< 29 October | 31 October > |
---|
The result was speedy delete under G8. — ξ xplicit 19:12, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was bad forum. AfD is not the forum for making redirection requests. Use the article talk page for this, please. Sandstein 07:53, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
I am nominating this not for deletion, but as a redirect to the Celeb section of the J! tournament page. Us441( talk)( contribs) 23:40, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:21, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
No evidence that this person actually exists. The supposed film credits in Sabrina and The Kid don't pan out in IMDB. No evidence of a character called "Lala Mozilla" existing in Sabrina. Tabercil ( talk) 23:46, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. apparent nonsense DGG ( talk ) 07:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
This Wiki is loaded with nonsense it should be Uncyclopedia material. It is also damaging to the real "Dragon Katol" mosquito coil product. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kenshinflyer ( talk • contribs) 12:19, 27 September 2010
The result was speedy deletion. ( WP:CSD#G3) -- Ed ( Edgar181) 23:38, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Obvious hoax; references and image are fake, biological data is nonsensical (a manta ray with a beak?!), no relevant search results in Google. -- Yzx ( talk) 23:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:38, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Non notable magazine. No sources. DimaG ( talk) 22:01, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Red (band). Davewild ( talk) 08:43, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested prod, Non-notable musician that fails WP:MUSICBIO and has been tagged as possibly not meeting notability guidelines for five months with no Google hits from the find sources. Aspects ( talk) 21:20, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete as purely promotional. -- SarekOfVulcan ( talk) 21:04, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Software, so no speedy. WP:N Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 20:57, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable, fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Appears to be largely autobiographical & poorly-sourced. Tagged for notability for almost a whole year. Rodhull andemu 20:36, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete per criterion A10. Dabomb87 ( talk) 00:38, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Content fork of Jackie Robinson, listed under the editor's username. Seems like this should be speedied, but I couldn't find a speedy criterion that would cover this. This has been sitting here for two years! — Chowbok ☠ 20:36, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:36, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod. Seems to be a non-notable newly invented team sport. E. Fokker ( talk) 20:21, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Will redirect John B. Means to John Barkley Means so anyone can perform the merge as required. Davewild ( talk) 08:38, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unable to find any non-trivial reliable sources independent of the subject to establish notability. The subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:PROFESSOR. J04n( talk page) 20:15, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:19, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unable to find any reliable sources independent of the subject to establish the notability of this subject. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. J04n( talk page) 19:51, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:36, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unsourced, tried to find on Google, and notable for only one event. intelati talk 19:46, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 22:26, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unable to find any non-trivial reliable sources independent of the subject to verify the article and establish notability. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. J04n( talk page) 19:34, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was nomination withdrawn. There is no remaining !vote for deletion and merge discussion can take place on the articles talk page. ( NAC) Armbrust Talk Contribs 13:11, 4 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This seems like absolute nonsense, no decent references and lots of speculative hocus pocus waffle.
E. Fokker (
talk)
18:31, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:35, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This is an article about a non-notable individual with no independent sources. I can find no record at Sherdog about his being an MMA fighter, his high point in acting seems to have been one role as an unnamed solider in a straight to DVD movie, and I found nothing notable about his freerunning. Papaursa ( talk) 17:02, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus is that he does not meet the notability guideline.. Davewild ( talk) 08:35, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
I've just declined the speedy on this, as there's clearly enough for A7. However, it feels very BLP1E, is he notable enough for his own article, or should it be redirected to something 9/11 related, or just deleted? Ged UK 14:52, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. extransit ( talk) 00:10, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Have just declined the speedy A7 on this, as the awards noted is probably enough. It's fairly close to a speedy-spam, but I've seen much worse.
A very quick google check doesn't throw much back that could be considered to meet the GNG, just to demonstrate existence. Ged UK 14:18, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:13, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Appears to be merely advertisement. There is little content on the page except for a "See also:" Veriss ( talk) 09:12, 23 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Reverted to original redirect. Not enough information to support separate article created by anon. Nirvana2013 ( talk) 09:36, 23 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:34, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable per WP:BAND, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Top Jim ( talk) 07:12, 23 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The !votes that comply with policy are almsot entirely one-sided. Consensus is that this is not notable enough for an article. Courcelles 00:33, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Non-notable photo sharing site. I am unable to find independent and verifiable, third party coverage of this site. Alexa rank is over 600k (admittedly a poor metric in determining notability though). VQuakr ( talk) 03:55, 23 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Dr. LL —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.45.237.180 ( talk) 19:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:16, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Declaration of interest: I am a director (i.e. board member) of another venue at the Edinburgh Fringe.-- ColinFine ( talk) 10:33, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Not enough coverage to establish notability ColinFine ( talk) 10:23, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Courcelles 05:57, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable local golf course Orange Mike | Talk 17:31, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:31, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:GNG secondary school group with no sources on the article and none that I could find to establish some kind of notability Mo ainm ~Talk 20:34, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:30, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Not a notable topic. The information could be given in one or two sentences in the article on the group. (For instance: "There have been various published estimates of the number of members, ranging from 80,000 down to only 24. This seems to be due to the Raelians' desire for publicity and the negligence of the news media in fact checking.") I struck out the second sentence due to OR concerns expressed, as well as possible BLP concerns.
Steve Dufour (
talk)
13:32, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep, withdrawn. — David Eppstein ( talk) 19:12, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
The subject does not pass WP:PROF, except possibly the first criterion
The single paper written by the subject has been cited on the order of 100 times according to Google scholar. This is significant, even given the subjects low h-score of 1, but it is not enough to build an encyclopedia article around. Mr. Kirszbraun should be mentioned in the article on Kirszbraun's theorem, but there are no sources on the subject and there will never be enough content for a separate article. Sławomir Biały ( talk) 13:25, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Nomination withdrawn Acather96 ( talk) 14:12, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Unremarkable music association, might be promotional. The only reference is in a different language on what I presume is the company website. Fails WP:GNG. Acather96 ( talk) 11:29, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Courcelles 00:27, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Same rationale as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mongolia national bandy team. Apologies for not including it in that AfD. The fault is probably my own. (If the WP:TWINKLE user manual includes guidelines for mass AfD discussions, I can't find it.) Shirt58 ( talk) 11:21, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete—there is clear consensus rooted in relevant policies and guidelines. — Deckiller ( t- c- l) 02:10, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This is a personal essay or original research. JohnCD ( talk) 11:14, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Paradise Hill, Oklahoma. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:55, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This place/township is not notable; very few permanent buildings, some vacation homes and commercial properties, no post office. I can't find significant coverage of it in secondary sources. The current article admits that the place mostly isn't even referred to by this name any more. Demiurge1000 ( talk) 10:50, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:15, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete. Does not meet notability for college athletes. Has not won a national award or inducted into the Hall of Fame or established a national record. All coverage and media attention is related to team stats and rankings with the University of Wisconsin. Cindamuse ( talk) 10:39, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Consensus is that this is a valid topic but that the content needs editing, as has partially been done already during this AfD. Sandstein 07:50, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Please refer to the multiple issue tags. It looks like an essay compiled from several technically unverifiable sources. The article has been unpatrolled for 30 days and no one knows what to do with it. Perhaps an expert on the subject could merge it somewhere. Would the community please decide. Kudpung ( talk) 10:27, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Keep per WP:SK #1: "The nominator ... fails to advance an argument for deletion" Colonel Warden ( talk) 07:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
At least needs a complete rewriting. As for now it's just a mess. KzKrann ( talk) 09:12, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Keep per WP:SK #1: "The nominator ... fails to advance an argument for deletion" Colonel Warden ( talk) 07:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
At least needs a complete rewriting. As for now it's just a mess. KzKrann ( talk) 09:12, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Davewild ( talk) 22:17, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unlike the other albums by the same band ( Songs from a Secret Garden, Dreamcatcher (album)), these releases make neither claim to nor proof of their notability, and as such seem to fall short of WP:MUSIC; note that whatever notability the band may have, it is WP:NOTINHERITED by any of these albums. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 08:20, 15 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:26, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Has gone untranslated at WP:PNT for more than two weeks, prod removed with no explanation Jac16888 Talk 08:18, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:18, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Subject of article is a non-notable work of fiction as per WP:BK. I did find the author's obituary in The Times [16] but it does not discuss this book, merely including it in "the other five". No other significant coverage at all that I can find. Demiurge1000 ( talk) 07:25, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep as per Laozi. Edward321 ( talk) 16:20, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:26, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Can't find anything that indicates this is any different from thousands of other run-of-the-mill rug cleaning companies. Likely WP:COI and has been prodded since Sept. 2009. Clarityfiend ( talk) 04:57, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:12, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
No references, no indication of importance, tagged since 2009 Talktome( Intelati) 00:20, 23 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 09:50, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
The article doesn't meet the notability guideline for Future Films of WikiProject Film. The merge option was thought of, but the article, which is related to 3 Idiots, already includes a mention about the plans to produce this film. When it was proposed for deletion, anon IP just removed the template without any discussion or assertion of the article's notability. IMHO, the article fails the notability guideline until the film's production actually begins. Mspraveen ( talk) 04:44, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Basically this is a "criticism of X" article where X is a BLP. Courcelles 00:26, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This article violates WP:NPOV and WP:BLP by giving undue weight to negative media treatment of this rabbi. Additionally, the excessive quotation which forms the basis for most of its content is inconsistent with the brevity requirements of Wikipedia:Non-free content. There seems to be a general consensus that content forking of BLPs must be done neutrally: we now have Public image of Barack Obama and Public image of George W. Bush, not controversy articles. If it is believed that this article may form some basis for the neutral treatment of Ginsburgh's public image, then I suggest removal of all non-free text, and incubation; if this is unlikely, outright deletion is the most prudent course of action. Peter Karlsen ( talk) 04:16, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. -- Cirt ( talk) 09:49, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable organisation per WP:ORG. No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Demiurge1000 ( talk) 04:10, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:03, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
There's nothing particularly notable about this Irish army company. Clarityfiend ( talk) 01:27, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:20, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
I can't find any RS which confirms his existence. I'm only finding Wikipedia mirrors, news aggregation services, and one press release I can't read. Hobit ( talk) 01:13, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Courcelles 00:34, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unable to find any reliable sources to verify the contents of this long-standing unreferenced BLP in order to establish notability. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. J04n( talk page) 00:50, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Aftermath of World War II. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 03:04, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This article is almost entirely unsourced, and it is disjointed, disorganised, incomplete, and has been dormant/stagnant for a long time. The subject matter is largely duplicated in existing Aftermath of World War II article. A few bits of sourced text that can be salvaged from this article have already been moved to the Aftermath of World War II article. Some of the graphics/photos may also be salvaged prior to deletion if any. A suggestion has been made to merge it with Aftermath of World War II article, but I believe that's unworkable and not worth the time and effort involved in trying to fix, source and cleanup. Communicat ( talk) 00:45, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:18, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unable to find any reliable sources independent of the subject to verify the contents of the article and establish notability. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. J04n( talk page) 00:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete—there is clear consensus rooted in relevant policies and procedures. — Deckiller ( t- c- l) 02:26, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Apparent conflict of interest - created by a user named after his company and subsequent edits from the company - one claim to WP:notability but nothing other than a regional business award. Few google hits. Not notable. Most references are not WP:reliable sources noq ( talk) 00:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:17, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unable to find any reliable sources to verify the contents of this long-standing unreferenced BLP. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. J04n( talk page) 00:16, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Dwarf Fortress—although there is consensus that this game does not warrant an article, editors are more than welcome to mention this game in the relevant "history" section. — Deckiller ( t- c- l) 02:17, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
I'm revisiting this AfD as suggested in the previous one. This game still seems to be non-notable, and I can't find enough reliable sources to establish any sort of notability. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry ( talk) 00:13, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 15:10, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unable to find reliable sources independent of this artist in order to establish notability this very long standing unreferenced BLP. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:Notability (people). J04n( talk page) 20:16, 23 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 15:10, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This article is such blatant self promotion that notable or not we would be better off deleting it. All the sources cited are book reviews, many of which are from websites that do not appear to be reliable sources. The two major contributors appear to be the author: User:CFOWriter and the publisher Dominic Caruso: User:Dominic in ohio. Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:39, 23 October 2010 (UTC) reply
< 29 October | 31 October > |
---|
The result was speedy delete under G8. — ξ xplicit 19:12, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was bad forum. AfD is not the forum for making redirection requests. Use the article talk page for this, please. Sandstein 07:53, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
I am nominating this not for deletion, but as a redirect to the Celeb section of the J! tournament page. Us441( talk)( contribs) 23:40, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:21, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
No evidence that this person actually exists. The supposed film credits in Sabrina and The Kid don't pan out in IMDB. No evidence of a character called "Lala Mozilla" existing in Sabrina. Tabercil ( talk) 23:46, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. apparent nonsense DGG ( talk ) 07:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
This Wiki is loaded with nonsense it should be Uncyclopedia material. It is also damaging to the real "Dragon Katol" mosquito coil product. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kenshinflyer ( talk • contribs) 12:19, 27 September 2010
The result was speedy deletion. ( WP:CSD#G3) -- Ed ( Edgar181) 23:38, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Obvious hoax; references and image are fake, biological data is nonsensical (a manta ray with a beak?!), no relevant search results in Google. -- Yzx ( talk) 23:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:38, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Non notable magazine. No sources. DimaG ( talk) 22:01, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Red (band). Davewild ( talk) 08:43, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested prod, Non-notable musician that fails WP:MUSICBIO and has been tagged as possibly not meeting notability guidelines for five months with no Google hits from the find sources. Aspects ( talk) 21:20, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete as purely promotional. -- SarekOfVulcan ( talk) 21:04, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Software, so no speedy. WP:N Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 20:57, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable, fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Appears to be largely autobiographical & poorly-sourced. Tagged for notability for almost a whole year. Rodhull andemu 20:36, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete per criterion A10. Dabomb87 ( talk) 00:38, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Content fork of Jackie Robinson, listed under the editor's username. Seems like this should be speedied, but I couldn't find a speedy criterion that would cover this. This has been sitting here for two years! — Chowbok ☠ 20:36, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:36, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod. Seems to be a non-notable newly invented team sport. E. Fokker ( talk) 20:21, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Will redirect John B. Means to John Barkley Means so anyone can perform the merge as required. Davewild ( talk) 08:38, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unable to find any non-trivial reliable sources independent of the subject to establish notability. The subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:PROFESSOR. J04n( talk page) 20:15, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:19, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unable to find any reliable sources independent of the subject to establish the notability of this subject. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. J04n( talk page) 19:51, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:36, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unsourced, tried to find on Google, and notable for only one event. intelati talk 19:46, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 22:26, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unable to find any non-trivial reliable sources independent of the subject to verify the article and establish notability. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. J04n( talk page) 19:34, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was nomination withdrawn. There is no remaining !vote for deletion and merge discussion can take place on the articles talk page. ( NAC) Armbrust Talk Contribs 13:11, 4 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This seems like absolute nonsense, no decent references and lots of speculative hocus pocus waffle.
E. Fokker (
talk)
18:31, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:35, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This is an article about a non-notable individual with no independent sources. I can find no record at Sherdog about his being an MMA fighter, his high point in acting seems to have been one role as an unnamed solider in a straight to DVD movie, and I found nothing notable about his freerunning. Papaursa ( talk) 17:02, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus is that he does not meet the notability guideline.. Davewild ( talk) 08:35, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
I've just declined the speedy on this, as there's clearly enough for A7. However, it feels very BLP1E, is he notable enough for his own article, or should it be redirected to something 9/11 related, or just deleted? Ged UK 14:52, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. extransit ( talk) 00:10, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Have just declined the speedy A7 on this, as the awards noted is probably enough. It's fairly close to a speedy-spam, but I've seen much worse.
A very quick google check doesn't throw much back that could be considered to meet the GNG, just to demonstrate existence. Ged UK 14:18, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:13, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Appears to be merely advertisement. There is little content on the page except for a "See also:" Veriss ( talk) 09:12, 23 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Reverted to original redirect. Not enough information to support separate article created by anon. Nirvana2013 ( talk) 09:36, 23 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:34, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable per WP:BAND, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Top Jim ( talk) 07:12, 23 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The !votes that comply with policy are almsot entirely one-sided. Consensus is that this is not notable enough for an article. Courcelles 00:33, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Non-notable photo sharing site. I am unable to find independent and verifiable, third party coverage of this site. Alexa rank is over 600k (admittedly a poor metric in determining notability though). VQuakr ( talk) 03:55, 23 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Dr. LL —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.45.237.180 ( talk) 19:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:16, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Declaration of interest: I am a director (i.e. board member) of another venue at the Edinburgh Fringe.-- ColinFine ( talk) 10:33, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Not enough coverage to establish notability ColinFine ( talk) 10:23, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Courcelles 05:57, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable local golf course Orange Mike | Talk 17:31, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:31, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:GNG secondary school group with no sources on the article and none that I could find to establish some kind of notability Mo ainm ~Talk 20:34, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:30, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Not a notable topic. The information could be given in one or two sentences in the article on the group. (For instance: "There have been various published estimates of the number of members, ranging from 80,000 down to only 24. This seems to be due to the Raelians' desire for publicity and the negligence of the news media in fact checking.") I struck out the second sentence due to OR concerns expressed, as well as possible BLP concerns.
Steve Dufour (
talk)
13:32, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep, withdrawn. — David Eppstein ( talk) 19:12, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
The subject does not pass WP:PROF, except possibly the first criterion
The single paper written by the subject has been cited on the order of 100 times according to Google scholar. This is significant, even given the subjects low h-score of 1, but it is not enough to build an encyclopedia article around. Mr. Kirszbraun should be mentioned in the article on Kirszbraun's theorem, but there are no sources on the subject and there will never be enough content for a separate article. Sławomir Biały ( talk) 13:25, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Nomination withdrawn Acather96 ( talk) 14:12, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Unremarkable music association, might be promotional. The only reference is in a different language on what I presume is the company website. Fails WP:GNG. Acather96 ( talk) 11:29, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Courcelles 00:27, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Same rationale as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mongolia national bandy team. Apologies for not including it in that AfD. The fault is probably my own. (If the WP:TWINKLE user manual includes guidelines for mass AfD discussions, I can't find it.) Shirt58 ( talk) 11:21, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete—there is clear consensus rooted in relevant policies and guidelines. — Deckiller ( t- c- l) 02:10, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This is a personal essay or original research. JohnCD ( talk) 11:14, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Paradise Hill, Oklahoma. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:55, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This place/township is not notable; very few permanent buildings, some vacation homes and commercial properties, no post office. I can't find significant coverage of it in secondary sources. The current article admits that the place mostly isn't even referred to by this name any more. Demiurge1000 ( talk) 10:50, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:15, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete. Does not meet notability for college athletes. Has not won a national award or inducted into the Hall of Fame or established a national record. All coverage and media attention is related to team stats and rankings with the University of Wisconsin. Cindamuse ( talk) 10:39, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Consensus is that this is a valid topic but that the content needs editing, as has partially been done already during this AfD. Sandstein 07:50, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Please refer to the multiple issue tags. It looks like an essay compiled from several technically unverifiable sources. The article has been unpatrolled for 30 days and no one knows what to do with it. Perhaps an expert on the subject could merge it somewhere. Would the community please decide. Kudpung ( talk) 10:27, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Keep per WP:SK #1: "The nominator ... fails to advance an argument for deletion" Colonel Warden ( talk) 07:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
At least needs a complete rewriting. As for now it's just a mess. KzKrann ( talk) 09:12, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Keep per WP:SK #1: "The nominator ... fails to advance an argument for deletion" Colonel Warden ( talk) 07:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
At least needs a complete rewriting. As for now it's just a mess. KzKrann ( talk) 09:12, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Davewild ( talk) 22:17, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unlike the other albums by the same band ( Songs from a Secret Garden, Dreamcatcher (album)), these releases make neither claim to nor proof of their notability, and as such seem to fall short of WP:MUSIC; note that whatever notability the band may have, it is WP:NOTINHERITED by any of these albums. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 08:20, 15 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:26, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Has gone untranslated at WP:PNT for more than two weeks, prod removed with no explanation Jac16888 Talk 08:18, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:18, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Subject of article is a non-notable work of fiction as per WP:BK. I did find the author's obituary in The Times [16] but it does not discuss this book, merely including it in "the other five". No other significant coverage at all that I can find. Demiurge1000 ( talk) 07:25, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep as per Laozi. Edward321 ( talk) 16:20, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:26, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Can't find anything that indicates this is any different from thousands of other run-of-the-mill rug cleaning companies. Likely WP:COI and has been prodded since Sept. 2009. Clarityfiend ( talk) 04:57, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:12, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
No references, no indication of importance, tagged since 2009 Talktome( Intelati) 00:20, 23 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 09:50, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
The article doesn't meet the notability guideline for Future Films of WikiProject Film. The merge option was thought of, but the article, which is related to 3 Idiots, already includes a mention about the plans to produce this film. When it was proposed for deletion, anon IP just removed the template without any discussion or assertion of the article's notability. IMHO, the article fails the notability guideline until the film's production actually begins. Mspraveen ( talk) 04:44, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Basically this is a "criticism of X" article where X is a BLP. Courcelles 00:26, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This article violates WP:NPOV and WP:BLP by giving undue weight to negative media treatment of this rabbi. Additionally, the excessive quotation which forms the basis for most of its content is inconsistent with the brevity requirements of Wikipedia:Non-free content. There seems to be a general consensus that content forking of BLPs must be done neutrally: we now have Public image of Barack Obama and Public image of George W. Bush, not controversy articles. If it is believed that this article may form some basis for the neutral treatment of Ginsburgh's public image, then I suggest removal of all non-free text, and incubation; if this is unlikely, outright deletion is the most prudent course of action. Peter Karlsen ( talk) 04:16, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. -- Cirt ( talk) 09:49, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable organisation per WP:ORG. No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Demiurge1000 ( talk) 04:10, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:03, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
There's nothing particularly notable about this Irish army company. Clarityfiend ( talk) 01:27, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:20, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
I can't find any RS which confirms his existence. I'm only finding Wikipedia mirrors, news aggregation services, and one press release I can't read. Hobit ( talk) 01:13, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Courcelles 00:34, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unable to find any reliable sources to verify the contents of this long-standing unreferenced BLP in order to establish notability. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. J04n( talk page) 00:50, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Aftermath of World War II. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 03:04, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This article is almost entirely unsourced, and it is disjointed, disorganised, incomplete, and has been dormant/stagnant for a long time. The subject matter is largely duplicated in existing Aftermath of World War II article. A few bits of sourced text that can be salvaged from this article have already been moved to the Aftermath of World War II article. Some of the graphics/photos may also be salvaged prior to deletion if any. A suggestion has been made to merge it with Aftermath of World War II article, but I believe that's unworkable and not worth the time and effort involved in trying to fix, source and cleanup. Communicat ( talk) 00:45, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:18, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unable to find any reliable sources independent of the subject to verify the contents of the article and establish notability. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. J04n( talk page) 00:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete—there is clear consensus rooted in relevant policies and procedures. — Deckiller ( t- c- l) 02:26, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Apparent conflict of interest - created by a user named after his company and subsequent edits from the company - one claim to WP:notability but nothing other than a regional business award. Few google hits. Not notable. Most references are not WP:reliable sources noq ( talk) 00:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:17, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unable to find any reliable sources to verify the contents of this long-standing unreferenced BLP. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. J04n( talk page) 00:16, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Dwarf Fortress—although there is consensus that this game does not warrant an article, editors are more than welcome to mention this game in the relevant "history" section. — Deckiller ( t- c- l) 02:17, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
I'm revisiting this AfD as suggested in the previous one. This game still seems to be non-notable, and I can't find enough reliable sources to establish any sort of notability. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry ( talk) 00:13, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 15:10, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unable to find reliable sources independent of this artist in order to establish notability this very long standing unreferenced BLP. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:Notability (people). J04n( talk page) 20:16, 23 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 15:10, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This article is such blatant self promotion that notable or not we would be better off deleting it. All the sources cited are book reviews, many of which are from websites that do not appear to be reliable sources. The two major contributors appear to be the author: User:CFOWriter and the publisher Dominic Caruso: User:Dominic in ohio. Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:39, 23 October 2010 (UTC) reply