![]() |
The result was redirect to Binghamton University#Harpur's Ferry Student Volunteer Ambulance Service. Redirect would be the normal course here, especially when the group has a distinctive name that might be looked for. No objection to merging a small amount of the content, if desired. DGG ( talk ) 15:56, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
This group appears to lack the coverage in independent necessary to meet WP:GNG or WP:ORG. The closest thing I could find was this story from Binghamton's local news. It looks like these students are doing some impressive work, but that doesn't make them notable. -- BDD ( talk) 23:34, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:08, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Retired minor league ballplayer who never played a game in the majors; no exceptional third-party sources out there that would pass GNG. Wizardman 23:07, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. SarahStierch ( talk) 15:14, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Recently developed method (2012) with no sources and no Google-hits outside Wikipedia (limited to western script hits, no Google test with Russian script). Seems to fail WP:GNG. The Banner talk 10:27, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of LGBT publications. No prejudice on Bearcat's redirect v/r - T P 17:16, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH or even the GNG. Google News did not turn up any hits. Delete or redirect to List of LGBT periodicals. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 22:51, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:09, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NCORP, no non-local reliable sources found. Tgeairn ( talk) 23:28, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:10, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not quite blatant enough for G11, but certainly seems very promotional and non-notable. Sulfurboy ( talk) 20:42, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Feel free to improve the article or renominate if interested. SarahStierch ( talk) 15:15, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Can't find any confirmation, that this series will continue in 2014, so delete per WP:OR Cybervoron ( talk) 14:21, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
No reliable sources to establish notability per WP:MUSIC. Kelly hi! 20:43, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:13, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Fails WP:BAND and all secondary coverage I can see is in passing and WP:ROUTINE; mostly announcements for upcoming concerts and the like. Sulfurboy ( talk) 21:48, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was merge to Orator (Cicero). SarahStierch ( talk) 15:17, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
non-notable dictionary definition Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 03:02, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:14, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
The last time it was nominated, it was done by a block evader. The song fails WP:NSONGS (No charts, no awards, no covers by another artist(s)) OR WP:GNG. © Tbhotch ™ ( en-2.5). 00:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:18, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. I was unable to find any substantial coverage. Google only turned up sales sites like Amazon.com. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 01:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- BDD ( talk) 21:19, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Insufficient notability for WP:Artist; article created and maintained by at least three WP:COI/ WP:SPA editors - see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Tameka Norris. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 11:49, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
No sources no coverage non notable tour MarioNovi ( talk) 22:20, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:25, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Essentially reads like a resume with no secondary or independent sources included (I didn't find any on a quick search either). The claims for notability are borderline: a couple of university level awards that may not be noteworthy by themsleves (searching for them leads to this article itself); and apparently winning a case for his client, the importance of which is again difficult to assess given the lack of secondary sources. The bio thus fails to meet the WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO standards. Abecedare ( talk) 21:00, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was merge to Wildstorm Universe. SarahStierch ( talk) 15:17, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
This does not establish notability independent of WildStorm through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN ( talk) 15:54, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. SarahStierch ( talk) 15:18, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
I've been mostly coming up empty for reliable, secondary independent written articles about this producer. Sure, he's done work for a lot of artists that have appeared on the official Italian record charts, but, among other citation style, organization and English spelling and grammer issues, most of the sources currently be used here are either unreliable discog pages, youtube videos, or links to other Wikipedia articles, and the reliable sources being used are mostly covering Eiffel 65 in-depth. Just because somebody produced an album for the group that sold 3,000,000 copies doesn't mean the producer is notable, cause remember, Notability is not inherited. I would suggest somebody clean up the page in case sources happen to be found to keep the article, but as of now, I'm suggesting a delete of this article due to notability concerns. 和DITOR E tails 03:31, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Dear Editors,
Thank you for having me included in the loop and sorry for the late replay
I concur with most of the problems pointed out by EditorE, and really I feel the article should contain more secondary sources.
The problem I found though, is that most of the secondary sources and interviews are in Italian like the followings: SuperEva guide , ZioMusic professional Magazine , DJMAG Italy
I guess is a quite common problem to face when writing in english about a somebody that is notable in his own country, but just episodically successful in the USA market. There are few interviews in english.
Maybe a solution to this problem might be either to extract the most relevant parts of the interviews and translate them, or as an alternative , to point to a Google translate url and include the page
As EditorE rightly points out most of the USA and International success of this producer comes from the hit single “ Blue (Da ba dee) “ and the album “ Europop” .
Anyway two facts should be considered:
1)This Producer has constantly performed successfully in the Italian charts before and after the 1999 USA success, as stated by the charts.
Before 1999:
1993 Bliss Team's " People Have The Power" (peak#7) 1994 Da Blitz " Stay With Me" (peak #1) " Let Me Be" (peak #11) 1995 " Movin On" (peak #1), " Take Me Back" (peak #4) 1996 " I Believe" (peak #8)
After 1999:
2002 Gabry Ponte “ Geordie” (Peak#15) 2003 Eiffel 65 " Quelli che non hanno età" (Peak#4) " Viaggia insieme a me” (Peak#10) Una Notte e forse mai più (Peak#14) Gabry Ponte “ La Danza Delle Streghe (Peak#5, 2003/04) 2008/9 Dari “ Sottovuoto Generazionale “(Peak#10) 2010 Dari “ In Testa” (Peak#12)
2)“Blue (Da Ba Dee), has been the biggest EDM hit single to come out from Italy , the earliest to hit the USA charts in such a fashion, was nominated to the
Grammy in 2001 as “best dance recording” , was used in several
Hollywood OST including the new IRON MAN III, was included in the Playstation game
RockBand and has been the only english sung tune to ever reach the top of the SIAE (Italian equivalent to ASCAP)
highest publishing earnings (year 2000) ,
“Blue (da ba dee)” has been a notable production
The motto “Notability is not inherited” is quite true: too many times people take credits just because they happen to be there at the right time.
But in this case please consider that Massimo Gabutti was the Producer, the Publisher, one of the Authors and the producer of the Video of this notable hit. Same applies for all the song and videos that he produced and made it to chart position before and after “Blue”
Please have a look at this article of THE VERGE The work of this producer (the song, the video) is described as iconic of a period. I guess that might make this producer notable
But again, I feel I failed to point out this facts in the article
It was my first article and even though after that I cooperated or helped other writers making researches or submitting first hand informations for articles they wrote for Wikipedia on the subject of Italian EDM , this one has been the only one I wrote directly, because I had an inner and precise knowledge of the facts and data I was writing about.
If given the chance , and following the suggestion outlined by EditorE, I will try to make the article more linked with facts and more up to the formatting and grammatical wikipedia standards
A final thought: I think that a Student, a Journalist or anybody that has to make a research about Italian EDM and Dance production , would miss an important and notable protagonist if this page will be deleted
That said I wish to thank all Editors for their work and any decision it will be taken I will accept, since I know that it will be for the good of the Wikipedia.
Thank you again for keeping in me the loop and listening to my opinion
Maxipedia ( talk) 09:48, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was merge to Optare . SarahStierch ( talk) 15:20, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Very small article with limited content. Originally part of Optare, so suggest redirect/merge as such. aycliffe talk 15:20, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Feel free to improve the content or renominate for deletion. SarahStierch ( talk) 15:23, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
The article does not claim any notability for the topic. Vanjagenije ( talk) 15:30, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of My-HiME characters#Fuka Academy staff. Redirected without delete so that a merge can take place if warranted. ( non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 20:39, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
This character does not establish notability independent of My-HiME through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN ( talk) 22:00, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. v/r - T P 17:19, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Other than an obscure book by a UFOlogist named Leonard Stringfield and an episode of a 1990s TV show, I can find no reliable sources that discuss this topic from an independent perspective required to write an article about it. LuckyLouie ( talk) 22:46, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was Whatever the hell User:Dsimics said, yeah, that's the consensus, do that.. v/r - T P 17:22, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Delete for being WP:POVFORK. Title and lead section of the article has no connection to its contents which is a bad fork of desktop environment, shell (computing) and WIMP (computing) articles and certainly not about Linux. The core of the article is an unreferenced, unexplained questionable WP:OR sentence in the lead: "The term Desktop Linux refers to all the software components that build a graphical user interface, that is designed for usage with a desktop computer and also devices, that offer identical human interface devices, such as Laptops." First, there is no mention of "Linux" in the underlined section. Second, graphical user interface is an aspect of computer software; it does not consist of software itself. Edits by some users like User:ScotXW has shown that they thought that perhaps "build" means "design and develop" and therefore this article is about software development. (I can't possibly say they are wrong because this jumble of text that asserts the title of "article" itself has no idea.) Third, the reset of the article is barely connected to this core sentence. It is from a flawed point of view that no other operating system other than Linux superfamily exist.
I was tempted to nominate this article for deletion under CSD:G1 but obviously the word "Linux" in the title is bound to attract Linux fans to say "keep" indiscriminately. Codename Lisa ( talk) 15:12, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
udev
or dbus
) for a much better big picture — but once again, it's still good as-is. Why should we delete it, when it can be improved? Should a headache be cured with some painkillers, or with an axe? :) --
Dsimic (
talk)
18:59, 17 October 2013 (UTC)Just checking, how are we standing from the point of reaching a consensus? Please comment. -- Dsimic ( talk) 12:46, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
In a few words, this is what's been pretty much concluded so far, as a brief summary of the discussion above:
Sounds like a plan? Thoughts? -- Dsimic ( talk) 23:12, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was no-consensus. WP:NAC closure by Eduemoni ↑talk↓ 21:08, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Sources present don't seem to me sufficient to warrant this biography passing WP:BIO. Only The Register is mainstream, and discovering few code vulnerabilities, with one mention in a mainstream publication, does not seem to cut it. The pl wiki cited interview in Polish Computerworld doesn't seem sufficient; it's not about him, it's about his views on computer security - being interviewed does not make one notable; this would require showing that his person is discussed in independent sources, which is not the case. And his achievements are not widely reported; IMHO he fails WP:ANYBIO 1 and 2, and all WP:CREATIVE points, as well. The cited, mostly niche sources, plus The Registrar, do not convince me that he made "a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field". CC Previous AfD participants: User:Boleyn, User:Unscintillating, User:DGG. PS. Also cc User:Tqbf who made extensive comments on this article's lack of notability's at the article's talk page. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:41, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:27, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
I created this article to tidy up after finding the website's logo and URL added to the article for the defunct newspaper of the same title, but there now seems to be no indication that the website is actually notable. It was dePRODded, without comment, by an IP editor in their first edit. Pam D 12:40, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
• manhistorian I would suggest keeping the article, the vast majority of people who view the MG article are in fact looking because of the online Publication. —Preceding undated comment added 15:02, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:29, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Non-notable play lacking Ghits and Gnews of substance. reddogsix ( talk) 17:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Home School Valedictorian. -- BDD ( talk) 21:31, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSONG Walter Görlitz ( talk) 18:44, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. Secret account 02:58, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Unsourced biography of a living person, apparently a beatbox musician. Don't see how this meets WP:ARTIST. Also note that article creator Burmich is a single-purpose account and likely in a conflict of interest. bender235 ( talk) 21:11, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Sustainable tourism. ( non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 12:34, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Used to be a redirect to Sustainable tourism, but now it is some marketing jibberish created by Rtsouthafrica (do I smell conflict of interest?). I'd say delete and re-create the redirect. bender235 ( talk) 21:05, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Feel free to improve the content or renominate for deletion. SarahStierch ( talk) 15:24, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. It is certainly used as a last name and there were various military regiments that used it also. However, there are no reliable sources that refer to the Tiwana as a clan. This is also impossible to redirect in a neutral manner because there are so many possible targets - see this. I doubt that turning this into a disambig page would be meaningful because the Tiwana element of those targets seems often to be of tangential relevance. Sitush ( talk) 16:51, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:35, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
fails WP:NSONGS. Doesn't appear to be a single either. Erick ( talk) 14:58, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:37, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Unsourced, and I'm unable to find anything that shows sufficient notability. Clarityfiend ( talk) 05:50, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario candidates, 2007 Ontario provincial election. -- BDD ( talk) 21:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not sufficiently notable per WP:POLITICIAN. School board trustee is not an office that qualifies a person for a Wikipedia article on its own, but rather the only school board trustees who qualify for articles are those who have also previously or subsequently held a more notable office — such as a mayoralty or a provincial, state or federal legislative seat. In addition, except for a single minor WP:BLP1E burst of news coverage for a single controversial comment, all of the sources actually being cited here are WP:PRIMARYSOURCES which fail to demonstrate that she's in any significant way more notable than most other school trustees who don't have articles. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 23:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Redirect to Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario candidates, 2007 Ontario provincial election. Agree trustee position not important enough to qualify for WP:POLITICIAN. Not much other coverage. Provincial also-ran status doesn't qualify her either but she is already mentioned on the candidate page so I recommend redirect. EncyclopediaUpdaticus ( talk) 22:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Would the fact that she's also the Former Chair of the Board (largest Catholic School Board in Canada), and running for Provincial Office again this Spring change anything? ( talk) 19:55, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep, withdrawn. — David Eppstein ( talk) 07:20, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
I could find many mentions of Azar, but couldn't find anything to confirm she is WP:Notable. Boleyn ( talk) 19:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. v/r - T P 03:37, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Given that the project is dead, there's little point in keeping this around. PS: no Computer Software category? Gaba (talk) 19:14, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 03:37, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
MMA fighter with no top tier fights so fails WP:NMMA. No evidence that he meets the kickboxing criteria at WP:KICK since the IKF is not listed as a major organization. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:58, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:51, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
MMA fighter who fails WP:NMMA with no top tier fights. Also fails WP:GNG with no significant independent coverage. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:52, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
MMA fighter who fails WP:NMMA with no top tier fights. Article lacks significant independent coverage to show he meets WP:GNG. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:30, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. SarahStierch ( talk) 15:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Unsourced WP:BLP, WP:OR The Banner talk 18:26, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
I added a note on the talk page of the article. As explained there the entire content of this article is largely factual (rather than opinion) and verifiable by visiting Mats profile at the Royal Academy of Music website plus his own personal and publishing websites (all linked at the foot of the article). Most of the information was gather directly from Mats via a copy of his CV, discussion and visiting his website and he requested that I help him by updating the information on the page as the previous version of the page was seriously out of date (have originally been written by his nephew a long time ago). Further the original page had no citations to justify the content. If there are issues I need to resolve can you please tell me how to do that - the docs and policies on wikipedia are very long and tedious and the language pretty impenetrable. JCarolHaynes ( talk) 00:02, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Good morning! The matter is really very uncomplicated: I work as professor at the Royal Academy
of Music in London and would not wish to have a profile on me which is grossly out of date. Nor would Wikipedia. The page was set up by my nephew several years ago, so now it's time to update it. YOu've seen the text, since my friend Carol Haynes has tried to put it up here several times. ALl it is, is an updated CV on me as a cellist/composer. Many thanks. MATS
I don't mind rewriting some of it if you feel it is not in an approved style. I am not sure what you want by way of references - the information is documented and the Royal Academy of Music website - which is linked in the article. What else can I reference. For example, there is no published information on which orchestras Mats has worked with other than the RAM website - and short of writing to every orchestra and asking them to write a publicly accesssible statement that Mats has worked with them I can't see how that basic information about a career is in anyway capable of confirmation by citation? JCarolHaynes ( talk) 09:28, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Not a violation of copyright if it is used with permission. JCarolHaynes ( talk) 14:40, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Shouldn't be a problem - how can I submit evidence? JCarolHaynes ( talk) 17:54, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks - I don't mind redrafting it to be more encyclopaedic. How do I submit authorisation for the use of content from the Royal Academy website? JCarolHaynes ( talk) 21:57, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
OK sent email requesting info about providing permission and advice about further citations required. JCarolHaynes ( talk) 01:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC)— JCarolHaynes ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:53, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMMA with no top tier fights. Starting one college basketball game is also not enough to show notability. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:24, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:54, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Unsourced article about an MMA fighter with no top tier fights. Fails WP:NMMA and WP:GNG. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:56, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
MMA fighter with no top tier fights. The main source is his club and none of the sources appear independent. A second place at a junior tournament does not show notability in judo. Fails WP:NMMA, WP:GNG, and WP:MANOTE. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:11, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 03:35, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
No significant awards, and his book on a robot-induced economic collapse is self-published -- which, as one would expect, has only 8 library holdings. (His SF book I can find no traces of anywhere) Other than that, the article is a list of speeches he gave. The three photos of him giving talks adds to the atmosphere of promotionalism (I note that the description of the first refers to him as "world famous bestselling author Federico Pistono") . I hesitated on this one,because it looked like a good many references, but they're mere links to his talks or announcements of them. DGG ( talk ) 18:08, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Biographical material about a living individual that is not compliant with this policy should be improved and rectified; if this is not possible, then it should be removed. If the entire page is substantially of poor quality, primarily containing contentious material that is unsourced or poorly sourced, then it may be necessary to delete the entire page as an initial step, followed by discussion.
I hope to have contributed to the debate. Apologies for my unfamiliarity with the entire process. Sincerely, Lorenzo g ( talk) 20:57, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:57, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
MMA fighter who fails WP:NMMA with no top tier fights. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:04, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 03:35, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Non notable ceo of a non-notable trade show company. The article is almost entirely about her family and education, because there's nothing substantial to say about her career, except that she once spoke at a political convention. there are, as usual, some trivial awards. DGG ( talk ) 18:01, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 03:35, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Retired MMA fighter who had a total of 4 fights, none with a top tier organization. One kickboxing bout doesn't make him notable either. Fails WP:NMMA, WP:KICK, and WP:GNG. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:00, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. Thanks for adding sources. v/r - T P 03:35, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Effectively unsourced BLP that says nothing about the actor. The Banner talk 19:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
1- Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. 2- Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. 3- Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.
I think the number of IMDB and wikipedia article he is listed in as an actor make him pass 1st and 3rd ones. What are your thoughts? @ Stemoc: -- Foodie ( talk) 10:58, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete. (CSD G11) As DGG says, there may be an article to write on this topic, but this isn't it. It is unadulterated promotion. JamesBWatson ( talk) 15:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Virtusl exchange might be a good topic for an article. This article,is however a promotion for one particualr initiative, and consists almost entirel y of general background and a list of who spoke at their various events, which is trivial coverage. As would be expected for such content, written by a paid promotional editor. This indicates a common problem with such editing: instead of a decent article that a NPOV editor would write on something good and interesting, we have this relatively useless propaganda. DGG ( talk ) 17:58, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 12:27, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
As an upcoming minor film, the article is completely unreferenced poorly referenced, and doesn't meet
WP:MOVIE and
WP:CRYSTAL.
Alex
discussion
★
16:39, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Movie is referenced now with Tribune Pakistan article, have a look. I Am ready to add every possible official external link . UBS ( talk) 16:59, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
It's well referenced now and meets WP Movie criteria. UBS ( talk) 11:44, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Recently added film budget with reference. UBS ( talk) 12:36, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
References are not just 2, and the number of references doesn't matter as movie is to be released far in 2014 so the sources are less BUT it's been proved that movie will release in 2014. UBS ( talk) 14:23, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Please close this discussion if you do not have doubt left.
UBS (
talk)
15:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:58, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Personal thesis, original research. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 16:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:59, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 16:09, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was non-consensus, without any objection to renominee. WP:NAC Eduemoni ↑talk↓ 21:11, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
My redirect was undone, claiming that simply being a main character in The West Wing is automatically notable. This is not true. This character fails WP:GNG. Merely appearing in a notable work isn't enough per WP:NOTINHERITED. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 15:50, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. v/r - T P 03:33, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Delete when searching [ [20]] I am not able to find widespread coverage. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 15:43, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was Move to Sol (laptop) and make a redirect . Move to Sol (laptop) as suggested and make a redirect from the company name; this is where the notability lies. It's what I think we normally do in cases like this. DGG ( talk ) 16:00, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
advertising The Banner talk 21:31, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
(UTC)
To me, it seems that the only notable thing about WeWi is the SOL, as being a Canadian company, starting out as ISP or offering ad hoc disaster recovery, to pick out a few, are not notable on their own (and likely would not have been mentioned in one or more independent sources if not for the SOL) under usual circumstances, as seems to be the case with WeWi. (Which is not a bad thing. Unusual circumstances making something normally not notable notable usually are along the lines of huge court cases and scandals, to mention some.)
The fact that out of seven sources, six are predominantly about the SOL and the remaining source is the company's website, does nothing to disprove that either. Should someone find a few reliable and independent sources that give more in-depth information about WeWi, or at least more-than-just-mention them, in a different context than the SOL, I'd agree that it's fine at its current location.
As it stands right now, the company is not what is notable, the laptop is, and the company gets mentioned here and there because of the laptop.
(Also, if you reply to both me and The Banner at the same time, which you seemed to do with last reply, could you please be a bit more clear who you're addressing with which points next time? I got a bit confused at first, thinking "but I never said that" before I realized you likely had switched from addressing me to addressing The Banner, and I assume we'd both rather not end up in a discussion about who-said-what based on such confusion. I know I would rather not.)
AddWittyNameHere (
talk)
06:20, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:02, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Notability is unclear. No bibliographical information about the sole cited reference (Smriti Granth ("Memorial volume") for Chaubey Mukta Prasad) can be located; its publisher etc are unknown and it is not found in worldcat or other usual databases. No other reference on the subject was found in an online search. Abecedare ( talk) 14:53, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW. The Bushranger One ping only 00:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Fails WP:AIRCRASH. Accident not involving anyone notable. WP:NOTNEWS also applies. ...William 13:50, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:26, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Fails WP:NWRITER Rob Sinden ( talk) 13:16, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:29, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:45, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:30, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Judge at low-level trial courts. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:45, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:31, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:45, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:32, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources (The Cyclopedia of New Zealand : Canterbury Provincial District is vanity publishing). One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:42, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:33, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:42, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( WP:SNOW). (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000 (talk) 01:19, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Full of unreliable sources and unsourced content. ReferencesAreImportant ( talk) 09:46, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:34, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Best is this local interest piece, not enough. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:38, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of journalists killed and missing in the Vietnam War. v/r - T P 03:32, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. The is coverage of the event in which he died but that is about the event, not Birch, and Wikipedia is not the news. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:37, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:35, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One NZ Catholic obit [27] is not enough. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:37, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Article is full of primary sources from organisations he is connected to. Most sources do not verify the claims made. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:30, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:45, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable [28]. No notable publications. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Most sources are by him not about him. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:30, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:46, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Is lead author on a few reasonably cited works but does not seem to have a significant impact. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Not a notable politician, didn't win a major election. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:26, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources (The Cyclopedia of New Zealand : Canterbury Provincial District is vanity publishing). One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:26, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tapper Transport. v/r - T P 03:27, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One good obit in The New Zealand Herald but that's it. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:18, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 03:27, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. (not G Waite from Michigan Technological University.) Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:19, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. v/r - T P 03:27, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:22, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:50, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to X rating. ( non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 01:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Non notable album. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Lack reviews, charting, awards. Nothing coming close to WP:NALBUMS. Shops are not reliable sources. duffbeerforme ( talk) 08:37, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:54, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Non notable band. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Lack reviews, charting, awards. Touring lacks coverage. Falls short of to album on an important label. Nothing coming close to WP:MUSIC. Sonicbids, bandcamp, youtube, facebook, tumblr, last.fm, Rocketshiplive are not good sources. A calender listing is not non trivial coverage. Ain’t No Party Like The As Artifacts Party! is just the band talking about themselves. A one paragraph review in Music & Noise Magazine is not enough. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:24, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 23:03, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Vanispamcruftisement. Being part of abelton live community is not notable. Band lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Releases not on important label. Current sourcing is payplayfm, adverts, dead shop, dead interview, forum. Nothing good. A search found nothing better. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:15, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- http://www.allmusic.com/album/thrills-and-chills-mw0000326449/credits - http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/putty-in-their-hands-thrills/id9584580 - http://www.cduniverse.com/productinfo.asp?pid=7146380 Nebulae's remix of our song "Wild Life" was featured on MTV's "The Real World: New Orleans" in 2000. See http://www.broadjam.com/artists/songs.php?artistID=265&mediaID=388 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hokusspokuss2000 ( talk • contribs) 12:03, 7 November 2013 (UTC) — Hokusspokuss2000 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 23:04, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Absolutely nothing to add, support or even improve this article. A Google news search provides little results with two of them mentioning a member. Another search provided one of the previous results (which is dead but recoverable). Google Books provided very little as well with the most being Wikipedia mirrors and one brief mention in a 2005 book about Linux. Small group discussing something notable (Unix/Linux) but non-notable itself. Everything in this article is their word with nothing third-party to support it. Final searches provided nothing else. SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 03:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Deletion for this article is contested. The article has been up for years, but an editor has tagged it for speedy and was reverted by IP. History also shows a contested PROD, so I'm going to let consensus decide if this product is notable. NintendoFan ( Talk, Contribs) 03:37, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
*Keep. I see no evidence that this article fails to meet any criteria. Wikitam331 ( talk) 15:28, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
*comment needs more sources to show notability/impact, otherwise I'd say delete or merge. PeteBaltar ( talk) 04:45, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Weak delete for now, if sources can be found the article can be recreated. FurrySings ( talk) 06:31, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. Bearian ( talk) 22:37, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Delete, the articles do not show that Covert Medication, while mentioned, doesn't show it is an actual term in widespread usage. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 03:27, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 23:05, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
This topic does not meet the notability requirements of WP:ORG: a good faith search on this topic brings up nothing but press releases from the company itself, and press releases disguised as news items (e.g. PR Wire). A link on the article to a NYT Profile of a company partner includes no information about the company itself. That Gerald Ford (not the former-president) is a limited partner is irrelevant, as is having a "prominent employee" (who seems to only be prominent for playing poker). Notability is not inherited through association. Additionally, the creator of this article is himself an employee of the company (see [41]. His only 3 edits on the encyclopedia were to create this article and place a link to it on the list of equity firms article.
In short: an article created through a COI account, on a topic with no evident substantive support in 3rd party sources. AstroCog ( talk) 02:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 23:06, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Revised several times , but remains promotional and of borderline notability DGG ( talk ) 01:57, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:04, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
This is an unsourced collection of biographies and anecdotes about life in the Hala Tribe. Most of the material was brought in with
this edit. Not sure if this qualifies for speedy A7, so I am nominating for deletion via AFD.
Diannaa (
talk)
01:53, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 00:50, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not exactly the most notable thing in the world. Especially suspicious that the article is up there now and the site was created by a twenty three year old SEO "expert"....
Egg
Centri
c
01:51, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Chicago Cubs minor league players. v/r - T P 03:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Minor league baseball free agent.. no claim to notability.. nothing special here. Spanneraol ( talk) 01:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Courtney_Fathom_Sell#Filmography. v/r - T P 03:24, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Non-notable film. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:24, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 00:41, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
fails WP:BIO and WP:PROF. his academic and writing career is unremarkable. and the article has a number of primary sources. the coverage I've found is about him making comments in the media rather than him as the subject. LibStar ( talk) 01:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:01, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (software). Only sources are download site blurbs or the company's own website. No reliable sources found. Grayfell ( talk) 00:11, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was redirect to Binghamton University#Harpur's Ferry Student Volunteer Ambulance Service. Redirect would be the normal course here, especially when the group has a distinctive name that might be looked for. No objection to merging a small amount of the content, if desired. DGG ( talk ) 15:56, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
This group appears to lack the coverage in independent necessary to meet WP:GNG or WP:ORG. The closest thing I could find was this story from Binghamton's local news. It looks like these students are doing some impressive work, but that doesn't make them notable. -- BDD ( talk) 23:34, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:08, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Retired minor league ballplayer who never played a game in the majors; no exceptional third-party sources out there that would pass GNG. Wizardman 23:07, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. SarahStierch ( talk) 15:14, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Recently developed method (2012) with no sources and no Google-hits outside Wikipedia (limited to western script hits, no Google test with Russian script). Seems to fail WP:GNG. The Banner talk 10:27, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of LGBT publications. No prejudice on Bearcat's redirect v/r - T P 17:16, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH or even the GNG. Google News did not turn up any hits. Delete or redirect to List of LGBT periodicals. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 22:51, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:09, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NCORP, no non-local reliable sources found. Tgeairn ( talk) 23:28, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:10, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not quite blatant enough for G11, but certainly seems very promotional and non-notable. Sulfurboy ( talk) 20:42, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Feel free to improve the article or renominate if interested. SarahStierch ( talk) 15:15, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Can't find any confirmation, that this series will continue in 2014, so delete per WP:OR Cybervoron ( talk) 14:21, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
No reliable sources to establish notability per WP:MUSIC. Kelly hi! 20:43, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:13, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Fails WP:BAND and all secondary coverage I can see is in passing and WP:ROUTINE; mostly announcements for upcoming concerts and the like. Sulfurboy ( talk) 21:48, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was merge to Orator (Cicero). SarahStierch ( talk) 15:17, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
non-notable dictionary definition Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 03:02, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:14, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
The last time it was nominated, it was done by a block evader. The song fails WP:NSONGS (No charts, no awards, no covers by another artist(s)) OR WP:GNG. © Tbhotch ™ ( en-2.5). 00:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:18, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. I was unable to find any substantial coverage. Google only turned up sales sites like Amazon.com. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 01:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- BDD ( talk) 21:19, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Insufficient notability for WP:Artist; article created and maintained by at least three WP:COI/ WP:SPA editors - see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Tameka Norris. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 11:49, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
No sources no coverage non notable tour MarioNovi ( talk) 22:20, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:25, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Essentially reads like a resume with no secondary or independent sources included (I didn't find any on a quick search either). The claims for notability are borderline: a couple of university level awards that may not be noteworthy by themsleves (searching for them leads to this article itself); and apparently winning a case for his client, the importance of which is again difficult to assess given the lack of secondary sources. The bio thus fails to meet the WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO standards. Abecedare ( talk) 21:00, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was merge to Wildstorm Universe. SarahStierch ( talk) 15:17, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
This does not establish notability independent of WildStorm through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN ( talk) 15:54, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. SarahStierch ( talk) 15:18, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
I've been mostly coming up empty for reliable, secondary independent written articles about this producer. Sure, he's done work for a lot of artists that have appeared on the official Italian record charts, but, among other citation style, organization and English spelling and grammer issues, most of the sources currently be used here are either unreliable discog pages, youtube videos, or links to other Wikipedia articles, and the reliable sources being used are mostly covering Eiffel 65 in-depth. Just because somebody produced an album for the group that sold 3,000,000 copies doesn't mean the producer is notable, cause remember, Notability is not inherited. I would suggest somebody clean up the page in case sources happen to be found to keep the article, but as of now, I'm suggesting a delete of this article due to notability concerns. 和DITOR E tails 03:31, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Dear Editors,
Thank you for having me included in the loop and sorry for the late replay
I concur with most of the problems pointed out by EditorE, and really I feel the article should contain more secondary sources.
The problem I found though, is that most of the secondary sources and interviews are in Italian like the followings: SuperEva guide , ZioMusic professional Magazine , DJMAG Italy
I guess is a quite common problem to face when writing in english about a somebody that is notable in his own country, but just episodically successful in the USA market. There are few interviews in english.
Maybe a solution to this problem might be either to extract the most relevant parts of the interviews and translate them, or as an alternative , to point to a Google translate url and include the page
As EditorE rightly points out most of the USA and International success of this producer comes from the hit single “ Blue (Da ba dee) “ and the album “ Europop” .
Anyway two facts should be considered:
1)This Producer has constantly performed successfully in the Italian charts before and after the 1999 USA success, as stated by the charts.
Before 1999:
1993 Bliss Team's " People Have The Power" (peak#7) 1994 Da Blitz " Stay With Me" (peak #1) " Let Me Be" (peak #11) 1995 " Movin On" (peak #1), " Take Me Back" (peak #4) 1996 " I Believe" (peak #8)
After 1999:
2002 Gabry Ponte “ Geordie” (Peak#15) 2003 Eiffel 65 " Quelli che non hanno età" (Peak#4) " Viaggia insieme a me” (Peak#10) Una Notte e forse mai più (Peak#14) Gabry Ponte “ La Danza Delle Streghe (Peak#5, 2003/04) 2008/9 Dari “ Sottovuoto Generazionale “(Peak#10) 2010 Dari “ In Testa” (Peak#12)
2)“Blue (Da Ba Dee), has been the biggest EDM hit single to come out from Italy , the earliest to hit the USA charts in such a fashion, was nominated to the
Grammy in 2001 as “best dance recording” , was used in several
Hollywood OST including the new IRON MAN III, was included in the Playstation game
RockBand and has been the only english sung tune to ever reach the top of the SIAE (Italian equivalent to ASCAP)
highest publishing earnings (year 2000) ,
“Blue (da ba dee)” has been a notable production
The motto “Notability is not inherited” is quite true: too many times people take credits just because they happen to be there at the right time.
But in this case please consider that Massimo Gabutti was the Producer, the Publisher, one of the Authors and the producer of the Video of this notable hit. Same applies for all the song and videos that he produced and made it to chart position before and after “Blue”
Please have a look at this article of THE VERGE The work of this producer (the song, the video) is described as iconic of a period. I guess that might make this producer notable
But again, I feel I failed to point out this facts in the article
It was my first article and even though after that I cooperated or helped other writers making researches or submitting first hand informations for articles they wrote for Wikipedia on the subject of Italian EDM , this one has been the only one I wrote directly, because I had an inner and precise knowledge of the facts and data I was writing about.
If given the chance , and following the suggestion outlined by EditorE, I will try to make the article more linked with facts and more up to the formatting and grammatical wikipedia standards
A final thought: I think that a Student, a Journalist or anybody that has to make a research about Italian EDM and Dance production , would miss an important and notable protagonist if this page will be deleted
That said I wish to thank all Editors for their work and any decision it will be taken I will accept, since I know that it will be for the good of the Wikipedia.
Thank you again for keeping in me the loop and listening to my opinion
Maxipedia ( talk) 09:48, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was merge to Optare . SarahStierch ( talk) 15:20, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Very small article with limited content. Originally part of Optare, so suggest redirect/merge as such. aycliffe talk 15:20, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Feel free to improve the content or renominate for deletion. SarahStierch ( talk) 15:23, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
The article does not claim any notability for the topic. Vanjagenije ( talk) 15:30, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of My-HiME characters#Fuka Academy staff. Redirected without delete so that a merge can take place if warranted. ( non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 20:39, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
This character does not establish notability independent of My-HiME through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN ( talk) 22:00, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. v/r - T P 17:19, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Other than an obscure book by a UFOlogist named Leonard Stringfield and an episode of a 1990s TV show, I can find no reliable sources that discuss this topic from an independent perspective required to write an article about it. LuckyLouie ( talk) 22:46, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was Whatever the hell User:Dsimics said, yeah, that's the consensus, do that.. v/r - T P 17:22, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Delete for being WP:POVFORK. Title and lead section of the article has no connection to its contents which is a bad fork of desktop environment, shell (computing) and WIMP (computing) articles and certainly not about Linux. The core of the article is an unreferenced, unexplained questionable WP:OR sentence in the lead: "The term Desktop Linux refers to all the software components that build a graphical user interface, that is designed for usage with a desktop computer and also devices, that offer identical human interface devices, such as Laptops." First, there is no mention of "Linux" in the underlined section. Second, graphical user interface is an aspect of computer software; it does not consist of software itself. Edits by some users like User:ScotXW has shown that they thought that perhaps "build" means "design and develop" and therefore this article is about software development. (I can't possibly say they are wrong because this jumble of text that asserts the title of "article" itself has no idea.) Third, the reset of the article is barely connected to this core sentence. It is from a flawed point of view that no other operating system other than Linux superfamily exist.
I was tempted to nominate this article for deletion under CSD:G1 but obviously the word "Linux" in the title is bound to attract Linux fans to say "keep" indiscriminately. Codename Lisa ( talk) 15:12, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
udev
or dbus
) for a much better big picture — but once again, it's still good as-is. Why should we delete it, when it can be improved? Should a headache be cured with some painkillers, or with an axe? :) --
Dsimic (
talk)
18:59, 17 October 2013 (UTC)Just checking, how are we standing from the point of reaching a consensus? Please comment. -- Dsimic ( talk) 12:46, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
In a few words, this is what's been pretty much concluded so far, as a brief summary of the discussion above:
Sounds like a plan? Thoughts? -- Dsimic ( talk) 23:12, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was no-consensus. WP:NAC closure by Eduemoni ↑talk↓ 21:08, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Sources present don't seem to me sufficient to warrant this biography passing WP:BIO. Only The Register is mainstream, and discovering few code vulnerabilities, with one mention in a mainstream publication, does not seem to cut it. The pl wiki cited interview in Polish Computerworld doesn't seem sufficient; it's not about him, it's about his views on computer security - being interviewed does not make one notable; this would require showing that his person is discussed in independent sources, which is not the case. And his achievements are not widely reported; IMHO he fails WP:ANYBIO 1 and 2, and all WP:CREATIVE points, as well. The cited, mostly niche sources, plus The Registrar, do not convince me that he made "a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field". CC Previous AfD participants: User:Boleyn, User:Unscintillating, User:DGG. PS. Also cc User:Tqbf who made extensive comments on this article's lack of notability's at the article's talk page. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:41, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:27, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
I created this article to tidy up after finding the website's logo and URL added to the article for the defunct newspaper of the same title, but there now seems to be no indication that the website is actually notable. It was dePRODded, without comment, by an IP editor in their first edit. Pam D 12:40, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
• manhistorian I would suggest keeping the article, the vast majority of people who view the MG article are in fact looking because of the online Publication. —Preceding undated comment added 15:02, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:29, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Non-notable play lacking Ghits and Gnews of substance. reddogsix ( talk) 17:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Home School Valedictorian. -- BDD ( talk) 21:31, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSONG Walter Görlitz ( talk) 18:44, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. Secret account 02:58, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Unsourced biography of a living person, apparently a beatbox musician. Don't see how this meets WP:ARTIST. Also note that article creator Burmich is a single-purpose account and likely in a conflict of interest. bender235 ( talk) 21:11, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Sustainable tourism. ( non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 12:34, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Used to be a redirect to Sustainable tourism, but now it is some marketing jibberish created by Rtsouthafrica (do I smell conflict of interest?). I'd say delete and re-create the redirect. bender235 ( talk) 21:05, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Feel free to improve the content or renominate for deletion. SarahStierch ( talk) 15:24, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. It is certainly used as a last name and there were various military regiments that used it also. However, there are no reliable sources that refer to the Tiwana as a clan. This is also impossible to redirect in a neutral manner because there are so many possible targets - see this. I doubt that turning this into a disambig page would be meaningful because the Tiwana element of those targets seems often to be of tangential relevance. Sitush ( talk) 16:51, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:35, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
fails WP:NSONGS. Doesn't appear to be a single either. Erick ( talk) 14:58, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:37, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Unsourced, and I'm unable to find anything that shows sufficient notability. Clarityfiend ( talk) 05:50, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario candidates, 2007 Ontario provincial election. -- BDD ( talk) 21:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not sufficiently notable per WP:POLITICIAN. School board trustee is not an office that qualifies a person for a Wikipedia article on its own, but rather the only school board trustees who qualify for articles are those who have also previously or subsequently held a more notable office — such as a mayoralty or a provincial, state or federal legislative seat. In addition, except for a single minor WP:BLP1E burst of news coverage for a single controversial comment, all of the sources actually being cited here are WP:PRIMARYSOURCES which fail to demonstrate that she's in any significant way more notable than most other school trustees who don't have articles. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 23:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Redirect to Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario candidates, 2007 Ontario provincial election. Agree trustee position not important enough to qualify for WP:POLITICIAN. Not much other coverage. Provincial also-ran status doesn't qualify her either but she is already mentioned on the candidate page so I recommend redirect. EncyclopediaUpdaticus ( talk) 22:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Would the fact that she's also the Former Chair of the Board (largest Catholic School Board in Canada), and running for Provincial Office again this Spring change anything? ( talk) 19:55, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep, withdrawn. — David Eppstein ( talk) 07:20, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
I could find many mentions of Azar, but couldn't find anything to confirm she is WP:Notable. Boleyn ( talk) 19:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. v/r - T P 03:37, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Given that the project is dead, there's little point in keeping this around. PS: no Computer Software category? Gaba (talk) 19:14, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 03:37, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
MMA fighter with no top tier fights so fails WP:NMMA. No evidence that he meets the kickboxing criteria at WP:KICK since the IKF is not listed as a major organization. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:58, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:51, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
MMA fighter who fails WP:NMMA with no top tier fights. Also fails WP:GNG with no significant independent coverage. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:52, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
MMA fighter who fails WP:NMMA with no top tier fights. Article lacks significant independent coverage to show he meets WP:GNG. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:30, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. SarahStierch ( talk) 15:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Unsourced WP:BLP, WP:OR The Banner talk 18:26, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
I added a note on the talk page of the article. As explained there the entire content of this article is largely factual (rather than opinion) and verifiable by visiting Mats profile at the Royal Academy of Music website plus his own personal and publishing websites (all linked at the foot of the article). Most of the information was gather directly from Mats via a copy of his CV, discussion and visiting his website and he requested that I help him by updating the information on the page as the previous version of the page was seriously out of date (have originally been written by his nephew a long time ago). Further the original page had no citations to justify the content. If there are issues I need to resolve can you please tell me how to do that - the docs and policies on wikipedia are very long and tedious and the language pretty impenetrable. JCarolHaynes ( talk) 00:02, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Good morning! The matter is really very uncomplicated: I work as professor at the Royal Academy
of Music in London and would not wish to have a profile on me which is grossly out of date. Nor would Wikipedia. The page was set up by my nephew several years ago, so now it's time to update it. YOu've seen the text, since my friend Carol Haynes has tried to put it up here several times. ALl it is, is an updated CV on me as a cellist/composer. Many thanks. MATS
I don't mind rewriting some of it if you feel it is not in an approved style. I am not sure what you want by way of references - the information is documented and the Royal Academy of Music website - which is linked in the article. What else can I reference. For example, there is no published information on which orchestras Mats has worked with other than the RAM website - and short of writing to every orchestra and asking them to write a publicly accesssible statement that Mats has worked with them I can't see how that basic information about a career is in anyway capable of confirmation by citation? JCarolHaynes ( talk) 09:28, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Not a violation of copyright if it is used with permission. JCarolHaynes ( talk) 14:40, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Shouldn't be a problem - how can I submit evidence? JCarolHaynes ( talk) 17:54, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks - I don't mind redrafting it to be more encyclopaedic. How do I submit authorisation for the use of content from the Royal Academy website? JCarolHaynes ( talk) 21:57, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
OK sent email requesting info about providing permission and advice about further citations required. JCarolHaynes ( talk) 01:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC)— JCarolHaynes ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:53, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMMA with no top tier fights. Starting one college basketball game is also not enough to show notability. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:24, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:54, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Unsourced article about an MMA fighter with no top tier fights. Fails WP:NMMA and WP:GNG. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:56, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
MMA fighter with no top tier fights. The main source is his club and none of the sources appear independent. A second place at a junior tournament does not show notability in judo. Fails WP:NMMA, WP:GNG, and WP:MANOTE. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:11, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 03:35, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
No significant awards, and his book on a robot-induced economic collapse is self-published -- which, as one would expect, has only 8 library holdings. (His SF book I can find no traces of anywhere) Other than that, the article is a list of speeches he gave. The three photos of him giving talks adds to the atmosphere of promotionalism (I note that the description of the first refers to him as "world famous bestselling author Federico Pistono") . I hesitated on this one,because it looked like a good many references, but they're mere links to his talks or announcements of them. DGG ( talk ) 18:08, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Biographical material about a living individual that is not compliant with this policy should be improved and rectified; if this is not possible, then it should be removed. If the entire page is substantially of poor quality, primarily containing contentious material that is unsourced or poorly sourced, then it may be necessary to delete the entire page as an initial step, followed by discussion.
I hope to have contributed to the debate. Apologies for my unfamiliarity with the entire process. Sincerely, Lorenzo g ( talk) 20:57, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:57, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
MMA fighter who fails WP:NMMA with no top tier fights. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:04, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 03:35, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Non notable ceo of a non-notable trade show company. The article is almost entirely about her family and education, because there's nothing substantial to say about her career, except that she once spoke at a political convention. there are, as usual, some trivial awards. DGG ( talk ) 18:01, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 03:35, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Retired MMA fighter who had a total of 4 fights, none with a top tier organization. One kickboxing bout doesn't make him notable either. Fails WP:NMMA, WP:KICK, and WP:GNG. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:00, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. Thanks for adding sources. v/r - T P 03:35, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Effectively unsourced BLP that says nothing about the actor. The Banner talk 19:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
1- Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. 2- Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. 3- Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.
I think the number of IMDB and wikipedia article he is listed in as an actor make him pass 1st and 3rd ones. What are your thoughts? @ Stemoc: -- Foodie ( talk) 10:58, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete. (CSD G11) As DGG says, there may be an article to write on this topic, but this isn't it. It is unadulterated promotion. JamesBWatson ( talk) 15:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Virtusl exchange might be a good topic for an article. This article,is however a promotion for one particualr initiative, and consists almost entirel y of general background and a list of who spoke at their various events, which is trivial coverage. As would be expected for such content, written by a paid promotional editor. This indicates a common problem with such editing: instead of a decent article that a NPOV editor would write on something good and interesting, we have this relatively useless propaganda. DGG ( talk ) 17:58, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 12:27, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
As an upcoming minor film, the article is completely unreferenced poorly referenced, and doesn't meet
WP:MOVIE and
WP:CRYSTAL.
Alex
discussion
★
16:39, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Movie is referenced now with Tribune Pakistan article, have a look. I Am ready to add every possible official external link . UBS ( talk) 16:59, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
It's well referenced now and meets WP Movie criteria. UBS ( talk) 11:44, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Recently added film budget with reference. UBS ( talk) 12:36, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
References are not just 2, and the number of references doesn't matter as movie is to be released far in 2014 so the sources are less BUT it's been proved that movie will release in 2014. UBS ( talk) 14:23, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Please close this discussion if you do not have doubt left.
UBS (
talk)
15:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:58, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Personal thesis, original research. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 16:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:59, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 16:09, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was non-consensus, without any objection to renominee. WP:NAC Eduemoni ↑talk↓ 21:11, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
My redirect was undone, claiming that simply being a main character in The West Wing is automatically notable. This is not true. This character fails WP:GNG. Merely appearing in a notable work isn't enough per WP:NOTINHERITED. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 15:50, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. v/r - T P 03:33, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Delete when searching [ [20]] I am not able to find widespread coverage. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 15:43, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was Move to Sol (laptop) and make a redirect . Move to Sol (laptop) as suggested and make a redirect from the company name; this is where the notability lies. It's what I think we normally do in cases like this. DGG ( talk ) 16:00, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
advertising The Banner talk 21:31, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
(UTC)
To me, it seems that the only notable thing about WeWi is the SOL, as being a Canadian company, starting out as ISP or offering ad hoc disaster recovery, to pick out a few, are not notable on their own (and likely would not have been mentioned in one or more independent sources if not for the SOL) under usual circumstances, as seems to be the case with WeWi. (Which is not a bad thing. Unusual circumstances making something normally not notable notable usually are along the lines of huge court cases and scandals, to mention some.)
The fact that out of seven sources, six are predominantly about the SOL and the remaining source is the company's website, does nothing to disprove that either. Should someone find a few reliable and independent sources that give more in-depth information about WeWi, or at least more-than-just-mention them, in a different context than the SOL, I'd agree that it's fine at its current location.
As it stands right now, the company is not what is notable, the laptop is, and the company gets mentioned here and there because of the laptop.
(Also, if you reply to both me and The Banner at the same time, which you seemed to do with last reply, could you please be a bit more clear who you're addressing with which points next time? I got a bit confused at first, thinking "but I never said that" before I realized you likely had switched from addressing me to addressing The Banner, and I assume we'd both rather not end up in a discussion about who-said-what based on such confusion. I know I would rather not.)
AddWittyNameHere (
talk)
06:20, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:02, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Notability is unclear. No bibliographical information about the sole cited reference (Smriti Granth ("Memorial volume") for Chaubey Mukta Prasad) can be located; its publisher etc are unknown and it is not found in worldcat or other usual databases. No other reference on the subject was found in an online search. Abecedare ( talk) 14:53, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW. The Bushranger One ping only 00:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Fails WP:AIRCRASH. Accident not involving anyone notable. WP:NOTNEWS also applies. ...William 13:50, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:26, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Fails WP:NWRITER Rob Sinden ( talk) 13:16, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:29, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:45, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:30, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Judge at low-level trial courts. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:45, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:31, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:45, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:32, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources (The Cyclopedia of New Zealand : Canterbury Provincial District is vanity publishing). One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:42, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:33, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:42, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( WP:SNOW). (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000 (talk) 01:19, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Full of unreliable sources and unsourced content. ReferencesAreImportant ( talk) 09:46, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:34, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Best is this local interest piece, not enough. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:38, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of journalists killed and missing in the Vietnam War. v/r - T P 03:32, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. The is coverage of the event in which he died but that is about the event, not Birch, and Wikipedia is not the news. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:37, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:35, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One NZ Catholic obit [27] is not enough. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:37, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Article is full of primary sources from organisations he is connected to. Most sources do not verify the claims made. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:30, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:45, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable [28]. No notable publications. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Most sources are by him not about him. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:30, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:46, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Is lead author on a few reasonably cited works but does not seem to have a significant impact. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Not a notable politician, didn't win a major election. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:26, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources (The Cyclopedia of New Zealand : Canterbury Provincial District is vanity publishing). One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:26, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tapper Transport. v/r - T P 03:27, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One good obit in The New Zealand Herald but that's it. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:18, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 03:27, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. (not G Waite from Michigan Technological University.) Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:19, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. v/r - T P 03:27, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:22, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:50, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to X rating. ( non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 01:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Non notable album. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Lack reviews, charting, awards. Nothing coming close to WP:NALBUMS. Shops are not reliable sources. duffbeerforme ( talk) 08:37, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:54, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Non notable band. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Lack reviews, charting, awards. Touring lacks coverage. Falls short of to album on an important label. Nothing coming close to WP:MUSIC. Sonicbids, bandcamp, youtube, facebook, tumblr, last.fm, Rocketshiplive are not good sources. A calender listing is not non trivial coverage. Ain’t No Party Like The As Artifacts Party! is just the band talking about themselves. A one paragraph review in Music & Noise Magazine is not enough. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:24, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 23:03, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Vanispamcruftisement. Being part of abelton live community is not notable. Band lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Releases not on important label. Current sourcing is payplayfm, adverts, dead shop, dead interview, forum. Nothing good. A search found nothing better. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:15, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- http://www.allmusic.com/album/thrills-and-chills-mw0000326449/credits - http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/putty-in-their-hands-thrills/id9584580 - http://www.cduniverse.com/productinfo.asp?pid=7146380 Nebulae's remix of our song "Wild Life" was featured on MTV's "The Real World: New Orleans" in 2000. See http://www.broadjam.com/artists/songs.php?artistID=265&mediaID=388 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hokusspokuss2000 ( talk • contribs) 12:03, 7 November 2013 (UTC) — Hokusspokuss2000 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 23:04, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Absolutely nothing to add, support or even improve this article. A Google news search provides little results with two of them mentioning a member. Another search provided one of the previous results (which is dead but recoverable). Google Books provided very little as well with the most being Wikipedia mirrors and one brief mention in a 2005 book about Linux. Small group discussing something notable (Unix/Linux) but non-notable itself. Everything in this article is their word with nothing third-party to support it. Final searches provided nothing else. SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 03:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Deletion for this article is contested. The article has been up for years, but an editor has tagged it for speedy and was reverted by IP. History also shows a contested PROD, so I'm going to let consensus decide if this product is notable. NintendoFan ( Talk, Contribs) 03:37, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
*Keep. I see no evidence that this article fails to meet any criteria. Wikitam331 ( talk) 15:28, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
*comment needs more sources to show notability/impact, otherwise I'd say delete or merge. PeteBaltar ( talk) 04:45, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Weak delete for now, if sources can be found the article can be recreated. FurrySings ( talk) 06:31, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. Bearian ( talk) 22:37, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Delete, the articles do not show that Covert Medication, while mentioned, doesn't show it is an actual term in widespread usage. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 03:27, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 23:05, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
This topic does not meet the notability requirements of WP:ORG: a good faith search on this topic brings up nothing but press releases from the company itself, and press releases disguised as news items (e.g. PR Wire). A link on the article to a NYT Profile of a company partner includes no information about the company itself. That Gerald Ford (not the former-president) is a limited partner is irrelevant, as is having a "prominent employee" (who seems to only be prominent for playing poker). Notability is not inherited through association. Additionally, the creator of this article is himself an employee of the company (see [41]. His only 3 edits on the encyclopedia were to create this article and place a link to it on the list of equity firms article.
In short: an article created through a COI account, on a topic with no evident substantive support in 3rd party sources. AstroCog ( talk) 02:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 23:06, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Revised several times , but remains promotional and of borderline notability DGG ( talk ) 01:57, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:04, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
This is an unsourced collection of biographies and anecdotes about life in the Hala Tribe. Most of the material was brought in with
this edit. Not sure if this qualifies for speedy A7, so I am nominating for deletion via AFD.
Diannaa (
talk)
01:53, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 00:50, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Not exactly the most notable thing in the world. Especially suspicious that the article is up there now and the site was created by a twenty three year old SEO "expert"....
Egg
Centri
c
01:51, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Chicago Cubs minor league players. v/r - T P 03:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Minor league baseball free agent.. no claim to notability.. nothing special here. Spanneraol ( talk) 01:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Courtney_Fathom_Sell#Filmography. v/r - T P 03:24, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Non-notable film. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:24, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 00:41, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
fails WP:BIO and WP:PROF. his academic and writing career is unremarkable. and the article has a number of primary sources. the coverage I've found is about him making comments in the media rather than him as the subject. LibStar ( talk) 01:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:01, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (software). Only sources are download site blurbs or the company's own website. No reliable sources found. Grayfell ( talk) 00:11, 6 November 2013 (UTC)