![]() |
The result was keep ( non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Even with very specific search parameters, I'm not finding very many hits. The only actual websites I could find regarding this film are from unreliable sources such as IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes. This film existed, but does not seem to have become a notable film. As a note, I've spun this off of the original bundled AfD, and only kept the comments pertaining to this show. Primefac ( talk) 20:48, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Even with very specific search parameters, "a vow to kill" has significantly more hits than it's capitalised counterpart. The only actual websites I could find regarding this film are from unreliable sources such as IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes. This film existed, but does not seem to have become a notable film. While I appreciate the creator's enthusiasm for creating new articles on Wikipedia, I highly recommend they read through the notability guidelines before starting more articles. As a note, I've spun this off of the original bundled AfD, and only kept the comments pertaining to this show. Primefac ( talk) 20:48, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Notability, no citation from sources Ninney ( talk) 23:09, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by Anthony Appleyard, CSD A3: Article has no meaningful, substantive content. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:11, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
No indication of notability, no sources, and no useful content. Why is this one special? BoxOfChickens ( talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 22:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:33, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Information already exists in Pocket Viewer, why is this one special? The article contains only specifications and the only source is the manual. BoxOfChickens ( talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 22:42, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
No indication of notability, no sources. Basically a product description. BoxOfChickens ( talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 22:40, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:12, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Appears to not meet WP:NBIO. Rubbish computer ( HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 22:29, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep ( non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBIO. Only notability is inherited from others such as her husband William Russell and her brother Patrick Henry. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 22:08, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:16, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Completely uncited and presented in an in-universe non-encyclopedic style. Flagged with issues for 9+ years without any improvement. This fictional character already has a sizable article which presents this information in a more appropriate manner.
I am also nominating the following related pages:
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nsteffel ( talk • contribs) 22:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Can't find any solid references about the subject. Of those available in the article, two are dead links, one's behind a paywall and one's a corporate site. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 22:04, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:23, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Notability; the article does not cite any sources. Ninney ( talk) 21:43, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Contested PROD. The prod rationale was "Self-published book, only review published on authors' own site. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK." and I agree with that assessment. I cannot find a single mention of the book in any reliable source. bonadea contributions talk 21:31, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was Deleted as G12 (copyright violation). — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 23:33, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Article focuses much about Survivors testimonies and not about the said person. Also, the article does not cite any sources. Ninney ( talk) 21:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 02:30, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Not Notable, Wikipedia is not for hobby projects Secretpolice101 ( talk) 20:30, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:WEB notability guidelines. Trivial mention in external literature without serious coverage of the website itself. Watchdog.org is the proper article, and this is not a legitimate WP:CFORK. jps ( talk) 20:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Prod removed by creator. The subject fails WP:NFOOTY as he has not played in a fully professional league. That list is here. Only the top 2 divisions of Scottish football are fully professional and Alloa were at the third level when he played. The Maltese league is also not fully professional and the clubs he's played for from 2012 on are all non-league clubs. Valenciano ( talk) 19:36, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:39, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Small software company with no notablility visible and no meaningful edits since the articles inception in 2009. S.K. ( talk) 18:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn, thanks Dharmadhyaksha-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:28, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
The film can very well be notable, but the article does not cite a single reliable source Ymblanter ( talk) 18:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
I have serious doubts whether the coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. All coverage (here's best: [7]) is related to her winning the 2015 Australian EY (Ernst & Young) Entrepreneur Of The Year Award. Everything else is in passing. So, first strike is WP:ONEEVENT. Regarding the award itself, it's a national award, that I don't think would be notable on its own and therefore is unlikely to be sufficient to give the winner notability on their own. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:43, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
It appears Manny Stul has won two awards for 2015 Australian Entrepreneur Of The Year and 2015 National Industry category winner. (Noted here: [8]) Susangrigg1 ( talk) 16:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Anthony Bradbury under criterion G5. (Non-admin closure) " Pepper" @ 17:44, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Biography of actor who does not meet WP:NACTOR. She has had minor roles in a few TV series, and the sources are one primary source (pkmart.pk) and one entry in a gossip column at showbizpak.com (which doesn't even support the information where it's inserted.) May be a case of WP:TOOSOON. bonadea contributions talk 16:41, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per WP:G12. North America 1000 11:59, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement for non-notable company. Google search for "Widespread Industrial Supplies" gives <100 hits. Bueller 007 ( talk) 16:40, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 11:23, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Nomination was withdrawn due to a lack of interest of other users; an unregistered user has expressed interest in pursuing the deletion further. - Mike Rosoft ( talk) 12:15, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:43, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 15:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW. The Bushranger One ping only 09:41, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Seems to fail WP:POLITICIAN to me, and there is no other claim od significance. TheLongTone ( talk) 14:50, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:44, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Subject lacks adequate notability. Only one of the four references included here even mentions him, and then only as a musical credit for a video game (i.e., WP:TRIVIALMENTION coverage only). Could find no reliable independent sources that discuss the subject in depth. Does not appear to meet WP:MUSICBIO, WP:PERSON, or WP:GNG. KDS4444 Talk 14:30, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
dab page with a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC History of Israel#Ottoman_rule_(1517–1920) and no other valid entries (or arguably one more per current dab). In either case, dab fails WP:TWODABS . Recommend Redirect: to the PRIMARYTOPIC and any Disambiguation hatnote / Further info / See also done there per my argument at Talk:Ottoman Palestine Widefox; talk 14:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Not in any way notable: WP:NOTINHERITED. I'd speedy this, but there are always people who consider that having some thin relationship to the Windsors makes somebody notable. TheLongTone ( talk) 14:08, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to History of Palestine#Ottoman era. Sandstein 07:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
dab page with a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC History of Palestine#Ottoman_era and no other valid entries (or arguably one more per talk page). In either case, dab fails WP:TWODABS . Recommend Redirect: reverting back to redirect to the PRIMARYTOPIC and any Disambiguation hatnote / Further info / See also done there per my argument at Talk:Ottoman Palestine. This dab was created without fixing incoming per WP:FIXDABLINKS. Instead of fixing, we can just revert this mess and dab at target per my talk. Widefox; talk 14:00, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:47, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
The radio station does not meet GNG. The PROD was contested without a reason by the article's creator whose only basis for its existence is a Facebook page. Sixth o f March 13:41, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:47, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Unsourced article without a credible claim to notability. Speedied this, but somebody removed the template without any explanation. TheLongTone ( talk) 13:30, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:49, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
No independent verifiable sources. First version was already tagged with {{ when}} from Nov 2015 - obviously copied but I've not found the source. Author de-prodded while logged out and only addressing one of three issues. Bazj ( talk) 13:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Deleting both. MelanieN ( talk) 00:51, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable martial artist. References are primary only. A similar situation to a recent AfD for a closely related subject Peter Rehse ( talk) 12:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related page for the same reason. Peter Rehse ( talk) 12:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nepal women's national football team. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Also a lack of references and there doesn't seem to be any sources that there is any official women's under-23 tournament in Asia. The references that are given doesn't mention anything about a supposed women's under-23 team. Ironically, one of the sources for the fixtures is FIFA's fixture & results page which only lists senior teamand for age group FIFA tournaments. InternacionalFutbolista ( talk) 11:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Keep This is an important and emerging Asiad/South Asiad women's team which will participate in the upcoming 2016 South Asian Games. As for GNG, it has been widely cited through local and international press coverage, check the sources on the page. Do not misuse Wikipedia, you know exactly what you're doing. Ayoopdog ( talk) 12:04, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Keep for now and improve While the articles in the Nepal women's u-23 team might not be notable, it doesn't mean the article is not. Many official competitions and tournaments are only available to u-23 sides, so it's more than likely the Nepal women's u-23 team took part in some of those. However I do agree that the references in this article should be improved, as a large part just seem to be copied from the senior women's team article. Inter&anthro ( talk) 17:53, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Article on a minor journal, created by an employee of the publishers, with no reliable independent sources. The "references" are merely index descriptors. Guy ( Help!) 11:24, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
"[t]he most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the journal is included in the major citation indices". According to the journal's website, it is indexed by several major indexing services, including SCOPUS (which is specifically mentioned by WP:NJOURNALS as an example of a major citation index).
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:39, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Article on a minor journal, created by an employee of the publishers, with no reliable independent sources. The "references" are merely index descriptors. Guy ( Help!) 11:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
"having an impact factor assigned by the Institute for Scientific Information's Journal Citation Reports always qualifies under Criterion 1". Here, Journal Citation Reports gives this journal an impact factor of 3.387. Also, this journal seems to be abstracted/indexed in significant databases.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:39, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Article on a minor journal, created by an employee of the publishers, with no reliable independent sources. The "reference" is merely an index descriptor. Guy ( Help!) 11:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
"having an impact factor assigned by the Institute for Scientific Information's Journal Citation Reports always qualifies under Criterion 1". Here, Journal Citation Reports gives this journal an impact factor of 0.815. Also, this journal seems to be abstracted/indexed in significant databases.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:39, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Article on a minor journal, created by an employee of the publishers, with no reliable independent sources. The "references" are merely index descriptors. Very low impact factor. Guy ( Help!) 11:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
"having an impact factor assigned by the Institute for Scientific Information's Journal Citation Reports always qualifies under Criterion 1". Here, Journal Citation Reports gives this journal an impact factor of 0.328. Also, this journal seems to be abstracted/indexed in significant databases.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –– Davey2010 Talk 00:39, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Article on a minor journal, created by an employee of the publishers, with no reliable independent sources. The "references" are merely index descriptors. Not PubMed indexed, no impact factor. Guy ( Help!) 11:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
"[t]he most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the journal is included in the major citation indices". According to the journal's website, it is indexed by several major indexing services, including SCOPUS (which is specifically mentioned by WP:NJOURNALS as an example of a major citation index), EBSCO, and ProQuest.
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable model/actor. One unsourced extra part in a movie, the rest is commercials. Fails WP:NMODEL. Sjö ( talk) 10:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
WHY ISN'T THIS A REFERENCE?
http://www.acquamodels.com/news/7745 Excuse the caps.Italic text
Added an additional reference - http://www.pen-online.jp/news/info/sirthomaslipton/
ADDED another additional REFERENCE from Cinema A La Carte - http://www.cinemawith-alc.com/2015/09/lipton.html— Preceding unsigned comment added by LilyTiare ( talk • contribs)
Jeesh!!! Sir Thomas Lipton (Mark Hobart) is pretty known here in Japan, China, Singapore and a few other Asian countries. I am trying my best to meet wikipedia requirements. And surely do not want the article removed. Been in countless TVCMs, shows and other media for more than a decade. Could you give me one concrete suggestion as to make this meet requirements. Most of what is published is in Japanese. The sir Thomas Lipton King of Teas is a TVCM, but it is also a movie of 3 minute for promotion of the Lipton brand, not an ad. There are both.
I was looking at /info/en/?search=Dante_Carver#cite_note-6 and see that a majority of the links do not work, the references no longer exist and the content is at best 6-7 years ago. What makes that article meet requirements.
I am totally open to a suggestion. Based on wiki guidelines, I need just one reference, minimum. Give me a hint.
Much appreciated!
Ho, how can I become a Wiki administrator? ;-)
The result was Deleted as G12 (copyright violation). — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 02:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
The subject was not notable prior to 2016 Pathankot attack and his death has not made him notable. Victims generally do not have their own article after an attack. WWGB ( talk) 10:45, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was userfy. per user's request below. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
No indication that this is a notable individual. It doesn't seem like the YouTube account is notable, the book is notable or the acting is.
Ricky81682 (
talk)
10:37, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Scott Mallon I have links to several hundred articles written by me for the publications I listed and while I admit I am certainly no "notable" superstar, in Southeast Asia I am quite a well known journalist, photographer and YouTube personality who has helped countless viewers of my site. My point is just how notable do I need to be to the people around the world? Please let me know anything you think I can or should do to add to the chance of the biography being included in Wikipedia. Thank you.
I will / can add links to at least some of the articles and photographs and other information. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Scottmallon (
talk •
contribs)
Scott Mallon Please take a look at my Wikipedia page now as I added five references which did not include the Internations interview. If need be I'll add another 25. I understand your concern about COI, but If the page is neutral and a statement of verifiable fact, then there should be no COI. Nor am I attempting to use the page to self-promote.
Scott Mallon Is it possible to simply put the page as my Userpage? Scott Mallon 06:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Contested Prod. Original concerns remain, this is a season article for a competition that at the moment consists of a single friendly match which is not in itself notable. No indication of GNG. Could potentially be notable in the future if sufficient iterations generate significant reliable coverage, but not yet. Fenix down ( talk) 09:53, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
I don't think it should be deleted since it's an annual tournament like the Trofeo Santiago Bernabéu plus it's officiated with the Kuwait Football Association. ( talk) 17:20, 4 January 2016 (KSA)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:58, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Contested Prod. Original concerns remain, this is a competition that at the moment consists of a single friendly match which is not in itself notable. No indication of GNG. Could potentially be notable in the future if sufficient iterations generate significant reliable coverage, but not yet. Fenix down ( talk) 09:53, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Renaming and expanding the article to cover the South Bluffs Warehouse Historic District, if desired, may take place as part of the normal editing process. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 05:18, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and written like advertisement. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 18:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
The South Bluffs Warehouse Historic District is an architecturally cohesive collection of late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century warehouses located along the bluff of the Mississippi River to the south of downtown Memphis, Tennessee.The article currently describes a residential neighborhood of houses and apartment complexes in Memphis that also happens to be called South Bluffs—not a collection of historic warehouses. Does the residential neighborhood also have legal recognition to satisfy WP:GEOLAND? Mz7 ( talk) 23:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 05:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Subject of the article fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. I really don't see anything special in traveling within West African countries to report cases of Ebola outbreak. He's only doing his job. Although, this debate was recently closed as "No Consensus" with no prejudice against speedy re-nomination. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 06:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 05:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Doest not meet WP:GNG or WP:LISTN. A search brings up nothing useable. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:22, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. A redirect may be made as part of the normal editing process, if desired. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 05:33, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Delete: as hagiography/autobiography/soapbox. Non-notable individual except for one incident, escaping gaol. Delete and possibly redirect name to HM Prison Crumlin Road. Quis separabit? 17:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I'd also remind editors participating in AFD not to engage in personal attacks or assumptions of bad faith. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 10:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Was part of a blanket AfD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreieck Ahlhorner Heide, which was closed as no consensus for procedural reasons. Non-notable interchange, just like thousands of others. Onel5969 TT me 17:32, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Individual does not meet the minimum level of notability required for an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ALPolitico ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete. Per WP:SNOW, and considering the apparent offsite disruption there's no point in prolonging this. Borders on speedy deletion as a hoax, but even if intended to be taken seriously, there is no way that this nonsense is going to be kept. Any established editor with a record of productive contributions may contact me if they know of reliable independent sources covering this topic, and I'll reopen the discussion. Sandstein 17:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
In case this spurious claim article is not speedily deleted as a blatant hoax or as made up, it should be deleted as original research. — teb728 t c 07:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Analog observation. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:40, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
This page covers the same subject as Analog_observation, only in far less detail. I propose a redirect to said article be put in its place. Kookas ( talk) 07:03, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 01:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Subject of the article fails WP:ACADEMIC. He is just doing his job Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 23:11, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was deleted by Sandstein per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"200 Great Gay Bars", which was closed as delete, the Denver Wrangler article having been included in that nomination of multiple related pages for deletion. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 21:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
The only indication of notability here is a list of "top 200 gay bars in the world". That's not enough for notability, and so unreliable a source that I listed it as A7, but it was declined. I assume there are some local sources also, but they won't help a local establishment. DGG ( talk ) 22:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
--- Another Believer ( Talk) 22:52, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:56, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
No indication of notability, no reliable sources (except one that does not mention Denace), nothing useful found via Google News. Huon ( talk) 19:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:11, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
While the subject is a perfectly respectable professor and scientist, I find no evidence of notability per WP:GNG or WP:SCHOLAR, either in article or externally. Sources I've found are all affiliated or trivial/passing mentions, and article is padded with unsourced personal details that suggests creator is associated with the subject. Until independent, reliable sources recognize his accomplishments, an encyclopedia article is unwarranted. --Animalparty! ( talk) 17:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:55, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
I'm struggling with this list, as I can't see that it should be on Wikipedia. The information is poorly laid out, out of date (there has been a subsequent census) and completely original research. The subject is not well defined (what constitutes a "place"?) and misleading (income for a small number of people does not give a good statistical sample). Overall, I think that the list should simply be deleted. WormTT( talk) 14:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2N3055. Sandstein 07:40, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
I prodded this due to "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline".It was deprodded by the creator with the following rationale: "I has got references it's only a transistor so there's not much to say about it save for datasheet, look at article about 2n3055 it has same type of references if this is to be deleted then 2n3055 should be deleted as well". The nominator admits himself this can never be destubbed, and as such, this already suggests this should not be a stand-alone article, but at best, merged (through I can't think of a target). What does come to mind is however WP:NOT - Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate catalog of things, including machine parts. As for 2n3055, well, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is an invalid argument, but the other article seems to be better referenced and not a stub, so the comparison is not valid anyway. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 05:44, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
No claim of significance - founded a non-notable society. Non notable BLP, should be deleted. WormTT( talk) 10:56, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Railway stations are generally kept if it exists which as proven by the sources below It does..., Consensus is to Keep (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 19:56, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Unremarkable geographical location/railway station. A Google image search brings up many unrelated photos, suggesting that the location isn't very notable. Only 10 Google News results. CatcherStorm talk 10:23, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. I disregarded the comments by the two blocked socks. MelanieN ( talk) 01:10, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Hype-heavy (borderline WP:G11) article with no real claim to notability; closest I find on Google search is a PowerPoint presentation given at a conference by one of the inventors, although name makes googling difficult. Nat Gertler ( talk) 09:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of French supercentenarians. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:59, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
I think the prior AFDs have shown a disfavor towards separate articles for individuals who only notability is longevity of a national scale (based on the WP:NOPAGE essay) with some merging to a place like List of French supercentenarians. Here, of the two sources, one is the GRG table which provides nothing more than would be found on her line at the French supercentenarians table and the other is a WP:ROUTINE obituary you would find for any person who died as the oldest French person (and which justifies this section but not each person's individual article). Ricky81682 ( talk) 09:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:11, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:Event notability criteria: one-time local event with no discernible long-term impact or coverage in sources. Nsteffel ( talk) 18:54, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 07:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. ambassadors are not inherently notable and an unremarkable diplomatic career. LibStar ( talk) 15:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is that there are not enough reliable sources to verify this. Sandstein 07:39, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. There are no reliable sources for this in the usual places although, as usual, we have a ton of mirrors. Sitush ( talk) 12:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Also note that the Punjab is in the US news recently as being the home of one of the San Bernardino shooters. Unscintillating ( talk) 00:30, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
I really couldn't care less what the creator of this article thinks is reliable - consensus is solidly against them and has been for years. Would you object to a neutrally-worded note at WT:INB regarding this AfD? I don't mind you asking for input there. - Sitush ( talk) 20:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not a lot of participation in this AfD, but enough to call a consensus to delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Overly
promotional lovefest for unsuccessful
politician. Ran in the Democratic primaries 2012 United States House of Representatives elections in New York, being beaten by the incumbent. This hagiography has a
bombarded of sources but they are for the most part no good for notability. Most of the sources covering the election are about the election itself, not Scala. The often do not mention him or only do so in passing. There are no independent reliable sources that cover him in any depth. Article also has a large section on his hip hop career but the sources there are similarly no good. Shops, blogs, passing mentions, his own site, no mention of him, dead, primary, about his band.
This is a deceptively sourced bloated puff piece that needs to be deleted.
duffbeerforme (
talk)
07:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Independent film from a non-notable production company featuring non-notable actors. There are no reliable sources cited in the article, so the film itself is not notable, either via specific notability criteria or WP:GNG. — C.Fred ( talk) 03:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 09:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
PROD removed by article creator, no reason given. Fails WP:GNG, no evidence of notability, article seems to be promotional. Giant Snowman 09:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus to delete following relisting. The Bushranger One ping only 09:38, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Doesn't see the notability, lack of reliable independent sources. The article had been deleted once before here, and also on Persian Wikipedia; Just like the other article " Rahim Rajaei Rizi" which has been nominated for deletion Viva! Persia ( talk) 07:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:59, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
refs do not discuss the subject in depth. person is not notable based on having performed many surgeries. KDS4444 Talk 07:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:49, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. I can't find any evidence of notability. G-plus is not a reliable source Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 13:59, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai ( talk) 05:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:45, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Another in a series of unremarkable German interchanges. No significant claim of notability is made, and there is no principle that interchanges are notable by default. Mangoe ( talk) 03:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:43, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Just listcruft -- allthefoxes ( Talk) 03:41, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:14, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Yet another in a list of unremarkable German highway interchanges. There is no claim to notability, and there is no precedent for taking all such interchanges as notable by default. Mangoe ( talk) 03:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:42, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP, written like a campaign brochure and parked on a single source, of a person notable only as an as-yet-unelected candidate in a future election. As always, this is not a claim of notability that gets a person over WP:NPOL; if you cannot make a credible and properly sourced claim that the subject was already eligible for a Wikipedia article for some other reason before becoming a candidate, then he does not become notable enough for a Wikipedia article until he wins the election. But nothing here demonstrates any preexisting notability — and it's worth noting that the article was created by a user named "Johnclieske123", suggesting a conflict of interest. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in November if he wins the seat. Bearcat ( talk) 02:30, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Forces Goal 2030#Air Force. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:42, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, to the extent that this should be covered it already is covered in Forces Goal 2030, and could easily be a section in the not terribly long Bangladesh Air Force. Curro2 ( talk) 01:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was keep ( non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Even with very specific search parameters, I'm not finding very many hits. The only actual websites I could find regarding this film are from unreliable sources such as IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes. This film existed, but does not seem to have become a notable film. As a note, I've spun this off of the original bundled AfD, and only kept the comments pertaining to this show. Primefac ( talk) 20:48, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Even with very specific search parameters, "a vow to kill" has significantly more hits than it's capitalised counterpart. The only actual websites I could find regarding this film are from unreliable sources such as IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes. This film existed, but does not seem to have become a notable film. While I appreciate the creator's enthusiasm for creating new articles on Wikipedia, I highly recommend they read through the notability guidelines before starting more articles. As a note, I've spun this off of the original bundled AfD, and only kept the comments pertaining to this show. Primefac ( talk) 20:48, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Notability, no citation from sources Ninney ( talk) 23:09, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by Anthony Appleyard, CSD A3: Article has no meaningful, substantive content. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:11, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
No indication of notability, no sources, and no useful content. Why is this one special? BoxOfChickens ( talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 22:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:33, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Information already exists in Pocket Viewer, why is this one special? The article contains only specifications and the only source is the manual. BoxOfChickens ( talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 22:42, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
No indication of notability, no sources. Basically a product description. BoxOfChickens ( talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 22:40, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:12, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Appears to not meet WP:NBIO. Rubbish computer ( HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 22:29, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep ( non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBIO. Only notability is inherited from others such as her husband William Russell and her brother Patrick Henry. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 22:08, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:16, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Completely uncited and presented in an in-universe non-encyclopedic style. Flagged with issues for 9+ years without any improvement. This fictional character already has a sizable article which presents this information in a more appropriate manner.
I am also nominating the following related pages:
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nsteffel ( talk • contribs) 22:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Can't find any solid references about the subject. Of those available in the article, two are dead links, one's behind a paywall and one's a corporate site. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 22:04, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:23, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Notability; the article does not cite any sources. Ninney ( talk) 21:43, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Contested PROD. The prod rationale was "Self-published book, only review published on authors' own site. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK." and I agree with that assessment. I cannot find a single mention of the book in any reliable source. bonadea contributions talk 21:31, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was Deleted as G12 (copyright violation). — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 23:33, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Article focuses much about Survivors testimonies and not about the said person. Also, the article does not cite any sources. Ninney ( talk) 21:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 02:30, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Not Notable, Wikipedia is not for hobby projects Secretpolice101 ( talk) 20:30, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:WEB notability guidelines. Trivial mention in external literature without serious coverage of the website itself. Watchdog.org is the proper article, and this is not a legitimate WP:CFORK. jps ( talk) 20:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Prod removed by creator. The subject fails WP:NFOOTY as he has not played in a fully professional league. That list is here. Only the top 2 divisions of Scottish football are fully professional and Alloa were at the third level when he played. The Maltese league is also not fully professional and the clubs he's played for from 2012 on are all non-league clubs. Valenciano ( talk) 19:36, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:39, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Small software company with no notablility visible and no meaningful edits since the articles inception in 2009. S.K. ( talk) 18:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn, thanks Dharmadhyaksha-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:28, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
The film can very well be notable, but the article does not cite a single reliable source Ymblanter ( talk) 18:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
I have serious doubts whether the coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. All coverage (here's best: [7]) is related to her winning the 2015 Australian EY (Ernst & Young) Entrepreneur Of The Year Award. Everything else is in passing. So, first strike is WP:ONEEVENT. Regarding the award itself, it's a national award, that I don't think would be notable on its own and therefore is unlikely to be sufficient to give the winner notability on their own. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:43, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
It appears Manny Stul has won two awards for 2015 Australian Entrepreneur Of The Year and 2015 National Industry category winner. (Noted here: [8]) Susangrigg1 ( talk) 16:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Anthony Bradbury under criterion G5. (Non-admin closure) " Pepper" @ 17:44, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Biography of actor who does not meet WP:NACTOR. She has had minor roles in a few TV series, and the sources are one primary source (pkmart.pk) and one entry in a gossip column at showbizpak.com (which doesn't even support the information where it's inserted.) May be a case of WP:TOOSOON. bonadea contributions talk 16:41, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per WP:G12. North America 1000 11:59, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement for non-notable company. Google search for "Widespread Industrial Supplies" gives <100 hits. Bueller 007 ( talk) 16:40, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 11:23, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Nomination was withdrawn due to a lack of interest of other users; an unregistered user has expressed interest in pursuing the deletion further. - Mike Rosoft ( talk) 12:15, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:43, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 15:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW. The Bushranger One ping only 09:41, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Seems to fail WP:POLITICIAN to me, and there is no other claim od significance. TheLongTone ( talk) 14:50, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:44, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Subject lacks adequate notability. Only one of the four references included here even mentions him, and then only as a musical credit for a video game (i.e., WP:TRIVIALMENTION coverage only). Could find no reliable independent sources that discuss the subject in depth. Does not appear to meet WP:MUSICBIO, WP:PERSON, or WP:GNG. KDS4444 Talk 14:30, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
dab page with a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC History of Israel#Ottoman_rule_(1517–1920) and no other valid entries (or arguably one more per current dab). In either case, dab fails WP:TWODABS . Recommend Redirect: to the PRIMARYTOPIC and any Disambiguation hatnote / Further info / See also done there per my argument at Talk:Ottoman Palestine Widefox; talk 14:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Not in any way notable: WP:NOTINHERITED. I'd speedy this, but there are always people who consider that having some thin relationship to the Windsors makes somebody notable. TheLongTone ( talk) 14:08, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to History of Palestine#Ottoman era. Sandstein 07:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
dab page with a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC History of Palestine#Ottoman_era and no other valid entries (or arguably one more per talk page). In either case, dab fails WP:TWODABS . Recommend Redirect: reverting back to redirect to the PRIMARYTOPIC and any Disambiguation hatnote / Further info / See also done there per my argument at Talk:Ottoman Palestine. This dab was created without fixing incoming per WP:FIXDABLINKS. Instead of fixing, we can just revert this mess and dab at target per my talk. Widefox; talk 14:00, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:47, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
The radio station does not meet GNG. The PROD was contested without a reason by the article's creator whose only basis for its existence is a Facebook page. Sixth o f March 13:41, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:47, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Unsourced article without a credible claim to notability. Speedied this, but somebody removed the template without any explanation. TheLongTone ( talk) 13:30, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:49, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
No independent verifiable sources. First version was already tagged with {{ when}} from Nov 2015 - obviously copied but I've not found the source. Author de-prodded while logged out and only addressing one of three issues. Bazj ( talk) 13:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Deleting both. MelanieN ( talk) 00:51, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable martial artist. References are primary only. A similar situation to a recent AfD for a closely related subject Peter Rehse ( talk) 12:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related page for the same reason. Peter Rehse ( talk) 12:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nepal women's national football team. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Also a lack of references and there doesn't seem to be any sources that there is any official women's under-23 tournament in Asia. The references that are given doesn't mention anything about a supposed women's under-23 team. Ironically, one of the sources for the fixtures is FIFA's fixture & results page which only lists senior teamand for age group FIFA tournaments. InternacionalFutbolista ( talk) 11:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Keep This is an important and emerging Asiad/South Asiad women's team which will participate in the upcoming 2016 South Asian Games. As for GNG, it has been widely cited through local and international press coverage, check the sources on the page. Do not misuse Wikipedia, you know exactly what you're doing. Ayoopdog ( talk) 12:04, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Keep for now and improve While the articles in the Nepal women's u-23 team might not be notable, it doesn't mean the article is not. Many official competitions and tournaments are only available to u-23 sides, so it's more than likely the Nepal women's u-23 team took part in some of those. However I do agree that the references in this article should be improved, as a large part just seem to be copied from the senior women's team article. Inter&anthro ( talk) 17:53, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Article on a minor journal, created by an employee of the publishers, with no reliable independent sources. The "references" are merely index descriptors. Guy ( Help!) 11:24, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
"[t]he most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the journal is included in the major citation indices". According to the journal's website, it is indexed by several major indexing services, including SCOPUS (which is specifically mentioned by WP:NJOURNALS as an example of a major citation index).
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:39, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Article on a minor journal, created by an employee of the publishers, with no reliable independent sources. The "references" are merely index descriptors. Guy ( Help!) 11:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
"having an impact factor assigned by the Institute for Scientific Information's Journal Citation Reports always qualifies under Criterion 1". Here, Journal Citation Reports gives this journal an impact factor of 3.387. Also, this journal seems to be abstracted/indexed in significant databases.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:39, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Article on a minor journal, created by an employee of the publishers, with no reliable independent sources. The "reference" is merely an index descriptor. Guy ( Help!) 11:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
"having an impact factor assigned by the Institute for Scientific Information's Journal Citation Reports always qualifies under Criterion 1". Here, Journal Citation Reports gives this journal an impact factor of 0.815. Also, this journal seems to be abstracted/indexed in significant databases.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:39, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Article on a minor journal, created by an employee of the publishers, with no reliable independent sources. The "references" are merely index descriptors. Very low impact factor. Guy ( Help!) 11:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
"having an impact factor assigned by the Institute for Scientific Information's Journal Citation Reports always qualifies under Criterion 1". Here, Journal Citation Reports gives this journal an impact factor of 0.328. Also, this journal seems to be abstracted/indexed in significant databases.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –– Davey2010 Talk 00:39, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Article on a minor journal, created by an employee of the publishers, with no reliable independent sources. The "references" are merely index descriptors. Not PubMed indexed, no impact factor. Guy ( Help!) 11:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
"[t]he most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the journal is included in the major citation indices". According to the journal's website, it is indexed by several major indexing services, including SCOPUS (which is specifically mentioned by WP:NJOURNALS as an example of a major citation index), EBSCO, and ProQuest.
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable model/actor. One unsourced extra part in a movie, the rest is commercials. Fails WP:NMODEL. Sjö ( talk) 10:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
WHY ISN'T THIS A REFERENCE?
http://www.acquamodels.com/news/7745 Excuse the caps.Italic text
Added an additional reference - http://www.pen-online.jp/news/info/sirthomaslipton/
ADDED another additional REFERENCE from Cinema A La Carte - http://www.cinemawith-alc.com/2015/09/lipton.html— Preceding unsigned comment added by LilyTiare ( talk • contribs)
Jeesh!!! Sir Thomas Lipton (Mark Hobart) is pretty known here in Japan, China, Singapore and a few other Asian countries. I am trying my best to meet wikipedia requirements. And surely do not want the article removed. Been in countless TVCMs, shows and other media for more than a decade. Could you give me one concrete suggestion as to make this meet requirements. Most of what is published is in Japanese. The sir Thomas Lipton King of Teas is a TVCM, but it is also a movie of 3 minute for promotion of the Lipton brand, not an ad. There are both.
I was looking at /info/en/?search=Dante_Carver#cite_note-6 and see that a majority of the links do not work, the references no longer exist and the content is at best 6-7 years ago. What makes that article meet requirements.
I am totally open to a suggestion. Based on wiki guidelines, I need just one reference, minimum. Give me a hint.
Much appreciated!
Ho, how can I become a Wiki administrator? ;-)
The result was Deleted as G12 (copyright violation). — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 02:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
The subject was not notable prior to 2016 Pathankot attack and his death has not made him notable. Victims generally do not have their own article after an attack. WWGB ( talk) 10:45, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was userfy. per user's request below. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
No indication that this is a notable individual. It doesn't seem like the YouTube account is notable, the book is notable or the acting is.
Ricky81682 (
talk)
10:37, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Scott Mallon I have links to several hundred articles written by me for the publications I listed and while I admit I am certainly no "notable" superstar, in Southeast Asia I am quite a well known journalist, photographer and YouTube personality who has helped countless viewers of my site. My point is just how notable do I need to be to the people around the world? Please let me know anything you think I can or should do to add to the chance of the biography being included in Wikipedia. Thank you.
I will / can add links to at least some of the articles and photographs and other information. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Scottmallon (
talk •
contribs)
Scott Mallon Please take a look at my Wikipedia page now as I added five references which did not include the Internations interview. If need be I'll add another 25. I understand your concern about COI, but If the page is neutral and a statement of verifiable fact, then there should be no COI. Nor am I attempting to use the page to self-promote.
Scott Mallon Is it possible to simply put the page as my Userpage? Scott Mallon 06:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Contested Prod. Original concerns remain, this is a season article for a competition that at the moment consists of a single friendly match which is not in itself notable. No indication of GNG. Could potentially be notable in the future if sufficient iterations generate significant reliable coverage, but not yet. Fenix down ( talk) 09:53, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
I don't think it should be deleted since it's an annual tournament like the Trofeo Santiago Bernabéu plus it's officiated with the Kuwait Football Association. ( talk) 17:20, 4 January 2016 (KSA)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:58, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Contested Prod. Original concerns remain, this is a competition that at the moment consists of a single friendly match which is not in itself notable. No indication of GNG. Could potentially be notable in the future if sufficient iterations generate significant reliable coverage, but not yet. Fenix down ( talk) 09:53, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Renaming and expanding the article to cover the South Bluffs Warehouse Historic District, if desired, may take place as part of the normal editing process. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 05:18, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and written like advertisement. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 18:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
The South Bluffs Warehouse Historic District is an architecturally cohesive collection of late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century warehouses located along the bluff of the Mississippi River to the south of downtown Memphis, Tennessee.The article currently describes a residential neighborhood of houses and apartment complexes in Memphis that also happens to be called South Bluffs—not a collection of historic warehouses. Does the residential neighborhood also have legal recognition to satisfy WP:GEOLAND? Mz7 ( talk) 23:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 05:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Subject of the article fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. I really don't see anything special in traveling within West African countries to report cases of Ebola outbreak. He's only doing his job. Although, this debate was recently closed as "No Consensus" with no prejudice against speedy re-nomination. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 06:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 05:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Doest not meet WP:GNG or WP:LISTN. A search brings up nothing useable. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:22, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. A redirect may be made as part of the normal editing process, if desired. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 05:33, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Delete: as hagiography/autobiography/soapbox. Non-notable individual except for one incident, escaping gaol. Delete and possibly redirect name to HM Prison Crumlin Road. Quis separabit? 17:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I'd also remind editors participating in AFD not to engage in personal attacks or assumptions of bad faith. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 10:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Was part of a blanket AfD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreieck Ahlhorner Heide, which was closed as no consensus for procedural reasons. Non-notable interchange, just like thousands of others. Onel5969 TT me 17:32, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Individual does not meet the minimum level of notability required for an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ALPolitico ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete. Per WP:SNOW, and considering the apparent offsite disruption there's no point in prolonging this. Borders on speedy deletion as a hoax, but even if intended to be taken seriously, there is no way that this nonsense is going to be kept. Any established editor with a record of productive contributions may contact me if they know of reliable independent sources covering this topic, and I'll reopen the discussion. Sandstein 17:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
In case this spurious claim article is not speedily deleted as a blatant hoax or as made up, it should be deleted as original research. — teb728 t c 07:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Analog observation. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:40, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
This page covers the same subject as Analog_observation, only in far less detail. I propose a redirect to said article be put in its place. Kookas ( talk) 07:03, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 01:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Subject of the article fails WP:ACADEMIC. He is just doing his job Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 23:11, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was deleted by Sandstein per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"200 Great Gay Bars", which was closed as delete, the Denver Wrangler article having been included in that nomination of multiple related pages for deletion. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 21:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
The only indication of notability here is a list of "top 200 gay bars in the world". That's not enough for notability, and so unreliable a source that I listed it as A7, but it was declined. I assume there are some local sources also, but they won't help a local establishment. DGG ( talk ) 22:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
--- Another Believer ( Talk) 22:52, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:56, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
No indication of notability, no reliable sources (except one that does not mention Denace), nothing useful found via Google News. Huon ( talk) 19:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:11, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
While the subject is a perfectly respectable professor and scientist, I find no evidence of notability per WP:GNG or WP:SCHOLAR, either in article or externally. Sources I've found are all affiliated or trivial/passing mentions, and article is padded with unsourced personal details that suggests creator is associated with the subject. Until independent, reliable sources recognize his accomplishments, an encyclopedia article is unwarranted. --Animalparty! ( talk) 17:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:55, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
I'm struggling with this list, as I can't see that it should be on Wikipedia. The information is poorly laid out, out of date (there has been a subsequent census) and completely original research. The subject is not well defined (what constitutes a "place"?) and misleading (income for a small number of people does not give a good statistical sample). Overall, I think that the list should simply be deleted. WormTT( talk) 14:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2N3055. Sandstein 07:40, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
I prodded this due to "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline".It was deprodded by the creator with the following rationale: "I has got references it's only a transistor so there's not much to say about it save for datasheet, look at article about 2n3055 it has same type of references if this is to be deleted then 2n3055 should be deleted as well". The nominator admits himself this can never be destubbed, and as such, this already suggests this should not be a stand-alone article, but at best, merged (through I can't think of a target). What does come to mind is however WP:NOT - Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate catalog of things, including machine parts. As for 2n3055, well, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is an invalid argument, but the other article seems to be better referenced and not a stub, so the comparison is not valid anyway. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 05:44, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
No claim of significance - founded a non-notable society. Non notable BLP, should be deleted. WormTT( talk) 10:56, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Railway stations are generally kept if it exists which as proven by the sources below It does..., Consensus is to Keep (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 19:56, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Unremarkable geographical location/railway station. A Google image search brings up many unrelated photos, suggesting that the location isn't very notable. Only 10 Google News results. CatcherStorm talk 10:23, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. I disregarded the comments by the two blocked socks. MelanieN ( talk) 01:10, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Hype-heavy (borderline WP:G11) article with no real claim to notability; closest I find on Google search is a PowerPoint presentation given at a conference by one of the inventors, although name makes googling difficult. Nat Gertler ( talk) 09:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of French supercentenarians. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:59, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
I think the prior AFDs have shown a disfavor towards separate articles for individuals who only notability is longevity of a national scale (based on the WP:NOPAGE essay) with some merging to a place like List of French supercentenarians. Here, of the two sources, one is the GRG table which provides nothing more than would be found on her line at the French supercentenarians table and the other is a WP:ROUTINE obituary you would find for any person who died as the oldest French person (and which justifies this section but not each person's individual article). Ricky81682 ( talk) 09:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:11, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:Event notability criteria: one-time local event with no discernible long-term impact or coverage in sources. Nsteffel ( talk) 18:54, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 07:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. ambassadors are not inherently notable and an unremarkable diplomatic career. LibStar ( talk) 15:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is that there are not enough reliable sources to verify this. Sandstein 07:39, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. There are no reliable sources for this in the usual places although, as usual, we have a ton of mirrors. Sitush ( talk) 12:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Also note that the Punjab is in the US news recently as being the home of one of the San Bernardino shooters. Unscintillating ( talk) 00:30, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
I really couldn't care less what the creator of this article thinks is reliable - consensus is solidly against them and has been for years. Would you object to a neutrally-worded note at WT:INB regarding this AfD? I don't mind you asking for input there. - Sitush ( talk) 20:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not a lot of participation in this AfD, but enough to call a consensus to delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Overly
promotional lovefest for unsuccessful
politician. Ran in the Democratic primaries 2012 United States House of Representatives elections in New York, being beaten by the incumbent. This hagiography has a
bombarded of sources but they are for the most part no good for notability. Most of the sources covering the election are about the election itself, not Scala. The often do not mention him or only do so in passing. There are no independent reliable sources that cover him in any depth. Article also has a large section on his hip hop career but the sources there are similarly no good. Shops, blogs, passing mentions, his own site, no mention of him, dead, primary, about his band.
This is a deceptively sourced bloated puff piece that needs to be deleted.
duffbeerforme (
talk)
07:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Independent film from a non-notable production company featuring non-notable actors. There are no reliable sources cited in the article, so the film itself is not notable, either via specific notability criteria or WP:GNG. — C.Fred ( talk) 03:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 09:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
PROD removed by article creator, no reason given. Fails WP:GNG, no evidence of notability, article seems to be promotional. Giant Snowman 09:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus to delete following relisting. The Bushranger One ping only 09:38, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Doesn't see the notability, lack of reliable independent sources. The article had been deleted once before here, and also on Persian Wikipedia; Just like the other article " Rahim Rajaei Rizi" which has been nominated for deletion Viva! Persia ( talk) 07:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:59, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
refs do not discuss the subject in depth. person is not notable based on having performed many surgeries. KDS4444 Talk 07:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:49, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. I can't find any evidence of notability. G-plus is not a reliable source Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 13:59, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai ( talk) 05:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:45, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Another in a series of unremarkable German interchanges. No significant claim of notability is made, and there is no principle that interchanges are notable by default. Mangoe ( talk) 03:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:43, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Just listcruft -- allthefoxes ( Talk) 03:41, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:14, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Yet another in a list of unremarkable German highway interchanges. There is no claim to notability, and there is no precedent for taking all such interchanges as notable by default. Mangoe ( talk) 03:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:42, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP, written like a campaign brochure and parked on a single source, of a person notable only as an as-yet-unelected candidate in a future election. As always, this is not a claim of notability that gets a person over WP:NPOL; if you cannot make a credible and properly sourced claim that the subject was already eligible for a Wikipedia article for some other reason before becoming a candidate, then he does not become notable enough for a Wikipedia article until he wins the election. But nothing here demonstrates any preexisting notability — and it's worth noting that the article was created by a user named "Johnclieske123", suggesting a conflict of interest. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in November if he wins the seat. Bearcat ( talk) 02:30, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Forces Goal 2030#Air Force. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:42, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, to the extent that this should be covered it already is covered in Forces Goal 2030, and could easily be a section in the not terribly long Bangladesh Air Force. Curro2 ( talk) 01:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)