![]() |
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject fails WP:GNG for the lack of multiple significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. While Bernardi did play (just) one match on the main tour level, WP:NSPORT/FAQ states that "the topic-specific notability guidelines described on this page do not replace the general notability guideline." I haven't been able to find much in my searches beyond promotional press releases, passing mentions/shallow coverage, match recaps or databases. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 23:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:04, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least two caps for the Zimbabwe women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from reliable sources, failing WP:GNG. This was what I did find. JTtheOG ( talk) 22:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least two caps for the Zimbabwe women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient coverage from reliable sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 22:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of The Walking Dead (comics) characters. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 07:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Only sources for notability in the article is casting news. All information I can find are talking about the episode he returns in or speculating on his fate, either way note enough to establish notability. Questions? four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 15:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Big O#Setting. Liz Read! Talk! 07:18, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Fixing AfD nomination based on IP request. No comment on the merits. Statement from IP - "Does not seem to be WP:SIGCOV, though I would settle for a merge " and "Found nothing substantial from my WP:BEFORE." AfD was started by IP but not completed in order to create discussion page. CNMall41 ( talk) 19:04, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there are two different Merge/Redirect targets listed here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV, sources exist [1] but not enough. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:41, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. This is an AFD where more participation would have led to a more decisive closure. Liz Read! Talk! 22:49, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Almost every source used here is a press release, zero indepth third-party coverage. Interviews with the chairman and "hey we opened this factory here" do not make a notable article. Sohom ( talk) 14:23, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:59, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
23:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:14, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:51, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
non-notable company; I see plenty of these toys for sale online but haven't been able to turn up any reliable sources ~ T P W 14:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
23:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Based on routine coverage. Advertisement. LKBT ( talk) 06:35, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
14:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Maliner (
talk)
19:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a piece of political propaganda that lacks independent notability. Charlie ( talk) 15:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Maliner (
talk)
19:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a piece of political propaganda that lacks independent notability. Charlie ( talk) 15:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Maliner (
talk)
19:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:55, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC and WP:NACTOR. Charlie ( talk) 16:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Maliner (
talk)
19:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Promo | 1. "Shreya Gupto Who Took The Digital Arena By Storm Has A Superb Cameo In Rajinikanth's Darbar". 10 January 2020. |
Interview, primary | 2. ^ "Being on Camera is a Great Stress Buster: Shreya Gupto". 28 August 2019. |
Promo interview | 3. ^ Jump up to:a b "The Lockdown Diary: Shreya Gupta". 10 July 2020. |
Promo | 4. ^ Jump up to:a b Suthar, Manisha (4 February 2019). "Shreya Gupto and Vishal Vashishtha in Filter Copy's sketch 'Why To Date Bengali Guy'". Archived from the original on 4 June 2019. Retrieved 4 June 2019. |
EXCLUSIVE promo | 5. ^ Jump up to:a b c "Exclusive: Chennai girl Shreya Gupta to work with Riya Sen in Ragini MMS 2.2". |
Database page with two sentence promo bio | 6. ^ "shreya". The Times of India. 11 November 2020. |
Mention Fails WP:SIGCOV, does not address the subject directly and indepth | 7. ^ "'Characters are made queer so that makers feel progressive'". 3 November 2020. |
Mention Fails WP:SIGCOV, does not address the subject directly and indepth | 8. ^ "Stories On Lesbian Relationships Without Any Male Protagonists Sharing the Spotlight". 8 April 2021. |
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 19:19, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG, reads like a list of facts and does not prove notability JMHamo ( talk) 19:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Seawolf35 ( talk - email) 13:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Does not seem to past WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE, a BEFORE search yields nothing but primary sources. Seawolf35 ( talk - email) 19:07, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable award. The award itself "EMY Africa Awards" isn't notable. Doesn't pass WP:GNG. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 18:28, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
BLP that is some way below our standards in terms of sourcing. No evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. My own Bulgarian searches yielded Topsport, a squad list mention, Blitz, a trivial mention of his departure, and Varna24, which confirms that he joined Spartak after a trial but does not give any in-depth information. The Varna24 is the closest thing to significant coverage but, on its own, is nowhere near GNG. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:10, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability in October, disputed, and then re-added. Not notable as a physician, propose delete for lacking notability. microbiologyMarcus ( petri dish• growths) 17:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 18:02, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Long orphaned article about proprietary index by a specific narrow company, that doesn't seem to continue being in production -- signs that the article might have been created as a way to promote the index. Not sure what to do with it (hence the discussion). Sadads ( talk) 16:59, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:50, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
fails GNG, not notable regarding sources Iljhgtn ( talk) 16:33, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG. Dougal18 ( talk) 15:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Rowing at the 1952 Summer Olympics – Men's coxed four. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 22:20, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
He competed at the 1952 Summer Olympics but didn't win a medal and I couldn't find anything significant enough through a WP:BEFORE search to pass WP:GNG. Suonii180 ( talk) 14:53, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:08, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a major piece of WP:OR. My BEFORE suggests that the topic itself may be notable (stress on may, but [12] and [13] among others seem promising), but sadly we need to WP:TNT what we have and start from scratch. There are unrefenced parts, parts that are effectively unreferenced (what is "Nesselrath (2005)"?) and parts that appear referenced but aren't (ex. the entire 'Purposes' section is sourced to [14], but verification shows that only the last sentence, and arguably not even all of it, can be referenced there - it is effectively pure OR with a fig leaf of "look, this one article mentions somethign slightly related so let's add this as an example and a reference and make it look good"). The same problem applies to second paragraph in the lead, which makes ORish general claims and has references to some works about specific fictional cities. The second half of the article is a fancrufty list of "notable examples" (notable according to whom?). If we feel generous, WP:ATD could be redirecting this to List of fictional settlements (not that this list is particularly impressive, sigh - but that's for another discussion). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced article about a local freesheet, apparently fails WP:GNG as I can't find a single secondary source about it online. Moved to draft once, and immediately recreated. Proposed deletion contested by article creator without comment. Wikishovel ( talk) 13:50, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. This is primarily because I think those advocating Keep are putting up such weak arguments that say, basically, being a bad article is not a reason for deletion which is not a great argument to Keep it. That said, if anyone wanted to create a Redirect from this page title or work on this article in Draft space, I would restore it or you can go to WP:REFUND. I just don't see a strong enough consensus to Redirect or Draftify that I can close this discussion in favor of either of those two options. Liz Read! Talk! 23:01, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced, messy list, that doesn't even include all the issues, despite numbering them. Industrial Insect (talk) 12:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
20:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Nagol0929 (
talk)
11:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Nagol0929 ( talk) 14:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. No sources found Nagol0929 ( talk) 11:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:42, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
No notable pro wrestler. No in-deep coverage about him HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 09:34, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:21, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891
Talk
Work
15:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:03, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
previously deleted and moved into draft. Draft:Lohum Cleantech. Advertisement of Lohum. GregChi ( talk) 03:32, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:17, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
14:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No clear consensus. AfD was opened by a blocked sock. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 04:32, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
The article only has one reference listed, which is the link to a CV on the Paraliament of Tanzania's website. Wikipedia’s guidelines recommend providing multiple, reliable sources to ensure
WP:VERIFY.
The article fails
WP:NOTABILITY because the article does not provide enough information to establish the notability of Juma Hassan Killimbah (according to wikipedias standards).
From what i’ve seen, Wikipedia guidelines for “biographies of living persons” require that the information must be “verifiable and neutrally presented, with an emphasis on high-quality secondary sources.” The article lacks sufficient biographical information and references to MEET these guidelines.
Geko72290 (
talk) 19:59, 19 October 2023 (UTC) Blocked sock. --
Goldsztajn (
talk)
00:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:NPOL giv[ing] presumptive notability [is] in part for articles like this, where offline sources are guaranteed to exist but aren't digitized or [easily] accessible online. Curbon7 ( talk) 21:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Tanzania National Assembly members 2005–2010: WP:BLP policy clearly takes precedence over NPOL SNG, so NPOL does not apply to this article, WP:BLP requires strong sourcing. None of the sources above or in article meet WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth, BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV. There is a good redirect target and it can be split out if sources are found. // Timothy :: talk 20:38, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per WP:G5, based on the blatantly abusive use of multiple sockpuppets to recreate this after the previous deletions. Getting around the EC protection indicates this isn't the creator's first stab at sockpuppetry, even if the exact master account is uncertain. Given that this is a WP:BLP subject with apparent controversies over politics and religion, keeping the sockpuppet created content would be particularly negligent. I will also be applying full protection to this title and the alternative title that was used for the initial recreation. Anyone who wants to try again can request recreation by showing a draft space or user space version with appropriate sources.
With that said, the better Keep comments did highlight coverage from reliable news outlets that might be the foundation of a viable article, so I encourage future reviewers to keep an open mind about the possible notability of the subject, if and when a "clean" version is presented. RL0919 ( talk) 18:53, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Not a G4, and not (yet) a confirmed G5 but no indication notability has changed since the three prior deletion discussions. Making political sermons which garnered attention does not change one's notability. Star Mississippi 13:17, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'm less than convinced with a number of the keep !votes here, especially given the relative strength of the delete contributions. Relisting to hopefully establish a consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Creations by banned or blocked users. I was on the fence about this before. There appeared to be sufficient sources to pass GNG, although not enough attention was given to the fact that most of these were WP:PRIMARY. I tended to agree with Peterkingiron that the subject ought to be notable, and had not bothered researching to prove the point as it was looking like it was heading for keep. However, in light of the socking, I'll make the point that GNG requires secondary sources, and they have not been found. It really should be deleted under G5. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 14:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NotAGenious ( talk) 11:22, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG, trivial claims of notability JMHamo ( talk) 11:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:36, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Does nothing but promote the subject subjectively. Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG, not WP:NCORP either. Sources don't cover the subject significantly. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 10:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 09:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Originally proposed for WP:PROD. The subject is a player with a marginal professional career and hardly any WP:SIGCOV, apart from just a bunch of passing mentions. [42] Angelo ( talk) 10:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 09:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Originally proposed for WP:PROD. The subject is a player with an extremely marginal professional career and close to no WP:SIGCOV: all I could find was nothing more but a bunch of stats pages with no context and a couple transfer report news, but nothing really worth of WP:GNG. [43] Angelo ( talk) 09:59, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of DC Universe locations. Liz Read! Talk! 09:16, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
"a fictional museum that appears in comic books published by DC Comics". Pure plot summary and a list of works it appears in, no analysis, reception, etc. WP:GNG fail. The best WP:ATD I can think of would be redirectign this to List of DC Universe locations. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:39, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of DC Universe locations. Liz Read! Talk! 09:17, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
" a fictional American city appearing in American comic books published by DC Comics." Plot summary + list of media that it is shown in. No analysis, or reception, etc. Fails WP:GNG. The best WP:ATD I can think of would be redirectign this to List of DC Universe locations. PS. If anyone cares, note that I've also just PRODed unreferenced fancruft at Central City Police Department which IMHO does not merit redirecting - but feel free to redirect it if you feel charitable... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:32, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 09:18, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. I did a WP:BEFORE and found nothing suitable or reliable enough to pass WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator ( talk) 14:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Polyamorph (
talk)
06:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 07:23, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:N and WP:NPOV. Issues mentioned in the 2008 AFD were never corrected, and the articles reads as if written by a COI/paid editor/both. RedundancyAdvocate ( talk) 06:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Switch Mobility#Buses. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:24, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Requested at WT:AFD by IP editor. Rationale stated: Non notable bus, only a small number were built. NotAGenious ( talk) 05:52, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NORG. Aside from self-published sources, only source comes from the Association of Optometrists (which appear to be some sort of sponsor/interview/invited content). Author of page has apparent COI. Fermiboson ( talk) 04:43, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:00, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
WP:PROMO. The sources here so far, many which are interviews, are insufficient to establish the notability of the subject. Does not pass WP:NSINGER as well. – robertsky ( talk) 04:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Secret (app). Liz Read! Talk! 01:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Pro forma nomination on behalf of 69.149.121.20, who attempted to transclude an AfD for this article to the AfD logpage in this diff.
Their rationale was: "talk page + talk page for user that made the page indicate there was discussion about deletion due to a lack of noteworthiness, but nothing was documented about why the page was kept over the past few years". jp× g 🗯️ 01:04, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete I'm not an expert of WP:BIO but this reads like a Linkedin page of the person's various professional movements and not his independent contributions or impact. I've not done a WP:BEFORE but at least on the available sources it looks like there is some coverage from reliable sources, but heavily leaning into the context of his involvement with Secret, so the few relevant sources could be Merged there. VRXCES ( talk) 09:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject fails WP:GNG for the lack of multiple significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. While Bernardi did play (just) one match on the main tour level, WP:NSPORT/FAQ states that "the topic-specific notability guidelines described on this page do not replace the general notability guideline." I haven't been able to find much in my searches beyond promotional press releases, passing mentions/shallow coverage, match recaps or databases. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 23:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:04, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least two caps for the Zimbabwe women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from reliable sources, failing WP:GNG. This was what I did find. JTtheOG ( talk) 22:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least two caps for the Zimbabwe women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient coverage from reliable sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 22:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of The Walking Dead (comics) characters. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 07:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Only sources for notability in the article is casting news. All information I can find are talking about the episode he returns in or speculating on his fate, either way note enough to establish notability. Questions? four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 15:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Big O#Setting. Liz Read! Talk! 07:18, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Fixing AfD nomination based on IP request. No comment on the merits. Statement from IP - "Does not seem to be WP:SIGCOV, though I would settle for a merge " and "Found nothing substantial from my WP:BEFORE." AfD was started by IP but not completed in order to create discussion page. CNMall41 ( talk) 19:04, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there are two different Merge/Redirect targets listed here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV, sources exist [1] but not enough. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:41, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. This is an AFD where more participation would have led to a more decisive closure. Liz Read! Talk! 22:49, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Almost every source used here is a press release, zero indepth third-party coverage. Interviews with the chairman and "hey we opened this factory here" do not make a notable article. Sohom ( talk) 14:23, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:59, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
23:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:14, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:51, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
non-notable company; I see plenty of these toys for sale online but haven't been able to turn up any reliable sources ~ T P W 14:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
23:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Based on routine coverage. Advertisement. LKBT ( talk) 06:35, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
14:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Maliner (
talk)
19:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a piece of political propaganda that lacks independent notability. Charlie ( talk) 15:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Maliner (
talk)
19:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a piece of political propaganda that lacks independent notability. Charlie ( talk) 15:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Maliner (
talk)
19:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:55, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC and WP:NACTOR. Charlie ( talk) 16:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Maliner (
talk)
19:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Promo | 1. "Shreya Gupto Who Took The Digital Arena By Storm Has A Superb Cameo In Rajinikanth's Darbar". 10 January 2020. |
Interview, primary | 2. ^ "Being on Camera is a Great Stress Buster: Shreya Gupto". 28 August 2019. |
Promo interview | 3. ^ Jump up to:a b "The Lockdown Diary: Shreya Gupta". 10 July 2020. |
Promo | 4. ^ Jump up to:a b Suthar, Manisha (4 February 2019). "Shreya Gupto and Vishal Vashishtha in Filter Copy's sketch 'Why To Date Bengali Guy'". Archived from the original on 4 June 2019. Retrieved 4 June 2019. |
EXCLUSIVE promo | 5. ^ Jump up to:a b c "Exclusive: Chennai girl Shreya Gupta to work with Riya Sen in Ragini MMS 2.2". |
Database page with two sentence promo bio | 6. ^ "shreya". The Times of India. 11 November 2020. |
Mention Fails WP:SIGCOV, does not address the subject directly and indepth | 7. ^ "'Characters are made queer so that makers feel progressive'". 3 November 2020. |
Mention Fails WP:SIGCOV, does not address the subject directly and indepth | 8. ^ "Stories On Lesbian Relationships Without Any Male Protagonists Sharing the Spotlight". 8 April 2021. |
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 19:19, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG, reads like a list of facts and does not prove notability JMHamo ( talk) 19:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Seawolf35 ( talk - email) 13:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Does not seem to past WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE, a BEFORE search yields nothing but primary sources. Seawolf35 ( talk - email) 19:07, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable award. The award itself "EMY Africa Awards" isn't notable. Doesn't pass WP:GNG. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 18:28, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
BLP that is some way below our standards in terms of sourcing. No evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. My own Bulgarian searches yielded Topsport, a squad list mention, Blitz, a trivial mention of his departure, and Varna24, which confirms that he joined Spartak after a trial but does not give any in-depth information. The Varna24 is the closest thing to significant coverage but, on its own, is nowhere near GNG. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:10, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability in October, disputed, and then re-added. Not notable as a physician, propose delete for lacking notability. microbiologyMarcus ( petri dish• growths) 17:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 18:02, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Long orphaned article about proprietary index by a specific narrow company, that doesn't seem to continue being in production -- signs that the article might have been created as a way to promote the index. Not sure what to do with it (hence the discussion). Sadads ( talk) 16:59, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:50, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
fails GNG, not notable regarding sources Iljhgtn ( talk) 16:33, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG. Dougal18 ( talk) 15:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Rowing at the 1952 Summer Olympics – Men's coxed four. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 22:20, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
He competed at the 1952 Summer Olympics but didn't win a medal and I couldn't find anything significant enough through a WP:BEFORE search to pass WP:GNG. Suonii180 ( talk) 14:53, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:08, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a major piece of WP:OR. My BEFORE suggests that the topic itself may be notable (stress on may, but [12] and [13] among others seem promising), but sadly we need to WP:TNT what we have and start from scratch. There are unrefenced parts, parts that are effectively unreferenced (what is "Nesselrath (2005)"?) and parts that appear referenced but aren't (ex. the entire 'Purposes' section is sourced to [14], but verification shows that only the last sentence, and arguably not even all of it, can be referenced there - it is effectively pure OR with a fig leaf of "look, this one article mentions somethign slightly related so let's add this as an example and a reference and make it look good"). The same problem applies to second paragraph in the lead, which makes ORish general claims and has references to some works about specific fictional cities. The second half of the article is a fancrufty list of "notable examples" (notable according to whom?). If we feel generous, WP:ATD could be redirecting this to List of fictional settlements (not that this list is particularly impressive, sigh - but that's for another discussion). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced article about a local freesheet, apparently fails WP:GNG as I can't find a single secondary source about it online. Moved to draft once, and immediately recreated. Proposed deletion contested by article creator without comment. Wikishovel ( talk) 13:50, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. This is primarily because I think those advocating Keep are putting up such weak arguments that say, basically, being a bad article is not a reason for deletion which is not a great argument to Keep it. That said, if anyone wanted to create a Redirect from this page title or work on this article in Draft space, I would restore it or you can go to WP:REFUND. I just don't see a strong enough consensus to Redirect or Draftify that I can close this discussion in favor of either of those two options. Liz Read! Talk! 23:01, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced, messy list, that doesn't even include all the issues, despite numbering them. Industrial Insect (talk) 12:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
20:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Nagol0929 (
talk)
11:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Nagol0929 ( talk) 14:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. No sources found Nagol0929 ( talk) 11:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:42, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
No notable pro wrestler. No in-deep coverage about him HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 09:34, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:21, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891
Talk
Work
15:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:03, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
previously deleted and moved into draft. Draft:Lohum Cleantech. Advertisement of Lohum. GregChi ( talk) 03:32, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:17, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
14:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No clear consensus. AfD was opened by a blocked sock. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 04:32, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
The article only has one reference listed, which is the link to a CV on the Paraliament of Tanzania's website. Wikipedia’s guidelines recommend providing multiple, reliable sources to ensure
WP:VERIFY.
The article fails
WP:NOTABILITY because the article does not provide enough information to establish the notability of Juma Hassan Killimbah (according to wikipedias standards).
From what i’ve seen, Wikipedia guidelines for “biographies of living persons” require that the information must be “verifiable and neutrally presented, with an emphasis on high-quality secondary sources.” The article lacks sufficient biographical information and references to MEET these guidelines.
Geko72290 (
talk) 19:59, 19 October 2023 (UTC) Blocked sock. --
Goldsztajn (
talk)
00:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:NPOL giv[ing] presumptive notability [is] in part for articles like this, where offline sources are guaranteed to exist but aren't digitized or [easily] accessible online. Curbon7 ( talk) 21:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Tanzania National Assembly members 2005–2010: WP:BLP policy clearly takes precedence over NPOL SNG, so NPOL does not apply to this article, WP:BLP requires strong sourcing. None of the sources above or in article meet WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth, BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV. There is a good redirect target and it can be split out if sources are found. // Timothy :: talk 20:38, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per WP:G5, based on the blatantly abusive use of multiple sockpuppets to recreate this after the previous deletions. Getting around the EC protection indicates this isn't the creator's first stab at sockpuppetry, even if the exact master account is uncertain. Given that this is a WP:BLP subject with apparent controversies over politics and religion, keeping the sockpuppet created content would be particularly negligent. I will also be applying full protection to this title and the alternative title that was used for the initial recreation. Anyone who wants to try again can request recreation by showing a draft space or user space version with appropriate sources.
With that said, the better Keep comments did highlight coverage from reliable news outlets that might be the foundation of a viable article, so I encourage future reviewers to keep an open mind about the possible notability of the subject, if and when a "clean" version is presented. RL0919 ( talk) 18:53, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Not a G4, and not (yet) a confirmed G5 but no indication notability has changed since the three prior deletion discussions. Making political sermons which garnered attention does not change one's notability. Star Mississippi 13:17, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'm less than convinced with a number of the keep !votes here, especially given the relative strength of the delete contributions. Relisting to hopefully establish a consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Creations by banned or blocked users. I was on the fence about this before. There appeared to be sufficient sources to pass GNG, although not enough attention was given to the fact that most of these were WP:PRIMARY. I tended to agree with Peterkingiron that the subject ought to be notable, and had not bothered researching to prove the point as it was looking like it was heading for keep. However, in light of the socking, I'll make the point that GNG requires secondary sources, and they have not been found. It really should be deleted under G5. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 14:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NotAGenious ( talk) 11:22, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG, trivial claims of notability JMHamo ( talk) 11:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:36, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Does nothing but promote the subject subjectively. Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG, not WP:NCORP either. Sources don't cover the subject significantly. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 10:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 09:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Originally proposed for WP:PROD. The subject is a player with a marginal professional career and hardly any WP:SIGCOV, apart from just a bunch of passing mentions. [42] Angelo ( talk) 10:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 09:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Originally proposed for WP:PROD. The subject is a player with an extremely marginal professional career and close to no WP:SIGCOV: all I could find was nothing more but a bunch of stats pages with no context and a couple transfer report news, but nothing really worth of WP:GNG. [43] Angelo ( talk) 09:59, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of DC Universe locations. Liz Read! Talk! 09:16, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
"a fictional museum that appears in comic books published by DC Comics". Pure plot summary and a list of works it appears in, no analysis, reception, etc. WP:GNG fail. The best WP:ATD I can think of would be redirectign this to List of DC Universe locations. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:39, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of DC Universe locations. Liz Read! Talk! 09:17, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
" a fictional American city appearing in American comic books published by DC Comics." Plot summary + list of media that it is shown in. No analysis, or reception, etc. Fails WP:GNG. The best WP:ATD I can think of would be redirectign this to List of DC Universe locations. PS. If anyone cares, note that I've also just PRODed unreferenced fancruft at Central City Police Department which IMHO does not merit redirecting - but feel free to redirect it if you feel charitable... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:32, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 09:18, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. I did a WP:BEFORE and found nothing suitable or reliable enough to pass WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator ( talk) 14:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Polyamorph (
talk)
06:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 07:23, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:N and WP:NPOV. Issues mentioned in the 2008 AFD were never corrected, and the articles reads as if written by a COI/paid editor/both. RedundancyAdvocate ( talk) 06:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Switch Mobility#Buses. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:24, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Requested at WT:AFD by IP editor. Rationale stated: Non notable bus, only a small number were built. NotAGenious ( talk) 05:52, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NORG. Aside from self-published sources, only source comes from the Association of Optometrists (which appear to be some sort of sponsor/interview/invited content). Author of page has apparent COI. Fermiboson ( talk) 04:43, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:00, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
WP:PROMO. The sources here so far, many which are interviews, are insufficient to establish the notability of the subject. Does not pass WP:NSINGER as well. – robertsky ( talk) 04:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Secret (app). Liz Read! Talk! 01:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Pro forma nomination on behalf of 69.149.121.20, who attempted to transclude an AfD for this article to the AfD logpage in this diff.
Their rationale was: "talk page + talk page for user that made the page indicate there was discussion about deletion due to a lack of noteworthiness, but nothing was documented about why the page was kept over the past few years". jp× g 🗯️ 01:04, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete I'm not an expert of WP:BIO but this reads like a Linkedin page of the person's various professional movements and not his independent contributions or impact. I've not done a WP:BEFORE but at least on the available sources it looks like there is some coverage from reliable sources, but heavily leaning into the context of his involvement with Secret, so the few relevant sources could be Merged there. VRXCES ( talk) 09:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)