![]() |
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 00:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No assertion of notability or that it meets WP:CORP also only substantial contributors are two accounts, both who have never edited outside of this article and one of which has the company name in their username. Mifter ( talk) 23:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ardmore, Pennsylvania. Feel free to merge from article history as appropriate. czar 04:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
I PROD'd this article, and it was de-PROD'd by Jahaza. I believe that this church fails WP:GNG. Having an association with a notable person (in this case, J. Howard Pew and very marginally Billy Graham) does not in and of itself confer notability. Of the references in the article, the first is routine local news reporting the opening of a new church, the second is a minor mention in a biography of Pew, the third is a paragraph mention in a history of the Presbyterian church, and the fourth is a minor mention in a history of the Pew Trust. None of these are in-depth coverage of the church either as an organization or as a building, so I believe the article falls short of notability requirements. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:00, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 00:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Same as the last reason; Although a show on Discovery Channel, the Critical Hour lacks any citations that indicates notability. Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 22:54, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 00:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Previously mass-nominated for deletion in 2006 - see this - but I've looked for sources several times in recent years and never found anything.
While there were suggestions in the prior AfD that such articles could be redirected to List of Brahmin gotras etc, the fact is that such lists are also now redirects because they're just not notable and/or verifiable. Sitush ( talk) 22:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 00:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. I've looked for sources on and off for years now and never got anywhere. The article has been tagged since at least 2012 and was previously mass-nominated for deletion here. Sitush ( talk) 22:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Kurykh ( talk) 00:08, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG and clearly fails WP:POLITICIAN. A twice failed candidate for Congress. Otherwise, the article just seems to be somebody's first hand reflection of this guy's life. The fact that he had a few notable people at his ranch and that he was briefly mentioned in death by the governor does not come close to establishing notability. Safiel ( talk) 22:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Company fails WP:ORG as there is no in-depth coverage. A few press releases, quotes, and brief mentions is all I can find. There is a "Mindspace" that shows up in search results from Israel but appears to be a completely different company in a completely different industry. CNMall41 ( talk) 19:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Absolutely nothing to suggest this meets WP:NFILM or even WP:GNG. I can find no coverage outside of what is provided in the article, which only goes to prove its existence. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 21:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
While it does get passing mentions -- such as this terrible rating from internet privacy experts in a CBC piece -- this small ISP does not appear to meet WP:COMPANY, in terms of significant coverage. Tellingly, the CBC didn't even list Acanac in its graph of notable Canadian providers, merely mentioning it in passing as among "many smaller ISPs..." Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC) Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=EBOX
/info/en/?search=Vmedia
/info/en/?search=Zazeen
/info/en/?search=Start_Communications
/info/en/?search=MNSi_Telecom
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/internet-carriers-may-be-breaching-canadian-privacy-laws-1.2992125
http://www.blogto.com/tech/2014/07/internet_providers_in_toronto_beyond_rogers_and_bell/
http://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/distributel-acquires-yak-communications-592589371.html
http://www.torontosun.com/2015/03/27/majority-of-canadians-back-crtc-on-pick-and-pay-poll
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/technology/gaming/playstation-nows-canada-problem-stingy-data-caps-may-hurt-streaming-games/article16471154/
http://business.financialpost.com/fp-tech-desk/openmedia-says-bell-plans-to-pull-usage-based-billing-proposal?__lsa=84f3-bfa0
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/03/12/best-worst-telecoms-privacy-canada_n_6850120.html -same chart as you provide above from CBC, and like the CBC article, Acanac is mentioned in the chart despite low ratings they are considered by CBC to be a significant independent ISP
https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/vwapj/crtc-0528-attach1.pdf/$FILE/crtc-0528-attach1.pdf
http://o.canada.com/technology/crtc-netflix-problems
http://o.canada.com/technology/personal-tech/how-to-get-cheaper-wireless-rates-in-canada
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/j-david-ellis/crtc-internet_b_2076284.html -this specific article even notes that Acanac is the only ISP in Canada to rank on their list of global ISPs quoting "This time Toronto makes #13 out of the list of 22, for a 28/1 DSL connection costing less than $33. Except it's not from an incumbent; it's from competitive ISP Acanac."
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/steve-e-anderson/cell-phone-bill-moore_b_4577942.html
And again all the additional sources all list Acanac as the best independent ISP choice for Canadians along side
Teksavvy
Nathanpalmer1986 (
talk)
17:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. There has been disruption and attempts to remove others' comments by SPAs. These have been discounted. Bishonen | talk 12:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
![]() | Please DO NOT edit other users comments or post personal attacks aimed them. If you believe an editors statement is incorrect or wish to reply for another reason write a response instead. |
The two-year-old news website has a passing mention in Bloomberg as a result of a fake news conspiracy that duped the site, but that's really all. I can't find any source that covers the site substantially. Most of those listed in the "Notable contributors" section are actually only one-time or guest contributors. See: WP:WEB Mark Schierbecker ( talk) 19:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Without prejudice to merging, renaming, or other WP:ATD. postdlf ( talk) 02:13, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
A promotional list of channels disguised as article. The list has no notability of its own. The list is not even good enough for merging with beIN Media Group The Banner talk 17:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Non notable company. Fails WP:GNG. Koala15 ( talk) 17:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable MMA fighter - does not meet WP:NMMA Peter Rehse ( talk) 17:00, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was Keep per XavierItzm's references and per general consensus. ( non-admin closure) Pishcal ( talk) 20:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
As I stated on the talk-page this article falls under WP:NOTNEWS, under WP:ROUTINE coverage. Terrorist attacks do not automatically fall under the notable criteria, here we have one person who was lightly injured, with the usual reactions to these types of attacks. The reactions generated a splash in the news coverage with no WP:LASTING impact. As I said as well please keep in mind WP:OSE, not all of these attacks can be lumped together under one umbrella. I would recommend deletion or a direct to List of terrorist incidents in February 2017. Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 16:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
References
The source said the suspect had made two money transfers of 3,000 and 2,000 euros to a fellow Egyptian in Poland in the days immediately before the attack.
The source said the suspect had made two money transfers of 3,000 and 2,000 euros to a fellow Egyptian in Poland in the days immediately before the attack
In just the past 13 months, there have been at least four attacks in France using knives, including one instance in which an off-duty police officer and wife were stabbed to death by a man who then filmed himself claiming allegiance to the Islamic State, broadcasting the video on Facebook. In St.-Étienne-du-Rouvray, a small town in Normandy, a 19-year-old man slit the throat of an elderly priest as he was saying Mass last July. The young man and an accomplice, who were fatally shot by the police, had proclaimed allegiance to the Islamic State just before the murder.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
the award ceremony fails WP:COVERAGE and WP:NNEWS as no in-depth analysis about the event can be found — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 16:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:03, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBOOK. All sources presented are trivial bibliographic links, and I was unable to find anything better. VQuakr ( talk) 16:13, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Prodded as not meeting WP:NAUTHOR the creator of the article immediately removed tag without modifying the article or adding to the talk page. Domdeparis ( talk) 15:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, the article under construction concerned a published French author by a Canadian publisher, she appearing in various newspapers articles (CBC, Le Figaro...) that may be verified on internet, she performed lectures and she attended renowned book fairs (Paris, Nice, Monaco. She is great granddaughter of notably famous poet and writer Robert Service. May you please guide me, best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rwservice ( talk • contribs) 15:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Charlotte Service-Longepe is continuing to write as an author and the page is bound to be created in the future. Please let me know what other information must be added to keep the article online. Her novel is available at Amazon, Fnac and various online bookstores, besides the book Pays de Dinan is sold at the Municipale Bibilothèque Dinan in France, articles from Ouest France are online. She is also performing lectures in Bibliothèques. She is not yet as famous as her great granddad but she is making her way that is why I believe wiki users will be interested in having information available on the page. Rwservice Rwservice ( talk)
Hi, how come the article is not a spam! the information written have proof on press articles from main French newspapers, everything is relevant and enrich Wikipedia. Saying that the author is not "notable for now" is only a personal opinion, the author had been published, read and had an important press coverage which show that the author is notable for some readers. Rwservice Rwservice ( talk)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
This may be a bit irregular, but I'm posting this on behalf of User:Bumbl loid who was having problems getting AfD to work. His rationale for deletion is: "The logo of "Advanced Liner" was a made up from SriLankan Airlines with few edits made to the logo's color. Second, there are no news clippings, evidences, nor proof that Husky Tours was bought and sold over to Yanson Group of Bus Companies. Third, given the data by http://data.gov.ph/catalogue/dataset/provincial-bus-franchises-2015, Husky Tours still exist and their franchise wasn't sold to Yanson Group." Peridon ( talk) 15:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Not much comes up about him on a quick Google search. He doesn't appear to be notable at all outside of Iraq. DrDevilFX ( talk) 14:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 21:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Director of 4 non notable films, doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG Can't find any indepth coverage of him. Theroadislong ( talk) 14:31, 14 February 2017 (UTC) Theroadislong ( talk) 14:31, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. ( non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Recreation of an article that has been speedy deleted (G11) twice in the last 6 weeks. This article has same problems. Article lacks significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Sources are business announcements, the company's web site and an article written by the deputy chairman of the parent company that doesn't mention the subject of the article. Google searches provided nothing new, mostly advertisements, social media and company's web site. Wikipedia is not a business listing site. Article fails WP:ORGCRITE, basic WP:GNG. CBS527 Talk 14:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MUSICBIO. Unable to locate secondary sources to support notability. Magnolia677 ( talk) 13:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and runs afoul of WP:BLP1E. Only claim of notability is his Twitter post detailing his experience as a temporary detainee by United States Customs & Border Protection (CBP) officials due to Executive Order 13769, and even that cannot be independently verified. Hundreds if not thousands of people were detained, some of them wrongly, and while his case is interesting it does not meet notability standards for a standalone Wikipedia article. General Ization Talk 13:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — Yash talk stalk 00:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Not notable. Subject is lacking in-depth coverage in reliable secondary sources, as required by notability criteria. Coverage seems to revolve around one news event in 2015 that was apparently inconsequential. Article created by single-purpose account with possible conflict of interest. Citobun ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. See WP:NPASR. Kurykh ( talk) 21:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
This textbook appears to fail WP:GNG. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 05:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
...is supposed to be a modern substitute of that...would be a WP:INHERITED argument. (No opinion on the rest of the merits.) Tigraan Click here to contact me 11:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. See WP:SOFTDELETE. Kurykh ( talk) 21:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Completely non notable. Fails WP:BIO. Model and Big Brother Brazil contestant. Both of these are considered no notable. scope_creep ( talk) 22:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
I couldn't verify its notability. Previous AfDs closed as no consensus due to lack of responses. Boleyn ( talk) 20:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Kurykh ( talk) 04:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Strictly local recurring event that does not meet the WP:EVENT criteria. Suggest merging with the Kauai article. Rogermx ( talk) 17:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Probably fancy history : no mention in classic books dealing with Ottoman dynasty (Uluçay, Alderson, Peirce). Creator ignored user:Chris Liak kind advice about the need of sources to rely on. Phso2 ( talk) 13:35, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. See WP:NPASR. Kurykh ( talk) 04:08, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unreferenced tracklist Rathfelder ( talk) 11:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. czar 04:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
This is one of a number of articles which were brought to AfD by a single editor back in January 2010 and closed as keep. The editor was subsequently blocked from deletion proposals and nominations on the grounds that he was flooding the community with more of them than they could process. In light of that, and the fact that nearly all of the "keep" votes in these AfDs were clearly copy-and-pasted across all of this editor's nominations (often with generic rationales like "notability easily established here"), I suspect that many if not most of these articles were voted as "keep" simply to end the flood of AfDs. Seven years have now gone by and this article is still a stub consisting solely of original research and a handful of basic factoids like platform and year of release, with no sources and no substantiated claim to notability (editors already tried, and failed, to establish the "considered one of the worst Jaguar games" thing with reliable sources at List of video games notable for negative reception), so I think it's due to be reconsidered for deletion.-- Martin IIIa ( talk) 12:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:08, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete. WP:BLP of a public relations strategist, written like a résumé rather than an encyclopedia article and not based on enough solid sourcing to pass WP:GNG. Of the 32 sources being cited here, ten are just glancing namechecks of his existence as a giver of soundbite in an article that isn't about him; seven are primary sources such as press releases from his own companies; five are unsubstantive blurbs; five verify tangential facts about his companies while failing to even contain a mention of his name at all; three are dead links; and one is a simple directory listing. Literally the only reference in the entire article that's substantively about Alepian is #1, and it's a profile in the alumni magazine of his alma mater -- so it would be acceptable for some supplementary verification of facts if the rest of the sourcing around it were much more solid, but it cannot bring GNG by itself as the article's only non-primary, non-blurby, non-soundbitey source. A person like this is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because he exists; he gets a Wikipedia article when he can be properly referenced over GNG. Bearcat ( talk) 13:12, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. evading previous salt, salted here too Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:11, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Blogs, forums, or affiliated sources, cant find any better online. Seems WP:TOOSOON, Author appears to have a COI. Insert CleverPhrase Here 12:17, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
Db-band}}
tagging. The article was already deleted thrice as
Dj Liskid under A7/G11, and that title has been salted, hence the use of
CamelCase here. The name of the editor who started it suggests its an
autobio. Self-promo and so far non-notable musician. —
Sam
Sailor
13:04, 14 February 2017 (UTC)The result was no consensus. Kurykh ( talk) 04:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Local Californian band that has self released one EP and an album. Fails the notability criteria under WP:MUSIC. Karst ( talk) 07:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
A look for additional sources on the subject revealed a low number of independent, in-depth coverage. Most results were from press releases or venues connected to subject. Her books do not appear to have garnered much attention either. Fails WP:BIO and WP:AUTHOR. Delta13C ( talk) 07:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NSINGER. Domdeparis ( talk) 11:03, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unremarkable person - would nominate for CSD but would prefer that the community can decide. Nördic Nightfury 10:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — Yash talk stalk 00:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unremarkable sunk ship Nördic Nightfury 10:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Promotion from a shill. Not notable. Awards are not major. Lacks coverage about him in multiple independent reliable sources. Meeting Paris is primary. Exposed vocals is a pay for play promotion platform. duffbeerforme ( talk) 10:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Bishonen | talk 11:57, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Proposing WP:TNT. Certainly there are right wing and conservative Jews. However, this article has existed for over 10 years and is not only virtually unsourced but woefully unimproved (except for the names and images of a lot of Republican politicians.) Note that we have articles on right wing and politically conservative Jewish groups, including Republican Jewish Coalition, Likud, Category:Conservative parties in Israel and so forth. However, this article, judging by its 11-year track record, is simply too sprawling and inchoate to enable creation of a coherent article. I suggest that we blow it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by E.M.Gregory ( talk • contribs) 09:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. General consensus. From experience, railway stations are kept regardless of notability. Agreed, could do with expanding. ( non-admin closure) Nördic Nightfury 08:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
The only possible claim to notability is the unsourced claim (mentioned in the main article Mohe County) that this is the northernmost railway station in China. Even if that can be sourced, the fact that this is already mentioned in the main article, makes this a usless content fork. T*U ( talk) 08:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:10, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable, self-promotion with multiple links to promotional sites Melcous ( talk) 08:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 02:13, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
The only content in this article is a table copied from the "Climate" section of the Russia article. There is a separate article Climate of Russia that contains more (and newer) information about extreme temperatures, but even if that info is incorporated here, this will be nothing more than a useless content fork. Unless or until there is additional information that can be added to this article, it should be deleted. T*U ( talk) 07:54, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was Merge and redirect to Requiem (Jenkins). ( non-admin closure) — Yash talk stalk 01:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
From what I can tell, a non-notable WP:NALBUM.
We have an article for the piece itself here: Requiem (Jenkins). This article should be redirected there. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 07:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. If there are still any doubts, after going through the sources listed below, about the subject's notability, feel free to renominate it. ( non-admin closure) — Yash talk stalk 01:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No indication this fella is notable. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NAUTHOR, and if it's even the same guy, WP:NCOLLATH. John from Idegon ( talk) 07:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
References
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Extreme paucity of RS in searches to improve this article. Refimprove template has been in place since 2012 with no improvements. Article fails WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST Delta13C ( talk) 08:34, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Robert Glasper. ( non-admin closure) — Yash talk stalk 00:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Non notable neologism, a google search turns up plenty of results for the mixture of art and science, but very little for the term itself and no reliable sources. Pinguinn 🐧 17:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Non-notable neologism that fails WP:GNG and since PRODing has become much more promotional. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Star Hellas#Star Hellas. czar 04:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
non-notable ((( The Quixotic Potato))) ( talk) 16:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:12, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
non-notable ((( The Quixotic Potato))) ( talk) 16:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. No prejudice towards continuing discussion on actions other than delete, so long as there is consensus on the relevant talk page(s). Kurykh ( talk) 21:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
non-notable ((( The Quixotic Potato))) ( talk) 16:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Reinas de Costa Rica#Representatives at Miss Earth. czar 04:48, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
non-notable ((( The Quixotic Potato))) ( talk) 16:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Deletion is conceivable here again as in May, because the sources now are simply only published and republished business announcements, quotes, financials and other triviality, the author has also confirmed they're an employee after they requested my re-review, but considering there's still nothing significant, it's unacceptable in our policies. Beyond this, there's simply nothing else different and thus still suggesting at a business listing, making WP:Wikipedia is not a business listing apply. SwisterTwister talk 21:47, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Spredfast’s product suite includes applications for monitoring social media accounts and using the interactions happening there for marketing purposes. One is to add more options for customer service requests or inquiries originating from social channels such as Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter rather than via email, web forums, or traditional contact centers, said Spredfast CEO Rod Favaron....Spredfast is also investing more deeply in partnerships with companies that offer complementary tools, such as social analytics. Its suite already works with at least 50 other tools within this category such as the (named companies)finishing with company quotes, financials, named business partners, clients and investors. That exactly fits the meaning of business announcement. Given everything else available is similar, that can only mean the company itself authored it. SwisterTwister talk 03:50, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
I wrote the current article, and work for Spredfast. I don't think I'm supposed to cast a vote here, and I'm not looking for Wikipedia to do anything outside its policies / content standards; but here are a few points for consideration:
- Bthoma ( talk) 21:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
; Further sources (academic and news) to support notability
|
---|
Here are some further references, mostly academic journal articles, that may inform the case for notability. I have not been able to find all of these in open access online sources, but have linked some; others may be available online as well. - Bthoma ( talk) 21:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC) Spredfast was used as a key tool for this social media research; the paper describes use of Spredfast in context of using similar tools:
Shoutlet sold to Spredfast; discusses sizes of both companies, logistics of merger, etc:
Abstract: "The article reports that New York Road Runners (NYRR), a nonprofit organization, has partnered with social media consultant Spredfast Spredfast to allow the participants at the 2015 New York City (NYC) Marathon to build their own social media videos that show their experience in the event."
Spredfast won an Emmy Award:
Spredfast mentioned (analysis, functions of software) in a number of New York Times articles, see this search result: https://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch/#/%22Spredfast%22/since1851/allresults/1/allauthors/newest/ "Mass Relevance (now Spredfast) has recently developed a comprehensive way to measure millions of pieces of social content per minute..." Also quotes "experts from ... Mass Relevance (now Spredfast)" as saying: "Mass Relevance (now Spredfast) was Twitter's first social TV partnerand one of the first companies to combine social media with traditional TV programming..."
"Cross Publishing, Tracking and Analysis of Content Streams in Social Media: These tools are very successful and widely used for public relations, social media, and (viral) marketing as well as policy campaigns (in the successful campaign of Barack Obama), in particular in the U.S. market. The following subsections will present the most common used tools in this application area." ... "Spredfast is an application developed for enterprises to follow their brand on the Web and manage promotion campaigns for new products ..." (From a 2012 conference paper)
Spredfast was named a Leader in “ The Forrester Wave: Social Relationship Platforms, Q2 2015” report by Forrester Research, Inc. Spredfast Spredfast was among 11 of the “most significant software providers,” according to Forrester Research Inc, to be included in the study. The SRPs were evaluated on 41 criteria, including their current offerings, strategy and market presence. Mentioned in industry press:
Adweek article (one small example of Spredfast's data being used in expert analysis):
One of 12 social network management systems reviewed in this peer reviewed journal article:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens ( talk) 09:53, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
|
Regarding WP:PROMO, I did not see any advertisements in the article, and since no advertisements have been identified, the objection is not actionable. Unscintillating ( talk) 19:31, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: |volume=
has extra text (
help); Cite journal requires |journal=
(
help)The book notes:
Spredfast introduced its social media management system (SMMS)—a social CRM—in 2010. Designed primarily for enterprise companies, Spredfast relies on its comprehensive social CRM dashboard. Although Spredfast has not been around as long as some of its top competitors in the social CRM space, it is regarded as one of the first to aggregate social media engagement and campaign management across major social media channels and leading blog platforms. In addition to social media channel and campaign management, Spredfast integrates a robust social data analytics suite, as well as several solutions for social media project/team management.
The book notes:
Vendor Spotlight—Spredfast
Governing your brand's social activity requires a great deal of organization across people, accounts and content, as well as the need to uphold your company brand standards. Spredfast, a social media management system provider, helps brands organize and orchestrate social media, specifically content, to facilitate the ideal interactions between brands and their communities.
...
Spredfast can also help you collaborate so that workflows and approvals help teams engage productively. As shown in Figure 10.9, teams can highlight activity proactively to share with contributors for reference or assign activity reactively to entire teams based on response needs. This collaboration replaces long email threads with system notifications and workflow automation within Spredfast to provide visibility across the team of what's been assigned, what needs prioritized attention, and what actions have been taken with visible audit trails.
...
Spredfast protects the security and safety of brands by equipping administrators with the power to manage accounts, passwords, and user roles from within the platform. Content contributors are given access to engage directly within Spredfast rather than have direct access to many passwords needed to access company social media accounts. For companies in regulated industries or those with additional security needs, Spredfast offers enhanced password management functionality, Single Sign-On, and IP restrictions.
Following are two Spredfast customers who user their tool for varying levels of governance:
[The book discusses Spredfast customers Whole Food Markets and AARP.]
one of the first to aggregate social media engagement and campaign management across major social media channels and leading blog platforms. In addition to social media channel and campaign management, Spredfast integrates a robust social data analytics suite, as well as several solutions for social media project/team managementis simply PR placement. Next, the blatancy of the second is the clear company involvements, take
Governing your brand's social activity requires a great deal of organization across people, accounts and content, as well as the need to uphold your company brand standards. Spredfast, a social media management system provider, helps brands organize and orchestrate social media, specifically content, to facilitate the ideal interactions between brands and their communities....Spredfast can also help you collaborate so that workflows and approvals help teams engage productively. As shown in Figure 10.9, teams can highlight activity proactively to share with contributors for reference or assign activity reactively to entire teams based on response needs. This collaboration replaces long email threads with system notifications and workflow automation within Spredfast to provide visibility across the team of what's been assigned, what needs prioritized attention, and what actions have been taken with visible audit trails. Spredfast protects the security and safety of brands by equipping administrators with the power to manage accounts, passwords, and user roles from within the platform. Content contributors are given access to engage directly within Spredfast rather than have direct access to many passwords needed to access company social media accounts. For companies in regulated industries or those with additional security needs, Spredfast offers enhanced password management functionality, Single Sign-On, and IP restrictions. Following are Spread customers", that in fact violates WP:CORPPDEPTH which states "Mere announcements, mentions, notices....are not significant, independent or used in articles for notability". It's also no different when we apply WP:NOT which says "Wikipedia is not a business webhost for simple company information, campaigning or advertising", and that above fits it exactly. Anything with first person company-speak is not going to be by anyone else but the company because it's advertising-toned, take
helps brands organize and orchestrate social media, specifically content, to facilitate the ideal interactionsand
Spredfast can help you....so that workflows and approvals help teams engage productivelyand
Spredfast offers enhanced password management functionality; no journalist would ever use that because a journalist is there to report news, not advertise the company and that's also what WP:CORPDEPTH itself covers. Our policies also state even republished press releases or announcements are unacceptable because they're still not independent. Another concern that is still covered by policy is past advertising which is non-negotiable because advertising has always been against policy here. To quote WP:GNG,
If a topic, May be presumed. since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected. For example, advertising, press releases, autobiographies, and the subject's website are not considered independent. SwisterTwister talk 06:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) f eminist 09:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Article about a low level American football team without independent sourcing to confirm claims. I am not aware of any other Division II teams with separate articles for their sports teams.
TM
15:30, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 04:03, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable actor.Absence of reliable source. Winged Blades Godric 14:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:14, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Dictionary article. Rathfelder ( talk) 08:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Mortee A term in dictionaries could be definited with one sentence as long as it makes the determination of concept , for this acticle there is an enough determinition . The Absolute Idealism defineted in, is the philosophy of Hegel as a whole , while (Actuality) is only one of Hegel's Idealist theories , therefore there is no reason to put all details of a whole philosophy to define a simple term .
to bind people by X policies is to bind thier intellectual freedom , you must give an objective argumentation rather than argue with X laws like those of wikipedia. -- Bilal philosopher ( talk) 12:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 12:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
The article on this fictional video game car was kept in the last deletion discussion on the grounds that it has been the subject of five "articles" in reputable media:
It's obvious that nobody would take a 2,000 horsepower video game car supposedly slated for production in 20 years seriously, and nobody would expend any effort researching or writing about such a thing. In general, for made up stuff to become notable, it needs to affect or impinge upon the real world in some way. Dennis Bratland ( talk) 07:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
None of the coverage includes any serious questions put to the company touting this product, such as whether any actual engineering was done, or if they picked a number like 2,000 horsepower (or 2,600? whatever) out of the air because it sounded cool. The premise that this represents any kind of future technology from Chrysler doesn't hold up, due to the lack of any evidence of rigor in the design. Neither is there any evidence of this imaginary object intersecting the real world in any way, such as affecting the sales or critical reception of the video game for better or worse, affecting the careers of the designers for better or worse, or forming a meaningful impression on the public's imagination. A good contrast would be Batmobile, which did all of these things, and has significant coverage in general interest publications, not only hyper-specialized online news blogs. If MOS:REALWORLD were adhered to, the contents of SRT Tomahawk would boil away to nothing, because there's nothing there but some made-up car stats that could have been written by a kid. -- Dennis Bratland ( talk) 17:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Writing an article based entirely on a subject's statement to the press is valid journalism, and can be cited to establish a fact in an article, but only on subjects whose notability has been established on something besides the press pack.
We have history of Wikipedia being abused by video game companies for pure advertising. A prime selling point of many of these games is the quantity of cars or other toys players can buy or unlock. iRacing.com was bloated with lists of simulated cars, spawning sub-articles of more cars, and of simulated race tracks. Vision Gran Turismo is filled with quite a bit of this excess. It's purely Wikipedia parroting the company's "Now with 100% more!" pitches. SRT Tomahawk would shrink to 100 words if you deleted all of the "The Tomahawk X is the penultimate variant of the Tomahawk, built to do seriously high top speeds with no problems" peacockery. This pattern of using Wikiepdia to create advert-articles by CarDekho, iRacing and here Polyphony Digital is what motivates me to try to put a stop to it. -- Dennis Bratland ( talk) 20:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
That AFD seems to me to have been confirmed by the handful of people who also commented at the ORCP who were not involved in the original discussion. Mkdw, Kudpung, and Ritchie said I was basically offbase, while Rob defended the !vote explicitly. None of the other users commented on that AFD (save DGG who was a bit more meta). I don't think it's a weak precedent at all, and I bet if I WP:CANVASSed the lot above (audience known to have certain opinions), this AFD straight turns to delete. I think your !vote is reasonable, but I'm not entirely sure it's the presently consensus position (and if I weren't on mobile now I might even take it up at WT:N given your resistance now and my resistance then or at least go peck through the archives there to see whether anyone else has written on it).
That all said, I think the topic is better covered in the context of the few RS which might be plausibly associated with it in the context of one or the other of its parent topics. This is certainly not the Portal gun. Do you disagree with that suggestion? -- Izno ( talk) 20:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
The car, as presented, is a hoax: it does not represent future technology, because no real was work done to forecast how that technology might work. Companies like Chrysler that have sketched these fanciful cars have invested nothing and committed to nothing.
Marketers pay close attention to where we allow advertising and promotion to sneak into the encyclopedia. Keeping this kind of thing around is mistake. -- Dennis Bratland ( talk) 17:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
It's incorrect to say that anybody defines concept cars to include a picture of a car you made. That false claim is one of the marketing hoaxes this game company is using to advertise their game. -- Dennis Bratland ( talk) 21:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:14, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG. 1 gnews hit. I also can't even find evidence of an actual football league even existing in Poland. LibStar ( talk) 04:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Organization has no notability and the article fails WP:GNG. Article relies on primary sources which are regurgitation of press releases in trade publications, no good secondary sources. Article is a commercial advertisement and should be deleted as per WP:PLUG as a commercial advertisement for a non-notable company. Octoberwoodland ( talk) 02:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was Clear consensus to redirect both the articles to Hmar people.( non-admin closure). Winged Blades Godric 04:00, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Not needed, we already have a section on this at Hmar people. That section should be expanded, rather than splitting the content here. I can't find any independent sources of this online either, so finding sources for a standalone article is going to be a no-go. Insert CleverPhrase Here 19:17, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Kurykh ( talk) 21:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Poorly-sourced academic bio. I am unable to find any sources that discuss the subject in any detail. The article consists mostly of unverified claims. - Mr X 01:15, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. No prejudice against a redirect to a notable mention. czar 04:51, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Can't find any non-trivial coverage about this, seems to be an extremely limited sub-genre of techno music. Triptothecottage ( talk) 09:09, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
This is probably better as a dictionary definition on Wiktionary. Amigacore is a valid genre. There are numerous sources that mention this term, some reliable like this Guardian article and this book and this book. However, because it originated in the 1980s before the web, it would be difficult to find anything online that provides in-depth coverage of this genre. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 04:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
The article contains original research. The book that has been used as a source on this article is not reliable as the author isn't a professional historian. User:Retrieverlove points out on his talk page that the information included on this page is self-made, and according to the discussion that I had with User:Phso2 the name of this woman isn't mentioned in Mustafa Çağatay Uluçay's book. A. D. Alderson lists her as a consort to Abdul Hamid I who died in 1850, but doesn't state that she was the mother of Mustafa IV. So the article: 1. contains original research 2. the information is incorrect 3. she wasn't the mother of Mustafa IV as both Uluçay and Alderson mention Ayşe Seniyeperver Sultan as his mother 4. there's little biographical information available to be used as a basis for an article. The other source that is used on the article also lists Ayşe Seniyeperver as Sultan Mustafa's mother. The subject isn't notable at all, and the article, in my opinion, should be deleted. Keivan.f Talk 04:13, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
A 50 store shopping center. No claim to notability. A case of WP:MILL. Searching turns up lots of hits like movie listing, passing mentions like "restaurant x" is opening at Augusta Exchange. Don't see anything that would establish notability. Was kept at 2008 AFD, but that really didn't substantiate notability. The article is still primarily a list of stores. MB 04:11, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) f eminist 09:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Seems completely non-notable, no in-depth coverage that I can find anywhere. No sources added in the 9 years of this article's existence. Triptothecottage ( talk) 04:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Non notable performer whose article is referenced only by twitter, facebook, instagram, and allmusic.com plus a brief standard bio on mtv.com The subject does not show notability and does not meet WP:GNG. Antonioatrylia ( talk) 03:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) f eminist 09:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
= Nothing for confirmed independent notability and substance given this mirrors what they would advertise to clients and that alone sufficient is for deletion, but also the history showing dozens and dozens of numerous accounts, a majority presumably company accounts which would also violate our policies; there's no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone and there's no exceptions for businesses, especially given all sources here are simply published or republished business announcements, including the supposedly best major ones. Searches also mirrored this by showing pages and pages of published and republished business announcements and press releases, including all of them being labeled. Take the current spurces:
The second link is simply a mirror of what I showed above in the analysis. None of it weighs any differently to what our policies state which is WP:Wikipedia is not advertising. Our policy
WP:NOT also repeatedly says "Articles must not be copyedited or rearranged when either the article is still promotional or when there is not the sufficient improvements needed in policy"; because there hasn't been hopeful signs of actual improvements, beyond a few rewording (for example, "The company enjoys servicing its customers" cannot be reworded as it's still PR, and PR is exactly what this article is), this any and all advertising is removed. Tp quote WP:CORPDEPTH exactly: except works carrying merely trivial coverage, such as:
sources that simply report meeting times, shopping hours or event schedules,
the publications of telephone numbers, addresses, and directions in business directories,
inclusion in lists of similar organizations,[3]
the season schedule or final score from sporting events,
routine communiqués announcing such matters as the hiring or departure of personnel,
brief announcements of mergers or sales of part of the business,
simple statements that a product line is being sold, changed, or discontinued,
routine notices of facility openings or closings (e.g., closure for a holiday or the end of the regular season),
routine notices of the opening or closing of local branches, franchises, or shops,
routine restaurant reviews,
quotations from an organization's personnel as story sources, or
passing mention, such as identifying a quoted person as working for an organization.
Because the sources are still largely supported by PR either published or republished, it's unacceptable.
SwisterTwister
talk
23:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was G4 Deleted by User: RHaworth. ( non-admin closure) B E C K Y S A Y L E S 18:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Per WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. Non-noteable rapper. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 02:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ansel Elgort. ( non-admin closure) f eminist 09:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
No evidence this song has been "ranked on national or significant music or sales charts," won a significant award or received significant coverage, thus failing WP:NSONGS. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
R from song}}
to artist article
Ansel Elgort for now per
WP:MUSICOUTCOMES. Can be rewritten if and when the
notability guideline for songs is met. —
Sam
Sailor
11:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)The result was delete. WP:SNOW NeilN talk to me 18:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Term is invented by a single company; promotional article is merely an advert for that company. No sources provided that would support any claims of effectiveness per WP:MEDRS. Fails WP:GNG by having no coverage in reliable sources independent of the company. RexxS ( talk) 00:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) LibStar ( talk) 10:03, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:PROF. none of the awards or achievements pass the mark. LibStar ( talk) 00:13, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 00:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No assertion of notability or that it meets WP:CORP also only substantial contributors are two accounts, both who have never edited outside of this article and one of which has the company name in their username. Mifter ( talk) 23:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ardmore, Pennsylvania. Feel free to merge from article history as appropriate. czar 04:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
I PROD'd this article, and it was de-PROD'd by Jahaza. I believe that this church fails WP:GNG. Having an association with a notable person (in this case, J. Howard Pew and very marginally Billy Graham) does not in and of itself confer notability. Of the references in the article, the first is routine local news reporting the opening of a new church, the second is a minor mention in a biography of Pew, the third is a paragraph mention in a history of the Presbyterian church, and the fourth is a minor mention in a history of the Pew Trust. None of these are in-depth coverage of the church either as an organization or as a building, so I believe the article falls short of notability requirements. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:00, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 00:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Same as the last reason; Although a show on Discovery Channel, the Critical Hour lacks any citations that indicates notability. Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 22:54, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 00:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Previously mass-nominated for deletion in 2006 - see this - but I've looked for sources several times in recent years and never found anything.
While there were suggestions in the prior AfD that such articles could be redirected to List of Brahmin gotras etc, the fact is that such lists are also now redirects because they're just not notable and/or verifiable. Sitush ( talk) 22:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 00:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. I've looked for sources on and off for years now and never got anywhere. The article has been tagged since at least 2012 and was previously mass-nominated for deletion here. Sitush ( talk) 22:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Kurykh ( talk) 00:08, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG and clearly fails WP:POLITICIAN. A twice failed candidate for Congress. Otherwise, the article just seems to be somebody's first hand reflection of this guy's life. The fact that he had a few notable people at his ranch and that he was briefly mentioned in death by the governor does not come close to establishing notability. Safiel ( talk) 22:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Company fails WP:ORG as there is no in-depth coverage. A few press releases, quotes, and brief mentions is all I can find. There is a "Mindspace" that shows up in search results from Israel but appears to be a completely different company in a completely different industry. CNMall41 ( talk) 19:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Absolutely nothing to suggest this meets WP:NFILM or even WP:GNG. I can find no coverage outside of what is provided in the article, which only goes to prove its existence. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 21:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
While it does get passing mentions -- such as this terrible rating from internet privacy experts in a CBC piece -- this small ISP does not appear to meet WP:COMPANY, in terms of significant coverage. Tellingly, the CBC didn't even list Acanac in its graph of notable Canadian providers, merely mentioning it in passing as among "many smaller ISPs..." Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC) Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=EBOX
/info/en/?search=Vmedia
/info/en/?search=Zazeen
/info/en/?search=Start_Communications
/info/en/?search=MNSi_Telecom
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/internet-carriers-may-be-breaching-canadian-privacy-laws-1.2992125
http://www.blogto.com/tech/2014/07/internet_providers_in_toronto_beyond_rogers_and_bell/
http://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/distributel-acquires-yak-communications-592589371.html
http://www.torontosun.com/2015/03/27/majority-of-canadians-back-crtc-on-pick-and-pay-poll
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/technology/gaming/playstation-nows-canada-problem-stingy-data-caps-may-hurt-streaming-games/article16471154/
http://business.financialpost.com/fp-tech-desk/openmedia-says-bell-plans-to-pull-usage-based-billing-proposal?__lsa=84f3-bfa0
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/03/12/best-worst-telecoms-privacy-canada_n_6850120.html -same chart as you provide above from CBC, and like the CBC article, Acanac is mentioned in the chart despite low ratings they are considered by CBC to be a significant independent ISP
https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/vwapj/crtc-0528-attach1.pdf/$FILE/crtc-0528-attach1.pdf
http://o.canada.com/technology/crtc-netflix-problems
http://o.canada.com/technology/personal-tech/how-to-get-cheaper-wireless-rates-in-canada
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/j-david-ellis/crtc-internet_b_2076284.html -this specific article even notes that Acanac is the only ISP in Canada to rank on their list of global ISPs quoting "This time Toronto makes #13 out of the list of 22, for a 28/1 DSL connection costing less than $33. Except it's not from an incumbent; it's from competitive ISP Acanac."
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/steve-e-anderson/cell-phone-bill-moore_b_4577942.html
And again all the additional sources all list Acanac as the best independent ISP choice for Canadians along side
Teksavvy
Nathanpalmer1986 (
talk)
17:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. There has been disruption and attempts to remove others' comments by SPAs. These have been discounted. Bishonen | talk 12:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
![]() | Please DO NOT edit other users comments or post personal attacks aimed them. If you believe an editors statement is incorrect or wish to reply for another reason write a response instead. |
The two-year-old news website has a passing mention in Bloomberg as a result of a fake news conspiracy that duped the site, but that's really all. I can't find any source that covers the site substantially. Most of those listed in the "Notable contributors" section are actually only one-time or guest contributors. See: WP:WEB Mark Schierbecker ( talk) 19:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Without prejudice to merging, renaming, or other WP:ATD. postdlf ( talk) 02:13, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
A promotional list of channels disguised as article. The list has no notability of its own. The list is not even good enough for merging with beIN Media Group The Banner talk 17:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Non notable company. Fails WP:GNG. Koala15 ( talk) 17:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable MMA fighter - does not meet WP:NMMA Peter Rehse ( talk) 17:00, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was Keep per XavierItzm's references and per general consensus. ( non-admin closure) Pishcal ( talk) 20:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
As I stated on the talk-page this article falls under WP:NOTNEWS, under WP:ROUTINE coverage. Terrorist attacks do not automatically fall under the notable criteria, here we have one person who was lightly injured, with the usual reactions to these types of attacks. The reactions generated a splash in the news coverage with no WP:LASTING impact. As I said as well please keep in mind WP:OSE, not all of these attacks can be lumped together under one umbrella. I would recommend deletion or a direct to List of terrorist incidents in February 2017. Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 16:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
References
The source said the suspect had made two money transfers of 3,000 and 2,000 euros to a fellow Egyptian in Poland in the days immediately before the attack.
The source said the suspect had made two money transfers of 3,000 and 2,000 euros to a fellow Egyptian in Poland in the days immediately before the attack
In just the past 13 months, there have been at least four attacks in France using knives, including one instance in which an off-duty police officer and wife were stabbed to death by a man who then filmed himself claiming allegiance to the Islamic State, broadcasting the video on Facebook. In St.-Étienne-du-Rouvray, a small town in Normandy, a 19-year-old man slit the throat of an elderly priest as he was saying Mass last July. The young man and an accomplice, who were fatally shot by the police, had proclaimed allegiance to the Islamic State just before the murder.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
the award ceremony fails WP:COVERAGE and WP:NNEWS as no in-depth analysis about the event can be found — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 16:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:03, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBOOK. All sources presented are trivial bibliographic links, and I was unable to find anything better. VQuakr ( talk) 16:13, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Prodded as not meeting WP:NAUTHOR the creator of the article immediately removed tag without modifying the article or adding to the talk page. Domdeparis ( talk) 15:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, the article under construction concerned a published French author by a Canadian publisher, she appearing in various newspapers articles (CBC, Le Figaro...) that may be verified on internet, she performed lectures and she attended renowned book fairs (Paris, Nice, Monaco. She is great granddaughter of notably famous poet and writer Robert Service. May you please guide me, best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rwservice ( talk • contribs) 15:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Charlotte Service-Longepe is continuing to write as an author and the page is bound to be created in the future. Please let me know what other information must be added to keep the article online. Her novel is available at Amazon, Fnac and various online bookstores, besides the book Pays de Dinan is sold at the Municipale Bibilothèque Dinan in France, articles from Ouest France are online. She is also performing lectures in Bibliothèques. She is not yet as famous as her great granddad but she is making her way that is why I believe wiki users will be interested in having information available on the page. Rwservice Rwservice ( talk)
Hi, how come the article is not a spam! the information written have proof on press articles from main French newspapers, everything is relevant and enrich Wikipedia. Saying that the author is not "notable for now" is only a personal opinion, the author had been published, read and had an important press coverage which show that the author is notable for some readers. Rwservice Rwservice ( talk)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
This may be a bit irregular, but I'm posting this on behalf of User:Bumbl loid who was having problems getting AfD to work. His rationale for deletion is: "The logo of "Advanced Liner" was a made up from SriLankan Airlines with few edits made to the logo's color. Second, there are no news clippings, evidences, nor proof that Husky Tours was bought and sold over to Yanson Group of Bus Companies. Third, given the data by http://data.gov.ph/catalogue/dataset/provincial-bus-franchises-2015, Husky Tours still exist and their franchise wasn't sold to Yanson Group." Peridon ( talk) 15:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Not much comes up about him on a quick Google search. He doesn't appear to be notable at all outside of Iraq. DrDevilFX ( talk) 14:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 21:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Director of 4 non notable films, doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG Can't find any indepth coverage of him. Theroadislong ( talk) 14:31, 14 February 2017 (UTC) Theroadislong ( talk) 14:31, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. ( non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Recreation of an article that has been speedy deleted (G11) twice in the last 6 weeks. This article has same problems. Article lacks significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Sources are business announcements, the company's web site and an article written by the deputy chairman of the parent company that doesn't mention the subject of the article. Google searches provided nothing new, mostly advertisements, social media and company's web site. Wikipedia is not a business listing site. Article fails WP:ORGCRITE, basic WP:GNG. CBS527 Talk 14:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MUSICBIO. Unable to locate secondary sources to support notability. Magnolia677 ( talk) 13:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and runs afoul of WP:BLP1E. Only claim of notability is his Twitter post detailing his experience as a temporary detainee by United States Customs & Border Protection (CBP) officials due to Executive Order 13769, and even that cannot be independently verified. Hundreds if not thousands of people were detained, some of them wrongly, and while his case is interesting it does not meet notability standards for a standalone Wikipedia article. General Ization Talk 13:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — Yash talk stalk 00:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Not notable. Subject is lacking in-depth coverage in reliable secondary sources, as required by notability criteria. Coverage seems to revolve around one news event in 2015 that was apparently inconsequential. Article created by single-purpose account with possible conflict of interest. Citobun ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. See WP:NPASR. Kurykh ( talk) 21:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
This textbook appears to fail WP:GNG. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 05:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
...is supposed to be a modern substitute of that...would be a WP:INHERITED argument. (No opinion on the rest of the merits.) Tigraan Click here to contact me 11:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. See WP:SOFTDELETE. Kurykh ( talk) 21:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Completely non notable. Fails WP:BIO. Model and Big Brother Brazil contestant. Both of these are considered no notable. scope_creep ( talk) 22:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
I couldn't verify its notability. Previous AfDs closed as no consensus due to lack of responses. Boleyn ( talk) 20:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Kurykh ( talk) 04:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Strictly local recurring event that does not meet the WP:EVENT criteria. Suggest merging with the Kauai article. Rogermx ( talk) 17:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Probably fancy history : no mention in classic books dealing with Ottoman dynasty (Uluçay, Alderson, Peirce). Creator ignored user:Chris Liak kind advice about the need of sources to rely on. Phso2 ( talk) 13:35, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. See WP:NPASR. Kurykh ( talk) 04:08, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unreferenced tracklist Rathfelder ( talk) 11:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. czar 04:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
This is one of a number of articles which were brought to AfD by a single editor back in January 2010 and closed as keep. The editor was subsequently blocked from deletion proposals and nominations on the grounds that he was flooding the community with more of them than they could process. In light of that, and the fact that nearly all of the "keep" votes in these AfDs were clearly copy-and-pasted across all of this editor's nominations (often with generic rationales like "notability easily established here"), I suspect that many if not most of these articles were voted as "keep" simply to end the flood of AfDs. Seven years have now gone by and this article is still a stub consisting solely of original research and a handful of basic factoids like platform and year of release, with no sources and no substantiated claim to notability (editors already tried, and failed, to establish the "considered one of the worst Jaguar games" thing with reliable sources at List of video games notable for negative reception), so I think it's due to be reconsidered for deletion.-- Martin IIIa ( talk) 12:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:08, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete. WP:BLP of a public relations strategist, written like a résumé rather than an encyclopedia article and not based on enough solid sourcing to pass WP:GNG. Of the 32 sources being cited here, ten are just glancing namechecks of his existence as a giver of soundbite in an article that isn't about him; seven are primary sources such as press releases from his own companies; five are unsubstantive blurbs; five verify tangential facts about his companies while failing to even contain a mention of his name at all; three are dead links; and one is a simple directory listing. Literally the only reference in the entire article that's substantively about Alepian is #1, and it's a profile in the alumni magazine of his alma mater -- so it would be acceptable for some supplementary verification of facts if the rest of the sourcing around it were much more solid, but it cannot bring GNG by itself as the article's only non-primary, non-blurby, non-soundbitey source. A person like this is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because he exists; he gets a Wikipedia article when he can be properly referenced over GNG. Bearcat ( talk) 13:12, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. evading previous salt, salted here too Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:11, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Blogs, forums, or affiliated sources, cant find any better online. Seems WP:TOOSOON, Author appears to have a COI. Insert CleverPhrase Here 12:17, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
Db-band}}
tagging. The article was already deleted thrice as
Dj Liskid under A7/G11, and that title has been salted, hence the use of
CamelCase here. The name of the editor who started it suggests its an
autobio. Self-promo and so far non-notable musician. —
Sam
Sailor
13:04, 14 February 2017 (UTC)The result was no consensus. Kurykh ( talk) 04:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Local Californian band that has self released one EP and an album. Fails the notability criteria under WP:MUSIC. Karst ( talk) 07:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
A look for additional sources on the subject revealed a low number of independent, in-depth coverage. Most results were from press releases or venues connected to subject. Her books do not appear to have garnered much attention either. Fails WP:BIO and WP:AUTHOR. Delta13C ( talk) 07:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NSINGER. Domdeparis ( talk) 11:03, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unremarkable person - would nominate for CSD but would prefer that the community can decide. Nördic Nightfury 10:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — Yash talk stalk 00:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unremarkable sunk ship Nördic Nightfury 10:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Promotion from a shill. Not notable. Awards are not major. Lacks coverage about him in multiple independent reliable sources. Meeting Paris is primary. Exposed vocals is a pay for play promotion platform. duffbeerforme ( talk) 10:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Bishonen | talk 11:57, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Proposing WP:TNT. Certainly there are right wing and conservative Jews. However, this article has existed for over 10 years and is not only virtually unsourced but woefully unimproved (except for the names and images of a lot of Republican politicians.) Note that we have articles on right wing and politically conservative Jewish groups, including Republican Jewish Coalition, Likud, Category:Conservative parties in Israel and so forth. However, this article, judging by its 11-year track record, is simply too sprawling and inchoate to enable creation of a coherent article. I suggest that we blow it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by E.M.Gregory ( talk • contribs) 09:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. General consensus. From experience, railway stations are kept regardless of notability. Agreed, could do with expanding. ( non-admin closure) Nördic Nightfury 08:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
The only possible claim to notability is the unsourced claim (mentioned in the main article Mohe County) that this is the northernmost railway station in China. Even if that can be sourced, the fact that this is already mentioned in the main article, makes this a usless content fork. T*U ( talk) 08:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:10, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable, self-promotion with multiple links to promotional sites Melcous ( talk) 08:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 02:13, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
The only content in this article is a table copied from the "Climate" section of the Russia article. There is a separate article Climate of Russia that contains more (and newer) information about extreme temperatures, but even if that info is incorporated here, this will be nothing more than a useless content fork. Unless or until there is additional information that can be added to this article, it should be deleted. T*U ( talk) 07:54, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was Merge and redirect to Requiem (Jenkins). ( non-admin closure) — Yash talk stalk 01:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
From what I can tell, a non-notable WP:NALBUM.
We have an article for the piece itself here: Requiem (Jenkins). This article should be redirected there. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 07:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. If there are still any doubts, after going through the sources listed below, about the subject's notability, feel free to renominate it. ( non-admin closure) — Yash talk stalk 01:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No indication this fella is notable. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NAUTHOR, and if it's even the same guy, WP:NCOLLATH. John from Idegon ( talk) 07:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
References
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Extreme paucity of RS in searches to improve this article. Refimprove template has been in place since 2012 with no improvements. Article fails WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST Delta13C ( talk) 08:34, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Robert Glasper. ( non-admin closure) — Yash talk stalk 00:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Non notable neologism, a google search turns up plenty of results for the mixture of art and science, but very little for the term itself and no reliable sources. Pinguinn 🐧 17:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Non-notable neologism that fails WP:GNG and since PRODing has become much more promotional. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Star Hellas#Star Hellas. czar 04:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
non-notable ((( The Quixotic Potato))) ( talk) 16:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:12, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
non-notable ((( The Quixotic Potato))) ( talk) 16:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. No prejudice towards continuing discussion on actions other than delete, so long as there is consensus on the relevant talk page(s). Kurykh ( talk) 21:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
non-notable ((( The Quixotic Potato))) ( talk) 16:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Reinas de Costa Rica#Representatives at Miss Earth. czar 04:48, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
non-notable ((( The Quixotic Potato))) ( talk) 16:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Deletion is conceivable here again as in May, because the sources now are simply only published and republished business announcements, quotes, financials and other triviality, the author has also confirmed they're an employee after they requested my re-review, but considering there's still nothing significant, it's unacceptable in our policies. Beyond this, there's simply nothing else different and thus still suggesting at a business listing, making WP:Wikipedia is not a business listing apply. SwisterTwister talk 21:47, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Spredfast’s product suite includes applications for monitoring social media accounts and using the interactions happening there for marketing purposes. One is to add more options for customer service requests or inquiries originating from social channels such as Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter rather than via email, web forums, or traditional contact centers, said Spredfast CEO Rod Favaron....Spredfast is also investing more deeply in partnerships with companies that offer complementary tools, such as social analytics. Its suite already works with at least 50 other tools within this category such as the (named companies)finishing with company quotes, financials, named business partners, clients and investors. That exactly fits the meaning of business announcement. Given everything else available is similar, that can only mean the company itself authored it. SwisterTwister talk 03:50, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
I wrote the current article, and work for Spredfast. I don't think I'm supposed to cast a vote here, and I'm not looking for Wikipedia to do anything outside its policies / content standards; but here are a few points for consideration:
- Bthoma ( talk) 21:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
; Further sources (academic and news) to support notability
|
---|
Here are some further references, mostly academic journal articles, that may inform the case for notability. I have not been able to find all of these in open access online sources, but have linked some; others may be available online as well. - Bthoma ( talk) 21:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC) Spredfast was used as a key tool for this social media research; the paper describes use of Spredfast in context of using similar tools:
Shoutlet sold to Spredfast; discusses sizes of both companies, logistics of merger, etc:
Abstract: "The article reports that New York Road Runners (NYRR), a nonprofit organization, has partnered with social media consultant Spredfast Spredfast to allow the participants at the 2015 New York City (NYC) Marathon to build their own social media videos that show their experience in the event."
Spredfast won an Emmy Award:
Spredfast mentioned (analysis, functions of software) in a number of New York Times articles, see this search result: https://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch/#/%22Spredfast%22/since1851/allresults/1/allauthors/newest/ "Mass Relevance (now Spredfast) has recently developed a comprehensive way to measure millions of pieces of social content per minute..." Also quotes "experts from ... Mass Relevance (now Spredfast)" as saying: "Mass Relevance (now Spredfast) was Twitter's first social TV partnerand one of the first companies to combine social media with traditional TV programming..."
"Cross Publishing, Tracking and Analysis of Content Streams in Social Media: These tools are very successful and widely used for public relations, social media, and (viral) marketing as well as policy campaigns (in the successful campaign of Barack Obama), in particular in the U.S. market. The following subsections will present the most common used tools in this application area." ... "Spredfast is an application developed for enterprises to follow their brand on the Web and manage promotion campaigns for new products ..." (From a 2012 conference paper)
Spredfast was named a Leader in “ The Forrester Wave: Social Relationship Platforms, Q2 2015” report by Forrester Research, Inc. Spredfast Spredfast was among 11 of the “most significant software providers,” according to Forrester Research Inc, to be included in the study. The SRPs were evaluated on 41 criteria, including their current offerings, strategy and market presence. Mentioned in industry press:
Adweek article (one small example of Spredfast's data being used in expert analysis):
One of 12 social network management systems reviewed in this peer reviewed journal article:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens ( talk) 09:53, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
|
Regarding WP:PROMO, I did not see any advertisements in the article, and since no advertisements have been identified, the objection is not actionable. Unscintillating ( talk) 19:31, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: |volume=
has extra text (
help); Cite journal requires |journal=
(
help)The book notes:
Spredfast introduced its social media management system (SMMS)—a social CRM—in 2010. Designed primarily for enterprise companies, Spredfast relies on its comprehensive social CRM dashboard. Although Spredfast has not been around as long as some of its top competitors in the social CRM space, it is regarded as one of the first to aggregate social media engagement and campaign management across major social media channels and leading blog platforms. In addition to social media channel and campaign management, Spredfast integrates a robust social data analytics suite, as well as several solutions for social media project/team management.
The book notes:
Vendor Spotlight—Spredfast
Governing your brand's social activity requires a great deal of organization across people, accounts and content, as well as the need to uphold your company brand standards. Spredfast, a social media management system provider, helps brands organize and orchestrate social media, specifically content, to facilitate the ideal interactions between brands and their communities.
...
Spredfast can also help you collaborate so that workflows and approvals help teams engage productively. As shown in Figure 10.9, teams can highlight activity proactively to share with contributors for reference or assign activity reactively to entire teams based on response needs. This collaboration replaces long email threads with system notifications and workflow automation within Spredfast to provide visibility across the team of what's been assigned, what needs prioritized attention, and what actions have been taken with visible audit trails.
...
Spredfast protects the security and safety of brands by equipping administrators with the power to manage accounts, passwords, and user roles from within the platform. Content contributors are given access to engage directly within Spredfast rather than have direct access to many passwords needed to access company social media accounts. For companies in regulated industries or those with additional security needs, Spredfast offers enhanced password management functionality, Single Sign-On, and IP restrictions.
Following are two Spredfast customers who user their tool for varying levels of governance:
[The book discusses Spredfast customers Whole Food Markets and AARP.]
one of the first to aggregate social media engagement and campaign management across major social media channels and leading blog platforms. In addition to social media channel and campaign management, Spredfast integrates a robust social data analytics suite, as well as several solutions for social media project/team managementis simply PR placement. Next, the blatancy of the second is the clear company involvements, take
Governing your brand's social activity requires a great deal of organization across people, accounts and content, as well as the need to uphold your company brand standards. Spredfast, a social media management system provider, helps brands organize and orchestrate social media, specifically content, to facilitate the ideal interactions between brands and their communities....Spredfast can also help you collaborate so that workflows and approvals help teams engage productively. As shown in Figure 10.9, teams can highlight activity proactively to share with contributors for reference or assign activity reactively to entire teams based on response needs. This collaboration replaces long email threads with system notifications and workflow automation within Spredfast to provide visibility across the team of what's been assigned, what needs prioritized attention, and what actions have been taken with visible audit trails. Spredfast protects the security and safety of brands by equipping administrators with the power to manage accounts, passwords, and user roles from within the platform. Content contributors are given access to engage directly within Spredfast rather than have direct access to many passwords needed to access company social media accounts. For companies in regulated industries or those with additional security needs, Spredfast offers enhanced password management functionality, Single Sign-On, and IP restrictions. Following are Spread customers", that in fact violates WP:CORPPDEPTH which states "Mere announcements, mentions, notices....are not significant, independent or used in articles for notability". It's also no different when we apply WP:NOT which says "Wikipedia is not a business webhost for simple company information, campaigning or advertising", and that above fits it exactly. Anything with first person company-speak is not going to be by anyone else but the company because it's advertising-toned, take
helps brands organize and orchestrate social media, specifically content, to facilitate the ideal interactionsand
Spredfast can help you....so that workflows and approvals help teams engage productivelyand
Spredfast offers enhanced password management functionality; no journalist would ever use that because a journalist is there to report news, not advertise the company and that's also what WP:CORPDEPTH itself covers. Our policies also state even republished press releases or announcements are unacceptable because they're still not independent. Another concern that is still covered by policy is past advertising which is non-negotiable because advertising has always been against policy here. To quote WP:GNG,
If a topic, May be presumed. since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected. For example, advertising, press releases, autobiographies, and the subject's website are not considered independent. SwisterTwister talk 06:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) f eminist 09:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Article about a low level American football team without independent sourcing to confirm claims. I am not aware of any other Division II teams with separate articles for their sports teams.
TM
15:30, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 04:03, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable actor.Absence of reliable source. Winged Blades Godric 14:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:14, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Dictionary article. Rathfelder ( talk) 08:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Mortee A term in dictionaries could be definited with one sentence as long as it makes the determination of concept , for this acticle there is an enough determinition . The Absolute Idealism defineted in, is the philosophy of Hegel as a whole , while (Actuality) is only one of Hegel's Idealist theories , therefore there is no reason to put all details of a whole philosophy to define a simple term .
to bind people by X policies is to bind thier intellectual freedom , you must give an objective argumentation rather than argue with X laws like those of wikipedia. -- Bilal philosopher ( talk) 12:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 12:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
The article on this fictional video game car was kept in the last deletion discussion on the grounds that it has been the subject of five "articles" in reputable media:
It's obvious that nobody would take a 2,000 horsepower video game car supposedly slated for production in 20 years seriously, and nobody would expend any effort researching or writing about such a thing. In general, for made up stuff to become notable, it needs to affect or impinge upon the real world in some way. Dennis Bratland ( talk) 07:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
None of the coverage includes any serious questions put to the company touting this product, such as whether any actual engineering was done, or if they picked a number like 2,000 horsepower (or 2,600? whatever) out of the air because it sounded cool. The premise that this represents any kind of future technology from Chrysler doesn't hold up, due to the lack of any evidence of rigor in the design. Neither is there any evidence of this imaginary object intersecting the real world in any way, such as affecting the sales or critical reception of the video game for better or worse, affecting the careers of the designers for better or worse, or forming a meaningful impression on the public's imagination. A good contrast would be Batmobile, which did all of these things, and has significant coverage in general interest publications, not only hyper-specialized online news blogs. If MOS:REALWORLD were adhered to, the contents of SRT Tomahawk would boil away to nothing, because there's nothing there but some made-up car stats that could have been written by a kid. -- Dennis Bratland ( talk) 17:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Writing an article based entirely on a subject's statement to the press is valid journalism, and can be cited to establish a fact in an article, but only on subjects whose notability has been established on something besides the press pack.
We have history of Wikipedia being abused by video game companies for pure advertising. A prime selling point of many of these games is the quantity of cars or other toys players can buy or unlock. iRacing.com was bloated with lists of simulated cars, spawning sub-articles of more cars, and of simulated race tracks. Vision Gran Turismo is filled with quite a bit of this excess. It's purely Wikipedia parroting the company's "Now with 100% more!" pitches. SRT Tomahawk would shrink to 100 words if you deleted all of the "The Tomahawk X is the penultimate variant of the Tomahawk, built to do seriously high top speeds with no problems" peacockery. This pattern of using Wikiepdia to create advert-articles by CarDekho, iRacing and here Polyphony Digital is what motivates me to try to put a stop to it. -- Dennis Bratland ( talk) 20:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
That AFD seems to me to have been confirmed by the handful of people who also commented at the ORCP who were not involved in the original discussion. Mkdw, Kudpung, and Ritchie said I was basically offbase, while Rob defended the !vote explicitly. None of the other users commented on that AFD (save DGG who was a bit more meta). I don't think it's a weak precedent at all, and I bet if I WP:CANVASSed the lot above (audience known to have certain opinions), this AFD straight turns to delete. I think your !vote is reasonable, but I'm not entirely sure it's the presently consensus position (and if I weren't on mobile now I might even take it up at WT:N given your resistance now and my resistance then or at least go peck through the archives there to see whether anyone else has written on it).
That all said, I think the topic is better covered in the context of the few RS which might be plausibly associated with it in the context of one or the other of its parent topics. This is certainly not the Portal gun. Do you disagree with that suggestion? -- Izno ( talk) 20:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
The car, as presented, is a hoax: it does not represent future technology, because no real was work done to forecast how that technology might work. Companies like Chrysler that have sketched these fanciful cars have invested nothing and committed to nothing.
Marketers pay close attention to where we allow advertising and promotion to sneak into the encyclopedia. Keeping this kind of thing around is mistake. -- Dennis Bratland ( talk) 17:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
It's incorrect to say that anybody defines concept cars to include a picture of a car you made. That false claim is one of the marketing hoaxes this game company is using to advertise their game. -- Dennis Bratland ( talk) 21:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:14, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG. 1 gnews hit. I also can't even find evidence of an actual football league even existing in Poland. LibStar ( talk) 04:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Organization has no notability and the article fails WP:GNG. Article relies on primary sources which are regurgitation of press releases in trade publications, no good secondary sources. Article is a commercial advertisement and should be deleted as per WP:PLUG as a commercial advertisement for a non-notable company. Octoberwoodland ( talk) 02:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was Clear consensus to redirect both the articles to Hmar people.( non-admin closure). Winged Blades Godric 04:00, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Not needed, we already have a section on this at Hmar people. That section should be expanded, rather than splitting the content here. I can't find any independent sources of this online either, so finding sources for a standalone article is going to be a no-go. Insert CleverPhrase Here 19:17, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Kurykh ( talk) 21:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Poorly-sourced academic bio. I am unable to find any sources that discuss the subject in any detail. The article consists mostly of unverified claims. - Mr X 01:15, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. No prejudice against a redirect to a notable mention. czar 04:51, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Can't find any non-trivial coverage about this, seems to be an extremely limited sub-genre of techno music. Triptothecottage ( talk) 09:09, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
This is probably better as a dictionary definition on Wiktionary. Amigacore is a valid genre. There are numerous sources that mention this term, some reliable like this Guardian article and this book and this book. However, because it originated in the 1980s before the web, it would be difficult to find anything online that provides in-depth coverage of this genre. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 04:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
The article contains original research. The book that has been used as a source on this article is not reliable as the author isn't a professional historian. User:Retrieverlove points out on his talk page that the information included on this page is self-made, and according to the discussion that I had with User:Phso2 the name of this woman isn't mentioned in Mustafa Çağatay Uluçay's book. A. D. Alderson lists her as a consort to Abdul Hamid I who died in 1850, but doesn't state that she was the mother of Mustafa IV. So the article: 1. contains original research 2. the information is incorrect 3. she wasn't the mother of Mustafa IV as both Uluçay and Alderson mention Ayşe Seniyeperver Sultan as his mother 4. there's little biographical information available to be used as a basis for an article. The other source that is used on the article also lists Ayşe Seniyeperver as Sultan Mustafa's mother. The subject isn't notable at all, and the article, in my opinion, should be deleted. Keivan.f Talk 04:13, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
A 50 store shopping center. No claim to notability. A case of WP:MILL. Searching turns up lots of hits like movie listing, passing mentions like "restaurant x" is opening at Augusta Exchange. Don't see anything that would establish notability. Was kept at 2008 AFD, but that really didn't substantiate notability. The article is still primarily a list of stores. MB 04:11, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) f eminist 09:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Seems completely non-notable, no in-depth coverage that I can find anywhere. No sources added in the 9 years of this article's existence. Triptothecottage ( talk) 04:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Non notable performer whose article is referenced only by twitter, facebook, instagram, and allmusic.com plus a brief standard bio on mtv.com The subject does not show notability and does not meet WP:GNG. Antonioatrylia ( talk) 03:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) f eminist 09:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
= Nothing for confirmed independent notability and substance given this mirrors what they would advertise to clients and that alone sufficient is for deletion, but also the history showing dozens and dozens of numerous accounts, a majority presumably company accounts which would also violate our policies; there's no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone and there's no exceptions for businesses, especially given all sources here are simply published or republished business announcements, including the supposedly best major ones. Searches also mirrored this by showing pages and pages of published and republished business announcements and press releases, including all of them being labeled. Take the current spurces:
The second link is simply a mirror of what I showed above in the analysis. None of it weighs any differently to what our policies state which is WP:Wikipedia is not advertising. Our policy
WP:NOT also repeatedly says "Articles must not be copyedited or rearranged when either the article is still promotional or when there is not the sufficient improvements needed in policy"; because there hasn't been hopeful signs of actual improvements, beyond a few rewording (for example, "The company enjoys servicing its customers" cannot be reworded as it's still PR, and PR is exactly what this article is), this any and all advertising is removed. Tp quote WP:CORPDEPTH exactly: except works carrying merely trivial coverage, such as:
sources that simply report meeting times, shopping hours or event schedules,
the publications of telephone numbers, addresses, and directions in business directories,
inclusion in lists of similar organizations,[3]
the season schedule or final score from sporting events,
routine communiqués announcing such matters as the hiring or departure of personnel,
brief announcements of mergers or sales of part of the business,
simple statements that a product line is being sold, changed, or discontinued,
routine notices of facility openings or closings (e.g., closure for a holiday or the end of the regular season),
routine notices of the opening or closing of local branches, franchises, or shops,
routine restaurant reviews,
quotations from an organization's personnel as story sources, or
passing mention, such as identifying a quoted person as working for an organization.
Because the sources are still largely supported by PR either published or republished, it's unacceptable.
SwisterTwister
talk
23:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was G4 Deleted by User: RHaworth. ( non-admin closure) B E C K Y S A Y L E S 18:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Per WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. Non-noteable rapper. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 02:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ansel Elgort. ( non-admin closure) f eminist 09:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
No evidence this song has been "ranked on national or significant music or sales charts," won a significant award or received significant coverage, thus failing WP:NSONGS. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
R from song}}
to artist article
Ansel Elgort for now per
WP:MUSICOUTCOMES. Can be rewritten if and when the
notability guideline for songs is met. —
Sam
Sailor
11:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)The result was delete. WP:SNOW NeilN talk to me 18:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Term is invented by a single company; promotional article is merely an advert for that company. No sources provided that would support any claims of effectiveness per WP:MEDRS. Fails WP:GNG by having no coverage in reliable sources independent of the company. RexxS ( talk) 00:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) LibStar ( talk) 10:03, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:PROF. none of the awards or achievements pass the mark. LibStar ( talk) 00:13, 14 February 2017 (UTC)