![]() |
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:29, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
I tried to find additional sources, but I could not find any. Almost all of this article's sources are questionable at best. The Internet Speculative Fiction Database is the only reliable source here. Of course, one meagre source is not enough to write an article on a living person. ― Susmuffin Talk 23:56, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 00:45, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails GNG. She's currently a PhD student, and there's no independent coverage that would substantiate her inclusion on Wikipedia, as commendable as her actions are. Her only apparent publication, "Implementing a 15-week AI-education program with under-resourced families across 13 global communities", has not been cited a single time. As for general coverage, I found the following: an article discussing aid in Cameroon, and not just Fofang's initiative; a single sentence within an article that is a list of women promoting STEM education in Africa; a single sentence stating she will participate in a 3D printing event; a blog post describing her among several "African women in tech"; another 3-sentence paragraph in another blog post about Girl's education in Cameroon; This one is the best one I could find. A Reuters article about "getting Cameroon's women into work", mentioning her thrice among other initiatives, and quotes her once. Summing up, she fails general notability, not to mention NACADEMIC. She certainly could become notable in a few years' time. PK650 ( talk) 23:44, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Berean Hunter, CSD G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:28, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
The subject of this article fails WP:GNG, WP:JOURNALIST and WP:ANYBIO. Two of the three sources cited in the article do not discuss the subject. The first source is an unreliable self-published wordpress source. A Google search of the subject doesn't show him being discussed in reliable sources. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 19:31, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
• Keep Article needs better sourcing but the subject is notable locally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djames11170 ( talk • contribs) 12:25, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
• Keep in accordance with
WP:BEFORE #2, as it is the case that this article was recently created, contributors should be given more time to develop the article. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Djames11170 (
talk •
contribs)
14:20, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:01, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. Two pieces of churnalistic press coverage in 2007 and 2008; WP:BEFORE shows zero coverage since then. The article has never been much better than this. Previous AFD kept partly on the basis of a Sun advertorial. If anyone can find meaningful RS coverage for Fuelmyblog ... David Gerard ( talk) 22:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. No consensus to delete, and a uniform consensus that it meets notability (both GNG and SNG) (non-admin closure) Britishfinance ( talk) 01:28, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
I'm nominating this article for deletion as it is far from meeting the WP:NM since it has not been covered by any relevant musicians and hasn't won any significant awards. There are a couple of album reviews and no other sources that establish its notability and it takes more than that to meet the criteria, since it needs to be articles only covering the song itself. MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 22:49, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. There do seem to be sources added that indicate GNG but editors dont currently support these as meeting GNG. This seems likely a result that they are not linked to online sources and are not referencing specific sections of the article. Personally I feel that this article could be recovered if written in more detail with the sources presented backing up more concrete statements. Fenix down ( talk) 11:30, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable football related person who fails NFOOTY and GNG. Some references provided, but SIGCOV is not reached, IMO. BlameRuiner ( talk) 09:09, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 12:31, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails basic notability criteria for athletes. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 21:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Curnews ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:01, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 12:31, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails basic notability criteria for athletes. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 21:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
Lists of actors who played one-time characters on a show (admittedly some actors played several different one-time characters). Sourcing to tv.com doesn't help, and IMDb probably does a better job of this than any site on the web. Mission: Impossible (1966 TV series) relied in guest stars quite a bit, but is it sufficient for these lists to pass WP:LISTN? – sgeureka t• c 21:51, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. – bradv 🍁 05:53, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
A company fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Per WP:overlap it can be mentioned in China Unicom, as it is a mobile virtual network operator without an actual bandwidth. Also, the creator just ignore they draft was declined in Draft:China Unicom Hong Kong. (The same user also created Draft:CUniq HK) Matthew hk ( talk) 17:20, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ミラ P 05:36, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:ANYBIO. Sources only account for passing mentions and being a priest doesn't confer notability. CNMall41 ( talk) 19:42, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:09, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
A non-notable school which fails WP:NORG, WP:SIGCOV. Störm (talk) 14:18, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:10, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Some mentions, but fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 14:03, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 13:51, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:13, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
No sources found. Fails WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 13:51, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. A lack of cited coverage in reliable sources leads to a consensus that this fails the notability guidelines. ~ mazca talk 23:03, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Nothing in the coverage. Fails WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 13:50, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:16, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Nothing in the coverage. Fails WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 13:50, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. There is consensus that the available sources do not show that Guri meets the general notability guideline or the subject-specific notability guidelines for actors or singers. — Newslinger talk 04:07, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Hence fails WP:GNG. He is an actor that fails WP:NACTOR, a singer that fails WP:SINGER. Furthermore this article has once been deleted in an AFD which can be found Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guri (singer) Celestina007 ( talk) 20:25, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
There are many reliable sources available which are enough for notebility. You should check once. His songs also appeared on apple music chart and Gaana's top 50. There are many possible sources. This is my opinion.. otherwise as you feel right. Thanks Virenderthind2019 ( talk) 11:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. – bradv 🍁 05:54, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
When readers see a link to the article they would expect more up to date info - so it wastes their time clicking it. I asked on the talk page but it seems no one, including me, thinks the article worth updating. Chidgk1 ( talk) 19:50, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
I just realised another problem with this article is that it does not cover all greenhouse gases. So countries with high methane emissions, such as New Zealand, are misrepresented. Chidgk1 ( talk) 18:08, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Silmarillion#Development of the text. No desire to Keep this article given fail of GNG; lean to accept Redirect. (non-admin closure) Britishfinance ( talk) 01:36, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Fictional island only mentioned in passing in reliable secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG. Not notable in-universe or in the real world. Hog Farm ( talk) 20:23, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Beleriand#Doriath. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:20, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable fictional realm. Fails WP:GNG as only mentions are in passing. Only inline sourced to primary sources and is entirely a plot summary. Hog Farm ( talk) 20:17, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. We've deleted a lot of fancruft, but I never thought I'd see North Korean political fancruft at AfD. Sandstein 19:15, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable letter. I can only find one source mentioning this letter, and that is the source in the article. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK. Hog Farm ( talk) 20:10, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to All that glitters is not gold. Sandstein 19:16, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Short poem used as a plot element in a work of fiction. Aside for the titular line being used as a common quote, I can't find anything that demonstrates notability. Fails WP:GNG and isn't really an independent work of poetry, so the notability guidelines for poetry don't apply here. Hog Farm ( talk) 20:04, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:05, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
With just 7 mentions on Google News she doesn't seem to pass WP:BIO. Also most of these mentions are at the single source ( Times of Oman), so probably her notability is very local. Bbarmadillo ( talk) 19:58, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:16, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Article appears to promote the event, but not so blatantly as to warrant a CSD. The article cite 6 refs, but they are only used once, seemingly in order to appear well-cited. Jeb3 Talk at me here What I've Done 19:56, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ミラ P 21:08, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
With 58 press mentions on Google News this person doesn't seem to pass WP:BIO. Also the style of the article is somewhat promotional. There are some trivial mentions at trusted sources, like "Earlier, the prime minister appointed Sayed Zulfiqar Abbas Bukhari as his special assistant on overseas Pakistanis and human resource development with the status of minister of state" The Express Tribune, but it is not enough to establish notability. Bbarmadillo ( talk) 19:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:19, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, as I cannot find any significant coverage, and WP:NGRIDIRON, as the subject did not play in a game professionally. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:08, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:13, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NGRIDIRON. Played in the German Football League, which isn't considered a major gridiron football league, and in NFL Europe, which was a developmental league. The only news coverage I could find was from this article from The Tennessean. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 17:04, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Failed
WP:PROD (
WP:DEPRODed with a "Consider merge or redirect to The Tribe (1999 TV series) as preferred WP:ATD."
message.) IOW, even the DEPROD message effectively acknowledges that this
WP:BLP is a clear
WP:NACTOR fail, that also fails
WP:BASIC. Note that I have no objection to a "redirect" to
The Tribe (1999 TV series) result. But this in a non-notable actor subject, and does not merit a standalone article. --
IJBall (
contribs •
talk)
16:53, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 17:00, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
WP:BLP of an actor, not reliably sourced as clearing our notability standards for actors. As always, actors are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist -- the notability test for actors requires evidence of distinctions such as noteworthy acting awards, and/or evidence that he's received enough media coverage about his work as an actor to clear WP:GNG. But the only roles listed here are supporting or bit parts, not major roles for the purposes of NACTOR #1, and the referencing is entirely to bad sources that aren't support for notability, like IMDb and blogs. As always, no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he has a stronger notability claim than just existing and better sourcing to support it, but nothing in this article is already enough as of today. Bearcat ( talk) 16:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 17:02, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NGRIDIRON. Never appeared in a professional game. Lepricavark ( talk) 16:28, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 16:28, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Subject of article lacks in-depth coverage in reliable sources hence failing WP:GNG. A before I conducted shows him mentioned on several gossip blogs with none of them being close to reliable. He fails WP:ANYBIO as I don’t see him winning any notable award and furthermore he’s an alleged actor but falls short of WP:NACTOR. Celestina007 ( talk) 15:59, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:17, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
No claim to any notability. Fails WP:NORG. Deleted in Russian Wikipedia. Mitte27 ( talk) 15:41, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 16:31, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
No indication at all that the speech was of particular significance historically; title betrays nothing remarkable Sirlanz ( talk) 14:57, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Dorsetonian ( talk) 20:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Recreation of a page already speedy deleted here . Deletetion and salting recommended, per previous deletion and crystal. Necromonger... We keep what we kill 14:56, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Comment the title suggests is a retroactive look back on 2020, and as you just stated, 2020 will start in a few days. This is pure crystal. Necromonger... We keep what we kill 17:48, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 16:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable singer where the corresponding article has been deleted on ar.wiki. Paid spam following the traditional pattern of creating an en.wiki page as a backup for when the ar.wiki page is deleted since we can't read the sourcing and will just assume it's notable because it has links. Sourcing is based on one song/event based on the analysis of native speakers I have talked to. Fails WP:N and WP:NOTSPAM. TonyBallioni ( talk) 14:44, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. The article has been significantly expanded since the nomination and initial delete votes; with no further arguments being made to delete in the last 5 days. If canvassing has affected this discussion, its primary result appears to have been a significant improvement in the article's content and sourcing. ~ mazca talk 16:10, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
This article duplicates information already in Endorsements in the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries. Yang has few endorsements compared with other candidates, so this split is unwarranted and will add to the difficulty of maintaining endorsements. - Mr X 🖋 14:22, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was merge to Water cooling#Computer usage. Sandstein 19:18, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Contested prod. Unreferenced for 12 years, obscure nick-name for a plumbing fitting, no hits in the first 30 items Google Books showed up so low notability, neologism that only exists here on the Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not the case-modder's how-to guide. Wtshymanski ( talk) 22:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
09:36, 28 December 2019 (UTC)The result was delete. Sandstein 19:18, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Not convinced this company passes WP:NCORP. 4 out of 9 references relate to a sponsorship deal with QPR football club, and the other references leave me unconvinced. Also there are neutrality issues here: "Royal Panda has been praised for its promotions and wide selection of games". Uhooep ( talk) 16:18, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Leave It to Beaver characters. Content can be merged from history. Sandstein 19:19, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Deprodded. Largely redundant to Leave It to Beaver characters, which already names all main, supporting and recurring cast members. This leaves extra info in the sections on "Other cast members" (where IMDb does a better job) and "Others in unnamed roles" (for real?!), plus what actor is already dead. Wikipedia is WP:NOTEVERYTHING; also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Bad Girls cast members, which ended in delete. – sgeureka t• c 12:12, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Archdeacons in the Diocese of Southwark. Not enough info to keep an article on the subject. (non-admin closure) ミラ P 20:58, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
The subject was an archdeacon but after searching I cannot find anything else that makes him notable. He has a who’s who entry for being an archdeacon but this is not notability for wikipedia. Archdeacons could be notable for other reasons but this one does not seem to be. Page appears abandoned by its creator. Sirfurboy ( talk) 10:06, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
*Delete - Lack of sourcing. Also, could not find additional info when I searched. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
CmdrGibbons (
talk •
contribs) 13:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC) striking confirmed blocked sockpuppet,
Atlantic306 (
talk)
17:58, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Also see:
Bashereyre ( talk) 21:56, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Per G3. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:02, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Blatant hoax. No verifiable information, no songs available, no fanbase, nothing. Information that can be verified is false. —- Sirfurboy ( talk) 09:50, 28 December 2019 (UTC) Sirfurboy ( talk) 09:50, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Per G3. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:02, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Blatant hoax Theroadislong ( talk) 09:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Per G3. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:02, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Blatant hoax. Theroadislong ( talk) 09:12, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Materialscientist ( talk) 10:47, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Blatant hoax Theroadislong ( talk) 09:09, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Per G3. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:02, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Blatant hoax Theroadislong ( talk) 09:08, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Per G3. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:01, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Blatant hoax Theroadislong ( talk) 09:07, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Per G3. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:01, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Blatant hoax Theroadislong ( talk) 09:06, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Per G3. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:01, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Blatant hoax Theroadislong ( talk) 09:05, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:32, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
This is a minor place. By the time of Lord of the Rings it is completely deserted. This article is virtually a stub with only one reference. We don't need an article on this. Jack Upland ( talk) 09:03, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Materialscientist ( talk) 10:50, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Hoax Theroadislong ( talk) 09:04, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Per G3. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:00, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Blatant hoax Theroadislong ( talk) 09:04, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:35, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Questionable notability, most references are self-referencial blogs and websites made by the biographed. Dereck Camacho ( talk) 08:09, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 07:08, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
This article, essentially about a supposed special kind of daydreaming, solely promotes a fringe theory, and all its sources totally fail WP:MEDRS, especially WP:MEDDATE. The term itself as used in reliable sources is just a synonym of Eidetic memory; hence a separate article would be a WP:CFORK. A careful reading reveals that most of the article is either WP:SYNTH or sourced to a certain Akhter Ahsen; in total, the article is to promote his ideas.
See
this website, which says that Ahsen is the founder of Eidetic Imagery, a cutting edge and innovative field in modern psychology
. Note the similarity of the website to the article, like how it talks about the I-S-M model, as the article does under "Practice"; or compare
here, the paragraph starting with Its solidly grounded theory...
, to the article's claim that Ahsen grounds his eidetic theory in both Eastern and Western traditions of science and philosophy. In addition, it draws on the most recent neuropsychological evidence involving two-process theory and holographic images in the work of Karl Pribram regarding the brain and the discovery of fractals in computer science.
Aside from being obviously fringey, it shows that the article is promotional just as that website is.
Here is another website promoting Ahsen and his ideas. Supporting that the article is promotional is the fact that it has 85.9%
authorship by three different
SPAs
[13]
[14]
[15] (and the other 14.1% is likely routine addition of DOIs and the like). One of the SPAs, the article's creator, called themselves Eidetics2008, and all three of them have similar names ending in 2###; they are probably all the same person, likely one with a COI with Ahsen or his circle of followers.
Ahsen's ideas about "eidetic imagery" are not notable, and the article content is completely unsalvageable; hence it should be deleted. -Crossroads- ( talk) 06:14, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:35, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
promotional and non-notable The lead para is an advertisement of why to use thef irm. The refs are mere notices of appointments or funding , or PR. DGG ( talk ) 06:05, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 07:09, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
I can not find any sources behind this game that shows its notability. GamerPro64 04:57, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep after the rewrite. – sgeureka t• c 05:48, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
There seems to be no real explation of what "hard fantasy" is besides a derivative of hard science fiction that someone happened to think up one day. It's mentioned in the Encyclopedia of Fantasy, but only as a minor dicdef and doesn't appear to be discussed in other, reliable sources as much more than a mere dictionary definition, therefore this article fails WP:GNG though it would probably be fitting for Wiktionary. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 12:24, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
*Redirect per Clarityfiend, perhaps add their sources at the target. I was not able to find enough sourcing to satisfy
WP:GNG, but the subgenre exists and is discussed occasionally. With basic verfiability and with hard fantasy being is a plausible search term (50-100 page views per day), a redirect to where it is mentioned is warranted. For verifiable material, redirect is one preferred alternative to deletion per our policy
WP:ATD. --{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
20:27, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
22:05, 29 December 2019 (UTC){{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
18:03, 29 December 2019 (UTC)The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 07:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
I couldn't find any significant independent coverage by anyone but the mentioned Richard Stallman. Largoplazo ( talk) 02:41, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 03:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
No claim to any notability. Fails WP:BIO. Deleted in Russian and Ukrainian Wikipedia. Mitte27 ( talk) 11:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Sub-cabinet officials [...] are usually considered notable, especially if they have had otherwise notable careers. ミラ P 19:43, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 02:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Contested PROD. No real indication of notability other than as part of Creative Artists Agency; would consider a merge into that, but the few references don't really indicate significant notability. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:44, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 21:52, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
I'm nominating this article for deletion as it is far from meeting the WP:NM since it has not been covered by any relevant musicians and hasn't won any significant awards. There is just a bunch of charts and it takes more than that to meet the criteria, there isn't a single piece talking about this song only. MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 00:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 02:11, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
I'm nominating this article for deletion as it is far from meeting the WP:NM since it has not been covered by any relevant musicians and hasn't won any significant awards. There is just a bunch of charts and it takes more than that to meet the criteria, there isn't a single piece talking about this song only. MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 00:39, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:05, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Lack of in-depth coverage in RS. This is a small center with 12-16 stores (both numbers unsourced). There are also two office buildings. Sources are all minor mentions or routine local coverage. Does not meet WP:GNG.Redirect to Central Business District, Saskatoon, where it is already mentioned (and contains most of the pertinent info in this stub article). MB 00:28, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:29, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
I tried to find additional sources, but I could not find any. Almost all of this article's sources are questionable at best. The Internet Speculative Fiction Database is the only reliable source here. Of course, one meagre source is not enough to write an article on a living person. ― Susmuffin Talk 23:56, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 00:45, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails GNG. She's currently a PhD student, and there's no independent coverage that would substantiate her inclusion on Wikipedia, as commendable as her actions are. Her only apparent publication, "Implementing a 15-week AI-education program with under-resourced families across 13 global communities", has not been cited a single time. As for general coverage, I found the following: an article discussing aid in Cameroon, and not just Fofang's initiative; a single sentence within an article that is a list of women promoting STEM education in Africa; a single sentence stating she will participate in a 3D printing event; a blog post describing her among several "African women in tech"; another 3-sentence paragraph in another blog post about Girl's education in Cameroon; This one is the best one I could find. A Reuters article about "getting Cameroon's women into work", mentioning her thrice among other initiatives, and quotes her once. Summing up, she fails general notability, not to mention NACADEMIC. She certainly could become notable in a few years' time. PK650 ( talk) 23:44, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Berean Hunter, CSD G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:28, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
The subject of this article fails WP:GNG, WP:JOURNALIST and WP:ANYBIO. Two of the three sources cited in the article do not discuss the subject. The first source is an unreliable self-published wordpress source. A Google search of the subject doesn't show him being discussed in reliable sources. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 19:31, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
• Keep Article needs better sourcing but the subject is notable locally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djames11170 ( talk • contribs) 12:25, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
• Keep in accordance with
WP:BEFORE #2, as it is the case that this article was recently created, contributors should be given more time to develop the article. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Djames11170 (
talk •
contribs)
14:20, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:01, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. Two pieces of churnalistic press coverage in 2007 and 2008; WP:BEFORE shows zero coverage since then. The article has never been much better than this. Previous AFD kept partly on the basis of a Sun advertorial. If anyone can find meaningful RS coverage for Fuelmyblog ... David Gerard ( talk) 22:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. No consensus to delete, and a uniform consensus that it meets notability (both GNG and SNG) (non-admin closure) Britishfinance ( talk) 01:28, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
I'm nominating this article for deletion as it is far from meeting the WP:NM since it has not been covered by any relevant musicians and hasn't won any significant awards. There are a couple of album reviews and no other sources that establish its notability and it takes more than that to meet the criteria, since it needs to be articles only covering the song itself. MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 22:49, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. There do seem to be sources added that indicate GNG but editors dont currently support these as meeting GNG. This seems likely a result that they are not linked to online sources and are not referencing specific sections of the article. Personally I feel that this article could be recovered if written in more detail with the sources presented backing up more concrete statements. Fenix down ( talk) 11:30, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable football related person who fails NFOOTY and GNG. Some references provided, but SIGCOV is not reached, IMO. BlameRuiner ( talk) 09:09, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 12:31, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails basic notability criteria for athletes. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 21:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Curnews ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:01, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 12:31, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails basic notability criteria for athletes. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 21:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
Lists of actors who played one-time characters on a show (admittedly some actors played several different one-time characters). Sourcing to tv.com doesn't help, and IMDb probably does a better job of this than any site on the web. Mission: Impossible (1966 TV series) relied in guest stars quite a bit, but is it sufficient for these lists to pass WP:LISTN? – sgeureka t• c 21:51, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. – bradv 🍁 05:53, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
A company fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Per WP:overlap it can be mentioned in China Unicom, as it is a mobile virtual network operator without an actual bandwidth. Also, the creator just ignore they draft was declined in Draft:China Unicom Hong Kong. (The same user also created Draft:CUniq HK) Matthew hk ( talk) 17:20, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ミラ P 05:36, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:ANYBIO. Sources only account for passing mentions and being a priest doesn't confer notability. CNMall41 ( talk) 19:42, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:09, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
A non-notable school which fails WP:NORG, WP:SIGCOV. Störm (talk) 14:18, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:10, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Some mentions, but fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 14:03, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 13:51, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:13, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
No sources found. Fails WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 13:51, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. A lack of cited coverage in reliable sources leads to a consensus that this fails the notability guidelines. ~ mazca talk 23:03, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Nothing in the coverage. Fails WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 13:50, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:16, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Nothing in the coverage. Fails WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 13:50, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. There is consensus that the available sources do not show that Guri meets the general notability guideline or the subject-specific notability guidelines for actors or singers. — Newslinger talk 04:07, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Hence fails WP:GNG. He is an actor that fails WP:NACTOR, a singer that fails WP:SINGER. Furthermore this article has once been deleted in an AFD which can be found Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guri (singer) Celestina007 ( talk) 20:25, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
There are many reliable sources available which are enough for notebility. You should check once. His songs also appeared on apple music chart and Gaana's top 50. There are many possible sources. This is my opinion.. otherwise as you feel right. Thanks Virenderthind2019 ( talk) 11:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. – bradv 🍁 05:54, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
When readers see a link to the article they would expect more up to date info - so it wastes their time clicking it. I asked on the talk page but it seems no one, including me, thinks the article worth updating. Chidgk1 ( talk) 19:50, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
I just realised another problem with this article is that it does not cover all greenhouse gases. So countries with high methane emissions, such as New Zealand, are misrepresented. Chidgk1 ( talk) 18:08, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Silmarillion#Development of the text. No desire to Keep this article given fail of GNG; lean to accept Redirect. (non-admin closure) Britishfinance ( talk) 01:36, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Fictional island only mentioned in passing in reliable secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG. Not notable in-universe or in the real world. Hog Farm ( talk) 20:23, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Beleriand#Doriath. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:20, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable fictional realm. Fails WP:GNG as only mentions are in passing. Only inline sourced to primary sources and is entirely a plot summary. Hog Farm ( talk) 20:17, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. We've deleted a lot of fancruft, but I never thought I'd see North Korean political fancruft at AfD. Sandstein 19:15, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable letter. I can only find one source mentioning this letter, and that is the source in the article. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK. Hog Farm ( talk) 20:10, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to All that glitters is not gold. Sandstein 19:16, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Short poem used as a plot element in a work of fiction. Aside for the titular line being used as a common quote, I can't find anything that demonstrates notability. Fails WP:GNG and isn't really an independent work of poetry, so the notability guidelines for poetry don't apply here. Hog Farm ( talk) 20:04, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:05, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
With just 7 mentions on Google News she doesn't seem to pass WP:BIO. Also most of these mentions are at the single source ( Times of Oman), so probably her notability is very local. Bbarmadillo ( talk) 19:58, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:16, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Article appears to promote the event, but not so blatantly as to warrant a CSD. The article cite 6 refs, but they are only used once, seemingly in order to appear well-cited. Jeb3 Talk at me here What I've Done 19:56, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ミラ P 21:08, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
With 58 press mentions on Google News this person doesn't seem to pass WP:BIO. Also the style of the article is somewhat promotional. There are some trivial mentions at trusted sources, like "Earlier, the prime minister appointed Sayed Zulfiqar Abbas Bukhari as his special assistant on overseas Pakistanis and human resource development with the status of minister of state" The Express Tribune, but it is not enough to establish notability. Bbarmadillo ( talk) 19:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:19, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, as I cannot find any significant coverage, and WP:NGRIDIRON, as the subject did not play in a game professionally. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:08, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:13, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NGRIDIRON. Played in the German Football League, which isn't considered a major gridiron football league, and in NFL Europe, which was a developmental league. The only news coverage I could find was from this article from The Tennessean. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 17:04, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Failed
WP:PROD (
WP:DEPRODed with a "Consider merge or redirect to The Tribe (1999 TV series) as preferred WP:ATD."
message.) IOW, even the DEPROD message effectively acknowledges that this
WP:BLP is a clear
WP:NACTOR fail, that also fails
WP:BASIC. Note that I have no objection to a "redirect" to
The Tribe (1999 TV series) result. But this in a non-notable actor subject, and does not merit a standalone article. --
IJBall (
contribs •
talk)
16:53, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 17:00, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
WP:BLP of an actor, not reliably sourced as clearing our notability standards for actors. As always, actors are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist -- the notability test for actors requires evidence of distinctions such as noteworthy acting awards, and/or evidence that he's received enough media coverage about his work as an actor to clear WP:GNG. But the only roles listed here are supporting or bit parts, not major roles for the purposes of NACTOR #1, and the referencing is entirely to bad sources that aren't support for notability, like IMDb and blogs. As always, no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he has a stronger notability claim than just existing and better sourcing to support it, but nothing in this article is already enough as of today. Bearcat ( talk) 16:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 17:02, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NGRIDIRON. Never appeared in a professional game. Lepricavark ( talk) 16:28, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 16:28, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Subject of article lacks in-depth coverage in reliable sources hence failing WP:GNG. A before I conducted shows him mentioned on several gossip blogs with none of them being close to reliable. He fails WP:ANYBIO as I don’t see him winning any notable award and furthermore he’s an alleged actor but falls short of WP:NACTOR. Celestina007 ( talk) 15:59, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:17, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
No claim to any notability. Fails WP:NORG. Deleted in Russian Wikipedia. Mitte27 ( talk) 15:41, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 16:31, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
No indication at all that the speech was of particular significance historically; title betrays nothing remarkable Sirlanz ( talk) 14:57, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Dorsetonian ( talk) 20:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Recreation of a page already speedy deleted here . Deletetion and salting recommended, per previous deletion and crystal. Necromonger... We keep what we kill 14:56, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Comment the title suggests is a retroactive look back on 2020, and as you just stated, 2020 will start in a few days. This is pure crystal. Necromonger... We keep what we kill 17:48, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 16:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable singer where the corresponding article has been deleted on ar.wiki. Paid spam following the traditional pattern of creating an en.wiki page as a backup for when the ar.wiki page is deleted since we can't read the sourcing and will just assume it's notable because it has links. Sourcing is based on one song/event based on the analysis of native speakers I have talked to. Fails WP:N and WP:NOTSPAM. TonyBallioni ( talk) 14:44, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. The article has been significantly expanded since the nomination and initial delete votes; with no further arguments being made to delete in the last 5 days. If canvassing has affected this discussion, its primary result appears to have been a significant improvement in the article's content and sourcing. ~ mazca talk 16:10, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
This article duplicates information already in Endorsements in the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries. Yang has few endorsements compared with other candidates, so this split is unwarranted and will add to the difficulty of maintaining endorsements. - Mr X 🖋 14:22, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was merge to Water cooling#Computer usage. Sandstein 19:18, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Contested prod. Unreferenced for 12 years, obscure nick-name for a plumbing fitting, no hits in the first 30 items Google Books showed up so low notability, neologism that only exists here on the Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not the case-modder's how-to guide. Wtshymanski ( talk) 22:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
09:36, 28 December 2019 (UTC)The result was delete. Sandstein 19:18, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Not convinced this company passes WP:NCORP. 4 out of 9 references relate to a sponsorship deal with QPR football club, and the other references leave me unconvinced. Also there are neutrality issues here: "Royal Panda has been praised for its promotions and wide selection of games". Uhooep ( talk) 16:18, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Leave It to Beaver characters. Content can be merged from history. Sandstein 19:19, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Deprodded. Largely redundant to Leave It to Beaver characters, which already names all main, supporting and recurring cast members. This leaves extra info in the sections on "Other cast members" (where IMDb does a better job) and "Others in unnamed roles" (for real?!), plus what actor is already dead. Wikipedia is WP:NOTEVERYTHING; also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Bad Girls cast members, which ended in delete. – sgeureka t• c 12:12, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Archdeacons in the Diocese of Southwark. Not enough info to keep an article on the subject. (non-admin closure) ミラ P 20:58, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
The subject was an archdeacon but after searching I cannot find anything else that makes him notable. He has a who’s who entry for being an archdeacon but this is not notability for wikipedia. Archdeacons could be notable for other reasons but this one does not seem to be. Page appears abandoned by its creator. Sirfurboy ( talk) 10:06, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
*Delete - Lack of sourcing. Also, could not find additional info when I searched. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
CmdrGibbons (
talk •
contribs) 13:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC) striking confirmed blocked sockpuppet,
Atlantic306 (
talk)
17:58, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Also see:
Bashereyre ( talk) 21:56, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Per G3. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:02, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Blatant hoax. No verifiable information, no songs available, no fanbase, nothing. Information that can be verified is false. —- Sirfurboy ( talk) 09:50, 28 December 2019 (UTC) Sirfurboy ( talk) 09:50, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Per G3. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:02, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Blatant hoax Theroadislong ( talk) 09:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Per G3. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:02, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Blatant hoax. Theroadislong ( talk) 09:12, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Materialscientist ( talk) 10:47, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Blatant hoax Theroadislong ( talk) 09:09, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Per G3. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:02, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Blatant hoax Theroadislong ( talk) 09:08, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Per G3. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:01, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Blatant hoax Theroadislong ( talk) 09:07, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Per G3. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:01, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Blatant hoax Theroadislong ( talk) 09:06, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Per G3. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:01, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Blatant hoax Theroadislong ( talk) 09:05, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:32, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
This is a minor place. By the time of Lord of the Rings it is completely deserted. This article is virtually a stub with only one reference. We don't need an article on this. Jack Upland ( talk) 09:03, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Materialscientist ( talk) 10:50, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Hoax Theroadislong ( talk) 09:04, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Per G3. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:00, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Blatant hoax Theroadislong ( talk) 09:04, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:35, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Questionable notability, most references are self-referencial blogs and websites made by the biographed. Dereck Camacho ( talk) 08:09, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 07:08, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
This article, essentially about a supposed special kind of daydreaming, solely promotes a fringe theory, and all its sources totally fail WP:MEDRS, especially WP:MEDDATE. The term itself as used in reliable sources is just a synonym of Eidetic memory; hence a separate article would be a WP:CFORK. A careful reading reveals that most of the article is either WP:SYNTH or sourced to a certain Akhter Ahsen; in total, the article is to promote his ideas.
See
this website, which says that Ahsen is the founder of Eidetic Imagery, a cutting edge and innovative field in modern psychology
. Note the similarity of the website to the article, like how it talks about the I-S-M model, as the article does under "Practice"; or compare
here, the paragraph starting with Its solidly grounded theory...
, to the article's claim that Ahsen grounds his eidetic theory in both Eastern and Western traditions of science and philosophy. In addition, it draws on the most recent neuropsychological evidence involving two-process theory and holographic images in the work of Karl Pribram regarding the brain and the discovery of fractals in computer science.
Aside from being obviously fringey, it shows that the article is promotional just as that website is.
Here is another website promoting Ahsen and his ideas. Supporting that the article is promotional is the fact that it has 85.9%
authorship by three different
SPAs
[13]
[14]
[15] (and the other 14.1% is likely routine addition of DOIs and the like). One of the SPAs, the article's creator, called themselves Eidetics2008, and all three of them have similar names ending in 2###; they are probably all the same person, likely one with a COI with Ahsen or his circle of followers.
Ahsen's ideas about "eidetic imagery" are not notable, and the article content is completely unsalvageable; hence it should be deleted. -Crossroads- ( talk) 06:14, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:35, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
promotional and non-notable The lead para is an advertisement of why to use thef irm. The refs are mere notices of appointments or funding , or PR. DGG ( talk ) 06:05, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 07:09, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
I can not find any sources behind this game that shows its notability. GamerPro64 04:57, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep after the rewrite. – sgeureka t• c 05:48, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
There seems to be no real explation of what "hard fantasy" is besides a derivative of hard science fiction that someone happened to think up one day. It's mentioned in the Encyclopedia of Fantasy, but only as a minor dicdef and doesn't appear to be discussed in other, reliable sources as much more than a mere dictionary definition, therefore this article fails WP:GNG though it would probably be fitting for Wiktionary. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 12:24, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
*Redirect per Clarityfiend, perhaps add their sources at the target. I was not able to find enough sourcing to satisfy
WP:GNG, but the subgenre exists and is discussed occasionally. With basic verfiability and with hard fantasy being is a plausible search term (50-100 page views per day), a redirect to where it is mentioned is warranted. For verifiable material, redirect is one preferred alternative to deletion per our policy
WP:ATD. --{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
20:27, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
22:05, 29 December 2019 (UTC){{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
18:03, 29 December 2019 (UTC)The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 07:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
I couldn't find any significant independent coverage by anyone but the mentioned Richard Stallman. Largoplazo ( talk) 02:41, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 03:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
No claim to any notability. Fails WP:BIO. Deleted in Russian and Ukrainian Wikipedia. Mitte27 ( talk) 11:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Sub-cabinet officials [...] are usually considered notable, especially if they have had otherwise notable careers. ミラ P 19:43, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 02:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Contested PROD. No real indication of notability other than as part of Creative Artists Agency; would consider a merge into that, but the few references don't really indicate significant notability. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:44, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 21:52, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
I'm nominating this article for deletion as it is far from meeting the WP:NM since it has not been covered by any relevant musicians and hasn't won any significant awards. There is just a bunch of charts and it takes more than that to meet the criteria, there isn't a single piece talking about this song only. MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 00:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 02:11, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
I'm nominating this article for deletion as it is far from meeting the WP:NM since it has not been covered by any relevant musicians and hasn't won any significant awards. There is just a bunch of charts and it takes more than that to meet the criteria, there isn't a single piece talking about this song only. MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 00:39, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:05, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Lack of in-depth coverage in RS. This is a small center with 12-16 stores (both numbers unsourced). There are also two office buildings. Sources are all minor mentions or routine local coverage. Does not meet WP:GNG.Redirect to Central Business District, Saskatoon, where it is already mentioned (and contains most of the pertinent info in this stub article). MB 00:28, 28 December 2019 (UTC)