![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | → | Archive 30 |
A consensus has formed and page creator requests that article be moved to a draft in his userspace. Because of the potential precedent of having an article about a proposal in such an early stage of planning linger in mainspace - and because there is a consensus - I am requesting that an editor close it swiftly. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 19:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Vajiralongkorn#October 13 or December 1, 2016 (Initiated 2757 days ago on 19 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 135#Access locks: Visual Design RFC (Initiated 2808 days ago on 29 October 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
(Initiated 2758 days ago on 18 December 2016) Could an uninvolved editor please assess the consensus and close this RfC. Best Polyamorph ( talk) 10:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Needs closure from uninvolved editor. (Initiated 2741 days ago on 4 January 2017). Nikkimaria ( talk) 03:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Access Locks: Citation Template Behaviour RFC (Initiated 2808 days ago on 29 October 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Infobox officeholder/Archive 21#RfC: Should predecessors and successors be included in officeholders' infoboxes? (Initiated 2767 days ago on 9 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
The discussion may need evaluation. -- George Ho ( talk) 00:59, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Would some kind soul gently assess consensus and answer the question asked? (Initiated 2753 days ago on 23 December 2016) — JFG talk 20:36, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Inside (video game)#RfC about the Theories header in the Plot section (Initiated 2747 days ago on 29 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of fake news websites/Archive 2#Request for Comment - Inclusion of Infowars in this list (Initiated 2759 days ago on 17 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Southern Poverty Law Center/Archive 14#RfC about addition of Ambassador Dermer's criticism of SPLC's list (Initiated 2754 days ago on 22 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Needs closure from uninvolved editor. Nikkimaria ( talk) 20:13, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Experienced and uninvolved close requested. Thanks. (Initiated 2737 days ago on 8 January 2017) ― Mandruss ☎ 22:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive286#RFC Closure review Category talk:People of Jewish descent#Survey (Initiated 2743 days ago on 2 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Please disposition Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 January 29#Template:Scratch Perverts, which has been relisted 3 times, and has been open for more than one month. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 00:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Eurodac#Request for comments: Mentioning of the murder case (Initiated 2738 days ago on 7 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2017 Chicago torture incident#RfC on WP:BLPCRIME (Initiated 2735 days ago on 10 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
While there is consensus in the ongoing discussions, those move reviews need uninvolved admin to review the comments. George Ho ( talk) 02:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
An uninvolved closer is needed to evaluate the consensus at Talk:2016–2017 Gambian constitutional crisis#Merge proposal. George Ho ( talk) 04:17, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
There is some disagreement over the way forward, and as I have been involved it would help to have an uninvolved editor or admin assess consensus and agree closure. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 17:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:John Furlong (sports administrator)#RfC about the inclusion of an "opening day crisis" section (Initiated 2743 days ago on 2 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Kfar Ahim#RfC: Arab vs. Palestinian? (Initiated 2734 days ago on 11 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor asses the consensus opinion on Talk:Southern Poverty Law Center/Archive 14#RfC about addition of Ambassador Dermer's criticism of SPLC's list (Initiated 2754 days ago on 22 December 2016). It initially started out with voting and then escalated to a lot of people going back and forth and it is a little difficult to gage what the full consensus opinion. TAG ( talk) 19:56, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Discussion at Template talk:Infobox person/Archive 32#RFC: "resting place" parameter (Initiated 2718 days ago on 27 January 2017) appears to have stalled, with no comments since February 9. An uninvolved experienced editor or admin is requested to evaluate consensus, since a simple numerical count shows a close vote (13 to remove, 10 to keep, 3 to rename) and it's a contentious subject area that's seen some heated discussion. clpo13( talk) 16:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports#Request for comments on the Airlines and destinations tables (Initiated 2760 days ago on 16 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Disputed status of Gibraltar#Request for Comment - Article Rewrite (Initiated 2761 days ago on 15 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bipartisan Report#December 2016 Request for Comment (Initiated 2765 days ago on 11 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Beauty Pageants#RfC about the draft SNG (Initiated 2733 days ago on 12 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:United States Senate election in South Dakota, 2016#Request for Comment: Should Kurt Evans be listed as "Failed to Qualify"? (Initiated 2773 days ago on 3 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:57, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 64#Explanation of Request for Comment on WP:WEIGHT of Russian influence on the 2016 United States presidential election in multiple articles and templates (Initiated 2764 days ago on 12 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Is an uninvolved administrator willing to close this discussion? The discussion has become extremely lengthy already, in just a single week, and will only get lengthier when not closed, while afaics no new arguments are being added. I can't close it myself because I have contributed to the discussion. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:17, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive946#Disruptive Editor on Ethiopia related pages (Initiated 2732 days ago on 13 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive946#Not notifying users about their pages being deleted (Initiated 2716 days ago on 29 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
This RfC expired on the 16th. An official close could help. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 20:06, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Username policy/Archive 23#"Official" accounts representing individuals as opposed to groups (Initiated 2772 days ago on 4 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
An uninvolved closer is needed to evaluate the consensus at Talk:New York Daily News#Request for Comment (Initiated 2727 days ago on 18 January 2017). -- George Ho ( talk) 01:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:New York#RFC: Should the lead feature information about New York City over information about New York State (Initiated 2762 days ago on 14 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Murder of Maria Ladenburger#RfC about the relevance of several aspects mentioned in the article about this crime (Initiated 2763 days ago on 13 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Death of JonBenét Ramsey#RfC: Is use of murder in the text, or use of murder categories, within the article against the WP:NPOV policy? (Initiated 2758 days ago on 18 December 2016)? Listing after a request on my talk page. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 07:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus? (Initiated 2732 days ago on 13 January 2017) -- Ronz ( talk) 17:05, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Death of JonBenét Ramsey#RfC: Is use of murder in the text, or use of murder categories, within the article against the WP:NPOV policy? (Initiated 2758 days ago on 18 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Radha Madhav Dham#RFC: Should an invocation at a county court be mentioned in the article? (Initiated 2759 days ago on 17 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
{{ done}} Due to extremely limited participation, closed as no consensus. ( non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:21, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
This discussion (Initiated 2713 days ago on 1 February 2017) also needs an uninvolved closer. -- George Ho ( talk) 03:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Saudi Arabia#RFC: Birthplace of Islam and Arabs (Initiated 2748 days ago on 28 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Andy Murray#Request for Comment British tennis player or Scottish tennis player (Initiated 2762 days ago on 14 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Carrie Fisher/Archive 2#Infobox image RfC (Initiated 2749 days ago on 27 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Albert Cashier#RFC: Gender (Initiated 2748 days ago on 28 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
This (Initiated 2737 days ago on 8 January 2017) needs closure from uninvolved editor. -- George Ho ( talk) 05:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The discussion (Initiated 2725 days ago on 20 January 2017) has been inactive for 12 days. - Mr X 11:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor kindly assess the consensus about inclusion of the Internet cult of Kekt phenomenon? (Initiated 2745 days ago on 31 December 2016) Thanks in advance for your assistance! — JFG talk 21:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Archive 63#RfC on the use of two film lists as sources (Initiated 2754 days ago on 22 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Discussion on splitting List of the UN resolutions concerning Israel and Palestine - initiated in 2014 with last comments added in early 2016. In my opinion there is a consensus to split, but since i initiated the discussion - i would like an external objective closure of the RfC. GreyShark ( dibra) 06:17, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Syrian Observatory for Human Rights#RfC about adding "pro-opposition" or "anti-Assad" to first sentence in the lead (Initiated 2756 days ago on 20 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Christmas/Archive 8#RFC - Date formats (Initiated 2748 days ago on 27 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The RfC (Initiated 2742 days ago on 3 January 2017) was ended by Legobot after the normal thirty days: consensus on the primary issue had been achieved well before that; but there is still disagreement upon the scope of the RfC - does the outcome apply only to the Star Trek: Discovery article. -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 15:03, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of highest-grossing films#RfC: How many entries should the main table have? (Initiated 2730 days ago on 15 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of original programs distributed by Netflix#RfC on section breaks for this article (Initiated 2722 days ago on 23 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:United States presidential election, 2000#Contradiction about Florida recount in the lead (Initiated 2724 days ago on 21 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Forever (website)#Proposed merge with Glen Meakem (Initiated 2718 days ago on 27 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Deletion process#Counter-proposal: Treating these like PRODs
Could an uninvolved editor please assess the consensus of this RfC? (Initiated 2779 days ago on 27 November 2016) Mz7 ( talk) 20:16, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2017 February 15#Lilah Parsons (Initiated 2699 days ago on 15 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive947#Harassment by User:Flyer22 Reborn (Initiated 2708 days ago on 6 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Menachem Mendel Schneerson#RFC on placement of Crown Heights Riots (Initiated 2754 days ago on 22 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved editor please assess the consensus and close this RfC? (Initiated 2738 days ago on 7 January 2017) Thanks in advance, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 02:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvoled and experienced editor kindly assess the consensus here. (Initiated 2737 days ago on 8 January 2017) Apologies in advance. -Serialjoepsycho- ( talk) 15:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved sysop assess the consensus at Talk:Tomas Gorny#Request for Comment [RfC]: Should an article written by a Forbes staff writer be kept?? This RfC (Initiated 2720 days ago on 25 January 2017) needs closed. I should note that there are SPA accounts that joined the discussion in order to add a comment to delete the source. Eliko007 ( talk) 02:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of YouTubers/Archive 9#Propose simplifying inclusion criterion (Initiated 2719 days ago on 26 January 2017)? I started the 2011 discussion at Talk:List of YouTubers/Archive 5#RfC: The criteria for inclusion on List of YouTube personalities, so I am not closing this discussion even though the consensus is clear. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Needs close from uninvolved editor. (Initiated 2715 days ago on 30 January 2017) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikkimaria ( talk • contribs) 11:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Casey Affleck#RfC about details in Early Life section (Initiated 2742 days ago on 3 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Honorific nicknames in popular music#Images (Initiated 2740 days ago on 5 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Experienced and uninvolved editor requested to evaluate this RfC (Initiated 2737 days ago on 7 January 2017). Thank you. JerryRussell ( talk) 06:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
There was a try for a closure by an involved editor, which I have reverted, as he himself has been the reason for this RFC.-- 85.74.33.233 ( talk) 23:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
there is no clear consensus either way. However, "AA" objects (perhaps because Question #6 bears on "balancing" material he wanted to add), and he reverted, with the bare comment "involved editor". I restored, noting that no uninvolved editors have stepped up, which he reverted as "
vandalism of the process", and there we are.
"It was poorly formulated, and after a first round of drive-by opinions the discussions tended to flounder."While I've admitted that two of the six questions were not clearly formulated, there was nothing wrong with the other four. And I had to do some outreach to get enough participation in this highly technical RfC, but I did the outreach, we got the participation, and the outcome is clear.
the only one who disagrees" is demonstrably false. But is this really the place to be arguing about that? ~ J. Johnson (JJ) ( talk) 22:00, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
{{ done}} Thryduulf ( talk) 22:07, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
This RFC (Initiated 2730 days ago on 15 January 2017) needs a close. Thank you Casprings ( talk) 19:17, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Please may an experienced user close the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 February 7#Template:US Presidential Administrations as no consensus? The discussion originally began (Initiated 2716 days ago on 29 January 2017) by myself and has been relisted once, however there is no sign of any consensus whatsoever. The discussion is a rather haphazard one, just to note.-- Nevé – selbert 15:15, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
This discussion (Initiated 2723 days ago on 22 January 2017) also needs an uninvolved closer. -- George Ho ( talk) 18:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Melania Trump/Archive 2#RfC: Photo (Initiated 2724 days ago on 21 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Political appointments of Donald Trump#RFC - Address significant content overlap (Initiated 2724 days ago on 21 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved administrator please assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 138#Use of Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/App/Banner on articles (Initiated 2746 days ago on 30 December 2016) (using the date from Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/App/Banner due to the close relationship between the two discussions)? Thanks, — Godsy ( TALK CONT) 21:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
{{ done}} I've unarchived this to Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Use of Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/App/Banner on articles and closed the discussion. The consensus is against adding to articles in its current form, or in an alternative form that links to the Play Store (or equivalent) and/or is not dismissable, including by users who are not logged it. A link in the site sidebar should be discussed separately before being added. Thryduulf ( talk) 15:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
The discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 9#Wikipedia:Violent Factionalizing Debate has been relisted several times already (Initiated 2755 days ago on 21 December 2016) and no new arguments have been added since 21 February and needs closing. Full disclosure: I am very involved with this discussion. Thryduulf ( talk) 14:33, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Macedonia (ancient kingdom)#RFC on using "ancient Greek kingdom" instead of just "ancient kingdom" in the lead section (Initiated 2739 days ago on 6 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
This discussion (Initiated 2725 days ago on 20 January 2017) also needs an uninvolved closer. -- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
This RfC (Initiated 2720 days ago on 25 January 2017) recently expired. Needs a close. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 16:27, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Needs an uninvolved party to close the discussion. (Initiated 2713 days ago on 1 February 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 10:12, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved editor please assess this RfC? It crossed the 30 day mark yesterday. Last comment was 1 March. Thanks! (Initiated 2707 days ago on 7 February 2017) Chris vLS ( talk) 00:05, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive948#User:Johnpacklambert (Initiated 2687 days ago on 27 February 2017)? See the subsection Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive948#Proposal: limit JPL's AFD-rate. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 19:44, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
This RFC (Initiated 2710 days ago on 4 February 2017) has run more than a month and has been quiet for weeks. Needs a close. Dicklyon ( talk) 19:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
{{ done}} ~ J. Johnson (JJ) ( talk) 19:46, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved editor please assess the consensus here. Thanks! (Initiated 2707 days ago on 7 February 2017) - SummerPhD v2.0 14:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive212#Arbitration enforcement action appeal by The Rambling Man (Initiated 2680 days ago on 6 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bronze Wolf Award#Request for comment on whether the Bronze Wolf Award by itself is enough to show notability of holders of the award (Initiated 2739 days ago on 6 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2687 days ago on 27 February 2017) This is a political-advocacy discussion I initiated within the Australian community
3 months ago and has been an active proposal, with widespread publicity within the Australian community (geonotice, mailing lists, mass-message talkpage note) for about a week. 50+ individual user-accounts have expressed opinions and the number of new people commenting has dropped to 1 or <1 per day - no new comments for several days. Although this is shorter than the standard 30 day comment period for on-wiki debates, this particular proposal has external factors affecting its timing.
Even though a simple tally of supporting vs. opposed comments shows a strong preference towards the former, I would like to request a hitherto uninvolved and experienced administrator to provide a formal 'close' decision because of the unusual nature of this proposal - and because a fair assessment of the Australian-wikipedia community's consensus is crucial. [Note: WMF-Legal
has also confirmed this is a technically&legally valid proposal in accordance with the
relevant WMF policy.
Witty
lama
14:34, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest#Investigating COI policy (Initiated 2718 days ago on 27 January 2017)? The discussion was listed at and archived from Template:Centralized discussion. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest#Concrete proposal 1 (Initiated 2716 days ago on 29 January 2017)? The discussion was listed at and archived from Template:Centralized discussion as part of the overall RfC Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest#Investigating COI policy (the above listing). Thanks for any help. Smallbones( smalltalk) 18:39, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Template talk:Alternative medicine sidebar#Title of template (Initiated 2748 days ago on 28 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Bot policy/Archive 26#Defining cosmetic changes (Initiated 2746 days ago on 30 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Revision deletion#RfC on Change RD1-wording (Initiated 2707 days ago on 7 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Clean coal technology#Request for comment on proposed move (Initiated 2707 days ago on 7 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 138#Future of magic links (Initiated 2711 days ago on 3 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 138#Backlog of unpatrolled files (Initiated 2702 days ago on 12 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor please assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people/Archive 7#RfC: Remove the grandfather clause? (Initiated 2698 days ago on 16 February 2017)? Thanks, Innisfree987 ( talk) 19:21, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Nintendo Switch#SoC details RfC (Initiated 2712 days ago on 2 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums#RfC on 5% threshold (Initiated 2711 days ago on 3 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Edit filter#RfC: use of edit filter against unreliable sources (Initiated 2705 days ago on 9 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
The uninvolved closer is needed to evaluate the consensus. (Initiated 2728 days ago on 16 January 2017) George Ho ( talk) 18:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
This discussion (Initiated 2724 days ago on 20 January 2017) also needs an uninvolved closer. -- George Ho ( talk) 18:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Started the RfC discussion almost a month ago at Talk:Death of Alan Kurdi#Proposed merge with Nilüfer Demir. It needs closure. -- George Ho ( talk) 04:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:British Empire#RfC Laissez-faire link (Initiated 2728 days ago on 17 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Nissan Caravan#Useless dab tags (Initiated 2731 days ago on 14 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Could some brave admin please assess the consensus at Talk:Kfar Ahim#RfC: Arab vs. Palestinian? (Initiated 2741 days ago on 4 January 2017)? One editor tried to close it, but it was reopened, hope we can finally close it soon, thanks, Huldra ( talk) 22:40, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:MAKS Air Show#RfC: Details (Initiated 2727 days ago on 18 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Armenia#RFC for Western Asia vs. Eastern Europe (Initiated 2713 days ago on 1 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
The backlog has been growing again, currently some 150 open discussions, the oldest is almost two months old.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
07:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Can an experienced user assess the consensus in this discussion? -- Mhhossein talk 19:25, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
(Initiated 2681 days ago on 5 March 2017) Needs closure by uninvolved admin. George Ho ( talk) 05:16, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Timothy Winter#Request for comment on "controversies" section (Initiated 2724 days ago on 21 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2017 Melbourne car attack#Inaccurate capitalisation and spelling (Initiated 2718 days ago on 27 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2748 days ago on 28 December 2016) Would appreciate a formal close by an uninvolved editor or administrator. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
This RfC (Initiated 2742 days ago on 3 January 2017) finished after 30 days of discussion, and I have now closed it to prevent the discussion from overrunning. This was merely a housekeeping closure; I have not determined a result, so I would like an administrator to override my closure with a result. Thank you. Linguist talk| contribs 14:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 133#Multi-part RFC on Wikipedia:Recent years (Initiated 2732 days ago on 13 January 2017)? The discussion is listed at Template:Centralized discussion. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced and uninvolved editor assess the consensus at Talk:2017 World Rally Championship#RFC? (Initiated 2722 days ago on 23 January 2017)? It would also be advised to take the subsequent discussion, Talk:2017 World Rally Championship#Top-level article into account when closing this one, as the RFC participants posted contributions relevant to the RFC question in that discussion as well. Thanks, T v x1 22:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Is anyone going to look into this. It's been more than 60 days and the discussion have now ended up being archived. T v x1 08:45, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2674 days ago on 12 March 2017) Would an uninvolved editor please assess the consensus and close this RfC? Thank-you. -- Nevé – selbert 11:01, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Tony Blair#RfC on inclusion of Iraq in the first paragraph (Initiated 2693 days ago on 21 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Tourism in Georgia (country)#RfC for UNWTO classification (Initiated 2698 days ago on 16 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Battle of France#RFC: "Decisive" included in the parameter result (Initiated 2696 days ago on 18 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 133#IP Block Exemptions should be expanded to include accounts (5+ years) in good standing (Initiated 2688 days ago on 26 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2685 days ago on 1 March 2017) Would an experienced editor (and not frequent aviation editor) assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports#Request for comment on terminal information in airline and destination tables? We have a vote of 14 supporting removal of concourse information from Airport Destinations Tables, while 3 oppose removal of the information. It has been 26 days since the discussion was opened, however, no contributions have been made in almost a week (6 days). Thanks! Stinger20 ( talk) 14:32, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2666 days ago on 20 March 2017) Request assessment and closure from an experienced, uninvolved editor at Talk:Day Without a Woman#Request for Comments on including organizers. The RfC has been open for six days, and there have been significant objections to its wording. Please also see related discussion at DRN. Funcrunch ( talk) 16:32, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2667 days ago on 19 March 2017) Request assessment and closure from an experienced, uninvolved editor at Talk:X-Men_(film_series)#RfC_about_change _in_title_for_X-Men_(film_series). The RfC has been open for 9 days with significant discussion and survery responses. Brocicle ( talk) 00:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess consensus at Talk:Demagogue#RfC on Donald Trump inclusion (Initiated 2695 days ago on 19 February 2017)? Thanks, – S. Rich ( talk) 23:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2688 days ago on 26 February 2017) - Would appreciate an experienced editor to assess consensus and close. Thank you very much! ―
Mandruss
☎
13:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
A close here would be good as the articles in question are high-traffic. (Initiated 2720 days ago on 25 January 2017) 121.218.198.209 ( talk) 08:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Reza Aslan/Archive 2#Aslan on Ahmadinejad (Initiated 2708 days ago on 6 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Donald Trump–Russia dossier#Request for comment: opinion of Paul Gregory (Initiated 2699 days ago on 15 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Would some kind soul assess consensus there and close the debate? (Initiated 2684 days ago on 2 March 2017) Thanks, — JFG talk 05:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Requesting uninvolved closer. I'm unsure if the template expired or if it was ever inserted correctly in the first place. RfC has gone for 30 days either way and is ready to be closed.(Initiated 2683 days ago on 3 March 2017) LM2000 ( talk) 05:47, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Erika Lauren Wasilewski#Request for comment (Initiated 2689 days ago on 25 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Regina Spektor#RfC: is Regina Spektor "American" or "Russian-American"? (Initiated 2686 days ago on 28 February 2017)? Please consider Talk:Regina Spektor#RfC result (from the section above) in your close. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Sebastian Gorka#RfC regarding Gorka's association with anti-semitic groups (Initiated 2677 days ago on 9 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Sean Spicer/Archive 2#RfC regarding lead material (Initiated 2681 days ago on 5 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 133#RFC on use of WP:OUTCOMES in deletion discussions (Initiated 2685 days ago on 1 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Visa requirements for Georgian citizens#RfC for map usage (Initiated 2678 days ago on 8 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Post-progressive#Request for comment (Initiated 2801 days ago on 5 November 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Post-progressive#Request for comment 2 (Initiated 2678 days ago on 8 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Southern Poverty Law Center#RfC on lead sentence (Initiated 2678 days ago on 8 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of Mahinda College alumni#RFC about the use of tables as opposed to lists (Initiated 2685 days ago on 1 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout#RfC: remove the proscription against previously-linked terms in the "See also" section? (Initiated 2687 days ago on 27 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
There is overwhelming evidence for, and consensus for, the status quo. WP:RM appears to be the appropriate forum for further discussions of this topic [1] Siuenti ( 씨유엔티) 10:12, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2729 days ago on 16 January 2017) Been open for two months and has consensus to delete, I'd say. p b p 03:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
We have 1 RM discussion from early March still open. (Initiated 2682 days ago on 4 March 2017) Would a disinterested admin please close it anyway? Dicklyon ( talk) 23:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Consensus clearly favors delisting the article; however, the talk page has seen a good deal of non- AGF and ad hominem remarks, and so would benefit from an uninvolved editor's assistance. — Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 12:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2657 days ago on 29 March 2017) This informal survey has reached a stable point where no new editors are participating, and there seems to be consensus on the preferred outcome. However, I don't want to close it because I'm WP:INVOLVED, and so are a bunch of "regulars" at the article. Would some kind soul perform a formal close? — JFG talk 15:55, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Tom Brady/Archive 3#RfC: Should the lead mention Deflategate? (Initiated 2719 days ago on 26 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:James O'Keefe#RfC about attributing accusations of selective editing (Initiated 2726 days ago on 19 January 2017) and Talk:James O'Keefe#RfC on adding latest video about Trump inauguration (Initiated 2725 days ago on 20 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Milo Yiannopoulos#Proposed merge with Dangerous (book) (Initiated 2693 days ago on 21 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Disputed status of Gibraltar#Request for Comment: Spanish Position Section of Article (Initiated 2711 days ago on 3 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Vikings (TV series)#Links from the cast list section (Initiated 2699 days ago on 15 February 2017)? There is disagreement about what the consensus is. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2649 days ago on 6 April 2017) I'm happy they don't really need to be in Wikipedia space, if someone want to chase them into my user space maybe they could start a new debate. Siuenti ( 씨유엔티) 20:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Administrators/Archive 15#Workshopping an RfC on the inactivity policy (Initiated 2749 days ago on 27 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Robert Sungenis#RfC re geocentrism (Initiated 2694 days ago on 20 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the consensus at Talk:Operation Storm#Using primary sources (Initiated 2694 days ago on 20 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Listing this here to ensure an eventual close as it affects a large number of articles. (Initiated 2673 days ago on 13 March 2017) Cheers, Laurdecl talk 09:35, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Air (band)#Rfc (Initiated 2687 days ago on 27 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2693 days ago on 20 February 2017) Several entries are still open despite the discussion having concluded. K.e.coffman ( talk) 12:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Emmett Till#Emmett Till lead sentence RFC (Initiated 2708 days ago on 6 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Human/Archive 34#Proposed merge with "Homo sapiens" (Initiated 2733 days ago on 12 January 2017)? — MartinZ ( talk) 20:35, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Requesting closure from an uninvolved editor. (Initiated 2697 days ago on 17 February 2017) North America 1000 20:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2739 days ago on 6 January 2017) Would an uninvolved editor please assess the consensus and close this RfC? Thanks! -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 03:27, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Infobox unit#RfC: capitalization rule for name parameter (Initiated 2737 days ago on 8 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Kevin O'Leary/Archives/2018#Request for Comment on Kevin O'Leary/Donald Trump comparisons (Initiated 2683 days ago on 3 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2663 days ago on 23 March 2017) Several days over the week listing period and not that contentious a move review. Just needs someone to close. TonyBallioni ( talk) 15:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 137#RFC on WP:RESTRICT (Initiated 2720 days ago on 25 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
An uninvolved but experienced closer may be needed. (Initiated 2669 days ago on 17 March 2017) George Ho ( talk) 18:11, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
I would like to know if experienced editor assess the consensus and close the vote for both votes on the same issue (namely on wheather we should use a central notice banner in South Africa to advocate for the amendment of the South African Copyright Act to allow for Freedom of Panorama) on both Afrikaans and English Wikipedia? The vote has been up since late March and has so far had strong support from both communities and seems to include a very large proportion of the South African editors I am aware of.
Is anyone willing to assess the consensus for this RfC (Initiated 2706 days ago on 8 February 2017), which was just de-listed after 30 days? Thanks. (I'm not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) -- Dr. Fleischman ( talk) 19:50, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geography#Vital statistics tables in country demography articles (Initiated 2734 days ago on 11 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Nazism sidebar#RfC: Swastika size in infobox (2, take 2) (Initiated 2672 days ago on 14 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Manassas, Virginia#RfC about the large map of surrounding counties (Initiated 2670 days ago on 16 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Several entries are open despite the discussion having concluded. (Initiated 2656 days ago on 30 March 2017) K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:07, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Discussion on merging One Million Plan -> Aliyah Bet (Initiated 3192 days ago on 11 October 2015) with three editors participating, and no further discussion. In my opinion there is a majority for merge 2:1, but since I was the one to initiate the discussion - it is proper for an external objective closure of the RfC. GreyShark ( dibra) 18:41, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2647 days ago on 8 April 2017) Has 1 !vote (mine), has been relisted twice, is up for third relisting, but XFDclose's relisting tool won't let me relist it. Thanks. L3X1 (distant write) 19:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive952#User:Beatley and SvG articles salvation effort (Initiated 2641 days ago on 14 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive288#Jennepicfoundation: move from topic ban to full ban (Initiated 2634 days ago on 21 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:West Montrose, Ontario#RfC about the photo of the buggy (Initiated 2680 days ago on 6 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2656 days ago on 30 March 2017) Would an experienced editor please see what, if any, further conclusions can be drawn from this RfC beyond the historicalisation of the Featured Portals process. Thanks. Bencherlite Talk 15:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Needs an uninvolved opinion to assess the consensus. Currently stands at 8 yes's and 8 no's . Be mindful of dumb answers and people voting twice. 21:42, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2664 days ago on 22 March 2017)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 191#RfC: Substantiating the choices of examples (MOS:EXAMPLES) (Initiated 2675 days ago on 11 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2644 days ago on 11 April 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 03:12, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2643 days ago on 12 April 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 21:12, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
I know this was just opened, but this was opened after a community consensus was reached and the user who disagreed with it didn't want to honor the community's thoughts. I would like a speedy closure as the user is being disruptive and preventing the community's decision from being enforced. The consensus is also nearly unanimous. (I expect the disruptive editor to show up here and say I personally attacked him by pointing out his disruption.) (Initiated 2627 days ago on 28 April 2017) nihlus kryik ( talk) 13:17, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
This is the page for making requests for closure, not the place to continue a dispute |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
I wasn't being disruptive, I was adding context via a neutral statement. Your views on what is classed as disruptive is concerning. Brocicle ( talk) 22:14, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
|
(Initiated 2656 days ago on 30 March 2017) Started in March with the last comment being on April 3rd. Well over the seven day listing period. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 132#Future years- how far is too far? (Initiated 2699 days ago on 15 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Charles Murray (political scientist)#RfC about SPLC identifying Murray as a White Nationalist (Initiated 2680 days ago on 6 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Requesting uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2679 days ago on 7 March 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 23:27, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Sebastian Gorka#RfC regarding antisemitism (Initiated 2686 days ago on 28 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Office of Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement#RfC about lead (Initiated 2680 days ago on 6 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Kara-Khanid Khanate#RfC about the languages in the lead (Initiated 2676 days ago on 10 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:United States presidential election, 2020/Archive 3#RFC: Should the Speculative Candidates sections be removed? (Initiated 2664 days ago on 22 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2017 Olathe, Kansas shooting#RfC about adding victim's family's reaction to "Reactions" section (Initiated 2662 days ago on 24 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Harassment#RfC regarding "non-editors" (Initiated 2665 days ago on 21 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:American Automobile Association#RfC on list of AAA regional clubs (Initiated 2665 days ago on 21 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:James O'Keefe#RfC about attributing accusations of selective editing (Initiated 2726 days ago on 19 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Although there is clear consensus, there is also high contention, so would an uninvolved editor, please close this? (Initiated 2654 days ago on 1 April 2017)? Thanks, -- 2601:648:8503:4467:D82F:EA1A:BEAB:EF93 ( talk) 17:29, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2640 days ago on 15 April 2017) --
George Ho (
talk)
23:23, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
As the person who started the RfC, I endorse this request for closure. Could a neutral admin please close it? Thanks.
Beyond My Ken (
talk)
18:22, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Several entries are open despite the discussion having concluded. (Initiated 2660 days ago on 26 March 2017) K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:12, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Discussion has been open almost four weeks. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 17:08, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2691 days ago on 23 February 2017) -- Tavix ( talk) 02:42, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2697 days ago on 17 February 2017) Overwhelming consensus against merging, please close. Seraphim System ( talk) 05:07, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved editor kindly close this RfC? (Initiated 2646 days ago on 9 April 2017) — JFG talk 09:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2648 days ago on 7 April 2017) George Ho ( talk) 08:38, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2665 days ago on 21 March 2017) -- Tavix ( talk) 02:42, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Robert Plant#RfC: is Robert Plant's net worth in 2012 extraneous trivia, or does it belong in Robert Plant's biography? (Initiated 2689 days ago on 25 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Corey Stewart (politician)#RfC: How to handle his campaign's Wikipedia editing? (Initiated 2661 days ago on 25 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:1873 in Germany#RfC on "Born in" year. See comment for more detail. (Initiated 2659 days ago on 27 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Gaslighting#RfC about Trump section (Initiated 2655 days ago on 31 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Harem#RfC about Quranic influence (Initiated 2624 days ago on 1 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive288#Standard offer unblock request from user Edday1051 (Initiated 2635 days ago on 20 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Blue Army (Poland)#RFC: use of a reference source that was taken down by the encyclopedia (Initiated 2653 days ago on 2 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at the topic ban discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive953#RXX-7979Ⅲ and historical deletionism (Initiated 2625 days ago on 30 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Could an experience and uninvolved editor close the following RFC. It relates to the wording in both Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections and United States presidential election, 2016. (Initiated 2679 days ago on 7 March 2017) Casprings ( talk) 23:06, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
I think we have enough time and enough people have taken part in the discussion. Casprings ( talk) 11:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Any chance someone can take a look at this now? Its been open for awhile and I think there is consensus. Casprings ( talk) 14:52, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Echosmith discography has now been relisted thrice without stating a reason for doing so. Please disposition this discussion, which I cannot close per WP:INVOLVED. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 17:57, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Could an uninvolved user please assess the consensus of this discussion and close it? You'll have to drag it out of the archive in order to do so. Thanks! (Initiated 2709 days ago on 5 February 2017) Mz7 ( talk) 04:05, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
{{ not done}} As you've been relisting it yourself, after you started the AfD yourself, I think you should let it run its course. An uninvolved admin would have probably closed the AfD after the 3rd relisting as "No Consensus" and usually, it's only uninvolved editors or admins who decide to relist or close an AfD. Exemplo347 ( talk)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:John Fleming (American politician)#Request for Comment: 2017 discussion on The Onion "incident." (Initiated 2654 days ago on 1 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ned Kelly#RfC about the photo in the Capture and release of hostages section (Initiated 2622 days ago on 3 May 2017)? Thanks, David.moreno72 08:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Anti-fascism#United States: 2016 to Current -- vote on whether to include section on Trump protestors and/or present-day antifa in US (Initiated 2658 days ago on 28 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2641 days ago on 14 April 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 13:05, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Piccadilly Rats has been opened since April 18 2017 and has one deletion vote and one comment. I'd say it's ready for a closure. Please close it up, I am unable to as I started the discussion. Ҝ Ø Ƽ Ħ 12:23, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer to close one or more discussions. (Initiated 2625 days ago on 30 April 2017) George Ho ( talk) 05:37, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
An uninvolved closer is needed. (Initiated 2634 days ago on 21 April 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 03:19, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2660 days ago on 26 March 2017) George Ho ( talk) 07:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
I'd love to close the RfC myself, even when I'm involved. However, I would prefer someone else to perform the closure instead with a good rationale. (Initiated 2619 days ago on 6 May 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 22:27, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2642 days ago on 13 April 2017). A good level of participation, but no clear consensus between two alternatives. An outside close would be appreciated. NAC would be fine. Scolaire ( talk) 10:34, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2615 days ago on 10 May 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 03:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2636 days ago on 19 April 2017). I believe the consensus is clear after the past three weeks (I'm fine waiting the full month), but at least one editor is acting contrary to the expected consensus, so I'm asking for an experienced, uninvolved editor to close the RFC formally. -- Izno ( talk) 15:54, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2608 days ago on 17 May 2017) Could an uninvolved editor please close this RfC. Although the outcome is clear, a closure will make it less likely that the issue will be relitigated in the near future, as sometimes happens in American Politics articles. SPECIFICO talk 01:22, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2700 days ago on 14 February 2017) Looks like there is consensus (but I contributed myself). Marcocapelle ( talk) 11:48, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2697 days ago on 17 February 2017) Looks like there is consensus (but I contributed myself). Marcocapelle ( talk) 12:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Erik Prince#RfC: Ties to Trump transition (Initiated 2649 days ago on 6 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Album-oriented rock#RfC: Acknowledging "adult-oriented rock" (Initiated 2735 days ago on 10 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Generation Snowflake#RFC - article title and NPOV (Initiated 2660 days ago on 26 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
An uninvolved closer is needed. (Initiated 2627 days ago on 28 April 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 01:02, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Requesting early closure because of possible BLP implications of the disputed section. (Initiated 2611 days ago on 14 May 2017) — JFG talk 15:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Battle of Cao Bang (1979)#RfC: Result (Initiated 2644 days ago on 11 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Flag#RfC about section "Similar flags" (Initiated 2636 days ago on 19 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Controversial Reddit communities#RfC Including SRS as a Controversial Reddit Community (Initiated 2616 days ago on 9 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people#RfC: Articles with only IMDb references eligible for BLPPROD? (Initiated 2640 days ago on 15 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2977 days ago on 13 May 2016)
Discussion been ongoing very slowly for a year (!), personally I can see a consensus and would close it myself if I knew how to action the request. jcc ( tea and biscuits) 17:26, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Could an administrator assess the consensus at the ban discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive955#Proposal: ban In ictu oculi from moving articles without going through RM (Initiated 2624 days ago on 1 May 2017)? Thanks,-- Cúchullain t/ c 15:58, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:International Justice Mission#Request for comment on placement of criticism (Initiated 2678 days ago on 8 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Drafts#RfC: Draft classifier template (Initiated 2671 days ago on 15 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Navigation boxes in coaching articles (again) (Initiated 2654 days ago on 1 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:European Graduate School#RfC about use primary sources in section "Status" (Initiated 2657 days ago on 29 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Lithuania#RfC: Lithuania in the USSR debate. (Initiated 2657 days ago on 29 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Requesting uninvolved closer, even though the request seems early. (Initiated 2609 days ago on 16 May 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 08:12, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Uninvolved closer is needed please. (Initiated 2603 days ago on 22 May 2017) George Ho ( talk) 02:56, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Need an uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2622 days ago on 3 May 2017) George Ho ( talk) 07:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive955#WP:HOUND (Initiated 2625 days ago on 30 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive956#User:Xx236.27s disruptive editing and advocacy on Vladimir Lenin and other Soviet themed articles (Initiated 2599 days ago on 26 May 2017)? Thanks, Midnightblueowl ( talk) 20:03, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest#Investigating COI policy (Initiated 2718 days ago on 27 January 2017)? The discussion was listed at and archived from Template:Centralized discussion. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
I am listing this discussion here since Primefac would like another editor or two to participate in another close.
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jewish diaspora#RFC concerning how to present the reasons causing the Diaspora (Initiated 2649 days ago on 6 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section#RfC regarding bolding of sponsored names (Initiated 2653 days ago on 2 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2638 days ago on 17 April 2017) This RfC recently expired. Needs a close. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 14:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Abraham#Infobox RfC (Initiated 2643 days ago on 12 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Muhammad#RfC (Initiated 2640 days ago on 15 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2626 days ago on 28 April 2017) Uninvolved closer needed. The archive bot put it in the archive. Crewcamel ( talk) 00:00, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Supreme Court of the United States#Request for Comment on Diversity Descriptions (Initiated 2622 days ago on 3 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Anne Frank Center for Mutual Respect#RfC - Article versions (Initiated 2631 days ago on 24 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Women's Equality Party#Proposal to remove 'nonpartisan' from the info box (Initiated 2624 days ago on 1 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Syrian Observatory for Human Rights#RFC regarding Washington Post critique (Initiated 2624 days ago on 1 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:En Marche!#RfC about the position of the party (Initiated 2621 days ago on 4 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers#RfC on Rivers: updating the naming/disambiguation conventions (Initiated 2628 days ago on 27 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Following four discussions were sort of heated (two of them definitely are). As none of the discussions did not achieve consensus, they provide a false impression. Requesting an unbiased closure, based on facts/sources provided in the discussions. this, that, this, and that. —usernamekiran (talk) 03:34, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
@ El C: I apologise. I thought by "we" you meant admins. Wikipedia:Closing discussions states discussions on talkpage of articles can be closed if the situation calls for it.
If @ Winged Blades of Godric: was confused by my request or didn't know what can be requested here then he shouldn't have used {not done} template so confidently, and the words "don't know, don't care".
And no, I didn't insult anybody.
Anyways, I closed the discussions. I think there is no point continuing this discussion. I humbly request everybody to cease communication here. —usernamekiran (talk) 12:28, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
The discussion requested a move to 2017 Manchester Arena bombing. It's effectively been mooted a short time ago as the police have confirmed that it was, in fact, a bombing. [2] As this is a very high-profile article at the top of the Main Page news section, could an admin please close the discussion and make the move ASAP? Prioryman ( talk) 06:30, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive289#Ban appeal for Paul Bedson (Initiated 2603 days ago on 22 May 2017)? Please review the unblock request at User talk:Paul Bedson. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Protests against Donald Trump/Archive 3#RfC: "multiple/several cities" (Initiated 2646 days ago on 9 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Need uninvolved closer please. (Initiated 2620 days ago on 5 May 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 15:27, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2017 Stockholm attack#Request for comment on whether the dog should be mentioned among casualties/fatalities or not (Initiated 2631 days ago on 24 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jews#RFC:Revised origins section (Initiated 2632 days ago on 23 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jars of Clay (album)#RfC: "Self-titled" (Initiated 2624 days ago on 1 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Medical resources#RfC on placement of Medical condition classification and resources template (Initiated 2622 days ago on 3 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Requesting an uninvolved editor to kindly assess consensus about the draft merge of {{ US Presidents}} and {{ US Presidential Administrations}}, which strongly overlap each other. (Initiated 2646 days ago on 9 April 2017) This RfC is the continuation of a previous debate held at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 February 7#Template:US Presidential Administrations (29 January – 3 March), following the process suggested by the closer. Thanks, — JFG talk 15:02, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2637 days ago on 18 April 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 22:02, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Re-requested closure at WP:AN on assumption that more than one closer may be needed. -- George Ho ( talk) 18:25, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Battle of Cao Bang (1979)#RfC: Number of troops in a division (Initiated 2641 days ago on 14 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ben Shapiro#RFC: Should there be a section about Shapiro's gun control debate with Piers Morgan? If yes, what sources can/should be quoted? (Initiated 2627 days ago on 28 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:User categories#Request for Comment on the guidelines regarding "joke" categories. (Initiated 2697 days ago on 17 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
I re-requested a closure at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard, saying that either a solo or teamwork closure may be needed. -- George Ho ( talk) 16:57, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer please. (Initiated 2607 days ago on 18 May 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 06:35, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved administrator please assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive957#Godsy back to Wikihounding - how to stop it? (Initiated 2594 days ago on 31 May 2017) Thanks, — Godsy ( TALK CONT) 00:41, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of violent incidents in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, 2017#RfC rerun: House demolitions (Initiated 2656 days ago on 30 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved editor kindly assess the outcome of this consensus-building effort on the lead section of a controversial article? (Initiated 2643 days ago on 12 April 2017) — JFG talk 19:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Day-care sex-abuse hysteria#RfC: Overall compliance with BLP and neutrality policies (Initiated 2635 days ago on 20 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Genocide#RfC (Initiated 2638 days ago on 17 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Abkhazia#Proposal for the Abkhazia Article (Initiated 2647 days ago on 8 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections#RfC on Jeffrey Carr and IISS (Initiated 2638 days ago on 17 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Six-Day War#"In reaction to the mobilisation of Egyptian forces along the Israeli border in the Sinai Peninsula, Israel launched a series of preemptive airstrikes" (Initiated 2633 days ago on 22 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer please. (Initiated 2607 days ago on 18 May 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 00:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved experienced editor assess the outcome of the consensus regarding the entry in the infobox of the article? (Initiated 2618 days ago on 7 May 2017)-- Joobo ( talk) 21:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2613 days ago on 12 May 2017) This RfC recently expired. We need an editor to weigh the arguments and assess the consensus. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 22:53, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2610 days ago on 15 May 2017) Clear consensus to exclude statement entirely has been reached and the RfC has been recently delisted, so I think this can be closed now. Seraphim System ( talk) 17:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
font-family:Candara;
declaration. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
23:09, 15 June 2017 (UTC)There has been a discussion for merging Jacen Solo into Solo family for between two and four years, depending on how you count. The discussion has never been closed and consensus is hard to determine, as the page is active, yet most of the votes for in favor of merging. Let's have this settled. DARTHBOTTO talk• cont 01:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Needs an uninvolved closer, to assess the consensus. Thanks. (Initiated 2613 days ago on 12 May 2017)-- Nevé – selbert 19:28, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2697 days ago on 17 February 2017) Looks like there is consensus. Marcocapelle ( talk) 12:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2649 days ago on 6 April 2017). Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:00, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
the discussion has not been edited in over a year, and it has been brought up at AN/I that it was not closed. if this might be considered forumshopping, feel free to refuse. -- Aunva6 talk - contribs 18:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Can an admin please review this discussion and survey on Donald Trump talk here and close it? Thanks. SW3 5DL ( talk) 16:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2626 days ago on 29 April 2017)* Please disposition the open discussions started in April 2017 at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/2017/April#Proposals, April 2017. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 12:52, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Very overdue DRV discussion. I think there is a reasonably clear consensus, but I contributed to the discussion and so did many of the other regulars who close DRV discussions. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 08:04, 11 June 2017 (UTC).
(Initiated 2584 days ago on 10 June 2017) There's been more than enough talk on this issue, the ongoing discussion is a honeypot for trolls. Power~enwiki ( talk) 21:32, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
The consensus is not to include the suggested word. It would be better if any uninvolved user could close the discussion. Thanks. (Initiated 2611 days ago on 14 May 2017)-- Mhhossein talk 13:04, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive954#User:Creuzbourg and User:K.e.coffman Talk:Hans-Ulrich Rudel (Initiated 2630 days ago on 25 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Mass creation of improperly referenced BLPs by User:SwisterTwister (Initiated 2610 days ago on 15 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Intercommunal conflict in Mandatory Palestine#RfC: Proposed split (Initiated 2636 days ago on 19 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Battle of Aleppo (2012–2016)#RfC about Al-Masdar (Initiated 2637 days ago on 18 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Plummer v. State/Archive 1#Request for Comment - Internet meme section - 1st revision (Initiated 2635 days ago on 20 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Looking for additional closers to collaborate with our volunteer User:Winged Blades of Godric, who's already signed up. Not a close for the fainthearted, I would tend to think.— S Marshall T/ C 22:16, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Would like an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ned Kelly#RfC about the photo in the Capture and release of hostages section (Initiated 2622 days ago on 3 May 2017)? Thanks, David.moreno72 09:15, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Noël Coward#RfC on 1944 controversy (Initiated 2631 days ago on 24 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Antonio Margarito#Request for Comment about Antonio Margarito's nationality (Initiated 2627 days ago on 28 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ned Kelly#RfC about the photo in the Capture and release of hostages section (Initiated 2622 days ago on 3 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Jesus#Press Criticism - Wikipedia's Multiple Parallel Narratives (Initiated 2625 days ago on 30 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bill Potts#Request for comment (Initiated 2629 days ago on 26 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Someone please close this RfC on the use of {{sic}} tags in quotations. This should be an easy close, as it asks a simple and concise question and there are 9 responses, almost all of which answer the question at least indirectly, and there is hardly any debate. A closing by an uninvolved party would be very valuable here because the question is relevant to a longstanding conflict. (Initiated 2601 days ago on 24 May 2017)? Bryan Henderson (giraffedata) ( talk) 15:39, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved experienced editor assess the outcome of the consensus regarding this RFC? (Initiated 2616 days ago on 9 May 2017) -- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:23, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
This needs an uninvolved closer. Meanwhile, Wikipedia:Citation underkill was created and then discussed. (Initiated 2585 days ago on 9 June 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 17:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Money.Net#RfC about Money.Net founded and founder data (Initiated 2609 days ago on 16 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Goguryeo#Request for comment (Initiated 2618 days ago on 7 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War)#RFC - Funding from US/European governments in the lead (Initiated 2609 days ago on 16 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System#RFC (Initiated 2613 days ago on 12 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Kind of Blue#RfC: Description of the recording artist for this album (Initiated 2617 days ago on 8 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement#RfC: Lead (Initiated 2607 days ago on 18 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Robert Mueller#RfC (Initiated 2606 days ago on 19 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Policy#Font size (Initiated 2611 days ago on 14 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
I am requesting early closure of Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout#Placement of expand language templates (Initiated 2577 days ago on 17 June 2017) which has turned into a slanging match. -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 08:41, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
{{
Done}}
{{
archive top}}
and {{
archive bottom}}
templates that had been added by
FleetCommand (
talk ·
contribs). As far as the RFC system is concerned, it's still closed. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
09:51, 29 June 2017 (UTC){{ done}} As an editor with no prior involvement in the issue, I reviewed the RfC and the related prior discussions ne novo and find that the clear consensus for placement of these templates is at the top of the article. See close for full rationale. While I am confident experienced involved editors are familiar with WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, I am linking to this for those who may not have recently reviewed it. ( non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:17, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2599 days ago on 26 May 2017) Second re-list was seven days ago. Outcome could be keep, redirect or no consensus, but I'm not sure which. Linguist 1 1 1 15:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2581 days ago on 13 June 2017) Closure was reverted on 13 June 2017, so the discussion was subsequently relisted. Frietjes ( talk) 15:10, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2590 days ago on 4 June 2017) Requesting that an experienced editor close the good article reassessment and carry out the consensus, which is unanimous. – Cognissonance ( talk) 06:09, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Requesting closure and potential action for the template page. North America 1000 21:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | → | Archive 30 |
A consensus has formed and page creator requests that article be moved to a draft in his userspace. Because of the potential precedent of having an article about a proposal in such an early stage of planning linger in mainspace - and because there is a consensus - I am requesting that an editor close it swiftly. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 19:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Vajiralongkorn#October 13 or December 1, 2016 (Initiated 2757 days ago on 19 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 135#Access locks: Visual Design RFC (Initiated 2808 days ago on 29 October 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
(Initiated 2758 days ago on 18 December 2016) Could an uninvolved editor please assess the consensus and close this RfC. Best Polyamorph ( talk) 10:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Needs closure from uninvolved editor. (Initiated 2741 days ago on 4 January 2017). Nikkimaria ( talk) 03:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Access Locks: Citation Template Behaviour RFC (Initiated 2808 days ago on 29 October 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Infobox officeholder/Archive 21#RfC: Should predecessors and successors be included in officeholders' infoboxes? (Initiated 2767 days ago on 9 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
The discussion may need evaluation. -- George Ho ( talk) 00:59, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Would some kind soul gently assess consensus and answer the question asked? (Initiated 2753 days ago on 23 December 2016) — JFG talk 20:36, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Inside (video game)#RfC about the Theories header in the Plot section (Initiated 2747 days ago on 29 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of fake news websites/Archive 2#Request for Comment - Inclusion of Infowars in this list (Initiated 2759 days ago on 17 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Southern Poverty Law Center/Archive 14#RfC about addition of Ambassador Dermer's criticism of SPLC's list (Initiated 2754 days ago on 22 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Needs closure from uninvolved editor. Nikkimaria ( talk) 20:13, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Experienced and uninvolved close requested. Thanks. (Initiated 2737 days ago on 8 January 2017) ― Mandruss ☎ 22:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive286#RFC Closure review Category talk:People of Jewish descent#Survey (Initiated 2743 days ago on 2 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Please disposition Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 January 29#Template:Scratch Perverts, which has been relisted 3 times, and has been open for more than one month. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 00:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Eurodac#Request for comments: Mentioning of the murder case (Initiated 2738 days ago on 7 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2017 Chicago torture incident#RfC on WP:BLPCRIME (Initiated 2735 days ago on 10 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
While there is consensus in the ongoing discussions, those move reviews need uninvolved admin to review the comments. George Ho ( talk) 02:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
An uninvolved closer is needed to evaluate the consensus at Talk:2016–2017 Gambian constitutional crisis#Merge proposal. George Ho ( talk) 04:17, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
There is some disagreement over the way forward, and as I have been involved it would help to have an uninvolved editor or admin assess consensus and agree closure. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 17:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:John Furlong (sports administrator)#RfC about the inclusion of an "opening day crisis" section (Initiated 2743 days ago on 2 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Kfar Ahim#RfC: Arab vs. Palestinian? (Initiated 2734 days ago on 11 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor asses the consensus opinion on Talk:Southern Poverty Law Center/Archive 14#RfC about addition of Ambassador Dermer's criticism of SPLC's list (Initiated 2754 days ago on 22 December 2016). It initially started out with voting and then escalated to a lot of people going back and forth and it is a little difficult to gage what the full consensus opinion. TAG ( talk) 19:56, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Discussion at Template talk:Infobox person/Archive 32#RFC: "resting place" parameter (Initiated 2718 days ago on 27 January 2017) appears to have stalled, with no comments since February 9. An uninvolved experienced editor or admin is requested to evaluate consensus, since a simple numerical count shows a close vote (13 to remove, 10 to keep, 3 to rename) and it's a contentious subject area that's seen some heated discussion. clpo13( talk) 16:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports#Request for comments on the Airlines and destinations tables (Initiated 2760 days ago on 16 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Disputed status of Gibraltar#Request for Comment - Article Rewrite (Initiated 2761 days ago on 15 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bipartisan Report#December 2016 Request for Comment (Initiated 2765 days ago on 11 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Beauty Pageants#RfC about the draft SNG (Initiated 2733 days ago on 12 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:United States Senate election in South Dakota, 2016#Request for Comment: Should Kurt Evans be listed as "Failed to Qualify"? (Initiated 2773 days ago on 3 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:57, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 64#Explanation of Request for Comment on WP:WEIGHT of Russian influence on the 2016 United States presidential election in multiple articles and templates (Initiated 2764 days ago on 12 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Is an uninvolved administrator willing to close this discussion? The discussion has become extremely lengthy already, in just a single week, and will only get lengthier when not closed, while afaics no new arguments are being added. I can't close it myself because I have contributed to the discussion. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:17, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive946#Disruptive Editor on Ethiopia related pages (Initiated 2732 days ago on 13 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive946#Not notifying users about their pages being deleted (Initiated 2716 days ago on 29 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
This RfC expired on the 16th. An official close could help. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 20:06, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Username policy/Archive 23#"Official" accounts representing individuals as opposed to groups (Initiated 2772 days ago on 4 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
An uninvolved closer is needed to evaluate the consensus at Talk:New York Daily News#Request for Comment (Initiated 2727 days ago on 18 January 2017). -- George Ho ( talk) 01:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:New York#RFC: Should the lead feature information about New York City over information about New York State (Initiated 2762 days ago on 14 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Murder of Maria Ladenburger#RfC about the relevance of several aspects mentioned in the article about this crime (Initiated 2763 days ago on 13 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Death of JonBenét Ramsey#RfC: Is use of murder in the text, or use of murder categories, within the article against the WP:NPOV policy? (Initiated 2758 days ago on 18 December 2016)? Listing after a request on my talk page. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 07:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus? (Initiated 2732 days ago on 13 January 2017) -- Ronz ( talk) 17:05, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Death of JonBenét Ramsey#RfC: Is use of murder in the text, or use of murder categories, within the article against the WP:NPOV policy? (Initiated 2758 days ago on 18 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Radha Madhav Dham#RFC: Should an invocation at a county court be mentioned in the article? (Initiated 2759 days ago on 17 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
{{ done}} Due to extremely limited participation, closed as no consensus. ( non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:21, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
This discussion (Initiated 2713 days ago on 1 February 2017) also needs an uninvolved closer. -- George Ho ( talk) 03:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Saudi Arabia#RFC: Birthplace of Islam and Arabs (Initiated 2748 days ago on 28 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Andy Murray#Request for Comment British tennis player or Scottish tennis player (Initiated 2762 days ago on 14 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Carrie Fisher/Archive 2#Infobox image RfC (Initiated 2749 days ago on 27 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Albert Cashier#RFC: Gender (Initiated 2748 days ago on 28 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
This (Initiated 2737 days ago on 8 January 2017) needs closure from uninvolved editor. -- George Ho ( talk) 05:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The discussion (Initiated 2725 days ago on 20 January 2017) has been inactive for 12 days. - Mr X 11:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor kindly assess the consensus about inclusion of the Internet cult of Kekt phenomenon? (Initiated 2745 days ago on 31 December 2016) Thanks in advance for your assistance! — JFG talk 21:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Archive 63#RfC on the use of two film lists as sources (Initiated 2754 days ago on 22 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Discussion on splitting List of the UN resolutions concerning Israel and Palestine - initiated in 2014 with last comments added in early 2016. In my opinion there is a consensus to split, but since i initiated the discussion - i would like an external objective closure of the RfC. GreyShark ( dibra) 06:17, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Syrian Observatory for Human Rights#RfC about adding "pro-opposition" or "anti-Assad" to first sentence in the lead (Initiated 2756 days ago on 20 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Christmas/Archive 8#RFC - Date formats (Initiated 2748 days ago on 27 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The RfC (Initiated 2742 days ago on 3 January 2017) was ended by Legobot after the normal thirty days: consensus on the primary issue had been achieved well before that; but there is still disagreement upon the scope of the RfC - does the outcome apply only to the Star Trek: Discovery article. -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 15:03, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of highest-grossing films#RfC: How many entries should the main table have? (Initiated 2730 days ago on 15 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of original programs distributed by Netflix#RfC on section breaks for this article (Initiated 2722 days ago on 23 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:United States presidential election, 2000#Contradiction about Florida recount in the lead (Initiated 2724 days ago on 21 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Forever (website)#Proposed merge with Glen Meakem (Initiated 2718 days ago on 27 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Deletion process#Counter-proposal: Treating these like PRODs
Could an uninvolved editor please assess the consensus of this RfC? (Initiated 2779 days ago on 27 November 2016) Mz7 ( talk) 20:16, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2017 February 15#Lilah Parsons (Initiated 2699 days ago on 15 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive947#Harassment by User:Flyer22 Reborn (Initiated 2708 days ago on 6 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Menachem Mendel Schneerson#RFC on placement of Crown Heights Riots (Initiated 2754 days ago on 22 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved editor please assess the consensus and close this RfC? (Initiated 2738 days ago on 7 January 2017) Thanks in advance, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 02:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvoled and experienced editor kindly assess the consensus here. (Initiated 2737 days ago on 8 January 2017) Apologies in advance. -Serialjoepsycho- ( talk) 15:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved sysop assess the consensus at Talk:Tomas Gorny#Request for Comment [RfC]: Should an article written by a Forbes staff writer be kept?? This RfC (Initiated 2720 days ago on 25 January 2017) needs closed. I should note that there are SPA accounts that joined the discussion in order to add a comment to delete the source. Eliko007 ( talk) 02:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of YouTubers/Archive 9#Propose simplifying inclusion criterion (Initiated 2719 days ago on 26 January 2017)? I started the 2011 discussion at Talk:List of YouTubers/Archive 5#RfC: The criteria for inclusion on List of YouTube personalities, so I am not closing this discussion even though the consensus is clear. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Needs close from uninvolved editor. (Initiated 2715 days ago on 30 January 2017) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikkimaria ( talk • contribs) 11:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Casey Affleck#RfC about details in Early Life section (Initiated 2742 days ago on 3 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Honorific nicknames in popular music#Images (Initiated 2740 days ago on 5 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Experienced and uninvolved editor requested to evaluate this RfC (Initiated 2737 days ago on 7 January 2017). Thank you. JerryRussell ( talk) 06:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
There was a try for a closure by an involved editor, which I have reverted, as he himself has been the reason for this RFC.-- 85.74.33.233 ( talk) 23:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
there is no clear consensus either way. However, "AA" objects (perhaps because Question #6 bears on "balancing" material he wanted to add), and he reverted, with the bare comment "involved editor". I restored, noting that no uninvolved editors have stepped up, which he reverted as "
vandalism of the process", and there we are.
"It was poorly formulated, and after a first round of drive-by opinions the discussions tended to flounder."While I've admitted that two of the six questions were not clearly formulated, there was nothing wrong with the other four. And I had to do some outreach to get enough participation in this highly technical RfC, but I did the outreach, we got the participation, and the outcome is clear.
the only one who disagrees" is demonstrably false. But is this really the place to be arguing about that? ~ J. Johnson (JJ) ( talk) 22:00, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
{{ done}} Thryduulf ( talk) 22:07, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
This RFC (Initiated 2730 days ago on 15 January 2017) needs a close. Thank you Casprings ( talk) 19:17, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Please may an experienced user close the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 February 7#Template:US Presidential Administrations as no consensus? The discussion originally began (Initiated 2716 days ago on 29 January 2017) by myself and has been relisted once, however there is no sign of any consensus whatsoever. The discussion is a rather haphazard one, just to note.-- Nevé – selbert 15:15, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
This discussion (Initiated 2723 days ago on 22 January 2017) also needs an uninvolved closer. -- George Ho ( talk) 18:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Melania Trump/Archive 2#RfC: Photo (Initiated 2724 days ago on 21 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Political appointments of Donald Trump#RFC - Address significant content overlap (Initiated 2724 days ago on 21 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved administrator please assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 138#Use of Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/App/Banner on articles (Initiated 2746 days ago on 30 December 2016) (using the date from Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/App/Banner due to the close relationship between the two discussions)? Thanks, — Godsy ( TALK CONT) 21:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
{{ done}} I've unarchived this to Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Use of Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/App/Banner on articles and closed the discussion. The consensus is against adding to articles in its current form, or in an alternative form that links to the Play Store (or equivalent) and/or is not dismissable, including by users who are not logged it. A link in the site sidebar should be discussed separately before being added. Thryduulf ( talk) 15:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
The discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 9#Wikipedia:Violent Factionalizing Debate has been relisted several times already (Initiated 2755 days ago on 21 December 2016) and no new arguments have been added since 21 February and needs closing. Full disclosure: I am very involved with this discussion. Thryduulf ( talk) 14:33, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Macedonia (ancient kingdom)#RFC on using "ancient Greek kingdom" instead of just "ancient kingdom" in the lead section (Initiated 2739 days ago on 6 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
This discussion (Initiated 2725 days ago on 20 January 2017) also needs an uninvolved closer. -- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
This RfC (Initiated 2720 days ago on 25 January 2017) recently expired. Needs a close. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 16:27, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Needs an uninvolved party to close the discussion. (Initiated 2713 days ago on 1 February 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 10:12, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved editor please assess this RfC? It crossed the 30 day mark yesterday. Last comment was 1 March. Thanks! (Initiated 2707 days ago on 7 February 2017) Chris vLS ( talk) 00:05, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive948#User:Johnpacklambert (Initiated 2687 days ago on 27 February 2017)? See the subsection Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive948#Proposal: limit JPL's AFD-rate. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 19:44, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
This RFC (Initiated 2710 days ago on 4 February 2017) has run more than a month and has been quiet for weeks. Needs a close. Dicklyon ( talk) 19:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
{{ done}} ~ J. Johnson (JJ) ( talk) 19:46, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved editor please assess the consensus here. Thanks! (Initiated 2707 days ago on 7 February 2017) - SummerPhD v2.0 14:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive212#Arbitration enforcement action appeal by The Rambling Man (Initiated 2680 days ago on 6 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bronze Wolf Award#Request for comment on whether the Bronze Wolf Award by itself is enough to show notability of holders of the award (Initiated 2739 days ago on 6 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2687 days ago on 27 February 2017) This is a political-advocacy discussion I initiated within the Australian community
3 months ago and has been an active proposal, with widespread publicity within the Australian community (geonotice, mailing lists, mass-message talkpage note) for about a week. 50+ individual user-accounts have expressed opinions and the number of new people commenting has dropped to 1 or <1 per day - no new comments for several days. Although this is shorter than the standard 30 day comment period for on-wiki debates, this particular proposal has external factors affecting its timing.
Even though a simple tally of supporting vs. opposed comments shows a strong preference towards the former, I would like to request a hitherto uninvolved and experienced administrator to provide a formal 'close' decision because of the unusual nature of this proposal - and because a fair assessment of the Australian-wikipedia community's consensus is crucial. [Note: WMF-Legal
has also confirmed this is a technically&legally valid proposal in accordance with the
relevant WMF policy.
Witty
lama
14:34, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest#Investigating COI policy (Initiated 2718 days ago on 27 January 2017)? The discussion was listed at and archived from Template:Centralized discussion. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest#Concrete proposal 1 (Initiated 2716 days ago on 29 January 2017)? The discussion was listed at and archived from Template:Centralized discussion as part of the overall RfC Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest#Investigating COI policy (the above listing). Thanks for any help. Smallbones( smalltalk) 18:39, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Template talk:Alternative medicine sidebar#Title of template (Initiated 2748 days ago on 28 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Bot policy/Archive 26#Defining cosmetic changes (Initiated 2746 days ago on 30 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Revision deletion#RfC on Change RD1-wording (Initiated 2707 days ago on 7 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Clean coal technology#Request for comment on proposed move (Initiated 2707 days ago on 7 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 138#Future of magic links (Initiated 2711 days ago on 3 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 138#Backlog of unpatrolled files (Initiated 2702 days ago on 12 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor please assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people/Archive 7#RfC: Remove the grandfather clause? (Initiated 2698 days ago on 16 February 2017)? Thanks, Innisfree987 ( talk) 19:21, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Nintendo Switch#SoC details RfC (Initiated 2712 days ago on 2 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums#RfC on 5% threshold (Initiated 2711 days ago on 3 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Edit filter#RfC: use of edit filter against unreliable sources (Initiated 2705 days ago on 9 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
The uninvolved closer is needed to evaluate the consensus. (Initiated 2728 days ago on 16 January 2017) George Ho ( talk) 18:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
This discussion (Initiated 2724 days ago on 20 January 2017) also needs an uninvolved closer. -- George Ho ( talk) 18:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Started the RfC discussion almost a month ago at Talk:Death of Alan Kurdi#Proposed merge with Nilüfer Demir. It needs closure. -- George Ho ( talk) 04:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:British Empire#RfC Laissez-faire link (Initiated 2728 days ago on 17 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Nissan Caravan#Useless dab tags (Initiated 2731 days ago on 14 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Could some brave admin please assess the consensus at Talk:Kfar Ahim#RfC: Arab vs. Palestinian? (Initiated 2741 days ago on 4 January 2017)? One editor tried to close it, but it was reopened, hope we can finally close it soon, thanks, Huldra ( talk) 22:40, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:MAKS Air Show#RfC: Details (Initiated 2727 days ago on 18 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Armenia#RFC for Western Asia vs. Eastern Europe (Initiated 2713 days ago on 1 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
The backlog has been growing again, currently some 150 open discussions, the oldest is almost two months old.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
07:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Can an experienced user assess the consensus in this discussion? -- Mhhossein talk 19:25, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
(Initiated 2681 days ago on 5 March 2017) Needs closure by uninvolved admin. George Ho ( talk) 05:16, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Timothy Winter#Request for comment on "controversies" section (Initiated 2724 days ago on 21 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2017 Melbourne car attack#Inaccurate capitalisation and spelling (Initiated 2718 days ago on 27 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2748 days ago on 28 December 2016) Would appreciate a formal close by an uninvolved editor or administrator. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
This RfC (Initiated 2742 days ago on 3 January 2017) finished after 30 days of discussion, and I have now closed it to prevent the discussion from overrunning. This was merely a housekeeping closure; I have not determined a result, so I would like an administrator to override my closure with a result. Thank you. Linguist talk| contribs 14:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 133#Multi-part RFC on Wikipedia:Recent years (Initiated 2732 days ago on 13 January 2017)? The discussion is listed at Template:Centralized discussion. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced and uninvolved editor assess the consensus at Talk:2017 World Rally Championship#RFC? (Initiated 2722 days ago on 23 January 2017)? It would also be advised to take the subsequent discussion, Talk:2017 World Rally Championship#Top-level article into account when closing this one, as the RFC participants posted contributions relevant to the RFC question in that discussion as well. Thanks, T v x1 22:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Is anyone going to look into this. It's been more than 60 days and the discussion have now ended up being archived. T v x1 08:45, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2674 days ago on 12 March 2017) Would an uninvolved editor please assess the consensus and close this RfC? Thank-you. -- Nevé – selbert 11:01, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Tony Blair#RfC on inclusion of Iraq in the first paragraph (Initiated 2693 days ago on 21 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Tourism in Georgia (country)#RfC for UNWTO classification (Initiated 2698 days ago on 16 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Battle of France#RFC: "Decisive" included in the parameter result (Initiated 2696 days ago on 18 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 133#IP Block Exemptions should be expanded to include accounts (5+ years) in good standing (Initiated 2688 days ago on 26 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2685 days ago on 1 March 2017) Would an experienced editor (and not frequent aviation editor) assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports#Request for comment on terminal information in airline and destination tables? We have a vote of 14 supporting removal of concourse information from Airport Destinations Tables, while 3 oppose removal of the information. It has been 26 days since the discussion was opened, however, no contributions have been made in almost a week (6 days). Thanks! Stinger20 ( talk) 14:32, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2666 days ago on 20 March 2017) Request assessment and closure from an experienced, uninvolved editor at Talk:Day Without a Woman#Request for Comments on including organizers. The RfC has been open for six days, and there have been significant objections to its wording. Please also see related discussion at DRN. Funcrunch ( talk) 16:32, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2667 days ago on 19 March 2017) Request assessment and closure from an experienced, uninvolved editor at Talk:X-Men_(film_series)#RfC_about_change _in_title_for_X-Men_(film_series). The RfC has been open for 9 days with significant discussion and survery responses. Brocicle ( talk) 00:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess consensus at Talk:Demagogue#RfC on Donald Trump inclusion (Initiated 2695 days ago on 19 February 2017)? Thanks, – S. Rich ( talk) 23:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2688 days ago on 26 February 2017) - Would appreciate an experienced editor to assess consensus and close. Thank you very much! ―
Mandruss
☎
13:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
A close here would be good as the articles in question are high-traffic. (Initiated 2720 days ago on 25 January 2017) 121.218.198.209 ( talk) 08:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Reza Aslan/Archive 2#Aslan on Ahmadinejad (Initiated 2708 days ago on 6 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Donald Trump–Russia dossier#Request for comment: opinion of Paul Gregory (Initiated 2699 days ago on 15 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Would some kind soul assess consensus there and close the debate? (Initiated 2684 days ago on 2 March 2017) Thanks, — JFG talk 05:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Requesting uninvolved closer. I'm unsure if the template expired or if it was ever inserted correctly in the first place. RfC has gone for 30 days either way and is ready to be closed.(Initiated 2683 days ago on 3 March 2017) LM2000 ( talk) 05:47, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Erika Lauren Wasilewski#Request for comment (Initiated 2689 days ago on 25 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Regina Spektor#RfC: is Regina Spektor "American" or "Russian-American"? (Initiated 2686 days ago on 28 February 2017)? Please consider Talk:Regina Spektor#RfC result (from the section above) in your close. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Sebastian Gorka#RfC regarding Gorka's association with anti-semitic groups (Initiated 2677 days ago on 9 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Sean Spicer/Archive 2#RfC regarding lead material (Initiated 2681 days ago on 5 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 133#RFC on use of WP:OUTCOMES in deletion discussions (Initiated 2685 days ago on 1 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Visa requirements for Georgian citizens#RfC for map usage (Initiated 2678 days ago on 8 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Post-progressive#Request for comment (Initiated 2801 days ago on 5 November 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Post-progressive#Request for comment 2 (Initiated 2678 days ago on 8 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Southern Poverty Law Center#RfC on lead sentence (Initiated 2678 days ago on 8 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of Mahinda College alumni#RFC about the use of tables as opposed to lists (Initiated 2685 days ago on 1 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout#RfC: remove the proscription against previously-linked terms in the "See also" section? (Initiated 2687 days ago on 27 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
There is overwhelming evidence for, and consensus for, the status quo. WP:RM appears to be the appropriate forum for further discussions of this topic [1] Siuenti ( 씨유엔티) 10:12, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2729 days ago on 16 January 2017) Been open for two months and has consensus to delete, I'd say. p b p 03:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
We have 1 RM discussion from early March still open. (Initiated 2682 days ago on 4 March 2017) Would a disinterested admin please close it anyway? Dicklyon ( talk) 23:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Consensus clearly favors delisting the article; however, the talk page has seen a good deal of non- AGF and ad hominem remarks, and so would benefit from an uninvolved editor's assistance. — Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 12:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2657 days ago on 29 March 2017) This informal survey has reached a stable point where no new editors are participating, and there seems to be consensus on the preferred outcome. However, I don't want to close it because I'm WP:INVOLVED, and so are a bunch of "regulars" at the article. Would some kind soul perform a formal close? — JFG talk 15:55, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Tom Brady/Archive 3#RfC: Should the lead mention Deflategate? (Initiated 2719 days ago on 26 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:James O'Keefe#RfC about attributing accusations of selective editing (Initiated 2726 days ago on 19 January 2017) and Talk:James O'Keefe#RfC on adding latest video about Trump inauguration (Initiated 2725 days ago on 20 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Milo Yiannopoulos#Proposed merge with Dangerous (book) (Initiated 2693 days ago on 21 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Disputed status of Gibraltar#Request for Comment: Spanish Position Section of Article (Initiated 2711 days ago on 3 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Vikings (TV series)#Links from the cast list section (Initiated 2699 days ago on 15 February 2017)? There is disagreement about what the consensus is. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2649 days ago on 6 April 2017) I'm happy they don't really need to be in Wikipedia space, if someone want to chase them into my user space maybe they could start a new debate. Siuenti ( 씨유엔티) 20:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Administrators/Archive 15#Workshopping an RfC on the inactivity policy (Initiated 2749 days ago on 27 December 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Robert Sungenis#RfC re geocentrism (Initiated 2694 days ago on 20 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the consensus at Talk:Operation Storm#Using primary sources (Initiated 2694 days ago on 20 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Listing this here to ensure an eventual close as it affects a large number of articles. (Initiated 2673 days ago on 13 March 2017) Cheers, Laurdecl talk 09:35, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Air (band)#Rfc (Initiated 2687 days ago on 27 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2693 days ago on 20 February 2017) Several entries are still open despite the discussion having concluded. K.e.coffman ( talk) 12:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Emmett Till#Emmett Till lead sentence RFC (Initiated 2708 days ago on 6 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Human/Archive 34#Proposed merge with "Homo sapiens" (Initiated 2733 days ago on 12 January 2017)? — MartinZ ( talk) 20:35, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Requesting closure from an uninvolved editor. (Initiated 2697 days ago on 17 February 2017) North America 1000 20:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2739 days ago on 6 January 2017) Would an uninvolved editor please assess the consensus and close this RfC? Thanks! -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 03:27, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Infobox unit#RfC: capitalization rule for name parameter (Initiated 2737 days ago on 8 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Kevin O'Leary/Archives/2018#Request for Comment on Kevin O'Leary/Donald Trump comparisons (Initiated 2683 days ago on 3 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2663 days ago on 23 March 2017) Several days over the week listing period and not that contentious a move review. Just needs someone to close. TonyBallioni ( talk) 15:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 137#RFC on WP:RESTRICT (Initiated 2720 days ago on 25 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
An uninvolved but experienced closer may be needed. (Initiated 2669 days ago on 17 March 2017) George Ho ( talk) 18:11, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
I would like to know if experienced editor assess the consensus and close the vote for both votes on the same issue (namely on wheather we should use a central notice banner in South Africa to advocate for the amendment of the South African Copyright Act to allow for Freedom of Panorama) on both Afrikaans and English Wikipedia? The vote has been up since late March and has so far had strong support from both communities and seems to include a very large proportion of the South African editors I am aware of.
Is anyone willing to assess the consensus for this RfC (Initiated 2706 days ago on 8 February 2017), which was just de-listed after 30 days? Thanks. (I'm not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) -- Dr. Fleischman ( talk) 19:50, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geography#Vital statistics tables in country demography articles (Initiated 2734 days ago on 11 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Nazism sidebar#RfC: Swastika size in infobox (2, take 2) (Initiated 2672 days ago on 14 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Manassas, Virginia#RfC about the large map of surrounding counties (Initiated 2670 days ago on 16 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Several entries are open despite the discussion having concluded. (Initiated 2656 days ago on 30 March 2017) K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:07, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Discussion on merging One Million Plan -> Aliyah Bet (Initiated 3192 days ago on 11 October 2015) with three editors participating, and no further discussion. In my opinion there is a majority for merge 2:1, but since I was the one to initiate the discussion - it is proper for an external objective closure of the RfC. GreyShark ( dibra) 18:41, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2647 days ago on 8 April 2017) Has 1 !vote (mine), has been relisted twice, is up for third relisting, but XFDclose's relisting tool won't let me relist it. Thanks. L3X1 (distant write) 19:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive952#User:Beatley and SvG articles salvation effort (Initiated 2641 days ago on 14 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive288#Jennepicfoundation: move from topic ban to full ban (Initiated 2634 days ago on 21 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:West Montrose, Ontario#RfC about the photo of the buggy (Initiated 2680 days ago on 6 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2656 days ago on 30 March 2017) Would an experienced editor please see what, if any, further conclusions can be drawn from this RfC beyond the historicalisation of the Featured Portals process. Thanks. Bencherlite Talk 15:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Needs an uninvolved opinion to assess the consensus. Currently stands at 8 yes's and 8 no's . Be mindful of dumb answers and people voting twice. 21:42, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2664 days ago on 22 March 2017)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 191#RfC: Substantiating the choices of examples (MOS:EXAMPLES) (Initiated 2675 days ago on 11 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2644 days ago on 11 April 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 03:12, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2643 days ago on 12 April 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 21:12, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
I know this was just opened, but this was opened after a community consensus was reached and the user who disagreed with it didn't want to honor the community's thoughts. I would like a speedy closure as the user is being disruptive and preventing the community's decision from being enforced. The consensus is also nearly unanimous. (I expect the disruptive editor to show up here and say I personally attacked him by pointing out his disruption.) (Initiated 2627 days ago on 28 April 2017) nihlus kryik ( talk) 13:17, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
This is the page for making requests for closure, not the place to continue a dispute |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
I wasn't being disruptive, I was adding context via a neutral statement. Your views on what is classed as disruptive is concerning. Brocicle ( talk) 22:14, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
|
(Initiated 2656 days ago on 30 March 2017) Started in March with the last comment being on April 3rd. Well over the seven day listing period. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 132#Future years- how far is too far? (Initiated 2699 days ago on 15 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Charles Murray (political scientist)#RfC about SPLC identifying Murray as a White Nationalist (Initiated 2680 days ago on 6 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Requesting uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2679 days ago on 7 March 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 23:27, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Sebastian Gorka#RfC regarding antisemitism (Initiated 2686 days ago on 28 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Office of Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement#RfC about lead (Initiated 2680 days ago on 6 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Kara-Khanid Khanate#RfC about the languages in the lead (Initiated 2676 days ago on 10 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:United States presidential election, 2020/Archive 3#RFC: Should the Speculative Candidates sections be removed? (Initiated 2664 days ago on 22 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2017 Olathe, Kansas shooting#RfC about adding victim's family's reaction to "Reactions" section (Initiated 2662 days ago on 24 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Harassment#RfC regarding "non-editors" (Initiated 2665 days ago on 21 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:American Automobile Association#RfC on list of AAA regional clubs (Initiated 2665 days ago on 21 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:James O'Keefe#RfC about attributing accusations of selective editing (Initiated 2726 days ago on 19 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Although there is clear consensus, there is also high contention, so would an uninvolved editor, please close this? (Initiated 2654 days ago on 1 April 2017)? Thanks, -- 2601:648:8503:4467:D82F:EA1A:BEAB:EF93 ( talk) 17:29, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2640 days ago on 15 April 2017) --
George Ho (
talk)
23:23, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
As the person who started the RfC, I endorse this request for closure. Could a neutral admin please close it? Thanks.
Beyond My Ken (
talk)
18:22, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Several entries are open despite the discussion having concluded. (Initiated 2660 days ago on 26 March 2017) K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:12, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Discussion has been open almost four weeks. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 17:08, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2691 days ago on 23 February 2017) -- Tavix ( talk) 02:42, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2697 days ago on 17 February 2017) Overwhelming consensus against merging, please close. Seraphim System ( talk) 05:07, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved editor kindly close this RfC? (Initiated 2646 days ago on 9 April 2017) — JFG talk 09:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2648 days ago on 7 April 2017) George Ho ( talk) 08:38, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2665 days ago on 21 March 2017) -- Tavix ( talk) 02:42, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Robert Plant#RfC: is Robert Plant's net worth in 2012 extraneous trivia, or does it belong in Robert Plant's biography? (Initiated 2689 days ago on 25 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Corey Stewart (politician)#RfC: How to handle his campaign's Wikipedia editing? (Initiated 2661 days ago on 25 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:1873 in Germany#RfC on "Born in" year. See comment for more detail. (Initiated 2659 days ago on 27 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Gaslighting#RfC about Trump section (Initiated 2655 days ago on 31 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Harem#RfC about Quranic influence (Initiated 2624 days ago on 1 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive288#Standard offer unblock request from user Edday1051 (Initiated 2635 days ago on 20 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Blue Army (Poland)#RFC: use of a reference source that was taken down by the encyclopedia (Initiated 2653 days ago on 2 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at the topic ban discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive953#RXX-7979Ⅲ and historical deletionism (Initiated 2625 days ago on 30 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Could an experience and uninvolved editor close the following RFC. It relates to the wording in both Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections and United States presidential election, 2016. (Initiated 2679 days ago on 7 March 2017) Casprings ( talk) 23:06, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
I think we have enough time and enough people have taken part in the discussion. Casprings ( talk) 11:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Any chance someone can take a look at this now? Its been open for awhile and I think there is consensus. Casprings ( talk) 14:52, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Echosmith discography has now been relisted thrice without stating a reason for doing so. Please disposition this discussion, which I cannot close per WP:INVOLVED. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 17:57, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Could an uninvolved user please assess the consensus of this discussion and close it? You'll have to drag it out of the archive in order to do so. Thanks! (Initiated 2709 days ago on 5 February 2017) Mz7 ( talk) 04:05, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
{{ not done}} As you've been relisting it yourself, after you started the AfD yourself, I think you should let it run its course. An uninvolved admin would have probably closed the AfD after the 3rd relisting as "No Consensus" and usually, it's only uninvolved editors or admins who decide to relist or close an AfD. Exemplo347 ( talk)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:John Fleming (American politician)#Request for Comment: 2017 discussion on The Onion "incident." (Initiated 2654 days ago on 1 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ned Kelly#RfC about the photo in the Capture and release of hostages section (Initiated 2622 days ago on 3 May 2017)? Thanks, David.moreno72 08:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Anti-fascism#United States: 2016 to Current -- vote on whether to include section on Trump protestors and/or present-day antifa in US (Initiated 2658 days ago on 28 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2641 days ago on 14 April 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 13:05, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Piccadilly Rats has been opened since April 18 2017 and has one deletion vote and one comment. I'd say it's ready for a closure. Please close it up, I am unable to as I started the discussion. Ҝ Ø Ƽ Ħ 12:23, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer to close one or more discussions. (Initiated 2625 days ago on 30 April 2017) George Ho ( talk) 05:37, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
An uninvolved closer is needed. (Initiated 2634 days ago on 21 April 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 03:19, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2660 days ago on 26 March 2017) George Ho ( talk) 07:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
I'd love to close the RfC myself, even when I'm involved. However, I would prefer someone else to perform the closure instead with a good rationale. (Initiated 2619 days ago on 6 May 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 22:27, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2642 days ago on 13 April 2017). A good level of participation, but no clear consensus between two alternatives. An outside close would be appreciated. NAC would be fine. Scolaire ( talk) 10:34, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2615 days ago on 10 May 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 03:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2636 days ago on 19 April 2017). I believe the consensus is clear after the past three weeks (I'm fine waiting the full month), but at least one editor is acting contrary to the expected consensus, so I'm asking for an experienced, uninvolved editor to close the RFC formally. -- Izno ( talk) 15:54, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2608 days ago on 17 May 2017) Could an uninvolved editor please close this RfC. Although the outcome is clear, a closure will make it less likely that the issue will be relitigated in the near future, as sometimes happens in American Politics articles. SPECIFICO talk 01:22, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2700 days ago on 14 February 2017) Looks like there is consensus (but I contributed myself). Marcocapelle ( talk) 11:48, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2697 days ago on 17 February 2017) Looks like there is consensus (but I contributed myself). Marcocapelle ( talk) 12:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Erik Prince#RfC: Ties to Trump transition (Initiated 2649 days ago on 6 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Album-oriented rock#RfC: Acknowledging "adult-oriented rock" (Initiated 2735 days ago on 10 January 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Generation Snowflake#RFC - article title and NPOV (Initiated 2660 days ago on 26 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
An uninvolved closer is needed. (Initiated 2627 days ago on 28 April 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 01:02, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Requesting early closure because of possible BLP implications of the disputed section. (Initiated 2611 days ago on 14 May 2017) — JFG talk 15:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Battle of Cao Bang (1979)#RfC: Result (Initiated 2644 days ago on 11 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Flag#RfC about section "Similar flags" (Initiated 2636 days ago on 19 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Controversial Reddit communities#RfC Including SRS as a Controversial Reddit Community (Initiated 2616 days ago on 9 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people#RfC: Articles with only IMDb references eligible for BLPPROD? (Initiated 2640 days ago on 15 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2977 days ago on 13 May 2016)
Discussion been ongoing very slowly for a year (!), personally I can see a consensus and would close it myself if I knew how to action the request. jcc ( tea and biscuits) 17:26, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Could an administrator assess the consensus at the ban discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive955#Proposal: ban In ictu oculi from moving articles without going through RM (Initiated 2624 days ago on 1 May 2017)? Thanks,-- Cúchullain t/ c 15:58, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:International Justice Mission#Request for comment on placement of criticism (Initiated 2678 days ago on 8 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Drafts#RfC: Draft classifier template (Initiated 2671 days ago on 15 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Navigation boxes in coaching articles (again) (Initiated 2654 days ago on 1 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:European Graduate School#RfC about use primary sources in section "Status" (Initiated 2657 days ago on 29 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Lithuania#RfC: Lithuania in the USSR debate. (Initiated 2657 days ago on 29 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Requesting uninvolved closer, even though the request seems early. (Initiated 2609 days ago on 16 May 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 08:12, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Uninvolved closer is needed please. (Initiated 2603 days ago on 22 May 2017) George Ho ( talk) 02:56, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Need an uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2622 days ago on 3 May 2017) George Ho ( talk) 07:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive955#WP:HOUND (Initiated 2625 days ago on 30 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive956#User:Xx236.27s disruptive editing and advocacy on Vladimir Lenin and other Soviet themed articles (Initiated 2599 days ago on 26 May 2017)? Thanks, Midnightblueowl ( talk) 20:03, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest#Investigating COI policy (Initiated 2718 days ago on 27 January 2017)? The discussion was listed at and archived from Template:Centralized discussion. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
I am listing this discussion here since Primefac would like another editor or two to participate in another close.
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jewish diaspora#RFC concerning how to present the reasons causing the Diaspora (Initiated 2649 days ago on 6 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section#RfC regarding bolding of sponsored names (Initiated 2653 days ago on 2 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2638 days ago on 17 April 2017) This RfC recently expired. Needs a close. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 14:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Abraham#Infobox RfC (Initiated 2643 days ago on 12 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Muhammad#RfC (Initiated 2640 days ago on 15 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2626 days ago on 28 April 2017) Uninvolved closer needed. The archive bot put it in the archive. Crewcamel ( talk) 00:00, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Supreme Court of the United States#Request for Comment on Diversity Descriptions (Initiated 2622 days ago on 3 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Anne Frank Center for Mutual Respect#RfC - Article versions (Initiated 2631 days ago on 24 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Women's Equality Party#Proposal to remove 'nonpartisan' from the info box (Initiated 2624 days ago on 1 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Syrian Observatory for Human Rights#RFC regarding Washington Post critique (Initiated 2624 days ago on 1 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:En Marche!#RfC about the position of the party (Initiated 2621 days ago on 4 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers#RfC on Rivers: updating the naming/disambiguation conventions (Initiated 2628 days ago on 27 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Following four discussions were sort of heated (two of them definitely are). As none of the discussions did not achieve consensus, they provide a false impression. Requesting an unbiased closure, based on facts/sources provided in the discussions. this, that, this, and that. —usernamekiran (talk) 03:34, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
@ El C: I apologise. I thought by "we" you meant admins. Wikipedia:Closing discussions states discussions on talkpage of articles can be closed if the situation calls for it.
If @ Winged Blades of Godric: was confused by my request or didn't know what can be requested here then he shouldn't have used {not done} template so confidently, and the words "don't know, don't care".
And no, I didn't insult anybody.
Anyways, I closed the discussions. I think there is no point continuing this discussion. I humbly request everybody to cease communication here. —usernamekiran (talk) 12:28, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
The discussion requested a move to 2017 Manchester Arena bombing. It's effectively been mooted a short time ago as the police have confirmed that it was, in fact, a bombing. [2] As this is a very high-profile article at the top of the Main Page news section, could an admin please close the discussion and make the move ASAP? Prioryman ( talk) 06:30, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive289#Ban appeal for Paul Bedson (Initiated 2603 days ago on 22 May 2017)? Please review the unblock request at User talk:Paul Bedson. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Protests against Donald Trump/Archive 3#RfC: "multiple/several cities" (Initiated 2646 days ago on 9 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Need uninvolved closer please. (Initiated 2620 days ago on 5 May 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 15:27, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2017 Stockholm attack#Request for comment on whether the dog should be mentioned among casualties/fatalities or not (Initiated 2631 days ago on 24 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jews#RFC:Revised origins section (Initiated 2632 days ago on 23 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jars of Clay (album)#RfC: "Self-titled" (Initiated 2624 days ago on 1 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Medical resources#RfC on placement of Medical condition classification and resources template (Initiated 2622 days ago on 3 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Requesting an uninvolved editor to kindly assess consensus about the draft merge of {{ US Presidents}} and {{ US Presidential Administrations}}, which strongly overlap each other. (Initiated 2646 days ago on 9 April 2017) This RfC is the continuation of a previous debate held at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 February 7#Template:US Presidential Administrations (29 January – 3 March), following the process suggested by the closer. Thanks, — JFG talk 15:02, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2637 days ago on 18 April 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 22:02, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Re-requested closure at WP:AN on assumption that more than one closer may be needed. -- George Ho ( talk) 18:25, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Battle of Cao Bang (1979)#RfC: Number of troops in a division (Initiated 2641 days ago on 14 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ben Shapiro#RFC: Should there be a section about Shapiro's gun control debate with Piers Morgan? If yes, what sources can/should be quoted? (Initiated 2627 days ago on 28 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:User categories#Request for Comment on the guidelines regarding "joke" categories. (Initiated 2697 days ago on 17 February 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
I re-requested a closure at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard, saying that either a solo or teamwork closure may be needed. -- George Ho ( talk) 16:57, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer please. (Initiated 2607 days ago on 18 May 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 06:35, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved administrator please assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive957#Godsy back to Wikihounding - how to stop it? (Initiated 2594 days ago on 31 May 2017) Thanks, — Godsy ( TALK CONT) 00:41, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of violent incidents in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, 2017#RfC rerun: House demolitions (Initiated 2656 days ago on 30 March 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved editor kindly assess the outcome of this consensus-building effort on the lead section of a controversial article? (Initiated 2643 days ago on 12 April 2017) — JFG talk 19:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Day-care sex-abuse hysteria#RfC: Overall compliance with BLP and neutrality policies (Initiated 2635 days ago on 20 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Genocide#RfC (Initiated 2638 days ago on 17 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Abkhazia#Proposal for the Abkhazia Article (Initiated 2647 days ago on 8 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections#RfC on Jeffrey Carr and IISS (Initiated 2638 days ago on 17 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Six-Day War#"In reaction to the mobilisation of Egyptian forces along the Israeli border in the Sinai Peninsula, Israel launched a series of preemptive airstrikes" (Initiated 2633 days ago on 22 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Needs uninvolved closer please. (Initiated 2607 days ago on 18 May 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 00:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved experienced editor assess the outcome of the consensus regarding the entry in the infobox of the article? (Initiated 2618 days ago on 7 May 2017)-- Joobo ( talk) 21:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2613 days ago on 12 May 2017) This RfC recently expired. We need an editor to weigh the arguments and assess the consensus. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 22:53, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2610 days ago on 15 May 2017) Clear consensus to exclude statement entirely has been reached and the RfC has been recently delisted, so I think this can be closed now. Seraphim System ( talk) 17:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
font-family:Candara;
declaration. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
23:09, 15 June 2017 (UTC)There has been a discussion for merging Jacen Solo into Solo family for between two and four years, depending on how you count. The discussion has never been closed and consensus is hard to determine, as the page is active, yet most of the votes for in favor of merging. Let's have this settled. DARTHBOTTO talk• cont 01:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Needs an uninvolved closer, to assess the consensus. Thanks. (Initiated 2613 days ago on 12 May 2017)-- Nevé – selbert 19:28, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2697 days ago on 17 February 2017) Looks like there is consensus. Marcocapelle ( talk) 12:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2649 days ago on 6 April 2017). Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:00, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
the discussion has not been edited in over a year, and it has been brought up at AN/I that it was not closed. if this might be considered forumshopping, feel free to refuse. -- Aunva6 talk - contribs 18:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Can an admin please review this discussion and survey on Donald Trump talk here and close it? Thanks. SW3 5DL ( talk) 16:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2626 days ago on 29 April 2017)* Please disposition the open discussions started in April 2017 at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/2017/April#Proposals, April 2017. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 12:52, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Very overdue DRV discussion. I think there is a reasonably clear consensus, but I contributed to the discussion and so did many of the other regulars who close DRV discussions. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 08:04, 11 June 2017 (UTC).
(Initiated 2584 days ago on 10 June 2017) There's been more than enough talk on this issue, the ongoing discussion is a honeypot for trolls. Power~enwiki ( talk) 21:32, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
The consensus is not to include the suggested word. It would be better if any uninvolved user could close the discussion. Thanks. (Initiated 2611 days ago on 14 May 2017)-- Mhhossein talk 13:04, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive954#User:Creuzbourg and User:K.e.coffman Talk:Hans-Ulrich Rudel (Initiated 2630 days ago on 25 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Mass creation of improperly referenced BLPs by User:SwisterTwister (Initiated 2610 days ago on 15 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Intercommunal conflict in Mandatory Palestine#RfC: Proposed split (Initiated 2636 days ago on 19 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Battle of Aleppo (2012–2016)#RfC about Al-Masdar (Initiated 2637 days ago on 18 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Plummer v. State/Archive 1#Request for Comment - Internet meme section - 1st revision (Initiated 2635 days ago on 20 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Looking for additional closers to collaborate with our volunteer User:Winged Blades of Godric, who's already signed up. Not a close for the fainthearted, I would tend to think.— S Marshall T/ C 22:16, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Would like an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ned Kelly#RfC about the photo in the Capture and release of hostages section (Initiated 2622 days ago on 3 May 2017)? Thanks, David.moreno72 09:15, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Noël Coward#RfC on 1944 controversy (Initiated 2631 days ago on 24 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Antonio Margarito#Request for Comment about Antonio Margarito's nationality (Initiated 2627 days ago on 28 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ned Kelly#RfC about the photo in the Capture and release of hostages section (Initiated 2622 days ago on 3 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Jesus#Press Criticism - Wikipedia's Multiple Parallel Narratives (Initiated 2625 days ago on 30 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bill Potts#Request for comment (Initiated 2629 days ago on 26 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Someone please close this RfC on the use of {{sic}} tags in quotations. This should be an easy close, as it asks a simple and concise question and there are 9 responses, almost all of which answer the question at least indirectly, and there is hardly any debate. A closing by an uninvolved party would be very valuable here because the question is relevant to a longstanding conflict. (Initiated 2601 days ago on 24 May 2017)? Bryan Henderson (giraffedata) ( talk) 15:39, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved experienced editor assess the outcome of the consensus regarding this RFC? (Initiated 2616 days ago on 9 May 2017) -- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:23, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
This needs an uninvolved closer. Meanwhile, Wikipedia:Citation underkill was created and then discussed. (Initiated 2585 days ago on 9 June 2017) -- George Ho ( talk) 17:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Money.Net#RfC about Money.Net founded and founder data (Initiated 2609 days ago on 16 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Goguryeo#Request for comment (Initiated 2618 days ago on 7 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War)#RFC - Funding from US/European governments in the lead (Initiated 2609 days ago on 16 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System#RFC (Initiated 2613 days ago on 12 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Kind of Blue#RfC: Description of the recording artist for this album (Initiated 2617 days ago on 8 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement#RfC: Lead (Initiated 2607 days ago on 18 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Robert Mueller#RfC (Initiated 2606 days ago on 19 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Policy#Font size (Initiated 2611 days ago on 14 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
I am requesting early closure of Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout#Placement of expand language templates (Initiated 2577 days ago on 17 June 2017) which has turned into a slanging match. -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 08:41, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
{{
Done}}
{{
archive top}}
and {{
archive bottom}}
templates that had been added by
FleetCommand (
talk ·
contribs). As far as the RFC system is concerned, it's still closed. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
09:51, 29 June 2017 (UTC){{ done}} As an editor with no prior involvement in the issue, I reviewed the RfC and the related prior discussions ne novo and find that the clear consensus for placement of these templates is at the top of the article. See close for full rationale. While I am confident experienced involved editors are familiar with WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, I am linking to this for those who may not have recently reviewed it. ( non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:17, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2599 days ago on 26 May 2017) Second re-list was seven days ago. Outcome could be keep, redirect or no consensus, but I'm not sure which. Linguist 1 1 1 15:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2581 days ago on 13 June 2017) Closure was reverted on 13 June 2017, so the discussion was subsequently relisted. Frietjes ( talk) 15:10, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
(Initiated 2590 days ago on 4 June 2017) Requesting that an experienced editor close the good article reassessment and carry out the consensus, which is unanimous. – Cognissonance ( talk) 06:09, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Requesting closure and potential action for the template page. North America 1000 21:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)