The result was deleted per G3 as this is very evidently a blatant hoax. — k6ka 🍁 ( Talk · Contributions) 21:57, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Deprodded. Same reason: Possible hoax. Article makes no sense. The dates do not correspond to those of the actual Himyarite Kingdom. The creator's explanation on the talk page makes no sense either. Srnec ( talk) 00:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. I find Rupples's contribution the most persuasive per our poilicies & guidelines, and was not challenged or disproven in any way. Daniel ( talk) 23:10, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Article about a non-notable subject who fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO and WP:ENTERTAINER. Only known for being a housemate in the Big Brother Season 4. They also appeared in a variety of non-notable beauty shows. — Nnadigoodluck ███ 23:36, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:15, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Amateur footballer with no professional football experience, whose only apparent point of notability is having been contracted with Chapecoense at the time of the LaMia Flight 2933 accident (he was not part of the first team squad however), last information about him is being contracted with some Italian Serie D (amateur league) team. I could not find enough proof of WP:GNG via reliable secondary sources, all I could find was passing mentions, transfer reports and similar stuff from minor local media. Angelo ( talk) 23:10, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:34, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Too much of a fringe topic with (mostly) unreliable sources (Journal of Cosmology) DarklitShadow ( talk) 23:08, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:12, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Sanitarium Health and Wellbeing Company#Products. Daniel ( talk) 23:08, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable brand, little substantial coverage. What little information exists on this page can be added to Sanitarium_Health_and_Wellbeing_Company#Products. Mooonswimmer 22:17, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 23:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Totally unsourced article. I already deleted a completely unsourced large potion of "Last year and death" which was mostly about his funeral. Charlie Hodge played no significant role in the music of Elvis Presley. He was a left-over hanger-on from the Army days who lived in the basement at Graceland. He was not a body guard, and had no significant role in the music, except to stand on stage with his own guitar and hand Elvis his water and scarf. The fans loved him, because he was always accessible to them. After the death of Elvis, Charlie took credit for everything and even claimed to have done Elvis' hair and makeup in the coffin (it was actually Larry Geller). — Maile ( talk) 12:23, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:31, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:04, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 21:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
I (obviously) do not have access to archives in Jamaica, but this doesn't sound like a very notable person. I can't find any more sources than those on the page, and it seems to me that we would need more of a biography than apparently exists for this person to meet the GNG. I don't think that being wealthy is enough, but I'm interested to hear why I am wrong if others have a strong !keep argument. JMWt ( talk) 21:17, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:34, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Solid Gold (TV series). If anyone wants to merge one or two sentences, they are welcome to do so from behind the redirects. Daniel ( talk) 23:08, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Holiday episodes of the Solid Gold (TV series) without any significant coverage in reliable sources. No mention in main article to warrant redirect. Fails WP:NEPISODE. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 19:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting.
A Solid Gold Christmas II was PROD'd before so is not eligible for Soft Deletion. Since this is a bundled nomination, I'm relisting the pair of articles.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:32, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to TRT EBA TV. Liz Read! Talk! 08:00, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
There is an article for TRT EBA TV which seems to be the new name Chidgk1 ( talk) 19:08, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:30, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:13, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NFILM, zero reviews found in a BEFORE.
PROD removed by creator, with the justification of adding user reviews from IMdB. I removed those reviews as they are not reliable and do not count toward notability DonaldD23 talk to me 20:37, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:12, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
ill defined
fgnievinski (
talk) 19:34, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
related:
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Order_(information_processing).
fgnievinski (
talk) 04:41, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Electrical grid security in the United States. The arguments to keep have not demonstrated that a standalone article is needed. Vanamonde ( Talk) 17:43, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
I originally intended on creating this page, but decided against it given that power was restored quickly to the area. If this attack had a prolonged effect on Pierce County, that would be a different story (see Moore County substation attack). elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 19:13, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Vanamonde ( Talk) 17:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Season-article without any sources for the season itself The Banner talk 09:33, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
[11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16] and [17]. The Competitions section links two tables to 1994-95 Mexican Primera Division season the subsection results by round or position by round is properly sourced and linked to https://www.rsssf.org/tablesm/mex95.html same applies to subsection Matches. It is not copyviolation due to it does not exist a similar page on RSSSF, there is a Overall page including 259 teams and hundreds of matches. However my article contains only the matches for the club in question and I did not copy from that site and paste over here, I use the info even it is clear is not the same. Also, that information is available on the Wikipedia Spanish version of 1994-95 Mexican Primera Division season and RSSSF states: "You are free to copy this document in whole or part provided that proper acknowledgement is given to the authors. All rights reserved." Acknowledgements properly included. HugoAcosta9 ( talk) 16:55, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
*Keep - nomination is flawed, articles can and do meet GNG - as this one does.The structure of the article only follows the RSSSF.com reference
https://www.rsssf.org/tablesm/mex95.html said that, it aggregates the reference from ESPN about Marcelo Delgado it clearly mentions he played for Cruz Azul during the 94/95 season. The Summary description of the campaign is based from the RSSSF.com link of 1994/95 Mexico Regular season, it clearly shows the path of Cruz Azul, the table for subsection called regular season, the subsection called table Overall season, and the Matches subsection of the article is from the RSSSF.com the same reference and the season 94/95. In an aggregate for this article in Statistics the reference Source:
http://yalma.fime.uanl.mx/~futmx/MFL/Mex95/News/norte29my95b.html it clearly showed the performance of players during the 94/95 season.
HugoAcosta9 (
talk) 14:34, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
*Keep - nomination is flawed, articles can and do meet GNG - as this one does. The structure of the article only follows the RSSSF.com reference
https://www.rsssf.org/tablesm/mex95.html said that, it aggregates the reference from ESPN about Marcelo Delgado it clearly mentions he played for Cruz Azul during the 94/95 season. The Summary description of the campaign is based from the RSSSF.com link of 1994/95 Mexico Regular season, it clearly shows the path of Cruz Azul, the table for subsection called regular season, the subsection called table Overall season, and the Matches subsection of the article is from the RSSSF.com the same reference and the season 94/95. In an aggregate for this article in Statistics the reference Source:
http://yalma.fime.uanl.mx/~futmx/MFL/Mex95/News/norte29my95b.html it clearly showed the performance of players during the 94/95 season.
HugoAcosta9 (
talk) 14:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 12:41, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisted AfD per
DRV
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Barkeep49 (
talk) 17:14, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting per
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 December 6. Note that the "per DRV" in the 28 November relist comment is a different DRV.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
RoySmith
(talk) 18:26, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 20:06, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Can't find any independent and significant coverage about the newspaper in internet. Fails WP:GNG. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️ Let's Talk ! 18:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:24, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 20:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Can't find any independent and significant coverage about the newspaper in internet. Fails WP:GNG. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️ Let's Talk ! 18:14, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:24, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Potentially fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC as I have been unable to locate significant coverage in searches. WP:FPL no longer relevant as WP:NFOOTBALL no longer exists.
Merthyr Town fails to establish notability as SPORTBASIC states team sites are generally not regarded as independent of the subject. The only slightly decent source that I could find was The 72 but this merely confirms his age and that he played two games for Newport - Soccerway could tell you that. Everything else that came up was just a mention in a squad list in local papers. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:12, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 04:30, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Can't find any independent and significant coverage about the newspaper in internet. Fails WP:GNG. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️ Let's Talk ! 18:05, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:09, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Lots of contributions in here which hold little weight due to either a) incorrect or disproven interpretation of policies or guidelines, or b) simple reference to policy or guidelines with no further elucidation, or c) no reference to policies or guidelines whatsoever. I largely discarded these.
I'm put in a position here where I need to evaluate the interaction between Sportsfan 1234 (SF1234) and Seacactus 13 (SC13) regarding who is correct per policy or guidelines. I'm further hampered by my inability to speak the language of the sources. Prima facie I am inclined to agree with SC13 in their comment at 18:08, 9 December 2022 (UTC), as it does not appear to be an unreasonable position to hold but, more importantly, was not responded to or disproven.
Oaktree b's comment is cause for pause, as is the fact — pointed out by Doczilla — that it was deleted back in 2020 and recreated with minimal changes, but ultimately I can't find a consensus in this discussion to delete. I would encourage this article to be renominated at AfD (at any time) by an interested editor, and a full source review analysis conducted to reach consensus on whether the sources discussed between SF1234 and SC13 constitute significant coverage or not. (There is an excellent table which allows the discussion of sources in AfD discussions, but alas, I cannot find it right now.)
Daniel ( talk) 22:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
This project page was nominated for deletion on February 8, 2020. The result of the discussion was delete. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
filelakeshoe (
t /
c)
🐱 17:55, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:05, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. I am unable to find sources about the newspaper in internet. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️ Let's Talk ! 17:50, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:03, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
There is notability tag in the article from February 2013. I am unable to find sources about the newspaper in internet. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️ Let's Talk ! 17:42, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:52, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Argon compounds. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:18, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
No sources at all even mention "Organoargon chemistry". Nothing on Google Scholar or Google Books, or regular Google. Not surprising, even "organoargon" is hardly in use as a term. Not a notable field of chemistry. Fram ( talk) 15:22, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Other organo–argon and organo-silicon molecules derived from the above should be equally stable), two (
Equilibrium structures, vibrational properties, and stabilities of organo-argon compounds), three (
theoretical calculations have discussed the existence of whole families of organo-argon compounds), four (
this study adds to the list of possible organo-argon compounds ... characterized theoretically as well as two new organo-argon molecules). I titled it without the hyphen and as "organoargon chemistry" per the guideline at WP:CHEMGROUP and consistency with the organometallics. Naturally it's a fairly new and small field, since its subject did not experimentally exist till this century. An alternative might be to merge it into Argon compounds, but that is already quite long. Double sharp ( talk) 15:27, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Thus, FArCCH is a gateway to a whole family of molecules, to organo-argon chemistry.It's not a neologism. We may argue about the hyphen, but Google gives a hit to Lomonosov State University for the hyphenless form: the quote Google shows me (I can't access the site for some reason) is
(4) theoretical analysis of stability and development of experimental approaches to synthesis of organoargon compounds (molecules with H-Ar-C- fragment). Double sharp ( talk) 15:39, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Thus, FArCCH is a gateway to a whole family of molecules, to organo-argon chemistry.Double sharp ( talk) 15:47, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
More generally, the experimental evidence (Figure 1) in conjunction with the theoretical data (Figure 2) is clear proof for the existence of the metastable ArCF22+ dication, a new kind of organo-argon species in the gas phase.This is perhaps somewhat wishful wording considering that ions are not bottlable, but it shows that a group working on this is happy to consider cations as part of the organoargon umbrella. Double sharp ( talk) 07:07, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I'm no expert on chemistry so reading through all of the comments, I can't decipher whether the consensus is to Keep or Merge to
Argon compounds. There does seem to be consensus that this article content shouldn't be deleted but debate continues on its destination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:44, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Root locus#Angle condition. Liz Read! Talk! 07:13, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Non sensical; tagged since 2016; non specific title, since "angle condition" can be used in many applications of geometry. D.Lazard ( talk) 15:13, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
18:28, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:39, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nobody appears to be arguing that this is currently notable, and absent any intent to work on a draft, the argument to draftify is weak. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:17, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
It's all about launch & Event based news. Fails WP:NCORP Lordofhunter ( talk) 13:17, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:38, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. No significant advancements have been made on the rename target since the relist, so WP:RM is the way to go. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Does not exist Chidgk1 ( talk) 10:47, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I believe there is a consensus to Keep but also Rename with several options mentioned. While this is typically discussed on the article talk page, I'm going to relist this discussion for a week because I fear after this discussion is closed, interested editors will just move on to the next article. So, over the next few days, let's see if we can come to a consensus on either an appropriate rename or whether the content should be Merged and, if so, where.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:32, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
There is not in fact a kind of bicycle known as an Islamic bicycle
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:14, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFILM 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:55, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk) 17:27, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:24, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
citations 1 and 3 subject was not lead or co-lead author. Should be resubmitted to properly represent subject as in computing.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hooploop23k ( talk • contribs) 20:51, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion was not properly transcluded to the log until now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
* Pppery *
it has begun... 17:02, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello all. I’m the subject of this article and have also requested deletion in the past. This article has also been requested for deletion a number of times by the original author. I would be more than happy to see this page simply go away so y’all can focus on properly notable humans in the encyclopedia.
(Also sorry if I messed up this comment, I have no idea how this works, but wanted to add a little color.
All the best,
J. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrCuff ( talk • contribs) 17:24, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Randykitty ( talk) 17:16, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
I don't know who created this entry, but this entry is full of mistakes! First, you can't find any information about Su-Fei-Erh or 苏菲尔 on Chinese Internet, whether on simplified Chinese or traditional Chinese Internet. So I tried to search from the official history book of Song Dynasty called History of Song which was compiled under the direction of First Minister Toqto'a and Prime Minister Alutu. Guess what I have found? NOT ANY INFORMATION ABOUT SO CALLED SU FEI-ERH IS RECORDED IN THIS BOOK! Therefore , I continued to read this entry, tried to find more information. And I've found that more mistakes than I've expected!
The Song Dynasty hired Muslim warriors from Bukhara to fight against Khitan nomads. 5,300 Muslim men from Bukhara were encouraged and invited to move to China in 1070 by the Song emperor Shenzong to help battle the Liao empire in the northeast and repopulate areas ravaged by fighting.[2] The emperor hired these men as mercenaries in his campaign against the Liao empire. Later on these men were settled between the Sung capital of Kaifeng and Yenching (modern day Beijing). China's northern and northeastern provinces were settled by Muslims in 1080 when 10,000 more Muslims were invited into China."
Many of Su fei-erh's descendants have wielded political power and prestige from the 12th century to the 19th century. One of the sons of Su fei-erh was appointed governor of Shandong while a grandson called Shams Shah was given the title of "Protector of the Tatars". Kamal al-Din, a great grandson, was made commander-in-chief of the army under Emperor Gaozong. In turn, Kamal's son Mahmud served as governor of Yunnan and Shaanxi. Further descendants were also appointed into high positions within the Song dynasty."
All the articles this page has cited have no relation with so called Su Fei-Erh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axel Shen ( talk • contribs) 21:51, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was AfD nom withdrawn and article merged.. Randykitty ( talk) 16:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Relies nearly exclusively on primary sources. Fails WP:GNG. Merge content into new section in New England Collegiate Baseball League. – Aidan721 ( talk) 15:55, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 16:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable executive/civil servant. Mooonswimmer 15:41, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Randykitty ( talk) 16:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Not even having reliable coverages, notability is too far. Lordofhunter ( talk) 15:19, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
"In depth" means that there is more than a passing mention or entry in a list or directory. Generally speaking, if there is two or more paragraphs about the subject then the coverage is considered in-depth.
At the present time, the general notability guideline provides inadequate guidance as to what level of coverage is significant. The example presently offered (a large book) should obviously not be taken as a minimum standard for significant coverage, as most topics that meet this criterion have not had entire books written about them.
It is therefore suggested that one hundred non-repetitious words, written in more or less continuous prose, in one or more sources, is clearly significant coverage in all cases. This figure is, however, only suggested as a maximum. Fifty such words would likely be significant.
— Grand'mere Eugene ( talk) 18:04, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. If the subject has not been covered outside of Wikipedia, no amount of improvements to the Wikipedia content will suddenly make the subject notable. Conversely, if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within a Wikipedia article will not decrease the subject's notability.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lakota Tech High School | primary source | ok for verifiability only | subject of article | ✘ No |
Multiple Native American schools opt to cancel or suspend fall sports; All Nations pushed to spring | Independent news source | Print news source, AGF fact-checking | Only 3 passing mentions | ✘ No |
South Dakota, Oglala Lakota schools to construct first public high school on Pine Ridge | Independent news source | Print news source, AGF fact-checking | 9 paragraphs, 264 words, Wikipedia:One hundred words | ✔ Yes |
Work continues in constructing Oglala Lakota County high school | Combination of interviews, historical information | Broadcast news source | 11 paragraphs, 288 words | ✔ Yes |
State, Oglala Lakota school district agree to build high school on Pine Ridge Reservation | Combination of interviews, historical information, not affiliated with subject | Print news source | 9 paragraphs, 268 words | ✔ Yes |
Schools Start Soon | Not affiliated with subject | Local print source | value not understood Article about district schools, 1 paragraph + part of a sentence, 121 words | ? Unknown |
Lakota Tech registration begins but district’s back to school plan is "work in progress" | Not affiliated with subject | Video news source | Article about school's opening, 587 words | ✔ Yes |
Lakota Tech High School finishes first year | Not affiliated with subject | Video news source | Quotes faculty, students, school district admin, 571 words | ✔ Yes |
First-year Lakota Tech hoops enjoying the benefits of transfers across the Pine Ridge Reservation | Not affiliated with subject | Print news source | In-depth coverage of basketball team's development in first year; 1,354 words. | ✔ Yes |
Talented gathering continued at Lakota (Listed on talk page, WP:CONTN | Not affiliated with subject | Print news source | In-depth coverage of basketball team; 577 words | ✔ Yes |
|
Not affiliated with subject | Print news source | Scholarship awarded to school; 226 words | ✔ Yes |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 16:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable company Mooonswimmer 14:42, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Randykitty ( talk) 16:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NLIST. Promotional ("The alphabetical listing below is expected to aid teachers, researchers, and learners in easily making an informed decision about their desired tertiary institutions in the State."). Bbb23 ( talk) 14:13, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 16:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Was AfD'd back in 2007, nothing has changed since then, (since he was dead). Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 13:48, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 16:18, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
I appreciate that this footballer is still quite young, but he doesn't seem to be notable just yet. I have done an extensive WP:BEFORE, which includes an Indonesian source search. Best sources found were Goal, Bolasport and Bola. All of these were mere mentions in a squad list. I could not find any indication of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. Please note that playing in an WP:FPL is no longer enough per WP:NSPORTS2022. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:07, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2014 FIFA World Cup#Awards. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🎉 ( HAPPY 2023) 12:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Nothing on this list can't be (or isn't already included) in the main 2014 FIFA World Cup article.
