![]() |
The result was redirect to Marko Jovanović. OK, thanks to pagemoves and redirect and edits whatnot it's not clear to me which article is being discussed here. I am assuming that the topic is a musician whose article was just redirected to the dab page so I'll leave this as-is. Consensus is in favour of deletion with or without redirect, but I see no reason to disturb the redirect currently present so it looks like the status quo satisfies the desires of participants. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:15, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBIO. No coverage in independent reliable sources found. The BLPPROD was invalid, so I have removed it. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 23:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Yunshui 雲 水 11:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Was DePRODed without addressing the issue(s). Concern was: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 21:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
multiple independent periodical articles or reviews). Also nominated for National Book Award, California Book Awards and as mentioned before, Women's Prize for Fiction. Hzh ( talk) 00:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. – Joe ( talk) 22:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
It fails WP:BLP as an WP:NOTE as through a cursory search through google throws up only one result from St. Louis Post Dispatch and that is only in passing. I know he just became Police Commisioner of St. Louis but that does not mean he is notable yet. I suggest wait till he has more sources released. Clarkcj12 ( talk) 20:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. – Joe ( talk) 12:12, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
NN musical group failing all 12 elements of WP:BAND. One could argue that there are few obscure pubs that could possibly be interpreted as passing #1 or GNG, but at the end of the day, you've got 4 no-name musicians without a notable label, self-releasing recordings on their own website. Toddst1 ( talk) 19:09, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 11:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
An advertorially toned BLP for a playback singer. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is PR-driven, passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Created by a sock ( Special:Contributions/Divshirsat12). Both sock and master are currently indef blocked for abusing multiple accounts: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rohanpednekar38. K.e.coffman ( talk) 19:22, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Cutting through the drama imported from itwiki, there is no consensus on whether the sources cited in the article are enough to satisfy the GNG. – Joe ( talk) 22:47, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Heavily canvassed article, violating WP:COI. Definitely fails WP:GNG, out of 5 external sources, just 2 are actually independent though local and way too recent, thus failing WP:NOTNEWS. Finally it definitely fails WP:ORG. Talkpage discussion stales on the false shifting of notability from the language to anyone dealing with it. Vituzzu ( talk) 11:54, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 11:44, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Uncited list of indiscriminate, non-notable information. Killer Moff ( talk) 15:31, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
New to this process, not sure how to send messages. But why is this being considered for deletion? I get this info from a website and constantly listening to the station and put the info in a spreadsheet. I do not know how to list the sources. I made this page as I would be interested in what songs a radio station plays and it didn't need to be on the main page. Since i have been following it for a few months now I thought it would be nice to have if other were interested. Any help on how to make this page suitable to say would be appreciated. If this is not the right place to write this please message me and let me know how to message. Tourist2088 ( talk) 16:24, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you Richard3120. I get my info from listening constantly, watching the recently played on their website as well as this site here, http://onlineradiobox.com/us/kazr/playlist/?cs=us.kazr , but that is only foe the last 7 days. I put that in a google spreadsheet. Is that reliable enough? Not sure how to link sources. I'll give it a try. Tourist2088 ( talk) 18:14, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
I thought it would be useful. That's why I made it. When I visited the page it had very little info I cared to read about. It is just a list of what they have played. Not what they are going to play. But they way they are, it probably is going to to be what play. They drove me crazy with their slogan "Everything That Rocks" then constantly seemed to play the same songs over and over. I just wanted to see in writing what "rocks". I figured the more info the better. Richard3120 I understand what you mean. But still, now I am just a sad tourist again. Tourist2088 ( talk) 22:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
I just saw that Mrschimpf has removed all the info I found interesting from the KAZR. Showing me that I have wasted a lot of time contributing. I thought it was nice to have some new info every month to look forward to. When I saw it was gone, that all sadness of my recent depression came back. I didn't see myself losing interest in this anytime, but even if I did. It still would have been nice to see some of what happened. I don't know if anyone else saw that info as useful or interesting. But I did and it brought me a little joy. Sadly made me feel like I had a purpose. And to see months of work taken away in a second has been devastating. Sorry I wasted everyone's times. But most of all I'm sorry I wasted mine. I'll stop. If this page is still around in a few days I'll start working on it again. But I have lost interest for now. Thank you. Sorry. Tourist2088 ( talk) 23:05, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
And for the record. This was for people looking to hear rock music from bands like Trivium, Anthrax, Strapping Young Lad, Rancid, and other hard rock/punk artists, that won't be found here. Not the pop artists mentioned above. I thought that was obvious. I really like the sort-able columns Wikipedia offers. That was helpful to me. In seeing what this station plays. Tourist2088 ( talk) 01:34, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
How long is this going to take to be deleted? Can it just be erased now along with everything I have contributed. I don't know how many more times I can take being told i am wrong. I have been feeling better recently. Took some time off from work to relax. Do this, now have all this happen. I feel like I will be lucky if I make it to tomorrow. But if I still feel this way then. What the point? Please just delete it so I don't have to think about it anymore. Please Tourist2088 ( talk) 08:35, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
I was confused on what an Active Rock station is. I assumed they play mostly "Active" bands. But this station plays a lot for Pink Floyd and Led Zeppelin. That is probably why they report as both Active and Mainstream. But still they claim to play "Everything" that rocks and I just wanted to provide a list of what they have played that "Rocks" since I could not find one. So I went out to get this info on my own. I used to see may "Lists" on wikipedia, but, looking for them now, they must have been deleted as I have not been able to find many i have seen in the past. Would it be okay if i had this list on my userpage? So I can use the template thing it has also have links to all the songs, artists, and albums? That is really cool info to have in one spot. If its not allowed in general can I have it on my userpage? I was reading the guidlines and it seemed like it would be frowned upon and possible deleted. As some of you may have guessed reading and fully understanding is not a strength of mine. I am a little unstable, very sensitive and take things personally easily. I understand no one was "going at me" but that is just the way it seemed. Would it really hurt anything if i had this on my user page as a work in progress that will never be finished?
Tourist2088 (
talk)
06:05, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Unfortunately that is what I took from that policy as well. Reading all of these "Wikipedia is not..." drives me to see that Wikipedia is not as great as I thought. If it was on my userspace i could possibly work it into something that is acceptable someday. But I would try to get to work one day. Tourist2088 ( talk) 02:22, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Nothing wrong with keeping it on my hard drive. I am still working on this in the spreadsheet. But, its a boring looking spreadsheet. Like I have said I just really like the presentation on Wikipedia, with links to the song, artist, album articles. If i made a draft I would definitely work on it at least once a month to update it. I would make attempt to make it into a real article. Also, not that i care too much about radio stations. But since i listen to this station and say they play everything that rocks. I would just like to see a list of what "Rocks". I understand a list certainly does not deserve its own article it would be nice if on the KAZR page it had the list of songs played in a "click on to Show" template, like some albums that have bonus tracks. It would be like an appendix of sorts. I don't vist many websites so I really am not looking for another place to put this info. I did kind of start a Facebook page, but the info had a boring presentation. Tourist2088 ( talk) 02:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
I read those two articles and the active rock article helps a little but also goes against what the station plays. Sometimes what they say rocks surprises me. Which is why I started the list. Too bad their isn't a companion site called Wikilists. A place where all the lists that get deleted could go. I guess the mainstream article doesn't give examples because there are too many. The problem with listening to this station find out what rocks is difficult because it always seems to be the same songs most over 20 years old. Tourist2088 ( talk) 05:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete by DGG WP:G11 and WP:G12, and deleted a second time by There'sNoTime as WP:A7. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:58, 6 January 2018 (UTC) ( non-admin closure)
Promotional in tone. As written, does not satisfy general notability or corporate notability. Google search finds that there is considerable controversy about this organization. If this article is to be kept, the controversy should be addressed in the article. (Tagging will not be sufficient.)
As written, this article has no independent references. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Added to Talk:Black Jaguar-White Tiger Foundation in this diff:
Some of those may of course be considered unreliable. Considering the sensationalist nature of most, it's possible that the article violates WP:NOTNEWS? — Paleo Neonate – 00:43, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 09:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
No real coverage. Look-like promotional page. Fails WP:NCORP. Störm (talk) 10:42, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Partly per the consensus and partly per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:17, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Not enough coverage. Written like a resume. Fails WP:NSCHOLAR. Störm (talk) 10:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of mosques in Pakistan. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:16, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Not much useful nor well-developed with no sourcing. Either delete it because it fails WP:GNG or may redirect it to List of mosques in Pakistan. Störm (talk) 14:17, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Well, it looks like consensus is that this is not notable. The confusion about whether the sole argument cited in favour of notability applies to the article topic or to some other journal with the same name does not help. Redirects at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
An open access journal listed by Beall as predatory. Not in ISI, not in DOAJ, no impact factor, not indexed in PubMed. And we can't really say any of that because there are no reliable independent sources about the journal other than Beall's list and mirrors. Guy ( Help!) 16:49, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 14:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG of the 17 sources 12 are soundcloud or itunes so are not useful for showing notability. 1 is the label so not independent, 3 (2 are identical sources, Earmilk) is a passing mention, as is dancingastronaute, 1; weraveyou is a site that accepts payment for promotional articles here so not reliable. the number of views on soundcloud is not an indicator of notability as a simple search on google for "pay for views on soundcloud" will suggest. Domdeparis ( talk) 13:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 14:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Not to be confused with the silversmith of the same name. Kleuske ( talk) 13:42, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
"Delete. The only indication this article gives is that the author has mistaken Wikipedia for a business listing site. Fails WP:ORG. WP:NOTDIR. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 16:06, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 11:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
This seems not to meet notability guidelines as outlined in WP:NCORP. The coverage so far is about announcements of a company going about its day to day activities which falls short of what an encyclopedia should have. Kagundu Talk To Me 13:38, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. — Cryptic 21:57, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable album of non-notable musucian Bbarmadillo ( talk) 11:08, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. No prejudice to creation as a redirect. ansh 666 09:37, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Neologistic phrase coined and used in a single book (the only reference in the article used for the topic itself), and apparently w/o established usage in the further field. Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 08:27, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
No independent sources discuss this in detail. Fails WP:N. Wikipedia is not a manual and is not a directory WP:ISNOT. Steve Quinn ( talk) 07:24, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 11:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Well, this is fun. References are PR releases, a book that doesn't mention it, and dead links. A WP:BEFORE uncovered little. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 06:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Does not meet notability for music (singer) WP:NM. Google search yields little results, few references. NikolaiHo ☎️ 03:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 11:49, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Dependent on non-independent sources. Included sources are his own author profile of HuffingtonPost or his blog posts. Amazon is a commercial site, Goodreads is a social catalog. The article is spammy, full of external links (Amazon and Facebook links) on the body. Possible COI. Mar11 ( talk) 05:53, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 14:12, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
fast food restaurant with two dozen outlets in a single city and nowhere else. The refs, naturally are all local, and are naturally the usual restaurant PR. Getting such PR is about the same sort of minimum basics for opening a restaurant as getting a refrigerator. DGG ( talk ) 05:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. So Why 10:23, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
None is source write about subject in depth. ·•· 1997 kB 10:40, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete By far the majority of the coverage is not indepedent. One of the supports voted twice and a couple appear to be single purpose accounts. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 12:08, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
notability not established for yet another blockchain company Ysangkok ( talk) 20:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Notability of HashCash Consultants is well-established. It is among top 2-3 companies in this space such as Ripple and ConsenSys. Please suggest objective ways if any of improving content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sayan999 ( talk • contribs) 21:38, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
There are 30+ articles and news coverage of the company that I have come across (could spend more time on the references). Besides US media coverage is not world media coverage. You have to look outside of just coindesk and the names you are familiar with. This company is part of the International Organization for standards committee created to form blockchain standards globally. Regarding 100+ enterprises, I am assuming a company working with major banks wouldn't claim falsely on their website, but again that is my assumption. If no basis is found for this claim, it can be removed. Either way, this make the page candidate for improvement not deletion is my view. Sayan999 ( talk) 21:29, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. No prejudice to recreation as a redirect. ansh 666 09:41, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Per the article itself, the Bulgarians "preferred to retreat without a fight", so there was no battle. There was an Ottoman military operation that recovered Adrianople/Edirne, but there is nothing to suggest that any conflict actually happened here. This should be deleted, as the relevant information is already present, in far better form, in the Second Balkan War article. Constantine ✍ 09:06, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
I further note that "Second Battle of Adrianople" is a rare name in the literature, at least as determined by GBooks hits. It should also be noted the original redirect of this title was the Battle of Adrianople (378), which is what the handful of GBooks hits would also suggest. The only instance of the title being used for the 1913 event is by Richard J. Evans (!) in one of his books as an image caption, but I would wager good money that this is a result of Wikipedia using the title. Constantine ✍ 09:18, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Unreferenced & promotional Rathfelder ( talk) 09:02, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Noah Lukeman. Yunshui 雲 水 11:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
In attempting to fix the {{
unreferenced}}
tag I failed to find a single secondary source, despite what appears extensive efforts by the author or publisher to promote it at the time of release. I haven't found a single review of this book or a performance of it as a play, much less from a publication whose name I recognise.
Xover (
talk)
08:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Indian Chinese cuisine. Since it's discussed at the new target page, it's not unreasonable to have this redirect there since there's consensus not to have a standalone article. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 02:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Sources referenced are passing mentions (CNN) or non-notable food websites. This could easily retarget to Paneer of which this is an entry. No significant coverage on the history of this food. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 08:41, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Killiondude ( talk) 07:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Nothing about this band or its music seems to meet WP:Notability (music) Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONG. Misleading chart source. Acharts.co is mirroring Bulgaria Singles Top 40 which is included in Deprecated charts section. IFPI (BAMP) does not have a official chart, ever since they updated their site. It should be a redirect to Gery-Nikol. Quickfingers ( talk) 06:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONG. Misleading chart source. Acharts.co is mirroring Bulgaria Singles Top 40 which is included in Deprecated charts section. IFPI (BAMP) does not have a official chart, ever since they updated their site. It should be a redirect to Gery-Nikol. Quickfingers ( talk) 06:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONG. Misleading chart source. Acharts.co is mirroring Bulgaria Singles Top 40 which is included in Deprecated charts section. IFPI (BAMP) does not have a official chart, ever since they updated their site. It should be a redirect to Tita. Quickfingers ( talk) 06:38, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONG. Misleading chart source. Acharts.co is mirroring Bulgaria Singles Top 40 which is included in Deprecated charts section. IFPI (BAMP) does not have a official chart, ever since they updated their site. It should be a redirect to 100 Kila. Quickfingers ( talk) 06:38, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONG. Misleading chart source. Acharts.co is mirroring Bulgaria Singles Top 40 which is included in Deprecated charts section. IFPI (BAMP) does not have a official chart, ever since they updated their site. Quickfingers ( talk) 06:36, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONG. Misleading chart source. Acharts.co is mirroring Bulgaria Singles Top 40 which is included in Deprecated charts section. IFPI (BAMP) does not have a official chart, ever since they updated their site. It should be a redirect to Tita. Quickfingers ( talk) 06:34, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 14:14, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NSPORT for pro football: didn't play in a CFL game (retired before the season started), his college football honors are in Conference USA honor roll mostly, which isn't listed in Template:College football award navbox. He does have some local news articles. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 05:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Weak delete. He may have been viral during the draft but he never played professionally and no reason was given. Could it be he never made the team? Postcard Cathy ( talk) 18:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is consensus that the mentioned flaws in the article can be addressed by editing while the subject itself is notable enough for inclusion. So Why 10:21, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Many of the sources linked to in this article are either blogs or do not mention the subject at all. Several of them are clearly self serving and shoehorned in for no apparent purpose (particularly offensive are a number of self publish articles that are included just so the author can claim he has published numerous articles on "a variety of subjects"). Poor sources indicate padding of resume for low-profile individual. Suggest immediate deletion as not notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.104.167.154 ( talk) 22:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was merge to Hand truck. ansh 666 09:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
WP is not a dictionary. Unclear what this article adds to the project. It is just describing a hand cart used for moving pianos. There is not even a dedicated source, just a mention in a book on piano tuning. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 05:07, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 17:19, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Article uses primary sources, and a search doesn't produce this convention as one of the first results. Fails WP:GNG. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 04:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 07:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
fails to meet basic WP:GNG. Saqib ( talk) 03:58, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep withdrawn by nominator. TonyBallioni ( talk) 22:06, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Nothing about this game appears to meet WP:GNG. No sources outside of some random blog posts exist. WP:NGAME is about video games, not "miniatures wargames", but this doesn't meet the spirit of it either. – Muboshgu ( talk) 03:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 07:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
An advertorially toned page on a non notable private business; significant RS coverage to meet WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH not found. Much of the article is details on the various research that the company published, but I don't believe that's sufficient in establishing notability and authoritativeness of the company as a source. Has been previously deleted via AfD (Oct 2016) and via CSD (Nov 2017). K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Not a notable YouTube channel. The coverage is only trivial mentions rather than significant coverage. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 03:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 07:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTSTATS – Ianblair23 (talk) 03:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 04:41, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
It looks like the filmography is in both this article and the main Dev (actor) article. Please make up your mind on whether it should be split or not. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 02:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator after page improvements. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki ( π, ν) 01:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
None of the entries on this page is really disambiguating "Muy". There are variations like de Muy, Le Muy, Félix du Muy, and Muy Muy, but it doesn't seem likely that these topics would be looked up solely by "Muy", and certainly aren't routinely known by the name "Muy" alone. The two May Rivers don't belong, nor do the three phrases in Spanish in the Other section that happen to begin with the Spanish word "muy". Finally, over half the entries on the page are red links anyway. It's at best a stretch. Largoplazo ( talk) 02:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 23:38, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
I can't figure out what this is supposed to be? A book? A collection of poems? A single poem? The article is mostly a debate over who authored the book. It doesn't explain what the book is about and how it is notable, other than it being old. Half of the article is in Telugu. Is it fiction because it involves poetry? No links to the equivalent article in Telugu. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 02:12, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
This article Kavijanasrayam deserves to exist since this is the oldest available piece of Telugu literature and many poets followed this book.By referring this book,scholars such as Charles Philip Brown wrote a book in English on Telugu prosodic techniques. The techniques can be added eventually to this article by other editors.
I think the direction of the article changed because one of the editors(SubhashiniIyer) was continously disrupting the page based on these aspects.
1) Jain Origins and 2) Nativity of the poet 3) Antiquity (940 AD)
The editor(Abrahmad111) has provided groundbreaking evidences from Telugu books on the above aspects.The editor who disrupted initially is shell shocked from the past 5 months and not even a single evidence has been challenged.The prejudiced and unintellectual editor 1)cannot tolerate the fact that Jain religion Telugu literature preceded Vedic religion Telugu Literature. It is a kind of religious intolerance extended to wikipedia.2) wanted the poet to belong to her home state(province) 3) cannot tolerate any Telugu Literature to be placed before 1050 AD since she assumes that all literature started after 1050 AD only after poet Nannaya, who belonged to her home state(province) .
Now that these biases were totally disproved,we can move those aspects to the talk page or retain them in a concise form in the actual page
Finally,the editor(Abrahmad111) was blocked based on only suspicion of sock puppetry but not proven.What is more important is the evidence he left. SattiPandu ( talk) 18:34, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Yes ! It should have been in a talk page.Unfortunately not done because editor(SubhashiniIyer) directly put the discussion on the page.Please see the history from the start.Where as ALL scholars call it a JAIN work, she just puts her personal opinions that is NOT a Jain WORK.Where as editor(Abrahmad111) provided Central Sahitya Academy reference, P.V.P Sastry,C.P.Brown,Nidudavolu Venkat Rao,Veturi Prabhakara Sastry,Chaganti Seshayya,S.V.Rama Rao and many more references.The editor (SubhashiniIyer) wants us to believe her opinion and reject Central Sahitya Academy run by govt of India and all references which are not inline with her biased mindset...
With regards to the earliest available Telugu Literature so far.. Mallia Rec 9th century poet Malliya Rechana-First Telugu Author (940AD) , Kavijanasrayam,Vemulawada Karimnagar,
With regards to Jain origins, the English links are self explanatory.. Jainism: art, architecture, literature & philosophy Jain literature. All scholars call it a JAIN work.Show me ONE author which calls it a non-JAIN work?.Please refer the Telugu links as well.
Books won't survive for 1000 years.They are copied and copied by generation after generation. Kavijanasrayam is available in 50 copies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SattiPandu ( talk • contribs) 19:34, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
You have removed the earlier content and references.
40 copies are available. Please check with some one who knows Telugu Unfortunately no english ref is available for this..
Significant coverage is done in these books. The references which were again removed. At least please read the English Meta-data in the archive.org
https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.333847 Kavi Janasramamu by Malliya Rechana
Publication date 1950 Topics City Collection digitallibraryindia; texts Language Telugu
Read the english meta-data or english preface.. https://archive.org/stream/kavijanaashrayam020695mbp#page/n3/mode/2up
Kavijanaashrayamu-Chandashastramu by Jayanthi Ramaiah
Publication date 1932 Publisher ANDHRA SAHITYA PARISHATH Collection universallibrary Contributor SRI KRISHNA DEVARAYANDRA BHASHA NILAYAM Language Telugu SattiPandu ( talk) 20:15, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 07:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Basically advertising. A list of their successes and services . It belongs on their web page, not an encyclopedia . Kept back in 2008 when our standards were lower. DGG ( talk ) 01:58, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
An under-sourced BLP on a reality TV show contestant and actor whose roles have been minor. Significant RS coverage not found. Article sourced to routine news about the show, interviews, and passing mentions. Does not meet WP:NACTOR. The article was deleted in 2015, as not meeting notability guidelines, only achieving top 4 in the show. The subject has not done anything significant since then, so I recommend deletion at this time, in line with the first AfD. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 07:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
A CV-like page on an unremarkable entrepreneur. Significant RS coverage not found. As a CEO of semi-notable company, does not meet WP:ANYBIO. 30 under 30 and similar accolades are likewise not indicative of notability. Article is sourced to routine notices about the company, interviews, WP:SPIP and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Created by Special:Contributions/Cocohickman, an account with one total edit. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:32, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 07:33, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMUSIC, no source for the "Rookie of the Year Award" and it doesn't appear as if they were a recurring cast member. Jon Kolbert ( talk) 03:57, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ansh 666 09:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Notability-tagged. Main claims to notability (one of earliest female rappers and earliest to record album) are unsourced. Thought it good for community to have a look. Agricola44 ( talk) 15:14, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 14:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
No evidence that he meets WP:PROF. Unimpressive list of coauthored books, and the only reference in the article is to what appears to be a fly-by-night academic journal that he founded himself. Bueller 007 ( talk) 15:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. The consensus seems to keep this, at least as a redirect, which can be achieved by editing. So Why 10:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Non notable and does not cite any references. Abishe ( talk) 12:44, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:G5 NeilN talk to me 09:49, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Killiondude ( talk) 07:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable future event. I'm not sure if curling is notable enough of a sport to have an article for this specific tournament. Perhaps this page could be redirected to US Open of Curling. Natg 19 ( talk) 08:02, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
It Is a notable Sport there is lots of other event pages Curler1200 ( talk) 23:16, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. One major problem for source-finding is that this series was released under different names for different markets. In French, it was Le Monde de Pahé. In Portuguese, it was Como Irmãos, etc etc. I tried to pillage the interlanguage links for sources, but nobody else has anything reliable we can use.
I'm confident it existed based on the clips I've found, but the utter lack of sources means we can't support an article about it. Refund absolutely applies if sources are located. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 14:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable tv series. Other than single passing mentions in a few interviews and a really old, no-info iMDB page, I can't even verify it's existence in the context portrayed in the article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:54, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Killiondude ( talk) 07:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG JMHamo ( talk) 17:22, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (withdrawn informally although never completed by the nominator) ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 14:17, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
A separate Wikipedia article listing the episodes of Chapo Trap House? Chapo Trap House barely meets the notability requirements. A list of episodes for this podcast surely doesn't? Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 18:17, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 07:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Most of the sources listed here are music blogs and YouTube videos. The amount of reliable sources on this subject do not have enough significant coverage to satisfy WP:MUSICBIO. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 19:17, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
material on youtube or user-created-content forums SamanthaFinmore ( talk) 01:21, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 00:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable street. No sources for over 10 years, no significant coverage found in search for reliable sources. It is a real street and there are some articles that mention the street name in passing. Gab4gab ( talk) 00:44, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. So Why 10:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails the criteria for establishing notability. Some references are from reliable sources but they are not independent of the subject and do not contain independent analysis and/or opinion. Fails WP:NCORP. -- HighKing ++ 20:54, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 07:29, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable company. There is no WP:INHERITORG from Heaven Hill. — cnzx ( talk • contribs) 22:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 04:48, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable book. The title gets 6 google hits. The article was started by William Forde Thompson, who is the author of the book. Vanity page. Was put through PROD, but not AfD. Bueller 007 ( talk) 17:39, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 14:15, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
No reliable, independent sources with significant coverage of the topic are cited, so he doesn't seem to meet GNG, and he doesn't seem to meet any other relevant WP:NM criteria either. KSFT ( t| c) 00:12, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was redirect to Marko Jovanović. OK, thanks to pagemoves and redirect and edits whatnot it's not clear to me which article is being discussed here. I am assuming that the topic is a musician whose article was just redirected to the dab page so I'll leave this as-is. Consensus is in favour of deletion with or without redirect, but I see no reason to disturb the redirect currently present so it looks like the status quo satisfies the desires of participants. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:15, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBIO. No coverage in independent reliable sources found. The BLPPROD was invalid, so I have removed it. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 23:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Yunshui 雲 水 11:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Was DePRODed without addressing the issue(s). Concern was: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 21:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
multiple independent periodical articles or reviews). Also nominated for National Book Award, California Book Awards and as mentioned before, Women's Prize for Fiction. Hzh ( talk) 00:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. – Joe ( talk) 22:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
It fails WP:BLP as an WP:NOTE as through a cursory search through google throws up only one result from St. Louis Post Dispatch and that is only in passing. I know he just became Police Commisioner of St. Louis but that does not mean he is notable yet. I suggest wait till he has more sources released. Clarkcj12 ( talk) 20:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. – Joe ( talk) 12:12, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
NN musical group failing all 12 elements of WP:BAND. One could argue that there are few obscure pubs that could possibly be interpreted as passing #1 or GNG, but at the end of the day, you've got 4 no-name musicians without a notable label, self-releasing recordings on their own website. Toddst1 ( talk) 19:09, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 11:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
An advertorially toned BLP for a playback singer. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is PR-driven, passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Created by a sock ( Special:Contributions/Divshirsat12). Both sock and master are currently indef blocked for abusing multiple accounts: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rohanpednekar38. K.e.coffman ( talk) 19:22, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Cutting through the drama imported from itwiki, there is no consensus on whether the sources cited in the article are enough to satisfy the GNG. – Joe ( talk) 22:47, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Heavily canvassed article, violating WP:COI. Definitely fails WP:GNG, out of 5 external sources, just 2 are actually independent though local and way too recent, thus failing WP:NOTNEWS. Finally it definitely fails WP:ORG. Talkpage discussion stales on the false shifting of notability from the language to anyone dealing with it. Vituzzu ( talk) 11:54, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 11:44, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Uncited list of indiscriminate, non-notable information. Killer Moff ( talk) 15:31, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
New to this process, not sure how to send messages. But why is this being considered for deletion? I get this info from a website and constantly listening to the station and put the info in a spreadsheet. I do not know how to list the sources. I made this page as I would be interested in what songs a radio station plays and it didn't need to be on the main page. Since i have been following it for a few months now I thought it would be nice to have if other were interested. Any help on how to make this page suitable to say would be appreciated. If this is not the right place to write this please message me and let me know how to message. Tourist2088 ( talk) 16:24, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you Richard3120. I get my info from listening constantly, watching the recently played on their website as well as this site here, http://onlineradiobox.com/us/kazr/playlist/?cs=us.kazr , but that is only foe the last 7 days. I put that in a google spreadsheet. Is that reliable enough? Not sure how to link sources. I'll give it a try. Tourist2088 ( talk) 18:14, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
I thought it would be useful. That's why I made it. When I visited the page it had very little info I cared to read about. It is just a list of what they have played. Not what they are going to play. But they way they are, it probably is going to to be what play. They drove me crazy with their slogan "Everything That Rocks" then constantly seemed to play the same songs over and over. I just wanted to see in writing what "rocks". I figured the more info the better. Richard3120 I understand what you mean. But still, now I am just a sad tourist again. Tourist2088 ( talk) 22:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
I just saw that Mrschimpf has removed all the info I found interesting from the KAZR. Showing me that I have wasted a lot of time contributing. I thought it was nice to have some new info every month to look forward to. When I saw it was gone, that all sadness of my recent depression came back. I didn't see myself losing interest in this anytime, but even if I did. It still would have been nice to see some of what happened. I don't know if anyone else saw that info as useful or interesting. But I did and it brought me a little joy. Sadly made me feel like I had a purpose. And to see months of work taken away in a second has been devastating. Sorry I wasted everyone's times. But most of all I'm sorry I wasted mine. I'll stop. If this page is still around in a few days I'll start working on it again. But I have lost interest for now. Thank you. Sorry. Tourist2088 ( talk) 23:05, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
And for the record. This was for people looking to hear rock music from bands like Trivium, Anthrax, Strapping Young Lad, Rancid, and other hard rock/punk artists, that won't be found here. Not the pop artists mentioned above. I thought that was obvious. I really like the sort-able columns Wikipedia offers. That was helpful to me. In seeing what this station plays. Tourist2088 ( talk) 01:34, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
How long is this going to take to be deleted? Can it just be erased now along with everything I have contributed. I don't know how many more times I can take being told i am wrong. I have been feeling better recently. Took some time off from work to relax. Do this, now have all this happen. I feel like I will be lucky if I make it to tomorrow. But if I still feel this way then. What the point? Please just delete it so I don't have to think about it anymore. Please Tourist2088 ( talk) 08:35, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
I was confused on what an Active Rock station is. I assumed they play mostly "Active" bands. But this station plays a lot for Pink Floyd and Led Zeppelin. That is probably why they report as both Active and Mainstream. But still they claim to play "Everything" that rocks and I just wanted to provide a list of what they have played that "Rocks" since I could not find one. So I went out to get this info on my own. I used to see may "Lists" on wikipedia, but, looking for them now, they must have been deleted as I have not been able to find many i have seen in the past. Would it be okay if i had this list on my userpage? So I can use the template thing it has also have links to all the songs, artists, and albums? That is really cool info to have in one spot. If its not allowed in general can I have it on my userpage? I was reading the guidlines and it seemed like it would be frowned upon and possible deleted. As some of you may have guessed reading and fully understanding is not a strength of mine. I am a little unstable, very sensitive and take things personally easily. I understand no one was "going at me" but that is just the way it seemed. Would it really hurt anything if i had this on my user page as a work in progress that will never be finished?
Tourist2088 (
talk)
06:05, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Unfortunately that is what I took from that policy as well. Reading all of these "Wikipedia is not..." drives me to see that Wikipedia is not as great as I thought. If it was on my userspace i could possibly work it into something that is acceptable someday. But I would try to get to work one day. Tourist2088 ( talk) 02:22, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Nothing wrong with keeping it on my hard drive. I am still working on this in the spreadsheet. But, its a boring looking spreadsheet. Like I have said I just really like the presentation on Wikipedia, with links to the song, artist, album articles. If i made a draft I would definitely work on it at least once a month to update it. I would make attempt to make it into a real article. Also, not that i care too much about radio stations. But since i listen to this station and say they play everything that rocks. I would just like to see a list of what "Rocks". I understand a list certainly does not deserve its own article it would be nice if on the KAZR page it had the list of songs played in a "click on to Show" template, like some albums that have bonus tracks. It would be like an appendix of sorts. I don't vist many websites so I really am not looking for another place to put this info. I did kind of start a Facebook page, but the info had a boring presentation. Tourist2088 ( talk) 02:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
I read those two articles and the active rock article helps a little but also goes against what the station plays. Sometimes what they say rocks surprises me. Which is why I started the list. Too bad their isn't a companion site called Wikilists. A place where all the lists that get deleted could go. I guess the mainstream article doesn't give examples because there are too many. The problem with listening to this station find out what rocks is difficult because it always seems to be the same songs most over 20 years old. Tourist2088 ( talk) 05:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete by DGG WP:G11 and WP:G12, and deleted a second time by There'sNoTime as WP:A7. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:58, 6 January 2018 (UTC) ( non-admin closure)
Promotional in tone. As written, does not satisfy general notability or corporate notability. Google search finds that there is considerable controversy about this organization. If this article is to be kept, the controversy should be addressed in the article. (Tagging will not be sufficient.)
As written, this article has no independent references. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Added to Talk:Black Jaguar-White Tiger Foundation in this diff:
Some of those may of course be considered unreliable. Considering the sensationalist nature of most, it's possible that the article violates WP:NOTNEWS? — Paleo Neonate – 00:43, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 09:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
No real coverage. Look-like promotional page. Fails WP:NCORP. Störm (talk) 10:42, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Partly per the consensus and partly per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:17, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Not enough coverage. Written like a resume. Fails WP:NSCHOLAR. Störm (talk) 10:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of mosques in Pakistan. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:16, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Not much useful nor well-developed with no sourcing. Either delete it because it fails WP:GNG or may redirect it to List of mosques in Pakistan. Störm (talk) 14:17, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Well, it looks like consensus is that this is not notable. The confusion about whether the sole argument cited in favour of notability applies to the article topic or to some other journal with the same name does not help. Redirects at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
An open access journal listed by Beall as predatory. Not in ISI, not in DOAJ, no impact factor, not indexed in PubMed. And we can't really say any of that because there are no reliable independent sources about the journal other than Beall's list and mirrors. Guy ( Help!) 16:49, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 14:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG of the 17 sources 12 are soundcloud or itunes so are not useful for showing notability. 1 is the label so not independent, 3 (2 are identical sources, Earmilk) is a passing mention, as is dancingastronaute, 1; weraveyou is a site that accepts payment for promotional articles here so not reliable. the number of views on soundcloud is not an indicator of notability as a simple search on google for "pay for views on soundcloud" will suggest. Domdeparis ( talk) 13:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 14:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Not to be confused with the silversmith of the same name. Kleuske ( talk) 13:42, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
"Delete. The only indication this article gives is that the author has mistaken Wikipedia for a business listing site. Fails WP:ORG. WP:NOTDIR. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 16:06, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 11:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
This seems not to meet notability guidelines as outlined in WP:NCORP. The coverage so far is about announcements of a company going about its day to day activities which falls short of what an encyclopedia should have. Kagundu Talk To Me 13:38, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. — Cryptic 21:57, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable album of non-notable musucian Bbarmadillo ( talk) 11:08, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. No prejudice to creation as a redirect. ansh 666 09:37, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Neologistic phrase coined and used in a single book (the only reference in the article used for the topic itself), and apparently w/o established usage in the further field. Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 08:27, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
No independent sources discuss this in detail. Fails WP:N. Wikipedia is not a manual and is not a directory WP:ISNOT. Steve Quinn ( talk) 07:24, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 11:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Well, this is fun. References are PR releases, a book that doesn't mention it, and dead links. A WP:BEFORE uncovered little. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 06:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Does not meet notability for music (singer) WP:NM. Google search yields little results, few references. NikolaiHo ☎️ 03:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 11:49, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Dependent on non-independent sources. Included sources are his own author profile of HuffingtonPost or his blog posts. Amazon is a commercial site, Goodreads is a social catalog. The article is spammy, full of external links (Amazon and Facebook links) on the body. Possible COI. Mar11 ( talk) 05:53, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 14:12, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
fast food restaurant with two dozen outlets in a single city and nowhere else. The refs, naturally are all local, and are naturally the usual restaurant PR. Getting such PR is about the same sort of minimum basics for opening a restaurant as getting a refrigerator. DGG ( talk ) 05:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. So Why 10:23, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
None is source write about subject in depth. ·•· 1997 kB 10:40, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete By far the majority of the coverage is not indepedent. One of the supports voted twice and a couple appear to be single purpose accounts. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 12:08, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
notability not established for yet another blockchain company Ysangkok ( talk) 20:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Notability of HashCash Consultants is well-established. It is among top 2-3 companies in this space such as Ripple and ConsenSys. Please suggest objective ways if any of improving content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sayan999 ( talk • contribs) 21:38, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
There are 30+ articles and news coverage of the company that I have come across (could spend more time on the references). Besides US media coverage is not world media coverage. You have to look outside of just coindesk and the names you are familiar with. This company is part of the International Organization for standards committee created to form blockchain standards globally. Regarding 100+ enterprises, I am assuming a company working with major banks wouldn't claim falsely on their website, but again that is my assumption. If no basis is found for this claim, it can be removed. Either way, this make the page candidate for improvement not deletion is my view. Sayan999 ( talk) 21:29, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. No prejudice to recreation as a redirect. ansh 666 09:41, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Per the article itself, the Bulgarians "preferred to retreat without a fight", so there was no battle. There was an Ottoman military operation that recovered Adrianople/Edirne, but there is nothing to suggest that any conflict actually happened here. This should be deleted, as the relevant information is already present, in far better form, in the Second Balkan War article. Constantine ✍ 09:06, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
I further note that "Second Battle of Adrianople" is a rare name in the literature, at least as determined by GBooks hits. It should also be noted the original redirect of this title was the Battle of Adrianople (378), which is what the handful of GBooks hits would also suggest. The only instance of the title being used for the 1913 event is by Richard J. Evans (!) in one of his books as an image caption, but I would wager good money that this is a result of Wikipedia using the title. Constantine ✍ 09:18, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Unreferenced & promotional Rathfelder ( talk) 09:02, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Noah Lukeman. Yunshui 雲 水 11:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
In attempting to fix the {{
unreferenced}}
tag I failed to find a single secondary source, despite what appears extensive efforts by the author or publisher to promote it at the time of release. I haven't found a single review of this book or a performance of it as a play, much less from a publication whose name I recognise.
Xover (
talk)
08:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Indian Chinese cuisine. Since it's discussed at the new target page, it's not unreasonable to have this redirect there since there's consensus not to have a standalone article. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 02:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Sources referenced are passing mentions (CNN) or non-notable food websites. This could easily retarget to Paneer of which this is an entry. No significant coverage on the history of this food. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 08:41, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Killiondude ( talk) 07:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Nothing about this band or its music seems to meet WP:Notability (music) Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONG. Misleading chart source. Acharts.co is mirroring Bulgaria Singles Top 40 which is included in Deprecated charts section. IFPI (BAMP) does not have a official chart, ever since they updated their site. It should be a redirect to Gery-Nikol. Quickfingers ( talk) 06:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONG. Misleading chart source. Acharts.co is mirroring Bulgaria Singles Top 40 which is included in Deprecated charts section. IFPI (BAMP) does not have a official chart, ever since they updated their site. It should be a redirect to Gery-Nikol. Quickfingers ( talk) 06:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONG. Misleading chart source. Acharts.co is mirroring Bulgaria Singles Top 40 which is included in Deprecated charts section. IFPI (BAMP) does not have a official chart, ever since they updated their site. It should be a redirect to Tita. Quickfingers ( talk) 06:38, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONG. Misleading chart source. Acharts.co is mirroring Bulgaria Singles Top 40 which is included in Deprecated charts section. IFPI (BAMP) does not have a official chart, ever since they updated their site. It should be a redirect to 100 Kila. Quickfingers ( talk) 06:38, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONG. Misleading chart source. Acharts.co is mirroring Bulgaria Singles Top 40 which is included in Deprecated charts section. IFPI (BAMP) does not have a official chart, ever since they updated their site. Quickfingers ( talk) 06:36, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONG. Misleading chart source. Acharts.co is mirroring Bulgaria Singles Top 40 which is included in Deprecated charts section. IFPI (BAMP) does not have a official chart, ever since they updated their site. It should be a redirect to Tita. Quickfingers ( talk) 06:34, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 14:14, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NSPORT for pro football: didn't play in a CFL game (retired before the season started), his college football honors are in Conference USA honor roll mostly, which isn't listed in Template:College football award navbox. He does have some local news articles. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 05:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Weak delete. He may have been viral during the draft but he never played professionally and no reason was given. Could it be he never made the team? Postcard Cathy ( talk) 18:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is consensus that the mentioned flaws in the article can be addressed by editing while the subject itself is notable enough for inclusion. So Why 10:21, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Many of the sources linked to in this article are either blogs or do not mention the subject at all. Several of them are clearly self serving and shoehorned in for no apparent purpose (particularly offensive are a number of self publish articles that are included just so the author can claim he has published numerous articles on "a variety of subjects"). Poor sources indicate padding of resume for low-profile individual. Suggest immediate deletion as not notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.104.167.154 ( talk) 22:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was merge to Hand truck. ansh 666 09:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
WP is not a dictionary. Unclear what this article adds to the project. It is just describing a hand cart used for moving pianos. There is not even a dedicated source, just a mention in a book on piano tuning. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 05:07, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 17:19, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Article uses primary sources, and a search doesn't produce this convention as one of the first results. Fails WP:GNG. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 04:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 07:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
fails to meet basic WP:GNG. Saqib ( talk) 03:58, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep withdrawn by nominator. TonyBallioni ( talk) 22:06, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Nothing about this game appears to meet WP:GNG. No sources outside of some random blog posts exist. WP:NGAME is about video games, not "miniatures wargames", but this doesn't meet the spirit of it either. – Muboshgu ( talk) 03:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 07:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
An advertorially toned page on a non notable private business; significant RS coverage to meet WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH not found. Much of the article is details on the various research that the company published, but I don't believe that's sufficient in establishing notability and authoritativeness of the company as a source. Has been previously deleted via AfD (Oct 2016) and via CSD (Nov 2017). K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Not a notable YouTube channel. The coverage is only trivial mentions rather than significant coverage. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 03:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 07:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTSTATS – Ianblair23 (talk) 03:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 04:41, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
It looks like the filmography is in both this article and the main Dev (actor) article. Please make up your mind on whether it should be split or not. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 02:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator after page improvements. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki ( π, ν) 01:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
None of the entries on this page is really disambiguating "Muy". There are variations like de Muy, Le Muy, Félix du Muy, and Muy Muy, but it doesn't seem likely that these topics would be looked up solely by "Muy", and certainly aren't routinely known by the name "Muy" alone. The two May Rivers don't belong, nor do the three phrases in Spanish in the Other section that happen to begin with the Spanish word "muy". Finally, over half the entries on the page are red links anyway. It's at best a stretch. Largoplazo ( talk) 02:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 23:38, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
I can't figure out what this is supposed to be? A book? A collection of poems? A single poem? The article is mostly a debate over who authored the book. It doesn't explain what the book is about and how it is notable, other than it being old. Half of the article is in Telugu. Is it fiction because it involves poetry? No links to the equivalent article in Telugu. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 02:12, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
This article Kavijanasrayam deserves to exist since this is the oldest available piece of Telugu literature and many poets followed this book.By referring this book,scholars such as Charles Philip Brown wrote a book in English on Telugu prosodic techniques. The techniques can be added eventually to this article by other editors.
I think the direction of the article changed because one of the editors(SubhashiniIyer) was continously disrupting the page based on these aspects.
1) Jain Origins and 2) Nativity of the poet 3) Antiquity (940 AD)
The editor(Abrahmad111) has provided groundbreaking evidences from Telugu books on the above aspects.The editor who disrupted initially is shell shocked from the past 5 months and not even a single evidence has been challenged.The prejudiced and unintellectual editor 1)cannot tolerate the fact that Jain religion Telugu literature preceded Vedic religion Telugu Literature. It is a kind of religious intolerance extended to wikipedia.2) wanted the poet to belong to her home state(province) 3) cannot tolerate any Telugu Literature to be placed before 1050 AD since she assumes that all literature started after 1050 AD only after poet Nannaya, who belonged to her home state(province) .
Now that these biases were totally disproved,we can move those aspects to the talk page or retain them in a concise form in the actual page
Finally,the editor(Abrahmad111) was blocked based on only suspicion of sock puppetry but not proven.What is more important is the evidence he left. SattiPandu ( talk) 18:34, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Yes ! It should have been in a talk page.Unfortunately not done because editor(SubhashiniIyer) directly put the discussion on the page.Please see the history from the start.Where as ALL scholars call it a JAIN work, she just puts her personal opinions that is NOT a Jain WORK.Where as editor(Abrahmad111) provided Central Sahitya Academy reference, P.V.P Sastry,C.P.Brown,Nidudavolu Venkat Rao,Veturi Prabhakara Sastry,Chaganti Seshayya,S.V.Rama Rao and many more references.The editor (SubhashiniIyer) wants us to believe her opinion and reject Central Sahitya Academy run by govt of India and all references which are not inline with her biased mindset...
With regards to the earliest available Telugu Literature so far.. Mallia Rec 9th century poet Malliya Rechana-First Telugu Author (940AD) , Kavijanasrayam,Vemulawada Karimnagar,
With regards to Jain origins, the English links are self explanatory.. Jainism: art, architecture, literature & philosophy Jain literature. All scholars call it a JAIN work.Show me ONE author which calls it a non-JAIN work?.Please refer the Telugu links as well.
Books won't survive for 1000 years.They are copied and copied by generation after generation. Kavijanasrayam is available in 50 copies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SattiPandu ( talk • contribs) 19:34, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
You have removed the earlier content and references.
40 copies are available. Please check with some one who knows Telugu Unfortunately no english ref is available for this..
Significant coverage is done in these books. The references which were again removed. At least please read the English Meta-data in the archive.org
https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.333847 Kavi Janasramamu by Malliya Rechana
Publication date 1950 Topics City Collection digitallibraryindia; texts Language Telugu
Read the english meta-data or english preface.. https://archive.org/stream/kavijanaashrayam020695mbp#page/n3/mode/2up
Kavijanaashrayamu-Chandashastramu by Jayanthi Ramaiah
Publication date 1932 Publisher ANDHRA SAHITYA PARISHATH Collection universallibrary Contributor SRI KRISHNA DEVARAYANDRA BHASHA NILAYAM Language Telugu SattiPandu ( talk) 20:15, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 07:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Basically advertising. A list of their successes and services . It belongs on their web page, not an encyclopedia . Kept back in 2008 when our standards were lower. DGG ( talk ) 01:58, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 07:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
An under-sourced BLP on a reality TV show contestant and actor whose roles have been minor. Significant RS coverage not found. Article sourced to routine news about the show, interviews, and passing mentions. Does not meet WP:NACTOR. The article was deleted in 2015, as not meeting notability guidelines, only achieving top 4 in the show. The subject has not done anything significant since then, so I recommend deletion at this time, in line with the first AfD. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 07:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
A CV-like page on an unremarkable entrepreneur. Significant RS coverage not found. As a CEO of semi-notable company, does not meet WP:ANYBIO. 30 under 30 and similar accolades are likewise not indicative of notability. Article is sourced to routine notices about the company, interviews, WP:SPIP and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Created by Special:Contributions/Cocohickman, an account with one total edit. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:32, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 07:33, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMUSIC, no source for the "Rookie of the Year Award" and it doesn't appear as if they were a recurring cast member. Jon Kolbert ( talk) 03:57, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ansh 666 09:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Notability-tagged. Main claims to notability (one of earliest female rappers and earliest to record album) are unsourced. Thought it good for community to have a look. Agricola44 ( talk) 15:14, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 14:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
No evidence that he meets WP:PROF. Unimpressive list of coauthored books, and the only reference in the article is to what appears to be a fly-by-night academic journal that he founded himself. Bueller 007 ( talk) 15:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. The consensus seems to keep this, at least as a redirect, which can be achieved by editing. So Why 10:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Non notable and does not cite any references. Abishe ( talk) 12:44, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:G5 NeilN talk to me 09:49, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Killiondude ( talk) 07:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable future event. I'm not sure if curling is notable enough of a sport to have an article for this specific tournament. Perhaps this page could be redirected to US Open of Curling. Natg 19 ( talk) 08:02, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
It Is a notable Sport there is lots of other event pages Curler1200 ( talk) 23:16, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. One major problem for source-finding is that this series was released under different names for different markets. In French, it was Le Monde de Pahé. In Portuguese, it was Como Irmãos, etc etc. I tried to pillage the interlanguage links for sources, but nobody else has anything reliable we can use.
I'm confident it existed based on the clips I've found, but the utter lack of sources means we can't support an article about it. Refund absolutely applies if sources are located. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 14:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable tv series. Other than single passing mentions in a few interviews and a really old, no-info iMDB page, I can't even verify it's existence in the context portrayed in the article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:54, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Killiondude ( talk) 07:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG JMHamo ( talk) 17:22, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (withdrawn informally although never completed by the nominator) ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 14:17, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
A separate Wikipedia article listing the episodes of Chapo Trap House? Chapo Trap House barely meets the notability requirements. A list of episodes for this podcast surely doesn't? Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 18:17, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 07:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Most of the sources listed here are music blogs and YouTube videos. The amount of reliable sources on this subject do not have enough significant coverage to satisfy WP:MUSICBIO. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 19:17, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
material on youtube or user-created-content forums SamanthaFinmore ( talk) 01:21, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 00:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable street. No sources for over 10 years, no significant coverage found in search for reliable sources. It is a real street and there are some articles that mention the street name in passing. Gab4gab ( talk) 00:44, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. So Why 10:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails the criteria for establishing notability. Some references are from reliable sources but they are not independent of the subject and do not contain independent analysis and/or opinion. Fails WP:NCORP. -- HighKing ++ 20:54, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 07:29, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable company. There is no WP:INHERITORG from Heaven Hill. — cnzx ( talk • contribs) 22:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 04:48, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable book. The title gets 6 google hits. The article was started by William Forde Thompson, who is the author of the book. Vanity page. Was put through PROD, but not AfD. Bueller 007 ( talk) 17:39, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 14:15, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
No reliable, independent sources with significant coverage of the topic are cited, so he doesn't seem to meet GNG, and he doesn't seem to meet any other relevant WP:NM criteria either. KSFT ( t| c) 00:12, 4 January 2018 (UTC)