![]() |
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 21:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards, just nominations. No independent, reliable sourcing, just a batch of kayfabe interviews and promotional pages. PROD removed by article creator. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) ( talk) 23:25, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Saint-Gobain. merge away Spartaz Humbug! 21:26, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and improvable and I'm not sure if this should be merged or simply deleted altogether and the best my searches found were this, this, this and this. Pinging Arjayay, Mean as custard and The Blade of the Northern Lights. SwisterTwister talk 22:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 21:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
A reboot to a show with no refs listed and does not have any info yet-falls under too soon as well. Wgolf ( talk) 22:55, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 15:17, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Does not meet notability. Charlie the Pig ( talk) 22:53, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 ( T) 01:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and improvable? as the best my searches instantly found was this, this and this and with the author being named "Khcw77", this suggests it may've been the subject and there's been no improvement since starting in April 2008. Pinging Missvain, Thoughtfortheday, Captain Fishy and Escape Orbit. SwisterTwister talk 22:41, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Links this, this, this and this all suggest this has gotten coverage and one of the browser links here particularly mentions this was one of John Donovan's most famous companies and I was actually going to boldly redirect this to his article but I'm not sure if this can be better improved or what because the current version would certainly need it (this article actually began in June 2006 as a redirect to Novell where it is currently mentioned as well at John J. Donovan's own article). Pinging Mean as custard, Chase me ladies, I'm the Calvary, Iliasbeshimov, Rich Farmbrough, Macrakis and Dreamyshade. SwisterTwister talk 22:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:27, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and improvable because despite the article appearing acceptable at first time, there are still questionable and unsupported claims and my searches (News, Books, browser and Highbeam) also found nothing better than this. Pinging Ged UK, Btnikk, Blanchardb and Tpbradbury and this article from June 2009 would certainly need better improvement if kept. SwisterTwister talk 22:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and improvable as the best I found was this, this, this and this and despite the article saying the company is "the most successful South Asian television entertainment program in North America" but not having a current Wikipedia article questions its weight and depth and this current article has not changed much since starting in September 2007. SwisterTwister talk 22:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 15:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable as the best I found was nothing convincingly better here, here, here and here and this hasn't changed much since starting in September 2011. Pinging tagger Cameron Scott and author Davemendez. SwisterTwister talk 22:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:13, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
No indication of individual notability, besides being part of a seven-piece boyband in Japan. No solo releases or acting roles of note. See WP:MUSIC and WP:NACTOR Karst ( talk) 22:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
The title of the article is a commercial protologism; there is insufficient evidence yet of notability. (The article was prodded shortly after creation, but the prod message was removed.) -- Lambiam 21:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) sst✈ discuss 15:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
A recent set of back-and-forth mini edit wars have made me look a bit deeper into the subject and the sources available for this article. In all of the online sources (and from what little I have seen of the offline sources) Burkan commands no significant coverage. 95% of the coverage is mentioning him as starting the corporate-training firewalking business and offering little else. I still cannot find one of the offline sources listed on the page, but the others are in a similar vein to the online sources. Burkan seems to have done little to attract public attention, and while he may be well-known, he does not appear to meet the notability criteria for Wikipedia. I am, however, willing to be convinced otherwise, should more appropriate sources be revealed. Primefac ( talk) 19:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:13, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
There is only one accessible article linked to this disambiguation page Rob van vee 19:04, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 03:01, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
non notable musician. Appears to have won a local music award but nothing significant. noq ( talk) 17:13, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete G4 by Bishonen ( non-admin closure) NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 01:14, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Article about a non-notable organization. Their work is cited by a number of publications, but there is almost no depth of coverage as required by WP:ORGDEPTH. - Mr X 16:30, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:49, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Have done a search for sources, but can't find anything beyond this article to show that a job skirt is a thing. Although technically it's well-written and appropriately toned, it does seem a bit How To and subjective/personal opinion. The searches I did by phrase pulled up a LOT of hits for "job. Skirt" (where a sentence ends with "job" and skirt is the first word in the following sentence). I looked up a related phrase I KNEW was definitely a "thing", interview suit, and see it ended up being redirected to Suit (clothing). Mabalu ( talk) 16:09, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 21:27, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
This is another case of obvious speedy and PROD but considering it has existed since March 2009 after a SPA started it and with almost no activity since then, a nomination is better and my searches simply found nothing better than a few business listings at Books. Wow, what an excellent article!
SwisterTwister
talk
07:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Deltora Quest 2. ( non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 ( T) 01:25, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
A bit difficult to search for since "Shadowlands" is a fictional name that's commonly used, but I'm not turning up references that make this title appear to be notable per WP:NBOOKS. Mikeblas ( talk) 14:47, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Stubify - The book does exist and a number of other articles point to it. The book does exist as part of what appears to be a WP:N series. - Pmedema ( talk) 15:13, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 21:03, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Seemingly non-notable and although I found links at News, Books, browser, Highbeam and Scholar, there's nothing to suggest obvious immediate improvement. Pinging the only still active users DGG and Deb. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn ( non-admin closure) -- Sam Sailor Talk! 13:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Not much evidence of notability; couldn't find much on web beyond facebook and pinterest. valereee ( talk) 13:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
WP:NOTNEWS Proded this a such, but template removed. TheLongTone ( talk) 13:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 01:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The only external references concern a spat with Donald Trump over a name. Hardly notability. Fails WP:GNG. Hariboneagle927 notes in the edit history "Lack of credible references does not mean the company isn't notable" - well, yes it does. Velella Velella Talk 11:11, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete per CSD A7 -- Kethrus | talk to me 09:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet notability guideline ( WP:GNG). Nominated for speedy deletion but am unsure if being "among the top websites" is a claim to notability (although it's previously been deleted per A7). There are no news/newspapers/books relating to this site and it's barely on Google (contradicting it being "among the top websites"). -- Kethrus | talk to me 11:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 01:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
This is the second AfD. The first one ended with the resolution to delete, as the player has not played in any pro league. The article was recreated with next-to-the same content. I requested speedy deletion, but the sysop declined as he thought there is a claim that he plays a fully pro league. It is not the case, as I shall restate. As the previous AfD has shown, the League Cup is not considered a fully-pro league, but rather a second-tier friendly game competition. After playing one match for Steaua in this League Cup, Aldea has moved to Fortuna and Ceahlăul, both second-league (not fully pro) clubs. - Andrei ( talk) 09:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Zero evidence of notability. The refs are very minor product awards, written as press releases. DGG ( talk ) 09:17, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete ( WP:SNOW) as per WP:NOTADVERT. North America 1000 04:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Blatant advertisement. Oscarthecat ( talk) 06:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 ( T) 01:22, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
No sources, no obvious claim of notability, no real facts Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:21, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
"2nd attempt -- HOPEfully can avoid Speedy Deletion due to Copyright problems..."So, your speaking about something which no longer exists is not a decent deletion rational here. As for your repeating the nom's disproven statement
"no obvious claim of notability, no real facts", that early concern has been addressed through it being shown that this Belgium film has analysis, coverage and commentary in multiple sources... many non-English. Thank you though for your echoing of the nom's opinion of the article pre-improvement. Schmidt, Michael Q. 23:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 ( T) 01:21, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
I have nothing against him having an article here but at the present state the article does not give ANYTHING about his notability. All I can find is that he is the educational attache', so do all educational attache's get articles? FreeatlastChitchat ( talk) 05:02, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:AFDISNTCLEANUP - If the bloke's notable then there's no reason to nominate, Anyone closing on one !vote. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
He seems likely notable and I found links here, here, here, here and here but the article would certainly need better improvement and attention if kept. SwisterTwister talk 07:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Seemingly non-notable band with a certainly unacceptable current article and the best links I found were here. It's also worth noting this seemed to have been started by the band themselves in July 2008 and the article has hardly changed since then. Pinging tagger Stifle and I'm not sure if tagger BNutzer will comment here but I'll notify them anyway. SwisterTwister talk 07:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 21:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
"Evan Vucci photographer" found links at Books, News, browser and Highbeam but I question whether this somewhat sourced and seemingly acceptable article is notable and there's also no move target to elsewhere. This also hasn't changed much since April 2005 and it simply seems he's best known for that one event. SwisterTwister talk 07:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Been up 3weeks & 90% sure we're gonna get any better than this!, Bloke's notable so wrapping it up ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:17, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
fails WP:BIO. ambassadors are not inherently notable. all I could find for coverage is merely confirming he held posts. LibStar ( talk) 00:57, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was move to Draft space. Sandstein 20:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
WP:TOOSOON for this cryptocurrency related company. Some good coverage in industry trades, but standard searches do not reveal any significant mentions in general reliable sources. Article was a good faith AFC accept (ping @ Timtrent:) Suggest company can be mentioned on List of bitcoin companies, and this article moved to Draft space. -- 1Wiki8........................... ( talk) 15:53, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Can be userfied if somebody wants it. Sandstein 20:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
The subject of this article is an unbuilt building, and lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications. The sources currently in the article amount to web forum posts and a single press release. Steps were taken WP:BEFORE this nomination to locate coverage from reliable sources, but were not successful. I am recommending deletion due to failing general notability guidelines. If appropriate sources are located during the course of this discussion please notify me on my talk page. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk) 17:12, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Comment I'm unable to make a recommendation here. The name (due to press photo citation practices -- "Mubarak (center)" is a typical result) makes it difficult to track down much. Certainly the sources as offered are non-viable, but the question in an AfD is where they exist at all. I'm inclined to say this is a case of WP:TOOSOON, but would be curious to know what domestic press have to say on the topic that might make it at least verifiable/reliable. -- 69.204.153.39 ( talk) 03:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. looks just short Spartaz Humbug! 21:29, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable OS, seems to be discontinued, no significant reliable coverage. - Champion ( talk) ( contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 00:25, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Weak Keep : The article isn't especially good or useful, and probably results from the confusing Wikipedia policy that entries in a list must nearly always link to an article (as in Wikipedia:PROSE ). In some of the distributions, like Kogaionon, the editor of the list simply linked to the notable thing the distribution was named for -- which is a wholly improper result, but the only real response to what seems to be the policy. Here, this article is linked from List of Linux distributions, and without it, the list will be incomplete for no good reason. Perhaps someone with a clearer grasp of the policy can explain how this apparent conflict is resolved.-- 69.204.153.39 ( talk) 14:58, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Delete: Seems to be (relatively) recently discontinued, but certainly isn't notable. This was all I found on it. -- Kethrus | talk to me 16:33, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
...for users who want to download a distribution over a 56k modem. If you travel frequently, a distribution that can reasonably be downloaded via a dial-up connection could be a blessing if disaster strikes ... We tested two compact distributions--Peanut Linux and Vector Linux... test system was a Pentium-200 with a 3GB hard disk, 64MB of RAM...
...some current Linux distributions are too bulky for some old hardware (such as 486s and some first-generation Pentiums). What is needed here is a lighter-weight distribution, such as Peanut Linux, which can do a full install on a 486 or better with 32MB of memory and a 600MB hard drive. ...
Lightweight Distros... aLinux [one of four]. Formerly known as Peanut Linux, aLinux is designed to be both fast and multimedia-friendly. Its graphic interface provides an easy transition for former Windows users.
...Section: Operating Systems and Kernel Modifications [list of 89 distros]... aLinux. Formerly known as Peanut Linux, aLinux is designed to be both fast and multimedia-friendly. Its graphic interface provides an easy transition for former Windows users. ...
linux-specific refs
|
---|
|
The result was delete and redirect to JayFrance#Discography. Duplicate. Redirection to existing sections/articles is preferred to AFD in such circumstances, and should at least be attempted first. postdlf ( talk) 15:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Simple duplication of JayFrance#Discography
Given that article (created a day ago) is wearing an unref tag dated from July, I also wonder if that article is a new recreation of an old deleted article? Andy Dingley ( talk) 02:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The article was created for adding non-single music production discographies from past and or future references. MikeJamesz
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:29, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable mixed martial arts organisation. Recently formed. Peter Rehse ( talk) 17:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Score. Don't usually close on one !vote but does make sense to just redirect ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NALBUMS, as it did not chart. MSJapan ( talk) 21:23, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Currently a one-hit wonder act. Had one song chosen for an ad campaign, but their "debut EP" did not chart. We already have an article on the song (which is notable per WP:NSONG), but this band only meets that same single criterion in WP:NBAND, and there's no substantial coverage (per Google). A band does not inherit notability based on meeting NSONG, and meeting one criterion of ten in NBAND simply is not sufficient grounds for inclusion. MSJapan ( talk) 21:22, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 03:13, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
I CSD'd this article when it was first published and someone deleted it. Does not meet WP:NSOCCER. She is a college soccer player. Charlie the Pig ( talk) 04:29, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Delete I can't find anything that can bring her up to GNG, though I would love to hear if the original author can. Dcs002 ( talk) 05:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:30, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Him talking about him is not ondependent of him. Reel Recon is a personal blog, not a reliable source .Releases are not on "important" label. Lacks charting, gold, rotation, awards. (note, previously at Daforce) duffbeerforme ( talk) 03:51, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Releases are not on "important" label, The Orchard is a ditribution network not a tradional record label. Part of a walled garden built by his record company. duffbeerforme ( talk) 03:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 03:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
This article was turned into a redirect by Lockley. Jerzy has turned the redirect back into an article, which caused AnomieBOT to recreate Category:Articles needing additional categories from February 2013. However, the article is not notable. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 03:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Redirect editorially if you want. Sandstein 21:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Jargon term that essentially means mirrored memory, a feature of many different computers, but only refers to the TI-89 Titanium. Blah2 ( talk) 17:51, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) -- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Well Kept Secrets, the result was redirect so this article probably isn't notable enough to belong in Wikipedia either. Blackbombchu ( talk) 22:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:30, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Large amounts of passing mentions, but no significant coverage in reliable third-party sources. Nothing found via Google News. Thus we have to conclude that Horick is not (yet) notable. The article was prodded for that reason, but all that was added were more passing mentions, plus a non-independent source. Huon ( talk) 21:19, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The nature of the work is the reason that the subject is covered in what has been deemed "passing mentions." The subject is typically included in programs or events with multiple artists, and therefore discussions of the subject/subject's work are in the context of a collection of other artists as well. 5 October 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redweagle ( talk • contribs) 21:26, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Article PRODded with reason "Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded by anonymous IP without stated reason. PROD reason still stands, hence: delete. Randykitty ( talk) 14:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Fails both WP:NMUSIC and WP:BIO for lack of any significant coverage in independent reliable sources. A search found only self-published sources or trivial mentions in press releases. Article appears to be an autobiography per the editor's comment here. (The article was first speedy deleted as a copyvio and then recreated from a direct copy-paste of text from the individual's website after the website page was released under a Creative Commons license.) — CactusWriter (talk) 14:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:49, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable standard. An emerging standard in the construction industry, there is no sign of widespread acceptance within the industry. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 14:12, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:30, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
I had created this page for promotion of this club. I believe that this subject is not worthy of a page of its own. Thus I am nominating my own page for deletion JoeDeg31 ( talk) 14:24, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 15:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NBOX and the author seems to have a close connection to the subject. It's just way too early for this article. Charlie the Pig ( talk) 02:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. No prejudice against renaming. ( non-admin closure) sst✈ discuss 15:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
This article is not written in an encyclopedic style. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 02:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 15:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Fails to meet WP:NBOX and it's way too soon for this article, even if he is undefeated. Charlie the Pig ( talk) 02:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:31, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be non-notable; although there are some in-depth sources about some of their artists, there appears to be little or no significant sources about Half Machine Records. Bjelleklang - talk 07:19, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:31, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
My searches found nothing better than some links at Books and browser and this has hardly changed since the author moved it to mainspace themselves from userspace. Notifying tagger Esprit15d. SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:31, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
The best my searches found was this and this and although some of the News links say he is "inimitable" suggesting he may have been known by some, there's nothing to suggest better improvement and not to mention this has stayed the same since starting in August 2006. Notifying tagger Titodutta. SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 15:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
I considered speedying again as A7 like Hello32020 in November 2006 but considering its age and the amount of edits since then, a full nomination may be best and my searches simply found nothing better than some of the listed links (found them at News and browser, the few that there are). There's simply nothing to suggest improvement for this seemingly now non-existent band and there's nothing to suggest it was better known even locally ( Mighty Lumberhorn would also have to be deleted). I'm also notifying Anne Delong and author Roboticus. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. After additional sourcing was found by Hirolovesswords, consensus, though slim, was keep. ( non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 13:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and improvable as although I found links at News, Books, browser and Highbeam, there's nothing to suggest keeping a separate article and as there's no article for the Charles River Conservancy, there if at all can be a mention at Charles River's article about conservation and stewardship. No one is more serious and conscious about the environment about me so it's unfortunate this can't be kept. SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 15:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Quite questionably notable company as although I found some links at News, Books, browser and Highbeam, there's simply nothing to suggest better improvement for this speedy and PROD-worthy article that has managed to stay since October 2007. Notifying past users Vrenator and Fluffernutter. SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete for Lou Cowell and no consensus for Simon Cowell (presenter). North America 1000 03:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
(NOTE:I am also nominating Simon Cowell (presenter))
I found this article first and immediately found nothing but results for American Idol's Simon Cowell and now looking at her father's article (and I literally thought this was AI's Simon Cowell until looking closely), there's nothing to suggest better as well with the best search results here, here and here. So the daughter is definitely not notable but as for Simon, I'm sure if redirecting to the show's article is best or simply deleting. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 02:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and it definitely seems there is no better coverage for the band as the best I found was this and as for Keanan Duffty (which I am also co-nominating), the best I found was this, this, this this] and this so although his article is somewhat larger and detailed, he's also questionably notable. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete, no prejudice against recreation if sources have been found-- Ymblanter ( talk) 16:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
This is an interesting case because it may not even exist anymore (no website and searches found nothing about it) so unless it actually got considerable coverage at one time and is improvable, there's nothing to suggest keeping this speedy and PROD-worthy article from May 2008 and there's simply been no improvement and all the involved and interested editors have since retired so there's no one to ping. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:31, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced and comes off as promotional for the company rather than just an article. GamerPro64 00:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 16:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Blatant promotion sourced to blogs, listings, primary and un reliable sources. A search found the usual press releases, promo, facebook, videos but nothing good. duffbeerforme ( talk) 03:40, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Though he appears to have cowritten a few notable songs, there is not enough biographical information in the sources cited to write a reasonable biography of him. See WP:COMPOSER. Note that I accepted this through AFC and then nominated for deletion because I don't think it should be kept, but don't feel confident enough in my assessment to make the call without further input. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 00:33, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 21:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards, just nominations. No independent, reliable sourcing, just a batch of kayfabe interviews and promotional pages. PROD removed by article creator. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) ( talk) 23:25, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Saint-Gobain. merge away Spartaz Humbug! 21:26, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and improvable and I'm not sure if this should be merged or simply deleted altogether and the best my searches found were this, this, this and this. Pinging Arjayay, Mean as custard and The Blade of the Northern Lights. SwisterTwister talk 22:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 21:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
A reboot to a show with no refs listed and does not have any info yet-falls under too soon as well. Wgolf ( talk) 22:55, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 15:17, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Does not meet notability. Charlie the Pig ( talk) 22:53, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 ( T) 01:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and improvable? as the best my searches instantly found was this, this and this and with the author being named "Khcw77", this suggests it may've been the subject and there's been no improvement since starting in April 2008. Pinging Missvain, Thoughtfortheday, Captain Fishy and Escape Orbit. SwisterTwister talk 22:41, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Links this, this, this and this all suggest this has gotten coverage and one of the browser links here particularly mentions this was one of John Donovan's most famous companies and I was actually going to boldly redirect this to his article but I'm not sure if this can be better improved or what because the current version would certainly need it (this article actually began in June 2006 as a redirect to Novell where it is currently mentioned as well at John J. Donovan's own article). Pinging Mean as custard, Chase me ladies, I'm the Calvary, Iliasbeshimov, Rich Farmbrough, Macrakis and Dreamyshade. SwisterTwister talk 22:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:27, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and improvable because despite the article appearing acceptable at first time, there are still questionable and unsupported claims and my searches (News, Books, browser and Highbeam) also found nothing better than this. Pinging Ged UK, Btnikk, Blanchardb and Tpbradbury and this article from June 2009 would certainly need better improvement if kept. SwisterTwister talk 22:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and improvable as the best I found was this, this, this and this and despite the article saying the company is "the most successful South Asian television entertainment program in North America" but not having a current Wikipedia article questions its weight and depth and this current article has not changed much since starting in September 2007. SwisterTwister talk 22:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 15:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable as the best I found was nothing convincingly better here, here, here and here and this hasn't changed much since starting in September 2011. Pinging tagger Cameron Scott and author Davemendez. SwisterTwister talk 22:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:13, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
No indication of individual notability, besides being part of a seven-piece boyband in Japan. No solo releases or acting roles of note. See WP:MUSIC and WP:NACTOR Karst ( talk) 22:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
The title of the article is a commercial protologism; there is insufficient evidence yet of notability. (The article was prodded shortly after creation, but the prod message was removed.) -- Lambiam 21:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) sst✈ discuss 15:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
A recent set of back-and-forth mini edit wars have made me look a bit deeper into the subject and the sources available for this article. In all of the online sources (and from what little I have seen of the offline sources) Burkan commands no significant coverage. 95% of the coverage is mentioning him as starting the corporate-training firewalking business and offering little else. I still cannot find one of the offline sources listed on the page, but the others are in a similar vein to the online sources. Burkan seems to have done little to attract public attention, and while he may be well-known, he does not appear to meet the notability criteria for Wikipedia. I am, however, willing to be convinced otherwise, should more appropriate sources be revealed. Primefac ( talk) 19:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:13, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
There is only one accessible article linked to this disambiguation page Rob van vee 19:04, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 03:01, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
non notable musician. Appears to have won a local music award but nothing significant. noq ( talk) 17:13, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete G4 by Bishonen ( non-admin closure) NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 01:14, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Article about a non-notable organization. Their work is cited by a number of publications, but there is almost no depth of coverage as required by WP:ORGDEPTH. - Mr X 16:30, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:49, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Have done a search for sources, but can't find anything beyond this article to show that a job skirt is a thing. Although technically it's well-written and appropriately toned, it does seem a bit How To and subjective/personal opinion. The searches I did by phrase pulled up a LOT of hits for "job. Skirt" (where a sentence ends with "job" and skirt is the first word in the following sentence). I looked up a related phrase I KNEW was definitely a "thing", interview suit, and see it ended up being redirected to Suit (clothing). Mabalu ( talk) 16:09, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 21:27, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
This is another case of obvious speedy and PROD but considering it has existed since March 2009 after a SPA started it and with almost no activity since then, a nomination is better and my searches simply found nothing better than a few business listings at Books. Wow, what an excellent article!
SwisterTwister
talk
07:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Deltora Quest 2. ( non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 ( T) 01:25, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
A bit difficult to search for since "Shadowlands" is a fictional name that's commonly used, but I'm not turning up references that make this title appear to be notable per WP:NBOOKS. Mikeblas ( talk) 14:47, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Stubify - The book does exist and a number of other articles point to it. The book does exist as part of what appears to be a WP:N series. - Pmedema ( talk) 15:13, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 21:03, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Seemingly non-notable and although I found links at News, Books, browser, Highbeam and Scholar, there's nothing to suggest obvious immediate improvement. Pinging the only still active users DGG and Deb. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn ( non-admin closure) -- Sam Sailor Talk! 13:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Not much evidence of notability; couldn't find much on web beyond facebook and pinterest. valereee ( talk) 13:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
WP:NOTNEWS Proded this a such, but template removed. TheLongTone ( talk) 13:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 01:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The only external references concern a spat with Donald Trump over a name. Hardly notability. Fails WP:GNG. Hariboneagle927 notes in the edit history "Lack of credible references does not mean the company isn't notable" - well, yes it does. Velella Velella Talk 11:11, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete per CSD A7 -- Kethrus | talk to me 09:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet notability guideline ( WP:GNG). Nominated for speedy deletion but am unsure if being "among the top websites" is a claim to notability (although it's previously been deleted per A7). There are no news/newspapers/books relating to this site and it's barely on Google (contradicting it being "among the top websites"). -- Kethrus | talk to me 11:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 01:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
This is the second AfD. The first one ended with the resolution to delete, as the player has not played in any pro league. The article was recreated with next-to-the same content. I requested speedy deletion, but the sysop declined as he thought there is a claim that he plays a fully pro league. It is not the case, as I shall restate. As the previous AfD has shown, the League Cup is not considered a fully-pro league, but rather a second-tier friendly game competition. After playing one match for Steaua in this League Cup, Aldea has moved to Fortuna and Ceahlăul, both second-league (not fully pro) clubs. - Andrei ( talk) 09:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Zero evidence of notability. The refs are very minor product awards, written as press releases. DGG ( talk ) 09:17, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete ( WP:SNOW) as per WP:NOTADVERT. North America 1000 04:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Blatant advertisement. Oscarthecat ( talk) 06:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 ( T) 01:22, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
No sources, no obvious claim of notability, no real facts Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:21, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
"2nd attempt -- HOPEfully can avoid Speedy Deletion due to Copyright problems..."So, your speaking about something which no longer exists is not a decent deletion rational here. As for your repeating the nom's disproven statement
"no obvious claim of notability, no real facts", that early concern has been addressed through it being shown that this Belgium film has analysis, coverage and commentary in multiple sources... many non-English. Thank you though for your echoing of the nom's opinion of the article pre-improvement. Schmidt, Michael Q. 23:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 ( T) 01:21, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
I have nothing against him having an article here but at the present state the article does not give ANYTHING about his notability. All I can find is that he is the educational attache', so do all educational attache's get articles? FreeatlastChitchat ( talk) 05:02, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:AFDISNTCLEANUP - If the bloke's notable then there's no reason to nominate, Anyone closing on one !vote. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
He seems likely notable and I found links here, here, here, here and here but the article would certainly need better improvement and attention if kept. SwisterTwister talk 07:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Seemingly non-notable band with a certainly unacceptable current article and the best links I found were here. It's also worth noting this seemed to have been started by the band themselves in July 2008 and the article has hardly changed since then. Pinging tagger Stifle and I'm not sure if tagger BNutzer will comment here but I'll notify them anyway. SwisterTwister talk 07:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 21:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
"Evan Vucci photographer" found links at Books, News, browser and Highbeam but I question whether this somewhat sourced and seemingly acceptable article is notable and there's also no move target to elsewhere. This also hasn't changed much since April 2005 and it simply seems he's best known for that one event. SwisterTwister talk 07:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Been up 3weeks & 90% sure we're gonna get any better than this!, Bloke's notable so wrapping it up ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:17, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
fails WP:BIO. ambassadors are not inherently notable. all I could find for coverage is merely confirming he held posts. LibStar ( talk) 00:57, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was move to Draft space. Sandstein 20:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
WP:TOOSOON for this cryptocurrency related company. Some good coverage in industry trades, but standard searches do not reveal any significant mentions in general reliable sources. Article was a good faith AFC accept (ping @ Timtrent:) Suggest company can be mentioned on List of bitcoin companies, and this article moved to Draft space. -- 1Wiki8........................... ( talk) 15:53, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Can be userfied if somebody wants it. Sandstein 20:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
The subject of this article is an unbuilt building, and lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications. The sources currently in the article amount to web forum posts and a single press release. Steps were taken WP:BEFORE this nomination to locate coverage from reliable sources, but were not successful. I am recommending deletion due to failing general notability guidelines. If appropriate sources are located during the course of this discussion please notify me on my talk page. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk) 17:12, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Comment I'm unable to make a recommendation here. The name (due to press photo citation practices -- "Mubarak (center)" is a typical result) makes it difficult to track down much. Certainly the sources as offered are non-viable, but the question in an AfD is where they exist at all. I'm inclined to say this is a case of WP:TOOSOON, but would be curious to know what domestic press have to say on the topic that might make it at least verifiable/reliable. -- 69.204.153.39 ( talk) 03:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. looks just short Spartaz Humbug! 21:29, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable OS, seems to be discontinued, no significant reliable coverage. - Champion ( talk) ( contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 00:25, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Weak Keep : The article isn't especially good or useful, and probably results from the confusing Wikipedia policy that entries in a list must nearly always link to an article (as in Wikipedia:PROSE ). In some of the distributions, like Kogaionon, the editor of the list simply linked to the notable thing the distribution was named for -- which is a wholly improper result, but the only real response to what seems to be the policy. Here, this article is linked from List of Linux distributions, and without it, the list will be incomplete for no good reason. Perhaps someone with a clearer grasp of the policy can explain how this apparent conflict is resolved.-- 69.204.153.39 ( talk) 14:58, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Delete: Seems to be (relatively) recently discontinued, but certainly isn't notable. This was all I found on it. -- Kethrus | talk to me 16:33, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
...for users who want to download a distribution over a 56k modem. If you travel frequently, a distribution that can reasonably be downloaded via a dial-up connection could be a blessing if disaster strikes ... We tested two compact distributions--Peanut Linux and Vector Linux... test system was a Pentium-200 with a 3GB hard disk, 64MB of RAM...
...some current Linux distributions are too bulky for some old hardware (such as 486s and some first-generation Pentiums). What is needed here is a lighter-weight distribution, such as Peanut Linux, which can do a full install on a 486 or better with 32MB of memory and a 600MB hard drive. ...
Lightweight Distros... aLinux [one of four]. Formerly known as Peanut Linux, aLinux is designed to be both fast and multimedia-friendly. Its graphic interface provides an easy transition for former Windows users.
...Section: Operating Systems and Kernel Modifications [list of 89 distros]... aLinux. Formerly known as Peanut Linux, aLinux is designed to be both fast and multimedia-friendly. Its graphic interface provides an easy transition for former Windows users. ...
linux-specific refs
|
---|
|
The result was delete and redirect to JayFrance#Discography. Duplicate. Redirection to existing sections/articles is preferred to AFD in such circumstances, and should at least be attempted first. postdlf ( talk) 15:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Simple duplication of JayFrance#Discography
Given that article (created a day ago) is wearing an unref tag dated from July, I also wonder if that article is a new recreation of an old deleted article? Andy Dingley ( talk) 02:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The article was created for adding non-single music production discographies from past and or future references. MikeJamesz
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:29, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable mixed martial arts organisation. Recently formed. Peter Rehse ( talk) 17:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Score. Don't usually close on one !vote but does make sense to just redirect ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NALBUMS, as it did not chart. MSJapan ( talk) 21:23, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Currently a one-hit wonder act. Had one song chosen for an ad campaign, but their "debut EP" did not chart. We already have an article on the song (which is notable per WP:NSONG), but this band only meets that same single criterion in WP:NBAND, and there's no substantial coverage (per Google). A band does not inherit notability based on meeting NSONG, and meeting one criterion of ten in NBAND simply is not sufficient grounds for inclusion. MSJapan ( talk) 21:22, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 03:13, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
I CSD'd this article when it was first published and someone deleted it. Does not meet WP:NSOCCER. She is a college soccer player. Charlie the Pig ( talk) 04:29, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Delete I can't find anything that can bring her up to GNG, though I would love to hear if the original author can. Dcs002 ( talk) 05:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:30, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Him talking about him is not ondependent of him. Reel Recon is a personal blog, not a reliable source .Releases are not on "important" label. Lacks charting, gold, rotation, awards. (note, previously at Daforce) duffbeerforme ( talk) 03:51, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Releases are not on "important" label, The Orchard is a ditribution network not a tradional record label. Part of a walled garden built by his record company. duffbeerforme ( talk) 03:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 03:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
This article was turned into a redirect by Lockley. Jerzy has turned the redirect back into an article, which caused AnomieBOT to recreate Category:Articles needing additional categories from February 2013. However, the article is not notable. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 03:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Redirect editorially if you want. Sandstein 21:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Jargon term that essentially means mirrored memory, a feature of many different computers, but only refers to the TI-89 Titanium. Blah2 ( talk) 17:51, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) -- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Well Kept Secrets, the result was redirect so this article probably isn't notable enough to belong in Wikipedia either. Blackbombchu ( talk) 22:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:30, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Large amounts of passing mentions, but no significant coverage in reliable third-party sources. Nothing found via Google News. Thus we have to conclude that Horick is not (yet) notable. The article was prodded for that reason, but all that was added were more passing mentions, plus a non-independent source. Huon ( talk) 21:19, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The nature of the work is the reason that the subject is covered in what has been deemed "passing mentions." The subject is typically included in programs or events with multiple artists, and therefore discussions of the subject/subject's work are in the context of a collection of other artists as well. 5 October 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redweagle ( talk • contribs) 21:26, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Article PRODded with reason "Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded by anonymous IP without stated reason. PROD reason still stands, hence: delete. Randykitty ( talk) 14:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Fails both WP:NMUSIC and WP:BIO for lack of any significant coverage in independent reliable sources. A search found only self-published sources or trivial mentions in press releases. Article appears to be an autobiography per the editor's comment here. (The article was first speedy deleted as a copyvio and then recreated from a direct copy-paste of text from the individual's website after the website page was released under a Creative Commons license.) — CactusWriter (talk) 14:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:49, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable standard. An emerging standard in the construction industry, there is no sign of widespread acceptance within the industry. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 14:12, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:30, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
I had created this page for promotion of this club. I believe that this subject is not worthy of a page of its own. Thus I am nominating my own page for deletion JoeDeg31 ( talk) 14:24, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 15:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NBOX and the author seems to have a close connection to the subject. It's just way too early for this article. Charlie the Pig ( talk) 02:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. No prejudice against renaming. ( non-admin closure) sst✈ discuss 15:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
This article is not written in an encyclopedic style. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 02:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 15:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Fails to meet WP:NBOX and it's way too soon for this article, even if he is undefeated. Charlie the Pig ( talk) 02:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:31, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be non-notable; although there are some in-depth sources about some of their artists, there appears to be little or no significant sources about Half Machine Records. Bjelleklang - talk 07:19, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:31, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
My searches found nothing better than some links at Books and browser and this has hardly changed since the author moved it to mainspace themselves from userspace. Notifying tagger Esprit15d. SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:31, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
The best my searches found was this and this and although some of the News links say he is "inimitable" suggesting he may have been known by some, there's nothing to suggest better improvement and not to mention this has stayed the same since starting in August 2006. Notifying tagger Titodutta. SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 15:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
I considered speedying again as A7 like Hello32020 in November 2006 but considering its age and the amount of edits since then, a full nomination may be best and my searches simply found nothing better than some of the listed links (found them at News and browser, the few that there are). There's simply nothing to suggest improvement for this seemingly now non-existent band and there's nothing to suggest it was better known even locally ( Mighty Lumberhorn would also have to be deleted). I'm also notifying Anne Delong and author Roboticus. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. After additional sourcing was found by Hirolovesswords, consensus, though slim, was keep. ( non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 13:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and improvable as although I found links at News, Books, browser and Highbeam, there's nothing to suggest keeping a separate article and as there's no article for the Charles River Conservancy, there if at all can be a mention at Charles River's article about conservation and stewardship. No one is more serious and conscious about the environment about me so it's unfortunate this can't be kept. SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 15:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Quite questionably notable company as although I found some links at News, Books, browser and Highbeam, there's simply nothing to suggest better improvement for this speedy and PROD-worthy article that has managed to stay since October 2007. Notifying past users Vrenator and Fluffernutter. SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete for Lou Cowell and no consensus for Simon Cowell (presenter). North America 1000 03:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
(NOTE:I am also nominating Simon Cowell (presenter))
I found this article first and immediately found nothing but results for American Idol's Simon Cowell and now looking at her father's article (and I literally thought this was AI's Simon Cowell until looking closely), there's nothing to suggest better as well with the best search results here, here and here. So the daughter is definitely not notable but as for Simon, I'm sure if redirecting to the show's article is best or simply deleting. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 02:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and it definitely seems there is no better coverage for the band as the best I found was this and as for Keanan Duffty (which I am also co-nominating), the best I found was this, this, this this] and this so although his article is somewhat larger and detailed, he's also questionably notable. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete, no prejudice against recreation if sources have been found-- Ymblanter ( talk) 16:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
This is an interesting case because it may not even exist anymore (no website and searches found nothing about it) so unless it actually got considerable coverage at one time and is improvable, there's nothing to suggest keeping this speedy and PROD-worthy article from May 2008 and there's simply been no improvement and all the involved and interested editors have since retired so there's no one to ping. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:31, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced and comes off as promotional for the company rather than just an article. GamerPro64 00:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 16:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Blatant promotion sourced to blogs, listings, primary and un reliable sources. A search found the usual press releases, promo, facebook, videos but nothing good. duffbeerforme ( talk) 03:40, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Though he appears to have cowritten a few notable songs, there is not enough biographical information in the sources cited to write a reasonable biography of him. See WP:COMPOSER. Note that I accepted this through AFC and then nominated for deletion because I don't think it should be kept, but don't feel confident enough in my assessment to make the call without further input. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 00:33, 20 October 2015 (UTC)