![]() |
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of notability under SNG or GNG. Actually no coverage of the actual topic because it does not exist. Just saying the he's going to have an album sometime in 2024 which doesn't even have a name. Coverage of the "album" is just some comments about it. Previously deleted. North8000 ( talk) 23:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:59, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 21:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Nothing of notability in the bands history, additionally many of the references are primary Facebook posts about their band members history etc and I'm unable to find any significant coverage of the band online, outside of some album reviews from smaller blogs. InDimensional ( talk) 23:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
The Stuff article listed as a reference appears to be the only example of WP:SIGCOV for the subject, detailing a junior selection some six years ago. Coverage since consists entirely of databases and routine mentions. At this time does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. Triptothecottage ( talk) 23:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Real Succes Chișinău. Liz Read! Talk! 21:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Moldovan football stadium fails to meet WP:GNG per WP:NSTADIUM. Available sources are WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs, which makes sense, since it's basically just a soccer field. A 150-seat "stadium" is unlikely to have significant coverage in any language's media. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 23:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Malinaccier ( talk) 01:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Renominating this page for deletion, as there was no input from any third party last time (closed as "no consensus").
Motivation from last time still holds:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 05:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 23:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Minor Indian bureaucrate fails WP:GNG, WP:NBIO, WP:NPOL. No meaningful WP:SIGCOV in any sources; coverage cited in article (and found in BEFORE search) is WP:TRIVIALMENTION of him in the course of reporting on local government activities, and much of it is problematic under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 22:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Article is fully promotional, mostly unsourced, and from a quick search I haven't found anything significant about this organisation (just other organisations with the same name). Suntooooth, it/he ( talk/ contribs) 22:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 16:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
An article that doesn't meet WP:ANYBIO, and WP:ENT. It is also good saving that "celebrities may be famous but not notable meeting WP:BASIC." Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 21:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. There seems to be a consensus to delete or draftify the article. Given that it is unlikely anybody will come around to improve the article (given the creator's indefinite block), my sense is that draftifying the article will just result in an abandoned draft. If the creator would like a copy of the article, I would be happy to provide it at any time. Malinaccier ( talk) 02:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
I do not think that this person meets the criteria for notability. I have been unable to find any reference to him other than the The Hindu article ( https://web.archive.org/web/20240317044514/https://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/history-and-culture/the-lawyer-as-a-writer/article4683660.ece), which just effectively said it was nice to read. And cryptic metadata from library websites who happen to have the book (which seems to just be stanford and nyu https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/in00000071311 ) Mason ( talk) 02:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Note to Closer. Page was created by
sockpuppet and is good for
WP:G5 speedy deletion.
RangersRus (
talk) 12:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as opinion is divided. Just FYI, a general comment for all AFDs, when an editor says "seems like" or "likely" or "appears to be" it means to me that the editor hasn't read or seen the sources and are basing their opinion on attributes like the title or the publisher. If that's the case, it's good not to have an absolutist opinion on what should happen with an article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk) 20:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear.
BD2412
T 04:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
We do not cover schools cricket, unless historically notable, which this is not. Fails WP:GNG, WP:EVENT, WP:NCRIC/ WP:OFFCRIC. AA ( talk) 18:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough in-depth coverage of the subject, an Italian rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. All I found were transactional announcements with routine coverage ( 1, 2, 3, 4) JTtheOG ( talk) 18:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of South Africa national rugby sevens players. Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Malinaccier ( talk) 19:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
This person clearly does meet WP:Notability (people)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gloern ( talk • contribs) 16:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 04:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Article subject is a home-made projectile featured in a youtube video. This was picked up in brief articles by HuffPost and Wired during the moral panic about 3D printed guns. However, there is no WP:SUSTAINED or significant coverage other than these two brief, WP:ONE EVENT silly-season articles.
On closer inspection, the 3D printed slugs are just cylinders with a pointy end which could just as easily be carved from a length of plastic, so there's no novel or meritorious engineering involved either (i.e. unlikely to be further papers or coverage beyond what is already linked. A search turned up nothing new) - this article is just about a guy sticking a lump of (quite expensive, laboriously printed) plastic onto the front of a commercially-bought shotgun cartridge and posting it on youtube for lols. Does not satisfy WP:GNG. Hemmers ( talk) 15:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as the article has already been PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to WXXA-TV. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 16:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 16:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Just relisting to be sure about Merge target article
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NTEAM because of a lack of coverage from RS. Let'srun ( talk) 17:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Complex/ Rational 21:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:39, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear.
BD2412
T 03:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Requested at WP:AN, listed as a courtesy. User:62.165.250.83, please add your deletion rationale below. Jip Orlando ( talk) 16:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Completely fails WP:GNG, WP:NCOMPANY, may even be considered an ad. - 62.165.250.83 ( talk) 14:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malinaccier ( talk) 18:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Reliant entirely on primary sources/no evidence of notability. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft redirect to Chukchi people based on limited participation. Malinaccier ( talk) 18:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. A possible alternative to deletion is a merge/redirect to Chukchi people. toweli ( talk) 16:24, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programmes broadcast by Nickelodeon (India)#Animated Series. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. M S Hassan ( talk) 16:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a mayor, not
properly sourced as passing inclusion criteria for mayors. As always, mayors are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to pass
WP:NPOL #2 -- where the inclusion test hinges not on simple verification of her existence, but on the ability to show a depth and range and volume of
reliable source coverage that enables us to write a substantive article about her political impact: specific things she did, specific projects she spearheaded, specific effects her mayoralty had on the development of the city, and on and so forth.
But this is of the "she is a mayor who exists, so here's some unsourced background information about her educational and pre-political career credentials" variety with absolutely none of the content about her mayoralty that we require, and is "referenced" solely to her
primary source profile on the
self-published website of the city council, which is not a notability-building source.
No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write and source something more substantive and better-sourced than this, but just using the city government's own website to prove that she exists is not how you get a mayor over the wikibar.
Bearcat (
talk) 16:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 15:58, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Completely uncoursed, fails WP:NPLACE as I could not find any reliable sources or indication of legal recognition. Hence this appears like mostly WP:ORIGINAL research. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I could not find any sources whatsoever, failing WP:GNG. Could be redirected to Govigama, but since there is no coverage of the Pamunu people, I don't see why this should be done. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 17:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I believe this article about a book fails general notability and book notability. Of the cited sources, The first is simply a Google Books page nad the second only has a trivial mention of the book on the 6th page. The third article [17] is a promotional article written by the author of the book, which according to WP:BKCRIT doesn't count for notability. Searching the internet for more coverage has turned up nothing but more trivial mentions. GranCavallo ( talk) 14:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
SourcesA book is presumed notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the following criteria:
- The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This can include published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists, and reviews. This excludes media re-prints of press releases, flap copy, or other publications where the author, its publisher, agent, or other self-interested parties advertise or speak about the book.
The review notes: ""Justice Waits: The UC Davis Sweetheart Murders" is Davis' story of the murders and their aftermath, a meticulously researched and highly readable account that tracks the lives of the victims and their familes, the almost Keystone Cops-like investigations that followed and what the Riggins and Gonsalves families hope will be the final chapter. ... A preliminary hearing to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to hold Hirschfield for trial is not scheduled until May. In this most gripping of true-crime stories, Davis concluded that while there may now be answers - brutal and nightmarish ones - there is no closure. Justice still waits."
The review notes: ""Justice Waits: The UC Davis Sweetheart Murders" ($24.95 in hardcover from Callister Press) is gripping and gutsy reportage about the crimes and the subsequent missteps in the investigation and how Davis himself has become part of the story. ... The book is frankly critical of some of the investigators and Davis acknowledges that he has made more than a few people angry with his pursuit of the case. But Davis is convinced that Riggins and Gonsalves, all these years later, deserve the justice that has so far eluded them. The story he tells is harrowing, and the end is not yet in sight."
The article notes: "The result is "Justice Waits: The UC Davis Sweetheart Murders" (Callister Press, $24.95, 220 pages), published late last year, just weeks before the 25th anniversary of the deaths of Riggins and Gonsalves. ... In 2000, he decided to turn his curiosity into a book project. He never dreamed it would take five years to finish. By the time Davis began his research, the case had gone ice cold. The journalist dug through court and police records, interviewed family members and friends of the victims, tracked down old suspects and confronted detectives and district attorneys, over and over, with questions about their investigation."
The review notes: "Joel Davis' book, "Justice Waits: The UC Davis Sweetheart Murders" intrigued me for three reasons. First, it sparked memories of what I would refer to as the serial-murder era in the late '70s and early '80s, when it seemed as if every few months there was a random crime spree, which then took forever to solve."
The article notes: "Twice Davis had to pull "Justice Waits: The UC Davis Sweetheart Murders" back from Callister Press when new information surfaced. Six months after publication he's pounding out a second edition and updating the story weekly on his Web site, justicewaits.com."
The article notes: " Davis' "Justice Waits: The UC Davis Sweetheart Murders," is now in its third printing. The book chronicles the murder case of UC Davis sweethearts John Riggins and Sabrina Gonsalves. Davis is writing an epilogue based on the recent preliminary hearing of murder suspect Richard Hirschfield, who in March was bound over for trial for the gruesome 1980 murders."
The article notes: ""Justice Waits: The UC Davis Sweetheart Murders" (Callister Press; $24.95) finally saw publication last month, culminating a five-year process during which Davis chased down dusty, forgotten court documents, interviewed dozens of players in the case and, at the same time, waged his own personal battle with Parkinson's disease."
The article notes: "His book project started as a yearlong reinvestigation into the murders and quickly turned into five years of searching through old court documents, chasing down investigators who had worked on the case, interviewing dozens of people and eventually becoming a crucial part of the story himself."
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 14:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
$5000 tournament at bwf international level which doesn't meet the notability criteria WP:GNG, WP:NSPORTS and WP:NBAD. The only notable ones which get enough coverage in notable websites are World Tour tournaments.
