![]() |
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NNADIGOODLUCK ( Talk| Contribs) 06:20, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Does not appear to be notable. His film and television roles are extremely minor. His stage work seems to consist of almost entirely non-notable productions with one or two understudy roles in notable productions. None of his writing seems to be notable. All of his awards seem to be minor awards that aren't enough to establish notability.
There have also been a lot of edits done to the article by IP addresses who seem to have a conflict of interest. One IP address admitted as much, [1] and the edit histories of 76.251.201.46 and 75.141.125.234 suggest they have a conflict as well. JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 23:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Completely unsourced list, filled with unnotable examples. Most of the works listed on the page make only a brief appearance in the work where they appear, and have very little importance to the plot. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. All similar lists have either already been deleted or are in the process of being deleted, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional musicals and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional books (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional plays (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional television shows (5th nomination). JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 22:51, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Article is not referenced, and provides little to no context to any entry on the list. Redundant with Category:Fictional musical groups JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 22:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Entirely promotional. No significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:NCORP. Redirected multiple times but the article was repeatedly restored each time, so an AfD is warranted. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:35, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
No demonstration of notability. Not seeing any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online. Fails WP:GNG Edwardx ( talk) 22:07, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. The argument that the subject passes GNG holds little water in the absence of any in-depth reliable sources. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Very minor, local radio presenter. His claim to notability is being a friend of a failed pop star who once appeared in a 90s boyband, and for having a stint as a cover presenter on a London-based local radio station. Cassianto Talk 21:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Non notable Islamist organisation. The total number of sources are two. Sio-india.com and jamaateislamihind.org. The sio-india.com is the website of the organisation and jamaateislamihind.org is the website of parent of the organisation, Jamaat-e-Islami Hind. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 20:57, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Fenix down ( talk) 18:01, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
no evidence that he played on senior level or in a fully professional league The Banner talk 20:02, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:35, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY. No significant coverage besides press coverage of annual events and vigils taking place there. Magnolia677 ( talk) 19:32, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted per A7. (non-admin closure) — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 10:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Apparently non-notable architecture firm. Article is unsourced, and I can't find enough sources to pass WP:CORPDEPTH. GNG fail as well. Hog Farm ( talk) 19:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
{{support|Regular}}
The firm doesn't appear to be notable, I can't find any reliable sources with make the article notable using Duckduckgo. --
TruthToBeSpoken
(talk)
20:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was Speedy/ WP:SNOW keep. The rationale proffered for deletion no longer holds, as the song has now been released and received substantial coverage, and the title has been confirmed. BD2412 T 05:08, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
This article has been created prematurely. While a title song for the film No Time to Die exists, the name of the track is unknown. Sources only refer to a "title track", which can simply mean the song that plays over the title sequence. The article itself is largely devoid of content save for quotes by the artists, film's director and producers exprrssing enthusiasm for the song, which you can find for every James Bond title thene. Mclarenfan17 ( talk) 19:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
[A]rguments which base notability or lack thereof upon winning, wins, success or popularity make no use of policies or guidelines.
While comparing with other articles is not, in general, a convincing argument, comparing with articles that have been through some kind of quality review such as Featured article, Good article, or have achieved a WikiProject A class rating, make a much more credible case.
The result was keep. Sandstein 20:34, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Dear Sirs, I am Ignazio Ciufolini (the Wikipedia staff verified my identity) and I am asking to delete my biography on Wikipedia because I have found that the page is being used for libelous statements. For some reason the page provides an unbalanced point of view, giving undue attention to controversies and lawsuits, while information concerning my research accomplishments has been removed without reason.
It seems that in the past years my page has been a magnet for editing wars resulting in unwanted attention on the libelous attacks against me instead of on my academic works. I do not have time and will to watch and to correct further personal attacks on my biography page, therefore please cosider to delete it.
Prof. Ignazio Ciufolini
University of Salento and Centro Fermi (Rome, Italy) Ignazio.Ciufolini ( talk) 18:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Rathfelder ( talk) 18:58, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Simply not notable under criteria laid out in WP:NORG. Article had been subject of an attempted speedy deletion, then proposed for deletion (PROD), but editor de-prodded and offered a press release as indication of notability [2]. So here we are. The notability issues for this mirror the issues with a bio of the founder, Draft:Amer Nejma, which has been rejected by four different evaluators: Worldbruce, Taewangkorea, CptViraj, & Theroadislong. By the way, this was included in MER-C's 12 January "suspicious articles" list posted at WikiProject Spam, where it came to my attention. ☆ Bri ( talk) 19:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Delete The only thing I could find from a search was the Thrive Global article. Which sounds like an advert. Even if it didn't though there would still have to be more then that to establish notability. -- Adamant1 ( talk) 07:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 20:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Non notable headquarters of the Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 18:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Keep Mansoora, Lahore (a neighborhood town or city district within the city of Lahore, Pakistan) is often covered in all the major newspapers of Pakistan. Even before this nomination, this article had 2 references from The News International and The Express Tribune newspapers of Pakistan. My Google Search turned up 3 more Pakistani news media references including Samaa TV News website and 2 more newspaper references. So it's very notable, no doubt.
How did the deletion nominator determine that it's not notable? Seems like the nominator does not like Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan (a political and religious party in Pakistan). That's fine, he's entitled to his view. But trying to delete an existing Wikipedia article on a neighborhood district just because the political party is also based there, does not make sense. Besides, making a 'Personal point of view' WP:PPOV basis or reason for deletion is clearly in violation of Wikipedia policy. Ngrewal1 ( talk) 17:13, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Non notable article related with Jamaat-e-Islami. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 18:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable business with no secondary source coverage.
A quick google search turned up nothing but Facebook and Yelp. Article has been tagged since March 2018 as needing sources (it has one tweet cited now) and needing notability established. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:31, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Sadly a WP:NOTBURO pushed and waste of time nomination. This was prod and deleted, and recreated by the same user, again, with the same incorrect title using "(disambiguation)" and bad formatting while there are still two draft versions by the same user. No sign of notability whatsoever, or even sign that the creator even cares to fix his articles. However, it seems some editors just love them some bureaucratic procedures. Gonnym ( talk) 18:07, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:31, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NCORP. MB 17:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Delete There is a few articles out there about them, but they don't seem usable due to neutrality issues or are on other topics and just mention the company in passing. -- Adamant1 ( talk) 07:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:31, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable actress. No sources seem to exist that are independent of the subject or the shows she's been on. Article deleted by PROD and restored via WP:REFUND. – Muboshgu ( talk) 16:25, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 16:28, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable entrepreneur. Sources are either interviews or pure churnalism. b uidh e 15:51, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Degree of a polynomial#Names of polynomials by degree. Sandstein 20:30, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Nonnotable class of equations: every single mathematical statement on the article is equally valid for algebraic equations in general, and no sources cover octic equations as a subtopic of the more general topic (let alone as a significant subtopic). The article should be replaced with a redirect to Degree of a polynomial#Names of polynomials by degree (which is how it was initially created in 2012). JBL ( talk) 14:05, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:30, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:MUSIC. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 09:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:30, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Having just extensively expanded Cambodian Campaign there is just very little information available about this minor battle and certainly not enough to justify it having its own page Mztourist ( talk) 09:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. This is somewhere between keep and no consensus as Pontificalibus's compelling keep argument has neither been seconded nor disputed; for the abundance of caution this is a "no consensus" case. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Some meteorites are notable and have been subject to in-depth study (ex. [4]). I can't find evidence that this one is subject to such studies. As such, I don't think it deserves an independent article, mention in some list should be enough. Not all meteorites are notable. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:01, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 10:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Still a badly auto-translated essay-like piece of original research. I do not see that it is salvageable in its current form, any more than it was in 2016. Orange Mike | Talk 07:25, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
As I said on the article's talk page, it is horrifically bad and should be deleted. It's nonsense written in often incomprehensible pseudo-English. For instance, I challenge anyone to tell us what just these words mean:
"It is the demographic limitation that is almost throughout history that even the most populous countries can not occupy the entire world. The concept of global imperialism, therefore, is a concept that does not emphasize the sovereignty of the whole world, but dominates part of the world, but must necessarily spread in space. In addition, the concept of global imperialism underscores the aspect of influence, empires that are considered global imperatives to excel in influencing world politics against all other nations, and that influence must be widespread."
Besides much of the article's text being unintelligible, most of its assertions, as far as they can be deciphered, are unsourced, like this gem of historical explication:
Portugal dominated the spice trade from the East to Europe, gaining a lot of profits and becoming prosperous. Portugal, due to the small population weakness, did not give them a military advantage, so they often used tricks to build their businesses, often using force only to fight when trade was threatened.
There is a place in WP for an article about the concept of "Global empire", but this gibberish is not it. Carlstak ( talk) 12:50, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Embassies and consulates are not inherently notable, this is a mere trade office with no consular powers. LibStar ( talk) 07:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete Materialscientist ( talk) 07:37, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Minor software company. No evidence that it meets WP:NCORP or WP:GNG - all the references are either by the company, to press releases (or republished press releases) or in one case to a one-line mentions of the existence of Kapture CRM. None of them are the in-depth, independent coverage in published, reputable sources that is required. The Mirror Cracked ( talk) 06:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 10:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Fails to meet WP:GNG. Non-notable film critic. KidAd ( talk) 05:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was Delete. G3 deleted by Bbb23 (non-admin closure) b uidh e 14:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Another version is currently tagged as db-hoax at Draft:Mezfin (name). I wouldn't call this a blatant enough hoax for speedy deletion, but on the other hand, I couldn't find any supporting evidence for the bizarre and contradictory claims made in this "article". b uidh e 03:24, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) --- C& C ( Coffeeandcrumbs) 15:37, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Isn't notable. Goatse is, in my opinion, just another shock website. Wikipedia is WP:NOTADIRECTORY. Minecrafter0271 ( talk) 03:19, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sourced indicate notability through GNG. Please remember that notability is not temporary. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 20:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Non notable company fails to comply with WP:GNG. The content seems promotional and breaches the WP:NPOV. The information provided here is supported solely by a single source. No clear reason for further existence of this subject. Abishe ( talk) 01:43, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:28, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
The sources are not at a level to show actual notability. State party chairman are not default notable, and there is not otherwise any sign of notability John Pack Lambert ( talk) 02:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Hug syrup 16:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Minor league baseball season articles fail notability guidelines and have been declared not notable. Here [6], here [7], here [8], and here [9] are four examples. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:58, 10 February 2020 (UTC) Also nominating-
References
The result was redirect to Hong Kong Cantonese. Sandstein 20:27, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
article is remnant stub after merging what was useful (not much) to the Hong Kong Cantonese article as proposed in Talk Sirlanz ( talk) 01:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 14:45, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
I don't think this meets WP:GNG. As the subject was produced by The New York Times, the NYTimes coverage is not independent of the subject. The Good Short Films coverage is of an impressive depth at first glance, but checking the site's information, they don't appear to disclose editorial policies, and the article's copious amounts of grammatical and spelling errors does not inspire confidence in the publication's reliability. Other than that, I was able to find some websites hosting the subject video, but no other secondary coverage. signed, Rosguill talk 01:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 14:44, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
This horribly promotional biographical article was inappropriately moved from draftspace to mainspace by @ DGG:, in a rare and uncharacteristic display of poor judgment by this editor. DGG advised that the only way to re-draftify it would be via the AfD process. So here we are. Re-draftify, preferably speedily if at all possible. — S Marshall T/ C 01:16, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
I am only here for discussion, I saw that her other Wikipedia pages from different languages were not linked to the page, thus I did it in order for the editors to see them. I think that improving the article is more appropriate than nominating for deletion, as the page for Articles for deletion states at subtitle 'Before nominating: checks and alternatives': C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for AfD. I would also like to ask where you think the problem lies, as you have not given an explanation to your concerns. -- Alberto1125 ( talk) 14:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)Alberto1125
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 14:43, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBAND. Provided sources include some ok coverage included in an interview in a local paper an AllMusic bio of a different group with overlapping members, press releases, and Discogs. Searching online and on Rock's Backpages, all I was able to find was a mere-mention in a piece on Vice/Noisey. I think that we're two or three sources short of meeting notability guidelines. signed, Rosguill talk 00:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 10:38, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
This is a purely in-universe list of fictional locations in Middle-earth with no clear inclusion criteria: some of the entries have articles, others link to small sections, others are not described anywhere meaningfully. Further, there are no references.
From a real world perspective, Middle-earth § Geography covers the topic at hand. For navigational purposes, Outline of Middle-earth § Geography lists all the notable locations. There is no need to present fictional geography in this level of granularity. BenKuykendall ( talk) 00:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:26, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Same user created pages on this school in several Asian languages, English, and Simple English. None of them list an independent source. Although I don't speak Japanese, a google search on its Japanese name was not promising. b uidh e 00:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NNADIGOODLUCK ( Talk| Contribs) 06:20, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Does not appear to be notable. His film and television roles are extremely minor. His stage work seems to consist of almost entirely non-notable productions with one or two understudy roles in notable productions. None of his writing seems to be notable. All of his awards seem to be minor awards that aren't enough to establish notability.
There have also been a lot of edits done to the article by IP addresses who seem to have a conflict of interest. One IP address admitted as much, [1] and the edit histories of 76.251.201.46 and 75.141.125.234 suggest they have a conflict as well. JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 23:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Completely unsourced list, filled with unnotable examples. Most of the works listed on the page make only a brief appearance in the work where they appear, and have very little importance to the plot. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. All similar lists have either already been deleted or are in the process of being deleted, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional musicals and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional books (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional plays (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional television shows (5th nomination). JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 22:51, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Article is not referenced, and provides little to no context to any entry on the list. Redundant with Category:Fictional musical groups JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 22:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Entirely promotional. No significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:NCORP. Redirected multiple times but the article was repeatedly restored each time, so an AfD is warranted. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:35, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
No demonstration of notability. Not seeing any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online. Fails WP:GNG Edwardx ( talk) 22:07, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. The argument that the subject passes GNG holds little water in the absence of any in-depth reliable sources. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Very minor, local radio presenter. His claim to notability is being a friend of a failed pop star who once appeared in a 90s boyband, and for having a stint as a cover presenter on a London-based local radio station. Cassianto Talk 21:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Non notable Islamist organisation. The total number of sources are two. Sio-india.com and jamaateislamihind.org. The sio-india.com is the website of the organisation and jamaateislamihind.org is the website of parent of the organisation, Jamaat-e-Islami Hind. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 20:57, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Fenix down ( talk) 18:01, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
no evidence that he played on senior level or in a fully professional league The Banner talk 20:02, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:35, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY. No significant coverage besides press coverage of annual events and vigils taking place there. Magnolia677 ( talk) 19:32, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted per A7. (non-admin closure) — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 10:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Apparently non-notable architecture firm. Article is unsourced, and I can't find enough sources to pass WP:CORPDEPTH. GNG fail as well. Hog Farm ( talk) 19:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
{{support|Regular}}
The firm doesn't appear to be notable, I can't find any reliable sources with make the article notable using Duckduckgo. --
TruthToBeSpoken
(talk)
20:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was Speedy/ WP:SNOW keep. The rationale proffered for deletion no longer holds, as the song has now been released and received substantial coverage, and the title has been confirmed. BD2412 T 05:08, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
This article has been created prematurely. While a title song for the film No Time to Die exists, the name of the track is unknown. Sources only refer to a "title track", which can simply mean the song that plays over the title sequence. The article itself is largely devoid of content save for quotes by the artists, film's director and producers exprrssing enthusiasm for the song, which you can find for every James Bond title thene. Mclarenfan17 ( talk) 19:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
[A]rguments which base notability or lack thereof upon winning, wins, success or popularity make no use of policies or guidelines.
While comparing with other articles is not, in general, a convincing argument, comparing with articles that have been through some kind of quality review such as Featured article, Good article, or have achieved a WikiProject A class rating, make a much more credible case.
The result was keep. Sandstein 20:34, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Dear Sirs, I am Ignazio Ciufolini (the Wikipedia staff verified my identity) and I am asking to delete my biography on Wikipedia because I have found that the page is being used for libelous statements. For some reason the page provides an unbalanced point of view, giving undue attention to controversies and lawsuits, while information concerning my research accomplishments has been removed without reason.
It seems that in the past years my page has been a magnet for editing wars resulting in unwanted attention on the libelous attacks against me instead of on my academic works. I do not have time and will to watch and to correct further personal attacks on my biography page, therefore please cosider to delete it.
Prof. Ignazio Ciufolini
University of Salento and Centro Fermi (Rome, Italy) Ignazio.Ciufolini ( talk) 18:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Rathfelder ( talk) 18:58, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Simply not notable under criteria laid out in WP:NORG. Article had been subject of an attempted speedy deletion, then proposed for deletion (PROD), but editor de-prodded and offered a press release as indication of notability [2]. So here we are. The notability issues for this mirror the issues with a bio of the founder, Draft:Amer Nejma, which has been rejected by four different evaluators: Worldbruce, Taewangkorea, CptViraj, & Theroadislong. By the way, this was included in MER-C's 12 January "suspicious articles" list posted at WikiProject Spam, where it came to my attention. ☆ Bri ( talk) 19:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Delete The only thing I could find from a search was the Thrive Global article. Which sounds like an advert. Even if it didn't though there would still have to be more then that to establish notability. -- Adamant1 ( talk) 07:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 20:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Non notable headquarters of the Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 18:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Keep Mansoora, Lahore (a neighborhood town or city district within the city of Lahore, Pakistan) is often covered in all the major newspapers of Pakistan. Even before this nomination, this article had 2 references from The News International and The Express Tribune newspapers of Pakistan. My Google Search turned up 3 more Pakistani news media references including Samaa TV News website and 2 more newspaper references. So it's very notable, no doubt.
How did the deletion nominator determine that it's not notable? Seems like the nominator does not like Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan (a political and religious party in Pakistan). That's fine, he's entitled to his view. But trying to delete an existing Wikipedia article on a neighborhood district just because the political party is also based there, does not make sense. Besides, making a 'Personal point of view' WP:PPOV basis or reason for deletion is clearly in violation of Wikipedia policy. Ngrewal1 ( talk) 17:13, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Non notable article related with Jamaat-e-Islami. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 18:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable business with no secondary source coverage.
A quick google search turned up nothing but Facebook and Yelp. Article has been tagged since March 2018 as needing sources (it has one tweet cited now) and needing notability established. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:31, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Sadly a WP:NOTBURO pushed and waste of time nomination. This was prod and deleted, and recreated by the same user, again, with the same incorrect title using "(disambiguation)" and bad formatting while there are still two draft versions by the same user. No sign of notability whatsoever, or even sign that the creator even cares to fix his articles. However, it seems some editors just love them some bureaucratic procedures. Gonnym ( talk) 18:07, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:31, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NCORP. MB 17:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Delete There is a few articles out there about them, but they don't seem usable due to neutrality issues or are on other topics and just mention the company in passing. -- Adamant1 ( talk) 07:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:31, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable actress. No sources seem to exist that are independent of the subject or the shows she's been on. Article deleted by PROD and restored via WP:REFUND. – Muboshgu ( talk) 16:25, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 16:28, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable entrepreneur. Sources are either interviews or pure churnalism. b uidh e 15:51, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Degree of a polynomial#Names of polynomials by degree. Sandstein 20:30, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Nonnotable class of equations: every single mathematical statement on the article is equally valid for algebraic equations in general, and no sources cover octic equations as a subtopic of the more general topic (let alone as a significant subtopic). The article should be replaced with a redirect to Degree of a polynomial#Names of polynomials by degree (which is how it was initially created in 2012). JBL ( talk) 14:05, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:30, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:MUSIC. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 09:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:30, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Having just extensively expanded Cambodian Campaign there is just very little information available about this minor battle and certainly not enough to justify it having its own page Mztourist ( talk) 09:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. This is somewhere between keep and no consensus as Pontificalibus's compelling keep argument has neither been seconded nor disputed; for the abundance of caution this is a "no consensus" case. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Some meteorites are notable and have been subject to in-depth study (ex. [4]). I can't find evidence that this one is subject to such studies. As such, I don't think it deserves an independent article, mention in some list should be enough. Not all meteorites are notable. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:01, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 10:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Still a badly auto-translated essay-like piece of original research. I do not see that it is salvageable in its current form, any more than it was in 2016. Orange Mike | Talk 07:25, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
As I said on the article's talk page, it is horrifically bad and should be deleted. It's nonsense written in often incomprehensible pseudo-English. For instance, I challenge anyone to tell us what just these words mean:
"It is the demographic limitation that is almost throughout history that even the most populous countries can not occupy the entire world. The concept of global imperialism, therefore, is a concept that does not emphasize the sovereignty of the whole world, but dominates part of the world, but must necessarily spread in space. In addition, the concept of global imperialism underscores the aspect of influence, empires that are considered global imperatives to excel in influencing world politics against all other nations, and that influence must be widespread."
Besides much of the article's text being unintelligible, most of its assertions, as far as they can be deciphered, are unsourced, like this gem of historical explication:
Portugal dominated the spice trade from the East to Europe, gaining a lot of profits and becoming prosperous. Portugal, due to the small population weakness, did not give them a military advantage, so they often used tricks to build their businesses, often using force only to fight when trade was threatened.
There is a place in WP for an article about the concept of "Global empire", but this gibberish is not it. Carlstak ( talk) 12:50, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Embassies and consulates are not inherently notable, this is a mere trade office with no consular powers. LibStar ( talk) 07:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete Materialscientist ( talk) 07:37, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Minor software company. No evidence that it meets WP:NCORP or WP:GNG - all the references are either by the company, to press releases (or republished press releases) or in one case to a one-line mentions of the existence of Kapture CRM. None of them are the in-depth, independent coverage in published, reputable sources that is required. The Mirror Cracked ( talk) 06:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 10:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Fails to meet WP:GNG. Non-notable film critic. KidAd ( talk) 05:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was Delete. G3 deleted by Bbb23 (non-admin closure) b uidh e 14:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Another version is currently tagged as db-hoax at Draft:Mezfin (name). I wouldn't call this a blatant enough hoax for speedy deletion, but on the other hand, I couldn't find any supporting evidence for the bizarre and contradictory claims made in this "article". b uidh e 03:24, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) --- C& C ( Coffeeandcrumbs) 15:37, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Isn't notable. Goatse is, in my opinion, just another shock website. Wikipedia is WP:NOTADIRECTORY. Minecrafter0271 ( talk) 03:19, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sourced indicate notability through GNG. Please remember that notability is not temporary. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 20:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Non notable company fails to comply with WP:GNG. The content seems promotional and breaches the WP:NPOV. The information provided here is supported solely by a single source. No clear reason for further existence of this subject. Abishe ( talk) 01:43, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:28, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
The sources are not at a level to show actual notability. State party chairman are not default notable, and there is not otherwise any sign of notability John Pack Lambert ( talk) 02:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Hug syrup 16:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Minor league baseball season articles fail notability guidelines and have been declared not notable. Here [6], here [7], here [8], and here [9] are four examples. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:58, 10 February 2020 (UTC) Also nominating-
References
The result was redirect to Hong Kong Cantonese. Sandstein 20:27, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
article is remnant stub after merging what was useful (not much) to the Hong Kong Cantonese article as proposed in Talk Sirlanz ( talk) 01:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 14:45, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
I don't think this meets WP:GNG. As the subject was produced by The New York Times, the NYTimes coverage is not independent of the subject. The Good Short Films coverage is of an impressive depth at first glance, but checking the site's information, they don't appear to disclose editorial policies, and the article's copious amounts of grammatical and spelling errors does not inspire confidence in the publication's reliability. Other than that, I was able to find some websites hosting the subject video, but no other secondary coverage. signed, Rosguill talk 01:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 14:44, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
This horribly promotional biographical article was inappropriately moved from draftspace to mainspace by @ DGG:, in a rare and uncharacteristic display of poor judgment by this editor. DGG advised that the only way to re-draftify it would be via the AfD process. So here we are. Re-draftify, preferably speedily if at all possible. — S Marshall T/ C 01:16, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
I am only here for discussion, I saw that her other Wikipedia pages from different languages were not linked to the page, thus I did it in order for the editors to see them. I think that improving the article is more appropriate than nominating for deletion, as the page for Articles for deletion states at subtitle 'Before nominating: checks and alternatives': C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for AfD. I would also like to ask where you think the problem lies, as you have not given an explanation to your concerns. -- Alberto1125 ( talk) 14:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)Alberto1125
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 14:43, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBAND. Provided sources include some ok coverage included in an interview in a local paper an AllMusic bio of a different group with overlapping members, press releases, and Discogs. Searching online and on Rock's Backpages, all I was able to find was a mere-mention in a piece on Vice/Noisey. I think that we're two or three sources short of meeting notability guidelines. signed, Rosguill talk 00:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 10:38, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
This is a purely in-universe list of fictional locations in Middle-earth with no clear inclusion criteria: some of the entries have articles, others link to small sections, others are not described anywhere meaningfully. Further, there are no references.
From a real world perspective, Middle-earth § Geography covers the topic at hand. For navigational purposes, Outline of Middle-earth § Geography lists all the notable locations. There is no need to present fictional geography in this level of granularity. BenKuykendall ( talk) 00:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:26, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Same user created pages on this school in several Asian languages, English, and Simple English. None of them list an independent source. Although I don't speak Japanese, a google search on its Japanese name was not promising. b uidh e 00:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)