The result was delete. czar 22:45, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable writer. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. No assertion of notability. GregorB ( talk) 15:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 03:22, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Not notable, not enough sources for an article of substance Vmavanti ( talk) 20:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. RebeccaGreen's additional sources were not challenged by anyone once presented. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Not notable Spartaz Humbug! 17:48, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was merge to Punk Farm. Consensus seems to favor at least redirecting and I believe the two merge/redirect votes are sufficient to close as such. (non-admin closure) –– Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 06:04, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Could simply have been redirected, but in ip insists on recreating, fails WP:NFILM. Been in development for years, but no indication the film will ever actually go into production. Indeed, several fansites are saying it's been cancelled twice, once by Dreamworks and once by MGM. Onel5969 TT me 23:54, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Sixers. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:41, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
One of many bands that never really made it. Though there is an AllMusic bio, I am not seeing sufficient indepth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Delete. Just Chilling ( talk) 19:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Whilst a basic tally of votes would indicate a keep outcome, the requirement of the closer is to consider the strength of the arguments put forward. /there is an overriding need to consider whether GNG is met. Yes, the player technically meets NFOOTY and yes he is still playing, but since his 16 minute fully professional appearance he has left that club and now plays for a much less notable team. There has been considerable effort to show SIGCOV, but in actual fact, all that this has shown is that the player has garnered trivial mentions in sources that go no further than routine match reporting / transfer talk. NFOOTY is a presumption of GNG and so when arguments supposedly supporting GNG in fact show the opposite, the logical conclusion must in this instance be that the the presumption is incorrect. Perhaps he will play at a higher level later in his career. That is purely speculative at this stage and the article can always be restored should this happen. Fenix down ( talk) 17:27, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
An article about a 20-year-old footballer who has played in one professional game, for 16 minutes, for a 2nd-tier league in the 2017–2018 season and now plays in a fourth-tier semi-professional league (per Soccerway/Worldfootball.net). There is one four-paragraph article about his moving from the pro team to the semi-pro team (a primary source: media reporting on current event), and his current team's press release announcing his signing (primary, non-independent source). This article does not appear to meet GNG, and just barely meets NFOOTY with 16 minutes of play in one pro game in a 2nd-tier league. It is WP:TOOSOON for a standalone article about this subject. (Did I mention 16 minutes in one pro game?) Leviv ich 19:14, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
"If the article does meet the criteria set forth below, then it is likely that sufficient sources exist to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article."(linking to GNG),
"...conversely, the meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept. These are merely rules of thumb which some editors choose to keep in mind.... NFOOTY does not trump GNG, it merely creates a presumption that the subject meets GNG - the nomination here asserts that the subject fails GNG. Icewhiz ( talk) 09:44, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
"received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subjectby providing such references - WP:GNG is not met. Icewhiz ( talk) 11:38, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
DordtCentraal (Dutch) | DordtCentraal (English Google translation) |
---|---|
Twee nieuwe verdedigers voor FC Dordrecht | Two new defenders for FC Dordrecht |
DORDRECHT-FC Dordrecht heft twee nieuwe spelers aan de selectie voor komend seizoen toegevoegd. De twee verdedigers Clarence Bijl en Julius Bliek zullen op amateurbasis naar de Dordtse Krommedijk komen. | DORDRECHT-FC Dordrecht has added two new players to the selection for next season. The two defenders Clarence Bijl and Julius Bliek will come to the Dordtse Krommedijk on an amateur basis. |
De achttienjarige rechtsback Clarence Bijl is afkomstig uit de jeugdopleiding van het Rotterdamse Feyenoord. Deze talentvolle verdediger speelde afgelopen seizoen bijna alle duels voor het A1 team van de club uit Rotterdam Zuid. | The eighteen year old right back Clarence Bijl comes from the youth academy of the Rotterdam Feyenoord. This talented defender played almost all matches for the A1 team of the club from Rotterdam Zuid last season. |
Julius Bliek maakt de overstap van VV Kloetinge. Bliek werd recentelijk nog uitgeroepen tot Zeeuws voetballer van het jaar. Bliek is een linksbenige en fysiek zeer sterke verdediger. | Julius Bliek makes the switch from VV Kloetinge. Bliek was recently declared the Zeeland footballer of the year. Bliek is a left-footed and physically very strong defender. |
Brabants Dagblad (Dutch) | Brabants Dagblad (English Google translation) |
---|---|
Royaal verlies RKC stemt tot nadenken | Generous loss RKC gives you thought |
Het is traditioneel dat RKC Waalwijk en FC Dordrecht elkaar in de oefencampagne treffen. Zaterdagmiddag gebeurde dat in het Riwal Hoogwerkers stadion in Dordrecht. Nog geen week voor de start van de competitie verloor RKC met 4-2. | It is traditional that RKC Waalwijk and FC Dordrecht meet in the practice campaign. On Saturday afternoon it happened in the Riwal Hoogwerkers stadium in Dordrecht. Less than a week before the start of the competition, RKC lost 4-2. |
RKC Waalwijk gebruikte het negende oefenduel om twee spelers te testen. Vahid Selimovic speelde links in de verdediging. Illies Bruylandts vormde samen met Roy Rudonja de tweemansaanval. Bij RKC ontbrak Roland Bergkamp wegens privé-omstandigheden was ook Nikki Baggerman er niet bij. | RKC Waalwijk used the ninth exhibition game to test two players. Vahid Selimovic played left in the defense. Illies Bruylandts formed the two-man attack with Roy Rudonja. RKC lacked Roland Bergkamp because of private circumstances, Nikki Baggerman was not there. |
Het nieuwe 5-3-2 systeem van de Waalwijkse club roept een week voor de start van de competitie alleen maar vraagtekens op. RKC kwam er aanvallend nauwelijks aan te pas, terwijl het verdedigend toch erg kwetsbaar bleek. Na achttien minuten profiteerde Terence Groothusen van een dekkingsfout. Hij kon de bal ongehinderd binnen schieten na een aanval over de rechterflank. | The new 5-3-2 system of the Waalwijk club raises questions just a week before the start of the competition. RKC hardly came in at all, while it proved to be very vulnerable. After eighteen minutes, Terence Groothusen benefited from a cover error. He could shoot the ball unhindered after an attack on the right flank. |
Goed doorjagen van Daan Rienstra leverde RKC een eerste kans op. De middenvelder stuitte echter op doelman Nick Wolters. Daarna duurde het lang voor RKC nog een keer dreigend in de buurt van het Dordtse doel kwam. Een kopbal van Roy Rudonja eindigde in een simpele prooi voor de keeper. De rust leek met 1-0 in te gaan, maar op de valreep sloeg Denis Mahmudov met een prachtige individuele actie toe. | Driving through Daan Rienstra well gave RKC a first chance. The midfielder, however, met goalkeeper Nick Wolters. After that it took a long time for RKC to come threateningly near the goal of Dordt. A header from Roy Rudonja ended in a simple prey for the keeper. The rest seemed to go in 1-0, but at the last minute Denis Mahmudov struck with a beautiful individual action. |
Uit de lucht | From the sky |
Na de pauze kwamen Mo Mezghrani en Johan Voskamp voor aanvoerder Jan Lammers en Rudonja in de ploeg. De laatste wissel rendeerde. Een voorzet van Quasten werd door Bruylandts in de voeten van de spits gelegd. Dan is het meestal wel raak. | After the break Mo Mezghrani and Johan Voskamp came in for the captain Jan Lammers and Rudonja. The last bill returned. A cross from Quasten was put in the striker's feet by Bruylandts. Then it is usually hit. |
Het grootste gedeelte van de tweede helft speelde zich af in de buurt van het doel van RKC. Toch kwam de 3-1 van Clarence Bijl uit de lucht vallen. Die kopte een kwartier voor tijd een voorzet van Mailson Lima Duarte Lopes binnen. Twee minuten later was het opnieuw prijs. Nu werkte Bijl met de voet een voorzet vanaf links binnen. | The majority of the second half took place in the vicinity of RKC's goal. Still, the 3-1 of Clarence Bijl came out of the blue. He headed for a cross from Mailson Lima Duarte Lopes fifteen minutes before time. Two minutes later it was again prize. Now Bijl worked with his foot a cross from the inside. |
De doelpunten van Bijl hakten erin bij RKC. Selimovic kreeg na een overtreding uit frustratie geel. Niet alleen de proefspelers overtuigden niet. RKC beleefde een zwakke generale. Daar veranderde de late 4-2 van Noel de Graauw niets aan. | The goals of Bijl chopped at RKC. Selimovic got yellow out of frustration after a foul. Not only the test players did not convince. RKC experienced a weak general. The late 4-2 of Noel de Graauw did not change anything. |
Krommedijk 360/SPN Media (Dutch) | Krommedijk 360/SPN Media (English Google translation) |
---|---|
Clarence Bijl verlaat FC Dordrecht voor streekgenoot | Clarence Bijl leaves FC Dordrecht for a local |
Clarence Bijl speelt komend seizoen voor ASWH. De negentienjarige verdediger verlaat FC Dordrecht en gaat komend seizoen in de Derde Divisie spelen, waarin de Ambachters elfde werden. | Clarence Bijl will play for ASWH next season. The nineteen-year-old defender leaves FC Dordrecht and will play in the Third Division next season, in which the Craftsmen were eleventh. |
Bijl kwam een jaar geleden over van de Feyenoord Academy, waarvoor hij tien jaar speelde. De speler kwam bij FC Dordrecht amper tot spelen. Zo speelde hij éénmalig zestien minuten in het eerste en kwam hij tot zeven wedstrijden in Jong FC Dordrecht. | Bijl came over a year ago from the Feyenoord Academy, for which he played ten years. The player hardly played at FC Dordrecht. For example, he played for the first time for sixteen minutes and he played seven matches in Jong FC Dordrecht. |
'De TC is uiteraard verheugd dat de multifunctionele Bijl, die onlangs al enkele keren meetrainde, de keuze heeft gemaakt om volgend seizoen op sportpark Schildman te spelen’, zo meldt ASWH op haar clubwebsite. | The TC is of course pleased that the multifunctional Bijl, who recently trained several times, made the choice to play at Schildman sports park next season,' ASWH reports on its club website. |
Last one. This is the press release from ASWH, on their website, that is explicitly cited by the Krommedijk 360/SPN Media piece translated below (and many others):
ASWH team press release (Dutch) | ASWH team press release (English Google translation) |
---|---|
De technische commissie is bezig om de laatste puntjes op de i te zetten bij het samenstellen van de selectie voor het seizoen 2018/19. Dit heeft wederom geresulteerd in de komst van een nieuwe speler. | The technical committee is working on the final points in the selection of the season 2018/19. This has again resulted in the arrival of a new player. |
De TC is met Clarence Bijl overeengekomen dat hij de selectie van ASWH komt versterken. De negentienjarige speler komt over van FC Dordrecht. Bijl is op meerdere posities inzetbaar, maar speelt voornamelijk als rechtsback. In de voorbereiding op het afgelopen seizoen gebruikte FC Dordrecht-trainer Gérard de Nooijer hem echter ook in een aanvallendere rol. Voor hij in 2017 naar Dordrecht vertrok, maakte Bijl tien jaar deel uit van de opleiding van Feyenoord. De Rotterdammers plukten hem als jeugdspeler weg bij zijn amateurclub FC Binnenmaas. De TC is uiteraard verheugd dat de multifunctionele Bijl, die onlangs al enkele keren meetrainde, de keuze heeft gemaakt om volgend seizoen op sportpark Schildman te spelen. | The TC has agreed with Clarence Bijl that he will strengthen the selection of ASWH. The nineteen-year-old player comes over from FC Dordrecht. Bijl can be used in several positions, but mainly plays as a right back. In the preparation for the past season FC Dordrecht coach Gérard de Nooijer also used him in a more attacking role. Before he left for Dordrecht in 2017, Bijl was part of the Feyenoord course for ten years. The Rotterdammers picked him off as a youth player at his amateur club FC Binnenmaas. The TC is of course pleased that the multifunctional Bijl, who recently trained several times, made the choice to play next season at sportpark Schildman. |
Wij heten Clarence van harte welkom bij onze vereniging en wensen hem veel succes en plezier bij ASWH! | We warmly welcome Clarence to our association and wish him every success and pleasure at ASWH! |
The result was that Clarence Bijl spent almost a season out of the picture to his great disappointment.and
In daily life he works at a tire company in Dordrecht.. By Bijl's own words, he is quoted as saying, about his time at Feyenoord and FC Dordrecht,
unfortunately nothing came of it in practice, and I finally participated once in a while as a substitute, and
I do not see ASWH as a new step up to professional football, but I do not want to think about that at all.It seems even Bijl has said he is not pursuing a professional career. But if editors here want to call these sources significant, or back an SNG that presumes notability for a player who played in one game for 16 minutes two years ago, I can't stop you folks from !voting "keep per NFOOTY" or suggesting a three-sentence mention is SIGCOV. I can't stop you from lowering our standards like that. I just don't understand how you can say with a straight face that this is an encyclopedia and not a football almanac. There is literally, right now, a sentence, cited, in Clarence Bijl, about how he almost scored a goal in a game, but it was blocked. Yes, this deserves inclusion in an encyclopedia. :-) Leviv ich 14:22, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 23:07, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Article is almost entirely unsourced. Of three sources provided one is dead and two are passing mentions insufficient to establish notability. Mccapra ( talk) 05:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Blankstein, Andrew. Los Angeles Times; Los Angeles, Calif. [Los Angeles, Calif]07 Feb 2003: B.2. ]. Article is certainly C.V. style PROMO. But it may be that he is notable. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 18:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 23:06, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable building. Fails WP:NBUILD. That a real estate agent is quoted on a local news website as saying the asking price of one of the flats is the most expensive in the town is not sufficient to make this building notable. The other coverage is not in-depth, but is merely routine, for example the pausing of construction. Pontificalibus 18:40, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Idols winners. Vanamonde ( Talk) 04:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
We don't have any such articles for other Idol versions, at most there are lists of finalists. Furthermore there have been only two seasons of this show, so whatever information is here is just repetition from the main article and really no chance for unique content. I suggest this should be redirected to Nepal Idol or (preferably) List of Idols winners. ... discospinster talk 20:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Internal measurement. Vanamonde ( Talk) 04:04, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
All of the sources are self published sources. ToT89 ( talk) 19:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 23:06, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
non notable personality. Sources are just some trivial coverage or self written, non independent articles. Are of no use. Fails GNG ToT89 ( talk) 19:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:HEY applies thanks to Julie's work, and there seems to be consensus that is enough. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 19:52, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Unsourced for twelve years and no article on Swedish Wikipedia so notability is doubtful. Mccapra ( talk) 19:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Diary#Other forms of diaries. Vanamonde ( Talk) 04:03, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Unsourced for 12 years and not evident that there are multiple reliable independent sources to support it. Mccapra ( talk) 19:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep (withdrawn) AustralianRupert ( talk) 08:35, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Swiss fighter pilot. Known for being the first female fighter pilot of the Swiss Air Force, which (sadly) is a matter of
WP:BLP1E. With a rank of 1LT, a
WP:SOLDIER pass is still some years away. I've already added a mention at
History of the Swiss Air Force, which is the appropriate level of coverage in my view.
Sandstein
18:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 23:09, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Article about former youth footballer who made 2 substitute's appearances (<30 minutes of total play) for a senior side in the fully-pro Paraguayan top division in 2011. The only online coverage of this player is routine (e.g., match reports or statistical database entries plus a name drop in an article by his former academy). In fact, it's impossible to track down what happened to him in the past 5 years, which says something about his notability as a footballer. Prior consensus (e.g., Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phakamani Mngadi) is that a nominal amount of play in a fully-pro league doesn't meet WP:NFOOTBALL when an article comprehensively fails WP:GNG - as is the case here. Jogurney ( talk) 18:42, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is that the subject is notable, even if not specifically as a singer. bd2412 T 02:39, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Fan-biography for a singer of a group who lacks independent notability. Masdggg, with 58 edits, is reverting a redirect, turning it into an article that lacks secondary sourcing proving the person is notable per GNG or per MUSICBIO. I don't necessarily think we should delete this, a redirect seems appropriate, but we do need to make clear that we have standards. Drmies ( talk) 18:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
-- Masdggg ( talk) 19:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 23:10, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Tagged for notability for 5 years. Searching turns up more on a picture framing shop in London. MB 18:14, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:24, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Notability guidelines. Artist doesn't even have a Wikipedia entry. Bernadette51 ( talk) 17:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 22:25, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
This is an unsourced skeleton article that hasn't been improved in over a decade. All musicians and songs are redlinked so there is nothing to work off of to add more content or sourcing. -- Tavix ( talk) 17:46, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:24, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
WP:NOTNEWS. While tragic, not all murders are notable. Coverage is local and contemporaneous. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 17:40, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 23:13, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
I tried to look up info about this event (almost 13 years past since it happened) and I don't see the article passing WP:EVENTCRITERIA even under #4. A lot can be found on the idea (which is not directly connected to this) but it acts as a coatrack for the actual event article. – The Grid ( talk) 17:19, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:23, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Not a suitable topic for an encyclopedia. Simply being in the Guinness Book of World Records is not a claim of notability, and the references are all to that book. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 16:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations, such as "people from ethnic / cultural / religious group X employed by organization Y" or "restaurants specializing in food type X in city Y". Cross-categories such as these are not considered a sufficient basis for creating an article, unless the intersection of those categories is in some way a culturally significant phenomenon.. I don't think we need any articles of the form "Guinness World Record holders from X country". Colin M ( talk) 21:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 03:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion
A7. No indication of importance (people, animals, organizations, web content, events) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73mmmm ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:22, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Bootleg Michael Jackson album, fails WP:FUTUREALBUM: "Unreleased material (including demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only recordings) is only notable if it has significant independent coverage in reliable sources." Popcornduff ( talk) 14:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep as improved. bd2412 T 02:59, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Playing in the Empire Games doesn't meet WP:NSPORTS, but worse, I can't verify that he played. We have a source that says that a H. Grocott (presumably this one, though not certain, could e.g. be his brother Horace Grocott) left for the Games [19], but the other source actually reporting on the games doesn't mention him as part of the team (source gives by name the four team players and the one solo player) [20]. If that source is correct, a G. R. Scott played at the Games instead.
None of the sources are indepth reliable sources about Harold Grocott, but passing mentions or primary sources. Fram ( talk) 13:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:09, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
A Siddha medicine but fails GNG comprehensively. Also, see WP:MEDRS. ∯WBG converse 13:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:19, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
I spot trivial name-mentions over this reminisce, this book and this DaliyMail piece. Atlas Obscura is user-generated content and not reliable.
Fails WP:GNG comprehensively. ∯WBG converse 13:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:17, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Cannot see how this passes WP:NAUTHOR or WP:GNG. Edwardx ( talk) 12:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:58, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Clear case of WP:BIO1E. All press about this individual is in regards to the accident. Probably should be a redirect, but several IP editors insist on having an article, so here we are. Please also see WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Onel5969 TT me 11:59, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was withdraw. Ref looks good. (non-admin closure) Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 12:37, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
No reference for the article. Largely original research. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 11:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. no policy-based reason to keep. Frankly the lone keep !vote was promotional. After I judged consensus I looked at the article, and it is blatantly promotional. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:17, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Keep: Added much needed criticism to the claims of "universal affordability. Also removed the "Titan Edition" section as it made the page looks like a sales page. Before the page was hastily deleted, this "Titan Edition" section was also continually being stripped down. This clearly shows there was multiple and ongoing good faith efforts still being made on this page to fix the issues. Lastly, this watch model is notable and encyclopedic within the luxury industry. It is an (1) atypically priced watch model going for 1/10th the market price (affordable within haute segment as verified from 3rd party sources) and (2) it is the most crowd funded watch of its kind coming out of NYC, which is a fashion authority. Izazii ( talk) 12:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is fairly clear consensus that this incident has fairly substantive coverage in reliable sources, and thus is basically notable. If those advocating to merge this still feel strongly about it, a merge discussion might be a better venue. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:52, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
NOT NEWS, and BLP1E DGG ( talk ) 09:17, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:13, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
insuffient evidence of notability ,and promotional as well DGG ( talk ) 09:13, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is to keep but there is no consensus on examining if this will gain more coverage in the future. Discussion about the title belongs on talk. (non-admin closure) wumbolo ^^^ 08:23, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
It doesn't merit a standalone article per WP:ROUTINE & WP:NOTNEWS. Two minor & seperate incidents were combined based on WP:OR to create this article. — Bukhari (Talk!) 08:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. While I personally have sympathy for the argument to delete, I cannot close this any other way. The existence of substantive coverage is a difficult argument to overcome. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:43, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
There is no indication of independent notability.The subject was born into a deposed family and married into another deposed family. Virtually everything in this article is about other people: her father, her grandparents, her great-grandparents, her half-siblings, her husbands, her children, her grandchildren. She is solely of genealogical interest, and Wikipedia is not a genealogical database. Surtsicna ( talk) 13:01, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:38, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:FILMMAKER as the film she made isn't really notable. Unless "Outfest award for Emerging talent" can be considered notable and significant, she also fails WP:ANYBIO. Point to note, the creator of the article is named CBerler. Daiyusha ( talk) 07:54, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:38, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Article does not seem to meet the BLP notability guidelines. Article has little sourced content, and coverage in the media is extremely thin. UnkleFester ( talk) 07:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 22:27, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Invalid criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia (see WP:INVALIDBIO). Claim to notability is through the subject's relationship with Nelly Furtado. Subject is not notable in his own right. UnkleFester ( talk) 07:02, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 22:30, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Fails notability under WP:ORG. Was previously deleted multiple times. Rusf10 ( talk) 04:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nominator wanted to withdraw the nomination, and the consensus is that the subject meets WP:NAUTHOR and WP:ANYBIO. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:43, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
It would be incredibly difficult to evaluate the notability of this kind of article (ie, an academic-like person who isn't affiliate with a university) without some assistance. I do notice there's a lot of primary sources in this one, which was the final straw in nomination. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 03:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 05:32, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Subject lacks notability and significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains( talk) 02:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was merge to Silverbridge, County Armagh. czar 05:31, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Seems to be about one event, about which I can find little but run of the mill coverage. SITH (talk) 00:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. The consensus is that the article's references are worthy enough for the subject to pass WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:41, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Delete: as insufficiently notable actress; notability cannot be derived from relatives. Rms125a@hotmail.com 01:16, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 22:45, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable writer. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. No assertion of notability. GregorB ( talk) 15:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 03:22, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Not notable, not enough sources for an article of substance Vmavanti ( talk) 20:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. RebeccaGreen's additional sources were not challenged by anyone once presented. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Not notable Spartaz Humbug! 17:48, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was merge to Punk Farm. Consensus seems to favor at least redirecting and I believe the two merge/redirect votes are sufficient to close as such. (non-admin closure) –– Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 06:04, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Could simply have been redirected, but in ip insists on recreating, fails WP:NFILM. Been in development for years, but no indication the film will ever actually go into production. Indeed, several fansites are saying it's been cancelled twice, once by Dreamworks and once by MGM. Onel5969 TT me 23:54, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Sixers. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:41, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
One of many bands that never really made it. Though there is an AllMusic bio, I am not seeing sufficient indepth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Delete. Just Chilling ( talk) 19:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Whilst a basic tally of votes would indicate a keep outcome, the requirement of the closer is to consider the strength of the arguments put forward. /there is an overriding need to consider whether GNG is met. Yes, the player technically meets NFOOTY and yes he is still playing, but since his 16 minute fully professional appearance he has left that club and now plays for a much less notable team. There has been considerable effort to show SIGCOV, but in actual fact, all that this has shown is that the player has garnered trivial mentions in sources that go no further than routine match reporting / transfer talk. NFOOTY is a presumption of GNG and so when arguments supposedly supporting GNG in fact show the opposite, the logical conclusion must in this instance be that the the presumption is incorrect. Perhaps he will play at a higher level later in his career. That is purely speculative at this stage and the article can always be restored should this happen. Fenix down ( talk) 17:27, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
An article about a 20-year-old footballer who has played in one professional game, for 16 minutes, for a 2nd-tier league in the 2017–2018 season and now plays in a fourth-tier semi-professional league (per Soccerway/Worldfootball.net). There is one four-paragraph article about his moving from the pro team to the semi-pro team (a primary source: media reporting on current event), and his current team's press release announcing his signing (primary, non-independent source). This article does not appear to meet GNG, and just barely meets NFOOTY with 16 minutes of play in one pro game in a 2nd-tier league. It is WP:TOOSOON for a standalone article about this subject. (Did I mention 16 minutes in one pro game?) Leviv ich 19:14, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
"If the article does meet the criteria set forth below, then it is likely that sufficient sources exist to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article."(linking to GNG),
"...conversely, the meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept. These are merely rules of thumb which some editors choose to keep in mind.... NFOOTY does not trump GNG, it merely creates a presumption that the subject meets GNG - the nomination here asserts that the subject fails GNG. Icewhiz ( talk) 09:44, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
"received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subjectby providing such references - WP:GNG is not met. Icewhiz ( talk) 11:38, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
DordtCentraal (Dutch) | DordtCentraal (English Google translation) |
---|---|
Twee nieuwe verdedigers voor FC Dordrecht | Two new defenders for FC Dordrecht |
DORDRECHT-FC Dordrecht heft twee nieuwe spelers aan de selectie voor komend seizoen toegevoegd. De twee verdedigers Clarence Bijl en Julius Bliek zullen op amateurbasis naar de Dordtse Krommedijk komen. | DORDRECHT-FC Dordrecht has added two new players to the selection for next season. The two defenders Clarence Bijl and Julius Bliek will come to the Dordtse Krommedijk on an amateur basis. |
De achttienjarige rechtsback Clarence Bijl is afkomstig uit de jeugdopleiding van het Rotterdamse Feyenoord. Deze talentvolle verdediger speelde afgelopen seizoen bijna alle duels voor het A1 team van de club uit Rotterdam Zuid. | The eighteen year old right back Clarence Bijl comes from the youth academy of the Rotterdam Feyenoord. This talented defender played almost all matches for the A1 team of the club from Rotterdam Zuid last season. |
Julius Bliek maakt de overstap van VV Kloetinge. Bliek werd recentelijk nog uitgeroepen tot Zeeuws voetballer van het jaar. Bliek is een linksbenige en fysiek zeer sterke verdediger. | Julius Bliek makes the switch from VV Kloetinge. Bliek was recently declared the Zeeland footballer of the year. Bliek is a left-footed and physically very strong defender. |
Brabants Dagblad (Dutch) | Brabants Dagblad (English Google translation) |
---|---|
Royaal verlies RKC stemt tot nadenken | Generous loss RKC gives you thought |
Het is traditioneel dat RKC Waalwijk en FC Dordrecht elkaar in de oefencampagne treffen. Zaterdagmiddag gebeurde dat in het Riwal Hoogwerkers stadion in Dordrecht. Nog geen week voor de start van de competitie verloor RKC met 4-2. | It is traditional that RKC Waalwijk and FC Dordrecht meet in the practice campaign. On Saturday afternoon it happened in the Riwal Hoogwerkers stadium in Dordrecht. Less than a week before the start of the competition, RKC lost 4-2. |
RKC Waalwijk gebruikte het negende oefenduel om twee spelers te testen. Vahid Selimovic speelde links in de verdediging. Illies Bruylandts vormde samen met Roy Rudonja de tweemansaanval. Bij RKC ontbrak Roland Bergkamp wegens privé-omstandigheden was ook Nikki Baggerman er niet bij. | RKC Waalwijk used the ninth exhibition game to test two players. Vahid Selimovic played left in the defense. Illies Bruylandts formed the two-man attack with Roy Rudonja. RKC lacked Roland Bergkamp because of private circumstances, Nikki Baggerman was not there. |
Het nieuwe 5-3-2 systeem van de Waalwijkse club roept een week voor de start van de competitie alleen maar vraagtekens op. RKC kwam er aanvallend nauwelijks aan te pas, terwijl het verdedigend toch erg kwetsbaar bleek. Na achttien minuten profiteerde Terence Groothusen van een dekkingsfout. Hij kon de bal ongehinderd binnen schieten na een aanval over de rechterflank. | The new 5-3-2 system of the Waalwijk club raises questions just a week before the start of the competition. RKC hardly came in at all, while it proved to be very vulnerable. After eighteen minutes, Terence Groothusen benefited from a cover error. He could shoot the ball unhindered after an attack on the right flank. |
Goed doorjagen van Daan Rienstra leverde RKC een eerste kans op. De middenvelder stuitte echter op doelman Nick Wolters. Daarna duurde het lang voor RKC nog een keer dreigend in de buurt van het Dordtse doel kwam. Een kopbal van Roy Rudonja eindigde in een simpele prooi voor de keeper. De rust leek met 1-0 in te gaan, maar op de valreep sloeg Denis Mahmudov met een prachtige individuele actie toe. | Driving through Daan Rienstra well gave RKC a first chance. The midfielder, however, met goalkeeper Nick Wolters. After that it took a long time for RKC to come threateningly near the goal of Dordt. A header from Roy Rudonja ended in a simple prey for the keeper. The rest seemed to go in 1-0, but at the last minute Denis Mahmudov struck with a beautiful individual action. |
Uit de lucht | From the sky |
Na de pauze kwamen Mo Mezghrani en Johan Voskamp voor aanvoerder Jan Lammers en Rudonja in de ploeg. De laatste wissel rendeerde. Een voorzet van Quasten werd door Bruylandts in de voeten van de spits gelegd. Dan is het meestal wel raak. | After the break Mo Mezghrani and Johan Voskamp came in for the captain Jan Lammers and Rudonja. The last bill returned. A cross from Quasten was put in the striker's feet by Bruylandts. Then it is usually hit. |
Het grootste gedeelte van de tweede helft speelde zich af in de buurt van het doel van RKC. Toch kwam de 3-1 van Clarence Bijl uit de lucht vallen. Die kopte een kwartier voor tijd een voorzet van Mailson Lima Duarte Lopes binnen. Twee minuten later was het opnieuw prijs. Nu werkte Bijl met de voet een voorzet vanaf links binnen. | The majority of the second half took place in the vicinity of RKC's goal. Still, the 3-1 of Clarence Bijl came out of the blue. He headed for a cross from Mailson Lima Duarte Lopes fifteen minutes before time. Two minutes later it was again prize. Now Bijl worked with his foot a cross from the inside. |
De doelpunten van Bijl hakten erin bij RKC. Selimovic kreeg na een overtreding uit frustratie geel. Niet alleen de proefspelers overtuigden niet. RKC beleefde een zwakke generale. Daar veranderde de late 4-2 van Noel de Graauw niets aan. | The goals of Bijl chopped at RKC. Selimovic got yellow out of frustration after a foul. Not only the test players did not convince. RKC experienced a weak general. The late 4-2 of Noel de Graauw did not change anything. |
Krommedijk 360/SPN Media (Dutch) | Krommedijk 360/SPN Media (English Google translation) |
---|---|
Clarence Bijl verlaat FC Dordrecht voor streekgenoot | Clarence Bijl leaves FC Dordrecht for a local |
Clarence Bijl speelt komend seizoen voor ASWH. De negentienjarige verdediger verlaat FC Dordrecht en gaat komend seizoen in de Derde Divisie spelen, waarin de Ambachters elfde werden. | Clarence Bijl will play for ASWH next season. The nineteen-year-old defender leaves FC Dordrecht and will play in the Third Division next season, in which the Craftsmen were eleventh. |
Bijl kwam een jaar geleden over van de Feyenoord Academy, waarvoor hij tien jaar speelde. De speler kwam bij FC Dordrecht amper tot spelen. Zo speelde hij éénmalig zestien minuten in het eerste en kwam hij tot zeven wedstrijden in Jong FC Dordrecht. | Bijl came over a year ago from the Feyenoord Academy, for which he played ten years. The player hardly played at FC Dordrecht. For example, he played for the first time for sixteen minutes and he played seven matches in Jong FC Dordrecht. |
'De TC is uiteraard verheugd dat de multifunctionele Bijl, die onlangs al enkele keren meetrainde, de keuze heeft gemaakt om volgend seizoen op sportpark Schildman te spelen’, zo meldt ASWH op haar clubwebsite. | The TC is of course pleased that the multifunctional Bijl, who recently trained several times, made the choice to play at Schildman sports park next season,' ASWH reports on its club website. |
Last one. This is the press release from ASWH, on their website, that is explicitly cited by the Krommedijk 360/SPN Media piece translated below (and many others):
ASWH team press release (Dutch) | ASWH team press release (English Google translation) |
---|---|
De technische commissie is bezig om de laatste puntjes op de i te zetten bij het samenstellen van de selectie voor het seizoen 2018/19. Dit heeft wederom geresulteerd in de komst van een nieuwe speler. | The technical committee is working on the final points in the selection of the season 2018/19. This has again resulted in the arrival of a new player. |
De TC is met Clarence Bijl overeengekomen dat hij de selectie van ASWH komt versterken. De negentienjarige speler komt over van FC Dordrecht. Bijl is op meerdere posities inzetbaar, maar speelt voornamelijk als rechtsback. In de voorbereiding op het afgelopen seizoen gebruikte FC Dordrecht-trainer Gérard de Nooijer hem echter ook in een aanvallendere rol. Voor hij in 2017 naar Dordrecht vertrok, maakte Bijl tien jaar deel uit van de opleiding van Feyenoord. De Rotterdammers plukten hem als jeugdspeler weg bij zijn amateurclub FC Binnenmaas. De TC is uiteraard verheugd dat de multifunctionele Bijl, die onlangs al enkele keren meetrainde, de keuze heeft gemaakt om volgend seizoen op sportpark Schildman te spelen. | The TC has agreed with Clarence Bijl that he will strengthen the selection of ASWH. The nineteen-year-old player comes over from FC Dordrecht. Bijl can be used in several positions, but mainly plays as a right back. In the preparation for the past season FC Dordrecht coach Gérard de Nooijer also used him in a more attacking role. Before he left for Dordrecht in 2017, Bijl was part of the Feyenoord course for ten years. The Rotterdammers picked him off as a youth player at his amateur club FC Binnenmaas. The TC is of course pleased that the multifunctional Bijl, who recently trained several times, made the choice to play next season at sportpark Schildman. |
Wij heten Clarence van harte welkom bij onze vereniging en wensen hem veel succes en plezier bij ASWH! | We warmly welcome Clarence to our association and wish him every success and pleasure at ASWH! |
The result was that Clarence Bijl spent almost a season out of the picture to his great disappointment.and
In daily life he works at a tire company in Dordrecht.. By Bijl's own words, he is quoted as saying, about his time at Feyenoord and FC Dordrecht,
unfortunately nothing came of it in practice, and I finally participated once in a while as a substitute, and
I do not see ASWH as a new step up to professional football, but I do not want to think about that at all.It seems even Bijl has said he is not pursuing a professional career. But if editors here want to call these sources significant, or back an SNG that presumes notability for a player who played in one game for 16 minutes two years ago, I can't stop you folks from !voting "keep per NFOOTY" or suggesting a three-sentence mention is SIGCOV. I can't stop you from lowering our standards like that. I just don't understand how you can say with a straight face that this is an encyclopedia and not a football almanac. There is literally, right now, a sentence, cited, in Clarence Bijl, about how he almost scored a goal in a game, but it was blocked. Yes, this deserves inclusion in an encyclopedia. :-) Leviv ich 14:22, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 23:07, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Article is almost entirely unsourced. Of three sources provided one is dead and two are passing mentions insufficient to establish notability. Mccapra ( talk) 05:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Blankstein, Andrew. Los Angeles Times; Los Angeles, Calif. [Los Angeles, Calif]07 Feb 2003: B.2. ]. Article is certainly C.V. style PROMO. But it may be that he is notable. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 18:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 23:06, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable building. Fails WP:NBUILD. That a real estate agent is quoted on a local news website as saying the asking price of one of the flats is the most expensive in the town is not sufficient to make this building notable. The other coverage is not in-depth, but is merely routine, for example the pausing of construction. Pontificalibus 18:40, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Idols winners. Vanamonde ( Talk) 04:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
We don't have any such articles for other Idol versions, at most there are lists of finalists. Furthermore there have been only two seasons of this show, so whatever information is here is just repetition from the main article and really no chance for unique content. I suggest this should be redirected to Nepal Idol or (preferably) List of Idols winners. ... discospinster talk 20:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Internal measurement. Vanamonde ( Talk) 04:04, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
All of the sources are self published sources. ToT89 ( talk) 19:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 23:06, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
non notable personality. Sources are just some trivial coverage or self written, non independent articles. Are of no use. Fails GNG ToT89 ( talk) 19:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:HEY applies thanks to Julie's work, and there seems to be consensus that is enough. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 19:52, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Unsourced for twelve years and no article on Swedish Wikipedia so notability is doubtful. Mccapra ( talk) 19:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Diary#Other forms of diaries. Vanamonde ( Talk) 04:03, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Unsourced for 12 years and not evident that there are multiple reliable independent sources to support it. Mccapra ( talk) 19:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep (withdrawn) AustralianRupert ( talk) 08:35, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Swiss fighter pilot. Known for being the first female fighter pilot of the Swiss Air Force, which (sadly) is a matter of
WP:BLP1E. With a rank of 1LT, a
WP:SOLDIER pass is still some years away. I've already added a mention at
History of the Swiss Air Force, which is the appropriate level of coverage in my view.
Sandstein
18:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 23:09, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Article about former youth footballer who made 2 substitute's appearances (<30 minutes of total play) for a senior side in the fully-pro Paraguayan top division in 2011. The only online coverage of this player is routine (e.g., match reports or statistical database entries plus a name drop in an article by his former academy). In fact, it's impossible to track down what happened to him in the past 5 years, which says something about his notability as a footballer. Prior consensus (e.g., Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phakamani Mngadi) is that a nominal amount of play in a fully-pro league doesn't meet WP:NFOOTBALL when an article comprehensively fails WP:GNG - as is the case here. Jogurney ( talk) 18:42, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is that the subject is notable, even if not specifically as a singer. bd2412 T 02:39, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Fan-biography for a singer of a group who lacks independent notability. Masdggg, with 58 edits, is reverting a redirect, turning it into an article that lacks secondary sourcing proving the person is notable per GNG or per MUSICBIO. I don't necessarily think we should delete this, a redirect seems appropriate, but we do need to make clear that we have standards. Drmies ( talk) 18:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
-- Masdggg ( talk) 19:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 23:10, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Tagged for notability for 5 years. Searching turns up more on a picture framing shop in London. MB 18:14, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:24, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Notability guidelines. Artist doesn't even have a Wikipedia entry. Bernadette51 ( talk) 17:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 22:25, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
This is an unsourced skeleton article that hasn't been improved in over a decade. All musicians and songs are redlinked so there is nothing to work off of to add more content or sourcing. -- Tavix ( talk) 17:46, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:24, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
WP:NOTNEWS. While tragic, not all murders are notable. Coverage is local and contemporaneous. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 17:40, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 23:13, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
I tried to look up info about this event (almost 13 years past since it happened) and I don't see the article passing WP:EVENTCRITERIA even under #4. A lot can be found on the idea (which is not directly connected to this) but it acts as a coatrack for the actual event article. – The Grid ( talk) 17:19, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:23, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Not a suitable topic for an encyclopedia. Simply being in the Guinness Book of World Records is not a claim of notability, and the references are all to that book. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 16:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations, such as "people from ethnic / cultural / religious group X employed by organization Y" or "restaurants specializing in food type X in city Y". Cross-categories such as these are not considered a sufficient basis for creating an article, unless the intersection of those categories is in some way a culturally significant phenomenon.. I don't think we need any articles of the form "Guinness World Record holders from X country". Colin M ( talk) 21:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 03:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion
A7. No indication of importance (people, animals, organizations, web content, events) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73mmmm ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:22, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Bootleg Michael Jackson album, fails WP:FUTUREALBUM: "Unreleased material (including demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only recordings) is only notable if it has significant independent coverage in reliable sources." Popcornduff ( talk) 14:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep as improved. bd2412 T 02:59, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Playing in the Empire Games doesn't meet WP:NSPORTS, but worse, I can't verify that he played. We have a source that says that a H. Grocott (presumably this one, though not certain, could e.g. be his brother Horace Grocott) left for the Games [19], but the other source actually reporting on the games doesn't mention him as part of the team (source gives by name the four team players and the one solo player) [20]. If that source is correct, a G. R. Scott played at the Games instead.
None of the sources are indepth reliable sources about Harold Grocott, but passing mentions or primary sources. Fram ( talk) 13:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:09, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
A Siddha medicine but fails GNG comprehensively. Also, see WP:MEDRS. ∯WBG converse 13:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:19, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
I spot trivial name-mentions over this reminisce, this book and this DaliyMail piece. Atlas Obscura is user-generated content and not reliable.
Fails WP:GNG comprehensively. ∯WBG converse 13:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:17, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Cannot see how this passes WP:NAUTHOR or WP:GNG. Edwardx ( talk) 12:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:58, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Clear case of WP:BIO1E. All press about this individual is in regards to the accident. Probably should be a redirect, but several IP editors insist on having an article, so here we are. Please also see WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Onel5969 TT me 11:59, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was withdraw. Ref looks good. (non-admin closure) Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 12:37, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
No reference for the article. Largely original research. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 11:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. no policy-based reason to keep. Frankly the lone keep !vote was promotional. After I judged consensus I looked at the article, and it is blatantly promotional. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:17, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Keep: Added much needed criticism to the claims of "universal affordability. Also removed the "Titan Edition" section as it made the page looks like a sales page. Before the page was hastily deleted, this "Titan Edition" section was also continually being stripped down. This clearly shows there was multiple and ongoing good faith efforts still being made on this page to fix the issues. Lastly, this watch model is notable and encyclopedic within the luxury industry. It is an (1) atypically priced watch model going for 1/10th the market price (affordable within haute segment as verified from 3rd party sources) and (2) it is the most crowd funded watch of its kind coming out of NYC, which is a fashion authority. Izazii ( talk) 12:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is fairly clear consensus that this incident has fairly substantive coverage in reliable sources, and thus is basically notable. If those advocating to merge this still feel strongly about it, a merge discussion might be a better venue. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:52, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
NOT NEWS, and BLP1E DGG ( talk ) 09:17, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:13, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
insuffient evidence of notability ,and promotional as well DGG ( talk ) 09:13, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is to keep but there is no consensus on examining if this will gain more coverage in the future. Discussion about the title belongs on talk. (non-admin closure) wumbolo ^^^ 08:23, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
It doesn't merit a standalone article per WP:ROUTINE & WP:NOTNEWS. Two minor & seperate incidents were combined based on WP:OR to create this article. — Bukhari (Talk!) 08:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. While I personally have sympathy for the argument to delete, I cannot close this any other way. The existence of substantive coverage is a difficult argument to overcome. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:43, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
There is no indication of independent notability.The subject was born into a deposed family and married into another deposed family. Virtually everything in this article is about other people: her father, her grandparents, her great-grandparents, her half-siblings, her husbands, her children, her grandchildren. She is solely of genealogical interest, and Wikipedia is not a genealogical database. Surtsicna ( talk) 13:01, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:38, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:FILMMAKER as the film she made isn't really notable. Unless "Outfest award for Emerging talent" can be considered notable and significant, she also fails WP:ANYBIO. Point to note, the creator of the article is named CBerler. Daiyusha ( talk) 07:54, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:38, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Article does not seem to meet the BLP notability guidelines. Article has little sourced content, and coverage in the media is extremely thin. UnkleFester ( talk) 07:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 22:27, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Invalid criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia (see WP:INVALIDBIO). Claim to notability is through the subject's relationship with Nelly Furtado. Subject is not notable in his own right. UnkleFester ( talk) 07:02, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 22:30, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Fails notability under WP:ORG. Was previously deleted multiple times. Rusf10 ( talk) 04:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nominator wanted to withdraw the nomination, and the consensus is that the subject meets WP:NAUTHOR and WP:ANYBIO. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:43, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
It would be incredibly difficult to evaluate the notability of this kind of article (ie, an academic-like person who isn't affiliate with a university) without some assistance. I do notice there's a lot of primary sources in this one, which was the final straw in nomination. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 03:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 05:32, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Subject lacks notability and significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains( talk) 02:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was merge to Silverbridge, County Armagh. czar 05:31, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Seems to be about one event, about which I can find little but run of the mill coverage. SITH (talk) 00:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. The consensus is that the article's references are worthy enough for the subject to pass WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:41, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Delete: as insufficiently notable actress; notability cannot be derived from relatives. Rms125a@hotmail.com 01:16, 19 February 2019 (UTC)