![]() |
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 01:42, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
A commercial vocational school. As such would need to make WP:NORG. Obviously in situ, it doesn't. BEFORE didn't yield anything better. Also, name is too vague to be useful. John from Idegon ( talk) 23:47, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Cited sources from within the industry or making passing mentions do not convey notability. RL0919 ( talk) 23:48, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
There is a book but the link goes to an empty page. Plus only a single fact is sourced to.suggesting it lacks depth. What is left is poor gruel for a BLP and utterly fails GNG. Porn awards no.longer offer any notability so a clear fail as a blp Spartaz Humbug! 23:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 23:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Neologism used by an opinion columnist. There is no evidence that this phrase itself has substantial, in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Neutrality talk 22:34, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy-delete (G12). ( non-admin closure) AllyD ( talk) 08:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
All in Spanish, and unreferenced Rathfelder ( talk) 22:20, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NNADIGOODLUCK ( Talk| Contribs) 22:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. There is not a single source (or even in combination) that provides enough detail to write a bio. Every single one is strictly about his sports career. It's quite possible this is just WP:TOOSOON, but that isn't a reason to keep it. John from Idegon ( talk) 22:17, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 23:14, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Semi-professional (at best) footballer, same reasoning as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Margraf. Geschichte ( talk) 21:59, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 23:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
List of non-notable fictional gadgets, fails WP:LISTN. The non-trivial references are from a page merger of The Intersect (Chuck) after an AfD in 2017, which itself was leaning close to deletion. – sgeureka t• c 21:20, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 23:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
I cant see the wapo source as its behind a paywall but its a film review not an article about the subject. An interview and article that is half promo and half quoting an advice column do not pass gng. Porn awards no longer provide notability. Not good enough for a blp Spartaz Humbug! 21:10, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 11:33, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Sources are rubbish. Porn Awards do not equal notability. There only decent source is about a stalker. That's not worth a biography. Spartaz Humbug! 21:03, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Commander in Chief (TV series)#Characters. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
I'm usually more than fine with main stand-alone lists for TV show characters. But this is a 14-year-old character list for a TV show that ran for only 18 episodes, and it has the same WP:NOTDIR problems as those three listed in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of politicians on Veep. Commander in Chief (TV series)#Characters does the job just fine. So, delete or redirect, or (for me inexplicable reasons) keep? – sgeureka t• c 20:51, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was WP:SNOW delete. WP:BLP1E properly applies here. BD2412 T 22:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Only notable for one event, is the youngest Indian mountain climber to reach the top of Everest, which is not notable as there have been people from many countries to do it and there is a "youngest" for each country that has people who have climbed Everest. Andise1 ( talk) 20:37, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 21:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Sources in the article are almost non-existent and that is due to there being virtually no reliable coverage/sources of this individual on the internet. Andise1 ( talk) 19:35, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 21:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
No claim to any notability. Fails WP:NN. Deleted in Russian Wikipedia. Mitte27 ( talk) 19:18, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Störm (talk) 17:59, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
This is a CONTENTFORK that could be easily merged to the Musharraf high treason case parent article. Vegan Gypsy ( talk) 08:22, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was Deleted as G5. Article deleted as a G5 by Mz7, who neglected to close this discussion. (non-admin closure) Smartyllama ( talk) 19:37, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFOOTY – Assistant manager and youth team manager BlameRuiner ( talk) 19:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Pure plot summary, and does not meet WP:NFICTION/ WP:GNG. DarkGlow ( talk) 18:52, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSPORTS. Also lack of sources. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:02, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to This Is Spinal Tap. Will also protect to prevent further unexpected restoration. RL0919 ( talk) 17:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Fictional album from the film This Is Spinal Tap (there have been a few actual Spinal Tap albums, but this is not one of them). The page is written from an in-universe perspective, with a fairly thorough breakdown on its appearance in the film itself and an infobox that fully buys into it— listing further fictional albums. The "other black sleeves" section is largely original research and speculation. There is a single reference here, which turns out to just be an image of a fake cover art, hosted on a Spinal Tap fansite, used within the fictional write-up; the two external links are also to fansites. The article has been listed as having issues for over five years and there have been no no significant changes made in that time. In short, this article falls afoul of WP:CRUFT, WP:UNIVERSE, WP:OR, and is just poorly maintained on top of that. — Kawnhr ( talk) 17:31, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Non notable software tagged for notability for 5 years fails WP:Notability (software) Theroadislong ( talk) 17:27, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 17:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
As per the lead, Characters on this list are those that do not contribute significantly to the plots of more than two episodes, and who are not associated with Buy More, Fulcrum, the Ring, or Volkoff Industries. (which are character lists as well, in addition to List of Chuck characters). This is basically indiscriminate WP:PLOT. – sgeureka t• c 16:57, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Sandstein 19:14, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of this band meeting WP:GNG/ WP:NBAND. Nothing much online, though there may be more in print that I can't access. Anarchyte ( talk | work) 13:44, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was D. Lete. Sandstein 19:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Article fails WP:SPORTBASIC as it relies on routine statistical listings, with no indication of significant coverage. This RfC has confirmed that SSGs like WP:CRIN do not supersede the GNG. Dee 03 16:05, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same reason:
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:03, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
There are multiple trivial mentions for this investor, but he doesn't pass WP:NBIO. Bbarmadillo ( talk) 15:10, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, creating Africa's first and only AI VC fund is a monumental achievement by any measure. Otherwise, someone else would have done it by now... More importantly, it's of vital importance for Africa's AI start-ups to know about probably their only source of early stage VC funding... It's also inspirational news for Africans (1.3 billion people), and perhaps other developing regions... Everiperdia, which apparently has a similar voting mechanism to Wikipedia, has created a profile about him... Thanks... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nneka Francis ( talk • contribs) 21:37, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
* Keep Hi, I was referring to the fact Everipedia submissions are voted on by its members... However, I actually meant, the criteria for The Guinness of Records is being first and only, which this is, and thus by definition notable... Furthermore, encyclopedic criteria means it’s not just notable but relevant, this is the sort of information cash-strapped Africans - 1/4 of the world’s population - would actively search for given the rapidly growing impact of AI, e.g. automation rapidly replacing human workers... Incidentally, would this discussion be better had by the 1/4 of the world’s population affected, Africans, rather than those perhaps less affected - I’m a bit surprised we are having this discussion given its notability and relevance. I guess perhaps this is why some regions, e.g. Russia, are toying with the idea of creating their own version of the internet... Thanks... Nneka Francis ( talk) 09:25, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
* keep Hi, the sources categorically state he is the founder, how he created the firm, and why it’s notable, by for instance describing its pioneering nature... Thanks...
Nneka Francis (
talk)
09:47, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
* keep Hi, it clearly meets the following Wikipedia criteria from
our definition of notability: “the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be "worthy of notice"[1] or "note"[2]—that is, "remarkable"[2] or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded"[1]”. Thanks... — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Nneka Francis (
talk •
contribs)
11:18, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Abishe ( talk) 14:07, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NNADIGOODLUCK ( Talk| Contribs) 14:19, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Does not seem like an encyclopedic article, it looks like news page which has only negative and news content about person not a informational. And also, Not notable page/content. Juppalsingh ( talk) 14:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
