![]() |
The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America 1000 01:57, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Not a notable person. An article apparently first written by the subject, and the talk page seems clear that the page's justification has never been better than really iffy. TheWhangdepootenawah ( talk) 22:48, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
That is, the reviewer makes clear that Hall is just a random YouTube nut chosen for illustrative purposes and then immediately dismissed. I don't see that as doing much of anything to establish Hall's notability. It's a two-sentence aside at best about someone who otherwise never made the Washington Post in any other context, as far as Google can determine. TheWhangdepootenawah ( talk) 12:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)One doesn't doubt that. But is he [i.e. the documentarian whose work is being reviewed] a sufficient witness? Does the sympathy for soldiers generated by the grunt film create an implicit, self-perpetuating argument for the war? Junger has been confronted with these questions, in reviews and in person, while promoting the film and his accompanying book, "War." In one such confrontation, available on YouTube, an angry and vociferous conspiracy theorist identified as Anthony J. Hall calls Junger's work "classic propaganda," deriding it as "all about the human interest stories of our boys . . . " This is unfair to Junger, and may be just another atavistic return of the old failure to distinguish between antiwar sentiment and hostility to the troops themselves.
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:11, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
No real reliable sources, or much indication of notability when looking closely, article obviously written by the subject Jac16888 Talk 22:17, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Riot Fest. No need for further discussion as deletion is not requested, and this should have earlier been speedy closed on that basis. Any merging from the history can occur through normal processes. postdlf ( talk) 16:30, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Overlaps and should merge with Riot Fest Rathfelder ( talk) 21:44, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. North America 1000 00:36, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
This is a definition, at best, but
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. And there is
already a definition in Wiktionary.
Geoff |
Who, me?
21:39, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:10, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Standard directory style promotional stub created by a declared paid contributor (in accordance with the TOU). Despite the TOU compliance, the firm does not meet local en.Wiki policies and guidelines towards inclusion, namely it does not meet the general guideline in WP:N when read in light of the guidelines in WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:SPIP. Sourcing is your standard PR stuff: TechCrunch and the like: coverage is pretty clearly lacking in intellectual independence thus making it fail our inclusion criteria. TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 12:52, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Since 2015, this film does not got any significant coverage rather trailers and posters. No any further source claims its releasing even. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 07:37, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:10, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Article subject is not notable and article contains many unsourced claims about him. Sfeldman ( talk) 18:46, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:10, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
WP:GNG tells us that "a series of publications ... in the same periodical is normally counted as one source." That would give the article two sources, both local news organizations. Searches of the usual "find sources" types found little else, only one namecheck. [1]. Two sources is multiple, but one would expect a notable director to have attracted considerably wider and more frequent attention.
The sources fail WP:SIGCOV. It has only been possible to squeeze out of them two sentences about his career. The first film, on which he was co-producer and member of the shoestring crew (but not director) made so little impact that not even a ripple is left. The second film was "due to be released early [2016]", but there's no evidence it was released, or even that production has begun. One would expect much more information to be available about a notable director.
Based on the available sources, the subject is not "worthy of note", "remarkable", or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" at this stage of his career. Worldbruce ( talk) 17:21, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete the current article as it is a BLP containing no references, it would have been eligible for WP:BLPPROD. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 12:55, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
This is an unsourced BLP stub from 2009. Subject authored a single pop/juvenile book 10 years ago that has average holdings according to WorldCat. Info is all OR. Agricola44 ( talk) 21:06, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:10, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
A non notable actress. Fails WP:ACTOR, and WP:GNG. The only coverage found fails WP:SIGCOV, it is from the websites that provide photos/wallpapers. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:11, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
A non notable poet/lyricist. Fails WP:AUTHOR, and WP:GNG. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:26, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Power~enwiki ( talk) 01:21, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
I request deletion of 29 short stub articles on topics of NRHP-listed places in Jerome County, Idaho, because it would be better to have them appear as redlinks encouraging new editors to create articles on these topics if/when they have time and resources to actually develop the topics. As noted at wp:REDLINKS, good redlinks help Wikipedia grow. Currently the articles are traps for readers who might follow a bluelink to the topic, only to find no substantial content. These are all 29 "NRIS-only" stub articles in Idaho, after I and other editors have expanded all other ones previously in the category. I am usually an inclusionist in AFD voting, and I have created and expanded many NRHP articles myself, and I have even been criticized for my own short stub articles, so it is very unusual for me to be nominating this batch. However these are different:
-- do ncr am 20:07, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The articles to be deleted are:
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:11, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
No reliable sources. MTV source doesn't mention the phrase and the other source is a blog with reader submissions. Nothing on google to make it anything more than an obscure niche term. Nothing in the article is sourced. Follows user's pattern of making articles about made up music genres. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 19:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 06:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:BAND ( ghits). Also note the clear WP:COI undertones in the way the band is described. DrStrauss talk 19:27, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Note that WP:POLOUTCOMES is an essay, and not policy. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:13, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Some coverage, but not significant. Boleyn ( talk) 19:05, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 07:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't pass WP:NACTRESS. No coverage in reliable third-party sources outside of passing mentions. menaechmi ( talk) 19:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 02:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 19:03, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:09, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Does not seem to meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 18:57, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
for instance. Largoplazo ( talk) 22:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 19:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet
WP:NPOL or
WP:GNG.
Boleyn (
talk)
18:55, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:14, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NOTE standards. Sources mostly refer to events the organization has hosted, but do not comment on the significance of the subject of this article or to his organization. Additionally, this article has been deleted before, and both times the article has been created by a paid contributor. PureRED | talk to me | 18:43, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete ( A7). Huon ( talk) 21:13, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
No significant coverage in independent, reliable media sources. Appears to be a standard businessman who fails biographical notability standards. DrStrauss talk 18:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy Delete under WP:G11. (non-admin closure) MassiveYR ♠ 11:55, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Prod contested by article creator. shoy ( reactions) 18:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:14, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Not notable, barely a list, untouched since 2009. Prod and prod-2 removed without comment. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 18:20, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Haji Mohammad Danesh. (non-admin closure) Power~enwiki ( talk) 01:26, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
I couldn't verify that he meets WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. No sources at all in article. Boleyn ( talk) 17:21, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. One person argued to keep, but failed to supply any policy-based reasons. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:10, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Mayors aren't unherently notable, local coverage - doesn't meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 17:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:15, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
I don't think he quite meets WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Article is written by the subject's son, references are not convincing. Boleyn ( talk) 17:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:20, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACADEMIC, and WP:ANYBIO. Also fails WP:GNG. —usernamekiran (talk) 16:03, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 02:44, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
No claims of notability, no substantive coverable in reliable sources, fails WP:GNG Rogermx ( talk) 15:38, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 06:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Not notable golf course. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:48, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:07, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable singer lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. reddogsix ( talk) 14:32, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:12, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Does not meet notability : reference points to amazon, flipkart and the other links does not portray any notability, the only link which it mentions is link from the publisher of the book Shrikanthv ( talk) 14:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Where do you see flipkart in it?? Shrikanthv. Cant you see News18, Swarajya Magazine, Independent News Service (INS), Business Stadard as the references? The article has been tried to brought to speedy deletion Unnecessarily and intentionally . Royaal ( talk) 08:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
I can't find evidence for notability. It's been tagged for notability for over 7 years. Doug Weller talk 14:07, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:16, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Only ref provided is a trivial mention. Google search turns up Facebook, Twitter, a Kickstarter account, and a number of self-published items. Google Books turns up what looks like only one hit, and it is also a trivial mention. Google News hits are only another list of trivial mentions.Subject does not appear to meet the requirements set out in WP:ACTOR. No awards, no significant coverage in published reliable independent verifiable secondary sources. Article creator's account has been blocked for copyright violations as well as abusing multiple accounts. KDS4444 ( talk) Note: This user has admitted participating in paid editing, though he has no COI with regard to this article at all.] 14:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 11:05, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NORG. No claim of notability, no national or regional media coverage, small organization. Rogermx ( talk) 15:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy redirect to Hugo Award for Best Fan Artist. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Redirect to Hugo Award for Best Fan Artist. No biographical information besides the statement that she won an amateur genre-specific writing contest. Analogous to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abigail Nussbaum. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 15:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:16, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Delete: as insufficiently notable actress. Quis separabit? 15:22, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Delete I found out that the married Eileen ran off with her hairdresser, but not much else. Does not seem that any of her film roles were really significant. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2455499/Minder-star-George-Coles-anguish-daughter-turned-him.html. Rogermx ( talk) 15:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:17, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
This article has been essentially unsourced since it was created by a user who looks a lot like a paid editor. My searches for sources turned up this in Noisey but nothing else that would suggest WP:NMUSIC or WP:BIO are met. SmartSE ( talk) 14:42, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:19, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
I've examined the sources cited and made my own searches but have not found in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. Neither WP:NARTIST or WP:BIO appear to be met. SmartSE ( talk) 14:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 06:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG/ WP:BIO, promotional tone. Kleuske ( talk) 13:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:29, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Ineligible for PROD due to being PROD'd and then dePROD'd in 2009.
Non-notable software. Creator clearly had a COI - they also created Axiom software inc, which was swiftly A7'd after creation. Fails WP:GNG & WP:NSOFT. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 06:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Lots of promotional fluff; one of the sources states that it's a "promotional tool." Nothing that indicates the band meets WP:NBAND. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:26, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 03:43, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBOX and there's not enough coverage to pass WP:GNG (other than this interview from a few years back). JTtheOG ( talk) 03:16, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG. Major rewriter ( User:EngiZe blocked for adding spam). The Banner talk 10:00, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:08, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. A tag has been on for 8 months and nothing has been added to help prove notability. The only independent source is the BBC one which is about a book that won an award and not the awards themselves. All the other sources are from the winners of this award so absolutely not independent. Domdeparis ( talk) 09:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 06:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails General Notability and Reliable Source. Non notable individual. Zazzysa ( talk) 09:19, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted under WP:G4. (non-admin closure) MassiveYR ♠ 17:34, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:MUSICBIO/GNG. Already deleted once. South Nashua ( talk) 09:05, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 12:16, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:ARTIST/GNG South Nashua ( talk) 09:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Fort Bragg Game. (non-admin closure) f e minist 13:24, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Not a notable sporting venue. The stadium was temporary, built for one game. It's the game ( Fort Bragg Game) that has enduring notability, not the venue. All information on the venue is on the game's page. – Muboshgu ( talk) 18:57, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) J 947( c) ( m) 06:28, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Previously deleted. Some assertations of notability, but all the charts mentioned are on WP:BADCHARTS (Australian Country Tracks). The awards won do not seem to be notable either per WP:BAND. Article is also very promotional in tone. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 06:15, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Please nominate at RfD. (non-admin closure) J 947( c) ( m) 18:47, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
No apparent connection to known target(s). Homechallenge55 ( talk) 05:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:21, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable local law firm. Has run-of-the-mill coverage. Inclusion in Wikipedia is promotional rather than encyclopedic.
Already speedy-deleted once, and resubmitted. Robert McClenon ( talk) 05:43, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:22, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Reliable sources do not talk about this company in-depth and most news hits are press releases. Also, COI/paid editing issues exist. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retained blood syndrome, which is related to this. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 05:13, 30 August 2017 (UTC)(edited to add other AFD 05:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC))
The result was snow delete. This is the absolute embodiment of spam; nobody other than the nom has suggested a single reason to save it, or provided a single example of a legitimate article using the term. I have no objections if those claiming it's a plausible search term want to create a redirect to something that's actually neutral, or at least salvageable. ‑ Iridescent 17:39, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Semi-procedural nomination. This was tagged for G11 deletion, which I declined. While there are obvious COI problems, legitimate scientific papers/journals/books describing the subject matter are cited in the article and are easily discoverable after doing a Google Scholar/Books search (e.g. [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]). This might suggest that the topic is notable enough to have its own article (perhaps after a name change) or be merged with another article.
This page was originally nominated with the following rationale:
"This page was created as part of a medical marketing campaign for ClearFlow and its "PleuraFlow Active Clearance Technology System" invented in part at the Cleveland Clinic; same editors here as the company article, except for the obvious SOCKing creators, that is. It was even edited by the account, User:ClearFlow. This is a particularly nasty abuse of Wikipedia. Please delete it and salt it. Here is where the medical marketing campaign is described, and "raising awareness" of "retained blood syndrome" was a key piece of it. This "article" is exactly what medical marketing looks like, by the way. I mean exactly. Jytdog ( talk) 01:53, 30 August 2017 (UTC)"
See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClearFlow -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 04:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Edward M. Boyle, Jr., MD, is a founder, director and share-holder of ClearFlow, Inc. ... A. Marc Gillinov, MD, is an inventor and consultant with stock options and a royalty from ClearFlow, Inc. ... William E. Cohn, MD is ... a shareholder in ClearFlow,Inc. ... S. Jill Ley, RN, has received speaker honoraria from ClearFlow, Inc. ... The Cleveland Clinic has equity in ClearFlow, Inc., and has received royalties." Beyond a marketing campaign by ClearFlow, there is very little in the medical literature using the article's title for this syndrome. I disagree that anybody would plausibly be searching for the term. -- RexxS ( talk) 16:45, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 11:06, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Unsourced since 2009, no sources found, not likely to be notable Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:12, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Empire State Trust Company
1901 Established Empire State Bank (1901-1902) 1902 Bank To Trust Co. Empire State Trust Company 03/01/1904 Merge To State McVickar Realty Trust Company 03/01/1904 Name Change To Empire Trust Company 12/01/1966 Merge To State Bank of New York, The (9/1922-10/1989) 10/06/1989 Merge To State Irving Trust Company 10/06/1989 Name Change To Bank of New York, The
Empire Trust Company
1902 Established McVickar Realty Trust Company 03/01/1904 Acquire By Merger Empire State Trust Company 03/01/1904 Name Change To Empire Trust Company 02/01/1913 Acquire By Merger Guardian Trust Company of New York 02/01/1913 Acquire By Merger Windsor Trust Company 07/01/1924 Acquire By Merger Hudson Trust Company 12/01/1966 Merge To State Bank of New York, The (9/1922-10/1989) 10/06/1989 Merge To State Irving Trust Company 10/06/1989 Name Change To Bank of New York, The
TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 22:46, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:24, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Promotional article about a teenager who is an actor and supposedly a prominent social media influencer. However, the links provided are mostly to social media, and those links show zero posts from his Instagram account and zero tweets from his Twitter account. Although he is listed in IMDb, his most prominent roles are said to be uncredited performances as "Student" in two Harry Potter films; I don't see anything that establishes that his entertainment career is notable. I recommend deletion, without prejudice to re-creation in the future if he later becomes clearly established as notable under the general notability guideline. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:50, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Genetic algorithm#Methodology. It's up to editors what, if anything, to merge from the history. Sandstein 09:13, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
This page has remained unreferenced and a stub since 2007. It is a real topic; however it so little referred to in the scientific literature that it is hardly worthy of its own page. A small section could easily be added too Genetic algorithm, Evolutionary algorithm, or Inheritance (genetic algorithm). Furthermore, the page hardly discusses speciation in the context. It mostly just repeats information that is discussed on numerous speciation-related pages. Andrew. Z. Colvin • Talk 20:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:24, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Per WP:NCORP and WP:ADVERT. The sources are either primary or look incredibly unreliable. Comatmebro ( talk) 03:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus with WP:NPASR. The article was changed during the AFD from covering the company to covering the magazine, so the nomination statement and the !votes no longer match the article's subject. So Why 06:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. The existing references are all either derived from press releases around mergers or are to enable verification of subsidiaries (but most of these fail verification). I have searched for more and better references but found none. Looking at the page history Legacypac made the case that "regional print business papers are notable", however this article cannot meet WP:NPERIODICAL because it is about a parent company rather than any particular publication. It would have to meet the criteria for WP:GROUP. Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 07:56, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. The article may be redirected at editorial discretion. As Uanfala notes, Macedonian language#Phonology does contain content copied from this article, so in accordance with WP:CWW, its attribution needs to be preserved in some form. Mz7 ( talk) 00:52, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
The contents of this page, including bibliography are also present on the page Macedonian language and a separate article for its phonology is not required. Dyolf87 ( talk) 07:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to InterPlanetary File System. (non-admin closure) Power~enwiki ( talk) 21:42, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Company is only mentioned in passing in the sources I have been able to find. The provided sources have only a few mentions of the company in what is a longer article on the topic of the industry generally. For example, getting a comment from the CEO and then mentioning the company. The product is discussed while the company is not. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 13:52, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is that the sources are passing mentions and thus don't confer notability Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:26, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG/ WP:ANYBIO AFAICT. "Mohamed Bin Khalifa" get plenty of hits, nut referring to different persons. "Mohamed Bin Khalifa Bin Yousef Al Suwaidi" returns no hits outside Wikipedia. Kleuske ( talk) 12:59, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear on the notability of the subject does not meet the standard. Alex Shih Talk 06:31, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
This was kept at AfD in April due to two weak keeps for NACTOR.
My concern is that if this person has truly played a significant part in a number of dramas, she'd fly past GNG by now.
I've looked hard for coverage of her in news and books and just can't see in-depth coverage of her beyond CVs and IMDB-blogs.
There are lots of mentions in cast lists, but that doesn't satisfy notability. This would do the trick except we need at least 2 examples and this is from the Daily Mirror, a tabloid newspaper, not from a reliable source.
I'd be happy for someone to post a few good sources and we can speedy close this as a keep. But without them, it looks like delete, currently. Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 08:59, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:26, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
A year after creation and this article still has no reliable sources, it lists his company, his personal website and his "Official" Facebook page. Nothing in the article can be proven as true. He is a self-promoter and cannot be relied upon as an accurate source. I have searched Google, Google books, Google news, and Google news archive - and nothing. Perhaps a Pinoy search would be better? Loopy30 ( talk) 02:20, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was Merge with Royal Rangers into Assembly of God youth organizations. The strongest preference in this extended discussion appears to be to merge these two entities of questionable-to-moderate individual notability into a clearly notable supertopic. bd2412 T 12:27, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and has no independent sources. No assertion of notability, mere existence is not a reason to have a Wikipedia article. ☆ Bri ( talk) 16:47, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge all to Tosaden Kōtsū Sanbashi Line. Selectively merge into the article about the tram line, then redirect there. (non-admin closure) f e minist 13:21, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable station on a barely notable Japanese tram network. Like most other articles on stations on the network, they fail to meet the GNGs and thus are not notable enough. This particular example consists of a single sentence, and has only seen maintenance edits over the nine years this article has existed.
The following articles on the tram network are also being included in this AFD, owing to their similar status as both short, unchanged articles and not notable enough:
(I'll be nominating some more stations on the network throughout the course of the next couple of hours - can somebody please merge them once done - many thanks in advance) GR (
Contact me) (
See my edits)
17:23, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America 1000 01:57, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Not a notable person. An article apparently first written by the subject, and the talk page seems clear that the page's justification has never been better than really iffy. TheWhangdepootenawah ( talk) 22:48, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
That is, the reviewer makes clear that Hall is just a random YouTube nut chosen for illustrative purposes and then immediately dismissed. I don't see that as doing much of anything to establish Hall's notability. It's a two-sentence aside at best about someone who otherwise never made the Washington Post in any other context, as far as Google can determine. TheWhangdepootenawah ( talk) 12:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)One doesn't doubt that. But is he [i.e. the documentarian whose work is being reviewed] a sufficient witness? Does the sympathy for soldiers generated by the grunt film create an implicit, self-perpetuating argument for the war? Junger has been confronted with these questions, in reviews and in person, while promoting the film and his accompanying book, "War." In one such confrontation, available on YouTube, an angry and vociferous conspiracy theorist identified as Anthony J. Hall calls Junger's work "classic propaganda," deriding it as "all about the human interest stories of our boys . . . " This is unfair to Junger, and may be just another atavistic return of the old failure to distinguish between antiwar sentiment and hostility to the troops themselves.
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:11, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
No real reliable sources, or much indication of notability when looking closely, article obviously written by the subject Jac16888 Talk 22:17, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Riot Fest. No need for further discussion as deletion is not requested, and this should have earlier been speedy closed on that basis. Any merging from the history can occur through normal processes. postdlf ( talk) 16:30, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Overlaps and should merge with Riot Fest Rathfelder ( talk) 21:44, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. North America 1000 00:36, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
This is a definition, at best, but
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. And there is
already a definition in Wiktionary.
Geoff |
Who, me?
21:39, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:10, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Standard directory style promotional stub created by a declared paid contributor (in accordance with the TOU). Despite the TOU compliance, the firm does not meet local en.Wiki policies and guidelines towards inclusion, namely it does not meet the general guideline in WP:N when read in light of the guidelines in WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:SPIP. Sourcing is your standard PR stuff: TechCrunch and the like: coverage is pretty clearly lacking in intellectual independence thus making it fail our inclusion criteria. TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 12:52, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Since 2015, this film does not got any significant coverage rather trailers and posters. No any further source claims its releasing even. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 07:37, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:10, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Article subject is not notable and article contains many unsourced claims about him. Sfeldman ( talk) 18:46, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:10, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
WP:GNG tells us that "a series of publications ... in the same periodical is normally counted as one source." That would give the article two sources, both local news organizations. Searches of the usual "find sources" types found little else, only one namecheck. [1]. Two sources is multiple, but one would expect a notable director to have attracted considerably wider and more frequent attention.
The sources fail WP:SIGCOV. It has only been possible to squeeze out of them two sentences about his career. The first film, on which he was co-producer and member of the shoestring crew (but not director) made so little impact that not even a ripple is left. The second film was "due to be released early [2016]", but there's no evidence it was released, or even that production has begun. One would expect much more information to be available about a notable director.
Based on the available sources, the subject is not "worthy of note", "remarkable", or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" at this stage of his career. Worldbruce ( talk) 17:21, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete the current article as it is a BLP containing no references, it would have been eligible for WP:BLPPROD. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 12:55, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
This is an unsourced BLP stub from 2009. Subject authored a single pop/juvenile book 10 years ago that has average holdings according to WorldCat. Info is all OR. Agricola44 ( talk) 21:06, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:10, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
A non notable actress. Fails WP:ACTOR, and WP:GNG. The only coverage found fails WP:SIGCOV, it is from the websites that provide photos/wallpapers. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:11, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
A non notable poet/lyricist. Fails WP:AUTHOR, and WP:GNG. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:26, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Power~enwiki ( talk) 01:21, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
I request deletion of 29 short stub articles on topics of NRHP-listed places in Jerome County, Idaho, because it would be better to have them appear as redlinks encouraging new editors to create articles on these topics if/when they have time and resources to actually develop the topics. As noted at wp:REDLINKS, good redlinks help Wikipedia grow. Currently the articles are traps for readers who might follow a bluelink to the topic, only to find no substantial content. These are all 29 "NRIS-only" stub articles in Idaho, after I and other editors have expanded all other ones previously in the category. I am usually an inclusionist in AFD voting, and I have created and expanded many NRHP articles myself, and I have even been criticized for my own short stub articles, so it is very unusual for me to be nominating this batch. However these are different:
-- do ncr am 20:07, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The articles to be deleted are:
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:11, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
No reliable sources. MTV source doesn't mention the phrase and the other source is a blog with reader submissions. Nothing on google to make it anything more than an obscure niche term. Nothing in the article is sourced. Follows user's pattern of making articles about made up music genres. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 19:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 06:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:BAND ( ghits). Also note the clear WP:COI undertones in the way the band is described. DrStrauss talk 19:27, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Note that WP:POLOUTCOMES is an essay, and not policy. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:13, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Some coverage, but not significant. Boleyn ( talk) 19:05, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 07:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't pass WP:NACTRESS. No coverage in reliable third-party sources outside of passing mentions. menaechmi ( talk) 19:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 02:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 19:03, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:09, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Does not seem to meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 18:57, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
for instance. Largoplazo ( talk) 22:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 19:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet
WP:NPOL or
WP:GNG.
Boleyn (
talk)
18:55, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:14, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NOTE standards. Sources mostly refer to events the organization has hosted, but do not comment on the significance of the subject of this article or to his organization. Additionally, this article has been deleted before, and both times the article has been created by a paid contributor. PureRED | talk to me | 18:43, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete ( A7). Huon ( talk) 21:13, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
No significant coverage in independent, reliable media sources. Appears to be a standard businessman who fails biographical notability standards. DrStrauss talk 18:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy Delete under WP:G11. (non-admin closure) MassiveYR ♠ 11:55, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Prod contested by article creator. shoy ( reactions) 18:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:14, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Not notable, barely a list, untouched since 2009. Prod and prod-2 removed without comment. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 18:20, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Haji Mohammad Danesh. (non-admin closure) Power~enwiki ( talk) 01:26, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
I couldn't verify that he meets WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. No sources at all in article. Boleyn ( talk) 17:21, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. One person argued to keep, but failed to supply any policy-based reasons. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:10, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Mayors aren't unherently notable, local coverage - doesn't meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 17:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:15, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
I don't think he quite meets WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Article is written by the subject's son, references are not convincing. Boleyn ( talk) 17:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:20, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACADEMIC, and WP:ANYBIO. Also fails WP:GNG. —usernamekiran (talk) 16:03, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 02:44, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
No claims of notability, no substantive coverable in reliable sources, fails WP:GNG Rogermx ( talk) 15:38, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 06:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Not notable golf course. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:48, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:07, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable singer lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. reddogsix ( talk) 14:32, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:12, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Does not meet notability : reference points to amazon, flipkart and the other links does not portray any notability, the only link which it mentions is link from the publisher of the book Shrikanthv ( talk) 14:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Where do you see flipkart in it?? Shrikanthv. Cant you see News18, Swarajya Magazine, Independent News Service (INS), Business Stadard as the references? The article has been tried to brought to speedy deletion Unnecessarily and intentionally . Royaal ( talk) 08:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
I can't find evidence for notability. It's been tagged for notability for over 7 years. Doug Weller talk 14:07, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:16, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Only ref provided is a trivial mention. Google search turns up Facebook, Twitter, a Kickstarter account, and a number of self-published items. Google Books turns up what looks like only one hit, and it is also a trivial mention. Google News hits are only another list of trivial mentions.Subject does not appear to meet the requirements set out in WP:ACTOR. No awards, no significant coverage in published reliable independent verifiable secondary sources. Article creator's account has been blocked for copyright violations as well as abusing multiple accounts. KDS4444 ( talk) Note: This user has admitted participating in paid editing, though he has no COI with regard to this article at all.] 14:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 11:05, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NORG. No claim of notability, no national or regional media coverage, small organization. Rogermx ( talk) 15:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy redirect to Hugo Award for Best Fan Artist. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Redirect to Hugo Award for Best Fan Artist. No biographical information besides the statement that she won an amateur genre-specific writing contest. Analogous to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abigail Nussbaum. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 15:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:16, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Delete: as insufficiently notable actress. Quis separabit? 15:22, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Delete I found out that the married Eileen ran off with her hairdresser, but not much else. Does not seem that any of her film roles were really significant. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2455499/Minder-star-George-Coles-anguish-daughter-turned-him.html. Rogermx ( talk) 15:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:17, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
This article has been essentially unsourced since it was created by a user who looks a lot like a paid editor. My searches for sources turned up this in Noisey but nothing else that would suggest WP:NMUSIC or WP:BIO are met. SmartSE ( talk) 14:42, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:19, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
I've examined the sources cited and made my own searches but have not found in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. Neither WP:NARTIST or WP:BIO appear to be met. SmartSE ( talk) 14:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 06:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG/ WP:BIO, promotional tone. Kleuske ( talk) 13:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:29, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Ineligible for PROD due to being PROD'd and then dePROD'd in 2009.
Non-notable software. Creator clearly had a COI - they also created Axiom software inc, which was swiftly A7'd after creation. Fails WP:GNG & WP:NSOFT. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 06:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Lots of promotional fluff; one of the sources states that it's a "promotional tool." Nothing that indicates the band meets WP:NBAND. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:26, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 03:43, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBOX and there's not enough coverage to pass WP:GNG (other than this interview from a few years back). JTtheOG ( talk) 03:16, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG. Major rewriter ( User:EngiZe blocked for adding spam). The Banner talk 10:00, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:08, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. A tag has been on for 8 months and nothing has been added to help prove notability. The only independent source is the BBC one which is about a book that won an award and not the awards themselves. All the other sources are from the winners of this award so absolutely not independent. Domdeparis ( talk) 09:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 06:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails General Notability and Reliable Source. Non notable individual. Zazzysa ( talk) 09:19, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted under WP:G4. (non-admin closure) MassiveYR ♠ 17:34, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:MUSICBIO/GNG. Already deleted once. South Nashua ( talk) 09:05, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 12:16, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:ARTIST/GNG South Nashua ( talk) 09:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Fort Bragg Game. (non-admin closure) f e minist 13:24, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Not a notable sporting venue. The stadium was temporary, built for one game. It's the game ( Fort Bragg Game) that has enduring notability, not the venue. All information on the venue is on the game's page. – Muboshgu ( talk) 18:57, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) J 947( c) ( m) 06:28, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Previously deleted. Some assertations of notability, but all the charts mentioned are on WP:BADCHARTS (Australian Country Tracks). The awards won do not seem to be notable either per WP:BAND. Article is also very promotional in tone. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 06:15, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Please nominate at RfD. (non-admin closure) J 947( c) ( m) 18:47, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
No apparent connection to known target(s). Homechallenge55 ( talk) 05:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:21, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable local law firm. Has run-of-the-mill coverage. Inclusion in Wikipedia is promotional rather than encyclopedic.
Already speedy-deleted once, and resubmitted. Robert McClenon ( talk) 05:43, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:22, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Reliable sources do not talk about this company in-depth and most news hits are press releases. Also, COI/paid editing issues exist. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retained blood syndrome, which is related to this. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 05:13, 30 August 2017 (UTC)(edited to add other AFD 05:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC))
The result was snow delete. This is the absolute embodiment of spam; nobody other than the nom has suggested a single reason to save it, or provided a single example of a legitimate article using the term. I have no objections if those claiming it's a plausible search term want to create a redirect to something that's actually neutral, or at least salvageable. ‑ Iridescent 17:39, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Semi-procedural nomination. This was tagged for G11 deletion, which I declined. While there are obvious COI problems, legitimate scientific papers/journals/books describing the subject matter are cited in the article and are easily discoverable after doing a Google Scholar/Books search (e.g. [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]). This might suggest that the topic is notable enough to have its own article (perhaps after a name change) or be merged with another article.
This page was originally nominated with the following rationale:
"This page was created as part of a medical marketing campaign for ClearFlow and its "PleuraFlow Active Clearance Technology System" invented in part at the Cleveland Clinic; same editors here as the company article, except for the obvious SOCKing creators, that is. It was even edited by the account, User:ClearFlow. This is a particularly nasty abuse of Wikipedia. Please delete it and salt it. Here is where the medical marketing campaign is described, and "raising awareness" of "retained blood syndrome" was a key piece of it. This "article" is exactly what medical marketing looks like, by the way. I mean exactly. Jytdog ( talk) 01:53, 30 August 2017 (UTC)"
See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClearFlow -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 04:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Edward M. Boyle, Jr., MD, is a founder, director and share-holder of ClearFlow, Inc. ... A. Marc Gillinov, MD, is an inventor and consultant with stock options and a royalty from ClearFlow, Inc. ... William E. Cohn, MD is ... a shareholder in ClearFlow,Inc. ... S. Jill Ley, RN, has received speaker honoraria from ClearFlow, Inc. ... The Cleveland Clinic has equity in ClearFlow, Inc., and has received royalties." Beyond a marketing campaign by ClearFlow, there is very little in the medical literature using the article's title for this syndrome. I disagree that anybody would plausibly be searching for the term. -- RexxS ( talk) 16:45, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 11:06, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Unsourced since 2009, no sources found, not likely to be notable Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:12, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Empire State Trust Company
1901 Established Empire State Bank (1901-1902) 1902 Bank To Trust Co. Empire State Trust Company 03/01/1904 Merge To State McVickar Realty Trust Company 03/01/1904 Name Change To Empire Trust Company 12/01/1966 Merge To State Bank of New York, The (9/1922-10/1989) 10/06/1989 Merge To State Irving Trust Company 10/06/1989 Name Change To Bank of New York, The
Empire Trust Company
1902 Established McVickar Realty Trust Company 03/01/1904 Acquire By Merger Empire State Trust Company 03/01/1904 Name Change To Empire Trust Company 02/01/1913 Acquire By Merger Guardian Trust Company of New York 02/01/1913 Acquire By Merger Windsor Trust Company 07/01/1924 Acquire By Merger Hudson Trust Company 12/01/1966 Merge To State Bank of New York, The (9/1922-10/1989) 10/06/1989 Merge To State Irving Trust Company 10/06/1989 Name Change To Bank of New York, The
TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 22:46, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:24, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Promotional article about a teenager who is an actor and supposedly a prominent social media influencer. However, the links provided are mostly to social media, and those links show zero posts from his Instagram account and zero tweets from his Twitter account. Although he is listed in IMDb, his most prominent roles are said to be uncredited performances as "Student" in two Harry Potter films; I don't see anything that establishes that his entertainment career is notable. I recommend deletion, without prejudice to re-creation in the future if he later becomes clearly established as notable under the general notability guideline. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:50, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Genetic algorithm#Methodology. It's up to editors what, if anything, to merge from the history. Sandstein 09:13, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
This page has remained unreferenced and a stub since 2007. It is a real topic; however it so little referred to in the scientific literature that it is hardly worthy of its own page. A small section could easily be added too Genetic algorithm, Evolutionary algorithm, or Inheritance (genetic algorithm). Furthermore, the page hardly discusses speciation in the context. It mostly just repeats information that is discussed on numerous speciation-related pages. Andrew. Z. Colvin • Talk 20:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:24, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Per WP:NCORP and WP:ADVERT. The sources are either primary or look incredibly unreliable. Comatmebro ( talk) 03:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus with WP:NPASR. The article was changed during the AFD from covering the company to covering the magazine, so the nomination statement and the !votes no longer match the article's subject. So Why 06:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. The existing references are all either derived from press releases around mergers or are to enable verification of subsidiaries (but most of these fail verification). I have searched for more and better references but found none. Looking at the page history Legacypac made the case that "regional print business papers are notable", however this article cannot meet WP:NPERIODICAL because it is about a parent company rather than any particular publication. It would have to meet the criteria for WP:GROUP. Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 07:56, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. The article may be redirected at editorial discretion. As Uanfala notes, Macedonian language#Phonology does contain content copied from this article, so in accordance with WP:CWW, its attribution needs to be preserved in some form. Mz7 ( talk) 00:52, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
The contents of this page, including bibliography are also present on the page Macedonian language and a separate article for its phonology is not required. Dyolf87 ( talk) 07:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to InterPlanetary File System. (non-admin closure) Power~enwiki ( talk) 21:42, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Company is only mentioned in passing in the sources I have been able to find. The provided sources have only a few mentions of the company in what is a longer article on the topic of the industry generally. For example, getting a comment from the CEO and then mentioning the company. The product is discussed while the company is not. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 13:52, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is that the sources are passing mentions and thus don't confer notability Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:26, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG/ WP:ANYBIO AFAICT. "Mohamed Bin Khalifa" get plenty of hits, nut referring to different persons. "Mohamed Bin Khalifa Bin Yousef Al Suwaidi" returns no hits outside Wikipedia. Kleuske ( talk) 12:59, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear on the notability of the subject does not meet the standard. Alex Shih Talk 06:31, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
This was kept at AfD in April due to two weak keeps for NACTOR.
My concern is that if this person has truly played a significant part in a number of dramas, she'd fly past GNG by now.
I've looked hard for coverage of her in news and books and just can't see in-depth coverage of her beyond CVs and IMDB-blogs.
There are lots of mentions in cast lists, but that doesn't satisfy notability. This would do the trick except we need at least 2 examples and this is from the Daily Mirror, a tabloid newspaper, not from a reliable source.
I'd be happy for someone to post a few good sources and we can speedy close this as a keep. But without them, it looks like delete, currently. Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 08:59, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:26, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
A year after creation and this article still has no reliable sources, it lists his company, his personal website and his "Official" Facebook page. Nothing in the article can be proven as true. He is a self-promoter and cannot be relied upon as an accurate source. I have searched Google, Google books, Google news, and Google news archive - and nothing. Perhaps a Pinoy search would be better? Loopy30 ( talk) 02:20, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was Merge with Royal Rangers into Assembly of God youth organizations. The strongest preference in this extended discussion appears to be to merge these two entities of questionable-to-moderate individual notability into a clearly notable supertopic. bd2412 T 12:27, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and has no independent sources. No assertion of notability, mere existence is not a reason to have a Wikipedia article. ☆ Bri ( talk) 16:47, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge all to Tosaden Kōtsū Sanbashi Line. Selectively merge into the article about the tram line, then redirect there. (non-admin closure) f e minist 13:21, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable station on a barely notable Japanese tram network. Like most other articles on stations on the network, they fail to meet the GNGs and thus are not notable enough. This particular example consists of a single sentence, and has only seen maintenance edits over the nine years this article has existed.
The following articles on the tram network are also being included in this AFD, owing to their similar status as both short, unchanged articles and not notable enough:
(I'll be nominating some more stations on the network throughout the course of the next couple of hours - can somebody please merge them once done - many thanks in advance) GR (
Contact me) (
See my edits)
17:23, 15 August 2017 (UTC)