Moreover the tournament winners are already mentioned here in Austrian International page as each of those editions can't be created on their own due to notability issue. zoglophie •talk• 08:34, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 12:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
An unsourced nothing. There was a bit more in it, none of it sourced, which I removed. I'm not good at WP:BEFORE, but I couldn't even find a website for the company, just lots of other websites selling their stuff. Bbb23 ( talk) 13:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of mayors of Galway. ✗ plicit 14:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
There was a discussion in 2011, but I think views on this generally may have developed. The sources don’t indicate WP:GNG and WP:NPOL/ WP:NSUBPOL. Iveagh Gardens ( talk) 13:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails the general notability guideline with no significant coverage, barely any secondary sources with not much verifiability since the accident lacks sustained continued coverage, which in turn also fails WP:EVENTCRIT. The accident has not demonstrated any lasting effects with a lack of in-depth coverage. Aviationwikiflight ( talk) 13:23, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was deleted per WP:G3. . (non-admin closure) Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Declined and rejected at WP:AFC it fails WP:NSCHOOL. Theroadislong ( talk) 13:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 16:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; some references are dead links. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 12:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:58, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 12:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Musk (disambiguation)#People. ✗ plicit 14:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Request to turn into Redirect to Musk (Disambiguation).
Article fails to demonstrate the notability of the "Musk Family" as an organisation or group, instead it is clearly serving as little more than a duplication of the existing disambiguation page. The short history section may have reliable sourcing but it is very blatantly written in terms of only Elon Musk and no-one else, and looks to be a cut down version of what's on his article's page which arguably evidences the lack of notability of the family as a whole.
Therefore the page should be turned into a redirect to the Disambiguation page until such a time noteworthiness of the family is established. Rambling Rambler ( talk) 12:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
This article should have never existed, it's an embarrassment. There is nothing notable about the Musk family besides Elon. 101.98.188.156 ( talk) 21:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Marilyn Manson#Art. Owen× ☎ 11:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. The article presently only links to fan webpages, with the exception of one brief article in Greek. toweli ( talk) 11:40, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear.
BD2412
T 02:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
This candidate has not achieved general notability. The one reference here to a national newspaper (article on Michael Healy-Rae visiting a mosque) doesn’t mention Keane. Otherwise, I don’t see that mentions of Keane in Radio Kerry, satisfy WP:NPOL or WP:SIGCOV. Most local election candidates could muster up some passing mention in local press. Iveagh Gardens ( talk) 10:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator and with consensus of participants.( non-admin closure) (non-admin closure) ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:36, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced and non-notable. No WP:RS that I can find. — Iadmc ♫ talk 09:48, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Promotion (e.g. ISO 27001 Certification and Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Certificate...) no sources to meet NCORP BoraVoro ( talk) 08:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 08:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
No independent reliable coverage to meet GNG /NCORP BoraVoro ( talk) 08:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 08:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 16:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Notability/usefulness not demonstrated. Just a list of licenses of softwares. Greatder ( talk) 07:48, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability.Why? I Ask ( talk) 16:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 08:28, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Ostensibly a team in a sailing competition, or possibly two unrelated teams of the same name. Not notable, no independent references, some of this is indistinguishable from vandalism. Walsh90210 ( talk) 07:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NASTRO, isn't present on the NGC catalog or any other notable catalog, I couldn't find any information on the web either. WxTrinity ( talk to me!) 05:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet GNG. Heartfox ( talk) 04:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Similar to the prior discussion in 2012. Malinaccier ( talk) 18:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Nothing has substantially improved, and the issue is still that this a list of trivia. Indeed, having looked up Loose Cannons by Graeme Donald, which was cited in the last discussion, I find that its subtitle is "101 Myths, Mishaps, And Misadventures Of Military History". In other words, it is a book of military trivia, and I note that Mental Floss is cited in the article. The whole premise is questionable, particularly in these days of mostly undeclared warfare, and the inclusion criteria don't match the members. Mangoe ( talk) 05:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, already brought to AFD so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 03:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
a renaming of the article (and) a clear definition of scopewould still be helpful. But these "ceremonial unofficial peace treaties" do seem to be discussed enough to be in a list article. Walsh90210 ( talk) 07:10, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programmes broadcast by Hungama TV#Animated series. Owen× ☎ 11:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't pass WP:GNG. M S Hassan ( talk) 04:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Self-authored Wikipedia about a non-notable musician. Half of the references on the page don't even mention him, and the ones that do only make a single passing mention of his involvement in some non-notable experimental indie band. The only substantial and reliable source I can find talking about him in any depth is this but, other than that, crickets. Elspamo4 ( talk) 03:46, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Notability and quality issues. The article was created by a single-purpose account in 2009. None of the content is sourced, the "general" references are generally about "assistive technology" or are by MJ Scherer, the creator of this model. Google Scholar has about 3 results not associated with Scherer, which use this as background.
None of the current content should be merged to assistive technology, so I have not unilaterally redirected the article. However, if there is sourced content to include there, I am not opposed to that redirect. Walsh90210 ( talk) 22:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NCORP - coverage seems to be routine at best with a few promotional pieces thrown in. Jellyfish (mobile) ( talk) 13:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Cardiff University#Schools and colleges where it's mentioned Star Mississippi 02:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence school is particularly notable outside notability of university DeputyBeagle ( talk) 12:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. I did not see much sourced material to merge, but I am happy to provide a copy of the deleted material if anybody ( Gjs238) is interested in using it. Malinaccier ( talk) 01:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
This isn’t really a topic here. Specifically there is nothing here to suggest that there is a current or recent community of Syrians of Italian heritage. The article discusses Romans of Syrian origins (off topic), then the arrival of Livorno Jews (should be merged into History of the Jews in Syria, and the rest is anecdote and a section copy-pasted from Italy–Syria relations to fill out the article and make it look like an actual topic. Mccapra ( talk) 05:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Giovanni Pellegrino. Owen× ☎ 11:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
This article is very odd. It started life as what appears to be a personal essay/content fork about Italian politics (entirely sourced to La guerra civile) under the title Terrorism in Italy since 1945, then at some point someone misinterpreted the content as about the book itself and content about that book introduced and the essay stuff removed, so for the past 13 years it's been about the book, but under the original title. I tried to find sources under that title, failed for 20 minutes, realized what happened, and moved the page.
Anyway, still can't find any reviews/analysis/sources. It's probable they may exist given the language barrier and very generic title, but I couldn't find any. If sufficient sources are presented I can withdraw. As an ATD if there are no sources redirect to the author Giovanni Pellegrino. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 05:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 11:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Appears to be a defunct instrument company that didn't make much of an impact. The only sources are a Youtube video, a product catalog PDF, and a fan forum - and that's after a user contested my PROD and looked for sources. Google News returns nothing. A search of Guitar World also comes up empty. A search for one of their guitars only returns some sales listings. Seems non-notable. Mbinebri ( talk) 18:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 02:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment there's a comment from an IP on the talk page for this AfD— Iadmc ♫ talk 04:50, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Company fails WP:NCORP. While several articles cited here provide significant coverage beyond trivial mentions, they are all in highly local publications (the Manistee News and the Traverse City Record-Eagle). Under NCORP, "Attention solely from local media (e.g., the weekly newspaper for a small town)... is not an indication of notability." A BEFORE search turns up no additional qualifying sources. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 16:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 02:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable cricket tournament which fails WP:GNG, WP:NCRIC, and WP:EVENT. AA ( talk) 13:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 02:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
BLP of an activist, deleted at AfD in January and immediately recreated. Notability is not evident to me at all, as the article is a collection of activities which are run of the mill. Mccapra ( talk) 22:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 02:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I see a consensus to delete this article. Liz Read! Talk! 05:42, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Article PRODded with reason "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by article creator with reason "this journal is endorsed and ranked by the Ministry of Research Technology, and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia (as already cited). Why would that not demonstrate notability?" This apparently refers to current ref. 3, but that database (SINTA) does not appear to be very selective and therefore fails both NJournals and GNG. PROD reason still stands, hence: delete. Randykitty ( talk) 21:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
the Director-General of Strengthening Research and Development, Ministry of Research Technology, and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia, Decree Number 105/M/KPT/2022.) The journal has been published for less than four years, but has more than 300 incoming citations according to Google Scholar. [23] Does this not clearly meet C2 of WP:JOURNALCRIT? -- Mikeblas ( talk) 23:40, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: If I had to close this based on the discussion so far, it would be to delete. However, more discussion genuinely would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 02:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Erasmus Student Network. Liz Read! Talk! 23:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Local branch of Erasmus Student Network, no independent notability. Broc ( talk) 08:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 02:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 13:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
While it's not a G4, it does not appear that the issues raised that led to the prior version being deleted have been resolved. Lushchai was a wonderful person and active Wikipedian but does not appear notable as an author. WP:NOTAMEMORIAL unfortunately applies. Star Mississippi 02:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. It is possible with enough time there would be enough participation to come to a consensus, but this has already been relisted twice. Malinaccier ( talk) 18:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Nominated by an IP user: Non-notable group, going by available sources. Both with its current ("Supersci") and its former ("Superscientifiku") name, the group is mentioned on some Swedish websites, but with very few exceptions (e.g. Sundsvalls Tidning) either these sources are non-reliable, or the subject is mentioned only in passing. GrabUp - Talk 18:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further evaluation of added sources would be helpful here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 01:50, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. After extended time for discussion, there remains a clear absence of consensus to delete.
BD2412
T 02:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:EVENTCRIT; subject is notable only for passing away. As this is a recent death, WP:BLP1E should probably apply here. See also WP:PSEUDO. Firestar464 ( talk) 00:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It would be nice to get an evaluation of additions to the article since its nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 13:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:PERP, WP:NOTNEWS - I can't see that there's likely to be unusual or lasting coverage regarding this murderer. BrigadierG ( talk) 00:08, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
This effectively shames and degrades the individual, which is not the purpose of wikipedia.Yes, how dare we "shame and degrade" a convicted multiple murderer by calling him a serial killer (which is much, much worse than being a multiple murderer, apparently)! Poor little chap! -- Necrothesp ( talk) 11:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 01:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
This doesn't seem to be a notable football rivalry. The references are generally about the country's relations, not football. Walsh90210 ( talk) 00:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
The Article does not have notability, according to WP:POLITICIAN, a politician is not notable when him/her position is lower than Congressman/Congresswoman, I don't see WP:GNG notability either. TheNuggeteer ( talk) 00:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of notability under SNG or GNG. Actually no coverage of the actual topic because it does not exist. Just saying the he's going to have an album sometime in 2024 which doesn't even have a name. Coverage of the "album" is just some comments about it. Previously deleted. North8000 ( talk) 23:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:59, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 21:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Nothing of notability in the bands history, additionally many of the references are primary Facebook posts about their band members history etc and I'm unable to find any significant coverage of the band online, outside of some album reviews from smaller blogs. InDimensional ( talk) 23:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
The Stuff article listed as a reference appears to be the only example of WP:SIGCOV for the subject, detailing a junior selection some six years ago. Coverage since consists entirely of databases and routine mentions. At this time does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. Triptothecottage ( talk) 23:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Real Succes Chișinău. Liz Read! Talk! 21:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Moldovan football stadium fails to meet WP:GNG per WP:NSTADIUM. Available sources are WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs, which makes sense, since it's basically just a soccer field. A 150-seat "stadium" is unlikely to have significant coverage in any language's media. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 23:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Malinaccier ( talk) 01:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Renominating this page for deletion, as there was no input from any third party last time (closed as "no consensus").
Motivation from last time still holds:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 05:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 23:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Minor Indian bureaucrate fails WP:GNG, WP:NBIO, WP:NPOL. No meaningful WP:SIGCOV in any sources; coverage cited in article (and found in BEFORE search) is WP:TRIVIALMENTION of him in the course of reporting on local government activities, and much of it is problematic under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 22:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Article is fully promotional, mostly unsourced, and from a quick search I haven't found anything significant about this organisation (just other organisations with the same name). Suntooooth, it/he ( talk/ contribs) 22:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 16:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
An article that doesn't meet WP:ANYBIO, and WP:ENT. It is also good saving that "celebrities may be famous but not notable meeting WP:BASIC." Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 21:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. There seems to be a consensus to delete or draftify the article. Given that it is unlikely anybody will come around to improve the article (given the creator's indefinite block), my sense is that draftifying the article will just result in an abandoned draft. If the creator would like a copy of the article, I would be happy to provide it at any time. Malinaccier ( talk) 02:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
I do not think that this person meets the criteria for notability. I have been unable to find any reference to him other than the The Hindu article ( https://web.archive.org/web/20240317044514/https://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/history-and-culture/the-lawyer-as-a-writer/article4683660.ece), which just effectively said it was nice to read. And cryptic metadata from library websites who happen to have the book (which seems to just be stanford and nyu https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/in00000071311 ) Mason ( talk) 02:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Note to Closer. Page was created by
sockpuppet and is good for
WP:G5 speedy deletion.
RangersRus (
talk) 12:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as opinion is divided. Just FYI, a general comment for all AFDs, when an editor says "seems like" or "likely" or "appears to be" it means to me that the editor hasn't read or seen the sources and are basing their opinion on attributes like the title or the publisher. If that's the case, it's good not to have an absolutist opinion on what should happen with an article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk) 20:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear.
BD2412
T 04:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
We do not cover schools cricket, unless historically notable, which this is not. Fails WP:GNG, WP:EVENT, WP:NCRIC/ WP:OFFCRIC. AA ( talk) 18:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough in-depth coverage of the subject, an Italian rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. All I found were transactional announcements with routine coverage ( 1, 2, 3, 4) JTtheOG ( talk) 18:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of South Africa national rugby sevens players. Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Malinaccier ( talk) 19:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
This person clearly does meet WP:Notability (people)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gloern ( talk • contribs) 16:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 04:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Article subject is a home-made projectile featured in a youtube video. This was picked up in brief articles by HuffPost and Wired during the moral panic about 3D printed guns. However, there is no WP:SUSTAINED or significant coverage other than these two brief, WP:ONE EVENT silly-season articles.
On closer inspection, the 3D printed slugs are just cylinders with a pointy end which could just as easily be carved from a length of plastic, so there's no novel or meritorious engineering involved either (i.e. unlikely to be further papers or coverage beyond what is already linked. A search turned up nothing new) - this article is just about a guy sticking a lump of (quite expensive, laboriously printed) plastic onto the front of a commercially-bought shotgun cartridge and posting it on youtube for lols. Does not satisfy WP:GNG. Hemmers ( talk) 15:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as the article has already been PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to WXXA-TV. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 16:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 16:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Just relisting to be sure about Merge target article
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NTEAM because of a lack of coverage from RS. Let'srun ( talk) 17:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Complex/ Rational 21:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:39, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear.
BD2412
T 03:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Requested at WP:AN, listed as a courtesy. User:62.165.250.83, please add your deletion rationale below. Jip Orlando ( talk) 16:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Completely fails WP:GNG, WP:NCOMPANY, may even be considered an ad. - 62.165.250.83 ( talk) 14:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malinaccier ( talk) 18:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Reliant entirely on primary sources/no evidence of notability. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft redirect to Chukchi people based on limited participation. Malinaccier ( talk) 18:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. A possible alternative to deletion is a merge/redirect to Chukchi people. toweli ( talk) 16:24, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programmes broadcast by Nickelodeon (India)#Animated Series. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. M S Hassan ( talk) 16:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a mayor, not
properly sourced as passing inclusion criteria for mayors. As always, mayors are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to pass
WP:NPOL #2 -- where the inclusion test hinges not on simple verification of her existence, but on the ability to show a depth and range and volume of
reliable source coverage that enables us to write a substantive article about her political impact: specific things she did, specific projects she spearheaded, specific effects her mayoralty had on the development of the city, and on and so forth.
