![]() |
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 17:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
fails WP:NCORP. Not enough third party coverage that is intellectually independent to surpass CORPDEPTH standards. Graywalls ( talk) 18:25, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain ( talk) 19:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
After noticing it had been flagged for notability concerns, I performed a before search which shows subject of the article is a non notable actor and musician who fails to satisfy any criterion from WP:NACTOR as she hasn’t taken up lead roles in the movies she has featured in or won any notable awards as the award they have claim to have won is very much non notable. Furthermore they certainly do not satisfy any criterion from WP:MUSICBIO. In summary, they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them thus a major GNG fail. Celestina007 ( talk) 23:43, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
[1], i suggest writing it better like an essay, with this Newspaper link, i found about the actress NOTICE501 ( talk) 13:35, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
The actress Shine has been trending all over social media than usual, i decided to write from sources i saw online, just like blessed memory Ada Jesus which happened same time. She is highly talked about both on YouTube and AIT Telvision. I haven't been her fan, friend or parent. notice501 ( talk) 19:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to George Floyd Square. Clear consensus. (non-admin closure) EpicPupper ( talk) 03:11, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable as a store, the only coverage is from the chain of events that led to the murder of George Floyd. These events are well covered in Murder of George Floyd, George Floyd Square, George Floyd protests in Minneapolis–Saint Paul and other related articles. This part of this article (the bulk of it) is simply a duplication of content elsewhere John B123 ( talk) 22:56, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) EpicPupper 21:30, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Does not look notable per WP:NBIO. EpicPupper 21:46, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn to re-scope article per suggestion. ( non-admin closure) Mottezen ( talk) 02:13, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
This article is a mish-mash list of conflicts between indigenous peoples and colonial or settler states from Hernan Cortez to the present day Chiapas conflict, though it marks the end date of the "Mexican Indian Wars" in 1933. The links tying all these conflicts together are very weak. These wars all implicate different actors and circumstances. No sources I saw made the connections between these conflicts the way this article does. Overall, there is very few mentions of this concept in the literature: 2 hits on google scholar, and 6 on Google books. "Indian Mexican Wars" has just as little hits.
Only one book in the hits I got was not simply making a mention in passing of this subject. This book only deals with the period of 1812 to 1900, and makes comparisons with Indian wars in Canada and the United States. The author uses the term "Mexican Indian Wars" just once in the whole book. He titled a relevant chapter "Indian Wars in Mexico" instead. The comparative nature of this books likely why the author even used the term "indian wars" at all; the term is absent in every other works of Mexican history.
Of the sources in the article, only one of them uses the term at all, and it doesn't strike me as a RS. And even then, the author, "History guy", only uses the term to describe three wars in the early 20th century.
The article was written by a now-blocked user mostly interested in American history. The Spanish article of this topic was written last year, and describes the term as a "anglophone concept", "'mostly used in Canada and the United States", and "not used in Spanish". I feel this is a case of circular reporting on Wikipedia. Tales of a totally made up conflict that lasted 414 years are being shared on instagram. Time to delete this aberration. Mottezen ( talk) 21:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Colorado Mesa University. (non-admin closure) Ashley yoursmile! 05:33, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Highly unnecessary WP:CONTENTFORK. A random student government position does not need a separate article. Relevant information, if any, can be merged to Colorado Mesa University as needed. KidAd • SPEAK 20:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ivri Lider as an WP:ATD. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 03:00, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NALBUM notability which require coverage in independent reliable secondary sources. Rusf10 ( talk) 20:23, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is GNG met 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 13:41, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Was AfD'd back in 2013, and nothing really has changed since then. While it is part of a historic district, it itself is not on the NRHP. Currently the vast majority of the article is primary sourced, and there is not enough in-depth coverage to pass GNG. Part of several articles which have all be recreated after AfD. I'll be sending them all to AfD, but did not feel bundling was appropriate, since all should be evaluated individually. Onel5969 TT me 14:25, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
References
References
{{
cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (
link)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:13, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable cricketer, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 20:16, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Randykitty ( talk) 17:43, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Failed to find any sources where his fifers are discussed as a set or group, so fails WP:NLIST, WP:RAWDATA. Also, note that User talk:Vibhijain who created this list has been blocked for socking. Störm (talk) 16:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
"...meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article."). wjemather please leave a message... 16:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
*Keep. Featured material which failed inclusion guidelines wouldn't be featured material otherwise. Unless his name is
Lewis.
