|
|
Hi Kabahaly! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Hello, I'm
UY Scuti. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
Kogalymavia Flight 9268— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. —
UY Scuti
Talk 19:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Hermionedidallthework. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Barbara L, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Hermionedidallthework (
talk) 19:59, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to
Zyablikovo District. Thank you.
Hermionedidallthework (
talk) 20:00, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Please see if the c/e is adequate or let me know where else to chnage-- Nvvchar. 13:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi I removed a strange template you left on this page. Please be careful when reviewing new articles. Thanks. Jane ( talk) 13:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, My intention wasn't to promote a product, but I had to enter links in the references. Please specifically indicate which sentences to be deleted. Antonyroman
Not really advertisement, just not a neutral point of view. This sentence "Today he is known for his unusually sharp depictions of various parts of Amsterdam that no longer exist."
Kabahaly (
talk) 14:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Ha! I am not Antonyroman, so I didn't put that there (and the Jacob Olie page is not a product). The photographer made unusually sharp photographs, and the places he photographed no longer exist. Is there something wrong with how I worded it that you see multiple issues? I am not sure how else to put it. He was not known for his photography during his lifetime, but becamse known for the nostalgic value of his photos. Maybe if you state your issues it would be clearer to me, because I don't see anything wrong with that sentence. Jane ( talk) 18:51, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
You have twice tagged Star of Devon for poor grammar, but I can't see any problem at all can you enlighten me? Theroadislong ( talk) 16:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- I've added two commas, and possibly there could be two more (around 'Devon'). It did work as it was, but I'm a stickler for commas. Peridon ( talk) 18:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
I can't see Oana Stoica Mujea as vandalism. Possibly promotional or not notable, as the title has been deleted on the Romanian Wikipedia twice (once each for those reasons so far as I can see), but not vandalism. It is in Romanian, not English, but we list articles in other languages at WP:PNT (unless we can see a clear problem that requires speedy deletion). You might see something there that I don't - if you have information about something that anyone else might not, or if there might be a language problem hiding something, please put a note on the talk page to explain this. It makes our lives easier... Peridon ( talk) 18:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you are signed up as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. We have a number of pending requests which need a volunteer to address them. Unless you are an inexperienced volunteer who is currently just watching DRN to learn our processes, please take a case. If you do not see yourself taking cases in the foreseeable future, please remove yourself from the volunteer list so that we can have a better idea of the size of our pool of volunteers; if you do see yourself taking cases, please watchlist the DRN page and keep an eye out to see if there are cases which are ready for a volunteer. We have recently had to refuse a number of cases because they were listed for days with no volunteer willing to take them, despite there being almost 150 volunteers listed on the volunteer page. Regards, TransporterMan ( talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself on the list of volunteers at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteering#List of the DRN volunteers.
First, assistance is needed at DRN. We have recently closed a number of cases without any services being provided for lack of a volunteer willing to take the case. There are at least three cases awaiting a volunteer at this moment. Please consider taking one.
Second, this is a volunteer roll call. If you remain interested in helping at DRN and are willing to actively do so by taking at least one case (and seeing it through) or helping with administrative matters at least once per calendar month, please add your name to this roll call list. Individuals currently on the principal volunteer list who do not add their name on the roll call list will be removed from the principal volunteer list after June 30, 2016 unless the DRN Coordinator chooses to retain their name for the best interest of DRN or the encyclopedia. Individuals whose names are removed after June 30, 2016, should feel free to re-add their names to the principal volunteer list, but are respectfully requested not to do so unless they are willing to take part at DRN at least one time per month as noted above. No one is going to be monitoring to see if you live up to that commitment, but we respectfully ask that you either live up to it or remove your name from the principal volunteer list.
Best regards, TransporterMan ( talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Political Compass (June 28)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Political Compass and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Nomination of The International 2016 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The International 2016 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The International 2016 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan ( talk) 19:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
My page on Sarah Bellamy who travelled with the First Fleet to colonise Australia had not been finished — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halljo22 ( talk • contribs) 22:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Doggy style, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to
include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs) 03:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced or
poorly sourced
defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
Rhett and Link.
Binksternet (
talk) 05:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
Userspace is exempt from G2 speedy deletes. Users are permitted to do tests in their own sandboxes. If it is your own test, you can use CSD-G7 to ask for delete, or if someone else tested in you userspace you can use CSD-U1. Also if someone independent declines your speedy delete nomination do not put it back on. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 10:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
I sincerely hope you don't go around Wikipedia making stuff up like you did at Black supremacy. Try it again and you'll be reported at WP:AN/I. — MShabazz Talk/ Stalk 13:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Why would you remove ElectroYoga? It's a real word that is developing. If you don't like the links that were provided we could just remove them. I need to site examples of where the word was used to substantiate that it is a real word that is now being used. I am perfectly happy to leave out the examples of the word being used. However the word electroyoga is used to describe a public event. Magenta1984 ( talk) 13:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)magenta1984
|
Thank you for reviewing pages on India. Regards, Prof TPMS ( talk) 10:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC) |
The article /r/The Donald has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- I doubt this warrants having its own article at this point, and from what I can see, we don't even know for sure if Donald Trump is really involved or it's just satire.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
nyuszika7h (
talk) 11:35, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of /r/The Donald for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article /r/The Donald is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion//r/The Donald until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. nyuszika7h ( talk) 11:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lockhart, Texas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maxwell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi!
Hate to bother you, but is there any way you could let me know how the Operation Infinite Reach GA review is going? Some of the news sources may be difficult to find, in which case I can easily email them to you or something. I'm only saying this because I will have a hard time getting online next week.
Best,
GAB gab 16:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- Hi,
- Just wanted to ask if you were still intending to do the GA review. If not, I fully understand, but I would appreciate knowing either way.
- Thanks,
Please add to my defence /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jeneral28#Suspected_sockpuppets. Have I not been a great contributor to many defence articles especially to [Mechanised Infantry Vehicle]]? Thanks Cantab1985 ( talk) 05:35, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/MacGyver_the_Lizard
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/MacGyver_the_Lizard .
Lizzymartin (
talk) 01:54, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Ferret. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Discord (software) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. You seem to have been an editor for some time, so I'm a little surprised to see unsourced apparent vandalism like this... --
ferret (
talk) 14:11, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
For now, I'll do you a favor: I won't seek redress for your insulting, completely false claim that I vandalized that article. In return, would you please respond to the edit summary I left? I said, "This wasn't vandalism by a long shot. And what about the text you put in quotation marks even though it wasn't a direct quote?" Now that you've finally read it, you probably see the mistakes you made. If you revert me again, use a far, far better explanation than "Removing vandalism" because we don't like when people lie. RunnyAmiga ※ talk 19:42, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- While I don't see your apology for your lie that I perpetrated vandalism, I appreciate that you seem to be working on less dishonest edit summaries. Of course, you're still putting unsourced text in quotation marks and removing text someone copied straight out of the New York Times by falsely calling it "unprofessional writing." (I assure you, the Times pays writers.) Am I going to have to go through every policy violation you commit one by one? Or can you just stop? RunnyAmiga ※ talk 19:54, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Kabahaly. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:The Political Compass
Hello, Kabahaly. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " The Political Compass".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 ( talk) 01:30, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Deadspin.
Woodroar (
talk) 23:33, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
User:Aspects.
Aspects (
talk) 07:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Space Station 13. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — KuyaBriBri Talk 19:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Kabahaly. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 | Hello! I, (
TheMasterGuru), would like to invite you to join
WikiProject YouTube! We're working on:
|
Hello, Kabahaly. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Al-Afaq International School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No significant coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Joy Awards (January 20)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joy Awards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
|
|
Hi Kabahaly! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Hello, I'm
UY Scuti. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
Kogalymavia Flight 9268— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. —
UY Scuti
Talk 19:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Hermionedidallthework. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Barbara L, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Hermionedidallthework (
talk) 19:59, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to
Zyablikovo District. Thank you.
Hermionedidallthework (
talk) 20:00, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Please see if the c/e is adequate or let me know where else to chnage-- Nvvchar. 13:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi I removed a strange template you left on this page. Please be careful when reviewing new articles. Thanks. Jane ( talk) 13:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, My intention wasn't to promote a product, but I had to enter links in the references. Please specifically indicate which sentences to be deleted. Antonyroman
Not really advertisement, just not a neutral point of view. This sentence "Today he is known for his unusually sharp depictions of various parts of Amsterdam that no longer exist."
Kabahaly (
talk) 14:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Ha! I am not Antonyroman, so I didn't put that there (and the Jacob Olie page is not a product). The photographer made unusually sharp photographs, and the places he photographed no longer exist. Is there something wrong with how I worded it that you see multiple issues? I am not sure how else to put it. He was not known for his photography during his lifetime, but becamse known for the nostalgic value of his photos. Maybe if you state your issues it would be clearer to me, because I don't see anything wrong with that sentence. Jane ( talk) 18:51, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
You have twice tagged Star of Devon for poor grammar, but I can't see any problem at all can you enlighten me? Theroadislong ( talk) 16:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- I've added two commas, and possibly there could be two more (around 'Devon'). It did work as it was, but I'm a stickler for commas. Peridon ( talk) 18:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
I can't see Oana Stoica Mujea as vandalism. Possibly promotional or not notable, as the title has been deleted on the Romanian Wikipedia twice (once each for those reasons so far as I can see), but not vandalism. It is in Romanian, not English, but we list articles in other languages at WP:PNT (unless we can see a clear problem that requires speedy deletion). You might see something there that I don't - if you have information about something that anyone else might not, or if there might be a language problem hiding something, please put a note on the talk page to explain this. It makes our lives easier... Peridon ( talk) 18:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you are signed up as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. We have a number of pending requests which need a volunteer to address them. Unless you are an inexperienced volunteer who is currently just watching DRN to learn our processes, please take a case. If you do not see yourself taking cases in the foreseeable future, please remove yourself from the volunteer list so that we can have a better idea of the size of our pool of volunteers; if you do see yourself taking cases, please watchlist the DRN page and keep an eye out to see if there are cases which are ready for a volunteer. We have recently had to refuse a number of cases because they were listed for days with no volunteer willing to take them, despite there being almost 150 volunteers listed on the volunteer page. Regards, TransporterMan ( talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself on the list of volunteers at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteering#List of the DRN volunteers.
First, assistance is needed at DRN. We have recently closed a number of cases without any services being provided for lack of a volunteer willing to take the case. There are at least three cases awaiting a volunteer at this moment. Please consider taking one.
Second, this is a volunteer roll call. If you remain interested in helping at DRN and are willing to actively do so by taking at least one case (and seeing it through) or helping with administrative matters at least once per calendar month, please add your name to this roll call list. Individuals currently on the principal volunteer list who do not add their name on the roll call list will be removed from the principal volunteer list after June 30, 2016 unless the DRN Coordinator chooses to retain their name for the best interest of DRN or the encyclopedia. Individuals whose names are removed after June 30, 2016, should feel free to re-add their names to the principal volunteer list, but are respectfully requested not to do so unless they are willing to take part at DRN at least one time per month as noted above. No one is going to be monitoring to see if you live up to that commitment, but we respectfully ask that you either live up to it or remove your name from the principal volunteer list.
Best regards, TransporterMan ( talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Political Compass (June 28)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Political Compass and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Nomination of The International 2016 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The International 2016 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The International 2016 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan ( talk) 19:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
My page on Sarah Bellamy who travelled with the First Fleet to colonise Australia had not been finished — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halljo22 ( talk • contribs) 22:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Doggy style, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to
include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs) 03:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced or
poorly sourced
defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
Rhett and Link.
Binksternet (
talk) 05:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
|
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
Userspace is exempt from G2 speedy deletes. Users are permitted to do tests in their own sandboxes. If it is your own test, you can use CSD-G7 to ask for delete, or if someone else tested in you userspace you can use CSD-U1. Also if someone independent declines your speedy delete nomination do not put it back on. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 10:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
I sincerely hope you don't go around Wikipedia making stuff up like you did at Black supremacy. Try it again and you'll be reported at WP:AN/I. — MShabazz Talk/ Stalk 13:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Why would you remove ElectroYoga? It's a real word that is developing. If you don't like the links that were provided we could just remove them. I need to site examples of where the word was used to substantiate that it is a real word that is now being used. I am perfectly happy to leave out the examples of the word being used. However the word electroyoga is used to describe a public event. Magenta1984 ( talk) 13:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)magenta1984
|
|
Thank you for reviewing pages on India. Regards, Prof TPMS ( talk) 10:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC) |
The article /r/The Donald has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- I doubt this warrants having its own article at this point, and from what I can see, we don't even know for sure if Donald Trump is really involved or it's just satire.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
nyuszika7h (
talk) 11:35, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of /r/The Donald for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article /r/The Donald is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion//r/The Donald until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. nyuszika7h ( talk) 11:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lockhart, Texas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maxwell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi!
Hate to bother you, but is there any way you could let me know how the Operation Infinite Reach GA review is going? Some of the news sources may be difficult to find, in which case I can easily email them to you or something. I'm only saying this because I will have a hard time getting online next week.
Best,
GAB gab 16:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- Hi,
- Just wanted to ask if you were still intending to do the GA review. If not, I fully understand, but I would appreciate knowing either way.
- Thanks,
Please add to my defence /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jeneral28#Suspected_sockpuppets. Have I not been a great contributor to many defence articles especially to [Mechanised Infantry Vehicle]]? Thanks Cantab1985 ( talk) 05:35, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/MacGyver_the_Lizard
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/MacGyver_the_Lizard .
Lizzymartin (
talk) 01:54, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Ferret. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Discord (software) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. You seem to have been an editor for some time, so I'm a little surprised to see unsourced apparent vandalism like this... --
ferret (
talk) 14:11, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
For now, I'll do you a favor: I won't seek redress for your insulting, completely false claim that I vandalized that article. In return, would you please respond to the edit summary I left? I said, "This wasn't vandalism by a long shot. And what about the text you put in quotation marks even though it wasn't a direct quote?" Now that you've finally read it, you probably see the mistakes you made. If you revert me again, use a far, far better explanation than "Removing vandalism" because we don't like when people lie. RunnyAmiga ※ talk 19:42, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- While I don't see your apology for your lie that I perpetrated vandalism, I appreciate that you seem to be working on less dishonest edit summaries. Of course, you're still putting unsourced text in quotation marks and removing text someone copied straight out of the New York Times by falsely calling it "unprofessional writing." (I assure you, the Times pays writers.) Am I going to have to go through every policy violation you commit one by one? Or can you just stop? RunnyAmiga ※ talk 19:54, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Kabahaly. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:The Political Compass
Hello, Kabahaly. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " The Political Compass".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 ( talk) 01:30, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Deadspin.
Woodroar (
talk) 23:33, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
User:Aspects.
Aspects (
talk) 07:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Space Station 13. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — KuyaBriBri Talk 19:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Kabahaly. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|
| Hello! I, (
TheMasterGuru), would like to invite you to join
WikiProject YouTube! We're working on:
|
Hello, Kabahaly. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Al-Afaq International School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No significant coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Joy Awards (January 20)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joy Awards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.