The result was delete. Sandstein 14:52, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 23:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to Riphah International University. Consensus is that there is no reason for this to be a seperate article (non-admin closure) Devonian Wombat ( talk) 11:57, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 21:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:19, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
A simple check of the references, and I have not checked all, just a random and substantial sample, shows a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources which is about the lady. She seems to be a fine perosn doing well in her career, but is WP:ROTM Fiddle Faddle 21:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 14:51, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Non notable film. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search to help it pass WP:NFILM. Found several film database sites, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not an IMdB mirror. Donaldd23 ( talk) 20:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus, leaning towards keep. BD2412 T 00:41, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Subject of article is an actor that fails to satisfy any criterion from WP:NACTOR and generally lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources, hence a GNG & WP:ENT fail also. A before search shows hits in unreliable sources that appear to be self published. Celestina007 ( talk) 20:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 14:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
None of the sources are about him except for the YouTube interview. This editor has not won any awards or garnered fame yet. Fails WP:Creative professionals. Created by a blocked user. TamilMirchi ( talk) 20:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Izno ( talk) 01:20, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
No sources exist for this editor. There is an article on the entertainment site Scoopwhoop about his short film Koothu, but there are no sources about him. This person is yet to become notable (such as gaining awards for feature films). Created by a blocked and paid user. Also, none of the information found in the article is present in any of the sources. TamilMirchi ( talk) 20:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
This actress has played the lead role in three films. I cound't find any coverage for Aata (2011), the first film she acted in. In two films, she has played comedienne role as shown by this source: [1]. The sources that cover her in depth are not reliable (i.e. Behindwoods, Webdunia, Times of India video interview). Since she has played the lead in only two notable films, this is a case of WP:Too soon until her film Pesu releases. Created by a paid/blocked user. TamilMirchi ( talk) 20:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
A filmmaker who has directed quite a few non-notable films, his most successful film would have been in the Tribeca Film Festival, but it isn't. No coverage that's indicative of WP:GNG or WP:NCREATIVE either in the article or on a WP:BEFORE search. Having a film or two what was at a few film festivals and got some views on youtube doesn't a notable filmmaker make. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The 2020 Tribeca Film Festival published its selection, distributed laurels, and gave awards. The festival happened untraditionally given the coronavirus outbreak. Updated article to reflect. Dzz134435 Talk Work 22:08, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:24, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG. Subject has one newspaper mention [2] but it's not significant coverage, just a short announcement of him having won a competition. Other sources are listings in various minor competitions, and then what appears to be a shortlist for an open sub-category of the Sony World Photography Awards. In any case, these awards do not make up for the lack of WP:SIGCOV. – Thjarkur (talk) 19:45, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Now United. Applies to all songs below, but since they were not properly tagged editors will have to do this manually and it can be reverted if contested. Sandstein 13:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONG. An editor is very keen on creating articles for every song by this teen pop group, even though none of them appear to have charted anywhere in the world, and none of them appear to be notable. The editor has reverted all attempts to redirect the articles to the group's page or their discography, so I am bringing this one to AfD as a test case to see if other editors think the articles are notable – all of them follow this article's format of a line or two about where the video was filmed (not evidence of notability), and another line or two about the TV shows where the song was performed as promotion, and that's it. Of the sources in the article, the first Billboard article and the UOL article don't mention the song at all, the second Billboard source is literally a passing mention of the release of the video, the Febreteen source is a Brazilian teen magazine which isn't an RS and only exists as a promotional link to "watch the video below", and the Pagina Zero source is just a title with no content whatsoever. I can't find any reliable sources talking about this song. The only part of WP:NMUSIC that could possibly be met here is criterion 5 of WP:NALBUM, as the group performed the song on a TV show to promote it, but as that criterion suggests, if all that can be said about the song is "it was performed on The Late Late Show with James Corden" then it would be better to note this in one sentence in the group's article, not devote a separate article to it. Richard3120 ( talk) 19:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:59, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
The article does not meet notability. I don't believe a merge is appropriate, if every proposed concept Disney has was merged the target articles would be a mess. The title of the article is very generic, so I don't believe a redirect is appropriate. // Timothy :: talk 19:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 13:59, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Not seeing enough depth of sourcing or coverage to justify an article. Plus the basic error in the 2nd paragraph. According to the first para, Moore's law would predict a 32-fold increase, not 10-fold. Edwardx ( talk) 18:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Graphics processors are on a supercharged development path that eclipses Moore's Law. ... GPUs are also advancing more quickly than CPUs because they rely upon a parallel architecture, Jesse Clayton, an Nvidia senior manager, pointed out in another session."
... there are two dynamics controlling the computing industry today – the end of Moore's law and software that can write itself, artificial intelligence, or AI. ... We can study where bottlenecks are. New software systems make the application go faster, not just the chip.
I call it Huang's Law. XOR'easter ( talk) 19:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Huang was throwing a variety of numbers out there; it seems he's still working out the exact multiple he's talking about). XOR'easter ( talk) 22:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
"Huang's law claims that a synergy between hardware, software and artificial intelligence makes the new 'law' possible."The law claims something that makes the law possible? Huh? And there's still no clear statement of it. All this, at the very very least, adds up to a case of WP:TOOSOON. If this really turns into a better-defined thing that people really refer to on a large scale, then come back to this in 5 or 10 years. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 15:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
"So Huang was throwing a variety of numbers out there; it seems he’s still working out the exact multiple he’s talking about."One specific benchmark measurement pointed out by one guy in one talk does not a law make. It's an ill-defined nebulous topic that cannot be written about in a cohesive way until and if it becomes more widely accepted and better specified. WP:GNG doesn't apply because there is no topic to apply it to. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 17:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
So we're writing an article on a "law" that someone attempted to coin 6 days ago. A "law" which is so vague that the current article can't even properly describe it. So yeah, the source is not reliable insofar as it attempts to coin a new "law" of computing. XOR's fetch analogy above was both hilarious and eerily apt. If Gordon Moore had made his famous observation in a keynote speech 6 days ago, and then some people wrote about it and called it "Moore's law", it would also be inappropriate for an article. And it would have even have had the advantage of being specific: "transistor density doubles every 18-24 months" (or whatever the exact time frame is). It wasn't using some vague notion of "performance" that Mims is; it was talking about transistor density. We wouldn't have been able to write about Moore's law for quite a few years at the very least...until we knew that people were continuing to use the term in the same way, and that people had written about it and studied it. This isn't a topic. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 00:39, 26 September 2020 (UTC)I call it Huang’s Law ... It describes how the silicon chips that power artificial intelligence more than double in performance every two years. While the increase can be attributed to both hardware and software, its steady progress makes it a unique enabler of everything from autonomous cars, trucks and ships to the face, voice and object recognition in our personal gadgets.
"Huang, who is CEO of Nvidia, didn’t call it Huang’s Law; I’m guessing he’ll leave that to others.". That's the exact opposite of using it, and the piece was very clear to point out that Huang was being pretty vague with his claims, which also supports the fact that there's no topic here. Let me stress this point, because it's vital: there is no topic here. The ExtremeTech piece, contrary to trying to use it to support notability, goes out of its way to also explain why this is not some well-defined thing, like Moore's law is, and to criticize Mims for not knowing what the hell he's talking about. We can't write about a topic if there is no well-defined topic. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 14:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:59, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
A religious secondary school. I CSD'd this as G11 but it was contested. The article does not meet GNG or WP:ORG, and appears promotional in nature. Sources in the article and BEFORE showed only database style listings, sites that do not meet WP:IS. // Timothy :: talk 18:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Draftify: The problem with this article is confusion between the works of a sacred organisation and the foundation and functions of a school to benefit the society. It should be moved back to draft, and heavily edited to show the purpose, benefits and notability of the school, outside of the references of the sacred organisation. -- Whiteguru ( talk) 12:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
This school was established 1975 very old & well famous school in our city. Wikipedia like this type of content. Our Article is not promotional to any entity or organization nor this school supports any kind of religion. It is just based on the ideology of Sri Aurobindo & Mira Alfassa. This old school gives good education to the society. Like Integral education. Many students pass out from the school.
There is another school which is based on the same ideology which has a Wikipedia page -
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Aurobindo%27s_Rourkela_School
like the above-mentioned school, Matrubhaban School & college is also a Normal school. So, my humble request to not nominate/vote this article to be deleted. Also I am trying to improve my article. My hope u will approve my content. Rewrite Man ( talk) 18:38, 26 September 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rewrite Man ( talk • contribs) 18:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Zoozaz1 talk 02:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Kay is not notable outside of having been a member of a band that has notability, but he does not have any notability on his own John Pack Lambert ( talk) 18:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to United States representatives at Miss World. Sandstein 14:00, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Was soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Texas World due to no participation in May 2020. Was then restored by request; however the editor that requested it to be restored has not improved it (all five sources are still primary or non-RS ones) therefore bringing it to AfD again. Black Kite (talk) 17:16, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
References
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Izno ( talk) 01:28, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Reason Wikipranav26 ( talk) 17:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:53, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a political officeholder at the local level, not properly sourced as passing WP:NPOL #2. The highest level of office he's stated to have held is that of county assessor, which is not an "inherently" notable office that guarantees a Wikipedia article per se -- but the only claim to greater notability than the norm is that he was charged with (but ultimately acquitted of) a crime nowhere near serious or important enough to claim that he would be notable under WP:PERP. And as for the sourcing, five of the seven footnotes here are primary sources (content on the self-published websites of his own employers, press releases, all-candidate election information directories) that are not support for notability -- and the two that are WP:GNG-worthy media coverage aren't enough to make him notable all by themselves as every officeholder at the local level can always show at least two hits in the local media. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have a lot more and better referencing than this. Bearcat ( talk) 17:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Microsoft Visual Studio#Debugger. (non-admin closure) Dps04 ( talk) 17:01, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSOFT, alike to other features of Microsoft Visual Studio which do not have their own articles Ed talk! 16:43, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Izno ( talk) 01:29, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
GNIS code of U6, which indicates that it is a place without legal recognition, so it quite flatly fails WP:GNG. The State Historical Society calls it a trading point and a store, but as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tingley, Missouri shows, a description as a "trading point" isn't enough for notability. Google maps shows a gas station calling itself a "marina" and a few outbuildings at the site now. A bit down the road, there's a collection of houses and maybe a few trailers, but that's too far south from where the topos are showing Glen Town. I'm still waiting on a newspapers.com decision from WP:LIBRARY, but Google Books ain't brining up anything useful. Hog Farm Bacon 16:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Single independent source, for an award issued by a non-notable company (contested PROD). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to Drinking fountains in Philadelphia. (non-admin closure) ( t · c) buidhe 18:25, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Prod rationale was Non-notable horse through trough. It's old, but that's not enough for notability. A city-level register of historic places is not enough to pass
WP:GEOFEAT. I'm struggling to find coverage for this particular site.
This is just a table listing and almost suggests it doesn't have a name beyond "Horse trough".
Another brief listing. It exists, it's old, and it has a bland name. That's about all that I can find about this, and it doesn't meet
WP:GEOFEAT or
WP:GNG.. Deprodded by
Spinningspark stating that if
Wilson Cary Swann or
Philadelphia Fountain Society existed, it could be merged there. However, GEOFEAT is still not met, GNG is not met, and since neither of the merge targets exist at the moment, to AFD this goes.
Hog Farm
Bacon
01:23, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Izno ( talk) 01:32, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Routine product, with routine pr and notices, but no significant discussions I could identify. The version in the esWPis almost identical. DGG ( talk ) 03:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. Refs are mix of blogs and press releases. Potentially notable. scope_creep Talk 19:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Been open for over a month now, three relists and no additional input since 27 August. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:06, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Apparent WP:NARTIST fail. I cannot find anything about this painter, and there is no equivalent in the Russian Wikipedia. I don't know how to back-transliterate this name into Cyrillic, so perhaps those who do can find something. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 14:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Russian painters of the 18th century, working outside the main urban centers, but not this artist? I'm OK with keeping the entry, but only if we can verify that there is indeed such a painting, and where he worked. You seems t assume he worked outside the main urban centers, but we don't really know that, do we? To answer your question: I can find several: Grigory Ostrovsky and Vasily Tropinin for example. Vexations ( talk) 11:52, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 04:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable footballer without an appearance in a fully professional league.. Speedy deletion was removed by another editor. Kante4 ( talk) 15:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:04, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Completely unnotable (even by Playboy standards) and any attempt to find coverage will only lead you to pornography. Can’t even find anything in Polish. Trillfendi ( talk) 14:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:35, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. References are run of the mill refs that fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. scope_creep Talk 15:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Izno ( talk) 01:36, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet the requirements of WP:BIO - while there are plenty of articles quoting him, I am unable to find any articles providing coverage of him as the subject. SmartSE ( talk) 15:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to Yandy.com. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:03, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
n independent notability -- covered adequately in the article on his company. DGG ( talk ) 09:58, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
New page review: this article is about the character name of an avatar assumed by a Youtuber in Japan. The content tells us that they have done many things on Youtube, and are famous within their niche. There is a great amount of detail, but nothing that suggests significance to me. Each detail is sourced but the sources appear to be social media, user-generated content and fan sites. Thus:
Overall this article appears to be fancruft that relies on inadequate sources. Mccapra ( talk) 13:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Article asserts significance, so not A7. However, on examining the assertion it falls flat: google scholar profile. Does not pass GNG or NPROF. Eostrix ( 🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 13:30, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete. G5/G11 (and salted) by Liz. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki ( π, ν) 01:55, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Article asserts significance, so not A7. However, does not pass NSINGER or GNG. The "Nobody safe" video has around 114k views on YouTube. There is little to be found in terms of sources here. Eostrix ( 🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 13:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 14:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
The subject of this biography has no discernible personal notability, just a subservient kind linked solely to another notable person. Being a "muse" is not a notable occupation - other than that, her achievements are few in order to meet the criteria. Ref (chew) (do) 12:51, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails the WP:GNG. Although I did find one decent source in the Sydney Morning Herald, GNG requires multiple sources to qualify. See also AfDs for supporting company Opmantek and its other software Open-AuDIT (all created by the same obvious COI editor LoCrow ( talk · contribs)) – Tera tix ₵ 12:52, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails the notability guideline for companies. Though I was able to find one decent article in the Sydney Morning Herald, NCORP requires multiple qualifying sources. See also AfDs for its software NMIS and Open-AudIT (all created by the same obvious COI editor LoCrow ( talk · contribs)). – Tera tix ₵ 12:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Izno ( talk) 01:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
WP:MILL puzzle video game. Notability ( WP:N) is not established with the cited sources. IGN has no content, Eurogamer has a brief mention, and PC Gamer reproduces an e-mail by the developer, which is a primary source. Sandstein 15:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:01, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails the notability guideline for products. PROD was contested in 2013 by obvious COI editor LoCrow ( talk · contribs). See also AfDs for its supporting company Opmantek and its other software NMIS. – Tera tix ₵ 12:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 14:02, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. Possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect to Hockey East but I'm not convinced it needs adding there. Boleyn ( talk) 20:29, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 11:24, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Due to discussion at WT:FOOTBALL#Ernest Proud it seems this probably fails WP:NFOOTBALL and from the look of things there isn't much to support WP:GNG either. Govvy ( talk) 12:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. The consensus is that the article passes WP:GNG and is therefore notable. There is also some agreement that the article needs to be improved, and to that, I say WP:DINC. (non-admin closure) Bait30 Talk 2 me pls? 18:04, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
No reliable sources to verify the events and the naming, fails to meet the relevant notability guideline. The article is based mostly on propagandist sites and on misinterpretation of sources. GevHev4 ( talk) 11:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The article contains provocation and violates the rules of Wikipedia.
1. The title of the photo on which the Armenian residents of Stepanakert are holding a demonstration demanding
reunification with Armenia is presented as an anti-Azerbaijani demonstration, the motive of which, as shown in the article, is itself Anti-Azerbaijanism.
2. The author of the article used numerous Azerbaijani sources that obviously cannot be considered
independent.
publications:
other unreliable sources
Գարիկ Ավագյան ( talk) 10:21, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 07:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Assistant coach. Doesn't pass GNG or NFOOTY. Eostrix ( 🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 10:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is that this is a WP:CFORK of Legitimacy of the State of Israel, which is about the same topic, and has other problems. Sandstein 14:35, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
The article has been nominated by Pincrete I have messaged the editor to complete the AfD Lightburst ( talk) 19:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Nominators rationale The article is little more than half-a-dozen random examples of use of a term which - while it may be regularly used in the Isr-Pal context - is not the subject of study in its own right and therefore not suitable as a WP topic. There are many word conjunctions, which are vaguely critical, used by one side to characterise the position of the other, Russian intransigence, European bureauocracy, Turkish sabre-rattling, American aggression may also be simarly used terms in particular contexts. The definition in the lead appears to be WP:OR, and necessarily so since I could not find any source defining the term. It is not even very neutral OR, since the term appears to be largely used by pro-Israel sources to negatively characterise the Arab non-recognition of Israel. The term might well be apt to be used within one of the Isr-Pal articles, but does not justify its own article IMO. Pincrete ( talk) 09:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC) Apologies for messing up the initial nomination and thanks to Lightburst.
The result was keep. I restored the AfD believing that it was wrongly closed by its nominator. The closure is clear indication of withdrawal. See User talk:DiplomatTesterMan#AfD Closure. Hence, closing the discussion as KEEP, with Nomination withdrawn note per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī ( talk) 11:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Just being in the "TIME magazine's 100 most influential people" list isn't a criteria of notability is it? Does not meet GNG. DTM ( talk) 09:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The lady is notable enough, though I agree as WP: BLP1E. I have accepted it in its current state and to flagged for cleanup. It is a borderline acceptance and I feel it is useful to allow the community to decide. I remain neutral in this discussion. Fiddle Faddle 11:54, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) IceWelder [ ✉] 15:40, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
While there are several sources that mention Fredrik Liljegren, all but one are principally about the company he co-founded: DICE, and he is only mentioned in passing. The last source focuses on RedJade, another company he worked at, again with a passing mention. In the same vein, most of the content that is sourced (I recently took out several unsourced parts) talks about DICE and only briefly about how he was involved, rather than about him directly.
There are only some key points about him in the sources:
I could not verify the integrity of the claims based on the Svenska Dagbladet article because full access to the SD archive is paywalled and the text in the preview thumbnail is illegible. However, the handful of paragraphs alone likely do not suffice for notability.
The subject, therefore, seems to fail WP:GNG, so I propose a redirect to the DICE article (merging is probably useless because all releveant content is already there). Favourably, the article should first be deleted and then a redirect created on top, so to avoid unwanted IP revert efforts. IceWelder [ ✉] 16:14, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:50, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." WP:BEFORE showed WP:ROUTINE coverage, but not significant coverage that addressed the subject directly and in-depth or that established it meets NBUILD. // Timothy :: talk 11:46, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:50, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Störm (talk) 00:19, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 14:02, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Article created by a blocked sockpuppet that fails WP:GNG. No coverage whatsoever in English-language sources. Currently largely unsourced. Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 18:11, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Keep I've been thinking a lot about several articles which highlight a
WP:SYSTEMIC problem about cultures that have been underrepresented historically. This figure seems to have had some importance in the politics of his time in 19th century Kosovo. One of the articles which have been used as a source, has been written by Ukshin Zajmi, an exceptional Kosovan journalist who died a few months ago. The nr.2 leader of the ruling party of Kosovo made an announcement about this sad event - an example of how well respected this figure was in Kosovo. I've done some cleanup - more should be done - and linked Zajmi's article but in general, sources do not have to be available online or written in English
(
WP:GNG). --
Maleschreiber ([[User talk:|talk]])
23:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Keep - Per Maleschreiber. And per WP:GNG. BabbaQ ( talk) 16:17, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Also stubbed. Should not be re-expanded except with human-written content. (non-admin closure) ( t · c) buidhe 18:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
On reviewing this article, I note that the text is a lightly-obfuscated raw machine translation of the French-language version of the article. Wikipedia's longstanding view on machine translations is set out at WP:MACHINETRANSLATION. Please will the community authorise the article's deletion? You should consider that this lady may well be notable, and that WP:MACHINETRANSLATION applies despite her likely notability. — S Marshall T/ C 12:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 10:46, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, only source is written by app developer (see https://github.com/rtyley/agit/blob/master/README.markdown), almost completely written by the developer himself, see Robertotyley ( talk · contribs) Ed talk! 07:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. G5 Drmies ( talk) 13:20, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Not in the source: WP:V requires that all articles have sources that contain information about the subject itself. Also, the creator Pumpie is now blocked for disruptive editing. Tetihgsaud ( talk) 04:04, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Not recognized by GNIS. Durham calls it a post office named after a California politician and local real estate developer. PO in existence from 1896-1904. There is a Machin Avenue in Novato. Not clear where the post office was located ("four miles north of Novato Ignacio"). No evidence that it was a community and nothing that would establish notability.
Glendoremus (
talk)
03:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. North America 1000 10:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
I don't see coverage to meet WP:GNG, and just being a backup singer for a famous singer, releasing some music (of no note) and being in one documentary doesn't a notable person make, and certainly doesn't make a pass of WP:MUSICBIO. Perhaps a redirect to Beyoncé#Music_videos_and_stage or 20 Feet From Stardom is in order? Eddie891 Talk Work 12:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MBisanz talk 14:50, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
A non-notable event. Coverage is limited to local papers, the biggest is a Cleveland sized publication, not enough to indicate notability. It doesn't even seem significant enough seem to a mention at BGSU to me, but opinions may differ there. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
PROD contested by obvious COI editor. Original rationale: "Fails the notability guideline for companies. Promotional tone." – Tera tix ₵ 02:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus not to delete. Merge is possible. Tone 08:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
I don't know why this was moved from draft space to article space; it's little more than a sort of dictionary definition with explanations from one or two reliable sources--but that they explain it doesn't make it encyclopedically notable. Note also that 2/3 of the "History" section is completely irrelevant, and that the "Public perception" part merely lists the sources and provides editorial commentary on them. I don't know if Wiktionary has an entry, but that's where it might belong--not here. Drmies ( talk) 01:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. Tone 08:16, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
I don't see enough significant coverage of this person or his work to pass WP:GNG or WP:DIRECTOR. It also seems to be created and heavily edited by a likely conflict of interest/ undisclosed paid editor (Josubu, who has the same name as Budine's production company). [49] Whisperjanes ( talk) 03:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
2007-04 ↻ restored
, 2007-04 ✗ deleted
, 2007-04 ✗ deleted
The result was delete. Tone 08:16, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP--references given are all company press releases; no indication of significant third party coverage elsewhere. Web search of company yields a sea of press releases. Author's contributions indicate a single purpose account engaged in promoting the company and its products. The Wicked Twisted Road ( talk) 02:02, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:41, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Promotion of a company. Fails notability. WP:ROUTINE Priyanjali singh ( talk) 08:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Promotional article, references do not establish pass of WP:GNG. References that might seem to suggest notability are in fact interviews or descriptions by people associated with the school. Nearlyevil665 ( talk) 08:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Non Notable film with nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search to help it to pass WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability for 5 years. Donaldd23 ( talk) 16:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
The article fails WP:NACTOR; none of her roles are significant enough (though I will admit her role in Sideways was memorable). Hitcher vs. Candyman ( talk) 15:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. Nature of references support keep. (non-admin closure) scope_creep Talk 13:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. Native advertising. scope_creep Talk 17:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
This isn't my usual field, but I do not think the sources show notability. They're sympathetic local interviews for a local promotor. I think this fails encyclopedic significance. A draft for this was declined, but the contributorcreatedthe article nevertheless. DGG ( talk ) 01:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Unreleased film, tagged since 2016. According to the article it will never be released...is it notable enough to keep on Wikipedia per WP:NFF? Donaldd23 ( talk) 01:14, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:49, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Even in the one source mentioned (which is a conference paper, not peer reviewed), the software is only covered in brief mentions. No other papers in Google Scholar cover it in more than a passing mention. It has no hits in Google Books. There is no reliably sourced content worth merging into the parent article. czar 01:08, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Non notable public info film. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE except one article that listed the film as "scary". Last nomination ended in no consensus as there was no participation in the discussion. Donaldd23 ( talk) 00:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:49, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
BLP of a non notable businessman. Much of the coverage relates to a court case although this isn’t an attack page. Plenty of promotional coverage and not much else. Mccapra ( talk) 19:59, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:17, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable software product, failing WP:NSOFTWARE and WP:GNG. Viable references are not forthcoming.
I also nominate this related topic:
-- Mikeblas ( talk) 22:50, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 14:52, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 23:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to Riphah International University. Consensus is that there is no reason for this to be a seperate article (non-admin closure) Devonian Wombat ( talk) 11:57, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 21:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:19, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
A simple check of the references, and I have not checked all, just a random and substantial sample, shows a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources which is about the lady. She seems to be a fine perosn doing well in her career, but is WP:ROTM Fiddle Faddle 21:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 14:51, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Non notable film. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search to help it pass WP:NFILM. Found several film database sites, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not an IMdB mirror. Donaldd23 ( talk) 20:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus, leaning towards keep. BD2412 T 00:41, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Subject of article is an actor that fails to satisfy any criterion from WP:NACTOR and generally lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources, hence a GNG & WP:ENT fail also. A before search shows hits in unreliable sources that appear to be self published. Celestina007 ( talk) 20:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 14:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
None of the sources are about him except for the YouTube interview. This editor has not won any awards or garnered fame yet. Fails WP:Creative professionals. Created by a blocked user. TamilMirchi ( talk) 20:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Izno ( talk) 01:20, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
No sources exist for this editor. There is an article on the entertainment site Scoopwhoop about his short film Koothu, but there are no sources about him. This person is yet to become notable (such as gaining awards for feature films). Created by a blocked and paid user. Also, none of the information found in the article is present in any of the sources. TamilMirchi ( talk) 20:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
This actress has played the lead role in three films. I cound't find any coverage for Aata (2011), the first film she acted in. In two films, she has played comedienne role as shown by this source: [1]. The sources that cover her in depth are not reliable (i.e. Behindwoods, Webdunia, Times of India video interview). Since she has played the lead in only two notable films, this is a case of WP:Too soon until her film Pesu releases. Created by a paid/blocked user. TamilMirchi ( talk) 20:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
A filmmaker who has directed quite a few non-notable films, his most successful film would have been in the Tribeca Film Festival, but it isn't. No coverage that's indicative of WP:GNG or WP:NCREATIVE either in the article or on a WP:BEFORE search. Having a film or two what was at a few film festivals and got some views on youtube doesn't a notable filmmaker make. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The 2020 Tribeca Film Festival published its selection, distributed laurels, and gave awards. The festival happened untraditionally given the coronavirus outbreak. Updated article to reflect. Dzz134435 Talk Work 22:08, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:24, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG. Subject has one newspaper mention [2] but it's not significant coverage, just a short announcement of him having won a competition. Other sources are listings in various minor competitions, and then what appears to be a shortlist for an open sub-category of the Sony World Photography Awards. In any case, these awards do not make up for the lack of WP:SIGCOV. – Thjarkur (talk) 19:45, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Now United. Applies to all songs below, but since they were not properly tagged editors will have to do this manually and it can be reverted if contested. Sandstein 13:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONG. An editor is very keen on creating articles for every song by this teen pop group, even though none of them appear to have charted anywhere in the world, and none of them appear to be notable. The editor has reverted all attempts to redirect the articles to the group's page or their discography, so I am bringing this one to AfD as a test case to see if other editors think the articles are notable – all of them follow this article's format of a line or two about where the video was filmed (not evidence of notability), and another line or two about the TV shows where the song was performed as promotion, and that's it. Of the sources in the article, the first Billboard article and the UOL article don't mention the song at all, the second Billboard source is literally a passing mention of the release of the video, the Febreteen source is a Brazilian teen magazine which isn't an RS and only exists as a promotional link to "watch the video below", and the Pagina Zero source is just a title with no content whatsoever. I can't find any reliable sources talking about this song. The only part of WP:NMUSIC that could possibly be met here is criterion 5 of WP:NALBUM, as the group performed the song on a TV show to promote it, but as that criterion suggests, if all that can be said about the song is "it was performed on The Late Late Show with James Corden" then it would be better to note this in one sentence in the group's article, not devote a separate article to it. Richard3120 ( talk) 19:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:59, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
The article does not meet notability. I don't believe a merge is appropriate, if every proposed concept Disney has was merged the target articles would be a mess. The title of the article is very generic, so I don't believe a redirect is appropriate. // Timothy :: talk 19:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 13:59, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Not seeing enough depth of sourcing or coverage to justify an article. Plus the basic error in the 2nd paragraph. According to the first para, Moore's law would predict a 32-fold increase, not 10-fold. Edwardx ( talk) 18:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Graphics processors are on a supercharged development path that eclipses Moore's Law. ... GPUs are also advancing more quickly than CPUs because they rely upon a parallel architecture, Jesse Clayton, an Nvidia senior manager, pointed out in another session."
... there are two dynamics controlling the computing industry today – the end of Moore's law and software that can write itself, artificial intelligence, or AI. ... We can study where bottlenecks are. New software systems make the application go faster, not just the chip.
I call it Huang's Law. XOR'easter ( talk) 19:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Huang was throwing a variety of numbers out there; it seems he's still working out the exact multiple he's talking about). XOR'easter ( talk) 22:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
"Huang's law claims that a synergy between hardware, software and artificial intelligence makes the new 'law' possible."The law claims something that makes the law possible? Huh? And there's still no clear statement of it. All this, at the very very least, adds up to a case of WP:TOOSOON. If this really turns into a better-defined thing that people really refer to on a large scale, then come back to this in 5 or 10 years. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 15:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
"So Huang was throwing a variety of numbers out there; it seems he’s still working out the exact multiple he’s talking about."One specific benchmark measurement pointed out by one guy in one talk does not a law make. It's an ill-defined nebulous topic that cannot be written about in a cohesive way until and if it becomes more widely accepted and better specified. WP:GNG doesn't apply because there is no topic to apply it to. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 17:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
So we're writing an article on a "law" that someone attempted to coin 6 days ago. A "law" which is so vague that the current article can't even properly describe it. So yeah, the source is not reliable insofar as it attempts to coin a new "law" of computing. XOR's fetch analogy above was both hilarious and eerily apt. If Gordon Moore had made his famous observation in a keynote speech 6 days ago, and then some people wrote about it and called it "Moore's law", it would also be inappropriate for an article. And it would have even have had the advantage of being specific: "transistor density doubles every 18-24 months" (or whatever the exact time frame is). It wasn't using some vague notion of "performance" that Mims is; it was talking about transistor density. We wouldn't have been able to write about Moore's law for quite a few years at the very least...until we knew that people were continuing to use the term in the same way, and that people had written about it and studied it. This isn't a topic. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 00:39, 26 September 2020 (UTC)I call it Huang’s Law ... It describes how the silicon chips that power artificial intelligence more than double in performance every two years. While the increase can be attributed to both hardware and software, its steady progress makes it a unique enabler of everything from autonomous cars, trucks and ships to the face, voice and object recognition in our personal gadgets.
"Huang, who is CEO of Nvidia, didn’t call it Huang’s Law; I’m guessing he’ll leave that to others.". That's the exact opposite of using it, and the piece was very clear to point out that Huang was being pretty vague with his claims, which also supports the fact that there's no topic here. Let me stress this point, because it's vital: there is no topic here. The ExtremeTech piece, contrary to trying to use it to support notability, goes out of its way to also explain why this is not some well-defined thing, like Moore's law is, and to criticize Mims for not knowing what the hell he's talking about. We can't write about a topic if there is no well-defined topic. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 14:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:59, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
A religious secondary school. I CSD'd this as G11 but it was contested. The article does not meet GNG or WP:ORG, and appears promotional in nature. Sources in the article and BEFORE showed only database style listings, sites that do not meet WP:IS. // Timothy :: talk 18:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Draftify: The problem with this article is confusion between the works of a sacred organisation and the foundation and functions of a school to benefit the society. It should be moved back to draft, and heavily edited to show the purpose, benefits and notability of the school, outside of the references of the sacred organisation. -- Whiteguru ( talk) 12:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
This school was established 1975 very old & well famous school in our city. Wikipedia like this type of content. Our Article is not promotional to any entity or organization nor this school supports any kind of religion. It is just based on the ideology of Sri Aurobindo & Mira Alfassa. This old school gives good education to the society. Like Integral education. Many students pass out from the school.
There is another school which is based on the same ideology which has a Wikipedia page -
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Aurobindo%27s_Rourkela_School
like the above-mentioned school, Matrubhaban School & college is also a Normal school. So, my humble request to not nominate/vote this article to be deleted. Also I am trying to improve my article. My hope u will approve my content. Rewrite Man ( talk) 18:38, 26 September 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rewrite Man ( talk • contribs) 18:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Zoozaz1 talk 02:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Kay is not notable outside of having been a member of a band that has notability, but he does not have any notability on his own John Pack Lambert ( talk) 18:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to United States representatives at Miss World. Sandstein 14:00, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Was soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Texas World due to no participation in May 2020. Was then restored by request; however the editor that requested it to be restored has not improved it (all five sources are still primary or non-RS ones) therefore bringing it to AfD again. Black Kite (talk) 17:16, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
References
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Izno ( talk) 01:28, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Reason Wikipranav26 ( talk) 17:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:53, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a political officeholder at the local level, not properly sourced as passing WP:NPOL #2. The highest level of office he's stated to have held is that of county assessor, which is not an "inherently" notable office that guarantees a Wikipedia article per se -- but the only claim to greater notability than the norm is that he was charged with (but ultimately acquitted of) a crime nowhere near serious or important enough to claim that he would be notable under WP:PERP. And as for the sourcing, five of the seven footnotes here are primary sources (content on the self-published websites of his own employers, press releases, all-candidate election information directories) that are not support for notability -- and the two that are WP:GNG-worthy media coverage aren't enough to make him notable all by themselves as every officeholder at the local level can always show at least two hits in the local media. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have a lot more and better referencing than this. Bearcat ( talk) 17:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Microsoft Visual Studio#Debugger. (non-admin closure) Dps04 ( talk) 17:01, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSOFT, alike to other features of Microsoft Visual Studio which do not have their own articles Ed talk! 16:43, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Izno ( talk) 01:29, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
GNIS code of U6, which indicates that it is a place without legal recognition, so it quite flatly fails WP:GNG. The State Historical Society calls it a trading point and a store, but as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tingley, Missouri shows, a description as a "trading point" isn't enough for notability. Google maps shows a gas station calling itself a "marina" and a few outbuildings at the site now. A bit down the road, there's a collection of houses and maybe a few trailers, but that's too far south from where the topos are showing Glen Town. I'm still waiting on a newspapers.com decision from WP:LIBRARY, but Google Books ain't brining up anything useful. Hog Farm Bacon 16:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Single independent source, for an award issued by a non-notable company (contested PROD). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to Drinking fountains in Philadelphia. (non-admin closure) ( t · c) buidhe 18:25, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Prod rationale was Non-notable horse through trough. It's old, but that's not enough for notability. A city-level register of historic places is not enough to pass
WP:GEOFEAT. I'm struggling to find coverage for this particular site.
This is just a table listing and almost suggests it doesn't have a name beyond "Horse trough".
Another brief listing. It exists, it's old, and it has a bland name. That's about all that I can find about this, and it doesn't meet
WP:GEOFEAT or
WP:GNG.. Deprodded by
Spinningspark stating that if
Wilson Cary Swann or
Philadelphia Fountain Society existed, it could be merged there. However, GEOFEAT is still not met, GNG is not met, and since neither of the merge targets exist at the moment, to AFD this goes.
Hog Farm
Bacon
01:23, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Izno ( talk) 01:32, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Routine product, with routine pr and notices, but no significant discussions I could identify. The version in the esWPis almost identical. DGG ( talk ) 03:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. Refs are mix of blogs and press releases. Potentially notable. scope_creep Talk 19:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Been open for over a month now, three relists and no additional input since 27 August. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:06, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Apparent WP:NARTIST fail. I cannot find anything about this painter, and there is no equivalent in the Russian Wikipedia. I don't know how to back-transliterate this name into Cyrillic, so perhaps those who do can find something. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 14:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Russian painters of the 18th century, working outside the main urban centers, but not this artist? I'm OK with keeping the entry, but only if we can verify that there is indeed such a painting, and where he worked. You seems t assume he worked outside the main urban centers, but we don't really know that, do we? To answer your question: I can find several: Grigory Ostrovsky and Vasily Tropinin for example. Vexations ( talk) 11:52, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 04:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable footballer without an appearance in a fully professional league.. Speedy deletion was removed by another editor. Kante4 ( talk) 15:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:04, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Completely unnotable (even by Playboy standards) and any attempt to find coverage will only lead you to pornography. Can’t even find anything in Polish. Trillfendi ( talk) 14:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:35, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. References are run of the mill refs that fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. scope_creep Talk 15:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Izno ( talk) 01:36, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet the requirements of WP:BIO - while there are plenty of articles quoting him, I am unable to find any articles providing coverage of him as the subject. SmartSE ( talk) 15:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to Yandy.com. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:03, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
n independent notability -- covered adequately in the article on his company. DGG ( talk ) 09:58, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
New page review: this article is about the character name of an avatar assumed by a Youtuber in Japan. The content tells us that they have done many things on Youtube, and are famous within their niche. There is a great amount of detail, but nothing that suggests significance to me. Each detail is sourced but the sources appear to be social media, user-generated content and fan sites. Thus:
Overall this article appears to be fancruft that relies on inadequate sources. Mccapra ( talk) 13:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Article asserts significance, so not A7. However, on examining the assertion it falls flat: google scholar profile. Does not pass GNG or NPROF. Eostrix ( 🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 13:30, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete. G5/G11 (and salted) by Liz. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki ( π, ν) 01:55, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Article asserts significance, so not A7. However, does not pass NSINGER or GNG. The "Nobody safe" video has around 114k views on YouTube. There is little to be found in terms of sources here. Eostrix ( 🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 13:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 14:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
The subject of this biography has no discernible personal notability, just a subservient kind linked solely to another notable person. Being a "muse" is not a notable occupation - other than that, her achievements are few in order to meet the criteria. Ref (chew) (do) 12:51, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails the WP:GNG. Although I did find one decent source in the Sydney Morning Herald, GNG requires multiple sources to qualify. See also AfDs for supporting company Opmantek and its other software Open-AuDIT (all created by the same obvious COI editor LoCrow ( talk · contribs)) – Tera tix ₵ 12:52, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails the notability guideline for companies. Though I was able to find one decent article in the Sydney Morning Herald, NCORP requires multiple qualifying sources. See also AfDs for its software NMIS and Open-AudIT (all created by the same obvious COI editor LoCrow ( talk · contribs)). – Tera tix ₵ 12:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Izno ( talk) 01:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
WP:MILL puzzle video game. Notability ( WP:N) is not established with the cited sources. IGN has no content, Eurogamer has a brief mention, and PC Gamer reproduces an e-mail by the developer, which is a primary source. Sandstein 15:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:01, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails the notability guideline for products. PROD was contested in 2013 by obvious COI editor LoCrow ( talk · contribs). See also AfDs for its supporting company Opmantek and its other software NMIS. – Tera tix ₵ 12:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 14:02, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. Possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect to Hockey East but I'm not convinced it needs adding there. Boleyn ( talk) 20:29, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 11:24, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Due to discussion at WT:FOOTBALL#Ernest Proud it seems this probably fails WP:NFOOTBALL and from the look of things there isn't much to support WP:GNG either. Govvy ( talk) 12:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. The consensus is that the article passes WP:GNG and is therefore notable. There is also some agreement that the article needs to be improved, and to that, I say WP:DINC. (non-admin closure) Bait30 Talk 2 me pls? 18:04, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
No reliable sources to verify the events and the naming, fails to meet the relevant notability guideline. The article is based mostly on propagandist sites and on misinterpretation of sources. GevHev4 ( talk) 11:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The article contains provocation and violates the rules of Wikipedia.
1. The title of the photo on which the Armenian residents of Stepanakert are holding a demonstration demanding
reunification with Armenia is presented as an anti-Azerbaijani demonstration, the motive of which, as shown in the article, is itself Anti-Azerbaijanism.
2. The author of the article used numerous Azerbaijani sources that obviously cannot be considered
independent.
publications:
other unreliable sources
Գարիկ Ավագյան ( talk) 10:21, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 07:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Assistant coach. Doesn't pass GNG or NFOOTY. Eostrix ( 🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 10:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is that this is a WP:CFORK of Legitimacy of the State of Israel, which is about the same topic, and has other problems. Sandstein 14:35, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
The article has been nominated by Pincrete I have messaged the editor to complete the AfD Lightburst ( talk) 19:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Nominators rationale The article is little more than half-a-dozen random examples of use of a term which - while it may be regularly used in the Isr-Pal context - is not the subject of study in its own right and therefore not suitable as a WP topic. There are many word conjunctions, which are vaguely critical, used by one side to characterise the position of the other, Russian intransigence, European bureauocracy, Turkish sabre-rattling, American aggression may also be simarly used terms in particular contexts. The definition in the lead appears to be WP:OR, and necessarily so since I could not find any source defining the term. It is not even very neutral OR, since the term appears to be largely used by pro-Israel sources to negatively characterise the Arab non-recognition of Israel. The term might well be apt to be used within one of the Isr-Pal articles, but does not justify its own article IMO. Pincrete ( talk) 09:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC) Apologies for messing up the initial nomination and thanks to Lightburst.
The result was keep. I restored the AfD believing that it was wrongly closed by its nominator. The closure is clear indication of withdrawal. See User talk:DiplomatTesterMan#AfD Closure. Hence, closing the discussion as KEEP, with Nomination withdrawn note per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī ( talk) 11:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Just being in the "TIME magazine's 100 most influential people" list isn't a criteria of notability is it? Does not meet GNG. DTM ( talk) 09:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The lady is notable enough, though I agree as WP: BLP1E. I have accepted it in its current state and to flagged for cleanup. It is a borderline acceptance and I feel it is useful to allow the community to decide. I remain neutral in this discussion. Fiddle Faddle 11:54, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) IceWelder [ ✉] 15:40, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
While there are several sources that mention Fredrik Liljegren, all but one are principally about the company he co-founded: DICE, and he is only mentioned in passing. The last source focuses on RedJade, another company he worked at, again with a passing mention. In the same vein, most of the content that is sourced (I recently took out several unsourced parts) talks about DICE and only briefly about how he was involved, rather than about him directly.
There are only some key points about him in the sources:
I could not verify the integrity of the claims based on the Svenska Dagbladet article because full access to the SD archive is paywalled and the text in the preview thumbnail is illegible. However, the handful of paragraphs alone likely do not suffice for notability.
The subject, therefore, seems to fail WP:GNG, so I propose a redirect to the DICE article (merging is probably useless because all releveant content is already there). Favourably, the article should first be deleted and then a redirect created on top, so to avoid unwanted IP revert efforts. IceWelder [ ✉] 16:14, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:50, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." WP:BEFORE showed WP:ROUTINE coverage, but not significant coverage that addressed the subject directly and in-depth or that established it meets NBUILD. // Timothy :: talk 11:46, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:50, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Störm (talk) 00:19, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 14:02, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Article created by a blocked sockpuppet that fails WP:GNG. No coverage whatsoever in English-language sources. Currently largely unsourced. Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 18:11, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Keep I've been thinking a lot about several articles which highlight a
WP:SYSTEMIC problem about cultures that have been underrepresented historically. This figure seems to have had some importance in the politics of his time in 19th century Kosovo. One of the articles which have been used as a source, has been written by Ukshin Zajmi, an exceptional Kosovan journalist who died a few months ago. The nr.2 leader of the ruling party of Kosovo made an announcement about this sad event - an example of how well respected this figure was in Kosovo. I've done some cleanup - more should be done - and linked Zajmi's article but in general, sources do not have to be available online or written in English
(
WP:GNG). --
Maleschreiber ([[User talk:|talk]])
23:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Keep - Per Maleschreiber. And per WP:GNG. BabbaQ ( talk) 16:17, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Also stubbed. Should not be re-expanded except with human-written content. (non-admin closure) ( t · c) buidhe 18:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
On reviewing this article, I note that the text is a lightly-obfuscated raw machine translation of the French-language version of the article. Wikipedia's longstanding view on machine translations is set out at WP:MACHINETRANSLATION. Please will the community authorise the article's deletion? You should consider that this lady may well be notable, and that WP:MACHINETRANSLATION applies despite her likely notability. — S Marshall T/ C 12:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 10:46, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, only source is written by app developer (see https://github.com/rtyley/agit/blob/master/README.markdown), almost completely written by the developer himself, see Robertotyley ( talk · contribs) Ed talk! 07:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. G5 Drmies ( talk) 13:20, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Not in the source: WP:V requires that all articles have sources that contain information about the subject itself. Also, the creator Pumpie is now blocked for disruptive editing. Tetihgsaud ( talk) 04:04, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Not recognized by GNIS. Durham calls it a post office named after a California politician and local real estate developer. PO in existence from 1896-1904. There is a Machin Avenue in Novato. Not clear where the post office was located ("four miles north of Novato Ignacio"). No evidence that it was a community and nothing that would establish notability.
Glendoremus (
talk)
03:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. North America 1000 10:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
I don't see coverage to meet WP:GNG, and just being a backup singer for a famous singer, releasing some music (of no note) and being in one documentary doesn't a notable person make, and certainly doesn't make a pass of WP:MUSICBIO. Perhaps a redirect to Beyoncé#Music_videos_and_stage or 20 Feet From Stardom is in order? Eddie891 Talk Work 12:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MBisanz talk 14:50, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
A non-notable event. Coverage is limited to local papers, the biggest is a Cleveland sized publication, not enough to indicate notability. It doesn't even seem significant enough seem to a mention at BGSU to me, but opinions may differ there. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
PROD contested by obvious COI editor. Original rationale: "Fails the notability guideline for companies. Promotional tone." – Tera tix ₵ 02:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus not to delete. Merge is possible. Tone 08:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
I don't know why this was moved from draft space to article space; it's little more than a sort of dictionary definition with explanations from one or two reliable sources--but that they explain it doesn't make it encyclopedically notable. Note also that 2/3 of the "History" section is completely irrelevant, and that the "Public perception" part merely lists the sources and provides editorial commentary on them. I don't know if Wiktionary has an entry, but that's where it might belong--not here. Drmies ( talk) 01:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. Tone 08:16, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
I don't see enough significant coverage of this person or his work to pass WP:GNG or WP:DIRECTOR. It also seems to be created and heavily edited by a likely conflict of interest/ undisclosed paid editor (Josubu, who has the same name as Budine's production company). [49] Whisperjanes ( talk) 03:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
2007-04 ↻ restored
, 2007-04 ✗ deleted
, 2007-04 ✗ deleted
The result was delete. Tone 08:16, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP--references given are all company press releases; no indication of significant third party coverage elsewhere. Web search of company yields a sea of press releases. Author's contributions indicate a single purpose account engaged in promoting the company and its products. The Wicked Twisted Road ( talk) 02:02, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:41, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Promotion of a company. Fails notability. WP:ROUTINE Priyanjali singh ( talk) 08:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Promotional article, references do not establish pass of WP:GNG. References that might seem to suggest notability are in fact interviews or descriptions by people associated with the school. Nearlyevil665 ( talk) 08:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Non Notable film with nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search to help it to pass WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability for 5 years. Donaldd23 ( talk) 16:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
The article fails WP:NACTOR; none of her roles are significant enough (though I will admit her role in Sideways was memorable). Hitcher vs. Candyman ( talk) 15:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. Nature of references support keep. (non-admin closure) scope_creep Talk 13:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. Native advertising. scope_creep Talk 17:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
This isn't my usual field, but I do not think the sources show notability. They're sympathetic local interviews for a local promotor. I think this fails encyclopedic significance. A draft for this was declined, but the contributorcreatedthe article nevertheless. DGG ( talk ) 01:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Unreleased film, tagged since 2016. According to the article it will never be released...is it notable enough to keep on Wikipedia per WP:NFF? Donaldd23 ( talk) 01:14, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:49, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Even in the one source mentioned (which is a conference paper, not peer reviewed), the software is only covered in brief mentions. No other papers in Google Scholar cover it in more than a passing mention. It has no hits in Google Books. There is no reliably sourced content worth merging into the parent article. czar 01:08, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Non notable public info film. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE except one article that listed the film as "scary". Last nomination ended in no consensus as there was no participation in the discussion. Donaldd23 ( talk) 00:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:49, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
BLP of a non notable businessman. Much of the coverage relates to a court case although this isn’t an attack page. Plenty of promotional coverage and not much else. Mccapra ( talk) 19:59, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Izno ( talk) 01:17, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable software product, failing WP:NSOFTWARE and WP:GNG. Viable references are not forthcoming.
I also nominate this related topic:
-- Mikeblas ( talk) 22:50, 23 September 2020 (UTC)