![]() |
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:42, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
This is WP:SYNTHESIS and a grab-bag of links most of which don't even point to Youth Services organizations. PepperBeast (talk) 23:35, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 23:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 23:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Andy Hunter (DJ)#Discography. Liz Read! Talk! 03:49, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, only one valid source. WP:NALBUM's criteria #4 states "The recording has won or been nominated for a major music award", and the album won a GMA Dove Award, but this does not improve notability, since WP:NALBUM states: "Specific to recordings, a recording may be notable if it meets at least one of these criteria" and the article only meets one. — Mcguy15 ( talk, contribs) 21:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:43, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:55, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. They are a small company who make sheds. One of their structures was involved in a minor news item in 2009, and this gets a brief uncited mention on the Dallas Cowboys article. That is their only claim to notability that I can see. Edwardx ( talk) 20:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:02, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Briefly made the news for being banned from national championships and subsequent reputation rehabilitation, but nothing to indicate they're notable. Appears to be defunct, their website is dead and I can't find any other trace (note, North Star Blue Ox are a women's AFL club). Not mentioned on Minnesota_Rugby_Football_Union and nothing to merge, so not a viable ATD. Star Mississippi 21:41, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:38, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Note: I'm not advocating deletion, I would be fine with draft space incubation, but the creator is not willing to wait for a neutral, independent review so we have no choice but AfD. While it's not clear whether it meets NFILM at the moment, I believe there's a chance sourcing could be found, but it is not suitable to remain in mainspace currently. Star Mississippi 20:36, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:12, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Pacific-Union Club. What little content there was has been merged into the proposed target article and this will now become a redirect. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 20:40, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
User:Th78blue requested a nomination at Wikipedia:Teahouse#How do I nominate an article for deletion?. They described it as "this old stub that I really do not feel passes as notable". As the article only cites primary sources, there is no indication that WP:GNG is met. casualdejekyll 19:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:36, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
2019 no consensus, but I am unable to find independent reliable source coverage to confirm he meets GNG. There are name checks, but it doesn't speak to his expertise. His research isn't well cited enough to be notable via that route and his company ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strategic Name Development) was deleted, so nowhere to merge. Star Mississippi 19:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:36, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
I don't think this meets WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. It has been reviewed by several online blogs, but I was unable to find any reviews or coverage in independent and reliable sources. The author does not have a Wikipedia article, so there is not a good redirect target. DanCherek ( talk) 16:46, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:34, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Declined PROD; I'll repeat the same reasoning: WP:NOTDIR, and the one "reference" appears to be a self-published website (that is dead). UnitedStatesian ( talk) 15:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:33, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Non notable entrepreneur and “managing consulting expert” who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. The sources used in the article are what is described as fake referencing some of the sources do not even discuss nor concern the subject of the article. A before search shows press releases and primary sources the former is considered unreliable and the latter cannot be used for verification of claims of notability thus is not considered tangible or reliable as they lack independence from the subject of the article. Furthermore, This is a possible WP:ADMASQ. He is also a politician that fails WP:NPOL. Celestina007 ( talk) 15:46, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
This is the fourth WP:ADMASQ from Kaizenify we have found thus far, the article is on a non notable individual who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them, The awards they supposedly won all appear non notable or unremarkable. Celestina007 ( talk) 14:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR as well as WP:SIGCOV. ManaliJain ( talk) 14:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 21:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
This guy's had his finger in several pies, but I couldn't find any reputable sources. All of his roles are small trivial ones on mostly non-notable shows. Zero sourcing in article, zero sourcing found. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 14:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:01, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
"List of songs in the NHL video game soundtracks" is not a notable concept. Music is not considered to be an important part of the NHL series, and there is no reliable source discussing the entire series' music in a significant or extensive manner. This list of licensed songs is also filled with original research and WP:GAMECRUFT content. OceanHok ( talk) 13:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:02, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable university team. Reywas92 Talk 13:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Gusfriend ( talk) 10:38, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 14:11, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Article subject requests deletion. See VRT Ticket 2022040710005871. Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. Geoff | Who, me? 12:53, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:22, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Page has many unsubstantiated claims about this person, written in a mostly promotional way. Additionally, I have researched several of the major authors of this article, and an exceptional number of them seem to be sockpuppet accounts created solely to edit this article, with little other edits other than this article. Some examples of these users include FireWriter, Fishmr, Hoorah83, and SweetYPeach. These users also seem to very strongly defendant of Billings. For example, Firewriter has, on several occasions, went above and beyond to an abnormal level to defend Billing's actions on user talk pages. Additionally, it seems like some of these usernames have relations to "teachers" on Acellus. For example, Firewriter has a strong relation to FireAngel, a "instructional material" creator on Acellus. This Twitter thread I have stumbled on shows the video with the strongly related username. https://twitter.com/karaokecomputer/status/1296065385381236737 The person who goes by FireAngel is Pajet Monet, who is closely associated with Roger Billings' companies, activities and podcasts. Additionally, I have found little to no evidence of many of the companies that Billings is said to have created with success, and claims have changed multiple times. For example, a section where they claimed association with Bill Gates later changed to just simply having their computer on their desk (which I see little evidence of). I believe this article serves little purpose other to unnecessarily inflate the ego and reputation of Roger Billings, and should be deleted. andritolion ( talk) 08:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 14:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Notability. Yet another hyped up rivalry between two insignificant football teams. TheLongTone ( talk) 12:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
two insignificant football teams?? Northampton Town and Peterborough United are league clubs with a large fan base. That statement there is terrible for the nomination. It's clear by one user box on TheLongTone page stating "This user couldn't care less about football." That he should avoid football related articles then, if you don't care, why are you nominating this article. This really is a bad-faith nomination from that perspective, I condone this behaviour. I don't know why it was deleted in 2016, that shouldn't of happened then. The article certainly needs improving and not deleting. Govvy ( talk) 12:27, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. An argument has been made that the sourcing is sufficient to pass WP:GNG, but the overall consensus disagrees with that since the coverage is routine news coverage related to elections that Savarkar lost. It is also pointed out that being a family member of someone notable, being an unsuccessful candidate for office, or leading a political movement are insufficient grounds for notability as well. Since the consensus here is well founded in the guidelines, I am closing this discussion accordingly. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL, Lost elections. Family members of politicians are not notable. Venkat TL ( talk) 08:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
ascertained by the quality of the argumentsor
of users who cared enough to participate. Hemantha ( talk) 09:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
08:51, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
This article has been created yet again despite still not meeting WP:GNG. Seems to be a COI. –– FormalDude talk 10:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
These criteria, generally, follow the general notability guideline with a stronger emphasis on quality of the sources to prevent gaming of the rules by marketing and public relations professionals.
Apart from conceiving and executing promotional campaigns targeted at the Media, Marketing & Television Trade online, it also offers similar services offlinemaking clear its reliability) is the parent of TellyChakkar, which even WP:ICTFSOURCES holds unreliable. Journalismguide seems to be nothing more than a blog. Refs 10-12 by Filmfare, BH and IE about Shehzada/Aryan cover some gossip-like issue and are significantly made up of quotes. IE does not even mention the company's name.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:57, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Redirection is up to editors. Sandstein 21:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NENTERTAINER. While he had a main role on The Tribe (1999 TV series) I don't think that role by itself provides enough notability. A WP:BEFORE search did not bring up anything else significant enough to show he passes WP:GNG. Suonii180 ( talk) 10:52, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
The article made unambiguous claims and is written like advertisement, possibly in violation of WP:SOAPBOX. The article appears to be part of a series of promotional articles. Deppty ( talk) 11:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2021 Minor League Cricket season#Squads. Where it is now covered. Sandstein 21:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Violates WP:NOTSTATS, as we don't need squad lists for every team in this minor tournament. For cricket articles, we tend to only have separate squad list articles for ICC international events ( ICC World Cup, ICC Men's T20 World Cup and women's equivalents). No evidence this list meets WP:NLIST or WP:GNG. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 10:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Monk characters. ✗ plicit 11:50, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Supporting character from a TV show, the article is a pure plot summary with primary references. Previously PRODed. User:BD2412 deprodded with a comment that a merge and redirec to List of Monk characters would be better. Then this was redirected by an anon, but restored due 'no merge done'. Well, I don't believe there is anything to merge, given it's a plot summary referenced to the TV series and nothing else. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. I am fine with a WP:SOFTDELETE style redirect (preserving history), but I don't think anything more is needed here. It's just soap opera WP:FANCRUFT. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Monk characters. ✗ plicit 11:51, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
A super WP:FANCRUFTy article, with no reception/analysis of the character, just a lengthy plot summary and a ton of WP:OR trivia (ex. "Compared to Sharona, Natalie has driven at least six different cars in the course of the series. How she can afford to switch cars so frequently, given her very low salary, is never explained", followed by a detailed description of her cars...). The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar, just some mentions on a plot summary here and there, mostly in the numerous Monk-universe guide book (the series was clearly quite popular at some point, but that popularity did not translate into any WP:SIGCOV-level study of this supporting character). A redirect to List of Monk characters should be more than sufficient. PS. Previously PRODed. User:BD2412 deprodded with a comment that a merge and redirec to List of Monk characters would be better. Then this was redirected by an anon, but restored due 'no merge done'. Well, I don't believe there is anything to merge, given it's a plot summary referenced to the TV series and nothing else. I am fine with WP:SOFTDELETE redirect preserving the history. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:51, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Actor has been working a long time, but his CV is a just a long litany of bit parts. Cannot find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Edwardx ( talk) 10:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Archie Comics characters. ✗ plicit 11:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Pure plot summary with a smattering of info on publication history. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. Listed references are pretty low quality, and even the best contains no analysis, just plot summary. The worst include a blog from 2010 about a possible "planned new appearance". Sigh. This is low quality WP:FANCRUFT. I recommend redirecting the entry to List of Archie Comics characters per WP:SOFTDELETE. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:54, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Quite simply, this fails WP:GNG. County roads are rarely notable, and we don't keep them unless they meet GNG, which this won't. Imzadi 1979 → 05:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Documentary that appears to fail WP:NFILM. Nothing in a BEFORE convinced me that this is notable. Previous AfD was no consensus in 2015. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
01:29, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:57, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
non-notable company - believe it or not, not every org or company nasa does business with is notable or even noteworthy and this doesn't appear to be an exception. CUPIDICAE💕 01:36, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nom. This mainspace article was created just minutes after Draft:Maven Research was moved to draftspace. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 03:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:57, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No further discussion has taken place since within the first 2 days of the afd being initiated, 3 weeks ago, thus reaching a consensus seems unlikely. The weight of opinion seems to be more in favour of keeping. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 20:34, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Non notable fan film. Appears to fail WP: NFILM. Previous nomination resulted in redirect/merge. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:10, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
01:29, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:48, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Article is full of primary sources, I could not find third party coverage. LibStar ( talk) 02:10, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Munster Reds Twenty20 players. Liz Read! Talk! 04:14, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCRIC. Has played just one game in 2017 Inter-Provincial Trophy. This competition is not deemed notable as per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Cricket/Official_cricket#Men's_Competitions_with_First-class/List_A/T20_status_that_we_don't_deem_notable. LibStar ( talk) 03:46, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Couldn't prod since one had been removed before under the mistaken impression "We have a low inclusion bar for train stations, probably also for small airports". This isn't an airport with facilities for public access or regular flights, it's some rich person's private property with a strip of clear field on which their small private planes can land. No significant coverage; see also essay Wikipedia:WikiProject_Airports/Notability#Private_airports_tend_not_to_be_notable_on_their_own Reywas92 Talk 02:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
This is an unremarkable SD9 that fails GNG by a mile. It is sourced exclusively to self-published railfan sites and one museum which at one point owned the locomotive. Much of this article is just a duplication of Southern Pacific 4450 which I have also nominated for deletion. "They were favorites of railfans and usually worked together" does not confer notability. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 02:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
This is literally just a random SD9 that isn't remarkable in any way. Fails GNG by a mile, with what isn't straight up original research sourced only to one dude's self published railfan site and a single museum which once owned the locomotive. This isn't even a preserved locomotive. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 02:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:25, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Suburban mayor fails WP:NPOL. KidAd • SPEAK 01:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. In the sense of "not delete". As has been pointed out, not even the nominator wants this article deleted; instead, the discussion is about whether this should be a redirect, a disambiguation page or an overview article about the several genocides in Ukraine. That is a content dispute that needs resolving on the article talk page, not at AfD. Sandstein 21:25, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
This term is being thrown-around, but it is just political rhetoric at this point. This dab should be returned to the prior redirect to Holodomor, a true genocide. MB 01:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
References
If the article is deleted I have a grim feeling someone should keep a copy of the text. Also, propose a disambiguation on "Ukranian Genocides" to be targeted by the original typo-redirects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.230.177.165 ( talk) 00:26, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:42, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
This is WP:SYNTHESIS and a grab-bag of links most of which don't even point to Youth Services organizations. PepperBeast (talk) 23:35, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 23:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 23:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Andy Hunter (DJ)#Discography. Liz Read! Talk! 03:49, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, only one valid source. WP:NALBUM's criteria #4 states "The recording has won or been nominated for a major music award", and the album won a GMA Dove Award, but this does not improve notability, since WP:NALBUM states: "Specific to recordings, a recording may be notable if it meets at least one of these criteria" and the article only meets one. — Mcguy15 ( talk, contribs) 21:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:43, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:55, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. They are a small company who make sheds. One of their structures was involved in a minor news item in 2009, and this gets a brief uncited mention on the Dallas Cowboys article. That is their only claim to notability that I can see. Edwardx ( talk) 20:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:02, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Briefly made the news for being banned from national championships and subsequent reputation rehabilitation, but nothing to indicate they're notable. Appears to be defunct, their website is dead and I can't find any other trace (note, North Star Blue Ox are a women's AFL club). Not mentioned on Minnesota_Rugby_Football_Union and nothing to merge, so not a viable ATD. Star Mississippi 21:41, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:38, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Note: I'm not advocating deletion, I would be fine with draft space incubation, but the creator is not willing to wait for a neutral, independent review so we have no choice but AfD. While it's not clear whether it meets NFILM at the moment, I believe there's a chance sourcing could be found, but it is not suitable to remain in mainspace currently. Star Mississippi 20:36, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:12, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Pacific-Union Club. What little content there was has been merged into the proposed target article and this will now become a redirect. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 20:40, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
User:Th78blue requested a nomination at Wikipedia:Teahouse#How do I nominate an article for deletion?. They described it as "this old stub that I really do not feel passes as notable". As the article only cites primary sources, there is no indication that WP:GNG is met. casualdejekyll 19:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:36, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
2019 no consensus, but I am unable to find independent reliable source coverage to confirm he meets GNG. There are name checks, but it doesn't speak to his expertise. His research isn't well cited enough to be notable via that route and his company ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strategic Name Development) was deleted, so nowhere to merge. Star Mississippi 19:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:36, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
I don't think this meets WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. It has been reviewed by several online blogs, but I was unable to find any reviews or coverage in independent and reliable sources. The author does not have a Wikipedia article, so there is not a good redirect target. DanCherek ( talk) 16:46, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:34, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Declined PROD; I'll repeat the same reasoning: WP:NOTDIR, and the one "reference" appears to be a self-published website (that is dead). UnitedStatesian ( talk) 15:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:33, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Non notable entrepreneur and “managing consulting expert” who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. The sources used in the article are what is described as fake referencing some of the sources do not even discuss nor concern the subject of the article. A before search shows press releases and primary sources the former is considered unreliable and the latter cannot be used for verification of claims of notability thus is not considered tangible or reliable as they lack independence from the subject of the article. Furthermore, This is a possible WP:ADMASQ. He is also a politician that fails WP:NPOL. Celestina007 ( talk) 15:46, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
This is the fourth WP:ADMASQ from Kaizenify we have found thus far, the article is on a non notable individual who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them, The awards they supposedly won all appear non notable or unremarkable. Celestina007 ( talk) 14:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR as well as WP:SIGCOV. ManaliJain ( talk) 14:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 21:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
This guy's had his finger in several pies, but I couldn't find any reputable sources. All of his roles are small trivial ones on mostly non-notable shows. Zero sourcing in article, zero sourcing found. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 14:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:01, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
"List of songs in the NHL video game soundtracks" is not a notable concept. Music is not considered to be an important part of the NHL series, and there is no reliable source discussing the entire series' music in a significant or extensive manner. This list of licensed songs is also filled with original research and WP:GAMECRUFT content. OceanHok ( talk) 13:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:02, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable university team. Reywas92 Talk 13:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Gusfriend ( talk) 10:38, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 14:11, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Article subject requests deletion. See VRT Ticket 2022040710005871. Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. Geoff | Who, me? 12:53, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:22, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Page has many unsubstantiated claims about this person, written in a mostly promotional way. Additionally, I have researched several of the major authors of this article, and an exceptional number of them seem to be sockpuppet accounts created solely to edit this article, with little other edits other than this article. Some examples of these users include FireWriter, Fishmr, Hoorah83, and SweetYPeach. These users also seem to very strongly defendant of Billings. For example, Firewriter has, on several occasions, went above and beyond to an abnormal level to defend Billing's actions on user talk pages. Additionally, it seems like some of these usernames have relations to "teachers" on Acellus. For example, Firewriter has a strong relation to FireAngel, a "instructional material" creator on Acellus. This Twitter thread I have stumbled on shows the video with the strongly related username. https://twitter.com/karaokecomputer/status/1296065385381236737 The person who goes by FireAngel is Pajet Monet, who is closely associated with Roger Billings' companies, activities and podcasts. Additionally, I have found little to no evidence of many of the companies that Billings is said to have created with success, and claims have changed multiple times. For example, a section where they claimed association with Bill Gates later changed to just simply having their computer on their desk (which I see little evidence of). I believe this article serves little purpose other to unnecessarily inflate the ego and reputation of Roger Billings, and should be deleted. andritolion ( talk) 08:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 14:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Notability. Yet another hyped up rivalry between two insignificant football teams. TheLongTone ( talk) 12:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
two insignificant football teams?? Northampton Town and Peterborough United are league clubs with a large fan base. That statement there is terrible for the nomination. It's clear by one user box on TheLongTone page stating "This user couldn't care less about football." That he should avoid football related articles then, if you don't care, why are you nominating this article. This really is a bad-faith nomination from that perspective, I condone this behaviour. I don't know why it was deleted in 2016, that shouldn't of happened then. The article certainly needs improving and not deleting. Govvy ( talk) 12:27, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. An argument has been made that the sourcing is sufficient to pass WP:GNG, but the overall consensus disagrees with that since the coverage is routine news coverage related to elections that Savarkar lost. It is also pointed out that being a family member of someone notable, being an unsuccessful candidate for office, or leading a political movement are insufficient grounds for notability as well. Since the consensus here is well founded in the guidelines, I am closing this discussion accordingly. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL, Lost elections. Family members of politicians are not notable. Venkat TL ( talk) 08:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
ascertained by the quality of the argumentsor
of users who cared enough to participate. Hemantha ( talk) 09:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
08:51, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
This article has been created yet again despite still not meeting WP:GNG. Seems to be a COI. –– FormalDude talk 10:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
These criteria, generally, follow the general notability guideline with a stronger emphasis on quality of the sources to prevent gaming of the rules by marketing and public relations professionals.
Apart from conceiving and executing promotional campaigns targeted at the Media, Marketing & Television Trade online, it also offers similar services offlinemaking clear its reliability) is the parent of TellyChakkar, which even WP:ICTFSOURCES holds unreliable. Journalismguide seems to be nothing more than a blog. Refs 10-12 by Filmfare, BH and IE about Shehzada/Aryan cover some gossip-like issue and are significantly made up of quotes. IE does not even mention the company's name.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:57, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Redirection is up to editors. Sandstein 21:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NENTERTAINER. While he had a main role on The Tribe (1999 TV series) I don't think that role by itself provides enough notability. A WP:BEFORE search did not bring up anything else significant enough to show he passes WP:GNG. Suonii180 ( talk) 10:52, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
The article made unambiguous claims and is written like advertisement, possibly in violation of WP:SOAPBOX. The article appears to be part of a series of promotional articles. Deppty ( talk) 11:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2021 Minor League Cricket season#Squads. Where it is now covered. Sandstein 21:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Violates WP:NOTSTATS, as we don't need squad lists for every team in this minor tournament. For cricket articles, we tend to only have separate squad list articles for ICC international events ( ICC World Cup, ICC Men's T20 World Cup and women's equivalents). No evidence this list meets WP:NLIST or WP:GNG. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 10:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Monk characters. ✗ plicit 11:50, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Supporting character from a TV show, the article is a pure plot summary with primary references. Previously PRODed. User:BD2412 deprodded with a comment that a merge and redirec to List of Monk characters would be better. Then this was redirected by an anon, but restored due 'no merge done'. Well, I don't believe there is anything to merge, given it's a plot summary referenced to the TV series and nothing else. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. I am fine with a WP:SOFTDELETE style redirect (preserving history), but I don't think anything more is needed here. It's just soap opera WP:FANCRUFT. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Monk characters. ✗ plicit 11:51, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
A super WP:FANCRUFTy article, with no reception/analysis of the character, just a lengthy plot summary and a ton of WP:OR trivia (ex. "Compared to Sharona, Natalie has driven at least six different cars in the course of the series. How she can afford to switch cars so frequently, given her very low salary, is never explained", followed by a detailed description of her cars...). The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar, just some mentions on a plot summary here and there, mostly in the numerous Monk-universe guide book (the series was clearly quite popular at some point, but that popularity did not translate into any WP:SIGCOV-level study of this supporting character). A redirect to List of Monk characters should be more than sufficient. PS. Previously PRODed. User:BD2412 deprodded with a comment that a merge and redirec to List of Monk characters would be better. Then this was redirected by an anon, but restored due 'no merge done'. Well, I don't believe there is anything to merge, given it's a plot summary referenced to the TV series and nothing else. I am fine with WP:SOFTDELETE redirect preserving the history. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:51, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Actor has been working a long time, but his CV is a just a long litany of bit parts. Cannot find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Edwardx ( talk) 10:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Archie Comics characters. ✗ plicit 11:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Pure plot summary with a smattering of info on publication history. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. Listed references are pretty low quality, and even the best contains no analysis, just plot summary. The worst include a blog from 2010 about a possible "planned new appearance". Sigh. This is low quality WP:FANCRUFT. I recommend redirecting the entry to List of Archie Comics characters per WP:SOFTDELETE. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:54, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Quite simply, this fails WP:GNG. County roads are rarely notable, and we don't keep them unless they meet GNG, which this won't. Imzadi 1979 → 05:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Documentary that appears to fail WP:NFILM. Nothing in a BEFORE convinced me that this is notable. Previous AfD was no consensus in 2015. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
01:29, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:57, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
non-notable company - believe it or not, not every org or company nasa does business with is notable or even noteworthy and this doesn't appear to be an exception. CUPIDICAE💕 01:36, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nom. This mainspace article was created just minutes after Draft:Maven Research was moved to draftspace. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 03:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:57, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No further discussion has taken place since within the first 2 days of the afd being initiated, 3 weeks ago, thus reaching a consensus seems unlikely. The weight of opinion seems to be more in favour of keeping. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 20:34, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Non notable fan film. Appears to fail WP: NFILM. Previous nomination resulted in redirect/merge. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:10, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
01:29, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:48, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Article is full of primary sources, I could not find third party coverage. LibStar ( talk) 02:10, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Munster Reds Twenty20 players. Liz Read! Talk! 04:14, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCRIC. Has played just one game in 2017 Inter-Provincial Trophy. This competition is not deemed notable as per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Cricket/Official_cricket#Men's_Competitions_with_First-class/List_A/T20_status_that_we_don't_deem_notable. LibStar ( talk) 03:46, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Couldn't prod since one had been removed before under the mistaken impression "We have a low inclusion bar for train stations, probably also for small airports". This isn't an airport with facilities for public access or regular flights, it's some rich person's private property with a strip of clear field on which their small private planes can land. No significant coverage; see also essay Wikipedia:WikiProject_Airports/Notability#Private_airports_tend_not_to_be_notable_on_their_own Reywas92 Talk 02:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
This is an unremarkable SD9 that fails GNG by a mile. It is sourced exclusively to self-published railfan sites and one museum which at one point owned the locomotive. Much of this article is just a duplication of Southern Pacific 4450 which I have also nominated for deletion. "They were favorites of railfans and usually worked together" does not confer notability. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 02:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
This is literally just a random SD9 that isn't remarkable in any way. Fails GNG by a mile, with what isn't straight up original research sourced only to one dude's self published railfan site and a single museum which once owned the locomotive. This isn't even a preserved locomotive. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 02:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:25, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Suburban mayor fails WP:NPOL. KidAd • SPEAK 01:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. In the sense of "not delete". As has been pointed out, not even the nominator wants this article deleted; instead, the discussion is about whether this should be a redirect, a disambiguation page or an overview article about the several genocides in Ukraine. That is a content dispute that needs resolving on the article talk page, not at AfD. Sandstein 21:25, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
This term is being thrown-around, but it is just political rhetoric at this point. This dab should be returned to the prior redirect to Holodomor, a true genocide. MB 01:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
References
If the article is deleted I have a grim feeling someone should keep a copy of the text. Also, propose a disambiguation on "Ukranian Genocides" to be targeted by the original typo-redirects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.230.177.165 ( talk) 00:26, 12 April 2022 (UTC)