![]() |
The result was nomination withdrawn as the article now contains a much stronger notability claim and better sourcing than it did at the time of nomination. Bearcat ( talk) 16:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Completely unsourced biography of a person notable only as "Speaker of the House" in the unofficial provisional legislature of a proposed U.S. state that never actually became a real state. While that might be valid grounds for an article if he could actually be sourced over WP:GNG for it, it's not an automatic WP:NPOL pass in the absence of any valid sourcing. Bearcat ( talk) 12:29, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 10:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Reviewing the article. I think it Fails policy WP:BIO. Its reads like a CV. Named to Thomson Reuters’ Super Lawyers each year since 2007. Could be notable? scope_creep ( talk) 11:59, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Student photographer who fails WP:CREATIVE.
Several dead references but Kultplus works and translation of block of text states:
Also participating in this evening will be Jenny Guy, student of the Art Academy of Düsseldorf which a few weeks ago presented its works in a major exhibition in Düsseldorf. In the evening she will be presented with some pictures that motivated mainly men.
This was published on 2016-03-15. Fails WP:GNG. scope_creep ( talk) 11:41, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Baaghi (2016 film). ( Non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:31, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Fails notability. Draft was declined thrice at AfC earlier this year for notability concerns. See Draft:Grandmaster Shifuji Shaurya Bhardwaj. — MBlaze Lightning T 09:09, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
This specific product is not notable on its own. The references and material in the article only refer to usual announcements about funding and product launches. A search of online sources about it doesn't yield much to establish notability either. Tushi Talk To Me 07:33, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) B E C K Y S A Y L E S 01:51, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable person due to lack of indepth coverage. Marvellous Spider-Man 05:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:36, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
no evidence that it is yet in regular production. The 2016 review says its major product is still in beta. DGG ( talk ) 05:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The 2016 review has a correction in its first comment stating it is no longer in BETA. Following your comment here, I have reached out to the review author to update the post in order to reflect that Megaventory is in full production mode (bear in mind the review post was initially put together in 2014).
Also, note that the product is not only in production but also in notable ranking - as is reflected in the relevant industry metric which is the GetRank. Megaventory is currently #17 in a global market of dozens of similar solutions and it has 30+ reviews in GetRank from an equal number of LinkedIn-authenticated users. This link to getapp.com was in the initial version of the Megaventory article and was rejected by a previous reviewer but I'd be glad to include the link again if you feel it adds to the newsworthiness of the Megaventory article.
Let me know if you have any other concerns you see in the article which can be addressed in the meantime and until the 2016 review article is updated with regards to the BETA mention. Thank you for taking the time to offer feedback which can be used to improve the article. Dathanasiadis ( talk) 15:12, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Presumably the WP:NOT is in reference to Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion and in particular (5) - Advertising, marketing or public relations. All content and corresponding references in the article are verifiable and from notable, third party sources - earlier feedback from other Wikipedia users has ensured this. Indicatively, the references include partnerships with a national ISP (COSMOTE), a multinational tech vendor (NEC), a national app marketplace (Maestrano), an independent review site which has taken the time to write a 3500-word unsolicited review (Merchant Maverick) and others. Please indicate if there are specific concerns with any of the included sources and associated content.
Dathanasiadis ( talk) 11:15, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mkdw talk 07:09, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
No real coverage of this run of the mill website, same as last time around. The citations consist of blogs and weak "news" orgs that "write" articles that are mere paraphrases of announcements and press releases. No real reporting, If the subject weren't touting these "events", nobody would know that they happened because they don't matter outside of this company's tiny fishbowl. They are using Wikipedia for PR. Dennis Bratland ( talk) 04:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable single. Sources in the article are unreliable, and no reliable ones could be found with a web search. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 03:53, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
This is a programming language designed as a teaching example in a textbook, and Google searches do not support the language meeting WP:GNG on its own. Page contains no references. Dgpop ( talk) 00:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 05:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Despite an extensive search for sources, I simply failed to find enough significant independent reliable coverage for this film. Most of what I could find are press releases, movie profiles, promotional material, and even false positives. Apparently this film was screened at a film festival which makes me hesitant to nominate this for deletion, but coverage (including reviews) is sorely lacking; the film apparently doesn't even have a Rotten Tomatoes page. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 00:51, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
While anyone can compile such lists by looking at past charts or back issues of Billboard in print or online, the topic of top ten alternative or modern rock songs is not one receiving significant discussion in independent sources, failing notability requirements for stand-alone lists. These may also qualify as "an indiscriminate collection of information" per WP:IINFO; otherwise, this may as well be expanded to include top 20 or top 40 chart hits. The list of Billboard number-one alternative hits would seem to be sufficient. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 23:18, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 01:13, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. There seems to be very little coverage in mainstream sources; I can find only a few Swedish language mentions, and nothing that would show notability. As for her career, it seems she has had one somewhat popular song ("Bang, Bang"), but it does not seem to have charted or received any awards; as such, it does not seem that the subject meets WP:MUSICBIO. Colonel Wilhelm Klink ( Complaints| Mistakes) 22:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. The one "keep" does not address the policy-based reasons advanced for deletion. Sandstein 09:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
This topic does not establish notability. TTN ( talk) 22:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters. Sandstein 09:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
This does not establish notability. TTN ( talk) 22:33, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. consensus DGG ( talk ) 00:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
This fails to establish notability. TTN ( talk) 22:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to DNA bank as alternate spelling. ( Non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
topic already exists at DNA bank. Can't delete per WP:A10 because it was not recently deleted. I would suggest a merge, but the article is so short that it contains little meaningful information. Icebob99 ( talk) 21:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
This article should be deleted as it fails WP:NOTTRAVELGUIDE as the whole article is written as a travel guide for a beach. - KAP03 ( talk) 21:13, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 01:09, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Much more of a definition than an article; would be more at home on Wiktionary. Okamialvis ( talk) 21:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters. Sandstein 09:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Does not meet notability requirements for fictional characters. Okamialvis ( talk) 20:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 01:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
non notable author: Two books, one in 6 libraries, the other in only 2. DGG ( talk ) 20:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
PROD removed by author stating that the album is notable. Still fails NALBUM and GNG as my PROD stands. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:50, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
non notable author -- a few self-published books with trivial reviews. DGG ( talk ) 19:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 10:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
This article should be deleted because it fails WP:FUTURE and WP:TOOSOON by being about a unreleased movie. It also fails WP:GNG because there is only one source verifying its existence. KAP03 ( talk) 19:19, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. The one "keep" does not address the reasons for deletion. Sandstein 10:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Looks as case of WP:TOSOON. Recent (2014) musical graduate with no significant coverage. Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 19:17, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Harrias because the creator ( User:Yousef.Alipour, WP:SPA) contested it at talk; unfortunately I cannot credit Harrias with good judgement, as the creator's argument at Talk:Inspecta show total lack of understanding of the notability guidelines I clearly linked in my PROD ("Inspecta has already have pages in two other languages... The company is growing fast and it's good to let other know about in the international language... You can easily find information about almost any company in wiki with even less than 100 employee" - those are textbook examples from Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions). Now we have to waste our time with this here. Sigh. As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. PS. Ping User:Anarchyte who suggested speedy deletion before my prod. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 19:13, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:J31ox (creator, WP:SPA) with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like spam. PS. Ping User:Superbeecat who nominated it for speedy before my prod. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 19:06, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 01:13, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Unreferenced, autobiography has "appeared" on three shows no evidence to such suggest they meet WP:GNG Theroadislong ( talk) 19:06, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " Iteɪ was deprodded by User:Mean as custard with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Jepsen was Miss Nebraska. That is her only semi-notable accomplishment, and that alone is not enough to demonstrate notability. The statements about her performance at Miss America probably do not rise to adding to her notability, and they are entirely unsourced. The only source on the article at present does not even related to her at all, it is a directory that shows that her borther was a semi-accomplished athletie in Nebraska. My search for sources showed up a picture in the John F. Kennedy papers of her giving a baton to a presidential aid to give to Caroline Kennedy. This article is an example of why we should not keep articles on minor people who have one thing that brings them close to notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 18:50, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Miss Nebraska. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
While this looks like a well sourced article, it is exactly the type of article the discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiproject Beauty Pageants talk page RfC has determined we do not need. All Howell has done so far is win Miss Nebraska. This in an d of itself is not enough to establish her notability. None of the sources are either outside of local sources covering her competition, some of them when she was still in high school in extremely local coverage, press releases, passing mentions or the like. Nothing moves beyond her lone blip of being Miss Nebraska, and any information related to this can be included on the Miss Nebraska page. There is no reason to keep this article at present. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 18:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. consensus DGG ( talk ) 00:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Declined CSD. Completely unsourced article, Fails GNG. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 18:24, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
I am not really sure why this is being considered for deletion. Twenty20 Constructioni Cloud is a viable construction software solution much like Procore or Timberline by Sage. Both of which have Wiki pages. Other than the fact that this is a newer software solution, the information is still relevant, accurate and although possibly has some advertising undertones, it is the true history of this product. There were no links to the website or product pages. No offers and no contact information. I am happy to make modifications if recommended. Any suggestions are appreciated
Brant.wadsworth ( talk) 21:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Brant.wadsworth
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — MRD2014 ( talk • contribs) 21:57, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
This article was created by socks. The original article, Mackenzie Ziegler, which also involved sock puppetry, was created two years ago. It was speedied a few times and then deleted per a discussion, recreated yet again and speedied. I then salted it. There have been updates to the article because of the passing years. This is a procedural nomination. I express no view on whether the subject is sufficiently notable but dump it back in the community's lap for yet another discussion. For anyone searching for significant coverage in reliable sources, you'd be better off usiing Mackenzie as the first name rather than Kenzie. Kenzie was used only to avoid the salting. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
I could only locate obituary articles while searching for sources. Article does not meet the criteria for WP:GNG Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 17:16, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
This article should be deleted because it is WP:LISTCRUFT definitions 1,2,3,6, and 7 and fails WP:LISTN and WP:GNG. KAP03 ( talk) 16:09, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Related AfDs: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of French born footballers who have played for other national teams and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of footballers born in Argentina who have played for other national teams
The result was delete. No salting, as it's not been deleted previously. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Hoax. No Google Books or Google Scholar results for this "syndrome", also no Google results I could find other than Wikipedia mirrors and this apparent medical exam where it is listed as a possible (and almost certainly wrong) answer to a question. Everymorning (talk) 15:45, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Article PRODded with reason "Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded by article creator after adding a statement to the article that the journal will be added in the "Czech Natural Bibliography", a minor non-selective database. PROD reason still stands, hence: delete. Randykitty ( talk) 14:38, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deletion (G11). ( non-admin closure) AllyD ( talk) 14:14, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
There is no indication of importance, no references and the only links used are the subject's facebook page. Poorly written and formatted. HeyJude70 ( talk) 11:39, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Mistakes due to inexperience of author please pardon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajay Sivaprasad ( talk • contribs) 12:18, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Totally unsourced article about a brand new beauty pageant for men, previously deleted at AfD as Mister Supranational 2016 (the male counterpart to equally non-notable Miss Supranational, an article that has been deleted multiple times, and recreated almost as many times). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 10:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There are many things which may be non-neutral about this article, starting with the title, but it is not clear from the discussion that these problems warrant deletion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Whereas such an article can in principle exist, the current one, created by a user without previous contribution and full of POV language (part of which I removed) is a good example of WP:NOT. It is based on just one document - a statement of the Verkhovna Rada from 2014 (Ref.3) which just contains a (short) list of localitis not under Ukrainian control, and the rest is POV and original research. Note that the localities which are currently not under the Ukrainian control are not the same as in 2014. Ymblanter ( talk) 09:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Keep good and sustainable article. Deletion of previous article cannot be reason to delete this one. database recognized by united nations is good contribution to encyclopedia. Well done - — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.97.50.159 ( talk • contribs)
Since some users in this AfD discussion make irritative claims to discredit article information (usually with weak or even without justified reasons), I would like to ask to you to go through it first and only afterwards make any statements. Please do not mislead other Wiki users with fake information which you claim is included in article. Thank you. -- Жовтневе багаття ( talk
Keep Good article, similar to articles about accupied territories of Moldova, Japan or Georgia. I do not see any reasons for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.124.4.246 ( talk) 13:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:45, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
A case of WP:TOOSOON and WP:BLP1E: Recreation of a deleted article Ajai Vasudev under different title. I failed to find any evidence to support his part as an associate director in Proprietors: Kammath & Kammath and Pokkiri Raja and I also can't find anything about his upcoming film Chunkzz so I suggest Delete or Redirect to Rajadhiraja or draftify as it was earlier and wait until his second film is released. GSS ( talk) 07:50, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. This AfD seems to have been filed in error - the filing editor is arguing in favour of keeping, not deletion. There were a couple of !votes for speedy deletion, but I have declined the speedy deletion request for the reasons I gave in my comment below. If deletion is still desired, please open a new deletion discussion. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 08:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
New Conservative Party for Reform is a registered parliamentary group and a de facto political party with 30 seats in National Assembly. It will be a de jure party in 30 days. I think that this article is obviously notable. 조국 ( talk) 07:39, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — MRD2014 ( talk • contribs) 21:52, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't conform to WP:BIO. Reads like an advert in current form. Devopam ( talk) 07:32, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as obviously invented, pure vandalism/blatant hoax. TimothyJosephWood 13:31, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Nothing notable. CSD would apply, but anons keep reverting that. Two facebook groups went to war and then that makes it important Nolelover Talk· Contribs 06:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
For a BLP this does not seem to suitably demonstrate notability. One ref is a blog, and the other is about a relationship that is not clearly notable. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:07, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Sure, the page needs some better footnotes, but this attorney is representing some huge athletes in some rather big-time cases in terms of sports eligibility. Folks need to be able to locate specialists and cutting this page give far too much power to the powerful. It seems like a prudent and notable page for Wikipedia and extra references, requested, have been called for directly. Rauterkus ( talk) 21:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
comment I'm not sure what this is in reference to but Wikipedia isn't a business directory so I'm not sure how not deleting this so people can "find a specialist" is a relevant reason to contest deletion? Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 01:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Was speedied, then turned into a redirect (which is probably what it should be), but the redirect kept getting reverted. Now de-prodded without rationale. Non-notable. At best a possible addition to Wiktionary. Onel5969 TT me 19:14, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The result was no consensus. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Delete per WP:NOTCATALOG. The list is a fancruft shopping catalog for PS3 Move games, and is redundant of other PS3 game lists like List of PlayStation 3 games released on disc and List of PlayStation 3 disc games released for download. If shoppers need to find out if a game supports Move, they can check Category:PlayStation Move-compatible games or consult the retailer. The list also serves as another console war fan article with its Exclusive marketing column. Odie5533 ( talk) 17:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) B E C K Y S A Y L E S 02:17, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
there seem not to be enough independent in-depth coverage on the subject to pass WP:GNG. No reliable source could be provided about the peak positions of the songs she released, majority of them being download links. — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 21:24, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) B E C K Y S A Y L E S 02:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MUSICBIO. The three sources cited in the article are all primary source interviews. Unable to locate reliable secondary sources to support notability. Magnolia677 ( talk) 19:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I guess that given the conspicuous lack of interest in this topic there's nothing to stop anybody from going ahead with the proposed merger, though. Sandstein 08:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable electronic product. Not enough references or coverage to justify its own article.afd Mikeblas ( talk) 01:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein.) North America 1000 22:47, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NALBUM criteria Domdeparis ( talk) 18:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus herein is that the topic is notable and for the article to be retained. North America 1000 22:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
the last AfD was almost 3 years ago with no consensus. whilst the murder is unfortunate, I don't see how it meets WP:VICTIM or WP:EVENT LibStar ( talk) 03:18, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Promotional bio of advertising executive. Full of adjectives of praise, but no evidence for them, except inclusion on a number of lists. Merely being placed on these specialized lists is not notability. DGG ( talk ) 01:07, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Because it only focuses with what his own PR agents and even the subject himself would put at his own job listing and websitesto be true, it would seem that all or most of the 24 secondary sources, mostly news sources, were churnalism. That may be true, I don't know. But I wonder how one would know that.
since this article itself cares to focus in specifying every single business fact of his- if that's true, that's more my fault than the original author. I didn't use all the sources that were out there, though, there are 798 news hits, perhaps 9 or so of 17 books published since 1984 that are applicable, 19 HighBeam hits, and other items on the internet that would qualify as reliable, SSs.
The result was delete. consensus after 3 relistings--a good example of why multiple relistings can sometimes be helpful. DGG ( talk ) 00:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable social activist and politician. He is not even the chief of the organisation. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:32, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein.) North America 1000 22:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Too much WP:PRIMARY sources don't prove anything about the notability. There are some passing mention in news, though not confirmed whether all of them are about him. One news article mentions more about his glass bottles than him. Marvellous Spider-Man 09:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Keep: I have added valid references to this page. There is a lot more you can include in this article. Many pages link to this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editor 222 ( talk • contribs) 14:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:09, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
While maybe a city with 63,000 people would propel the mayor to notability in some cases, we need actual good sources. Here all the sources are just routine coverage of a local political candidate. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 02:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
I don't think this was ever notable, and the website for the "movement" no longer works. Natureium ( talk) 02:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Single tertiary and weak secondary sourcing. Does not meet WP:BIO WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO in my opinion. Unable to locate additional sourcing beyond some indications of 2 co-authored professional journal articles that are paywalled. Please note that I had previously used WP:PROD for this article. TheCrazedBeast ( talk) 15:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC. Not one secondary source is used in this article (as is required for Wikipedia biographies). The sources are a mixture of blog interviews, one-word mentions, and dead links. A few sources are not linked. Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:FILMMAKER. This is the second (or third?) AfD for this biography. Magnolia677 ( talk) 00:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
I hope this helps to clarify and resolve the concerns about this particular article. Pclibuser ( talk) 00:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
I am not yet prepared to accept that a subject such as this warrants a standalone article (any more than "the color blue in Canada" or "Stray dogs in Canada" or "Stray dogs in Canada in 2016" or "Stray dogs in August in Canada, 2016"). This could be converted into a redirect to Social exclusion, but the remaining redirect would be pretty pointless. KDS4444 ( talk) 13:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) B E C K Y S A Y L E S 02:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
There are not enough sources about Bussel to show that she is notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 02:44, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
|
Notes
Citations |
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN and, more importantly, WP:BIO. There are a ton of local sources that discuss Redfearn (to be expected when you're the mayor) but I'm not seeing anything resembling significant national (or international) coverage. Primefac ( talk) 02:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — MRD2014 ( talk • contribs) 21:47, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
There is one posted source, and it is a wiki. The article contains just a few sentences. Kellymoat ( talk) 04:18, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. The way the discussion has gone after Cunard's sources is pretty split. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
This was kept in 2011. I think our standards for notability of ompanies has increased--the present article is just a directory listing DGG ( talk ) 01:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
*Keep per 1Wiki8.
Hang googles (
talk)
10:40, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Publicly traded corporations says (my bolding):
There has been considerable discussion over time whether publicly traded corporations, or at least publicly traded corporations listed on major stock exchanges such as the NYSE and other comparable international stock exchanges, are inherently notable. Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in this (or any other) case. However, sufficient independent sources almost always exist for such companies, so that notability can be established using the primary criterion discussed above. Examples of such sources include independent press coverage and analyst reports. Accordingly, article authors should make sure to seek out such coverage and add references to such articles to properly establish notability.
Editors coming across an article on such a company without such references are encouraged to search (or request that others search) prior to nominating for deletion, given the very high (but not certain) likelihood that a publicly traded company is actually notable according to the primary criterion.
The article notes:
Netlist, a publicly traded company based in Irvine, California that was founded in 2000 and that you have probably never heard of, will probably make a big splash at the SC09 supercomputing trade show next week. Netlist, which makes memory modules on an OEM basis for various companies, said Wednesday that in December it will roll out a virtualized, dense memory DDR3 module that will be able to trick servers into having more main memory than they are supposed to.
...
Netlist got its start in 2000 doing custom printed circuit board design, and a "netlist," according to Paul Duran, director of business development at the company, is akin to a bill of materials for all of the connectivity on a PCB. A few years back, when dense rack and blade servers started going volume, Netlist became a specialist in making very low profile memory on an OEM basis for blade server makers. (The company does not disclose who its customers are, but they're probably the usual suspects.) The company also developed a memory packaging technology called Planar-X, which allows for two PCBs loaded with memory chips to be packaged together relatively inexpensively to share a single memory slot. This technique is cheaper and more reliable, according to Duran, than some of the dual-die packaging techniques memory module makers use to make dense memory cards out of low density and cheaper memory chips.
The article notes:
Right about now, server memory module maker Netlist is probably wishing that it hadn't already gone public. But if the enthusiasm in a new public offering by investors on Wall Street last Friday is any indication, Netlist may be onto something with its new HyperCloud DDR3 super-dense main memory for servers.
...
Netlist is not particularly large or profitable at this point in its history, but it has what sounds like a good idea, and so the company hired Needham & Company to put together a public offering of three million of its shares to raise some cash to put HyperCloud memory into production and market it.
...
Netlist has a market capitalization of $79.2m at time of writing. The real wonder is not why Netlist - which has a knack for choppy revenues and losses, as many startups do - was able to get money out of Wall Street. It is why one of the big server makers - Intel, or Advanced Micro Devices, all of which have a huge stake in server virtualization and will have to make up some revenue declines and margins if server virtualization eventually causes footprints to contract - hasn't snapped up Netlist already.
The article notes:
Netlist Inc. said it has raised about $15.4 million from a common stock offering of 4 million shares priced at $3.85 each.
After commissions and other expenses, the offering will leave Netlist with $14.12 million in proceeds. The company will use that money for operations, including marketing, research and development, working capital and other general corporate purposes.
...
Netlist makes memory subsystems for servers and high-performance computers and communications equipment.
The article notes:
Irvine's Netlist is trying to carve out a niche in this battleground by creating specialized memory packages for the likes of Dell and IBM and their high-end corporate computers.
Since opening in 2000, Netlist has lost a total of $20 million cracking into the computing world after initially focusing on the telecommunications industry. Memory's high end is a crowded place, too. Netlist competes with, among others, O.C. shops SimpleTech and Viking.
Netlist's gambit may be paying off, as the company is at least profitable in its most recent six-month period. And sales are up 80 percent.
The article notes:
Shareholders who bought Netlist's first public shares for $7 each in December are taking the company to court as the shares drop to nearly $3.
The suits accuse the Irvine-based maker of computer memory equipment and its officers of violating federal securities laws by not revealing its vulnerability to a declining computer-memory market at the time of its initial public offering.
...
In its IPO, 146-employee Netlist raised $39.5 million, net after $4.2 million in underwriting expenses, by selling 6.25 million shares at $7 each. The stock closed Thursday at $3.17.
The article notes:
Netlist Inc. will sell $15 million in common stock, the Irvine-based storage equipment maker said today. It plans to use proceeds to accelerate its patent monetization strategy, commercialize its HybriDIMM product line, and for general corporate purposes.
...
The Business Journal in February reported that Netlist would receive $23 million from South Korea-based Samsung Electronics Co. and have access to thousands of patents from the world’s largest electronics company as part of a joint venture to co-develop a product combining Netlist’s HyperVault offering with Samsung’s DRAM and NAND memory technology.
The article notes:
Flash DIMM technology developer Netlist has signed a five-year joint development deal with global memory leader Samsung to produce non-volatile DIMMs, giving it a lifeline from years of litigation hell against Diablo Technologies over memory channel storage IP.
The basic concept is to put flash chips on DDR3 and 4 memory DIMMS, thus giving the flash memory channel access, which has lower latency than PCIe flash cards. Netlist and Diablo Technologies worked together on this and then separated, Diablo licensing the resulting Memory Channel Storage to SMART Storage.
...
Business results for Netlist have been poor. Revenues for its third 2015 quarter were a slim $1.6m, compared to $4.8m a year go. There was a $5.4m net loss; it was $4.1m a year ago. Ho hum, you think, this company is really struggling.
Step forward Sammy in white knight guise, with a gift of $8m cash from Samsung Electronics and a $15m investment in Netlist from Samsung Venture Investment Corporation. That $23m will come in very handy indeed. Netlist and Samsung intend to sample NVDIMM product to select customers in 2016.
https://www.zacks.com/stock/research/NLST/brokerage-reports WebCite lists several analyst reports about Netlist.
the items cited above are in my view routine notices, not substantial coverage. Brokerage reports are irrelevant, because they indiscriminately cover all public companies. And the product descriptions I removed would be inappropriate in any article, even as a bare list. WP is NOT A CATALOG. DGG ( talk ) 04:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
"Netlist Inc. will sell $15 million in common stock, the Irvine-based storage equipment maker said today. It plans to use proceeds to accelerate....It plans to get funding...."
[Specific finances and numbers]....Step forward Sammy in white knight guise, with a gift of $8m cash from Samsung Electronics and a $15m investment in Netlist from Samsung Venture Investment Corporation. That $23m will come in very handy indeed. Netlist and Samsung intend to sample NVDIMM product to select customers in 2016"
"Flash DIMM technology developer Netlist has signed a five-year joint development deal with global memory leader Samsung to produce non-volatile DIMMs, giving it a lifeline"
"Irvine's Netlist is trying to carve out a niche in this battleground by creating specialized memory packages for the likes of Dell and IBM and their high-end corporate computers....Now here are their profits"
"Netlist Inc. said it has raised about $15.4 million from a common stock offering of 4 million shares priced at $3.85 each....Here are the financials and what they make...."
"Netlist, a publicly traded company based in Irvine, California that was founded in 2000 and that you have probably never heard of, will probably make a big splash at the SC09 supercomputing trade show next week....Here is what the company's business involves....Here are the company's services and what it offers"
The Orange County Register is simply that, a localized and local-focused business column for everyday business activities, it's not independent since it's simply a local business journal, journals of which are blatantly known for republishing anything for companies.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) B E C K Y S A Y L E S 02:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
this article is a complete joke and has no place on wikipedia this is no educational article and it would not even be considered relevant or notable according to any of wikipedia’s rules Jonnymoon96 ( talk) 04:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Catch (TV series)#Cast and characters. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Prodded a few weeks ago, which was de-prodded with a
WP:OSE rationale. Current citations are more about the casting of the role, rather than the character. Can't see how this fictional character passes
WP:GNG.
Onel5969
TT me
20:05, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Lacks any WP:SECONDARY. Fails WP:GNG. TheMagikCow ( talk) 11:24, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was nomination withdrawn as the article now contains a much stronger notability claim and better sourcing than it did at the time of nomination. Bearcat ( talk) 16:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Completely unsourced biography of a person notable only as "Speaker of the House" in the unofficial provisional legislature of a proposed U.S. state that never actually became a real state. While that might be valid grounds for an article if he could actually be sourced over WP:GNG for it, it's not an automatic WP:NPOL pass in the absence of any valid sourcing. Bearcat ( talk) 12:29, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 10:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Reviewing the article. I think it Fails policy WP:BIO. Its reads like a CV. Named to Thomson Reuters’ Super Lawyers each year since 2007. Could be notable? scope_creep ( talk) 11:59, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Student photographer who fails WP:CREATIVE.
Several dead references but Kultplus works and translation of block of text states:
Also participating in this evening will be Jenny Guy, student of the Art Academy of Düsseldorf which a few weeks ago presented its works in a major exhibition in Düsseldorf. In the evening she will be presented with some pictures that motivated mainly men.
This was published on 2016-03-15. Fails WP:GNG. scope_creep ( talk) 11:41, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Baaghi (2016 film). ( Non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:31, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Fails notability. Draft was declined thrice at AfC earlier this year for notability concerns. See Draft:Grandmaster Shifuji Shaurya Bhardwaj. — MBlaze Lightning T 09:09, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
This specific product is not notable on its own. The references and material in the article only refer to usual announcements about funding and product launches. A search of online sources about it doesn't yield much to establish notability either. Tushi Talk To Me 07:33, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) B E C K Y S A Y L E S 01:51, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable person due to lack of indepth coverage. Marvellous Spider-Man 05:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:36, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
no evidence that it is yet in regular production. The 2016 review says its major product is still in beta. DGG ( talk ) 05:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The 2016 review has a correction in its first comment stating it is no longer in BETA. Following your comment here, I have reached out to the review author to update the post in order to reflect that Megaventory is in full production mode (bear in mind the review post was initially put together in 2014).
Also, note that the product is not only in production but also in notable ranking - as is reflected in the relevant industry metric which is the GetRank. Megaventory is currently #17 in a global market of dozens of similar solutions and it has 30+ reviews in GetRank from an equal number of LinkedIn-authenticated users. This link to getapp.com was in the initial version of the Megaventory article and was rejected by a previous reviewer but I'd be glad to include the link again if you feel it adds to the newsworthiness of the Megaventory article.
Let me know if you have any other concerns you see in the article which can be addressed in the meantime and until the 2016 review article is updated with regards to the BETA mention. Thank you for taking the time to offer feedback which can be used to improve the article. Dathanasiadis ( talk) 15:12, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Presumably the WP:NOT is in reference to Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion and in particular (5) - Advertising, marketing or public relations. All content and corresponding references in the article are verifiable and from notable, third party sources - earlier feedback from other Wikipedia users has ensured this. Indicatively, the references include partnerships with a national ISP (COSMOTE), a multinational tech vendor (NEC), a national app marketplace (Maestrano), an independent review site which has taken the time to write a 3500-word unsolicited review (Merchant Maverick) and others. Please indicate if there are specific concerns with any of the included sources and associated content.
Dathanasiadis ( talk) 11:15, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mkdw talk 07:09, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
No real coverage of this run of the mill website, same as last time around. The citations consist of blogs and weak "news" orgs that "write" articles that are mere paraphrases of announcements and press releases. No real reporting, If the subject weren't touting these "events", nobody would know that they happened because they don't matter outside of this company's tiny fishbowl. They are using Wikipedia for PR. Dennis Bratland ( talk) 04:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable single. Sources in the article are unreliable, and no reliable ones could be found with a web search. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 03:53, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
This is a programming language designed as a teaching example in a textbook, and Google searches do not support the language meeting WP:GNG on its own. Page contains no references. Dgpop ( talk) 00:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 05:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Despite an extensive search for sources, I simply failed to find enough significant independent reliable coverage for this film. Most of what I could find are press releases, movie profiles, promotional material, and even false positives. Apparently this film was screened at a film festival which makes me hesitant to nominate this for deletion, but coverage (including reviews) is sorely lacking; the film apparently doesn't even have a Rotten Tomatoes page. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 00:51, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
While anyone can compile such lists by looking at past charts or back issues of Billboard in print or online, the topic of top ten alternative or modern rock songs is not one receiving significant discussion in independent sources, failing notability requirements for stand-alone lists. These may also qualify as "an indiscriminate collection of information" per WP:IINFO; otherwise, this may as well be expanded to include top 20 or top 40 chart hits. The list of Billboard number-one alternative hits would seem to be sufficient. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 23:18, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 01:13, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. There seems to be very little coverage in mainstream sources; I can find only a few Swedish language mentions, and nothing that would show notability. As for her career, it seems she has had one somewhat popular song ("Bang, Bang"), but it does not seem to have charted or received any awards; as such, it does not seem that the subject meets WP:MUSICBIO. Colonel Wilhelm Klink ( Complaints| Mistakes) 22:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. The one "keep" does not address the policy-based reasons advanced for deletion. Sandstein 09:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
This topic does not establish notability. TTN ( talk) 22:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters. Sandstein 09:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
This does not establish notability. TTN ( talk) 22:33, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. consensus DGG ( talk ) 00:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
This fails to establish notability. TTN ( talk) 22:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to DNA bank as alternate spelling. ( Non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
topic already exists at DNA bank. Can't delete per WP:A10 because it was not recently deleted. I would suggest a merge, but the article is so short that it contains little meaningful information. Icebob99 ( talk) 21:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
This article should be deleted as it fails WP:NOTTRAVELGUIDE as the whole article is written as a travel guide for a beach. - KAP03 ( talk) 21:13, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 01:09, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Much more of a definition than an article; would be more at home on Wiktionary. Okamialvis ( talk) 21:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters. Sandstein 09:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Does not meet notability requirements for fictional characters. Okamialvis ( talk) 20:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 01:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
non notable author: Two books, one in 6 libraries, the other in only 2. DGG ( talk ) 20:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
PROD removed by author stating that the album is notable. Still fails NALBUM and GNG as my PROD stands. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:50, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
non notable author -- a few self-published books with trivial reviews. DGG ( talk ) 19:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 10:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
This article should be deleted because it fails WP:FUTURE and WP:TOOSOON by being about a unreleased movie. It also fails WP:GNG because there is only one source verifying its existence. KAP03 ( talk) 19:19, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. The one "keep" does not address the reasons for deletion. Sandstein 10:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Looks as case of WP:TOSOON. Recent (2014) musical graduate with no significant coverage. Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 19:17, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Harrias because the creator ( User:Yousef.Alipour, WP:SPA) contested it at talk; unfortunately I cannot credit Harrias with good judgement, as the creator's argument at Talk:Inspecta show total lack of understanding of the notability guidelines I clearly linked in my PROD ("Inspecta has already have pages in two other languages... The company is growing fast and it's good to let other know about in the international language... You can easily find information about almost any company in wiki with even less than 100 employee" - those are textbook examples from Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions). Now we have to waste our time with this here. Sigh. As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. PS. Ping User:Anarchyte who suggested speedy deletion before my prod. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 19:13, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:J31ox (creator, WP:SPA) with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like spam. PS. Ping User:Superbeecat who nominated it for speedy before my prod. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 19:06, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 01:13, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Unreferenced, autobiography has "appeared" on three shows no evidence to such suggest they meet WP:GNG Theroadislong ( talk) 19:06, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " Iteɪ was deprodded by User:Mean as custard with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Jepsen was Miss Nebraska. That is her only semi-notable accomplishment, and that alone is not enough to demonstrate notability. The statements about her performance at Miss America probably do not rise to adding to her notability, and they are entirely unsourced. The only source on the article at present does not even related to her at all, it is a directory that shows that her borther was a semi-accomplished athletie in Nebraska. My search for sources showed up a picture in the John F. Kennedy papers of her giving a baton to a presidential aid to give to Caroline Kennedy. This article is an example of why we should not keep articles on minor people who have one thing that brings them close to notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 18:50, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Miss Nebraska. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
While this looks like a well sourced article, it is exactly the type of article the discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiproject Beauty Pageants talk page RfC has determined we do not need. All Howell has done so far is win Miss Nebraska. This in an d of itself is not enough to establish her notability. None of the sources are either outside of local sources covering her competition, some of them when she was still in high school in extremely local coverage, press releases, passing mentions or the like. Nothing moves beyond her lone blip of being Miss Nebraska, and any information related to this can be included on the Miss Nebraska page. There is no reason to keep this article at present. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 18:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. consensus DGG ( talk ) 00:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Declined CSD. Completely unsourced article, Fails GNG. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 18:24, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
I am not really sure why this is being considered for deletion. Twenty20 Constructioni Cloud is a viable construction software solution much like Procore or Timberline by Sage. Both of which have Wiki pages. Other than the fact that this is a newer software solution, the information is still relevant, accurate and although possibly has some advertising undertones, it is the true history of this product. There were no links to the website or product pages. No offers and no contact information. I am happy to make modifications if recommended. Any suggestions are appreciated
Brant.wadsworth ( talk) 21:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Brant.wadsworth
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — MRD2014 ( talk • contribs) 21:57, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
This article was created by socks. The original article, Mackenzie Ziegler, which also involved sock puppetry, was created two years ago. It was speedied a few times and then deleted per a discussion, recreated yet again and speedied. I then salted it. There have been updates to the article because of the passing years. This is a procedural nomination. I express no view on whether the subject is sufficiently notable but dump it back in the community's lap for yet another discussion. For anyone searching for significant coverage in reliable sources, you'd be better off usiing Mackenzie as the first name rather than Kenzie. Kenzie was used only to avoid the salting. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
I could only locate obituary articles while searching for sources. Article does not meet the criteria for WP:GNG Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 17:16, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
This article should be deleted because it is WP:LISTCRUFT definitions 1,2,3,6, and 7 and fails WP:LISTN and WP:GNG. KAP03 ( talk) 16:09, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Related AfDs: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of French born footballers who have played for other national teams and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of footballers born in Argentina who have played for other national teams
The result was delete. No salting, as it's not been deleted previously. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Hoax. No Google Books or Google Scholar results for this "syndrome", also no Google results I could find other than Wikipedia mirrors and this apparent medical exam where it is listed as a possible (and almost certainly wrong) answer to a question. Everymorning (talk) 15:45, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Article PRODded with reason "Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded by article creator after adding a statement to the article that the journal will be added in the "Czech Natural Bibliography", a minor non-selective database. PROD reason still stands, hence: delete. Randykitty ( talk) 14:38, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deletion (G11). ( non-admin closure) AllyD ( talk) 14:14, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
There is no indication of importance, no references and the only links used are the subject's facebook page. Poorly written and formatted. HeyJude70 ( talk) 11:39, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Mistakes due to inexperience of author please pardon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajay Sivaprasad ( talk • contribs) 12:18, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Totally unsourced article about a brand new beauty pageant for men, previously deleted at AfD as Mister Supranational 2016 (the male counterpart to equally non-notable Miss Supranational, an article that has been deleted multiple times, and recreated almost as many times). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 10:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There are many things which may be non-neutral about this article, starting with the title, but it is not clear from the discussion that these problems warrant deletion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Whereas such an article can in principle exist, the current one, created by a user without previous contribution and full of POV language (part of which I removed) is a good example of WP:NOT. It is based on just one document - a statement of the Verkhovna Rada from 2014 (Ref.3) which just contains a (short) list of localitis not under Ukrainian control, and the rest is POV and original research. Note that the localities which are currently not under the Ukrainian control are not the same as in 2014. Ymblanter ( talk) 09:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Keep good and sustainable article. Deletion of previous article cannot be reason to delete this one. database recognized by united nations is good contribution to encyclopedia. Well done - — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.97.50.159 ( talk • contribs)
Since some users in this AfD discussion make irritative claims to discredit article information (usually with weak or even without justified reasons), I would like to ask to you to go through it first and only afterwards make any statements. Please do not mislead other Wiki users with fake information which you claim is included in article. Thank you. -- Жовтневе багаття ( talk
Keep Good article, similar to articles about accupied territories of Moldova, Japan or Georgia. I do not see any reasons for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.124.4.246 ( talk) 13:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:45, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
A case of WP:TOOSOON and WP:BLP1E: Recreation of a deleted article Ajai Vasudev under different title. I failed to find any evidence to support his part as an associate director in Proprietors: Kammath & Kammath and Pokkiri Raja and I also can't find anything about his upcoming film Chunkzz so I suggest Delete or Redirect to Rajadhiraja or draftify as it was earlier and wait until his second film is released. GSS ( talk) 07:50, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. This AfD seems to have been filed in error - the filing editor is arguing in favour of keeping, not deletion. There were a couple of !votes for speedy deletion, but I have declined the speedy deletion request for the reasons I gave in my comment below. If deletion is still desired, please open a new deletion discussion. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 08:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
New Conservative Party for Reform is a registered parliamentary group and a de facto political party with 30 seats in National Assembly. It will be a de jure party in 30 days. I think that this article is obviously notable. 조국 ( talk) 07:39, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — MRD2014 ( talk • contribs) 21:52, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't conform to WP:BIO. Reads like an advert in current form. Devopam ( talk) 07:32, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as obviously invented, pure vandalism/blatant hoax. TimothyJosephWood 13:31, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Nothing notable. CSD would apply, but anons keep reverting that. Two facebook groups went to war and then that makes it important Nolelover Talk· Contribs 06:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
For a BLP this does not seem to suitably demonstrate notability. One ref is a blog, and the other is about a relationship that is not clearly notable. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:07, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Sure, the page needs some better footnotes, but this attorney is representing some huge athletes in some rather big-time cases in terms of sports eligibility. Folks need to be able to locate specialists and cutting this page give far too much power to the powerful. It seems like a prudent and notable page for Wikipedia and extra references, requested, have been called for directly. Rauterkus ( talk) 21:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
comment I'm not sure what this is in reference to but Wikipedia isn't a business directory so I'm not sure how not deleting this so people can "find a specialist" is a relevant reason to contest deletion? Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 01:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Was speedied, then turned into a redirect (which is probably what it should be), but the redirect kept getting reverted. Now de-prodded without rationale. Non-notable. At best a possible addition to Wiktionary. Onel5969 TT me 19:14, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The result was no consensus. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Delete per WP:NOTCATALOG. The list is a fancruft shopping catalog for PS3 Move games, and is redundant of other PS3 game lists like List of PlayStation 3 games released on disc and List of PlayStation 3 disc games released for download. If shoppers need to find out if a game supports Move, they can check Category:PlayStation Move-compatible games or consult the retailer. The list also serves as another console war fan article with its Exclusive marketing column. Odie5533 ( talk) 17:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) B E C K Y S A Y L E S 02:17, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
there seem not to be enough independent in-depth coverage on the subject to pass WP:GNG. No reliable source could be provided about the peak positions of the songs she released, majority of them being download links. — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 21:24, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) B E C K Y S A Y L E S 02:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MUSICBIO. The three sources cited in the article are all primary source interviews. Unable to locate reliable secondary sources to support notability. Magnolia677 ( talk) 19:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I guess that given the conspicuous lack of interest in this topic there's nothing to stop anybody from going ahead with the proposed merger, though. Sandstein 08:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable electronic product. Not enough references or coverage to justify its own article.afd Mikeblas ( talk) 01:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein.) North America 1000 22:47, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NALBUM criteria Domdeparis ( talk) 18:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus herein is that the topic is notable and for the article to be retained. North America 1000 22:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
the last AfD was almost 3 years ago with no consensus. whilst the murder is unfortunate, I don't see how it meets WP:VICTIM or WP:EVENT LibStar ( talk) 03:18, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Promotional bio of advertising executive. Full of adjectives of praise, but no evidence for them, except inclusion on a number of lists. Merely being placed on these specialized lists is not notability. DGG ( talk ) 01:07, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Because it only focuses with what his own PR agents and even the subject himself would put at his own job listing and websitesto be true, it would seem that all or most of the 24 secondary sources, mostly news sources, were churnalism. That may be true, I don't know. But I wonder how one would know that.
since this article itself cares to focus in specifying every single business fact of his- if that's true, that's more my fault than the original author. I didn't use all the sources that were out there, though, there are 798 news hits, perhaps 9 or so of 17 books published since 1984 that are applicable, 19 HighBeam hits, and other items on the internet that would qualify as reliable, SSs.
The result was delete. consensus after 3 relistings--a good example of why multiple relistings can sometimes be helpful. DGG ( talk ) 00:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable social activist and politician. He is not even the chief of the organisation. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:32, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein.) North America 1000 22:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Too much WP:PRIMARY sources don't prove anything about the notability. There are some passing mention in news, though not confirmed whether all of them are about him. One news article mentions more about his glass bottles than him. Marvellous Spider-Man 09:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Keep: I have added valid references to this page. There is a lot more you can include in this article. Many pages link to this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editor 222 ( talk • contribs) 14:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:09, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
While maybe a city with 63,000 people would propel the mayor to notability in some cases, we need actual good sources. Here all the sources are just routine coverage of a local political candidate. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 02:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
I don't think this was ever notable, and the website for the "movement" no longer works. Natureium ( talk) 02:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Single tertiary and weak secondary sourcing. Does not meet WP:BIO WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO in my opinion. Unable to locate additional sourcing beyond some indications of 2 co-authored professional journal articles that are paywalled. Please note that I had previously used WP:PROD for this article. TheCrazedBeast ( talk) 15:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC. Not one secondary source is used in this article (as is required for Wikipedia biographies). The sources are a mixture of blog interviews, one-word mentions, and dead links. A few sources are not linked. Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:FILMMAKER. This is the second (or third?) AfD for this biography. Magnolia677 ( talk) 00:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
I hope this helps to clarify and resolve the concerns about this particular article. Pclibuser ( talk) 00:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
I am not yet prepared to accept that a subject such as this warrants a standalone article (any more than "the color blue in Canada" or "Stray dogs in Canada" or "Stray dogs in Canada in 2016" or "Stray dogs in August in Canada, 2016"). This could be converted into a redirect to Social exclusion, but the remaining redirect would be pretty pointless. KDS4444 ( talk) 13:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) B E C K Y S A Y L E S 02:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
There are not enough sources about Bussel to show that she is notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 02:44, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
|
Notes
Citations |
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN and, more importantly, WP:BIO. There are a ton of local sources that discuss Redfearn (to be expected when you're the mayor) but I'm not seeing anything resembling significant national (or international) coverage. Primefac ( talk) 02:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — MRD2014 ( talk • contribs) 21:47, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
There is one posted source, and it is a wiki. The article contains just a few sentences. Kellymoat ( talk) 04:18, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. The way the discussion has gone after Cunard's sources is pretty split. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
This was kept in 2011. I think our standards for notability of ompanies has increased--the present article is just a directory listing DGG ( talk ) 01:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
*Keep per 1Wiki8.
Hang googles (
talk)
10:40, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Publicly traded corporations says (my bolding):
There has been considerable discussion over time whether publicly traded corporations, or at least publicly traded corporations listed on major stock exchanges such as the NYSE and other comparable international stock exchanges, are inherently notable. Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in this (or any other) case. However, sufficient independent sources almost always exist for such companies, so that notability can be established using the primary criterion discussed above. Examples of such sources include independent press coverage and analyst reports. Accordingly, article authors should make sure to seek out such coverage and add references to such articles to properly establish notability.
Editors coming across an article on such a company without such references are encouraged to search (or request that others search) prior to nominating for deletion, given the very high (but not certain) likelihood that a publicly traded company is actually notable according to the primary criterion.
The article notes:
Netlist, a publicly traded company based in Irvine, California that was founded in 2000 and that you have probably never heard of, will probably make a big splash at the SC09 supercomputing trade show next week. Netlist, which makes memory modules on an OEM basis for various companies, said Wednesday that in December it will roll out a virtualized, dense memory DDR3 module that will be able to trick servers into having more main memory than they are supposed to.
...
Netlist got its start in 2000 doing custom printed circuit board design, and a "netlist," according to Paul Duran, director of business development at the company, is akin to a bill of materials for all of the connectivity on a PCB. A few years back, when dense rack and blade servers started going volume, Netlist became a specialist in making very low profile memory on an OEM basis for blade server makers. (The company does not disclose who its customers are, but they're probably the usual suspects.) The company also developed a memory packaging technology called Planar-X, which allows for two PCBs loaded with memory chips to be packaged together relatively inexpensively to share a single memory slot. This technique is cheaper and more reliable, according to Duran, than some of the dual-die packaging techniques memory module makers use to make dense memory cards out of low density and cheaper memory chips.
The article notes:
Right about now, server memory module maker Netlist is probably wishing that it hadn't already gone public. But if the enthusiasm in a new public offering by investors on Wall Street last Friday is any indication, Netlist may be onto something with its new HyperCloud DDR3 super-dense main memory for servers.
...
Netlist is not particularly large or profitable at this point in its history, but it has what sounds like a good idea, and so the company hired Needham & Company to put together a public offering of three million of its shares to raise some cash to put HyperCloud memory into production and market it.
...
Netlist has a market capitalization of $79.2m at time of writing. The real wonder is not why Netlist - which has a knack for choppy revenues and losses, as many startups do - was able to get money out of Wall Street. It is why one of the big server makers - Intel, or Advanced Micro Devices, all of which have a huge stake in server virtualization and will have to make up some revenue declines and margins if server virtualization eventually causes footprints to contract - hasn't snapped up Netlist already.
The article notes:
Netlist Inc. said it has raised about $15.4 million from a common stock offering of 4 million shares priced at $3.85 each.
After commissions and other expenses, the offering will leave Netlist with $14.12 million in proceeds. The company will use that money for operations, including marketing, research and development, working capital and other general corporate purposes.
...
Netlist makes memory subsystems for servers and high-performance computers and communications equipment.
The article notes:
Irvine's Netlist is trying to carve out a niche in this battleground by creating specialized memory packages for the likes of Dell and IBM and their high-end corporate computers.
Since opening in 2000, Netlist has lost a total of $20 million cracking into the computing world after initially focusing on the telecommunications industry. Memory's high end is a crowded place, too. Netlist competes with, among others, O.C. shops SimpleTech and Viking.
Netlist's gambit may be paying off, as the company is at least profitable in its most recent six-month period. And sales are up 80 percent.
The article notes:
Shareholders who bought Netlist's first public shares for $7 each in December are taking the company to court as the shares drop to nearly $3.
The suits accuse the Irvine-based maker of computer memory equipment and its officers of violating federal securities laws by not revealing its vulnerability to a declining computer-memory market at the time of its initial public offering.
...
In its IPO, 146-employee Netlist raised $39.5 million, net after $4.2 million in underwriting expenses, by selling 6.25 million shares at $7 each. The stock closed Thursday at $3.17.
The article notes:
Netlist Inc. will sell $15 million in common stock, the Irvine-based storage equipment maker said today. It plans to use proceeds to accelerate its patent monetization strategy, commercialize its HybriDIMM product line, and for general corporate purposes.
...
The Business Journal in February reported that Netlist would receive $23 million from South Korea-based Samsung Electronics Co. and have access to thousands of patents from the world’s largest electronics company as part of a joint venture to co-develop a product combining Netlist’s HyperVault offering with Samsung’s DRAM and NAND memory technology.
The article notes:
Flash DIMM technology developer Netlist has signed a five-year joint development deal with global memory leader Samsung to produce non-volatile DIMMs, giving it a lifeline from years of litigation hell against Diablo Technologies over memory channel storage IP.
The basic concept is to put flash chips on DDR3 and 4 memory DIMMS, thus giving the flash memory channel access, which has lower latency than PCIe flash cards. Netlist and Diablo Technologies worked together on this and then separated, Diablo licensing the resulting Memory Channel Storage to SMART Storage.
...
Business results for Netlist have been poor. Revenues for its third 2015 quarter were a slim $1.6m, compared to $4.8m a year go. There was a $5.4m net loss; it was $4.1m a year ago. Ho hum, you think, this company is really struggling.
Step forward Sammy in white knight guise, with a gift of $8m cash from Samsung Electronics and a $15m investment in Netlist from Samsung Venture Investment Corporation. That $23m will come in very handy indeed. Netlist and Samsung intend to sample NVDIMM product to select customers in 2016.
https://www.zacks.com/stock/research/NLST/brokerage-reports WebCite lists several analyst reports about Netlist.
the items cited above are in my view routine notices, not substantial coverage. Brokerage reports are irrelevant, because they indiscriminately cover all public companies. And the product descriptions I removed would be inappropriate in any article, even as a bare list. WP is NOT A CATALOG. DGG ( talk ) 04:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
"Netlist Inc. will sell $15 million in common stock, the Irvine-based storage equipment maker said today. It plans to use proceeds to accelerate....It plans to get funding...."
[Specific finances and numbers]....Step forward Sammy in white knight guise, with a gift of $8m cash from Samsung Electronics and a $15m investment in Netlist from Samsung Venture Investment Corporation. That $23m will come in very handy indeed. Netlist and Samsung intend to sample NVDIMM product to select customers in 2016"
"Flash DIMM technology developer Netlist has signed a five-year joint development deal with global memory leader Samsung to produce non-volatile DIMMs, giving it a lifeline"
"Irvine's Netlist is trying to carve out a niche in this battleground by creating specialized memory packages for the likes of Dell and IBM and their high-end corporate computers....Now here are their profits"
"Netlist Inc. said it has raised about $15.4 million from a common stock offering of 4 million shares priced at $3.85 each....Here are the financials and what they make...."
"Netlist, a publicly traded company based in Irvine, California that was founded in 2000 and that you have probably never heard of, will probably make a big splash at the SC09 supercomputing trade show next week....Here is what the company's business involves....Here are the company's services and what it offers"
The Orange County Register is simply that, a localized and local-focused business column for everyday business activities, it's not independent since it's simply a local business journal, journals of which are blatantly known for republishing anything for companies.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) B E C K Y S A Y L E S 02:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
this article is a complete joke and has no place on wikipedia this is no educational article and it would not even be considered relevant or notable according to any of wikipedia’s rules Jonnymoon96 ( talk) 04:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Catch (TV series)#Cast and characters. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Prodded a few weeks ago, which was de-prodded with a
WP:OSE rationale. Current citations are more about the casting of the role, rather than the character. Can't see how this fictional character passes
WP:GNG.
Onel5969
TT me
20:05, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Lacks any WP:SECONDARY. Fails WP:GNG. TheMagikCow ( talk) 11:24, 11 December 2016 (UTC)