![]() |
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
No sign of notability whatsoever, no sources, and no corresponding Spanish article. Fails WP:GNG and (assuming it is inhabited) WP:NPLACE. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 23:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 23:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Relies for notability very largely on a single article in "Creation" magazine. This is largely based around an interview with the subject so is not reliable . The Order of Australia is not an award that conveys any special notability. This whole article looks like a promotional job with nothing that meets WP:GNG. It has been tagged as potentially lacking notability since 2013 without any significant subsequent improvement. Velella Velella Talk 22:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of this rugby league player to meet WP:GNG. All I found was this. JTtheOG ( talk) 22:24, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources and the article only links to primary sources. toweli ( talk) 21:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Editors interested in converting this page title to a Redirect can discuss this option on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 20:27, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG DonaldD23 talk to me 11:26, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:57, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Might be another No consensus closure.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:29, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:27, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Previously considered for deletion in 2010. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kvno1jrc jalandhar cantt. Since then notability of schools is much stricter. This one is unreferenced for 14 years and fails WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar ( talk) 20:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously at AFD, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:24, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nothing against establishing a Redirect but I didn't see this player mentioned there. Liz Read! Talk! 20:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Papua New Guinea national rugby league team players as I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. I found a couple trivial mentions ( 2010, 2016, etc.) and not much else. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Papua New Guinea national rugby league team players. as an ATD Liz Read! Talk! 20:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Papua New Guinea national rugby league team players as I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. I found a couple trivial mentions ( 2010, 2011, etc.) and not much else. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced article which doesn't appear to meet WP:NLIST / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 20:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 09:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this footballer. Contested PROD. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
20:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 09:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this footballer. Contested PROD. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
20:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 14:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Work itself does not appear to meet WP:GNG and WP:N. Sourcing, aside from primary sources such as tweets and youtube discussions, are mainly interviews and discuss the author far more than the work itself. Artist is possibly notable, however this doesn't seem to quite meet the notability bar. Mdann52 ( talk) 09:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
those who worked on the pagewhich also smacks of attempts to conceal your relationship to this article. To put it bluntly, your work on this article may well be that of an overenthusiastic hobbyist, but it also looks distinctly like COI or UPE. Can you confirm that you have no specific relationship, financial or otherwise, with the project or its contributors? Jclemens ( talk) 16:11, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
"In 2019, Marsh was described as the executive producer and voice director of S.A.L.E.M.: The Secret Archive of Legends, Enchantments, and Monsters, with his company, Surfer Jack Productions, producing the series. [1] [2] The series is created by a queer woman named Samantha "Sam" Sawyer, based on her unpublished comic of the same name. [3] [4]
References
a redirect is the first option I favor, and a draft is the second option I favor.) throughout this discussion, which might be mistaken for multiple !votes. Jclemens ( talk) 04:42, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as opinion is divided between Delete, Redirect, Keep and Draftify. A reminder, only BOLD one vote that reflects your opinion on what should happen with this article. If you change your mind, strike any previous votes. Do not unnecessarily bold words that might be confused for additional votes or it could be seen as disruptive editing. One editor=One vote. Also, avoid bludgeonining any discussion. If you find yourself repeating your comments, cancel your post and move on.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:40, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 14:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOLY has changed since last AfD, inherent notability is only granted to medal winners. This article fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. Australia only played in the Olympics as a host nation and lost every game. Only primary sources provided. LibStar ( talk) 18:27, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to University of Alabama at Birmingham. Liz Read! Talk! 20:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP: N. PROD removed without sufficient sourcing improvements -- the sourcing on the article is either primary or database entries. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 16:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The article is about the school that created the invention.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirecting is an option per
WP:ATD, or should this be kept?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
18:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
at times it is better to cover a notable topic as part of a larger page about a broader topic, with more context. This is one of those times; it would be better to structure the coverage within the article on the University, at least given the current state of sourcing. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to English Foxhound. In my time working in AFDLand, this is one of the least likely articles I would expect would generate talk of political conspiracies, accusations of being a cat lover or comparisons with Hitler. The important factor in determining AFD closures is policy and consensus and right now, the rough consensus is that this article subject does not have significant coverage in reliable, secondary, independent sources to warrant a stand-alone article. This is the important factor, not upcoming elections or hidden conflict-of-interests and this is generally how AFD discussions are closed no matter what the article subject is. Liz Read! Talk! 21:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:PROD removed by IP on grounds that "IFA is currently very important to secure the Foxhound as a breed in the current fight against the Labor manifesto for this July UK election". Struggling to find evidence this organisation even exists. It certainly has nothing to meet WP:NORG. AusLondonder ( talk) 17:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Trial hunting has saved the English foxhounds from total extermination. This Wikipedia entry has never been flagged in the past eight years. Why now just before the election? This is very suspicious. Such deletion is obviously politically motivated. COI should be disclosed by the person who did push for deletion and all other based in the UK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tintin2004123 ( talk • contribs) 07:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
This page is written to request COI declaration from Traumnovele and AusLondoner. Traumnovele is obviously a CAT lover from his own page and therefore not so keen on the foxhound. Do you want to be responsible for killing thousands of foxhounds? IFA is a front fighter to save the foxhound from extermination in the UK. AusLondoner and a couple of other bloggers are involved with labor fights from a Corbynist angle according to their own pages. Labor manifesto published two weeks ago is clear: total ban of trail hunting. Push to delete IFA entry is conducive to eliminating opposition. Wikipedia should not be used against freedom of speech. Many entries represent anti- hunting ideas in Wikipedia. Just a few does represent the pro hunting side. Hitler eliminated opposition when coming to power in 1933. Is Wikipedia now following the same Nazi methodology !!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tintin2004123 ( talk • contribs) 12:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Reference 2 now fixed with clear mention of IFA (in French). Note that Dailymail is a perfectly reliable source used extensively by Wikipedia. Covertside article does clearly mention the creation of IFA at the end of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.26.171.20 ( talk) 04:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
‘’’keep’’’ The last paragraph of the Covertside article clearly mention the launch of an ‘international association to promote the Foxhound’ This cannot be more relevant. Then it does describe exactly the structure, organisation and purpose of the International Foxhound Association. Reference 2 is a fourth reliable source very well known in France ‘Chassons.com’ (in extra of the Dailymail, Covertside and the French government registry of association). I feel there is bad faith here with you trying to delete a page for absolutely no valid reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.94.10.176 ( talk) 19:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 14:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPRODUCT. Created by a sockmaster (prior to block, not G5 eligible). I found that nearly every source used made no mention of 8XR at all. The two remaining sources are interviews/promo/non-independent. WP:VG/S's reliable source search has zero results. General efforts to search up any other coverage, reliable or not, for an "8XR engine" found essentially nothing. -- ferret ( talk) 15:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 14:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG. Dougal18 ( talk) 14:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 16:41, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
PROD was removed without comment, but this place is obviously non-notable and never was. Sources consist of GNIS (not sufficient for notability) and a trivial one-word mention in a 1913 magazine ("The first section extends from Pendleton to Havana station, a distance of eight miles"). Satellite view shows empty farmland; topo maps from the 1930s suggest this was never a community but rather a rail siding possibly with a flag stop for local farmers. That is a far cry from a "community" and the article thus fails WP:GEOLAND. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 14:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:48, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Apologies in advance for editors reviewing this AfD. In any other situation I would PROD this as obviously failing the notability guidelines for companies, but because this quickly-withdrawn AfD exists the article is now permanently ineligible for PROD. – Tera tix ₵ 14:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
14:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 13:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
He fails GNG. A Google search found no sigcov just mentions in match reports. Dougal18 ( talk) 14:23, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Supremes discography#1960s. Owen× ☎ 23:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Couldn't find a reliable source verifying notability of or significantly covering the whole song by the Supremes. Sure, it charted in (West) Germany, but that's all I can find. If it fails GNG, then the song may also fail WP:NSONG. Even if notable, the article won't likely expand in the near or far future. George Ho ( talk) 07:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Almost forgot: should be redirected to The Supremes discography#1960s as alternative to deletion. -- George Ho ( talk) 07:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
14:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:51, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
I could not find any significant coverage besides the Nintendo Life and IGN reviews in the article. QuietCicada chirp 13:56, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://archive.org/details/Nintendo_Power_Issue_246_October_2009/page/n27/mode/2up | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.nintendolife.com/reviews/2009/07/hb_arcade_cards | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.ign.com/games/hb-arcade-cards | ![]() |
~ Though it is listed as reliable in WP:NPPSG, there is only a single summary sentence and the review consists of user-generated content | ![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
It exists, but isn't notable. I couldn't find a suitable WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 08:01, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
14:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 15:57, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
This is clearly PROMO, created by a now blocked sock puppet. It hasn't received sig/ in-depth coverage in RS, aside from some churnalism or paid coverage. Furthermore, it is not even a magazine as the article claims, but rather a boutique or maybe some e-commerce store. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 12:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
13:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability.Meanwhile, articles in The Express Tribune and DAWN , published on the same day - 29 September 2023 - to mark the subject's launch and the PROMO tone in both coverages suggests they're based on PR stuff and for PR purpose. WP:SIRS states that coverage based on based on a company's marketing materials shouldn't be acceptable for WP:N. While they're suitable for WP:V purpose, but using them to establish GNG seems inadequate given the rigorous sourcing requirements for establishing WP:N. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 20:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Through this new portal, relevant information will be available to users at the click of a mouse, ensuring that pertinent information is readily available.is clearly not something we should rely on to decide that a for-profit company with a history of promotional editing is notable. Toadspike [Talk] 14:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus materialized after nom withdrew their Delete view. Owen× ☎ 23:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Nominated for deletion as this article entirely lacks WP:Sources and doesn't meet WP:Notability neither WP:GNG
I wondered why it is retained on Wikipedia from 2006 till this moment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by War Term ( talk • contribs) 02:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete lack of notability and no sources since 2006 — Iadmc ♫ talk 00:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Article content does not determine notability. Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. If the subject has not been covered outside of Wikipedia, no amount of improvement to the Wikipedia content will suddenly make the subject notable. Conversely, if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within a Wikipedia article will not decrease the subject's notability.I added a couple sources to the article, and also posted multiple potential sources from ProQuest at Talk:Westview Secondary School. Based on these sources, this subject meets WP:GNG, per criteria at WP:NSCHOOL. — Grand'mere Eugene ( talk) 04:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity. Notability rests on significant coverage in reliable sources. — Grand'mere Eugene ( talk) 10:59, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:22, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
14:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 14:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a New Zealand rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. All I found was this transactional announcement. Unless WP:SIGCOV is found, I suggest draftification. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
14:01, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 21:03, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTTVGUIDE applies here. Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans. The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. As with sources per WP:RS besides those unsourced, consists of nothing but YouTube posts, dead links, trivial mentions, WP:PRIMARY, commercial sites, WP:TERTIARY, blogspot, fanpages and primarily on anything but the broadcasting itself; not helping this list to assert notability. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 16:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:56, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
13:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Biathlete who placed lowly in two Olympic Games. No World Cup results of note either; 49th and 68th places tend not to get coverage. I did not find any coverage when searchnig either, apart from passing mentions (and I did search in the Hungarian name order. Therefore fails WP:SPORTCRIT. Geschichte ( talk) 21:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Edited and proofread by Dr. Pál Hencsei and Vilmos Horváth Photos: Hungarian Olympic Committee Hungarian Olympic Academy Hungarian Olympic and Sports Museum Judit Bódayné Blaha, József Erdélyi István Fucskó, JochaPress, Tamás Róth Domonkos Vígh and the authors ISSN 0238-0412 Publisher: Hungarian Olympic Committee Responsible for the publication: Zsolt Borkai, MOB president Printing house: Pátria Nyomda Zrt., responsible manager: Katalin Orgován Printing preparation: János Kerényi
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:54, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
13:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:43, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
This article has existed as a stub since 2007. It is yet another obscure Trotskyist international; this one didn't even last longer than a year before splitting! Its two cited sources are both (clearly unreliable) articles published by other obscure Trotskyist Internationals (the International Bolshevik Tendency and League for the Fifth International). A search on Google Scholar yields only two results, both of which are false positives. [9] I tried looking for it in one Robert J. Alexander's books, but only found a passing mention in a section about the International Marxist Group, without any real detail whatsoever.
As it doesn't appear to have any significant coverage in reliable sources, I don't think it meets our notability guidelines for organizations and I'm recommending it for deletion. Grnrchst ( talk) 13:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters#Snout Spout. Liz Read! Talk! 11:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence that this is notable per BEFORE. 🍕 Boneless Pizza!🍕 ( 🔔) 11:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters#Man-E-Faces. Liz Read! Talk! 11:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence that this is notable per BEFORE. 🍕 Boneless Pizza!🍕 ( 🔔) 11:36, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters. Liz Read! Talk! 11:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence that this is notable per BEFORE. 🍕 Boneless Pizza!🍕 ( 🔔) 11:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 11:25, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Abandoned season article with incomplete statistics. Team playing on the second tier of Romania, with less significant coverage than the first tier gets. No significant coverage sources in the entry. This season is not a piece in a complete series; there is no article on the previous nor the next season. It's also the only entry about a Romanian second-tier team in 2019–20. Geschichte ( talk) 11:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. Liz Read! Talk! 11:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
The book is notable only in its relation to Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. Two out of three sources (1 and 3) are primary, source 2 does not mention the book (source is from 2011, and the book is from 2022). It maybe notable enough for ~2 sentences in the SICP article. Artem.G ( talk) 10:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:08, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I am not sure this individual meets the General notability guideline. The main claim to notability is that he played for his country in 2016. This claim is not supported by reliable sources. I did some searching and found sources such as ESPN and GSA which mention the lineups without this individual's name in them. Even if if we can establish that this person made a substitute appearance in a single non-competitive match, I feel this is still not enough for notability. C 679 09:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. – Joe ( talk) 11:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
This does not appear to be a notable programme. I am not convinced there is a good WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 08:24, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep though there seems to be an agreement that they could be merged into one list. – Joe ( talk) 11:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Original research list that doesn't satisfy WP:NLIST I am also nominating the the related North, East, and West articles.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
It was a sad incident but WP is a not a newspaper. Clearly fails NEVENT! Saqib ( talk I contribs) 06:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Futsal Week. Liz Read! Talk! 05:43, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable youth league, seems to have received minimal if any coverage, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT Mdann52 ( talk) 05:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.. Liz Read! Talk! 05:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:17, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
No WP:SIGCOV at all. Steelkamp ( talk) 04:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Member of a Parish council, whose sole news articles about his recent decision to run in the current election. If he wins, automatically notable, but at this point he is subject to general notability policy, and has no indication of passing Brislian ( talk) 04:57, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
This has no sigcov/notability and no coverage in secondary and reliable sources. Alexeyevitch( talk) 04:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of mosques in Azerbaijan. Liz Read! Talk! 04:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Short list created in 2013 that has no sources that mostly duplicates the info in the better quality List of mosques in Azerbaijan. As an WP:ATD, I'd also support a redirect to the Azerbaijan list. Dan the Animator 04:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Snowing. (non-admin closure) Queen of Hearts talk 23:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No real media coverage rather than a couple interviews in the initial press run. Only one major review. ⠀ tomástomástomás⠀ talk⠀ 03:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 02:02, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Did not find any sources behind this series to establish notability. GamerPro64 02:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Huawei Mate series. Liz Read! Talk! 03:45, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
It exists, but doesn't appear to be notable enough for a standalone article. A possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect to Huawei Mate series but I was unsure about that, especially as this is wholly unsourced. Boleyn ( talk) 07:59, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:56, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of notability for this footballer. The only sources are a pair of interviews with some routine coverage interspersed, as well as the BBC piece with two sentences of independent coverage. My searches did not yield much else. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
This article is about cartoonist that does not meet notability. The sourcung in the article is primary sources, or not reliable sources. I can find nothing in my searches to substantiate inclusion of this article on Wikipedia. Whpq ( talk) 00:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Bigwombat ( talk) 08:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
No sign of notability whatsoever, no sources, and no corresponding Spanish article. Fails WP:GNG and (assuming it is inhabited) WP:NPLACE. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 23:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 23:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Relies for notability very largely on a single article in "Creation" magazine. This is largely based around an interview with the subject so is not reliable . The Order of Australia is not an award that conveys any special notability. This whole article looks like a promotional job with nothing that meets WP:GNG. It has been tagged as potentially lacking notability since 2013 without any significant subsequent improvement. Velella Velella Talk 22:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of this rugby league player to meet WP:GNG. All I found was this. JTtheOG ( talk) 22:24, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources and the article only links to primary sources. toweli ( talk) 21:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Editors interested in converting this page title to a Redirect can discuss this option on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 20:27, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG DonaldD23 talk to me 11:26, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:57, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Might be another No consensus closure.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:29, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:27, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Previously considered for deletion in 2010. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kvno1jrc jalandhar cantt. Since then notability of schools is much stricter. This one is unreferenced for 14 years and fails WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar ( talk) 20:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously at AFD, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:24, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nothing against establishing a Redirect but I didn't see this player mentioned there. Liz Read! Talk! 20:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Papua New Guinea national rugby league team players as I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. I found a couple trivial mentions ( 2010, 2016, etc.) and not much else. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Papua New Guinea national rugby league team players. as an ATD Liz Read! Talk! 20:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Papua New Guinea national rugby league team players as I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. I found a couple trivial mentions ( 2010, 2011, etc.) and not much else. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced article which doesn't appear to meet WP:NLIST / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 20:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 09:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this footballer. Contested PROD. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
20:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 09:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this footballer. Contested PROD. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
20:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 14:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Work itself does not appear to meet WP:GNG and WP:N. Sourcing, aside from primary sources such as tweets and youtube discussions, are mainly interviews and discuss the author far more than the work itself. Artist is possibly notable, however this doesn't seem to quite meet the notability bar. Mdann52 ( talk) 09:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
those who worked on the pagewhich also smacks of attempts to conceal your relationship to this article. To put it bluntly, your work on this article may well be that of an overenthusiastic hobbyist, but it also looks distinctly like COI or UPE. Can you confirm that you have no specific relationship, financial or otherwise, with the project or its contributors? Jclemens ( talk) 16:11, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
"In 2019, Marsh was described as the executive producer and voice director of S.A.L.E.M.: The Secret Archive of Legends, Enchantments, and Monsters, with his company, Surfer Jack Productions, producing the series. [1] [2] The series is created by a queer woman named Samantha "Sam" Sawyer, based on her unpublished comic of the same name. [3] [4]
References
a redirect is the first option I favor, and a draft is the second option I favor.) throughout this discussion, which might be mistaken for multiple !votes. Jclemens ( talk) 04:42, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as opinion is divided between Delete, Redirect, Keep and Draftify. A reminder, only BOLD one vote that reflects your opinion on what should happen with this article. If you change your mind, strike any previous votes. Do not unnecessarily bold words that might be confused for additional votes or it could be seen as disruptive editing. One editor=One vote. Also, avoid bludgeonining any discussion. If you find yourself repeating your comments, cancel your post and move on.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:40, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 14:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOLY has changed since last AfD, inherent notability is only granted to medal winners. This article fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. Australia only played in the Olympics as a host nation and lost every game. Only primary sources provided. LibStar ( talk) 18:27, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to University of Alabama at Birmingham. Liz Read! Talk! 20:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP: N. PROD removed without sufficient sourcing improvements -- the sourcing on the article is either primary or database entries. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 16:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The article is about the school that created the invention.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirecting is an option per
WP:ATD, or should this be kept?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
18:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
at times it is better to cover a notable topic as part of a larger page about a broader topic, with more context. This is one of those times; it would be better to structure the coverage within the article on the University, at least given the current state of sourcing. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to English Foxhound. In my time working in AFDLand, this is one of the least likely articles I would expect would generate talk of political conspiracies, accusations of being a cat lover or comparisons with Hitler. The important factor in determining AFD closures is policy and consensus and right now, the rough consensus is that this article subject does not have significant coverage in reliable, secondary, independent sources to warrant a stand-alone article. This is the important factor, not upcoming elections or hidden conflict-of-interests and this is generally how AFD discussions are closed no matter what the article subject is. Liz Read! Talk! 21:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:PROD removed by IP on grounds that "IFA is currently very important to secure the Foxhound as a breed in the current fight against the Labor manifesto for this July UK election". Struggling to find evidence this organisation even exists. It certainly has nothing to meet WP:NORG. AusLondonder ( talk) 17:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Trial hunting has saved the English foxhounds from total extermination. This Wikipedia entry has never been flagged in the past eight years. Why now just before the election? This is very suspicious. Such deletion is obviously politically motivated. COI should be disclosed by the person who did push for deletion and all other based in the UK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tintin2004123 ( talk • contribs) 07:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
This page is written to request COI declaration from Traumnovele and AusLondoner. Traumnovele is obviously a CAT lover from his own page and therefore not so keen on the foxhound. Do you want to be responsible for killing thousands of foxhounds? IFA is a front fighter to save the foxhound from extermination in the UK. AusLondoner and a couple of other bloggers are involved with labor fights from a Corbynist angle according to their own pages. Labor manifesto published two weeks ago is clear: total ban of trail hunting. Push to delete IFA entry is conducive to eliminating opposition. Wikipedia should not be used against freedom of speech. Many entries represent anti- hunting ideas in Wikipedia. Just a few does represent the pro hunting side. Hitler eliminated opposition when coming to power in 1933. Is Wikipedia now following the same Nazi methodology !!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tintin2004123 ( talk • contribs) 12:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Reference 2 now fixed with clear mention of IFA (in French). Note that Dailymail is a perfectly reliable source used extensively by Wikipedia. Covertside article does clearly mention the creation of IFA at the end of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.26.171.20 ( talk) 04:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
‘’’keep’’’ The last paragraph of the Covertside article clearly mention the launch of an ‘international association to promote the Foxhound’ This cannot be more relevant. Then it does describe exactly the structure, organisation and purpose of the International Foxhound Association. Reference 2 is a fourth reliable source very well known in France ‘Chassons.com’ (in extra of the Dailymail, Covertside and the French government registry of association). I feel there is bad faith here with you trying to delete a page for absolutely no valid reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.94.10.176 ( talk) 19:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 14:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPRODUCT. Created by a sockmaster (prior to block, not G5 eligible). I found that nearly every source used made no mention of 8XR at all. The two remaining sources are interviews/promo/non-independent. WP:VG/S's reliable source search has zero results. General efforts to search up any other coverage, reliable or not, for an "8XR engine" found essentially nothing. -- ferret ( talk) 15:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 14:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG. Dougal18 ( talk) 14:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 16:41, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
PROD was removed without comment, but this place is obviously non-notable and never was. Sources consist of GNIS (not sufficient for notability) and a trivial one-word mention in a 1913 magazine ("The first section extends from Pendleton to Havana station, a distance of eight miles"). Satellite view shows empty farmland; topo maps from the 1930s suggest this was never a community but rather a rail siding possibly with a flag stop for local farmers. That is a far cry from a "community" and the article thus fails WP:GEOLAND. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 14:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:48, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Apologies in advance for editors reviewing this AfD. In any other situation I would PROD this as obviously failing the notability guidelines for companies, but because this quickly-withdrawn AfD exists the article is now permanently ineligible for PROD. – Tera tix ₵ 14:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
14:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 13:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
He fails GNG. A Google search found no sigcov just mentions in match reports. Dougal18 ( talk) 14:23, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Supremes discography#1960s. Owen× ☎ 23:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Couldn't find a reliable source verifying notability of or significantly covering the whole song by the Supremes. Sure, it charted in (West) Germany, but that's all I can find. If it fails GNG, then the song may also fail WP:NSONG. Even if notable, the article won't likely expand in the near or far future. George Ho ( talk) 07:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Almost forgot: should be redirected to The Supremes discography#1960s as alternative to deletion. -- George Ho ( talk) 07:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
14:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:51, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
I could not find any significant coverage besides the Nintendo Life and IGN reviews in the article. QuietCicada chirp 13:56, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://archive.org/details/Nintendo_Power_Issue_246_October_2009/page/n27/mode/2up | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.nintendolife.com/reviews/2009/07/hb_arcade_cards | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.ign.com/games/hb-arcade-cards | ![]() |
~ Though it is listed as reliable in WP:NPPSG, there is only a single summary sentence and the review consists of user-generated content | ![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
It exists, but isn't notable. I couldn't find a suitable WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 08:01, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
14:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 15:57, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
This is clearly PROMO, created by a now blocked sock puppet. It hasn't received sig/ in-depth coverage in RS, aside from some churnalism or paid coverage. Furthermore, it is not even a magazine as the article claims, but rather a boutique or maybe some e-commerce store. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 12:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
13:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability.Meanwhile, articles in The Express Tribune and DAWN , published on the same day - 29 September 2023 - to mark the subject's launch and the PROMO tone in both coverages suggests they're based on PR stuff and for PR purpose. WP:SIRS states that coverage based on based on a company's marketing materials shouldn't be acceptable for WP:N. While they're suitable for WP:V purpose, but using them to establish GNG seems inadequate given the rigorous sourcing requirements for establishing WP:N. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 20:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Through this new portal, relevant information will be available to users at the click of a mouse, ensuring that pertinent information is readily available.is clearly not something we should rely on to decide that a for-profit company with a history of promotional editing is notable. Toadspike [Talk] 14:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus materialized after nom withdrew their Delete view. Owen× ☎ 23:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Nominated for deletion as this article entirely lacks WP:Sources and doesn't meet WP:Notability neither WP:GNG
I wondered why it is retained on Wikipedia from 2006 till this moment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by War Term ( talk • contribs) 02:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete lack of notability and no sources since 2006 — Iadmc ♫ talk 00:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Article content does not determine notability. Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. If the subject has not been covered outside of Wikipedia, no amount of improvement to the Wikipedia content will suddenly make the subject notable. Conversely, if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within a Wikipedia article will not decrease the subject's notability.I added a couple sources to the article, and also posted multiple potential sources from ProQuest at Talk:Westview Secondary School. Based on these sources, this subject meets WP:GNG, per criteria at WP:NSCHOOL. — Grand'mere Eugene ( talk) 04:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity. Notability rests on significant coverage in reliable sources. — Grand'mere Eugene ( talk) 10:59, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:22, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
14:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 14:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a New Zealand rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. All I found was this transactional announcement. Unless WP:SIGCOV is found, I suggest draftification. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
14:01, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 21:03, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTTVGUIDE applies here. Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans. The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. As with sources per WP:RS besides those unsourced, consists of nothing but YouTube posts, dead links, trivial mentions, WP:PRIMARY, commercial sites, WP:TERTIARY, blogspot, fanpages and primarily on anything but the broadcasting itself; not helping this list to assert notability. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 16:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:56, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
13:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Biathlete who placed lowly in two Olympic Games. No World Cup results of note either; 49th and 68th places tend not to get coverage. I did not find any coverage when searchnig either, apart from passing mentions (and I did search in the Hungarian name order. Therefore fails WP:SPORTCRIT. Geschichte ( talk) 21:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Edited and proofread by Dr. Pál Hencsei and Vilmos Horváth Photos: Hungarian Olympic Committee Hungarian Olympic Academy Hungarian Olympic and Sports Museum Judit Bódayné Blaha, József Erdélyi István Fucskó, JochaPress, Tamás Róth Domonkos Vígh and the authors ISSN 0238-0412 Publisher: Hungarian Olympic Committee Responsible for the publication: Zsolt Borkai, MOB president Printing house: Pátria Nyomda Zrt., responsible manager: Katalin Orgován Printing preparation: János Kerényi
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:54, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
13:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:43, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
This article has existed as a stub since 2007. It is yet another obscure Trotskyist international; this one didn't even last longer than a year before splitting! Its two cited sources are both (clearly unreliable) articles published by other obscure Trotskyist Internationals (the International Bolshevik Tendency and League for the Fifth International). A search on Google Scholar yields only two results, both of which are false positives. [9] I tried looking for it in one Robert J. Alexander's books, but only found a passing mention in a section about the International Marxist Group, without any real detail whatsoever.
As it doesn't appear to have any significant coverage in reliable sources, I don't think it meets our notability guidelines for organizations and I'm recommending it for deletion. Grnrchst ( talk) 13:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters#Snout Spout. Liz Read! Talk! 11:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence that this is notable per BEFORE. 🍕 Boneless Pizza!🍕 ( 🔔) 11:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters#Man-E-Faces. Liz Read! Talk! 11:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence that this is notable per BEFORE. 🍕 Boneless Pizza!🍕 ( 🔔) 11:36, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters. Liz Read! Talk! 11:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence that this is notable per BEFORE. 🍕 Boneless Pizza!🍕 ( 🔔) 11:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 11:25, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Abandoned season article with incomplete statistics. Team playing on the second tier of Romania, with less significant coverage than the first tier gets. No significant coverage sources in the entry. This season is not a piece in a complete series; there is no article on the previous nor the next season. It's also the only entry about a Romanian second-tier team in 2019–20. Geschichte ( talk) 11:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. Liz Read! Talk! 11:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
The book is notable only in its relation to Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. Two out of three sources (1 and 3) are primary, source 2 does not mention the book (source is from 2011, and the book is from 2022). It maybe notable enough for ~2 sentences in the SICP article. Artem.G ( talk) 10:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:08, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I am not sure this individual meets the General notability guideline. The main claim to notability is that he played for his country in 2016. This claim is not supported by reliable sources. I did some searching and found sources such as ESPN and GSA which mention the lineups without this individual's name in them. Even if if we can establish that this person made a substitute appearance in a single non-competitive match, I feel this is still not enough for notability. C 679 09:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. – Joe ( talk) 11:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
This does not appear to be a notable programme. I am not convinced there is a good WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 08:24, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep though there seems to be an agreement that they could be merged into one list. – Joe ( talk) 11:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Original research list that doesn't satisfy WP:NLIST I am also nominating the the related North, East, and West articles.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
It was a sad incident but WP is a not a newspaper. Clearly fails NEVENT! Saqib ( talk I contribs) 06:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Futsal Week. Liz Read! Talk! 05:43, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable youth league, seems to have received minimal if any coverage, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT Mdann52 ( talk) 05:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.. Liz Read! Talk! 05:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:17, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
No WP:SIGCOV at all. Steelkamp ( talk) 04:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Member of a Parish council, whose sole news articles about his recent decision to run in the current election. If he wins, automatically notable, but at this point he is subject to general notability policy, and has no indication of passing Brislian ( talk) 04:57, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
This has no sigcov/notability and no coverage in secondary and reliable sources. Alexeyevitch( talk) 04:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of mosques in Azerbaijan. Liz Read! Talk! 04:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Short list created in 2013 that has no sources that mostly duplicates the info in the better quality List of mosques in Azerbaijan. As an WP:ATD, I'd also support a redirect to the Azerbaijan list. Dan the Animator 04:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Snowing. (non-admin closure) Queen of Hearts talk 23:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
No real media coverage rather than a couple interviews in the initial press run. Only one major review. ⠀ tomástomástomás⠀ talk⠀ 03:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 02:02, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Did not find any sources behind this series to establish notability. GamerPro64 02:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Huawei Mate series. Liz Read! Talk! 03:45, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
It exists, but doesn't appear to be notable enough for a standalone article. A possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect to Huawei Mate series but I was unsure about that, especially as this is wholly unsourced. Boleyn ( talk) 07:59, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:56, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of notability for this footballer. The only sources are a pair of interviews with some routine coverage interspersed, as well as the BBC piece with two sentences of independent coverage. My searches did not yield much else. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
This article is about cartoonist that does not meet notability. The sourcung in the article is primary sources, or not reliable sources. I can find nothing in my searches to substantiate inclusion of this article on Wikipedia. Whpq ( talk) 00:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Bigwombat ( talk) 08:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)