![]() |
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 22:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was Transwiki. Editors attained a consensus that this content is not suitable for Wikipedia, and the text of the pages have been copied and moved to Wiktionary. In light of the deletion policy, the pages will be converted into soft redirects to their corresponding entries on Wiktionary. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
I believe this and the other lists below do not meet WP:NOTEVERYTHING and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 17:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Oops
|
---|
|
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:54, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:13, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Has never been sourced since its creation over 20 years ago. Appears to be original research. Better (but still not great) coverage of computation of roots is at our main article nth root. My prod saying all this was removed as the only edit by a new editor without improvement, and with the only rationale being WP:ITSUSEFUL. — David Eppstein ( talk) 19:09, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:53, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the national championships do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. Google search turns up nothing outside of wikis and scoring databases. Previous AFD received zero arguments in favor of keeping this article that cited any evidence of notability. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
21:14, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:53, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:03, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the national championships do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. Google search turns up nothing outside of wikis and scoring databases. Previous AFD received zero arguments in favor of keeping this article that cited any evidence of notability. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
21:15, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:22, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 22:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Poppler (software). Owen× ☎ 22:38, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable software per WP:N. SL93 ( talk) 22:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
pdftotext
is version used in most linux distros,
like Ubuntu. This particular tool is far from notable, but would serve as a useful redirect. —
BillHPike (
talk,
contribs)
00:44, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We have 2 different Merge/Redirect target articles now suggested
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:15, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:36, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the national championships do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. Google search turns up nothing outside of wikis and scoring databases. PROD removed without explanation. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the national championships do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. Google search turns up nothing outside of wikis and scoring databases. Previous AFD received zero arguments in favor of keeping this article that cited any evidence of notability. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
The sourcing currently does not meet WP:NCORP. There may be other sources in Georgian, which I can’t read. Notability seems very uncertain and we’re long past the 90 day limit for draftification. Mccapra ( talk) 22:34, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 22:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
All prior XfDs for this page:
|
Non-notable company. The sources in the article, and those found in my own WP:BEFORE, do not support a claim to notability under WP:SIGCOV or WP:NORG. Frankly, from what I can tell, there aren't even sufficiently reliable sources to support the text in the article. And the level of FV issues and apparent REFBOMBing is more than a little problematic. As raised by Bastun, Spleodrach and Ww2censor in the previous AfD discussion, the majority of the references available (in the article and elsewhere) are press releases, directory-style listings, ROTM industry publications and other trivial passing mentions that do not support a claim to notability. (In almost every case, they don't even support the text they are placed alongside.) That multiple versions of this article continue to be created in Draft form(s) is also confusing and disquieting... Guliolopez ( talk) 19:21, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a writer, not
properly sourced as passing
WP:AUTHOR. The attempted notability claim here, that she won a literary award, would be fine if the article were sourced properly, but is not "inherently" notable without sourcing -- an award has to itself be a notable award in the first place before it can make its winners notable for winning it, so an award claim cannot clinch inclusion without sourcing for it. But I had to remove the citation that was present here as it led to a squatted page that tried to make me download a virus rather than anything that verified any literary awards, and that left the article completely unsourced — and going by its URL it looks to have been a
primary source, not a reliable or GNG-building one, even before it got squatted.
Meanwhile, the award she purportedly won does not have a Wikipedia article at all, and instead substitutes a link to the biography of the other unrelated writer the award was named for, which is not in and of itself proof that the award is a notable one.
On a
WP:BEFORE search, meanwhile, the closest thing to an acceptable source I found was one
book review on a
WordPress blog -- and even if I were to overlook the fact that it's WordPress, I just can't overlook the even bigger issue with it: this article was created in 2011 by an editor with the username Mohammad Rajabpur, while that WordPress review was written in 2020 with a bylined author credit of Mohammad Rajabpur, strongly implying the possibility of
conflict of interest editing by a friend or colleague. And I can otherwise confirm that she's never had any
WP:GNG-worthy coverage in Canada at all, as her name brings up absolutely nothing in either ProQuest or Newspapers.com.
Since I cannot read Farsi, I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with better access to Iranian media than I've got can find evidence that she's had GNG-worthy coverage in Iran, but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have any sources.
Bearcat (
talk)
17:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Tamasha (TV series). I found no policy basis for deleting the page history prior to redirecting, and accordingly discarded this view. Owen× ☎ 22:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails to meet the GNG. All I found on the web is some ROTM coverage, but nothing significant or in-dept Saqib ( talk I contribs) 17:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Sokil as an acceptable ATD. Owen× ☎ 22:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
List that's been a stub since 2010 consisting of solely red links with little chance of expansion. I initially merged the content to the disambiguation page Sokil but was opposed by Bkonrad due to the lack of any blue links. As an WP:ATD, I still support merging this content into that disambiguation page but in any case don't think this topic is notable enough for its own stand-alone article. Dan the Animator 16:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
in the description if the entry is red-linked or unlinked. RunningTiger123 ( talk) 19:03, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 23:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Since there are only two other topics that could be known as the 'Transpennine Express', I think that this dab page is not needed/useful. A hatnote at the main TPE article linking to the two could suffice JuniperChill ( talk) 16:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
If there are two or three other topics, it is still possible to use a hatnote which lists the other topics explicitly, but if this would require too much text (roughly, if the hatnote would extend well over one line on a standard page), then it is better to create a disambiguation page and refer only to that."
If there are two or three other topics, it is still possible to use a hatnote which lists the other topics explicitly, but if this would require too much text (roughly, if the hatnote would extend well over one line on a standard page), then it is better to create a disambiguation page and refer only to that.It means that there is no strict need to create disambig pages for three topics. But once these pages are there anyway, these should not be deleted. That's not in the policy. Please use everyone's time in a more constructive manner! gidonb ( talk) 17:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 22:20, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a textbook translator, not
properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for translators. The strongest notability claim here, that he won a private internal award from a trade association, is not an automatic notability freebie without
WP:GNG-worthy sourcing -- but the only attempt at "referencing" here is one of his books metaverifying its own existence, which is not the kind of sourcing we need to see.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced better than this. And we're much stricter on referencing articles properly than we were 20 years ago, so the fact that this was kept in an AFD discussion in 2005 is not definitive, especially since even some of the keep arguments at the time called for improvement that the article never saw.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Legends League Cricket#Franchise tournament. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 07:42, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable cricket team taking part in matches not having official T20 status. Couldn't find independent coverage about the team, to pass wider requirements of WP:NORG and WP:GNG. The highest to SIGCOV are the sources which says about the announcement of the teams, launch of jersey by the team owners- with all of these belonging to WP:ROUTINE. RoboCric Let's chat 07:54, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirect, or simply delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
14:37, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nickelodeon without prejudice to merging any content that is sourced and fits within the target. Owen× ☎ 22:20, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
This currently non-notable article lacks sources to pass GNG, WP:NMEDIA and NTV. Listed this as a CSD G2 (Test edit) which was reverted, so listing it here. This has to go! Intrisit ( talk) 12:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:21, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Mackay, Queensland#Transport. ✗ plicit 14:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NROAD because there isn't any independent significant coverage. Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs) 14:01, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 14:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable local radio station with no significant coverage so proposing redirect to iHeartMedia. Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs) 13:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources and what's linked in the article doesn't establish notability. Surprisingly, there isn't significant coverage of the group in Freax: The Brief History of the Demoscene, Volume 1 (2005) by Tamás Polgár ; "Andromeda" is mentioned 25 times, but in reference to the Norwegian demo group, not the Greek group that is the subject of the article. toweli ( talk) 13:19, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 07:37, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. There doesn't seem to be anything here, and a single appearance for the North Korean national team in 2000 doesn't cut it. Anwegmann ( talk) 07:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Cristiano Ronaldo#Family, children, and relationships. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
It does not appear that this player is notable on his own merit, beyond his connection to his father. If anything, this is way WP:TOOSOON, but I also think it fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG on its own merits. Anwegmann ( talk) 07:13, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Ambiguous term, unsourced and I found it difficult to find good sources to add. Boleyn ( talk) 14:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
14:52, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:16, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't meet WP:NBOOK / WP:GNG. Possible WP:ATD is redirect to publisher, but I am not sure if the title is ambiguous. Boleyn ( talk) 14:48, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. This reflects opinions outside of AI generated comments which are word salad. Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:BAND criteria. Not notable in any way. FromCzech ( talk) 05:05, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: If I were closing, I would ignore the AI-generated delete !vote.However, that leaves this with no discussion yet and therefore relist becomes necessary.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.
I would usually consider an opinion to Draftify an article but with no one offering to work on this article, I think it would just be G13'd down the road. As a Soft Delete, it can be restored to main or Draft space should an editor be interested in developing it further. Liz Read! Talk! 04:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Can't seem to find any WP:SIGCOV on this player beyond basic coverage either from the clubs, his college, or transfer notes. It appears as though he never actually played a professional match, which might be a failure of WP:SPORTBASIC. The only thing of basic substance I found was this, which is local and behind a paywall. Anwegmann ( talk) 04:27, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 04:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
This does not meet the criteria for notability. A Google search yields no results outside of Baseball-Reference. Dennis C. Abrams ( talk) 03:18, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:57, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus and no indication of any forthcoming input Star Mississippi 16:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
This article does not meet the notability criteria. There are simply no references to him on the internet other than compendiums of baseball stats which include his name. Dennis C. Abrams ( talk) 03:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:56, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBIO; non-notable actress who mostly appeared in adult films. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:15, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Editors disagree with ambiguous deletion rationale. Liz Read! Talk! 04:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
unsourced tautology Elinruby ( talk) 04:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Namibia national rugby union players. Liz Read! Talk! 05:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Namibia national rugby union players as I am unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
03:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Neither "keep" !votes adequately addressed the WP:SIGCOV issue, nor how playing at the highest level abides by relevant notability guidelines. ✗ plicit 14:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a New Zealand women's rugby league player, to meet WP:GNG. A possible redirect target is New Zealand women's national rugby league team. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It would be helpful to identify which sources establish notability, by current Wikipedia standards, rather than just making a claim.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:12, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
03:07, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Not seeing how this journal meets WP:GNG or more specialized WP:Notability (academic journals). Does not seem indexed in anything significant: [7] (Engineering Source (EBSCO), MEDLINE (United States National Library of Medicine), zbMATH). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The abstract notes: "It is an important topic to speed up the construction of world-leading scientific journals. This paper explores a variety of publishing practices based on the journals of Science China Series and Science Bulletin, such as optimizing the content orientations, strengthening the sponsor’s policy support of Chinese Academy of Sciences, promoting the initiative of the scientisfs, and improving the academic quality. We also propose some successful suggestions on the construction of journal clustering, international cooperation and exchanges, the professional publishing team, and the digital development of media integration."
The abstract notes: "By analyzing a number of special issues on chemistry published in Chinese Science Bulletin, this paper discussed the strategies and approaches of organizing special issues for scientific journals, including the following four aspects: 1) How to choose the topics? 2) What is the most effective editing procedure? 3) How to advertise and promote the special issues? 4) How to make more associated experts involved? Examples indicate that special issues play an important role in improving the academic quality and enhancing the influence of scientific journals."
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
After a review of the sources in this article, I'm not convinced this team meets the WP:GNG or WP:NSEASONS. In order of appearance in the article, the first source is merely informing readers of a blub meeting, the second is about the athletic club, not the team, the third is all of two short sentences, white the remaining sources are brief and routine game recaps. A check of newspaper archives didn't come up with much better. Let'srun ( talk) 01:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Not a notable organization. Created by undergraduate students last year; no substantial coverage that is independent from the group. Walsh90210 ( talk) 01:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 22:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was Transwiki. Editors attained a consensus that this content is not suitable for Wikipedia, and the text of the pages have been copied and moved to Wiktionary. In light of the deletion policy, the pages will be converted into soft redirects to their corresponding entries on Wiktionary. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
I believe this and the other lists below do not meet WP:NOTEVERYTHING and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 17:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Oops
|
---|
|
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:54, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:13, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Has never been sourced since its creation over 20 years ago. Appears to be original research. Better (but still not great) coverage of computation of roots is at our main article nth root. My prod saying all this was removed as the only edit by a new editor without improvement, and with the only rationale being WP:ITSUSEFUL. — David Eppstein ( talk) 19:09, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:53, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the national championships do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. Google search turns up nothing outside of wikis and scoring databases. Previous AFD received zero arguments in favor of keeping this article that cited any evidence of notability. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
21:14, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:53, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:03, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the national championships do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. Google search turns up nothing outside of wikis and scoring databases. Previous AFD received zero arguments in favor of keeping this article that cited any evidence of notability. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
21:15, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:22, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 22:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Poppler (software). Owen× ☎ 22:38, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable software per WP:N. SL93 ( talk) 22:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
pdftotext
is version used in most linux distros,
like Ubuntu. This particular tool is far from notable, but would serve as a useful redirect. —
BillHPike (
talk,
contribs)
00:44, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We have 2 different Merge/Redirect target articles now suggested
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:15, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:36, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the national championships do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. Google search turns up nothing outside of wikis and scoring databases. PROD removed without explanation. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the national championships do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. Google search turns up nothing outside of wikis and scoring databases. Previous AFD received zero arguments in favor of keeping this article that cited any evidence of notability. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
The sourcing currently does not meet WP:NCORP. There may be other sources in Georgian, which I can’t read. Notability seems very uncertain and we’re long past the 90 day limit for draftification. Mccapra ( talk) 22:34, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 22:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
All prior XfDs for this page:
|
Non-notable company. The sources in the article, and those found in my own WP:BEFORE, do not support a claim to notability under WP:SIGCOV or WP:NORG. Frankly, from what I can tell, there aren't even sufficiently reliable sources to support the text in the article. And the level of FV issues and apparent REFBOMBing is more than a little problematic. As raised by Bastun, Spleodrach and Ww2censor in the previous AfD discussion, the majority of the references available (in the article and elsewhere) are press releases, directory-style listings, ROTM industry publications and other trivial passing mentions that do not support a claim to notability. (In almost every case, they don't even support the text they are placed alongside.) That multiple versions of this article continue to be created in Draft form(s) is also confusing and disquieting... Guliolopez ( talk) 19:21, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a writer, not
properly sourced as passing
WP:AUTHOR. The attempted notability claim here, that she won a literary award, would be fine if the article were sourced properly, but is not "inherently" notable without sourcing -- an award has to itself be a notable award in the first place before it can make its winners notable for winning it, so an award claim cannot clinch inclusion without sourcing for it. But I had to remove the citation that was present here as it led to a squatted page that tried to make me download a virus rather than anything that verified any literary awards, and that left the article completely unsourced — and going by its URL it looks to have been a
primary source, not a reliable or GNG-building one, even before it got squatted.
Meanwhile, the award she purportedly won does not have a Wikipedia article at all, and instead substitutes a link to the biography of the other unrelated writer the award was named for, which is not in and of itself proof that the award is a notable one.
On a
WP:BEFORE search, meanwhile, the closest thing to an acceptable source I found was one
book review on a
WordPress blog -- and even if I were to overlook the fact that it's WordPress, I just can't overlook the even bigger issue with it: this article was created in 2011 by an editor with the username Mohammad Rajabpur, while that WordPress review was written in 2020 with a bylined author credit of Mohammad Rajabpur, strongly implying the possibility of
conflict of interest editing by a friend or colleague. And I can otherwise confirm that she's never had any
WP:GNG-worthy coverage in Canada at all, as her name brings up absolutely nothing in either ProQuest or Newspapers.com.
Since I cannot read Farsi, I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with better access to Iranian media than I've got can find evidence that she's had GNG-worthy coverage in Iran, but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have any sources.
Bearcat (
talk)
17:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Tamasha (TV series). I found no policy basis for deleting the page history prior to redirecting, and accordingly discarded this view. Owen× ☎ 22:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails to meet the GNG. All I found on the web is some ROTM coverage, but nothing significant or in-dept Saqib ( talk I contribs) 17:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Sokil as an acceptable ATD. Owen× ☎ 22:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
List that's been a stub since 2010 consisting of solely red links with little chance of expansion. I initially merged the content to the disambiguation page Sokil but was opposed by Bkonrad due to the lack of any blue links. As an WP:ATD, I still support merging this content into that disambiguation page but in any case don't think this topic is notable enough for its own stand-alone article. Dan the Animator 16:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
in the description if the entry is red-linked or unlinked. RunningTiger123 ( talk) 19:03, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 23:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Since there are only two other topics that could be known as the 'Transpennine Express', I think that this dab page is not needed/useful. A hatnote at the main TPE article linking to the two could suffice JuniperChill ( talk) 16:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
If there are two or three other topics, it is still possible to use a hatnote which lists the other topics explicitly, but if this would require too much text (roughly, if the hatnote would extend well over one line on a standard page), then it is better to create a disambiguation page and refer only to that."
If there are two or three other topics, it is still possible to use a hatnote which lists the other topics explicitly, but if this would require too much text (roughly, if the hatnote would extend well over one line on a standard page), then it is better to create a disambiguation page and refer only to that.It means that there is no strict need to create disambig pages for three topics. But once these pages are there anyway, these should not be deleted. That's not in the policy. Please use everyone's time in a more constructive manner! gidonb ( talk) 17:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 22:20, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a textbook translator, not
properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for translators. The strongest notability claim here, that he won a private internal award from a trade association, is not an automatic notability freebie without
WP:GNG-worthy sourcing -- but the only attempt at "referencing" here is one of his books metaverifying its own existence, which is not the kind of sourcing we need to see.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced better than this. And we're much stricter on referencing articles properly than we were 20 years ago, so the fact that this was kept in an AFD discussion in 2005 is not definitive, especially since even some of the keep arguments at the time called for improvement that the article never saw.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Legends League Cricket#Franchise tournament. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 07:42, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable cricket team taking part in matches not having official T20 status. Couldn't find independent coverage about the team, to pass wider requirements of WP:NORG and WP:GNG. The highest to SIGCOV are the sources which says about the announcement of the teams, launch of jersey by the team owners- with all of these belonging to WP:ROUTINE. RoboCric Let's chat 07:54, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirect, or simply delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
14:37, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nickelodeon without prejudice to merging any content that is sourced and fits within the target. Owen× ☎ 22:20, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
This currently non-notable article lacks sources to pass GNG, WP:NMEDIA and NTV. Listed this as a CSD G2 (Test edit) which was reverted, so listing it here. This has to go! Intrisit ( talk) 12:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:21, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Mackay, Queensland#Transport. ✗ plicit 14:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NROAD because there isn't any independent significant coverage. Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs) 14:01, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 14:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable local radio station with no significant coverage so proposing redirect to iHeartMedia. Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs) 13:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources and what's linked in the article doesn't establish notability. Surprisingly, there isn't significant coverage of the group in Freax: The Brief History of the Demoscene, Volume 1 (2005) by Tamás Polgár ; "Andromeda" is mentioned 25 times, but in reference to the Norwegian demo group, not the Greek group that is the subject of the article. toweli ( talk) 13:19, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 07:37, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. There doesn't seem to be anything here, and a single appearance for the North Korean national team in 2000 doesn't cut it. Anwegmann ( talk) 07:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Cristiano Ronaldo#Family, children, and relationships. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
It does not appear that this player is notable on his own merit, beyond his connection to his father. If anything, this is way WP:TOOSOON, but I also think it fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG on its own merits. Anwegmann ( talk) 07:13, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Ambiguous term, unsourced and I found it difficult to find good sources to add. Boleyn ( talk) 14:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
14:52, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:16, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't meet WP:NBOOK / WP:GNG. Possible WP:ATD is redirect to publisher, but I am not sure if the title is ambiguous. Boleyn ( talk) 14:48, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. This reflects opinions outside of AI generated comments which are word salad. Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:BAND criteria. Not notable in any way. FromCzech ( talk) 05:05, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: If I were closing, I would ignore the AI-generated delete !vote.However, that leaves this with no discussion yet and therefore relist becomes necessary.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.
I would usually consider an opinion to Draftify an article but with no one offering to work on this article, I think it would just be G13'd down the road. As a Soft Delete, it can be restored to main or Draft space should an editor be interested in developing it further. Liz Read! Talk! 04:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Can't seem to find any WP:SIGCOV on this player beyond basic coverage either from the clubs, his college, or transfer notes. It appears as though he never actually played a professional match, which might be a failure of WP:SPORTBASIC. The only thing of basic substance I found was this, which is local and behind a paywall. Anwegmann ( talk) 04:27, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 04:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
This does not meet the criteria for notability. A Google search yields no results outside of Baseball-Reference. Dennis C. Abrams ( talk) 03:18, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:57, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus and no indication of any forthcoming input Star Mississippi 16:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
This article does not meet the notability criteria. There are simply no references to him on the internet other than compendiums of baseball stats which include his name. Dennis C. Abrams ( talk) 03:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:56, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBIO; non-notable actress who mostly appeared in adult films. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:15, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Editors disagree with ambiguous deletion rationale. Liz Read! Talk! 04:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
unsourced tautology Elinruby ( talk) 04:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Namibia national rugby union players. Liz Read! Talk! 05:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Namibia national rugby union players as I am unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
03:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Neither "keep" !votes adequately addressed the WP:SIGCOV issue, nor how playing at the highest level abides by relevant notability guidelines. ✗ plicit 14:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a New Zealand women's rugby league player, to meet WP:GNG. A possible redirect target is New Zealand women's national rugby league team. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It would be helpful to identify which sources establish notability, by current Wikipedia standards, rather than just making a claim.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:12, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
03:07, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Not seeing how this journal meets WP:GNG or more specialized WP:Notability (academic journals). Does not seem indexed in anything significant: [7] (Engineering Source (EBSCO), MEDLINE (United States National Library of Medicine), zbMATH). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The abstract notes: "It is an important topic to speed up the construction of world-leading scientific journals. This paper explores a variety of publishing practices based on the journals of Science China Series and Science Bulletin, such as optimizing the content orientations, strengthening the sponsor’s policy support of Chinese Academy of Sciences, promoting the initiative of the scientisfs, and improving the academic quality. We also propose some successful suggestions on the construction of journal clustering, international cooperation and exchanges, the professional publishing team, and the digital development of media integration."
The abstract notes: "By analyzing a number of special issues on chemistry published in Chinese Science Bulletin, this paper discussed the strategies and approaches of organizing special issues for scientific journals, including the following four aspects: 1) How to choose the topics? 2) What is the most effective editing procedure? 3) How to advertise and promote the special issues? 4) How to make more associated experts involved? Examples indicate that special issues play an important role in improving the academic quality and enhancing the influence of scientific journals."
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
After a review of the sources in this article, I'm not convinced this team meets the WP:GNG or WP:NSEASONS. In order of appearance in the article, the first source is merely informing readers of a blub meeting, the second is about the athletic club, not the team, the third is all of two short sentences, white the remaining sources are brief and routine game recaps. A check of newspaper archives didn't come up with much better. Let'srun ( talk) 01:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Not a notable organization. Created by undergraduate students last year; no substantial coverage that is independent from the group. Walsh90210 ( talk) 01:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC)