![]() |
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:03, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Footballer who fails WP:NFOOTY, having never played in a fully professional league or at full international level. No evidence of substantial coverage to otherwise satisfy WP:GNG. Jellyman ( talk) 22:54, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:52, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Footballer who fails WP:NFOOTY, having never played in a fully professional league or at full international level. Several references but mainly WP:ROUTINE, so no evidence of substantial coverage to otherwise satisfy WP:GNG. Jellyman ( talk) 22:50, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:01, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
All plot + no sources = fancruft. Clarityfiend ( talk) 20:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Contrary to one comment, we do delete articles related to major works when the specific subject of the article is not itself notable according to our guidelines. RL0919 ( talk) 04:14, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
I cannot find any indication that the Squats have been discussed in academic or journalistic publications. It appears that the article is little more than a collection of plot -related information that would only interest a small segment of Warhammer 40,000 fans. ― Susmuffin Talk 20:10, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 04:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Simply doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:BROADCAST. Onel5969 TT me 19:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:59, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
The user who made it has a bias POV on Joko Widodo and his former deputy Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, as he made clear in this Wikiquote edit. See also user's history on enwiki and idwiki. Flix11 ( talk) 17:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:00, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 10:12, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Primary sources, even if reliable, do not establish notability. No prejudice against creating a redirect or disambiguation page though the usual editorial processes, but I don't see a strong case here for one or the other. RL0919 ( talk) 18:58, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable fictional bloodline. No primary sources cited, never mind secondary (article tagged for over nine years), and the article is almost entirely in-universe (article tagged for over a decade). A search throws up almost nothing particularly useful as a source... This journal article (from an extremely minor publisher) has a single sentence about the bloodline within a paragraph about the portrayal of vampires in the Warhammer universe generally. This is not enough to support an article. Josh Milburn ( talk) 17:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 18:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character in the Warhammer universe. Long, in-universe article (and it's been tagged with {{ in universe}} for a decade) with no secondary sources cited. A search throws up nothing that would work as a third-party source. Not notable. Josh Milburn ( talk) 17:18, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not redirecting due to the concern about the term being used in multiple works of fiction. RL0919 ( talk) 18:54, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Entirely in-universe discussion of a non-notable group of fictional characters. No third-party sources are cited, and while a search did throw up a couple of mentions in scholarly work, they were nothing more than passing mentions. Josh Milburn ( talk) 17:04, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 19:00, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable fictional race; no secondary sources cited. The article is written in a very "in-universe" style, and has been tagged as such for a decade with little sign of improvement. Josh Milburn ( talk) 16:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NCORP. Störm (talk) 12:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. After some time for investigation, we appear to have turned the corner on this to a weak consensus for notability. RL0919 ( talk) 04:25, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NACADEMIC. ubiquity ( talk) 16:15, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Dear friends and ubiquity ( talk), thanks for your notes. I know there are lots to be mentioned in Akram Pedramnia page but it will be done soon. She is a writer and translator and one of the most famous novels is translated by her called Ulysses written by James Joyce. This translation is the only one done perfectly up to now. This translation is banned in Iran and she had to publish it somewhere outside Iran. It is done now. She is against censorship in Iran. I hope you understand the importance of her wiki page in English. Her Farsi page was under lots of misunderstandings which is clean now. I wish your ideas on keeping her page and removing deletion notes on top of the page. Best wishes for you all. Morteza Bemani ( talk) 11:08, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 16:57, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Matharu does not appear to have garnered significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, and therefore fails to satisfy the biographical and general notability guidelines. Please see the attached source assessment table. Much of the article is not supported by the citations provided and appears to be written like a curriculum vitae.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
[3] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
[4] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
[5] | ![]() |
~ For basic details, yes. For corroborating achievements, no. | ![]() |
✘ No |
[6] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
[7] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
[8] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
[9] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
[10] | ![]() |
~ For basic details, probably. For claims of notability, especially in a prospectus-like publication, no. | ![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
References
The result was keep. The opening rationale was not a suggestion to delete; any other options including merging and redirecting can be done by ordinary editing away from an AfD. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:01, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Redirect to Meher Baba (preferably to the Teachings section). Not seeing any significant coverage of the concept apart from trivial mentions in independent sources. ∯WBG converse 13:45, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
...(irrelevant stuff)... He explained that the Avatar comes to Earth every 700 to 1,400 years and that five perfect masters, who are present at all times on Earth, aid his successive manifestations...(irrelevant stuff)...One day in May 1913, Babajan beckoned Merwan and kissed him on the forehead.[a quote]Thus began an inner quest that would take Merwan to meet four other Perfect Masters: Sai Baba of Shirdi (c. 1840–1918), Tajuddin Baba (1861–1925), Narayan Majaraj (1885–1945) and, finally, Upasni Maharaj (ca. 1870–1941)...(irrelevant stuff)...
It's clearly one of his core concepts and deserves coverage. I'm not against merging Mast and Mandali into the article (and renaming), that seems sensible too. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 21:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Deleted by ST47 under WP:CSD#G5. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:44, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
I removed the A7 tag placed by Interstellarity only because A7 technically cannot be applied to books. However, it is clear that this book does not meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. Total lack of adequate, substantial coverage in reliable sources. Hug syrup 14:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. – sgeureka t• c 16:19, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable fictional character TTN ( talk) 14:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. – sgeureka t• c 16:19, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable fictional character TTN ( talk) 14:15, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lack of independent reliable sources that provide significant coverage of the subject. RL0919 ( talk) 19:09, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Many references to news articles cited in the article but every single one of them is a link to a quotation/interview with the subject (i.e., a primary source, not independent of the subject). There is some coverage of industry prizes but these appear to be minor prizes the awarding of which did not involve any significant coverage of the subject. Could not find any reviews of their books in reliable sources. Fails
WP:GNG/
WP:ANYBIO/
WP:AUTHOR.
Additionally, this article is obviously a
WP:PROMO article and as such fails
WP:NOT. The article creator (and largest contributor)
appears to be essentially single-purpose-account that edits almost exclusively topics related to the subject of this article (i.e., him and his company). Even when this account has edited topics other than articles related to Clem Chambers, it has been to add links to the books of Clem Chambers. As such this also appears to the the subject of a potential undisclosed
WP:COI. There does not appear to be an earlier point in the edit history that could be reverted to that is free of these
WP:PROMO problems and as such this is a
WP:TNT case.
FOARP (
talk)
13:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy redirect to Random (album). Clear G7 request, no reason for bureaucracy StarM 02:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
The sources mentioning this are unreliable and the article seems to not meet the SSN criteria WP:MUSIC. Interstellarity ( talk) 13:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:33, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Per WP:NOTDICTIONARY. I attempted WP:BEFORE but all I could find are definitions - does not seem to have much history attached. The article has been a dicdef ever since it was created. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 12:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 16:59, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. Lots of sources in the article, but no reliable ones discussing her directly in detail. A Google search for ""Soumaya Keynes is" doesn't yield any News or Book results. The main claim to notability in the article appears to be her role at The Economist. However that publication publishes all its articles anonymously due to a "a belief that what is written is more important than who writes it" and because its articles are considered collaborative works (detailed here). Due to this there is no reason why being a section editor at this publication should confer notability. -- Pontificalibus 11:37, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
I hope I am responding correctly. I am new to Wikipedia, and based on the deletions page this was my understanding of how to express my view. I apologize if this is incorrect.
I believe this article should remain. I oppose the deletion because Wikipedia's general inclusion threshold is "whether the subject is notable enough for someone to have written something substantive (more than just a mention) about that subject that has been published in a reliable source" (taken from the Help: my article got nominated for deletion!). I believe that source 8 on the wikipedia article meets this criteria, as do others on the page. The source talks directly about Soumaya Keynes at great length and is from a reliable source (the Mercatus Center at George Mason University).
Furthermore, I believe that the article is both significant and interesting. While I agree that The Economist not crediting their journalists with authorship creates issues, the article highlighted in the "select scholarship and works" section, for example, is attributed to Keynes in multiple reputable sources (such as NPR) which can be seen in the citations. This piece is significant because it led to further research on the topic and media coverage of the piece. Furthermore, it led to further research that confirmed what had been stated in the article making the article's topic more significant. Beavinlake ( talk) 19:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was turned into a disambiguation page. There was consensus that the fictional topic should not have a stand-alone article. – sgeureka t• c 16:25, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional item (and not even from a super popular series like D&D or SW...). No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded with a request for AfD discussion, so here we go. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:58, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete for failing PLOT and the GNG. In the future, any sourced analysis of the character (if found) can still be added to the articles of the works he appeared in. – sgeureka t• c 13:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded with rationale best summarized as WP:ITSIMPORTANT. Can we do better, please? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:57, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Vala (Middle-earth)#Varda. Keep arguments based on primary sources are discounted as usual, and the remaining appear to be well refuted. RL0919 ( talk) 06:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded with a rationale WP:ITSIMPORTANT. Who can do better? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:56, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was merge to Galadriel. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:03, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Hog Farm who suggested a merger but without a clear target. Let's discuss: keep, merge (where?), or delete? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. The only keep recommendation argued with in-universe notability and inherited notability, but this has no bearing for the GNG and also WP:NOTINHERITED. No significant scholar analysis was found for this fictional race. – sgeureka t• c 16:33, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional race (nation). No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. I did look in the Tolkien Encyclopedia, and they do have an entry there. But setting aside it seems to be the only non-primary source that discusses them in-depth (and GNG requires multiple sources), the problem with that entry is that it does not contain a shred of analysis outside being a plot summary: it does not contain an ounce of relation to the real word, nothing about possible Tolkien inspirations, meaning, influence, etc. As noted in the entry on TE (which I recently expanded), quality of entries in this work varies, and some don't go beyond a plot summary that one would expect to find at wikia or such. While I usually lean towards keeping anything that has an entry in another encyclopedia, this is because usually other encyclopedias contain a summary of scholarly analysis of a topic. For this one, there is no such analysis anywhere, so, with the note that this topic has an entry in TE, I am still nominating it for deletion as essentially pure fancruft. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:51, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 10:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:03, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 10:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:49, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional race (nation, etc.). No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. While it can be argued that a simple solution is to merge this to Easterlings, it is not clear that the target article is notable itself. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:46, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable academic who has not received coverage in third-party sources. Only an associate professor and not a professor, Hauge's bibliography does not distinguish him in particular, the typical scientist publishes at least ten times as many articles. The articles currently has three sources: (1) a book without page number (2) OK enough, but not really discussing Hauge's person. Would be better suited for an article about spider research in Norway. (3) an obituary in shape of a forum post, a type of source I have never seen in Wikipedia and hopefully will never see again. I searched for obituaries in actual media outlets without finding any. A search in the database Retriever for "førsteamanuensis Erling Hauge" yielded 4 hits between 1988-2006, none of which are about him, but are about spiders with a couple of comments from Hauge. Many people will comment in the media from time to time, for instance a police lieutenant about criminal cases. Geschichte ( talk) 10:45, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Saturn in fiction#Literature. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:04, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was merge to Demogorgon. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:05, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of organizations in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:36, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:35, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of organizations in Judge Dredd. Both "keep" and "delete" !votes suggested merge / redirect as an alternative Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional group/organization. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was merge to Lothlórien. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:40, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. No indication of coverage in independent sources. RL0919 ( talk) 04:42, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. – sgeureka t• c 16:35, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional group/organization. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character (well, actually this discusses two fictional characters; if kept should be split...). No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. – sgeureka t• c 16:35, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:37, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:37, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability, despite a lengthy in-universe fancruft fictional character biography. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and (lengthy) list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:26, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Vanity spam - Michael Dabhi has been deleted and salted — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 14:10, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Chairman of a local youth branch of a major party. Fram ( talk) 10:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:44, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Generic self-storage company. scope_creep Talk 10:12, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Discounting the socking. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:43, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails GNG. None of the sources are reliable, two are actually for other dog breeds. Google search reveals nothing attributable. Cavalryman ( talk) 10:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Discounting the socking. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:41, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails GNG. The last three sources are potentially reliable, but are used to cite trivial information, such as a single dog used to hunt raccoons. Google search reveals nothing attributable. Cavalryman ( talk) 09:59, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:40, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character, fails WP:NCHAR. No stand-alone notability. Unencyclopedic: WP:FANCRUFT, WP:PLOT only written in in-universe style, no analysis from a real-world perspective. No obvious prospect for an encyclopedic article to be written. PROD added but removed. Nicknack009 ( talk) 07:50, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character, fails WP:NCHAR. No stand-alone notability. Unencyclopedic: WP:FANCRUFT, WP:PLOT only written in in-universe style, no analysis from a real-world perspective. No obvious prospect for an encyclopedic article to be written. PROD added but removed. Nicknack009 ( talk) 07:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 07:51, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Footballer who fails NFOOTY as he never played outside of El Salvador league (not fully-pro). I believe he also fails GNG: despite the number of references, pretty much all of them besides maybe one (elsalvador.com piece) are routine match reports and transfer updates -- BlameRuiner ( talk) 06:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete. G3'd by RHaworth. (non-admin closure) SITH (talk) 14:21, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
No actual sources, possible hoax, possibly related to WP:Articles_for_deletion/Rome_2.0 MB 05:59, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 04:56, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Unsourced orphan, fails GNG. This seems to be a recessive trait found in some breeds of pointer, not worthy of an article. Cavalryman ( talk) 04:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Gun dog#Flushing dogs. RL0919 ( talk) 05:05, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails GNG. Flushing is a single aspect of a gundog’s purpose, interestingly two of the the photos in the article of spaniels retrieving, a separate aspect. Cavalryman ( talk) 04:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 04:56, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Only a single source cited, could not find anything attributable on Google and as far as I can work out (their website has no search function I can find) this is not recognised by the Real Sociedad Canina de España (Spanish kennel club. I suspect this is a largely unknown localised breed, but without attributable RS it is TOOSOON. Cavalryman ( talk) 04:37, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 03:50, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
A puff piece for someone whose claim to notability is being the founder of a company that already has its own page (which by the way, suffers from a biased POV). Paul 1953 ( talk) 22:26, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 05:04, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 04:52, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional race. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 05:08, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:23, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:40, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. – sgeureka t• c 13:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Barkeep49 ( talk) 15:48, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:21, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Barkeep49 ( talk) 15:45, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:19, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Could be created as a redirect if there is a suitable target. RL0919 ( talk) 05:42, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:Notability (books). Deprodded by User:Necrothesp. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:18, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Races and nations of Warhammer Fantasy#Elves where the concept is already covered. – sgeureka t• c 12:46, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Combination of in-universe plot with 'how to play a game' strategy guide based on WP:PRIMARY sources. Fails WP:NFICTION, WP:PLOT and in general, GNG. Yes, I know there are hundreds of articles about how to play with Wood Elves in various WH games, but that's all PRIMARY. If we cannot discuss the significance of this faction to real life (scholarly reception, etc.), there is little we can work with here. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Races and nations of Warhammer Fantasy#Lizardmen. RL0919 ( talk) 05:44, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Combination of in-universe plot with 'how to play a game' strategy guide based on WP:PRIMARY sources. Fails WP:NFICTION, WP:PLOT and in general, GNG. Yes, I know there are hundreds of articles about how to play with Lizardmen in various WH games, but that's all PRIMARY. If we cannot discuss the significance of this faction to real life (scholarly reception, etc.), there is little we can work with here. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Dungeons & Dragons goblinoid deities. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:12, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character that fails WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not an in-universe fictional biography summary. Could be soft deleted by redirecting to List of Forgotten Realms deities. Prodded by me. Redirected by User:BOZ. Restored by User:Necrothesp with "rv; has been arround since the beginning of D&D; I think this needs to go to AfD". Ok, we are here, outcome obviously is going to be the same so what's the WP:POINT? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:15, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. But a redirect can be added at editorial discretion if the proposed target does not end up deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 20:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character that fails WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not an in-universe fictional biography summary. Could be soft deleted by redirecting to List of Forgotten Realms deities. Prodded by me. Redirected by User:BOZ. Restored by User:Necrothesp with "rv; has been arround since the beginning of D&D; I think this needs to go to AfD". Ok, we are here, outcome obviously is going to be the same so what's the WP:POINT? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Options were split about equally between deleting, keeping and merging. A NC result allows for a further merge discussion to take place. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:14, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character that fails WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not an in-universe fictional biography summary. Could be soft deleted by redirecting to List of Forgotten Realms deities. Prodded by me. Redirected by User:BOZ. Restored by User:Necrothesp with "rv; has been arround since the beginning of D&D; I think this needs to go to AfD". Ok, we are here, outcome obviously is going to be the same so what's the WP:POINT? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Dungeons & Dragons orc deities#Gruumsh. Seeing as for many people "merge" appears to mean "redirect". I see the concern that the target may fail WP:LISTN and thus unsuitable, but if that so one expects that the redirect will be deleted as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 20:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character that fails WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not an in-universe fictional biography summary. Could be soft deleted by redirecting to List of Forgotten Realms deities. Prodded by me. Redirected by User:BOZ. Restored by User:Necrothesp with "rv; has been arround since the beginning of D&D; I think this needs to go to AfD". Ok, we are here, outcome obviously is going to be the same so what's the WP:POINT? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of demon lords in Dungeons & Dragons#Juiblex. RL0919 ( talk) 03:57, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character that fails WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not an in-universe fictional biography summary. Could be soft deleted by redirecting to List of Forgotten Realms deities. Prodded by me. Redirected by User:BOZ. Restored by User:Necrothesp with "rv; Juiblex has been arround since the beginning of D&D; I think this needs to go to AfD". Ok, we are here, outcome obviously is going to be the same so what's the WP:POINT? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:13, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Mound (novella)#Plot. RL0919 ( talk) 03:55, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location that fails WP:NFICTION, WP:GNG and WP:PLOT. BEFORE does not show any analysis, only in-universe style summaries. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no helpful rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:11, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 05:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
WP:NOTNEWS. There is nothing especially noteworthy about this particular outbreak of vaccine-derived polio, with its 4 cases, in the context of ~20 outbreaks, and 150 cases of vaccine-derived polio across 16 countries in 2019 (so far). Any more than any particular severe winter storm, there is no reason to believe that this particular outbreak of vaccine-derived polio, among all of them that the world has seen this year and over the past few years, will uniquely have the enduring notability that is described in WP:NOTNEWS as being a critical consideration (it is 'just another outbreak' - it sucks for the handful of affected people, but is unlikely to have historical significance as a stand-alone epidemic), such that it requires special detailed coverage above that given the overall polio eradication effort (which article briefly mentions this Philippines outbreak). Agricolae ( talk) 04:39, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. If anyone would like the article restored to draft to work on, ping me and I'll sort that out. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Too many contradictions and too few references to check them against. For example, the lede mentions three films she has "played a role in", but the Wikipedia articles do not mention her or mention her only as a singer. The "Music Career" section says her debut song was in 2012, but her discography starts in 2004, and does not include the one song cited in "Music Career". The two awards (unlinked, so difficult to check) are for songs that do not appear in the list. It's very difficult to estimate her impact based on this information.
Previously discussed in Articles for deletion/Gurlez Akhtar, which has a comment relevant to this discussion. ubiquity ( talk) 15:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:16, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
I am only seeing three references, two are broken/expired links and one is a primary source. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:20, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. If a different article should be deleted, file a separate AfD for that. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 06:30, 13 November 2019 (UTC) Adding following related page:
Thanks. Störm (talk) 06:34, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment - For a notable school in Karachi, see Quaid-e-Azam Public School, Karachi. Störm (talk) 06:07, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 04:50, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Some more pages that fail WP:NSEASONS much like the 1906 Afd and the 1911 Afd as the only references are to a fan wiki. I would also like to nominate these articles for the same reason.
The result was delete. czar 19:12, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
An alphabetical list of India-related articles. It might have made perfect sense when it was started in 2003, and possibly its existence might have still served a purpose in 2007, when it was kept in this mass nomination of country indexes. Twelve years on, however, it's painfully difficult to see why this should continue to be lying around in mainspace.
The index is not maintained: it lists about 5,400 articles, which is only 2.5% of the 210,000 articles tracked at WP:INDIA. And it is not just villages or other minor topics that are missing from it: it doesn't link to the state of Telangana, or to the prime minister Narendra Modi, nor does it have an entry for what you'd imagine would be timeless topics like Brahmin and Brahman. So it can't even serve as a nominal guide to the more prominent topics, a job that's anyway done much better by Outline of India.
The index is neither complete nor representative, so its very existence is misleading to readers. And it's a magnet for editors' busywork: the regular edits it receives either disambiguate links, or insert links to obscure articles to be then claimed as "successfully de-orphaned".
If this particular list of articles is of any use to any editor, it should be moved to the project namespace. And if its title is deemed to be a likely search phrase, then it could be redirected to Outline of India or to Category:India. – Uanfala (talk) 01:45, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 20:28, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Non notable song failing WP:NSONG Ceethekreator ( talk) 16:23, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Similarly, some charts representing the home country of the artist or composer... can be included if no other suitable charts can be located.-- Calthinus ( talk) 23:41, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
This article is heavily WP:SYNTH in how it tries to show various devices are "firearms", despite the definition of "firearm" being a weapon, and not a tool. At worst it's misleading and confusing to readers. Also seems like largely a copy paste job from other articles. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 16:48, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 03:41, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
WP:CRYSTALBALL, primarily. Only source cited is Ursula von der Leyen's manifesto, and most of the article is literally a quote from this manifesto. Also appears to be no significant media coverage (at the time of this AfD) to meet WP:GNG. No opposition to this article being re-created if and when the Conference becomes more than a suggestion in a campaign document. -- a they/them | argue | contribs 23:47, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Although there is substantial support for deletion, there is greater support for keeping this content. The deletion rationales appear to center on the triviality of individual instances, but do not override the evidence that the subject in general is notable. Specific concerns about what columns or information should be included on the page are matters for editorial discussion, not for AfD. BD2412 T 17:54, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
WP:NOPAGE it isn’t notable enough to have an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaneciaTaylor ( talk · contribs) 22:48, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Per request(s) below, nominating subordinate articles:
@ JaneciaTaylor, William Harris, RadioKAOS, and Spirit of Eagle: notifying other contributors. Cavalryman ( talk) 04:58, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Rosebud214 your not being truthful. I didn’t say I was going to nominate this article for deletion somebody else did. I kind of regret nominating this article for deletion; I should of let that person do it. The article was going to be nominated for deletion anyway because that person said they were going to do it after the Afd discussion about my article was done, hopefully this article doesn’t get deleted after this, it just that other people would want it deleted off of Wikipedia, and would agree about deleting this article. It is a great article that shouldn’t be deleted. JaneciaTaylor ( talk) 00:50, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, the sources provided for this page do not discuss the deaths
as a group or set, they discuss each individually. Cavalryman ( talk) 06:15, 2 December 2019 (UTC).
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:24, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) It had no meaningful hits in a source search, though perhaps I'm missing some directory of German sources? No worthwhile redirect targets, as the list of record labels requires independent notability for its entries. Unsourced since 2011. PROD'd in 2011. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ ping}} me. czar 00:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Madina Lake. WP:ATD-R czar 19:10, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable member of a band. No reliable sources in the article. Andise1 ( talk) 00:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Madina Lake. WP:ATD-R czar 19:07, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable member of a band. Sources are weak and more about the band than this member. Andise1 ( talk) 00:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Madina Lake. czar 19:10, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Non notable lead singer (on his own) of a band. The band is notable, just not this member. Andise1 ( talk) 00:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 03:43, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM: I have not found any reviews by established critics or other significant external coverage or recognition for this independent documentary film about pornographic performers who own animals. It was kept at AfD in 2005, in part because its IMDB entry was taken as proof of notability. Cheers, gnu 57 00:13, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:03, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Footballer who fails WP:NFOOTY, having never played in a fully professional league or at full international level. No evidence of substantial coverage to otherwise satisfy WP:GNG. Jellyman ( talk) 22:54, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:52, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Footballer who fails WP:NFOOTY, having never played in a fully professional league or at full international level. Several references but mainly WP:ROUTINE, so no evidence of substantial coverage to otherwise satisfy WP:GNG. Jellyman ( talk) 22:50, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:01, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
All plot + no sources = fancruft. Clarityfiend ( talk) 20:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Contrary to one comment, we do delete articles related to major works when the specific subject of the article is not itself notable according to our guidelines. RL0919 ( talk) 04:14, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
I cannot find any indication that the Squats have been discussed in academic or journalistic publications. It appears that the article is little more than a collection of plot -related information that would only interest a small segment of Warhammer 40,000 fans. ― Susmuffin Talk 20:10, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 04:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Simply doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:BROADCAST. Onel5969 TT me 19:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:59, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
The user who made it has a bias POV on Joko Widodo and his former deputy Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, as he made clear in this Wikiquote edit. See also user's history on enwiki and idwiki. Flix11 ( talk) 17:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:00, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 10:12, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Primary sources, even if reliable, do not establish notability. No prejudice against creating a redirect or disambiguation page though the usual editorial processes, but I don't see a strong case here for one or the other. RL0919 ( talk) 18:58, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable fictional bloodline. No primary sources cited, never mind secondary (article tagged for over nine years), and the article is almost entirely in-universe (article tagged for over a decade). A search throws up almost nothing particularly useful as a source... This journal article (from an extremely minor publisher) has a single sentence about the bloodline within a paragraph about the portrayal of vampires in the Warhammer universe generally. This is not enough to support an article. Josh Milburn ( talk) 17:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 18:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character in the Warhammer universe. Long, in-universe article (and it's been tagged with {{ in universe}} for a decade) with no secondary sources cited. A search throws up nothing that would work as a third-party source. Not notable. Josh Milburn ( talk) 17:18, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not redirecting due to the concern about the term being used in multiple works of fiction. RL0919 ( talk) 18:54, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Entirely in-universe discussion of a non-notable group of fictional characters. No third-party sources are cited, and while a search did throw up a couple of mentions in scholarly work, they were nothing more than passing mentions. Josh Milburn ( talk) 17:04, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 19:00, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable fictional race; no secondary sources cited. The article is written in a very "in-universe" style, and has been tagged as such for a decade with little sign of improvement. Josh Milburn ( talk) 16:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NCORP. Störm (talk) 12:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. After some time for investigation, we appear to have turned the corner on this to a weak consensus for notability. RL0919 ( talk) 04:25, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NACADEMIC. ubiquity ( talk) 16:15, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Dear friends and ubiquity ( talk), thanks for your notes. I know there are lots to be mentioned in Akram Pedramnia page but it will be done soon. She is a writer and translator and one of the most famous novels is translated by her called Ulysses written by James Joyce. This translation is the only one done perfectly up to now. This translation is banned in Iran and she had to publish it somewhere outside Iran. It is done now. She is against censorship in Iran. I hope you understand the importance of her wiki page in English. Her Farsi page was under lots of misunderstandings which is clean now. I wish your ideas on keeping her page and removing deletion notes on top of the page. Best wishes for you all. Morteza Bemani ( talk) 11:08, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 16:57, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Matharu does not appear to have garnered significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, and therefore fails to satisfy the biographical and general notability guidelines. Please see the attached source assessment table. Much of the article is not supported by the citations provided and appears to be written like a curriculum vitae.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
[3] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
[4] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
[5] | ![]() |
~ For basic details, yes. For corroborating achievements, no. | ![]() |
✘ No |
[6] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
[7] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
[8] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
[9] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
[10] | ![]() |
~ For basic details, probably. For claims of notability, especially in a prospectus-like publication, no. | ![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
References
The result was keep. The opening rationale was not a suggestion to delete; any other options including merging and redirecting can be done by ordinary editing away from an AfD. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:01, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Redirect to Meher Baba (preferably to the Teachings section). Not seeing any significant coverage of the concept apart from trivial mentions in independent sources. ∯WBG converse 13:45, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
...(irrelevant stuff)... He explained that the Avatar comes to Earth every 700 to 1,400 years and that five perfect masters, who are present at all times on Earth, aid his successive manifestations...(irrelevant stuff)...One day in May 1913, Babajan beckoned Merwan and kissed him on the forehead.[a quote]Thus began an inner quest that would take Merwan to meet four other Perfect Masters: Sai Baba of Shirdi (c. 1840–1918), Tajuddin Baba (1861–1925), Narayan Majaraj (1885–1945) and, finally, Upasni Maharaj (ca. 1870–1941)...(irrelevant stuff)...
It's clearly one of his core concepts and deserves coverage. I'm not against merging Mast and Mandali into the article (and renaming), that seems sensible too. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 21:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Deleted by ST47 under WP:CSD#G5. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:44, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
I removed the A7 tag placed by Interstellarity only because A7 technically cannot be applied to books. However, it is clear that this book does not meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. Total lack of adequate, substantial coverage in reliable sources. Hug syrup 14:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. – sgeureka t• c 16:19, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable fictional character TTN ( talk) 14:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. – sgeureka t• c 16:19, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable fictional character TTN ( talk) 14:15, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lack of independent reliable sources that provide significant coverage of the subject. RL0919 ( talk) 19:09, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Many references to news articles cited in the article but every single one of them is a link to a quotation/interview with the subject (i.e., a primary source, not independent of the subject). There is some coverage of industry prizes but these appear to be minor prizes the awarding of which did not involve any significant coverage of the subject. Could not find any reviews of their books in reliable sources. Fails
WP:GNG/
WP:ANYBIO/
WP:AUTHOR.
Additionally, this article is obviously a
WP:PROMO article and as such fails
WP:NOT. The article creator (and largest contributor)
appears to be essentially single-purpose-account that edits almost exclusively topics related to the subject of this article (i.e., him and his company). Even when this account has edited topics other than articles related to Clem Chambers, it has been to add links to the books of Clem Chambers. As such this also appears to the the subject of a potential undisclosed
WP:COI. There does not appear to be an earlier point in the edit history that could be reverted to that is free of these
WP:PROMO problems and as such this is a
WP:TNT case.
FOARP (
talk)
13:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy redirect to Random (album). Clear G7 request, no reason for bureaucracy StarM 02:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
The sources mentioning this are unreliable and the article seems to not meet the SSN criteria WP:MUSIC. Interstellarity ( talk) 13:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:33, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Per WP:NOTDICTIONARY. I attempted WP:BEFORE but all I could find are definitions - does not seem to have much history attached. The article has been a dicdef ever since it was created. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 12:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 16:59, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. Lots of sources in the article, but no reliable ones discussing her directly in detail. A Google search for ""Soumaya Keynes is" doesn't yield any News or Book results. The main claim to notability in the article appears to be her role at The Economist. However that publication publishes all its articles anonymously due to a "a belief that what is written is more important than who writes it" and because its articles are considered collaborative works (detailed here). Due to this there is no reason why being a section editor at this publication should confer notability. -- Pontificalibus 11:37, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
I hope I am responding correctly. I am new to Wikipedia, and based on the deletions page this was my understanding of how to express my view. I apologize if this is incorrect.
I believe this article should remain. I oppose the deletion because Wikipedia's general inclusion threshold is "whether the subject is notable enough for someone to have written something substantive (more than just a mention) about that subject that has been published in a reliable source" (taken from the Help: my article got nominated for deletion!). I believe that source 8 on the wikipedia article meets this criteria, as do others on the page. The source talks directly about Soumaya Keynes at great length and is from a reliable source (the Mercatus Center at George Mason University).
Furthermore, I believe that the article is both significant and interesting. While I agree that The Economist not crediting their journalists with authorship creates issues, the article highlighted in the "select scholarship and works" section, for example, is attributed to Keynes in multiple reputable sources (such as NPR) which can be seen in the citations. This piece is significant because it led to further research on the topic and media coverage of the piece. Furthermore, it led to further research that confirmed what had been stated in the article making the article's topic more significant. Beavinlake ( talk) 19:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was turned into a disambiguation page. There was consensus that the fictional topic should not have a stand-alone article. – sgeureka t• c 16:25, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional item (and not even from a super popular series like D&D or SW...). No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded with a request for AfD discussion, so here we go. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:58, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete for failing PLOT and the GNG. In the future, any sourced analysis of the character (if found) can still be added to the articles of the works he appeared in. – sgeureka t• c 13:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded with rationale best summarized as WP:ITSIMPORTANT. Can we do better, please? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:57, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Vala (Middle-earth)#Varda. Keep arguments based on primary sources are discounted as usual, and the remaining appear to be well refuted. RL0919 ( talk) 06:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded with a rationale WP:ITSIMPORTANT. Who can do better? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:56, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was merge to Galadriel. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:03, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Hog Farm who suggested a merger but without a clear target. Let's discuss: keep, merge (where?), or delete? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. The only keep recommendation argued with in-universe notability and inherited notability, but this has no bearing for the GNG and also WP:NOTINHERITED. No significant scholar analysis was found for this fictional race. – sgeureka t• c 16:33, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional race (nation). No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. I did look in the Tolkien Encyclopedia, and they do have an entry there. But setting aside it seems to be the only non-primary source that discusses them in-depth (and GNG requires multiple sources), the problem with that entry is that it does not contain a shred of analysis outside being a plot summary: it does not contain an ounce of relation to the real word, nothing about possible Tolkien inspirations, meaning, influence, etc. As noted in the entry on TE (which I recently expanded), quality of entries in this work varies, and some don't go beyond a plot summary that one would expect to find at wikia or such. While I usually lean towards keeping anything that has an entry in another encyclopedia, this is because usually other encyclopedias contain a summary of scholarly analysis of a topic. For this one, there is no such analysis anywhere, so, with the note that this topic has an entry in TE, I am still nominating it for deletion as essentially pure fancruft. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:51, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 10:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:03, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 10:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:49, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional race (nation, etc.). No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. While it can be argued that a simple solution is to merge this to Easterlings, it is not clear that the target article is notable itself. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:46, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable academic who has not received coverage in third-party sources. Only an associate professor and not a professor, Hauge's bibliography does not distinguish him in particular, the typical scientist publishes at least ten times as many articles. The articles currently has three sources: (1) a book without page number (2) OK enough, but not really discussing Hauge's person. Would be better suited for an article about spider research in Norway. (3) an obituary in shape of a forum post, a type of source I have never seen in Wikipedia and hopefully will never see again. I searched for obituaries in actual media outlets without finding any. A search in the database Retriever for "førsteamanuensis Erling Hauge" yielded 4 hits between 1988-2006, none of which are about him, but are about spiders with a couple of comments from Hauge. Many people will comment in the media from time to time, for instance a police lieutenant about criminal cases. Geschichte ( talk) 10:45, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Saturn in fiction#Literature. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:04, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was merge to Demogorgon. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:05, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of organizations in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:36, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:35, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of organizations in Judge Dredd. Both "keep" and "delete" !votes suggested merge / redirect as an alternative Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional group/organization. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was merge to Lothlórien. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:40, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. No indication of coverage in independent sources. RL0919 ( talk) 04:42, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. – sgeureka t• c 16:35, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional group/organization. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character (well, actually this discusses two fictional characters; if kept should be split...). No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. – sgeureka t• c 16:35, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:37, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:37, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability, despite a lengthy in-universe fancruft fictional character biography. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and (lengthy) list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:26, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Vanity spam - Michael Dabhi has been deleted and salted — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 14:10, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Chairman of a local youth branch of a major party. Fram ( talk) 10:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:44, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Generic self-storage company. scope_creep Talk 10:12, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Discounting the socking. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:43, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails GNG. None of the sources are reliable, two are actually for other dog breeds. Google search reveals nothing attributable. Cavalryman ( talk) 10:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Discounting the socking. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:41, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails GNG. The last three sources are potentially reliable, but are used to cite trivial information, such as a single dog used to hunt raccoons. Google search reveals nothing attributable. Cavalryman ( talk) 09:59, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:40, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character, fails WP:NCHAR. No stand-alone notability. Unencyclopedic: WP:FANCRUFT, WP:PLOT only written in in-universe style, no analysis from a real-world perspective. No obvious prospect for an encyclopedic article to be written. PROD added but removed. Nicknack009 ( talk) 07:50, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character, fails WP:NCHAR. No stand-alone notability. Unencyclopedic: WP:FANCRUFT, WP:PLOT only written in in-universe style, no analysis from a real-world perspective. No obvious prospect for an encyclopedic article to be written. PROD added but removed. Nicknack009 ( talk) 07:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 07:51, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Footballer who fails NFOOTY as he never played outside of El Salvador league (not fully-pro). I believe he also fails GNG: despite the number of references, pretty much all of them besides maybe one (elsalvador.com piece) are routine match reports and transfer updates -- BlameRuiner ( talk) 06:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete. G3'd by RHaworth. (non-admin closure) SITH (talk) 14:21, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
No actual sources, possible hoax, possibly related to WP:Articles_for_deletion/Rome_2.0 MB 05:59, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 04:56, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Unsourced orphan, fails GNG. This seems to be a recessive trait found in some breeds of pointer, not worthy of an article. Cavalryman ( talk) 04:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Gun dog#Flushing dogs. RL0919 ( talk) 05:05, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails GNG. Flushing is a single aspect of a gundog’s purpose, interestingly two of the the photos in the article of spaniels retrieving, a separate aspect. Cavalryman ( talk) 04:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 04:56, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Only a single source cited, could not find anything attributable on Google and as far as I can work out (their website has no search function I can find) this is not recognised by the Real Sociedad Canina de España (Spanish kennel club. I suspect this is a largely unknown localised breed, but without attributable RS it is TOOSOON. Cavalryman ( talk) 04:37, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 03:50, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
A puff piece for someone whose claim to notability is being the founder of a company that already has its own page (which by the way, suffers from a biased POV). Paul 1953 ( talk) 22:26, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 05:04, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 04:52, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional race. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 05:08, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:23, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:40, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. – sgeureka t• c 13:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Barkeep49 ( talk) 15:48, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:21, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Barkeep49 ( talk) 15:45, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:19, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Could be created as a redirect if there is a suitable target. RL0919 ( talk) 05:42, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:Notability (books). Deprodded by User:Necrothesp. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:18, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Races and nations of Warhammer Fantasy#Elves where the concept is already covered. – sgeureka t• c 12:46, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Combination of in-universe plot with 'how to play a game' strategy guide based on WP:PRIMARY sources. Fails WP:NFICTION, WP:PLOT and in general, GNG. Yes, I know there are hundreds of articles about how to play with Wood Elves in various WH games, but that's all PRIMARY. If we cannot discuss the significance of this faction to real life (scholarly reception, etc.), there is little we can work with here. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Races and nations of Warhammer Fantasy#Lizardmen. RL0919 ( talk) 05:44, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Combination of in-universe plot with 'how to play a game' strategy guide based on WP:PRIMARY sources. Fails WP:NFICTION, WP:PLOT and in general, GNG. Yes, I know there are hundreds of articles about how to play with Lizardmen in various WH games, but that's all PRIMARY. If we cannot discuss the significance of this faction to real life (scholarly reception, etc.), there is little we can work with here. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Dungeons & Dragons goblinoid deities. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:12, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character that fails WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not an in-universe fictional biography summary. Could be soft deleted by redirecting to List of Forgotten Realms deities. Prodded by me. Redirected by User:BOZ. Restored by User:Necrothesp with "rv; has been arround since the beginning of D&D; I think this needs to go to AfD". Ok, we are here, outcome obviously is going to be the same so what's the WP:POINT? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:15, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. But a redirect can be added at editorial discretion if the proposed target does not end up deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 20:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character that fails WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not an in-universe fictional biography summary. Could be soft deleted by redirecting to List of Forgotten Realms deities. Prodded by me. Redirected by User:BOZ. Restored by User:Necrothesp with "rv; has been arround since the beginning of D&D; I think this needs to go to AfD". Ok, we are here, outcome obviously is going to be the same so what's the WP:POINT? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Options were split about equally between deleting, keeping and merging. A NC result allows for a further merge discussion to take place. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:14, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character that fails WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not an in-universe fictional biography summary. Could be soft deleted by redirecting to List of Forgotten Realms deities. Prodded by me. Redirected by User:BOZ. Restored by User:Necrothesp with "rv; has been arround since the beginning of D&D; I think this needs to go to AfD". Ok, we are here, outcome obviously is going to be the same so what's the WP:POINT? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Dungeons & Dragons orc deities#Gruumsh. Seeing as for many people "merge" appears to mean "redirect". I see the concern that the target may fail WP:LISTN and thus unsuitable, but if that so one expects that the redirect will be deleted as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 20:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character that fails WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not an in-universe fictional biography summary. Could be soft deleted by redirecting to List of Forgotten Realms deities. Prodded by me. Redirected by User:BOZ. Restored by User:Necrothesp with "rv; has been arround since the beginning of D&D; I think this needs to go to AfD". Ok, we are here, outcome obviously is going to be the same so what's the WP:POINT? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of demon lords in Dungeons & Dragons#Juiblex. RL0919 ( talk) 03:57, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional character that fails WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not an in-universe fictional biography summary. Could be soft deleted by redirecting to List of Forgotten Realms deities. Prodded by me. Redirected by User:BOZ. Restored by User:Necrothesp with "rv; Juiblex has been arround since the beginning of D&D; I think this needs to go to AfD". Ok, we are here, outcome obviously is going to be the same so what's the WP:POINT? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:13, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Mound (novella)#Plot. RL0919 ( talk) 03:55, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fictional location that fails WP:NFICTION, WP:GNG and WP:PLOT. BEFORE does not show any analysis, only in-universe style summaries. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no helpful rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:11, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 05:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
WP:NOTNEWS. There is nothing especially noteworthy about this particular outbreak of vaccine-derived polio, with its 4 cases, in the context of ~20 outbreaks, and 150 cases of vaccine-derived polio across 16 countries in 2019 (so far). Any more than any particular severe winter storm, there is no reason to believe that this particular outbreak of vaccine-derived polio, among all of them that the world has seen this year and over the past few years, will uniquely have the enduring notability that is described in WP:NOTNEWS as being a critical consideration (it is 'just another outbreak' - it sucks for the handful of affected people, but is unlikely to have historical significance as a stand-alone epidemic), such that it requires special detailed coverage above that given the overall polio eradication effort (which article briefly mentions this Philippines outbreak). Agricolae ( talk) 04:39, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. If anyone would like the article restored to draft to work on, ping me and I'll sort that out. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Too many contradictions and too few references to check them against. For example, the lede mentions three films she has "played a role in", but the Wikipedia articles do not mention her or mention her only as a singer. The "Music Career" section says her debut song was in 2012, but her discography starts in 2004, and does not include the one song cited in "Music Career". The two awards (unlinked, so difficult to check) are for songs that do not appear in the list. It's very difficult to estimate her impact based on this information.
Previously discussed in Articles for deletion/Gurlez Akhtar, which has a comment relevant to this discussion. ubiquity ( talk) 15:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:16, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
I am only seeing three references, two are broken/expired links and one is a primary source. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:20, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. If a different article should be deleted, file a separate AfD for that. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 06:30, 13 November 2019 (UTC) Adding following related page:
Thanks. Störm (talk) 06:34, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment - For a notable school in Karachi, see Quaid-e-Azam Public School, Karachi. Störm (talk) 06:07, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 04:50, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Some more pages that fail WP:NSEASONS much like the 1906 Afd and the 1911 Afd as the only references are to a fan wiki. I would also like to nominate these articles for the same reason.
The result was delete. czar 19:12, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
An alphabetical list of India-related articles. It might have made perfect sense when it was started in 2003, and possibly its existence might have still served a purpose in 2007, when it was kept in this mass nomination of country indexes. Twelve years on, however, it's painfully difficult to see why this should continue to be lying around in mainspace.
The index is not maintained: it lists about 5,400 articles, which is only 2.5% of the 210,000 articles tracked at WP:INDIA. And it is not just villages or other minor topics that are missing from it: it doesn't link to the state of Telangana, or to the prime minister Narendra Modi, nor does it have an entry for what you'd imagine would be timeless topics like Brahmin and Brahman. So it can't even serve as a nominal guide to the more prominent topics, a job that's anyway done much better by Outline of India.
The index is neither complete nor representative, so its very existence is misleading to readers. And it's a magnet for editors' busywork: the regular edits it receives either disambiguate links, or insert links to obscure articles to be then claimed as "successfully de-orphaned".
If this particular list of articles is of any use to any editor, it should be moved to the project namespace. And if its title is deemed to be a likely search phrase, then it could be redirected to Outline of India or to Category:India. – Uanfala (talk) 01:45, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 20:28, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Non notable song failing WP:NSONG Ceethekreator ( talk) 16:23, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Similarly, some charts representing the home country of the artist or composer... can be included if no other suitable charts can be located.-- Calthinus ( talk) 23:41, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
This article is heavily WP:SYNTH in how it tries to show various devices are "firearms", despite the definition of "firearm" being a weapon, and not a tool. At worst it's misleading and confusing to readers. Also seems like largely a copy paste job from other articles. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 16:48, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 03:41, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
WP:CRYSTALBALL, primarily. Only source cited is Ursula von der Leyen's manifesto, and most of the article is literally a quote from this manifesto. Also appears to be no significant media coverage (at the time of this AfD) to meet WP:GNG. No opposition to this article being re-created if and when the Conference becomes more than a suggestion in a campaign document. -- a they/them | argue | contribs 23:47, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Although there is substantial support for deletion, there is greater support for keeping this content. The deletion rationales appear to center on the triviality of individual instances, but do not override the evidence that the subject in general is notable. Specific concerns about what columns or information should be included on the page are matters for editorial discussion, not for AfD. BD2412 T 17:54, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
WP:NOPAGE it isn’t notable enough to have an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaneciaTaylor ( talk · contribs) 22:48, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Per request(s) below, nominating subordinate articles:
@ JaneciaTaylor, William Harris, RadioKAOS, and Spirit of Eagle: notifying other contributors. Cavalryman ( talk) 04:58, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Rosebud214 your not being truthful. I didn’t say I was going to nominate this article for deletion somebody else did. I kind of regret nominating this article for deletion; I should of let that person do it. The article was going to be nominated for deletion anyway because that person said they were going to do it after the Afd discussion about my article was done, hopefully this article doesn’t get deleted after this, it just that other people would want it deleted off of Wikipedia, and would agree about deleting this article. It is a great article that shouldn’t be deleted. JaneciaTaylor ( talk) 00:50, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, the sources provided for this page do not discuss the deaths
as a group or set, they discuss each individually. Cavalryman ( talk) 06:15, 2 December 2019 (UTC).
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:24, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) It had no meaningful hits in a source search, though perhaps I'm missing some directory of German sources? No worthwhile redirect targets, as the list of record labels requires independent notability for its entries. Unsourced since 2011. PROD'd in 2011. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ ping}} me. czar 00:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Madina Lake. WP:ATD-R czar 19:10, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable member of a band. No reliable sources in the article. Andise1 ( talk) 00:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Madina Lake. WP:ATD-R czar 19:07, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable member of a band. Sources are weak and more about the band than this member. Andise1 ( talk) 00:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Madina Lake. czar 19:10, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Non notable lead singer (on his own) of a band. The band is notable, just not this member. Andise1 ( talk) 00:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 03:43, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM: I have not found any reviews by established critics or other significant external coverage or recognition for this independent documentary film about pornographic performers who own animals. It was kept at AfD in 2005, in part because its IMDB entry was taken as proof of notability. Cheers, gnu 57 00:13, 28 November 2019 (UTC)