![]() |
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:16, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Promotional piece not based on secondary sources. I failed to find anything I'd call reliable, but what I did find indicates that this is not a "school" (and it carefully avoids calling itself one on its website) but a "tuition centre", a difference that may well be relevant to the amount of government approval or oversight (see The Star for an explanation of the difference and the surrounding issues). Without any reliable sources we cannot have an article; with reliable sources we'd still have to rewrite the page in its entirety, starting with the title. There's nothing salvageable here. Huon ( talk) 19:42, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:17, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable subject that does not meet WP:BASIC. The 2007 Deseret Morning News Church Almanac source listed in the article presumably provides some coverage, but there's no link to readily assess the depth of coverage. Importantly, multiple, independent reliable sources that provide significant coverage are required, not just one. Several WP:BEFORE searches are only providing name checks and faint, fleeting minor mentions in independent reliable sources. Other than the almanac source, the remaining sources in the article are primary, and are not usable to establish notability. North America 1000 18:54, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
I found no notability for this and the author doesn't have an article. Fails WP:BK. SL93 ( talk) 22:41, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Facing New York. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
There is no charting information, or otherwise significant coverage among several independent reliable sources. The band who recorded the album aren't even notable for a biography article.
WP:NALBUMS states "Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography", and that is clearly the case here except there's no article this could be merged to since it isn't even by a notable band. N Ø 17:14, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Note: The article about the band's other album has been deleted. So now this article is an orphan with no articles linking to it. And it only cites one reliable source. We frankly don't even need a discussion about deleting this, the person who removed my PROD nomination of this article twice and is the only keep vote here is probably a member of or closely linked to the band.-- N Ø 23:22, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 11:32, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Pure promotion of their activities. The references mostly are either from them, or are general treatments of the problems they hope to solve. Material emphasising how important the need is for the work of a charity or foundation is how they raise money, not encyclopedic content. DGG ( talk ) 04:40, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
The article has been significantly modified and shortened to remove promotional material and provide clearer referencing for existing achievements rather than future aims. Further clarity has been given the promotion of their identity as an academic institution rather than the misinterpreted suggestion of charity or foundation -- Trennez ( talk) 12:33, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable musician, article reads like a press release. I could only find tabloid sources. 💵Money💵emoji💵 💸 13:54, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of awards and nominations received by Li Yuchun. North America 1000 07:09, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Topic much better covered by the article List of awards and nominations received by Li Yuchun Mccapra ( talk) 13:54, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:15, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Christina Thung, the author of the current version has requested a face-to-face meeting with me about this so I thought I would let her see a few more people's opinions. It does seem to have a number of independent references. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 12:52, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Not a jyotirlinga, actually the 12th jyotirlinga is Grishneshwar, which is in Daulatabad, Maharashtra ( 1, 2). This is clearly a promotional article created by temple staff to promote the temple and lure the people. ‐‐ 1997kB ( talk) 12:35, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Self promotional spam for Non notable initiative. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Article has multiple sources but half are ref bombed Fictitious references that do not support the quote they are connected to. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:48, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable subject that fails WP:BASIC. Source searches provide no independent, significant biographical coverage, just quotations from the subject about religious beliefs ( [5]), quotations from the subject acting as a spokesperson ( [6]) fleeting passing mentions and name checks. Furthermore, the entire article is reliant upon primary sources, which do not serve to establish notability. North America 1000 07:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Source | Analysis |
---|---|
[9] | Consists of a name check and then all quotations from the subject, acting as a spokesperson. Being just about all quotations makes this a primary source, which does not establish notability. Furthermore, this article provides just about no biographical information about the subject. |
[10] | An article about the subject attending an event and acting as a spokesperson, consisting mostly of quotations, making it primary in nature. This also provides basically no biographical information about the subject, and is just minor routine coverage about an event, rather than the subject. |
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:26, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
does not appear to meet notability requirements RF23 ( talk) 08:09, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Of note is that the article was rewritten and significantly expanded (around 27x compared to its state at the time of the deletion nomination), which included the addition of many sources ( diff). Some, but not much analysis of the subject's notability relative to the added sources has occurred herein after the rewrite. After two full reslitings, ultimately no consensus for a particular outcome exists at this time in this discussion. North America 1000 07:36, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a film director, which literally just states that she exists and then filmographies her films without even attempting to make or source a claim that she passes WP:NCREATIVE for any of them. And all that's present for sourcing here is a deadlinked page on a defunct website whose content is impossible to verify at all, and the IMDb page for one of her films. As always, every filmmaker is not automatically entitled to have an article just because one or more of her films have IMDb entries -- a filmmaker needs to have a credible claim of notability that would pass NCREATIVE, and needs to have reliable source coverage about her to support an article. Bearcat ( talk) 20:11, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. (non-admin closure) funplussmart ( talk) 22:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I can't find any actual coverage of this Hauck and I'm having trouble verifying his credits outside of IMDB due to the common name but I'm still not seeing anything about any Adam Hauck that equates to significant in depth coverage. Praxidicae ( talk) 19:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 11:30, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
This seems like it possibly could be WP:TOOSOON but in any case I'm not seeing the necessary coverage required to meet any of the N criteria and I'm not sure what "Athena was in 7th position in Maxim Cover Girl 2018 contest from West Coast." means but I can find nothing to support such claims. Praxidicae ( talk) 19:23, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
https://maximcovergirl.com/2018/athena-brensberger
Athena is an international model and science communicator and works for
NASA Socials.--
Insaafbarua (
talk)
19:42, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete. WP:A7/ WP:G11 by Sjb72. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki ( π, ν) 19:01, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable organization. No significant coverage to be found. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 19:19, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:21, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Unlike Group of Seven or BRICS which are widely known and an actual existing club of countries, Next Eleven is only a hypothetical list of countries proposed by Goldman Sachs' Jim O'Neill (economist) who has a penchant for such acronyms like BRIC, MIST, MINT [17]. The coverage is only in Goldman Sachs papers or articles from its employees. O'Neil abandoned and replaced this list with another list called MIKT in 2011 and then again with MINT in 2014. the Authors bio already has this section Jim O'Neill#Next Eleven. DBig Xrayᗙ 19:08, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. North America 1000 08:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable artist, not much coverage online. aNode (discuss) 13:14, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable subject that fails WP:BASIC. Several WP:BEFORE searches are only providing name checks in independent, reliable sources. The article is entirely reliant upon primary sources, none of which are usable to establish notability. North America 1000 18:13, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable "director" with very loose claims which are unsupported by an RS or in depth coverage. Fails GNG and just about every N criteria. Praxidicae ( talk) 17:23, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Pure WP:ARTSPAM of a company that is "closely tied" to another company with no real in depth coverage and a ton of spammy PR garbage. Praxidicae ( talk) 17:20, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 22:21, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable musician, no sources and no evidence that his "award" is significant or credible. Add to that it's been deleted in the past under other names and the creator has never been able to provide a single source which would support it's inclusion or credibility. If anyone would like to comment or explain what here negates an A7, I'll gladly also rescind my AFD. Praxidicae ( talk) 17:17, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined, proposed for deletion instead which will give the creator a week to find some reliable sources, otherwise it will be deleted, but since you've for some reason removed the {{ prod}} template, wasting everyone's time here at AfD for a week will have the same effect. Tag-bombing a new editor's first article with an A7 template within an hour of its creation is atrocious behaviour. ‑ Iridescent 17:26, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable subject that fails WP:BASIC. This source listed in the article provides some information, but multiple, independent reliable sources that provide significant coverage are required, not just one.
The second listed source in the article is from the Encyclopedia of Latter-Day Saint History, which is a primary source, because it is published by the Deseret Book Company, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Deseret Management Corporation, which is wholly owned by the LDS Church. Primary sources such as these do not serve to establish notability.
Assorted WP:BEFORE searches have turned up little other than name checks, which is not significant coverage. North America 1000 06:05, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, author, inventor, or vendor) have actually considered the topic notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works of their own that focus upon it—without incentive, promotion, or other influence by people connected to the topic matter.
The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) —— SerialNumber 54129 14:18, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Fails WP:NFILM. The Forbes review is contributed, the LA Times review is a capsule review, and the others aren't by nationally known film critics. wumbolo ^^^ 16:18, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
KEEP: The movie is real, in cinemas, and will be a DVD. The transcript is based on the Facts of a Court Case which really happened and from which a conviction resulted. Anybody can verify this in the official Records. There's no reason to delete this article from Wikipedia. People searching for information will need it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CelticUser ( talk • contribs) 06:32, 23 October 2018 (UTC) — CelticUser ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. Consensus here is clearly delete, but I'd just like to note a few things:
Non notable author with an utterly non-notable prize, akin to that of a high school talent show. No coverage or meaningful reviews (that I can find.) And I'm not sure how winning a random prize that no one has ever heard of is significant or meaningful, but here we are. Praxidicae ( talk) 15:36, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The prize is likely significant to someone.That's nice - winning first place in a state fair for best apple pie is significant to someone too. Doesn't mean it's significant in the context of Wikipedia. Let's use some common sense here. Praxidicae ( talk) 15:42, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Let's put a lid on this Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:10, 23 October 2018 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
The result was merge to Siyi. How much to merge is left to editorial discretion. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 13:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
nominator's rationale WP:original research. There is Taishan, Guangdong, a modern administrative area (a city), or Sunning (old name of Taishan), an administrative area in Qing dynasty. As well as Siyi, a notable area of 4 cities (or called Wu Yi, which Si mean 4, Wu mean 5) and Siyi Yue, a local dialect of Yue Chinese . However, introducing a new original research concept "Greater Taishan Region" is not allowed in wikipedia. Even if it exist, i don't find any reliable source in Chinese or in English. Matthew hk ( talk) 15:04, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The Greater Taishan Region ... is another term used to refer the Sze Yap Region, where "Sze Yap" redirects to "Siyi". Most of the content is duplicated in that article. The information in the list of notable people is duplicated the articles for individual counties in Guangdong, but we can move the list to the Siyi article if it's ethnically sensitive. If we can find a source for the term "Greater Taishan Region" or "台山地区" it may warrant a single mention in the Siyi article. Delete as second choice. Snuge purveyor ( talk) 00:18, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was speedy procedural close per WP:BMB; nominator is a banned sockpuppeteer. If an editor in good standing has a good-faith reason to discuss deletion of this article, please re-nominate. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 16:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:Nactor. One role in TV series, last AFD was held with the same reason and the result was Delete. Iqra Dude ( talk) 14:43, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:27, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Stub created in 2007 as a WP:DICTDEF. Tagged as unreferenced since 2007. Attracted some link spam in in 2016 as part of a walled garden campaign to promote what's now Draft:Medicare cost report and tagged for ref improvement since then. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:54, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:30, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Fails as per WP:NCORP. Notability would not be inherited by mentioning subjects with Wikipedia articles. Dial911 ( talk) 23:11, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Weak Keep: If a publisher publishes multiple best-selling works [31] [32] [33], then that's really not inherited notability, but a function of the core activity of that business, and ORGSIG applies. Visible online in-depth coverage is woeful (are there RS Indian publishing trade press sources?), but it's at minimum NOTEWORTHY as the most prolific publisher of low-end books [34] which is credited as having been primarily responsible for launching the Indian mass-market fiction boom. [35] [36] (yes, they're both interviews, but Hachette is independent of Srishti, and questions asked in an interview in an RS can be treated as factual). Since its inclusion is a necessary part of the modern history of book publishing in India, it should at most be encapsulated and redirected there, but if that's to be done it probably requires a more comprehensive/balanced expansion of that target. ~ Hydronium~Hydroxide~ (Talk)~ 02:42, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:35, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
A shareware word processor written by a small group of people not a company of any significance, with no indication of actual significance. I can't find any evidence it's considered important, or ever was. Almost entirely the work of user: Marius2~enwiki, who has never edited on any other topic, and maintained by others with a similarly narrow focus. Guy ( Help!) 10:43, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. North America 1000 08:26, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Initially this biography was only sourced to subject's own web page. I have added a few references to sources, but I do not find the coverage needed to build an article from scratch. As it currently stands it fails [[
WP:BASIC]]
/[[
WP:GNG]]
.
Sam
Sailor
16:57, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG TheLongTone ( talk) 13:34, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Venturini Motorsports. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:38, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Non notable individual who clearly fails WP:GNG. I deprodded it by a mistake so I felt it was my responsibility to nominate it here. Redirecting it to Venturini Motorsports seems like the best thing to do right now. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 12:56, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Szzuk ( talk) 20:57, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Citations either only mention the subject of the article in passing or are unreliable; fails WP:GNG. Almost entirely original research. -- Joshualouie711 talk 03:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to America's Got Talent (season 12)#Week 3. (non-admin closure) Szzuk ( talk) 21:02, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Somehow like an advertisement, feel free to rewrite B dash ( talk) 06:11, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 13:21, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable neighborhood in a Swiss municipality, article has existed for 10 years without any claim to notability and no additional sources of additional information to expand the article. Tobyc75 ( talk) 12:16, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 11:32, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
fail WP:NOTSTATS and see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of national teams with no FIFA World Cup appearances Hhkohh ( talk) 12:02, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:39, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
This is WP:LISTCRUFT 5 wicket innings are not that exceptional in test cricket. Most of the sources are simply score cards. This fails WP:NOTSTATS Dom from Paris ( talk) 11:21, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was Speedy deleted per WP:G5. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 19:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
WP:N Ladsgroup overleg 10:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 22:23, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
no evidence of notability Rathfelder ( talk) 08:49, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was merge to Municipal Art Society. (non-admin closure) Szzuk ( talk) 21:08, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Has no sources and has never had any since creation in 2005. A web search shows it to have closed and I do not see sources to support its notability. I recommend merge with Municipal Art Society. Lopifalko ( talk) 08:57, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 08:17, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Footballer who fails WP:NFOOTY and GNG. BlameRuiner ( talk) 08:34, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:43, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Promotional article for non-notable artist. The sources are either database entries, mere mentions, or routine coverage. I would venture to say that this is the most substantial coverage of the subject provided, which I don't believe meets WP:GNG. The awards that the subject won are a "Tui Award for Best Children's Music Album of the Year" and a runner up for a New Zealand Music Award, which are not notable enough to meet WP:ANYBIO. signed, Rosguill talk 05:35, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus seems to be that the article can be fixed outside of AFD. (non-admin closure) — Mythdon ( talk • contribs) 14:03, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMG, with no charting singles, an empty lead and history section, and scarce mentions online.
Addressing the points brought up from the first nomination:
If standards mean a six-letter lead devoid of any useful information and a large discography section comprising primary iTunes links (and Qobuz, what's that?), I'm not sure what to say.
Define "excellent" and "work"? This is blind support for something unspecified.
So? We have many smaller artists who have contributed to said labels, but that does not mean they deserve a Wikipage if they fail the notability criteria.
Linking sources which contains info isn't useful if it isn't used on the page. At the very least include those info in a separate "Career" or "History" section, which I fail to see here.
This page is not fit for mainspace viewing, seeing it lacks lots of information despite having "reliable sources". It's useless to link so many sources but not include them in the page (sticking them into discography songs doesn't count). At the very least, move it to a draft where it can be properly expanded. aNode (discuss) 06:19, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:33, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
No in depth coverage in reliable sources, does not meet WP:ORGCRITE, WP:GNG. All provided sources are mere-mentions, listicles, or database entries. The closest to in-depth coverage is [75], but even that one isn't really about the bar and doesn't make any analysis or even discuss the establishment's history and on closer examination appears to be published as a blog post. signed, Rosguill talk 04:05, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Toronto District School Board. (non-admin closure) — Mythdon ( talk • contribs) 14:18, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, no in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Of the provided sources, two are affiliated with the school, and the other two are maps that show that the school exists. Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, middle schools are generally redirected to an article about the district or governing body. signed, Rosguill talk 03:58, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:44, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
I found nothing that shows notability. Fails WP:NF. SL93 ( talk) 02:04, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 13:25, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Page was soft deleted in May 2018 Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Baker_Twins. KalHolmann ( talk) 01:59, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Chronology leading to 2nd nomination:
Policy grounds on which to delete:
KalHolmann ( talk) 04:22, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. If in the future this would be a useful starting point for a draft, let me know and I'll be happy to put it there. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:45, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
WP:BALL or can be merged with Future of the Royal Air Force Sammartinlai ( talk) 01:55, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Merge. Gavbadger ( talk) 18:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:47, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSCHOOL - no references besides a primary source (their official website). Potentially promotional. WP:BEFORE failed to bring up anything of note. Kirbanzo ( talk) 01:32, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. After two full relistings, no consensus for a particular outcome has transpired. Per very low user participation herein, closing with No prejudice against speedy renomination. North America 1000 06:14, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. North America 1000 06:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:50, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
A minor fictional character from Investiture of the Gods with zero secondary source establishing his notability. Article is poorly written by the blocked sockpuppet User:Tathagata Buddha, with nonsensical content about an "Akin Silver". Fails WP:GNG. Zanhe ( talk) 20:35, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:54, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Decade old template for the inclusion of reliable sources. No realiable sources can be found. Does not meet the WP:Notability guidelines. Jiŋgiby ( talk) 20:13, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:55, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
No indication of meeting notability guidelines. References given are press releases and mentions in context of getting quotes from people working for the company without any WP:significant coverage of the company. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 17:54, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 08:37, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Run-of-the-mill newspaper reporter. Not even a suggestion of notability, nor any sources except for mention of appearing in a documentary about a campaign he covered. Calton | Talk 17:47, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:12, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Exceedingly short career (2 years) for film maker who fails WP:FILMMAKER and WP:BIO, and WP:SIGCOV scope_creep ( talk) 15:56, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:57, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
An article that says almost nothing about the subject. In this case an audio equipment manufacturer yet all the sources are reviews of some (all?) of their products - mostly from a single source. Nothing about the company and nothing to indicate that it is notable. Any piece of equipment sent to a reviewer will get a review - these are not independent sources no matter how independent the reviewer. Article created by an SPA - looks like COI and possibly paid editing. Velella Velella Talk 13:19, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete as equivalent to expired WP:PROD. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:58, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMOVIE. Coverage is mostly from user-generated IMDb or sourced directly to the film or trailer. Nothing usable found in WP:BEFORE. Tera TIX 12:26, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:00, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Non notable martial artist does not meet WP:MANOTE. Very (self?) promotional with ref bombing of trivial, distantly or unrelated. All competitions are low level. PRehse ( talk) 13:17, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:11, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Driver who haven't raced in any professional racing series, and haven't any significant achievements, fails any WP:NMOTORSPORT criteria. Corvus tristis ( talk) 11:14, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:11, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable. As a quiz bowl player I can confirm that no particular trophies are very notable. Alexschmidt711 ( talk) 00:16, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Jimfbleak Spinning Spark 20:35, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Nursery School. No indication of notabilty. No references (only external links to primary source). Searching only turns up directory-type listings. Fails GNG. MB 00:15, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:16, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Promotional piece not based on secondary sources. I failed to find anything I'd call reliable, but what I did find indicates that this is not a "school" (and it carefully avoids calling itself one on its website) but a "tuition centre", a difference that may well be relevant to the amount of government approval or oversight (see The Star for an explanation of the difference and the surrounding issues). Without any reliable sources we cannot have an article; with reliable sources we'd still have to rewrite the page in its entirety, starting with the title. There's nothing salvageable here. Huon ( talk) 19:42, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:17, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable subject that does not meet WP:BASIC. The 2007 Deseret Morning News Church Almanac source listed in the article presumably provides some coverage, but there's no link to readily assess the depth of coverage. Importantly, multiple, independent reliable sources that provide significant coverage are required, not just one. Several WP:BEFORE searches are only providing name checks and faint, fleeting minor mentions in independent reliable sources. Other than the almanac source, the remaining sources in the article are primary, and are not usable to establish notability. North America 1000 18:54, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
I found no notability for this and the author doesn't have an article. Fails WP:BK. SL93 ( talk) 22:41, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Facing New York. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
There is no charting information, or otherwise significant coverage among several independent reliable sources. The band who recorded the album aren't even notable for a biography article.
WP:NALBUMS states "Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography", and that is clearly the case here except there's no article this could be merged to since it isn't even by a notable band. N Ø 17:14, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Note: The article about the band's other album has been deleted. So now this article is an orphan with no articles linking to it. And it only cites one reliable source. We frankly don't even need a discussion about deleting this, the person who removed my PROD nomination of this article twice and is the only keep vote here is probably a member of or closely linked to the band.-- N Ø 23:22, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 11:32, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Pure promotion of their activities. The references mostly are either from them, or are general treatments of the problems they hope to solve. Material emphasising how important the need is for the work of a charity or foundation is how they raise money, not encyclopedic content. DGG ( talk ) 04:40, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
The article has been significantly modified and shortened to remove promotional material and provide clearer referencing for existing achievements rather than future aims. Further clarity has been given the promotion of their identity as an academic institution rather than the misinterpreted suggestion of charity or foundation -- Trennez ( talk) 12:33, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable musician, article reads like a press release. I could only find tabloid sources. 💵Money💵emoji💵 💸 13:54, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of awards and nominations received by Li Yuchun. North America 1000 07:09, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Topic much better covered by the article List of awards and nominations received by Li Yuchun Mccapra ( talk) 13:54, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:15, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Christina Thung, the author of the current version has requested a face-to-face meeting with me about this so I thought I would let her see a few more people's opinions. It does seem to have a number of independent references. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 12:52, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Not a jyotirlinga, actually the 12th jyotirlinga is Grishneshwar, which is in Daulatabad, Maharashtra ( 1, 2). This is clearly a promotional article created by temple staff to promote the temple and lure the people. ‐‐ 1997kB ( talk) 12:35, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Self promotional spam for Non notable initiative. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Article has multiple sources but half are ref bombed Fictitious references that do not support the quote they are connected to. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:48, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable subject that fails WP:BASIC. Source searches provide no independent, significant biographical coverage, just quotations from the subject about religious beliefs ( [5]), quotations from the subject acting as a spokesperson ( [6]) fleeting passing mentions and name checks. Furthermore, the entire article is reliant upon primary sources, which do not serve to establish notability. North America 1000 07:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Source | Analysis |
---|---|
[9] | Consists of a name check and then all quotations from the subject, acting as a spokesperson. Being just about all quotations makes this a primary source, which does not establish notability. Furthermore, this article provides just about no biographical information about the subject. |
[10] | An article about the subject attending an event and acting as a spokesperson, consisting mostly of quotations, making it primary in nature. This also provides basically no biographical information about the subject, and is just minor routine coverage about an event, rather than the subject. |
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:26, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
does not appear to meet notability requirements RF23 ( talk) 08:09, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Of note is that the article was rewritten and significantly expanded (around 27x compared to its state at the time of the deletion nomination), which included the addition of many sources ( diff). Some, but not much analysis of the subject's notability relative to the added sources has occurred herein after the rewrite. After two full reslitings, ultimately no consensus for a particular outcome exists at this time in this discussion. North America 1000 07:36, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a film director, which literally just states that she exists and then filmographies her films without even attempting to make or source a claim that she passes WP:NCREATIVE for any of them. And all that's present for sourcing here is a deadlinked page on a defunct website whose content is impossible to verify at all, and the IMDb page for one of her films. As always, every filmmaker is not automatically entitled to have an article just because one or more of her films have IMDb entries -- a filmmaker needs to have a credible claim of notability that would pass NCREATIVE, and needs to have reliable source coverage about her to support an article. Bearcat ( talk) 20:11, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. (non-admin closure) funplussmart ( talk) 22:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I can't find any actual coverage of this Hauck and I'm having trouble verifying his credits outside of IMDB due to the common name but I'm still not seeing anything about any Adam Hauck that equates to significant in depth coverage. Praxidicae ( talk) 19:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 11:30, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
This seems like it possibly could be WP:TOOSOON but in any case I'm not seeing the necessary coverage required to meet any of the N criteria and I'm not sure what "Athena was in 7th position in Maxim Cover Girl 2018 contest from West Coast." means but I can find nothing to support such claims. Praxidicae ( talk) 19:23, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
https://maximcovergirl.com/2018/athena-brensberger
Athena is an international model and science communicator and works for
NASA Socials.--
Insaafbarua (
talk)
19:42, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete. WP:A7/ WP:G11 by Sjb72. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki ( π, ν) 19:01, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable organization. No significant coverage to be found. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 19:19, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:21, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Unlike Group of Seven or BRICS which are widely known and an actual existing club of countries, Next Eleven is only a hypothetical list of countries proposed by Goldman Sachs' Jim O'Neill (economist) who has a penchant for such acronyms like BRIC, MIST, MINT [17]. The coverage is only in Goldman Sachs papers or articles from its employees. O'Neil abandoned and replaced this list with another list called MIKT in 2011 and then again with MINT in 2014. the Authors bio already has this section Jim O'Neill#Next Eleven. DBig Xrayᗙ 19:08, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. North America 1000 08:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable artist, not much coverage online. aNode (discuss) 13:14, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable subject that fails WP:BASIC. Several WP:BEFORE searches are only providing name checks in independent, reliable sources. The article is entirely reliant upon primary sources, none of which are usable to establish notability. North America 1000 18:13, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable "director" with very loose claims which are unsupported by an RS or in depth coverage. Fails GNG and just about every N criteria. Praxidicae ( talk) 17:23, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Pure WP:ARTSPAM of a company that is "closely tied" to another company with no real in depth coverage and a ton of spammy PR garbage. Praxidicae ( talk) 17:20, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 22:21, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable musician, no sources and no evidence that his "award" is significant or credible. Add to that it's been deleted in the past under other names and the creator has never been able to provide a single source which would support it's inclusion or credibility. If anyone would like to comment or explain what here negates an A7, I'll gladly also rescind my AFD. Praxidicae ( talk) 17:17, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined, proposed for deletion instead which will give the creator a week to find some reliable sources, otherwise it will be deleted, but since you've for some reason removed the {{ prod}} template, wasting everyone's time here at AfD for a week will have the same effect. Tag-bombing a new editor's first article with an A7 template within an hour of its creation is atrocious behaviour. ‑ Iridescent 17:26, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable subject that fails WP:BASIC. This source listed in the article provides some information, but multiple, independent reliable sources that provide significant coverage are required, not just one.
The second listed source in the article is from the Encyclopedia of Latter-Day Saint History, which is a primary source, because it is published by the Deseret Book Company, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Deseret Management Corporation, which is wholly owned by the LDS Church. Primary sources such as these do not serve to establish notability.
Assorted WP:BEFORE searches have turned up little other than name checks, which is not significant coverage. North America 1000 06:05, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, author, inventor, or vendor) have actually considered the topic notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works of their own that focus upon it—without incentive, promotion, or other influence by people connected to the topic matter.
The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) —— SerialNumber 54129 14:18, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Fails WP:NFILM. The Forbes review is contributed, the LA Times review is a capsule review, and the others aren't by nationally known film critics. wumbolo ^^^ 16:18, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
KEEP: The movie is real, in cinemas, and will be a DVD. The transcript is based on the Facts of a Court Case which really happened and from which a conviction resulted. Anybody can verify this in the official Records. There's no reason to delete this article from Wikipedia. People searching for information will need it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CelticUser ( talk • contribs) 06:32, 23 October 2018 (UTC) — CelticUser ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. Consensus here is clearly delete, but I'd just like to note a few things:
Non notable author with an utterly non-notable prize, akin to that of a high school talent show. No coverage or meaningful reviews (that I can find.) And I'm not sure how winning a random prize that no one has ever heard of is significant or meaningful, but here we are. Praxidicae ( talk) 15:36, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The prize is likely significant to someone.That's nice - winning first place in a state fair for best apple pie is significant to someone too. Doesn't mean it's significant in the context of Wikipedia. Let's use some common sense here. Praxidicae ( talk) 15:42, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Let's put a lid on this Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:10, 23 October 2018 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
The result was merge to Siyi. How much to merge is left to editorial discretion. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 13:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
nominator's rationale WP:original research. There is Taishan, Guangdong, a modern administrative area (a city), or Sunning (old name of Taishan), an administrative area in Qing dynasty. As well as Siyi, a notable area of 4 cities (or called Wu Yi, which Si mean 4, Wu mean 5) and Siyi Yue, a local dialect of Yue Chinese . However, introducing a new original research concept "Greater Taishan Region" is not allowed in wikipedia. Even if it exist, i don't find any reliable source in Chinese or in English. Matthew hk ( talk) 15:04, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The Greater Taishan Region ... is another term used to refer the Sze Yap Region, where "Sze Yap" redirects to "Siyi". Most of the content is duplicated in that article. The information in the list of notable people is duplicated the articles for individual counties in Guangdong, but we can move the list to the Siyi article if it's ethnically sensitive. If we can find a source for the term "Greater Taishan Region" or "台山地区" it may warrant a single mention in the Siyi article. Delete as second choice. Snuge purveyor ( talk) 00:18, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was speedy procedural close per WP:BMB; nominator is a banned sockpuppeteer. If an editor in good standing has a good-faith reason to discuss deletion of this article, please re-nominate. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 16:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:Nactor. One role in TV series, last AFD was held with the same reason and the result was Delete. Iqra Dude ( talk) 14:43, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:27, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Stub created in 2007 as a WP:DICTDEF. Tagged as unreferenced since 2007. Attracted some link spam in in 2016 as part of a walled garden campaign to promote what's now Draft:Medicare cost report and tagged for ref improvement since then. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:54, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:30, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Fails as per WP:NCORP. Notability would not be inherited by mentioning subjects with Wikipedia articles. Dial911 ( talk) 23:11, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Weak Keep: If a publisher publishes multiple best-selling works [31] [32] [33], then that's really not inherited notability, but a function of the core activity of that business, and ORGSIG applies. Visible online in-depth coverage is woeful (are there RS Indian publishing trade press sources?), but it's at minimum NOTEWORTHY as the most prolific publisher of low-end books [34] which is credited as having been primarily responsible for launching the Indian mass-market fiction boom. [35] [36] (yes, they're both interviews, but Hachette is independent of Srishti, and questions asked in an interview in an RS can be treated as factual). Since its inclusion is a necessary part of the modern history of book publishing in India, it should at most be encapsulated and redirected there, but if that's to be done it probably requires a more comprehensive/balanced expansion of that target. ~ Hydronium~Hydroxide~ (Talk)~ 02:42, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:35, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
A shareware word processor written by a small group of people not a company of any significance, with no indication of actual significance. I can't find any evidence it's considered important, or ever was. Almost entirely the work of user: Marius2~enwiki, who has never edited on any other topic, and maintained by others with a similarly narrow focus. Guy ( Help!) 10:43, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. North America 1000 08:26, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Initially this biography was only sourced to subject's own web page. I have added a few references to sources, but I do not find the coverage needed to build an article from scratch. As it currently stands it fails [[
WP:BASIC]]
/[[
WP:GNG]]
.
Sam
Sailor
16:57, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG TheLongTone ( talk) 13:34, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Venturini Motorsports. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:38, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Non notable individual who clearly fails WP:GNG. I deprodded it by a mistake so I felt it was my responsibility to nominate it here. Redirecting it to Venturini Motorsports seems like the best thing to do right now. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 12:56, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Szzuk ( talk) 20:57, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Citations either only mention the subject of the article in passing or are unreliable; fails WP:GNG. Almost entirely original research. -- Joshualouie711 talk 03:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to America's Got Talent (season 12)#Week 3. (non-admin closure) Szzuk ( talk) 21:02, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Somehow like an advertisement, feel free to rewrite B dash ( talk) 06:11, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 13:21, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable neighborhood in a Swiss municipality, article has existed for 10 years without any claim to notability and no additional sources of additional information to expand the article. Tobyc75 ( talk) 12:16, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 11:32, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
fail WP:NOTSTATS and see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of national teams with no FIFA World Cup appearances Hhkohh ( talk) 12:02, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:39, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
This is WP:LISTCRUFT 5 wicket innings are not that exceptional in test cricket. Most of the sources are simply score cards. This fails WP:NOTSTATS Dom from Paris ( talk) 11:21, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was Speedy deleted per WP:G5. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 19:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
WP:N Ladsgroup overleg 10:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 22:23, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
no evidence of notability Rathfelder ( talk) 08:49, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was merge to Municipal Art Society. (non-admin closure) Szzuk ( talk) 21:08, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Has no sources and has never had any since creation in 2005. A web search shows it to have closed and I do not see sources to support its notability. I recommend merge with Municipal Art Society. Lopifalko ( talk) 08:57, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 08:17, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Footballer who fails WP:NFOOTY and GNG. BlameRuiner ( talk) 08:34, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:43, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Promotional article for non-notable artist. The sources are either database entries, mere mentions, or routine coverage. I would venture to say that this is the most substantial coverage of the subject provided, which I don't believe meets WP:GNG. The awards that the subject won are a "Tui Award for Best Children's Music Album of the Year" and a runner up for a New Zealand Music Award, which are not notable enough to meet WP:ANYBIO. signed, Rosguill talk 05:35, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus seems to be that the article can be fixed outside of AFD. (non-admin closure) — Mythdon ( talk • contribs) 14:03, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMG, with no charting singles, an empty lead and history section, and scarce mentions online.
Addressing the points brought up from the first nomination:
If standards mean a six-letter lead devoid of any useful information and a large discography section comprising primary iTunes links (and Qobuz, what's that?), I'm not sure what to say.
Define "excellent" and "work"? This is blind support for something unspecified.
So? We have many smaller artists who have contributed to said labels, but that does not mean they deserve a Wikipage if they fail the notability criteria.
Linking sources which contains info isn't useful if it isn't used on the page. At the very least include those info in a separate "Career" or "History" section, which I fail to see here.
This page is not fit for mainspace viewing, seeing it lacks lots of information despite having "reliable sources". It's useless to link so many sources but not include them in the page (sticking them into discography songs doesn't count). At the very least, move it to a draft where it can be properly expanded. aNode (discuss) 06:19, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:33, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
No in depth coverage in reliable sources, does not meet WP:ORGCRITE, WP:GNG. All provided sources are mere-mentions, listicles, or database entries. The closest to in-depth coverage is [75], but even that one isn't really about the bar and doesn't make any analysis or even discuss the establishment's history and on closer examination appears to be published as a blog post. signed, Rosguill talk 04:05, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Toronto District School Board. (non-admin closure) — Mythdon ( talk • contribs) 14:18, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, no in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Of the provided sources, two are affiliated with the school, and the other two are maps that show that the school exists. Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, middle schools are generally redirected to an article about the district or governing body. signed, Rosguill talk 03:58, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:44, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
I found nothing that shows notability. Fails WP:NF. SL93 ( talk) 02:04, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 13:25, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Page was soft deleted in May 2018 Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Baker_Twins. KalHolmann ( talk) 01:59, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Chronology leading to 2nd nomination:
Policy grounds on which to delete:
KalHolmann ( talk) 04:22, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. If in the future this would be a useful starting point for a draft, let me know and I'll be happy to put it there. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:45, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
WP:BALL or can be merged with Future of the Royal Air Force Sammartinlai ( talk) 01:55, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Merge. Gavbadger ( talk) 18:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:47, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSCHOOL - no references besides a primary source (their official website). Potentially promotional. WP:BEFORE failed to bring up anything of note. Kirbanzo ( talk) 01:32, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. After two full relistings, no consensus for a particular outcome has transpired. Per very low user participation herein, closing with No prejudice against speedy renomination. North America 1000 06:14, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. North America 1000 06:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:50, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
A minor fictional character from Investiture of the Gods with zero secondary source establishing his notability. Article is poorly written by the blocked sockpuppet User:Tathagata Buddha, with nonsensical content about an "Akin Silver". Fails WP:GNG. Zanhe ( talk) 20:35, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:54, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Decade old template for the inclusion of reliable sources. No realiable sources can be found. Does not meet the WP:Notability guidelines. Jiŋgiby ( talk) 20:13, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:55, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
No indication of meeting notability guidelines. References given are press releases and mentions in context of getting quotes from people working for the company without any WP:significant coverage of the company. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 17:54, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 08:37, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Run-of-the-mill newspaper reporter. Not even a suggestion of notability, nor any sources except for mention of appearing in a documentary about a campaign he covered. Calton | Talk 17:47, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:12, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Exceedingly short career (2 years) for film maker who fails WP:FILMMAKER and WP:BIO, and WP:SIGCOV scope_creep ( talk) 15:56, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:57, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
An article that says almost nothing about the subject. In this case an audio equipment manufacturer yet all the sources are reviews of some (all?) of their products - mostly from a single source. Nothing about the company and nothing to indicate that it is notable. Any piece of equipment sent to a reviewer will get a review - these are not independent sources no matter how independent the reviewer. Article created by an SPA - looks like COI and possibly paid editing. Velella Velella Talk 13:19, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete as equivalent to expired WP:PROD. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:58, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMOVIE. Coverage is mostly from user-generated IMDb or sourced directly to the film or trailer. Nothing usable found in WP:BEFORE. Tera TIX 12:26, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:00, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Non notable martial artist does not meet WP:MANOTE. Very (self?) promotional with ref bombing of trivial, distantly or unrelated. All competitions are low level. PRehse ( talk) 13:17, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:11, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Driver who haven't raced in any professional racing series, and haven't any significant achievements, fails any WP:NMOTORSPORT criteria. Corvus tristis ( talk) 11:14, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:11, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable. As a quiz bowl player I can confirm that no particular trophies are very notable. Alexschmidt711 ( talk) 00:16, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Jimfbleak Spinning Spark 20:35, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Nursery School. No indication of notabilty. No references (only external links to primary source). Searching only turns up directory-type listings. Fails GNG. MB 00:15, 22 October 2018 (UTC)