< November 5 | November 7 > |
---|
The result was keep. Cirt ( talk) 07:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable wrestler at this point in time. Article is not sourced at all and has extremely little information. Though has appeared on national tv at least two times in a major professional wrestling company. I wasn't sure if it should be deleted or not.-- Will C 21:49, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
To the best of my knowledge, lamp-making does not figure as a significant cultural tradition among Maya peoples, historical or contemporary. While it's quite possible that lamps are among the many types of products, crafts & trinkets manufactured and sold by modern Maya locally or to the tourist trade, this in itself is insufficient to demonstrate notability & encylopaedic significance for the manufacture or product. The article's creator seems themselves to be associated with a business selling such products, and there's nothing really here to suggest that calling the product is anything other than a marketing technique. If it were to be established as a genuine & significant Maya craft, then you'd expect there to be multiple independent mentions in the ethnographic literature (as is the case for example with Maya textiles, a craft with a long history and the subject of quite a few books and ethnographic/art history articles and exhibitions). However I have been unable to find any such mentions of Maya lamp-making; unless such mentions can be provided then the claims of a business selling them is not enough to verify adequate notability. cjllw ʘ TALK 23:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
unreferenced; author keeps removing PROD tags — Jeff G. ( talk| contribs) 23:39, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Unsourced sub-stub, no references cited; probably based on original research, as this appears to be one of a number of similar articles which form something of a walled garden of OR-based articles. (See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of the Tigris, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Kapisa and User:ChrisO/Ancient Persian problems for related discussions.) Tagged for cleanup since April 2008 but none has been forthcoming. I've tried to substantiate the topic of the article but have found no information on a "Siege of Doriskos". -- ChrisO ( talk) 23:35, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
I sometimes find valid sources, BUT it is not my fault that Google does not let me preview it unless I buy the book, so that does not make [my wrong timed creation of a couple of articles, when I was inexperienced] it OR or SYN!-- Ariobarza ( talk) 09:37, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk reply
If your on the googlebooks and you first see the book, there is a part under the small text that says add to my library, more editions... click on more editions, and search in those, IF you have not already done this, And Doug, its on page 67 read it all the way through if you have to, it spells it Doriscus, but the most popular and widely accepted spelling is Doriskos, I have already checked this, thank you.-- Ariobarza ( talk) 11:01, 9 November 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Biographical article on a Canadian--well, I'm not sure what, and the article doesn't really help. Packed with pointless detail, but rather short on actual claims of notability or public notice thereof. Prod tag removed by article creator, for which this article and one on his 'organisation' are his only contributions. CalendarWatcher ( talk) 23:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Utterly unimportant Canadian 'gang'. Not a smidgen of sourcing or claims of notability, even locally. Prod tag removed by article creator, for which this article and one on its co-founder are his only contributions. CalendarWatcher ( talk) 23:23, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The Joslyn article didn't really have much going for it; there are a couple news sources I found which mentioned her, but they also mentioned half of the other contestants. Don't think that's a huge step for notability. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 22:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Joslyn is completely unnotable, so I believe that this article should be deleted. Carrieunderwoodfan ( talk) 22:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Carrieunderwoodfan ( talk) 22:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:33, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable film - fails WP:N ukexpat ( talk) 22:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:33, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of Lunar (series) through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the plot sections in the main articles are enough coverage. TTN ( talk) 22:08, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Lunar: The Silver Star. MBisanz talk 02:33, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of Lunar (series) through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the plot sections in the main articles are enough coverage. TTN ( talk) 22:08, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Lunar: Eternal Blue. No sourced content, nothing useful to merge. Cirt ( talk) 07:47, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of Lunar (series) through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the plot sections in the main articles are enough coverage. TTN ( talk) 22:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Cirt ( talk) 07:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of the Resistance: Fall of Man series through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the plot sections in the main articles are enough coverage. TTN ( talk) 21:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable dicdef. - fails WP:N ukexpat ( talk) 21:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Syn ergy 02:05, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable, unmade movie, fails WP:N and WP:CRYSTAL ukexpat ( talk) 21:40, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails Notability and BIO. SkyWalker ( talk) 10:57, 28 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Article meets criteria for WP:HOAX. Google search finds only a dozen mentions and related to CWF-Pro and other made-up online wrestling groups. Original CWF disbanded in 1989. Article fails to link to any credible source. — CactusWriter | needles 21:23, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Cirt ( talk) 07:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Can be merged with an article related to transexual issues, such as Transphobia. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 21:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
See WP:ITSNOTABLE -- Damiens.rf 21:22, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
non-notable, only one very minor source lists accomplishments-- Daviddavey ( talk) 03:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was nominated for speedy deletion, but contested. The importance of the awards (for the conductor and the Golden Diploma) need to be investigated before this is deleted, taking into account that Estonian orchestras are probably not oft-mentioned in English language sources. So looking for Estonian sources is needed. Mgm| (talk) 11:30, 27 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This is an essay and any worthwhile material belongs in the Leadership article. Nick Dowling ( talk) 05:52, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Syn ergy 01:52, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:BK. See related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journey of Souls. ScienceApologist ( talk) 21:11, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Michael Newton. MBisanz talk 02:30, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:BK. See related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destiny of Souls ScienceApologist ( talk) 21:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:29, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable game and WP is not a how-to. ukexpat ( talk) 21:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:29, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Future Book since 2006, no reliable sources could be found regarding publication of book, fails WP:BK. Captain-tucker ( talk) 21:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:28, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Claims of notability, zero third-party sources to back them up. Article reads like an advertisement. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:01, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:27, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
A subject such as this is not encyclopedic and does not warrant its own article. The content is limited to opinion polls in the opening paragraph and NAFTA in the body; both topics are covered in more significant Wikipedia articles. Amwestover ( talk| contrib) 20:38, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Gex (series). MBisanz talk 02:27, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of Gex (series) through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the section in the main article is enough. TTN ( talk) 20:23, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Cirt ( talk) 07:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete per WP:G12 by User:TexasAndroid. Non-admin closure. DARTH PANDA duel 21:46, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
No independent sources offered, username implies WP:COI. Merge might be appropriate if this is a likely search term. Guy ( Help!) 20:08, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. MBisanz talk 02:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC) reply
A Single AFROTC Detachment is not notable enough, and this article does not satisfy notability by itself. The content here is very similar to the main Air Force ROTC page. Mjf3719 ( talk) 19:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:24, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This isn't an encyclopedia article. I don't know if it could be transwikied somewhere, however it doesn't belong in article space on the English Wikipedia. PhilKnight ( talk) 19:38, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily closed as duplicate discussion of Real vmx ( AfD discussion), an identical article. Uncle G ( talk) 19:38, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable OS/software. No reliable sources provided, none found. TN‑ X- Man 18:52, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete ( A7) by TexasAndroid. Non-admin closure. MuZemike ( talk) 21:22, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Bundle with Huey Johnson. Non notable plans and person, can find no third party references. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line 17:53, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. as emerging snow. StarM 23:47, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable power plant, written like an ad. Probably could be speedied.
ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ
Drop me a line 17:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
*Speedy Delete G11 - Advertisement like-article, not notable.
David
WS
(contribs) 18:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Advertisement for non-notable piece of software Damiens.rf 17:18, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
I spotted this article through a request at Editor Assistance apparently from someone involved with this theatre school complaining about attacks being made in the article. When I checked it out, I was rather surprised to find that it's actually nothing but an attack - it's entirely about internal workings, a court case about said internal workings, and so on. I looked back further and couldn't find anything that resembled notability in previous versions of the article, so not only is it an attack page that includes attacks on specific people, it also doesn't appear to meet WP:CORP. I was sorely tempted to delete it out of hand, but thought I may be misinterpreting - better to ask for opinions first. Consider me a strong Delete (I'm including an associated article that extends the issues regarding a single person off into a discussion of a lawsuit. Both of these articles have minor coverage from local newspapers, from the looks of things, but they just aren't notable in the grand scheme of things.). Tony Fox (arf!) 17:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 15:31, 7 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable software; no google hits or independent reviews. Blowdart | talk 16:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
This is not about a band, organization or anything like that. It's about an operating system released under GPL GNU public license. This means that it is the property of everyone in the whole world. I haven't seen the name of any organization or person (that doesn't already exist on the English Wikipedia) in this article.
If your wish is that every device in the future will run Windows XP please delete this article. But all your deceives will be very slow. I don't know if there is any commercial organization supporting you? And as a result of that they have forced you do delete this article. I though Wikipedia was for the community not the big corporations!?
Try entering "real vmx" at google:
This is what i get: Google hits —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexuspol ( talk • contribs) 16:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC) — Alexuspol ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
I can live without you attempts to break down my spirit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexuspol ( talk • contribs) 20:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
that you are the ones in charge of what's get pubished here. Bye bye... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexuspol ( talk • contribs) 22:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
So I interpret the section break as: The settle about independent sources is settled. Either there are sources or there are not. That's just facts, you can't argue with that. No matter how motivated you are be some specific interest.
The result was speedy delete. Closing as moot, AFD housekeeping. Article already deleted by Akradecki. - Smerdis of Tlön ( talk) 17:11, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails notability criteria for WP:MUSICBIO. This is a recreation of an article previously deleted by Afd last June. Search for notabilty is complicated by a number of other people named "Divine Allah" including a connecticut rapper and Black Panther Party leader. However, searches which include album titles ( [32] and [33]) reveal nothing but MySpace mentions and WP mirrors. — CactusWriter | needles 15:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:21, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
A single level in a computer game. No claim in article of
notability for this particular level. Prod contested without comment. (comment on prod is on
article talk page)
Fabrictramp |
talk to me 15:39, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
I have souces! Under the reference section. Also, about merging, I don't think it's a bad idea. If anybody wants this, I would like to discuss how it is handeled. Also, this level is very special. That's why I think it should have it's own article. You could make a article about a level, and I wouldn't nominate it for deletion, a long as it had sufficient information and had sources. Everysubjectman
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:21, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Game guide. Fails Wikipedia:VG/GL. SkyWalker ( talk) 15:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:21, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Game guide. Fails Wikipedia:VG/GL. SkyWalker ( talk) 15:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete per WP:A9 by User:TexasAndroid. Non-admin closure. DARTH PANDA duel 21:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails both WP:CRYSTAL and WP:MUSIC. Article was previously deleted by PROD on 13 Jun 2008 under the title Ghetto Rhymin' (Divine album) because the album was still "forthcoming" after one year. Article was recreated one month later. A search finds no evidence that this album was ever released. The only mentions of album are user-created sites like MySpace and references to Wikiipedia. — CactusWriter | needles 15:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to United States presidential election, 2012. That is a much better article about the same election, and its deletion would require a separate AfD. There is no consensus here to delete any article about the 2012 US presidential election in general. Sandstein 17:14, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Probably could be speedied. Election hasn't been talked about even yet. Unsourced material. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line 15:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable website. Reliable sources not listed and none found. I am unable to verify the claims in the History section, especially the claims to features in the Montreal Gazette and The Coast. TN‑ X- Man 14:30, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The references to the two articles have been added, they were available on the Irked Magazine Media Coverage page as PDFs of the original newspaper articles. Sources have now been cited as well. This is a notable Canadian online magazine, devoted to disability culture. Underthesea26, 15:05, 6 November 2008 (GMT)
The result was speedy delete as copyvio. AKRadecki Speaketh 16:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
No indication of notability, was tagged as A7 speedy. Tag removed by anon. No secondary sources, none found via Google (Google Scholar gives two papers by Giovannangeli, apparently conference proceedings). Huon ( talk) 14:17, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Syn ergy 01:57, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable person who is related to some notable people. Notability is not inherited. McWomble ( talk) 14:08, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following page for the same reason:
McWomble ( talk) 14:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
I have therefore re-deleted Carol & Cheryl, per the prior AFD consensus, and creator's admission, that it was a hoax. I have deleted this as a hoax by the same author, given that it's named after one of the admitted hoaxers. I have also deleted Wanda Bummery, another creation of Pansasu which is clearly another related hoax built upon Carol & Cheryl (and which had already been tagged for being a suspected hoax), and Tiffany Lei, the only other creation of Nicoken, which is an unsourced biography that mentions the same purported (but as far as I can tell entirely nonexistent) record company "StarWest Records" as the clear hoaxes do.
I mention as an aside that I know from what xe wrote what web site Sarcasticidealist has been to. I found it in my searches, too. But I spotted what Sarcasticidealist didn't: It's a Wikipedia mirror, and that name is in the title of all of the mirrored articles, and has nothing to do with this purported subject.
I encourage Edward321 to do better research in deletion discussions in the future. Uncle G ( talk) 19:55, 7 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This article has been posted without consent of the subject, associated record company or management. Please remove. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pansasu ( talk • contribs) 2008/11/05 16:49:03
The result was I have re-opended Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeituni Onyango. Closing it on the technicality that the nom had withdrawn hisdelete opinion, when many others had given one, was always going to result in a needless repetition of the debate. The initial debate will probably be a no-consensus, but that's beside the point. -- Scott MacDonald ( talk) 14:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This is a bit of an odd one - normally *I'd* consider a rapid re-AFD of a subject to be disruptive, however as far as I can see - a withdrawn nomination isn't actually a "close" in the normal sense because no determination of community consensus is achieved because the discussion is automatically disregarded and the community hasn't *actually* spoken on the notability of the subject or the article. So as an AFD process, it never happened. (I am going to make a suggestion to make the AFD process tighter because otherwise, it's a loophole that allows people to use AFD as a protective measure - they nominate the article they want to protect and then withdraw the nom - I am not suggesting this is the case here, just that's if we are saying that "withdraw" is a proper "close" then it could be used that way).
OK to the matter at hand. I think this fails per BLP/NPF/B1E/NOTNEWS and no independent notability is established. This is not a criticism of the work put into the artice or the sources - just that she's not notable outside of this one event or her comment to OB. Cameron Scott ( talk) 14:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Fictional character from an unpublished book. Fails WP:BK for a start and a heap of others. McWomble ( talk) 14:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Unpublished book. Fails WP:BK. McWomble ( talk) 12:20, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Article is on the verge of spam and is about a non- notable local cable access program. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 11:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete I agree - spam, unreferenced, fails notability. Yachtsman1 ( talk) 23:53, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The following conversation occurred on the author's talk page, and has been transcribed here as part of the AfD discussion:
How am I supposed to get a page started if you guys continually delete it for this "notability"
By what measure is that? I can find tons of radio shows, podcasts, non-profit organizations, and similar which all have entries.
This is not spam. I spent hours last night trying to conform to what your other mods were editing to clean up.. and ya'll delete everything. I don't get it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skeptics_guide ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanguiness ( talk • contribs)
- Please refer to the guidelines for notability. Basically, if your cable access show has been the subject of multiple significant third-party coverage (something beyond a local interest newspaper), then it would meet the criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. If you'll take a close look at the article you provided as an example, that particular podcast is notable for 1) having had many major nationally notable guests and 2) having received significant coverage in reliable third-party sources. Also, as this article has been submitted for a deletion, this discussion should properly be held on the page's AfD page. With that in mind, I will transcribe this discussion to that page. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 13:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Tagged for speedy delete and contested. Procedural nomination based on speedy nominators comment that it is a copyvio from http://www.freevistafiles.com/URank+URank-IE-toolbar-for-website-rating.html I offer no comment as to keep or delete. -- VS talk 11:25, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
As mentioned in the discussion page, the material in http://www.freevistafiles.com/URank+URank-IE-toolbar-for-website-rating.html, is opened under GFDL, an email was sent. Please do not delete. Amosygal ( talk) 11:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was A7 by Angusmclellan , non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable amateur footballer. Fails WP:ATHLETE. McWomble ( talk) 10:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
I've nominated this article for deletion in accordance with the talkpage consensus on the issue [41], and on the grounds that it does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. I've considered speedy deletion, but considering the fact that the article has been on for quite a while and its contents are more than a little disputed, I opted for "standard deletion". The article states that Marin(o) is a "World War II survivor", a person who led some immigrants on their trip to Peru, and "helped establish an immigrant community". I'm sure he's neither alone in that, nor does he appear to have been an "official" or elected leader of some group. He merely appears to have been a more prominent person among the Peruvian Croatian immigrants. -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 10:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Can I enter my names under several other pseudonyms (all Croats apparently with Anglo-Saxon pseudonyms) and decide to overule the "majority"? I have a real problem with the way a decision will be taken...no that I'm necessarily in favor of keeping the article.
Debona.michel (
talk) 10:10, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Is this discussion forum really notable enough? If you look closely, all except one source is from that forum. Also, it describes the admins on there, which is too, questionable. The Wikipedia page does not have a "list of admins members are to have a healthy fear of". Also a bit of advert and WP:COI since creator is named Emb gunther. Delete. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 ( talk) 08:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. snowy spam. StarM 02:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Neologism in fact being guerrilla spam for an Australian company. — RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 08:38, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Mount Warrigal, New South Wales. Content under the re-direct if anyone wants to perform the merge. StarM 22:31, 9 November 2008 (UTC) reply
fails WP:ORG no real assertion or evidence of notability. Michellecrisp ( talk) 06:30, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Sub-minor political party in Colorado without reliable sources (to be a minor party you need 1000 affiliants). Ran two candidates, neither of whom got any significant vote percentage, or more than passing coverage (One of them Bill Hammons, is presently at AfD, nominated by me.) gnfnrf ( talk) 05:34, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Under WP:MUSIC, a separate article for a song needs extra-good justification. Though this article is being deleted, I've no objection to the use of this name for a DAB if consensus supports that, and there are targets that are real articles EdJohnston ( talk) 17:04, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Song hasn't charted yet, no sources besides primary ones. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 05:23, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:18, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable 28-room hotel (correct website http://www.comfitel.ru/). No past history, no recent events connected to it either. NVO ( talk) 05:20, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. I've ignored the two delete !votes. Being a bad article is an editorial issue, and not one for AfD. Syn ergy 02:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Article is in poor English that even to the writer must have made little sense (see the addition by an anonymous editor of the crucial word 'not' in the first line, well after the article was created, here). Sources are, well, poorly referenced and no citations whatsoever are given. Worse, even if an editor had these sources on her desk, she probably wouldn't know what to source how, since the language of the article is so muddled and confused, and conveys no authority at all. A myriad of problems here--never mind that the importance of the topic isn't asserted or explained. Drmies ( talk) 05:01, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
{{
cite conference}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)The result was Delete the text that currently exists, and redirect it to Triangle (the disambiguation page). The phrase 'hardcore triangle' receives many Google hits for many different meanings of the word 'triangle'. In all cases, 'hardcore' is given its ordinary, natural meaning but the word 'triangle' remains ambiguous for any given usage of the term 'hardcore triangle'. Therefore, a redirect will bring the user to whatever he or she is seeking. The chaotic method of playing the percussive instrument does appear to be a meme, and I have found references from bands other than the one mentioned. - Richard Cavell ( talk) 06:52, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
non-notable at best, but likely a hoax. Bullzeye (Ring for Service) 04:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:18, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable future software. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. TN‑ X- Man 03:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This is ridiculous Wiki Mods, this project is spoken much too often on pspupdates.com, and only because you guys can't find doesn't mean it isn't a concrete project, how dare you insult our work? Is this the constructive criticism on which you expect to reflect the founder of wikipedia? IF you delete this, I will not allow it to ever be placed on Wikipedia. Nov 8, 2008 5:48 PM (Shinydude100)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:16, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Unsourced article about a local activity. No ghits. Possibly WP:NFT. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 02:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was that as Eastmain and others note, it is simply not possible to be "notable only in Polish". Notability is neither subjective nor language-dependant. Angus McLellan (Talk) 02:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Not notable, article does not even assert the importance or significance of the subject. There are hardly any WP:RS in existence, never mind in the article. Searches can be confusing because there is another person with the same name, but if you add the search terms poet or playwright, these are all the refs I can find [44] none or only one of these four refs are in English, most are passing mentions and I'm not even sure they're of this person and not the other with the same name. It says a lot that after repeated requests from numerous people for WP:RS to be added to the article, none have been. No offence to the relatives of AB, I'm sure she was really lovely and creative but her works are largely remembered only by family it seems. Sticky Parkin 02:51, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Syn ergy 01:58, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Band that does not meet WP:MUSIC. brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:14, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This record label was deleted via afd (and a few speedies), yet User:Eastmain removed the latest speedy tag stating that "CSD-G4 doesn't apply because the article now has a reference from a newspaper in Phoenix". Assuming that's correct Wikipedia policy and assuming that the Phoenix article was not in the original deleted article, the article nevertheless should be deleted again. The small mention in the online blog section of a Phoenix newspaper is a far cry from the significant coverage required by Wikipedia:Notability. brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:45, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:13, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This band was speedy deleted a whole bunch of times, and was once even salted. It claims (no reliable sources) to have toured with other bands, but that by itself doesn't cause it to meet the WP:MUSIC notability standard. brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:13, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted under A7, G11, A3.
The result was A7 by Fuhghettaboutit , NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 04:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Borderline db-band. Created by User:Kingk420, implying a conflict of interest. Raymie Humbert (TrackerTV) ( receiver, archives) 02:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:15, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Article lacks inline sources. The references mentioned are so vague that they do not properly substantiate the tenuous historical claims made in the article. On top of that, the English is so difficult and muddled, and the structure so unclear (even at the paragraph level), that it is practically impossible for other editors to clean up the article, let alone source it, even if the historicity of these events was relatively easy to establish--and in that respect this might well be WP:OR. The talk page suggests that sources are to be provided, but that note (by the sole author of the article) has been there for half a year. Drmies ( talk) 02:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Since the number of comments by this editor, and comments on those comments, overwhelmed the list of !comments by other editors, I've refactored them here. -- Alvestrand ( talk) 17:52, 8 November 2008 (UTC) reply
It comes mainly from here too, p.351 start reading from The mountain was...(it's were this articles text starts from too, [48], and the title is based on the fact that it say's it happened in the final stage, that the Siege was on a Hill in Pasargadae. So no OR, POV, but word by word cited, thanks-- Ariobarza ( talk) 19:47, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk Thank you.-- Ariobarza ( talk) 19:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk reply
(to Alvestrand)
+Max Duncker, The History of Antiquity, tr. Evelyn Abbott. London, Richard Bentley * Son (1881) p. 351-352. ISBN 2792979279 +Rawlinson, George (1885). The Seven Great Monarchies of the Eastern World, New York, John B. Eldan Press, reprint (2007) p. 121-123. In 4 volumes. ISBN 9781428647 +M. A. Dandamaev, A Political History of the Achaemenid Empire, tr. W. J. Vogelsang, BRILL Press, (1989) p. 16-17. ISBN 9004091726 +Fischer, W.B., Ilya Gershevitch, and Ehsan Yarshster, The Cambridge History of Iran, Cambridge University Press (1993) p. 145. In 1 volume. ISBN 0521200911
There might be hundereds more, and these sources are already listed on the main page of the article, it just needs to be updated, the end.-- Ariobarza ( talk) 09:31, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Listcruft to a high extreme.
Odd naming, but it seems to fit with the naming conventions. Raymie Humbert (TrackerTV) ( receiver, archives) 02:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable free hosted web comic. Icewedge ( talk) 02:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Pasargadae. MBisanz talk 02:13, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Article is wholly unsourced and appears to be the fruit of original research; compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Pedasa and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of the Tigris, concerning articles by the same editor, which suffer(ed) from the same problems. I have found a handful of references to a "battle of Pasargadae" in 19th century sources but it seems to be only fleetingly covered there, and not at all by modern sources. Possibly a historical hypothesis that was put forward in the 19th century but abandoned thereafter? -- ChrisO ( talk) 01:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
+ [49] + [50] + [51] + [52] + [53] + [54] + [55] + [56] + [57] + [58]
And this is just the tip of the iceberge, there are perhaps 30 more books I can find from the 1900's to 1980's, and more, so more are on the way, thanks everyone.-- Ariobarza ( talk) 10:25, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Prod removed without addressing the issues presented. Still just a neologism from a TV show. Closedmouth ( talk) 12:52, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:BIO, non-notable author. Another self-promotional article that uses Wikipedia to advertize the individual's books. The article was created and fully expanded by Technorj. The article uses Clube do Hardware as source, but mind that Clube do Hardware is a website creted by Gabriel Torres himself. EconomistBR 13:30, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of The Ghost of Frankenstein through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement. TTN ( talk) 13:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. It has been tagged for notability since April. Schuym1 ( talk) 15:28, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Moodle. MBisanz talk 02:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Schuym1 ( talk) 18:22, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NM, no substantial coverage, no release date, no confirmed tracks. Only confirmed info in the article is what E.N.D. stands for Diverse Mentality 18:29, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Endorse deltion - There is only 1 reference and not much coverage so until new information comes up then it needs to be deleted. Xx1994xx ( talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 16:25, 2 November 2008 (UTC). reply
The result was Delete. Marasmusine ( talk) 09:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This list is contained in List of PlayStation Portable games, and the few other additional notes should be listed on the individual articles' pages. MrKIA11 ( talk) 22:03, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:37, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
PROD citing "unverified speculation" was rightly removed with the addition of a CBC article, but this article still makes it quite clear this is still very far from becoming any kind of reality: "the plans were just 'step 2 of 122' in the process. "; "The councillor who represents the area ... said he welcomes the consortium's bid, but it should be just one of many the city considers. ... H e's unlikely to support this proposal because it contains too many buildings and parking spaces, and not enough public green space." Fails WP:CRYSTAL and is probably spam. Ros0709 ( talk) 22:14, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Underworld (film series). MBisanz talk 02:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of its series through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement. TTN ( talk) 14:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:03, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This is a BLP that I tagged as unsourced over a year ago. I tried to source it, and I find stuff written BY him, but not ABOUT him. He may be notable, but it can't be independently verified, thus a WP:V issue. PHARMBOY ( moo) ( plop) 12:28, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List_of_Drawn_Together_episodes#Season_2:_2005-2006. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Unnotable episode of the television series Drawn Together. No significant coverage in reliable third party sources. Entire article is plot and OR. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Elite Systems. MBisanz talk 02:03, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
No notability, almost nothing is actually contained in the article. However, this edit replaced a redirect to Grand tourer which is used in several articles, and should it be deleted, the redirect should be recreated. The359 ( talk) 00:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
< November 5 | November 7 > |
---|
The result was keep. Cirt ( talk) 07:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable wrestler at this point in time. Article is not sourced at all and has extremely little information. Though has appeared on national tv at least two times in a major professional wrestling company. I wasn't sure if it should be deleted or not.-- Will C 21:49, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
To the best of my knowledge, lamp-making does not figure as a significant cultural tradition among Maya peoples, historical or contemporary. While it's quite possible that lamps are among the many types of products, crafts & trinkets manufactured and sold by modern Maya locally or to the tourist trade, this in itself is insufficient to demonstrate notability & encylopaedic significance for the manufacture or product. The article's creator seems themselves to be associated with a business selling such products, and there's nothing really here to suggest that calling the product is anything other than a marketing technique. If it were to be established as a genuine & significant Maya craft, then you'd expect there to be multiple independent mentions in the ethnographic literature (as is the case for example with Maya textiles, a craft with a long history and the subject of quite a few books and ethnographic/art history articles and exhibitions). However I have been unable to find any such mentions of Maya lamp-making; unless such mentions can be provided then the claims of a business selling them is not enough to verify adequate notability. cjllw ʘ TALK 23:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
unreferenced; author keeps removing PROD tags — Jeff G. ( talk| contribs) 23:39, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Unsourced sub-stub, no references cited; probably based on original research, as this appears to be one of a number of similar articles which form something of a walled garden of OR-based articles. (See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of the Tigris, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Kapisa and User:ChrisO/Ancient Persian problems for related discussions.) Tagged for cleanup since April 2008 but none has been forthcoming. I've tried to substantiate the topic of the article but have found no information on a "Siege of Doriskos". -- ChrisO ( talk) 23:35, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
I sometimes find valid sources, BUT it is not my fault that Google does not let me preview it unless I buy the book, so that does not make [my wrong timed creation of a couple of articles, when I was inexperienced] it OR or SYN!-- Ariobarza ( talk) 09:37, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk reply
If your on the googlebooks and you first see the book, there is a part under the small text that says add to my library, more editions... click on more editions, and search in those, IF you have not already done this, And Doug, its on page 67 read it all the way through if you have to, it spells it Doriscus, but the most popular and widely accepted spelling is Doriskos, I have already checked this, thank you.-- Ariobarza ( talk) 11:01, 9 November 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Biographical article on a Canadian--well, I'm not sure what, and the article doesn't really help. Packed with pointless detail, but rather short on actual claims of notability or public notice thereof. Prod tag removed by article creator, for which this article and one on his 'organisation' are his only contributions. CalendarWatcher ( talk) 23:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Utterly unimportant Canadian 'gang'. Not a smidgen of sourcing or claims of notability, even locally. Prod tag removed by article creator, for which this article and one on its co-founder are his only contributions. CalendarWatcher ( talk) 23:23, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The Joslyn article didn't really have much going for it; there are a couple news sources I found which mentioned her, but they also mentioned half of the other contestants. Don't think that's a huge step for notability. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 22:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Joslyn is completely unnotable, so I believe that this article should be deleted. Carrieunderwoodfan ( talk) 22:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Carrieunderwoodfan ( talk) 22:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:33, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable film - fails WP:N ukexpat ( talk) 22:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:33, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of Lunar (series) through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the plot sections in the main articles are enough coverage. TTN ( talk) 22:08, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Lunar: The Silver Star. MBisanz talk 02:33, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of Lunar (series) through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the plot sections in the main articles are enough coverage. TTN ( talk) 22:08, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Lunar: Eternal Blue. No sourced content, nothing useful to merge. Cirt ( talk) 07:47, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of Lunar (series) through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the plot sections in the main articles are enough coverage. TTN ( talk) 22:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Cirt ( talk) 07:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of the Resistance: Fall of Man series through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the plot sections in the main articles are enough coverage. TTN ( talk) 21:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable dicdef. - fails WP:N ukexpat ( talk) 21:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Syn ergy 02:05, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable, unmade movie, fails WP:N and WP:CRYSTAL ukexpat ( talk) 21:40, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails Notability and BIO. SkyWalker ( talk) 10:57, 28 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Article meets criteria for WP:HOAX. Google search finds only a dozen mentions and related to CWF-Pro and other made-up online wrestling groups. Original CWF disbanded in 1989. Article fails to link to any credible source. — CactusWriter | needles 21:23, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Cirt ( talk) 07:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Can be merged with an article related to transexual issues, such as Transphobia. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 21:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
See WP:ITSNOTABLE -- Damiens.rf 21:22, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
non-notable, only one very minor source lists accomplishments-- Daviddavey ( talk) 03:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was nominated for speedy deletion, but contested. The importance of the awards (for the conductor and the Golden Diploma) need to be investigated before this is deleted, taking into account that Estonian orchestras are probably not oft-mentioned in English language sources. So looking for Estonian sources is needed. Mgm| (talk) 11:30, 27 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This is an essay and any worthwhile material belongs in the Leadership article. Nick Dowling ( talk) 05:52, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Syn ergy 01:52, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:BK. See related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journey of Souls. ScienceApologist ( talk) 21:11, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Michael Newton. MBisanz talk 02:30, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:BK. See related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destiny of Souls ScienceApologist ( talk) 21:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:29, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable game and WP is not a how-to. ukexpat ( talk) 21:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:29, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Future Book since 2006, no reliable sources could be found regarding publication of book, fails WP:BK. Captain-tucker ( talk) 21:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:28, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Claims of notability, zero third-party sources to back them up. Article reads like an advertisement. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:01, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:27, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
A subject such as this is not encyclopedic and does not warrant its own article. The content is limited to opinion polls in the opening paragraph and NAFTA in the body; both topics are covered in more significant Wikipedia articles. Amwestover ( talk| contrib) 20:38, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Gex (series). MBisanz talk 02:27, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of Gex (series) through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the section in the main article is enough. TTN ( talk) 20:23, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Cirt ( talk) 07:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete per WP:G12 by User:TexasAndroid. Non-admin closure. DARTH PANDA duel 21:46, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
No independent sources offered, username implies WP:COI. Merge might be appropriate if this is a likely search term. Guy ( Help!) 20:08, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. MBisanz talk 02:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC) reply
A Single AFROTC Detachment is not notable enough, and this article does not satisfy notability by itself. The content here is very similar to the main Air Force ROTC page. Mjf3719 ( talk) 19:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:24, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This isn't an encyclopedia article. I don't know if it could be transwikied somewhere, however it doesn't belong in article space on the English Wikipedia. PhilKnight ( talk) 19:38, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily closed as duplicate discussion of Real vmx ( AfD discussion), an identical article. Uncle G ( talk) 19:38, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable OS/software. No reliable sources provided, none found. TN‑ X- Man 18:52, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete ( A7) by TexasAndroid. Non-admin closure. MuZemike ( talk) 21:22, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Bundle with Huey Johnson. Non notable plans and person, can find no third party references. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line 17:53, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. as emerging snow. StarM 23:47, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable power plant, written like an ad. Probably could be speedied.
ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ
Drop me a line 17:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
*Speedy Delete G11 - Advertisement like-article, not notable.
David
WS
(contribs) 18:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Advertisement for non-notable piece of software Damiens.rf 17:18, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
I spotted this article through a request at Editor Assistance apparently from someone involved with this theatre school complaining about attacks being made in the article. When I checked it out, I was rather surprised to find that it's actually nothing but an attack - it's entirely about internal workings, a court case about said internal workings, and so on. I looked back further and couldn't find anything that resembled notability in previous versions of the article, so not only is it an attack page that includes attacks on specific people, it also doesn't appear to meet WP:CORP. I was sorely tempted to delete it out of hand, but thought I may be misinterpreting - better to ask for opinions first. Consider me a strong Delete (I'm including an associated article that extends the issues regarding a single person off into a discussion of a lawsuit. Both of these articles have minor coverage from local newspapers, from the looks of things, but they just aren't notable in the grand scheme of things.). Tony Fox (arf!) 17:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 15:31, 7 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable software; no google hits or independent reviews. Blowdart | talk 16:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
This is not about a band, organization or anything like that. It's about an operating system released under GPL GNU public license. This means that it is the property of everyone in the whole world. I haven't seen the name of any organization or person (that doesn't already exist on the English Wikipedia) in this article.
If your wish is that every device in the future will run Windows XP please delete this article. But all your deceives will be very slow. I don't know if there is any commercial organization supporting you? And as a result of that they have forced you do delete this article. I though Wikipedia was for the community not the big corporations!?
Try entering "real vmx" at google:
This is what i get: Google hits —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexuspol ( talk • contribs) 16:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC) — Alexuspol ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
I can live without you attempts to break down my spirit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexuspol ( talk • contribs) 20:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
that you are the ones in charge of what's get pubished here. Bye bye... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexuspol ( talk • contribs) 22:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
So I interpret the section break as: The settle about independent sources is settled. Either there are sources or there are not. That's just facts, you can't argue with that. No matter how motivated you are be some specific interest.
The result was speedy delete. Closing as moot, AFD housekeeping. Article already deleted by Akradecki. - Smerdis of Tlön ( talk) 17:11, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails notability criteria for WP:MUSICBIO. This is a recreation of an article previously deleted by Afd last June. Search for notabilty is complicated by a number of other people named "Divine Allah" including a connecticut rapper and Black Panther Party leader. However, searches which include album titles ( [32] and [33]) reveal nothing but MySpace mentions and WP mirrors. — CactusWriter | needles 15:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:21, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
A single level in a computer game. No claim in article of
notability for this particular level. Prod contested without comment. (comment on prod is on
article talk page)
Fabrictramp |
talk to me 15:39, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
I have souces! Under the reference section. Also, about merging, I don't think it's a bad idea. If anybody wants this, I would like to discuss how it is handeled. Also, this level is very special. That's why I think it should have it's own article. You could make a article about a level, and I wouldn't nominate it for deletion, a long as it had sufficient information and had sources. Everysubjectman
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:21, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Game guide. Fails Wikipedia:VG/GL. SkyWalker ( talk) 15:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:21, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Game guide. Fails Wikipedia:VG/GL. SkyWalker ( talk) 15:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete per WP:A9 by User:TexasAndroid. Non-admin closure. DARTH PANDA duel 21:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails both WP:CRYSTAL and WP:MUSIC. Article was previously deleted by PROD on 13 Jun 2008 under the title Ghetto Rhymin' (Divine album) because the album was still "forthcoming" after one year. Article was recreated one month later. A search finds no evidence that this album was ever released. The only mentions of album are user-created sites like MySpace and references to Wikiipedia. — CactusWriter | needles 15:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to United States presidential election, 2012. That is a much better article about the same election, and its deletion would require a separate AfD. There is no consensus here to delete any article about the 2012 US presidential election in general. Sandstein 17:14, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Probably could be speedied. Election hasn't been talked about even yet. Unsourced material. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line 15:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable website. Reliable sources not listed and none found. I am unable to verify the claims in the History section, especially the claims to features in the Montreal Gazette and The Coast. TN‑ X- Man 14:30, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The references to the two articles have been added, they were available on the Irked Magazine Media Coverage page as PDFs of the original newspaper articles. Sources have now been cited as well. This is a notable Canadian online magazine, devoted to disability culture. Underthesea26, 15:05, 6 November 2008 (GMT)
The result was speedy delete as copyvio. AKRadecki Speaketh 16:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
No indication of notability, was tagged as A7 speedy. Tag removed by anon. No secondary sources, none found via Google (Google Scholar gives two papers by Giovannangeli, apparently conference proceedings). Huon ( talk) 14:17, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Syn ergy 01:57, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable person who is related to some notable people. Notability is not inherited. McWomble ( talk) 14:08, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following page for the same reason:
McWomble ( talk) 14:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
I have therefore re-deleted Carol & Cheryl, per the prior AFD consensus, and creator's admission, that it was a hoax. I have deleted this as a hoax by the same author, given that it's named after one of the admitted hoaxers. I have also deleted Wanda Bummery, another creation of Pansasu which is clearly another related hoax built upon Carol & Cheryl (and which had already been tagged for being a suspected hoax), and Tiffany Lei, the only other creation of Nicoken, which is an unsourced biography that mentions the same purported (but as far as I can tell entirely nonexistent) record company "StarWest Records" as the clear hoaxes do.
I mention as an aside that I know from what xe wrote what web site Sarcasticidealist has been to. I found it in my searches, too. But I spotted what Sarcasticidealist didn't: It's a Wikipedia mirror, and that name is in the title of all of the mirrored articles, and has nothing to do with this purported subject.
I encourage Edward321 to do better research in deletion discussions in the future. Uncle G ( talk) 19:55, 7 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This article has been posted without consent of the subject, associated record company or management. Please remove. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pansasu ( talk • contribs) 2008/11/05 16:49:03
The result was I have re-opended Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeituni Onyango. Closing it on the technicality that the nom had withdrawn hisdelete opinion, when many others had given one, was always going to result in a needless repetition of the debate. The initial debate will probably be a no-consensus, but that's beside the point. -- Scott MacDonald ( talk) 14:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This is a bit of an odd one - normally *I'd* consider a rapid re-AFD of a subject to be disruptive, however as far as I can see - a withdrawn nomination isn't actually a "close" in the normal sense because no determination of community consensus is achieved because the discussion is automatically disregarded and the community hasn't *actually* spoken on the notability of the subject or the article. So as an AFD process, it never happened. (I am going to make a suggestion to make the AFD process tighter because otherwise, it's a loophole that allows people to use AFD as a protective measure - they nominate the article they want to protect and then withdraw the nom - I am not suggesting this is the case here, just that's if we are saying that "withdraw" is a proper "close" then it could be used that way).
OK to the matter at hand. I think this fails per BLP/NPF/B1E/NOTNEWS and no independent notability is established. This is not a criticism of the work put into the artice or the sources - just that she's not notable outside of this one event or her comment to OB. Cameron Scott ( talk) 14:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Fictional character from an unpublished book. Fails WP:BK for a start and a heap of others. McWomble ( talk) 14:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Unpublished book. Fails WP:BK. McWomble ( talk) 12:20, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Article is on the verge of spam and is about a non- notable local cable access program. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 11:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete I agree - spam, unreferenced, fails notability. Yachtsman1 ( talk) 23:53, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The following conversation occurred on the author's talk page, and has been transcribed here as part of the AfD discussion:
How am I supposed to get a page started if you guys continually delete it for this "notability"
By what measure is that? I can find tons of radio shows, podcasts, non-profit organizations, and similar which all have entries.
This is not spam. I spent hours last night trying to conform to what your other mods were editing to clean up.. and ya'll delete everything. I don't get it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skeptics_guide ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanguiness ( talk • contribs)
- Please refer to the guidelines for notability. Basically, if your cable access show has been the subject of multiple significant third-party coverage (something beyond a local interest newspaper), then it would meet the criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. If you'll take a close look at the article you provided as an example, that particular podcast is notable for 1) having had many major nationally notable guests and 2) having received significant coverage in reliable third-party sources. Also, as this article has been submitted for a deletion, this discussion should properly be held on the page's AfD page. With that in mind, I will transcribe this discussion to that page. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 13:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Tagged for speedy delete and contested. Procedural nomination based on speedy nominators comment that it is a copyvio from http://www.freevistafiles.com/URank+URank-IE-toolbar-for-website-rating.html I offer no comment as to keep or delete. -- VS talk 11:25, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
As mentioned in the discussion page, the material in http://www.freevistafiles.com/URank+URank-IE-toolbar-for-website-rating.html, is opened under GFDL, an email was sent. Please do not delete. Amosygal ( talk) 11:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was A7 by Angusmclellan , non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable amateur footballer. Fails WP:ATHLETE. McWomble ( talk) 10:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
I've nominated this article for deletion in accordance with the talkpage consensus on the issue [41], and on the grounds that it does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. I've considered speedy deletion, but considering the fact that the article has been on for quite a while and its contents are more than a little disputed, I opted for "standard deletion". The article states that Marin(o) is a "World War II survivor", a person who led some immigrants on their trip to Peru, and "helped establish an immigrant community". I'm sure he's neither alone in that, nor does he appear to have been an "official" or elected leader of some group. He merely appears to have been a more prominent person among the Peruvian Croatian immigrants. -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 10:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Can I enter my names under several other pseudonyms (all Croats apparently with Anglo-Saxon pseudonyms) and decide to overule the "majority"? I have a real problem with the way a decision will be taken...no that I'm necessarily in favor of keeping the article.
Debona.michel (
talk) 10:10, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Is this discussion forum really notable enough? If you look closely, all except one source is from that forum. Also, it describes the admins on there, which is too, questionable. The Wikipedia page does not have a "list of admins members are to have a healthy fear of". Also a bit of advert and WP:COI since creator is named Emb gunther. Delete. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 ( talk) 08:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. snowy spam. StarM 02:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Neologism in fact being guerrilla spam for an Australian company. — RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 08:38, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Mount Warrigal, New South Wales. Content under the re-direct if anyone wants to perform the merge. StarM 22:31, 9 November 2008 (UTC) reply
fails WP:ORG no real assertion or evidence of notability. Michellecrisp ( talk) 06:30, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Sub-minor political party in Colorado without reliable sources (to be a minor party you need 1000 affiliants). Ran two candidates, neither of whom got any significant vote percentage, or more than passing coverage (One of them Bill Hammons, is presently at AfD, nominated by me.) gnfnrf ( talk) 05:34, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Under WP:MUSIC, a separate article for a song needs extra-good justification. Though this article is being deleted, I've no objection to the use of this name for a DAB if consensus supports that, and there are targets that are real articles EdJohnston ( talk) 17:04, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Song hasn't charted yet, no sources besides primary ones. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 05:23, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:18, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable 28-room hotel (correct website http://www.comfitel.ru/). No past history, no recent events connected to it either. NVO ( talk) 05:20, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. I've ignored the two delete !votes. Being a bad article is an editorial issue, and not one for AfD. Syn ergy 02:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Article is in poor English that even to the writer must have made little sense (see the addition by an anonymous editor of the crucial word 'not' in the first line, well after the article was created, here). Sources are, well, poorly referenced and no citations whatsoever are given. Worse, even if an editor had these sources on her desk, she probably wouldn't know what to source how, since the language of the article is so muddled and confused, and conveys no authority at all. A myriad of problems here--never mind that the importance of the topic isn't asserted or explained. Drmies ( talk) 05:01, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
{{
cite conference}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)The result was Delete the text that currently exists, and redirect it to Triangle (the disambiguation page). The phrase 'hardcore triangle' receives many Google hits for many different meanings of the word 'triangle'. In all cases, 'hardcore' is given its ordinary, natural meaning but the word 'triangle' remains ambiguous for any given usage of the term 'hardcore triangle'. Therefore, a redirect will bring the user to whatever he or she is seeking. The chaotic method of playing the percussive instrument does appear to be a meme, and I have found references from bands other than the one mentioned. - Richard Cavell ( talk) 06:52, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
non-notable at best, but likely a hoax. Bullzeye (Ring for Service) 04:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:18, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable future software. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. TN‑ X- Man 03:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This is ridiculous Wiki Mods, this project is spoken much too often on pspupdates.com, and only because you guys can't find doesn't mean it isn't a concrete project, how dare you insult our work? Is this the constructive criticism on which you expect to reflect the founder of wikipedia? IF you delete this, I will not allow it to ever be placed on Wikipedia. Nov 8, 2008 5:48 PM (Shinydude100)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:16, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Unsourced article about a local activity. No ghits. Possibly WP:NFT. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 02:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was that as Eastmain and others note, it is simply not possible to be "notable only in Polish". Notability is neither subjective nor language-dependant. Angus McLellan (Talk) 02:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Not notable, article does not even assert the importance or significance of the subject. There are hardly any WP:RS in existence, never mind in the article. Searches can be confusing because there is another person with the same name, but if you add the search terms poet or playwright, these are all the refs I can find [44] none or only one of these four refs are in English, most are passing mentions and I'm not even sure they're of this person and not the other with the same name. It says a lot that after repeated requests from numerous people for WP:RS to be added to the article, none have been. No offence to the relatives of AB, I'm sure she was really lovely and creative but her works are largely remembered only by family it seems. Sticky Parkin 02:51, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Syn ergy 01:58, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Band that does not meet WP:MUSIC. brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:14, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This record label was deleted via afd (and a few speedies), yet User:Eastmain removed the latest speedy tag stating that "CSD-G4 doesn't apply because the article now has a reference from a newspaper in Phoenix". Assuming that's correct Wikipedia policy and assuming that the Phoenix article was not in the original deleted article, the article nevertheless should be deleted again. The small mention in the online blog section of a Phoenix newspaper is a far cry from the significant coverage required by Wikipedia:Notability. brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:45, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:13, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This band was speedy deleted a whole bunch of times, and was once even salted. It claims (no reliable sources) to have toured with other bands, but that by itself doesn't cause it to meet the WP:MUSIC notability standard. brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:13, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted under A7, G11, A3.
The result was A7 by Fuhghettaboutit , NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 04:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Borderline db-band. Created by User:Kingk420, implying a conflict of interest. Raymie Humbert (TrackerTV) ( receiver, archives) 02:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:15, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Article lacks inline sources. The references mentioned are so vague that they do not properly substantiate the tenuous historical claims made in the article. On top of that, the English is so difficult and muddled, and the structure so unclear (even at the paragraph level), that it is practically impossible for other editors to clean up the article, let alone source it, even if the historicity of these events was relatively easy to establish--and in that respect this might well be WP:OR. The talk page suggests that sources are to be provided, but that note (by the sole author of the article) has been there for half a year. Drmies ( talk) 02:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Since the number of comments by this editor, and comments on those comments, overwhelmed the list of !comments by other editors, I've refactored them here. -- Alvestrand ( talk) 17:52, 8 November 2008 (UTC) reply
It comes mainly from here too, p.351 start reading from The mountain was...(it's were this articles text starts from too, [48], and the title is based on the fact that it say's it happened in the final stage, that the Siege was on a Hill in Pasargadae. So no OR, POV, but word by word cited, thanks-- Ariobarza ( talk) 19:47, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk Thank you.-- Ariobarza ( talk) 19:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk reply
(to Alvestrand)
+Max Duncker, The History of Antiquity, tr. Evelyn Abbott. London, Richard Bentley * Son (1881) p. 351-352. ISBN 2792979279 +Rawlinson, George (1885). The Seven Great Monarchies of the Eastern World, New York, John B. Eldan Press, reprint (2007) p. 121-123. In 4 volumes. ISBN 9781428647 +M. A. Dandamaev, A Political History of the Achaemenid Empire, tr. W. J. Vogelsang, BRILL Press, (1989) p. 16-17. ISBN 9004091726 +Fischer, W.B., Ilya Gershevitch, and Ehsan Yarshster, The Cambridge History of Iran, Cambridge University Press (1993) p. 145. In 1 volume. ISBN 0521200911
There might be hundereds more, and these sources are already listed on the main page of the article, it just needs to be updated, the end.-- Ariobarza ( talk) 09:31, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Listcruft to a high extreme.
Odd naming, but it seems to fit with the naming conventions. Raymie Humbert (TrackerTV) ( receiver, archives) 02:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable free hosted web comic. Icewedge ( talk) 02:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Pasargadae. MBisanz talk 02:13, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Article is wholly unsourced and appears to be the fruit of original research; compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Pedasa and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of the Tigris, concerning articles by the same editor, which suffer(ed) from the same problems. I have found a handful of references to a "battle of Pasargadae" in 19th century sources but it seems to be only fleetingly covered there, and not at all by modern sources. Possibly a historical hypothesis that was put forward in the 19th century but abandoned thereafter? -- ChrisO ( talk) 01:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
+ [49] + [50] + [51] + [52] + [53] + [54] + [55] + [56] + [57] + [58]
And this is just the tip of the iceberge, there are perhaps 30 more books I can find from the 1900's to 1980's, and more, so more are on the way, thanks everyone.-- Ariobarza ( talk) 10:25, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Prod removed without addressing the issues presented. Still just a neologism from a TV show. Closedmouth ( talk) 12:52, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:BIO, non-notable author. Another self-promotional article that uses Wikipedia to advertize the individual's books. The article was created and fully expanded by Technorj. The article uses Clube do Hardware as source, but mind that Clube do Hardware is a website creted by Gabriel Torres himself. EconomistBR 13:30, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of The Ghost of Frankenstein through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement. TTN ( talk) 13:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. It has been tagged for notability since April. Schuym1 ( talk) 15:28, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Moodle. MBisanz talk 02:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Schuym1 ( talk) 18:22, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NM, no substantial coverage, no release date, no confirmed tracks. Only confirmed info in the article is what E.N.D. stands for Diverse Mentality 18:29, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Endorse deltion - There is only 1 reference and not much coverage so until new information comes up then it needs to be deleted. Xx1994xx ( talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 16:25, 2 November 2008 (UTC). reply
The result was Delete. Marasmusine ( talk) 09:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This list is contained in List of PlayStation Portable games, and the few other additional notes should be listed on the individual articles' pages. MrKIA11 ( talk) 22:03, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:37, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
PROD citing "unverified speculation" was rightly removed with the addition of a CBC article, but this article still makes it quite clear this is still very far from becoming any kind of reality: "the plans were just 'step 2 of 122' in the process. "; "The councillor who represents the area ... said he welcomes the consortium's bid, but it should be just one of many the city considers. ... H e's unlikely to support this proposal because it contains too many buildings and parking spaces, and not enough public green space." Fails WP:CRYSTAL and is probably spam. Ros0709 ( talk) 22:14, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Underworld (film series). MBisanz talk 02:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of its series through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement. TTN ( talk) 14:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:03, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This is a BLP that I tagged as unsourced over a year ago. I tried to source it, and I find stuff written BY him, but not ABOUT him. He may be notable, but it can't be independently verified, thus a WP:V issue. PHARMBOY ( moo) ( plop) 12:28, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List_of_Drawn_Together_episodes#Season_2:_2005-2006. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Unnotable episode of the television series Drawn Together. No significant coverage in reliable third party sources. Entire article is plot and OR. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Elite Systems. MBisanz talk 02:03, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
No notability, almost nothing is actually contained in the article. However, this edit replaced a redirect to Grand tourer which is used in several articles, and should it be deleted, the redirect should be recreated. The359 ( talk) 00:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply