The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:58, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable athlete and reality television contestant. It's my understanding that simply competing at the Olympics is insufficient to establish notability. This athlete did not medal in his event. Bgsu98 ( talk) 23:17, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 04:08, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Article about a company that lacks appropriate sourcing to meet the relevant guideline,
WP:NCORP. The sources aren't independent in
WP:ORGIND sense, as they are mostly fundraising announcemnets that provide no independent "opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject.
"
~Styyx
Talk? 23:27, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
help clarify when a standalone article can or should be written". They "
can also provide examples of sources and types of coverage considered significant for the purposes of determining notability, such as [...] the strict significant coverage requirements spelled out in the SNG for organizations and companies". GNG requires reliable, independent and significant coverage. This company doesn't meet the GNG, because the available sourcing isn't considered to be independent for such subjects ( WP:ORGIND). ~Styyx Talk? 15:42, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:33, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
This artist does not meet WP criteria for notability per WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. The article sourcing consists of churnalism from human interest listicles, user-submitted content, or her own statements about her technique. A BEFORE search failed to reveal any art historical or critical reviews or analysis, no representation in significant exhibitions, nor notable museum permanent collections. No SIGCOV in reliable sources independent of the artist. Netherzone ( talk) 23:09, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Delete - I am not finding an reliable sources establishing notability as an artist. Looks like most of the references are promotional. WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 20:53, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:59, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:49, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Completely unsourced article about a television film, not making any serious claim to passing either
WP:NFILM or
WP:TVSHOW. As always, films (whether for TV or theatrical) are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they have pages on IMDb -- they need to have
reliable source coverage about them in real media, establishing a reason why they would pass a notability criterion (notable film or television awards, critical analysis by professional film or television critics, etc.)
This literally just states that the film exists and cites absolutely no
WP:GNG-worthy sourcing, but even after having searched all of Google, ProQuest and Newspapers.com, I just can't find any sources that would make a difference: I can only find television listings grids and glancing namechecks of its existence in broad overviews of Lisa Rinna's career, which isn't the kind of sourcing that's needed.
Bearcat (
talk) 12:29, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:06, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:58, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
An apparent autobiography which I'm not convinced passes WP:NACADEMIC or WP:NBIO. SuperMarioMan ( Talk) 22:53, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:06, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, WP:NGYMNASTICS and WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 20:19, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:48, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:29, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF coverage is primary with just 1 ref that is just routine coverage. KSAWikipedian ( talk) 17:07, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:42, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
The article does not seem to fulfil the requirement of Notability; The only part that I think comes close is the last section, which, however, is also not notable enough as per WP:EVENT Yet Another Internet User ( talk) 14:34, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
PhantomSteve/
talk¦
contribs\ 19:16, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Mylo Xyloto. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable release. The song received airplay in Italy to promote Coldplay Live 2012 but failed to rank in major charts, being limited to ultratip/download ones, which are basically like Billboard's Bubbling Under Hot 100. The band does not recognize its nature as a single either since "Hurts Like Heaven" was referred as the fifth and last single from Mylo Xyloto (2011). GustavoCza ( talk • contribs) 21:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:31, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. HeinzMaster ( talk) 22:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please back your opinion with policy guidelines
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 20:43, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. The community came to a consensus in March that caps alone do not confer notability and WP:NFOOTY was deprecated. Based on that, I disregarded the comments by Zanoni and Das osmnezz which LOCALCONSENSUS around the community's decision. -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 16:35, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. HeinzMaster ( talk) 22:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: no consensus yet
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 20:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. As in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrative divisions of the Donetsk People's Republic: The "keep" case is weak: it makes reference only to publications by this self-declared government. These are not sources that are independent from the subject of the article, and therefore not reliable sources. In the absence of such sources, WP:V mandates deletion. Sandstein 09:42, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
This is an unreferenced fork of Luhansk People's Republic#Administrative divisions, which cites only unreliable sources; unencyclopedic; it’s like WP:SYNTH but not from reliable sources, giving the appearance of legitimacy to a fake country; borderline WP:HOAX. This information is not found in WP:reliable sources
This is a detailed expansion of a decree by the “authorities” in a Russian puppet state in Ukraine about territories they only partially control, which can be summed up in a single line in the main article: “the DNR authorities issued a decree rejecting Ukraine's 2020 reform of administrative divisions in Luhansk Oblast and only recognize the older division into raions: see Administrative divisions of Luhansk Oblast#Administrative divisions until 2020.”
See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrative divisions of the Donetsk People's Republic. — Michael Z. 03:26, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Stifle (
talk) 10:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 20:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 12:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. There are no independent sources covering the subject in-depth. Cartoon Brew is only independent source and only has a passing mention. Slywriter ( talk) 11:46, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:19, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 20:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Previous AfD was closed as Keep, which was overturned in Deletion Review.
I find the idea of keeping this article nothing short of scandalous. Fails WP:GNG, clear case of WP:PROMOTION and WP:COI. It was written by Łukaszyk himself, and is about his own PhD thesis. It was already deleted for these reasons back in 2009, after which Łukaszyk restored the article.
In the previous AfD Łukaszyk bombarded the page with irrelevant references, which were merely citing his paper. To satisfy WP:GNG a citation is not enough, one needs significant coverage, that addresses the topic directly and in detail. I managed to find a single arXiv pre-print [10] that gives it significant coverage. As it is not published, it doesn't count as a reliable source for the purposes of WP:GNG. Still, I find it interesting to remark that this pre-print dismisses the "Lukaszyk-Karmowski metric", which is not a metric, as a mistaken version of the well-known expected absolute difference, which is in fact a metric.
I think it's also important to mention that in the previous AfD all legitimate participants !voted Delete. All Keep !votes came from WP:SPAs or users that Łukaszyk WP:CANVASSED from the Polish Wikipedia. Łukaszyk has since then been blocked for sockpuppetry. Tercer ( talk) 20:22, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
are not permitted to post or edit material at the direction of a blocked editor (sometimes called proxy editing or "proxying") unless they can show that the changes are either verifiable or productive and they have independent reasons for making such edits. New accounts that engage in the same behavior as a banned editor or blocked account in the same context, and that appear to be editing Wikipedia solely for that purpose, are subject to the remedies applied to the editor whose behavior they are imitating.XOR'easter ( talk) 22:42, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Notability is about the sourcing that currently exists. Because of this, I disregarded arguments of the form " sourcing will appear in the future." Maybe they will, but we do not have a crystall ball to know for sure. Guerillero Parlez Moi 16:48, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
No reliable independent sources talk about this, and there is of course no extensive coverage about it. So this definitely does not meet the general notability guidelines. Yakme ( talk) 14:29, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 19:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was Keep and tag for improvements, as sending to draft space might just result in a CSD G13 deletion in six months. (non-admin closure) Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 10:39, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
There exists few sources for its notability, only two websites (Investopedia and a scripophily association), and no sources whatsoever at the page itself (though there are external links). Also, the guidelines section smacks of a guide (as in NOTGUIDE). I recommend deletion, without prejudice to redirect (as it is a real concept) or rewrite. Thanks. NotReallyMoniak ( talk) 01:02, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 19:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Marissa Lingen. Guerillero Parlez Moi 20:35, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
this is nothing more than list cruft - we don't usually include massive bibliographies for authors who are of questionable notability much less those who's works have not received critical coverage - this is a list of basically everything she's ever touched even minor short stories on blogs which are self published among other things. I tried to clean it up in the main article and redirect it but it's not even clear waht works have received coverage, so i fail to see how this warrants a standalone list as this isn't a personal resume service nor should we be linking to everything she's ever touched. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:30, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 18:19, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 19:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep withdrawn by nominator.
(non-admin closure)
𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (
talk) 07:45, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Lacks significant, independent coverage
𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (
talk) 18:37, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. No WP:NCORP-compliant sources have been provided. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:21, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
It had been bounced from Drafts to mainspace and was eventually up at AfD, as a result of which the article was soft-deleted due to minimal participation. It re-appeared again as a result of a request for undeletion where the article creator asserted it was a public company with good reliable citations. This topic doesn't meet NCORP and there is a lack of references which meet our criteria for notability of companies. See previous AfD for details of refs. HighKing ++ 15:30, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Fairly unremarkable release. Limited coverage does not satisfy WP:NALBUMS or WP:NSONGS. >> Lil-unique1 ( talk) — 15:10, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lil Peep discography. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
For full transparency, I removed a bulk of unsourced material here. Per WP:LEAK, this is not encyclopedic. Poorly sourced (if at all) and full of speculation. >> Lil-unique1 ( talk) — 15:03, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:21, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable reality TV contestant ( Top Chef: Portland). Placed 10/15. Only notable for that one appearance (WP:ONEEVENT). Wani ( talk) 14:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Tone 14:29, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable future film lacking significant coverage, per WP:TOOSOON AND WP:NFF BOVINEBOY 2008 14:21, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was Weak keep. (non-admin closure) Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 16:39, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
I tried to look for some stuff about this person through Google but all in vain; I found nothing. This subject fails GNG and also any other relevant subjective criteria. ─ The Aafī (talk) 13:50, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Femke (
talk) 14:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to It's Showtime (Philippine TV program)#Hosts. czar 04:11, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR. Never really acted. Refs are early stage PR and puff. scope_creep Talk 08:16, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 12:57, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 04:13, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; WP:SPORTBASIC - noting the new standards that apply to sports biographies. There's no SIGCOV here and no major wins that would lead to a presumption of notability. Tagged for notability since April, nomination as G4 declined back in February - so here we are! Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 12:30, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 12:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:10, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2014. A brief look at the edit history shows that someone claiming to be Albert Doda has, on multiple occasions, tried to get the article deleted. See also User talk:Temrk. The article is currently a stats stub and searches in Google Images, Google News and ProQuest yielded nothing useful at all. DDG had some Albanian news stories but none of them appear to be about this particular Albert Doda. The article should be deleted per WP:GNG, WP:SPORTBASIC and per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. Soccerway only shows him playing in one game, which, even prior to the changes in WP:NSPORT recently, wouldn't have been good enough for a stand-alone article per WP:WINNEROUTCOMES. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:06, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 14:28, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Can't find any significant coverage and, since WP:NFOOTBALL is deprecated (bear in mind he only played 49 mins in the second tier of Albania so it's one of the weakest passes possible), WP:GNG is required and so a Soccerway stats stub is no longer acceptable unless significant coverage can be located. I searched using multiple search engines but couldn't find anything better than a passing mention in a crime news story in My London. The age of "Uesti Cenaj" matches the details for this footballer so it's likely that they are the same person but the level of coverage is insufficient for GNG and he doesn't meet the criteria at WP:PERPETRATOR. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Promotional BLP, subject lacks coverage in sources that are both independent and reliable. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:29, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:03, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
This is not a valid disambiguation page: all entries are WP:Partial title matches not known solely as "Jamiat". The definition given is unsourced. An alternative to deletion might be a {{ Wiktionary redirect}} to wikt:جمع Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 08:40, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
This article is a duplicate of DYLS-FM (see history of the page) and the title "MORe Cebu or MORe Visayas" does not exist. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 08:08, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. North America 1000 12:15, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
The current sources are all unverifiable as they've gone 404 and I can't prove how much coverage they gave. Given that I only get 30 hits for the strip's name, I doubt the sources were substantial to begin with and I found no more in a WP:BEFORE. Zero results on GNews, for one. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:51, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
It is a spin-off of the graphic novel series of the same name begun in 1989This isn't much to go on, but if a publisher is identified I might be able to find some old print sources covering the original series. Argento Surfer ( talk) 14:26, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:47, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Femke (
talk) 07:28, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2022 ASEAN Para Games. Liz Read! Talk! 06:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Wheelchair tennis at the 2022 ASEAN Para Games
This article has no references. It also refers to a future event (as stated in the parent article) and does not give enough details to be encyclopedic, as well as being too soon for a future event. The lede sentence incorrectly uses the past tense. This article has no encyclopedic content. It does not belong in article space. Not moving to draft space because author moved another similar article back into article space from draft space, so might prefer an AFD. Robert McClenon ( talk) 05:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 04:14, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Trade organisation doesn't seem to meet WP:NORG - lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:53, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:48, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to New Mal–Changrabandha–New Cooch Behar line. Liz Read! Talk! 05:57, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
As railway stations are not inhernetly notable, and this railway station clearly does not meet GNG, it should be deleted/redirected to its main line. All sources available are from sites like indiarailinfo.com, erail.in, and similar; aka, fancruft-style sites that list information on everything of remote relevance, have limited oversight, and are not indicators of notability. Vermont ( 🐿️— 🏳️🌈) 03:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. czar 04:15, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
WP:NOTGALLERY, WP:NOTDIRECTORY. The vast majority of these have no source, no context, and aren't even important enough to be discussed in the article on the country subdivisions itself. Thankfully the list is very incomplete, as the country subdivisions has more than 1,000 country subdivisions apparently. Heraldrist ( talk) 02:53, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 00:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
No indication of notability. KSAWikipedian ( talk) 02:35, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:32, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 00:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
No indication of notability. The references are either primary or just routine coverage. KSAWikipedian ( talk) 02:31, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
No indication of notability. The references are either primary or just routine coverage. KSAWikipedian ( talk) 02:19, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:16, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn ( non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 03:30, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Doesn't meet notability criteria, based on the current sources, and it's unlikely there is much more out there. Laski22 ( talk) 01:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Given that the prospective merger target has been deleted. Whether a redirect to List of Bowling Green State University buildings#McDonald Hall is worth it is a matter for interested editors to decide. Sandstein 09:45, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Only one secondary source in the entire article. Nothing better found in a WP:BEFORE. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 00:36, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Could there be an alternative merge target besides
Ian McConville as this article is also being considered for deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'm going to extend this discussion a bit....or until another admin decides it should be closed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 04:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Only one source which is a local newspaper from the author's hometown. Nothing better found in a WP:BEFORE. Tagged for notability 2+ years. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 00:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:22, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
A topic which can be sourced exclusively to student media, with no evidence of wider coverage in mass market general interest media, is not likely to be viewed as notable.I would say that Sam and Fuzzy is not a notable web cartoon based on my analysis of coverage. SWinxy ( talk) 03:47, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:13, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR. Coverage is all stage PR. Barely acted. scope_creep Talk 01:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NFILM Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 00:48, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It's unclear why the AFD nominator removed a valid PROD tag in order to send it to AFD instead. But it is now no longer eligible for "Soft Deletion".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:57, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:58, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable athlete and reality television contestant. It's my understanding that simply competing at the Olympics is insufficient to establish notability. This athlete did not medal in his event. Bgsu98 ( talk) 23:17, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 04:08, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Article about a company that lacks appropriate sourcing to meet the relevant guideline,
WP:NCORP. The sources aren't independent in
WP:ORGIND sense, as they are mostly fundraising announcemnets that provide no independent "opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject.
"
~Styyx
Talk? 23:27, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
help clarify when a standalone article can or should be written". They "
can also provide examples of sources and types of coverage considered significant for the purposes of determining notability, such as [...] the strict significant coverage requirements spelled out in the SNG for organizations and companies". GNG requires reliable, independent and significant coverage. This company doesn't meet the GNG, because the available sourcing isn't considered to be independent for such subjects ( WP:ORGIND). ~Styyx Talk? 15:42, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:33, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
This artist does not meet WP criteria for notability per WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. The article sourcing consists of churnalism from human interest listicles, user-submitted content, or her own statements about her technique. A BEFORE search failed to reveal any art historical or critical reviews or analysis, no representation in significant exhibitions, nor notable museum permanent collections. No SIGCOV in reliable sources independent of the artist. Netherzone ( talk) 23:09, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Delete - I am not finding an reliable sources establishing notability as an artist. Looks like most of the references are promotional. WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 20:53, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:59, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:49, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Completely unsourced article about a television film, not making any serious claim to passing either
WP:NFILM or
WP:TVSHOW. As always, films (whether for TV or theatrical) are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they have pages on IMDb -- they need to have
reliable source coverage about them in real media, establishing a reason why they would pass a notability criterion (notable film or television awards, critical analysis by professional film or television critics, etc.)
This literally just states that the film exists and cites absolutely no
WP:GNG-worthy sourcing, but even after having searched all of Google, ProQuest and Newspapers.com, I just can't find any sources that would make a difference: I can only find television listings grids and glancing namechecks of its existence in broad overviews of Lisa Rinna's career, which isn't the kind of sourcing that's needed.
Bearcat (
talk) 12:29, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:06, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:58, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
An apparent autobiography which I'm not convinced passes WP:NACADEMIC or WP:NBIO. SuperMarioMan ( Talk) 22:53, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:06, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, WP:NGYMNASTICS and WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 20:19, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:48, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:29, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF coverage is primary with just 1 ref that is just routine coverage. KSAWikipedian ( talk) 17:07, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:42, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
The article does not seem to fulfil the requirement of Notability; The only part that I think comes close is the last section, which, however, is also not notable enough as per WP:EVENT Yet Another Internet User ( talk) 14:34, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
PhantomSteve/
talk¦
contribs\ 19:16, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Mylo Xyloto. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable release. The song received airplay in Italy to promote Coldplay Live 2012 but failed to rank in major charts, being limited to ultratip/download ones, which are basically like Billboard's Bubbling Under Hot 100. The band does not recognize its nature as a single either since "Hurts Like Heaven" was referred as the fifth and last single from Mylo Xyloto (2011). GustavoCza ( talk • contribs) 21:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:31, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. HeinzMaster ( talk) 22:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please back your opinion with policy guidelines
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 20:43, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. The community came to a consensus in March that caps alone do not confer notability and WP:NFOOTY was deprecated. Based on that, I disregarded the comments by Zanoni and Das osmnezz which LOCALCONSENSUS around the community's decision. -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 16:35, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. HeinzMaster ( talk) 22:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: no consensus yet
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 20:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. As in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrative divisions of the Donetsk People's Republic: The "keep" case is weak: it makes reference only to publications by this self-declared government. These are not sources that are independent from the subject of the article, and therefore not reliable sources. In the absence of such sources, WP:V mandates deletion. Sandstein 09:42, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
This is an unreferenced fork of Luhansk People's Republic#Administrative divisions, which cites only unreliable sources; unencyclopedic; it’s like WP:SYNTH but not from reliable sources, giving the appearance of legitimacy to a fake country; borderline WP:HOAX. This information is not found in WP:reliable sources
This is a detailed expansion of a decree by the “authorities” in a Russian puppet state in Ukraine about territories they only partially control, which can be summed up in a single line in the main article: “the DNR authorities issued a decree rejecting Ukraine's 2020 reform of administrative divisions in Luhansk Oblast and only recognize the older division into raions: see Administrative divisions of Luhansk Oblast#Administrative divisions until 2020.”
See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrative divisions of the Donetsk People's Republic. — Michael Z. 03:26, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Stifle (
talk) 10:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 20:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 12:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. There are no independent sources covering the subject in-depth. Cartoon Brew is only independent source and only has a passing mention. Slywriter ( talk) 11:46, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:19, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 20:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Previous AfD was closed as Keep, which was overturned in Deletion Review.
I find the idea of keeping this article nothing short of scandalous. Fails WP:GNG, clear case of WP:PROMOTION and WP:COI. It was written by Łukaszyk himself, and is about his own PhD thesis. It was already deleted for these reasons back in 2009, after which Łukaszyk restored the article.
In the previous AfD Łukaszyk bombarded the page with irrelevant references, which were merely citing his paper. To satisfy WP:GNG a citation is not enough, one needs significant coverage, that addresses the topic directly and in detail. I managed to find a single arXiv pre-print [10] that gives it significant coverage. As it is not published, it doesn't count as a reliable source for the purposes of WP:GNG. Still, I find it interesting to remark that this pre-print dismisses the "Lukaszyk-Karmowski metric", which is not a metric, as a mistaken version of the well-known expected absolute difference, which is in fact a metric.
I think it's also important to mention that in the previous AfD all legitimate participants !voted Delete. All Keep !votes came from WP:SPAs or users that Łukaszyk WP:CANVASSED from the Polish Wikipedia. Łukaszyk has since then been blocked for sockpuppetry. Tercer ( talk) 20:22, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
are not permitted to post or edit material at the direction of a blocked editor (sometimes called proxy editing or "proxying") unless they can show that the changes are either verifiable or productive and they have independent reasons for making such edits. New accounts that engage in the same behavior as a banned editor or blocked account in the same context, and that appear to be editing Wikipedia solely for that purpose, are subject to the remedies applied to the editor whose behavior they are imitating.XOR'easter ( talk) 22:42, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Notability is about the sourcing that currently exists. Because of this, I disregarded arguments of the form " sourcing will appear in the future." Maybe they will, but we do not have a crystall ball to know for sure. Guerillero Parlez Moi 16:48, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
No reliable independent sources talk about this, and there is of course no extensive coverage about it. So this definitely does not meet the general notability guidelines. Yakme ( talk) 14:29, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 19:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was Keep and tag for improvements, as sending to draft space might just result in a CSD G13 deletion in six months. (non-admin closure) Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 10:39, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
There exists few sources for its notability, only two websites (Investopedia and a scripophily association), and no sources whatsoever at the page itself (though there are external links). Also, the guidelines section smacks of a guide (as in NOTGUIDE). I recommend deletion, without prejudice to redirect (as it is a real concept) or rewrite. Thanks. NotReallyMoniak ( talk) 01:02, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 19:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Marissa Lingen. Guerillero Parlez Moi 20:35, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
this is nothing more than list cruft - we don't usually include massive bibliographies for authors who are of questionable notability much less those who's works have not received critical coverage - this is a list of basically everything she's ever touched even minor short stories on blogs which are self published among other things. I tried to clean it up in the main article and redirect it but it's not even clear waht works have received coverage, so i fail to see how this warrants a standalone list as this isn't a personal resume service nor should we be linking to everything she's ever touched. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:30, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 18:19, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 19:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep withdrawn by nominator.
(non-admin closure)
𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (
talk) 07:45, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Lacks significant, independent coverage
𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (
talk) 18:37, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. No WP:NCORP-compliant sources have been provided. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:21, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
It had been bounced from Drafts to mainspace and was eventually up at AfD, as a result of which the article was soft-deleted due to minimal participation. It re-appeared again as a result of a request for undeletion where the article creator asserted it was a public company with good reliable citations. This topic doesn't meet NCORP and there is a lack of references which meet our criteria for notability of companies. See previous AfD for details of refs. HighKing ++ 15:30, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Fairly unremarkable release. Limited coverage does not satisfy WP:NALBUMS or WP:NSONGS. >> Lil-unique1 ( talk) — 15:10, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lil Peep discography. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
For full transparency, I removed a bulk of unsourced material here. Per WP:LEAK, this is not encyclopedic. Poorly sourced (if at all) and full of speculation. >> Lil-unique1 ( talk) — 15:03, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:21, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable reality TV contestant ( Top Chef: Portland). Placed 10/15. Only notable for that one appearance (WP:ONEEVENT). Wani ( talk) 14:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Tone 14:29, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable future film lacking significant coverage, per WP:TOOSOON AND WP:NFF BOVINEBOY 2008 14:21, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was Weak keep. (non-admin closure) Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 16:39, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
I tried to look for some stuff about this person through Google but all in vain; I found nothing. This subject fails GNG and also any other relevant subjective criteria. ─ The Aafī (talk) 13:50, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Femke (
talk) 14:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to It's Showtime (Philippine TV program)#Hosts. czar 04:11, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR. Never really acted. Refs are early stage PR and puff. scope_creep Talk 08:16, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 12:57, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 04:13, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; WP:SPORTBASIC - noting the new standards that apply to sports biographies. There's no SIGCOV here and no major wins that would lead to a presumption of notability. Tagged for notability since April, nomination as G4 declined back in February - so here we are! Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 12:30, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 12:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:10, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2014. A brief look at the edit history shows that someone claiming to be Albert Doda has, on multiple occasions, tried to get the article deleted. See also User talk:Temrk. The article is currently a stats stub and searches in Google Images, Google News and ProQuest yielded nothing useful at all. DDG had some Albanian news stories but none of them appear to be about this particular Albert Doda. The article should be deleted per WP:GNG, WP:SPORTBASIC and per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. Soccerway only shows him playing in one game, which, even prior to the changes in WP:NSPORT recently, wouldn't have been good enough for a stand-alone article per WP:WINNEROUTCOMES. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:06, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 14:28, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Can't find any significant coverage and, since WP:NFOOTBALL is deprecated (bear in mind he only played 49 mins in the second tier of Albania so it's one of the weakest passes possible), WP:GNG is required and so a Soccerway stats stub is no longer acceptable unless significant coverage can be located. I searched using multiple search engines but couldn't find anything better than a passing mention in a crime news story in My London. The age of "Uesti Cenaj" matches the details for this footballer so it's likely that they are the same person but the level of coverage is insufficient for GNG and he doesn't meet the criteria at WP:PERPETRATOR. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Promotional BLP, subject lacks coverage in sources that are both independent and reliable. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:29, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:03, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
This is not a valid disambiguation page: all entries are WP:Partial title matches not known solely as "Jamiat". The definition given is unsourced. An alternative to deletion might be a {{ Wiktionary redirect}} to wikt:جمع Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 08:40, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
This article is a duplicate of DYLS-FM (see history of the page) and the title "MORe Cebu or MORe Visayas" does not exist. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 08:08, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. North America 1000 12:15, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
The current sources are all unverifiable as they've gone 404 and I can't prove how much coverage they gave. Given that I only get 30 hits for the strip's name, I doubt the sources were substantial to begin with and I found no more in a WP:BEFORE. Zero results on GNews, for one. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:51, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
It is a spin-off of the graphic novel series of the same name begun in 1989This isn't much to go on, but if a publisher is identified I might be able to find some old print sources covering the original series. Argento Surfer ( talk) 14:26, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:47, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Femke (
talk) 07:28, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2022 ASEAN Para Games. Liz Read! Talk! 06:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Wheelchair tennis at the 2022 ASEAN Para Games
This article has no references. It also refers to a future event (as stated in the parent article) and does not give enough details to be encyclopedic, as well as being too soon for a future event. The lede sentence incorrectly uses the past tense. This article has no encyclopedic content. It does not belong in article space. Not moving to draft space because author moved another similar article back into article space from draft space, so might prefer an AFD. Robert McClenon ( talk) 05:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 04:14, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Trade organisation doesn't seem to meet WP:NORG - lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:53, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:48, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to New Mal–Changrabandha–New Cooch Behar line. Liz Read! Talk! 05:57, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
As railway stations are not inhernetly notable, and this railway station clearly does not meet GNG, it should be deleted/redirected to its main line. All sources available are from sites like indiarailinfo.com, erail.in, and similar; aka, fancruft-style sites that list information on everything of remote relevance, have limited oversight, and are not indicators of notability. Vermont ( 🐿️— 🏳️🌈) 03:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. czar 04:15, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
WP:NOTGALLERY, WP:NOTDIRECTORY. The vast majority of these have no source, no context, and aren't even important enough to be discussed in the article on the country subdivisions itself. Thankfully the list is very incomplete, as the country subdivisions has more than 1,000 country subdivisions apparently. Heraldrist ( talk) 02:53, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 00:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
No indication of notability. KSAWikipedian ( talk) 02:35, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:32, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 00:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
No indication of notability. The references are either primary or just routine coverage. KSAWikipedian ( talk) 02:31, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
No indication of notability. The references are either primary or just routine coverage. KSAWikipedian ( talk) 02:19, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:16, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn ( non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 03:30, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Doesn't meet notability criteria, based on the current sources, and it's unlikely there is much more out there. Laski22 ( talk) 01:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Given that the prospective merger target has been deleted. Whether a redirect to List of Bowling Green State University buildings#McDonald Hall is worth it is a matter for interested editors to decide. Sandstein 09:45, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Only one secondary source in the entire article. Nothing better found in a WP:BEFORE. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 00:36, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Could there be an alternative merge target besides
Ian McConville as this article is also being considered for deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'm going to extend this discussion a bit....or until another admin decides it should be closed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 04:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Only one source which is a local newspaper from the author's hometown. Nothing better found in a WP:BEFORE. Tagged for notability 2+ years. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 00:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:22, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
A topic which can be sourced exclusively to student media, with no evidence of wider coverage in mass market general interest media, is not likely to be viewed as notable.I would say that Sam and Fuzzy is not a notable web cartoon based on my analysis of coverage. SWinxy ( talk) 03:47, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:13, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR. Coverage is all stage PR. Barely acted. scope_creep Talk 01:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NFILM Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 00:48, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It's unclear why the AFD nominator removed a valid PROD tag in order to send it to AFD instead. But it is now no longer eligible for "Soft Deletion".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:57, 30 July 2022 (UTC)