![]() |
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:59, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Non notable bus route which fails GNG – Davey2010 Talk 22:54, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 01:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Only a single reference which doesn't mention the article subject. No evidence of notability nor of its claim to notability as "... the largest exporter of processed wooden, LB & metal products". Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 22:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Lack of coverage in secondary sources other than routine listings. AfDing because it was prodded at least one time in it's past. Savonneux ( talk) 21:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Autobiographical article by a reality-show contestant, already deleted three times including WP:Articles for deletion/Raphael Jabbour and salted. This one perhaps escapes WP:CSD#G4 repost of deleted material as there are more references, but they seem to be the sort of coverage any reality-show contestant gets, plus one about a song he has since released. Maybe he will go on to build a notable career to the standard of WP:MUSICBIO, but this is way WP:Too soon. JohnCD ( talk) 20:57, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Completely unreferenced Rathfelder ( talk) 20:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Unreferenced and promotional Rathfelder ( talk) 20:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable local judge, even if a figure of pride for local Native Americans. Orange Mike | Talk 20:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Begrudging Delete As for the user name, the ECC probably means "Eau Claire County." I am from Wisconsin and formerly from the area in question and the courthouse holds a large portion of the county government so it could easily be part of the sheriff's department, health department or anything else for that matter. I can attest that there would be little to no news coverage beyond the county the judge sits in. There are about 250 WI circuit court justices -- about 50 in Milwaukee County alone. As much as I would personally would not mind an article on him (more important currently than many Wisconsin Assembly member articles who died 100 years ago) I would agree that it would open a can of worms. Dolotta ( talk) 17:05, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to The Orange Lights. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 22:50, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
no evidence of notability (charts). AfD'ing the band too and the lighthouse family guy from this band is already in the process of being debated for deletion Rayman60 ( talk) 18:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Forgotten Realms deities. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 22:50, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
This character currently fails to establish notability. TTN ( talk) 18:14, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. WP:SNOW. It'd be unnecessary to leave this open any longer. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte ( work | talk) 10:31, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Not well referenced or notable Rathfelder ( talk) 17:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete under criterion G7, request by page creator. Editors are reminded to make sure WP:GNG is met before trying to create this page again. — C.Fred ( talk) 20:23, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
This was a contested prod. The article does not appear now to meet the standard set by the WP:GNG; the only reliable source which pops up in the WP:VG custom source is a sponsored piece at GameZone. This is unlikely to be notable at this time. Izno ( talk) 17:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
14-year old DJ who claims to have founded his own record label. The article tries to assert enough notability that it is not eligible for CSD, and the article is referenced so it is not eligible for PROD. — Latchem 17:12, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The result was keep. Subject now passes WP:NFOOTY. Nominator and all other editors involved now agree keep. Fenix down ( talk) 17:24, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Previous concern is unknown. However, Ijaha has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 17:11, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
*Delete - Fails
NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a
fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy
GNG.
Fenix down (
talk)
09:34, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Although this may be BLPRODed, my PROD was removed with absolutely no explanations yet I myself searched all local newspapers and have found nothing; I also still confirm everything from my PROD. SwisterTwister talk 17:10, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:20, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Unreleased film. Subject clearly fails WP:NFILMS. Additionally, extremely heavy WP:COI and promotional behavior. PROD declined by an SPA using a deceptive edit summary. Safiel ( talk) 16:52, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
AdolfDsouza ( talk) 15:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Miss Hawaii USA. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 ( T) 22:35, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Machado was only Miss Hawaii USA for a week, but because she was canned because she was older than the then allowed age, it does not create notability for her. This incident might be worth explaining in an article on Miss Hawaii USA but does not merit a stand alone article. Machado also appeared in a TV show that was cancelled after two weeks. That is no where near enough to make her notable as an actress. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedied as an article previously deleted per a deletion discussion. Echoeboard has repeatedly removed the speedy tag. See also [1], a smoking gun as far as Echoeboard is concerned. Salting. Bishonen | talk 21:04, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 15:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Miss Hawaii USA. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 ( T) 22:33, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Fairbank's only claim to fame is she won Miss Hawaii USA one year. Winning a state beauty pageant alone is not enough to make someone notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:25, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
unreferenced. not notable Rathfelder ( talk) 23:01, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Unreferenced track list. No evidence of notability Rathfelder ( talk) 21:22, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Shaquille O'Neal. czar 07:32, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Toney is only mentioned in the context of his notable son Shaquille O' Neal. Take away his relationship (or lack thereof) with his son then we have an individual who briefly played college basketball. Notability is not inherited so this should be an easy decision for voters. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 21:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 07:43, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
We already have a List of Bollywood films of 2016 and List of highest-grossing Indian films. Secondly, all the references in the article seem to be misleading. - Managerarc™ talk 21:07, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Unnecessary to leave open any longer. WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte ( work | talk) 10:29, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
not notable Kabahaly ( talk) 15:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was Move to draft. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion per WP:G4 was declined on the grounds that article is very different with many more references and more claims of importance. However, the underlying notability concerns remain. He has not received significant coverage or played in a fully pro league, meaning the article still doe not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 19:44, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Al-Futtaim Group. MBisanz talk 02:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Frankly I would've PRODed but either it may be removed or this may be restarted later so AfD is likely best; my searches simply found a few links at News and searching at GulfNews and Khaleej Times also found nothing convincingly better (only 2 passing mentions at the former) and also the listed links here are also simply trivial and mentions....and that's not surprising considering it's simply a localized company. SwisterTwister talk 19:43, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
The subject of the article has requested deletion in the page history. I think if there isn't clear consensus to keep, we should respect his wishes per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. Sro23 ( talk) 15:09, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG & WP:BLPNOTE Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 15:09, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was deleted per WP:BLPPROD. — David Eppstein ( talk) 03:41, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Going by the creator's name, there is a WP:COI... The problem as always is notability.
GScholar claims 52 cites for the book (Constitutional & Administrative Law) - this being said, 2016 is the 9th edition of the book, so one would assume it sells reasonably well. All in all, I still think it is too little for WP:PROF. Tigraan Click here to contact me 16:33, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Non-Notable medical professional Uncletomwood ( talk) 16:11, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Komala_Party_of_Iranian_Kurdistan. MBisanz talk 02:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Fails to demonstrate Wikipedia:Notability. Pahlevun ( talk) 10:37, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 07:45, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Fails GNG. Award mentioned is also non-notable. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 09:43, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Youth system. czar 07:47, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Not notable definition Yellow Dingo (talk) 09:35, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 16:26, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy the notability criteria. FamblyCat94 ( talk) 02:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte ( work | talk) 10:28, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy the notability criteria. FamblyCat94 03:07, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 16:04, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy the notability criteria. FamblyCat94 ( talk) 03:09, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not a lot of participation, but it's already been listed once, and the only person arguing to keep is the article's creator, who fails to cite any policy-based reasons to keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:29, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
To help the article creator User:JamesT5723 understand better, and to answer issues he raised on the talk page and in edit summaries, it should be explained that having a registered trademark is in no way evidence of notability by Wikipedia's standards. Anyone can pay a fee and register a trademark.
Claims that this is one of the fastest growing clubs, is unique in its policies, or unique in other ways, only serve to make one ask why hasn't a single book, newspaper, magazine or reputable website ever written anything about this club?
It is true that there are other articles of questionable notability. Combat Veterans Motorcycle Association would probably not survive a deletion nomination, since all the coverage is WP:ROUTINE toy runs and charity events. The article Blue Angels Motorcycle Club isn't much, but the club has been the subject of ongoing press coverage for many years, mostly due to criminal activity (which is nothing to envy if you ask me). But what matters here is that other stuff exists is no help in keeping Gods Of War Motorcycle Club from being deleted. Regardless of what is wrong with some other article, the question here is whether this article meets the guidelines for notability. For that we need citations showing significant coverage, which are not published by the club, or available for purchase like a license, a trademark, or a vanity press book. Dennis Bratland ( talk) 08:39, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
You mention that we are not in the papers, books etc.. well this is beciuase we are not breaking the law, & as far as I am aware.. there are people & organisations who are listed that obey the law. I had mentioned the Blue Angels, & you said "but the club has been the subject of ongoing press coverage for many years", as I pointed out.. none of the reference links etc attributed to them actually indicate this. Same can be said for Shanon Ponton, who is a trainer on the biggest loser, & all his links bar 1 fail, other than having been on personal trainer on a TV program.. what worth of notability is it. & I am not advocating that either of htese be removed, becuase even though our listing has more actual VALID links listed on our page, their is obviously thousnads of people that would find their links notworthy, where 100's might not. As for the trade mark, you actually have to go through a long process, so it's not just pay & you're done. You said "Claims that this is one of the fastest growing clubs, is unique in its policies, or unique in other ways, only serve to make one ask why hasn't a single book, newspaper, magazine or reputable website ever written anything about this club".. this is not a claim but a fact & the fact we now have locations across 3 countries in 18 monthes proves that, if you do some research you will not find another Military MC that is not 1%, not controlled by one, that admits all service personnel only, from any country, male or female.. & caters for disabled veterans that are unable to ride any more.. That makes us Unique. Just becuase we don't go blowing our trumpet doesn't mean that we are not known, or we wouldn't be getting the amount of applications each day we get. We ARE listed on a reputable web site & the link is on as a reference, it is an extremely highly regarded website in the Motorcycle community, & the site is the main registry for clubs & is respected the world round, & we have been listed 3 times on it!! Claims of notability are subject to personal view, & as I agree that criminal activity isn't something to envy, you seem to advocate that unless a club does something wrong then then are not notworthy, the club has a very good reputation, & is also able to remain netural in around outlaw club, which in its self is it notable.. what one person may not class & notworthy may be to hundred of thousands of others. we get dozens of applcations each day from around the world & have approved yet another location only yesterday in Rowley Regis UK, so it we were certainly notworthy for enough people to wish to establish there. User:JamesT5723 23:47, 28 July 2016
The result was delete. North America 1000 01:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
A web startup. With a cloud-based product. We're knee-deep in these things and it's hard to see why this one is notable for either technical innovation nor corporate significance. Andy Dingley ( talk) 13:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Created by the content translation tool. Poorly sourced. Notable? Black Kite (talk) 12:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
I just declined a speedy deletion nomination as sources supporting notability are not needed to avoid WP:A7, but I've just reviewed the sources and they're seriously wanting. A lot of them are dead links, but of those that are active we have...
And that's it - using Google, I can't find any reliable independent coverage to support notability. All I can find are primary sources and lots of hits on the generic terminology. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 09:42, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete - Echoing the nominator's rationale, I cannot find any reliable, third-party sources for this company. It also stinks of a COI; it was written by an editor whose only contributions were to this article (and all but one in the span of five minutes) nearly five years ago, it reads like a promotion piece, virtually of the content is either listing the company's products or its clients, and it references primary sources and dead links. Thanks, - A Texas Historian ( Questions?) 11:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete per above. TimothyJosephWood 13:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 13:25, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Does not satisfy the notability criteria. FamblyCat94 ( talk) 02:49, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
An author who has published his own book on PHP. No evidence of any notability, the refs are advertisements for his book plus his own web-site. Fails WP:GNG by a long way. Could possibly have been a speedy delete. Velella Velella Talk 08:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 01:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable porn star that had been deleted previously by a PROD but recreated by a user who went on binge of creating several articles for non-notable porn stars. Award win is for a scene so therefore doesn't meet PORNBIO standards. No reliable sources to meet the GNG either. Wikiuser20102011 ( talk) 07:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Apart from the nominator, there is a consensus here that Dunn is more notable than your average diplomat, given the nature of the coverage and her longer than usual career. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 10:33, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:BIO. ambassadors are not inherently notable. All this has is primary sources of government press releases. Consensus has shown for ambassadors to be notable they need third party coverage of their achievements and contributions to diplomacy LibStar ( talk) 08:29, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:39, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Fails NPOLITICIAN. Only widespread coverage is BLP1E John from Idegon ( talk) 07:29, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Phantom cat. Almost nobody wants to keep, but editors need to figure out how much, if anything, they want to merge from history. Sandstein 20:31, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFRINGE and WP:GNG.
Searches for the alternative title given in the article, "Gippsland big cat", turn up less results. —PermStrump (talk) 07:29, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The article notes:
Big cat sightings
The Gippsland Phantom Cat
It is claimed the cats were brought to south-eastern Victoria by American World War II airmen who had cougars as mascots and released them into the Australian bush.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Seems to fail WP:CORPDEPTH. MSJapan ( talk) 07:45, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Leon County, Florida#Public safety. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 ( T) 22:27, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:ORG. Police agencies seldom do. You'll find plenty about crime, a bit about personal changes but no discussion in detail from multiple reliable sources from geographically diverse areas. John from Idegon ( talk) 06:45, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
sorry but no evidence of notability ( WP:GNG / Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)) Postoronniy-13 ( talk) 00:00, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Fails PORNBIO & GNG. Many nominations, with only one dubious award, which appears not to be for a movie. K.e.coffman ( talk) 07:02, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Deleted after I tagged it (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 22:49, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
The company appears to be non-notable as I'm unable to locate RS coverage to confirm notability. K.e.coffman ( talk) 06:54, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep as a week has listed no other comments (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 03:17, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
This article has a number of problems for which I see no feasible fix than to delete the article altogether. It is a stub of questionable quality that is poorly sourced and most of the content contained within it is improperly original research. After doing a prima facie search, the term "homeless dumping" is scarcely used in any published literature or other medium. The term "patient dumping" that makes up the majority of the article is far more commonly used and is covered in the article Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (whose section "Mandated and non-mandated care" is the re-direct of "patient dumping"). For those reasons, this article should be deleted. Ergo Sum 23:16, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Lacking coverage in independent sources, only passing mention in some sources, first NYT reference is not useful because notability is not inherited, relationship to Goldman Sachs is not useful because notability is not inherited. This article reads like a company announcement for investors and clients. Steve Quinn ( talk) 05:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
non-notable coach of non-notable team (that article should probably go too) Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:48, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
PROD removed apparently with the basis that the improvements were enough but they are not, searches at all major Australian newspapers have no found anything better than the listed and, even then, these listed are simply mentions including as either website listings or guides. SwisterTwister talk 05:22, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 07:49, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Now that the self-published refs are gone we're left with a non-notable person who is associated with several non-notable organizations. The author was a sock master undertaking multiple paid-edits. for (;;) (talk) 14:14, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:15, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Kleuske ( talk) 02:05, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of attacks related to post-secondary schools. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 ( T) 22:26, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Every victim of crime is noteworthy in their own way, but that does not necessarily make them of encyclopedic value. This victim does not seem to have been notable for anything other than her death. See WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Drmies ( talk) 01:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. czar 07:50, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Not notable Wikipedia version. GZWDer ( talk) 19:40, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Keep Confirmed version by Wikipedia abouth 1000 articles.-- Samək Talk 20:43, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable tag team. Nothing sourced except move sets and week by week updates. True CRaysball | #RaysUp 01:29, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not a snowball's chance of another outcome. czar 08:01, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable porn actress. G4 speedy declined because new article is too different from the previous deleted version. Still fails WP:PORNBIO with only a scene-related award win. Fails WP:GNG with no reliable sources cited and only a quote to CNBC found in searches. She appeared in a Pitbull music video but that falls well short of PORNBIO criterion #3. The only new facts since the 2014 deletion debate are a few more award nominations. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:59, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Non notable bus route which fails GNG – Davey2010 Talk 22:54, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 01:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Only a single reference which doesn't mention the article subject. No evidence of notability nor of its claim to notability as "... the largest exporter of processed wooden, LB & metal products". Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 22:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Lack of coverage in secondary sources other than routine listings. AfDing because it was prodded at least one time in it's past. Savonneux ( talk) 21:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Autobiographical article by a reality-show contestant, already deleted three times including WP:Articles for deletion/Raphael Jabbour and salted. This one perhaps escapes WP:CSD#G4 repost of deleted material as there are more references, but they seem to be the sort of coverage any reality-show contestant gets, plus one about a song he has since released. Maybe he will go on to build a notable career to the standard of WP:MUSICBIO, but this is way WP:Too soon. JohnCD ( talk) 20:57, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Completely unreferenced Rathfelder ( talk) 20:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Unreferenced and promotional Rathfelder ( talk) 20:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable local judge, even if a figure of pride for local Native Americans. Orange Mike | Talk 20:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Begrudging Delete As for the user name, the ECC probably means "Eau Claire County." I am from Wisconsin and formerly from the area in question and the courthouse holds a large portion of the county government so it could easily be part of the sheriff's department, health department or anything else for that matter. I can attest that there would be little to no news coverage beyond the county the judge sits in. There are about 250 WI circuit court justices -- about 50 in Milwaukee County alone. As much as I would personally would not mind an article on him (more important currently than many Wisconsin Assembly member articles who died 100 years ago) I would agree that it would open a can of worms. Dolotta ( talk) 17:05, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to The Orange Lights. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 22:50, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
no evidence of notability (charts). AfD'ing the band too and the lighthouse family guy from this band is already in the process of being debated for deletion Rayman60 ( talk) 18:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Forgotten Realms deities. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 22:50, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
This character currently fails to establish notability. TTN ( talk) 18:14, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. WP:SNOW. It'd be unnecessary to leave this open any longer. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte ( work | talk) 10:31, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Not well referenced or notable Rathfelder ( talk) 17:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete under criterion G7, request by page creator. Editors are reminded to make sure WP:GNG is met before trying to create this page again. — C.Fred ( talk) 20:23, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
This was a contested prod. The article does not appear now to meet the standard set by the WP:GNG; the only reliable source which pops up in the WP:VG custom source is a sponsored piece at GameZone. This is unlikely to be notable at this time. Izno ( talk) 17:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
14-year old DJ who claims to have founded his own record label. The article tries to assert enough notability that it is not eligible for CSD, and the article is referenced so it is not eligible for PROD. — Latchem 17:12, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The result was keep. Subject now passes WP:NFOOTY. Nominator and all other editors involved now agree keep. Fenix down ( talk) 17:24, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Previous concern is unknown. However, Ijaha has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 17:11, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
*Delete - Fails
NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a
fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy
GNG.
Fenix down (
talk)
09:34, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Although this may be BLPRODed, my PROD was removed with absolutely no explanations yet I myself searched all local newspapers and have found nothing; I also still confirm everything from my PROD. SwisterTwister talk 17:10, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:20, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Unreleased film. Subject clearly fails WP:NFILMS. Additionally, extremely heavy WP:COI and promotional behavior. PROD declined by an SPA using a deceptive edit summary. Safiel ( talk) 16:52, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
AdolfDsouza ( talk) 15:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Miss Hawaii USA. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 ( T) 22:35, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Machado was only Miss Hawaii USA for a week, but because she was canned because she was older than the then allowed age, it does not create notability for her. This incident might be worth explaining in an article on Miss Hawaii USA but does not merit a stand alone article. Machado also appeared in a TV show that was cancelled after two weeks. That is no where near enough to make her notable as an actress. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedied as an article previously deleted per a deletion discussion. Echoeboard has repeatedly removed the speedy tag. See also [1], a smoking gun as far as Echoeboard is concerned. Salting. Bishonen | talk 21:04, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 15:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Miss Hawaii USA. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 ( T) 22:33, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Fairbank's only claim to fame is she won Miss Hawaii USA one year. Winning a state beauty pageant alone is not enough to make someone notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:25, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
unreferenced. not notable Rathfelder ( talk) 23:01, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Unreferenced track list. No evidence of notability Rathfelder ( talk) 21:22, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Shaquille O'Neal. czar 07:32, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Toney is only mentioned in the context of his notable son Shaquille O' Neal. Take away his relationship (or lack thereof) with his son then we have an individual who briefly played college basketball. Notability is not inherited so this should be an easy decision for voters. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 21:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 07:43, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
We already have a List of Bollywood films of 2016 and List of highest-grossing Indian films. Secondly, all the references in the article seem to be misleading. - Managerarc™ talk 21:07, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Unnecessary to leave open any longer. WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte ( work | talk) 10:29, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
not notable Kabahaly ( talk) 15:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was Move to draft. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion per WP:G4 was declined on the grounds that article is very different with many more references and more claims of importance. However, the underlying notability concerns remain. He has not received significant coverage or played in a fully pro league, meaning the article still doe not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 19:44, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Al-Futtaim Group. MBisanz talk 02:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Frankly I would've PRODed but either it may be removed or this may be restarted later so AfD is likely best; my searches simply found a few links at News and searching at GulfNews and Khaleej Times also found nothing convincingly better (only 2 passing mentions at the former) and also the listed links here are also simply trivial and mentions....and that's not surprising considering it's simply a localized company. SwisterTwister talk 19:43, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
The subject of the article has requested deletion in the page history. I think if there isn't clear consensus to keep, we should respect his wishes per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. Sro23 ( talk) 15:09, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG & WP:BLPNOTE Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 15:09, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was deleted per WP:BLPPROD. — David Eppstein ( talk) 03:41, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Going by the creator's name, there is a WP:COI... The problem as always is notability.
GScholar claims 52 cites for the book (Constitutional & Administrative Law) - this being said, 2016 is the 9th edition of the book, so one would assume it sells reasonably well. All in all, I still think it is too little for WP:PROF. Tigraan Click here to contact me 16:33, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Non-Notable medical professional Uncletomwood ( talk) 16:11, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Komala_Party_of_Iranian_Kurdistan. MBisanz talk 02:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Fails to demonstrate Wikipedia:Notability. Pahlevun ( talk) 10:37, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 07:45, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Fails GNG. Award mentioned is also non-notable. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 09:43, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Youth system. czar 07:47, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Not notable definition Yellow Dingo (talk) 09:35, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 16:26, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy the notability criteria. FamblyCat94 ( talk) 02:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte ( work | talk) 10:28, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy the notability criteria. FamblyCat94 03:07, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 16:04, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy the notability criteria. FamblyCat94 ( talk) 03:09, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not a lot of participation, but it's already been listed once, and the only person arguing to keep is the article's creator, who fails to cite any policy-based reasons to keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:29, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
To help the article creator User:JamesT5723 understand better, and to answer issues he raised on the talk page and in edit summaries, it should be explained that having a registered trademark is in no way evidence of notability by Wikipedia's standards. Anyone can pay a fee and register a trademark.
Claims that this is one of the fastest growing clubs, is unique in its policies, or unique in other ways, only serve to make one ask why hasn't a single book, newspaper, magazine or reputable website ever written anything about this club?
It is true that there are other articles of questionable notability. Combat Veterans Motorcycle Association would probably not survive a deletion nomination, since all the coverage is WP:ROUTINE toy runs and charity events. The article Blue Angels Motorcycle Club isn't much, but the club has been the subject of ongoing press coverage for many years, mostly due to criminal activity (which is nothing to envy if you ask me). But what matters here is that other stuff exists is no help in keeping Gods Of War Motorcycle Club from being deleted. Regardless of what is wrong with some other article, the question here is whether this article meets the guidelines for notability. For that we need citations showing significant coverage, which are not published by the club, or available for purchase like a license, a trademark, or a vanity press book. Dennis Bratland ( talk) 08:39, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
You mention that we are not in the papers, books etc.. well this is beciuase we are not breaking the law, & as far as I am aware.. there are people & organisations who are listed that obey the law. I had mentioned the Blue Angels, & you said "but the club has been the subject of ongoing press coverage for many years", as I pointed out.. none of the reference links etc attributed to them actually indicate this. Same can be said for Shanon Ponton, who is a trainer on the biggest loser, & all his links bar 1 fail, other than having been on personal trainer on a TV program.. what worth of notability is it. & I am not advocating that either of htese be removed, becuase even though our listing has more actual VALID links listed on our page, their is obviously thousnads of people that would find their links notworthy, where 100's might not. As for the trade mark, you actually have to go through a long process, so it's not just pay & you're done. You said "Claims that this is one of the fastest growing clubs, is unique in its policies, or unique in other ways, only serve to make one ask why hasn't a single book, newspaper, magazine or reputable website ever written anything about this club".. this is not a claim but a fact & the fact we now have locations across 3 countries in 18 monthes proves that, if you do some research you will not find another Military MC that is not 1%, not controlled by one, that admits all service personnel only, from any country, male or female.. & caters for disabled veterans that are unable to ride any more.. That makes us Unique. Just becuase we don't go blowing our trumpet doesn't mean that we are not known, or we wouldn't be getting the amount of applications each day we get. We ARE listed on a reputable web site & the link is on as a reference, it is an extremely highly regarded website in the Motorcycle community, & the site is the main registry for clubs & is respected the world round, & we have been listed 3 times on it!! Claims of notability are subject to personal view, & as I agree that criminal activity isn't something to envy, you seem to advocate that unless a club does something wrong then then are not notworthy, the club has a very good reputation, & is also able to remain netural in around outlaw club, which in its self is it notable.. what one person may not class & notworthy may be to hundred of thousands of others. we get dozens of applcations each day from around the world & have approved yet another location only yesterday in Rowley Regis UK, so it we were certainly notworthy for enough people to wish to establish there. User:JamesT5723 23:47, 28 July 2016
The result was delete. North America 1000 01:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
A web startup. With a cloud-based product. We're knee-deep in these things and it's hard to see why this one is notable for either technical innovation nor corporate significance. Andy Dingley ( talk) 13:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Created by the content translation tool. Poorly sourced. Notable? Black Kite (talk) 12:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
I just declined a speedy deletion nomination as sources supporting notability are not needed to avoid WP:A7, but I've just reviewed the sources and they're seriously wanting. A lot of them are dead links, but of those that are active we have...
And that's it - using Google, I can't find any reliable independent coverage to support notability. All I can find are primary sources and lots of hits on the generic terminology. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 09:42, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete - Echoing the nominator's rationale, I cannot find any reliable, third-party sources for this company. It also stinks of a COI; it was written by an editor whose only contributions were to this article (and all but one in the span of five minutes) nearly five years ago, it reads like a promotion piece, virtually of the content is either listing the company's products or its clients, and it references primary sources and dead links. Thanks, - A Texas Historian ( Questions?) 11:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete per above. TimothyJosephWood 13:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 13:25, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Does not satisfy the notability criteria. FamblyCat94 ( talk) 02:49, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
An author who has published his own book on PHP. No evidence of any notability, the refs are advertisements for his book plus his own web-site. Fails WP:GNG by a long way. Could possibly have been a speedy delete. Velella Velella Talk 08:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 01:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable porn star that had been deleted previously by a PROD but recreated by a user who went on binge of creating several articles for non-notable porn stars. Award win is for a scene so therefore doesn't meet PORNBIO standards. No reliable sources to meet the GNG either. Wikiuser20102011 ( talk) 07:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Apart from the nominator, there is a consensus here that Dunn is more notable than your average diplomat, given the nature of the coverage and her longer than usual career. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 10:33, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:BIO. ambassadors are not inherently notable. All this has is primary sources of government press releases. Consensus has shown for ambassadors to be notable they need third party coverage of their achievements and contributions to diplomacy LibStar ( talk) 08:29, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:39, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Fails NPOLITICIAN. Only widespread coverage is BLP1E John from Idegon ( talk) 07:29, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Phantom cat. Almost nobody wants to keep, but editors need to figure out how much, if anything, they want to merge from history. Sandstein 20:31, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFRINGE and WP:GNG.
Searches for the alternative title given in the article, "Gippsland big cat", turn up less results. —PermStrump (talk) 07:29, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The article notes:
Big cat sightings
The Gippsland Phantom Cat
It is claimed the cats were brought to south-eastern Victoria by American World War II airmen who had cougars as mascots and released them into the Australian bush.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Seems to fail WP:CORPDEPTH. MSJapan ( talk) 07:45, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Leon County, Florida#Public safety. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 ( T) 22:27, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:ORG. Police agencies seldom do. You'll find plenty about crime, a bit about personal changes but no discussion in detail from multiple reliable sources from geographically diverse areas. John from Idegon ( talk) 06:45, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
sorry but no evidence of notability ( WP:GNG / Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)) Postoronniy-13 ( talk) 00:00, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Fails PORNBIO & GNG. Many nominations, with only one dubious award, which appears not to be for a movie. K.e.coffman ( talk) 07:02, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Deleted after I tagged it (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 22:49, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
The company appears to be non-notable as I'm unable to locate RS coverage to confirm notability. K.e.coffman ( talk) 06:54, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep as a week has listed no other comments (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 03:17, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
This article has a number of problems for which I see no feasible fix than to delete the article altogether. It is a stub of questionable quality that is poorly sourced and most of the content contained within it is improperly original research. After doing a prima facie search, the term "homeless dumping" is scarcely used in any published literature or other medium. The term "patient dumping" that makes up the majority of the article is far more commonly used and is covered in the article Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (whose section "Mandated and non-mandated care" is the re-direct of "patient dumping"). For those reasons, this article should be deleted. Ergo Sum 23:16, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Lacking coverage in independent sources, only passing mention in some sources, first NYT reference is not useful because notability is not inherited, relationship to Goldman Sachs is not useful because notability is not inherited. This article reads like a company announcement for investors and clients. Steve Quinn ( talk) 05:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
non-notable coach of non-notable team (that article should probably go too) Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:48, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
PROD removed apparently with the basis that the improvements were enough but they are not, searches at all major Australian newspapers have no found anything better than the listed and, even then, these listed are simply mentions including as either website listings or guides. SwisterTwister talk 05:22, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 07:49, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Now that the self-published refs are gone we're left with a non-notable person who is associated with several non-notable organizations. The author was a sock master undertaking multiple paid-edits. for (;;) (talk) 14:14, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:15, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Kleuske ( talk) 02:05, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of attacks related to post-secondary schools. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 ( T) 22:26, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Every victim of crime is noteworthy in their own way, but that does not necessarily make them of encyclopedic value. This victim does not seem to have been notable for anything other than her death. See WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Drmies ( talk) 01:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. czar 07:50, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Not notable Wikipedia version. GZWDer ( talk) 19:40, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Keep Confirmed version by Wikipedia abouth 1000 articles.-- Samək Talk 20:43, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable tag team. Nothing sourced except move sets and week by week updates. True CRaysball | #RaysUp 01:29, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not a snowball's chance of another outcome. czar 08:01, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable porn actress. G4 speedy declined because new article is too different from the previous deleted version. Still fails WP:PORNBIO with only a scene-related award win. Fails WP:GNG with no reliable sources cited and only a quote to CNBC found in searches. She appeared in a Pitbull music video but that falls well short of PORNBIO criterion #3. The only new facts since the 2014 deletion debate are a few more award nominations. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)