![]() |
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:40, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
removed prod, but none of the concerns was fixed- fundamentally doesn't meet WP:NSOFTWARE jcc ( tea and biscuits) 22:33, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello jcc, Rentier, K.e.coffman
The Gro CRM page I created is being considered for deletion. I read the concerns. I am in the process of updating the page further. Any suggestions or guidance would be very helpful. Thanks! Shanescott127 ( talk) 06:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC) Shanescott127 06:13, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:40, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
doesn't meet WP:NSOFTWARE ; a search for sources finds only PRWire articles which doesn't meet WP:CORPDEPTH. jcc ( tea and biscuits) 22:19, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 23:00, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
nothing has changed since January when this article was deleted at AfD, now a confirmed UPE sock has republished it, the same things apply- all provided sources are reprinted press releases not meeting WP:CORPDEPTH (a lot are venture funding reports), or from non-notable promotionalism only websites jcc ( tea and biscuits) 22:16, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete, G11 by DGG. (non-admin closure) !dave 10:29, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
non-notable, reviewing the sources we see that most are trivial mentions, republished press releases or in one instance, the CEO has offered their comment to a self published blog, showing that this company is fundamentally non-notable. jcc ( tea and biscuits) 22:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:41, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Almost-unsourced BLP. Has been PRODded before, and dePRODded in March 2017 with "Needs expansion but enough to work on". The only source is one which verifies that she is CEO of CEPR but adds no other info. The rest of the content was added, unsourced, when the article was created by an editor who has made 5 edits, 3 of them about this person. No indication of notability, no sources to support most of the article. No useful ghits found. If we remove the unsourced BLP content we are left with "is the CEO of CERP". A redirect to Centre for Economic Policy Research would be appropriate, as she is mentioned there in infobox. Pam D 21:08, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 08:24, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG without multiple independent sources covering the subject in detail. References are either human interest stories from a small media outlet, published by the church itself or a brief mention in an architectual magazine. TM 18:22, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Contested Prod - Non-notable MMA fighter does not meet WP:NMMA PRehse ( talk) 18:19, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep after improvements. ansh 666 07:32, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Delete: as non-notable musician. Quis separabit? 17:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:32, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Article on a non-notable marketer, commissioned from a paid editor. The article is based entirely on puff "profiles", interviews, advertorials and other low quality, non-independent sources. Searches turn up no significant coverage in independent sources. Melcous has cleaned up some of the more blatantly spammy text, but this is still a clear attempt to use Wikipedia for self-promotion. – Joe ( talk) 15:35, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
"Avijit Arya has to his credit testimonials accredited by the finest, attested to his exponential experience..."and
"Thus, his acute understanding of the entire industry and related verticals!". Clearly lacking the necessary in-depth, independent coverage in reliable, secondary sources to establish WP:Notability at this time. Snow let's rap 23:53, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:41, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Deletion per WP:ENT. The person is an actor, but does not meet the criteria for notability of actors. Being an actor does not make him inherently notable. Adotchar| reply here 15:35, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Second NAC close, feel free to revert if wrong... (non-admin closure) !dave 18:22, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Searches for this mostly bring up a different "declaration" involving the Japanese government, which seems to enjoy some notability; there are also a fair number of false hits on various things the NK government has "declared". This particular declaration seems to have no footprint outside a bunch of communist partys who have said that they signed it— and Pyongyang blowing its own horn. Mangoe ( talk) 15:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:42, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable restaurant. Article reads like an advertisement and the sources are routine for a restaurant. TM 14:21, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ansh 666 07:33, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Basic definition with no references. PROD was contested without comment. Argento Surfer ( talk) 14:18, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:33, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG. Coin945 ( talk) 10:27, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:34, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Album does not meet notability and only has references to iTunes and self-pub. Artist article was Prodded in August. There is a Forbes article [10] and some random blog article [11] but they are interviews. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 15:13, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:42, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
social networking site which has since ceased operations and moved to a new platform. Uhooep ( talk) 04:53, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus that the result of the previous AfD was correct. No need to relist this one a third time. ansh 666 21:20, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to be sufficiently INDEPENDENTLY notable to warrant its own article. FamblyCat94 ( talk) 00:32, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. No objection to recreation if notability is met after release of new album (or if he becomes notable some other way), but as of right now he doesn't. Let me know if anyone wants it restored to user or draft space. ansh 666 07:36, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Four previous versions have been deleted here and at Ski Mask The Slump God. I do not think that notability has yet been established. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 13:47, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
— 67.169.149.118 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
— 66.30.161.208 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was no consensus. ansh 666 07:37, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to be INDEPENDENTLY notable enough to warrant its own article. FamblyCat94 ( talk) 00:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ansh 666 07:37, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable Toypadlock ( talk) 17:19, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:37, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. The coverage appears to only be routine coverage and press releases. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 06:07, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Note that WP:AfD is not cleanup - the quality of the article has no bearing on the notability of the subject. ansh 666 07:40, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 06:40, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:42, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Looks like she is not quite yet notable beside Long Beach Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 13:11, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Israeli–Palestinian conflict. The Bushranger One ping only 01:40, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
There is no official definition of Israeli-Palestinian war and this disambiguation page does not add any meaningful information. Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 11:43, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ansh 666 07:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Article contains essentially no information not already present at It's a Wonderful Life. If the trivial "quotes" section necessitates a separate article, here it is - otherwise this should be redirected. Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 11:21, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
As for the argument that Clarence is an "iconic character", don't most iconic films have iconic characters? If this argument were to be accepted as correct, we would end up with separate articles for each of the main characters in almost every popular film. And most of them would look essentially like the one here -- little more than a duplication of material from the parent article. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 16:08, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks again for the comment. Have a happy holiday season. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 22:24, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was Stubify. There seems to be a strong consensus that what we have is not fit for purpose and a sense that the article is being used to exaggerate the importance of the subject. There is not quite a consensus to delete outright (I have ignored the SPAs) so I'm going to stubify this and ask that this be rewritten from the good sources only. After that we will be better placed to see if this article can stand up or not. If we have issues with SPAs and COI editors coming in to push the previous mess we can either move it to draft or have another discussion (hint if its go 2 and the pov pushing is continuing the community tends to delete and not exercise much AGF). Spartaz Humbug! 08:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Same problems as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Culture Pro Wrestling (in fact, it's the same promotion with other name). Most of the sources are from their own website (defiant wrestling or What Culture), their own youtube channel or Cagematch (which covers every wrestling event in the world). I don't see any third party sources enough to establish their notability. HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 10:42, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
I found these
Not sure if that's enough but they did get in some news for the YoutTube stuff. Again, it's not great. ★Trekker ( talk) 12:20, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
*Keep Passes
WP:GNG. --
TheCorageone1
Connect
15:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC) —
TheCorageone1 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
*Keep No delete, the article as reliable sources. -
RigaPietrev12
User talk:RigaPietrev12 comment added
15:43, 18 December 2017 (UTC) —
RigaPietrev12 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
*Keep The article as reliable sources and has a very good writting -
Spinarok15 comment added
16:06, 18 December 2017 (UTC) —
Spinarok15 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Found two more Crave articles here and here. Still, not sure if that helpes much. ★Trekker ( talk) 20:40, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability.There is no disputing that it has received some level of coverage as you stated above, the question becomes what qualifies as significant. In my opinion the article shows enough sources to meet this. - Galatz Talk 23:45, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:44, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
I do not believe this individual meets WP:GNG. No claims of notability are made in the article and the only mentions of this person that I can find are on social media. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 09:36, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:42, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:RLN and doesn't seem to meet the GNG Mattlore ( talk) 09:15, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NSPORT for rugby league. Papua New Guinea did not participate in the Pacific Cup in the 1980s), unsure why Fleets contested it. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 14:09, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:RLN and doesn't seem to meet the GNG Mattlore ( talk) 09:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus WP:NPASR. ansh 666 07:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Does this really need a separate article? The details can easily fit in the Self-tying shoes section. If it is to stay separate, then it should be added to the Nike navbox. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 01:09, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Not a notable term. The only reference is both promotional, and doesn't use the term. Google search results are for Live streaming software. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 02:21, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Software broadcasting is a way of delivering business software so that it can be accessed from anywhere, and on a subscription basis. This claim doesn't have any sources to support and verify it. The only case in which I have seen the words software and broadcasting used side by side (but not as a compound term) is in the content of discussing broadcasting (streaming) through software instead of tradition hardware based broadcasting.-- DreamLinker ( talk) 07:22, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus WP:NPASR. ansh 666 07:46, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
No reliable sources for the band HINDWIKI • CHAT 00:04, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete as expired WP:PROD. ansh 666 07:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBIO. Coverage in reliable sources not found. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 01:23, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
None of this has been published or anthologized by a major press, and I do not see any significant critical attention. DGG ( talk ) 08:47, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 08:43, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Lack of notability, and Promotionalism, trying to make it appear more important than it is. This is not even one of the Comprehensive Cancer Care Centers, the highest level in the US. The references consist on unspectacular placings of various lists--there is also a good deal of PRto be found in Google. DGG ( talk ) 00:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Keep' Most of the NCI-designated Cancer Centers have articles. Regardless of whether it's a Comprehensive Cancer Center, it's still one of the NCI-designated Cancer Centers, which represent approximately the top 4% of cancer centers in the country. The references show that it passes WP:ORG, and 11 of the 18 references are not affiliated with UVA. Natureium ( talk) 17:53, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTTRIVIA and WP:NOTTRAVEL. Prod removed by unreg user without citing any reason Ajf773 ( talk) 08:36, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable, edits by suspicious IP (promo) and no references. References on Google are marginally minor at best, if at all. Cahk ( talk) 08:33, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Every single bus route for one country. Fails WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:NOR as there is a distinct lack of sources. A list that is almost indiscriminate as well Ajf773 ( talk) 08:30, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
No notability. It was created by an account with only 3 edits and that too in this article. sami talk 08:26, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ansh 666 07:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
This article lacks a neutral point of view, it's full of mistakes and/or lies based on self-published sources. The most blatant one is the affirmation that she's one of the World's Top 10 bass players, totally made up by her or her manager. This is the original source: http://www.notreble.com/buzz/2011/12/26/top-ten-bass-not-bass-discussion-new-signature-basses-and-gear-plus-the-top-videos-columns-of-the-week/ and it only says that her video was the 7th most popular article on that blog on that week. Any other interpretation is invalid and all the other references prove nothing, as they have not been verified. Also, I find the article generally poorly written, exaggerating her achievements and her picture is copyrighted. Stevialover ( talk) 07:53, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
{{
not in citation}}
tag next to the statement so as to alert other editors, but don't just open AfDfor such cases –
Ammarpad (
talk)
12:51, 21 December 2017 (UTC)The result was merge to W. Christopher Winter. ansh 666 07:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. No references. NikolaiHo ☎️ 05:31, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
I see no indication that this single mayoral election in a mid-size city is specifically notable in any way that would mean it needs its own individual article. There's no parent article like Mayoral elections in Sanjo to merge & redirect or I'd do that. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:24, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by Bbb23 per CSD G5 (Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 01:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; individual remains only "Wikipedia-notable" with respect to one event. Previously deleted per discussion; I don't have access to the prior version to assess the level of change. (Also, note that the changes to the prior AFD discussion arise from an issue with the new-page curation toolbar; I am reporting at the village pump.) Julietdeltalima (talk) 21:35, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Air India, SpiceJet, Cleartrip, Mobikwik & Faasos were the only companies I ever corresponded with. Never informed the rest of them about any Loopholes. For the same reason, I never mentioned any technical details in this article. Compromised list may still include some E-commerce websites, Home services, Travel agencies, Educational Institutions, Government applications, etc" Hagennos ( talk) 23:28, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
An article shouldn't be deleted just because it "SEEMS" to be something. A simple Google search will show-up numerous media outlets covering him(exclusively or otherwise). The subject's profession is that of a Security researcher, who publishes his findings through a blog. So, obviously his media coverage would also involve parts of his written research. Thus, references can't be said to be sourced from the Individual himself. Also, If the article seems to be promotional, Wikipedia suggests someone re-editing the article rather than completely removing it.
The user Hagennos( talk) has quoted the subject from his last blog(for reasons not known). Here is his statement from the latest Inteview " Right now, I’m doing some security research & upgrading my skills in the InfoSec domain. My upcoming blogs will hopefully make some positive impact on the Industry. Also, some market research for a potential product may be in the timeline." Nexa9911 ( talk) 07:47, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Comment At first there was an issue with the notability. Now, the article is being said to be promo. Is wikipedia full of deletionsists or what? Nexa9911 ( talk) 05:38, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:44, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
I've been trying to find better sourcing for this article since I came across it (I don't remember exactly why, but somehow I ended up at it). I did some minor cleanup, etc. and have asked for the opinions of others at User:Oshwah/TalkPageArchives/2017-12#Blake Ricciardi, WT:BIOG#Blake Ricciardi, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Business#Blake Ricciardi, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject California#Blake Ricciardi and WT:FASH#Blake Ricciardi. There's been no response from anyone at the relevant WikiProjects and the only other suggestions I received was the subject of the article in not likely Wikipedia notable. I can find anything which shows how this person meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG; I'm finding the this person does exist, but most of the mentions are from primary sources or trivia in nature. If there7s some Wikiproject notability guideline that this person meets, then fine and the article then might be worth keeping; otherwise, I think it should be deleted. I've also looked for a possible way to redirect or merge the article, but I cannot find any good candidates for such a thing -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:33, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:44, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Despite the claim on the talk page that this is a legitimate term used in science, I can't find the slightest indication that that is the case. I have searched: Google, GScholar, PubMed, the Animal Biosciences section of Annual Reviews, Science Magazine & its related publications, ScienceDirect, and World Scientific and haven't come up with so much as a single hit even using this term, let alone describing it in an in-depth fashion. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:22, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
References
The result was redirect to PDC World Darts Championship. ansh 666 07:49, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. No sources and no evidence of any of the information added to this former redirect. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 04:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:49, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Stub that fails WP:NCOMPANY, WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES, see also WP:CORPSPAM. Previously prodded by User:Atlantic306, did not improve much since. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:36, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 04:19, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Renata3 with the following rationale "Fortune 1000 company traded on NYSE". Long ago I used to think that being listed at a stock exchange suffices, but this was not accepted as part of WP:NCORP, so we need better keep arguments - and I am not seeing any serious coverage outside the usual smattering of business directory entries and press releases. As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:44, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The article notes that New Jersey Resources was ranked 672 on the Fortune 1000 and had $3,738,000,000 in revenue and $142,000,000 in profit.
The article notes:
New Jersey Resources Corp., parent of New Jersey Natural Gas Co., supplies some 330,000 customers throughout Monmouth, Ocean, Morris and Middlesex counties. But in recent years, the company has looked well beyond those horizons to increase sales.
Since 1991, the Wall Township-based utility holding company has sold more than 33 billion cubic feet of gas to customers in six states outside of New Jersey.
...
"Life here truly is, and should be, an efficient load factor," remarked Oliver G. Richard 3d, chairman and chief executive officer of New Jersey Resources.
...
As a holding company, New Jersey Natural has long looked beyond its regular utility business for growth. Trying to diversify in years past, New Jersey Resources already has a number of unregulated ventures, including Paradigm Power Inc., which invests in natural gas-fueled cogeneration and independent power projects; Commercial Realty & Resources Corp., which develops commercial real estate; and NJR Energy Corp., which engages in energy-related investments.
While results from the diversified businesses have been mixed, the company has had more success selling gas in unregulated markets. In 1991, virtually all of the company's sales were to core residential and commercial customers. By 1992, the company sold 11.8 billion cubic feet in off-system sales outside the state. Last year, those sales jumped to 21 billion cubic feet.
The article notes:
It has been a good run for utility stocks the past three years. The sector is up 23 percent during that time frame and one of the steadiest performing players has been New Jersey Resources.
The Wall Township-based owner of New Jersey Natural Gas, which provides gas to 450,000 customers in central Jersey, is heading for its 14th consecutive year of earnings growth, one of the longest streaks in the sector.
...
In a research report, Morningstar.com analyst John Kearney said New Jersey Resources "exemplifies the stability and consistency that risk-averse, income-oriented investors look for." The company also benefits from a good relationship with regulators - an affinity it enjoys largely as a result of not having sought a rate increase for its delivery costs in 10 years.
The article notes:
In an unusual takeover battle between two New Jersey utility companies, the NUI Corporation says it will continue its attempt to merge with the larger New Jersey Resources Corporation despite a lopsided defeat in a proxy battle.
The defeat is expected to be confirmed at a shareholders' meeting Tuesday of New Jersey Resources, which delivers natural gas to 220,000 customers in Monmouth and Ocean Counties and parts of Morris and Middlesex Counties.
...
At the Feb. 2 annual meeting of New Jersey Resources, NUI sought to place on the company's board its own slate of candidates, who would support the merger. Both utilities resorted to an unusual amount of publicity for companies their size, including radio spots and full-page ads in the financial sections of The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal.
The article notes:
New Jersey Resources Corp. is considering a combination with South Jersey Industries Inc., a deal that would bring together two natural-gas utilities in the state, according to people familiar with the matter.
Details of the talks couldn’t be learned and it is possible that there won’t be a deal. As of Tuesday morning, New Jersey Resources had a market value of $3.4 billion. South Jersey Industries was valued at $2.8 billion.
New Jersey Resources, based in Wall, N.J., provides natural gas and other services to homes and businesses from the Gulf Coast to Canada, according to its website. It is the parent company of New Jersey Natural Gas, which serves more than 486,000 customers in Monmouth, Ocean, Middlesex, Morris and Burlington counties. New Jersey Resources also operates a 6,700 mile natural-gas transportation and distribution network serving almost 500,000 customers, according to the website.
The article notes:
New Jersey Natural Gas -- which serves approximately 512,000 customers in Monmouth and Ocean counties, portions of Burlington, Middlesex, and Morris counties, and one borough in Sussex County --requested in November 2015 a 24-percent rate increase, or a $21.69 uptick in an average customer's monthly bill
...
Kinney said executive compensation and returns on investments derive from the entirety of New Jersey Resources, the parent company of NJNG, which has several subsidiaries that reach customers outside the Garden State.
...
From 2008 through 2015, the company has seen its customer base grow by 1.5 percent annually, and has already invested approximately $806 million in its natural-gas transmission and distribution system.
The article notes:
None of that has deterred Laurence Downes, an unflappable and soft-spoken executive who for the past 10 years has led New Jersey Resources, a natural gas company with $2.5 billion in revenue last year.
...
Downes is fond of telling audiences the company - the owner of the state's second-largest gas utility, New Jersey Natural Gas - is one of the fastest-growing local gas distribution businesses in the country. Shareholders who invested $1,000 in NJR in 1952 have seen their investment grow to more than $800,000 today, he is quick to point out.
New Jersey Natural Gas, which has 455,000 customers in Monmouth and Ocean counties, accounts for about 80 percent of the parent company's earnings. And yet the utility has not raised the rates it charges to deliver gas to residents and businesses for more than a decade.
...
Downes came to New Jersey Resources in 1985 after working on utility bonds at a bank, a job he came to enjoy.
The article notes:
The management of New Jersey Natural Gas Co. has come under sharp criticism by state regulators over the company's steadily rising gas costs in the wake of a new request for higher rates.
The Board of Regulatory Commissioners (BRC) this week called for changes in the utility's management structure. The board said the company's gas costs have gone from the lowest in the state in 1985 to the highest of the four natural gas utilities serving New Jersey, and wants the company to explain why rates are climbing. The Wall Township-based company serves 325,000 customers in Monmouth, Ocean, Morris and Middlesex counties.
...
New Jersey Natural is organized under a parent holding company, New Jersey Resources Corp., which was formed to allow the company to diversify into a number of unregulated, non-utility businesses. But while New Jersey Resources has several subsidiaries involved in energy, cogeneration and real estate ventures, the overwhelming bulk of revenue and income comes from the utility.
The article notes:
...local mayors and officials who gathered Wednesday morning to speak out against the 24-percent rate hike proposed by New Jersey Natural Gas. As reported by NJ Advance Media, the utility company that serves half a million people mainly in Ocean and Monmouth counties proposed the steep increase as its top executives have seen their overall compensation skyrocket in recent years.
New Jersey Natural Gas says the rate increase is its first since 2007, and is necessary to mend its ailing infrastructure. It also contends its uptick in executive compensation has no impact on the rate increase.
...
A NJNG spokesman, Michael Kinney, said executive compensation and return on investments derive from the entirety of New Jersey Resources, the parent company of NJNG, which has several subsidiaries that provide other services.
In 2016, it served half a million people. A 2016 article noted the company was harshly criticized for a proposed 24% rate hike. The company has received sustained coverage between 1984 and 2016. It clearly passes Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline and Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies).
The result was redirect to Diving plane#Cars. ansh 666 07:50, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Glorified dicdef. Untouched since 2006. Probably easier to nuke and start again, with content merged into a larger-scoped article. Coin945 ( talk) 05:27, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ansh 666 07:50, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Contested Prod - no indication of notability - primarily an advertisement for a new product PRehse ( talk) 12:03, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:50, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2014, never fixed. Cited sources do not meet the trifecta of reliable, independent, secondary. Mostly self-published. The creator of the article believes it is NPOV, but since he's involved with the product I don't feel inclined to accept his view on that. Guy ( Help!) 12:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete as expired WP:PROD. ansh 666 07:50, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Notability. Coverage is that to be expected of a bloke doing this sort of job. TheLongTone ( talk) 13:33, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:SOFTDEL as the equivalent of an uncontested PROD; WP:REFUND applies. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 05:42, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Business exec with not enough sources for GNG. Sources in article are passing mentions, job appointments, and 1 interview. BEFORE doesn't yield much more. Icewhiz ( talk) 14:13, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 08:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
The article, as written here, is self-contradictory. It says he was from the 3rd tannaitic generation (significantly after the destruction of thre second temple) and that he was appointed High Priest 27-25 years before the destruction of the second temple. Looks like a bad translation of the Hebrew article at the time it was written; the edit summary of the very next edit there is that the article needs to be checked by an expert. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:26, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Section 51(i) of the Constitution of Australia. If we are going to merge we really need to have some sourced content to merge otherwise its a simply OR. Spartaz Humbug! 08:46, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Does this not just state a clause, rather than explaining any of its historical significance or anything like that? I don't even think a clause is notable unless in extreme circumstances. Its content is covered by Section 51(i) of the Constitution of Australia . As a sidenote it's been unsourced since 2006. Coin945 ( talk) 10:43, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Despite numerous arguments that sources exist and references to google searches the Keep side have not actually brought specific sources for discussion. The nature of the sourcing has been discussed in detail and its significant that the final 4 votes who all had the benefit of reading the whole discussion and clearly show their own search for sources come down to a firm delete. That's not to say that a sourced article couldn't get written if the sourcing is clarified. On that basis while its a delete, I see no reason to see permission to have another go at this from scratch if someone wants to take this on. Spartaz Humbug! 08:53, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Page is pure fancruft - almost all unsourced and what sources are used are SPS and including the fancruft-signatures of a ridiculous list of ELs and picture gallery. Barely passed AFD in 2008 and has not developed since. Would need to be completely rewritten to make an encyclopedic article out of this. Jytdog ( talk) 23:56, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Here, I is will paste it here for you.
;NO SOURCES IN THE SECTION BELOW
- RouterOS
The main product of MikroTik is an operating system based on the Linux kernel, known as the MikroTik RouterOS. Installed on the company's proprietary hardware (RouterBOARD series), or on standard x86-based computers, it turns a computer into a network router and implements various additional features, such as firewalling, virtual private network (VPN) service and client, [1] bandwidth shaping and quality of service, wireless access point functions and other commonly used features when interconnecting networks. The system is also able to serve as a captive-portal-based hotspot system.
The operating system is licensed in increasing service levels, each releasing more of the available RouterOS features. A MS Windows application called Winbox provides a graphical user interface for the RouterOS configuration and monitoring, but RouterOS also allows access via FTP, telnet, and secure shell (SSH). An application programming interface is available for direct access from applications for management and monitoring.
- NO SOURCES IN THE SECTION BELOW
- Features
RouterOS supports many applications used by Internet service providers, for example OSPF, BGP, Multiprotocol Label Switching (VPLS/MPLS), OpenFlow. The product is supported by Mikrotik through a forum and a wiki, providing assorted and thematic examples of configurations. RouterOS supports Internet Protocol Version 4 (IPv4) as well as Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6).
The software provides support for virtually all network interfaces that the Linux kernel 3.3.5 supports, except wireless, where the Atheros chipsets are the only supported hardware, as of RouterOS version 6.33.
- ONE SOURCE IN THE SECTION BELOW
- Release history
- RouterOS version 6: May 2013 [2]
- RouterOS version 6.38 (December 30, 2016
)- RouterOS version 5: March 2010
- RouterOS version 4: October 2009
- RouterOS version 3: January 2008
- ONLY SPAM REFS TO MICROTEK AND ONLY IN THE LAST SENTENCE IN THE SECTION BELOW
- RouterBOARD
The company manufactures a series of integrated circuit boards, marketed under the name RouterBOARD, as well as accessory components which implement a complete hardware operating platform for RouterOS.
The RouterBOARD line, combined with RouterOS, is marketed at small- to medium-sized wireless Internet service providers, typically providing broadband wireless access in remote areas. Products include pre-assembled small office/home office (SOHO) routers, wireless 802.11a/b/g/n/ac MIMO and TDMA devices for indoor and outdoor use, and also bare routers in form of printed circuit boards (PCBs) for integration into custom solutions. Also, the RouterBOARD line includes a series of Mini PCI and Mini PCI Express wireless adapters, supporting a range of IEEE 802.11 protocols, and designed to be used together with the router boards lineup.
Some RouterBOARD boards and their versions are supported by third-party Linux-based firmware, notably OpenWrt.[6][7][8][9][10]
- ALMOST NOTHING BELOW IS ACTUALLY IN THE REF GIVEN AND THE LAST SENTENCE IS UNSOURCED
- Cloud Core Router
In November 2012, MikroTik released the Cloud Core Router integrated unit which is based on the Tilera CPU supporting nine to 72 CPU cores, 8 SFP+ ( MiniGBIC) interfaces, as well as "fast-path" packet forwarding between interfaces (with independently tested 119 million packets and 80 Gbit/s forwarding rate [3]). This unit targets the medium-sized network providers as well as try to be a well priced alternative to the other more well-known brands.
- PURE FANCRUFT SOURCED ONLY TO MIKOTIK WEBSITE
- MikroTik User Meeting (MUM)
The MUM is a conference and exhibition about networking, more targeted at MikroTik device users. Started as a regular gathering of forum users in January 2006, the events are now taking place every few weeks around the world, gathering hundreds of people at every event. The biggest event As of November 2015 [update] was in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, gathering 2650 people. [4]
- THE KEY LAST SENTENCE UNSOURCED; ENTIRELY PROMOTIONAL, "ARGUING" WITH THE SOURCED CONTENT
- Vulnerabilities
On June 15, 2015, Brian Krebs, an online reporter, reported that "recently, researchers at the Fujitsu Security Operations Center in Warrington, UK began tracking [the] Upatre [trojan software] being served from hundreds of compromised home routers – particularly routers powered by MikroTik and Ubiquiti’s AirOS." A vulnerability hasn't been linked with this incident and Bryan Campbell, the lead threat intelligence analyst at Fujitsu says while a vulnerability could exist, this could also be the result of unsecured devices that still have default credentials enabled. [5] additional citation(s) needed
References
Now... what was that about "the content is sourced" again? People talking here are not dealing with the actual article nor Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. "Unsourced" means that there is no reference - no citation provided, that the content is actually summarizing. The content here is just fancruft added by fans based on what they know about the company and its products. That is all it is. -- Jytdog ( talk) 23:36, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: |website=
ignored (
help)</ref>Diga-se de passagem, o que há de mais moderno em equipamentos para este seguimento, onde utilizaremos os rádios da Mikrotik.
Mikrotiky jsou velmi populární u poskytovatelů bezdrátového připojení a ohlasy od uživatelů jsou většinu kladné.
And don't forget the ridiculous laundry list of spammy ELs.
typing "mikrotic" into Google News and taking a cursory look at the numerous secondary sources present thereis an invalid argument at AfD. The requirement is very simple - a few actual RS with actual substantial discussion of the actual subject. Not handwaves. Jytdog ( talk) 01:58, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:53, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Not enough coverage exists to make this notable. The article was recreated in 2013 after being deleted in 2008, but the same problem persists. Tagged for not notable since 2015. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 00:58, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:53, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
The subject does not meet LISTN, the applicable notability guideline, and it likely runs afoul of RAWDATA as well. Rebb ing 02:41, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dog crossbreed. This is my first close of an AfD. If I got it wrong and I did a WP:BADNAC, please tell me and I will try not to fuck up second time round😄 (non-admin closure) !dave 09:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable dog hybrid TKK! bark with me! 18:53, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Floating cities and islands in fiction. Spartaz Humbug! 08:56, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Extremely crufty, barely referenced list of WP:OR popculture trivia. Doesn't even really distinguish between floating (on water) islands and floating (in the air) islands. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 17:44, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Papua New Guinea national rugby league team players. seems like a good compromise between lack of notability and possibility of being searched. ansh 666 07:55, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
I had placed a Speedy deletion tag on Alan Rero which SoWhy removed in good faith since the persona appears to be a player in the national team. I have placed a deletion notice for the second time as it can be good to be a player in the national team but that does not make published information about this automatically available and therefore does not mandate that the person needs a Wikipedia page. Wikipedia is not a primary source of information and I found a lack of reliable information about this person and therefore tagged the article for deletion. One may feel free to contest the deletion and add more reliable sources to the article. If that gets done, deletion would automatically get averted. Diptanshu 💬 15:50, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Note: I fixed this nomination and moved it since there was no first nomination. Regards So Why 15:55, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Merge discussion can be opened on article talk page if desired. ansh 666 07:55, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
A person who went to Newington College and then opened a Koala park. He does not appear to be notable as an academic. No disclosed research or equivalent Adsfvdf54gbb ( talk) 12:06, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies: ping me or message me for a restore if sources are located. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Per source searches, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. North America 1000 10:34, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 08:57, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
WP:BLP of an artist, with no evidence of reliable source coverage about him in media shown at all: the "references" here are entirely primary sources, such as a lecture he gave and unpublished interviews personally conducted by the creator of this article. However, Wikipedia requires sources to be published for proper verification that they actually say what they're claimed to have said, and nobody can ever be "sourced" by simply interviewing them personally or by listening to them give a speech -- so none of the sourcing here is acceptable, and nothing claimed in the text constitutes an automatic WP:NARTIST pass in the absence of any acceptable sourcing. Bearcat ( talk) 19:51, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Keep In addition to what 104.163.155.42 and Arthistorian1977 have stated about museum collections (per WP:ARTIST), I have found the following sources: Canadian Art, Times of India (brief but independent), tecnoartenews.com, mybindi.com, artdaily.org; and the following books: The Critical Vision: Selected Writings, A. S. Raman, 1993, Indian Contemporary Art: Post Independence, Vadehra Art Gallery (catalogue) 2010, Studies in Modern Indian Art: A Collection of Essays, Ratan Parimoo, 1975, Graphic Art in India Since 1850: An Exhibition, The Akademi (catalogue), 1985, Reimagining India: Unlocking the Potential of Asia’s Next Superpower edited by Clay Chandler, Adil Zainulbhai, 2013, P. Mansaram Galerie de Drie Hendricken, 1964 (appears to be a monograph). Some of these are mentions, others more substantial, but combined with the museum collections, other museum exhibitions (international) and the work with McLuhan (widely exhibited), this easily passes WP:GNG. freshacconci (✉) 17:08, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep after improvements. ansh 666 07:57, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Per source searches, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Not finding any significant coverage in various searches, just name checks in search results listing it as a publisher and minor passing mentions. North America 1000 09:43, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. I have discarded SPA votes which are mere assertions of notability. The keep argument that the products are notable therefore the company is do not overcome policy based voted based on notability standards for companies. Spartaz Humbug! 08:59, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
De-Prodded. WP:PROMO content of a startup company that lacks coverage for WP:CORPDEPTH. Most of the coverage is on the company's applications (most notably Facetune), and not on the company itself. Article creator also created articles for the new applications Enlight Photofox and Enlight Videoleap this month which I PRODed. Icewhiz ( talk) 08:37, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 02:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Source searches are only providing passing mentions, such as this and this. Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. North America 1000 11:35, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:23, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Upcoming film with no indication of notability yet. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:37, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to USC School of Cinematic Arts. As a side note, I took classes in this division during my time at USC :) ansh 666 07:58, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Sub-division of USC School of Cinematic Arts. I redirected but was reverted by an IP citing OTHERSTUFF, so taking it here. This is an academic division within a larger school within a university. The information is best contained within the school itself. Suggest redirect and merge from history. TonyBallioni ( talk) 19:37, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to Minnesota Fighting Pike. Very selective merge to parent article. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:23, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Team only played one year, content can be merged into Minnesota Fighting Pike. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 00:20, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:17, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:FOOTYN as well as WP:GNG. NikolaiHo ☎️ 00:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
He is a pro football player, he won the AFC Cup, which is an official, competitive soccer tournament contested between clubs in Asia
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 09:00, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Article fails notability. No references cited. Author has created many articles titled "Iraq national football team in <<year>>". None cite any sources. It is simply a score record, which doesn't belong on Wikipedia.
Note: If this article is deleted, the rest of the articles entitled "Iraq national football team in <<year>>" should be also deleted accordingly.
NikolaiHo
☎️
00:08, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:40, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Article about the victim of a crime, who otherwise is not notable, and the crime itself doesn't seem to be notable based on WP:EVENTS Emk9 ( talk) 02:00, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:40, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
removed prod, but none of the concerns was fixed- fundamentally doesn't meet WP:NSOFTWARE jcc ( tea and biscuits) 22:33, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello jcc, Rentier, K.e.coffman
The Gro CRM page I created is being considered for deletion. I read the concerns. I am in the process of updating the page further. Any suggestions or guidance would be very helpful. Thanks! Shanescott127 ( talk) 06:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC) Shanescott127 06:13, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:40, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
doesn't meet WP:NSOFTWARE ; a search for sources finds only PRWire articles which doesn't meet WP:CORPDEPTH. jcc ( tea and biscuits) 22:19, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 23:00, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
nothing has changed since January when this article was deleted at AfD, now a confirmed UPE sock has republished it, the same things apply- all provided sources are reprinted press releases not meeting WP:CORPDEPTH (a lot are venture funding reports), or from non-notable promotionalism only websites jcc ( tea and biscuits) 22:16, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete, G11 by DGG. (non-admin closure) !dave 10:29, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
non-notable, reviewing the sources we see that most are trivial mentions, republished press releases or in one instance, the CEO has offered their comment to a self published blog, showing that this company is fundamentally non-notable. jcc ( tea and biscuits) 22:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:41, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Almost-unsourced BLP. Has been PRODded before, and dePRODded in March 2017 with "Needs expansion but enough to work on". The only source is one which verifies that she is CEO of CEPR but adds no other info. The rest of the content was added, unsourced, when the article was created by an editor who has made 5 edits, 3 of them about this person. No indication of notability, no sources to support most of the article. No useful ghits found. If we remove the unsourced BLP content we are left with "is the CEO of CERP". A redirect to Centre for Economic Policy Research would be appropriate, as she is mentioned there in infobox. Pam D 21:08, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 08:24, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG without multiple independent sources covering the subject in detail. References are either human interest stories from a small media outlet, published by the church itself or a brief mention in an architectual magazine. TM 18:22, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Contested Prod - Non-notable MMA fighter does not meet WP:NMMA PRehse ( talk) 18:19, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep after improvements. ansh 666 07:32, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Delete: as non-notable musician. Quis separabit? 17:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:32, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Article on a non-notable marketer, commissioned from a paid editor. The article is based entirely on puff "profiles", interviews, advertorials and other low quality, non-independent sources. Searches turn up no significant coverage in independent sources. Melcous has cleaned up some of the more blatantly spammy text, but this is still a clear attempt to use Wikipedia for self-promotion. – Joe ( talk) 15:35, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
"Avijit Arya has to his credit testimonials accredited by the finest, attested to his exponential experience..."and
"Thus, his acute understanding of the entire industry and related verticals!". Clearly lacking the necessary in-depth, independent coverage in reliable, secondary sources to establish WP:Notability at this time. Snow let's rap 23:53, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:41, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Deletion per WP:ENT. The person is an actor, but does not meet the criteria for notability of actors. Being an actor does not make him inherently notable. Adotchar| reply here 15:35, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Second NAC close, feel free to revert if wrong... (non-admin closure) !dave 18:22, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Searches for this mostly bring up a different "declaration" involving the Japanese government, which seems to enjoy some notability; there are also a fair number of false hits on various things the NK government has "declared". This particular declaration seems to have no footprint outside a bunch of communist partys who have said that they signed it— and Pyongyang blowing its own horn. Mangoe ( talk) 15:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:42, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable restaurant. Article reads like an advertisement and the sources are routine for a restaurant. TM 14:21, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ansh 666 07:33, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Basic definition with no references. PROD was contested without comment. Argento Surfer ( talk) 14:18, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:33, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG. Coin945 ( talk) 10:27, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:34, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Album does not meet notability and only has references to iTunes and self-pub. Artist article was Prodded in August. There is a Forbes article [10] and some random blog article [11] but they are interviews. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 15:13, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:42, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
social networking site which has since ceased operations and moved to a new platform. Uhooep ( talk) 04:53, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus that the result of the previous AfD was correct. No need to relist this one a third time. ansh 666 21:20, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to be sufficiently INDEPENDENTLY notable to warrant its own article. FamblyCat94 ( talk) 00:32, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. No objection to recreation if notability is met after release of new album (or if he becomes notable some other way), but as of right now he doesn't. Let me know if anyone wants it restored to user or draft space. ansh 666 07:36, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Four previous versions have been deleted here and at Ski Mask The Slump God. I do not think that notability has yet been established. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 13:47, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
— 67.169.149.118 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
— 66.30.161.208 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was no consensus. ansh 666 07:37, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to be INDEPENDENTLY notable enough to warrant its own article. FamblyCat94 ( talk) 00:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ansh 666 07:37, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable Toypadlock ( talk) 17:19, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:37, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. The coverage appears to only be routine coverage and press releases. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 06:07, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Note that WP:AfD is not cleanup - the quality of the article has no bearing on the notability of the subject. ansh 666 07:40, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 06:40, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:42, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Looks like she is not quite yet notable beside Long Beach Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 13:11, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Israeli–Palestinian conflict. The Bushranger One ping only 01:40, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
There is no official definition of Israeli-Palestinian war and this disambiguation page does not add any meaningful information. Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 11:43, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ansh 666 07:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Article contains essentially no information not already present at It's a Wonderful Life. If the trivial "quotes" section necessitates a separate article, here it is - otherwise this should be redirected. Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 11:21, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
As for the argument that Clarence is an "iconic character", don't most iconic films have iconic characters? If this argument were to be accepted as correct, we would end up with separate articles for each of the main characters in almost every popular film. And most of them would look essentially like the one here -- little more than a duplication of material from the parent article. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 16:08, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks again for the comment. Have a happy holiday season. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 22:24, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was Stubify. There seems to be a strong consensus that what we have is not fit for purpose and a sense that the article is being used to exaggerate the importance of the subject. There is not quite a consensus to delete outright (I have ignored the SPAs) so I'm going to stubify this and ask that this be rewritten from the good sources only. After that we will be better placed to see if this article can stand up or not. If we have issues with SPAs and COI editors coming in to push the previous mess we can either move it to draft or have another discussion (hint if its go 2 and the pov pushing is continuing the community tends to delete and not exercise much AGF). Spartaz Humbug! 08:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Same problems as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Culture Pro Wrestling (in fact, it's the same promotion with other name). Most of the sources are from their own website (defiant wrestling or What Culture), their own youtube channel or Cagematch (which covers every wrestling event in the world). I don't see any third party sources enough to establish their notability. HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 10:42, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
I found these
Not sure if that's enough but they did get in some news for the YoutTube stuff. Again, it's not great. ★Trekker ( talk) 12:20, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
*Keep Passes
WP:GNG. --
TheCorageone1
Connect
15:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC) —
TheCorageone1 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
*Keep No delete, the article as reliable sources. -
RigaPietrev12
User talk:RigaPietrev12 comment added
15:43, 18 December 2017 (UTC) —
RigaPietrev12 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
*Keep The article as reliable sources and has a very good writting -
Spinarok15 comment added
16:06, 18 December 2017 (UTC) —
Spinarok15 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Found two more Crave articles here and here. Still, not sure if that helpes much. ★Trekker ( talk) 20:40, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability.There is no disputing that it has received some level of coverage as you stated above, the question becomes what qualifies as significant. In my opinion the article shows enough sources to meet this. - Galatz Talk 23:45, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:44, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
I do not believe this individual meets WP:GNG. No claims of notability are made in the article and the only mentions of this person that I can find are on social media. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 09:36, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:42, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:RLN and doesn't seem to meet the GNG Mattlore ( talk) 09:15, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NSPORT for rugby league. Papua New Guinea did not participate in the Pacific Cup in the 1980s), unsure why Fleets contested it. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 14:09, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:RLN and doesn't seem to meet the GNG Mattlore ( talk) 09:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus WP:NPASR. ansh 666 07:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Does this really need a separate article? The details can easily fit in the Self-tying shoes section. If it is to stay separate, then it should be added to the Nike navbox. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 01:09, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Not a notable term. The only reference is both promotional, and doesn't use the term. Google search results are for Live streaming software. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 02:21, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Software broadcasting is a way of delivering business software so that it can be accessed from anywhere, and on a subscription basis. This claim doesn't have any sources to support and verify it. The only case in which I have seen the words software and broadcasting used side by side (but not as a compound term) is in the content of discussing broadcasting (streaming) through software instead of tradition hardware based broadcasting.-- DreamLinker ( talk) 07:22, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus WP:NPASR. ansh 666 07:46, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
No reliable sources for the band HINDWIKI • CHAT 00:04, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete as expired WP:PROD. ansh 666 07:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBIO. Coverage in reliable sources not found. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 01:23, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
None of this has been published or anthologized by a major press, and I do not see any significant critical attention. DGG ( talk ) 08:47, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 08:43, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Lack of notability, and Promotionalism, trying to make it appear more important than it is. This is not even one of the Comprehensive Cancer Care Centers, the highest level in the US. The references consist on unspectacular placings of various lists--there is also a good deal of PRto be found in Google. DGG ( talk ) 00:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Keep' Most of the NCI-designated Cancer Centers have articles. Regardless of whether it's a Comprehensive Cancer Center, it's still one of the NCI-designated Cancer Centers, which represent approximately the top 4% of cancer centers in the country. The references show that it passes WP:ORG, and 11 of the 18 references are not affiliated with UVA. Natureium ( talk) 17:53, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTTRIVIA and WP:NOTTRAVEL. Prod removed by unreg user without citing any reason Ajf773 ( talk) 08:36, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable, edits by suspicious IP (promo) and no references. References on Google are marginally minor at best, if at all. Cahk ( talk) 08:33, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Every single bus route for one country. Fails WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:NOR as there is a distinct lack of sources. A list that is almost indiscriminate as well Ajf773 ( talk) 08:30, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
No notability. It was created by an account with only 3 edits and that too in this article. sami talk 08:26, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ansh 666 07:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
This article lacks a neutral point of view, it's full of mistakes and/or lies based on self-published sources. The most blatant one is the affirmation that she's one of the World's Top 10 bass players, totally made up by her or her manager. This is the original source: http://www.notreble.com/buzz/2011/12/26/top-ten-bass-not-bass-discussion-new-signature-basses-and-gear-plus-the-top-videos-columns-of-the-week/ and it only says that her video was the 7th most popular article on that blog on that week. Any other interpretation is invalid and all the other references prove nothing, as they have not been verified. Also, I find the article generally poorly written, exaggerating her achievements and her picture is copyrighted. Stevialover ( talk) 07:53, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
{{
not in citation}}
tag next to the statement so as to alert other editors, but don't just open AfDfor such cases –
Ammarpad (
talk)
12:51, 21 December 2017 (UTC)The result was merge to W. Christopher Winter. ansh 666 07:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. No references. NikolaiHo ☎️ 05:31, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
I see no indication that this single mayoral election in a mid-size city is specifically notable in any way that would mean it needs its own individual article. There's no parent article like Mayoral elections in Sanjo to merge & redirect or I'd do that. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:24, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by Bbb23 per CSD G5 (Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 01:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; individual remains only "Wikipedia-notable" with respect to one event. Previously deleted per discussion; I don't have access to the prior version to assess the level of change. (Also, note that the changes to the prior AFD discussion arise from an issue with the new-page curation toolbar; I am reporting at the village pump.) Julietdeltalima (talk) 21:35, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Air India, SpiceJet, Cleartrip, Mobikwik & Faasos were the only companies I ever corresponded with. Never informed the rest of them about any Loopholes. For the same reason, I never mentioned any technical details in this article. Compromised list may still include some E-commerce websites, Home services, Travel agencies, Educational Institutions, Government applications, etc" Hagennos ( talk) 23:28, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
An article shouldn't be deleted just because it "SEEMS" to be something. A simple Google search will show-up numerous media outlets covering him(exclusively or otherwise). The subject's profession is that of a Security researcher, who publishes his findings through a blog. So, obviously his media coverage would also involve parts of his written research. Thus, references can't be said to be sourced from the Individual himself. Also, If the article seems to be promotional, Wikipedia suggests someone re-editing the article rather than completely removing it.
The user Hagennos( talk) has quoted the subject from his last blog(for reasons not known). Here is his statement from the latest Inteview " Right now, I’m doing some security research & upgrading my skills in the InfoSec domain. My upcoming blogs will hopefully make some positive impact on the Industry. Also, some market research for a potential product may be in the timeline." Nexa9911 ( talk) 07:47, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Comment At first there was an issue with the notability. Now, the article is being said to be promo. Is wikipedia full of deletionsists or what? Nexa9911 ( talk) 05:38, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:44, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
I've been trying to find better sourcing for this article since I came across it (I don't remember exactly why, but somehow I ended up at it). I did some minor cleanup, etc. and have asked for the opinions of others at User:Oshwah/TalkPageArchives/2017-12#Blake Ricciardi, WT:BIOG#Blake Ricciardi, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Business#Blake Ricciardi, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject California#Blake Ricciardi and WT:FASH#Blake Ricciardi. There's been no response from anyone at the relevant WikiProjects and the only other suggestions I received was the subject of the article in not likely Wikipedia notable. I can find anything which shows how this person meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG; I'm finding the this person does exist, but most of the mentions are from primary sources or trivia in nature. If there7s some Wikiproject notability guideline that this person meets, then fine and the article then might be worth keeping; otherwise, I think it should be deleted. I've also looked for a possible way to redirect or merge the article, but I cannot find any good candidates for such a thing -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:33, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:44, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Despite the claim on the talk page that this is a legitimate term used in science, I can't find the slightest indication that that is the case. I have searched: Google, GScholar, PubMed, the Animal Biosciences section of Annual Reviews, Science Magazine & its related publications, ScienceDirect, and World Scientific and haven't come up with so much as a single hit even using this term, let alone describing it in an in-depth fashion. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:22, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
References
The result was redirect to PDC World Darts Championship. ansh 666 07:49, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. No sources and no evidence of any of the information added to this former redirect. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 04:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:49, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Stub that fails WP:NCOMPANY, WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES, see also WP:CORPSPAM. Previously prodded by User:Atlantic306, did not improve much since. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:36, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 04:19, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Renata3 with the following rationale "Fortune 1000 company traded on NYSE". Long ago I used to think that being listed at a stock exchange suffices, but this was not accepted as part of WP:NCORP, so we need better keep arguments - and I am not seeing any serious coverage outside the usual smattering of business directory entries and press releases. As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:44, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The article notes that New Jersey Resources was ranked 672 on the Fortune 1000 and had $3,738,000,000 in revenue and $142,000,000 in profit.
The article notes:
New Jersey Resources Corp., parent of New Jersey Natural Gas Co., supplies some 330,000 customers throughout Monmouth, Ocean, Morris and Middlesex counties. But in recent years, the company has looked well beyond those horizons to increase sales.
Since 1991, the Wall Township-based utility holding company has sold more than 33 billion cubic feet of gas to customers in six states outside of New Jersey.
...
"Life here truly is, and should be, an efficient load factor," remarked Oliver G. Richard 3d, chairman and chief executive officer of New Jersey Resources.
...
As a holding company, New Jersey Natural has long looked beyond its regular utility business for growth. Trying to diversify in years past, New Jersey Resources already has a number of unregulated ventures, including Paradigm Power Inc., which invests in natural gas-fueled cogeneration and independent power projects; Commercial Realty & Resources Corp., which develops commercial real estate; and NJR Energy Corp., which engages in energy-related investments.
While results from the diversified businesses have been mixed, the company has had more success selling gas in unregulated markets. In 1991, virtually all of the company's sales were to core residential and commercial customers. By 1992, the company sold 11.8 billion cubic feet in off-system sales outside the state. Last year, those sales jumped to 21 billion cubic feet.
The article notes:
It has been a good run for utility stocks the past three years. The sector is up 23 percent during that time frame and one of the steadiest performing players has been New Jersey Resources.
The Wall Township-based owner of New Jersey Natural Gas, which provides gas to 450,000 customers in central Jersey, is heading for its 14th consecutive year of earnings growth, one of the longest streaks in the sector.
...
In a research report, Morningstar.com analyst John Kearney said New Jersey Resources "exemplifies the stability and consistency that risk-averse, income-oriented investors look for." The company also benefits from a good relationship with regulators - an affinity it enjoys largely as a result of not having sought a rate increase for its delivery costs in 10 years.
The article notes:
In an unusual takeover battle between two New Jersey utility companies, the NUI Corporation says it will continue its attempt to merge with the larger New Jersey Resources Corporation despite a lopsided defeat in a proxy battle.
The defeat is expected to be confirmed at a shareholders' meeting Tuesday of New Jersey Resources, which delivers natural gas to 220,000 customers in Monmouth and Ocean Counties and parts of Morris and Middlesex Counties.
...
At the Feb. 2 annual meeting of New Jersey Resources, NUI sought to place on the company's board its own slate of candidates, who would support the merger. Both utilities resorted to an unusual amount of publicity for companies their size, including radio spots and full-page ads in the financial sections of The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal.
The article notes:
New Jersey Resources Corp. is considering a combination with South Jersey Industries Inc., a deal that would bring together two natural-gas utilities in the state, according to people familiar with the matter.
Details of the talks couldn’t be learned and it is possible that there won’t be a deal. As of Tuesday morning, New Jersey Resources had a market value of $3.4 billion. South Jersey Industries was valued at $2.8 billion.
New Jersey Resources, based in Wall, N.J., provides natural gas and other services to homes and businesses from the Gulf Coast to Canada, according to its website. It is the parent company of New Jersey Natural Gas, which serves more than 486,000 customers in Monmouth, Ocean, Middlesex, Morris and Burlington counties. New Jersey Resources also operates a 6,700 mile natural-gas transportation and distribution network serving almost 500,000 customers, according to the website.
The article notes:
New Jersey Natural Gas -- which serves approximately 512,000 customers in Monmouth and Ocean counties, portions of Burlington, Middlesex, and Morris counties, and one borough in Sussex County --requested in November 2015 a 24-percent rate increase, or a $21.69 uptick in an average customer's monthly bill
...
Kinney said executive compensation and returns on investments derive from the entirety of New Jersey Resources, the parent company of NJNG, which has several subsidiaries that reach customers outside the Garden State.
...
From 2008 through 2015, the company has seen its customer base grow by 1.5 percent annually, and has already invested approximately $806 million in its natural-gas transmission and distribution system.
The article notes:
None of that has deterred Laurence Downes, an unflappable and soft-spoken executive who for the past 10 years has led New Jersey Resources, a natural gas company with $2.5 billion in revenue last year.
...
Downes is fond of telling audiences the company - the owner of the state's second-largest gas utility, New Jersey Natural Gas - is one of the fastest-growing local gas distribution businesses in the country. Shareholders who invested $1,000 in NJR in 1952 have seen their investment grow to more than $800,000 today, he is quick to point out.
New Jersey Natural Gas, which has 455,000 customers in Monmouth and Ocean counties, accounts for about 80 percent of the parent company's earnings. And yet the utility has not raised the rates it charges to deliver gas to residents and businesses for more than a decade.
...
Downes came to New Jersey Resources in 1985 after working on utility bonds at a bank, a job he came to enjoy.
The article notes:
The management of New Jersey Natural Gas Co. has come under sharp criticism by state regulators over the company's steadily rising gas costs in the wake of a new request for higher rates.
The Board of Regulatory Commissioners (BRC) this week called for changes in the utility's management structure. The board said the company's gas costs have gone from the lowest in the state in 1985 to the highest of the four natural gas utilities serving New Jersey, and wants the company to explain why rates are climbing. The Wall Township-based company serves 325,000 customers in Monmouth, Ocean, Morris and Middlesex counties.
...
New Jersey Natural is organized under a parent holding company, New Jersey Resources Corp., which was formed to allow the company to diversify into a number of unregulated, non-utility businesses. But while New Jersey Resources has several subsidiaries involved in energy, cogeneration and real estate ventures, the overwhelming bulk of revenue and income comes from the utility.
The article notes:
...local mayors and officials who gathered Wednesday morning to speak out against the 24-percent rate hike proposed by New Jersey Natural Gas. As reported by NJ Advance Media, the utility company that serves half a million people mainly in Ocean and Monmouth counties proposed the steep increase as its top executives have seen their overall compensation skyrocket in recent years.
New Jersey Natural Gas says the rate increase is its first since 2007, and is necessary to mend its ailing infrastructure. It also contends its uptick in executive compensation has no impact on the rate increase.
...
A NJNG spokesman, Michael Kinney, said executive compensation and return on investments derive from the entirety of New Jersey Resources, the parent company of NJNG, which has several subsidiaries that provide other services.
In 2016, it served half a million people. A 2016 article noted the company was harshly criticized for a proposed 24% rate hike. The company has received sustained coverage between 1984 and 2016. It clearly passes Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline and Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies).
The result was redirect to Diving plane#Cars. ansh 666 07:50, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Glorified dicdef. Untouched since 2006. Probably easier to nuke and start again, with content merged into a larger-scoped article. Coin945 ( talk) 05:27, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ansh 666 07:50, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Contested Prod - no indication of notability - primarily an advertisement for a new product PRehse ( talk) 12:03, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:50, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2014, never fixed. Cited sources do not meet the trifecta of reliable, independent, secondary. Mostly self-published. The creator of the article believes it is NPOV, but since he's involved with the product I don't feel inclined to accept his view on that. Guy ( Help!) 12:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete as expired WP:PROD. ansh 666 07:50, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Notability. Coverage is that to be expected of a bloke doing this sort of job. TheLongTone ( talk) 13:33, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:SOFTDEL as the equivalent of an uncontested PROD; WP:REFUND applies. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 05:42, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Business exec with not enough sources for GNG. Sources in article are passing mentions, job appointments, and 1 interview. BEFORE doesn't yield much more. Icewhiz ( talk) 14:13, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 08:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
The article, as written here, is self-contradictory. It says he was from the 3rd tannaitic generation (significantly after the destruction of thre second temple) and that he was appointed High Priest 27-25 years before the destruction of the second temple. Looks like a bad translation of the Hebrew article at the time it was written; the edit summary of the very next edit there is that the article needs to be checked by an expert. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:26, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Section 51(i) of the Constitution of Australia. If we are going to merge we really need to have some sourced content to merge otherwise its a simply OR. Spartaz Humbug! 08:46, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Does this not just state a clause, rather than explaining any of its historical significance or anything like that? I don't even think a clause is notable unless in extreme circumstances. Its content is covered by Section 51(i) of the Constitution of Australia . As a sidenote it's been unsourced since 2006. Coin945 ( talk) 10:43, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Despite numerous arguments that sources exist and references to google searches the Keep side have not actually brought specific sources for discussion. The nature of the sourcing has been discussed in detail and its significant that the final 4 votes who all had the benefit of reading the whole discussion and clearly show their own search for sources come down to a firm delete. That's not to say that a sourced article couldn't get written if the sourcing is clarified. On that basis while its a delete, I see no reason to see permission to have another go at this from scratch if someone wants to take this on. Spartaz Humbug! 08:53, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Page is pure fancruft - almost all unsourced and what sources are used are SPS and including the fancruft-signatures of a ridiculous list of ELs and picture gallery. Barely passed AFD in 2008 and has not developed since. Would need to be completely rewritten to make an encyclopedic article out of this. Jytdog ( talk) 23:56, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Here, I is will paste it here for you.
;NO SOURCES IN THE SECTION BELOW
- RouterOS
The main product of MikroTik is an operating system based on the Linux kernel, known as the MikroTik RouterOS. Installed on the company's proprietary hardware (RouterBOARD series), or on standard x86-based computers, it turns a computer into a network router and implements various additional features, such as firewalling, virtual private network (VPN) service and client, [1] bandwidth shaping and quality of service, wireless access point functions and other commonly used features when interconnecting networks. The system is also able to serve as a captive-portal-based hotspot system.
The operating system is licensed in increasing service levels, each releasing more of the available RouterOS features. A MS Windows application called Winbox provides a graphical user interface for the RouterOS configuration and monitoring, but RouterOS also allows access via FTP, telnet, and secure shell (SSH). An application programming interface is available for direct access from applications for management and monitoring.
- NO SOURCES IN THE SECTION BELOW
- Features
RouterOS supports many applications used by Internet service providers, for example OSPF, BGP, Multiprotocol Label Switching (VPLS/MPLS), OpenFlow. The product is supported by Mikrotik through a forum and a wiki, providing assorted and thematic examples of configurations. RouterOS supports Internet Protocol Version 4 (IPv4) as well as Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6).
The software provides support for virtually all network interfaces that the Linux kernel 3.3.5 supports, except wireless, where the Atheros chipsets are the only supported hardware, as of RouterOS version 6.33.
- ONE SOURCE IN THE SECTION BELOW
- Release history
- RouterOS version 6: May 2013 [2]
- RouterOS version 6.38 (December 30, 2016
)- RouterOS version 5: March 2010
- RouterOS version 4: October 2009
- RouterOS version 3: January 2008
- ONLY SPAM REFS TO MICROTEK AND ONLY IN THE LAST SENTENCE IN THE SECTION BELOW
- RouterBOARD
The company manufactures a series of integrated circuit boards, marketed under the name RouterBOARD, as well as accessory components which implement a complete hardware operating platform for RouterOS.
The RouterBOARD line, combined with RouterOS, is marketed at small- to medium-sized wireless Internet service providers, typically providing broadband wireless access in remote areas. Products include pre-assembled small office/home office (SOHO) routers, wireless 802.11a/b/g/n/ac MIMO and TDMA devices for indoor and outdoor use, and also bare routers in form of printed circuit boards (PCBs) for integration into custom solutions. Also, the RouterBOARD line includes a series of Mini PCI and Mini PCI Express wireless adapters, supporting a range of IEEE 802.11 protocols, and designed to be used together with the router boards lineup.
Some RouterBOARD boards and their versions are supported by third-party Linux-based firmware, notably OpenWrt.[6][7][8][9][10]
- ALMOST NOTHING BELOW IS ACTUALLY IN THE REF GIVEN AND THE LAST SENTENCE IS UNSOURCED
- Cloud Core Router
In November 2012, MikroTik released the Cloud Core Router integrated unit which is based on the Tilera CPU supporting nine to 72 CPU cores, 8 SFP+ ( MiniGBIC) interfaces, as well as "fast-path" packet forwarding between interfaces (with independently tested 119 million packets and 80 Gbit/s forwarding rate [3]). This unit targets the medium-sized network providers as well as try to be a well priced alternative to the other more well-known brands.
- PURE FANCRUFT SOURCED ONLY TO MIKOTIK WEBSITE
- MikroTik User Meeting (MUM)
The MUM is a conference and exhibition about networking, more targeted at MikroTik device users. Started as a regular gathering of forum users in January 2006, the events are now taking place every few weeks around the world, gathering hundreds of people at every event. The biggest event As of November 2015 [update] was in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, gathering 2650 people. [4]
- THE KEY LAST SENTENCE UNSOURCED; ENTIRELY PROMOTIONAL, "ARGUING" WITH THE SOURCED CONTENT
- Vulnerabilities
On June 15, 2015, Brian Krebs, an online reporter, reported that "recently, researchers at the Fujitsu Security Operations Center in Warrington, UK began tracking [the] Upatre [trojan software] being served from hundreds of compromised home routers – particularly routers powered by MikroTik and Ubiquiti’s AirOS." A vulnerability hasn't been linked with this incident and Bryan Campbell, the lead threat intelligence analyst at Fujitsu says while a vulnerability could exist, this could also be the result of unsecured devices that still have default credentials enabled. [5] additional citation(s) needed
References
Now... what was that about "the content is sourced" again? People talking here are not dealing with the actual article nor Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. "Unsourced" means that there is no reference - no citation provided, that the content is actually summarizing. The content here is just fancruft added by fans based on what they know about the company and its products. That is all it is. -- Jytdog ( talk) 23:36, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: |website=
ignored (
help)</ref>Diga-se de passagem, o que há de mais moderno em equipamentos para este seguimento, onde utilizaremos os rádios da Mikrotik.
Mikrotiky jsou velmi populární u poskytovatelů bezdrátového připojení a ohlasy od uživatelů jsou většinu kladné.
And don't forget the ridiculous laundry list of spammy ELs.
typing "mikrotic" into Google News and taking a cursory look at the numerous secondary sources present thereis an invalid argument at AfD. The requirement is very simple - a few actual RS with actual substantial discussion of the actual subject. Not handwaves. Jytdog ( talk) 01:58, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:53, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Not enough coverage exists to make this notable. The article was recreated in 2013 after being deleted in 2008, but the same problem persists. Tagged for not notable since 2015. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 00:58, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:53, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
The subject does not meet LISTN, the applicable notability guideline, and it likely runs afoul of RAWDATA as well. Rebb ing 02:41, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dog crossbreed. This is my first close of an AfD. If I got it wrong and I did a WP:BADNAC, please tell me and I will try not to fuck up second time round😄 (non-admin closure) !dave 09:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable dog hybrid TKK! bark with me! 18:53, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Floating cities and islands in fiction. Spartaz Humbug! 08:56, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Extremely crufty, barely referenced list of WP:OR popculture trivia. Doesn't even really distinguish between floating (on water) islands and floating (in the air) islands. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 17:44, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Papua New Guinea national rugby league team players. seems like a good compromise between lack of notability and possibility of being searched. ansh 666 07:55, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
I had placed a Speedy deletion tag on Alan Rero which SoWhy removed in good faith since the persona appears to be a player in the national team. I have placed a deletion notice for the second time as it can be good to be a player in the national team but that does not make published information about this automatically available and therefore does not mandate that the person needs a Wikipedia page. Wikipedia is not a primary source of information and I found a lack of reliable information about this person and therefore tagged the article for deletion. One may feel free to contest the deletion and add more reliable sources to the article. If that gets done, deletion would automatically get averted. Diptanshu 💬 15:50, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Note: I fixed this nomination and moved it since there was no first nomination. Regards So Why 15:55, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Merge discussion can be opened on article talk page if desired. ansh 666 07:55, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
A person who went to Newington College and then opened a Koala park. He does not appear to be notable as an academic. No disclosed research or equivalent Adsfvdf54gbb ( talk) 12:06, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies: ping me or message me for a restore if sources are located. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Per source searches, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. North America 1000 10:34, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 08:57, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
WP:BLP of an artist, with no evidence of reliable source coverage about him in media shown at all: the "references" here are entirely primary sources, such as a lecture he gave and unpublished interviews personally conducted by the creator of this article. However, Wikipedia requires sources to be published for proper verification that they actually say what they're claimed to have said, and nobody can ever be "sourced" by simply interviewing them personally or by listening to them give a speech -- so none of the sourcing here is acceptable, and nothing claimed in the text constitutes an automatic WP:NARTIST pass in the absence of any acceptable sourcing. Bearcat ( talk) 19:51, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Keep In addition to what 104.163.155.42 and Arthistorian1977 have stated about museum collections (per WP:ARTIST), I have found the following sources: Canadian Art, Times of India (brief but independent), tecnoartenews.com, mybindi.com, artdaily.org; and the following books: The Critical Vision: Selected Writings, A. S. Raman, 1993, Indian Contemporary Art: Post Independence, Vadehra Art Gallery (catalogue) 2010, Studies in Modern Indian Art: A Collection of Essays, Ratan Parimoo, 1975, Graphic Art in India Since 1850: An Exhibition, The Akademi (catalogue), 1985, Reimagining India: Unlocking the Potential of Asia’s Next Superpower edited by Clay Chandler, Adil Zainulbhai, 2013, P. Mansaram Galerie de Drie Hendricken, 1964 (appears to be a monograph). Some of these are mentions, others more substantial, but combined with the museum collections, other museum exhibitions (international) and the work with McLuhan (widely exhibited), this easily passes WP:GNG. freshacconci (✉) 17:08, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep after improvements. ansh 666 07:57, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Per source searches, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Not finding any significant coverage in various searches, just name checks in search results listing it as a publisher and minor passing mentions. North America 1000 09:43, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. I have discarded SPA votes which are mere assertions of notability. The keep argument that the products are notable therefore the company is do not overcome policy based voted based on notability standards for companies. Spartaz Humbug! 08:59, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
De-Prodded. WP:PROMO content of a startup company that lacks coverage for WP:CORPDEPTH. Most of the coverage is on the company's applications (most notably Facetune), and not on the company itself. Article creator also created articles for the new applications Enlight Photofox and Enlight Videoleap this month which I PRODed. Icewhiz ( talk) 08:37, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 02:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Source searches are only providing passing mentions, such as this and this. Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. North America 1000 11:35, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:23, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Upcoming film with no indication of notability yet. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:37, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to USC School of Cinematic Arts. As a side note, I took classes in this division during my time at USC :) ansh 666 07:58, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Sub-division of USC School of Cinematic Arts. I redirected but was reverted by an IP citing OTHERSTUFF, so taking it here. This is an academic division within a larger school within a university. The information is best contained within the school itself. Suggest redirect and merge from history. TonyBallioni ( talk) 19:37, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to Minnesota Fighting Pike. Very selective merge to parent article. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:23, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Team only played one year, content can be merged into Minnesota Fighting Pike. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 00:20, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:17, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:FOOTYN as well as WP:GNG. NikolaiHo ☎️ 00:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
He is a pro football player, he won the AFC Cup, which is an official, competitive soccer tournament contested between clubs in Asia
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 09:00, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Article fails notability. No references cited. Author has created many articles titled "Iraq national football team in <<year>>". None cite any sources. It is simply a score record, which doesn't belong on Wikipedia.
Note: If this article is deleted, the rest of the articles entitled "Iraq national football team in <<year>>" should be also deleted accordingly.
NikolaiHo
☎️
00:08, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:40, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Article about the victim of a crime, who otherwise is not notable, and the crime itself doesn't seem to be notable based on WP:EVENTS Emk9 ( talk) 02:00, 18 December 2017 (UTC)