![]() |
The result was Speedy Deleted (G11) by Jimfbleak. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 18:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Promotional. Lacking external references. Not notable. Rathfelder ( talk) 23:04, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by User:Doc James per WP:G12. North America 1000 05:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Blatantly fails WP:ARTIST and, more importantly, WP:GNG. Found not a single source about her online nor in print. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 22:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 02:49, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
This article was made by a sock of Lpkids2006, if he keeps creating any articles, the admins shall block the account as a sock of Lpkids2006. KGirlTrucker87 talk what I'm been doing 22:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Tushi Talk To Me 06:35, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails to adhere to WP:BLP per WP:BLPDEL having a non-neutral point of view WP:NPOV. Many citations lack WP:V and much of the article was written by several WP:SOCK. Twrofpwr ( talk) 22:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Miss Peru. Sandstein 16:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Affair was not a pageant, as suggested, but a handpicking: She was handpicked by the Miss Peru Organization for both, Miss Universe 1977 [1] and Miss World 1977. Former nomination was closed before I could correct it. The Banner talk 21:47, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 02:50, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Poorly sourced WP:BLP of a writer with no strong claim to passing WP:AUTHOR. His titles were all released by print on demand houses rather than established publishing companies, according to his own website, and the strongest claim of notability is that he won a minor literary award for one of them -- but while a major literary award on the order of the Pulitzer or the National Book Awards constitutes an AUTHOR pass for its winners, the "Next Generation Indie Book Award" does not. And the only "references" here are the website of that non-notable award and the sales pages of his books on amazon.com or iUniverse -- which means that WP:GNG has not been met, as no reliable source coverage about him in media has been shown. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 21:07, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Babasónicos discography. Sandstein 16:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete per WP:NMUSIC or redirect to Babasónicos discography. The album itself isn't notable. Chris Troutman ( talk) 20:57, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
No references and no claim of notability. Being the largest mall in some city seems insufficient to me. Chris Troutman ( talk) 20:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 02:52, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
PROD contested by article creator. Seems to fail WP:GNG. My search for sources came up empty, and for the 2 sources provided in the article, one is a primary source (his homepage) and I see no mention of him in the other. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 20:03, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 02:55, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL; this game hasn't been released yet and there aren't reliable sources discussing it, either. Chris Troutman ( talk) 19:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 02:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Article about a film and television production company, making no strong claim to passing WP:CORP -- as written it simply posits the existence of the company's projects as inherited notability, which it isn't. And there's no reliable source coverage to support it, either -- all we have is a contextless pile of external links to the company's own webpage, its IMDb page and the separate IMDb pages of its principal partners, as well as two brief news blurbs which are about the shows and not the company. Which means the sourcing is not good enough to pass WP:GNG, and the substance isn't claiming anything that would grant them an exemption from having to pass GNG. Also the article was created by a user named "Merkennedy", suggesting a conflict of interest since one of the firm's partners is Maria Kennedy. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 19:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. This is a mixture of this AfD and WP:G11, as the page was fairly promotional in tone. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Some local coverage, but I couldn't establish that they meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 19:05, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 02:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Minor character from the Transformers universe. No evidence of real-world notability. Josh Milburn ( talk) 18:59, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dollhouse (Melanie Martinez EP). Content may be merged from history. Sandstein 16:57, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Completely unsourced article about a concert tour, consisting only of the setlist and a list of the tour venues. Per WP:NCONCERT, however, "Concert tours are notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Such coverage might show notability in terms of artistic approach, financial success, relationship to audience, or other such terms. Sources that merely establish that a tour happened are not sufficient to demonstrate notability. Tours that cannot be sufficiently referenced in secondary sources should be covered in a section on the artist's page rather than creating a dedicated article." So until some kind of notability of the necessary type can be shown and sourced, the correct place for any content about this is in Melanie Martinez (singer) rather than a standalone article. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 13:25, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 00:45, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
I have a suspicion this was written by the promoter. It has had no references since 2010 and I find nothing significant when I did a google search. ツ Stacey ( talk) 21:42, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 02:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Very minor character from the Transformers universe. No evidence of real world notability, and no sources cited. Tagged as of unclear notability (among other problems) for over three years. Josh Milburn ( talk) 18:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 02:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Minor character from the Transformers universe. No evidence of real-world notability. Tagged as of unclear notability for over two years. Josh Milburn ( talk) 18:48, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 00:47, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: Music DinosaurKiller ( talk) 18:36, 20 May 2016 (UTC)DinosaurKiller Creating deletion discussion for Umi Garrett
DELETE-Notability concerns — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.140.154.209 ( talk) 19:15, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
LionPrince101 ( talk) 04:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)LionPrince101
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 03:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
A list about non-notable entries. Notability can't be inherited from ISA which appears to be the mother article. Irakakiku ( talk) 18:11, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Cobb County School District. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 00:48, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Middle school with no real claim to notability other than blue ribbon status. Blue ribbon status is now so common, so many schools have it, that it really isn't much of a claim at all. This should be redirected or merged to Cobb County School District in accordance with longstanding tradition evidenced by WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and the thousands of middle schools in Category:Redirects from school articles. Jacona ( talk) 02:06, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
AusLondonder, Parsley Man, while I think we are in agreement, for the sake of clarity would you consider changing your vote to redirect to Cobb County School District per the part of WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES that reads "Most elementary (primary) and middle schools that don't source a clear claim to notability usually get merged or redirected in AfD. Schools that don't meet the standard typically get merged or redirected to the school district authority that operates them (generally North America) or the lowest level locality (elsewhere or where there is no governing body) rather than being completely removed from the encyclopedia. 'Redirect' as an alternative to deletion is anchored in policy." I think that would demonstrate consensus so this can be closed. If that's not your intention, that's OK, just want to make sure. Thanks! Jacona ( talk) 18:52, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 03:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Previously at PROD, twice (mine was removed because it was the 2nd). This article doesn't prove notability. (according to WP:VG/S) GamingUnion is unreliable, DigitallyDownloaded and Indie Haven aren't listed. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 06:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 11:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Could be a hoax. Markov ( talk) 09:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORP. TMB existed for maybe 20 years, and it's not clear quite when they went out of business (the Wayback Machine's last hit is in 2014, and it looks like activity was spotty and the site was rarely updated before then). According to their now-defunct website, they were founded in 1990. For a company producing a technical product in the US during the 90s and 2000s, they should have at least some significant web footprint. But they don't. 194 ghits is it, and a lot of these appear to be false positives (something called "TMB optical density" is relevant in certain biochemical assay processes). There's also a variety of mentions on forums and used telescope equipment dealers, but nothing reliable or significant.
It looks like TMB's optics were important to a core of high-level amateur astronomers in some parts of the US, and might've been known elsewhere, but there's just not enough coverage. They got briefly profiled a few times in blogs, podcasts, and niche journals, but that's just it... all brief coverage. Much of the coverage came in the wake of Tom Back's sudden death. —/ Mendaliv/ 2¢/ Δ's/ 18:36, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by User:Mojo Hand per WP:G4 and WP:G11. North America 1000 05:43, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted in an AfD in 2005, where the company was found to lack notability. Recreated in 2009 but has slipped under the radar since then, so I don't really think it is eligible for a G4 speedy deletion; there haven't been any secondary sources since it was created and it is written like a promotion piece - not blatant advertising but certainly promotional bonadea contributions talk 17:46, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ethnic plastic surgery. There's consensus not to have an article. Whether to merge anything can be discussed further on the talk page. Sandstein 17:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:13, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
This doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY. A photo with some minimal coverage. Boleyn ( talk) 17:40, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
The article was a repost from a AfD deleted article but the Db-repost was declined because apparently there was includes clear and sufficient claims of significance postdating previous AFD. I disagree with that and consider the issues leading to the last AfD delete (last July) to still hold with no new significant information. He does not meet WP:NACTOR and as with all the previous AfDs the martial arts claims are questionable. Does not meet WP:KICK or WP:MANOTE Peter Rehse ( talk) 13:58, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Can be userfied on request. Sandstein 17:05, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Since PROD was removed, The child actress only has 2 'actual' credits, both of which were recurring roles. No other known nominations or awards, article looks more like resume, Article fails WP:NACTOR and is basically WP:TOOSOON..Why was it not deleted 3 years back is unbelievable .. Ste moc 07:54, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
"Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention..."The "Casualty" refs are all passing/trivial mentions. (As for the Houdini and Doyle thing – I thought only the three leads were main credited until I saw Monday's episode and realized that five people got "main" billing. But the important point here is that Carey doesn't get "main" billing, but only "guest" billing, again proving that her role on H&D is indeed "recurring" and thus is likely not "significant" in WP:NACTOR terms.) P.S. I generally agree with John Pack Lambert's point that the bar for "notability" for minors should be high as well. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 05:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:06, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
As said in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Navegantes (that deleted part of the "neighborhoods of Pichilemu" articles): Fails WP:GEOLAND. The neighborhoods are not "legally" recognized by Chilean Law as territorial units (they are not part of administrative, electoral or census divisions). Juntas de vecinos are not a legal recognition of a place, because they are not government bodies, they are voluntary NGOs based in a territory chosen by their founders. In fact, it could be possible to find more than one junta de vecinos in the same neighborhood, or a junta that is composed by neighbors of two or more different neighborhoods. Villa Los navegantes is a little neighborhood (of 200 inhabitants) with no non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources. Sfs90 ( talk) 04:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
I also nominate the following related pages because the same reasons; the only reference of this articles is a list of representatives of local organizations on the Municipality of Pichilemu, that is not a legal recognition of the neighborhoods:
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 03:48, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Seems like a clear example of WP:NOTNEWS to me; sources not contemporary with the event are needed to convince me otherwise. TheLongTone ( talk) 15:16, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Comment. I am the author of the article. The purpose of the article was to move some of the news event to a different page from the Río Bravo, Suchitepéquez article at the objection of this user as stated here. It seems that he felt that the picture and items about the lynching were overwhelming the content of a page that was suppposed to be about a town. In an attempt to ameliorate this, I tried to bring in some town data from the Spanish Wikipedia -- this material however, is poorly sourced in English. However, it does seem to serve to make the Río Bravo, Suchitepéquez article less about the murder and more about the town itself. If it is decided that the event itself does not merit its own article, then the content I suppose would better be left in the article about the town, but the above I hope, explains my intent in creating the article. As TheLongTone mentions above, I can find no sources that are not centered around the time of the event itself, so it may not be deemed noteworthy. I am open to suggestions as to how this should be handled. Many thanks for your kind attention. H.dryad ( talk) 16:09, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Comment/Keep I think H.dryad brings up an excellent point and while the sources need to be improved I think this article is notable enough. If not than it should obviously be merged with Río Bravo, Suchitepéquez, but per H.dryad's logic I think it should be kept separate. Inter&anthro ( talk) 14:31, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. No support for deletion here. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:08, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Advanced search for: "additive decomposition" | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Fails WP:GNG with no independent reliable sources. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 20:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:01, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Absolutely no sources for anything in the article; not a noteworthy company.
The result was speedy keep. per SK1 - AFD was only just closed. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 17:38, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Questionable notability. Might fail WP:SUSTAINED. Ringbang ( talk) 16:54, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 16:08, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Lots of press releases, primary sources, and brief mentions, but not significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Fails WP:GNG/ WP:ORG (and that it was created by a blocked paid editor doesn't help, but is not itself reason for deletion). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete/speedy delete. This is a mixture of the two deletions. The article was created by a sock, but the show also seems to have a serious issue with notability, enough to where it appears to fail GNG and to where any future recreations of this article could be seen as WP:G4 violations unless they provide sourcing to show where the show would pass notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:45, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Cannot find evidence of significant third party coverage to meet WP:GNG. RA0808 talk contribs 15:44, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Has now at least one ref, so can't delete outright lacking consensus. Sandstein 17:08, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Non notable director, Originally tagged under BLP-Unsourced but bizzarely for whatever reason it doesn't meet it so here we are, Anyway Fails DIRECTOR & GNG.. – Davey2010 Talk 04:51, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was Redirect as this week has shown this as consensus (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 05:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
It's all plot, it's unreferenced, and it's not notable. The 47-volume series has its own page and this book is listed there which seems sufficient. Dubbin u | t | c 15:18, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete ( WP:CSD#G4) by RHaworth ( talk · contribs)
No indications that this company has been the subject of significant third party coverage. Many of the citations given are dead-links. In general, the "Awards" noted are the typical awards that any company might pick up by applying to enough different trade groups. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 14:56, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Let Go (Avril Lavigne album). MBisanz talk 17:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Another song created by this user, which fails WP:NSONGS, and in this case WP:SINGLE also. No source indicates that this was ever released as a single and the only ounce of release history is from a Discogs link which indicates it to be a promo release. A placement in New Zealand is easily merged in the artist's parent discography article. Also point to be noted that the first AFD it was redirected, but nevertheless recreated without any improvement at all. — IB [ Poke ] 14:40, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. I won't userfy this content, but others may. Sandstein 17:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Not a notable person. JDDJS ( talk) 16:31, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The subject of this page is a well-known person worldwide, and is not limited to just within the League of Legends community. Wikipedia masterr ( talk) 16:47, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Astros (album). MBisanz talk 17:10, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMUSIC. No sources to indicate notability. Erick ( talk) 18:09, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Houston Fire Department#Notable incidents. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 06:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
It happened, but I can't establish that it is WP:NOTABLE Boleyn ( talk) 13:44, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedy keep Jdcomix ( talk) 18:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable article, proposing a merge back to 2011 Super Outbreak Jdcomix ( talk) 13:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:52, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Deceptively well-sourced article. However, upon closer inspection, none of the sources is an in-depth discussion of Gray. Instead, we have a number of in-passing mentions in local outlets (possible not all reliable sources) connected to him being a public defender in some minor cases. In short, what would be expected for any small-time lawyer. His representation of Fetty Wap does not seem to have generated any significant coverage either. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO, hence: delete. Randykitty ( talk) 13:27, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. I concur that this appears to be an example of block evasion. Per WP:NOTSTATS nothing encyclopedic worth saving. Fenix down ( talk) 06:18, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Poorly-sourced article consisting of detailed sports stats with almost no encyclopedic prose, context, or analysis. No evidence of notability. This could easily be summarized in the main article 2015–16 Cupa României. - Mr X 11:53, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. and rename. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 06:18, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
No evidence for existence of this village, which has been tagged as unreferenced since July 2013 (recent attempts to use other Wikipedia pages as references). Its mention in Shekhawati was added by the same editor - possible COI? "Hails from" the place, in one edit summary. Does not appear to be a recognised populated place. Pam D 10:32, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
References
The result was merge to Cape Air. MBisanz talk 17:10, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Does this have sufficient notability separate from Cape Air? If not, it should be redirected. SSTflyer 10:07, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:49, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this is WP:NOTABLE; it exists, but that seems to be all. Boleyn ( talk) 09:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Morgan Technical Ceramics. Independent notability not established. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:58, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Just an unreferenced advertisement for a subsidiary company Dubbin u | t | c 08:22, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Mhhossein ( talk) 09:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic, uninformative, unbalanced and written like a high-school essay. DePRODded after another user supported the PROD by citing WP:TNT Dubbin u | t | c 08:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Blue Mountain (band). MBisanz talk 17:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
I considered PROD too, there's nothing to suggest she actually has the needed solid independent notability for an article separate from the apparently one band she's best known for; my searches have only found expected mentions at Books and News. I suggest Deleting and then at best Redirecting to the band itself. SwisterTwister talk 07:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 17:03, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that it meets
WP:NFILM or
WP:GNG
Boleyn (
talk)
07:24, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedily deleted under G5 after moving. — Spaceman Spiff 12:58, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Promotional piece failing WP:NFILM. See Saksham everyone is capable, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saksham - everyone is capable and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaurav Goswami (Body Builder) for the history of promotion. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 07:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Note: The article creator has move the article to Draft space. If the piece is promotional, it should not stay there as well. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 10:01, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedily deleted. under G5. — Spaceman Spiff 12:57, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable athlete with no major awards won. Fails WP:GNG. Also possibly part of advertisements being done on Wiki. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saksham - everyone is capable and Saksham everyone is capable for history. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 07:11, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Note: The article creator has move the article to Draft space. If the piece is promotional, it should not stay there as well. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 10:01, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:03, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:BIO and WP:PROF. no participants in last AfD so renominating. the alternate foreign language article in Farsi is very bare. I could find sources for other Raj Shankars but not significant coverage for this neurochemist. Given that his research is in medical sciences one would expect significant coverage in English, which there isn't. LibStar ( talk) 03:15, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 17:13, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Advanced search for: "SilverPlatter" | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Completely unsourced for nearly a decade. Holypod ( talk) 02:53, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
References
The result was redirect to Orders, decorations, and medals. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 17:13, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and has not been referenced ever since its creation by Andrew Yong on 14 October 2003 at 15:05 UTC. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 01:21, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
No external references Rathfelder ( talk) 21:13, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a writer with no strong claim to passing WP:AUTHOR. The article is sourced entirely to primary, commercial and social networking sources, with the sole indication of reliable source coverage in real media being a single blurb about her winning of a non-notable "teenager of the year" award -- and the "positive reviews" for her book are all on user-generated content sites like GoodReads or amazon.com, which means they're not the professional critical reviews that it takes to support notability. As always, Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform on which any writer is automatically eligible for an article just because she exists -- RS coverage, supporting a credible claim of notability, is required. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 20:57, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per low participation herein. North America 1000 23:04, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, not sourced conform WP:RS, promo The Banner talk 18:43, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
This article is part of an esoteric and nonstandard scheme of musical instrument classification proposed by Steve Mann ( User:Glogger, who created this article), in which musical instruments are grouped based on the classical elements. The term "quintephone" has almost never been used outside of publications by Mann and his colleagues, and in web sites and books which copied from this article; in fact, the article notes that "the classification has still not been debated in organological studies". In short, it's a neologism with a longstanding Wikipedia article. Zetawoof ( ζ) 00:56, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:45, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Appears entirely sourced to PR material. Looking pass the advert issues, I am unable to locate any independent, reliable sources that discuss the subject in depth as defined at WP:CORP. VQuakr ( talk) 18:19, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Should probably be speedied but speedies for schools are always rejected. This is not an article, but more like a directory listing. Would need to be totally rewritten to be an article. GigglesnortHotel ( talk) 17:16, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Notability not established. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:56, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
hanged this to a redirect to Czech University of Life Sciences Prague on the grounds that individual faculties are rarely notable; article creator begs to differ. TheLongTone ( talk) 15:24, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep - Faculty of Economics and Management, CULS Prague is largest Faculty in Czech Republic - proof - official stats of http://www.msmt.cz/index.php?lang=2 : http://dsia.uiv.cz/vystupy/vu_vs_f1.html (more than 10,000 students + more than 2000 Foreign exchange students) - probably is also largest Faculty in Central Europe. If this large Faculty can not have own wiki page should be deleted also majority of other (mostly smaller) faculties - for example: Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, University of Economics in Prague, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jaffna, Faculty of Economics, Ljubljana, Faculty of Law, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Management of Warsaw University of Technology and thousands of others. Another reason for its own wiki page is a little different focus from the parent university. I am believe that the largest faculty of economics in Central Europe, its wiki deserves. TradeCZ ( talk) 16:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep - After expanding is IMHO acceptable. -- Postrach ( talk) 09:09, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Content will be extended in the coming days / weeks. Do you really think that, for example the faculty
Faculty of Management of Warsaw University of Technology has a greater right to have a wiki page?
193.84.36.110 (
talk)
14:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep -
TradeCZ (
talk) 08:39, 19 May 2016 (UTC) Duplicate "keep" stricken. One person one !vote please.
86.17.222.157 (
talk)
09:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Luniz. MBisanz talk 17:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable album. The user Lil' Kim Monica reverted the redirection to Luniz by Live and Die 4 Hip Hop. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 20:06, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
This is an advertisement for an executive of a PR firm and political spin-doctor. While the subject has had a few appearances as a talking head/spin-doctor on TV and has been quoted on behalf of his clients, there is no in-depth coverage of this individual. I don't believe these appearances on behalf of his clients meet the bar to pass WP:ENT. Note that almost all content has been contributed by 3 WP:SPA editors. Toddst1 ( talk) 20:38, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 08:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) It is currently an impressive refbombed collection of every passing mention, primary source, and local paper that has mentioned the game, but shows no enduring or independent notability of its own. Remove the unreliable sources and there would be nothing left. The game had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. It is most often invoked as a cultural gateway into furry fandom so a redirect to its mention at Furry_fandom#Role-playing should suffice. czar 03:13, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Advanced search for: "FurryMUCK" | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
References
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 05:39, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Non notable list that could be merged into main article, but it does not need to be in it's own article. Fails WP:GNG. Qed237 (talk) 12:50, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:38, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Actress with no notability to be found-she has done no films as of now, so way too soon. Wgolf ( talk) 05:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is to delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:36, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
I came across this as a speedy candidate, where it was tagged as being overly promotional. The page isn't over the top promotional enough to be a comfortable speedy, however at the same time there really isn't anything out there to show how this game is ultimately notable enough for an article. It exists and can be played, but there's just no coverage outside of an article written by the student newspaper of the college the game's creators attended. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Jytdog ( talk) 02:50, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Sources are mostly press releases; the key aspect of GNG is that here are sufficient independent sources with substantial discussion with which to build an article. That the article "must" be built on press releases, as that is pretty much all there is, makes the article inherently promotional and not encyclopedic
Jytdog (
talk)
03:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 17:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable product lacks references. damiens.rf 08:06, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 16:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that he played Major Arena Soccer League, which is not confirmed as fully pro. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 03:16, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following article for the same reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 03:18, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that he played National Professional Soccer League, which is not confirmed as fully pro. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 03:05, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following articles for the same reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 03:10, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 00:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Article about biography without any significant citations. Looks Autobiography. GreenCricket (talk) 13:09, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Non notable film. Koala15 ( talk) 02:38, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 00:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
I don't see enough sources to establish notability per WP:GNG. Leading a a team to a minor league championship, as mentioned in the lead as what he's "perhaps most notable for" is not an inclusion criteria on Wikipedia. I don't understand the keep votes in the previous discussion, which fail to note the lack of significant coverage. – Muboshgu ( talk) 02:20, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:29, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
May not meet "significant coverage" required by WP:GNG. Seems to fail WP:NOTSOAPBOX and WP:NOTWEBHOST. RA0808 talk contribs 01:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G3 vandalism. JohnCD ( talk) 15:31, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Probably hoax. Possible copyvio of http://www.dictiome.com/en/93367/Apophis-pronunciation-Aussprache-prononciation-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5-pronunciaci%C3%B3n. As far as I can tell, it's just been copied form there with the name changed. I can't find any evidence that an Egyptian deity of this name exists. Adam9007 ( talk) 00:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted per CSD A9: Music recording by redlinked artist and no indication of importance or significance. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NALBUM. Adam9007 ( talk) 00:27, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
There's no evidence to suggest this is still active and the new external link is now closed and my own searches only found a few links here and nothing good, thus with no signs of improvement and existing like this since February 2007, there's nothing to suggest keeping.
Previous AFD closed as "No Consensus" when the AFD had no "Keep" arguments whatsoever. "No objection" may have been more appropriate. Relisting. Toddst1 ( talk) 00:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:37, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Has read like an ad copy since 2013 and has very limited sources, almost all of which are from Franky Zapata or his company. His product may or may not be notable, but his page is centered around it. Titanium Dragon ( talk) 00:48, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was Speedy Deleted (G11) by Jimfbleak. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 18:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Promotional. Lacking external references. Not notable. Rathfelder ( talk) 23:04, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by User:Doc James per WP:G12. North America 1000 05:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Blatantly fails WP:ARTIST and, more importantly, WP:GNG. Found not a single source about her online nor in print. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 22:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 02:49, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
This article was made by a sock of Lpkids2006, if he keeps creating any articles, the admins shall block the account as a sock of Lpkids2006. KGirlTrucker87 talk what I'm been doing 22:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Tushi Talk To Me 06:35, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails to adhere to WP:BLP per WP:BLPDEL having a non-neutral point of view WP:NPOV. Many citations lack WP:V and much of the article was written by several WP:SOCK. Twrofpwr ( talk) 22:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Miss Peru. Sandstein 16:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Affair was not a pageant, as suggested, but a handpicking: She was handpicked by the Miss Peru Organization for both, Miss Universe 1977 [1] and Miss World 1977. Former nomination was closed before I could correct it. The Banner talk 21:47, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 02:50, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Poorly sourced WP:BLP of a writer with no strong claim to passing WP:AUTHOR. His titles were all released by print on demand houses rather than established publishing companies, according to his own website, and the strongest claim of notability is that he won a minor literary award for one of them -- but while a major literary award on the order of the Pulitzer or the National Book Awards constitutes an AUTHOR pass for its winners, the "Next Generation Indie Book Award" does not. And the only "references" here are the website of that non-notable award and the sales pages of his books on amazon.com or iUniverse -- which means that WP:GNG has not been met, as no reliable source coverage about him in media has been shown. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 21:07, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Babasónicos discography. Sandstein 16:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete per WP:NMUSIC or redirect to Babasónicos discography. The album itself isn't notable. Chris Troutman ( talk) 20:57, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
No references and no claim of notability. Being the largest mall in some city seems insufficient to me. Chris Troutman ( talk) 20:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 02:52, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
PROD contested by article creator. Seems to fail WP:GNG. My search for sources came up empty, and for the 2 sources provided in the article, one is a primary source (his homepage) and I see no mention of him in the other. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 20:03, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 02:55, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL; this game hasn't been released yet and there aren't reliable sources discussing it, either. Chris Troutman ( talk) 19:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 02:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Article about a film and television production company, making no strong claim to passing WP:CORP -- as written it simply posits the existence of the company's projects as inherited notability, which it isn't. And there's no reliable source coverage to support it, either -- all we have is a contextless pile of external links to the company's own webpage, its IMDb page and the separate IMDb pages of its principal partners, as well as two brief news blurbs which are about the shows and not the company. Which means the sourcing is not good enough to pass WP:GNG, and the substance isn't claiming anything that would grant them an exemption from having to pass GNG. Also the article was created by a user named "Merkennedy", suggesting a conflict of interest since one of the firm's partners is Maria Kennedy. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 19:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. This is a mixture of this AfD and WP:G11, as the page was fairly promotional in tone. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Some local coverage, but I couldn't establish that they meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 19:05, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 02:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Minor character from the Transformers universe. No evidence of real-world notability. Josh Milburn ( talk) 18:59, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dollhouse (Melanie Martinez EP). Content may be merged from history. Sandstein 16:57, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Completely unsourced article about a concert tour, consisting only of the setlist and a list of the tour venues. Per WP:NCONCERT, however, "Concert tours are notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Such coverage might show notability in terms of artistic approach, financial success, relationship to audience, or other such terms. Sources that merely establish that a tour happened are not sufficient to demonstrate notability. Tours that cannot be sufficiently referenced in secondary sources should be covered in a section on the artist's page rather than creating a dedicated article." So until some kind of notability of the necessary type can be shown and sourced, the correct place for any content about this is in Melanie Martinez (singer) rather than a standalone article. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 13:25, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 00:45, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
I have a suspicion this was written by the promoter. It has had no references since 2010 and I find nothing significant when I did a google search. ツ Stacey ( talk) 21:42, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 02:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Very minor character from the Transformers universe. No evidence of real world notability, and no sources cited. Tagged as of unclear notability (among other problems) for over three years. Josh Milburn ( talk) 18:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 02:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Minor character from the Transformers universe. No evidence of real-world notability. Tagged as of unclear notability for over two years. Josh Milburn ( talk) 18:48, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 00:47, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: Music DinosaurKiller ( talk) 18:36, 20 May 2016 (UTC)DinosaurKiller Creating deletion discussion for Umi Garrett
DELETE-Notability concerns — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.140.154.209 ( talk) 19:15, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
LionPrince101 ( talk) 04:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)LionPrince101
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 03:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
A list about non-notable entries. Notability can't be inherited from ISA which appears to be the mother article. Irakakiku ( talk) 18:11, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Cobb County School District. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 00:48, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Middle school with no real claim to notability other than blue ribbon status. Blue ribbon status is now so common, so many schools have it, that it really isn't much of a claim at all. This should be redirected or merged to Cobb County School District in accordance with longstanding tradition evidenced by WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and the thousands of middle schools in Category:Redirects from school articles. Jacona ( talk) 02:06, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
AusLondonder, Parsley Man, while I think we are in agreement, for the sake of clarity would you consider changing your vote to redirect to Cobb County School District per the part of WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES that reads "Most elementary (primary) and middle schools that don't source a clear claim to notability usually get merged or redirected in AfD. Schools that don't meet the standard typically get merged or redirected to the school district authority that operates them (generally North America) or the lowest level locality (elsewhere or where there is no governing body) rather than being completely removed from the encyclopedia. 'Redirect' as an alternative to deletion is anchored in policy." I think that would demonstrate consensus so this can be closed. If that's not your intention, that's OK, just want to make sure. Thanks! Jacona ( talk) 18:52, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 03:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Previously at PROD, twice (mine was removed because it was the 2nd). This article doesn't prove notability. (according to WP:VG/S) GamingUnion is unreliable, DigitallyDownloaded and Indie Haven aren't listed. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 06:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 11:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Could be a hoax. Markov ( talk) 09:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORP. TMB existed for maybe 20 years, and it's not clear quite when they went out of business (the Wayback Machine's last hit is in 2014, and it looks like activity was spotty and the site was rarely updated before then). According to their now-defunct website, they were founded in 1990. For a company producing a technical product in the US during the 90s and 2000s, they should have at least some significant web footprint. But they don't. 194 ghits is it, and a lot of these appear to be false positives (something called "TMB optical density" is relevant in certain biochemical assay processes). There's also a variety of mentions on forums and used telescope equipment dealers, but nothing reliable or significant.
It looks like TMB's optics were important to a core of high-level amateur astronomers in some parts of the US, and might've been known elsewhere, but there's just not enough coverage. They got briefly profiled a few times in blogs, podcasts, and niche journals, but that's just it... all brief coverage. Much of the coverage came in the wake of Tom Back's sudden death. —/ Mendaliv/ 2¢/ Δ's/ 18:36, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by User:Mojo Hand per WP:G4 and WP:G11. North America 1000 05:43, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted in an AfD in 2005, where the company was found to lack notability. Recreated in 2009 but has slipped under the radar since then, so I don't really think it is eligible for a G4 speedy deletion; there haven't been any secondary sources since it was created and it is written like a promotion piece - not blatant advertising but certainly promotional bonadea contributions talk 17:46, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ethnic plastic surgery. There's consensus not to have an article. Whether to merge anything can be discussed further on the talk page. Sandstein 17:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:13, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
This doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY. A photo with some minimal coverage. Boleyn ( talk) 17:40, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
The article was a repost from a AfD deleted article but the Db-repost was declined because apparently there was includes clear and sufficient claims of significance postdating previous AFD. I disagree with that and consider the issues leading to the last AfD delete (last July) to still hold with no new significant information. He does not meet WP:NACTOR and as with all the previous AfDs the martial arts claims are questionable. Does not meet WP:KICK or WP:MANOTE Peter Rehse ( talk) 13:58, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Can be userfied on request. Sandstein 17:05, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Since PROD was removed, The child actress only has 2 'actual' credits, both of which were recurring roles. No other known nominations or awards, article looks more like resume, Article fails WP:NACTOR and is basically WP:TOOSOON..Why was it not deleted 3 years back is unbelievable .. Ste moc 07:54, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
"Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention..."The "Casualty" refs are all passing/trivial mentions. (As for the Houdini and Doyle thing – I thought only the three leads were main credited until I saw Monday's episode and realized that five people got "main" billing. But the important point here is that Carey doesn't get "main" billing, but only "guest" billing, again proving that her role on H&D is indeed "recurring" and thus is likely not "significant" in WP:NACTOR terms.) P.S. I generally agree with John Pack Lambert's point that the bar for "notability" for minors should be high as well. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 05:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:06, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
As said in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Navegantes (that deleted part of the "neighborhoods of Pichilemu" articles): Fails WP:GEOLAND. The neighborhoods are not "legally" recognized by Chilean Law as territorial units (they are not part of administrative, electoral or census divisions). Juntas de vecinos are not a legal recognition of a place, because they are not government bodies, they are voluntary NGOs based in a territory chosen by their founders. In fact, it could be possible to find more than one junta de vecinos in the same neighborhood, or a junta that is composed by neighbors of two or more different neighborhoods. Villa Los navegantes is a little neighborhood (of 200 inhabitants) with no non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources. Sfs90 ( talk) 04:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
I also nominate the following related pages because the same reasons; the only reference of this articles is a list of representatives of local organizations on the Municipality of Pichilemu, that is not a legal recognition of the neighborhoods:
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 03:48, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Seems like a clear example of WP:NOTNEWS to me; sources not contemporary with the event are needed to convince me otherwise. TheLongTone ( talk) 15:16, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Comment. I am the author of the article. The purpose of the article was to move some of the news event to a different page from the Río Bravo, Suchitepéquez article at the objection of this user as stated here. It seems that he felt that the picture and items about the lynching were overwhelming the content of a page that was suppposed to be about a town. In an attempt to ameliorate this, I tried to bring in some town data from the Spanish Wikipedia -- this material however, is poorly sourced in English. However, it does seem to serve to make the Río Bravo, Suchitepéquez article less about the murder and more about the town itself. If it is decided that the event itself does not merit its own article, then the content I suppose would better be left in the article about the town, but the above I hope, explains my intent in creating the article. As TheLongTone mentions above, I can find no sources that are not centered around the time of the event itself, so it may not be deemed noteworthy. I am open to suggestions as to how this should be handled. Many thanks for your kind attention. H.dryad ( talk) 16:09, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Comment/Keep I think H.dryad brings up an excellent point and while the sources need to be improved I think this article is notable enough. If not than it should obviously be merged with Río Bravo, Suchitepéquez, but per H.dryad's logic I think it should be kept separate. Inter&anthro ( talk) 14:31, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. No support for deletion here. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:08, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Advanced search for: "additive decomposition" | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Fails WP:GNG with no independent reliable sources. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 20:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:01, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Absolutely no sources for anything in the article; not a noteworthy company.
The result was speedy keep. per SK1 - AFD was only just closed. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 17:38, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Questionable notability. Might fail WP:SUSTAINED. Ringbang ( talk) 16:54, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 16:08, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Lots of press releases, primary sources, and brief mentions, but not significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Fails WP:GNG/ WP:ORG (and that it was created by a blocked paid editor doesn't help, but is not itself reason for deletion). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete/speedy delete. This is a mixture of the two deletions. The article was created by a sock, but the show also seems to have a serious issue with notability, enough to where it appears to fail GNG and to where any future recreations of this article could be seen as WP:G4 violations unless they provide sourcing to show where the show would pass notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:45, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Cannot find evidence of significant third party coverage to meet WP:GNG. RA0808 talk contribs 15:44, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Has now at least one ref, so can't delete outright lacking consensus. Sandstein 17:08, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Non notable director, Originally tagged under BLP-Unsourced but bizzarely for whatever reason it doesn't meet it so here we are, Anyway Fails DIRECTOR & GNG.. – Davey2010 Talk 04:51, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was Redirect as this week has shown this as consensus (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 05:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
It's all plot, it's unreferenced, and it's not notable. The 47-volume series has its own page and this book is listed there which seems sufficient. Dubbin u | t | c 15:18, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete ( WP:CSD#G4) by RHaworth ( talk · contribs)
No indications that this company has been the subject of significant third party coverage. Many of the citations given are dead-links. In general, the "Awards" noted are the typical awards that any company might pick up by applying to enough different trade groups. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 14:56, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Let Go (Avril Lavigne album). MBisanz talk 17:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Another song created by this user, which fails WP:NSONGS, and in this case WP:SINGLE also. No source indicates that this was ever released as a single and the only ounce of release history is from a Discogs link which indicates it to be a promo release. A placement in New Zealand is easily merged in the artist's parent discography article. Also point to be noted that the first AFD it was redirected, but nevertheless recreated without any improvement at all. — IB [ Poke ] 14:40, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. I won't userfy this content, but others may. Sandstein 17:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Not a notable person. JDDJS ( talk) 16:31, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The subject of this page is a well-known person worldwide, and is not limited to just within the League of Legends community. Wikipedia masterr ( talk) 16:47, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Astros (album). MBisanz talk 17:10, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMUSIC. No sources to indicate notability. Erick ( talk) 18:09, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Houston Fire Department#Notable incidents. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 06:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
It happened, but I can't establish that it is WP:NOTABLE Boleyn ( talk) 13:44, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedy keep Jdcomix ( talk) 18:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable article, proposing a merge back to 2011 Super Outbreak Jdcomix ( talk) 13:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:52, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Deceptively well-sourced article. However, upon closer inspection, none of the sources is an in-depth discussion of Gray. Instead, we have a number of in-passing mentions in local outlets (possible not all reliable sources) connected to him being a public defender in some minor cases. In short, what would be expected for any small-time lawyer. His representation of Fetty Wap does not seem to have generated any significant coverage either. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO, hence: delete. Randykitty ( talk) 13:27, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. I concur that this appears to be an example of block evasion. Per WP:NOTSTATS nothing encyclopedic worth saving. Fenix down ( talk) 06:18, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Poorly-sourced article consisting of detailed sports stats with almost no encyclopedic prose, context, or analysis. No evidence of notability. This could easily be summarized in the main article 2015–16 Cupa României. - Mr X 11:53, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. and rename. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 06:18, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
No evidence for existence of this village, which has been tagged as unreferenced since July 2013 (recent attempts to use other Wikipedia pages as references). Its mention in Shekhawati was added by the same editor - possible COI? "Hails from" the place, in one edit summary. Does not appear to be a recognised populated place. Pam D 10:32, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
References
The result was merge to Cape Air. MBisanz talk 17:10, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Does this have sufficient notability separate from Cape Air? If not, it should be redirected. SSTflyer 10:07, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:49, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this is WP:NOTABLE; it exists, but that seems to be all. Boleyn ( talk) 09:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Morgan Technical Ceramics. Independent notability not established. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:58, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Just an unreferenced advertisement for a subsidiary company Dubbin u | t | c 08:22, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Mhhossein ( talk) 09:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic, uninformative, unbalanced and written like a high-school essay. DePRODded after another user supported the PROD by citing WP:TNT Dubbin u | t | c 08:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Blue Mountain (band). MBisanz talk 17:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
I considered PROD too, there's nothing to suggest she actually has the needed solid independent notability for an article separate from the apparently one band she's best known for; my searches have only found expected mentions at Books and News. I suggest Deleting and then at best Redirecting to the band itself. SwisterTwister talk 07:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 17:03, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that it meets
WP:NFILM or
WP:GNG
Boleyn (
talk)
07:24, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedily deleted under G5 after moving. — Spaceman Spiff 12:58, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Promotional piece failing WP:NFILM. See Saksham everyone is capable, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saksham - everyone is capable and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaurav Goswami (Body Builder) for the history of promotion. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 07:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Note: The article creator has move the article to Draft space. If the piece is promotional, it should not stay there as well. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 10:01, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedily deleted. under G5. — Spaceman Spiff 12:57, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable athlete with no major awards won. Fails WP:GNG. Also possibly part of advertisements being done on Wiki. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saksham - everyone is capable and Saksham everyone is capable for history. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 07:11, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Note: The article creator has move the article to Draft space. If the piece is promotional, it should not stay there as well. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 10:01, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:03, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:BIO and WP:PROF. no participants in last AfD so renominating. the alternate foreign language article in Farsi is very bare. I could find sources for other Raj Shankars but not significant coverage for this neurochemist. Given that his research is in medical sciences one would expect significant coverage in English, which there isn't. LibStar ( talk) 03:15, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 17:13, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Advanced search for: "SilverPlatter" | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Completely unsourced for nearly a decade. Holypod ( talk) 02:53, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
References
The result was redirect to Orders, decorations, and medals. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 17:13, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and has not been referenced ever since its creation by Andrew Yong on 14 October 2003 at 15:05 UTC. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 01:21, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
No external references Rathfelder ( talk) 21:13, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a writer with no strong claim to passing WP:AUTHOR. The article is sourced entirely to primary, commercial and social networking sources, with the sole indication of reliable source coverage in real media being a single blurb about her winning of a non-notable "teenager of the year" award -- and the "positive reviews" for her book are all on user-generated content sites like GoodReads or amazon.com, which means they're not the professional critical reviews that it takes to support notability. As always, Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform on which any writer is automatically eligible for an article just because she exists -- RS coverage, supporting a credible claim of notability, is required. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 20:57, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per low participation herein. North America 1000 23:04, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, not sourced conform WP:RS, promo The Banner talk 18:43, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
This article is part of an esoteric and nonstandard scheme of musical instrument classification proposed by Steve Mann ( User:Glogger, who created this article), in which musical instruments are grouped based on the classical elements. The term "quintephone" has almost never been used outside of publications by Mann and his colleagues, and in web sites and books which copied from this article; in fact, the article notes that "the classification has still not been debated in organological studies". In short, it's a neologism with a longstanding Wikipedia article. Zetawoof ( ζ) 00:56, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:45, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Appears entirely sourced to PR material. Looking pass the advert issues, I am unable to locate any independent, reliable sources that discuss the subject in depth as defined at WP:CORP. VQuakr ( talk) 18:19, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Should probably be speedied but speedies for schools are always rejected. This is not an article, but more like a directory listing. Would need to be totally rewritten to be an article. GigglesnortHotel ( talk) 17:16, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Notability not established. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:56, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
hanged this to a redirect to Czech University of Life Sciences Prague on the grounds that individual faculties are rarely notable; article creator begs to differ. TheLongTone ( talk) 15:24, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep - Faculty of Economics and Management, CULS Prague is largest Faculty in Czech Republic - proof - official stats of http://www.msmt.cz/index.php?lang=2 : http://dsia.uiv.cz/vystupy/vu_vs_f1.html (more than 10,000 students + more than 2000 Foreign exchange students) - probably is also largest Faculty in Central Europe. If this large Faculty can not have own wiki page should be deleted also majority of other (mostly smaller) faculties - for example: Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, University of Economics in Prague, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jaffna, Faculty of Economics, Ljubljana, Faculty of Law, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Management of Warsaw University of Technology and thousands of others. Another reason for its own wiki page is a little different focus from the parent university. I am believe that the largest faculty of economics in Central Europe, its wiki deserves. TradeCZ ( talk) 16:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep - After expanding is IMHO acceptable. -- Postrach ( talk) 09:09, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Content will be extended in the coming days / weeks. Do you really think that, for example the faculty
Faculty of Management of Warsaw University of Technology has a greater right to have a wiki page?
193.84.36.110 (
talk)
14:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep -
TradeCZ (
talk) 08:39, 19 May 2016 (UTC) Duplicate "keep" stricken. One person one !vote please.
86.17.222.157 (
talk)
09:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Luniz. MBisanz talk 17:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable album. The user Lil' Kim Monica reverted the redirection to Luniz by Live and Die 4 Hip Hop. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 20:06, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
This is an advertisement for an executive of a PR firm and political spin-doctor. While the subject has had a few appearances as a talking head/spin-doctor on TV and has been quoted on behalf of his clients, there is no in-depth coverage of this individual. I don't believe these appearances on behalf of his clients meet the bar to pass WP:ENT. Note that almost all content has been contributed by 3 WP:SPA editors. Toddst1 ( talk) 20:38, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 08:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) It is currently an impressive refbombed collection of every passing mention, primary source, and local paper that has mentioned the game, but shows no enduring or independent notability of its own. Remove the unreliable sources and there would be nothing left. The game had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. It is most often invoked as a cultural gateway into furry fandom so a redirect to its mention at Furry_fandom#Role-playing should suffice. czar 03:13, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Advanced search for: "FurryMUCK" | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
References
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 05:39, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Non notable list that could be merged into main article, but it does not need to be in it's own article. Fails WP:GNG. Qed237 (talk) 12:50, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:38, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Actress with no notability to be found-she has done no films as of now, so way too soon. Wgolf ( talk) 05:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is to delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:36, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
I came across this as a speedy candidate, where it was tagged as being overly promotional. The page isn't over the top promotional enough to be a comfortable speedy, however at the same time there really isn't anything out there to show how this game is ultimately notable enough for an article. It exists and can be played, but there's just no coverage outside of an article written by the student newspaper of the college the game's creators attended. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Jytdog ( talk) 02:50, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Sources are mostly press releases; the key aspect of GNG is that here are sufficient independent sources with substantial discussion with which to build an article. That the article "must" be built on press releases, as that is pretty much all there is, makes the article inherently promotional and not encyclopedic
Jytdog (
talk)
03:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 17:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable product lacks references. damiens.rf 08:06, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 16:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that he played Major Arena Soccer League, which is not confirmed as fully pro. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 03:16, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following article for the same reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 03:18, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that he played National Professional Soccer League, which is not confirmed as fully pro. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 03:05, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following articles for the same reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 03:10, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 00:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Article about biography without any significant citations. Looks Autobiography. GreenCricket (talk) 13:09, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Non notable film. Koala15 ( talk) 02:38, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 00:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
I don't see enough sources to establish notability per WP:GNG. Leading a a team to a minor league championship, as mentioned in the lead as what he's "perhaps most notable for" is not an inclusion criteria on Wikipedia. I don't understand the keep votes in the previous discussion, which fail to note the lack of significant coverage. – Muboshgu ( talk) 02:20, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:29, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
May not meet "significant coverage" required by WP:GNG. Seems to fail WP:NOTSOAPBOX and WP:NOTWEBHOST. RA0808 talk contribs 01:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G3 vandalism. JohnCD ( talk) 15:31, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Probably hoax. Possible copyvio of http://www.dictiome.com/en/93367/Apophis-pronunciation-Aussprache-prononciation-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5-pronunciaci%C3%B3n. As far as I can tell, it's just been copied form there with the name changed. I can't find any evidence that an Egyptian deity of this name exists. Adam9007 ( talk) 00:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted per CSD A9: Music recording by redlinked artist and no indication of importance or significance. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NALBUM. Adam9007 ( talk) 00:27, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
There's no evidence to suggest this is still active and the new external link is now closed and my own searches only found a few links here and nothing good, thus with no signs of improvement and existing like this since February 2007, there's nothing to suggest keeping.
Previous AFD closed as "No Consensus" when the AFD had no "Keep" arguments whatsoever. "No objection" may have been more appropriate. Relisting. Toddst1 ( talk) 00:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:37, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Has read like an ad copy since 2013 and has very limited sources, almost all of which are from Franky Zapata or his company. His product may or may not be notable, but his page is centered around it. Titanium Dragon ( talk) 00:48, 4 May 2016 (UTC)