I've created Terra Ignota (series) to cover the entire set of four books, as I didn't think it proper to repeat the worldbuilding and setting information in each book. There might be an argument to split off individual novel pages from a single page about the series as a whole if it gets too long, but I don't think that argument will carry much weight until the fourth book is out. I'm sorry to step on your toes, but you've not edited the page in a week, so I assume that means you're not able to at the moment. I welcome your help in writing the page. Smith (talk) 22:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC) reply

@ ACB Smith:Fair enough, thanks for letting me know! I was just about to go take the construction template down anyways since I realised it had been a while. James Hyett ( talk) 23:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello James Hyett! Thanks for the hard work you have been doing in the leadup to the 2018 election! If you need help with anything, let me know! :) Bkissin ( talk) 16:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, James Hyett. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{ helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! OhKayeSierra ( talk) 23:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

-- User:Martin Urbanec ( talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC) reply

The article The Mayor of Garret has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced plot-only article, and does not appear to be notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) ( talk) 19:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your edits at Delgamuukw v British Columbia. I'll also be continuing to help improve the article and other related articles, so I was wondering about your decision to switch the straight apostrophes to curly apostrophes. Is this a significant distinction that warrants deviating from MOS:'? Sancho 21:25, 8 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Hey there! The apostrophes indicate (erroneously in the first case, but it is the accepted spelling) that the t's are actually Ejective consonants (ie [tʼ]) which are represented with curly apostrophes in the IPA and writing systems that use them, such as that of the Babine-Witsuwitʼen language. I admit I had overlooked that section of MOS, and I wonder if there might be a discussion somewhere regarding ejective consonants and the use of curly apostrophes... In fact, I've just noticed that even in the first line of that page there is inconsistency! James Hyett ( talk) 15:21, 9 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! How did you learn that David J. Peterson had created a language for Lovecraft Country? I couldn't find anything to confirm this, so I asked him and he just told me "I will tell you that I did indeed work on that show, but I’m afraid I’m not ever going to talk about it beyond that", so how did you know he worked on this show? G. H. Wojnicz ( talk) 19:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC) reply

@ G. H. Wojnicz: Hiya! Sorry, I probably should have provided a reference for that, but I am not entirely clear on how to cite end credits! I noticed he was credited in the final episode as "Language of Adam" Consultant or something along those lines. James Hyett ( talk) 19:51, 22 October 2020 (UTC) reply

@ James Hyett: Thank you. I asked Peterson if he had indeed worked on the show, he said "I will tell you that I did indeed work on that show, but I’m afraid I’m not ever going to talk about it beyond that. Let’s just say I rather people not know I worked on the show, but won’t go so far as to lie and say I didn’t." I've no idea why, but since he's not willing to talk about this experience, I was just wondering how you had heard about it. G. H. Wojnicz ( talk) 20:15, 22 October 2020 (UTC) reply

@ G. H. Wojnicz: Wow, that's interesting to know. Thanks for checking in. James Hyett ( talk) 20:33, 22 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Heather Dale, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi ( talk) 19:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is referenced far, far too heavily to primary and unreliable sources that are not support for notability at all: content self-published by the festival itself, the city government, the city tourist bureau, the Kingston Theatre Association or individual people who've been associated with it; blogs and university student media. While there is some proper WP:GNG-worthy media coverage from the Kingston Whig-Standard sprinkled in, the rule isn't that as long as there are a few proper media sources in the mix the article can be based mostly on bad ones; it's that the article needs to be based entirely on media coverage with bad sourcing kept to an absolute minimum.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Kick & Push Festival and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat ( talk) 02:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, James Hyett! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bearcat ( talk) 02:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC) reply

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 ( talk) 07:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

The Kick & Push Festival, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

microbiologyMarcus ^{( petri dish)} 20:09, 18 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply