![]() |
The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:38, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Not notable, couldn't find any relevant sources. Deprodded without comment Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 17:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was WP:SNOW keep. A proposal to rename the article will follow, as this is not the venue for that. BD2412 T 07:47, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
RS like the CIA World Factbook state that there are no military forces in Iceland. Lot of related discussion in talk page too. World Factbook states that forces like the ICRU are civilian manned too.
https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/iceland/#military-and-security Nathanielcwm ( talk) 23:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:46, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
No significant coverage. Non-notable musician. SL93 ( talk) 22:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:55, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Geostub made by Spokane Ball yt who was blocked for creating similarly poorly-sourced stubs. This one fails WP:GEOLAND which requires populated places to either be legally recognized or have sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. Please don't just add a GEONAMES entry as a ref; community consensus has consistently been against using such databases to establish legal recognition or GNG. – dlthewave ☎ 22:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Delete I cannot seem to find anything on it. I don't think it is a actual city or town but more like a unofficial areas or community. Perhaps if someone can come along and provide some sources for it then I might change my mind but this article adds nothing to Wikipedia. Super ( talk) 05:56, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:47, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Article is sourced only to the GEONAMES database which is insufficient to establish either GNG or legal recognition as required by
WP:GEOLAND. "Keep" !voters in the recent AfD failed to demonstrate that the article meets either of these WP:GEOLAND criteria; "GEOnet Names Server is back up, and confirms that this is a populated place."
and "Appears to be an actual, legally recognized community, thus meeting GEOLAND"
(asserting that the US Geonames database somehow confers legal recognition for a place in the Congo) are misinterpretations of
WP:GEOLAND that should have been thrown out, and one of the two "comments" makes the same error. The guideline has never stated that all settlements are notable or that simply
demonstrating the existence of a place is sufficient. –
dlthewave
☎
22:16, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. What S Marshall said. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:38, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Non notable politician who contested the Lok Sabha election from UP but faced defeat. The sources are almost exclusively routine announcements of her appointment as a spokesperson to INC. Umakant Bhalerao ( talk) 12:03, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
*Delete Doesn't meet notability criteria for politicians
WP:POLITICIAN. (
talk)
09:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC) —
Tnawang (
talk ·
contribs) is a confirmed
sock puppet of
Vinodtiwari2608 (
talk ·
contribs).
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Seeking stronger consensus about the provided sources
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwaiiplayer (
talk)
13:19, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
—ScottyWong—
21:12, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
It is common for multiple newspapers or journals to publish the same story, sometimes with minor alterations or different headlines, but one story does not constitute multiple works, so at best, this is one source with limited support for notability due to the lack of depth and secondary context or commentary. There is also the March 2019 annoucement of her political candidacy: 1, 2, 3, 4 ANI, 5, 6, that also does not offer in-depth coverage. There are several sources that report on her work as a spokesperson: The Wire, March 2021, gave an interview about the party's position; The Print, May 2021, went viral on social media after a debate; India TV, July 2021, represents party's position on rising petrol prices; PTC News, September 2021, criticised a politician; Jansatta, October 2021, told a news anchor to not interrupt her during a debate. Reports of her doing her job as a spokesperson in debates, interviews, or quotes to the media also lack secondary context or commentary about her. Her past and current career can be verified, but there does not appear to be much more than a brief CV and some family political history, so it seems WP:TOOSOON for an article. Beccaynr ( talk) 03:34, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
In the absence of multiple sources, it must be possible to verify that the source reflects a neutral point of view, is credible and provides sufficient detail for a comprehensive article. However, I do not think a source of this quality is available here. In the People SNG, the WP:BASIC criteria states
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability, and from my view, I have !voted to delete because the sources, even when combined, do not appear to provide sufficient detail and depth about Shrinate for a comprehensive article. Also, the politicians/political figures and journalists criteria seem designed to exclude routine news reporting as support for notability, and a related challenge is the many sources that appear to be promotional announcements instead of independent reports. But I want to emphasize the WP:TOOSOON part of my !vote, because better sources may exist in the future. Beccaynr ( talk) 16:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Local band, fails WP:BAND: I can't find any significant coverage online, no other indication of notability. See also related AfD Monster X (band). Lennart97 ( talk) 20:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Local band, fails WP:BAND: I can't find any significant coverage online, no other indication of notability. See also related AfD Devoid of Faith. Lennart97 ( talk) 20:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:32, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 14:45, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Stifle (
talk)
14:45, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
20:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:39, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
I skipped this one initially due to the population claim, but the slightest glance at topos and aerials shows that there is no way that 1,775 people lived in a place where there is a truck stop over by the highway and, yes, a grain elevator by the tracks at the point indicated by GNIS. For comparison, Ritzville, Washington is what a place with that many people actually looks like on the ground. Which is funny, actually, because if you read the start of this heartwarming article, you can see that the byline is "RITZVILLE, Adams County", which by an extraordinary coincidence had, in 1990, a population of 1,725. And furthermore, it turns out that the fire which burned into the 4,500 acre farm and which consumed some 20,000 acres in all "began beside the railroad tracks near Tokio." And that's the only reference to Tokio in the article. I've complained along the way about several examples where the cited sources were significantly misread, but this is on a whole 'nother level of failure. Further searching is clogged to a large degree by the capital of Japan, but what I found was of questionable reliability. It does show up in ghosttowns.com, but what it says about buildings destroyed by the fire doesn't fit all that well with the aerials: there wasn't a cluster of buildings here, only a single structure attached to the oldest grain elevator, the latter still there. There apparently was a school, as there is a picture showing the usual isolated couple of buildings at an undetermined location. Another wiki has an entry repeating the ghosttowns.com info and adding the unsourced claim that it had a peak population of 550, which is not terribly plausible: it's a third the population of Ritzville and would have to have occupied a correspondingly large area. I'm not convinced there's enough to separate this minimal settlement/commercial center/shipping point out from the larger Ritzville area. Everything else in the article is about the truck stop, which is of purely regional interest. Mangoe ( talk) 19:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMUSIC, all sources are WP:PRIMARY, no chart placings either. Xclusivzik ( talk) 19:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Populated place that seems to lack either legal recognition for WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG coverage. RL0919 ( talk) 22:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Notability is not established per WP:GEOLAND. It's a subdivision off of a state highway. (Its actual name is "The Villages at Charlie Creek") I PROD this earlier today and the creator removed it based on labels in Wikimapia - the website grabs articles that have {{ coord}} data...which is the case here. – The Grid ( talk) 19:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. —ScottyWong— 15:23, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Unable to find any coverage in reliable sources for this WP:BLP, does not meet WP:NGRIDIRON as the United Football League (2009–2012) was not a top-tier professional league and there does not appear to be anything notable about his college career. Contested WP:PROD J04n( talk page) 19:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
This article doesn't show evidence of WP:GNG. The two listed sources consist of a link to a Google search and a single line reference in an old poetry quarterly, neither of which demonstrate notability. I'm also deeply sceptical about the notability/existence of some of the listed awards, ie "The Sylvia Plath Award for Poems about Women (1986)". JonnyDKeen ( talk) 18:38, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:13, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
No assertion of notability. Why is it significant that a game uses SDL? Without an affirmative answer to this question, this falls under WP:NOTDIR. This is not a defining feature of video games that warrants a list. Axem Titanium ( talk) 20:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Unreferenced list with no assertion of notability. Why is it significant that a game uses Scaleform, an extremely common middleware solution? Without an affirmative answer to this question, this falls under WP:NOTDIR. This is not a defining feature of video games that warrants a list. Axem Titanium ( talk) 20:07, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 00:23, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Unreferenced list with no assertion of notability. Why is it significant that a game has EAX support? Without an affirmative answer to this question, this falls under WP:NOTDIR. This is not a defining feature of video games that warrants a list. Axem Titanium ( talk) 18:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
This list does not appear to meet the criteria at WP:SAL and WP:NOTDIR. Havok is one of the most widespread middleware technologies in video games. It would be easier to list games NOT using Havok. This is not a defining feature of video games appropriate as a list topic. Axem Titanium ( talk) 18:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
This list does not appear to meet the criteria at WP:SAL and WP:NOTDIR. The length and seemingly narrow scope is deceptive because this list is extremely out of date (and largely unreferenced). PhysX is a standard library within Nvidia GameWorks and, as such, is used in practically every major video game of the past five years and will continue to be for the foreseeable future. This is not a defining feature of video games appropriate as a list topic. Axem Titanium ( talk) 18:17, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete. G5 by Bbb23. (non-admin closure) User:力 (powera, π, ν) 20:04, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable minor performer Orange Mike | Talk 16:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Lacks coverage to even be a WP:NLIST. Refs currently in the page mention it only as part of award lists. Since 2019, both mainstream and entertainment press have stopped mentioning it altogether in award listings as well. Hemanthah ( talk) 15:20, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:33, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Lacking sources, not likely to ever be expanded beyond what it is currently, and would be best off merged with Superior orders. Mako001 ( talk) 14:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:43, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:39, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ugandan Australians and also this, this and this AFD, these is no need for this page. The page fails WP:NOTEVERYTHING in that it's not encyclopedic with stubs about every possible diaspora group in the world. Geschichte ( talk) 14:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Same reason as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cedar Hill (Iron County, Missouri), and yes I found it via the shared name. This Cedar Hill also seems like an undistinguished hill, failing GEOLAND. Geschichte ( talk) 14:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. None of the arguments are strong, but after two relists, the most compelling, detailed argument is that the current sources meet GNG, a position which has not been refuted. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 15:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO Yaakovaryeh ( talk) 05:32, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:36, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 11:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:BASIC, and WP:ANYBIO. To the best of my ability to find films she was in, she does not appear to have lead or otherwise significant roles in multiple notable films. She also does not appear to have received WP:SIGCOV that I could find (and none exist in articles on the various Scandanavian Wikipedias that have her article on it). As a result, I propose that this article be deleted for failing to be notable. — Mikehawk10 ( talk) 05:36, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
06:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:36, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 15:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
References do not pass WP:GNG as far as I can see - Rich T| C| E-Mail 01:03, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk)
02:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
06:56, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bold third relist, need wider input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:35, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:39, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
This page about an influencer seems to fail the notability criteria on Wikipedia:Notability (people) Quark1005 ( talk) 03:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Close to a consensus above (discarding policy-deficient !votes), but relisting to see if it can be established more clearly.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:35, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Unsourced, fails WP:BAND. All I can find in terms of significant coverage is one album review by Punknews.org, which isn't nearly enough. Lennart97 ( talk) 10:26, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 11:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
per WP:NF, lacking significant coverage by independent reliable sources, reviews cited in article other than Leisure Byte are non-notable blog reviews and do not contribute to the notability of the film BOVINEBOY 2008 09:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Contested PROD [5]. Fails NACTOR. No noteworthy credits and little to no coverage in RS. KH-1 ( talk) 00:09, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can't soft delete as a contested PROD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠
PMC♠
(talk)
06:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
09:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:40, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable student organization. No significant coverage. It was prodded in 2009 with the reason "orphaned article, lacks 3rd party references demonstrating notability of this organization." The prod was removed the next day with the edit summary of "removing". The article lacks 3rd party references and still shows no notability, but hey, at least the article isn't an orphan anymore. SL93 ( talk) 04:52, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
06:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
09:13, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is it is not notable. Appreciate Chubbles' argument, and bias is certainly an issue to be contended with, project wide. However, without sourcing to back it up, there isn't an article to be had. If anyone wants this to work on in Draft to find and add sourcing, feel free to ping me. I don't see that happening with another week's relist/ Star Mississippi 03:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCOMPANY, lacks significant coverage about the record label and why it is notable Dan arndt ( talk) 05:49, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
06:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
09:12, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep (withdrawn). Geschichte ( talk) 21:07, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage and the article is only sourced to IMDb. SL93 ( talk) 06:32, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Mlb96 ( talk) 03:17, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Artist doesn't seem to meet
WP:ANYBIO- coverage is largely non-independent sources and interview-based articles.
MrsSnoozyTurtle
06:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator. Thank you for adding the extra sources. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:04, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Contested PROD [21]. Appears to fail WP:NBAND, no noteworthy awards, little to no coverage. KH-1 ( talk) 05:22, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Another mathematics "topic" that is just two common words used together in different contexts. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 04:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The effects of higher order correlations sometimes can be removed by nonlinear rescaling of the axes, using Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) or related multivariate methods( Melhlop and Lynch 1986). So, of the three sentences in the stub, one of them is factually wrong. Of the four sources, two are being used misleadingly and one, being an arXiv preprint, is not reliable. XOR'easter ( talk) 20:38, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Nonnotable weatherman Loew Galitz ( talk) 04:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. —ScottyWong— 15:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Not a well-defined term. Fivos Papadimitriou wrote a book of this title last year but that doesn't make it notable. We have some extremely vague descriptions and a list of partial-title-matches from a literature search. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 03:25, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
explain the coherent...-- RTFM. "In mathematics, spatial complexity is defined [1] as the complexity of a spatial entity". ... "spatial complexity can be measured by two metrics: one based on run-length encoding and another on edit distance". Now, in your turn, please explain what you see incoherent here, and I will be glad to explain, although it is not my freakig business: !voter's ignoance is not an argument at AfD. On the other hand, Eppstein's opinion below is properly argumentative as should be. Loew Galitz ( talk) 17:02, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
References
Bludgeoning is when a user dominates the conversation in order to persuade others to their point of view. It is typically seen at Articles for deletion.... Typically, the person replies to almost every "!vote" or comment, arguing against that particular person's point of view. ... They always have to have the last word .... While they may have some very valid points, they get lost due to the dominant behavior and others are less likely to consider their viewpoints because of their behavior.Seems pretty on-the-nose to me. -- JBL ( talk) 12:23, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:35, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection of information, which does not add anything valuable to COVID-19 pandemic in Serbia. As a reminder, articles that are inconsistent with WP:NOT may be deleted per WP:DELREASON # 14. JBchrch talk 06:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
🌀
Locomotive207-
talk
🌀
02:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:36, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. There is really not much to these relations except the historical fact that the islands were "discovered" by a Spaniard, this fact is covered in Tuvalu#Early_contacts_with_other_cultures. Even the article states: " bilateral relations both politically and commercially between the two countries are scarce, mainly framed within the framework of EU cooperation" LibStar ( talk) 00:27, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
02:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage I could find and their website doesn't appear to have been updated in many, many years, so no help there either. ThadeusOfNazereth Talk to Me! 00:09, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage for this actor and the article is only sourced to IMDb. Not to be confused with the notable character. SL93 ( talk) 00:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:38, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Not notable, couldn't find any relevant sources. Deprodded without comment Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 17:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was WP:SNOW keep. A proposal to rename the article will follow, as this is not the venue for that. BD2412 T 07:47, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
RS like the CIA World Factbook state that there are no military forces in Iceland. Lot of related discussion in talk page too. World Factbook states that forces like the ICRU are civilian manned too.
https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/iceland/#military-and-security Nathanielcwm ( talk) 23:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:46, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
No significant coverage. Non-notable musician. SL93 ( talk) 22:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:55, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Geostub made by Spokane Ball yt who was blocked for creating similarly poorly-sourced stubs. This one fails WP:GEOLAND which requires populated places to either be legally recognized or have sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. Please don't just add a GEONAMES entry as a ref; community consensus has consistently been against using such databases to establish legal recognition or GNG. – dlthewave ☎ 22:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Delete I cannot seem to find anything on it. I don't think it is a actual city or town but more like a unofficial areas or community. Perhaps if someone can come along and provide some sources for it then I might change my mind but this article adds nothing to Wikipedia. Super ( talk) 05:56, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:47, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Article is sourced only to the GEONAMES database which is insufficient to establish either GNG or legal recognition as required by
WP:GEOLAND. "Keep" !voters in the recent AfD failed to demonstrate that the article meets either of these WP:GEOLAND criteria; "GEOnet Names Server is back up, and confirms that this is a populated place."
and "Appears to be an actual, legally recognized community, thus meeting GEOLAND"
(asserting that the US Geonames database somehow confers legal recognition for a place in the Congo) are misinterpretations of
WP:GEOLAND that should have been thrown out, and one of the two "comments" makes the same error. The guideline has never stated that all settlements are notable or that simply
demonstrating the existence of a place is sufficient. –
dlthewave
☎
22:16, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. What S Marshall said. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:38, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Non notable politician who contested the Lok Sabha election from UP but faced defeat. The sources are almost exclusively routine announcements of her appointment as a spokesperson to INC. Umakant Bhalerao ( talk) 12:03, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
*Delete Doesn't meet notability criteria for politicians
WP:POLITICIAN. (
talk)
09:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC) —
Tnawang (
talk ·
contribs) is a confirmed
sock puppet of
Vinodtiwari2608 (
talk ·
contribs).
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Seeking stronger consensus about the provided sources
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwaiiplayer (
talk)
13:19, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
—ScottyWong—
21:12, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
It is common for multiple newspapers or journals to publish the same story, sometimes with minor alterations or different headlines, but one story does not constitute multiple works, so at best, this is one source with limited support for notability due to the lack of depth and secondary context or commentary. There is also the March 2019 annoucement of her political candidacy: 1, 2, 3, 4 ANI, 5, 6, that also does not offer in-depth coverage. There are several sources that report on her work as a spokesperson: The Wire, March 2021, gave an interview about the party's position; The Print, May 2021, went viral on social media after a debate; India TV, July 2021, represents party's position on rising petrol prices; PTC News, September 2021, criticised a politician; Jansatta, October 2021, told a news anchor to not interrupt her during a debate. Reports of her doing her job as a spokesperson in debates, interviews, or quotes to the media also lack secondary context or commentary about her. Her past and current career can be verified, but there does not appear to be much more than a brief CV and some family political history, so it seems WP:TOOSOON for an article. Beccaynr ( talk) 03:34, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
In the absence of multiple sources, it must be possible to verify that the source reflects a neutral point of view, is credible and provides sufficient detail for a comprehensive article. However, I do not think a source of this quality is available here. In the People SNG, the WP:BASIC criteria states
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability, and from my view, I have !voted to delete because the sources, even when combined, do not appear to provide sufficient detail and depth about Shrinate for a comprehensive article. Also, the politicians/political figures and journalists criteria seem designed to exclude routine news reporting as support for notability, and a related challenge is the many sources that appear to be promotional announcements instead of independent reports. But I want to emphasize the WP:TOOSOON part of my !vote, because better sources may exist in the future. Beccaynr ( talk) 16:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Local band, fails WP:BAND: I can't find any significant coverage online, no other indication of notability. See also related AfD Monster X (band). Lennart97 ( talk) 20:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Local band, fails WP:BAND: I can't find any significant coverage online, no other indication of notability. See also related AfD Devoid of Faith. Lennart97 ( talk) 20:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:32, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 14:45, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Stifle (
talk)
14:45, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
20:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:39, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
I skipped this one initially due to the population claim, but the slightest glance at topos and aerials shows that there is no way that 1,775 people lived in a place where there is a truck stop over by the highway and, yes, a grain elevator by the tracks at the point indicated by GNIS. For comparison, Ritzville, Washington is what a place with that many people actually looks like on the ground. Which is funny, actually, because if you read the start of this heartwarming article, you can see that the byline is "RITZVILLE, Adams County", which by an extraordinary coincidence had, in 1990, a population of 1,725. And furthermore, it turns out that the fire which burned into the 4,500 acre farm and which consumed some 20,000 acres in all "began beside the railroad tracks near Tokio." And that's the only reference to Tokio in the article. I've complained along the way about several examples where the cited sources were significantly misread, but this is on a whole 'nother level of failure. Further searching is clogged to a large degree by the capital of Japan, but what I found was of questionable reliability. It does show up in ghosttowns.com, but what it says about buildings destroyed by the fire doesn't fit all that well with the aerials: there wasn't a cluster of buildings here, only a single structure attached to the oldest grain elevator, the latter still there. There apparently was a school, as there is a picture showing the usual isolated couple of buildings at an undetermined location. Another wiki has an entry repeating the ghosttowns.com info and adding the unsourced claim that it had a peak population of 550, which is not terribly plausible: it's a third the population of Ritzville and would have to have occupied a correspondingly large area. I'm not convinced there's enough to separate this minimal settlement/commercial center/shipping point out from the larger Ritzville area. Everything else in the article is about the truck stop, which is of purely regional interest. Mangoe ( talk) 19:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMUSIC, all sources are WP:PRIMARY, no chart placings either. Xclusivzik ( talk) 19:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Populated place that seems to lack either legal recognition for WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG coverage. RL0919 ( talk) 22:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Notability is not established per WP:GEOLAND. It's a subdivision off of a state highway. (Its actual name is "The Villages at Charlie Creek") I PROD this earlier today and the creator removed it based on labels in Wikimapia - the website grabs articles that have {{ coord}} data...which is the case here. – The Grid ( talk) 19:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. —ScottyWong— 15:23, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Unable to find any coverage in reliable sources for this WP:BLP, does not meet WP:NGRIDIRON as the United Football League (2009–2012) was not a top-tier professional league and there does not appear to be anything notable about his college career. Contested WP:PROD J04n( talk page) 19:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
This article doesn't show evidence of WP:GNG. The two listed sources consist of a link to a Google search and a single line reference in an old poetry quarterly, neither of which demonstrate notability. I'm also deeply sceptical about the notability/existence of some of the listed awards, ie "The Sylvia Plath Award for Poems about Women (1986)". JonnyDKeen ( talk) 18:38, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:13, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
No assertion of notability. Why is it significant that a game uses SDL? Without an affirmative answer to this question, this falls under WP:NOTDIR. This is not a defining feature of video games that warrants a list. Axem Titanium ( talk) 20:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Unreferenced list with no assertion of notability. Why is it significant that a game uses Scaleform, an extremely common middleware solution? Without an affirmative answer to this question, this falls under WP:NOTDIR. This is not a defining feature of video games that warrants a list. Axem Titanium ( talk) 20:07, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 00:23, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Unreferenced list with no assertion of notability. Why is it significant that a game has EAX support? Without an affirmative answer to this question, this falls under WP:NOTDIR. This is not a defining feature of video games that warrants a list. Axem Titanium ( talk) 18:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
This list does not appear to meet the criteria at WP:SAL and WP:NOTDIR. Havok is one of the most widespread middleware technologies in video games. It would be easier to list games NOT using Havok. This is not a defining feature of video games appropriate as a list topic. Axem Titanium ( talk) 18:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
This list does not appear to meet the criteria at WP:SAL and WP:NOTDIR. The length and seemingly narrow scope is deceptive because this list is extremely out of date (and largely unreferenced). PhysX is a standard library within Nvidia GameWorks and, as such, is used in practically every major video game of the past five years and will continue to be for the foreseeable future. This is not a defining feature of video games appropriate as a list topic. Axem Titanium ( talk) 18:17, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete. G5 by Bbb23. (non-admin closure) User:力 (powera, π, ν) 20:04, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable minor performer Orange Mike | Talk 16:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Lacks coverage to even be a WP:NLIST. Refs currently in the page mention it only as part of award lists. Since 2019, both mainstream and entertainment press have stopped mentioning it altogether in award listings as well. Hemanthah ( talk) 15:20, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:33, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Lacking sources, not likely to ever be expanded beyond what it is currently, and would be best off merged with Superior orders. Mako001 ( talk) 14:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:43, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:39, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ugandan Australians and also this, this and this AFD, these is no need for this page. The page fails WP:NOTEVERYTHING in that it's not encyclopedic with stubs about every possible diaspora group in the world. Geschichte ( talk) 14:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Same reason as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cedar Hill (Iron County, Missouri), and yes I found it via the shared name. This Cedar Hill also seems like an undistinguished hill, failing GEOLAND. Geschichte ( talk) 14:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. None of the arguments are strong, but after two relists, the most compelling, detailed argument is that the current sources meet GNG, a position which has not been refuted. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 15:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO Yaakovaryeh ( talk) 05:32, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:36, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 11:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:BASIC, and WP:ANYBIO. To the best of my ability to find films she was in, she does not appear to have lead or otherwise significant roles in multiple notable films. She also does not appear to have received WP:SIGCOV that I could find (and none exist in articles on the various Scandanavian Wikipedias that have her article on it). As a result, I propose that this article be deleted for failing to be notable. — Mikehawk10 ( talk) 05:36, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
06:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:36, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 15:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
References do not pass WP:GNG as far as I can see - Rich T| C| E-Mail 01:03, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk)
02:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
06:56, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bold third relist, need wider input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:35, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:39, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
This page about an influencer seems to fail the notability criteria on Wikipedia:Notability (people) Quark1005 ( talk) 03:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Close to a consensus above (discarding policy-deficient !votes), but relisting to see if it can be established more clearly.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:35, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Unsourced, fails WP:BAND. All I can find in terms of significant coverage is one album review by Punknews.org, which isn't nearly enough. Lennart97 ( talk) 10:26, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 11:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
per WP:NF, lacking significant coverage by independent reliable sources, reviews cited in article other than Leisure Byte are non-notable blog reviews and do not contribute to the notability of the film BOVINEBOY 2008 09:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Contested PROD [5]. Fails NACTOR. No noteworthy credits and little to no coverage in RS. KH-1 ( talk) 00:09, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can't soft delete as a contested PROD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠
PMC♠
(talk)
06:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
09:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:40, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable student organization. No significant coverage. It was prodded in 2009 with the reason "orphaned article, lacks 3rd party references demonstrating notability of this organization." The prod was removed the next day with the edit summary of "removing". The article lacks 3rd party references and still shows no notability, but hey, at least the article isn't an orphan anymore. SL93 ( talk) 04:52, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
06:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
09:13, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is it is not notable. Appreciate Chubbles' argument, and bias is certainly an issue to be contended with, project wide. However, without sourcing to back it up, there isn't an article to be had. If anyone wants this to work on in Draft to find and add sourcing, feel free to ping me. I don't see that happening with another week's relist/ Star Mississippi 03:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCOMPANY, lacks significant coverage about the record label and why it is notable Dan arndt ( talk) 05:49, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
06:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
09:12, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep (withdrawn). Geschichte ( talk) 21:07, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage and the article is only sourced to IMDb. SL93 ( talk) 06:32, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Mlb96 ( talk) 03:17, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Artist doesn't seem to meet
WP:ANYBIO- coverage is largely non-independent sources and interview-based articles.
MrsSnoozyTurtle
06:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator. Thank you for adding the extra sources. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:04, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Contested PROD [21]. Appears to fail WP:NBAND, no noteworthy awards, little to no coverage. KH-1 ( talk) 05:22, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Another mathematics "topic" that is just two common words used together in different contexts. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 04:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The effects of higher order correlations sometimes can be removed by nonlinear rescaling of the axes, using Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) or related multivariate methods( Melhlop and Lynch 1986). So, of the three sentences in the stub, one of them is factually wrong. Of the four sources, two are being used misleadingly and one, being an arXiv preprint, is not reliable. XOR'easter ( talk) 20:38, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Nonnotable weatherman Loew Galitz ( talk) 04:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. —ScottyWong— 15:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Not a well-defined term. Fivos Papadimitriou wrote a book of this title last year but that doesn't make it notable. We have some extremely vague descriptions and a list of partial-title-matches from a literature search. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 03:25, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
explain the coherent...-- RTFM. "In mathematics, spatial complexity is defined [1] as the complexity of a spatial entity". ... "spatial complexity can be measured by two metrics: one based on run-length encoding and another on edit distance". Now, in your turn, please explain what you see incoherent here, and I will be glad to explain, although it is not my freakig business: !voter's ignoance is not an argument at AfD. On the other hand, Eppstein's opinion below is properly argumentative as should be. Loew Galitz ( talk) 17:02, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
References
Bludgeoning is when a user dominates the conversation in order to persuade others to their point of view. It is typically seen at Articles for deletion.... Typically, the person replies to almost every "!vote" or comment, arguing against that particular person's point of view. ... They always have to have the last word .... While they may have some very valid points, they get lost due to the dominant behavior and others are less likely to consider their viewpoints because of their behavior.Seems pretty on-the-nose to me. -- JBL ( talk) 12:23, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:35, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection of information, which does not add anything valuable to COVID-19 pandemic in Serbia. As a reminder, articles that are inconsistent with WP:NOT may be deleted per WP:DELREASON # 14. JBchrch talk 06:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
🌀
Locomotive207-
talk
🌀
02:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:36, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. There is really not much to these relations except the historical fact that the islands were "discovered" by a Spaniard, this fact is covered in Tuvalu#Early_contacts_with_other_cultures. Even the article states: " bilateral relations both politically and commercially between the two countries are scarce, mainly framed within the framework of EU cooperation" LibStar ( talk) 00:27, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
02:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage I could find and their website doesn't appear to have been updated in many, many years, so no help there either. ThadeusOfNazereth Talk to Me! 00:09, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage for this actor and the article is only sourced to IMDb. Not to be confused with the notable character. SL93 ( talk) 00:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC)