< 20 January | 22 January > |
---|
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:36, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable writer who fails to meet WP:AUTHOR or WP:BK. All of his manuscripts are self-published, as the article itself admits, and therefore cannot be used to demonstrate notability, per WP:SPS. No WP:RS sources exist to establish WP:N. Everything on Google appears to be self-generated by the writer himself. Also, there have been extensive WP:AUTO and WP:COI problems with the article almost from the beginning, and its problems with notability have long been discussed on the talk page without resolution. Qworty ( talk) 23:26, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Since this has only been deleted once previously, I don't think the salt shaker is needed quite yet. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:06, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Previously deleted as Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Thiaoouba_Prophecy. Many of the sources cited do not mention book or author. Still no significant and independent coverage found to satisfy notability requirements. LuckyLouie ( talk) 21:40, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:36, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Local radio presenter, at college, local coverage only, fails WP:BIO. Paste Let’s have a chat. 21:28, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 08:43, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Withdrawn by proposer. Withdrawn by proposer; clear consensus to keep updated article Avi ( talk) 07:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Does not really seem like a proper topic for an encyclopedia article. It starts out by saying "counter-missionary" (notice that it is not a noun as WP titles should be) is opposition to any missionary activity. Then it switches to efforts to convert Jews to Christianity. Other activities are not mentioned at all although there are many people who oppose missionary activities by, for instance, Christians to tribal groups in the Amazon, cults on college campuses, even Muslims in non-Muslim countries. To me it seems better to discuss Jewish anti-missionarism in the same article that discusses missionary activities targeting Jews, so that both sides are presented together for better neutrality Nomination withdrawn since there is a sincere effort to change the topic of the article.
Borock (
talk)
20:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was Keep. If users wish tomove and rename, fine; this is an editorial decision anyone can WP:BOLDly make, and not something for AfD Ironholds ( talk) 14:00, 30 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Seems to be a minor part of Erskine, however good sources are hard to come by. Article doesn't have much context or content at the moment. The settlement is unlikely to be notable enough on its own, so the article should be redirected or deleted. Scotlandplaces.gov.uk says it consist of only one building. Travelbird ( talk) 14:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Groome describes "Wilkiestown" as "a post-office hamlet in Kirknewton parish". Ironically, it's the Pigeon racing news and gazette from April 1967 that reveals that it wasn't until after the demolition of the mansion, when the Scottish War Blinded built various facilities (including "a Housing Estate; a Hostel for the single men; modern workshops; recreational facilities such as a Concert Hall; Bowling Green; Playground; Playing Field; and a Youth Club"), that the Linburn Estate became part of Wilkieston. The 1973 Johnston's gazetteer of Scotland describes Linburn as "estate at Wilkieston". Uncle G ( talk) 05:18, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Discussion of improving, merging, etc can be done on the article's talk page,(which I note has never been used) there is clearly not a consensus to delete. Beeblebrox ( talk) 22:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Not sure what the point of this article is. We already have Chinese language, Varieties of Chinese which properly describes the different varieties, and articles on traditional and simplified characters for the written language. The table is confusing and misleading – there's not one was of using Chinese in China as it implies – with some very odd choices of entries, and should not be in all Chinese which really limits its readership. Without that there's almost nothing to the article. JohnBlackburne words deeds 23:17, 13 January 2011 (UTC) reply
This article ignores all this, instead focussing on a small (and unusual) selection of words. The grouping is not by variety but by territory and says nothing about the pronunciation of the words (useful as it often gives a clue why different characters are used), even which variety is used where, or which territories use which of simplified or traditional characters. Nor is it indicated which entries are vernacular Chinese. As such this article is of little use to anyone learning Chinese. There is already an article on written Cantonese which covers most of the written differences between Mandarin and Cantonese, in a much more encyclopaedic way, including some of these words, which would perhaps be a better place for this.-- JohnBlackburne words deeds 14:14, 15 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:07, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
No indication of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. This (and its related articles) look like components of a PR blitz on behalf of Northam Psychotechnologies. LuckyLouie ( talk) 20:19, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:22, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Autobiographical articles are strongly discouraged but that is what this appears to be: it was written by User:Harris DC about the Harris County District Clerk. Whilst I commend the author for removing the most peacocky of the content within the article when advised to do so, this still remains an entirely flattering and one-sided profile of a subject whose political career depends on a positive public perception and appears to fall foul of WP:SOAP. Then there is the question of notability: WP:POLITICIAN notes that elected politicians at state level or greater are generally notable, but this is a county post. Not all the refs mention the subject and those that do are doubtful in terms of meeting WP:GNG. I have strong reservations about the article's neurality and there does not appear to be sufficient notability to justify its inclusion. I42 ( talk) 19:46, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Those contributing to the page are new to wikipedia. Athaenara is right in that the guidelines on rules where not initially followed, but that has since ceased after being put on notice by same.
The office answers to 4.3 million tax payers. The office holder was voted in by over half a million voters in the 2010 election (with over 1.2 million people total voting in this race alone). The county is the largest in TX. The DA (district attorney Pat Lykos has her own page, yet without the district clerk to manage the Sheriff and DA's criminal intake PLUS the 74 countywide courts and staff and paperwork/ filings that go withit, she cannot do her job and prosecute any criminals.
It is a farce to say that this position is not notable when the office controls 500 employees and 26.6 million dollars in budget. It is a farce when the district clerk of the largest county in Texas gets elected with more votes than candidate for US senate or Governor in other states like Delaware. I understand that the username was in conflict, but i just picked a name. My goal is to flesh out the existing Harris County website with a note on each of its office holders.
Not sure the editors are aware, but Houston is only one third the size in population of Harris County (and resides almost entirely inside the county). More people voted for District Clerk then for Mayor Annise Parker.-- Harris DC ( talk) 14:39, 22 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Added three more on point (about--not mentions) mainstream articles and Electoral Summary to show orders of magnitude.-- Harris DC ( talk) 15:08, 23 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:22, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Subject does not meet notability guidelines for bands and there is no indication that there is significant coverage in reliable sources (fails WP:GNG as well). Danger ( talk) 19:36, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. notability comes from sources not from mentions or working in the media so the delete arguments appear the ones based on policy Spartaz Humbug! 03:23, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Clearly her name is notable. But 2 of 3 sources mentioning her, are really not concerned with her, but with the more famous name holder. Then, there's an interview, which really doesn't count in showing notability. There seems to be no 3rd party reliable source that provides substantive biographical details about this Heather Mills, and not the other. Rob ( talk) 19:15, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:10, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Prod declined rather rudely. Anyway, overspecific list. Parent list List of moths of Israel doesn't exist, so why should it have an even more specific subpage? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 18:46, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:12, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
This article was deleted at its first AfD on the grounds that though a tragic event there was no evidence of the lasting effects required by WP:EVENT. It has now been reposted with an additional paragraph saying that the school and the local authority have said that they will review their anti-bullying policies. Announcement of a review is the normal reaction of any organisation to fend off criticism, and it does not seem to me that this addition is significant enough to overcome the reasons given for deletion at the AfD. The new version was tagged WP:CSD#G4 and in my view it qualifies, but I am sure that a G4 deletion would be challenged at DRV, which would probably say that the article should be relisted, so to save time I bring it straight back here. JohnCD ( talk) 18:33, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Also new info that the documentary about her story/organ donation got a peabody award after being shown pretty widely including bbc america —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.204.253 ( talk) 00:48, 22 January 2011 (UTC) reply
As well as wide coverage of the events themselves this article over a year later http://www.pluggedin.com/familyroom/articles/2002/bullyinghitshome.aspx in an american based website (which at that point was also a printed publication) shoes that the the story has gained enough significance/influence to be used as one of many sources/references in an article on linked issues. RR1953 ( talk) 18:57, 23 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:24, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Unreferenced, and Google appears to give no results relating to an actual Indonesian version of the show. Possible hoax. Anemone Projectors 17:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Keep arguments based on german wikipedia notability carry no weight here and the issue is sourcing. There appears to be a consensus that the person doesn't pass BIO and it should be noted that reliaty show participants are not considered inherantly notable here even if they garner some press as BLP1E kicks in. Spartaz Humbug! 03:26, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:BIO. Nobody knows this person. She isn't famous. She hasn't achieved anything. She has only lost in game shows. Captain Chandana ( talk) 17:41, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Never thought I'd say this...but Non-notable soup CTJF83 chat 17:30, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. If more sources "comes to light" we can reconsider but this is a BLP and it can't be in article space without them. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Yutsi Talk/ Contributions 17:22, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Not notable, almost all links are red links. Yutsi Talk/ Contributions 17:16, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:27, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
No coverage outside of the social media press. All references are promotional puff pieces. Wenttomowameadow ( talk) 08:17, 13 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. merge is only an option if there is decent sourcing and this is a delete because there isn't Spartaz Humbug! 03:29, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Article fails WP:NOTABILITY. Has a few links but they seem to be press releases and self-published.Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. Hu12 ( talk) 16:26, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
I cannot find sufficient sources to show that the basic requirements for biographies are met. The only source which could provide notability is this but I do not think this is sufficient. Unless extra, independent sources can be found, which directly discuss the subject, this should be deleted. SmartSE ( talk) 15:57, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. actual merge target can be changed as soon as there is some clarity on where it fits - article talk would be best place to decide that. Spartaz Humbug! 03:30, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD - Fails WP:GNG - OK, so a number of states use circular highway shields... doesn't mean there needs to be an article on it. Admrboltz ( talk) 06:22, 10 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 03:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Minor author with no evidence of notability. The only source is a local newspaper, where the main reason for mentioning him seems to be that he is a "local" author. I know people of no notability at all who have received this much local press coverage. JamesBWatson ( talk) 15:01, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:41, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Unremarkable song. No references (youtube not valid). No significant coverage. — Timneu22 · talk 14:40, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:20, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
No indications that this record label rises to the notability requirements of WP:ORG. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 14:16, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete - Reaper Eternal ( talk) 18:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
I think this might be a hoax. I searched for this study, and found nothing. Reaper Eternal ( talk) 14:09, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:26, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
A nice PR blurb written by the subject's PR. Fails WP:NPOV, sources are distinctly trivial, language is non-neutral. As far as I can tell the primary purpose of this article is promotion of the subject. Guy ( Help!) 13:20, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:27, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The article fails to make a case against the criteria of WP:ORG. Non-trivial independent reliable sources showing impact on the historic record have not been found. Unfortunately the article creator (who is employed by the same company, see user page) has persisted in removing improvement notices, speedy deletion tags and a PROD so raising for wider discussion. Fæ ( talk) 11:14, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:30, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Nothing in Google scholar or books with this phrase, which leads me to wonder if it's all publicity for the company named in the lead. Part of a family of related articles. Dougweller ( talk) 11:10, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Very very minor provincial amateur football team, no sources. Guy ( Help!) 10:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable local urban legend. Dmol ( talk) 09:41, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Failed PROD. PROD reason was "Unsourced, does not appear to be any sources on google search, does not appear notable." Decline reason was "albums by notable musicians are notable"
I disagree with the decline, as while that might be a rule of thumb, it does not trump the demand for sources, of which there are none. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:50, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete: Non notable album as notability is not inherited, also no reliable sources found. Mattg82 ( talk) 15:58, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete all. Courcelles 22:45, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1114 AH. Apparently, this whole scheme isn't speedy-deletable per that consensus, so I'm nominating the remaining articles here. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:58, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
JamesBWatson ( talk) 09:30, 17 January 2011 (UTC) replyThere is no encyclopedic reason to have a separate page for every possible unit of measure conversion on a numeric scale. If there is a reason that this particular time period is of importance, then YES by all means (say, something of significance about the time period 1114 AH). But I don't see that in the article.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:57, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Worthy topic, but this is an unsalvageable piece of unreferenced original research that reads more like a newspaper editorial on current events than like what we'd expect from an encyclopedia. Delete and restart from scratch. Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 02:40, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:27, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The article does not provide reliable, independent sources to show that the subject company meets the notability standards of WP:CORP. NawlinWiki ( talk) 20:39, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. There doesn't seem to be sources so,,, Spartaz Humbug! 03:34, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable film per my Google search; a selection to the little-known Syracuse International Film Festival does not confer sufficient notability. Perhaps just a case of WP:TOOSOON. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 21:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List of Decepticons. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:13, 27 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable fictional character, no reliable sources, and none of the non-reliable sources are even about the character. Black Kite (t) (c) 19:55, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete Per nom. BE——Critical__ Talk 20:35, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
*Delete. no 3d-person sources. So he's O-U-T. Got it?
Pillhead Maddox (
talk)
22:42, 16 January 2011 (UTC).
reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Subject appears to not meet WP:GNG Bhtooefr ( talk) 17:45, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:10, 27 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Unreferenced BLP of unestablished notability. brew crewer (yada, yada) 17:27, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:38, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
This publishing company has had barely any coverage in reliable third-party sources. The BBC reference in the article only mentions the publisher as a side-note at the bottom of the page. The rest of the references are either broken or belong to the company itself. The company hasn't even published any works notable enough for an article on Wikipedia. This article should have been deleted on one of the previous two AfDs, but hopefully third time's the charm! – Pee Jay 17:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 03:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Per WP:OR and Not dictionary, article seems to an attempt list Irish (Gaelic) names for annual events Gnevin ( talk) 12:21, 23 December 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:06, 27 January 2011 (UTC) reply
This article had been deleted twice pursuant to discussions in 2005 and 2006. The most notable event, obviously, came after (in 2007), but I still believe that this person is not sufficiently notable — WP:15M applies in this case, I think. Delete. -- Nlu ( talk) 15:47, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:40, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
No indication that this living person meets Wikipedia:Notability (people). Qwfp ( talk) 12:50, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:40, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
hints at but does not address notability, recent string of edits by rep of company named in article are suspect as the thing reads as an advert Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 11:32, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:40, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Article written by a member of the group, which has remained unsourced for nearly a year. A Google search fails to turn up any non-trivial third-party coverage, and the organization fails the WP:ORG notability criteria. -- DAJF ( talk) 09:01, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:49, 26 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Not a notable website. Meager coverage at best. Drmies ( talk) 05:19, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete - Per reasons given.
Η936631
(talk)
07:53, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The author was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Thomas Abbott (2nd nomination) and I can't find any RS about the poem. John Vandenberg ( chat) 04:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC) The deleted Paul Thomas Abbott mentions this as a source; see Isis magazine. John Vandenberg ( chat) 04:29, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete Dubious encyclopedic value given its superficial notability, if any. Hard to imagine a poem being notable if its author is not. Agent 86 ( talk) 00:24, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Only 26,000 sales seems pretty tiny for a single. And its use in a video game is hardly unusual. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 06:01, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:41, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
All of the sources I'm finding are trivial and unreliable. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 06:04, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:45, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Claim of notability is an award which is not readily verified and questionable reliability. Unable to locate additional coverage in secondary sources. Pnm ( talk) 01:06, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Magnetar. Spartaz Humbug! 03:42, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The phrase "Quantum electrodynamic threshold" does not appear to be notable. (Google scholar finds only the single use in Scientific American, google books and regular google turn up mostly wikipedia mirrors and circular refs.) Anything useful said about the content of the Scientific American article is already contained in the magnetar article, so there is nothing to merge. TimothyRias ( talk) 10:56, 7 January 2011 (UTC) TimothyRias ( talk) 10:56, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Obvious redirect to wherever. But not notable for its own article per google news and books. BE——Critical__ Talk 20:53, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Directory of people, should be deleted as per Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_directory Travelbird ( talk) 03:03, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:46, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG, and who in spite of having been on contract with several fully pro teams, has yet to play in a fully pro league. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 04:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:42, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Band fails notability guidelines for musical groups. Awards are nomination only for a young, local festival. Radio play is on a local station. Danger ( talk) 04:41, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:42, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Article appears to be someone's college essay, in tone, organisation, and headings. Purely OR/synthesis, and redundant to the main article linked at top. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 03:35, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
WP:NOT a list of trivia. Article is woefully incomplete and unreferenced. Admrboltz ( talk) 03:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. notability clearly isn't there Spartaz Humbug! 03:43, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Despite the initial press release, this company never formed, and the project they were supposedly working on is long since cancelled. I live in Wellington and work in the industry and can confirm the company does not exist. Chopper Dave ( talk) 02:36, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment - I do not wish to vote, but I do wish to comment. I feel that you would need need an official reference or source saying that the company is no longer active or was never formed, not just 'your word for it'. According to an IGN artical, the have a game that is currently 'TBA' and is nothing to do with Halo Chronicals. I don't know how often IGN update their pages though, or if it is a reliable source. Skullbird11 ( talk) 23:04, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment - Understandable, it's hard to prove something doesn't exist :) No phone number in the NZ phonebook, they're not part of the New Zealand Game Developers Association, and there is no mention of them outside speculation for the title and a press release or two. They have no website, and searching '"Wingnut Interactive" Hiring' on google results in no actual hiring ads. They were literally announced as part of a deal, registered, and then never formed. The deal fell through and all that's left is this wiki entry :) Chopper Dave ( talk) 04:23, 22 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
fails WP:NALBUMS . also nominating the this song off this EP: Heavy Metal Pirates. LibStar ( talk) 02:14, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Nothing to suggest that this book publisher is notable. Was originally a copyvio spam article, but OTRS permission was received to resolve copyvio issues. Step hen 00:30, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not for lists or repositories of loosely associated topics. The list is also a non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations of unrelated items as well as derived entirely in primary sources. Almost none of the content is even sourced and there is a extraordinaire high chance of original research and synthesis. See also WP:POPCULTURE — Farix ( t | c) 00:10, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to 2019 Asian Games. Almost everybody here agrees that this article should be merged and the target mentioned most frequently is 2019 Asian Games. Whether or not both articles should be merged into something else is a matter for the talk page. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 03:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC) reply
WP:CRYSTAL JDDJS ( talk) 22:19, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Merge. It, along with 2019 Asian Games should be merged into an article along the lines of 2019 & 2023 Asian Games bids much the same way as 2018 and 2022 FIFA World Cup bids. Only after they are both awarded can they be given their own separate page (again as was the case for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups. Ravendrop ( talk) 00:31, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Controversies of the United States Senate election in Virginia, 2006#Allen's Macaca controversy. Spartaz Humbug! 03:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
This is an article about a name which one person was called, maybe two or three times in one year. Yes there are sources, but it seems like it's too minor for an encyclopedia article. Jaque Hammer ( talk) 13:37, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
-- Bobbyd2011 ( talk) 19:21, 22 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Article fails WP:PLOT. It has been redirected three times but has been restored each time without any improvement. The only reference in the article is a ratings figure that is available in List of Fish Hooks episodes so the episode provides nothing more than is available in the main list article, except for a lengthy plot. AussieLegend ( talk) 00:53, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
fails WP:CREATIVE. gnews confirms that she writes articles as a journalist [19], but nothing about her as the subject. simply cowriting a book doesn't get her over the line either. LibStar ( talk) 01:34, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
No evidence of notability. Google search does not seem to provide evidence of notability. Ladyof Shalott 00:44, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable fictional character, no reliable sources, as usual Black Kite (t) (c) 19:52, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment I would generally want this kind of thing deleted, but what about Lee's Guide to Loose 1988 Transformers: The Decepticons. Lee's Toy Review magazine, issue #208, March 2010? BE——Critical__ Talk 20:36, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Peacock, primary sources, COI, dubious notability. Prod declined because an admin thought there might be sources but I'm not convinced. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 20:55, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
i
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Although this person appears to have been written about in many hip-hop related blogs (and of course on imdb.com), I am completely unable to come up with anything that meets WP:RS to establish notability. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 20:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. passing mentions do not count towards establishing notability Spartaz Humbug! 03:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
I don't see how this person is notable. Apparently, according to the one (Russian-language) source provided for this BLP, he is one of the most famous men in America, but this is belied by the paucity of hits in Google News. I'm willing to state that Carrot Top is more famous. Drmies ( talk) 18:11, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:51, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Although he may have been prominent locally or among his peers, does not meet general notability requirements Wkharrisjr ( talk) 16:20, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:51, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Rationale was "The subject of the article does not satisfy the criteria listed in WP:BAND. The single independent reference provided is a local/regional newspaper." The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 04:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Appears to fail the general notability guideline and WP:ATHLETE. Existing references appear to be either unreliable or trivial in nature, not a discussion of the topic. The exception is this article. I am unable to view the full text, but it appears to be a fairly in-depth discussion by a regional source, but to me this alone doesn't meet the general guideline. A quick Google search didn't turn up anything better. VQuakr ( talk) 04:36, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Thank you Kugao -- Emerald gloves ( talk) 03:05, 18 January 2011 (UTC) reply
So can we get the "Article considered for deletion" blocks off the page? :) -- Emerald gloves ( talk) 03:05, 18 January 2011 (UTC) Emerald gloves reply
The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Lack of sources for notability. I checked LexisNexis (behind a paywall but exhaustive and it found only one piece mentioning his name La Nación (Costa Rica) August 26, 2006). The spanish text can be found at [32], "IMAS recorta presupuesto para fiesta" the relevant text "En el acto participará el presidente Óscar Arias Sánchez, el ministro de Lucha contra la pobreza, Fernando Zumbado, y el artista costarricense Hugo Sánchez Bonilla, quien creó el logo del IMAS en 1972. A este último se le brindará un reconocimiento especial." which google translation gives as "Participate in the event President Oscar Arias Sánchez, the minister for Combating Poverty, Fernando Zumbado, and Hugo Sanchez Bonilla Costa Rican artist who created the logo of the IMAS in 1972. The latter will provide special recognition" IMAS stands for Instituto Mixto de Ayuda Social (Spanish: Joint Social Welfare Institute; Costa Rica) [33]. The only other source I can find is this page [34] for an exhibition at Pennsylvania State University.
There is no article for him on the Spanish language wikipedia. I checked without finding a single mention of him on the following paywalled databases: "Art Retrospective:Index of abstracts from art periodicals published throughout the world" and "ARTbibliographies Index of literature on modern and contemporary art, photography and design." LittleHow ( talk) 05:05, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Failure to find any reliable sources including newspapers etc covered by lexisnexus. One problem is that there is a notable John Tynan who is a jazz writer (and has yet to have a wikipedia article) which makes hunting sources difficult. But searching with his name and the bands mentioned finds only a few pages with tangential references. [35], [36], [37].
It is a concern that the initial article was created by the individual that is also the same individual that uploaded an accompanying image based upon a painting they owned of Tynan suggesting a connection with the individual.
Being a road manager of bands does not seem of itself grounds for notability LittleHow ( talk) 11:36, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:34, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
I have tried googlind 'Pisal surname', 'Pisal name' and 'Pisal last name', and none returned more than 10 results. Kayau Voting IS evil 13:15, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:34, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Biography of an actor who fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Only ever credited with minor roles. Article was created as part of a hoax campaign by a now banned user, with much greater claims of notability. When unverifiable claims were removed, we're left with a biography that can only cite IMDB and other similar film databases as a source. No significant coverage to be found. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 12:03, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
< 20 January | 22 January > |
---|
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:36, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable writer who fails to meet WP:AUTHOR or WP:BK. All of his manuscripts are self-published, as the article itself admits, and therefore cannot be used to demonstrate notability, per WP:SPS. No WP:RS sources exist to establish WP:N. Everything on Google appears to be self-generated by the writer himself. Also, there have been extensive WP:AUTO and WP:COI problems with the article almost from the beginning, and its problems with notability have long been discussed on the talk page without resolution. Qworty ( talk) 23:26, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Since this has only been deleted once previously, I don't think the salt shaker is needed quite yet. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:06, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Previously deleted as Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Thiaoouba_Prophecy. Many of the sources cited do not mention book or author. Still no significant and independent coverage found to satisfy notability requirements. LuckyLouie ( talk) 21:40, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:36, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Local radio presenter, at college, local coverage only, fails WP:BIO. Paste Let’s have a chat. 21:28, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 08:43, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Withdrawn by proposer. Withdrawn by proposer; clear consensus to keep updated article Avi ( talk) 07:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Does not really seem like a proper topic for an encyclopedia article. It starts out by saying "counter-missionary" (notice that it is not a noun as WP titles should be) is opposition to any missionary activity. Then it switches to efforts to convert Jews to Christianity. Other activities are not mentioned at all although there are many people who oppose missionary activities by, for instance, Christians to tribal groups in the Amazon, cults on college campuses, even Muslims in non-Muslim countries. To me it seems better to discuss Jewish anti-missionarism in the same article that discusses missionary activities targeting Jews, so that both sides are presented together for better neutrality Nomination withdrawn since there is a sincere effort to change the topic of the article.
Borock (
talk)
20:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was Keep. If users wish tomove and rename, fine; this is an editorial decision anyone can WP:BOLDly make, and not something for AfD Ironholds ( talk) 14:00, 30 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Seems to be a minor part of Erskine, however good sources are hard to come by. Article doesn't have much context or content at the moment. The settlement is unlikely to be notable enough on its own, so the article should be redirected or deleted. Scotlandplaces.gov.uk says it consist of only one building. Travelbird ( talk) 14:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Groome describes "Wilkiestown" as "a post-office hamlet in Kirknewton parish". Ironically, it's the Pigeon racing news and gazette from April 1967 that reveals that it wasn't until after the demolition of the mansion, when the Scottish War Blinded built various facilities (including "a Housing Estate; a Hostel for the single men; modern workshops; recreational facilities such as a Concert Hall; Bowling Green; Playground; Playing Field; and a Youth Club"), that the Linburn Estate became part of Wilkieston. The 1973 Johnston's gazetteer of Scotland describes Linburn as "estate at Wilkieston". Uncle G ( talk) 05:18, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Discussion of improving, merging, etc can be done on the article's talk page,(which I note has never been used) there is clearly not a consensus to delete. Beeblebrox ( talk) 22:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Not sure what the point of this article is. We already have Chinese language, Varieties of Chinese which properly describes the different varieties, and articles on traditional and simplified characters for the written language. The table is confusing and misleading – there's not one was of using Chinese in China as it implies – with some very odd choices of entries, and should not be in all Chinese which really limits its readership. Without that there's almost nothing to the article. JohnBlackburne words deeds 23:17, 13 January 2011 (UTC) reply
This article ignores all this, instead focussing on a small (and unusual) selection of words. The grouping is not by variety but by territory and says nothing about the pronunciation of the words (useful as it often gives a clue why different characters are used), even which variety is used where, or which territories use which of simplified or traditional characters. Nor is it indicated which entries are vernacular Chinese. As such this article is of little use to anyone learning Chinese. There is already an article on written Cantonese which covers most of the written differences between Mandarin and Cantonese, in a much more encyclopaedic way, including some of these words, which would perhaps be a better place for this.-- JohnBlackburne words deeds 14:14, 15 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:07, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
No indication of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. This (and its related articles) look like components of a PR blitz on behalf of Northam Psychotechnologies. LuckyLouie ( talk) 20:19, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:22, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Autobiographical articles are strongly discouraged but that is what this appears to be: it was written by User:Harris DC about the Harris County District Clerk. Whilst I commend the author for removing the most peacocky of the content within the article when advised to do so, this still remains an entirely flattering and one-sided profile of a subject whose political career depends on a positive public perception and appears to fall foul of WP:SOAP. Then there is the question of notability: WP:POLITICIAN notes that elected politicians at state level or greater are generally notable, but this is a county post. Not all the refs mention the subject and those that do are doubtful in terms of meeting WP:GNG. I have strong reservations about the article's neurality and there does not appear to be sufficient notability to justify its inclusion. I42 ( talk) 19:46, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Those contributing to the page are new to wikipedia. Athaenara is right in that the guidelines on rules where not initially followed, but that has since ceased after being put on notice by same.
The office answers to 4.3 million tax payers. The office holder was voted in by over half a million voters in the 2010 election (with over 1.2 million people total voting in this race alone). The county is the largest in TX. The DA (district attorney Pat Lykos has her own page, yet without the district clerk to manage the Sheriff and DA's criminal intake PLUS the 74 countywide courts and staff and paperwork/ filings that go withit, she cannot do her job and prosecute any criminals.
It is a farce to say that this position is not notable when the office controls 500 employees and 26.6 million dollars in budget. It is a farce when the district clerk of the largest county in Texas gets elected with more votes than candidate for US senate or Governor in other states like Delaware. I understand that the username was in conflict, but i just picked a name. My goal is to flesh out the existing Harris County website with a note on each of its office holders.
Not sure the editors are aware, but Houston is only one third the size in population of Harris County (and resides almost entirely inside the county). More people voted for District Clerk then for Mayor Annise Parker.-- Harris DC ( talk) 14:39, 22 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Added three more on point (about--not mentions) mainstream articles and Electoral Summary to show orders of magnitude.-- Harris DC ( talk) 15:08, 23 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:22, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Subject does not meet notability guidelines for bands and there is no indication that there is significant coverage in reliable sources (fails WP:GNG as well). Danger ( talk) 19:36, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. notability comes from sources not from mentions or working in the media so the delete arguments appear the ones based on policy Spartaz Humbug! 03:23, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Clearly her name is notable. But 2 of 3 sources mentioning her, are really not concerned with her, but with the more famous name holder. Then, there's an interview, which really doesn't count in showing notability. There seems to be no 3rd party reliable source that provides substantive biographical details about this Heather Mills, and not the other. Rob ( talk) 19:15, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:10, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Prod declined rather rudely. Anyway, overspecific list. Parent list List of moths of Israel doesn't exist, so why should it have an even more specific subpage? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 18:46, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:12, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
This article was deleted at its first AfD on the grounds that though a tragic event there was no evidence of the lasting effects required by WP:EVENT. It has now been reposted with an additional paragraph saying that the school and the local authority have said that they will review their anti-bullying policies. Announcement of a review is the normal reaction of any organisation to fend off criticism, and it does not seem to me that this addition is significant enough to overcome the reasons given for deletion at the AfD. The new version was tagged WP:CSD#G4 and in my view it qualifies, but I am sure that a G4 deletion would be challenged at DRV, which would probably say that the article should be relisted, so to save time I bring it straight back here. JohnCD ( talk) 18:33, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Also new info that the documentary about her story/organ donation got a peabody award after being shown pretty widely including bbc america —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.204.253 ( talk) 00:48, 22 January 2011 (UTC) reply
As well as wide coverage of the events themselves this article over a year later http://www.pluggedin.com/familyroom/articles/2002/bullyinghitshome.aspx in an american based website (which at that point was also a printed publication) shoes that the the story has gained enough significance/influence to be used as one of many sources/references in an article on linked issues. RR1953 ( talk) 18:57, 23 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:24, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Unreferenced, and Google appears to give no results relating to an actual Indonesian version of the show. Possible hoax. Anemone Projectors 17:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Keep arguments based on german wikipedia notability carry no weight here and the issue is sourcing. There appears to be a consensus that the person doesn't pass BIO and it should be noted that reliaty show participants are not considered inherantly notable here even if they garner some press as BLP1E kicks in. Spartaz Humbug! 03:26, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:BIO. Nobody knows this person. She isn't famous. She hasn't achieved anything. She has only lost in game shows. Captain Chandana ( talk) 17:41, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Never thought I'd say this...but Non-notable soup CTJF83 chat 17:30, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. If more sources "comes to light" we can reconsider but this is a BLP and it can't be in article space without them. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Yutsi Talk/ Contributions 17:22, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Not notable, almost all links are red links. Yutsi Talk/ Contributions 17:16, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:27, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
No coverage outside of the social media press. All references are promotional puff pieces. Wenttomowameadow ( talk) 08:17, 13 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. merge is only an option if there is decent sourcing and this is a delete because there isn't Spartaz Humbug! 03:29, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Article fails WP:NOTABILITY. Has a few links but they seem to be press releases and self-published.Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. Hu12 ( talk) 16:26, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
I cannot find sufficient sources to show that the basic requirements for biographies are met. The only source which could provide notability is this but I do not think this is sufficient. Unless extra, independent sources can be found, which directly discuss the subject, this should be deleted. SmartSE ( talk) 15:57, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. actual merge target can be changed as soon as there is some clarity on where it fits - article talk would be best place to decide that. Spartaz Humbug! 03:30, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD - Fails WP:GNG - OK, so a number of states use circular highway shields... doesn't mean there needs to be an article on it. Admrboltz ( talk) 06:22, 10 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 03:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Minor author with no evidence of notability. The only source is a local newspaper, where the main reason for mentioning him seems to be that he is a "local" author. I know people of no notability at all who have received this much local press coverage. JamesBWatson ( talk) 15:01, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:41, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Unremarkable song. No references (youtube not valid). No significant coverage. — Timneu22 · talk 14:40, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:20, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
No indications that this record label rises to the notability requirements of WP:ORG. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 14:16, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete - Reaper Eternal ( talk) 18:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
I think this might be a hoax. I searched for this study, and found nothing. Reaper Eternal ( talk) 14:09, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:26, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
A nice PR blurb written by the subject's PR. Fails WP:NPOV, sources are distinctly trivial, language is non-neutral. As far as I can tell the primary purpose of this article is promotion of the subject. Guy ( Help!) 13:20, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:27, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The article fails to make a case against the criteria of WP:ORG. Non-trivial independent reliable sources showing impact on the historic record have not been found. Unfortunately the article creator (who is employed by the same company, see user page) has persisted in removing improvement notices, speedy deletion tags and a PROD so raising for wider discussion. Fæ ( talk) 11:14, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:30, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Nothing in Google scholar or books with this phrase, which leads me to wonder if it's all publicity for the company named in the lead. Part of a family of related articles. Dougweller ( talk) 11:10, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Very very minor provincial amateur football team, no sources. Guy ( Help!) 10:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable local urban legend. Dmol ( talk) 09:41, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Failed PROD. PROD reason was "Unsourced, does not appear to be any sources on google search, does not appear notable." Decline reason was "albums by notable musicians are notable"
I disagree with the decline, as while that might be a rule of thumb, it does not trump the demand for sources, of which there are none. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:50, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete: Non notable album as notability is not inherited, also no reliable sources found. Mattg82 ( talk) 15:58, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete all. Courcelles 22:45, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1114 AH. Apparently, this whole scheme isn't speedy-deletable per that consensus, so I'm nominating the remaining articles here. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:58, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
JamesBWatson ( talk) 09:30, 17 January 2011 (UTC) replyThere is no encyclopedic reason to have a separate page for every possible unit of measure conversion on a numeric scale. If there is a reason that this particular time period is of importance, then YES by all means (say, something of significance about the time period 1114 AH). But I don't see that in the article.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:57, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Worthy topic, but this is an unsalvageable piece of unreferenced original research that reads more like a newspaper editorial on current events than like what we'd expect from an encyclopedia. Delete and restart from scratch. Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 02:40, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:27, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The article does not provide reliable, independent sources to show that the subject company meets the notability standards of WP:CORP. NawlinWiki ( talk) 20:39, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. There doesn't seem to be sources so,,, Spartaz Humbug! 03:34, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable film per my Google search; a selection to the little-known Syracuse International Film Festival does not confer sufficient notability. Perhaps just a case of WP:TOOSOON. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 21:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List of Decepticons. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:13, 27 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable fictional character, no reliable sources, and none of the non-reliable sources are even about the character. Black Kite (t) (c) 19:55, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete Per nom. BE——Critical__ Talk 20:35, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
*Delete. no 3d-person sources. So he's O-U-T. Got it?
Pillhead Maddox (
talk)
22:42, 16 January 2011 (UTC).
reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Subject appears to not meet WP:GNG Bhtooefr ( talk) 17:45, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:10, 27 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Unreferenced BLP of unestablished notability. brew crewer (yada, yada) 17:27, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:38, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
This publishing company has had barely any coverage in reliable third-party sources. The BBC reference in the article only mentions the publisher as a side-note at the bottom of the page. The rest of the references are either broken or belong to the company itself. The company hasn't even published any works notable enough for an article on Wikipedia. This article should have been deleted on one of the previous two AfDs, but hopefully third time's the charm! – Pee Jay 17:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 03:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Per WP:OR and Not dictionary, article seems to an attempt list Irish (Gaelic) names for annual events Gnevin ( talk) 12:21, 23 December 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:06, 27 January 2011 (UTC) reply
This article had been deleted twice pursuant to discussions in 2005 and 2006. The most notable event, obviously, came after (in 2007), but I still believe that this person is not sufficiently notable — WP:15M applies in this case, I think. Delete. -- Nlu ( talk) 15:47, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:40, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
No indication that this living person meets Wikipedia:Notability (people). Qwfp ( talk) 12:50, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:40, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
hints at but does not address notability, recent string of edits by rep of company named in article are suspect as the thing reads as an advert Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 11:32, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:40, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Article written by a member of the group, which has remained unsourced for nearly a year. A Google search fails to turn up any non-trivial third-party coverage, and the organization fails the WP:ORG notability criteria. -- DAJF ( talk) 09:01, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:49, 26 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Not a notable website. Meager coverage at best. Drmies ( talk) 05:19, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete - Per reasons given.
Η936631
(talk)
07:53, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The author was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Thomas Abbott (2nd nomination) and I can't find any RS about the poem. John Vandenberg ( chat) 04:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC) The deleted Paul Thomas Abbott mentions this as a source; see Isis magazine. John Vandenberg ( chat) 04:29, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete Dubious encyclopedic value given its superficial notability, if any. Hard to imagine a poem being notable if its author is not. Agent 86 ( talk) 00:24, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Only 26,000 sales seems pretty tiny for a single. And its use in a video game is hardly unusual. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 06:01, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:41, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
All of the sources I'm finding are trivial and unreliable. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 06:04, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:45, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Claim of notability is an award which is not readily verified and questionable reliability. Unable to locate additional coverage in secondary sources. Pnm ( talk) 01:06, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Magnetar. Spartaz Humbug! 03:42, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The phrase "Quantum electrodynamic threshold" does not appear to be notable. (Google scholar finds only the single use in Scientific American, google books and regular google turn up mostly wikipedia mirrors and circular refs.) Anything useful said about the content of the Scientific American article is already contained in the magnetar article, so there is nothing to merge. TimothyRias ( talk) 10:56, 7 January 2011 (UTC) TimothyRias ( talk) 10:56, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Obvious redirect to wherever. But not notable for its own article per google news and books. BE——Critical__ Talk 20:53, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Directory of people, should be deleted as per Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_directory Travelbird ( talk) 03:03, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:46, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG, and who in spite of having been on contract with several fully pro teams, has yet to play in a fully pro league. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 04:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:42, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Band fails notability guidelines for musical groups. Awards are nomination only for a young, local festival. Radio play is on a local station. Danger ( talk) 04:41, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:42, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Article appears to be someone's college essay, in tone, organisation, and headings. Purely OR/synthesis, and redundant to the main article linked at top. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 03:35, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
WP:NOT a list of trivia. Article is woefully incomplete and unreferenced. Admrboltz ( talk) 03:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. notability clearly isn't there Spartaz Humbug! 03:43, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Despite the initial press release, this company never formed, and the project they were supposedly working on is long since cancelled. I live in Wellington and work in the industry and can confirm the company does not exist. Chopper Dave ( talk) 02:36, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment - I do not wish to vote, but I do wish to comment. I feel that you would need need an official reference or source saying that the company is no longer active or was never formed, not just 'your word for it'. According to an IGN artical, the have a game that is currently 'TBA' and is nothing to do with Halo Chronicals. I don't know how often IGN update their pages though, or if it is a reliable source. Skullbird11 ( talk) 23:04, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment - Understandable, it's hard to prove something doesn't exist :) No phone number in the NZ phonebook, they're not part of the New Zealand Game Developers Association, and there is no mention of them outside speculation for the title and a press release or two. They have no website, and searching '"Wingnut Interactive" Hiring' on google results in no actual hiring ads. They were literally announced as part of a deal, registered, and then never formed. The deal fell through and all that's left is this wiki entry :) Chopper Dave ( talk) 04:23, 22 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
fails WP:NALBUMS . also nominating the this song off this EP: Heavy Metal Pirates. LibStar ( talk) 02:14, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Nothing to suggest that this book publisher is notable. Was originally a copyvio spam article, but OTRS permission was received to resolve copyvio issues. Step hen 00:30, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not for lists or repositories of loosely associated topics. The list is also a non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations of unrelated items as well as derived entirely in primary sources. Almost none of the content is even sourced and there is a extraordinaire high chance of original research and synthesis. See also WP:POPCULTURE — Farix ( t | c) 00:10, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to 2019 Asian Games. Almost everybody here agrees that this article should be merged and the target mentioned most frequently is 2019 Asian Games. Whether or not both articles should be merged into something else is a matter for the talk page. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 03:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC) reply
WP:CRYSTAL JDDJS ( talk) 22:19, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Merge. It, along with 2019 Asian Games should be merged into an article along the lines of 2019 & 2023 Asian Games bids much the same way as 2018 and 2022 FIFA World Cup bids. Only after they are both awarded can they be given their own separate page (again as was the case for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups. Ravendrop ( talk) 00:31, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Controversies of the United States Senate election in Virginia, 2006#Allen's Macaca controversy. Spartaz Humbug! 03:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
This is an article about a name which one person was called, maybe two or three times in one year. Yes there are sources, but it seems like it's too minor for an encyclopedia article. Jaque Hammer ( talk) 13:37, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
-- Bobbyd2011 ( talk) 19:21, 22 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Article fails WP:PLOT. It has been redirected three times but has been restored each time without any improvement. The only reference in the article is a ratings figure that is available in List of Fish Hooks episodes so the episode provides nothing more than is available in the main list article, except for a lengthy plot. AussieLegend ( talk) 00:53, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
fails WP:CREATIVE. gnews confirms that she writes articles as a journalist [19], but nothing about her as the subject. simply cowriting a book doesn't get her over the line either. LibStar ( talk) 01:34, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
No evidence of notability. Google search does not seem to provide evidence of notability. Ladyof Shalott 00:44, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable fictional character, no reliable sources, as usual Black Kite (t) (c) 19:52, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment I would generally want this kind of thing deleted, but what about Lee's Guide to Loose 1988 Transformers: The Decepticons. Lee's Toy Review magazine, issue #208, March 2010? BE——Critical__ Talk 20:36, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Peacock, primary sources, COI, dubious notability. Prod declined because an admin thought there might be sources but I'm not convinced. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 20:55, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
i
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Although this person appears to have been written about in many hip-hop related blogs (and of course on imdb.com), I am completely unable to come up with anything that meets WP:RS to establish notability. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 20:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. passing mentions do not count towards establishing notability Spartaz Humbug! 03:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
I don't see how this person is notable. Apparently, according to the one (Russian-language) source provided for this BLP, he is one of the most famous men in America, but this is belied by the paucity of hits in Google News. I'm willing to state that Carrot Top is more famous. Drmies ( talk) 18:11, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:51, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Although he may have been prominent locally or among his peers, does not meet general notability requirements Wkharrisjr ( talk) 16:20, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:51, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Rationale was "The subject of the article does not satisfy the criteria listed in WP:BAND. The single independent reference provided is a local/regional newspaper." The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 04:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Appears to fail the general notability guideline and WP:ATHLETE. Existing references appear to be either unreliable or trivial in nature, not a discussion of the topic. The exception is this article. I am unable to view the full text, but it appears to be a fairly in-depth discussion by a regional source, but to me this alone doesn't meet the general guideline. A quick Google search didn't turn up anything better. VQuakr ( talk) 04:36, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Thank you Kugao -- Emerald gloves ( talk) 03:05, 18 January 2011 (UTC) reply
So can we get the "Article considered for deletion" blocks off the page? :) -- Emerald gloves ( talk) 03:05, 18 January 2011 (UTC) Emerald gloves reply
The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Lack of sources for notability. I checked LexisNexis (behind a paywall but exhaustive and it found only one piece mentioning his name La Nación (Costa Rica) August 26, 2006). The spanish text can be found at [32], "IMAS recorta presupuesto para fiesta" the relevant text "En el acto participará el presidente Óscar Arias Sánchez, el ministro de Lucha contra la pobreza, Fernando Zumbado, y el artista costarricense Hugo Sánchez Bonilla, quien creó el logo del IMAS en 1972. A este último se le brindará un reconocimiento especial." which google translation gives as "Participate in the event President Oscar Arias Sánchez, the minister for Combating Poverty, Fernando Zumbado, and Hugo Sanchez Bonilla Costa Rican artist who created the logo of the IMAS in 1972. The latter will provide special recognition" IMAS stands for Instituto Mixto de Ayuda Social (Spanish: Joint Social Welfare Institute; Costa Rica) [33]. The only other source I can find is this page [34] for an exhibition at Pennsylvania State University.
There is no article for him on the Spanish language wikipedia. I checked without finding a single mention of him on the following paywalled databases: "Art Retrospective:Index of abstracts from art periodicals published throughout the world" and "ARTbibliographies Index of literature on modern and contemporary art, photography and design." LittleHow ( talk) 05:05, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Failure to find any reliable sources including newspapers etc covered by lexisnexus. One problem is that there is a notable John Tynan who is a jazz writer (and has yet to have a wikipedia article) which makes hunting sources difficult. But searching with his name and the bands mentioned finds only a few pages with tangential references. [35], [36], [37].
It is a concern that the initial article was created by the individual that is also the same individual that uploaded an accompanying image based upon a painting they owned of Tynan suggesting a connection with the individual.
Being a road manager of bands does not seem of itself grounds for notability LittleHow ( talk) 11:36, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:34, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
I have tried googlind 'Pisal surname', 'Pisal name' and 'Pisal last name', and none returned more than 10 results. Kayau Voting IS evil 13:15, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:34, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Biography of an actor who fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Only ever credited with minor roles. Article was created as part of a hoax campaign by a now banned user, with much greater claims of notability. When unverifiable claims were removed, we're left with a biography that can only cite IMDB and other similar film databases as a source. No significant coverage to be found. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 12:03, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply