The result was speedy delete as uncontroversial housekeeping. This is a clear spelling mistake corrected by the article creator xyrself. Uncle G ( talk) 02:40, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
The article title is a typo of "Myostatin inhibitors". A page with this title already exists, created by the same user 1 minute after Myostation inhibitors was created. Both articles contain nearly identical content, so there is nothing to be merged. Bibeyjj ( talk) 00:00, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Randy Hillier. Liz Read! Talk! 23:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
The party is unregistered and no longer seems to exist. The Ontario First Party website now mentions the Populist Party Ontario. If the PPO gains traction, a PPO article should be created. The OFP page should redirect to either Randy Hillier or the PPO, depending on what is most appropriate. (Note: I am a member of other political organizations. I do not believe my AfD is a conflict of interest.) LABcrabs ( talk) 19:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Vladimir.copic ( talk) ( non-admin closure)
Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Sourced only to IMDB, ePhotozine and a passing mention in an article about Cliff Richard. Geoff | Who, me? 22:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
References
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn in favour of a merge discussion. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 23:05, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Already covered at Kasautii Zindagii Kay (2001 TV series) which is not long enough to need a split. Redirecting has been contested. Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
I'm frankly not seeing how this is a useful list - the difference between the CS Regular Army and CS Provisional Army is really just an academic point, to the extent that we don't have separate articles for the those forces, and the CS Regular army wasn't an actual serving formation as the plans for it feel through, and it wound up just really helping provide some seniority stuff. The scope of the list excludes general officers, who are listed at List of American Civil War generals (Confederate), and I don't believe it's standard practice to create lists for lower-ranking officers of a specific army. Hog Farm Talk 22:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:40, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable boxer that fails WP:GNG and WP:NBOX. – 2. O. Boxing 20:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Additional references are available, such as BoxRec and numerous news articles, but I do not want to expand the article further, if it is about to be deleted...sorry, but that's not how article creation or AFD works. You include references to establish notability before you publish the article, not when the article gets sent to AFD. I recommend you use WP:Articles for creation in the future. If you can't be bothered to add these numerous references (none of which I found in my BEFORE search), then the article will be deleted. And just to clarify, WP:GNG is what you need to satisfy. – 2. O. Boxing 00:29, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:38, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Cryptocurrency with no reliable sources that support notability. Draft:Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency) already exists. Singularity42 ( talk) 19:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Reference Number | Reference | Comments | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Xiasi.finance | Web site of cryptocurrency | No | Yes | No | No |
2 | hindawi.com | About the breed of dog | Yes | No | Yes | No |
3 | wagwalking.com | About the breed of dog | Yes | No | ? | No |
4 | fis.edu.hk | This appears to be about schools in Hong Kong | Yes | No | Probably | No |
5 | hindawi.com | Same as 2, about the breed of dog | Yes | No | Yes | No |
6 | dictionary.com | About the phrase 'meme coin' | Yes | No | Yes | No |
7 | Xiasi.finance | White paper on cryptocurrency | No | Yes | No | No |
8 | coingecko.com | Market quote on price of cryptocurrency | Yes | No | Yes | No |
9 | bscscan.com | Market information on cryptocurrency | Yes | No | Yes | No |
10 | poocoin.app | Market information on cryptocurrency | Yes | No | Yes | No |
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Paliwoda was a low level animator involved in projects with huge numbers of animators. The article lacks any reliable sourcing, IMDB is not reliable and we should not be basing articles on it. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 18:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
has only one project on his name a case of WP:TOOSOON, if not deleted shall be redirected to the page of film which he has worked for Suryabeej ⋠talk⋡ 18:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
I think this fails WP:GNG. I am not getting any hits on Google for this police department from any independent sources. Furthermore, I don't even believe it is the most notable police department with this name, as most Google hits are for the police department of Lexington, KY. Bensci54 ( talk) 18:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Average revenue per user. Sandstein 17:05, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
This is simply a dictionary entry. In 9 years, it's never been more than a single sentence. Sean Brunnock ( talk) 16:41, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:05, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable. In 9 years, it's never been more than a single sentence. Sean Brunnock ( talk) 16:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:04, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
The person has set a world record for the most A-Level exams taken and there has been some media coverage about this achievement. However, it does not justify an independent Wikipedia page discussing his personal goals and achievements. The page is written like a self-promotional advertisement, and he is essentially only notable for a WP:SINGLEEVENT. A shadowy figure ( talk) 16:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Panamerican Championship. Sandstein 17:04, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Article fails WP:V. I can't find enough evidence to be convinced that this organization ever existed, let alone to verify the specific details claimed. The user who created this article created dozens articles about football organizations from 2007–2008. Many of those articles were deleted due to lack of notability or because they didn't exist. BLAIXX 15:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was Draftify.. The article is now located at Draft:Tiger 3. North America 1000 15:14, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Upcoming film but no significant coverage on production is shown to meet WP:NFF. More than a year from release, recommend draftifying per WP:TOOSOON. -- Ab207 ( talk) 14:38, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:29, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Not notable. No sources mentioning him as a subject. AtheistGeorgian ( talk) 14:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Is a vice-chancellor of a non-notable university. And has no supporting articles to establish notability, other than one-two local news articles. Daiyusha ( talk) 11:43, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 10:35, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced promotional autobiography. Can't find any support for claims of a platinum record. Most news sources concern a hit and run case from 2002 when KK would have been 6 years old? Cabayi ( talk) 10:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
His first claim to fame was his debut production single, ‘O Oh Janne Jaana’ in 1995. It featured in Salman Khan’s ‘Pyaar Kiya To Darna Kya’ and became a worldwide hit.That film was released in 1998. The subject here is born on in 1996. The photograph provided in that source is completely different than that of subject. Also, like the nominator says above, subject would have been six years old during the hit-and-run case. It is most probably intentional hijacking of the article, than confusion because of the common last name "Khan". —usernamekiran (talk) 18:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:52, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
The coverage is the type of routine coverage which does not pass WP:GNG. And non-senior victories do not meet WP:NSPORTS. Onel5969 TT me 10:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:42, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of notability, a single review in a highly specialized magazine. Even the broader internet, which has plenty of sites for this kind of topic, has very little attention for this one, i.e. 22 Google hits [2]. Nothing in Google Books. Fram ( talk) 08:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn and closed per WP:SK1(a). (non-admin closure) 2pou ( talk) 18:53, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
The WP:NBEAUTY essay defers to WP:GNG, and I cannot find any significant coverage of the subject. I am only seeing mentions of her 4th place Miss Earth finishing mentioned in the article, but each one is just a name drop stating her placing—no in-depth coverage. — 2pou ( talk) 07:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:40, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable academic. Search finds nothing even close to satisfying WP:GNG, and I cannot see anything in here to show WP:NACADEMIC notability either. A single close and primary source cited, and a Google profile which shows an h-index of 16. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 06:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Chumpih t 07:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Appears to have little in the way of coverage, unsure if WP:NSPECIES is satisfied. Chumpih t 06:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP: SNOW: No consensus to delete has emerged after 24 hours' discussion, and is unlikely to do so in future. SN54129 20:53, 6 March 2022 (UTC) (non-admin closure) SN54129 20:53, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Notability not established with substantive sources. Every street in London has some sort of business offices or residences on it, that doesn't mean it's notable and needs an article Reywas92 Talk 05:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The company ran into excise problems in 1807, when HM Excise decided that since retailers were selling the beer in units smaller than 0.5 firkins (20 l) the company would not qualify for the statutory duty-free "wastage" allowance of 3 barrels in every 36. A court case ensued, which hinged on the way that the company had been initially financed with partnership "shares" being sold to some 600 London publicans to raise GB£250,000 (equivalent to £20,727,704 in 2020) Arguing that the publicans were (what would now be called) "silent" or "sleeping" partners, with Brown and Parry the "managing" partners, the Brewery prevailed and saved an estimated GB£6,000 per year in excise duty.
Another legal problem ensued with the charge this time being that the brewery was adulterating its beer, with isinglass, and again the company prevailed in court. In fact, the brewery had arranged for nearby yeast dealer James Butcher to buy up discarded fish skins from fishmongers and dissolve them in stale beer, in search of an alternative to islinglass. The casks which had been seized from the brewery premises were on public display (and smell) at the yard of the Excise Office and Brown was characterized in Satirist as a businessman with a wide variety of shady schemes afoot. Although, as in the previous case, the company partners suspected the hands of its competitors in the prosecution, in fact the competitors, who had been adulterating their products, shared a common interest with the Golden Lane company in not letting a prosecution for fining succeed.
A witness for the defence at the trial was engineer William Murdoch, who claimed to have devised this fish-skin process and who had sold it as a trade secret to a consortium of London brewers, and who testified that it was 'exactly the same thing' as isinglass. The defence argument, supported by the testimony of Humphry Davy, despite his never done any experiments with the fish-skin process himself or being able to answer any questions about the brewery specifically, was that the fish-skin, like isinglass, was not an additive, because it sunk to the bottom of the vat and precipitated out, and that it should be treated by the government the same as isinglass was. Judge Archibald Macdonald found for the defence that is was unreasonable to object to innovations in brewery practices that were thanks to advances in the science of chemistry, a decision that would be later reflected in an 1817 change to the law on finings.
The result was delete. Yes, the question is whether there are sources, but this discussion does not provide any. Per WP:BURDEN, people who want to keep content must provide the sources for it. Sandstein 11:51, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept at AfD in 2017, but I just don't see the GNG pass. The sources that were posted in that AfD aren't significant coverage. For example, [11] and [12] are trivial mentions ("X event was organized by Anjuman") or are largely about other people, like [13]. The link to TheNews.com.pk is permadead, but this covers the same story and makes clear that it's the same kind of "event arranged by this organization" trivial mention. The book source is a trivial mention in a footnote. The sole source cited in the article is too short to constitute sigcov - it's a short notice about someone running for reelection to be president of the organization.
Overall there just isn't enough significant coverage of the organization to justify a keep under WP:NORG/ WP:GNG, regardless of how often it gets mentioned in books or news articles. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:45, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Written like advertisement , not have enough reliable and independent sources. and only featured in some regional news portals that are not enough supportive . AlexandruAAlu ( talk) 08:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:27, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:39, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Doesn't pass WP:NPOLITICIAN or WP:GNG. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 05:55, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:49, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –– FormalDude talk 12:05, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable boxer; fails WP:NBOX. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:36, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Gary The HAMMER Holmgren is an extremely well documented and notable boxing champion out of St Paul Minnesota. The fact you even petitioned for a deletion of his wiki page is a joke and makes you look foolish.
As an inducted profession boxer in the Minnesota boxing hall of fame he is regarded as a legend and has more of a right to be here than you do.
http://www.mnbhof.org/Minnesota_Boxing_Hall_of_Fame/Gary_Holmgren.html
He is featured in countless news articles and publishing’s throughout his history.
https://www.twincities.com/2017/08/05/st-paul-boxing-basement-of-legend-will-get-second-run/amp/
https://amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/12/how-a-st-paul-basement-boxing-space-came-back-swin/
https://www.60yearsofboxing.org/round-8--honors---awards.html
http://www2.mnhs.org/library/findaids/boxbd01.pdf
https://africanring.co.za/product/gary-holmgren-1974-1984/
https://briollaw.com/briol-fight-clip/
https://www.twincities.com/2017/08/05/st-paul-boxing-basement-of-legend-will-get-second-run/
Just do a Google search for yourself, I’m sure you’ll get plenty of results ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.115.159.102 ( talk) 00:26, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Please note that the failure to meet these criteria does not mean an article must be deleted. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:07, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Gary the Hammer Holmgren was also featured in a novel featured on Google books based on his notability throughout Minnesota boxing history and boxing history in general.
https://books.google.com/books?id=qS_MDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT514&dq=gary+the+hammer+holmgren&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiurvij3fj1AhXlSjABHUVVAtUQ6AF6BAgLEAM — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boxinginformer ( talk • contribs) 22:51, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
— Boxinginformer ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:46, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
MBisanz
talk
01:23, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:27, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
WP:MILL institution. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. The WP:NSCHOOL criteria have been made much stricter since the previous deletion discussion. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 03:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:26, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
I don't believe this person meets WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG. The majority of sources are unreliable blogs or trivial mentions, as well as primary (youtube and the artist's own Vimeo). Two longer sources, FAD Art News and the Evening Standard, are interviews with minimal additional content (generally not considered significant coverage for the purposes of notability). The only reasonably long non-interview is the Camden New Journal, which is a local source and insufficient on its own to indicate notability. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:25, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
After scouring the Internet, I could find nothing but passing mentions of Destinos in secondary sources— not enough coverage to satisfy GNG. Helen( 💬 📖) 19:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
AssumeGoodWraith (
talk |
contribs)
02:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There is clearly no consensus here in this divided discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
This topic fails WP:GNG. On its face this topic satisfies WP:NFOOT, but as WP:NSPORTS notes this is not a substitute for the GNG. My WP:BEFORE is only turning up sports database entries (so far the article is sourced to one such database entry) and a few sporadic mentions such as this, with no significant coverage. - Indy beetle ( talk) 00:12, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Association football (soccer) figures are presumed notable if they meet the following: 1. Players who have played in, and managers who have managed in, any Tier 1 International Match as defined by FIFAWhich they have done. And we shouldn't be randomly picking off international footballers from less well represented countries- I've never seen an international male, European footballer nominated successfully for deletion. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 14:57, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
very strong reason to believe that significant, independent, non-routine, non-promotional secondary coverage from multiple reliable sources is available. JoelleJay ( talk) 23:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: sigcov?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
AssumeGoodWraith (
talk |
contribs)
02:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to KFNX. Liz Read! Talk! 04:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Linux evangelism radio show that was broadcast from 2001 through 2010 or so, and apparently syndicated nationally. Only sources I can find, from the existing ones in the article and a quick google:
I think this falls short of GNG. The specific notability guideline,
WP:RPRGM, says that generally, an individual radio program is likely to be notable if it airs on a network of radio stations (either national or regional in scope)
, but goes on to say that the presence of RS is a better indicator.
Gaelan
💬
✏️
13:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:58, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Gum did not star in The Forgiven, most sources are just passing mentions, interviews, or unreliable sources. Even in reviews of his work, he is rarely, if ever mentioned in the review (by name or character.) CUPIDICAE💕 16:22, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Amy Yoder Begley. As a compromise, he's mentioned there as her coach. Sandstein 11:49, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable runner. Did not run professionally, only collegiately. Natg 19 ( talk) 07:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
19:41, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
01:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:32, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO, no significant coverage. Also fails WP:NPOL for merely being on a regional council LibStar ( talk) 01:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:32, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. Ambassadors are not inherently notable. No significant coverage. LibStar ( talk) 00:56, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to "Weird Paul" Petroskey. ✗ plicit 01:33, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
The only source presented is a YouTube video by Petroskey, and I could not find any further evidence of notability in an online search. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 00:04, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as uncontroversial housekeeping. This is a clear spelling mistake corrected by the article creator xyrself. Uncle G ( talk) 02:40, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
The article title is a typo of "Myostatin inhibitors". A page with this title already exists, created by the same user 1 minute after Myostation inhibitors was created. Both articles contain nearly identical content, so there is nothing to be merged. Bibeyjj ( talk) 00:00, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Randy Hillier. Liz Read! Talk! 23:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
The party is unregistered and no longer seems to exist. The Ontario First Party website now mentions the Populist Party Ontario. If the PPO gains traction, a PPO article should be created. The OFP page should redirect to either Randy Hillier or the PPO, depending on what is most appropriate. (Note: I am a member of other political organizations. I do not believe my AfD is a conflict of interest.) LABcrabs ( talk) 19:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Vladimir.copic ( talk) ( non-admin closure)
Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Sourced only to IMDB, ePhotozine and a passing mention in an article about Cliff Richard. Geoff | Who, me? 22:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
References
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn in favour of a merge discussion. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 23:05, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Already covered at Kasautii Zindagii Kay (2001 TV series) which is not long enough to need a split. Redirecting has been contested. Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
I'm frankly not seeing how this is a useful list - the difference between the CS Regular Army and CS Provisional Army is really just an academic point, to the extent that we don't have separate articles for the those forces, and the CS Regular army wasn't an actual serving formation as the plans for it feel through, and it wound up just really helping provide some seniority stuff. The scope of the list excludes general officers, who are listed at List of American Civil War generals (Confederate), and I don't believe it's standard practice to create lists for lower-ranking officers of a specific army. Hog Farm Talk 22:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:40, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable boxer that fails WP:GNG and WP:NBOX. – 2. O. Boxing 20:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Additional references are available, such as BoxRec and numerous news articles, but I do not want to expand the article further, if it is about to be deleted...sorry, but that's not how article creation or AFD works. You include references to establish notability before you publish the article, not when the article gets sent to AFD. I recommend you use WP:Articles for creation in the future. If you can't be bothered to add these numerous references (none of which I found in my BEFORE search), then the article will be deleted. And just to clarify, WP:GNG is what you need to satisfy. – 2. O. Boxing 00:29, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:38, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Cryptocurrency with no reliable sources that support notability. Draft:Xiasi Inu (cryptocurrency) already exists. Singularity42 ( talk) 19:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Reference Number | Reference | Comments | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Xiasi.finance | Web site of cryptocurrency | No | Yes | No | No |
2 | hindawi.com | About the breed of dog | Yes | No | Yes | No |
3 | wagwalking.com | About the breed of dog | Yes | No | ? | No |
4 | fis.edu.hk | This appears to be about schools in Hong Kong | Yes | No | Probably | No |
5 | hindawi.com | Same as 2, about the breed of dog | Yes | No | Yes | No |
6 | dictionary.com | About the phrase 'meme coin' | Yes | No | Yes | No |
7 | Xiasi.finance | White paper on cryptocurrency | No | Yes | No | No |
8 | coingecko.com | Market quote on price of cryptocurrency | Yes | No | Yes | No |
9 | bscscan.com | Market information on cryptocurrency | Yes | No | Yes | No |
10 | poocoin.app | Market information on cryptocurrency | Yes | No | Yes | No |
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Paliwoda was a low level animator involved in projects with huge numbers of animators. The article lacks any reliable sourcing, IMDB is not reliable and we should not be basing articles on it. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 18:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
has only one project on his name a case of WP:TOOSOON, if not deleted shall be redirected to the page of film which he has worked for Suryabeej ⋠talk⋡ 18:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
I think this fails WP:GNG. I am not getting any hits on Google for this police department from any independent sources. Furthermore, I don't even believe it is the most notable police department with this name, as most Google hits are for the police department of Lexington, KY. Bensci54 ( talk) 18:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Average revenue per user. Sandstein 17:05, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
This is simply a dictionary entry. In 9 years, it's never been more than a single sentence. Sean Brunnock ( talk) 16:41, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:05, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable. In 9 years, it's never been more than a single sentence. Sean Brunnock ( talk) 16:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:04, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
The person has set a world record for the most A-Level exams taken and there has been some media coverage about this achievement. However, it does not justify an independent Wikipedia page discussing his personal goals and achievements. The page is written like a self-promotional advertisement, and he is essentially only notable for a WP:SINGLEEVENT. A shadowy figure ( talk) 16:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Panamerican Championship. Sandstein 17:04, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Article fails WP:V. I can't find enough evidence to be convinced that this organization ever existed, let alone to verify the specific details claimed. The user who created this article created dozens articles about football organizations from 2007–2008. Many of those articles were deleted due to lack of notability or because they didn't exist. BLAIXX 15:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was Draftify.. The article is now located at Draft:Tiger 3. North America 1000 15:14, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Upcoming film but no significant coverage on production is shown to meet WP:NFF. More than a year from release, recommend draftifying per WP:TOOSOON. -- Ab207 ( talk) 14:38, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:29, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Not notable. No sources mentioning him as a subject. AtheistGeorgian ( talk) 14:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Is a vice-chancellor of a non-notable university. And has no supporting articles to establish notability, other than one-two local news articles. Daiyusha ( talk) 11:43, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 10:35, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced promotional autobiography. Can't find any support for claims of a platinum record. Most news sources concern a hit and run case from 2002 when KK would have been 6 years old? Cabayi ( talk) 10:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
His first claim to fame was his debut production single, ‘O Oh Janne Jaana’ in 1995. It featured in Salman Khan’s ‘Pyaar Kiya To Darna Kya’ and became a worldwide hit.That film was released in 1998. The subject here is born on in 1996. The photograph provided in that source is completely different than that of subject. Also, like the nominator says above, subject would have been six years old during the hit-and-run case. It is most probably intentional hijacking of the article, than confusion because of the common last name "Khan". —usernamekiran (talk) 18:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:52, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
The coverage is the type of routine coverage which does not pass WP:GNG. And non-senior victories do not meet WP:NSPORTS. Onel5969 TT me 10:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:42, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of notability, a single review in a highly specialized magazine. Even the broader internet, which has plenty of sites for this kind of topic, has very little attention for this one, i.e. 22 Google hits [2]. Nothing in Google Books. Fram ( talk) 08:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn and closed per WP:SK1(a). (non-admin closure) 2pou ( talk) 18:53, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
The WP:NBEAUTY essay defers to WP:GNG, and I cannot find any significant coverage of the subject. I am only seeing mentions of her 4th place Miss Earth finishing mentioned in the article, but each one is just a name drop stating her placing—no in-depth coverage. — 2pou ( talk) 07:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:40, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable academic. Search finds nothing even close to satisfying WP:GNG, and I cannot see anything in here to show WP:NACADEMIC notability either. A single close and primary source cited, and a Google profile which shows an h-index of 16. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 06:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Chumpih t 07:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Appears to have little in the way of coverage, unsure if WP:NSPECIES is satisfied. Chumpih t 06:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP: SNOW: No consensus to delete has emerged after 24 hours' discussion, and is unlikely to do so in future. SN54129 20:53, 6 March 2022 (UTC) (non-admin closure) SN54129 20:53, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Notability not established with substantive sources. Every street in London has some sort of business offices or residences on it, that doesn't mean it's notable and needs an article Reywas92 Talk 05:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The company ran into excise problems in 1807, when HM Excise decided that since retailers were selling the beer in units smaller than 0.5 firkins (20 l) the company would not qualify for the statutory duty-free "wastage" allowance of 3 barrels in every 36. A court case ensued, which hinged on the way that the company had been initially financed with partnership "shares" being sold to some 600 London publicans to raise GB£250,000 (equivalent to £20,727,704 in 2020) Arguing that the publicans were (what would now be called) "silent" or "sleeping" partners, with Brown and Parry the "managing" partners, the Brewery prevailed and saved an estimated GB£6,000 per year in excise duty.
Another legal problem ensued with the charge this time being that the brewery was adulterating its beer, with isinglass, and again the company prevailed in court. In fact, the brewery had arranged for nearby yeast dealer James Butcher to buy up discarded fish skins from fishmongers and dissolve them in stale beer, in search of an alternative to islinglass. The casks which had been seized from the brewery premises were on public display (and smell) at the yard of the Excise Office and Brown was characterized in Satirist as a businessman with a wide variety of shady schemes afoot. Although, as in the previous case, the company partners suspected the hands of its competitors in the prosecution, in fact the competitors, who had been adulterating their products, shared a common interest with the Golden Lane company in not letting a prosecution for fining succeed.
A witness for the defence at the trial was engineer William Murdoch, who claimed to have devised this fish-skin process and who had sold it as a trade secret to a consortium of London brewers, and who testified that it was 'exactly the same thing' as isinglass. The defence argument, supported by the testimony of Humphry Davy, despite his never done any experiments with the fish-skin process himself or being able to answer any questions about the brewery specifically, was that the fish-skin, like isinglass, was not an additive, because it sunk to the bottom of the vat and precipitated out, and that it should be treated by the government the same as isinglass was. Judge Archibald Macdonald found for the defence that is was unreasonable to object to innovations in brewery practices that were thanks to advances in the science of chemistry, a decision that would be later reflected in an 1817 change to the law on finings.
The result was delete. Yes, the question is whether there are sources, but this discussion does not provide any. Per WP:BURDEN, people who want to keep content must provide the sources for it. Sandstein 11:51, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept at AfD in 2017, but I just don't see the GNG pass. The sources that were posted in that AfD aren't significant coverage. For example, [11] and [12] are trivial mentions ("X event was organized by Anjuman") or are largely about other people, like [13]. The link to TheNews.com.pk is permadead, but this covers the same story and makes clear that it's the same kind of "event arranged by this organization" trivial mention. The book source is a trivial mention in a footnote. The sole source cited in the article is too short to constitute sigcov - it's a short notice about someone running for reelection to be president of the organization.
Overall there just isn't enough significant coverage of the organization to justify a keep under WP:NORG/ WP:GNG, regardless of how often it gets mentioned in books or news articles. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:45, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Written like advertisement , not have enough reliable and independent sources. and only featured in some regional news portals that are not enough supportive . AlexandruAAlu ( talk) 08:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:27, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:39, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Doesn't pass WP:NPOLITICIAN or WP:GNG. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 05:55, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:49, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –– FormalDude talk 12:05, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable boxer; fails WP:NBOX. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:36, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Gary The HAMMER Holmgren is an extremely well documented and notable boxing champion out of St Paul Minnesota. The fact you even petitioned for a deletion of his wiki page is a joke and makes you look foolish.
As an inducted profession boxer in the Minnesota boxing hall of fame he is regarded as a legend and has more of a right to be here than you do.
http://www.mnbhof.org/Minnesota_Boxing_Hall_of_Fame/Gary_Holmgren.html
He is featured in countless news articles and publishing’s throughout his history.
https://www.twincities.com/2017/08/05/st-paul-boxing-basement-of-legend-will-get-second-run/amp/
https://amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/12/how-a-st-paul-basement-boxing-space-came-back-swin/
https://www.60yearsofboxing.org/round-8--honors---awards.html
http://www2.mnhs.org/library/findaids/boxbd01.pdf
https://africanring.co.za/product/gary-holmgren-1974-1984/
https://briollaw.com/briol-fight-clip/
https://www.twincities.com/2017/08/05/st-paul-boxing-basement-of-legend-will-get-second-run/
Just do a Google search for yourself, I’m sure you’ll get plenty of results ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.115.159.102 ( talk) 00:26, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Please note that the failure to meet these criteria does not mean an article must be deleted. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:07, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Gary the Hammer Holmgren was also featured in a novel featured on Google books based on his notability throughout Minnesota boxing history and boxing history in general.
https://books.google.com/books?id=qS_MDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT514&dq=gary+the+hammer+holmgren&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiurvij3fj1AhXlSjABHUVVAtUQ6AF6BAgLEAM — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boxinginformer ( talk • contribs) 22:51, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
— Boxinginformer ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:46, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
MBisanz
talk
01:23, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:27, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
WP:MILL institution. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. The WP:NSCHOOL criteria have been made much stricter since the previous deletion discussion. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 03:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:26, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
I don't believe this person meets WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG. The majority of sources are unreliable blogs or trivial mentions, as well as primary (youtube and the artist's own Vimeo). Two longer sources, FAD Art News and the Evening Standard, are interviews with minimal additional content (generally not considered significant coverage for the purposes of notability). The only reasonably long non-interview is the Camden New Journal, which is a local source and insufficient on its own to indicate notability. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:25, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
After scouring the Internet, I could find nothing but passing mentions of Destinos in secondary sources— not enough coverage to satisfy GNG. Helen( 💬 📖) 19:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
AssumeGoodWraith (
talk |
contribs)
02:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There is clearly no consensus here in this divided discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
This topic fails WP:GNG. On its face this topic satisfies WP:NFOOT, but as WP:NSPORTS notes this is not a substitute for the GNG. My WP:BEFORE is only turning up sports database entries (so far the article is sourced to one such database entry) and a few sporadic mentions such as this, with no significant coverage. - Indy beetle ( talk) 00:12, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Association football (soccer) figures are presumed notable if they meet the following: 1. Players who have played in, and managers who have managed in, any Tier 1 International Match as defined by FIFAWhich they have done. And we shouldn't be randomly picking off international footballers from less well represented countries- I've never seen an international male, European footballer nominated successfully for deletion. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 14:57, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
very strong reason to believe that significant, independent, non-routine, non-promotional secondary coverage from multiple reliable sources is available. JoelleJay ( talk) 23:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: sigcov?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
AssumeGoodWraith (
talk |
contribs)
02:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to KFNX. Liz Read! Talk! 04:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Linux evangelism radio show that was broadcast from 2001 through 2010 or so, and apparently syndicated nationally. Only sources I can find, from the existing ones in the article and a quick google:
I think this falls short of GNG. The specific notability guideline,
WP:RPRGM, says that generally, an individual radio program is likely to be notable if it airs on a network of radio stations (either national or regional in scope)
, but goes on to say that the presence of RS is a better indicator.
Gaelan
💬
✏️
13:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:58, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Gum did not star in The Forgiven, most sources are just passing mentions, interviews, or unreliable sources. Even in reviews of his work, he is rarely, if ever mentioned in the review (by name or character.) CUPIDICAE💕 16:22, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Amy Yoder Begley. As a compromise, he's mentioned there as her coach. Sandstein 11:49, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable runner. Did not run professionally, only collegiately. Natg 19 ( talk) 07:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
19:41, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
01:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:32, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO, no significant coverage. Also fails WP:NPOL for merely being on a regional council LibStar ( talk) 01:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:32, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. Ambassadors are not inherently notable. No significant coverage. LibStar ( talk) 00:56, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to "Weird Paul" Petroskey. ✗ plicit 01:33, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
The only source presented is a YouTube video by Petroskey, and I could not find any further evidence of notability in an online search. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 00:04, 4 March 2022 (UTC)