSTATS,
WP:MIRROR,
WP:DIRECTORY.
Jack |
talk page 19:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Jack |
talk page
19:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 19:53, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Dubious notability. The article demonstrates no more than mere existence. The listing of the second-level officers makes it a promotional directory entry. I cannot access the first reference, but "being in the next wave of trading firms" in Poland is not notability. The second is just a local article on a local firm, and that is not reliable for notability because local newspapers give coverage to all such firms. DGG ( talk ) 22:58, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro ( talk) 03:39, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, WP:NFILM. Mr. Guye ( talk) 02:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
No claim to any notability (notability is not inherited from one nationally broadcasted tv show). Fails WP:CORP and WP:NOTSOAPBOX. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 01:45, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
No independent reliable sources to give evidence of notability. David Biddulph ( talk) 04:33, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America 1000 23:15, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBIO. Two of the sources are dead; one is an unreliable YouTube source; and one, although reliable, only briefly mentions the subject. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 05:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
The above problems have been addressed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dennizm ( talk • contribs) 10:37, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 20:05, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 05:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
I've nominated this simply because it's not only so blatant business job listing (WP:SPAM and WP:NOT), but there's no actual claims of significance, hence this could use immediate deletion if possible, because (1) the one award listed is entirely trivial and unconvincing, being a trivial "citizen" award, regardless of where it comes from, and (2) she's only a finalist for a TV show, that's not at all a confirmation of actual notability or substance let alone a convincing article. Everything else simply goes to be exact business listing materials such as "She's a health advocate and plans to start a nonprofit). The fact this also then, next, goes to such specifics about her schools and education, it can only be either a self-advertised biography and it is, by User:Paigemobley. SwisterTwister talk 02:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete clearly a self-promo job created by the subject, User:Paigemobley. I guess she could become notable if she wins America's Next Top Model, but I see little out there yet beyond YouTube, Social Media etc and minor mentions as a finalist in PerezHilton.com and Parent Herald. Iadmc (Jubileeclipman) ( talk) 20:40, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Argument- Id like to make an argument against both Iadmc (Jubileeclipman) and SwisterTwister talk talk . Allow me to reference to the wiki articles of Michael Heverly, Cory Wade Hindorff, Jane Randall, Celia Ammerman, and Anchal Joseph. All of these former Top Model contestants have articles WITHOUT winning Top Model. They also ALL have far less "out there" or credits then that of Paige Mobley. To delete Paige Mobley without deleting all these other Top Model contestant articles would not make sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paigemobley ( talk • contribs) 21:04, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Argument Iadmc (Jubileeclipman) Im sorry, but I have to disagree. Cory Wade Hindorff "currently lives in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania." and Jane Randall " is engaged to a Canadian oil tycoon."... I don't see how these are notable or worthy establishments beyond the competition. As far as reliable sources go.. Ive read the article and I understand that collaboratively created websites (such as IMDB, personal site and Youtube) are not encouraged. However, the rest of the cited resources come from 3rd party acceptable articles. I will state again, to delete Paige Mobley while keeping the MANY other Top Model contestant articles does not make sense. Especially when MANY have significantly less accomplishments and experience than Paige Mobley. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paigemobley ( talk • contribs) 21:31, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
OK. I've flagged Cory Wade Hindorff for deletion I can only find social media etc for him. He's certainly an important role model for gay men and boys but little is written about him in third party sources. At least in the UK. The others have successful modelling careers though whether they are genuinely notable is also disputable. Iadmc (Jubileeclipman) ( talk) 01:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. North America 1000 23:12, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG. very gnews hits but mostly from one source. Despite being international very few winners are notable, in fact most winners are from host country so not sure if this is a world class marathon . I will reconsider if someone can find in-depth coverage in Chinese LibStar ( talk) 18:11, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Apology accepted. Currently the article is poorly sourced. LibStar ( talk) 18:22, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this is WP:NOTABLE. Boleyn ( talk) 14:53, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deletion G11. ( non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:31, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think pre-K to 8th grade schools are intrinsically notable. I think it's high school and above. If so, this article doesn't qualify as notable as I could not find significant coverage online. Mr. Guye ( talk) 02:20, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G12 (unambiguous copyvio of https://in.sagepub.com/en-in/sas/author/arindam-banik) by Ronhjones. — David Eppstein ( talk) 02:56, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
I could not find independent coverage online making it fail WP:GNG, and also it fails WP:NACADEMIC. Mr. Guye ( talk) 02:10, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 17:32, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Apparent hoax. I can't find any evidence this band exists, or has ever existed. Searches reveal nothing. Adam9007 ( talk) 02:03, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:49, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:BLP and WP:NMUSIC. Mr. Guye ( talk) 02:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Shirt58 ( talk) 05:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Kvng with the following rationale "Sourcing is not clearly insufficient so this deletion is potentially controversial." Well, as far as I am concerned the sourcing is weak and consists of unreliable, niche/minor spam-sites that are likely payed to promote content, and press-releases, which do so openly. It is also misleading - the first (now dead) ref was labelled CNBC but the link betrays it was just a republished press release. It was created by WP:SPA and likely WP:COI, given its name, User:Magda wolves - and sadly, since the event took place last weak, I guess the spammer achieved its goal; the least we can do is clean that up and delete it. As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:54, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was A7. Not waiting for this to WP:SNOW over. Ian.thomson ( talk) 03:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, non-notable fictional object RA0808 talk contribs 01:25, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Wikipedia isn't a free webhost for nonsensical analyses assserting that Apollo 11 didn't happen Acroterion (talk) 01:34, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Seems to be a mathematical opinion essay. Such content is not appropriate in an encyclopedia. Mr. Guye ( talk) 01:19, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:49, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Not a notable filmmaker/artist (theatrical director). No notable films. Can't find much reliable sources in the searches as well. Regards,
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (
talk
mail)
07:04, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:50, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Prod removed by creator with no reasoning. Cannot find any significant coverage in reliable sources. A few mentions to show that this event took place, but nothing substantial. -- Darth Mike (talk) 12:50, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale, which I still consider valid: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Peakipedia (Creator, WP:SPA) with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:42, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
No claim or indication of notability beyond the reality show, for which winning is required to show notability John from Idegon ( talk) 22:49, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Article is for a proposed alliance that never came to pass. Seems like news coverage was not lasting and was limited to Turkish newspapers. That is, doesn't appear to pass WP:EVENTCRITERIA (or WP:GNG). Ajpolino ( talk) 00:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. A redirect can be created at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 10:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I don't think elementary schools are intrinsically notable. Even if they are, this subject has little evidence of existence, let alone fulfillment of WP:GNG. Its Facebook page has 0 likes, and it is only MENTIONED in passing in other Wikipedia pages. Mr. Guye ( talk) 23:46, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:37, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Article is contested. Listed at AFD to determine consensus. Cloud9shopper ( talk) 23:38, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro ( talk) 03:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Insufficient indication of notability. The only proven claim to fame is that he's part of Street Radio (although I also have some questions about the notability of that subject, but that's another discussion), but notability is not inherited; J. Math needs to be notable in his own right to have an article. Nothing else in this article has any references to back it up, and even if it did, it wouldn't do that much to indicate notability. The only potentially good source currently on this article is the Vibe Magazine mention; however, I actually looked up the August 2008 issue of Vibe, and Street Radio gets only the briefest of brief mentions in that issue (page 46) -- certainly not enough to indicate notability. I did some thorough searching but I really couldn't find any other credible/verifiable sources indicating that J. Math might be notable. IagoQnsi ( talk) 04:17, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
KEEP Page has been updated with many new sources and information regarding the issues raised above. J. Math's main point of notability is that as a songwriter for notable artists like 50 Cent, Wu-Tang Clan, Cam'ron, Rick Ross, Wu-Tang Clan, Styles P, and many more. He is credited as such on multiple major label albums that have placed on Billboard charts internationally, which I have updated the page with. He is also credited as such for the RIAA gold certified album "Strength and Loyalty" by Bone Thugs-n-Harmony.
Another point of notability is that he often is credited with other roles, specifically A&R and mixing engineer, and has been integrally involved with many major label or notable independent label releases, including 2Pac, Wu-Tang Clan, and Styles P. I updated the page with these credits and included many online sources, while using the liner notes from these albums to confirm. I also found interviews with J. Math and included a couple quotes regarding the development of these albums. Kairaba ( talk) 05:22, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Kairaba
KEEP I'm not sure why above user thinks the subject of this article fails
WP:MUSBIO. This notability standard clearly states that "Musicians or ensembles (this category includes bands, singers, rappers, orchestras, DJs, musical theatre groups, instrumentalists, etc.) may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria:" and then it lists 12 different points of notability. The article says someone may be notable if they meet at least 1 criteria, and I have shown that the subject of the article meets at least 4 of those 12. I will list them and their satisfactions here for convenience.
1. Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself
- I referenced an article from Vibe Magazine which is entitled "Reasons why hip-hop isn't dead". That article goes on to list only 5 notable producers/composers of which J. Math is one. - I referenced an a full page article in Scratch Magazine that significantly covers J. Math by name as well as some history around his career. - I referenced a hiphopdx.com article that heavily reference and quotes J. Math. - I referenced a sohh.com article that heavily reference and quotes J. Math.
2. Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart.
- I updated the page with Billboard charts (Top 200, Hot 100) that list J. Math as a composer on at least 5 different songs by notable artists, such as 2Pac, Wu-Tang Clan, and G-Unit.
3. Has had a record certified gold or higher in at least one country.
- I updated the page to reflect that J. Math is listed as a composer on the RIAA gold certified album "Strength and Loyalty" by Bone Thugs-n-Harmony.
11. Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network.
- J. Math is listed as a composer on G-Unit's "I Like The Way She Do It", which was in heavy rotation on national radio and the music video aired regularly on MTV.
Kairaba ( talk) 16:51, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Kairaba Duplicate keep !voye. Struck off Nordic Nightfury 10:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) clpo13( talk) 19:53, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Unsourced stub with barely-paraphrased web content. Will be covered in Off-road tire (which I'm working on), barring further deletionism. Jergling ( talk) 22:25, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:51, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete and Salt as this has been restarted despite, not only a speedy G11 before, but an AfD Delete close last year with clear consensus, and there's literally nothing better from this article from when it was last deleted, searches unsurprisingly found triviality, and that's exactly what the listed sources are, either trivial PR or republished PR interviews, no actual substance. Also, the last AfD showed there was paid advertising contributions from advertising-only accounts which seems to be a viable option in this current case. Regardless of publications listed, it's all still in fact PR advertising, and some of the publications classify it themselves by either explicitly saying so or otherwise in similar form. SwisterTwister talk 22:15, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
An article about two teams that have met just four times in their history; see WP:NRIVALRY as to why this is not worthy of its own article. Furthermore, an internet search reveals that the rivalry does exist but there is certainly nothing to suggest a wider WP:GNG pass. The article consists entirely of original research also. Spiderone 22:03, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. North America 1000 00:18, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Organization stub unref since 2009
Staszek Lem (
talk)
21:53, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
This article has been tagged as failing to meet Wikipedia's standards for four years now; little has been done to address these issues. I don't believe that this 'rivalry' warrants its own article; the teams haven't met that many times; I can find very little coverage on the internet other than trivial mentions and coverage from unreliable blogs and forums. The article is almost entirely original research. Also see WP:NRIVALRY; rivalries are not inherently notable and WP:GNG needs to be met independently. Spiderone 21:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. The article is now supported by more than one reliable source, which appears to have been the main concern for the delete !voters. ( non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 18:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm not sure this list is notable enough to warrant it's own article. It might be, but I'd like to see what other folks opinions are. Kaldari ( talk) 21:37, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America 1000 00:14, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable conservation non-profit worker. No reliable sources to be found. Google has him showing up as being quoted in a few pages related to birding, but not enough to be non-trivial under WP:GNG. TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete and WP:SALT both Sukuma calendar and Sukuma Calendar. Note that after this close I have also nominated Draft:Sukuma Calendar for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sukuma Calendar. North America 1000 00:21, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Previously deleted at Sukuma Calendar as a blatant hoax. See also Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard/Archive 51#Sukuma Ancient Salt Technology, about related articles created by the same user. Cordless Larry ( talk) 19:06, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:03, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete. WP:BLP, referenced entirely to primary sources except for a single glancing namecheck of his existence in a news article that isn't about him, of a single-market radio and television personality. As always, merely existing as a local media personality is not an automatic inclusion freebie -- it would be enough if he could be sourced over WP:GNG for it, but there is no automatic presumption of notability just because he exists if there's this little sourcing to support it. Bearcat ( talk) 18:47, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete: as non-notbale. Completely fails GNG, few credentials and no indication of a successful career. I am sorry she/they had a short life but, just as with any other category, not all drag queens are equally notable. Quis separabit? 18:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete: no significant sources. Staszek Lem ( talk) 21:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. consensus DGG ( talk ) 18:37, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
unremarkable journalist. fails WP:JOURNALIST criteria Domdeparis ( talk) 18:31, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- thats debatable, Im updating the article including quite some references to his work œæœ( Rinotova ( talk) 13:40, 22 November 2016 (UTC))
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
makes no claims of notability Domdeparis ( talk) 18:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Band does not meet the WP:BAND criteria they haven't been launched yet and the project does not seem notable as yet. Domdeparis ( talk) 18:12, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:MUSBIO notability cirteria Domdeparis ( talk) 17:46, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:08, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
unremarkable and profoundly promotional. Even the photo is inappropriate IMHO. fails WP:BLP conditions Domdeparis ( talk) 17:42, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn as passing WP:PROF#C5. ( non-admin closure) Nsk92 ( talk) 21:58, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NACADEMIC criteria Domdeparis ( talk) 17:04, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 01:12, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:Music and seemingly WP:GNG. Found three interviews: http://www.reelscotland.com/interview-paul-leonard-morgan-on-scoring-dredd/ http://coolmusicltd.com/composers/paul-leonard-morgan/ http://www.dewolfemusic.com/page/Paul_Leonard_Morgan 2 of which are for commercial ventures he is involved with.
additional issues unrelated to deletion: Almost reference less. Set up by SPA, has had copyvio issues from COI editors in the past (admittedly immediately reverted). Rayman60 ( talk) 16:56, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 23:37, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
I failed to find significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources to support notability. The speedy was declined but the subject fails to pass WP:GNG. GSS ( talk) 16:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:14, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable journalist who fails WP:GNG and WP:NJOURNALIST. Article appears to be autobiographical or at least have some conflict of interest based on the creator's username. Google search only returned Facebook hits for me, and Google News brought up no sources on the individual. TonyBallioni ( talk) 16:46, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:24, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The company founded by User:Spurkait, whose autobio article is now also at Afd, this Nettech has also been edited by banned sockpuppeteer account User:Maqs1231, whose article Nettech Ltd is also at Afd as part of a WP:Walled garden of spam articles. As for this Nettech, while it may well be a legitimate and worthwhile training provider, neither the copious references on the article nor what I find through my own search amount to enough significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:08, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 13:45, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
This article has only two cited sources and relatively biased content, out of tone with the rest of the wiki. 141.114.194.83 ( talk) 04:05, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 23:33, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
This person does not seem to meet WP:GNG. being a future board member of Deutsche Telekom is not sufficient I believe. Domdeparis ( talk) 14:56, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) LibStar ( talk) 01:14, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:BIO. keep !voters need to actually demonstrate not notability beyond inherent notability. The one source provided although detailed is written by his daughter so cannot be considered independent of the subject. LibStar ( talk) 14:52, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedily deleted as created by a block-evading editor. (It was also close to be speedily-deletable as promotion.) The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 21:10, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
there are no sources backing up the claim as being "official" none found on the web Domdeparis ( talk) 14:26, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 17:51, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Blatant hoax, no Google hits outside false positives and Wikipedia mirrors. Especially the train-killing anecdote sounds like an obvious joke. Speedy deletion deprodded purely because the article is 10 years old (which does not seem a great argument). Even if not a hoax, there is no claim of notability whatsoever, as the subject seems like a random fascist who achieved nothing in his life, but given the tone of the article especially in its early version [5], the lack of sources, the lack of Google hits, the history of its IP creator who later tried to create a further hoax through WP:AFC ( [6]), there is little doubt it is a hoax. Cavarrone 13:29, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. While there are concerns being voiced about whether the sources located bestow WP:N, I do not see a consensus to delete the article. Joyous! | Talk 01:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable website without a single reliable source giving in-depth coverage of them. Links to their website have been actively spammed here for a long time by throw-away IPs on a considerable number of articles, and it was when doing an external link search (looking for more spam links) that I found the article. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 19:23, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I believe the reason McGeddon gave in his removed PROD is valid; "Fails WP:BASIC with no secondary sources". The sources given seem to only be links to the radio stations mentioned in the article, without indicating how they are relevant to this person. Article seems to be an autobiography for promotional purposes. 331dot ( talk) 12:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
If you tell me how to add secondary sources then I will add them. The page is not for promotional reasons at all it's to highlight achievements in the radio industry over the past 15 years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigbailey0012 ( talk • contribs) 12:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. I'm trying to change username but have no idea what the instructions are telling me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigbailey0012 ( talk • contribs) 12:19, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Lets have a chat? no idea how to but I am trying to resolve every issue you are throwing at me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigbailey0012 ( talk • contribs) 12:34, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Wrong forum - AfD is not the place to propose a merge, and deletion is incompatible with merging. Michig ( talk) 10:45, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Not a notable product, many news articles about it are actually press releases. Suggest merging anything usable into Kerio Technologies Shritwod ( talk) 09:03, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Wrong forum - AfD is not the place to propose a merge, and deletion is incompatible with merging. Michig ( talk) 10:46, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Not a notable product, many news articles about it are actually press releases. Suggest merging anything usable into Kerio Technologies Shritwod ( talk) 09:03, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Wrong forum - AfD is not the place to propose a merge, and deletion is incompatible with merging. Michig ( talk) 10:46, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Not a notable product, many news articles about it are actually press releases. Suggest merging anything usable into Kerio Technologies Shritwod ( talk) 09:03, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:29, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Rail cruft - refs mainly point to Flickr/original research blog posts etc. Non notable company, only interested in rail related leasing. Nordic Nightfury 07:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. JohnCD ( talk) 17:53, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:BLP, WP:CREATIVE. Could not find any reliable sources online. Mr. Guye ( talk) 04:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NEOLOGISM. Mr. Guye ( talk) 03:53, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
This article about a living person is in clear violation of COI policies, as described for instance in WP:PSCOI. It was plainly written by its subject, as you can see in the history, and it is laid out like a CV. I’ve mentioned all this in the talk page and gotten no response. Eflatmajor7th ( talk) 15:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. consensus DGG ( talk ) 18:40, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Prod removed by creator. Many refs that proves that company exists, but no refs to show notability. Cannot find reliable sources to show notability. There are several sources in the article but most of them are primary sources; the rest do not appear in-depth enough to indicate notability. Cannot find any coverage of the site itself. -- Darth Mike (talk) 15:54, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the feedback but I can assure you as the creator the intention of this piece isn't promotional, but to provide details on the long history of the business using Gizmodo as base structure to create the page. I will look to add a section on coverage with details on breaking news & additional notable sources. Will post here as soon as this has been updated, any further advice & guidance is greatly appreciated. — Coast123 ( talk) 9:30, 10 November 2016 (GMT)
1. Two sentences that shows it exists. 2. Own site. First party. 3. Not about site, about culture clashes. 4. Three sentences that shows it exists. 5. A line in a chart (it exists). 6. Linked-In profile 8. Short paragraph that says it exists. 9. It exists. 11. Looks like a paid advertisement. 12. Own site. First party. 13. Three sentences that shows it exists. Of the two left, 7 and 10, they're both just interviews with the creator. Not independent from the subject matter. -- Darth Mike (talk) 13:48, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy G11 by Ritchie333. czar 19:51, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Article seems promotional. Mr. Guye ( talk) 03:11, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. While several participants believe the article(s) should be deleted based on WP:NOSTATS, several others pointed to very similar articles that had been improved to the point of...encyclopedia-ness... Even the user who made the original nomination changed his mind. Joyous! | Talk 01:42, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages because they all fail the same criteria:
Delete all. See change of vote below. (Information is more readily available in specialist online cricket sites and should not be repeated here per
WP:NOTSTATS,
WP:MIRROR,
WP:DIRECTORY.
Jack |
talk page 19:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Jack |
talk page
19:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 19:53, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Dubious notability. The article demonstrates no more than mere existence. The listing of the second-level officers makes it a promotional directory entry. I cannot access the first reference, but "being in the next wave of trading firms" in Poland is not notability. The second is just a local article on a local firm, and that is not reliable for notability because local newspapers give coverage to all such firms. DGG ( talk ) 22:58, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro ( talk) 03:39, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, WP:NFILM. Mr. Guye ( talk) 02:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
No claim to any notability (notability is not inherited from one nationally broadcasted tv show). Fails WP:CORP and WP:NOTSOAPBOX. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 01:45, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
No independent reliable sources to give evidence of notability. David Biddulph ( talk) 04:33, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America 1000 23:15, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBIO. Two of the sources are dead; one is an unreliable YouTube source; and one, although reliable, only briefly mentions the subject. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 05:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
The above problems have been addressed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dennizm ( talk • contribs) 10:37, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 20:05, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 05:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
I've nominated this simply because it's not only so blatant business job listing (WP:SPAM and WP:NOT), but there's no actual claims of significance, hence this could use immediate deletion if possible, because (1) the one award listed is entirely trivial and unconvincing, being a trivial "citizen" award, regardless of where it comes from, and (2) she's only a finalist for a TV show, that's not at all a confirmation of actual notability or substance let alone a convincing article. Everything else simply goes to be exact business listing materials such as "She's a health advocate and plans to start a nonprofit). The fact this also then, next, goes to such specifics about her schools and education, it can only be either a self-advertised biography and it is, by User:Paigemobley. SwisterTwister talk 02:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete clearly a self-promo job created by the subject, User:Paigemobley. I guess she could become notable if she wins America's Next Top Model, but I see little out there yet beyond YouTube, Social Media etc and minor mentions as a finalist in PerezHilton.com and Parent Herald. Iadmc (Jubileeclipman) ( talk) 20:40, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Argument- Id like to make an argument against both Iadmc (Jubileeclipman) and SwisterTwister talk talk . Allow me to reference to the wiki articles of Michael Heverly, Cory Wade Hindorff, Jane Randall, Celia Ammerman, and Anchal Joseph. All of these former Top Model contestants have articles WITHOUT winning Top Model. They also ALL have far less "out there" or credits then that of Paige Mobley. To delete Paige Mobley without deleting all these other Top Model contestant articles would not make sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paigemobley ( talk • contribs) 21:04, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Argument Iadmc (Jubileeclipman) Im sorry, but I have to disagree. Cory Wade Hindorff "currently lives in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania." and Jane Randall " is engaged to a Canadian oil tycoon."... I don't see how these are notable or worthy establishments beyond the competition. As far as reliable sources go.. Ive read the article and I understand that collaboratively created websites (such as IMDB, personal site and Youtube) are not encouraged. However, the rest of the cited resources come from 3rd party acceptable articles. I will state again, to delete Paige Mobley while keeping the MANY other Top Model contestant articles does not make sense. Especially when MANY have significantly less accomplishments and experience than Paige Mobley. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paigemobley ( talk • contribs) 21:31, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
OK. I've flagged Cory Wade Hindorff for deletion I can only find social media etc for him. He's certainly an important role model for gay men and boys but little is written about him in third party sources. At least in the UK. The others have successful modelling careers though whether they are genuinely notable is also disputable. Iadmc (Jubileeclipman) ( talk) 01:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. North America 1000 23:12, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG. very gnews hits but mostly from one source. Despite being international very few winners are notable, in fact most winners are from host country so not sure if this is a world class marathon . I will reconsider if someone can find in-depth coverage in Chinese LibStar ( talk) 18:11, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Apology accepted. Currently the article is poorly sourced. LibStar ( talk) 18:22, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this is WP:NOTABLE. Boleyn ( talk) 14:53, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deletion G11. ( non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:31, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think pre-K to 8th grade schools are intrinsically notable. I think it's high school and above. If so, this article doesn't qualify as notable as I could not find significant coverage online. Mr. Guye ( talk) 02:20, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G12 (unambiguous copyvio of https://in.sagepub.com/en-in/sas/author/arindam-banik) by Ronhjones. — David Eppstein ( talk) 02:56, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
I could not find independent coverage online making it fail WP:GNG, and also it fails WP:NACADEMIC. Mr. Guye ( talk) 02:10, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 17:32, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Apparent hoax. I can't find any evidence this band exists, or has ever existed. Searches reveal nothing. Adam9007 ( talk) 02:03, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:49, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:BLP and WP:NMUSIC. Mr. Guye ( talk) 02:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Shirt58 ( talk) 05:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Kvng with the following rationale "Sourcing is not clearly insufficient so this deletion is potentially controversial." Well, as far as I am concerned the sourcing is weak and consists of unreliable, niche/minor spam-sites that are likely payed to promote content, and press-releases, which do so openly. It is also misleading - the first (now dead) ref was labelled CNBC but the link betrays it was just a republished press release. It was created by WP:SPA and likely WP:COI, given its name, User:Magda wolves - and sadly, since the event took place last weak, I guess the spammer achieved its goal; the least we can do is clean that up and delete it. As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:54, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was A7. Not waiting for this to WP:SNOW over. Ian.thomson ( talk) 03:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, non-notable fictional object RA0808 talk contribs 01:25, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Wikipedia isn't a free webhost for nonsensical analyses assserting that Apollo 11 didn't happen Acroterion (talk) 01:34, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Seems to be a mathematical opinion essay. Such content is not appropriate in an encyclopedia. Mr. Guye ( talk) 01:19, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:49, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Not a notable filmmaker/artist (theatrical director). No notable films. Can't find much reliable sources in the searches as well. Regards,
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (
talk
mail)
07:04, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:50, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Prod removed by creator with no reasoning. Cannot find any significant coverage in reliable sources. A few mentions to show that this event took place, but nothing substantial. -- Darth Mike (talk) 12:50, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale, which I still consider valid: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Peakipedia (Creator, WP:SPA) with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:42, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
No claim or indication of notability beyond the reality show, for which winning is required to show notability John from Idegon ( talk) 22:49, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Article is for a proposed alliance that never came to pass. Seems like news coverage was not lasting and was limited to Turkish newspapers. That is, doesn't appear to pass WP:EVENTCRITERIA (or WP:GNG). Ajpolino ( talk) 00:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)