This person isn't in the public eye so the article isn't relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:A201:5B01:4191:72F7:356D:A859 ( talk) 15:27, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 14:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in secondary reliable sources hence fails WP:GNG. All I can see are primary sources discussing her. I also see her works being self published on Amazon in the end I see no evidence of true notability. Celestina007 ( talk) 13:59, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 14:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Does this TV show really need three character lists ( Characters >> Recurring characters >> Guest characters)? As guest characters, these characters have little if any plot arc significance, and listing them borders on WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Most of them are direct family members of actually significant characters, so they can also be named in that character's section where relevant. No opposition for a selective merge for some characters, as I realize that the characters' importance is on a spectrum. – sgeureka t• c 13:47, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 14:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Per WP:2DABS; hatnotes are the better option. Was prodded giving this reason by GeoffreyT2000. Deprodded by creator Deb who felt it was pointless to delete it when it has existed for 16 years. Boleyn ( talk) 13:33, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence fails WP:GNG. I can’t see him scaling WP:ANYBIO as well. Celestina007 ( talk) 13:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The subject has an extensive body of work in the music industry, where being the producer, mastering engineer, or and member tends to garner a passing mention in the publicity, reviews and catalogues. He is one of the first to use online music publishing via sites such as Perpetuity, SoundCloud, Reverbnation and MySpace (in its early days) to get his and other artists music out independent of the major labels. I’d happily add a discography, but understandably it will take a while to collate and code for inclusion. Elastic2303 ( talk) 19:32, 1 January 2020 (UTC) Delete The article mainly rely upon primary sources and more reliable sources should be included. It fails to meet WP:GNG as per nom. Abishe ( talk) 14:03, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to Citizenship Amendment Act protests. Consensus is that there should be no standalone article. I will merge the useful information to CAA, and leave behind a redirect. (non-admin closure) Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! ⚓ 20:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
I think this is not notable enough for a stand-alone article like this. The poem finds mention in Citizenship_Amendment_Act_protests#Slogans_and_poems and is nicely placed there. DTM ( talk) 12:23, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article.Thats what I am saying too. The subject of the article, the poem, is not notable enough to have a stand-alone article.
No subject is automatically or inherently notable merely because it exists: the evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or recognition, and that this was not a mere short-term interest[...]
Notability is not temporary; once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage.That means the subject has to have significant coverage, to pass the general notability guideline.
Brief bursts of news coverage may not sufficiently demonstrate notability.
The criteria applied to the creation or retention of an article are not the same as those applied to the content inside it. The notability guidelines do not apply to contents of articles or lists.Here it means, if the subject of the article is notable, then the notability criteria do not apply to the verifiable content. We are discussing about the notability of the poem here, as I described in the previous bullet point.
The result was delete. Tone 14:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Contested prod (twice). Fails WP:NOTDIR and WP:LISTN because the guest stars are only loosely associated with each other and the show. The guest stars are also listed in the show's respective season articles. Compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mission: Impossible guest stars (A–M) (2nd nomination), which is heading towards SNOW deletion. – sgeureka t• c 11:37, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 11:34, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
Lists of non-notable fictional politicians in TV series, failing WP:NOTDIR. All noteworthy politicians are covered in List of Veep characters#Politicians , List of House of Cards characters and List of The West Wing characters, respectively. – sgeureka t• c 11:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 11:34, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
I admire that Teen Wolf doesn't have stand-alone articles for its main characters. But does that mean it needs three character list ( Characters > Secondary characters > Minor characters)? I see "Minor" as the cut-off point to not cover characters anymore. – sgeureka t• c 10:57, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 11:38, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
For-pay spam. Not seeing a passage of GNG. ∯WBG converse 09:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 11:38, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NGOLF and/or WP:GNG. Routine news-pieces, as to sports-journalism and all that. ∯WBG converse 09:56, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Linlin. Tone 11:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. lullabying ( talk) 09:54, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Notability failure. There are only six results in the Google News and a appearing in an opinion piece on a NYT article "By Elizabeth Carey Ms. Carey is a freelance writer and running coach based in Seattle." does not create national notability. Graywalls ( talk) 09:49, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 11:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:ANYBIO. Child actress, who failed to make any big. For-pay article. ∯WBG converse 09:45, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) NNADIGOODLUCK ( Talk| Contribs) 11:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Non notable model & actress who fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG & WP:NACTOR. Celestina007 ( talk) 13:50, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NNADIGOODLUCK ( Talk| Contribs) 09:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
The list as a whole is an original research. It is not full, as it contains mostly celebrities, and most of the entries are not medically sourced (therefore not sure). BasileusAutokratorPL ( talk) 13:20, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
@ BD2412: The problem is that the list contains (famous) men who CLAIM to become fathers after a certain age. The only sure thing is usually the fact that their much younger wives became mothers... And, is it a coincidence that most of the fathers listed are notable for other reasons? BasileusAutokratorPL ( talk) 21:30, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Subject of the article hasn’t received enough significant coverage in RS hence falls short of WP:GNG Hidden Hills Editor ( talk) 16:53, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG & WP:ENT. Yet to have significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Hitro talk 08:26, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Why it should be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:8100:3916:61BF:13DC:6EE:DEEE:5C2A ( talk) 08:41, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Sandy Creek, Queensland after User:Aoziwe's WP:BOLD merger. – sgeureka t• c 09:41, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Seems to be a small modern bridge over a tiny rural creek with no clear significance: not historic and no other apparent claim to notability. The Drover's Wife ( talk) 07:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
For-pay spam; as well-evidenced out at the t/p. Fails WP:ANYBIO and/or WP:GNG. Complete lack of any significant coverage about the subject, other than trivial name-drops. Not a single honor confers any notability and is uniformly low-tier. ∯WBG converse 07:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 11:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
The parent organization is notable. That said, there is literally zero coverage about 'daan paatra' and its claims anywhere outside iskcon's own site. Most linked sources point to the food program that the government manages, and there is no mention of this program. Daiyusha ( talk) 07:22, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 08:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't play in a fully professional league, hasn't played in the national team yet. Not much coverage. Looks to me like a case of WP:TOOSOON Daiyusha ( talk) 07:19, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
For-pay spam, part of which were not disclosed.
Fails the rigorous standards of WP:NCORP. Garnered some attention during app-launch (afais, only over the linked 3 piees notwitstanding that CultOfMac reviews products for pay) and fizzed out thereafter; thus failing WP:NOTNEWS. Page Bri as original prod-er. ∯WBG converse 07:09, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTNEWS (and obviously WP:NCORP) even if the used fringe news outlets were considered. For-pay spam. ∯WBG converse 07:05, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. RL0919 ( talk) 04:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
does not meet notability for organizations/companies. Also created by a single purpose account that has not done anything but create this article. Graywalls ( talk) 03:57, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! ⚓ 07:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
This article is about a relatively obscure but emerging company that is only notable for AWE Network and the one news network that always spreads extreme right-wing conspiracy theories and disinformation while earnestly thinking that the governments of Russia and Syria are better than American "liberals". Barely reads more than a dictionary term, which is unacceptable. GaɱingFørFuɲ 365 03:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Subject clearly meets notability criteria. If the article contains inaccurate information or the subject wants to formally request deletion for whatever reason, I encourage User:Sajmeister1 to reach out to our Volunteer Response Team where they can explain their concerns and prove their identity/relationship to the subject in a confidential fashion. RL0919 ( talk) 04:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
This is purely a technical implementation of a request repeatedly voiced by Sajmeister1, using edit summaries like "Please help delete this page ASAP". Please imagine, for all purposes including the (non-)applicability of "speedy keep" criteria, that this deletion discussion has been created by Sajmeister1, not me. See the revision history of the article for details.
The user has apparently attempted to provide a conflict of interest disclosure in the edit summary of Special:Diff/920619391. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 02:46, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Ostensibly a promotional exercise. Originally moved to draft from NPP and then moved back to mainspace by one the many contributors who appear to have a COI without improvements. The article needs proper mainstream sources to qualify under WP:BAND, but I haven;'t found any. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 02:17, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 04:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
An actor that possibly does not meet WP:GNG or even WP:ENT. The main role she has was in the early episodes of the children’s series Zoey 101 with some roles in films and TV after. It does not appear to have acted in any notable films or programs besides The Walking Dead in a few episodes in the late winter of 2013. A Google search turns up an interview she did on Instagram about her time on Zoey 101 in late July that didn’t attract any media attention except for some blog posts about the video. Pahiy ( talk) 00:56, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 00:35, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
This is a non-notable list. It survived a deletion nearly 14 years ago, I'm thinking could a second time worth a shot to have this deleted or should this just be used for what the original nomination from all those years ago wanted the use of WP:Categorization. Pahiy ( talk) 00:20, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 01:42, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
A commercial vocational school. As such would need to make WP:NORG. Obviously in situ, it doesn't. BEFORE didn't yield anything better. Also, name is too vague to be useful. John from Idegon ( talk) 23:47, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Cited sources from within the industry or making passing mentions do not convey notability. RL0919 ( talk) 23:48, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
There is a book but the link goes to an empty page. Plus only a single fact is sourced to.suggesting it lacks depth. What is left is poor gruel for a BLP and utterly fails GNG. Porn awards no.longer offer any notability so a clear fail as a blp Spartaz Humbug! 23:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 23:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Neologism used by an opinion columnist. There is no evidence that this phrase itself has substantial, in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Neutrality talk 22:34, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy-delete (G12). ( non-admin closure) AllyD ( talk) 08:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
All in Spanish, and unreferenced Rathfelder ( talk) 22:20, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NNADIGOODLUCK ( Talk| Contribs) 22:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. There is not a single source (or even in combination) that provides enough detail to write a bio. Every single one is strictly about his sports career. It's quite possible this is just WP:TOOSOON, but that isn't a reason to keep it. John from Idegon ( talk) 22:17, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 23:14, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Semi-professional (at best) footballer, same reasoning as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Margraf. Geschichte ( talk) 21:59, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 23:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
List of non-notable fictional gadgets, fails WP:LISTN. The non-trivial references are from a page merger of The Intersect (Chuck) after an AfD in 2017, which itself was leaning close to deletion. – sgeureka t• c 21:20, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 23:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
I cant see the wapo source as its behind a paywall but its a film review not an article about the subject. An interview and article that is half promo and half quoting an advice column do not pass gng. Porn awards no longer provide notability. Not good enough for a blp Spartaz Humbug! 21:10, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 11:33, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Sources are rubbish. Porn Awards do not equal notability. There only decent source is about a stalker. That's not worth a biography. Spartaz Humbug! 21:03, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Commander in Chief (TV series)#Characters. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
I'm usually more than fine with main stand-alone lists for TV show characters. But this is a 14-year-old character list for a TV show that ran for only 18 episodes, and it has the same WP:NOTDIR problems as those three listed in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of politicians on Veep. Commander in Chief (TV series)#Characters does the job just fine. So, delete or redirect, or (for me inexplicable reasons) keep? – sgeureka t• c 20:51, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was WP:SNOW delete. WP:BLP1E properly applies here. BD2412 T 22:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Only notable for one event, is the youngest Indian mountain climber to reach the top of Everest, which is not notable as there have been people from many countries to do it and there is a "youngest" for each country that has people who have climbed Everest. Andise1 ( talk) 20:37, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 21:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Sources in the article are almost non-existent and that is due to there being virtually no reliable coverage/sources of this individual on the internet. Andise1 ( talk) 19:35, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 21:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
No claim to any notability. Fails WP:NN. Deleted in Russian Wikipedia. Mitte27 ( talk) 19:18, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Störm (talk) 17:59, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
This is a CONTENTFORK that could be easily merged to the Musharraf high treason case parent article. Vegan Gypsy ( talk) 08:22, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was Deleted as G5. Article deleted as a G5 by Mz7, who neglected to close this discussion. (non-admin closure) Smartyllama ( talk) 19:37, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFOOTY – Assistant manager and youth team manager BlameRuiner ( talk) 19:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Pure plot summary, and does not meet WP:NFICTION/ WP:GNG. DarkGlow ( talk) 18:52, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSPORTS. Also lack of sources. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:02, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to This Is Spinal Tap. Will also protect to prevent further unexpected restoration. RL0919 ( talk) 17:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Fictional album from the film This Is Spinal Tap (there have been a few actual Spinal Tap albums, but this is not one of them). The page is written from an in-universe perspective, with a fairly thorough breakdown on its appearance in the film itself and an infobox that fully buys into it— listing further fictional albums. The "other black sleeves" section is largely original research and speculation. There is a single reference here, which turns out to just be an image of a fake cover art, hosted on a Spinal Tap fansite, used within the fictional write-up; the two external links are also to fansites. The article has been listed as having issues for over five years and there have been no no significant changes made in that time. In short, this article falls afoul of WP:CRUFT, WP:UNIVERSE, WP:OR, and is just poorly maintained on top of that. — Kawnhr ( talk) 17:31, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Non notable software tagged for notability for 5 years fails WP:Notability (software) Theroadislong ( talk) 17:27, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 17:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
As per the lead, Characters on this list are those that do not contribute significantly to the plots of more than two episodes, and who are not associated with Buy More, Fulcrum, the Ring, or Volkoff Industries. (which are character lists as well, in addition to List of Chuck characters). This is basically indiscriminate WP:PLOT. – sgeureka t• c 16:57, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Sandstein 19:14, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of this band meeting WP:GNG/ WP:NBAND. Nothing much online, though there may be more in print that I can't access. Anarchyte ( talk | work) 13:44, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was D. Lete. Sandstein 19:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Article fails WP:SPORTBASIC as it relies on routine statistical listings, with no indication of significant coverage. This RfC has confirmed that SSGs like WP:CRIN do not supersede the GNG. Dee 03 16:05, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same reason:
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:03, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
There are multiple trivial mentions for this investor, but he doesn't pass WP:NBIO. Bbarmadillo ( talk) 15:10, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, creating Africa's first and only AI VC fund is a monumental achievement by any measure. Otherwise, someone else would have done it by now... More importantly, it's of vital importance for Africa's AI start-ups to know about probably their only source of early stage VC funding... It's also inspirational news for Africans (1.3 billion people), and perhaps other developing regions... Everiperdia, which apparently has a similar voting mechanism to Wikipedia, has created a profile about him... Thanks... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nneka Francis ( talk • contribs) 21:37, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
* Keep Hi, I was referring to the fact Everipedia submissions are voted on by its members... However, I actually meant, the criteria for The Guinness of Records is being first and only, which this is, and thus by definition notable... Furthermore, encyclopedic criteria means it’s not just notable but relevant, this is the sort of information cash-strapped Africans - 1/4 of the world’s population - would actively search for given the rapidly growing impact of AI, e.g. automation rapidly replacing human workers... Incidentally, would this discussion be better had by the 1/4 of the world’s population affected, Africans, rather than those perhaps less affected - I’m a bit surprised we are having this discussion given its notability and relevance. I guess perhaps this is why some regions, e.g. Russia, are toying with the idea of creating their own version of the internet... Thanks... Nneka Francis ( talk) 09:25, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
* keep Hi, the sources categorically state he is the founder, how he created the firm, and why it’s notable, by for instance describing its pioneering nature... Thanks...
Nneka Francis (
talk)
09:47, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
* keep Hi, it clearly meets the following Wikipedia criteria from
our definition of notability: “the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be "worthy of notice"[1] or "note"[2]—that is, "remarkable"[2] or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded"[1]”. Thanks... — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Nneka Francis (
talk •
contribs)
11:18, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Abishe ( talk) 14:07, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NNADIGOODLUCK ( Talk| Contribs) 14:19, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Does not seem like an encyclopedic article, it looks like news page which has only negative and news content about person not a informational. And also, Not notable page/content. Juppalsingh ( talk) 14:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
This person isn't in the public eye so the article isn't relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:A201:5B01:4191:72F7:356D:A859 ( talk) 15:27, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 14:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in secondary reliable sources hence fails WP:GNG. All I can see are primary sources discussing her. I also see her works being self published on Amazon in the end I see no evidence of true notability. Celestina007 ( talk) 13:59, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 14:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Does this TV show really need three character lists ( Characters >> Recurring characters >> Guest characters)? As guest characters, these characters have little if any plot arc significance, and listing them borders on WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Most of them are direct family members of actually significant characters, so they can also be named in that character's section where relevant. No opposition for a selective merge for some characters, as I realize that the characters' importance is on a spectrum. – sgeureka t• c 13:47, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 14:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Per WP:2DABS; hatnotes are the better option. Was prodded giving this reason by GeoffreyT2000. Deprodded by creator Deb who felt it was pointless to delete it when it has existed for 16 years. Boleyn ( talk) 13:33, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence fails WP:GNG. I can’t see him scaling WP:ANYBIO as well. Celestina007 ( talk) 13:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The subject has an extensive body of work in the music industry, where being the producer, mastering engineer, or and member tends to garner a passing mention in the publicity, reviews and catalogues. He is one of the first to use online music publishing via sites such as Perpetuity, SoundCloud, Reverbnation and MySpace (in its early days) to get his and other artists music out independent of the major labels. I’d happily add a discography, but understandably it will take a while to collate and code for inclusion. Elastic2303 ( talk) 19:32, 1 January 2020 (UTC) Delete The article mainly rely upon primary sources and more reliable sources should be included. It fails to meet WP:GNG as per nom. Abishe ( talk) 14:03, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to Citizenship Amendment Act protests. Consensus is that there should be no standalone article. I will merge the useful information to CAA, and leave behind a redirect. (non-admin closure) Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! ⚓ 20:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
I think this is not notable enough for a stand-alone article like this. The poem finds mention in Citizenship_Amendment_Act_protests#Slogans_and_poems and is nicely placed there. DTM ( talk) 12:23, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article.Thats what I am saying too. The subject of the article, the poem, is not notable enough to have a stand-alone article.
No subject is automatically or inherently notable merely because it exists: the evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or recognition, and that this was not a mere short-term interest[...]
Notability is not temporary; once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage.That means the subject has to have significant coverage, to pass the general notability guideline.
Brief bursts of news coverage may not sufficiently demonstrate notability.
The criteria applied to the creation or retention of an article are not the same as those applied to the content inside it. The notability guidelines do not apply to contents of articles or lists.Here it means, if the subject of the article is notable, then the notability criteria do not apply to the verifiable content. We are discussing about the notability of the poem here, as I described in the previous bullet point.
The result was delete. Tone 14:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Contested prod (twice). Fails WP:NOTDIR and WP:LISTN because the guest stars are only loosely associated with each other and the show. The guest stars are also listed in the show's respective season articles. Compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mission: Impossible guest stars (A–M) (2nd nomination), which is heading towards SNOW deletion. – sgeureka t• c 11:37, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 11:34, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
Lists of non-notable fictional politicians in TV series, failing WP:NOTDIR. All noteworthy politicians are covered in List of Veep characters#Politicians , List of House of Cards characters and List of The West Wing characters, respectively. – sgeureka t• c 11:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 11:34, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
I admire that Teen Wolf doesn't have stand-alone articles for its main characters. But does that mean it needs three character list ( Characters > Secondary characters > Minor characters)? I see "Minor" as the cut-off point to not cover characters anymore. – sgeureka t• c 10:57, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 11:38, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
For-pay spam. Not seeing a passage of GNG. ∯WBG converse 09:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 11:38, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NGOLF and/or WP:GNG. Routine news-pieces, as to sports-journalism and all that. ∯WBG converse 09:56, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Linlin. Tone 11:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. lullabying ( talk) 09:54, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Notability failure. There are only six results in the Google News and a appearing in an opinion piece on a NYT article "By Elizabeth Carey Ms. Carey is a freelance writer and running coach based in Seattle." does not create national notability. Graywalls ( talk) 09:49, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 11:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:ANYBIO. Child actress, who failed to make any big. For-pay article. ∯WBG converse 09:45, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) NNADIGOODLUCK ( Talk| Contribs) 11:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Non notable model & actress who fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG & WP:NACTOR. Celestina007 ( talk) 13:50, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NNADIGOODLUCK ( Talk| Contribs) 09:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
The list as a whole is an original research. It is not full, as it contains mostly celebrities, and most of the entries are not medically sourced (therefore not sure). BasileusAutokratorPL ( talk) 13:20, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
@ BD2412: The problem is that the list contains (famous) men who CLAIM to become fathers after a certain age. The only sure thing is usually the fact that their much younger wives became mothers... And, is it a coincidence that most of the fathers listed are notable for other reasons? BasileusAutokratorPL ( talk) 21:30, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Subject of the article hasn’t received enough significant coverage in RS hence falls short of WP:GNG Hidden Hills Editor ( talk) 16:53, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG & WP:ENT. Yet to have significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Hitro talk 08:26, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Why it should be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:8100:3916:61BF:13DC:6EE:DEEE:5C2A ( talk) 08:41, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Sandy Creek, Queensland after User:Aoziwe's WP:BOLD merger. – sgeureka t• c 09:41, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Seems to be a small modern bridge over a tiny rural creek with no clear significance: not historic and no other apparent claim to notability. The Drover's Wife ( talk) 07:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
For-pay spam; as well-evidenced out at the t/p. Fails WP:ANYBIO and/or WP:GNG. Complete lack of any significant coverage about the subject, other than trivial name-drops. Not a single honor confers any notability and is uniformly low-tier. ∯WBG converse 07:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 11:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
The parent organization is notable. That said, there is literally zero coverage about 'daan paatra' and its claims anywhere outside iskcon's own site. Most linked sources point to the food program that the government manages, and there is no mention of this program. Daiyusha ( talk) 07:22, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 08:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't play in a fully professional league, hasn't played in the national team yet. Not much coverage. Looks to me like a case of WP:TOOSOON Daiyusha ( talk) 07:19, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
For-pay spam, part of which were not disclosed.
Fails the rigorous standards of WP:NCORP. Garnered some attention during app-launch (afais, only over the linked 3 piees notwitstanding that CultOfMac reviews products for pay) and fizzed out thereafter; thus failing WP:NOTNEWS. Page Bri as original prod-er. ∯WBG converse 07:09, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTNEWS (and obviously WP:NCORP) even if the used fringe news outlets were considered. For-pay spam. ∯WBG converse 07:05, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. RL0919 ( talk) 04:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
does not meet notability for organizations/companies. Also created by a single purpose account that has not done anything but create this article. Graywalls ( talk) 03:57, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! ⚓ 07:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
This article is about a relatively obscure but emerging company that is only notable for AWE Network and the one news network that always spreads extreme right-wing conspiracy theories and disinformation while earnestly thinking that the governments of Russia and Syria are better than American "liberals". Barely reads more than a dictionary term, which is unacceptable. GaɱingFørFuɲ 365 03:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Subject clearly meets notability criteria. If the article contains inaccurate information or the subject wants to formally request deletion for whatever reason, I encourage User:Sajmeister1 to reach out to our Volunteer Response Team where they can explain their concerns and prove their identity/relationship to the subject in a confidential fashion. RL0919 ( talk) 04:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
This is purely a technical implementation of a request repeatedly voiced by Sajmeister1, using edit summaries like "Please help delete this page ASAP". Please imagine, for all purposes including the (non-)applicability of "speedy keep" criteria, that this deletion discussion has been created by Sajmeister1, not me. See the revision history of the article for details.
The user has apparently attempted to provide a conflict of interest disclosure in the edit summary of Special:Diff/920619391. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 02:46, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Ostensibly a promotional exercise. Originally moved to draft from NPP and then moved back to mainspace by one the many contributors who appear to have a COI without improvements. The article needs proper mainstream sources to qualify under WP:BAND, but I haven;'t found any. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 02:17, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 04:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
An actor that possibly does not meet WP:GNG or even WP:ENT. The main role she has was in the early episodes of the children’s series Zoey 101 with some roles in films and TV after. It does not appear to have acted in any notable films or programs besides The Walking Dead in a few episodes in the late winter of 2013. A Google search turns up an interview she did on Instagram about her time on Zoey 101 in late July that didn’t attract any media attention except for some blog posts about the video. Pahiy ( talk) 00:56, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 00:35, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
This is a non-notable list. It survived a deletion nearly 14 years ago, I'm thinking could a second time worth a shot to have this deleted or should this just be used for what the original nomination from all those years ago wanted the use of WP:Categorization. Pahiy ( talk) 00:20, 1 January 2020 (UTC)