![]() |
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
WP:NOTADVERTISING. This is a trademarked product name. The company does not meet notability requirements per WP:CORP Atsme 📞 📧 22:36, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
There is a lot of detail here, but I'm struggling to see how being the mayor of a small Louisiana town for two years renders him notable. Marquardtika ( talk) 22:20, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Many of the article's sources have dubious reliability at best. This article concerns an album made by a music project whose article, in turn, was deleted after an AfD discussion in February & March 2016. The album was released by a label that does not meet notability guidelines as well. I, the person who created the article back in November 2008, allow for the possibility of deletion. Mungo Kitsch ( talk) 21:16, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:31, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not news, nor is it a database for missing persons. The majority of the sources are, in fact, databases themselves. Disappearances can be somewhat tricky because they sometimes generate local coverage on anniversaries. However, it would be difficult to argue this coverage isn't routine in nature. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 20:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
As with other events, media coverage can confer notability on a high-profile criminal act, provided such coverage meets the above guidelines and those regarding reliable sources. The important phrases here are (1)"high-profile", (2)"coverage [that] meets the above (WP:ROUTINE and WP:SENSATIONALISM) guidelines, and (3)reliable sources. I've been doing a search for news coverage on the web and also just a general google search. I've found this piece of local coverage returning to the event 11 years later (May 12th, 2017), a similar local coverage piece (Sept 15, 2017), and this last 10 year anniversary piece which is also local coverage (Aug 2, 2016). The only other things I've found are reddit posts and blogs. I don't know how reliable this is but this statement gives me pause:
According to the National Missing and Unidentified Persons System, 90,000 people are missing at any given time in this country.There are currently 2,000 missing persons cases in Texas, half of which are still active. This article deals with a drop in the proverbial bucket. I can definitively say that there is no chance that this meets criterion 1 set out above. This leads to criterion 2 and 3 together. There is a dearth of reliable sources for this article, it's mostly databases and a couple pieces of local news. I don't consider these to be "routine" per say given that they are revisiting events a decade on, but, it's not sufficient to pull me to the position of keep. We could pack the encyclopeadia full of these kinds of articles. Some are encyclopedic, and some are not. This one, in my estimation, falls under the category of "is not". Mr rnddude ( talk) 08:35, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:29, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Dylan Geick does not meet Wikipedia's notability requirements for an article. I'm moving that it be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.168.196 ( talk • contribs) 20:11, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 23:09, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Yeah, it exists, but I'm not seeing significant coverage in reliable sources, just some how-it-works explanations. The current article is a mess, reading like a how-to guide without any sourcing. -- Tavix ( talk) 19:20, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 23:09, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources for this BLP, to satisfy notability requirements. Mattg82 ( talk) 19:07, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 23:09, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Nothing in this orphan article that suggests this passes WP:CORPDEPTH and a BEFORE search also fails to turn-up anything. It has had unresolved maintenance tags for the last six years. Chetsford ( talk) 18:29, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 23:09, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Nothing in this orphan article that suggests this passes WP:CORPDEPTH and a BEFORE search also fails to turn-up anything. It has had unresolved maintenance tags for the last seven years. Chetsford ( talk) 18:26, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 23:10, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO Tenuous notability. Refs are blogs and trade papers with very minor coverage. Passing mention is several ref. scope_creep ( talk) 17:49, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 23:11, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Nothing to suggest this is a notable album as required by WP:NALBUMS. Mattg82 ( talk) 17:57, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 23:11, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMUSIC none of the sources are in depth coverage in WP:RS. One album review in an obscure music site (Bluesbunny) Domdeparis ( talk) 18:19, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 23:11, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
The subject fails Wikipedia:Notability. While trying to do research on this to make this into a potential project, I could not find enough coverage from reliable, third-party sources to support this character having a separate article. Aoba47 ( talk) 18:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:45, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. Included on a travel website, but that's about it. Article (like many similar ones) is highly promotional as well, but the main problem is that the reliable, independent sources which are about this temple seem to be lacking (searched in Google News, Google Books and the first 5 pages of Google hits). Note that the article is about the existing temple, not about the proposed one that can be found in sources like this and which may be notable on architectural grounds. This is about yet another planned temple. Fram ( talk) 12:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. T. Canens ( talk) 00:32, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
subject does not appear to meet notability guidelines. RF23 ( talk) 22:28, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
204.130.0.8 ( talk) 23:29, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) scope_creep ( talk) 12:56, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO and WP:NACTOR. Minor bond actor, 5 lines. Other refs are shops and blogs. scope_creep ( talk) 14:51, 26 January 2018 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator
Speedy keep Well known actress, this is a crazy nom. She's done a heck of a lot more than just appeared in a Bond film and has plenty of coverage in sources.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:47, 27 January 2018 (UTC) Comment Your right. I think it must have been a moment of madness. scope_creep ( talk) 12:54, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:33, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Sadly, an unremarkable crime. TheLongTone ( talk) 14:48, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 22:25, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
WP:ORG and WP:ORGIND. All sources are based on press releases. scope_creep ( talk) 14:40, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:15, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Struggling to find independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO. Run-of-the-mill businessman. Autobiographical promotional article. BEM is the very bottom rung of the UK honours system. Edwardx ( talk) 14:28, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 22:25, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete No indications of notability, references are either PRIMARY sources, entries ffrom a website showing an album distributed by the company (not in-depth, no intellectually independent, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND) and an article from theteams.kr which is a Q&A published verbatim with the founder, fails WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing ++ 14:11, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 22:25, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Started by User:Arslan Gadi with COI, principal is Qamar Ud Din Khan Gadi. Nothing significant in WP:RS. Private with no coverage fails WP:NSCHOOL. Störm (talk) 11:57, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 22:24, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG/ WP:CORPDEPTH. Apart from WP:PRIMARY it's unsourced. Kleuske ( talk) 10:38, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
1dd no evidence of notability DGG ( talk ) 09:25, 2 February 2018 (UTC) .
The result was keep. WP:SNOW Guy ( Help!) 18:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Article does not cite reliable sources. Relies heavily on a single, and not independent source. No significant coverage in reliable RS found. So doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:POLITICIAN. M A A Z T A L K 10:04, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW Guy ( Help!) 18:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Article does not cite reliable sources. Relies heavily on a single, and not independent source. No significant coverage in reliable RS found. So doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:POLITICIAN. M A A Z T A L K 10:03, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:16, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
unsuccessful political candidate--no other notability DGG ( talk ) 09:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. I'm withdrawing this on the basis of the NYT article, but I hope Yngvadottir ( talk · contribs) will continue removing promotional content, such as the quotations. DGG ( talk ) 04:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
totally non-noable product and company. Minor promotional and consumer complaint references only DGG ( talk ) 09:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. T. Canens ( talk) 00:39, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG. Found no significant coverage including in Google News. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 02:10, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. T. Canens ( talk) 00:38, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Looks-like a news report as we are WP:NOTNEWS. Nothing significant in WP:RS. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 18:41, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was Speedy deleted G11 by Seraphimblade. (non-admin closure) !dave 11:28, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Can't find substantial third-party mentions, apparently not notable independent of its artists (I'm getting lots of birch bark canoe hits though :p) Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 13:23, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:37, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
All sources I can find online seem to deal with
a different Ava Preston. This voice actress seems not to be notable. - Add: apparently it is the same person. Notability still doubtful in my eyes as per
WP:NACTOR - people with more experience with role notability etc. please assess. --
Elmidae (
talk ·
contribs)
05:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Page creator here, Elmidae I believe the "different Ava Preston" you linked to IS the voice actress. The opening statement didn't really clarify that so I amended it. When I made the page I was initially only aware of the voice acting but had later added notable recurring live-action roles as well. IMDB is not being relied upon as a source, it is simply listed for convenience. I've added more. ScratchMarshall ( talk) 22:26, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Iraq FA Cup#Finals. T. Canens ( talk) 00:36, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
No source; no context Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 15:27, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. T. Canens ( talk) 00:35, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The article does not include any references. I am unable to find any independent coverage of this subject. This subject does not appear to meet Wikipedia:GNG. Rogerthat94 ( talk) 17:13, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:26, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG the sources are passing mentions (2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, ) do not mention him (10, 13, ) whats on piece that are identical PR pieces (5, 7, 8, 19, 20) WP:INTERVIEW (11) Album credit (4, 18) None are sufficent to pass the notability guidelines Domdeparis ( talk) 17:22, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 22:19, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete: as non-notable actress; cannot derive notability by dint of siblings ( Penny Marshall, Gerry Marshall). Quis separabit? 01:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:24, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
No independent notability for the Russian network. No references to support its development. Article is mainly a TV guide list of programs and the infobox television network. Another option is to redirect this to Spike (TV channel) and add a section about Russia, provided there is something to write about. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 01:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC) updated 06:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Merge to Paramount Network. It can be covered in the international versions section. I don't see how this network is significantly different from its parent.-- Rusf10 ( talk) 06:41, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:16, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Written like an advert, dubious notability, sources are either tangential in nature or first party press releases. FASTILY 21:18, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:24, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails CORP. John from Idegon ( talk) 22:32, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
current information in the article in the "notes" section, and set this as a redirect to that page. groig ( talk) 15:39, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:51, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Struggling to find independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Promotional tone, created by a WP:SPA. Fails WP:SUSTAINED. References provided are either mentions-in-passing (fails WP:CORPDEPTH) or rely almost exclusively on company produced material and/or quotations (fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND). Edwardx ( talk) 18:31, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:24, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Only claim to notability is La Crosse Method Protocol, which may or may not itself be notable. Fails WP:GNG PriceDL ( talk) 07:42, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Per the later uncontested sources. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:17, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Not notable, fails WP:ORG and a search reveals very few sources, not enough to establish notability. Rusf10 ( talk) 07:12, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The article notes:
George Street Co-op, 89 Morris St., New Brunswick; (732) 247-8280; www.georgestreetcoop.com. This venerable downtown New Brunswick institution has been around forever, or so it seems. It started in 1973, when some students from the Vegetarian Club at Rutgers University opened a buying club in a garage off George Street. They soon moved to a small storefront on George Street. The co-op is now located in even bigger quarters on nearby Morris Street. The co-op's aim is to sell vegetarian foods with the least amount of processing and contaminants but with the greatest nutritional value possible. Anyone can shop at the store, which is stocked with organic produce, organic whole grains, breads and cereals, low-carb foods, chips and natural treats, juice and juicers, ready-to-eat sandwiches and entrees, and many other items. Membership is $24 a year. If you work 2 hours a month at the co-op, you get a 6 percent discount. If you work 2 hours a week, you get 15 percent off. And the co-op offers a 5 percent everyday discount to those 65 and over. The co-op is open daily.
The article notes:
Whatever the excesses and extravagances of the 1980s me-first period, the George Street Co-op in New Brunswick not only managed to survive, it prospered with its philosophy of "community and fellowship in a cooperative environment."
In fact, the co-op members were able to buy their own building, hence the George Street Co-op is no longer in a storefront on George Street but is at 89 Morris St.
...
The co-op has approximately 600 members who pay $10 a year plus $2 for printing the newsletter. New members pay a $5 deposit, which is returned if they leave.
Anyone receiving financial assistance can ask to have the dues waived. The co-op accepts food stamps.
Each co-op member family must work two hours a month for each member of the family. This work could be writing the newsletter, helping in the store, checking in orders, bagging produce, filling bulk bins, taking out trash or other duties, depending on the day and time.
The article notes:
According to its brochure, the co-op was begun in 1973 "when about 10 people from the Vegetarian Club at Rutgers started a buying club and worked out of a garage off George Street."
A year later, the club moved to a storefront on George Street. In the spring of 1988, the store moved to its present location at 89 Morris St.
In addition to providing produce which is organic (grown without the use of pesticides or chemical additives), the George Street Co-op carries a range of vegetarian food that includes grains and nuts, herbs, spices, pasta, dairy products, pasta, teas, and ready-to-eat sandwiches. The store also sells books and body-care products.
The article notes:
Members pay an annual $10 fee, which includes $2 for the co-op's monthly Food For Thought newsletter, in addition to a one-time $5 deposit which is refundable when membership is terminated. The bulk of the dues covers salaries for the eight full-time workers and overhead.
...
The co-op's founding members started a buying club 23 years ago in a garage off George Street, moving within a year into a leased storefront. As the operation expanded, the co-op was able to purchase its own building on Morris Street but retained the George Street name.
The article notes:
The George Street Co-Op in New Brunswick with 600 members, the state's largest was founded 20 years ago by a g roup of residents in conjunction with the Rutgers Vegetarian Club and the owner of a restaurant and health food store. Woods, who started working there as a volunteer when he was 11 and is now the manager, said the store has outgrown its storefront location on Morris Street. (It moved from George Street in 1988 but kept the name.)
The article notes:
Long before supermarkets devoted aisle space to organic produce, tofu and free-range chicken, there was the George Street Co-op in New Brunswick.
Started in 1973 by members of the Vegetarian Club at Rutgers College, the co-op has survived three decades, filling a niche for consumers seeking healthy alternatives.
But now that organic food has gone mainstream, the co-op is struggling to find its place.
...
The co-op, which moved from George Street to its current location on Morris Street in 1988, is a health food store collectively owned by about 200 members. Each member works a few hours a week or month to receive discounts on products, ranging from tofu and organic vegetables to fragrance-free soaps and paper towels made of 100 percent recycled paper.
...
About 10 years ago, the co-op opened its doors to nonmembers, who now make up 75 percent of the store's sales.
The article notes:
All that said, what's a 30-year-old, communal, organic-only food cooperative doing in the year 2000?
Surviving quite nicely, thank you, in hip downtown New Brunswick. With more than 200 members, the not-for-profit George Street Co-op still purchases and sells natural foods the old fashioned way: They vote on it.
...
The co-op makes an intriguing example of how a group of people from all walks of life can join forces to keep an idealistic vision alive for almost three decades, and continue to make it work in today's world.
Within a year, the membership and demand had grown, and they opened a retail store on George Street. By 1988, the cooperative had expanded to the point where it had to relocate to larger quarters at the present site. The Morris Street store is open to the public, which pays sticker price for more than 4,500 items. By working two hours each month at various jobs, members, who pay $12 per year plus an equity deposit of $100, receive an 8 percent discount. Putting in two hours per week gets you a 20 percent discount.
...
... There's more at stake than you might think: Last year, sales topped $800,000.
The Star-Ledger is the largest circulated newspaper in the U.S. state of New Jersey and is based in Newark. It is a statewide or regional newspaper so it passes the guideline.The source's audience must also be considered. Evidence of significant coverage by international or national, or at least regional, media is a strong indication of notability. On the other hand, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability; at least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary.
The result was delete. The promised citations do not appear to have materialized. T. Canens ( talk) 00:21, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Does not meet the GNG. Can't find significant coverage in independent sources. Is simply a phrase coined by one author of a couple of papers on blockchains. Can't find it mentioned elsewhere online or in any article on Wikipedia. Kb.au ( talk) 02:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW Guy ( Help!) 18:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Article has 3 sources. 1 is from Baluchistan PA that shows particulars. 2 and 3 are sources that only mention and no significant coverage. It does not meet WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. M A A Z T A L K 09:27, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#cite_note-note7-12 M A A Z T A L K 09:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
"Politicians and judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office, and members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature.[12] This also applies to persons who have been elected to such offices but have not yet assumed them."
Wikipedia is structurally biased against non-European people. This is why we have criteria for notability which do not require finding lots of good RS. Only 50% of the world's population has internet access, and to suggest that an elected Pakistani politician does not meet this criteria seems unaware of the geographical and structural bias which makes it harder to prove notability for non-European people. This article, and all articles on elected Pakistani MPs, are inherently notable. Jwslubbock ( talk) 15:17, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was merge to Nicole Kersh. T. Canens ( talk) 00:19, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private business; significant RS coverage not found. Fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Created by Special:Contributions/KerriZ with few other contributions outside this topic. K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:10, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Killiondude ( talk) 22:19, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Contested prod. Subject is non-notable. Only one of the provided sources are a reliable source that cover the subject at length. None other can be found. WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 15:35, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Chronicles of Amber. Content can be merged from history. Sandstein 09:10, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Not needed. If really necessary information about collected editions could be added at The Chronicles of Amber -- wooden superman 16:27, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:15, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
This is pure Wikipedia:Content forking. The only notable person is the father, and so the text may be included there. No reason for a new lemma in Wikipedia. -- Hannover86 ( talk) 10:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. T. Canens ( talk) 00:14, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Article seems based entirely on inherited notability (and not very strong one at that). No substantial coverage of the person seems to exist. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 08:44, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:17, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails applicable notability criteria, namely EVENT. Also seems to fall under the pillar policy NOT John from Idegon ( talk) 08:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:17, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Contested PROD, with that tag removed for what looks to be a case of crystal ball use. Ayers doesn't pass any of the applicable standards for his professional career, and is presently only an assistant coach, which doesn't seem to get him over the line in that regard either. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:43, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Delete - I am not seeing independent, reliable sources that establish WP:GNG. Most sources I can find are short blurbs on being hired for various jobs (routine coverage not to the level of in depth profiles) or are published by non-independent sources (school websites, School fan sites, etc). Rikster2 ( talk) 12:55, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Delete - He played professionally at the highest level in Finland, however, that doesn't qualify under WP:NHOOPS. His other pro play was in the NBA D-League which also doesn't qualify under NHOOPS. References are almost non-existent in article. Those found in a BEFORE search are fleeting and incidental; what one would expect for an assistant coach at a D1 school; primarily in the form of mention in box scores and game recaps. Therefore, does not pass GNG either. No prejudice for recreation if / when he becomes a head coach. Chetsford ( talk) 05:36, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Keep He played professionally in France [36], in Finland, and D League [37]. So yes he is notable for wikipedia, just like hundreds other players.-- Bozalegenda ( talk) 22:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
I added more sources, so i hope that now is everything ok.-- Bozalegenda ( talk) 15:24, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
@ Rikster2: are you kidding me right now? Should we add a 100 sources so you could be happy??? You dont even know to add refs in articles, you are just doing some minor edits in infobox and that is not making this wiki better. Just realize man Ayers is reliable for wikipedia, there are plenty of sources on web about him. Just type his name on google and you will see. He played in EuroCup and that competition is about 20 times stronger then Australian League, he played also in French first division. So yes he is reliable whether you like it or not.-- Bozalegenda ( talk) 23:50, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:17, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
His daughter wrote a "novelized telling of his story", but that's about it. He doesn't satisfy either WP:BIO or WP:SOLDIER. Clarityfiend ( talk) 08:27, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:21, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR, as there is at most 1 significant role listed, and whether the film is significant is unclear. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:17, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:20, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable municipal park. Fails WP:GNG, no reliable source coverage. Even the town's website doesn't tell you anything about the park other than it has two football fields. Rusf10 ( talk) 06:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep per WP:WITHDRAWN. ( non-admin closure) Hagennos ( talk) 08:21, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Non notable minor Railway station. Does not pass notability guidelines under Wikipedia:Notability_(Railway_lines_and_stations). Fails Wp:GNG Hagennos ( talk) 05:07, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep . Based on long standing consensus that all Railway Stations are notable I am closing this discussion as per WP:WITHDRAWN. ( non-admin closure) Hagennos ( talk) 08:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Non notable Railway station . Fails WP:GNG and also delete under WP:NOTTRAVELGUIDE . The criteria for notability of Railway stations are clear in Wikipedia:Notability_(Railway_lines_and_stations) Hagennos ( talk) 05:03, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. This is a train wreck thanks to the SPAs. No prejudice against speedy renomination, preferably with extended-confirmed protection on the AFD. T. Canens ( talk) 00:13, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Another cryptocurrency article with poor references and promotional content. A quick WP:BEFORE didn't unearth much more in reliable sources. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 04:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Staffed with a team of cryptocurrency experts, we are committed to providing sound recommendations on the best and safest coins to invest in.Sound recommendations are not independent media coverage from an established source with a history of editorial oversight. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 05:43, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Like all discussions, deletion discussions must be decided in accordance with consensus and Wikipedia policies and guidelines. If you are not fairly experienced, or are unfamiliar with deletion policy or the workings of deletion discussions, do not close such discussions. You closed a controversial AfD with very differing answers 3 days after it was opened. You're not an admin and you've not got the experienced to even be making these judgments. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
very few people have any idea as to what this project is all aboutand suggests it's largely hypeware. I've cleaned up the article more ("3rd generation cryptocurrency" appears to be their promotional terminology that's not otherwise well-defined). power~enwiki ( π, ν) 18:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SKCRIT#1. The nominator has withdrawn the nomination and no one other than the nominator recommends that the page be deleted or redirected. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Treats a single model from 2011 that does not appear to have seen further uptake and/or discussion since. Not notable as a scientific concept. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 08:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable business whose featured product shows on non-notable website blogs like World News Network, TheHollywoodTimes.net, UsWeekly.com (not the magazine), and the contributor section of Huffington Post. Travolution is a maybe, but it's a news announcement of the product. That leaves a Spanish newspaper that briefly mentions the name but it is not clear whether it's the same business or another business of the same name. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 03:38, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable, potentially hoax-show. I can find no evidence in any language that this exists outside of their own self sourced website. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 02:58, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
A WP:PROMO page on an unremarkable online travel agency. Does no meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Significant RS coverage cannot be found; what comes up is trivial mentions and self-promotion link. The first AfD closed as "Delete" in Oct 2016; there are no new indications of notability since then. The ranking on "Top 100 Startups In The Arab World 2017" strongly suggests it's WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopedia entry. K.e.coffman ( talk) 02:47, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Delete: non-notable school. Google search did not provide any evidence of notability or notable alumni. Quis separabit? 02:44, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Does not meet WP:NMODEL and significant RS coverage not found. Cyber Girl of the Year honour is not significant and well known; the article on the program has been deleted here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playboy Cyber Club (2nd nomination). K.e.coffman ( talk) 02:01, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:11, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
An unelected politician without significant coverage in reliable sources. Mattg82 ( talk) 01:15, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:11, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Significant coverage not found, and the undeleted article was mistakenly re-deleted per WP:G4 when the previous deletion was a prod rather than an AfD. One of the non-English sources in the article appears to be a blog. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:BLP, a policy, has precedence over WP:GNG, a guideline. None of the keeps seriously engaged with the BLP argument. T. Canens ( talk) 00:06, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
This is a mess from a WP:BLP point of view. The acquitted person is prominently named and thereby linked to an accusation of which he was found not guilty. It is one of exactly two such articles on Wikipedia; the other is Acquittal of O.J. Simpson (which redirects to the "murder case" article). Simpson, at the time of the murder case, was already notable as a sportsperson; the person named in this article otherwise is not notable. The article also is an incoherent collection of largely unreferenced information, partly wrong, partly based on opinion pieces. There are better sources than the ones cited in the article, but it still only amounts to routine coverage of an ongoing court case (the acquittal is being appealed). It may even be possible to write a valid encyclopedia article about the case (if we presume it is notable, which seems doubtful), but doing so would amount to rewriting it in its entirety; WP:TNT applies, particularly given the presumption in favor of privacy. Huon ( talk) 00:49, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
A short run TV series with next to no coverage in independent reliable sources. Of the independent references included in the article, Style only mentions the show incidentally and body+soul doesn't mention it at all. It's also not mentioned on Australian TV news site TV Tonight. Fails WP:GNG and WP:TVSHOW. Kb.au ( talk) 00:43, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:06, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Unnecessary spin-off of Mercy College (New York) notable alumni section. College only has some 18 alumni with wikipedia articles. They can all be listed at the article. Which they are. Note- Another similar page List of Mercy College (New York) people was deleted. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:00, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
WP:NOTADVERTISING. This is a trademarked product name. The company does not meet notability requirements per WP:CORP Atsme 📞 📧 22:36, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
There is a lot of detail here, but I'm struggling to see how being the mayor of a small Louisiana town for two years renders him notable. Marquardtika ( talk) 22:20, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Many of the article's sources have dubious reliability at best. This article concerns an album made by a music project whose article, in turn, was deleted after an AfD discussion in February & March 2016. The album was released by a label that does not meet notability guidelines as well. I, the person who created the article back in November 2008, allow for the possibility of deletion. Mungo Kitsch ( talk) 21:16, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:31, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not news, nor is it a database for missing persons. The majority of the sources are, in fact, databases themselves. Disappearances can be somewhat tricky because they sometimes generate local coverage on anniversaries. However, it would be difficult to argue this coverage isn't routine in nature. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 20:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
As with other events, media coverage can confer notability on a high-profile criminal act, provided such coverage meets the above guidelines and those regarding reliable sources. The important phrases here are (1)"high-profile", (2)"coverage [that] meets the above (WP:ROUTINE and WP:SENSATIONALISM) guidelines, and (3)reliable sources. I've been doing a search for news coverage on the web and also just a general google search. I've found this piece of local coverage returning to the event 11 years later (May 12th, 2017), a similar local coverage piece (Sept 15, 2017), and this last 10 year anniversary piece which is also local coverage (Aug 2, 2016). The only other things I've found are reddit posts and blogs. I don't know how reliable this is but this statement gives me pause:
According to the National Missing and Unidentified Persons System, 90,000 people are missing at any given time in this country.There are currently 2,000 missing persons cases in Texas, half of which are still active. This article deals with a drop in the proverbial bucket. I can definitively say that there is no chance that this meets criterion 1 set out above. This leads to criterion 2 and 3 together. There is a dearth of reliable sources for this article, it's mostly databases and a couple pieces of local news. I don't consider these to be "routine" per say given that they are revisiting events a decade on, but, it's not sufficient to pull me to the position of keep. We could pack the encyclopeadia full of these kinds of articles. Some are encyclopedic, and some are not. This one, in my estimation, falls under the category of "is not". Mr rnddude ( talk) 08:35, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:29, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Dylan Geick does not meet Wikipedia's notability requirements for an article. I'm moving that it be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.168.196 ( talk • contribs) 20:11, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 23:09, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Yeah, it exists, but I'm not seeing significant coverage in reliable sources, just some how-it-works explanations. The current article is a mess, reading like a how-to guide without any sourcing. -- Tavix ( talk) 19:20, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 23:09, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources for this BLP, to satisfy notability requirements. Mattg82 ( talk) 19:07, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 23:09, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Nothing in this orphan article that suggests this passes WP:CORPDEPTH and a BEFORE search also fails to turn-up anything. It has had unresolved maintenance tags for the last six years. Chetsford ( talk) 18:29, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 23:09, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Nothing in this orphan article that suggests this passes WP:CORPDEPTH and a BEFORE search also fails to turn-up anything. It has had unresolved maintenance tags for the last seven years. Chetsford ( talk) 18:26, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 23:10, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO Tenuous notability. Refs are blogs and trade papers with very minor coverage. Passing mention is several ref. scope_creep ( talk) 17:49, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 23:11, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Nothing to suggest this is a notable album as required by WP:NALBUMS. Mattg82 ( talk) 17:57, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 23:11, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMUSIC none of the sources are in depth coverage in WP:RS. One album review in an obscure music site (Bluesbunny) Domdeparis ( talk) 18:19, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 23:11, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
The subject fails Wikipedia:Notability. While trying to do research on this to make this into a potential project, I could not find enough coverage from reliable, third-party sources to support this character having a separate article. Aoba47 ( talk) 18:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:45, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. Included on a travel website, but that's about it. Article (like many similar ones) is highly promotional as well, but the main problem is that the reliable, independent sources which are about this temple seem to be lacking (searched in Google News, Google Books and the first 5 pages of Google hits). Note that the article is about the existing temple, not about the proposed one that can be found in sources like this and which may be notable on architectural grounds. This is about yet another planned temple. Fram ( talk) 12:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. T. Canens ( talk) 00:32, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
subject does not appear to meet notability guidelines. RF23 ( talk) 22:28, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
204.130.0.8 ( talk) 23:29, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) scope_creep ( talk) 12:56, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO and WP:NACTOR. Minor bond actor, 5 lines. Other refs are shops and blogs. scope_creep ( talk) 14:51, 26 January 2018 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator
Speedy keep Well known actress, this is a crazy nom. She's done a heck of a lot more than just appeared in a Bond film and has plenty of coverage in sources.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:47, 27 January 2018 (UTC) Comment Your right. I think it must have been a moment of madness. scope_creep ( talk) 12:54, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:33, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Sadly, an unremarkable crime. TheLongTone ( talk) 14:48, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 22:25, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
WP:ORG and WP:ORGIND. All sources are based on press releases. scope_creep ( talk) 14:40, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:15, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Struggling to find independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO. Run-of-the-mill businessman. Autobiographical promotional article. BEM is the very bottom rung of the UK honours system. Edwardx ( talk) 14:28, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 22:25, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete No indications of notability, references are either PRIMARY sources, entries ffrom a website showing an album distributed by the company (not in-depth, no intellectually independent, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND) and an article from theteams.kr which is a Q&A published verbatim with the founder, fails WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing ++ 14:11, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 22:25, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Started by User:Arslan Gadi with COI, principal is Qamar Ud Din Khan Gadi. Nothing significant in WP:RS. Private with no coverage fails WP:NSCHOOL. Störm (talk) 11:57, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 22:24, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG/ WP:CORPDEPTH. Apart from WP:PRIMARY it's unsourced. Kleuske ( talk) 10:38, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
1dd no evidence of notability DGG ( talk ) 09:25, 2 February 2018 (UTC) .
The result was keep. WP:SNOW Guy ( Help!) 18:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Article does not cite reliable sources. Relies heavily on a single, and not independent source. No significant coverage in reliable RS found. So doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:POLITICIAN. M A A Z T A L K 10:04, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW Guy ( Help!) 18:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Article does not cite reliable sources. Relies heavily on a single, and not independent source. No significant coverage in reliable RS found. So doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:POLITICIAN. M A A Z T A L K 10:03, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:16, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
unsuccessful political candidate--no other notability DGG ( talk ) 09:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. I'm withdrawing this on the basis of the NYT article, but I hope Yngvadottir ( talk · contribs) will continue removing promotional content, such as the quotations. DGG ( talk ) 04:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
totally non-noable product and company. Minor promotional and consumer complaint references only DGG ( talk ) 09:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. T. Canens ( talk) 00:39, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG. Found no significant coverage including in Google News. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 02:10, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. T. Canens ( talk) 00:38, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Looks-like a news report as we are WP:NOTNEWS. Nothing significant in WP:RS. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 18:41, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was Speedy deleted G11 by Seraphimblade. (non-admin closure) !dave 11:28, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Can't find substantial third-party mentions, apparently not notable independent of its artists (I'm getting lots of birch bark canoe hits though :p) Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 13:23, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:37, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
All sources I can find online seem to deal with
a different Ava Preston. This voice actress seems not to be notable. - Add: apparently it is the same person. Notability still doubtful in my eyes as per
WP:NACTOR - people with more experience with role notability etc. please assess. --
Elmidae (
talk ·
contribs)
05:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Page creator here, Elmidae I believe the "different Ava Preston" you linked to IS the voice actress. The opening statement didn't really clarify that so I amended it. When I made the page I was initially only aware of the voice acting but had later added notable recurring live-action roles as well. IMDB is not being relied upon as a source, it is simply listed for convenience. I've added more. ScratchMarshall ( talk) 22:26, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Iraq FA Cup#Finals. T. Canens ( talk) 00:36, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
No source; no context Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 15:27, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. T. Canens ( talk) 00:35, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The article does not include any references. I am unable to find any independent coverage of this subject. This subject does not appear to meet Wikipedia:GNG. Rogerthat94 ( talk) 17:13, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:26, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG the sources are passing mentions (2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, ) do not mention him (10, 13, ) whats on piece that are identical PR pieces (5, 7, 8, 19, 20) WP:INTERVIEW (11) Album credit (4, 18) None are sufficent to pass the notability guidelines Domdeparis ( talk) 17:22, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 22:19, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete: as non-notable actress; cannot derive notability by dint of siblings ( Penny Marshall, Gerry Marshall). Quis separabit? 01:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:24, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
No independent notability for the Russian network. No references to support its development. Article is mainly a TV guide list of programs and the infobox television network. Another option is to redirect this to Spike (TV channel) and add a section about Russia, provided there is something to write about. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 01:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC) updated 06:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Merge to Paramount Network. It can be covered in the international versions section. I don't see how this network is significantly different from its parent.-- Rusf10 ( talk) 06:41, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:16, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Written like an advert, dubious notability, sources are either tangential in nature or first party press releases. FASTILY 21:18, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:24, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails CORP. John from Idegon ( talk) 22:32, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
current information in the article in the "notes" section, and set this as a redirect to that page. groig ( talk) 15:39, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:51, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Struggling to find independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Promotional tone, created by a WP:SPA. Fails WP:SUSTAINED. References provided are either mentions-in-passing (fails WP:CORPDEPTH) or rely almost exclusively on company produced material and/or quotations (fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND). Edwardx ( talk) 18:31, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:24, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Only claim to notability is La Crosse Method Protocol, which may or may not itself be notable. Fails WP:GNG PriceDL ( talk) 07:42, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Per the later uncontested sources. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:17, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Not notable, fails WP:ORG and a search reveals very few sources, not enough to establish notability. Rusf10 ( talk) 07:12, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The article notes:
George Street Co-op, 89 Morris St., New Brunswick; (732) 247-8280; www.georgestreetcoop.com. This venerable downtown New Brunswick institution has been around forever, or so it seems. It started in 1973, when some students from the Vegetarian Club at Rutgers University opened a buying club in a garage off George Street. They soon moved to a small storefront on George Street. The co-op is now located in even bigger quarters on nearby Morris Street. The co-op's aim is to sell vegetarian foods with the least amount of processing and contaminants but with the greatest nutritional value possible. Anyone can shop at the store, which is stocked with organic produce, organic whole grains, breads and cereals, low-carb foods, chips and natural treats, juice and juicers, ready-to-eat sandwiches and entrees, and many other items. Membership is $24 a year. If you work 2 hours a month at the co-op, you get a 6 percent discount. If you work 2 hours a week, you get 15 percent off. And the co-op offers a 5 percent everyday discount to those 65 and over. The co-op is open daily.
The article notes:
Whatever the excesses and extravagances of the 1980s me-first period, the George Street Co-op in New Brunswick not only managed to survive, it prospered with its philosophy of "community and fellowship in a cooperative environment."
In fact, the co-op members were able to buy their own building, hence the George Street Co-op is no longer in a storefront on George Street but is at 89 Morris St.
...
The co-op has approximately 600 members who pay $10 a year plus $2 for printing the newsletter. New members pay a $5 deposit, which is returned if they leave.
Anyone receiving financial assistance can ask to have the dues waived. The co-op accepts food stamps.
Each co-op member family must work two hours a month for each member of the family. This work could be writing the newsletter, helping in the store, checking in orders, bagging produce, filling bulk bins, taking out trash or other duties, depending on the day and time.
The article notes:
According to its brochure, the co-op was begun in 1973 "when about 10 people from the Vegetarian Club at Rutgers started a buying club and worked out of a garage off George Street."
A year later, the club moved to a storefront on George Street. In the spring of 1988, the store moved to its present location at 89 Morris St.
In addition to providing produce which is organic (grown without the use of pesticides or chemical additives), the George Street Co-op carries a range of vegetarian food that includes grains and nuts, herbs, spices, pasta, dairy products, pasta, teas, and ready-to-eat sandwiches. The store also sells books and body-care products.
The article notes:
Members pay an annual $10 fee, which includes $2 for the co-op's monthly Food For Thought newsletter, in addition to a one-time $5 deposit which is refundable when membership is terminated. The bulk of the dues covers salaries for the eight full-time workers and overhead.
...
The co-op's founding members started a buying club 23 years ago in a garage off George Street, moving within a year into a leased storefront. As the operation expanded, the co-op was able to purchase its own building on Morris Street but retained the George Street name.
The article notes:
The George Street Co-Op in New Brunswick with 600 members, the state's largest was founded 20 years ago by a g roup of residents in conjunction with the Rutgers Vegetarian Club and the owner of a restaurant and health food store. Woods, who started working there as a volunteer when he was 11 and is now the manager, said the store has outgrown its storefront location on Morris Street. (It moved from George Street in 1988 but kept the name.)
The article notes:
Long before supermarkets devoted aisle space to organic produce, tofu and free-range chicken, there was the George Street Co-op in New Brunswick.
Started in 1973 by members of the Vegetarian Club at Rutgers College, the co-op has survived three decades, filling a niche for consumers seeking healthy alternatives.
But now that organic food has gone mainstream, the co-op is struggling to find its place.
...
The co-op, which moved from George Street to its current location on Morris Street in 1988, is a health food store collectively owned by about 200 members. Each member works a few hours a week or month to receive discounts on products, ranging from tofu and organic vegetables to fragrance-free soaps and paper towels made of 100 percent recycled paper.
...
About 10 years ago, the co-op opened its doors to nonmembers, who now make up 75 percent of the store's sales.
The article notes:
All that said, what's a 30-year-old, communal, organic-only food cooperative doing in the year 2000?
Surviving quite nicely, thank you, in hip downtown New Brunswick. With more than 200 members, the not-for-profit George Street Co-op still purchases and sells natural foods the old fashioned way: They vote on it.
...
The co-op makes an intriguing example of how a group of people from all walks of life can join forces to keep an idealistic vision alive for almost three decades, and continue to make it work in today's world.
Within a year, the membership and demand had grown, and they opened a retail store on George Street. By 1988, the cooperative had expanded to the point where it had to relocate to larger quarters at the present site. The Morris Street store is open to the public, which pays sticker price for more than 4,500 items. By working two hours each month at various jobs, members, who pay $12 per year plus an equity deposit of $100, receive an 8 percent discount. Putting in two hours per week gets you a 20 percent discount.
...
... There's more at stake than you might think: Last year, sales topped $800,000.
The Star-Ledger is the largest circulated newspaper in the U.S. state of New Jersey and is based in Newark. It is a statewide or regional newspaper so it passes the guideline.The source's audience must also be considered. Evidence of significant coverage by international or national, or at least regional, media is a strong indication of notability. On the other hand, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability; at least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary.
The result was delete. The promised citations do not appear to have materialized. T. Canens ( talk) 00:21, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Does not meet the GNG. Can't find significant coverage in independent sources. Is simply a phrase coined by one author of a couple of papers on blockchains. Can't find it mentioned elsewhere online or in any article on Wikipedia. Kb.au ( talk) 02:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW Guy ( Help!) 18:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Article has 3 sources. 1 is from Baluchistan PA that shows particulars. 2 and 3 are sources that only mention and no significant coverage. It does not meet WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. M A A Z T A L K 09:27, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#cite_note-note7-12 M A A Z T A L K 09:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
"Politicians and judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office, and members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature.[12] This also applies to persons who have been elected to such offices but have not yet assumed them."
Wikipedia is structurally biased against non-European people. This is why we have criteria for notability which do not require finding lots of good RS. Only 50% of the world's population has internet access, and to suggest that an elected Pakistani politician does not meet this criteria seems unaware of the geographical and structural bias which makes it harder to prove notability for non-European people. This article, and all articles on elected Pakistani MPs, are inherently notable. Jwslubbock ( talk) 15:17, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was merge to Nicole Kersh. T. Canens ( talk) 00:19, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private business; significant RS coverage not found. Fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Created by Special:Contributions/KerriZ with few other contributions outside this topic. K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:10, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Killiondude ( talk) 22:19, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Contested prod. Subject is non-notable. Only one of the provided sources are a reliable source that cover the subject at length. None other can be found. WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 15:35, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Chronicles of Amber. Content can be merged from history. Sandstein 09:10, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Not needed. If really necessary information about collected editions could be added at The Chronicles of Amber -- wooden superman 16:27, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:15, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
This is pure Wikipedia:Content forking. The only notable person is the father, and so the text may be included there. No reason for a new lemma in Wikipedia. -- Hannover86 ( talk) 10:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. T. Canens ( talk) 00:14, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Article seems based entirely on inherited notability (and not very strong one at that). No substantial coverage of the person seems to exist. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 08:44, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:17, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails applicable notability criteria, namely EVENT. Also seems to fall under the pillar policy NOT John from Idegon ( talk) 08:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 00:17, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Contested PROD, with that tag removed for what looks to be a case of crystal ball use. Ayers doesn't pass any of the applicable standards for his professional career, and is presently only an assistant coach, which doesn't seem to get him over the line in that regard either. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:43, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Delete - I am not seeing independent, reliable sources that establish WP:GNG. Most sources I can find are short blurbs on being hired for various jobs (routine coverage not to the level of in depth profiles) or are published by non-independent sources (school websites, School fan sites, etc). Rikster2 ( talk) 12:55, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Delete - He played professionally at the highest level in Finland, however, that doesn't qualify under WP:NHOOPS. His other pro play was in the NBA D-League which also doesn't qualify under NHOOPS. References are almost non-existent in article. Those found in a BEFORE search are fleeting and incidental; what one would expect for an assistant coach at a D1 school; primarily in the form of mention in box scores and game recaps. Therefore, does not pass GNG either. No prejudice for recreation if / when he becomes a head coach. Chetsford ( talk) 05:36, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Keep He played professionally in France [36], in Finland, and D League [37]. So yes he is notable for wikipedia, just like hundreds other players.-- Bozalegenda ( talk) 22:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
I added more sources, so i hope that now is everything ok.-- Bozalegenda ( talk) 15:24, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
@ Rikster2: are you kidding me right now? Should we add a 100 sources so you could be happy??? You dont even know to add refs in articles, you are just doing some minor edits in infobox and that is not making this wiki better. Just realize man Ayers is reliable for wikipedia, there are plenty of sources on web about him. Just type his name on google and you will see. He played in EuroCup and that competition is about 20 times stronger then Australian League, he played also in French first division. So yes he is reliable whether you like it or not.-- Bozalegenda ( talk) 23:50, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:17, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
His daughter wrote a "novelized telling of his story", but that's about it. He doesn't satisfy either WP:BIO or WP:SOLDIER. Clarityfiend ( talk) 08:27, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:21, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR, as there is at most 1 significant role listed, and whether the film is significant is unclear. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:17, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:20, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable municipal park. Fails WP:GNG, no reliable source coverage. Even the town's website doesn't tell you anything about the park other than it has two football fields. Rusf10 ( talk) 06:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep per WP:WITHDRAWN. ( non-admin closure) Hagennos ( talk) 08:21, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Non notable minor Railway station. Does not pass notability guidelines under Wikipedia:Notability_(Railway_lines_and_stations). Fails Wp:GNG Hagennos ( talk) 05:07, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep . Based on long standing consensus that all Railway Stations are notable I am closing this discussion as per WP:WITHDRAWN. ( non-admin closure) Hagennos ( talk) 08:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Non notable Railway station . Fails WP:GNG and also delete under WP:NOTTRAVELGUIDE . The criteria for notability of Railway stations are clear in Wikipedia:Notability_(Railway_lines_and_stations) Hagennos ( talk) 05:03, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. This is a train wreck thanks to the SPAs. No prejudice against speedy renomination, preferably with extended-confirmed protection on the AFD. T. Canens ( talk) 00:13, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Another cryptocurrency article with poor references and promotional content. A quick WP:BEFORE didn't unearth much more in reliable sources. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 04:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Staffed with a team of cryptocurrency experts, we are committed to providing sound recommendations on the best and safest coins to invest in.Sound recommendations are not independent media coverage from an established source with a history of editorial oversight. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 05:43, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Like all discussions, deletion discussions must be decided in accordance with consensus and Wikipedia policies and guidelines. If you are not fairly experienced, or are unfamiliar with deletion policy or the workings of deletion discussions, do not close such discussions. You closed a controversial AfD with very differing answers 3 days after it was opened. You're not an admin and you've not got the experienced to even be making these judgments. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
very few people have any idea as to what this project is all aboutand suggests it's largely hypeware. I've cleaned up the article more ("3rd generation cryptocurrency" appears to be their promotional terminology that's not otherwise well-defined). power~enwiki ( π, ν) 18:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SKCRIT#1. The nominator has withdrawn the nomination and no one other than the nominator recommends that the page be deleted or redirected. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Treats a single model from 2011 that does not appear to have seen further uptake and/or discussion since. Not notable as a scientific concept. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 08:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable business whose featured product shows on non-notable website blogs like World News Network, TheHollywoodTimes.net, UsWeekly.com (not the magazine), and the contributor section of Huffington Post. Travolution is a maybe, but it's a news announcement of the product. That leaves a Spanish newspaper that briefly mentions the name but it is not clear whether it's the same business or another business of the same name. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 03:38, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable, potentially hoax-show. I can find no evidence in any language that this exists outside of their own self sourced website. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 02:58, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
A WP:PROMO page on an unremarkable online travel agency. Does no meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Significant RS coverage cannot be found; what comes up is trivial mentions and self-promotion link. The first AfD closed as "Delete" in Oct 2016; there are no new indications of notability since then. The ranking on "Top 100 Startups In The Arab World 2017" strongly suggests it's WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopedia entry. K.e.coffman ( talk) 02:47, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Delete: non-notable school. Google search did not provide any evidence of notability or notable alumni. Quis separabit? 02:44, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Does not meet WP:NMODEL and significant RS coverage not found. Cyber Girl of the Year honour is not significant and well known; the article on the program has been deleted here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playboy Cyber Club (2nd nomination). K.e.coffman ( talk) 02:01, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:11, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
An unelected politician without significant coverage in reliable sources. Mattg82 ( talk) 01:15, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:11, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Significant coverage not found, and the undeleted article was mistakenly re-deleted per WP:G4 when the previous deletion was a prod rather than an AfD. One of the non-English sources in the article appears to be a blog. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:BLP, a policy, has precedence over WP:GNG, a guideline. None of the keeps seriously engaged with the BLP argument. T. Canens ( talk) 00:06, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
This is a mess from a WP:BLP point of view. The acquitted person is prominently named and thereby linked to an accusation of which he was found not guilty. It is one of exactly two such articles on Wikipedia; the other is Acquittal of O.J. Simpson (which redirects to the "murder case" article). Simpson, at the time of the murder case, was already notable as a sportsperson; the person named in this article otherwise is not notable. The article also is an incoherent collection of largely unreferenced information, partly wrong, partly based on opinion pieces. There are better sources than the ones cited in the article, but it still only amounts to routine coverage of an ongoing court case (the acquittal is being appealed). It may even be possible to write a valid encyclopedia article about the case (if we presume it is notable, which seems doubtful), but doing so would amount to rewriting it in its entirety; WP:TNT applies, particularly given the presumption in favor of privacy. Huon ( talk) 00:49, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
A short run TV series with next to no coverage in independent reliable sources. Of the independent references included in the article, Style only mentions the show incidentally and body+soul doesn't mention it at all. It's also not mentioned on Australian TV news site TV Tonight. Fails WP:GNG and WP:TVSHOW. Kb.au ( talk) 00:43, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:06, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Unnecessary spin-off of Mercy College (New York) notable alumni section. College only has some 18 alumni with wikipedia articles. They can all be listed at the article. Which they are. Note- Another similar page List of Mercy College (New York) people was deleted. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:00, 26 January 2018 (UTC)