StickyWicket (
talk)
16:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable cricketer, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 20:02, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable cricketer, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 20:01, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable cricketer, nothing in coverage, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 19:46, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Rawalpindi cricket team. Randykitty ( talk) 17:44, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable cricketer, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 19:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain ( talk) 18:58, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable education institution. Earlier PROD by Robert McClenon was removed by the creating editor without explanation, and previous attempt was rejected and now exists in drafts; hence this AfD. Unsourced, and a search finds nothing beyond the usual social media and directory listings. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORG. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 19:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 18:42, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Waste of time AfD due to someone who clearly cannot read. Duplicative content of List of Fables characters that is not a justified split. TTN ( talk) 18:16, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 14:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Dead company. No independent sources but dead links to its websites an a couple of pres releases Lembit Staan ( talk) 17:19, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain ( talk) 18:57, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Unsourced, and presumably autobiographical (based on the article's content, and the author's username). It would need rewriting from scratch, but I'm not seeing the sources to do it - I can find an actor of that name mentioned on IMDB as having played a small role in the 2020 film 'The Grudge' (not the film linked to from the article); I can't quite make the connection with 'Fear the Walking Dead', the character mentioned in the article seems to be played by somebody else, but maybe he plays an older version of that character or something? Anyway, based on the sources I can find, the subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. (Note - there is another actor of this name, from Winnipeg - most of the sources I came across were about that person, not the subject of this article) GirthSummit (blether) 17:18, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
I have to disagree on everything that is saying Ray Starchan Wikipedia page is very accurate everything on there is 100% true I don’t know why this page is going up for deletion when I provided every single link every single proof that this account this Wikipedia page is correct now if you would like for me to submit more information regarding this person in this Wikipedia page I can and I will so I don’t believe that this patient needs to be deleted at all if he can provide more information regarding this page and why it should be delete it please Inform me and I will gladly take it down but I am this person I have provided you guys would fall in accurate information like I said earlier I would like to provide you guys with the information regarding myself if it’s links on a contract I can also provide my management I can also provide my agency and my legal Representative thank you for your time and hopefully this page when I get taken down at all — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyveon L. Ray ( talk • contribs) 23:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
I’m Going To Have To Disagree With The Take Down Of This Page I Searched This Person Up And Everything On This Account Is Right I Keep Up With This Actor I Watch Him On Tv And I Follow Him On Instagram Everything On This Page Is Right I Have Seen Him On Fear The Walking Dead Ever Since Season 5 Of The Show And He Has Played Duane Jones wry Good And If You Keel Up With The Show You Would Know That The Original Person That Play Duane Jones no Longer Play Him Anymore So I Would Keep This Page Up And Running. Sock
GirthSummit
(blether)
17:56, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete: No indication of notability and almost unreadable to boot. - Sumanuil ( talk) 04:55, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete: Clearly a WP:COI issue, among other serious problems–nothing is sourced, no indication of notability; information regarding Fear the Walking Dead is fake, I actually watch the series and that actor and character have never appeared; and the content in the "Early life" section is copied and pasted from Jude Demorest with just being slightly altered. The quote used in that section is directly lifted from this source with an interview with a different actor. Drovethrughosts ( talk) 14:23, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was draftify. The article has been moved to Draft:Closed for Storm by its creator. . ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 05:15, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Non notable future documentary, appears to fail WP:NFF as production wasn't notable. Should be deleted or moved to draftspace until it is released and notability can be established. Donaldd23 ( talk) 16:50, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:15, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Non notable “Dj” who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them, thus do not satisfy WP:GNG and also doesn’t seem to satisfy any criterion from WP:MUSICBIO or WP:ENT. Celestina007 ( talk) 16:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 14:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NGRIDIRON, having never played professionally. Fails WP:NCOLLATH with a non-notable college football career ( [12]). Fails WP:GNG, as this is the only significant coverage I can find on the subject. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:05, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:35, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Unsourced, appears to fail WP:MUSICBIO. I can't find any significant coverage of this band, or other clear indications of notability; they've released two albums on a relatively obscure label and opened for notable bands, but that's about it. The Italian wiki doesn't have an article on them. Lennart97 ( talk) 16:05, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain ( talk) 18:57, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
The user who created this article turns out to be a pathological liar. Assuming Juan exists, is any of the history (conveniently sourced to paper books without URL) true? Is this person notable? Are we better off using WP:TNT rather than risk WP:CITOGENESIS?
Whpq tried to speedy this but was contested. — Alexis Jazz ( talk or ping me) 15:32, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:35, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
A private school which fails NORG. No significant coverage and thus fails GNG also Poppified talk 15:15, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:35, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMUSICIAN and WP:GNG; only copy and pasted press release coverage available. Very lazy copying and pasting as well. If you don't believe me, see how they all contain the line "He started music professionally at the age of 17 having drawn great support from his mother who he describes as his number one fan." somewhere in the article.
Once you remove this single press release, that has been copied and pasted across numerous Nigerian websites, there appears to be no coverage of him. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:55, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:36, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Unreferenced biography of a living person which has been in CAT:NN's backlog for 12 years. He existed and had some success, but I couldn't find anything to establish he is notable. Boleyn ( talk) 14:52, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Was originally nominated as part of a bundle nomination of equally non-significantly-covered animated soundtrack albums, but commenters ignorant about the coverage of the topics tried to convince me they were somehow individually notable. The commenters used lousy reasoning, or WP:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, in trying to suggest certain topics in that nomination had individual notability. One suggested a couple of albums were by notable artists, which didn't make them notable as Notability is not inherited. Another agued "some of these articles are getting 100+ views/day", which is an invalid WP:POPULARPAGE argument. Another agued "Deleting the articles in question would delete the not insignificant article histories and revisions that could serve as rough drafts for future versions of these pages if they hold up to notability standards at a later date", which is invalid as most of these soundtracks never do and even so, we are not a WP:CRYSTALBALL.
With all fairness, I could understand how one could argue the song's Razzie nomination would make this topic significant, as not only is that a major (albeit comedic) award it is also the only time in history before The Emoji Movie anything animated was even Razzie-nominated. However, that only gives the song itself significance, and even then there isn't anything to find for that. Other coverage is one Allmusic rev, a self-published fansite, and retail pages. That does not establish WP:SIGCOV 👨x🐱 ( talk) 14:22, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
I can't find the newspapers.com articles, but are you sure they're specifically about the soundtrack?The Town Talk piece is literally a two-page spread about its recording. newspapers.com is theoretically paywalled, although accessible through The Wikipedia Library. This is what I meant at the time about the issue with having nominations so close together even if they're unbundled -- I've done BEFORE on three of the nominations and found two of them had sigcov that wasn't found already. There are 31 nominations. You're a reasonable and likable person, I know you have no intent to foster that workload on AfD !voters, and I know you in all likelihood genuinely didn't realize that !voters need to do their own BEFOREs rather than taking the nominator's for granted and that anything before really about 2005 has way, way more accessible on archival sources than the open internet. I don't know who's going to comb newspapers.com for the remaining 28, and I don't know if it's me. (As for HS RS, the HS is a FAC standard, not an AfD standard. I'm not sure I'd use it in an FA, but they have editorial control and appear to fact-check.) Vaticidal prophet 13:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. NCORP failed Nosebagbear ( talk) 15:12, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Does not meet NCORP. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources beyond routine stuff like fundraising, partnerships and self-published articles. M4DU7 ( talk) 14:22, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Proud Family. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:30, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Was originally nominated as part of a bundle nomination of equally non-significantly-covered animated soundtrack albums, but commenters ignorant about the coverage of the topics tried to convince me they were somehow individually notable. The commenters used lousy reasoning, or WP:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, in trying to suggest certain topics in that nomination had individual notability. One suggested a couple of albums were by notable artists, which didn't make them notable as Notability is not inherited. Another agued "some of these articles are getting 100+ views/day", which is an invalid WP:POPULARPAGE argument. Another agued "Deleting the articles in question would delete the not insignificant article histories and revisions that could serve as rough drafts for future versions of these pages if they hold up to notability standards at a later date", which is invalid as most of these soundtracks never do and even so, we are not a WP:CRYSTALBALL.
All I could find was one Allmusic review and a mention of one song being in the show for Jet magazine. That is not WP:SIGCOV and does not establish notability. 👨x🐱 ( talk) 14:18, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to The Pebble and the Penguin#Music. (non-admin closure) Ashley yoursmile! 05:40, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Was originally nominated as part of a bundle nomination of equally non-significantly-covered animated soundtrack albums, but commenters ignorant about the coverage of the topics tried to convince me they were somehow individually notable. The commenters used lousy reasoning, or WP:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, in trying to suggest certain topics in that nomination had individual notability. One suggested a couple of albums were by notable artists, which didn't make them notable as Notability is not inherited. Another agued "some of these articles are getting 100+ views/day", which is an invalid WP:POPULARPAGE argument. Another agued "Deleting the articles in question would delete the not insignificant article histories and revisions that could serve as rough drafts for future versions of these pages if they hold up to notability standards at a later date", which is invalid as most of these soundtracks never do and even so, we are not a WP:CRYSTALBALL.
Having one allmusic review does not establish notability. Being a soundtrack of a Don Bluth film does not establish independent notability. Having the kick-ass Tim Curry on your soundtrack album doesn– yeah, you get the idea. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. 👨x🐱 ( talk) 14:14, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fails to show notability Nosebagbear ( talk) 15:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Fail of WP:GNG. nearlyevil 665 09:14, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
I removed an A11 on this, as it wasn't quite one, but I don't think this is something discussed much in RSes. The Big Four international beauty pageants seems to be a notable topic, but the expansion with the other two seems very peripheral. There's a little bit of discussion, but I can only find one that appears even possibly RS, and I'm unsure it constitutes SIGCOV. There may be room for this article in a couple years, because the additional pageants look very new, but perhaps just WP:TOOSOON. Vaticidal prophet 12:47, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
References
{{
cite news}}
: |last=
has generic name (
help)
{{
cite news}}
: |last1=
has generic name (
help)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
I am concerned that this does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT. This may not even satisfy basic WP:V as there are no sources in the article at all and there never were any. Searches relating to this, its teams, Spuž and Ulcinj are coming back with no useful results at all. This would require multiple independent and reliable sources reporting on it in depth to qualify for an article. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:42, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete G3. Article was deleted as WP:CSD#G3 by Stwalkerster (non-admin closure) McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 18:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Would be presumed notable if his role can be verified. I have attempted a WP:BEFORE search but can't find anything to verify the article's statement. Fails WP:V as well as WP:N as far as I can tell. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was Closing since nominator is a sock.. The nominator was blocked for sockpuppetry. Feel free to renominate, etc, if necessary. Missvain ( talk) 18:56, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
No reliable sources found on a WP:Before and no sources to establish GNG. ♠Devan Lallu Talk 14:35, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator, only !vote was to keep, and sources were added. XOR'easter ( talk) 17:47, 24 April 2021 (UTC) ( non-admin closure)
Biography of a pulp fiction and children’s writer unsourced since 2003. A search is hard because it throws up only false positives for me and I’m not even finding unreliable sources. The article looks like it was based on an obituary but maybe others will be able to find sources demonstrating notability.
Mccapra (
talk)
11:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Randykitty ( talk) 18:49, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, the history section and only reference are nothing to do with this exhibition centre operator. WP:BEFORE reveals only trivial coverage. SailingInABathTub ( talk) 19:57, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Source | Significant? | Independent? | Reliable? | Secondary? | Pass/Fail | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
#1 Süddeutsche Zeitung | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
An article about the company losing money and cutting jobs due to COVID-19 - routine coverage. |
#2 Augsburger Allgemeine | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
An article about the company losing money due to COVID-19 - routine coverage. |
#3 BR24 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
An article about the company cancelling 'Expo Real' due to COVID-19 - routine coverage. |
#4 Die Spiele | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Report on the 1972 Olympic games. No mention of the company. |
#5 Spiegel Politik | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
An article on suspected corruption at the Munich trade fair by employees of the company. Routine coverage per WP:EVENTCRIT. |
#6 Süddeutsche Zeitung | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
An article about the company expanding its exhibition space - routine coverage. |
#7 Frankfurter Allgemeine | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
An article about Munich hosting the International Motor Show. No mention of the company. |
#8 IFO Institute | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
A report on the company's economic importance, commissioned by the company. |
#9 statista | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The company's annual sales history - routine coverage |
#10 Merkur.de | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
An article about the company cutting jobs due to COVID-19 - routine coverage. |
#11 University thesis | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
A university thesis. Not considered to reliable per WP:SCHOLARSHIP |
#12 University thesis | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
A university thesis. Not considered to reliable per WP:SCHOLARSHIP |
Total qualifying sources | 0 | There is no significant coverage in multiple reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.
|
SailingInABathTub ( talk) 14:49, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT; searches of the Montenegrin name are not returning any useful results, mainly Wikipedia mirrors. Friendly tournaments are not inherently notable and are required to have multiple sources covering them in depth to justify an article. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:59, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
I am also nominating this for the same reason:
The result was speedy keep. Non-administrator Closure - Per WP:SNOW, I cannot see a way of this being deleted (8 keep (3 speedy keep and 5 keep) with 2 delete votes, including the nomination). Reasoning for deletion were WP:NOTNEWS and some reasons for keep were WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, WP:RAPID, and the fact of this being a terrorist attack. (non-admin closure) Elijahandskip ( talk) 10:58, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Non notable and reads like a news report ( WP:NOTNEWS), with only 1 reference. f Kadzi ( talk) 10:24, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Some sources available but not enough from established WP:RS to show a clear passing of WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT, which requires more than just routine announcements of the event. I found a brochure published by the tournament itself, clearly not an independent source. I found an announcement about the 2013 tournament here and some about subsequent tournaments here and here. Notice that all articles are written by 'editorial staff' rather than actual named authors and all are written promotionally.
I could not find any coverage of individual matches, not even the finals. All coverage, and there's very little of it, seems to be pre-tournament announcements. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:58, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
This article has been unsourced for 11 years and there is no indication of notability. I have given the individual tournament articles a PROD already. My WP:BEFORE search is only coming back with Wikipedia mirrors and no coverage in established WP:RS, therefore, I see no potential for this article to be more than what it currently is. WP:GNG not established. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Non notable actor with no evidence of meeting WP:NACTOR. The only film he probably worked and played a main role in is Pappur Biye which is not a notable film either. Umakant Bhalerao ( talk) 08:17, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. The keep votes centre entirely around NFOOTY which is a presumption of GNG. Per WP:ROUGHCONSENSUS my assessment of the arguments is that those claiming the subject fails gng carry more weight as not a single source which might indicate the significant coverage NFOOTBALL assumes has been presented. Fenix down ( talk) 23:22, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL as that's guideline is working now. Only played 6 minutes of pro-league football, back in 2017, and now plays on the third tier. I know this is a "career still ongoing" case, but as said the 6 minutes is pretty long ago. Geschichte ( talk) 05:27, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Q1: How is this guideline related to the general notability guideline?
A1: The topic-specific notability guidelines described on this page do not replace the general notability guideline.
Q2: If a sports figure meets the criteria specified in a sports-specific notability guideline, does this mean he/she does not have to meet the general notability guideline?
A2: No, the article must still eventually provide sources indicating that the subject meets the general notability guideline.
Q5: The second sentence in the guideline says "The article must provide reliable sources showing that the subject meets the general notability guideline or the sport specific criteria set forth below." Does this mean that the general notability guideline doesn't have to be met?
A5: No; as per Q1 and Q2, eventually sources must be provided showing that the general notability guideline is met.
The coverage found in the Swedish article, by various !voters above, and by my own searches in Swedish newspapers are exclusively passing mentions and database entries, which do not contribute to GNG. Furthermore, the argument that he might be notable in the future is straight-up the definition of an argument to avoid ( crystal). JoelleJay ( talk) 18:41, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Q2: If a sports figure meets the criteria specified in a sports-specific notability guideline, does this mean he/she does not have to meet the general notability guideline?
A2: No, the article must still eventually provide sources indicating that the subject meets the general notability guideline.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:23, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Prod removed by article creator. This strikes me as more or less an advertisement. A search finds some trivial coverage of the doctor, on items such as which mask he recommends for COVID protection. GNG fail. --- Possibly ( talk) 01:39, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
All prior XfDs for this page:
|
It was noted during the current RM that this pseudoscientific hypothesis fails WP:GNG, with the only source not by proponents Johnjoe McFadden and Jim Al-Khalili being a rebuttal that is an arXiv preprint. The article subject is unrelated to the theory more commonly known as quantum evolution, which does not involve quantum mechanics. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 04:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
If not merge, then delete, the keep !votes have a bit of a "well, it has references" theme, and the closer's statement had the qualification
The article embodies all that is worst about this kind of topic, however.Given the breakdown of the numbers and the caveats in the !votes, it should perhaps have been relisted rather than closed back then, but that aside, we're here again now, and the intervening years have not proved the topic notable. XOR'easter ( talk) 15:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Still no consensus made after the 2nd relist. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 07:00, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
No notability for this single to warrant a standalone article. Nearlyevil665 ( talk) 14:59, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 06:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:V. I have found no evidence that the airport exists. Even if it does exist, may have a very hard time meeting WP:GNG. Rusf10 ( talk) 03:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 07:49, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
No disambiguation needed - the only mention of IntelliMax is in the track listing of Contemporary Sapporo. Leschnei ( talk) 12:59, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator. ✗ plicit 00:57, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
BLP does not meet
WP:NBIO- notability is not inherited from the role of being one of 74 judges in the second-tier court for a country.
MrsSnoozyTurtle (
talk)
00:15, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator. MrsSnoozyTurtle ( talk) 22:09, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:55, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Not enough depth for WP:GNG, in my view. No significant coverage cited in the article and little found in searches. The best that I could find were 2 passing mentions in The World Game, SMH match report, a list in My Football and a picture of him in QT. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:04, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 17:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
fails WP:NCORP. Not enough third party coverage that is intellectually independent to surpass CORPDEPTH standards. Graywalls ( talk) 18:25, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain ( talk) 19:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
After noticing it had been flagged for notability concerns, I performed a before search which shows subject of the article is a non notable actor and musician who fails to satisfy any criterion from WP:NACTOR as she hasn’t taken up lead roles in the movies she has featured in or won any notable awards as the award they have claim to have won is very much non notable. Furthermore they certainly do not satisfy any criterion from WP:MUSICBIO. In summary, they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them thus a major GNG fail. Celestina007 ( talk) 23:43, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
[1], i suggest writing it better like an essay, with this Newspaper link, i found about the actress NOTICE501 ( talk) 13:35, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
The actress Shine has been trending all over social media than usual, i decided to write from sources i saw online, just like blessed memory Ada Jesus which happened same time. She is highly talked about both on YouTube and AIT Telvision. I haven't been her fan, friend or parent. notice501 ( talk) 19:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to George Floyd Square. Clear consensus. (non-admin closure) EpicPupper ( talk) 03:11, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable as a store, the only coverage is from the chain of events that led to the murder of George Floyd. These events are well covered in Murder of George Floyd, George Floyd Square, George Floyd protests in Minneapolis–Saint Paul and other related articles. This part of this article (the bulk of it) is simply a duplication of content elsewhere John B123 ( talk) 22:56, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) EpicPupper 21:30, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Does not look notable per WP:NBIO. EpicPupper 21:46, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn to re-scope article per suggestion. ( non-admin closure) Mottezen ( talk) 02:13, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
This article is a mish-mash list of conflicts between indigenous peoples and colonial or settler states from Hernan Cortez to the present day Chiapas conflict, though it marks the end date of the "Mexican Indian Wars" in 1933. The links tying all these conflicts together are very weak. These wars all implicate different actors and circumstances. No sources I saw made the connections between these conflicts the way this article does. Overall, there is very few mentions of this concept in the literature: 2 hits on google scholar, and 6 on Google books. "Indian Mexican Wars" has just as little hits.
Only one book in the hits I got was not simply making a mention in passing of this subject. This book only deals with the period of 1812 to 1900, and makes comparisons with Indian wars in Canada and the United States. The author uses the term "Mexican Indian Wars" just once in the whole book. He titled a relevant chapter "Indian Wars in Mexico" instead. The comparative nature of this books likely why the author even used the term "indian wars" at all; the term is absent in every other works of Mexican history.
Of the sources in the article, only one of them uses the term at all, and it doesn't strike me as a RS. And even then, the author, "History guy", only uses the term to describe three wars in the early 20th century.
The article was written by a now-blocked user mostly interested in American history. The Spanish article of this topic was written last year, and describes the term as a "anglophone concept", "'mostly used in Canada and the United States", and "not used in Spanish". I feel this is a case of circular reporting on Wikipedia. Tales of a totally made up conflict that lasted 414 years are being shared on instagram. Time to delete this aberration. Mottezen ( talk) 21:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Colorado Mesa University. (non-admin closure) Ashley yoursmile! 05:33, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Highly unnecessary WP:CONTENTFORK. A random student government position does not need a separate article. Relevant information, if any, can be merged to Colorado Mesa University as needed. KidAd • SPEAK 20:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ivri Lider as an WP:ATD. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 03:00, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NALBUM notability which require coverage in independent reliable secondary sources. Rusf10 ( talk) 20:23, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is GNG met 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 13:41, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Was AfD'd back in 2013, and nothing really has changed since then. While it is part of a historic district, it itself is not on the NRHP. Currently the vast majority of the article is primary sourced, and there is not enough in-depth coverage to pass GNG. Part of several articles which have all be recreated after AfD. I'll be sending them all to AfD, but did not feel bundling was appropriate, since all should be evaluated individually. Onel5969 TT me 14:25, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
References
References
{{
cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (
link)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:13, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable cricketer, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 20:16, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Randykitty ( talk) 17:43, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Failed to find any sources where his fifers are discussed as a set or group, so fails WP:NLIST, WP:RAWDATA. Also, note that User talk:Vibhijain who created this list has been blocked for socking. Störm (talk) 16:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
"...meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article."). wjemather please leave a message... 16:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
*Keep. Featured material which failed inclusion guidelines wouldn't be featured material otherwise. Unless his name is
Lewis.
StickyWicket (
talk)
16:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable cricketer, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 20:02, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable cricketer, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 20:01, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable cricketer, nothing in coverage, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 19:46, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Rawalpindi cricket team. Randykitty ( talk) 17:44, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable cricketer, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 19:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain ( talk) 18:58, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable education institution. Earlier PROD by Robert McClenon was removed by the creating editor without explanation, and previous attempt was rejected and now exists in drafts; hence this AfD. Unsourced, and a search finds nothing beyond the usual social media and directory listings. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORG. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 19:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 18:42, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Waste of time AfD due to someone who clearly cannot read. Duplicative content of List of Fables characters that is not a justified split. TTN ( talk) 18:16, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 14:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Dead company. No independent sources but dead links to its websites an a couple of pres releases Lembit Staan ( talk) 17:19, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain ( talk) 18:57, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Unsourced, and presumably autobiographical (based on the article's content, and the author's username). It would need rewriting from scratch, but I'm not seeing the sources to do it - I can find an actor of that name mentioned on IMDB as having played a small role in the 2020 film 'The Grudge' (not the film linked to from the article); I can't quite make the connection with 'Fear the Walking Dead', the character mentioned in the article seems to be played by somebody else, but maybe he plays an older version of that character or something? Anyway, based on the sources I can find, the subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. (Note - there is another actor of this name, from Winnipeg - most of the sources I came across were about that person, not the subject of this article) GirthSummit (blether) 17:18, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
I have to disagree on everything that is saying Ray Starchan Wikipedia page is very accurate everything on there is 100% true I don’t know why this page is going up for deletion when I provided every single link every single proof that this account this Wikipedia page is correct now if you would like for me to submit more information regarding this person in this Wikipedia page I can and I will so I don’t believe that this patient needs to be deleted at all if he can provide more information regarding this page and why it should be delete it please Inform me and I will gladly take it down but I am this person I have provided you guys would fall in accurate information like I said earlier I would like to provide you guys with the information regarding myself if it’s links on a contract I can also provide my management I can also provide my agency and my legal Representative thank you for your time and hopefully this page when I get taken down at all — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyveon L. Ray ( talk • contribs) 23:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
I’m Going To Have To Disagree With The Take Down Of This Page I Searched This Person Up And Everything On This Account Is Right I Keep Up With This Actor I Watch Him On Tv And I Follow Him On Instagram Everything On This Page Is Right I Have Seen Him On Fear The Walking Dead Ever Since Season 5 Of The Show And He Has Played Duane Jones wry Good And If You Keel Up With The Show You Would Know That The Original Person That Play Duane Jones no Longer Play Him Anymore So I Would Keep This Page Up And Running. Sock
GirthSummit
(blether)
17:56, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete: No indication of notability and almost unreadable to boot. - Sumanuil ( talk) 04:55, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete: Clearly a WP:COI issue, among other serious problems–nothing is sourced, no indication of notability; information regarding Fear the Walking Dead is fake, I actually watch the series and that actor and character have never appeared; and the content in the "Early life" section is copied and pasted from Jude Demorest with just being slightly altered. The quote used in that section is directly lifted from this source with an interview with a different actor. Drovethrughosts ( talk) 14:23, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was draftify. The article has been moved to Draft:Closed for Storm by its creator. . ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 05:15, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Non notable future documentary, appears to fail WP:NFF as production wasn't notable. Should be deleted or moved to draftspace until it is released and notability can be established. Donaldd23 ( talk) 16:50, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:15, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Non notable “Dj” who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them, thus do not satisfy WP:GNG and also doesn’t seem to satisfy any criterion from WP:MUSICBIO or WP:ENT. Celestina007 ( talk) 16:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 14:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NGRIDIRON, having never played professionally. Fails WP:NCOLLATH with a non-notable college football career ( [12]). Fails WP:GNG, as this is the only significant coverage I can find on the subject. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:05, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:35, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Unsourced, appears to fail WP:MUSICBIO. I can't find any significant coverage of this band, or other clear indications of notability; they've released two albums on a relatively obscure label and opened for notable bands, but that's about it. The Italian wiki doesn't have an article on them. Lennart97 ( talk) 16:05, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain ( talk) 18:57, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
The user who created this article turns out to be a pathological liar. Assuming Juan exists, is any of the history (conveniently sourced to paper books without URL) true? Is this person notable? Are we better off using WP:TNT rather than risk WP:CITOGENESIS?
Whpq tried to speedy this but was contested. — Alexis Jazz ( talk or ping me) 15:32, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:35, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
A private school which fails NORG. No significant coverage and thus fails GNG also Poppified talk 15:15, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:35, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMUSICIAN and WP:GNG; only copy and pasted press release coverage available. Very lazy copying and pasting as well. If you don't believe me, see how they all contain the line "He started music professionally at the age of 17 having drawn great support from his mother who he describes as his number one fan." somewhere in the article.
Once you remove this single press release, that has been copied and pasted across numerous Nigerian websites, there appears to be no coverage of him. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:55, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:36, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Unreferenced biography of a living person which has been in CAT:NN's backlog for 12 years. He existed and had some success, but I couldn't find anything to establish he is notable. Boleyn ( talk) 14:52, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Was originally nominated as part of a bundle nomination of equally non-significantly-covered animated soundtrack albums, but commenters ignorant about the coverage of the topics tried to convince me they were somehow individually notable. The commenters used lousy reasoning, or WP:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, in trying to suggest certain topics in that nomination had individual notability. One suggested a couple of albums were by notable artists, which didn't make them notable as Notability is not inherited. Another agued "some of these articles are getting 100+ views/day", which is an invalid WP:POPULARPAGE argument. Another agued "Deleting the articles in question would delete the not insignificant article histories and revisions that could serve as rough drafts for future versions of these pages if they hold up to notability standards at a later date", which is invalid as most of these soundtracks never do and even so, we are not a WP:CRYSTALBALL.
With all fairness, I could understand how one could argue the song's Razzie nomination would make this topic significant, as not only is that a major (albeit comedic) award it is also the only time in history before The Emoji Movie anything animated was even Razzie-nominated. However, that only gives the song itself significance, and even then there isn't anything to find for that. Other coverage is one Allmusic rev, a self-published fansite, and retail pages. That does not establish WP:SIGCOV 👨x🐱 ( talk) 14:22, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
I can't find the newspapers.com articles, but are you sure they're specifically about the soundtrack?The Town Talk piece is literally a two-page spread about its recording. newspapers.com is theoretically paywalled, although accessible through The Wikipedia Library. This is what I meant at the time about the issue with having nominations so close together even if they're unbundled -- I've done BEFORE on three of the nominations and found two of them had sigcov that wasn't found already. There are 31 nominations. You're a reasonable and likable person, I know you have no intent to foster that workload on AfD !voters, and I know you in all likelihood genuinely didn't realize that !voters need to do their own BEFOREs rather than taking the nominator's for granted and that anything before really about 2005 has way, way more accessible on archival sources than the open internet. I don't know who's going to comb newspapers.com for the remaining 28, and I don't know if it's me. (As for HS RS, the HS is a FAC standard, not an AfD standard. I'm not sure I'd use it in an FA, but they have editorial control and appear to fact-check.) Vaticidal prophet 13:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. NCORP failed Nosebagbear ( talk) 15:12, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Does not meet NCORP. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources beyond routine stuff like fundraising, partnerships and self-published articles. M4DU7 ( talk) 14:22, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Proud Family. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:30, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Was originally nominated as part of a bundle nomination of equally non-significantly-covered animated soundtrack albums, but commenters ignorant about the coverage of the topics tried to convince me they were somehow individually notable. The commenters used lousy reasoning, or WP:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, in trying to suggest certain topics in that nomination had individual notability. One suggested a couple of albums were by notable artists, which didn't make them notable as Notability is not inherited. Another agued "some of these articles are getting 100+ views/day", which is an invalid WP:POPULARPAGE argument. Another agued "Deleting the articles in question would delete the not insignificant article histories and revisions that could serve as rough drafts for future versions of these pages if they hold up to notability standards at a later date", which is invalid as most of these soundtracks never do and even so, we are not a WP:CRYSTALBALL.
All I could find was one Allmusic review and a mention of one song being in the show for Jet magazine. That is not WP:SIGCOV and does not establish notability. 👨x🐱 ( talk) 14:18, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to The Pebble and the Penguin#Music. (non-admin closure) Ashley yoursmile! 05:40, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Was originally nominated as part of a bundle nomination of equally non-significantly-covered animated soundtrack albums, but commenters ignorant about the coverage of the topics tried to convince me they were somehow individually notable. The commenters used lousy reasoning, or WP:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, in trying to suggest certain topics in that nomination had individual notability. One suggested a couple of albums were by notable artists, which didn't make them notable as Notability is not inherited. Another agued "some of these articles are getting 100+ views/day", which is an invalid WP:POPULARPAGE argument. Another agued "Deleting the articles in question would delete the not insignificant article histories and revisions that could serve as rough drafts for future versions of these pages if they hold up to notability standards at a later date", which is invalid as most of these soundtracks never do and even so, we are not a WP:CRYSTALBALL.
Having one allmusic review does not establish notability. Being a soundtrack of a Don Bluth film does not establish independent notability. Having the kick-ass Tim Curry on your soundtrack album doesn– yeah, you get the idea. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. 👨x🐱 ( talk) 14:14, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fails to show notability Nosebagbear ( talk) 15:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Fail of WP:GNG. nearlyevil 665 09:14, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
I removed an A11 on this, as it wasn't quite one, but I don't think this is something discussed much in RSes. The Big Four international beauty pageants seems to be a notable topic, but the expansion with the other two seems very peripheral. There's a little bit of discussion, but I can only find one that appears even possibly RS, and I'm unsure it constitutes SIGCOV. There may be room for this article in a couple years, because the additional pageants look very new, but perhaps just WP:TOOSOON. Vaticidal prophet 12:47, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
References
{{
cite news}}
: |last=
has generic name (
help)
{{
cite news}}
: |last1=
has generic name (
help)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
I am concerned that this does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT. This may not even satisfy basic WP:V as there are no sources in the article at all and there never were any. Searches relating to this, its teams, Spuž and Ulcinj are coming back with no useful results at all. This would require multiple independent and reliable sources reporting on it in depth to qualify for an article. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:42, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete G3. Article was deleted as WP:CSD#G3 by Stwalkerster (non-admin closure) McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 18:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Would be presumed notable if his role can be verified. I have attempted a WP:BEFORE search but can't find anything to verify the article's statement. Fails WP:V as well as WP:N as far as I can tell. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was Closing since nominator is a sock.. The nominator was blocked for sockpuppetry. Feel free to renominate, etc, if necessary. Missvain ( talk) 18:56, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
No reliable sources found on a WP:Before and no sources to establish GNG. ♠Devan Lallu Talk 14:35, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator, only !vote was to keep, and sources were added. XOR'easter ( talk) 17:47, 24 April 2021 (UTC) ( non-admin closure)
Biography of a pulp fiction and children’s writer unsourced since 2003. A search is hard because it throws up only false positives for me and I’m not even finding unreliable sources. The article looks like it was based on an obituary but maybe others will be able to find sources demonstrating notability.
Mccapra (
talk)
11:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Randykitty ( talk) 18:49, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, the history section and only reference are nothing to do with this exhibition centre operator. WP:BEFORE reveals only trivial coverage. SailingInABathTub ( talk) 19:57, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Source | Significant? | Independent? | Reliable? | Secondary? | Pass/Fail | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
#1 Süddeutsche Zeitung | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
An article about the company losing money and cutting jobs due to COVID-19 - routine coverage. |
#2 Augsburger Allgemeine | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
An article about the company losing money due to COVID-19 - routine coverage. |
#3 BR24 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
An article about the company cancelling 'Expo Real' due to COVID-19 - routine coverage. |
#4 Die Spiele | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Report on the 1972 Olympic games. No mention of the company. |
#5 Spiegel Politik | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
An article on suspected corruption at the Munich trade fair by employees of the company. Routine coverage per WP:EVENTCRIT. |
#6 Süddeutsche Zeitung | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
An article about the company expanding its exhibition space - routine coverage. |
#7 Frankfurter Allgemeine | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
An article about Munich hosting the International Motor Show. No mention of the company. |
#8 IFO Institute | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
A report on the company's economic importance, commissioned by the company. |
#9 statista | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The company's annual sales history - routine coverage |
#10 Merkur.de | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
An article about the company cutting jobs due to COVID-19 - routine coverage. |
#11 University thesis | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
A university thesis. Not considered to reliable per WP:SCHOLARSHIP |
#12 University thesis | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
A university thesis. Not considered to reliable per WP:SCHOLARSHIP |
Total qualifying sources | 0 | There is no significant coverage in multiple reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.
|
SailingInABathTub ( talk) 14:49, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT; searches of the Montenegrin name are not returning any useful results, mainly Wikipedia mirrors. Friendly tournaments are not inherently notable and are required to have multiple sources covering them in depth to justify an article. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:59, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
I am also nominating this for the same reason:
The result was speedy keep. Non-administrator Closure - Per WP:SNOW, I cannot see a way of this being deleted (8 keep (3 speedy keep and 5 keep) with 2 delete votes, including the nomination). Reasoning for deletion were WP:NOTNEWS and some reasons for keep were WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, WP:RAPID, and the fact of this being a terrorist attack. (non-admin closure) Elijahandskip ( talk) 10:58, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Non notable and reads like a news report ( WP:NOTNEWS), with only 1 reference. f Kadzi ( talk) 10:24, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Some sources available but not enough from established WP:RS to show a clear passing of WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT, which requires more than just routine announcements of the event. I found a brochure published by the tournament itself, clearly not an independent source. I found an announcement about the 2013 tournament here and some about subsequent tournaments here and here. Notice that all articles are written by 'editorial staff' rather than actual named authors and all are written promotionally.
I could not find any coverage of individual matches, not even the finals. All coverage, and there's very little of it, seems to be pre-tournament announcements. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:58, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
This article has been unsourced for 11 years and there is no indication of notability. I have given the individual tournament articles a PROD already. My WP:BEFORE search is only coming back with Wikipedia mirrors and no coverage in established WP:RS, therefore, I see no potential for this article to be more than what it currently is. WP:GNG not established. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Non notable actor with no evidence of meeting WP:NACTOR. The only film he probably worked and played a main role in is Pappur Biye which is not a notable film either. Umakant Bhalerao ( talk) 08:17, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. The keep votes centre entirely around NFOOTY which is a presumption of GNG. Per WP:ROUGHCONSENSUS my assessment of the arguments is that those claiming the subject fails gng carry more weight as not a single source which might indicate the significant coverage NFOOTBALL assumes has been presented. Fenix down ( talk) 23:22, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL as that's guideline is working now. Only played 6 minutes of pro-league football, back in 2017, and now plays on the third tier. I know this is a "career still ongoing" case, but as said the 6 minutes is pretty long ago. Geschichte ( talk) 05:27, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Q1: How is this guideline related to the general notability guideline?
A1: The topic-specific notability guidelines described on this page do not replace the general notability guideline.
Q2: If a sports figure meets the criteria specified in a sports-specific notability guideline, does this mean he/she does not have to meet the general notability guideline?
A2: No, the article must still eventually provide sources indicating that the subject meets the general notability guideline.
Q5: The second sentence in the guideline says "The article must provide reliable sources showing that the subject meets the general notability guideline or the sport specific criteria set forth below." Does this mean that the general notability guideline doesn't have to be met?
A5: No; as per Q1 and Q2, eventually sources must be provided showing that the general notability guideline is met.
The coverage found in the Swedish article, by various !voters above, and by my own searches in Swedish newspapers are exclusively passing mentions and database entries, which do not contribute to GNG. Furthermore, the argument that he might be notable in the future is straight-up the definition of an argument to avoid ( crystal). JoelleJay ( talk) 18:41, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Q2: If a sports figure meets the criteria specified in a sports-specific notability guideline, does this mean he/she does not have to meet the general notability guideline?
A2: No, the article must still eventually provide sources indicating that the subject meets the general notability guideline.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:23, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Prod removed by article creator. This strikes me as more or less an advertisement. A search finds some trivial coverage of the doctor, on items such as which mask he recommends for COVID protection. GNG fail. --- Possibly ( talk) 01:39, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
All prior XfDs for this page:
|
It was noted during the current RM that this pseudoscientific hypothesis fails WP:GNG, with the only source not by proponents Johnjoe McFadden and Jim Al-Khalili being a rebuttal that is an arXiv preprint. The article subject is unrelated to the theory more commonly known as quantum evolution, which does not involve quantum mechanics. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 04:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
If not merge, then delete, the keep !votes have a bit of a "well, it has references" theme, and the closer's statement had the qualification
The article embodies all that is worst about this kind of topic, however.Given the breakdown of the numbers and the caveats in the !votes, it should perhaps have been relisted rather than closed back then, but that aside, we're here again now, and the intervening years have not proved the topic notable. XOR'easter ( talk) 15:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Still no consensus made after the 2nd relist. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 07:00, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
No notability for this single to warrant a standalone article. Nearlyevil665 ( talk) 14:59, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 06:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:V. I have found no evidence that the airport exists. Even if it does exist, may have a very hard time meeting WP:GNG. Rusf10 ( talk) 03:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 07:49, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
No disambiguation needed - the only mention of IntelliMax is in the track listing of Contemporary Sapporo. Leschnei ( talk) 12:59, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator. ✗ plicit 00:57, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
BLP does not meet
WP:NBIO- notability is not inherited from the role of being one of 74 judges in the second-tier court for a country.
MrsSnoozyTurtle (
talk)
00:15, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator. MrsSnoozyTurtle ( talk) 22:09, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:55, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Not enough depth for WP:GNG, in my view. No significant coverage cited in the article and little found in searches. The best that I could find were 2 passing mentions in The World Game, SMH match report, a list in My Football and a picture of him in QT. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:04, 24 April 2021 (UTC)