![]() |
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 20:23, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:PRODUCT or WP:GNG Qxukhgiels ( talk) 21:16, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 20:23, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:PRODUCT or WP:GNG Qxukhgiels ( talk) 21:15, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 20:23, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
No sourced indication of notability. The only information I can find is in mirrors of the content of this article; I see nothing in reliable sources. Ultimately fails WP:GNG. Possibly created by someone familiar with the subject (i.e., a relative), based on the author's username. Kinu t/ c 20:59, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was Keep per established notability, though article needs work Metamagician3000 ( talk) 10:32, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Subject lacks notability. Chris Troutman ( talk) 20:53, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Keep. Multiple published sources in both media [1] [2] [3] and books [4] [5] .-- Samuel J. Howard ( talk) 23:12, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The article notes (bolding added for emphasis):
This article provides substantial coverage of the subject.Three and a half years later, Hearn is British boxing’s dominant promoter. He has an exclusive, 23-fights-a-year deal with Sky until the summer of 2016. Many of the country’s best talent have flocked to his Matchroom stable. And on Saturday night comes his crowning glory, Froch v George Groves II, in front of 80,000 people at Wembley.
The article notes (bolding added for emphasis):
This article also provides substantial coverage about the subject.Eddie joined Matchroom Sport in 2000 after working in the sponsorship and event management industry and in a short space of time has become arguably the biggest boxing promoter in Europe.
...
"Eddie has coped despite the albatross around his neck of being Barry Hearn's son," he says. "He is no longer Barry Hearn's son. He is Eddie Hearn, a stand-alone performer, and that is his biggest achievement."
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Eddie Hearn to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Brown, Oliver (2014-05-27). "The motto for Barry and Eddie Hearn, the first family of sport and Essex: We are relentless". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 2014-11-18. Retrieved 2014-11-18.
Nothing expresses the essence of Barry and Eddie Hearn’s relationship quite like the tale of what the father was doing when his son, heir to a sporting dynasty and now frontman for the biggest fight in British history, came into the world.
Far from tenderly clutching wife Susan’s hand in the delivery room, the incorrigible Hearn Snr was embroiled in battle at Romford Snooker Hall.
“It was 1-1!” he protests. “I was playing my mate Crunchy Warne for 50 quid. She has still not forgiven me after 44 years of marriage.”
Even as an oblivious newborn, Eddie was being steeped in the family’s uncompromising sport-first ethos. His dad’s eyes dance with mischief at the memory.
“Someone at the hospital rang to say, ‘Your wife’s in the final stages of labour’. I mean, I was there as quick as I could.
"I potted the blue, we shook hands, Crunchy paid me.
"I got to the hospital, saw my wife on a trolley and said, ‘Best of luck, darling’. She looked back and said, ‘That’s great. I had him 20 minutes ago.’”
Hearn père et fils cut a disparate pair here at their sprawling Brentwood mansion, where their Matchroom company offices have been carved from the same rooms in which Eddie and sister Katie grew up.
...
"Eddie and Katie were both schooled to think in terms of the family business. That’s why, when he was 12, I started taking him to the gyms, to the shows, much to his mother's distress."
...
“I’ve had it all my life,” Eddie says. “All the time I was playing cricket for Essex, or boxing in Billericay, people would say, ‘Oh, you’re only in the team because of your dad’.
Keevins, Hugh (2014-02-27). "Premier League Darts followed by Big Fight Night.. promoter Eddie Hearn packs crowds in for Glasgow double header". Daily Record. Archived from the original on 2014-11-15. Retrieved 2014-11-15.
Hearn knows what makes Burns tick because he once tried to start a career in boxing.
He said: “I had three fights as an amateur before I said, ‘Thank you very much, that’ll do me’. I didn’t have Ricky’s hunger and I didn’t have the desire the kids off the council estates had.
“My dad always instilled a working-class mentality in me but I knew I wasn’t good enough to be a boxer.
“I did play cricket for Essex up until Under-19 level. But now I’m older I want to protect a family dynasty in my business life and happily taken on that mantle.”
McRae, Donald (2011-02-18). "Barry Hearn: Apart from Leyton Orient, everything is turning a profit". Archived from the original on 2014-11-15. Retrieved 2014-11-15.
His laughter is contagious, as is his resolute assault on snobbery, but Hearn provides insight into the way his family works. "This will end up sounding like a Monty Python sketch, but I do bang on about working-class values. I remember taking Eddie to the gym and telling him I was going to show him the difference between a working-class bloke and a rich kid. I was 48 and he was 16 and we were meant to spar three rounds. It was a proper fight. I nailed him in the first with the best shot I've ever thrown. He took it and dropped me twice in the second round. We never had the third. That was the last time I ever put the gloves on because I liked his attitude. Katie looks after logistics and she's fantastic. And, while I'd never say this to his face, Eddie might even be better than me."
Hubbard, Alan (2013-03-10). "Frank Warren: 'I'm not worried about Fast Eddie. Do me a favour'". The Independent. Archived from the original on 2014-11-15. Retrieved 2014-11-15.
Ridley, Ian (2011-10-22). "Out for the count: What does it take for a British boxing underdog to have a tilt at a world title in Atlantic City?". The Daily Mail. Archived from the original on 2014-11-15. Retrieved 2014-11-15.Fast Eddie Hearn
Has established British boxing's largest stable of over 20 fighters, headed by super-middleweight Carl Froch. Kell Brook, Tony Bellew and George Groves have all moved from Warren's stable.
Went to public school in Brentwood and boxed as an amateur.
Son of multi-sports czar Barry.
‘My old man fell out of boxing because he was dealing with too many a***holes,’ says Eddie, 32, who went to his first fight at the age of nine, his father’s promotion of Frank Bruno v Joe Bugner at Tottenham’s White Hart Lane football ground.
Hearn junior, who boxed as a teenager at Billericay Boys Club in Essex, loves it though and was drawn back. Even his ill-fated promotion of Audley Harrison failed to discourage him.
From these sources, we know the following information about Eddie Hearn:
Allowing Eddie Hearn to remain a stand-alone article will allow editors to add non-Matchroom Sport, non-boxing promoter, information to the article. Mandating a merge would discourage editors from adding such information.
The result was Keep. ( non-admin closure) Dwaipayan ( talk) 20:59, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
I am unable to find significant mentions in online sources. A few book may passingly mention the name. So, perhaps does not meet WP:GNG. However, there may be sources available in Marathi language. So, bringing this up in AfD for broader community consensus. Dwaipayan ( talk) 19:44, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator During this AfD, appropriate references were added to the article, helping to prove the notability of the subject. So, I am withdrawing this nomination per WP:WDAFD.-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 20:58, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 07:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
PROD was declined, but I still don't see what makes it notable. It's a good restaurant that shows Australian sports. I am unable to find any 3rd party coverage beyond mentions of its existence. StarM 01:31, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE per sparse particlpation after two relistings. Deor ( talk) 10:31, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
No indication of notability, only one reference does more than mention him in passing. Primefac ( talk) 19:25, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 20:22, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Murry1975 ( talk) 19:34, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Old Europe (archaeology). It is admitted both in the article and in this debate that Danube civilization is a synonym for Old Europe. There is thus no doubt that this article has to go, Wikipedia never has two articles on the same subject. If there is more than one accepted point of view they are both covered in the same article. I have a slight reservation about this in that Old Europe (archaeology) explicitly states that its scope is the theory of Marija Gimbutas. If there is a broader, or competing, understanding of Old Europe then there is scope for expanding that article and changing its scope, or even possibly having a separate article leaving Gimbutas' theory as the original article.
The only issue outstanding is whether this page should be deleted before redirecting. Since several contributors to the debate thought there was something salvagable from it, I have chosen not to delete. Dougweller felt that this would leave the door open for Lactasamir to copy the contents wholesale into the Old Europe article. I strongly advise Lactasamir not to do this. Any material added should be supported by reliable sources that discuss a complex of sites as a unified culture or civilisation. It is not acceptable to refer to several disparate archeological sites and point out similarities ourselves. That has to be done by reliable sources first before we draw that inference.
Much was made in this debate of the sources not being archeologists. There is nothing in Wikipedia policy prohibiting covering the views of none experts on an expert subject. However, that view has to be notable and covered in reliable sources. Further, if it is in conflict with the accepted scholarly position then it must not be presented as fact. Rather, it must be presented as the views of that (non-expert) minority. Further, such views must not be given undue weight. Spinning Spark 18:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
This is original research. Most of the sources do not mention a "Danube Civilization. I note the first line says "Danube Civilization or Old Europe", and Old Europe links to an already existing article Old Europe (archaeology). As an example, a search for "Danube civilization" and "Cucuteni-Trypillian culture" on GBooks and GScholar turns up nothing. Dougweller ( talk) 17:04, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
There should absolutely be no deletion! The Danube civilization are mostly located in former east block countries and therefore the term are not well known in the western world. The term Danube civilization are just a newer name for the older term "Old Europe". The reason why the term Danube civilization are not used in every book or article about e.g. Trypillian culture or Vinča culture are that the civilization are spread all over south eastern Europe and archaeologist in e.g. Serbia will focus on the Vinča culture, and Ukranian archaeologist will focus on Trypillian culture. Different countries with different languages. As i said before most of the civilization are even today unknown for most people in the west. Claming that there are no sources for Danube Civilization are not true! Harald Haarmann are one of the most predominant scholars in the field. He is a leading figure in linguistics. Have in mind that it is linguist who decipher old scrips e.g. ( Michael Ventris who deciphered Linear B).
Harald Haarmann - Educational Background - Habilitation, qualification at professorship level, Trier University with a two volume study on linguistics of Balkan languages. Ph.D., Linguistics, Bonn University with a study on Celtic Latin language contacts. University studies at Hamburg, Bonn, Coimbra (Portugal), Bangor (Wales). Fields of study General linguistics, Romance philology, Slavic languages, Finno-Ugric languages, and archaeology. Institutional Affiliations - Vice President and Director of Institute of Archaeomythology. Member of the research team of the Research Centre on Multilingualism Brussels. Member of the EU scientific committee supervising Euromosaic III. So there are no reason to doubt his expertise, in short he is a linguist who also studied archaeology.
Marija Gimbutas called it Old Europe, so i will definitely support it if the whole article gets relocated to the Old Europe (archaeology) article. I still belive that the term Danube civilization are right, but the term Old Europe are much more used, even if it is the same thing as Danube civilization. But i would prefer to keep the article with the current name - Danube civilization. Lactasamir ( talk) 23:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Claiming that the Danube civilization are original research are simply not true! and the sources where Dougweller claims there are no mention of Danube civilization or Old Europe instead shows that there are plenty of sources.
We cannot ignore highly regarded scholars like Marija Gimbutas, Harald Haarmann, Shan M. M. Winn, Marco Merlini, Mihail Videyko - see [10] And institutions like New York university (ISAW) Institute for the Study of the Ancient World or Ashmolean Museum and the Brukenthal National Museum - see [11]
Whatever the term are, Danube civilization or Old Europe is a fact, and cannot be disputed. So the article should absolutly not be deleted. Lactasamir ( talk) 04:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
As i earlier explained you Dougweller, Haarmann does bot advocate for the biblical flood, but for the Black Sea deluge hypothesis which it is agreed that the sequence of events actually did occur almost 8,000 years ago. Haarmann believes this event perhaps is the root to the biblical Noah's Flood referred to in the Book of Noah and in Gilgamesh. [12]
Claiming Harald Haarmann seems to be on the fringe of these subjects are absolutely not true! he is also a student of archaeology and as the Vice President and Director of Institute of Archaeomythology he works in cooperation with many other shcolars. In 2008 he was part of a large exhibition and symposium in Romania. The institutions involved were - Brukenthal National Museum, National History Museum of Transylvania, National Museum of History, Bucharest, Institute of Archaeology, Iasi, Braila Museum of Archaeology and History, Braia, Department of Archaeology, Cuza University, Iasi, Museum of History and Archaeology, Piatra-Neamt Museum of Banat, Timisoara, Museum of Banat Mountain Area, Resita. [13] The Institute of Archaeomythology and Harald Haarmann and Mikhail Videiko (Trypillian culture expert) Institute of Archaeology National Academy of Sciences, Kiev, Ukraine were also a part of it. This is just one example. Lactasamir ( talk) 12:56, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Furthermore the Eftimie Murgu University in Reşiţa, Romania, collaborated with the Institute of Archaeomythology, Euro Innovanet SRL, Italy, and the Romanian Academy, Iaşi, with Harald Haarmann and Marco Merlini in an international symposium in 2011 in Romania. The symposium was organized around two main themes: The evolution of the Vinča culture, and the significance of the Tărtăria tablets for the Danube Script. [14]
In 2004 Haarmann was among the scholars at the interdisciplinary symposium held in the Novi Sad Branch of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts. [15] So he is far from an isolated scholar, but highly integrated in the Balkan scholarly world. Lactasamir ( talk) 14:23, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
You will not recognize any of the sources? I think that if you read the sources there will be no doubt. You will not recognize serious people working on the subject. You will not recognize that the terms Danube civilization and Old Europe are the same thing, just different names (depending of the scholar). You make it sound like it is me trying to make up some kind of fantasy?
Mihail Videyko is a leading expert on Trypillian culture and are employed at Institute of Archaeology National Academy of Sciences, Kiev, Ukraine. Do you not recognize him when he writes about Old Europe (the same thing as Danube civilization). [19] In this source called "When we were in Old Europe"
Quoting him -
"Let’s start with the fact that “Old Europe” was initially constructed not by political scientists, politicians or even by journalists, but… by archeologists. This term has existed for a few decades and it is applied to quite different territories of our continent and in terms of time cultures which are considered to belong to Old Europe are separated from modern times by lots of time which amounts to six or eight millenniums. The civilized part of that “first” Old Europe included the eastern part of the Apennine peninsula, the Balkans, the territory of modern Hungary, the CzechRepublic, Slovakia, Romania, Moldova and part of the territory of Ukraine from the Carpathians to the Dnieper. Its separate oases also existed beyond the mentioned above borders and were connected, first of all, with the expansion of the bearers of the Neolithic culture of Linear Band Pottery. The Cucuteni-Trypillian civilization which is more known in Ukraine as the Trypillian archeological culture was part of Old Europe" On page 17 you can see a map of Old Europe with the different cultures. Do you not recognize the Brukenthal National Museum Sibiu [20] where they write about the Danube civilization several times? One needs to understand that this civilization are known under different names, Old Europe or Danube civilization, Danube valley cultures and it consisted of many sub cultures like the Trypillian, Vinca, Varna and so on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lactasamir ( talk • contribs) 18:20, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello Paul B :) I also think a merge into Old Europe could be a solution, if there is consensus I will be happy to relocate much of the Danube civilization article into Old Europe and then tone down the overly promotional style. Lactasamir ( talk) 18:44, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 22:44, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Article about a Bangladeshi academic that fails both GNG and WP:PROF. All online coverage I can find is self-generated, and the subject's works have no holdings and no citations that I could find. § FreeRangeFrog croak 18:24, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was No consensus. This debate has been marred by some sockpupetting and lots of irrelevant comments. I was ready to close this as delete, but then came to the comments from SpinningSpark. I recommend that the sources unearthed be added to the article as soon as possible to show notability. No prejudice against a re-nomination of this article after 1 or 2 months. Randykitty ( talk) 03:05, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
PR puffery trying to create notability for an utterly non-notable "actress and model". The article has obviously been created by a PR agent, and was full of fake/bogus references before other editors started cleaning it up, leaving only a single reference even mentioning her, an article that has nothing to do with her being an actress or model, only a run-of-the-mill "fashion designer". Or to sum it up: the article not only fails WP:NACTOR but also falls short of passing WP:GNG by a country mile. Thomas.W talk 18:39, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
cannes.html#.VFNZEkvaNuY
I’ve personally watched several of her films, and if Wikipedia has any form of credibility then it should take control of allowing certain commentators who specialise in certain areas of knowledge access to accept or delete articles on a particular subject.
Armeena is an up and coming actress who’s played star roles in many films already as well as major roles on other shows, and serials. This actress is also becoming very popular in the British Asian scene. Please retain this article. The whole world doesn’t revolve around western cinema or Hollywood alone; there are actors in Bollywood who command fan base multitudes greater than the most famous of Hollywood actors. Yes my dear American/European commentators – there is a greater world out there beyond your shores, and Wikipedia is meant to be a world encyclopedia!
EddyJawed( talk) 11:11, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
For her TV career there is;
For her fashion career, there really is a LOT of coverage. This is just a small selection. I haven't checked these sites carefully for reliability, but there is just so much coverage that she just has to be notable for this at least;
For her film career, notability is a bit more dubious, but she does get some coverage in the Times of India, a lack of which was exercising some commentators. Sorry, some of these articles are probably available online, but I found them through InfoTrac which requires registration so I can't give a link.
Three articles in the Times about Pushkar Jog's film give some coverage to her as the co-star;
Another Times article gives her some coverage prior to release of the film (she is the cause of the delay which the article is about) and is named as the star;
She is also named as the star in
And finally, another article found on Infotrac, but about her fashion career rather than film,
Spinning Spark 12:03, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Comments I have no horse in this but just wanted to add that some of above news articles that are mentioned by Spinning are available online:
The result was delete. WP:BIODELETE gives me some latitude here, and the promotionally and sourcing of the article as it stands is seriously a problem j⚛e decker talk 20:21, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable musician. The article is based entirely on primary sources and, according to the author herself on the article's Talk:Omid Soltani, "There are no more available resources for omid". WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 11:46, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 20:18, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Per WP:BLAR, I'm obligated to nominate this article for an afd. I previously redirected to Chandler:_Red_Tide, but was reverted just recently by an IP. I'll just assume the good faith of that IP and say that I do not believe that this is a notable character outside of the aforementioned book article. They have no individual notability and should instead be redirected to the main book article. Thanks. Tutelary ( talk) 19:43, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 00:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
This article serves the purpose of self-promotion. Wikipedia is not Linkdin. It might be better suited for Greek Wikipedia. [ [29]]. Politis ( talk) 10:58, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:12, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Article fails WP:BAND in it's entirety. There's a claim of notability - nomination as "one of the most significant representations of the european independent Rock scene" - which is not cited and cannot be verified. No reliable sources whatsover. — MelbourneStar☆ talk 14:14, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The item in question as been removed. And updated on the page. —Lastknownent
The result was speedily deleted by User:Jimfbleak per CSD G10 (attack page). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 14:19, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
WP:NOTEBLP and WP:ALIVE don't pass. Sources are not provided. 115ash →(☏) 11:13, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:11, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases (PubMed indexing is through PubMed Central), no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Article de-PRODded with a claim of "historic purpose" as "the first academic journal from India focusing on the discipline of family medicine and primary care exclusively", which is a clear misreading of NJournals#3. Randykitty ( talk) 10:29, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
1. It meets criteria of WP:NJournals it is indeed indexed in Pubmed. Please see http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Journal+of+family+medicine+and+primary+care If you can click on any article you see that it has a PMID as well as PMCID. I guess one checked the NLM catalog which still says the older status " PubMed: Coverage to be announced " But indeed is is coveredin Pubmed as well as Pubmed Central. Those journals that are in PMC only do come up in Pubmed searches but they do not get PMID. They get a PMCID only. JFMPC has both PMID and PMCID NJournals does not require it to be in MEDLINE necessarily 2. It also meets the third criteria of WP:NJournals since it is the first medical journal from India as well as South Asia on family medicine as a reference to this has been put already. Also a NLM catalog search proves this fact to be true.
Drsoumyadeepb ( talk) 13:17, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spinning Spark 12:14, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Unreferenced and not much more than a track listing. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 05:16, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn due to recent prior AfD. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 01:38, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Not notable. All references but one point to the organization's website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cobbsaladin ( talk • contribs) 08:25, 6 November 2014 Cobbsaladin
The result was delete. Clear consensus after relisting. -- Kinu t/ c 18:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Per WP:BIO; the subject is not worthy of notice. -- 82.136.210.153 ( talk) 16:35, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 06:57, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Poorly-sourced article that does not show how the subject meets a notability guideline such as WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, or WP:ACADEMIC. Looks more like a résumé with some peacock terms thrown in than an actual encyclopedia article. Note: foreign-language sources might exist; any input on those is welcome. Kinu t/ c 21:00, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. Cunard's extensive list of citations clearly puts to rest any idea that this is insufficiently sourced. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Nominated for procedural deletion with the following reason: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement." However, article does contain some reliable sources which suggest it is/was a challenger to Paypal. Bringing to AfD for a wider opinion. -- Euryalus ( talk) 12:48, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Jonnelle Marte wrote:
The article provides several more paragraphs of coverage of Popmoney, noting that "But POPmoney’s key feature is that it will allow users to send money directly from one bank account to another."A new service by CashEdge Inc., which provides online banking services for financial institutions, would let users send money to friends and family through a text message or email — further cutting down on our need to stop at ATMs or write checks when we owe people money.
Mary Pilon wrote:
This week, Popmoney, a service from CashEdge, went live. It’s currently available at only two financial institutions, but will expand to seven in coming months, Neil Platt, Popmoney’s senior vice president, said. (CashEdge already has various institutions as clients elsewhere, including Bank of America and Citibank.)
Popmoney lets users send money to recipients via text message or email. The recipient receives a code that he can use to receive the cash, even if he doesn’t have a Popmoney account. It’s the first service allowing bank customers to send money with nothing more than a friend’s email address or cellphone number, Mr. Platt said. Although many online banks offer free transfers and PayPal functions, Popmoney will bear a bank’s branding.
“We think this will be part of every checking account in a couple of years,” he said.
Fees for using the service are determined by the bank. First Hawaiian Bank, one of the first to offer Popmoney, charges $1 per transaction. Some banks might adopt tiered pricing approaches, waiving fees for select customers or on a promotional basis, Mr. Platt said.
Jonnelle Marte wrote:
About 170 banks offer Popmoney, a service that lets you transfer money from your savings or checking account online to another person's account at any participating bank. You just need the payment amount and the person's email address and phone number. If your bank doesn't offer the service, you can't send money, but you can receive it by entering your account information at Popmoney.com.
the Associated Press wrote:
About 200 banks, including several of the nation's largest, already use CashEdge's PopMoney service.
Ross Kenneth Urken wrote:
Perhaps you've seen the commercials for Popmoney, a service that allows a customer to send money using the recipient's phone number or email address. Currently available through 1,700 financial institutions, as well as to any individual user who downloads its app, it has a lot of people jazzed by their ability to pay the babysitter or settle their portion of the dinner check with a tap on their smartphone.
Keep If 175 American banks are offering this, including some
large ones, it suggests small-n "notable". Anyway, here's another report, NPOV an' all:
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:10, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
No indication that this subject meets the notability guideline for academics. No reliable sources that show how WP:GNG is met. Most of the provided "references" are either dead links or do not even mention subject of the article (based on a rough translation); those that mention the subject are passing mentions and are insufficient on which to base a WP:BLP. Contested PROD. Kinu t/ c 21:14, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Online survey software company does not appear to meet the notability criteria for web content or organizations. Current sources in the article are PR or come from the organization's own website. An attempt to find reviews of the product or their organization in reliable sources was unsuccessful. I, JethroBT drop me a line 05:13, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:08, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
While the subject of this article might be notable as an academic, there are no reliable sources that demonstrate WP:GNG is met. Most of the provided "references" are either dead links or do not even mention subject of the article (based on a rough translation); those that mention the subject are passing mentions, which is insufficient for a biographical article. Contested PROD. Kinu t/ c 21:17, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:08, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Page seems insignificant, there appears to be no or little information on Google about the person, and the page has been tagged for over 3 years with no improvements. It is of no help to anyone. Kiwuser ( talk) 01:19, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No quorum ( non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 22:52, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
The subject appears to fail WP:BASIC (our general notability criterion for biographies) and, I suspect, all secondary guidelines as well. No sources currently presented in the article appear to even verify the subject exists, and all I could find online was IMDB, which I could login and edit if I wished (hence it fails WP:RS). VQuakr ( talk) 02:49, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 06:55, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
No indication of notability per WP:NMUSIC and WP:NCONCERT. An editor is creating a bunch of concert/tour articles for this band, (see Category:Dream Theater concert tours), all of which are based on fan forums, and all should be merged to a List of Dream Theater concert tours. I don't know how to nominate multiple articles for simultaneous discussion, but it'd be great if someone could. --Animalparty-- ( talk) 03:47, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spinning Spark 12:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
As I mentioned on the talk page there isn't anything notable about this Michael Bentley page to deserve an encyclopedic entry. Nothing is credible here.Sowhatchawant (talk) 10:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spinning Spark 12:22, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Delete, sources provided d not show that subject meets the guidelines for inclusion. Was thinking about deleting as blp prod but the two sources provided shows he exists buyt not much else. Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 10:53, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help), Shrestha was noted for fusing western and Nepali music. Although the paragraph about him is only 9 sentences, it suggests there is probably more substantial coverage in Nepali sources. —
CactusWriter
(talk)
18:02, 22 October 2014 (UTC)The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 16:04, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
fails WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:GNG LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:21, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 00:08, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Non notable actor. Played an uncredited role in 22 Jump Street and a bar patron in Knucklehead. No noteworthy roles. page was created by a user MKincke - possible COI Gbawden ( talk) 13:24, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 22:42, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
The only real credible claim of notability for this person is that she won a non-notable pageant. None of the other pageants appear to be notable in themselves. I do not see how she passes general notability guidelines otherwise - I do see some articles in the Slovak press on Google, but quick translations suggest they are not much use as sources. Mabalu ( talk) 15:12, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. j⚛e decker talk 15:54, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Basically unsourced biography of a living person. Five of the six references point towards the subject's own website, and the other ref is an ABC Chicago report that barely mentions him. The few points in his biography that might merit notability (worked at the Federal Reserve? Taught twenty years at Elmhurst College?) are unsourced. bender235 ( talk) 16:41, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The article notes:
For 25 years, he has run a group called National Taxpayers United of Illinois, using that position and his newsletter to attack tax increases, seek tax cuts and decry wasteful spending.
He claims to have the second-largest taxpayer group in the Midwest, with 10,000 members and 200 local affiliates around the state. That's probably exaggerated, but he's definitely not alone.
Tobin gets his name in the newspapers a lot because if somebody proposes a tax increase, we can depend on him to be against it. We sometimes call him a conservative, but he prefers to think of himself as a libertarian. Either way, I'd say he's from the right of the political spectrum.
The article notes:
Tobin also took issue with non-uniformed public workers, most who can retire at 60 and earn a pension of $12,474 for the average worker; $21,321 for teachers. They would also receive Social Security benefits, which are a maximum of $22,000 a year.
“These are pampered government employees who get outrageous pension benefits and salaries,” he said. “My personal case is, I’m going to have to work until I drop to pay my bills, plus their lavish salaries.”
Tobin said he founded Taxpayers United in 1976. It has an annual budget of about $300,000, a mailing list of about 30,000 members and a staff of eight.
The article notes:
"If we don't have (pension) reform, the checks will stop coming," Tobin said.
This is the group's first trip to New York. It was created in 1976 by Christina Tobin's father, longtime anti-tax activist Jim Tobin, who in 2002 ran for Illinois lieutenant governor on the Libertarian line. The group has a long history of tangling with the public sector in that state: Last year, it went to court in a failed effort to block a near-doubling of tolls on Illinois highways.
The article notes:
Over the years, JIM TOBIN has received a fair amount of ink in Illinois, playing the role of anti-tax crusader and sometime candidate - including an attempted run for governor as a Libertarian in 1998.
The result was no consensus to delete, and perhaps no consensus that the person even existed. Article may well wind up back at AfD, but it seems there is sufficient doubt at this time. Mojo Hand ( talk) 02:01, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Artist that does not seem to meet WP:ARTIST or claim to significance. Only References to be found are from his galleries website or auction houses and art galleries selling his paintings. - McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 20:12, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 04:01, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable: no substantial coverage in reliable sources. Ibadibam ( talk) 20:03, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was merge to Johan Neerman. a merge to Johan Neerman seems the best solution for now, with no prejudice against re-expansion to a separate article if things develop . doncram, you seem to understand the situation, so would you please do it? DGG ( talk ) 08:28, 16 November 2014 (UTC) (This also applies to Johanson3 scooters.) DGG ( talk ) 20:30, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
This is a failed IndieGoGo project. It probably never should have been created anyway. The information that was in the article before I revised it was machine translated as well as extremely poorly sourced. I am also nominating the following related page because it is basically the exact same article:
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Brightgalrs ( talk • contribs)
I'm sorry but you are not there to put a personal statement. Articles have all necessary proof from verified sources listed below and for your information Company has registered branding, patents and concept and manufacturing the products now. Julia Williams123 — Preceding undated comment added 09:20, 24 October 2014 (UTC) I would really appreciate if before editing notes or making groundless opinion you would rely on reliable sources without violating content. Julia Williams123 — Preceding undated comment added 20:31, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
I cannot not agree with Lemnaminor as articles have more than BBC blog. Please have a look at http://www.gizmodo.de/2014/09/09/johanson3-das-allround-fahrzeug-fuer-den-umweltbewussten-staedter.html http://www.techfieber.de/2014/08/31/johanson3-das-allround-fahrzeug-fuer-den-umweltbewussten-staedter-video/ http://goodcrowd.info/post/93407293659/belgian-transport-designer-johan-neerman-announces http://www.industrie-techno.com/le-velo-solaire-qui-veut-remplacer-la-voiture.32282 http://finance.yahoo.com/news/innovative-approach-personal-mobility-launches-111400050.html Also check company data at http://kbopub.economie.fgov.be/kbopub/toonondernemingps.html?ondernemingsnummer=837049028 Johanson3 product holds several patents on innovation and technology. You can find this information by doing your homework on google. This proves the uniqueness of the product and its originality. Before expressing unvalid statements and give personal opinion please do your research on the subject. I would like to encourage you also to have a look at the story of this company and their background http://archives.lesoir.be/neerman-dans-le-metro_t-20000819-Z0JKRZ.html/ http://archives.lesoir.be/100-vagues-a-lames-l-irresistible-legerete-de-l-alu-les_t-20030307-Z0MWVF.html http://neerman.net You can find more information in the books, journals, printed editions and archives noted at the page of the owner of the company as it was created in 1967 and internet at that time was not so popular. Nominator Brightgalrs appears to have no expertise in the field and seems to focus on ( please follow the link) /info/en/?search=User:Brightgalrs which makes his statements suspicious of any decent contribution to the page - Regards, - Julia Williams123 — Preceding undated comment added 09:23, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
I am really keen on removing AFD template and closing this discussion. For the following reasons:
I also would like to ask the administrator to close this discussion and relist article. Julia Williams123 — Preceding undated comment added 08:49, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
I cannot agree with you. LeSoir article is destined to speak about the creator behind the johanson3 series. If you do understand French you will see that the inventor has notable background by designing various transport systems in Europe which is recognized worldwide. The Name of Johan Neerman is clearly identifiable in this article. You can also follow that the same person is the creator of the range of the johanson3 e-bikes and the creator of the company. The link to Website provided proves that the company exists and in good standing. It is not a company directory that you may consider not verified it’s a government website with all data registration. Regarding articles in Gizmodo, Techfieber, Yahoo, Industrie–techno, photovoltaic and others they were all written by different editors. You can find the name of the editors. Yes indeed they all talk about johanson3 like a new way of transportation but they are not like you call identical as they are put by different editors and in different languages nothing to do with a copy of press release. All links provided above proves the information to be only of a professional nature with no personal point of view. It seems that you keep disliking professional publications for more personal reasons than professional ones as you have not read them thoroughly. Regarding comment of “not notable”. Company and product johanson3 own several international patents. Do your homework on google it will give you some more thought. Among of all reasons for deletions I cannot find any that will be related to the articles. I see just a person giving his personal views by trying to impose weak conclusions about the company. Facts are there. Apparently you did not check good enough the reliable sources that I have provided you. I understand that may be you have your personal opinion and strong feelings about and the inventor. It would be greatly appreciated if you would try not to violate content.
Regarding my close connection to the subject I’m quite happy that you understand that I write always in the same field of transportation also please note that nor Brightgalrs nor Lemnaminor ( talk) have no experience in writing in the field of transportation or any close related field. See bellow
Regards, - Julia Williams123
List of the articles listed below has nothing to do with PR fluff. They are from wellknown proven international resources. I like the way you guys critisize my article but you don’t know what you are talking about. Also regarding your comment about “diatribe by Julia Williams123 against her opponentsis just not acceptable” I consider that I have my right here like the author of the article to explain my work by adding valid arguments. If you do have an issue with innovation in mobility why using Wikipedia for it? You can complain to its inventor who owns intellectual property on his innovations. You seem to be rather desperate in trying trying to push always the same song by trying to impose personal views and issues with the topic which has nothing to do with the quality of the content of these articles which brings all the necessary proof of their reliability. Here is some statement of notability 1. This range of products are significant involvement by a notable person (in our case Johan Neerman ) and is a major part of his career. I think it will be totally insain to challenge work done in the past by Johan Neerman and company Neerman Consulting which designed major transport systems worldwide. The product represents a unique accomplishment in the field as it was never creadted before. More over its patented for various technologies. Please pay attention its not passing along random gossip like you may say it’s the famous publications and reputable independent media sources. And article complies fair and balanced Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. They are not advertising a product their just tell why its notable and innovative. Before Writing just about BBC look at http://www.gizmodo.de/2014/09/09/johanson3-das-allround-fahrzeug-fuer-den-umweltbewussten-staedter.html http://www.techfieber.de/2014/08/31/johanson3-das-allround-fahrzeug-fuer-den-umweltbewussten-staedter-video/ http://www.industrie-techno.com/le-velo-solaire-qui-veut-remplacer-la-voiture.32282 http://finance.yahoo.com/news/innovative-approach-personal-mobility-launches-111400050.html Vorsatz William (October 2014). "Dreirad mit Solardach". Photovoltaik 99: 96. I hope this time I answer your questions and I dont see the point to keep going with the same idea as article contain not just BBC source. Read it carefully. If you don’t like the article or the product please note its not a reason to not recognize notability. Also the last but not the least note. Look at Notability there stated: “Conversely, if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within a Wikipedia article will not decrease the subject's notability.” Please keep in mind that also. Best regards, your devoted Julia Williams123 — Preceding undated comment added 20:52, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
1. This range of products are significant involvement by a notable person (in our case Johan Neerman ) and is a major part of his career. I think it will be totally insain to challenge work done in the past by Johan Neerman and company Neerman Consulting which designed major transport systems worldwide. 2. The product represents a unique accomplishment in the field as it was never created before. More over it’s patented for various technologies. Please pay attention its not passing along random gossip like you may say it’s the famous publications and reputable independent media sources. Also the last but not the least note. Look at Notability there stated: “Conversely, if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within a Wikipedia article will not decrease the subject's notability.” Please keep in mind that also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julia Williams123 ( talk • contribs) 12:38, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
“Regarding pointless attack on fellow editors )))” Its what I see in my case. I just replying to justify and protect my article nothing personal. “This is a failed IndieGoGo project. It probably never should have been created anyway” Brightgalrs “In addition, Julia Williams123 seems to be a SPA with a very close connection to the subject” Lemnaminor
I see just negative erroneous and my fellow editors don’t look at the facts. Who is attacking? Best regards, your devoted Julia Williams123 — Preceding undated comment added 12:36, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
I cannot agree with Lemnaminor's point. LeSoir article is destined to speak about the creator behind the johanson3 series. If you do understand French you will see that the inventor has notable background by designing various transport systems in Europe which is recognized worldwide. Following that some statement of notability This range of products are significant involvement by a notable person (in our case Johan Neerman ) and is a major part of his career.
The Name of Johan Neerman is clearly identifiable in this article. You can also follow that the same person is the creator of the range of the johanson3 e-bikes and the creator of the company. The link to Website provided proves that the company exists and in good standing. It is not a company directory that you may consider not verified it’s a government website with all data registration. Regarding articles in Gizmodo, Techfieber, Yahoo, Industrie–techno, photovoltaic and others they were all written by different editors. You can find the name of the editors. Yes indeed they all talk about johanson3 like a new way of transportation but they are not like you call identical as they are put by different editors and in different languages nothing to do with a copy of press release. All links provided above proves the information to be only of a professional nature with no personal point of view. [[User:Julia Williams123 |Julia Williams123] — Preceding undated comment added 20:24, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Delete all except Summit Series (conference) Spinning Spark 12:28, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
fails WP:BASIC UW Dawgs ( talk) 01:33, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
Each of the individuals are represented as being affiliated with the Summit Series. All are articles are lightly sourced, edited by a handful of Editors/ WP:SOCKPUPPET, and written in a self-promotional style. Taken together, it has the appearance of puffery and marketing material, against WP:NOTADVERTISING.
Additionally, the Pete Gross article was created by moving the established Pete Gross article to Peter R. Gross. Similarly, Jeff Rosenthal was created after the establish article was moved to Jeffrey S. Rosenthal. While this AFD is not a page move (or DAB) request, those will likely follow pending the outcome of these AFDs. UW Dawgs ( talk) 02:20, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Most of this debate has pointlessly been taken up with a procedural wrangle over the propriety of renominating. My ruling on that is that the first AFD was closed with no prejudice against speedy renomination so this AFD is perfectly proper. I note that the first AFD could have legitimately been closed delete on the sole recommendation of the proposer at the discretion of the closing admin. This AFD has had little more (constructive) participation. Nevertheless, what there is, is for delete. No prejudice against recreation if acceptable sources come to light. Spinning Spark 13:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
The first AfD was a dud. Let's hope this one isn't. Aside from the fact that neither of the two links recently added bolster a claim to notability ( a publisher's blurb and an Amazon sale page), I have nothing else to add. The arguments for deletion were thoroughly explained at the first deletion discussion, and I encourage participants to read through them before making up their minds. - Biruitorul Talk 01:56, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
I also see a procedural conflict here if the 1st AfD closing is overturned by the closer, an administrator, or taken to DRV. What happens to the current discussion? Any argument on the merits is now confounded by the 2nd AfD.
Opining that I work on the nomination's agenda is off topic and IMO dismissive. In the context it is also supporting the nomination viewpoint that the AfD community did an inadequate job in the first AfD, which IMO is not support for building an encyclopedia.
The comment to save the article hearkens back to the WP:ARS viewpoint that nominations create rescue opportunities. Articles are not born needing to be saved, because in general as per WP:AGF, we assume that they meet our guidelines. Unscintillating ( talk) 14:52, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
@ Northamerica1000: You've not responded to my comment of 14:52, 1 November 2014 (UTC). One of the points there was WP:RELIST, which says, "Relisting debates repeatedly in the hope of getting sufficient participation is not recommended". This topic has been at AfD since October 5. Why did you relist? Unscintillating ( talk) 03:24, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
JTdale and Rhododendrites, could I perhaps prevail upon you both to register a clear vote, whatever it may be? I believe I have set out a fairly tight case for deletion, and that you should take this into account. I will also note that in the month this has spent at AfD, only the feeblest objections to deletion have been made, and certainly no convincing indication of notability has emerged. Finally, if you do both take part, this discussion will close and we won't have to put up with Unscintillating's trolling anymore. - Biruitorul Talk 17:58, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 03:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Per WP:NOTFILM; this film has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. There is a single reference in the Spanish article that can be used to verify the film's existence, but even with the other external links ( Cinenacional.com, Internet Movie Database) this is not significant coverage in reliable sources. The film is mentioned as one of the works of various people (for example: [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45]), but those are biographies of people, not material about this film. The most interesting thing I've been able to find is what appears to be a photo related to this film. [46] I don't think this is enough. -- 82.136.210.153 ( talk) 15:53, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Red (Taylor Swift album) . While there was no argument for notability at all, there was also only one argument advanced in favor of, and none against, a redirect, and WP:ATD gives us a reason to prefer the redirect j⚛e decker talk 20:14, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONGS not only for lacking significant coverage from reliable third-party sources that aren't album reviews, but also for not having enough solo information to grow beyond a stub. WP:CFORK at best. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 08:18, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. j⚛e decker talk 22:39, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable agency. Orange Mike | Talk 01:07, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Keep - The agency holds a prominent local reputation as evidenced by its inclusion in a recent Advertising Age article detailing the growing advertising/tech industry in Austin. Advertising Age The agency's involvement in SXSW should also be noted on the page Zagat Chief Marketer to improve the notability. I've begun updating and citing the awards section to showcase some of the agency's more recent notable activity. - McPetersJ ( talk) 19:59, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Wizardman 23:42, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable former minor league baseball player who fails WP:BASE/N and, though attempts have previously been made to prove WP:GNG, one believes such attempts were not sufficient. He never reached the major leagues, nor did he hold any roles at the major league level. Seeing as how he was a second round draft pick, one would assume there'd be at least one profile article out there or something significant, but nothing of note has apparently surfaced. Alex ( talk) 21:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Keep. SK#1: nom withdrawn, and no other deletion arguments ( non-admin closure) czar ♔ 04:31, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Per
WP:NMOTORSPORT Marcelo Monte could apparently in theory have an article because he raced once in the
24 Hours of Le Mans; however, per
WP:BASIC ("A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.") he does not in the practice qualify for an article. To make matters worse,
Mathias karl estress (the creator of the article) has been asked repeatedly on his talk page to add references to this BLP, yet he has ignored this request. But what makes this article fatally flawed is that it consists primarily of a copy-paste translation job of a blog entry in Portuguese created by the aforementioned Mathias Karl Estress, as can be verified
here. A hypothetical article about Marcelo Monte would have to be created from scratch.
Dontreader (
talk)
01:09, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
"Withdrawn by nominator" I still believe that the article is fatally flawed, but in theory Marcelo Monte qualifies for an article on Wikipedia per WP:NMOTORSPORT, so I will take less drastic measures concerning the article than an attempt to delete it. Please close this discussion. Thanks... Dontreader ( talk) 08:46, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Esta pagina é baseada em fatos reais e o autor assim o comprovou, tambem pesquisei esse piloto e todas as informações do autor são verdadeiras, é um erro deletar esta pagina. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavio Teixeira Prado ( talk • contribs) 15:18, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
http://flaviossteixeiraprado.blogspot.com/2014/09/origem-wikipedia-enciclopedia-livre.html Como você explica isso? Você não compreende Inglés e Você não compreende a Wikipedia. Essa é uma receita para o desastre, se você quiser criar um artigo na Wikipedia Inglés. Dontreader ( talk) 20:25, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
What's wrong with me being of Portugal, just use a translator, I met a child Marcelo Lot personally when he ran here in Estoril, don't put anything on my blog, without search, if it is proven that he ran LE MANS, that you too agree, it is obvious that he had to go through the other categories, he also appears in references of STOCK CAR BRAZIL, as stated in LE MANS, and can be checked, alias still in activity in the STOCK CAR BRAZIL, can prove if you want, many of the existing profiles on WIKIPEDIA has the EXTERNAL LINKS extracted from own WEB SITES that person being made the biography, its deletion has no basis whatsoever, I ask that you remove, not to harm nor my research nor the author of the pagethat's great career researcher and Austrian riders, I mean I understand English and also to Wikipedia, I'm not an idiot like you try to say, I'm a writer and I've never had confidence in my blog for writing things that do not match the truth, please use your talent for things more useful than deleting this page. Flavioss Teixeira Prado — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavio Teixeira Prado ( talk • contribs) 15:06, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Mathias Karl Stress told me this bored and does not intend to further collaborate with Wikipedia, reliable sources in the post 3 passed, pilots Stock Car Brazil (picked up on Wikipedia), 24 hours Le Mans (picked up on Wikipedia) only external references that are from my blog, I've never had to remove any post for being fake, since they are the result of research and also claims that several external links from wikipedia are taken from web sites created by fans or by the own person this being written, I say dear Sir, with such evidence because you didn't remove the deletion. Cordially, Flavioss Teixeira Prado — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavio Teixeira Prado ( talk • contribs) 18:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
If my blog cannot be used for both, for the Sir will not police and proposes deletion to the many pages of Wikipedia, use of external links to blogs and web sites for fans of the own person described??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavio Teixeira Prado ( talk • contribs) 23:55, 8 November 2014 (UTC) Like I said, you have to learn the ground rules first, by researched all the rules were followed and whether the basic Sir check the history, there were many collaborations and now Sir comes wanting to delete and harm the work of new writers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavio Teixeira Prado ( talk • contribs) 00:07, 9 November 2014 (UTC) So for what Sir wrote the facebook page of Marcelo Monte can be used as external links??? Sir also said that this page does not follow the basic rules, so I googled follows all, Dear Sir please remove the deletion request, but we can continue to discuss the matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavio Teixeira Prado ( talk • contribs) 00:22, 9 November 2014 (UTC) Flavioss Teixeira Prado ( Portuguese - race car writer )
About the analsegicos was known in an interview to Marcelo Monte in a Brazilian television talk show, not as check on Wikipedia, but I am VERY GRATEFUL for removing the DELETION, and help new writers of historical racing, sincerely grateful, Flavio Teixeira Prado — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavio Teixeira Prado ( talk • contribs) 13:50, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spinning Spark 13:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Does not seem to meet the notability guidelines for musical groups. Only the fourth reference seems to be a substantial independent reference: The first two seem to be trivial mentions (or, if they're not, they may not be independent), and the third is not independent. There are no sources to substantiate the information about their musical style or influences. I cannot seem to find any additional sources. Anon126 ( notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 05:23, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
"A musician or ensemble [...] may be notable if it meets at least one of the following criteria: 5. Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable)." That criterion is met because they have released three albums on CD Baby, as you can see in the references now. The Irish Punk website that I found is not big but it's independent of the subject, and there's no reason to question its reliability, plus it addresses many of the previous concerns. Anon126 and Jinkinson, please examine the article now and reconsider. The band should be given some time to grow, and notability has been established already. Dontreader ( talk) 06:58, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
"Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself." And now I will quote from WP:GNG: If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material.
So let's see if we can agree on this matter. Here's my list of reliable, independent sources with significant coverage:
Notice that Schwäbisch Gmünd mentions The Wakes several times, and Google Translate produces this text (for example):
Who said today's youth is apolitical: As singer Paul Sheridan midnight the song "Peat Bog Soldiers" intones one of the newest pieces from The Wakes, spontaneous cheers go through the "Esperanza". And immediately afterwards the mass singing of young guests the Irish version of "The Peat Bog Soldiers" with - the song with which in 1933 the prisoners wanted to do in Lower Saxony concentration camp Börgermoor himself courage. Since The Wakes set but the same two pieces on top of it derived from the Italian workers' movement and resistance against fascism during the Second World War: "Bandiera Rossa" and "Bella Ciao". "Irish Folk 'n Roll" called the band from Glasgow to their music style. With their newer pieces of punk rock are at least as strongly as from traditional Celtic music. But The Wakes have also ballads in the luggage, for example for social criticism football fans this evening. When The Wakes on stage in "Esperanza", may traditionally the St.Pauli-Antifa song "Pirates of the League" not missing. And in her new song "Colours" they sing their club "Celtic" and the stress of the city rivals "Glasgow Rangers".
Plus we have other strong sources with passing mentions but that also increase notability. And back to criterion #1 from WP:BAND, I quote: "This criterion includes published works in all forms". This does not exclude videos, so I'm adding this video to my list of reliable, independent sources with significant coverage. Do you agree with my list? If so, that's enough to establish notability, together with the passing mentions. Dontreader ( talk) 21:54, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Deor ( talk) 10:19, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be a non notable album. If this was by THE Milla Jovovich then according to her bio her 2nd album (this one?) was never released. Gbawden ( talk) 11:13, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 03:54, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
I have looked for third party coverage of Connan but everything out there looks like promotion. Without detailed third party interest WP:GNG is not satisfied. Binksternet ( talk) 22:04, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
-what seems to be a Russian dance-music oriented blog: http://prophi-music.livejournal.com/431304.html
-interview with a writer: http://mshinafelt.blogspot.fr/2012/06/introducing-tom-connan.html
-a magazine music critique is available on IAE magazine (Wikipedia blacklisted site though). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinlived ( talk • contribs) 22:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
-and some DJ setlists playing some tracks: http://djallure32.podomatic.com/entry/2014-03-15T19_41_10-07_00 http://www.awesomedjproductions.com/trance.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinlived ( talk • contribs) 22:37, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
It seems that the interview was initially released on this website, and then on the blog: http://www.chorusandverse.com/blog.php?id=20120629A
Also, I don't think the Russian site is a blog, however I don't speak that language so it's a bit hard to know.
Eventually, "some news outlets host interactive columns they call blogs, and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professional journalists or are professionals in the field on which they write and the blog is subject to the news outlet's full editorial control." (see WP:SPS). The previous link would fall into that category as for me. Justinlived ( talk) 00:37, 22 October 2014 (UTC) Justinlived ( talk) 00:26, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
I found another Russian website mentioning Connan's work, with a recent single: http://popforyou.ru/new/single/809-tom-connan-wanna-know-why.html Using Google translate, it seems that it's not a promotion, but rather a short critique. Justinlived ( talk) 20:17, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Also found a Vietnamese website mentioning what appears to be his last single -good comment, after using Google translate: http://nhacso.net/nghe-nhac/wanna-know-why.X1tUVkBcaA==.html Justinlived ( talk) 20:43, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator. I'm correcting for format because the nominator used the wrong template to close it. Bearcat ( talk) 05:57, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
This article was created shortly after it was announced that she had been retained by Jian Ghomeshi. She also represented Michael Bryant in a high profile case. Although these cases may be significant, the coverage has not been about her. The only coverage about her has been routine coverage of her cases and some coverage in an industry publication. She fails WP:GNG. Tchaliburton ( talk) 00:20, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
[1] OnBeyondZebrax ( talk) 13:00, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 20:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
I have not found any significant quantity of notable sources that could suggest notability. A previous speedy deletion was withdrawn so that the creator and main contributor to the article could find better references, but the article still relies on a single primary source and on the web I've found mainly primary or affiliated sources. I've searched for this name in Google News and Yahoo! News and I have not found any citation. I'm opening an AfD so that other editors could contribute to ascertain the notability of this person. LowLevel73 (talk) 00:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello there
As this page is less than 24 hours old and the 5th was Bonfire night, I have not had a reasonable or significant time to add more sections to the page. I have been working on three other pages, specifically the Pirate Party Wales, Pirate Party UK and Bridgend (UK Parliament constituency) which currently intertwine so I would ask that more time be allocated so that their purposes become clear.
Here are some quick bullet points for why Andy is notable:
Andy Chyba can be found in many places online. This will be a bit of a mess and in no particular order, so some sources will be better than others, I've not had time to sort them yet:
World View Show:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPN7eLcmSBM#t=16 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_D3BTXyuRos
Green Party official blog:
Bright Green:
http://brightgreenscotland.org/index.php/tag/andy-chyba/
Andy has a book published called "The Asylum of the Universe"
RT News Speak with Andy on anti-fracking
http://rt.com/op-edge/fracking-renewable-energy-policy-116/ http://rt.com/news/chevron-fracking-protest-clashes-884/
Andy Chyba "live" on RT news: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ep1G8lSsJA (at around 2:21)
The Green Dragon:
http://agreenwales.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/we-are-backing-pippa.html Backing for Andy's opposition but quite a lot of mentioning on Andy here
Guardian (left wing news paper, big in the UK) news paper, one of the many people credited was Andy Chyba:
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/jul/26/green-party-immigration
Wales Online (Welsh newspaper, big in Wales where Andy is residing):
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/campaigners-raise-alarm-over-proposed-1855462
Obviously these will take time to go through to find the most significant parts. There are no doubt other links that I've just not really gone through yet.
Additionally perhaps more recognisable sources of information such as the BBC often do not give any coverage to The Green Party (the Green Party are currently threatening to press legal action because of this) so alternative sources are generally where you find information on them, such as independent blogs or alternative news channels like RT.
Another I found about Andy Chyba: http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/05/2012514505415433.ht
The sources just need compiling into something more readable and in a better order... are are no doubt other sources, I just need more time to put them together. You'll see my edit history is rather large :)
Drowz0r ( talk) 01:02, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Drowz0r ( talk) 00:53, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The claims of notability present in the article are not things that get a person into Wikipedia — they boil down to candidacies for offices that the subject hasn't won, which fails WP:NPOL. And nearly all of the improved sources that Drowz0r offered above don't get him over WP:GNG either, as most of them are primary sources — and he's not the subject of the few that are properly reliable, but is merely namechecked as the provider of a short comment about something else (which doesn't confer encyclopedic notability either). And publishing a book isn't a free notability pass either — writers don't get Wikipedia articles until you can source them past WP:CREATIVE. So no, there isn't any substantive demonstration of notability here. No prejudice against recreation if and when he wins an office that would get him over a notability hump, but right now he's a delete. Bearcat ( talk) 20:12, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 20:23, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:PRODUCT or WP:GNG Qxukhgiels ( talk) 21:16, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 20:23, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:PRODUCT or WP:GNG Qxukhgiels ( talk) 21:15, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 20:23, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
No sourced indication of notability. The only information I can find is in mirrors of the content of this article; I see nothing in reliable sources. Ultimately fails WP:GNG. Possibly created by someone familiar with the subject (i.e., a relative), based on the author's username. Kinu t/ c 20:59, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was Keep per established notability, though article needs work Metamagician3000 ( talk) 10:32, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Subject lacks notability. Chris Troutman ( talk) 20:53, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Keep. Multiple published sources in both media [1] [2] [3] and books [4] [5] .-- Samuel J. Howard ( talk) 23:12, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The article notes (bolding added for emphasis):
This article provides substantial coverage of the subject.Three and a half years later, Hearn is British boxing’s dominant promoter. He has an exclusive, 23-fights-a-year deal with Sky until the summer of 2016. Many of the country’s best talent have flocked to his Matchroom stable. And on Saturday night comes his crowning glory, Froch v George Groves II, in front of 80,000 people at Wembley.
The article notes (bolding added for emphasis):
This article also provides substantial coverage about the subject.Eddie joined Matchroom Sport in 2000 after working in the sponsorship and event management industry and in a short space of time has become arguably the biggest boxing promoter in Europe.
...
"Eddie has coped despite the albatross around his neck of being Barry Hearn's son," he says. "He is no longer Barry Hearn's son. He is Eddie Hearn, a stand-alone performer, and that is his biggest achievement."
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Eddie Hearn to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Brown, Oliver (2014-05-27). "The motto for Barry and Eddie Hearn, the first family of sport and Essex: We are relentless". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 2014-11-18. Retrieved 2014-11-18.
Nothing expresses the essence of Barry and Eddie Hearn’s relationship quite like the tale of what the father was doing when his son, heir to a sporting dynasty and now frontman for the biggest fight in British history, came into the world.
Far from tenderly clutching wife Susan’s hand in the delivery room, the incorrigible Hearn Snr was embroiled in battle at Romford Snooker Hall.
“It was 1-1!” he protests. “I was playing my mate Crunchy Warne for 50 quid. She has still not forgiven me after 44 years of marriage.”
Even as an oblivious newborn, Eddie was being steeped in the family’s uncompromising sport-first ethos. His dad’s eyes dance with mischief at the memory.
“Someone at the hospital rang to say, ‘Your wife’s in the final stages of labour’. I mean, I was there as quick as I could.
"I potted the blue, we shook hands, Crunchy paid me.
"I got to the hospital, saw my wife on a trolley and said, ‘Best of luck, darling’. She looked back and said, ‘That’s great. I had him 20 minutes ago.’”
Hearn père et fils cut a disparate pair here at their sprawling Brentwood mansion, where their Matchroom company offices have been carved from the same rooms in which Eddie and sister Katie grew up.
...
"Eddie and Katie were both schooled to think in terms of the family business. That’s why, when he was 12, I started taking him to the gyms, to the shows, much to his mother's distress."
...
“I’ve had it all my life,” Eddie says. “All the time I was playing cricket for Essex, or boxing in Billericay, people would say, ‘Oh, you’re only in the team because of your dad’.
Keevins, Hugh (2014-02-27). "Premier League Darts followed by Big Fight Night.. promoter Eddie Hearn packs crowds in for Glasgow double header". Daily Record. Archived from the original on 2014-11-15. Retrieved 2014-11-15.
Hearn knows what makes Burns tick because he once tried to start a career in boxing.
He said: “I had three fights as an amateur before I said, ‘Thank you very much, that’ll do me’. I didn’t have Ricky’s hunger and I didn’t have the desire the kids off the council estates had.
“My dad always instilled a working-class mentality in me but I knew I wasn’t good enough to be a boxer.
“I did play cricket for Essex up until Under-19 level. But now I’m older I want to protect a family dynasty in my business life and happily taken on that mantle.”
McRae, Donald (2011-02-18). "Barry Hearn: Apart from Leyton Orient, everything is turning a profit". Archived from the original on 2014-11-15. Retrieved 2014-11-15.
His laughter is contagious, as is his resolute assault on snobbery, but Hearn provides insight into the way his family works. "This will end up sounding like a Monty Python sketch, but I do bang on about working-class values. I remember taking Eddie to the gym and telling him I was going to show him the difference between a working-class bloke and a rich kid. I was 48 and he was 16 and we were meant to spar three rounds. It was a proper fight. I nailed him in the first with the best shot I've ever thrown. He took it and dropped me twice in the second round. We never had the third. That was the last time I ever put the gloves on because I liked his attitude. Katie looks after logistics and she's fantastic. And, while I'd never say this to his face, Eddie might even be better than me."
Hubbard, Alan (2013-03-10). "Frank Warren: 'I'm not worried about Fast Eddie. Do me a favour'". The Independent. Archived from the original on 2014-11-15. Retrieved 2014-11-15.
Ridley, Ian (2011-10-22). "Out for the count: What does it take for a British boxing underdog to have a tilt at a world title in Atlantic City?". The Daily Mail. Archived from the original on 2014-11-15. Retrieved 2014-11-15.Fast Eddie Hearn
Has established British boxing's largest stable of over 20 fighters, headed by super-middleweight Carl Froch. Kell Brook, Tony Bellew and George Groves have all moved from Warren's stable.
Went to public school in Brentwood and boxed as an amateur.
Son of multi-sports czar Barry.
‘My old man fell out of boxing because he was dealing with too many a***holes,’ says Eddie, 32, who went to his first fight at the age of nine, his father’s promotion of Frank Bruno v Joe Bugner at Tottenham’s White Hart Lane football ground.
Hearn junior, who boxed as a teenager at Billericay Boys Club in Essex, loves it though and was drawn back. Even his ill-fated promotion of Audley Harrison failed to discourage him.
From these sources, we know the following information about Eddie Hearn:
Allowing Eddie Hearn to remain a stand-alone article will allow editors to add non-Matchroom Sport, non-boxing promoter, information to the article. Mandating a merge would discourage editors from adding such information.
The result was Keep. ( non-admin closure) Dwaipayan ( talk) 20:59, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
I am unable to find significant mentions in online sources. A few book may passingly mention the name. So, perhaps does not meet WP:GNG. However, there may be sources available in Marathi language. So, bringing this up in AfD for broader community consensus. Dwaipayan ( talk) 19:44, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator During this AfD, appropriate references were added to the article, helping to prove the notability of the subject. So, I am withdrawing this nomination per WP:WDAFD.-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 20:58, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 07:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
PROD was declined, but I still don't see what makes it notable. It's a good restaurant that shows Australian sports. I am unable to find any 3rd party coverage beyond mentions of its existence. StarM 01:31, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE per sparse particlpation after two relistings. Deor ( talk) 10:31, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
No indication of notability, only one reference does more than mention him in passing. Primefac ( talk) 19:25, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 20:22, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Murry1975 ( talk) 19:34, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Old Europe (archaeology). It is admitted both in the article and in this debate that Danube civilization is a synonym for Old Europe. There is thus no doubt that this article has to go, Wikipedia never has two articles on the same subject. If there is more than one accepted point of view they are both covered in the same article. I have a slight reservation about this in that Old Europe (archaeology) explicitly states that its scope is the theory of Marija Gimbutas. If there is a broader, or competing, understanding of Old Europe then there is scope for expanding that article and changing its scope, or even possibly having a separate article leaving Gimbutas' theory as the original article.
The only issue outstanding is whether this page should be deleted before redirecting. Since several contributors to the debate thought there was something salvagable from it, I have chosen not to delete. Dougweller felt that this would leave the door open for Lactasamir to copy the contents wholesale into the Old Europe article. I strongly advise Lactasamir not to do this. Any material added should be supported by reliable sources that discuss a complex of sites as a unified culture or civilisation. It is not acceptable to refer to several disparate archeological sites and point out similarities ourselves. That has to be done by reliable sources first before we draw that inference.
Much was made in this debate of the sources not being archeologists. There is nothing in Wikipedia policy prohibiting covering the views of none experts on an expert subject. However, that view has to be notable and covered in reliable sources. Further, if it is in conflict with the accepted scholarly position then it must not be presented as fact. Rather, it must be presented as the views of that (non-expert) minority. Further, such views must not be given undue weight. Spinning Spark 18:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
This is original research. Most of the sources do not mention a "Danube Civilization. I note the first line says "Danube Civilization or Old Europe", and Old Europe links to an already existing article Old Europe (archaeology). As an example, a search for "Danube civilization" and "Cucuteni-Trypillian culture" on GBooks and GScholar turns up nothing. Dougweller ( talk) 17:04, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
There should absolutely be no deletion! The Danube civilization are mostly located in former east block countries and therefore the term are not well known in the western world. The term Danube civilization are just a newer name for the older term "Old Europe". The reason why the term Danube civilization are not used in every book or article about e.g. Trypillian culture or Vinča culture are that the civilization are spread all over south eastern Europe and archaeologist in e.g. Serbia will focus on the Vinča culture, and Ukranian archaeologist will focus on Trypillian culture. Different countries with different languages. As i said before most of the civilization are even today unknown for most people in the west. Claming that there are no sources for Danube Civilization are not true! Harald Haarmann are one of the most predominant scholars in the field. He is a leading figure in linguistics. Have in mind that it is linguist who decipher old scrips e.g. ( Michael Ventris who deciphered Linear B).
Harald Haarmann - Educational Background - Habilitation, qualification at professorship level, Trier University with a two volume study on linguistics of Balkan languages. Ph.D., Linguistics, Bonn University with a study on Celtic Latin language contacts. University studies at Hamburg, Bonn, Coimbra (Portugal), Bangor (Wales). Fields of study General linguistics, Romance philology, Slavic languages, Finno-Ugric languages, and archaeology. Institutional Affiliations - Vice President and Director of Institute of Archaeomythology. Member of the research team of the Research Centre on Multilingualism Brussels. Member of the EU scientific committee supervising Euromosaic III. So there are no reason to doubt his expertise, in short he is a linguist who also studied archaeology.
Marija Gimbutas called it Old Europe, so i will definitely support it if the whole article gets relocated to the Old Europe (archaeology) article. I still belive that the term Danube civilization are right, but the term Old Europe are much more used, even if it is the same thing as Danube civilization. But i would prefer to keep the article with the current name - Danube civilization. Lactasamir ( talk) 23:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Claiming that the Danube civilization are original research are simply not true! and the sources where Dougweller claims there are no mention of Danube civilization or Old Europe instead shows that there are plenty of sources.
We cannot ignore highly regarded scholars like Marija Gimbutas, Harald Haarmann, Shan M. M. Winn, Marco Merlini, Mihail Videyko - see [10] And institutions like New York university (ISAW) Institute for the Study of the Ancient World or Ashmolean Museum and the Brukenthal National Museum - see [11]
Whatever the term are, Danube civilization or Old Europe is a fact, and cannot be disputed. So the article should absolutly not be deleted. Lactasamir ( talk) 04:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
As i earlier explained you Dougweller, Haarmann does bot advocate for the biblical flood, but for the Black Sea deluge hypothesis which it is agreed that the sequence of events actually did occur almost 8,000 years ago. Haarmann believes this event perhaps is the root to the biblical Noah's Flood referred to in the Book of Noah and in Gilgamesh. [12]
Claiming Harald Haarmann seems to be on the fringe of these subjects are absolutely not true! he is also a student of archaeology and as the Vice President and Director of Institute of Archaeomythology he works in cooperation with many other shcolars. In 2008 he was part of a large exhibition and symposium in Romania. The institutions involved were - Brukenthal National Museum, National History Museum of Transylvania, National Museum of History, Bucharest, Institute of Archaeology, Iasi, Braila Museum of Archaeology and History, Braia, Department of Archaeology, Cuza University, Iasi, Museum of History and Archaeology, Piatra-Neamt Museum of Banat, Timisoara, Museum of Banat Mountain Area, Resita. [13] The Institute of Archaeomythology and Harald Haarmann and Mikhail Videiko (Trypillian culture expert) Institute of Archaeology National Academy of Sciences, Kiev, Ukraine were also a part of it. This is just one example. Lactasamir ( talk) 12:56, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Furthermore the Eftimie Murgu University in Reşiţa, Romania, collaborated with the Institute of Archaeomythology, Euro Innovanet SRL, Italy, and the Romanian Academy, Iaşi, with Harald Haarmann and Marco Merlini in an international symposium in 2011 in Romania. The symposium was organized around two main themes: The evolution of the Vinča culture, and the significance of the Tărtăria tablets for the Danube Script. [14]
In 2004 Haarmann was among the scholars at the interdisciplinary symposium held in the Novi Sad Branch of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts. [15] So he is far from an isolated scholar, but highly integrated in the Balkan scholarly world. Lactasamir ( talk) 14:23, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
You will not recognize any of the sources? I think that if you read the sources there will be no doubt. You will not recognize serious people working on the subject. You will not recognize that the terms Danube civilization and Old Europe are the same thing, just different names (depending of the scholar). You make it sound like it is me trying to make up some kind of fantasy?
Mihail Videyko is a leading expert on Trypillian culture and are employed at Institute of Archaeology National Academy of Sciences, Kiev, Ukraine. Do you not recognize him when he writes about Old Europe (the same thing as Danube civilization). [19] In this source called "When we were in Old Europe"
Quoting him -
"Let’s start with the fact that “Old Europe” was initially constructed not by political scientists, politicians or even by journalists, but… by archeologists. This term has existed for a few decades and it is applied to quite different territories of our continent and in terms of time cultures which are considered to belong to Old Europe are separated from modern times by lots of time which amounts to six or eight millenniums. The civilized part of that “first” Old Europe included the eastern part of the Apennine peninsula, the Balkans, the territory of modern Hungary, the CzechRepublic, Slovakia, Romania, Moldova and part of the territory of Ukraine from the Carpathians to the Dnieper. Its separate oases also existed beyond the mentioned above borders and were connected, first of all, with the expansion of the bearers of the Neolithic culture of Linear Band Pottery. The Cucuteni-Trypillian civilization which is more known in Ukraine as the Trypillian archeological culture was part of Old Europe" On page 17 you can see a map of Old Europe with the different cultures. Do you not recognize the Brukenthal National Museum Sibiu [20] where they write about the Danube civilization several times? One needs to understand that this civilization are known under different names, Old Europe or Danube civilization, Danube valley cultures and it consisted of many sub cultures like the Trypillian, Vinca, Varna and so on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lactasamir ( talk • contribs) 18:20, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello Paul B :) I also think a merge into Old Europe could be a solution, if there is consensus I will be happy to relocate much of the Danube civilization article into Old Europe and then tone down the overly promotional style. Lactasamir ( talk) 18:44, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 22:44, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Article about a Bangladeshi academic that fails both GNG and WP:PROF. All online coverage I can find is self-generated, and the subject's works have no holdings and no citations that I could find. § FreeRangeFrog croak 18:24, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was No consensus. This debate has been marred by some sockpupetting and lots of irrelevant comments. I was ready to close this as delete, but then came to the comments from SpinningSpark. I recommend that the sources unearthed be added to the article as soon as possible to show notability. No prejudice against a re-nomination of this article after 1 or 2 months. Randykitty ( talk) 03:05, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
PR puffery trying to create notability for an utterly non-notable "actress and model". The article has obviously been created by a PR agent, and was full of fake/bogus references before other editors started cleaning it up, leaving only a single reference even mentioning her, an article that has nothing to do with her being an actress or model, only a run-of-the-mill "fashion designer". Or to sum it up: the article not only fails WP:NACTOR but also falls short of passing WP:GNG by a country mile. Thomas.W talk 18:39, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
cannes.html#.VFNZEkvaNuY
I’ve personally watched several of her films, and if Wikipedia has any form of credibility then it should take control of allowing certain commentators who specialise in certain areas of knowledge access to accept or delete articles on a particular subject.
Armeena is an up and coming actress who’s played star roles in many films already as well as major roles on other shows, and serials. This actress is also becoming very popular in the British Asian scene. Please retain this article. The whole world doesn’t revolve around western cinema or Hollywood alone; there are actors in Bollywood who command fan base multitudes greater than the most famous of Hollywood actors. Yes my dear American/European commentators – there is a greater world out there beyond your shores, and Wikipedia is meant to be a world encyclopedia!
EddyJawed( talk) 11:11, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
For her TV career there is;
For her fashion career, there really is a LOT of coverage. This is just a small selection. I haven't checked these sites carefully for reliability, but there is just so much coverage that she just has to be notable for this at least;
For her film career, notability is a bit more dubious, but she does get some coverage in the Times of India, a lack of which was exercising some commentators. Sorry, some of these articles are probably available online, but I found them through InfoTrac which requires registration so I can't give a link.
Three articles in the Times about Pushkar Jog's film give some coverage to her as the co-star;
Another Times article gives her some coverage prior to release of the film (she is the cause of the delay which the article is about) and is named as the star;
She is also named as the star in
And finally, another article found on Infotrac, but about her fashion career rather than film,
Spinning Spark 12:03, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Comments I have no horse in this but just wanted to add that some of above news articles that are mentioned by Spinning are available online:
The result was delete. WP:BIODELETE gives me some latitude here, and the promotionally and sourcing of the article as it stands is seriously a problem j⚛e decker talk 20:21, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable musician. The article is based entirely on primary sources and, according to the author herself on the article's Talk:Omid Soltani, "There are no more available resources for omid". WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 11:46, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 20:18, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Per WP:BLAR, I'm obligated to nominate this article for an afd. I previously redirected to Chandler:_Red_Tide, but was reverted just recently by an IP. I'll just assume the good faith of that IP and say that I do not believe that this is a notable character outside of the aforementioned book article. They have no individual notability and should instead be redirected to the main book article. Thanks. Tutelary ( talk) 19:43, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 00:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
This article serves the purpose of self-promotion. Wikipedia is not Linkdin. It might be better suited for Greek Wikipedia. [ [29]]. Politis ( talk) 10:58, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:12, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Article fails WP:BAND in it's entirety. There's a claim of notability - nomination as "one of the most significant representations of the european independent Rock scene" - which is not cited and cannot be verified. No reliable sources whatsover. — MelbourneStar☆ talk 14:14, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The item in question as been removed. And updated on the page. —Lastknownent
The result was speedily deleted by User:Jimfbleak per CSD G10 (attack page). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 14:19, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
WP:NOTEBLP and WP:ALIVE don't pass. Sources are not provided. 115ash →(☏) 11:13, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:11, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases (PubMed indexing is through PubMed Central), no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Article de-PRODded with a claim of "historic purpose" as "the first academic journal from India focusing on the discipline of family medicine and primary care exclusively", which is a clear misreading of NJournals#3. Randykitty ( talk) 10:29, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
1. It meets criteria of WP:NJournals it is indeed indexed in Pubmed. Please see http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Journal+of+family+medicine+and+primary+care If you can click on any article you see that it has a PMID as well as PMCID. I guess one checked the NLM catalog which still says the older status " PubMed: Coverage to be announced " But indeed is is coveredin Pubmed as well as Pubmed Central. Those journals that are in PMC only do come up in Pubmed searches but they do not get PMID. They get a PMCID only. JFMPC has both PMID and PMCID NJournals does not require it to be in MEDLINE necessarily 2. It also meets the third criteria of WP:NJournals since it is the first medical journal from India as well as South Asia on family medicine as a reference to this has been put already. Also a NLM catalog search proves this fact to be true.
Drsoumyadeepb ( talk) 13:17, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spinning Spark 12:14, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Unreferenced and not much more than a track listing. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 05:16, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn due to recent prior AfD. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 01:38, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Not notable. All references but one point to the organization's website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cobbsaladin ( talk • contribs) 08:25, 6 November 2014 Cobbsaladin
The result was delete. Clear consensus after relisting. -- Kinu t/ c 18:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Per WP:BIO; the subject is not worthy of notice. -- 82.136.210.153 ( talk) 16:35, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 06:57, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Poorly-sourced article that does not show how the subject meets a notability guideline such as WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, or WP:ACADEMIC. Looks more like a résumé with some peacock terms thrown in than an actual encyclopedia article. Note: foreign-language sources might exist; any input on those is welcome. Kinu t/ c 21:00, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. Cunard's extensive list of citations clearly puts to rest any idea that this is insufficiently sourced. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Nominated for procedural deletion with the following reason: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement." However, article does contain some reliable sources which suggest it is/was a challenger to Paypal. Bringing to AfD for a wider opinion. -- Euryalus ( talk) 12:48, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Jonnelle Marte wrote:
The article provides several more paragraphs of coverage of Popmoney, noting that "But POPmoney’s key feature is that it will allow users to send money directly from one bank account to another."A new service by CashEdge Inc., which provides online banking services for financial institutions, would let users send money to friends and family through a text message or email — further cutting down on our need to stop at ATMs or write checks when we owe people money.
Mary Pilon wrote:
This week, Popmoney, a service from CashEdge, went live. It’s currently available at only two financial institutions, but will expand to seven in coming months, Neil Platt, Popmoney’s senior vice president, said. (CashEdge already has various institutions as clients elsewhere, including Bank of America and Citibank.)
Popmoney lets users send money to recipients via text message or email. The recipient receives a code that he can use to receive the cash, even if he doesn’t have a Popmoney account. It’s the first service allowing bank customers to send money with nothing more than a friend’s email address or cellphone number, Mr. Platt said. Although many online banks offer free transfers and PayPal functions, Popmoney will bear a bank’s branding.
“We think this will be part of every checking account in a couple of years,” he said.
Fees for using the service are determined by the bank. First Hawaiian Bank, one of the first to offer Popmoney, charges $1 per transaction. Some banks might adopt tiered pricing approaches, waiving fees for select customers or on a promotional basis, Mr. Platt said.
Jonnelle Marte wrote:
About 170 banks offer Popmoney, a service that lets you transfer money from your savings or checking account online to another person's account at any participating bank. You just need the payment amount and the person's email address and phone number. If your bank doesn't offer the service, you can't send money, but you can receive it by entering your account information at Popmoney.com.
the Associated Press wrote:
About 200 banks, including several of the nation's largest, already use CashEdge's PopMoney service.
Ross Kenneth Urken wrote:
Perhaps you've seen the commercials for Popmoney, a service that allows a customer to send money using the recipient's phone number or email address. Currently available through 1,700 financial institutions, as well as to any individual user who downloads its app, it has a lot of people jazzed by their ability to pay the babysitter or settle their portion of the dinner check with a tap on their smartphone.
Keep If 175 American banks are offering this, including some
large ones, it suggests small-n "notable". Anyway, here's another report, NPOV an' all:
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:10, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
No indication that this subject meets the notability guideline for academics. No reliable sources that show how WP:GNG is met. Most of the provided "references" are either dead links or do not even mention subject of the article (based on a rough translation); those that mention the subject are passing mentions and are insufficient on which to base a WP:BLP. Contested PROD. Kinu t/ c 21:14, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Online survey software company does not appear to meet the notability criteria for web content or organizations. Current sources in the article are PR or come from the organization's own website. An attempt to find reviews of the product or their organization in reliable sources was unsuccessful. I, JethroBT drop me a line 05:13, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:08, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
While the subject of this article might be notable as an academic, there are no reliable sources that demonstrate WP:GNG is met. Most of the provided "references" are either dead links or do not even mention subject of the article (based on a rough translation); those that mention the subject are passing mentions, which is insufficient for a biographical article. Contested PROD. Kinu t/ c 21:17, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:08, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Page seems insignificant, there appears to be no or little information on Google about the person, and the page has been tagged for over 3 years with no improvements. It is of no help to anyone. Kiwuser ( talk) 01:19, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No quorum ( non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 22:52, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
The subject appears to fail WP:BASIC (our general notability criterion for biographies) and, I suspect, all secondary guidelines as well. No sources currently presented in the article appear to even verify the subject exists, and all I could find online was IMDB, which I could login and edit if I wished (hence it fails WP:RS). VQuakr ( talk) 02:49, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 06:55, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
No indication of notability per WP:NMUSIC and WP:NCONCERT. An editor is creating a bunch of concert/tour articles for this band, (see Category:Dream Theater concert tours), all of which are based on fan forums, and all should be merged to a List of Dream Theater concert tours. I don't know how to nominate multiple articles for simultaneous discussion, but it'd be great if someone could. --Animalparty-- ( talk) 03:47, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spinning Spark 12:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
As I mentioned on the talk page there isn't anything notable about this Michael Bentley page to deserve an encyclopedic entry. Nothing is credible here.Sowhatchawant (talk) 10:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spinning Spark 12:22, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Delete, sources provided d not show that subject meets the guidelines for inclusion. Was thinking about deleting as blp prod but the two sources provided shows he exists buyt not much else. Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 10:53, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help), Shrestha was noted for fusing western and Nepali music. Although the paragraph about him is only 9 sentences, it suggests there is probably more substantial coverage in Nepali sources. —
CactusWriter
(talk)
18:02, 22 October 2014 (UTC)The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 16:04, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
fails WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:GNG LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:21, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 00:08, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Non notable actor. Played an uncredited role in 22 Jump Street and a bar patron in Knucklehead. No noteworthy roles. page was created by a user MKincke - possible COI Gbawden ( talk) 13:24, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 22:42, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
The only real credible claim of notability for this person is that she won a non-notable pageant. None of the other pageants appear to be notable in themselves. I do not see how she passes general notability guidelines otherwise - I do see some articles in the Slovak press on Google, but quick translations suggest they are not much use as sources. Mabalu ( talk) 15:12, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. j⚛e decker talk 15:54, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Basically unsourced biography of a living person. Five of the six references point towards the subject's own website, and the other ref is an ABC Chicago report that barely mentions him. The few points in his biography that might merit notability (worked at the Federal Reserve? Taught twenty years at Elmhurst College?) are unsourced. bender235 ( talk) 16:41, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The article notes:
For 25 years, he has run a group called National Taxpayers United of Illinois, using that position and his newsletter to attack tax increases, seek tax cuts and decry wasteful spending.
He claims to have the second-largest taxpayer group in the Midwest, with 10,000 members and 200 local affiliates around the state. That's probably exaggerated, but he's definitely not alone.
Tobin gets his name in the newspapers a lot because if somebody proposes a tax increase, we can depend on him to be against it. We sometimes call him a conservative, but he prefers to think of himself as a libertarian. Either way, I'd say he's from the right of the political spectrum.
The article notes:
Tobin also took issue with non-uniformed public workers, most who can retire at 60 and earn a pension of $12,474 for the average worker; $21,321 for teachers. They would also receive Social Security benefits, which are a maximum of $22,000 a year.
“These are pampered government employees who get outrageous pension benefits and salaries,” he said. “My personal case is, I’m going to have to work until I drop to pay my bills, plus their lavish salaries.”
Tobin said he founded Taxpayers United in 1976. It has an annual budget of about $300,000, a mailing list of about 30,000 members and a staff of eight.
The article notes:
"If we don't have (pension) reform, the checks will stop coming," Tobin said.
This is the group's first trip to New York. It was created in 1976 by Christina Tobin's father, longtime anti-tax activist Jim Tobin, who in 2002 ran for Illinois lieutenant governor on the Libertarian line. The group has a long history of tangling with the public sector in that state: Last year, it went to court in a failed effort to block a near-doubling of tolls on Illinois highways.
The article notes:
Over the years, JIM TOBIN has received a fair amount of ink in Illinois, playing the role of anti-tax crusader and sometime candidate - including an attempted run for governor as a Libertarian in 1998.
The result was no consensus to delete, and perhaps no consensus that the person even existed. Article may well wind up back at AfD, but it seems there is sufficient doubt at this time. Mojo Hand ( talk) 02:01, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Artist that does not seem to meet WP:ARTIST or claim to significance. Only References to be found are from his galleries website or auction houses and art galleries selling his paintings. - McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 20:12, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 04:01, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable: no substantial coverage in reliable sources. Ibadibam ( talk) 20:03, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was merge to Johan Neerman. a merge to Johan Neerman seems the best solution for now, with no prejudice against re-expansion to a separate article if things develop . doncram, you seem to understand the situation, so would you please do it? DGG ( talk ) 08:28, 16 November 2014 (UTC) (This also applies to Johanson3 scooters.) DGG ( talk ) 20:30, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
This is a failed IndieGoGo project. It probably never should have been created anyway. The information that was in the article before I revised it was machine translated as well as extremely poorly sourced. I am also nominating the following related page because it is basically the exact same article:
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Brightgalrs ( talk • contribs)
I'm sorry but you are not there to put a personal statement. Articles have all necessary proof from verified sources listed below and for your information Company has registered branding, patents and concept and manufacturing the products now. Julia Williams123 — Preceding undated comment added 09:20, 24 October 2014 (UTC) I would really appreciate if before editing notes or making groundless opinion you would rely on reliable sources without violating content. Julia Williams123 — Preceding undated comment added 20:31, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
I cannot not agree with Lemnaminor as articles have more than BBC blog. Please have a look at http://www.gizmodo.de/2014/09/09/johanson3-das-allround-fahrzeug-fuer-den-umweltbewussten-staedter.html http://www.techfieber.de/2014/08/31/johanson3-das-allround-fahrzeug-fuer-den-umweltbewussten-staedter-video/ http://goodcrowd.info/post/93407293659/belgian-transport-designer-johan-neerman-announces http://www.industrie-techno.com/le-velo-solaire-qui-veut-remplacer-la-voiture.32282 http://finance.yahoo.com/news/innovative-approach-personal-mobility-launches-111400050.html Also check company data at http://kbopub.economie.fgov.be/kbopub/toonondernemingps.html?ondernemingsnummer=837049028 Johanson3 product holds several patents on innovation and technology. You can find this information by doing your homework on google. This proves the uniqueness of the product and its originality. Before expressing unvalid statements and give personal opinion please do your research on the subject. I would like to encourage you also to have a look at the story of this company and their background http://archives.lesoir.be/neerman-dans-le-metro_t-20000819-Z0JKRZ.html/ http://archives.lesoir.be/100-vagues-a-lames-l-irresistible-legerete-de-l-alu-les_t-20030307-Z0MWVF.html http://neerman.net You can find more information in the books, journals, printed editions and archives noted at the page of the owner of the company as it was created in 1967 and internet at that time was not so popular. Nominator Brightgalrs appears to have no expertise in the field and seems to focus on ( please follow the link) /info/en/?search=User:Brightgalrs which makes his statements suspicious of any decent contribution to the page - Regards, - Julia Williams123 — Preceding undated comment added 09:23, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
I am really keen on removing AFD template and closing this discussion. For the following reasons:
I also would like to ask the administrator to close this discussion and relist article. Julia Williams123 — Preceding undated comment added 08:49, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
I cannot agree with you. LeSoir article is destined to speak about the creator behind the johanson3 series. If you do understand French you will see that the inventor has notable background by designing various transport systems in Europe which is recognized worldwide. The Name of Johan Neerman is clearly identifiable in this article. You can also follow that the same person is the creator of the range of the johanson3 e-bikes and the creator of the company. The link to Website provided proves that the company exists and in good standing. It is not a company directory that you may consider not verified it’s a government website with all data registration. Regarding articles in Gizmodo, Techfieber, Yahoo, Industrie–techno, photovoltaic and others they were all written by different editors. You can find the name of the editors. Yes indeed they all talk about johanson3 like a new way of transportation but they are not like you call identical as they are put by different editors and in different languages nothing to do with a copy of press release. All links provided above proves the information to be only of a professional nature with no personal point of view. It seems that you keep disliking professional publications for more personal reasons than professional ones as you have not read them thoroughly. Regarding comment of “not notable”. Company and product johanson3 own several international patents. Do your homework on google it will give you some more thought. Among of all reasons for deletions I cannot find any that will be related to the articles. I see just a person giving his personal views by trying to impose weak conclusions about the company. Facts are there. Apparently you did not check good enough the reliable sources that I have provided you. I understand that may be you have your personal opinion and strong feelings about and the inventor. It would be greatly appreciated if you would try not to violate content.
Regarding my close connection to the subject I’m quite happy that you understand that I write always in the same field of transportation also please note that nor Brightgalrs nor Lemnaminor ( talk) have no experience in writing in the field of transportation or any close related field. See bellow
Regards, - Julia Williams123
List of the articles listed below has nothing to do with PR fluff. They are from wellknown proven international resources. I like the way you guys critisize my article but you don’t know what you are talking about. Also regarding your comment about “diatribe by Julia Williams123 against her opponentsis just not acceptable” I consider that I have my right here like the author of the article to explain my work by adding valid arguments. If you do have an issue with innovation in mobility why using Wikipedia for it? You can complain to its inventor who owns intellectual property on his innovations. You seem to be rather desperate in trying trying to push always the same song by trying to impose personal views and issues with the topic which has nothing to do with the quality of the content of these articles which brings all the necessary proof of their reliability. Here is some statement of notability 1. This range of products are significant involvement by a notable person (in our case Johan Neerman ) and is a major part of his career. I think it will be totally insain to challenge work done in the past by Johan Neerman and company Neerman Consulting which designed major transport systems worldwide. The product represents a unique accomplishment in the field as it was never creadted before. More over its patented for various technologies. Please pay attention its not passing along random gossip like you may say it’s the famous publications and reputable independent media sources. And article complies fair and balanced Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. They are not advertising a product their just tell why its notable and innovative. Before Writing just about BBC look at http://www.gizmodo.de/2014/09/09/johanson3-das-allround-fahrzeug-fuer-den-umweltbewussten-staedter.html http://www.techfieber.de/2014/08/31/johanson3-das-allround-fahrzeug-fuer-den-umweltbewussten-staedter-video/ http://www.industrie-techno.com/le-velo-solaire-qui-veut-remplacer-la-voiture.32282 http://finance.yahoo.com/news/innovative-approach-personal-mobility-launches-111400050.html Vorsatz William (October 2014). "Dreirad mit Solardach". Photovoltaik 99: 96. I hope this time I answer your questions and I dont see the point to keep going with the same idea as article contain not just BBC source. Read it carefully. If you don’t like the article or the product please note its not a reason to not recognize notability. Also the last but not the least note. Look at Notability there stated: “Conversely, if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within a Wikipedia article will not decrease the subject's notability.” Please keep in mind that also. Best regards, your devoted Julia Williams123 — Preceding undated comment added 20:52, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
1. This range of products are significant involvement by a notable person (in our case Johan Neerman ) and is a major part of his career. I think it will be totally insain to challenge work done in the past by Johan Neerman and company Neerman Consulting which designed major transport systems worldwide. 2. The product represents a unique accomplishment in the field as it was never created before. More over it’s patented for various technologies. Please pay attention its not passing along random gossip like you may say it’s the famous publications and reputable independent media sources. Also the last but not the least note. Look at Notability there stated: “Conversely, if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within a Wikipedia article will not decrease the subject's notability.” Please keep in mind that also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julia Williams123 ( talk • contribs) 12:38, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
“Regarding pointless attack on fellow editors )))” Its what I see in my case. I just replying to justify and protect my article nothing personal. “This is a failed IndieGoGo project. It probably never should have been created anyway” Brightgalrs “In addition, Julia Williams123 seems to be a SPA with a very close connection to the subject” Lemnaminor
I see just negative erroneous and my fellow editors don’t look at the facts. Who is attacking? Best regards, your devoted Julia Williams123 — Preceding undated comment added 12:36, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
I cannot agree with Lemnaminor's point. LeSoir article is destined to speak about the creator behind the johanson3 series. If you do understand French you will see that the inventor has notable background by designing various transport systems in Europe which is recognized worldwide. Following that some statement of notability This range of products are significant involvement by a notable person (in our case Johan Neerman ) and is a major part of his career.
The Name of Johan Neerman is clearly identifiable in this article. You can also follow that the same person is the creator of the range of the johanson3 e-bikes and the creator of the company. The link to Website provided proves that the company exists and in good standing. It is not a company directory that you may consider not verified it’s a government website with all data registration. Regarding articles in Gizmodo, Techfieber, Yahoo, Industrie–techno, photovoltaic and others they were all written by different editors. You can find the name of the editors. Yes indeed they all talk about johanson3 like a new way of transportation but they are not like you call identical as they are put by different editors and in different languages nothing to do with a copy of press release. All links provided above proves the information to be only of a professional nature with no personal point of view. [[User:Julia Williams123 |Julia Williams123] — Preceding undated comment added 20:24, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Delete all except Summit Series (conference) Spinning Spark 12:28, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
fails WP:BASIC UW Dawgs ( talk) 01:33, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
Each of the individuals are represented as being affiliated with the Summit Series. All are articles are lightly sourced, edited by a handful of Editors/ WP:SOCKPUPPET, and written in a self-promotional style. Taken together, it has the appearance of puffery and marketing material, against WP:NOTADVERTISING.
Additionally, the Pete Gross article was created by moving the established Pete Gross article to Peter R. Gross. Similarly, Jeff Rosenthal was created after the establish article was moved to Jeffrey S. Rosenthal. While this AFD is not a page move (or DAB) request, those will likely follow pending the outcome of these AFDs. UW Dawgs ( talk) 02:20, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Most of this debate has pointlessly been taken up with a procedural wrangle over the propriety of renominating. My ruling on that is that the first AFD was closed with no prejudice against speedy renomination so this AFD is perfectly proper. I note that the first AFD could have legitimately been closed delete on the sole recommendation of the proposer at the discretion of the closing admin. This AFD has had little more (constructive) participation. Nevertheless, what there is, is for delete. No prejudice against recreation if acceptable sources come to light. Spinning Spark 13:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
The first AfD was a dud. Let's hope this one isn't. Aside from the fact that neither of the two links recently added bolster a claim to notability ( a publisher's blurb and an Amazon sale page), I have nothing else to add. The arguments for deletion were thoroughly explained at the first deletion discussion, and I encourage participants to read through them before making up their minds. - Biruitorul Talk 01:56, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
I also see a procedural conflict here if the 1st AfD closing is overturned by the closer, an administrator, or taken to DRV. What happens to the current discussion? Any argument on the merits is now confounded by the 2nd AfD.
Opining that I work on the nomination's agenda is off topic and IMO dismissive. In the context it is also supporting the nomination viewpoint that the AfD community did an inadequate job in the first AfD, which IMO is not support for building an encyclopedia.
The comment to save the article hearkens back to the WP:ARS viewpoint that nominations create rescue opportunities. Articles are not born needing to be saved, because in general as per WP:AGF, we assume that they meet our guidelines. Unscintillating ( talk) 14:52, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
@ Northamerica1000: You've not responded to my comment of 14:52, 1 November 2014 (UTC). One of the points there was WP:RELIST, which says, "Relisting debates repeatedly in the hope of getting sufficient participation is not recommended". This topic has been at AfD since October 5. Why did you relist? Unscintillating ( talk) 03:24, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
JTdale and Rhododendrites, could I perhaps prevail upon you both to register a clear vote, whatever it may be? I believe I have set out a fairly tight case for deletion, and that you should take this into account. I will also note that in the month this has spent at AfD, only the feeblest objections to deletion have been made, and certainly no convincing indication of notability has emerged. Finally, if you do both take part, this discussion will close and we won't have to put up with Unscintillating's trolling anymore. - Biruitorul Talk 17:58, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 03:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Per WP:NOTFILM; this film has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. There is a single reference in the Spanish article that can be used to verify the film's existence, but even with the other external links ( Cinenacional.com, Internet Movie Database) this is not significant coverage in reliable sources. The film is mentioned as one of the works of various people (for example: [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45]), but those are biographies of people, not material about this film. The most interesting thing I've been able to find is what appears to be a photo related to this film. [46] I don't think this is enough. -- 82.136.210.153 ( talk) 15:53, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Red (Taylor Swift album) . While there was no argument for notability at all, there was also only one argument advanced in favor of, and none against, a redirect, and WP:ATD gives us a reason to prefer the redirect j⚛e decker talk 20:14, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONGS not only for lacking significant coverage from reliable third-party sources that aren't album reviews, but also for not having enough solo information to grow beyond a stub. WP:CFORK at best. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 08:18, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. j⚛e decker talk 22:39, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable agency. Orange Mike | Talk 01:07, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Keep - The agency holds a prominent local reputation as evidenced by its inclusion in a recent Advertising Age article detailing the growing advertising/tech industry in Austin. Advertising Age The agency's involvement in SXSW should also be noted on the page Zagat Chief Marketer to improve the notability. I've begun updating and citing the awards section to showcase some of the agency's more recent notable activity. - McPetersJ ( talk) 19:59, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Wizardman 23:42, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable former minor league baseball player who fails WP:BASE/N and, though attempts have previously been made to prove WP:GNG, one believes such attempts were not sufficient. He never reached the major leagues, nor did he hold any roles at the major league level. Seeing as how he was a second round draft pick, one would assume there'd be at least one profile article out there or something significant, but nothing of note has apparently surfaced. Alex ( talk) 21:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Keep. SK#1: nom withdrawn, and no other deletion arguments ( non-admin closure) czar ♔ 04:31, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Per
WP:NMOTORSPORT Marcelo Monte could apparently in theory have an article because he raced once in the
24 Hours of Le Mans; however, per
WP:BASIC ("A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.") he does not in the practice qualify for an article. To make matters worse,
Mathias karl estress (the creator of the article) has been asked repeatedly on his talk page to add references to this BLP, yet he has ignored this request. But what makes this article fatally flawed is that it consists primarily of a copy-paste translation job of a blog entry in Portuguese created by the aforementioned Mathias Karl Estress, as can be verified
here. A hypothetical article about Marcelo Monte would have to be created from scratch.
Dontreader (
talk)
01:09, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
"Withdrawn by nominator" I still believe that the article is fatally flawed, but in theory Marcelo Monte qualifies for an article on Wikipedia per WP:NMOTORSPORT, so I will take less drastic measures concerning the article than an attempt to delete it. Please close this discussion. Thanks... Dontreader ( talk) 08:46, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Esta pagina é baseada em fatos reais e o autor assim o comprovou, tambem pesquisei esse piloto e todas as informações do autor são verdadeiras, é um erro deletar esta pagina. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavio Teixeira Prado ( talk • contribs) 15:18, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
http://flaviossteixeiraprado.blogspot.com/2014/09/origem-wikipedia-enciclopedia-livre.html Como você explica isso? Você não compreende Inglés e Você não compreende a Wikipedia. Essa é uma receita para o desastre, se você quiser criar um artigo na Wikipedia Inglés. Dontreader ( talk) 20:25, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
What's wrong with me being of Portugal, just use a translator, I met a child Marcelo Lot personally when he ran here in Estoril, don't put anything on my blog, without search, if it is proven that he ran LE MANS, that you too agree, it is obvious that he had to go through the other categories, he also appears in references of STOCK CAR BRAZIL, as stated in LE MANS, and can be checked, alias still in activity in the STOCK CAR BRAZIL, can prove if you want, many of the existing profiles on WIKIPEDIA has the EXTERNAL LINKS extracted from own WEB SITES that person being made the biography, its deletion has no basis whatsoever, I ask that you remove, not to harm nor my research nor the author of the pagethat's great career researcher and Austrian riders, I mean I understand English and also to Wikipedia, I'm not an idiot like you try to say, I'm a writer and I've never had confidence in my blog for writing things that do not match the truth, please use your talent for things more useful than deleting this page. Flavioss Teixeira Prado — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavio Teixeira Prado ( talk • contribs) 15:06, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Mathias Karl Stress told me this bored and does not intend to further collaborate with Wikipedia, reliable sources in the post 3 passed, pilots Stock Car Brazil (picked up on Wikipedia), 24 hours Le Mans (picked up on Wikipedia) only external references that are from my blog, I've never had to remove any post for being fake, since they are the result of research and also claims that several external links from wikipedia are taken from web sites created by fans or by the own person this being written, I say dear Sir, with such evidence because you didn't remove the deletion. Cordially, Flavioss Teixeira Prado — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavio Teixeira Prado ( talk • contribs) 18:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
If my blog cannot be used for both, for the Sir will not police and proposes deletion to the many pages of Wikipedia, use of external links to blogs and web sites for fans of the own person described??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavio Teixeira Prado ( talk • contribs) 23:55, 8 November 2014 (UTC) Like I said, you have to learn the ground rules first, by researched all the rules were followed and whether the basic Sir check the history, there were many collaborations and now Sir comes wanting to delete and harm the work of new writers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavio Teixeira Prado ( talk • contribs) 00:07, 9 November 2014 (UTC) So for what Sir wrote the facebook page of Marcelo Monte can be used as external links??? Sir also said that this page does not follow the basic rules, so I googled follows all, Dear Sir please remove the deletion request, but we can continue to discuss the matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavio Teixeira Prado ( talk • contribs) 00:22, 9 November 2014 (UTC) Flavioss Teixeira Prado ( Portuguese - race car writer )
About the analsegicos was known in an interview to Marcelo Monte in a Brazilian television talk show, not as check on Wikipedia, but I am VERY GRATEFUL for removing the DELETION, and help new writers of historical racing, sincerely grateful, Flavio Teixeira Prado — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavio Teixeira Prado ( talk • contribs) 13:50, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spinning Spark 13:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Does not seem to meet the notability guidelines for musical groups. Only the fourth reference seems to be a substantial independent reference: The first two seem to be trivial mentions (or, if they're not, they may not be independent), and the third is not independent. There are no sources to substantiate the information about their musical style or influences. I cannot seem to find any additional sources. Anon126 ( notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 05:23, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
"A musician or ensemble [...] may be notable if it meets at least one of the following criteria: 5. Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable)." That criterion is met because they have released three albums on CD Baby, as you can see in the references now. The Irish Punk website that I found is not big but it's independent of the subject, and there's no reason to question its reliability, plus it addresses many of the previous concerns. Anon126 and Jinkinson, please examine the article now and reconsider. The band should be given some time to grow, and notability has been established already. Dontreader ( talk) 06:58, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
"Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself." And now I will quote from WP:GNG: If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material.
So let's see if we can agree on this matter. Here's my list of reliable, independent sources with significant coverage:
Notice that Schwäbisch Gmünd mentions The Wakes several times, and Google Translate produces this text (for example):
Who said today's youth is apolitical: As singer Paul Sheridan midnight the song "Peat Bog Soldiers" intones one of the newest pieces from The Wakes, spontaneous cheers go through the "Esperanza". And immediately afterwards the mass singing of young guests the Irish version of "The Peat Bog Soldiers" with - the song with which in 1933 the prisoners wanted to do in Lower Saxony concentration camp Börgermoor himself courage. Since The Wakes set but the same two pieces on top of it derived from the Italian workers' movement and resistance against fascism during the Second World War: "Bandiera Rossa" and "Bella Ciao". "Irish Folk 'n Roll" called the band from Glasgow to their music style. With their newer pieces of punk rock are at least as strongly as from traditional Celtic music. But The Wakes have also ballads in the luggage, for example for social criticism football fans this evening. When The Wakes on stage in "Esperanza", may traditionally the St.Pauli-Antifa song "Pirates of the League" not missing. And in her new song "Colours" they sing their club "Celtic" and the stress of the city rivals "Glasgow Rangers".
Plus we have other strong sources with passing mentions but that also increase notability. And back to criterion #1 from WP:BAND, I quote: "This criterion includes published works in all forms". This does not exclude videos, so I'm adding this video to my list of reliable, independent sources with significant coverage. Do you agree with my list? If so, that's enough to establish notability, together with the passing mentions. Dontreader ( talk) 21:54, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Deor ( talk) 10:19, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be a non notable album. If this was by THE Milla Jovovich then according to her bio her 2nd album (this one?) was never released. Gbawden ( talk) 11:13, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 03:54, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
I have looked for third party coverage of Connan but everything out there looks like promotion. Without detailed third party interest WP:GNG is not satisfied. Binksternet ( talk) 22:04, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
-what seems to be a Russian dance-music oriented blog: http://prophi-music.livejournal.com/431304.html
-interview with a writer: http://mshinafelt.blogspot.fr/2012/06/introducing-tom-connan.html
-a magazine music critique is available on IAE magazine (Wikipedia blacklisted site though). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinlived ( talk • contribs) 22:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
-and some DJ setlists playing some tracks: http://djallure32.podomatic.com/entry/2014-03-15T19_41_10-07_00 http://www.awesomedjproductions.com/trance.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinlived ( talk • contribs) 22:37, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
It seems that the interview was initially released on this website, and then on the blog: http://www.chorusandverse.com/blog.php?id=20120629A
Also, I don't think the Russian site is a blog, however I don't speak that language so it's a bit hard to know.
Eventually, "some news outlets host interactive columns they call blogs, and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professional journalists or are professionals in the field on which they write and the blog is subject to the news outlet's full editorial control." (see WP:SPS). The previous link would fall into that category as for me. Justinlived ( talk) 00:37, 22 October 2014 (UTC) Justinlived ( talk) 00:26, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
I found another Russian website mentioning Connan's work, with a recent single: http://popforyou.ru/new/single/809-tom-connan-wanna-know-why.html Using Google translate, it seems that it's not a promotion, but rather a short critique. Justinlived ( talk) 20:17, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Also found a Vietnamese website mentioning what appears to be his last single -good comment, after using Google translate: http://nhacso.net/nghe-nhac/wanna-know-why.X1tUVkBcaA==.html Justinlived ( talk) 20:43, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator. I'm correcting for format because the nominator used the wrong template to close it. Bearcat ( talk) 05:57, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
This article was created shortly after it was announced that she had been retained by Jian Ghomeshi. She also represented Michael Bryant in a high profile case. Although these cases may be significant, the coverage has not been about her. The only coverage about her has been routine coverage of her cases and some coverage in an industry publication. She fails WP:GNG. Tchaliburton ( talk) 00:20, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
[1] OnBeyondZebrax ( talk) 13:00, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 20:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
I have not found any significant quantity of notable sources that could suggest notability. A previous speedy deletion was withdrawn so that the creator and main contributor to the article could find better references, but the article still relies on a single primary source and on the web I've found mainly primary or affiliated sources. I've searched for this name in Google News and Yahoo! News and I have not found any citation. I'm opening an AfD so that other editors could contribute to ascertain the notability of this person. LowLevel73 (talk) 00:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello there
As this page is less than 24 hours old and the 5th was Bonfire night, I have not had a reasonable or significant time to add more sections to the page. I have been working on three other pages, specifically the Pirate Party Wales, Pirate Party UK and Bridgend (UK Parliament constituency) which currently intertwine so I would ask that more time be allocated so that their purposes become clear.
Here are some quick bullet points for why Andy is notable:
Andy Chyba can be found in many places online. This will be a bit of a mess and in no particular order, so some sources will be better than others, I've not had time to sort them yet:
World View Show:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPN7eLcmSBM#t=16 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_D3BTXyuRos
Green Party official blog:
Bright Green:
http://brightgreenscotland.org/index.php/tag/andy-chyba/
Andy has a book published called "The Asylum of the Universe"
RT News Speak with Andy on anti-fracking
http://rt.com/op-edge/fracking-renewable-energy-policy-116/ http://rt.com/news/chevron-fracking-protest-clashes-884/
Andy Chyba "live" on RT news: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ep1G8lSsJA (at around 2:21)
The Green Dragon:
http://agreenwales.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/we-are-backing-pippa.html Backing for Andy's opposition but quite a lot of mentioning on Andy here
Guardian (left wing news paper, big in the UK) news paper, one of the many people credited was Andy Chyba:
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/jul/26/green-party-immigration
Wales Online (Welsh newspaper, big in Wales where Andy is residing):
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/campaigners-raise-alarm-over-proposed-1855462
Obviously these will take time to go through to find the most significant parts. There are no doubt other links that I've just not really gone through yet.
Additionally perhaps more recognisable sources of information such as the BBC often do not give any coverage to The Green Party (the Green Party are currently threatening to press legal action because of this) so alternative sources are generally where you find information on them, such as independent blogs or alternative news channels like RT.
Another I found about Andy Chyba: http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/05/2012514505415433.ht
The sources just need compiling into something more readable and in a better order... are are no doubt other sources, I just need more time to put them together. You'll see my edit history is rather large :)
Drowz0r ( talk) 01:02, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Drowz0r ( talk) 00:53, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
The claims of notability present in the article are not things that get a person into Wikipedia — they boil down to candidacies for offices that the subject hasn't won, which fails WP:NPOL. And nearly all of the improved sources that Drowz0r offered above don't get him over WP:GNG either, as most of them are primary sources — and he's not the subject of the few that are properly reliable, but is merely namechecked as the provider of a short comment about something else (which doesn't confer encyclopedic notability either). And publishing a book isn't a free notability pass either — writers don't get Wikipedia articles until you can source them past WP:CREATIVE. So no, there isn't any substantive demonstration of notability here. No prejudice against recreation if and when he wins an office that would get him over a notability hump, but right now he's a delete. Bearcat ( talk) 20:12, 7 November 2014 (UTC)