The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Liz Read! Talk! 05:14, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails
GNG. It has been edited almost exclusively by one IP editor (although their specific IPv6 has changed, all of them edit in the same pattern and time) since April 2020. Before that, it received little editorial attention. It has had a {{
more citations needed}} since February 2011. There are nearly no inline citations. It has nearly 0 sources to corroborate the majority of information in the article. Of the 4 that exist, only 1 is reliable and has significant coverage (Chicago Tribune). Attempts to find sources have failed, as nothing that I can find satisfies
RS and also has coverage beyond 2 words (or 3). It also reads as a
FORUM and is full of ultimately unverifiable information. If it does turn out to be notable, it would be far better to
blow it up.
WhoAteMyButter (
🌇talk│
🍂contribs)
23:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Keep - From poking around, there is an insane amount of coverage on the (Insane) Spanish Cobras, especially starting around June 1977. So there is
WP:RSed coverage via newspapers.com and
from the Schaumburg Police Department educational pamphlet on street gangs covers them.
Surely, any city police department with a gang unit would most likely have material on them. There is coverage in books.
1,
2,
3 and more. There's coverage in newspapers
and
here by a guy who says he's only interested in researching 20th century (street) gangs. In
2019. They feature in
arts and culture too, and the
FBI's got a file on them. Perennial crime coverage won't stop. So stay tuned for more to come, folks, as they are a "folk" gang, not a "people" gang.
4,
5,
6,
in 2023.
United Gangs,
Hour Detroit has brief mentions. Perhaps the article should be worked on.
The Eloquent Peasant (
talk)
13:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep but noting also that the nomination was withdrawn, hence the early close. Star Mississippi 17:41, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Article is totally unsourced and any assertions that prove notability should be unsourced. WP:BEFORE search shows vague results that may not be this storm as with no sources there’s nothing to base which storm this even is. Should be deleted per WP:TNT and restarted. Nominated on behalf of User:74.101.92.237 at Talk:October 1997 North American storm complex#Reason for deletion. The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 23:26, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Nicaragua women's international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 23:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Nicaragua women's international footballers. The subject has earned at least three caps for the Nicaragua women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. NOTE: Name also spelled Heyssel in sources. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 22:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Pure WP:FANCRUFT, with healthy doses of WP:OR and speculation. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Both keep and delete side have some bad arguments that aren't policy based, but consensus does lean very heavily towards keep. Yamamoto Ichiro ( talk) 05:00, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Most of the body of this article, other than the plot and lede, seems to be just WP:ROUTINE. There is some reliable sources that cover it, but that does not always justify notability. Other than the sources, the article seems to be a collection of random information that does not wish to justify the body. Taking into account the numerous WP:BLP1E and WP:BLP situations associated with this article with them being constantly removed for good reason, it should be decided whether this game meets WP:GNG accounting for how the current article presents itself. The sources are fine, but the body suggests that it is just a collection of illegitimate information that doesn't seem to justify how Yandere Simulator is notable. 8ID ( talk) 20:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 17:40, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
No sources, disputed definition. MicrobiologyMarcus ( talk) 20:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG DonaldD23 talk to me 20:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro ( talk) 05:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
I don't think "first African American in the United States to earn a PhD in juvenile justice" is a noteworthy enough first to get a Wikipedia page, and the lack of any national news coverage seems to support that. The fact that his U.S. Senate campaign has also attracted little attention is also telling. Also--and I know this isn't really relevant but it's worth mentioning--the article is terribly written and not at all neutral. Sentences like "For more information or to make a donation to the Tracy Andrus Foundation, please visit www.tracyandrusfoundation.com" should not be on Wikipedia. BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 18:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 16:11, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
There are no independent sources that I could find that would make this individual notable (nor does the article have any such sources), thank you Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 17:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to ANT1. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:30, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
This subject does not meet WP:GNG as a former television network due to a complete lack of secondary coverage. I suppose a redirect to ANT1 Group might be reasonable, but I appreciate any other thoughts. Let'srun ( talk) 17:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn by nominator. My WP:BEFORE was not especially good this time, it seems. (non-admin closure) — Alalch E. 10:57, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
This episode of The Cleveland Show does not individually meet WP:GNG. The references used are insufficient for a determination that the subject is notable, and my WP:BEFORE did not reveal significant coverage elsewhere. Articles about television series' episodes, like all articles, need to be about subjects that are notable in order to merit inclusion. Unilateral redirection was attempted two times, by longstanding editors, but has been reverted by IPs, and the most recent restoration was done by an IP with a singular focus on the series (see WP:SPA). — Alalch E. 17:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
This is a 262-word review of the episode. The review notes: "The Cleveland Show: This one I’m a little less sure on. There were fewer laughs than in last week’s episode – outside of pretty much anything featuring Cleveland, Jr., and Cleveland’s inappropriate come-ons to a variety of teenage boys – but the storyline made a lot more sense. I mean, if you’re the kind of person who thinks that a man having an opossum stuck to his penis equals instant laughs, it’s entirely possible this was your favorite episode of television of all time, but I’m sad to say I’m not that kind of person. The cut-away gags still aren’t working, as though the show is trying to figure out a way to be its parent show without really being its parent show. ... Grade: B-"
This is a 565-word review of the episode. The review notes: "Thankfully the best gag of the episode was reserved for Ernie's possum latching on to Cleveland's crotch. Sure the entire segment of a naked Cleveland trying to wrestle this creature off his crotch came across as very juvenile, but it was pretty well done and it's hard not to laugh at the sight of Cleveland humping a dresser in attempt to shake the possum off. ... The other memorable segment of the episode was towards the end when Cleveland and a small army of rednecks attempt to rescue Ernie from his foster home. The ensuing gunfight was ridiculously over-the-top and was nicely choreographed, with plenty of bullets and the kind of violence you'd expect to see from a show like this."
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 16:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
I found one short review and a few very short announcement articles like this one, but no real significant coverage. QuietCicada ( talk) 16:33, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:Not news. A transient event that had no consequences. Can easely be added in a section to Algeria-Israel relations instead of a whole new article. Dl.thinker ( talk) 12:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. There has been an abject lack of actual discussion from those !voting 'keep' that would establish the notability of this subject. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:59, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Created as a redirect to a now deleted page. Appears to fail NMUSIC/NACTOR.
Background: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asad Ali Palijo, [3], [4] KH-1 ( talk) 12:25, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Official accounts post [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30] and others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1Wikee ( talk • contribs) 14:12, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NEVENT. Refs in article and BEFORE showed nothing other than promo, stats and game recaps. Nothing meets independent reliable sources with significant coverage addressing the subject directly and indepth. // Timothy :: talk 10:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Criminal Minds characters#Jason Gideon with the history under the redirect if you'd like to work on it in Draft, BD2412. Star Mississippi 16:09, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Sources in the article are primary (one's an interview with the actor, other is just a random trivia fact released by CBS), a quick Google search does not give any sources that prove individual notability, and per WP:N, it is not worth a standalone article. If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to List of Criminal Minds characters#Jason Gideon. Spinixster (chat!) 10:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of CSI: Crime Scene Investigation characters. (non-admin closure) 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 14:12, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Sources in the article are more about the actor, a quick Google search does not give any sources that prove individual notability, and per WP:N, it is not worth a standalone article. If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to List of CSI: Crime Scene Investigation characters. Spinixster (chat!) 10:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
After Draft:Julian Calv was rejected for failing WP:NMUSICIAN, this article was simply recreated in main space instead, which is not a promising sign. The draft itself was subsequently deleted after a PROD nomination.
The subject appears to be a busker and member of a non-notable avant-garde chamber music ensemble "Non Prophets" (NB - not Non-Prophets) with some local-interest coverage but no evidence of yet meeting inclusion criteria. The single Route 4/Thorn and Roots is included in this nomination and contains a couple of additional references.
The main article references are:
The single article references are:
There is therefore no evidence of meeting WP:GNG or any of the criteria at WP:NMUSICIAN. Dorsetonian ( talk) 07:05, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
No RS independent coverage (all interviews or quotes from subject) for this minor actress from Delhi who has not, despite the article's claims, had a starring role in a major production. Web series, non-speaking/small parts - the actors and actresses she has worked with do not confer notability. Fails WP:GNG; WP:NACTOR. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:07, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:09, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please offer more thoughtful rationales than merely "Keep" with no further explanation.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Chatham County, North Carolina#Townships. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 05:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and substantively fails WP:NGEO as it is functionally similar to an "area in an irrigation district", as townships in NC have been politcally defunct (though technically legally extant) since 1880. All sources I can find are either old copies of legislation/legal documents with single mentions or websites that scrape from the US census. The provided source for the "Geography" section doesn't even label the township or show its borders, it's just a map of North Carolina that one can zoom in and out of. Indy beetle ( talk) 05:31, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Aintabli ( talk) 04:52, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
The topic is definitely notable and deserves an encyclopaedic entry. However, it was extensively edited by POV-pushing sockpuppets: Öztürküm (the creator), Kumanof, Hatymat, Lionzm, Suyumbikä, ManavAnton. Basically, the majority of the edits and content are from the aforementioned accounts. There are clusters of several sources that need verification, and since they are all placed after the end of each paragraph and not interspersed throughout, there is likely a problem of synthesis. To save time, I suggest a WP:TNT for this article, so that when it is created again, reliable sources are used with a NPOV. Aintabli ( talk) 04:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Does not have WP:SIGCOV. The only sources specifically covering it are related to a controversy in late 2022. A bunch of other sources are about art on Reddit in general but only fleetingly mention r/art as one (of very many) places the reader can find that. ― novov (t c) 03:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:11, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:36, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist but I'm seeing No Consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Adobe Illustrator#File formats. Liz Read! Talk! 05:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
The topic does not seem to meet WP:GNG and my BEFORE is unhelpful. This is effectively a documentation cobbled from primary sources and mentions in passing. Not sure what is the best redirect target - some Adobe's software of some list of file extensions? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
18:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 03:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2021. PROD removed because it "ran for 37 episodes". Still needs reliable sources though. DonaldD23 talk to me 03:05, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I'd like to see more evaluation of the new sources discovered.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:05, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:11, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:50, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Yes, all summer as this discussion smoldered I said I would open a BLPN thread about it; at the very least any serious discussion of creating this spinoff should have been deferred until we could have that discussion. I didn't create it because the talk page thread wasn't really getting much interest. I've had computer difficulties in the last couple of weeks that have limited my time online (and appear at present not likely to be resolved for another couple of weeks). So unfortunately someone decided to go ahead and do this, and force the issue here. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:36, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Just because BLP does not explicitly prohibit something does not mean the community necessarily intended to permit it. For instance, consider the BLPN discussion about whether we should name Santos's ex-wife. It was pointed out by the one editor very much in favor of doing so that BLPNAME, upon which most of us rested our arguments against doing this, does not explicitly say we shouldn't. The rest of us felt that BLPPRIVACY as well argued against inclusion given that while she has been named in the media, she has turned down interview requests through intermediaries and, barring some sort of investigative finding that it was purely a Green Card marriage, her name is so irrelevant to the discussion right now that it would add nothing for readers.
Granted the same facets of BLP are not what is at play here, but IMO the same general caution should be applied. As noted in my nomination I think WP:POVFORK is relevant here, even if it is not a BLP policy, as it asks a similar leve of circumspection. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:07, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable fig tree in Namibia. The first source is an actual newspaper, but the article is about sending books to Namibia and just mentions the tree in passing. The second source is a broken hyperlink. I can't find anything else about this tree online that isn't from Facebook or a wordpress blog. BusterTheMighty ( talk) 02:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2016. PROD removed because "it ran for 3 years". Still needs reliable sources though DonaldD23 talk to me 03:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:57, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:13, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist, already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. And thank you to the article subject for their graciousness. Liz Read! Talk! 03:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and does not appear to meet WP:AUTHOR. The subject also has previously edited their own page, declaring a COI. 30Four ( talk) 01:47, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I take the comments by the article subject as a Keep so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:16, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable run-of-the-mill actor. Natg 19 ( talk) 00:54, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete, only 1 unreliable source and all roles are minor. Per notability guidelines, we're looking for a major role to justify inclusion. GraziePrego ( talk) 04:04, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Delete Due to reliable sources. Worldiswide ( talk) 03:15, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:14, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Cannot find anything about it on the internet (confused with Chak Dhota in Jammu and Kashmir, even the coords are incorrect), doesn't meet WP:NPLACE or WP:GNG, orphan and lack of useful references. Aydoh8 ( talk) 00:26, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:41, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Taking to AFD after a PROD was removed. There's no point in keeping this page per WP:TWODABS when only the topics with the "Taylor Swift" name are the singer and her self-titled album. Nothing else could be more than a partial title match, and WP:PTM says those wouldn't belong on DAB pages. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 02:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:12, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
I cannot find any reputable third-party sources for this company, in my opinion this is not notable enough for an article. It's been marked as not being notable since June 2010. FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 02:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:42, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Procedural nomination per request at WT:AFD. Reason was: "This is not a notable person. He has appeared on one season of a reality TV show that has hundreds of contestants." CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE 02:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:40, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Likely to fail WP:NBIO KH-1 ( talk) 01:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 01:04, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Tholvi F.C.
This is an unreleased film. Unreleased films are only notable if the production satisfies general notability, which is seldom the case, and this article says only that the film is in post-production. The references are mostly about the teaser, and so are promotional rather than encyclopedic, or are interviews. The article is a reasonable summary of what the sources say, because neither the article nor the sources say much.
There was a draft, which has been blanked by its originator. The draft should be deleted as blanked by the originator, and this article should be draftified. Robert McClenon ( talk) 14:23, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For further input, since article has been somewhat improved...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
01:07, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:45, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable game, fails WP:GNG. Metacritic has zero reviews, critical or user, for any of the three games denoted here. WP:VG/S search comes up with nothing but database entries, with one exception: GameZebo. GameZebo has reviews and walkthroughs for each of the three games, yet no other publications seem to have a whisper about it. GameZebo also ran a promotion for their forums to give away free copies of the game. That means each individual game has exactly 1 source of in-depth significant coverage from our vetted reliable sources. -- ferret ( talk) 00:28, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
I couldn't find anything besides the PC Gamer source already used in the article and a short demo announcement from Rock Paper Shotgun. QuietCicada ( talk) 00:08, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:42, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
This biography of a wine expert and Master of Wine is sourced only to a book he co-wrote. I have carried out WP:BEFORE and not found references to add. I don't think he meets WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. I wondered whether being a Master of Wine made him notable, but the discussion I found about this from 2010 did not reach consensus. Tacyarg ( talk) 22:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Nicaragua women's international footballers. No policy-based, source-backed argument for retention. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:42, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Nicaragua women's international footballers. The subject has appeared for the Nicaragua women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 22:54, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Liz Read! Talk! 05:14, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails
GNG. It has been edited almost exclusively by one IP editor (although their specific IPv6 has changed, all of them edit in the same pattern and time) since April 2020. Before that, it received little editorial attention. It has had a {{
more citations needed}} since February 2011. There are nearly no inline citations. It has nearly 0 sources to corroborate the majority of information in the article. Of the 4 that exist, only 1 is reliable and has significant coverage (Chicago Tribune). Attempts to find sources have failed, as nothing that I can find satisfies
RS and also has coverage beyond 2 words (or 3). It also reads as a
FORUM and is full of ultimately unverifiable information. If it does turn out to be notable, it would be far better to
blow it up.
WhoAteMyButter (
🌇talk│
🍂contribs)
23:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Keep - From poking around, there is an insane amount of coverage on the (Insane) Spanish Cobras, especially starting around June 1977. So there is
WP:RSed coverage via newspapers.com and
from the Schaumburg Police Department educational pamphlet on street gangs covers them.
Surely, any city police department with a gang unit would most likely have material on them. There is coverage in books.
1,
2,
3 and more. There's coverage in newspapers
and
here by a guy who says he's only interested in researching 20th century (street) gangs. In
2019. They feature in
arts and culture too, and the
FBI's got a file on them. Perennial crime coverage won't stop. So stay tuned for more to come, folks, as they are a "folk" gang, not a "people" gang.
4,
5,
6,
in 2023.
United Gangs,
Hour Detroit has brief mentions. Perhaps the article should be worked on.
The Eloquent Peasant (
talk)
13:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep but noting also that the nomination was withdrawn, hence the early close. Star Mississippi 17:41, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Article is totally unsourced and any assertions that prove notability should be unsourced. WP:BEFORE search shows vague results that may not be this storm as with no sources there’s nothing to base which storm this even is. Should be deleted per WP:TNT and restarted. Nominated on behalf of User:74.101.92.237 at Talk:October 1997 North American storm complex#Reason for deletion. The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 23:26, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Nicaragua women's international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 23:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Nicaragua women's international footballers. The subject has earned at least three caps for the Nicaragua women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. NOTE: Name also spelled Heyssel in sources. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 22:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Pure WP:FANCRUFT, with healthy doses of WP:OR and speculation. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Both keep and delete side have some bad arguments that aren't policy based, but consensus does lean very heavily towards keep. Yamamoto Ichiro ( talk) 05:00, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Most of the body of this article, other than the plot and lede, seems to be just WP:ROUTINE. There is some reliable sources that cover it, but that does not always justify notability. Other than the sources, the article seems to be a collection of random information that does not wish to justify the body. Taking into account the numerous WP:BLP1E and WP:BLP situations associated with this article with them being constantly removed for good reason, it should be decided whether this game meets WP:GNG accounting for how the current article presents itself. The sources are fine, but the body suggests that it is just a collection of illegitimate information that doesn't seem to justify how Yandere Simulator is notable. 8ID ( talk) 20:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 17:40, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
No sources, disputed definition. MicrobiologyMarcus ( talk) 20:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG DonaldD23 talk to me 20:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro ( talk) 05:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
I don't think "first African American in the United States to earn a PhD in juvenile justice" is a noteworthy enough first to get a Wikipedia page, and the lack of any national news coverage seems to support that. The fact that his U.S. Senate campaign has also attracted little attention is also telling. Also--and I know this isn't really relevant but it's worth mentioning--the article is terribly written and not at all neutral. Sentences like "For more information or to make a donation to the Tracy Andrus Foundation, please visit www.tracyandrusfoundation.com" should not be on Wikipedia. BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 18:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 16:11, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
There are no independent sources that I could find that would make this individual notable (nor does the article have any such sources), thank you Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 17:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to ANT1. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:30, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
This subject does not meet WP:GNG as a former television network due to a complete lack of secondary coverage. I suppose a redirect to ANT1 Group might be reasonable, but I appreciate any other thoughts. Let'srun ( talk) 17:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn by nominator. My WP:BEFORE was not especially good this time, it seems. (non-admin closure) — Alalch E. 10:57, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
This episode of The Cleveland Show does not individually meet WP:GNG. The references used are insufficient for a determination that the subject is notable, and my WP:BEFORE did not reveal significant coverage elsewhere. Articles about television series' episodes, like all articles, need to be about subjects that are notable in order to merit inclusion. Unilateral redirection was attempted two times, by longstanding editors, but has been reverted by IPs, and the most recent restoration was done by an IP with a singular focus on the series (see WP:SPA). — Alalch E. 17:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
This is a 262-word review of the episode. The review notes: "The Cleveland Show: This one I’m a little less sure on. There were fewer laughs than in last week’s episode – outside of pretty much anything featuring Cleveland, Jr., and Cleveland’s inappropriate come-ons to a variety of teenage boys – but the storyline made a lot more sense. I mean, if you’re the kind of person who thinks that a man having an opossum stuck to his penis equals instant laughs, it’s entirely possible this was your favorite episode of television of all time, but I’m sad to say I’m not that kind of person. The cut-away gags still aren’t working, as though the show is trying to figure out a way to be its parent show without really being its parent show. ... Grade: B-"
This is a 565-word review of the episode. The review notes: "Thankfully the best gag of the episode was reserved for Ernie's possum latching on to Cleveland's crotch. Sure the entire segment of a naked Cleveland trying to wrestle this creature off his crotch came across as very juvenile, but it was pretty well done and it's hard not to laugh at the sight of Cleveland humping a dresser in attempt to shake the possum off. ... The other memorable segment of the episode was towards the end when Cleveland and a small army of rednecks attempt to rescue Ernie from his foster home. The ensuing gunfight was ridiculously over-the-top and was nicely choreographed, with plenty of bullets and the kind of violence you'd expect to see from a show like this."
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 16:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
I found one short review and a few very short announcement articles like this one, but no real significant coverage. QuietCicada ( talk) 16:33, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:Not news. A transient event that had no consequences. Can easely be added in a section to Algeria-Israel relations instead of a whole new article. Dl.thinker ( talk) 12:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. There has been an abject lack of actual discussion from those !voting 'keep' that would establish the notability of this subject. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:59, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Created as a redirect to a now deleted page. Appears to fail NMUSIC/NACTOR.
Background: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asad Ali Palijo, [3], [4] KH-1 ( talk) 12:25, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Official accounts post [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30] and others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1Wikee ( talk • contribs) 14:12, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NEVENT. Refs in article and BEFORE showed nothing other than promo, stats and game recaps. Nothing meets independent reliable sources with significant coverage addressing the subject directly and indepth. // Timothy :: talk 10:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Criminal Minds characters#Jason Gideon with the history under the redirect if you'd like to work on it in Draft, BD2412. Star Mississippi 16:09, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Sources in the article are primary (one's an interview with the actor, other is just a random trivia fact released by CBS), a quick Google search does not give any sources that prove individual notability, and per WP:N, it is not worth a standalone article. If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to List of Criminal Minds characters#Jason Gideon. Spinixster (chat!) 10:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of CSI: Crime Scene Investigation characters. (non-admin closure) 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 14:12, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Sources in the article are more about the actor, a quick Google search does not give any sources that prove individual notability, and per WP:N, it is not worth a standalone article. If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to List of CSI: Crime Scene Investigation characters. Spinixster (chat!) 10:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
After Draft:Julian Calv was rejected for failing WP:NMUSICIAN, this article was simply recreated in main space instead, which is not a promising sign. The draft itself was subsequently deleted after a PROD nomination.
The subject appears to be a busker and member of a non-notable avant-garde chamber music ensemble "Non Prophets" (NB - not Non-Prophets) with some local-interest coverage but no evidence of yet meeting inclusion criteria. The single Route 4/Thorn and Roots is included in this nomination and contains a couple of additional references.
The main article references are:
The single article references are:
There is therefore no evidence of meeting WP:GNG or any of the criteria at WP:NMUSICIAN. Dorsetonian ( talk) 07:05, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
No RS independent coverage (all interviews or quotes from subject) for this minor actress from Delhi who has not, despite the article's claims, had a starring role in a major production. Web series, non-speaking/small parts - the actors and actresses she has worked with do not confer notability. Fails WP:GNG; WP:NACTOR. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:07, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:09, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please offer more thoughtful rationales than merely "Keep" with no further explanation.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Chatham County, North Carolina#Townships. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 05:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and substantively fails WP:NGEO as it is functionally similar to an "area in an irrigation district", as townships in NC have been politcally defunct (though technically legally extant) since 1880. All sources I can find are either old copies of legislation/legal documents with single mentions or websites that scrape from the US census. The provided source for the "Geography" section doesn't even label the township or show its borders, it's just a map of North Carolina that one can zoom in and out of. Indy beetle ( talk) 05:31, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Aintabli ( talk) 04:52, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
The topic is definitely notable and deserves an encyclopaedic entry. However, it was extensively edited by POV-pushing sockpuppets: Öztürküm (the creator), Kumanof, Hatymat, Lionzm, Suyumbikä, ManavAnton. Basically, the majority of the edits and content are from the aforementioned accounts. There are clusters of several sources that need verification, and since they are all placed after the end of each paragraph and not interspersed throughout, there is likely a problem of synthesis. To save time, I suggest a WP:TNT for this article, so that when it is created again, reliable sources are used with a NPOV. Aintabli ( talk) 04:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Does not have WP:SIGCOV. The only sources specifically covering it are related to a controversy in late 2022. A bunch of other sources are about art on Reddit in general but only fleetingly mention r/art as one (of very many) places the reader can find that. ― novov (t c) 03:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:11, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:36, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist but I'm seeing No Consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Adobe Illustrator#File formats. Liz Read! Talk! 05:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
The topic does not seem to meet WP:GNG and my BEFORE is unhelpful. This is effectively a documentation cobbled from primary sources and mentions in passing. Not sure what is the best redirect target - some Adobe's software of some list of file extensions? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
18:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 03:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2021. PROD removed because it "ran for 37 episodes". Still needs reliable sources though. DonaldD23 talk to me 03:05, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I'd like to see more evaluation of the new sources discovered.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:05, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:11, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:50, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Yes, all summer as this discussion smoldered I said I would open a BLPN thread about it; at the very least any serious discussion of creating this spinoff should have been deferred until we could have that discussion. I didn't create it because the talk page thread wasn't really getting much interest. I've had computer difficulties in the last couple of weeks that have limited my time online (and appear at present not likely to be resolved for another couple of weeks). So unfortunately someone decided to go ahead and do this, and force the issue here. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:36, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Just because BLP does not explicitly prohibit something does not mean the community necessarily intended to permit it. For instance, consider the BLPN discussion about whether we should name Santos's ex-wife. It was pointed out by the one editor very much in favor of doing so that BLPNAME, upon which most of us rested our arguments against doing this, does not explicitly say we shouldn't. The rest of us felt that BLPPRIVACY as well argued against inclusion given that while she has been named in the media, she has turned down interview requests through intermediaries and, barring some sort of investigative finding that it was purely a Green Card marriage, her name is so irrelevant to the discussion right now that it would add nothing for readers.
Granted the same facets of BLP are not what is at play here, but IMO the same general caution should be applied. As noted in my nomination I think WP:POVFORK is relevant here, even if it is not a BLP policy, as it asks a similar leve of circumspection. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:07, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable fig tree in Namibia. The first source is an actual newspaper, but the article is about sending books to Namibia and just mentions the tree in passing. The second source is a broken hyperlink. I can't find anything else about this tree online that isn't from Facebook or a wordpress blog. BusterTheMighty ( talk) 02:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2016. PROD removed because "it ran for 3 years". Still needs reliable sources though DonaldD23 talk to me 03:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:57, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:13, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist, already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. And thank you to the article subject for their graciousness. Liz Read! Talk! 03:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and does not appear to meet WP:AUTHOR. The subject also has previously edited their own page, declaring a COI. 30Four ( talk) 01:47, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I take the comments by the article subject as a Keep so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:16, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable run-of-the-mill actor. Natg 19 ( talk) 00:54, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete, only 1 unreliable source and all roles are minor. Per notability guidelines, we're looking for a major role to justify inclusion. GraziePrego ( talk) 04:04, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Delete Due to reliable sources. Worldiswide ( talk) 03:15, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:14, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Cannot find anything about it on the internet (confused with Chak Dhota in Jammu and Kashmir, even the coords are incorrect), doesn't meet WP:NPLACE or WP:GNG, orphan and lack of useful references. Aydoh8 ( talk) 00:26, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:41, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Taking to AFD after a PROD was removed. There's no point in keeping this page per WP:TWODABS when only the topics with the "Taylor Swift" name are the singer and her self-titled album. Nothing else could be more than a partial title match, and WP:PTM says those wouldn't belong on DAB pages. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 02:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:12, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
I cannot find any reputable third-party sources for this company, in my opinion this is not notable enough for an article. It's been marked as not being notable since June 2010. FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 02:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:42, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Procedural nomination per request at WT:AFD. Reason was: "This is not a notable person. He has appeared on one season of a reality TV show that has hundreds of contestants." CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE 02:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:40, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Likely to fail WP:NBIO KH-1 ( talk) 01:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 01:04, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Tholvi F.C.
This is an unreleased film. Unreleased films are only notable if the production satisfies general notability, which is seldom the case, and this article says only that the film is in post-production. The references are mostly about the teaser, and so are promotional rather than encyclopedic, or are interviews. The article is a reasonable summary of what the sources say, because neither the article nor the sources say much.
There was a draft, which has been blanked by its originator. The draft should be deleted as blanked by the originator, and this article should be draftified. Robert McClenon ( talk) 14:23, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For further input, since article has been somewhat improved...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
01:07, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:45, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable game, fails WP:GNG. Metacritic has zero reviews, critical or user, for any of the three games denoted here. WP:VG/S search comes up with nothing but database entries, with one exception: GameZebo. GameZebo has reviews and walkthroughs for each of the three games, yet no other publications seem to have a whisper about it. GameZebo also ran a promotion for their forums to give away free copies of the game. That means each individual game has exactly 1 source of in-depth significant coverage from our vetted reliable sources. -- ferret ( talk) 00:28, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
I couldn't find anything besides the PC Gamer source already used in the article and a short demo announcement from Rock Paper Shotgun. QuietCicada ( talk) 00:08, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:42, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
This biography of a wine expert and Master of Wine is sourced only to a book he co-wrote. I have carried out WP:BEFORE and not found references to add. I don't think he meets WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. I wondered whether being a Master of Wine made him notable, but the discussion I found about this from 2010 did not reach consensus. Tacyarg ( talk) 22:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Nicaragua women's international footballers. No policy-based, source-backed argument for retention. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:42, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Nicaragua women's international footballers. The subject has appeared for the Nicaragua women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 22:54, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)