But this is of the "she is a mayor who exists, so here's some unsourced background information about her educational and pre-political career credentials" variety with absolutely none of the content about her mayoralty that we require, and is "referenced" solely to her
primary source profile on the
self-published website of the city council, which is not a notability-building source.
No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write and source something more substantive and better-sourced than this, but just using the city government's own website to prove that she exists is not how you get a mayor over the wikibar.
Bearcat (
talk) 16:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 15:58, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Completely uncoursed, fails WP:NPLACE as I could not find any reliable sources or indication of legal recognition. Hence this appears like mostly WP:ORIGINAL research. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I could not find any sources whatsoever, failing WP:GNG. Could be redirected to Govigama, but since there is no coverage of the Pamunu people, I don't see why this should be done. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 17:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I believe this article about a book fails general notability and book notability. Of the cited sources, The first is simply a Google Books page nad the second only has a trivial mention of the book on the 6th page. The third article [17] is a promotional article written by the author of the book, which according to WP:BKCRIT doesn't count for notability. Searching the internet for more coverage has turned up nothing but more trivial mentions. GranCavallo ( talk) 14:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
SourcesA book is presumed notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the following criteria:
- The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This can include published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists, and reviews. This excludes media re-prints of press releases, flap copy, or other publications where the author, its publisher, agent, or other self-interested parties advertise or speak about the book.
The review notes: ""Justice Waits: The UC Davis Sweetheart Murders" is Davis' story of the murders and their aftermath, a meticulously researched and highly readable account that tracks the lives of the victims and their familes, the almost Keystone Cops-like investigations that followed and what the Riggins and Gonsalves families hope will be the final chapter. ... A preliminary hearing to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to hold Hirschfield for trial is not scheduled until May. In this most gripping of true-crime stories, Davis concluded that while there may now be answers - brutal and nightmarish ones - there is no closure. Justice still waits."
The review notes: ""Justice Waits: The UC Davis Sweetheart Murders" ($24.95 in hardcover from Callister Press) is gripping and gutsy reportage about the crimes and the subsequent missteps in the investigation and how Davis himself has become part of the story. ... The book is frankly critical of some of the investigators and Davis acknowledges that he has made more than a few people angry with his pursuit of the case. But Davis is convinced that Riggins and Gonsalves, all these years later, deserve the justice that has so far eluded them. The story he tells is harrowing, and the end is not yet in sight."
The article notes: "The result is "Justice Waits: The UC Davis Sweetheart Murders" (Callister Press, $24.95, 220 pages), published late last year, just weeks before the 25th anniversary of the deaths of Riggins and Gonsalves. ... In 2000, he decided to turn his curiosity into a book project. He never dreamed it would take five years to finish. By the time Davis began his research, the case had gone ice cold. The journalist dug through court and police records, interviewed family members and friends of the victims, tracked down old suspects and confronted detectives and district attorneys, over and over, with questions about their investigation."
The review notes: "Joel Davis' book, "Justice Waits: The UC Davis Sweetheart Murders" intrigued me for three reasons. First, it sparked memories of what I would refer to as the serial-murder era in the late '70s and early '80s, when it seemed as if every few months there was a random crime spree, which then took forever to solve."
The article notes: "Twice Davis had to pull "Justice Waits: The UC Davis Sweetheart Murders" back from Callister Press when new information surfaced. Six months after publication he's pounding out a second edition and updating the story weekly on his Web site, justicewaits.com."
The article notes: " Davis' "Justice Waits: The UC Davis Sweetheart Murders," is now in its third printing. The book chronicles the murder case of UC Davis sweethearts John Riggins and Sabrina Gonsalves. Davis is writing an epilogue based on the recent preliminary hearing of murder suspect Richard Hirschfield, who in March was bound over for trial for the gruesome 1980 murders."
The article notes: ""Justice Waits: The UC Davis Sweetheart Murders" (Callister Press; $24.95) finally saw publication last month, culminating a five-year process during which Davis chased down dusty, forgotten court documents, interviewed dozens of players in the case and, at the same time, waged his own personal battle with Parkinson's disease."
The article notes: "His book project started as a yearlong reinvestigation into the murders and quickly turned into five years of searching through old court documents, chasing down investigators who had worked on the case, interviewing dozens of people and eventually becoming a crucial part of the story himself."
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 14:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
$5000 tournament at bwf international level which doesn't meet the notability criteria WP:GNG, WP:NSPORTS and WP:NBAD. The only notable ones which get enough coverage in notable websites are World Tour tournaments.
Moreover the tournament winners are already mentioned here in Austrian International page as each of those editions can't be created on their own due to notability issue. zoglophie •talk• 08:34, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 12:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
An unsourced nothing. There was a bit more in it, none of it sourced, which I removed. I'm not good at WP:BEFORE, but I couldn't even find a website for the company, just lots of other websites selling their stuff. Bbb23 ( talk) 13:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of mayors of Galway. ✗ plicit 14:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
There was a discussion in 2011, but I think views on this generally may have developed. The sources don’t indicate WP:GNG and WP:NPOL/ WP:NSUBPOL. Iveagh Gardens ( talk) 13:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails the general notability guideline with no significant coverage, barely any secondary sources with not much verifiability since the accident lacks sustained continued coverage, which in turn also fails WP:EVENTCRIT. The accident has not demonstrated any lasting effects with a lack of in-depth coverage. Aviationwikiflight ( talk) 13:23, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was deleted per WP:G3. . (non-admin closure) Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Declined and rejected at WP:AFC it fails WP:NSCHOOL. Theroadislong ( talk) 13:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 16:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; some references are dead links. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 12:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:58, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 12:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Musk (disambiguation)#People. ✗ plicit 14:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Request to turn into Redirect to Musk (Disambiguation).
Article fails to demonstrate the notability of the "Musk Family" as an organisation or group, instead it is clearly serving as little more than a duplication of the existing disambiguation page. The short history section may have reliable sourcing but it is very blatantly written in terms of only Elon Musk and no-one else, and looks to be a cut down version of what's on his article's page which arguably evidences the lack of notability of the family as a whole.
Therefore the page should be turned into a redirect to the Disambiguation page until such a time noteworthiness of the family is established. Rambling Rambler ( talk) 12:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
This article should have never existed, it's an embarrassment. There is nothing notable about the Musk family besides Elon. 101.98.188.156 ( talk) 21:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Marilyn Manson#Art. Owen× ☎ 11:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. The article presently only links to fan webpages, with the exception of one brief article in Greek. toweli ( talk) 11:40, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear.
BD2412
T 02:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
This candidate has not achieved general notability. The one reference here to a national newspaper (article on Michael Healy-Rae visiting a mosque) doesn’t mention Keane. Otherwise, I don’t see that mentions of Keane in Radio Kerry, satisfy WP:NPOL or WP:SIGCOV. Most local election candidates could muster up some passing mention in local press. Iveagh Gardens ( talk) 10:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator and with consensus of participants.( non-admin closure) (non-admin closure) ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:36, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced and non-notable. No WP:RS that I can find. — Iadmc ♫ talk 09:48, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Promotion (e.g. ISO 27001 Certification and Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Certificate...) no sources to meet NCORP BoraVoro ( talk) 08:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 08:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
No independent reliable coverage to meet GNG /NCORP BoraVoro ( talk) 08:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 08:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 16:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Notability/usefulness not demonstrated. Just a list of licenses of softwares. Greatder ( talk) 07:48, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability.Why? I Ask ( talk) 16:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 08:28, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Ostensibly a team in a sailing competition, or possibly two unrelated teams of the same name. Not notable, no independent references, some of this is indistinguishable from vandalism. Walsh90210 ( talk) 07:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NASTRO, isn't present on the NGC catalog or any other notable catalog, I couldn't find any information on the web either. WxTrinity ( talk to me!) 05:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet GNG. Heartfox ( talk) 04:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Similar to the prior discussion in 2012. Malinaccier ( talk) 18:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Nothing has substantially improved, and the issue is still that this a list of trivia. Indeed, having looked up Loose Cannons by Graeme Donald, which was cited in the last discussion, I find that its subtitle is "101 Myths, Mishaps, And Misadventures Of Military History". In other words, it is a book of military trivia, and I note that Mental Floss is cited in the article. The whole premise is questionable, particularly in these days of mostly undeclared warfare, and the inclusion criteria don't match the members. Mangoe ( talk) 05:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, already brought to AFD so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 03:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
a renaming of the article (and) a clear definition of scopewould still be helpful. But these "ceremonial unofficial peace treaties" do seem to be discussed enough to be in a list article. Walsh90210 ( talk) 07:10, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programmes broadcast by Hungama TV#Animated series. Owen× ☎ 11:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't pass WP:GNG. M S Hassan ( talk) 04:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Self-authored Wikipedia about a non-notable musician. Half of the references on the page don't even mention him, and the ones that do only make a single passing mention of his involvement in some non-notable experimental indie band. The only substantial and reliable source I can find talking about him in any depth is this but, other than that, crickets. Elspamo4 ( talk) 03:46, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Notability and quality issues. The article was created by a single-purpose account in 2009. None of the content is sourced, the "general" references are generally about "assistive technology" or are by MJ Scherer, the creator of this model. Google Scholar has about 3 results not associated with Scherer, which use this as background.
None of the current content should be merged to assistive technology, so I have not unilaterally redirected the article. However, if there is sourced content to include there, I am not opposed to that redirect. Walsh90210 ( talk) 22:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NCORP - coverage seems to be routine at best with a few promotional pieces thrown in. Jellyfish (mobile) ( talk) 13:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Cardiff University#Schools and colleges where it's mentioned Star Mississippi 02:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence school is particularly notable outside notability of university DeputyBeagle ( talk) 12:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. I did not see much sourced material to merge, but I am happy to provide a copy of the deleted material if anybody ( Gjs238) is interested in using it. Malinaccier ( talk) 01:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
This isn’t really a topic here. Specifically there is nothing here to suggest that there is a current or recent community of Syrians of Italian heritage. The article discusses Romans of Syrian origins (off topic), then the arrival of Livorno Jews (should be merged into History of the Jews in Syria, and the rest is anecdote and a section copy-pasted from Italy–Syria relations to fill out the article and make it look like an actual topic. Mccapra ( talk) 05:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Giovanni Pellegrino. Owen× ☎ 11:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
This article is very odd. It started life as what appears to be a personal essay/content fork about Italian politics (entirely sourced to La guerra civile) under the title Terrorism in Italy since 1945, then at some point someone misinterpreted the content as about the book itself and content about that book introduced and the essay stuff removed, so for the past 13 years it's been about the book, but under the original title. I tried to find sources under that title, failed for 20 minutes, realized what happened, and moved the page.
Anyway, still can't find any reviews/analysis/sources. It's probable they may exist given the language barrier and very generic title, but I couldn't find any. If sufficient sources are presented I can withdraw. As an ATD if there are no sources redirect to the author Giovanni Pellegrino. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 05:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 11:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Appears to be a defunct instrument company that didn't make much of an impact. The only sources are a Youtube video, a product catalog PDF, and a fan forum - and that's after a user contested my PROD and looked for sources. Google News returns nothing. A search of Guitar World also comes up empty. A search for one of their guitars only returns some sales listings. Seems non-notable. Mbinebri ( talk) 18:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 02:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment there's a comment from an IP on the talk page for this AfD— Iadmc ♫ talk 04:50, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Company fails WP:NCORP. While several articles cited here provide significant coverage beyond trivial mentions, they are all in highly local publications (the Manistee News and the Traverse City Record-Eagle). Under NCORP, "Attention solely from local media (e.g., the weekly newspaper for a small town)... is not an indication of notability." A BEFORE search turns up no additional qualifying sources. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 16:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 02:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable cricket tournament which fails WP:GNG, WP:NCRIC, and WP:EVENT. AA ( talk) 13:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 02:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
BLP of an activist, deleted at AfD in January and immediately recreated. Notability is not evident to me at all, as the article is a collection of activities which are run of the mill. Mccapra ( talk) 22:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 02:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I see a consensus to delete this article. Liz Read! Talk! 05:42, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Article PRODded with reason "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by article creator with reason "this journal is endorsed and ranked by the Ministry of Research Technology, and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia (as already cited). Why would that not demonstrate notability?" This apparently refers to current ref. 3, but that database (SINTA) does not appear to be very selective and therefore fails both NJournals and GNG. PROD reason still stands, hence: delete. Randykitty ( talk) 21:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
the Director-General of Strengthening Research and Development, Ministry of Research Technology, and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia, Decree Number 105/M/KPT/2022.) The journal has been published for less than four years, but has more than 300 incoming citations according to Google Scholar. [23] Does this not clearly meet C2 of WP:JOURNALCRIT? -- Mikeblas ( talk) 23:40, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: If I had to close this based on the discussion so far, it would be to delete. However, more discussion genuinely would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 02:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Erasmus Student Network. Liz Read! Talk! 23:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Local branch of Erasmus Student Network, no independent notability. Broc ( talk) 08:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 02:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 13:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
While it's not a G4, it does not appear that the issues raised that led to the prior version being deleted have been resolved. Lushchai was a wonderful person and active Wikipedian but does not appear notable as an author. WP:NOTAMEMORIAL unfortunately applies. Star Mississippi 02:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. It is possible with enough time there would be enough participation to come to a consensus, but this has already been relisted twice. Malinaccier ( talk) 18:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Nominated by an IP user: Non-notable group, going by available sources. Both with its current ("Supersci") and its former ("Superscientifiku") name, the group is mentioned on some Swedish websites, but with very few exceptions (e.g. Sundsvalls Tidning) either these sources are non-reliable, or the subject is mentioned only in passing. GrabUp - Talk 18:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further evaluation of added sources would be helpful here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 01:50, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. After extended time for discussion, there remains a clear absence of consensus to delete.
BD2412
T 02:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:EVENTCRIT; subject is notable only for passing away. As this is a recent death, WP:BLP1E should probably apply here. See also WP:PSEUDO. Firestar464 ( talk) 00:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It would be nice to get an evaluation of additions to the article since its nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 13:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:PERP, WP:NOTNEWS - I can't see that there's likely to be unusual or lasting coverage regarding this murderer. BrigadierG ( talk) 00:08, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
This effectively shames and degrades the individual, which is not the purpose of wikipedia.Yes, how dare we "shame and degrade" a convicted multiple murderer by calling him a serial killer (which is much, much worse than being a multiple murderer, apparently)! Poor little chap! -- Necrothesp ( talk) 11:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 01:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
This doesn't seem to be a notable football rivalry. The references are generally about the country's relations, not football. Walsh90210 ( talk) 00:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
The Article does not have notability, according to WP:POLITICIAN, a politician is not notable when him/her position is lower than Congressman/Congresswoman, I don't see WP:GNG notability either. TheNuggeteer ( talk) 00:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC)