![]() |
The result was Speedy Deleted - G7 - The creator decided to create, nominate and then blank the article .... Not sure why but there we go!
, NAC –
Davey2010
Talk
00:53, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Later Hirak1525 ( talk) 22:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Opabinia regalis ( talk) 05:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
notability unclear; old age is not sufficient. Fgnievinski ( talk) 23:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:48, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
non-notable person, reads like an advert for her company Deunanknute ( talk) 23:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
no refs, appears non-notable (tough name to google), BLP issues, probable COI/autobiography Deunanknute ( talk) 23:17, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete both. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
No indication of notability per WP:CREATIVE, WP:BIO or WP:GNG. No significant coverage online in WP:Reliable sources - just passing mentions, apart from the blog interview cited. His one claim to fame is for being second unit director on the film Sold, but I can find no evidence of his involvement in online credits for that film. Dai Pritchard ( talk) 22:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related page because it similarly gives no indication of notability per WP:NFILM, with no significant coverage online from reliable, secondary sources:
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable musician. Google web and book searches of his English and Chinese name result in no notable coverage except on the wiki-like website imslp.org. Zanhe ( talk) 22:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Nakon 21:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Earlier I thought that the subject is partially notable, but after reading WP:AFC and searching for references once again I changed my mind. Though I wanted to give the page a fair chance, therefore I'm going through the discussion. According to me the page fails WP:NOTE and tries to promote the subject in an overtly manner without imparting any real information. Mr RD 22:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. - nomination withdrawn ( non-admin closure) -- Sam Sing! 19:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Another non-notable pipe band. Ostrichyearning ( talk) 22:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Not a good enough reason for deletion - please be more specific. Article relates to an active pipe band, although does require updated. -- Thehorseltd ( talk) 22:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Nakon 21:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable pipe band. Ostrichyearning ( talk) 22:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
I could of put this as a BLP prod but there are links as it turns out. But the notability is a question here. Wgolf ( talk) 21:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
lack of notability/verifiability, Wikipedia not a directory Wantonlife ( talk) 20:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Redirect to Cheshire Senior Cup. EoRdE6( Come Talk to Me!) 02:37, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable competition season Kivo ( talk) 19:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 02:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable player who is yet to make his first team debut. Fails WP:RLN, contested PROD. Mattlore ( talk) 19:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. j⚛e decker talk 18:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
No references verify the general notability of this station. Therefore it is not a suitable subject for a standalone article. AadaamS ( talk) 18:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#A7 -- auburnpilot talk 02:35, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
non-notable local charity per WP:NONPROFIT Deunanknute ( talk) 18:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 20:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
non-notable per
WP:BKCRIT, all coverage is either about the author with passing mention of the book, all in depth coverage appears to be non-independent (paid reviews)
Deunanknute (
talk)
18:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 18:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
non-notable per WP:CORP, all references lack any depth about the company past trivial coverage per WP:CORPDEPTH Deunanknute ( talk) 18:24, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 18:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
non-notably company per WP:CORP, no independent references found, promotional content with no assertion of previous works Deunanknute ( talk) 18:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Thawte. j⚛e decker talk 18:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
This no longer seems to be running and debatable whether it was notable in the first place. That said, article been around long enoguh that CSD probably isn't warranted. Mike1901 ( talk) 17:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 18:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Unreferenced article about a Youtube series. Prod was removed without explanation. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:MOVIE almost qualifies for speedy deletion per WP:A7 Crystallizedcarbon ( talk) 17:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 18:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Consensus at WP:PHARM and WP:CHEMS is that chemical compounds must meet the general notability guideline to be included in Wikipedia. This is not a notable chemical compound. Clonazolam is not a pharmaceutical drug, but rather a designer drug only sold online. The made-up names "Clonazolam" and "Clonitrazolam" are intended to sound like the names of benzodiazepine pharmaceuticals, but they are only used on online recreational drug forums - they do not appear anywhere in the scientific literature, patent literature, Google Scholar, etc. The first two references in the article mention this chemical compound, but only as one in a large number of other similar compounds. There is nothing that distinguishes this one from the many other non-notable ones mentioned. The rest of the references (currently numbers 3 through 7) do not even mention this compound - they are general references about benzodiazepines that support text that is about benzodiazepines in general, not about this compound in particular. There are no reliable sources (or more specifically WP:MEDRS-compliant sources) to suggest that any claims of effects in humans are anything but speculation. Designer drugs certainly can become notable enough to be included in Wikipedia, but this one is not ... at least not yet. Per WP:N, WP:V, WP:OR, and WP:SYNTH this page should be deleted. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 17:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 18:54, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
I don't believe this biographical subject meets the GNG or PROF. Lots of references but little of substance - citations are mostly to book sellers, blogs, self published sources, and directories. Sam Walton ( talk) 17:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 18:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Contested WP:PROD. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Sources offered are all primary, trivial mentions, stock ticker listings, wikis or otherwise unhelpful. Googling turned up nothing useful. Msnicki ( talk) 16:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Added: I note also that a previous version of the page by the same author, KIFS Securities, was speedy deleted as WP:G11 by Randykitty. Msnicki ( talk) 23:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Nakon 21:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
This is a somewhat difficult nomination for me. There are indeed a few sources in the article. But all but one appear to be non-independent sources. This could also potentially be merged to fair trade, but either way I can't see this really needing a separate article. Also, the article seems to have some POV issues so should the article be kept, these need to be resolved. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 15:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) ansh 666 17:33, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Non notable game that has little coverage in reliable sources. Philafrenzy ( talk) 14:48, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Strong Delete -This article is against religion faith. And Also pictures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nijam122 ( talk • contribs) 13:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Keep Nakon 21:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMODEL, fails WP:BLP1E, sourced only with WP:ROUTINE coverage. Part of a mass creation of articles on pageant participents by a [1] SOCK farm link and junk building effort. Legacypac ( talk) 11:31, 31 January 2015 (UTC) Legacypac ( talk) 11:31, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Addendum: I just looked back over your cut-and-paste Keep votes on these pageant AfDs. You made the first one at 6:43. The second came at 6:50, with six more coming over the next eleven minutes. You cannot possibly be claiming to have made an adequate search for sources in a time frame like that, and I'm quite comfortable with calling that bad faith. Would you care to reconsider? Ravenswing 03:14, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
I'm not convinced that this is notable roundabout. A GBooks search turns up exactly two passing mentions of it. QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 13:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Nakon 22:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
There seems to be no sources indicating the notability of Agha and the entire article seems to be an advert for him. http://www.so.undp.org/content/rbas/en/home/presscenter/articles/2011/02/20/-corporate-social-responsibility-in-iraq-brainstorming-meeting-in-erbil-20th-february-2011-.html is the only real source in the article and mentions him by name. The Reuters, http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSnBw115171a+100+BSW20140811?irpc=932, is nothing more than a photograph that has him standing in the background and no mention in the article. The other sources are to Linkedin and so are not really reliable. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Please see the final version of the article. There is no intention to advertise Agha and rather generate a comprehensive profile for him. This is being conducted on the basis of his reference availability with more than 70% of the information provided. The language can be amended to avoid the presentation of adver. Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuleyBaker ( talk • contribs) 13:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC) — JuleyBaker ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
I reworked the text and removed photos. Honestly, I do not see the content as not credible or flawed. Neither as adver. It is a well informed platform that is giving 360 degrees information about the individual.
Please REMOVE the DELETION notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuleyBaker ( talk • contribs) 13:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC) — JuleyBaker ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
I agree with JuleyBaker. This is an individual who has served in private and public capacities and is clearly an individual that Wiki searches would like to see. The information is credible, with pictures of him with global icons. The flow of information also is appealing.
I suggest to improve the language though.
Certainly a DELETION notice or any sign of controversy on what I see is not fair. As a Wiki user, I'd like to have access to such profiles with high density of data.
Thank you for highlighting this matter to my attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhdalagha ( talk • contribs) 15:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC) — Mhdalagha ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Impressive fixes. I add my voice to Juley and mhdalagha. Wiki should keep it. Please remove DELETION notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamedhammady ( talk • contribs) 17:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC) — Hamedhammady ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
'1. Delete the article * 2. Wiki to apply amendments to meet Wiki guidelines and remove the deletion notice * 3. Wiki to suggest required amendments for the contributors to apply within a deadline or delete the article upon failure to comply'
Please take the above with an urgent consideration for the sake of our integrity as contributors, and for Wiki as a platform and for the individual's own public exposure. Thank you! JuleyBaker — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.98.4.61 ( talk) 09:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
I second JuleyBaker Hamedhammady — Preceding undated comment added 09:33, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks JuleyBaker and Hamedhammady. I am in support of any of the above three choice. The current deletion notice should not stay long. Either the notice or the entire article should be removed. Please take action immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhdalagha ( talk • contribs) 09:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sadads and j⚛e decker
May I seek your insights on how to improve the article towards acceptability? I'm ready to work on it. This would be an excellent exercise. Thank you. JuleyBaker — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamedhammady ( talk • contribs) 19:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
I added a few links. Hope this is of value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhdalagha ( talk • contribs) 20:32, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sadads. Need your help on the article to make it a valuable addition to Wiki's wealth of useful public information. This is an article written by a well renowned historian and a number of contributors whom I do not know have added their part in it and I added every source possible to make it as notable as required while monitoring it and trying to keep it real and credible with spotlights on good work done by the global leaders/organizations mentioned in it regardless of my exposure.
I am grateful for your feedback and soonest verdict on either removing the deletion notice (preferable) or removing the whole thing all together. Thanks much! Muhammad A. Agha ( talk) 07:26, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was No consensus, defaults to keep. Nakon 22:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Next to no sources are cited and the page is essentially a big advertisement for a business that appears to no longer exist. Wikinium ( talk) 23:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nakon 01:50, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Light rail stations are not notable until actually placed into use, which will not happen with this particular station until this September. Conifer ( talk) 23:19, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
AUTOBIO by Rjarkhipov -doesn't appear to be meeting BIO and GNG standard. Anupmehra - Let's talk! 02:33, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:57, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
The article cites no WP:RS, only primary sources, and I can find no reviews or discussion in secondary sources. The article, therefore, appears to fail WP:GNG. I don't see that this meets any of the criteria of WP:BKCRIT either - in particular, it has won no major awards and the author is not sufficiently notable to make his works implicitly notable. GoldenRing ( talk) 11:47, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
On initial research, I only found 1 that can be used as a source. [1] Seeing the lack of supporting references, I would have to agree that it indeed does not meet the aforementioned criteria. Pmanz2014 || Let's Connect 12:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help)
The review notes (from the Google snippet):
Getting Free has many of the remarkable qualities which distinguished Mr Hinton's first novel, Collision Course (OUP, 1976). For one thing, it is compulsive reading. It begins: 'Johanna's hands were trembling as she picked up"...
The review notes (from the Google snippet):
With insight and understanding Nigel Hinton tells the story of two teenage lovers and their struggle to get free and live their own life. ...
The book notes (from the Google snippet):
Nigel Hinton's Getting Free contains many elements familiar from the traditional adventure srory — pursuit, a spell spent snow-bound in a lonely cottage, a desperate drive in search of help, assorted eccentrics, a hint of the supernatural.
The result was Redirect to Cam Brook#Cam Valley. Nakon 01:41, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Neither of the two river/brook valleys listed (there are seven River Cams or Cam Rivers) has an actual article, so what's the point of this so-called dab page? At best, it's an incomplete rehashing of
Cam (disambiguation)#Rivers
Cam River.
Clarityfiend (
talk)
10:12, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Paul R. Martin. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:42, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NBOOK. Single review found. Tgeairn ( talk) 05:52, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 01:51, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
I quote the proposer of the previous PROD: "It appears to be about nothing at all. It gives no details of any preceding system of units. it mentions an Arabic unit of mass which appears irrelevant. I would suggest WP:NOTABLE"
The original editor removed the PROD with a justification which I quote: "(It provides details about the current system. It provides the details about the system before the current system (Note: Portuguese system). Bahar was used in China to East coast of Africa (Refer: http://sizes.com/units/bahar.htm )(also refer references).)"
This hardly says anything at all, and does not address the original point. Imaginatorium ( talk) 12:17, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2014 Thai Division 2 League North Eastern Region. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:44, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Contested PROD and redirect on the grounds that WP:NSEASONS doesn't have to apply. As a guideline it does. This is a club that plays in a non- fully professional league, which lies at third level (regional) of Thai football. Previous consensus is that clubs that do not play in FPLs should not have individual season articles unless they can be shown to meet WP:GNG. This stat heavy article fails to do that. Would be happy with a redirect to the regional season article. Fenix down ( talk) 12:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:BIODELETE: "If a deletion discussion of any biographical article (of whether a well known or less known individual) has received few or no comments from any editor besides the nominator, the discussion may be closed at the closer's discretion and best judgment." j⚛e decker talk 19:13, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Problematic WP:BLP of a person whose primary claim of notability is as a city councillor in a city not large enough to confer notability on its city councillors under WP:NPOL, and whose sourcing is almost entirely of the primary (city's own website), unreliable (Blogspot) or "local weekly that's not widely distributed enough to count toward the notability test" (Oshawa Express) varieties. Which leaves the main reason why he might qualify for an article as a single two-day blip of major-daily newspaper coverage that he got when he allegedly committed a crime after he was out of office — but that just makes him a WP:BLP1E. According to a ProQuest search, further, he still hadn't actually gone to trial for the crime in question as of the last time any newspaper in all of Canada deigned to write anything about the matter at all (and even that deign was a passing acknowledgement of his existence in an article about the 2014 municipal election, not an article that was in any way substantively about him.) So under BLP1E, we should strongly consider not keeping an article about him as (a) reliable sources covered him only in the context of a single event; (b) he is, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual; and (c) the event is not significant. And under WP:PERP, we should strongly consider not keeping an article about him as he hasn't verifiably been convicted of anything. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 05:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 14:34, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Contested PROD and redirect on the grounds that WP:NSEASONS doesn't have to apply. As a guideline it does. This is a club that plays in a non- fully professional league, which lies at third level (regional) of Thai football. Previous consensus is that clubs that do not play in FPLs should not have individual season articles unless they can be shown to meet WP:GNG. This stat heavy article fails to do that. Would be happy with a redirect to the regional season article Fenix down ( talk) 11:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2010 Thai Division 2 League North Eastern Region. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:49, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Contested PROD and redirect on the grounds that WP:NSEASONS doesn't have to apply. As a guideline it does. This is a club that plays in a non- fully professional league, which lies at third level (regional) of Thai football. Previous consensus is that clubs that do not play in FPLs should not have individual season articles unless they can be shown to meet WP:GNG. This stat heavy article fails to do that. Would be happy with a redirect to regional season article Fenix down ( talk) 11:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2011 Thai Division 2 League North Eastern Region. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Contested PROD and redirect on the grounds that WP:NSEASONS doesn't have to apply. As a guideline it does. This is a club that plays in a non- fully professional league, which lies at third level (regional) of Thai football. Previous consensus is that clubs that do not play in FPLs should not have individual season articles unless they can be shown to meet WP:GNG. This stat heavy article fails to do that. Fenix down ( talk) 11:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2012 Thai Division 2 League North Eastern Region. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:53, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Contested PROD on the grounds that WP:NSEASONS doesn't have to apply. As a guideline it does. This is a club that plays in a non- fully professional league, which lies at third level (regional) of Thai football. Previous consensus is that clubs that do not play in FPLs should not have individual season articles unless they can be shown to meet WP:GNG. This stat heavy article fails to do that. Fenix down ( talk) 11:31, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
DICDEF supported only by the dubious Cardarelli. Google books finds just two occurrences of the term - both in books by Cardarelli. Oxford English Dictionary has no entry for "Stupping". No convincing evidence for the existence of this unit. Ahah: just found Shipping ton, for which it is a pretty obvious misprint/misreading. Pam D 11:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
2nd runner up of a non-notable beauty pageant. There are no secondary sources, all cited sources are from the web site of the organizer. This source is in NEpali though, but when I use Google translate, I don't find that the 2nd runner up is even mentioned. Google returns almost no hits [4]. Vanjagenije ( talk) 11:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
1st runner-up of a non-notable beauty pageant. There are no secondary sources cited. Google does return some hits [5] none of which seam like reliable sources to me. Fails WP:GNG Vanjagenije ( talk) 11:40, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
DICDEF supported only by the dubious Cardarelli. Not included in Metric prefix which appears to be a solid and well-sourced article; not listed in Oxford English Dictionary (while "kilo-" as a prefix is listed). If any reliable source can be found for this prefix it should be added to Metric prefixes and a redirect made from "Lacta". Pam D 10:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
non-notable video game players group Deunanknute ( talk) 13:20, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 14:29, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Contested PROD on the grounds that WP:NSEASONS doesn't have to apply. As a guideline it does. This is a club that plays in a non- fully professional league, which lies at third level (regional) of Thai football. Previous consensus is that clubs that do not play in FPLs should not have individual season articles unless they can be shown to meet WP:GNG. This stat heavy article fails to do that. Fenix down ( talk) 09:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Not encyclopedic. Broadcaster awarded rights may change frequently, hence unlikely to be adequately maintained unless a working group can adopt. Haruth ( talk) 09:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to UCL Institute of Archaeology#Publications. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 13:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Not indexed in any selective database (none of the databases listed are even close to being selective). No independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Randykitty ( talk) 15:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 21:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
As for dimi this does not warrant an article. Imaginatorium ( talk) 09:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Nakon 01:46, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Reason Possible self-promotion and/or indiscriminate publicity — Preceding unsigned comment added by Euphemus ( talk • contribs) 18:20, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Ronald McNair. Or to such other article as is desired and determined by consensus on the talk page. Stifle ( talk) 14:32, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Unremarkable University program - not notable IMO Gbawden ( talk) 11:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 01:47, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Article contains no evidence of notability in reliable third party sources, subject does not appear to meet the requirements of WP:ACADEMIC. KDS4444 Talk 08:44, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Added Awards and made some edits for biography-- Armineaghayan ( talk) 15:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Sirius XM Radio channels. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable radio station; lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources, failing WP:GNG / WP:N. -- Wikipedical ( talk) 23:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted per CSD G12, "Unambiguous copyright infringement: Source urls: http://blog.cinnamonhotels.com/about-cinnamon-u/, http://www.ovguide.com/cinnamon-hotels-and-resorts-9202a8c04000641f8000000014f4cffd". NORTH AMERICA 1000 16:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
There is little significant independent sources outside routinal reports by Sri Lanka media (e.g. [10] [11]). 野狼院ひさし u/ t/ c 07:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 09:58, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Redirect to Uptown (band) was removed by page creator. Carlos Galvan was redirected to Uptown as well. Non notable singer Gbawden ( talk) 06:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
This is a rather useless stub on a topic that should be adequately covered in Kim Kardashian and Kanye West. A redirect may also be appropriate here. (Forgot to sign.)- RHM22 ( talk) 05:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 19:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
non-notable per WP:CORP Deunanknute ( talk) 19:25, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 19:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Junior journalist for the Washington Post, previously of a blog. Only sources currently are from the blog and the post itself. A google search did not turn up much. The claim that he is award winning is misleading as he won a minor award for his military reporting. Overall fails WP:AUTHOR Mrfrobinson ( talk) 17:51, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE -- the author may wish to consider improving List of Urdu-language poets in the alternate j⚛e decker talk 19:05, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Sounds like an essay on poets. "We can't forget also" makes it sound like a memorial. WP:TNT? This article makes no sense, delete and start again may be the best option Gbawden ( talk) 14:23, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 19:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Looking at his credits, it all looks like bit parts to me. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 06:28, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 19:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
The current version of the page is an unsourced stub. I tried to find reliable sources, but couldn't find anything that could expand it beyond a stub. (Basically just verification that it exists.) Unless somebody can prove that RS exists for this that can state something beyond it exists and is popular in its territory, it should be deleted. Luthien22 ( talk) 00:47, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 19:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
non-notable per WP:CORP, unable to find significant coverage via Google, but tricky due to name. Deunanknute ( talk) 23:55, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. postdlf ( talk) 15:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
WP:TOOSOON. Firstly, it's hard to say whether all of these teams will actually be in the Championship or not. Secondly, it seems to have sparked an edit war over the contents for no good reason. And thirdly, even the main season doesn't have an article yet. There's also every possibility that these deals could change in the mean time. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 23:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 01:52, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
non notable business owner. Sources are all in passing quotes of him saying why people should still make press releases. No articles about subject. Gaijin42 ( talk) 22:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Keep Simply because those discussions mentioned in my option demonstrate he's an important part of the press release industry Santafesoul ( talk) 03:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
"Also KEPP" because the Business 2 Community article is clearly about his low cost ($10 instead of $500) approach to the business and why his company has grown to 100M.
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 19:23, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
non-released book. WP:TOOSOON WP:CRYSTAL Gaijin42 ( talk) 21:48, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE for Apache Rivet (nomination was withdrawn for the broader set) j⚛e decker talk 01:51, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
This a bulk deletion nomination for all of the articles in Category:Apache_httpd_modules except for List of Apache modules.
These articles are all for plugins for the Apache HTTP server. I think don't think they're notable according to wp:nsoft: They're just modules which provide a particular feature to Apache. Some of these pages are quite short... just a declaration of what the module is and what it does... and I would imagine there probably isn't any more to say about them without the descending into writing technical documentation.
Since we already have a list article that enumerates apache modules, I propose that we delete these articles and merge content as necessary into List of Apache modules. tommylommykins ( talk) 19:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Nakon 01:32, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable housing estate without official recognition as a hamlet, village, or town. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 19:07, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was Merge to Tom Gilb. Nakon 01:28, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
This sounds like it's a good book, but as far as I can see, fails to meet the notability criteria for articles about books. Perhaps its content should be merged into Tom Gilb? -- The Anome ( talk) 14:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 19:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
This person doesn't seem notable enough for his own article. Considering he released only one album with his band, which in itself isn't notable and I don't know how notable the album is, and when Googling his name, I only got 2 pages of results, with most if not all results don't seem like reliable sources. Pyrotle… the "y" is silent, BTW. 01:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK, point #1. NORTH AMERICA 1000 17:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Suggest a merge to I Killed the Zeitgeist. Lachlan Foley ( talk) 04:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Nakon 01:26, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Claims to fame: oilman, failed Senate candidate, federal postmaster in Shreveport, Louisiana. Not close to WP:NPOL. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Nakon 01:25, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Page duplicates some aspects of Operation Lam Son 719 but without providing any real detail or WP:RS. Page seems to exist to support the existence of Battle of Hill 723 which is also nominated for deletion Mztourist ( talk) 03:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Unable to find WP:RS, other than a small mention in one book, web search generally comes back to this page. Page is vaguely worded with no real detail and relies on a single non WP:RS. Page appears to be an attempt to dice up Operation Lam Son 719 but without providing any useful or verifiable information Mztourist ( talk) 03:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Content appears to have been merged to Metric prefix#Double prefixes Nakon 01:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Per WP:NOTDICTIONARY - War wizard90 ( talk) 03:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 22:17, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Simply refers to a specific product, may not be notable smileguy91 talk 02:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:42, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
I began vetting the article for compliance with WP:BLP and found myself deleting the entire page, with the exception of a WP:ONEEVENT. Almost everything in the article was cited to primary sources, court records, gossip/alternative magazines like the Washingtonian, brief mentions, or sources that do not even mention Salerian. I'm not sure how to categorize this source. The remaining sources that were reliable often had just 1 paragraph on him or were blurbs from a press release and nothing in-depth.
You can see the article before my trimming here for reference.
The only event Salerian is known for is being indicted for prescribing pain pills to drug dealers. First this appears to potentially be related to psychological or mental problems, making the article rather insensitive. Second, It appears to be a very minor news item, attracting few readers here [15] and being of little importance to an encyclopedia. Third, there's WP:ONEEVENT; there is no way to create a full biographical profile here using BLP-compliant sources.
This article serves a tremendous opportunity to harm and embarrass a living person and no meaningful benefit to Wikipedia. I will ask the article-subject to confirm BLPREQUESTDELETE as well. CorporateM ( Talk) 02:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Bobherry talk 01:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Claim to fame is owning a sugar plantation; that's about it. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Keep The source: "Clarke, Lewis Strong". Louisiana Historical Association, A Dictionary of Louisiana Biography (lahistory.com) automatically makes him notable. This publication doesn't just add biographies of people "who own a sugar plantation". Billy Hathorn ( talk) 16:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) -- Sam Sing! 12:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Character is not notable, article is bad and has not been improved for a long time, tags requesting citations and concerns for the article's notability are long-standing. Kavidun ( talk) 15:16, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was No Consensus, defaults to keep. Nakon 01:35, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Unsorted. No evidence of any special notability. Velella Velella Talk 04:40, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
I have included more references in the article, from various news and government websites like: [17] [18] hope these provide sufficient evidence of special notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danny.mosaic ( talk • contribs) 07:50, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was No Consensus, defaults to keep. Nakon 01:37, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
this article is not even a stub, and should at best be a wiktionary entry μηδείς ( talk) 03:03, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment: I feel like there's an article in here somewhere... maybe create "Theonymics" with this content+ and redirect "Theonym" to it? Vrac ( talk) 21:16, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. AfD withdrawn DGG ( talk ) 17:54, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Promotioanl and non-notable -- see inforbox DGG ( talk ) 01:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
I've expanded the article some, doing partnered contests with the 1st and 3rd most played online PC games seems noteworthy to me. [1] Polypunk ( talk) 20:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Promotional article for Bio Vision. The phrases "Senescent toxin" or "Senescent toxins" are not apparently used in the literature, a/c Google scholar, so it's simply their proprietary name DGG ( talk ) 01:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete - Wikipedia is not a directory. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 12:36, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY Deunanknute ( talk) 00:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:38, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Does not appear to be Wikipedia-notable. Lachlan Foley ( talk) 23:00, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) -- Sam Sing! 07:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Searching through Google, this has a few valid references but is unlikely to expand further than a stub article, and I would perhaps suggest merging it with Strange House. Lachlan Foley ( talk) 23:55, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was Speedy Deleted - G7 - The creator decided to create, nominate and then blank the article .... Not sure why but there we go!
, NAC –
Davey2010
Talk
00:53, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Later Hirak1525 ( talk) 22:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Opabinia regalis ( talk) 05:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
notability unclear; old age is not sufficient. Fgnievinski ( talk) 23:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:48, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
non-notable person, reads like an advert for her company Deunanknute ( talk) 23:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
no refs, appears non-notable (tough name to google), BLP issues, probable COI/autobiography Deunanknute ( talk) 23:17, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete both. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
No indication of notability per WP:CREATIVE, WP:BIO or WP:GNG. No significant coverage online in WP:Reliable sources - just passing mentions, apart from the blog interview cited. His one claim to fame is for being second unit director on the film Sold, but I can find no evidence of his involvement in online credits for that film. Dai Pritchard ( talk) 22:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related page because it similarly gives no indication of notability per WP:NFILM, with no significant coverage online from reliable, secondary sources:
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable musician. Google web and book searches of his English and Chinese name result in no notable coverage except on the wiki-like website imslp.org. Zanhe ( talk) 22:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Nakon 21:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Earlier I thought that the subject is partially notable, but after reading WP:AFC and searching for references once again I changed my mind. Though I wanted to give the page a fair chance, therefore I'm going through the discussion. According to me the page fails WP:NOTE and tries to promote the subject in an overtly manner without imparting any real information. Mr RD 22:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. - nomination withdrawn ( non-admin closure) -- Sam Sing! 19:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Another non-notable pipe band. Ostrichyearning ( talk) 22:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Not a good enough reason for deletion - please be more specific. Article relates to an active pipe band, although does require updated. -- Thehorseltd ( talk) 22:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Nakon 21:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable pipe band. Ostrichyearning ( talk) 22:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
I could of put this as a BLP prod but there are links as it turns out. But the notability is a question here. Wgolf ( talk) 21:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
lack of notability/verifiability, Wikipedia not a directory Wantonlife ( talk) 20:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Redirect to Cheshire Senior Cup. EoRdE6( Come Talk to Me!) 02:37, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable competition season Kivo ( talk) 19:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 02:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable player who is yet to make his first team debut. Fails WP:RLN, contested PROD. Mattlore ( talk) 19:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. j⚛e decker talk 18:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
No references verify the general notability of this station. Therefore it is not a suitable subject for a standalone article. AadaamS ( talk) 18:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#A7 -- auburnpilot talk 02:35, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
non-notable local charity per WP:NONPROFIT Deunanknute ( talk) 18:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 20:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
non-notable per
WP:BKCRIT, all coverage is either about the author with passing mention of the book, all in depth coverage appears to be non-independent (paid reviews)
Deunanknute (
talk)
18:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 18:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
non-notable per WP:CORP, all references lack any depth about the company past trivial coverage per WP:CORPDEPTH Deunanknute ( talk) 18:24, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 18:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
non-notably company per WP:CORP, no independent references found, promotional content with no assertion of previous works Deunanknute ( talk) 18:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Thawte. j⚛e decker talk 18:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
This no longer seems to be running and debatable whether it was notable in the first place. That said, article been around long enoguh that CSD probably isn't warranted. Mike1901 ( talk) 17:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 18:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Unreferenced article about a Youtube series. Prod was removed without explanation. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:MOVIE almost qualifies for speedy deletion per WP:A7 Crystallizedcarbon ( talk) 17:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 18:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Consensus at WP:PHARM and WP:CHEMS is that chemical compounds must meet the general notability guideline to be included in Wikipedia. This is not a notable chemical compound. Clonazolam is not a pharmaceutical drug, but rather a designer drug only sold online. The made-up names "Clonazolam" and "Clonitrazolam" are intended to sound like the names of benzodiazepine pharmaceuticals, but they are only used on online recreational drug forums - they do not appear anywhere in the scientific literature, patent literature, Google Scholar, etc. The first two references in the article mention this chemical compound, but only as one in a large number of other similar compounds. There is nothing that distinguishes this one from the many other non-notable ones mentioned. The rest of the references (currently numbers 3 through 7) do not even mention this compound - they are general references about benzodiazepines that support text that is about benzodiazepines in general, not about this compound in particular. There are no reliable sources (or more specifically WP:MEDRS-compliant sources) to suggest that any claims of effects in humans are anything but speculation. Designer drugs certainly can become notable enough to be included in Wikipedia, but this one is not ... at least not yet. Per WP:N, WP:V, WP:OR, and WP:SYNTH this page should be deleted. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 17:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 18:54, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
I don't believe this biographical subject meets the GNG or PROF. Lots of references but little of substance - citations are mostly to book sellers, blogs, self published sources, and directories. Sam Walton ( talk) 17:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 18:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Contested WP:PROD. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Sources offered are all primary, trivial mentions, stock ticker listings, wikis or otherwise unhelpful. Googling turned up nothing useful. Msnicki ( talk) 16:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Added: I note also that a previous version of the page by the same author, KIFS Securities, was speedy deleted as WP:G11 by Randykitty. Msnicki ( talk) 23:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Nakon 21:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
This is a somewhat difficult nomination for me. There are indeed a few sources in the article. But all but one appear to be non-independent sources. This could also potentially be merged to fair trade, but either way I can't see this really needing a separate article. Also, the article seems to have some POV issues so should the article be kept, these need to be resolved. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 15:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) ansh 666 17:33, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Non notable game that has little coverage in reliable sources. Philafrenzy ( talk) 14:48, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Strong Delete -This article is against religion faith. And Also pictures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nijam122 ( talk • contribs) 13:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Keep Nakon 21:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMODEL, fails WP:BLP1E, sourced only with WP:ROUTINE coverage. Part of a mass creation of articles on pageant participents by a [1] SOCK farm link and junk building effort. Legacypac ( talk) 11:31, 31 January 2015 (UTC) Legacypac ( talk) 11:31, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Addendum: I just looked back over your cut-and-paste Keep votes on these pageant AfDs. You made the first one at 6:43. The second came at 6:50, with six more coming over the next eleven minutes. You cannot possibly be claiming to have made an adequate search for sources in a time frame like that, and I'm quite comfortable with calling that bad faith. Would you care to reconsider? Ravenswing 03:14, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
I'm not convinced that this is notable roundabout. A GBooks search turns up exactly two passing mentions of it. QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 13:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Nakon 22:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
There seems to be no sources indicating the notability of Agha and the entire article seems to be an advert for him. http://www.so.undp.org/content/rbas/en/home/presscenter/articles/2011/02/20/-corporate-social-responsibility-in-iraq-brainstorming-meeting-in-erbil-20th-february-2011-.html is the only real source in the article and mentions him by name. The Reuters, http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSnBw115171a+100+BSW20140811?irpc=932, is nothing more than a photograph that has him standing in the background and no mention in the article. The other sources are to Linkedin and so are not really reliable. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Please see the final version of the article. There is no intention to advertise Agha and rather generate a comprehensive profile for him. This is being conducted on the basis of his reference availability with more than 70% of the information provided. The language can be amended to avoid the presentation of adver. Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuleyBaker ( talk • contribs) 13:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC) — JuleyBaker ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
I reworked the text and removed photos. Honestly, I do not see the content as not credible or flawed. Neither as adver. It is a well informed platform that is giving 360 degrees information about the individual.
Please REMOVE the DELETION notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuleyBaker ( talk • contribs) 13:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC) — JuleyBaker ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
I agree with JuleyBaker. This is an individual who has served in private and public capacities and is clearly an individual that Wiki searches would like to see. The information is credible, with pictures of him with global icons. The flow of information also is appealing.
I suggest to improve the language though.
Certainly a DELETION notice or any sign of controversy on what I see is not fair. As a Wiki user, I'd like to have access to such profiles with high density of data.
Thank you for highlighting this matter to my attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhdalagha ( talk • contribs) 15:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC) — Mhdalagha ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Impressive fixes. I add my voice to Juley and mhdalagha. Wiki should keep it. Please remove DELETION notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamedhammady ( talk • contribs) 17:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC) — Hamedhammady ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
'1. Delete the article * 2. Wiki to apply amendments to meet Wiki guidelines and remove the deletion notice * 3. Wiki to suggest required amendments for the contributors to apply within a deadline or delete the article upon failure to comply'
Please take the above with an urgent consideration for the sake of our integrity as contributors, and for Wiki as a platform and for the individual's own public exposure. Thank you! JuleyBaker — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.98.4.61 ( talk) 09:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
I second JuleyBaker Hamedhammady — Preceding undated comment added 09:33, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks JuleyBaker and Hamedhammady. I am in support of any of the above three choice. The current deletion notice should not stay long. Either the notice or the entire article should be removed. Please take action immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhdalagha ( talk • contribs) 09:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sadads and j⚛e decker
May I seek your insights on how to improve the article towards acceptability? I'm ready to work on it. This would be an excellent exercise. Thank you. JuleyBaker — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamedhammady ( talk • contribs) 19:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
I added a few links. Hope this is of value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhdalagha ( talk • contribs) 20:32, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sadads. Need your help on the article to make it a valuable addition to Wiki's wealth of useful public information. This is an article written by a well renowned historian and a number of contributors whom I do not know have added their part in it and I added every source possible to make it as notable as required while monitoring it and trying to keep it real and credible with spotlights on good work done by the global leaders/organizations mentioned in it regardless of my exposure.
I am grateful for your feedback and soonest verdict on either removing the deletion notice (preferable) or removing the whole thing all together. Thanks much! Muhammad A. Agha ( talk) 07:26, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was No consensus, defaults to keep. Nakon 22:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Next to no sources are cited and the page is essentially a big advertisement for a business that appears to no longer exist. Wikinium ( talk) 23:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nakon 01:50, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Light rail stations are not notable until actually placed into use, which will not happen with this particular station until this September. Conifer ( talk) 23:19, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
AUTOBIO by Rjarkhipov -doesn't appear to be meeting BIO and GNG standard. Anupmehra - Let's talk! 02:33, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:57, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
The article cites no WP:RS, only primary sources, and I can find no reviews or discussion in secondary sources. The article, therefore, appears to fail WP:GNG. I don't see that this meets any of the criteria of WP:BKCRIT either - in particular, it has won no major awards and the author is not sufficiently notable to make his works implicitly notable. GoldenRing ( talk) 11:47, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
On initial research, I only found 1 that can be used as a source. [1] Seeing the lack of supporting references, I would have to agree that it indeed does not meet the aforementioned criteria. Pmanz2014 || Let's Connect 12:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help)
The review notes (from the Google snippet):
Getting Free has many of the remarkable qualities which distinguished Mr Hinton's first novel, Collision Course (OUP, 1976). For one thing, it is compulsive reading. It begins: 'Johanna's hands were trembling as she picked up"...
The review notes (from the Google snippet):
With insight and understanding Nigel Hinton tells the story of two teenage lovers and their struggle to get free and live their own life. ...
The book notes (from the Google snippet):
Nigel Hinton's Getting Free contains many elements familiar from the traditional adventure srory — pursuit, a spell spent snow-bound in a lonely cottage, a desperate drive in search of help, assorted eccentrics, a hint of the supernatural.
The result was Redirect to Cam Brook#Cam Valley. Nakon 01:41, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Neither of the two river/brook valleys listed (there are seven River Cams or Cam Rivers) has an actual article, so what's the point of this so-called dab page? At best, it's an incomplete rehashing of
Cam (disambiguation)#Rivers
Cam River.
Clarityfiend (
talk)
10:12, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Paul R. Martin. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:42, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NBOOK. Single review found. Tgeairn ( talk) 05:52, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 01:51, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
I quote the proposer of the previous PROD: "It appears to be about nothing at all. It gives no details of any preceding system of units. it mentions an Arabic unit of mass which appears irrelevant. I would suggest WP:NOTABLE"
The original editor removed the PROD with a justification which I quote: "(It provides details about the current system. It provides the details about the system before the current system (Note: Portuguese system). Bahar was used in China to East coast of Africa (Refer: http://sizes.com/units/bahar.htm )(also refer references).)"
This hardly says anything at all, and does not address the original point. Imaginatorium ( talk) 12:17, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2014 Thai Division 2 League North Eastern Region. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:44, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Contested PROD and redirect on the grounds that WP:NSEASONS doesn't have to apply. As a guideline it does. This is a club that plays in a non- fully professional league, which lies at third level (regional) of Thai football. Previous consensus is that clubs that do not play in FPLs should not have individual season articles unless they can be shown to meet WP:GNG. This stat heavy article fails to do that. Would be happy with a redirect to the regional season article. Fenix down ( talk) 12:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:BIODELETE: "If a deletion discussion of any biographical article (of whether a well known or less known individual) has received few or no comments from any editor besides the nominator, the discussion may be closed at the closer's discretion and best judgment." j⚛e decker talk 19:13, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Problematic WP:BLP of a person whose primary claim of notability is as a city councillor in a city not large enough to confer notability on its city councillors under WP:NPOL, and whose sourcing is almost entirely of the primary (city's own website), unreliable (Blogspot) or "local weekly that's not widely distributed enough to count toward the notability test" (Oshawa Express) varieties. Which leaves the main reason why he might qualify for an article as a single two-day blip of major-daily newspaper coverage that he got when he allegedly committed a crime after he was out of office — but that just makes him a WP:BLP1E. According to a ProQuest search, further, he still hadn't actually gone to trial for the crime in question as of the last time any newspaper in all of Canada deigned to write anything about the matter at all (and even that deign was a passing acknowledgement of his existence in an article about the 2014 municipal election, not an article that was in any way substantively about him.) So under BLP1E, we should strongly consider not keeping an article about him as (a) reliable sources covered him only in the context of a single event; (b) he is, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual; and (c) the event is not significant. And under WP:PERP, we should strongly consider not keeping an article about him as he hasn't verifiably been convicted of anything. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 05:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 14:34, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Contested PROD and redirect on the grounds that WP:NSEASONS doesn't have to apply. As a guideline it does. This is a club that plays in a non- fully professional league, which lies at third level (regional) of Thai football. Previous consensus is that clubs that do not play in FPLs should not have individual season articles unless they can be shown to meet WP:GNG. This stat heavy article fails to do that. Would be happy with a redirect to the regional season article Fenix down ( talk) 11:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2010 Thai Division 2 League North Eastern Region. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:49, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Contested PROD and redirect on the grounds that WP:NSEASONS doesn't have to apply. As a guideline it does. This is a club that plays in a non- fully professional league, which lies at third level (regional) of Thai football. Previous consensus is that clubs that do not play in FPLs should not have individual season articles unless they can be shown to meet WP:GNG. This stat heavy article fails to do that. Would be happy with a redirect to regional season article Fenix down ( talk) 11:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2011 Thai Division 2 League North Eastern Region. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Contested PROD and redirect on the grounds that WP:NSEASONS doesn't have to apply. As a guideline it does. This is a club that plays in a non- fully professional league, which lies at third level (regional) of Thai football. Previous consensus is that clubs that do not play in FPLs should not have individual season articles unless they can be shown to meet WP:GNG. This stat heavy article fails to do that. Fenix down ( talk) 11:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2012 Thai Division 2 League North Eastern Region. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:53, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Contested PROD on the grounds that WP:NSEASONS doesn't have to apply. As a guideline it does. This is a club that plays in a non- fully professional league, which lies at third level (regional) of Thai football. Previous consensus is that clubs that do not play in FPLs should not have individual season articles unless they can be shown to meet WP:GNG. This stat heavy article fails to do that. Fenix down ( talk) 11:31, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
DICDEF supported only by the dubious Cardarelli. Google books finds just two occurrences of the term - both in books by Cardarelli. Oxford English Dictionary has no entry for "Stupping". No convincing evidence for the existence of this unit. Ahah: just found Shipping ton, for which it is a pretty obvious misprint/misreading. Pam D 11:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
2nd runner up of a non-notable beauty pageant. There are no secondary sources, all cited sources are from the web site of the organizer. This source is in NEpali though, but when I use Google translate, I don't find that the 2nd runner up is even mentioned. Google returns almost no hits [4]. Vanjagenije ( talk) 11:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
1st runner-up of a non-notable beauty pageant. There are no secondary sources cited. Google does return some hits [5] none of which seam like reliable sources to me. Fails WP:GNG Vanjagenije ( talk) 11:40, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
DICDEF supported only by the dubious Cardarelli. Not included in Metric prefix which appears to be a solid and well-sourced article; not listed in Oxford English Dictionary (while "kilo-" as a prefix is listed). If any reliable source can be found for this prefix it should be added to Metric prefixes and a redirect made from "Lacta". Pam D 10:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
non-notable video game players group Deunanknute ( talk) 13:20, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 14:29, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Contested PROD on the grounds that WP:NSEASONS doesn't have to apply. As a guideline it does. This is a club that plays in a non- fully professional league, which lies at third level (regional) of Thai football. Previous consensus is that clubs that do not play in FPLs should not have individual season articles unless they can be shown to meet WP:GNG. This stat heavy article fails to do that. Fenix down ( talk) 09:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Not encyclopedic. Broadcaster awarded rights may change frequently, hence unlikely to be adequately maintained unless a working group can adopt. Haruth ( talk) 09:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to UCL Institute of Archaeology#Publications. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 13:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Not indexed in any selective database (none of the databases listed are even close to being selective). No independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Randykitty ( talk) 15:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 21:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
As for dimi this does not warrant an article. Imaginatorium ( talk) 09:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Nakon 01:46, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Reason Possible self-promotion and/or indiscriminate publicity — Preceding unsigned comment added by Euphemus ( talk • contribs) 18:20, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Ronald McNair. Or to such other article as is desired and determined by consensus on the talk page. Stifle ( talk) 14:32, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Unremarkable University program - not notable IMO Gbawden ( talk) 11:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 01:47, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Article contains no evidence of notability in reliable third party sources, subject does not appear to meet the requirements of WP:ACADEMIC. KDS4444 Talk 08:44, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Added Awards and made some edits for biography-- Armineaghayan ( talk) 15:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Sirius XM Radio channels. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable radio station; lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources, failing WP:GNG / WP:N. -- Wikipedical ( talk) 23:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted per CSD G12, "Unambiguous copyright infringement: Source urls: http://blog.cinnamonhotels.com/about-cinnamon-u/, http://www.ovguide.com/cinnamon-hotels-and-resorts-9202a8c04000641f8000000014f4cffd". NORTH AMERICA 1000 16:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
There is little significant independent sources outside routinal reports by Sri Lanka media (e.g. [10] [11]). 野狼院ひさし u/ t/ c 07:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 09:58, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Redirect to Uptown (band) was removed by page creator. Carlos Galvan was redirected to Uptown as well. Non notable singer Gbawden ( talk) 06:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
This is a rather useless stub on a topic that should be adequately covered in Kim Kardashian and Kanye West. A redirect may also be appropriate here. (Forgot to sign.)- RHM22 ( talk) 05:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 19:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
non-notable per WP:CORP Deunanknute ( talk) 19:25, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 19:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Junior journalist for the Washington Post, previously of a blog. Only sources currently are from the blog and the post itself. A google search did not turn up much. The claim that he is award winning is misleading as he won a minor award for his military reporting. Overall fails WP:AUTHOR Mrfrobinson ( talk) 17:51, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE -- the author may wish to consider improving List of Urdu-language poets in the alternate j⚛e decker talk 19:05, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Sounds like an essay on poets. "We can't forget also" makes it sound like a memorial. WP:TNT? This article makes no sense, delete and start again may be the best option Gbawden ( talk) 14:23, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 19:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Looking at his credits, it all looks like bit parts to me. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 06:28, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 19:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
The current version of the page is an unsourced stub. I tried to find reliable sources, but couldn't find anything that could expand it beyond a stub. (Basically just verification that it exists.) Unless somebody can prove that RS exists for this that can state something beyond it exists and is popular in its territory, it should be deleted. Luthien22 ( talk) 00:47, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 19:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
non-notable per WP:CORP, unable to find significant coverage via Google, but tricky due to name. Deunanknute ( talk) 23:55, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. postdlf ( talk) 15:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
WP:TOOSOON. Firstly, it's hard to say whether all of these teams will actually be in the Championship or not. Secondly, it seems to have sparked an edit war over the contents for no good reason. And thirdly, even the main season doesn't have an article yet. There's also every possibility that these deals could change in the mean time. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 23:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 01:52, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
non notable business owner. Sources are all in passing quotes of him saying why people should still make press releases. No articles about subject. Gaijin42 ( talk) 22:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Keep Simply because those discussions mentioned in my option demonstrate he's an important part of the press release industry Santafesoul ( talk) 03:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
"Also KEPP" because the Business 2 Community article is clearly about his low cost ($10 instead of $500) approach to the business and why his company has grown to 100M.
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 19:23, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
non-released book. WP:TOOSOON WP:CRYSTAL Gaijin42 ( talk) 21:48, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE for Apache Rivet (nomination was withdrawn for the broader set) j⚛e decker talk 01:51, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
This a bulk deletion nomination for all of the articles in Category:Apache_httpd_modules except for List of Apache modules.
These articles are all for plugins for the Apache HTTP server. I think don't think they're notable according to wp:nsoft: They're just modules which provide a particular feature to Apache. Some of these pages are quite short... just a declaration of what the module is and what it does... and I would imagine there probably isn't any more to say about them without the descending into writing technical documentation.
Since we already have a list article that enumerates apache modules, I propose that we delete these articles and merge content as necessary into List of Apache modules. tommylommykins ( talk) 19:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Nakon 01:32, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable housing estate without official recognition as a hamlet, village, or town. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 19:07, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was Merge to Tom Gilb. Nakon 01:28, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
This sounds like it's a good book, but as far as I can see, fails to meet the notability criteria for articles about books. Perhaps its content should be merged into Tom Gilb? -- The Anome ( talk) 14:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 19:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
This person doesn't seem notable enough for his own article. Considering he released only one album with his band, which in itself isn't notable and I don't know how notable the album is, and when Googling his name, I only got 2 pages of results, with most if not all results don't seem like reliable sources. Pyrotle… the "y" is silent, BTW. 01:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK, point #1. NORTH AMERICA 1000 17:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Suggest a merge to I Killed the Zeitgeist. Lachlan Foley ( talk) 04:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Nakon 01:26, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Claims to fame: oilman, failed Senate candidate, federal postmaster in Shreveport, Louisiana. Not close to WP:NPOL. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Nakon 01:25, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Page duplicates some aspects of Operation Lam Son 719 but without providing any real detail or WP:RS. Page seems to exist to support the existence of Battle of Hill 723 which is also nominated for deletion Mztourist ( talk) 03:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Unable to find WP:RS, other than a small mention in one book, web search generally comes back to this page. Page is vaguely worded with no real detail and relies on a single non WP:RS. Page appears to be an attempt to dice up Operation Lam Son 719 but without providing any useful or verifiable information Mztourist ( talk) 03:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Content appears to have been merged to Metric prefix#Double prefixes Nakon 01:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Per WP:NOTDICTIONARY - War wizard90 ( talk) 03:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 22:17, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Simply refers to a specific product, may not be notable smileguy91 talk 02:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:42, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
I began vetting the article for compliance with WP:BLP and found myself deleting the entire page, with the exception of a WP:ONEEVENT. Almost everything in the article was cited to primary sources, court records, gossip/alternative magazines like the Washingtonian, brief mentions, or sources that do not even mention Salerian. I'm not sure how to categorize this source. The remaining sources that were reliable often had just 1 paragraph on him or were blurbs from a press release and nothing in-depth.
You can see the article before my trimming here for reference.
The only event Salerian is known for is being indicted for prescribing pain pills to drug dealers. First this appears to potentially be related to psychological or mental problems, making the article rather insensitive. Second, It appears to be a very minor news item, attracting few readers here [15] and being of little importance to an encyclopedia. Third, there's WP:ONEEVENT; there is no way to create a full biographical profile here using BLP-compliant sources.
This article serves a tremendous opportunity to harm and embarrass a living person and no meaningful benefit to Wikipedia. I will ask the article-subject to confirm BLPREQUESTDELETE as well. CorporateM ( Talk) 02:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Bobherry talk 01:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Claim to fame is owning a sugar plantation; that's about it. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Keep The source: "Clarke, Lewis Strong". Louisiana Historical Association, A Dictionary of Louisiana Biography (lahistory.com) automatically makes him notable. This publication doesn't just add biographies of people "who own a sugar plantation". Billy Hathorn ( talk) 16:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) -- Sam Sing! 12:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Character is not notable, article is bad and has not been improved for a long time, tags requesting citations and concerns for the article's notability are long-standing. Kavidun ( talk) 15:16, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was No Consensus, defaults to keep. Nakon 01:35, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Unsorted. No evidence of any special notability. Velella Velella Talk 04:40, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
I have included more references in the article, from various news and government websites like: [17] [18] hope these provide sufficient evidence of special notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danny.mosaic ( talk • contribs) 07:50, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was No Consensus, defaults to keep. Nakon 01:37, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
this article is not even a stub, and should at best be a wiktionary entry μηδείς ( talk) 03:03, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment: I feel like there's an article in here somewhere... maybe create "Theonymics" with this content+ and redirect "Theonym" to it? Vrac ( talk) 21:16, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. AfD withdrawn DGG ( talk ) 17:54, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Promotioanl and non-notable -- see inforbox DGG ( talk ) 01:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
I've expanded the article some, doing partnered contests with the 1st and 3rd most played online PC games seems noteworthy to me. [1] Polypunk ( talk) 20:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Promotional article for Bio Vision. The phrases "Senescent toxin" or "Senescent toxins" are not apparently used in the literature, a/c Google scholar, so it's simply their proprietary name DGG ( talk ) 01:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete - Wikipedia is not a directory. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 12:36, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY Deunanknute ( talk) 00:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:38, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Does not appear to be Wikipedia-notable. Lachlan Foley ( talk) 23:00, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) -- Sam Sing! 07:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Searching through Google, this has a few valid references but is unlikely to expand further than a stub article, and I would perhaps suggest merging it with Strange House. Lachlan Foley ( talk) 23:55, 3 February 2015 (UTC)