There are two pieces of WP:INDISCRIMINATE information - man of the match and "goal of the tournament" awards that have no sporting merit and are decided by a spectator poll.
In short, WP:NOTSTATS, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:NLIST and the main article is not large enough to warrant a WP:SPLIT Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 12:11, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 16:13, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't satisfy WP:BIO as a BBC radio producer. Clarityfiend ( talk) 10:47, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Palawan#Education. Liz Read! Talk! 08:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSCHOOL. A quick WP:BEFORE search led to no avail. Mere mentions from directories and news reports won't satisfy WP:SIGCOV. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 09:42, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tagbilaran#Education. Liz Read! Talk! 08:31, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSCHOOL. A quick WP:BEFORE search led to no avail. Mere mentions from directories and news reports won't satisfy WP:SIGCOV. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 09:41, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Digos#Education. Liz Read! Talk! 08:29, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSCHOOL. A quick WP:BEFORE search led to no avail. Mere mentions from directories and news reports won't satisfy WP:SIGCOV. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 09:37, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Dasmariñas#Education. Liz Read! Talk! 08:28, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSCHOOL. A quick WP:BEFORE search led to no avail. Mere mentions from directories won't satisfy WP:SIGCOV. No hits on Google News. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 09:34, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to General Santos#Education. Liz Read! Talk! 08:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSCHOOL. A quick WP:BEFORE search led to no avail. Mere mentions from directories won't satisfy WP:SIGCOV. No hits on Google News. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 09:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2012 European Trophy. Liz Read! Talk! 04:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
No references. Some duplicate info. Merge rest to 2012 European Trophy. – Aidan721 ( talk) 04:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 03:35, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, not enough notability. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 03:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. I did a WP:BEFORE and found a review from Radio Times. Needs one more review or significant reliable source to pass NFO, NFSOURCES and WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator ( talk) 03:04, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Keep: I have striked my "Delete" since reliable sources have been provided to satisfy WP:GNG Mike Allen
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:07, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Can't find much that proves notability. Onegreatjoke ( talk) 03:02, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. The history may be restored on request if a viable merge or redirect target is identified. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:30, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. Article was previously deleted in November 2016 and was recreated about eight months later in July 2017. The sources in the article are still not enough to meet WP:GNG and since the distro is now discontinued it is unlikely to get additional coverage in the future. Sources in the article amount to primary non-independent sources and blogs, none of which contribute to the notability of the subject, and I couldn't find anything online showing notability. GBooks and Scholar show absolutely nothing either. Aoidh ( talk) 16:10, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
KSAWikipedian (
talk) 07:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist to see if there are any other possible Redirect or Merge targets as that is result some participants want but there hasn't been a viable target identified yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:41, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 02:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable video game – no evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources. Only the game's page on Steam [46] (not independent) and a couple of reviews on blogs (not reliable) appear to exist, which is not enough to sustain an article. I should also note that I removed a game synopsis from the article as an apparent copyright violation of the game's page on Steam. Complex/ Rational 02:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2022–23 Grand Prix of Figure Skating Final#Junior. as an ATD, similar to what happened with his skating partner. Liz Read! Talk! 00:44, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Was deprodded with the rationale, "Baram does meet notability guidelines according to WP:NSKATE. However, like his skating partner, he is an ISU Junior Grand Prix Final medalist." However, NSKATE says, in reference to Junior skaters, "Have won a medal at an international senior-level event or the World Junior Figure Skating Championships". In looking at World Junior Figure Skating Championships, that does not appear to be the same thing as the ISU Junior Grand Prix. Therefore, meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NSKATE. If those two article regarding the World Juniors and Junior Grand Prix are actually duplicate articles, please ping me and I'll speedily close this. Onel5969 TT me 02:34, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 02:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:29, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2022–23 Grand Prix of Figure Skating Final#Junior. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 00:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Was deprodded with the rationale, "Baram does meet notability guidelines according to WP:NSKATE. She is an ISU Junior Grand Prix Final medalist." However, NSKATE says, in reference to Junior skaters, "Have won a medal at an international senior-level event or the World Junior Figure Skating Championships". In looking at World Junior Figure Skating Championships, that does not appear to be the same thing as the ISU Junior Grand Prix. Therefore, meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NSKATE. If those two article regarding the World Juniors and Junior Grand Prix are actually duplicate articles, please ping me and I'll speedily close this. Onel5969 TT me 02:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 02:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:28, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:40, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, with all but one source being either not independent, interviews, or a WP:SIGCOV fail. A PROD nomination was contested by page author. JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs) 00:16, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:39, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, with the only source being a WP:SIGCOV fail. A PROD nomination was contested by article creator. JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs) 00:11, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was deleted per G3 as this is very evidently a blatant hoax. — k6ka 🍁 ( Talk · Contributions) 21:57, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Deprodded. Same reason: Possible hoax. Article makes no sense. The dates do not correspond to those of the actual Himyarite Kingdom. The creator's explanation on the talk page makes no sense either. Srnec ( talk) 00:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. I find Rupples's contribution the most persuasive per our poilicies & guidelines, and was not challenged or disproven in any way. Daniel ( talk) 23:10, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Article about a non-notable subject who fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO and WP:ENTERTAINER. Only known for being a housemate in the Big Brother Season 4. They also appeared in a variety of non-notable beauty shows. — Nnadigoodluck ███ 23:36, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:15, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Amateur footballer with no professional football experience, whose only apparent point of notability is having been contracted with Chapecoense at the time of the LaMia Flight 2933 accident (he was not part of the first team squad however), last information about him is being contracted with some Italian Serie D (amateur league) team. I could not find enough proof of WP:GNG via reliable secondary sources, all I could find was passing mentions, transfer reports and similar stuff from minor local media. Angelo ( talk) 23:10, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:34, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Too much of a fringe topic with (mostly) unreliable sources (Journal of Cosmology) DarklitShadow ( talk) 23:08, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:12, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Sanitarium Health and Wellbeing Company#Products. Daniel ( talk) 23:08, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable brand, little substantial coverage. What little information exists on this page can be added to Sanitarium_Health_and_Wellbeing_Company#Products. Mooonswimmer 22:17, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 23:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Totally unsourced article. I already deleted a completely unsourced large potion of "Last year and death" which was mostly about his funeral. Charlie Hodge played no significant role in the music of Elvis Presley. He was a left-over hanger-on from the Army days who lived in the basement at Graceland. He was not a body guard, and had no significant role in the music, except to stand on stage with his own guitar and hand Elvis his water and scarf. The fans loved him, because he was always accessible to them. After the death of Elvis, Charlie took credit for everything and even claimed to have done Elvis' hair and makeup in the coffin (it was actually Larry Geller). — Maile ( talk) 12:23, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:31, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:04, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 21:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
I (obviously) do not have access to archives in Jamaica, but this doesn't sound like a very notable person. I can't find any more sources than those on the page, and it seems to me that we would need more of a biography than apparently exists for this person to meet the GNG. I don't think that being wealthy is enough, but I'm interested to hear why I am wrong if others have a strong !keep argument. JMWt ( talk) 21:17, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:34, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Solid Gold (TV series). If anyone wants to merge one or two sentences, they are welcome to do so from behind the redirects. Daniel ( talk) 23:08, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Holiday episodes of the Solid Gold (TV series) without any significant coverage in reliable sources. No mention in main article to warrant redirect. Fails WP:NEPISODE. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 19:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting.
A Solid Gold Christmas II was PROD'd before so is not eligible for Soft Deletion. Since this is a bundled nomination, I'm relisting the pair of articles.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:32, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to TRT EBA TV. Liz Read! Talk! 08:00, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
There is an article for TRT EBA TV which seems to be the new name Chidgk1 ( talk) 19:08, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:30, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:13, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NFILM, zero reviews found in a BEFORE.
PROD removed by creator, with the justification of adding user reviews from IMdB. I removed those reviews as they are not reliable and do not count toward notability DonaldD23 talk to me 20:37, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:12, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
ill defined
fgnievinski (
talk) 19:34, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
related:
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Order_(information_processing).
fgnievinski (
talk) 04:41, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Electrical grid security in the United States. The arguments to keep have not demonstrated that a standalone article is needed. Vanamonde ( Talk) 17:43, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
I originally intended on creating this page, but decided against it given that power was restored quickly to the area. If this attack had a prolonged effect on Pierce County, that would be a different story (see Moore County substation attack). elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 19:13, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Vanamonde ( Talk) 17:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Season-article without any sources for the season itself The Banner talk 09:33, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
[11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16] and [17]. The Competitions section links two tables to 1994-95 Mexican Primera Division season the subsection results by round or position by round is properly sourced and linked to https://www.rsssf.org/tablesm/mex95.html same applies to subsection Matches. It is not copyviolation due to it does not exist a similar page on RSSSF, there is a Overall page including 259 teams and hundreds of matches. However my article contains only the matches for the club in question and I did not copy from that site and paste over here, I use the info even it is clear is not the same. Also, that information is available on the Wikipedia Spanish version of 1994-95 Mexican Primera Division season and RSSSF states: "You are free to copy this document in whole or part provided that proper acknowledgement is given to the authors. All rights reserved." Acknowledgements properly included. HugoAcosta9 ( talk) 16:55, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
*Keep - nomination is flawed, articles can and do meet GNG - as this one does.The structure of the article only follows the RSSSF.com reference
https://www.rsssf.org/tablesm/mex95.html said that, it aggregates the reference from ESPN about Marcelo Delgado it clearly mentions he played for Cruz Azul during the 94/95 season. The Summary description of the campaign is based from the RSSSF.com link of 1994/95 Mexico Regular season, it clearly shows the path of Cruz Azul, the table for subsection called regular season, the subsection called table Overall season, and the Matches subsection of the article is from the RSSSF.com the same reference and the season 94/95. In an aggregate for this article in Statistics the reference Source:
http://yalma.fime.uanl.mx/~futmx/MFL/Mex95/News/norte29my95b.html it clearly showed the performance of players during the 94/95 season.
HugoAcosta9 (
talk) 14:34, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
*Keep - nomination is flawed, articles can and do meet GNG - as this one does. The structure of the article only follows the RSSSF.com reference
https://www.rsssf.org/tablesm/mex95.html said that, it aggregates the reference from ESPN about Marcelo Delgado it clearly mentions he played for Cruz Azul during the 94/95 season. The Summary description of the campaign is based from the RSSSF.com link of 1994/95 Mexico Regular season, it clearly shows the path of Cruz Azul, the table for subsection called regular season, the subsection called table Overall season, and the Matches subsection of the article is from the RSSSF.com the same reference and the season 94/95. In an aggregate for this article in Statistics the reference Source:
http://yalma.fime.uanl.mx/~futmx/MFL/Mex95/News/norte29my95b.html it clearly showed the performance of players during the 94/95 season.
HugoAcosta9 (
talk) 14:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 12:41, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisted AfD per
DRV
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Barkeep49 (
talk) 17:14, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting per
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 December 6. Note that the "per DRV" in the 28 November relist comment is a different DRV.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
RoySmith
(talk) 18:26, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 20:06, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Can't find any independent and significant coverage about the newspaper in internet. Fails WP:GNG. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️ Let's Talk ! 18:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:24, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 20:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Can't find any independent and significant coverage about the newspaper in internet. Fails WP:GNG. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️ Let's Talk ! 18:14, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:24, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Potentially fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC as I have been unable to locate significant coverage in searches. WP:FPL no longer relevant as WP:NFOOTBALL no longer exists.
Merthyr Town fails to establish notability as SPORTBASIC states team sites are generally not regarded as independent of the subject. The only slightly decent source that I could find was The 72 but this merely confirms his age and that he played two games for Newport - Soccerway could tell you that. Everything else that came up was just a mention in a squad list in local papers. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:12, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 04:30, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Can't find any independent and significant coverage about the newspaper in internet. Fails WP:GNG. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️ Let's Talk ! 18:05, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:09, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Lots of contributions in here which hold little weight due to either a) incorrect or disproven interpretation of policies or guidelines, or b) simple reference to policy or guidelines with no further elucidation, or c) no reference to policies or guidelines whatsoever. I largely discarded these.
I'm put in a position here where I need to evaluate the interaction between Sportsfan 1234 (SF1234) and Seacactus 13 (SC13) regarding who is correct per policy or guidelines. I'm further hampered by my inability to speak the language of the sources. Prima facie I am inclined to agree with SC13 in their comment at 18:08, 9 December 2022 (UTC), as it does not appear to be an unreasonable position to hold but, more importantly, was not responded to or disproven.
Oaktree b's comment is cause for pause, as is the fact — pointed out by Doczilla — that it was deleted back in 2020 and recreated with minimal changes, but ultimately I can't find a consensus in this discussion to delete. I would encourage this article to be renominated at AfD (at any time) by an interested editor, and a full source review analysis conducted to reach consensus on whether the sources discussed between SF1234 and SC13 constitute significant coverage or not. (There is an excellent table which allows the discussion of sources in AfD discussions, but alas, I cannot find it right now.)
Daniel ( talk) 22:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
This project page was nominated for deletion on February 8, 2020. The result of the discussion was delete. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
filelakeshoe (
t /
c)
🐱 17:55, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:05, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. I am unable to find sources about the newspaper in internet. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️ Let's Talk ! 17:50, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:03, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
There is notability tag in the article from February 2013. I am unable to find sources about the newspaper in internet. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️ Let's Talk ! 17:42, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:52, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Argon compounds. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:18, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
No sources at all even mention "Organoargon chemistry". Nothing on Google Scholar or Google Books, or regular Google. Not surprising, even "organoargon" is hardly in use as a term. Not a notable field of chemistry. Fram ( talk) 15:22, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Other organo–argon and organo-silicon molecules derived from the above should be equally stable), two (
Equilibrium structures, vibrational properties, and stabilities of organo-argon compounds), three (
theoretical calculations have discussed the existence of whole families of organo-argon compounds), four (
this study adds to the list of possible organo-argon compounds ... characterized theoretically as well as two new organo-argon molecules). I titled it without the hyphen and as "organoargon chemistry" per the guideline at WP:CHEMGROUP and consistency with the organometallics. Naturally it's a fairly new and small field, since its subject did not experimentally exist till this century. An alternative might be to merge it into Argon compounds, but that is already quite long. Double sharp ( talk) 15:27, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Thus, FArCCH is a gateway to a whole family of molecules, to organo-argon chemistry.It's not a neologism. We may argue about the hyphen, but Google gives a hit to Lomonosov State University for the hyphenless form: the quote Google shows me (I can't access the site for some reason) is
(4) theoretical analysis of stability and development of experimental approaches to synthesis of organoargon compounds (molecules with H-Ar-C- fragment). Double sharp ( talk) 15:39, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Thus, FArCCH is a gateway to a whole family of molecules, to organo-argon chemistry.Double sharp ( talk) 15:47, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
More generally, the experimental evidence (Figure 1) in conjunction with the theoretical data (Figure 2) is clear proof for the existence of the metastable ArCF22+ dication, a new kind of organo-argon species in the gas phase.This is perhaps somewhat wishful wording considering that ions are not bottlable, but it shows that a group working on this is happy to consider cations as part of the organoargon umbrella. Double sharp ( talk) 07:07, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I'm no expert on chemistry so reading through all of the comments, I can't decipher whether the consensus is to Keep or Merge to
Argon compounds. There does seem to be consensus that this article content shouldn't be deleted but debate continues on its destination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:44, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Root locus#Angle condition. Liz Read! Talk! 07:13, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Non sensical; tagged since 2016; non specific title, since "angle condition" can be used in many applications of geometry. D.Lazard ( talk) 15:13, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
18:28, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:39, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nobody appears to be arguing that this is currently notable, and absent any intent to work on a draft, the argument to draftify is weak. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:17, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
It's all about launch & Event based news. Fails WP:NCORP Lordofhunter ( talk) 13:17, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:38, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. No significant advancements have been made on the rename target since the relist, so WP:RM is the way to go. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Does not exist Chidgk1 ( talk) 10:47, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I believe there is a consensus to Keep but also Rename with several options mentioned. While this is typically discussed on the article talk page, I'm going to relist this discussion for a week because I fear after this discussion is closed, interested editors will just move on to the next article. So, over the next few days, let's see if we can come to a consensus on either an appropriate rename or whether the content should be Merged and, if so, where.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:32, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
There is not in fact a kind of bicycle known as an Islamic bicycle
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:14, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFILM 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:55, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk) 17:27, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:24, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
citations 1 and 3 subject was not lead or co-lead author. Should be resubmitted to properly represent subject as in computing.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hooploop23k ( talk • contribs) 20:51, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion was not properly transcluded to the log until now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
* Pppery *
it has begun... 17:02, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello all. I’m the subject of this article and have also requested deletion in the past. This article has also been requested for deletion a number of times by the original author. I would be more than happy to see this page simply go away so y’all can focus on properly notable humans in the encyclopedia.
(Also sorry if I messed up this comment, I have no idea how this works, but wanted to add a little color.
All the best,
J. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrCuff ( talk • contribs) 17:24, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Randykitty ( talk) 17:16, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
I don't know who created this entry, but this entry is full of mistakes! First, you can't find any information about Su-Fei-Erh or 苏菲尔 on Chinese Internet, whether on simplified Chinese or traditional Chinese Internet. So I tried to search from the official history book of Song Dynasty called History of Song which was compiled under the direction of First Minister Toqto'a and Prime Minister Alutu. Guess what I have found? NOT ANY INFORMATION ABOUT SO CALLED SU FEI-ERH IS RECORDED IN THIS BOOK! Therefore , I continued to read this entry, tried to find more information. And I've found that more mistakes than I've expected!
The Song Dynasty hired Muslim warriors from Bukhara to fight against Khitan nomads. 5,300 Muslim men from Bukhara were encouraged and invited to move to China in 1070 by the Song emperor Shenzong to help battle the Liao empire in the northeast and repopulate areas ravaged by fighting.[2] The emperor hired these men as mercenaries in his campaign against the Liao empire. Later on these men were settled between the Sung capital of Kaifeng and Yenching (modern day Beijing). China's northern and northeastern provinces were settled by Muslims in 1080 when 10,000 more Muslims were invited into China."
Many of Su fei-erh's descendants have wielded political power and prestige from the 12th century to the 19th century. One of the sons of Su fei-erh was appointed governor of Shandong while a grandson called Shams Shah was given the title of "Protector of the Tatars". Kamal al-Din, a great grandson, was made commander-in-chief of the army under Emperor Gaozong. In turn, Kamal's son Mahmud served as governor of Yunnan and Shaanxi. Further descendants were also appointed into high positions within the Song dynasty."
All the articles this page has cited have no relation with so called Su Fei-Erh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axel Shen ( talk • contribs) 21:51, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was AfD nom withdrawn and article merged.. Randykitty ( talk) 16:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Relies nearly exclusively on primary sources. Fails WP:GNG. Merge content into new section in New England Collegiate Baseball League. – Aidan721 ( talk) 15:55, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 16:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable executive/civil servant. Mooonswimmer 15:41, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Randykitty ( talk) 16:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Not even having reliable coverages, notability is too far. Lordofhunter ( talk) 15:19, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
"In depth" means that there is more than a passing mention or entry in a list or directory. Generally speaking, if there is two or more paragraphs about the subject then the coverage is considered in-depth.
At the present time, the general notability guideline provides inadequate guidance as to what level of coverage is significant. The example presently offered (a large book) should obviously not be taken as a minimum standard for significant coverage, as most topics that meet this criterion have not had entire books written about them.
It is therefore suggested that one hundred non-repetitious words, written in more or less continuous prose, in one or more sources, is clearly significant coverage in all cases. This figure is, however, only suggested as a maximum. Fifty such words would likely be significant.
— Grand'mere Eugene ( talk) 18:04, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. If the subject has not been covered outside of Wikipedia, no amount of improvements to the Wikipedia content will suddenly make the subject notable. Conversely, if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within a Wikipedia article will not decrease the subject's notability.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lakota Tech High School | primary source | ok for verifiability only | subject of article | ✘ No |
Multiple Native American schools opt to cancel or suspend fall sports; All Nations pushed to spring | Independent news source | Print news source, AGF fact-checking | Only 3 passing mentions | ✘ No |
South Dakota, Oglala Lakota schools to construct first public high school on Pine Ridge | Independent news source | Print news source, AGF fact-checking | 9 paragraphs, 264 words, Wikipedia:One hundred words | ✔ Yes |
Work continues in constructing Oglala Lakota County high school | Combination of interviews, historical information | Broadcast news source | 11 paragraphs, 288 words | ✔ Yes |
State, Oglala Lakota school district agree to build high school on Pine Ridge Reservation | Combination of interviews, historical information, not affiliated with subject | Print news source | 9 paragraphs, 268 words | ✔ Yes |
Schools Start Soon | Not affiliated with subject | Local print source | value not understood Article about district schools, 1 paragraph + part of a sentence, 121 words | ? Unknown |
Lakota Tech registration begins but district’s back to school plan is "work in progress" | Not affiliated with subject | Video news source | Article about school's opening, 587 words | ✔ Yes |
Lakota Tech High School finishes first year | Not affiliated with subject | Video news source | Quotes faculty, students, school district admin, 571 words | ✔ Yes |
First-year Lakota Tech hoops enjoying the benefits of transfers across the Pine Ridge Reservation | Not affiliated with subject | Print news source | In-depth coverage of basketball team's development in first year; 1,354 words. | ✔ Yes |
Talented gathering continued at Lakota (Listed on talk page, WP:CONTN | Not affiliated with subject | Print news source | In-depth coverage of basketball team; 577 words | ✔ Yes |
|
Not affiliated with subject | Print news source | Scholarship awarded to school; 226 words | ✔ Yes |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 16:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable company Mooonswimmer 14:42, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Randykitty ( talk) 16:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NLIST. Promotional ("The alphabetical listing below is expected to aid teachers, researchers, and learners in easily making an informed decision about their desired tertiary institutions in the State."). Bbb23 ( talk) 14:13, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 16:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Was AfD'd back in 2007, nothing has changed since then, (since he was dead). Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 13:48, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 16:18, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
I appreciate that this footballer is still quite young, but he doesn't seem to be notable just yet. I have done an extensive WP:BEFORE, which includes an Indonesian source search. Best sources found were Goal, Bolasport and Bola. All of these were mere mentions in a squad list. I could not find any indication of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. Please note that playing in an WP:FPL is no longer enough per WP:NSPORTS2022. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:07, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2014 FIFA World Cup#Awards. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🎉 ( HAPPY 2023) 12:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Nothing on this list can't be (or isn't already included) in the main 2014 FIFA World Cup article.
There are two pieces of WP:INDISCRIMINATE information - man of the match and "goal of the tournament" awards that have no sporting merit and are decided by a spectator poll.
In short, WP:NOTSTATS, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:NLIST and the main article is not large enough to warrant a WP:SPLIT Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 12:11, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 16:13, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't satisfy WP:BIO as a BBC radio producer. Clarityfiend ( talk) 10:47, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Palawan#Education. Liz Read! Talk! 08:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSCHOOL. A quick WP:BEFORE search led to no avail. Mere mentions from directories and news reports won't satisfy WP:SIGCOV. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 09:42, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tagbilaran#Education. Liz Read! Talk! 08:31, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSCHOOL. A quick WP:BEFORE search led to no avail. Mere mentions from directories and news reports won't satisfy WP:SIGCOV. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 09:41, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Digos#Education. Liz Read! Talk! 08:29, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSCHOOL. A quick WP:BEFORE search led to no avail. Mere mentions from directories and news reports won't satisfy WP:SIGCOV. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 09:37, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Dasmariñas#Education. Liz Read! Talk! 08:28, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSCHOOL. A quick WP:BEFORE search led to no avail. Mere mentions from directories won't satisfy WP:SIGCOV. No hits on Google News. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 09:34, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to General Santos#Education. Liz Read! Talk! 08:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSCHOOL. A quick WP:BEFORE search led to no avail. Mere mentions from directories won't satisfy WP:SIGCOV. No hits on Google News. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 09:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2012 European Trophy. Liz Read! Talk! 04:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
No references. Some duplicate info. Merge rest to 2012 European Trophy. – Aidan721 ( talk) 04:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 03:35, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, not enough notability. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 03:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. I did a WP:BEFORE and found a review from Radio Times. Needs one more review or significant reliable source to pass NFO, NFSOURCES and WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator ( talk) 03:04, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Keep: I have striked my "Delete" since reliable sources have been provided to satisfy WP:GNG Mike Allen
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:07, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Can't find much that proves notability. Onegreatjoke ( talk) 03:02, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. The history may be restored on request if a viable merge or redirect target is identified. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:30, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. Article was previously deleted in November 2016 and was recreated about eight months later in July 2017. The sources in the article are still not enough to meet WP:GNG and since the distro is now discontinued it is unlikely to get additional coverage in the future. Sources in the article amount to primary non-independent sources and blogs, none of which contribute to the notability of the subject, and I couldn't find anything online showing notability. GBooks and Scholar show absolutely nothing either. Aoidh ( talk) 16:10, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
KSAWikipedian (
talk) 07:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist to see if there are any other possible Redirect or Merge targets as that is result some participants want but there hasn't been a viable target identified yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:41, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 02:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable video game – no evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources. Only the game's page on Steam [46] (not independent) and a couple of reviews on blogs (not reliable) appear to exist, which is not enough to sustain an article. I should also note that I removed a game synopsis from the article as an apparent copyright violation of the game's page on Steam. Complex/ Rational 02:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2022–23 Grand Prix of Figure Skating Final#Junior. as an ATD, similar to what happened with his skating partner. Liz Read! Talk! 00:44, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Was deprodded with the rationale, "Baram does meet notability guidelines according to WP:NSKATE. However, like his skating partner, he is an ISU Junior Grand Prix Final medalist." However, NSKATE says, in reference to Junior skaters, "Have won a medal at an international senior-level event or the World Junior Figure Skating Championships". In looking at World Junior Figure Skating Championships, that does not appear to be the same thing as the ISU Junior Grand Prix. Therefore, meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NSKATE. If those two article regarding the World Juniors and Junior Grand Prix are actually duplicate articles, please ping me and I'll speedily close this. Onel5969 TT me 02:34, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 02:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:29, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2022–23 Grand Prix of Figure Skating Final#Junior. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 00:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Was deprodded with the rationale, "Baram does meet notability guidelines according to WP:NSKATE. She is an ISU Junior Grand Prix Final medalist." However, NSKATE says, in reference to Junior skaters, "Have won a medal at an international senior-level event or the World Junior Figure Skating Championships". In looking at World Junior Figure Skating Championships, that does not appear to be the same thing as the ISU Junior Grand Prix. Therefore, meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NSKATE. If those two article regarding the World Juniors and Junior Grand Prix are actually duplicate articles, please ping me and I'll speedily close this. Onel5969 TT me 02:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 02:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:28, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:40, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, with all but one source being either not independent, interviews, or a WP:SIGCOV fail. A PROD nomination was contested by page author. JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs) 00:16, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:39, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, with the only source being a WP:SIGCOV fail. A PROD nomination was contested by article creator. JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs) 00:11, 26 December 2022 (UTC)