![]() |
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Why the page should be deleted The nominator edited Holborn and St Pancras (UK Parliament constituency) to wikilink the Brexit Party candidate, Hector Birchwood. I reverted as no such article existed. The editor then created the article on Hector Birchwood and restored the link. The article is unreferenced and appears to have been created by the candidate or an associate of his to support his candidacy. Dudley Miles ( talk) 00:09, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
>>> It's a short factual entry about a candidate for that seat. Why shouldn't the entries link to one another? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:1019:3D7B:1:1:C11:B3CA ( talk) 08:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
>>> I created the article by clicking on the link I created. That's how Wikimedia sites work. Inevitable there is a short period when there is no contents as I write what I know and can find out. I've now added multiple references to the page too, so it is not unreferenced.
Hector Birchwood is quite a well known figure due to his repeated appearances on the Heir Hunters TV programme, extending over some years.
Inevitably if someone is a candidate it is going to have things about that candidate on it.
His adoption as a political candidate makes him intrinsically a more interesting subject and his work in discovering missing heirs is surely relevant and makes him a person of interest. Palfreman ( talk) 09:17, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
>>> I've added eight references, covering student activism, his career, Heir Hunters and being appointed Brexit Party candidate.
Obviously he is more of interest as an electoral candidate, but being one of the top private investigators in world in his field and TV appearances do make him interesting independently of his candidacy. Palfreman ( talk) 10:00, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Lourdes 13:31, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SKCRIT#1. The nominator has withdrawn their nomination and there are no other arguments for deletion or redirection. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 07:47, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Does not appear to be independently notable of the company she founded,
Brit + Co. Merge to Brit + Co, or vice versa.
Loksmythe (
talk) 23:36, 15 November 2019 (UTC) Sorry, I didn't realize this had already been proposed for deletion in past. Withdrawing the nomination.
Loksmythe (
talk)
23:42, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 23:02, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Article was created after a hoax that stated that the subject was shutting down was solved. I don’t see any notability per se, as it’s just one of many web-game portals. The page also has a few MOS violations that I’m currently working on fixing but I still don’t see why this needs a article in the first place. HurricaneGeek2002 talk 22:29, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lourdes 13:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Game never came into existence, little to no information about the game despite being shown at TGS. SuperUserCode ( talk) 22:18, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was draftified. If the article is not improved in draft, it will be deleted in due course. It is now at Draft:RuPaul's DragCon UK. BD2412 T 01:57, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Event has not yet happened ( WP:CRYSTAL) and all sources provided are affiliated and not independent. Loksmythe ( talk) 22:00, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lourdes 13:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Last AfD attracted only two commenters and was 7 years ago. Boleyn ( talk) 21:50, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. No consensus to Delete, and after a re-list, the consensus to Keep was upheld with further RS that went unchallenged (non-admin closure) Britishfinance ( talk) 16:02, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Sources were either Press releases or sponsored by company. Paid editing concerns as well Catorce2016 ( talk) 11:09, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Sources with quotes
|
---|
|
This is very negative material about Domio. Although the article was edited by editors with a conflict of interest, it is also clear that editors without a conflict of interest have also edited it to added sourced negative material to make the article balanced.Controversy, Illegal Permits and Lawsuits
Domio has come under scrutiny for their business practices in Boston, San Diego, Nashville and other cities. In Boston, Domio set up a fake Airbnb host named "Anthony" and rented out 88 units under the pseudonym. [1] In Nashville, co-founder and COO Adrian Lam received a court order from the Davidson County Circuit Court in June 2019 to stop renting out his North Nashville condominium, however, Lam was allowed to continue renting out another short-term rental property in East Nashville that doesn’t require him to live there to rent it out. Other Domio employees who have been served with lawsuits over fraudulent permits for homes owned in their name include data scientist Hengyi “Harry” Zhu, revenue manager Juan Miguel Rivera Pecunia and marketing director Umer Usman. [2] [3]References
- ^ Sullivan, Jack (2018-01-09). "Everyone knows Anthony in the North End – just not this one". CommonWealth Magazine. Retrieved 2019-09-23.
- ^ Mazza, Sandy. "What is Domio, the short-term rental platform under fire in Nashville?". The Tennessean. Retrieved 2019-09-24.
- ^ "Get Access". The Tennessean. Retrieved 2019-09-23.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:42, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Created as apparent promotional article for cryptocurrency Neucoin; no evidence of notability for Kaufman. Has never been much more of an article than this. WP:BEFORE shows only passing mentions, a few of which form the refs for this article. Of his achievements, Neucoin is a redirect to an article that doesn't even mention Neucoin, and Jango (website) is also tagged as advert. PRODed, PROD seconded per WP:NOTWEBHOST; PROD removed by someone adding "better sources" that turned out to be a pile of crypto blogs, not RSes. There's nothing to back this article and never seems to have been. David Gerard ( talk) 20:45, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 20:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
A possibly non-notable actress. Wouldn't pass WP:NACTRESS or WP:GNG Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 20:06, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 20:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Subject not notable. Article is unsourced with no means for remedy. Google produces a handful of mentions of NKishi, all within articles primarily about musical projects he's involved in. I could find none that mentioned more than just his name. The only writing of any length about the subject is a bio page on the website of one of his own projects. Skeletor3000 ( talk) 19:56, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Races and nations of Warhammer Fantasy#Chaos Dwarf. Sandstein 19:54, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
This article does not establish notability. TTN ( talk) 19:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
I've only just started working to improve this. Does it need to have the same level of detail as the other Warhammer pages like Dark Elves (Warhammer) or The Empire (Warhammer) or do all Warhammer army pages have the same notability problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.169.227.240 ( talk) 19:50, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:53, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
This article does not establish notability. TTN ( talk) 19:12, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:53, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
This article does not establish notability. TTN ( talk) 19:12, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:52, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
This article does not establish notability. TTN ( talk) 19:11, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:52, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Unsourced except for an external link to the school's website (which is a primary, subject-related source). No cited claim of notability, thereby failing
WP:GNG I have added this
WP:NSCHOOL. This does not apply: "schools that only provide a support to mainstream education"
WP:BEFORE check failed to bring up anything of note. Kirbanzo ( userpage - talk - contribs) 19:07, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. No indication of notability. Oberlin appears to be a locally "prominent" citizen who served in WWI. Mentioned in one secondary source; other sources include a blog and Find a Grave. Searching newspaper databases, Google books brings up nothing to show notability. DiamondRemley39 ( talk) 18:11, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Declined (and seconded) PROD (neither by me). Article appears to be based on a paper published in July of this year which has gathered no significant attention. Fails WP:GNG. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 17:59, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 19:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
LPTV station doesn´t meet notability. CentralTime301 ( talk, contribs) 16:34, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 19:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
LPTV station doesn´t meet WP:GNG and WP:NOTABILITY. CentralTime301 ( talk, contribs) 16:32, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. With 2 deletes and 1 weak keep, and a request being made to the original author for sources, I would go with a SoftDelete here. If someone feels terribly wronged, I'll undelete it without arguments. Lourdes 13:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
This page fails WP:NSEASONS due to the fact that the team didn't play in the top tier of Myanmar football. I would also like to nominate these two pages for the fact that it might pass WP:NSEASONS with the team in that time being in the top league, the quality of the page is terrible.
HawkAussie ( talk) 00:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is consensus that there is sufficient sourcing Nosebagbear ( talk) 16:39, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Article violates WP:FORUM and WP:NOTADVOCACY. The whole article is skewed and based on personal opinions of individuals. The first line itself is an opinion of the subject followed by the body of the article filled with opinions from other people. Some of the paragraphs have no reference. Talking about references, I researched to understand that
1. Ref #1 leads here - https://www.cbc.ca/News/TV+Shows/Marketplace/ID/2290470304 - a dead link
2. Ref #2 leads here - https://search.proquest.com/docview/434365733 - failed verification unless you have an account
3. Ref #5 leads here - https://www.quackwatch.org/04ConsumerEducation/NegativeBR/vbible.html - a personal opinion of a certain individual
4. Ref #6 leads here - https://www.deseret.com/1989/9/8/18823059/speakers-urge-quackdown-against-health-fraud-in-utah - a stand-alone story, but a reflection of the opinion from the previous source
5. Ref #7 leads here - https://www.quackwatch.org/04ConsumerEducation/NegativeBR/hbible.html - a book review, which are generally personal opinions
The remaining are books which I couldn’t read or get hold of. Failed verification, in a way. In the absence of proper references, it violates WP:NBIO and WP:GNG too. Also observe edit warring, possible vandalism per WP:VD. Overall, delete. Brenthaven ( talk) 16:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus that notability is not established Nosebagbear ( talk) 16:40, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Non notable rapper. A Google search provides zero coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC Ceethekreator ( talk) 15:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Does not appear to be a notable methodology with only 7 results from a Google search. ... discospinster talk 15:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. There seems to be a rough agreement that though it currently fails TOOSOON and its sources aren't in a state to make a clear indication of notability via NCREATIVE, there is a firm possibility that it will be able to in the future. While there was the suggestion that it require AfC (in effect a variation on salting), there wasn't consensus for that even if it was judged to be within an AfD's authority to determine that. Nosebagbear ( talk) 16:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 15:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Move to draft:It is not yet ready, it may make a curve when fully created and verifyable source is added. Rocky 734 ( talk) 17:03, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Spammy article with nothing reliable coming up when googling for sources. All that's cited, and all that I find, are the same spammy promo junk. Fails WP:GNG – eggofreason( talk · contribs) 15:08, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was dratify. Nominator withdraw, but there seems to be a consensus to dratify the article. (non-admin closure) Kirbanzo ( userpage - talk - contribs) 18:38, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Unsourced, does not demonstrate notability (failing WP:NFILM). Potentially WP:TOOSOON. WP:BEFORE check did not bring up anything of note. Kirbanzo ( userpage - talk - contribs) 15:04, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Move to draft:It is reasonable to move to draft. Rocky 734 ( talk) 16:55, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Please remove deletion tag on The Body (2019 film) article. I was added many sources related that article and in future I will add many sources to improve this article.
@ Rocky 734: i am not lying. I was added information that time and then @ Kirbanzo: attached deletion tag. Now the article is ready. Waiting for remove deletion tag so then i upload official poster of article.
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Simply does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOLAR. Onel5969 TT me 15:03, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. (non-admin closure) Störm (talk) 19:58, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Störm (talk) 13:42, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Both sides argue excellent points; but after a month's worth of discussion and two relistings, no consensus to delete has been established. (non-admin closure) —— SN 54129 16:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
After almost two years with no further mention in reliable sources, it appears that the topic fails both WP:SUSTAINED and WP:NotNews guidlines. I created the article in December, 2017 because I thought the Redhawks spoof was interesting and had a couple of reliable sources, but I did not want to add to the already large size of the main article, Washington Redskins name controversy. "Not the News" should have warranted a waiting period before doing so, which is my error. With the passage of time, the criteria of notability is relevant; the topic was a blip in the media that did not last a week, so a separate article should not have been created (again, my bad). That does not mean the topic should automatically folded back into the main article, which remains too large to include all of the minor details surrounding the controversy while remaining a GA, something I am currently trying to remedy. WriterArtistDC ( talk) 14:11, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
This is not a guarantee that a topic will necessarily be handled as a separate, stand-alone page. Editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article.If it's treated as an event, it lacks WP:LASTING impact.— Bagumba ( talk) 09:22, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. as a7/g11 (non-admin closure) Praxidicae ( talk) 13:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Andrew Base ( talk) 13:08, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Deletion rationale is not convincing in light of WP:NTEMP. ST47 ( talk) 14:42, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Company is no longer significant; seems to have faded away with little relevance once it was acquired. Misterpottery ( talk) 12:31, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ST47 ( talk) 14:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Person is not at all noteworthy. Fails WP:NBIO and his other works are WP:NOTINHERITED. Also, no sources in article are independent of the subject as required by WP:NBIO. Reads like a PR creation. Misterpottery ( talk) 12:29, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 12:32, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
This is a specialty list that has no value for a general encyclopedia. It is only useful for a specific fictional, in-universe classification. The grouping itself does not establish notability. TTN ( talk) 12:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:40, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONG. Another article for a non-notable song created by the Roxanne Seeman SPA, and again no obvious redirect target. For one thing, the song has been recorded by two notable artists and therefore falls foul of WP:XY, but in any case there's no compelling case to redirect to either artist – the original version is an instrumental from a non-notable album that doesn't have it's own Wikipedia page, and the version with lyrics was a session outtake that was only included as a bonus track on an album 40 years after its original release. No doubt this article will also now be refbombed by the SPA in an attempt to make the song seem notable. Richard3120 ( talk) 12:14, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
{{Track listing | title1 = Area Code 808 | writer1 = Deodato, George Parrish, Jr | length1 = 6:45 | title2 = Whistle Bump | writer2 = Deodato | length2 = 4:32 | title3 = Tahitti Hut | writer3 = Maurice White | length3 = 4:27 | title4 = San Juan Sunset | writer4 = | length4 = 4:15 | title5 = Love Island | writer5 = Deodato | length5 = 6:40 | title6 = Chariot of the Gods | writer6 = Don Juan Mancha, Edwin Starr | length6 = 3:09 | title7 = Pina Colada | writer7 =[Deodato]] | length7 = 5:55 | title8 = Take The “A” Train | writer8 = Billy Strayhorn | length8 = 3:48 Rosedelune ( talk) 16:49, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ST47 ( talk) 14:33, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable app, and apparently defunct. I tidied this page and was going to tag it for notability. However, neither the app's website nor its iTunes links work; there is no indication that it ever got much beyond development, and if it did it's unlikely to be bracketed with the other apps mentioned in the article which are notable. Not my area of expertise, so brought to AfD. Emeraude ( talk) 12:02, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related page because it's about the developer of the above. Non-notable; searches provide no substantial coverage beyond directories etc, nothing in article suggests any real notability, tagged for notablility since March 2018. Both articleswere created by the same user (presumably the "girlfriend" mentioned?) :
The result was delete. ST47 ( talk) 14:32, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 11:55, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. The argument in favor of keeping the article is not convincing given that no evidence of notability was provided. I have reviewed the article and while it contains a large number of references, most of them are either trivial mentions in lists of software, or primary sources linking to the subject's official website. ST47 ( talk) 14:31, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 11:54, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 12:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
This article fails to establish notability. TTN ( talk) 11:51, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 12:43, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
This article fails to establish notability. The "Reception" section is trivial. TTN ( talk) 11:50, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 12:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
This article fails to establish notability. TTN ( talk) 11:49, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 12:26, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NTOUR and WP:SIGCOV. The article creator has been creating articles for every tour by Motorhead and other heavy rock outfits, none of them sourced to any reliable sources, and none of which give any indication of notability, simply that the tour existed, simply a list of tour dates and setlists sourced to blogs. This article has been redirected three times to Iron Fist (album), and each time the article creator has reverted the redirect with no explanation and no attempt to improve the article, so rather than carrying on edit warring back and forth I've brought this to AfD to get a consensus. Richard3120 ( talk) 11:38, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ST47 ( talk) 14:28, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
non-remarkable product that only serves to re-host product information that's more fitting for phonearena Graywalls ( talk) 11:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ST47 ( talk) 14:28, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Cannot find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG. Run-of-the-mill businesswoman. Edwardx ( talk) 11:30, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 12:23, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Struggling to find independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG. Run-of-the-mill businessman. Edwardx ( talk) 11:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. I am discounting the "this seems notable" vote, as there was no evidence of notability provided. The article currently has one reference, and it is to a primary source, so the nom's deletion rationale is valid. ST47 ( talk) 14:14, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 10:30, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ST47 ( talk) 14:11, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 10:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ST47 ( talk) 14:11, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, WP:WEBSITE. Störm (talk) 10:24, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. So many issues - that it is an article on a person without clear refs on someone who died quite recently and the tone are just two, that it should probably be WP:TNTed either way. Boleyn ( talk) 08:54, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to USS Estrella (1862)#United States Navy service. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:SOLDIER as a captain. A minor distinction as the first commander of "a ship armed with self-propelled torpedoes" isn't enough. Clarityfiend ( talk) 08:29, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Article claims subject is an artist, record producer & composer but subject fails WP:SINGER, WP:COMPOSER & WP:BASIC. All references provided in the article are not by reliable media & do not establish notability for the subject. A WP:BEFORE shows subject is not yet notable. Celestina007 ( talk) 08:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
I am afraid I do not see from the article why this person is notable. There are dozens of thousands of dental surgeons in the world, and I do not see how this one stands out. Ymblanter ( talk) 07:52, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 12:21, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Actor/director who's involved in one unreleased film with no other credits. Clearly does not meet WP:GNG. JamesG5 ( talk) 07:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 07:27, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Although briefly an elected local official, Mike Conway does not meet the notability criteria. I could find no significant coverage of him in published secondary sources; the only significant detail gleaned from a google search of his name is the fact that he died in 2016. Further, no details have been added to the body of this article (aside from reference tweaks) since its creation in 2009. Drdpw ( talk) 06:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 07:27, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Lower division college basketball team, fails WP:GNG, WP:NSEASONS for not being top level, and at this point mostly WP:NOTSTATS. SportingFlyer T· C 05:11, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 07:27, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Failure of WP:ENT and WP:CS: Actress has no significant roles in any notable films or television shows, nor a large fan base. The article has been around for over three years but no reliable inline citations have been given—that's because the actress' prescence is very minimal. I tried finding suitable sources myself but was unable to. I do not think that an actress who has only played mostly minor roles in minor films/TV warrants her own article. CentreLeftRight ✉ 05:01, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:34, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
The article doesn't make a claim to notability, and the game seems to mostly be referenced on shopping and fandom sites. WP:GNG does not seem to be met. Hog Farm ( talk) 04:35, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. The consensus here seems to be that this does not meet NSONG and no viable redirect target currently exists. ST47 ( talk) 14:03, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Funny track, but no actual evidence of notability. One week at #31 in one chart, and that was it. The link to the band name is a redirect back here. Guy ( help!) 22:26, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No agreement and minimal participation after two relists. RL0919 ( talk) 04:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails the general notability guideline. Part of an ongoing cleanup campaign of conflict-of-interest editing in international Australian rules football articles. I'm AfDing this rather than PRODing because a couple of sources mention the organisation - however, these mentions are not substantial and the articles focus on the sport of Footy 9s rather than the organisation behind it. – Tera tix ₵ 04:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 04:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. References are all routine coverage of press releases in industry press, thus failing WP:INDEPENDENT and WP:AUD. My own searching failed to find anything better. The editing history of the article's original author strongly suggests WP:UPE. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:49, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
No indication that the individual is notable separately from the company. ... discospinster talk 20:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that he plays in National Independent Soccer Association. Since this league is not (or not confirmed) fully professional per WP:FPL this does not satisfy WP:NFOOTY. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 03:06, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
WP:PROD removed by page's creator. Subject lacks notability and significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains( talk) 02:55, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Vala (Middle-earth)#Aulë. Content can be merged from history if editorial consensus supports it. Sandstein 19:33, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
No indication this fictional character passes WP:GNG/ WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with rationale "significant figure in Tolkien's works". WP:BEFORE fails to show any in-depth analysis or anything that goes beyond in-univere PLOT summary. Is mentioned in J.R.R. Tolkien Encyclopedia: Scholarship and Critical Assessment in several entries but does not have its own entry. I don't think we should have a separate entry on this level of minute in-universe entity either. Thoughts? PS. Looking at Template:Ainur many other similar entities have been just redirected and so can this one be (redirect target: Vala_(Middle-earth)#Aulë). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:19, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia can't handle a list this long. In fact, it's so long and incomplete that no one's going to bother to do all the research and fill in all the gaps here. Songwaters ( talk) 02:28, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENT: none of the references currently in the article constitute significant coverage in reliable sources. The source for his death is a highly sketchy self-published website, and everything else is a database entry (IMDb or IAFD). I looked for new ones and found only trivial coverage in several books about pornography [16] [17] [18]. (Complicating the search was the fact that a mainstream actor has the same name.) Cheers, gnu 57 02:16, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. ST47 ( talk) 13:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Lots of content, but almost all of it is unsourced. Neither any of the bands members nor any of its music appear to be independently Wikipedia notable, but there are some pretty old comments on the talk page about the songs being used in TV shows, etc. which might meet WP:NSONG. Article has been tagged with {{ More citations needed}} since May 2014, but most of the content of the article appears to have been added before the end of 2012. A very cursory WP:BEFORE Google search gets the Wikipedia article as the first hit, but not very much after that even going a few pages deep. I'm not seeing much here per WP:GNG or WP:NBAND, but there could be older sources out there somewhere. Article was WP:PRODDED early on after it was created in 2006, but deprodded (mostly based upon WP:OSE reasons) per discussion on its talk page. Way back in the day, OSE arguments might've have been given much more weight since there were so few articles in comparison to today, but don't thing that's really considered to be a good reason for keeping something these days. There does appear to have been some COI editing really early on, but not sure if that matters now. I asked about this at WT:MUSICIAN#The Slugs and also posted some {{{ Please see}} notices about it on some other WikiProject talk pages, but only one response has been received so far, and that particular response wasn't really something strongly suggesting the article should be kept. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 02:04, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:15, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Non notable magazine and the content is supported primarily by the website of the relevant magazine. The article doesn't have reliable sources at all. Abishe ( talk) 01:59, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 02:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Creating nomination on behalf of 216.160.67.169, per their request. I am neutral. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Copied the following reason from Talk:Where-to-be-born Index#Nominating this article for deletion―― Phoenix7777 ( talk) 03:47, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
I'm nominating this article for deletion due to its encyclopedic irrelevance and lack of notability. Specifically, this article qualifies for deletion due to these reasons from the Wikipedia:Deletion_policy:
As others have noted, this article is essentially advertising for the Economist Intelligence Unit. It is not a culturally relevant index as evidenced by its lack of incoming links and discussion relating it to other article. 216.160.67.169 ( talk) 00:29, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. I am largely discounting Fifthavenuebrands, as they are a new user who has submitted votes with poor rationale not only here but at a large number of AfDs over a very short period of time. Based on the article history, they evidently never had time to work on it, and no reliable sources or evidence of notability were discussed at this debate. ST47 ( talk) 13:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
I'm submitting this for consideration for deletion on account of a lack of notability, after seeing discussions to that effect on the article's Talk page indicating a mutual inability to locate satisfactory sources. I can't find any either—and the company's new name, "Stone Group of Companies", turns up virtually nothing. Largoplazo ( talk) 00:33, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Why the page should be deleted The nominator edited Holborn and St Pancras (UK Parliament constituency) to wikilink the Brexit Party candidate, Hector Birchwood. I reverted as no such article existed. The editor then created the article on Hector Birchwood and restored the link. The article is unreferenced and appears to have been created by the candidate or an associate of his to support his candidacy. Dudley Miles ( talk) 00:09, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
>>> It's a short factual entry about a candidate for that seat. Why shouldn't the entries link to one another? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:1019:3D7B:1:1:C11:B3CA ( talk) 08:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
>>> I created the article by clicking on the link I created. That's how Wikimedia sites work. Inevitable there is a short period when there is no contents as I write what I know and can find out. I've now added multiple references to the page too, so it is not unreferenced.
Hector Birchwood is quite a well known figure due to his repeated appearances on the Heir Hunters TV programme, extending over some years.
Inevitably if someone is a candidate it is going to have things about that candidate on it.
His adoption as a political candidate makes him intrinsically a more interesting subject and his work in discovering missing heirs is surely relevant and makes him a person of interest. Palfreman ( talk) 09:17, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
>>> I've added eight references, covering student activism, his career, Heir Hunters and being appointed Brexit Party candidate.
Obviously he is more of interest as an electoral candidate, but being one of the top private investigators in world in his field and TV appearances do make him interesting independently of his candidacy. Palfreman ( talk) 10:00, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Lourdes 13:31, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SKCRIT#1. The nominator has withdrawn their nomination and there are no other arguments for deletion or redirection. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 07:47, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Does not appear to be independently notable of the company she founded,
Brit + Co. Merge to Brit + Co, or vice versa.
Loksmythe (
talk) 23:36, 15 November 2019 (UTC) Sorry, I didn't realize this had already been proposed for deletion in past. Withdrawing the nomination.
Loksmythe (
talk)
23:42, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 23:02, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Article was created after a hoax that stated that the subject was shutting down was solved. I don’t see any notability per se, as it’s just one of many web-game portals. The page also has a few MOS violations that I’m currently working on fixing but I still don’t see why this needs a article in the first place. HurricaneGeek2002 talk 22:29, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lourdes 13:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Game never came into existence, little to no information about the game despite being shown at TGS. SuperUserCode ( talk) 22:18, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was draftified. If the article is not improved in draft, it will be deleted in due course. It is now at Draft:RuPaul's DragCon UK. BD2412 T 01:57, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Event has not yet happened ( WP:CRYSTAL) and all sources provided are affiliated and not independent. Loksmythe ( talk) 22:00, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lourdes 13:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Last AfD attracted only two commenters and was 7 years ago. Boleyn ( talk) 21:50, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. No consensus to Delete, and after a re-list, the consensus to Keep was upheld with further RS that went unchallenged (non-admin closure) Britishfinance ( talk) 16:02, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Sources were either Press releases or sponsored by company. Paid editing concerns as well Catorce2016 ( talk) 11:09, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Sources with quotes
|
---|
|
This is very negative material about Domio. Although the article was edited by editors with a conflict of interest, it is also clear that editors without a conflict of interest have also edited it to added sourced negative material to make the article balanced.Controversy, Illegal Permits and Lawsuits
Domio has come under scrutiny for their business practices in Boston, San Diego, Nashville and other cities. In Boston, Domio set up a fake Airbnb host named "Anthony" and rented out 88 units under the pseudonym. [1] In Nashville, co-founder and COO Adrian Lam received a court order from the Davidson County Circuit Court in June 2019 to stop renting out his North Nashville condominium, however, Lam was allowed to continue renting out another short-term rental property in East Nashville that doesn’t require him to live there to rent it out. Other Domio employees who have been served with lawsuits over fraudulent permits for homes owned in their name include data scientist Hengyi “Harry” Zhu, revenue manager Juan Miguel Rivera Pecunia and marketing director Umer Usman. [2] [3]References
- ^ Sullivan, Jack (2018-01-09). "Everyone knows Anthony in the North End – just not this one". CommonWealth Magazine. Retrieved 2019-09-23.
- ^ Mazza, Sandy. "What is Domio, the short-term rental platform under fire in Nashville?". The Tennessean. Retrieved 2019-09-24.
- ^ "Get Access". The Tennessean. Retrieved 2019-09-23.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:42, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Created as apparent promotional article for cryptocurrency Neucoin; no evidence of notability for Kaufman. Has never been much more of an article than this. WP:BEFORE shows only passing mentions, a few of which form the refs for this article. Of his achievements, Neucoin is a redirect to an article that doesn't even mention Neucoin, and Jango (website) is also tagged as advert. PRODed, PROD seconded per WP:NOTWEBHOST; PROD removed by someone adding "better sources" that turned out to be a pile of crypto blogs, not RSes. There's nothing to back this article and never seems to have been. David Gerard ( talk) 20:45, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 20:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
A possibly non-notable actress. Wouldn't pass WP:NACTRESS or WP:GNG Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 20:06, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 20:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Subject not notable. Article is unsourced with no means for remedy. Google produces a handful of mentions of NKishi, all within articles primarily about musical projects he's involved in. I could find none that mentioned more than just his name. The only writing of any length about the subject is a bio page on the website of one of his own projects. Skeletor3000 ( talk) 19:56, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Races and nations of Warhammer Fantasy#Chaos Dwarf. Sandstein 19:54, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
This article does not establish notability. TTN ( talk) 19:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
I've only just started working to improve this. Does it need to have the same level of detail as the other Warhammer pages like Dark Elves (Warhammer) or The Empire (Warhammer) or do all Warhammer army pages have the same notability problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.169.227.240 ( talk) 19:50, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:53, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
This article does not establish notability. TTN ( talk) 19:12, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:53, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
This article does not establish notability. TTN ( talk) 19:12, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:52, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
This article does not establish notability. TTN ( talk) 19:11, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:52, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Unsourced except for an external link to the school's website (which is a primary, subject-related source). No cited claim of notability, thereby failing
WP:GNG I have added this
WP:NSCHOOL. This does not apply: "schools that only provide a support to mainstream education"
WP:BEFORE check failed to bring up anything of note. Kirbanzo ( userpage - talk - contribs) 19:07, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. No indication of notability. Oberlin appears to be a locally "prominent" citizen who served in WWI. Mentioned in one secondary source; other sources include a blog and Find a Grave. Searching newspaper databases, Google books brings up nothing to show notability. DiamondRemley39 ( talk) 18:11, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Declined (and seconded) PROD (neither by me). Article appears to be based on a paper published in July of this year which has gathered no significant attention. Fails WP:GNG. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 17:59, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 19:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
LPTV station doesn´t meet notability. CentralTime301 ( talk, contribs) 16:34, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 19:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
LPTV station doesn´t meet WP:GNG and WP:NOTABILITY. CentralTime301 ( talk, contribs) 16:32, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. With 2 deletes and 1 weak keep, and a request being made to the original author for sources, I would go with a SoftDelete here. If someone feels terribly wronged, I'll undelete it without arguments. Lourdes 13:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
This page fails WP:NSEASONS due to the fact that the team didn't play in the top tier of Myanmar football. I would also like to nominate these two pages for the fact that it might pass WP:NSEASONS with the team in that time being in the top league, the quality of the page is terrible.
HawkAussie ( talk) 00:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is consensus that there is sufficient sourcing Nosebagbear ( talk) 16:39, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Article violates WP:FORUM and WP:NOTADVOCACY. The whole article is skewed and based on personal opinions of individuals. The first line itself is an opinion of the subject followed by the body of the article filled with opinions from other people. Some of the paragraphs have no reference. Talking about references, I researched to understand that
1. Ref #1 leads here - https://www.cbc.ca/News/TV+Shows/Marketplace/ID/2290470304 - a dead link
2. Ref #2 leads here - https://search.proquest.com/docview/434365733 - failed verification unless you have an account
3. Ref #5 leads here - https://www.quackwatch.org/04ConsumerEducation/NegativeBR/vbible.html - a personal opinion of a certain individual
4. Ref #6 leads here - https://www.deseret.com/1989/9/8/18823059/speakers-urge-quackdown-against-health-fraud-in-utah - a stand-alone story, but a reflection of the opinion from the previous source
5. Ref #7 leads here - https://www.quackwatch.org/04ConsumerEducation/NegativeBR/hbible.html - a book review, which are generally personal opinions
The remaining are books which I couldn’t read or get hold of. Failed verification, in a way. In the absence of proper references, it violates WP:NBIO and WP:GNG too. Also observe edit warring, possible vandalism per WP:VD. Overall, delete. Brenthaven ( talk) 16:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus that notability is not established Nosebagbear ( talk) 16:40, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Non notable rapper. A Google search provides zero coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC Ceethekreator ( talk) 15:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Does not appear to be a notable methodology with only 7 results from a Google search. ... discospinster talk 15:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. There seems to be a rough agreement that though it currently fails TOOSOON and its sources aren't in a state to make a clear indication of notability via NCREATIVE, there is a firm possibility that it will be able to in the future. While there was the suggestion that it require AfC (in effect a variation on salting), there wasn't consensus for that even if it was judged to be within an AfD's authority to determine that. Nosebagbear ( talk) 16:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 15:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Move to draft:It is not yet ready, it may make a curve when fully created and verifyable source is added. Rocky 734 ( talk) 17:03, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Spammy article with nothing reliable coming up when googling for sources. All that's cited, and all that I find, are the same spammy promo junk. Fails WP:GNG – eggofreason( talk · contribs) 15:08, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was dratify. Nominator withdraw, but there seems to be a consensus to dratify the article. (non-admin closure) Kirbanzo ( userpage - talk - contribs) 18:38, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Unsourced, does not demonstrate notability (failing WP:NFILM). Potentially WP:TOOSOON. WP:BEFORE check did not bring up anything of note. Kirbanzo ( userpage - talk - contribs) 15:04, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Move to draft:It is reasonable to move to draft. Rocky 734 ( talk) 16:55, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Please remove deletion tag on The Body (2019 film) article. I was added many sources related that article and in future I will add many sources to improve this article.
@ Rocky 734: i am not lying. I was added information that time and then @ Kirbanzo: attached deletion tag. Now the article is ready. Waiting for remove deletion tag so then i upload official poster of article.
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Simply does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOLAR. Onel5969 TT me 15:03, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. (non-admin closure) Störm (talk) 19:58, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Störm (talk) 13:42, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Both sides argue excellent points; but after a month's worth of discussion and two relistings, no consensus to delete has been established. (non-admin closure) —— SN 54129 16:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
After almost two years with no further mention in reliable sources, it appears that the topic fails both WP:SUSTAINED and WP:NotNews guidlines. I created the article in December, 2017 because I thought the Redhawks spoof was interesting and had a couple of reliable sources, but I did not want to add to the already large size of the main article, Washington Redskins name controversy. "Not the News" should have warranted a waiting period before doing so, which is my error. With the passage of time, the criteria of notability is relevant; the topic was a blip in the media that did not last a week, so a separate article should not have been created (again, my bad). That does not mean the topic should automatically folded back into the main article, which remains too large to include all of the minor details surrounding the controversy while remaining a GA, something I am currently trying to remedy. WriterArtistDC ( talk) 14:11, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
This is not a guarantee that a topic will necessarily be handled as a separate, stand-alone page. Editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article.If it's treated as an event, it lacks WP:LASTING impact.— Bagumba ( talk) 09:22, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. as a7/g11 (non-admin closure) Praxidicae ( talk) 13:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Andrew Base ( talk) 13:08, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Deletion rationale is not convincing in light of WP:NTEMP. ST47 ( talk) 14:42, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Company is no longer significant; seems to have faded away with little relevance once it was acquired. Misterpottery ( talk) 12:31, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ST47 ( talk) 14:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Person is not at all noteworthy. Fails WP:NBIO and his other works are WP:NOTINHERITED. Also, no sources in article are independent of the subject as required by WP:NBIO. Reads like a PR creation. Misterpottery ( talk) 12:29, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 12:32, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
This is a specialty list that has no value for a general encyclopedia. It is only useful for a specific fictional, in-universe classification. The grouping itself does not establish notability. TTN ( talk) 12:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:40, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONG. Another article for a non-notable song created by the Roxanne Seeman SPA, and again no obvious redirect target. For one thing, the song has been recorded by two notable artists and therefore falls foul of WP:XY, but in any case there's no compelling case to redirect to either artist – the original version is an instrumental from a non-notable album that doesn't have it's own Wikipedia page, and the version with lyrics was a session outtake that was only included as a bonus track on an album 40 years after its original release. No doubt this article will also now be refbombed by the SPA in an attempt to make the song seem notable. Richard3120 ( talk) 12:14, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
{{Track listing | title1 = Area Code 808 | writer1 = Deodato, George Parrish, Jr | length1 = 6:45 | title2 = Whistle Bump | writer2 = Deodato | length2 = 4:32 | title3 = Tahitti Hut | writer3 = Maurice White | length3 = 4:27 | title4 = San Juan Sunset | writer4 = | length4 = 4:15 | title5 = Love Island | writer5 = Deodato | length5 = 6:40 | title6 = Chariot of the Gods | writer6 = Don Juan Mancha, Edwin Starr | length6 = 3:09 | title7 = Pina Colada | writer7 =[Deodato]] | length7 = 5:55 | title8 = Take The “A” Train | writer8 = Billy Strayhorn | length8 = 3:48 Rosedelune ( talk) 16:49, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ST47 ( talk) 14:33, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable app, and apparently defunct. I tidied this page and was going to tag it for notability. However, neither the app's website nor its iTunes links work; there is no indication that it ever got much beyond development, and if it did it's unlikely to be bracketed with the other apps mentioned in the article which are notable. Not my area of expertise, so brought to AfD. Emeraude ( talk) 12:02, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related page because it's about the developer of the above. Non-notable; searches provide no substantial coverage beyond directories etc, nothing in article suggests any real notability, tagged for notablility since March 2018. Both articleswere created by the same user (presumably the "girlfriend" mentioned?) :
The result was delete. ST47 ( talk) 14:32, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 11:55, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. The argument in favor of keeping the article is not convincing given that no evidence of notability was provided. I have reviewed the article and while it contains a large number of references, most of them are either trivial mentions in lists of software, or primary sources linking to the subject's official website. ST47 ( talk) 14:31, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 11:54, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 12:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
This article fails to establish notability. TTN ( talk) 11:51, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 12:43, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
This article fails to establish notability. The "Reception" section is trivial. TTN ( talk) 11:50, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 12:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
This article fails to establish notability. TTN ( talk) 11:49, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 12:26, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NTOUR and WP:SIGCOV. The article creator has been creating articles for every tour by Motorhead and other heavy rock outfits, none of them sourced to any reliable sources, and none of which give any indication of notability, simply that the tour existed, simply a list of tour dates and setlists sourced to blogs. This article has been redirected three times to Iron Fist (album), and each time the article creator has reverted the redirect with no explanation and no attempt to improve the article, so rather than carrying on edit warring back and forth I've brought this to AfD to get a consensus. Richard3120 ( talk) 11:38, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ST47 ( talk) 14:28, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
non-remarkable product that only serves to re-host product information that's more fitting for phonearena Graywalls ( talk) 11:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ST47 ( talk) 14:28, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Cannot find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG. Run-of-the-mill businesswoman. Edwardx ( talk) 11:30, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 12:23, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Struggling to find independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG. Run-of-the-mill businessman. Edwardx ( talk) 11:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. I am discounting the "this seems notable" vote, as there was no evidence of notability provided. The article currently has one reference, and it is to a primary source, so the nom's deletion rationale is valid. ST47 ( talk) 14:14, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 10:30, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ST47 ( talk) 14:11, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 10:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ST47 ( talk) 14:11, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, WP:WEBSITE. Störm (talk) 10:24, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. So many issues - that it is an article on a person without clear refs on someone who died quite recently and the tone are just two, that it should probably be WP:TNTed either way. Boleyn ( talk) 08:54, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to USS Estrella (1862)#United States Navy service. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:SOLDIER as a captain. A minor distinction as the first commander of "a ship armed with self-propelled torpedoes" isn't enough. Clarityfiend ( talk) 08:29, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Article claims subject is an artist, record producer & composer but subject fails WP:SINGER, WP:COMPOSER & WP:BASIC. All references provided in the article are not by reliable media & do not establish notability for the subject. A WP:BEFORE shows subject is not yet notable. Celestina007 ( talk) 08:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
I am afraid I do not see from the article why this person is notable. There are dozens of thousands of dental surgeons in the world, and I do not see how this one stands out. Ymblanter ( talk) 07:52, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 12:21, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Actor/director who's involved in one unreleased film with no other credits. Clearly does not meet WP:GNG. JamesG5 ( talk) 07:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 07:27, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Although briefly an elected local official, Mike Conway does not meet the notability criteria. I could find no significant coverage of him in published secondary sources; the only significant detail gleaned from a google search of his name is the fact that he died in 2016. Further, no details have been added to the body of this article (aside from reference tweaks) since its creation in 2009. Drdpw ( talk) 06:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 07:27, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Lower division college basketball team, fails WP:GNG, WP:NSEASONS for not being top level, and at this point mostly WP:NOTSTATS. SportingFlyer T· C 05:11, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 07:27, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Failure of WP:ENT and WP:CS: Actress has no significant roles in any notable films or television shows, nor a large fan base. The article has been around for over three years but no reliable inline citations have been given—that's because the actress' prescence is very minimal. I tried finding suitable sources myself but was unable to. I do not think that an actress who has only played mostly minor roles in minor films/TV warrants her own article. CentreLeftRight ✉ 05:01, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:34, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
The article doesn't make a claim to notability, and the game seems to mostly be referenced on shopping and fandom sites. WP:GNG does not seem to be met. Hog Farm ( talk) 04:35, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. The consensus here seems to be that this does not meet NSONG and no viable redirect target currently exists. ST47 ( talk) 14:03, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Funny track, but no actual evidence of notability. One week at #31 in one chart, and that was it. The link to the band name is a redirect back here. Guy ( help!) 22:26, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No agreement and minimal participation after two relists. RL0919 ( talk) 04:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails the general notability guideline. Part of an ongoing cleanup campaign of conflict-of-interest editing in international Australian rules football articles. I'm AfDing this rather than PRODing because a couple of sources mention the organisation - however, these mentions are not substantial and the articles focus on the sport of Footy 9s rather than the organisation behind it. – Tera tix ₵ 04:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 04:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. References are all routine coverage of press releases in industry press, thus failing WP:INDEPENDENT and WP:AUD. My own searching failed to find anything better. The editing history of the article's original author strongly suggests WP:UPE. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:49, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
No indication that the individual is notable separately from the company. ... discospinster talk 20:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that he plays in National Independent Soccer Association. Since this league is not (or not confirmed) fully professional per WP:FPL this does not satisfy WP:NFOOTY. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 03:06, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
WP:PROD removed by page's creator. Subject lacks notability and significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains( talk) 02:55, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Vala (Middle-earth)#Aulë. Content can be merged from history if editorial consensus supports it. Sandstein 19:33, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
No indication this fictional character passes WP:GNG/ WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with rationale "significant figure in Tolkien's works". WP:BEFORE fails to show any in-depth analysis or anything that goes beyond in-univere PLOT summary. Is mentioned in J.R.R. Tolkien Encyclopedia: Scholarship and Critical Assessment in several entries but does not have its own entry. I don't think we should have a separate entry on this level of minute in-universe entity either. Thoughts? PS. Looking at Template:Ainur many other similar entities have been just redirected and so can this one be (redirect target: Vala_(Middle-earth)#Aulë). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:19, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia can't handle a list this long. In fact, it's so long and incomplete that no one's going to bother to do all the research and fill in all the gaps here. Songwaters ( talk) 02:28, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENT: none of the references currently in the article constitute significant coverage in reliable sources. The source for his death is a highly sketchy self-published website, and everything else is a database entry (IMDb or IAFD). I looked for new ones and found only trivial coverage in several books about pornography [16] [17] [18]. (Complicating the search was the fact that a mainstream actor has the same name.) Cheers, gnu 57 02:16, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. ST47 ( talk) 13:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Lots of content, but almost all of it is unsourced. Neither any of the bands members nor any of its music appear to be independently Wikipedia notable, but there are some pretty old comments on the talk page about the songs being used in TV shows, etc. which might meet WP:NSONG. Article has been tagged with {{ More citations needed}} since May 2014, but most of the content of the article appears to have been added before the end of 2012. A very cursory WP:BEFORE Google search gets the Wikipedia article as the first hit, but not very much after that even going a few pages deep. I'm not seeing much here per WP:GNG or WP:NBAND, but there could be older sources out there somewhere. Article was WP:PRODDED early on after it was created in 2006, but deprodded (mostly based upon WP:OSE reasons) per discussion on its talk page. Way back in the day, OSE arguments might've have been given much more weight since there were so few articles in comparison to today, but don't thing that's really considered to be a good reason for keeping something these days. There does appear to have been some COI editing really early on, but not sure if that matters now. I asked about this at WT:MUSICIAN#The Slugs and also posted some {{{ Please see}} notices about it on some other WikiProject talk pages, but only one response has been received so far, and that particular response wasn't really something strongly suggesting the article should be kept. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 02:04, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:15, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Non notable magazine and the content is supported primarily by the website of the relevant magazine. The article doesn't have reliable sources at all. Abishe ( talk) 01:59, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 02:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Creating nomination on behalf of 216.160.67.169, per their request. I am neutral. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Copied the following reason from Talk:Where-to-be-born Index#Nominating this article for deletion―― Phoenix7777 ( talk) 03:47, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
I'm nominating this article for deletion due to its encyclopedic irrelevance and lack of notability. Specifically, this article qualifies for deletion due to these reasons from the Wikipedia:Deletion_policy:
As others have noted, this article is essentially advertising for the Economist Intelligence Unit. It is not a culturally relevant index as evidenced by its lack of incoming links and discussion relating it to other article. 216.160.67.169 ( talk) 00:29, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. I am largely discounting Fifthavenuebrands, as they are a new user who has submitted votes with poor rationale not only here but at a large number of AfDs over a very short period of time. Based on the article history, they evidently never had time to work on it, and no reliable sources or evidence of notability were discussed at this debate. ST47 ( talk) 13:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
I'm submitting this for consideration for deletion on account of a lack of notability, after seeing discussions to that effect on the article's Talk page indicating a mutual inability to locate satisfactory sources. I can't find any either—and the company's new name, "Stone Group of Companies", turns up virtually nothing. Largoplazo ( talk) 00:33, 15 November 2019 (UTC)