![]() |
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
This article does not demonstrate the notability of Sanivarapupeta road. One of its two sources is about a building and mentions Sanivarapupeta road only once. The other source does not mention. Sanivarapupeta road. To be notable, the road should be "the subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable and independent ..." Eddie Blick ( talk) 23:35, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:15, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
No reliable sources showed up in my searches. Fails WP:N. SL93 ( talk) 21:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Reasons for contesting the WP:PROD do not seeem satisfactory reasons to support notability. TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:33, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 16:27, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
The subject of this promotional biography does not meet the "significant coverage" criteria as described in WP:BIO. Only acting role is in a movie that was released two days ago. References are brief puff pieces. Deli nk ( talk) 20:26, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Comment: I think Mrs. East Asia Erath and Mrs. Erath Photogenic can be consider for notability. Wikibaji ( talk) 09:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2006 in video gaming. Bishonen | talk 04:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm not even sure how it would be possible to show this was notable. Just a blog entry, surely.. WP:NOTBLOG JMWt ( talk) 20:14, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Keep #1 - Bluerasberry is only asking for the contents of this article to be merged not deleted and no one else has put forward a deletion reason. Merge discussions should take place on one of the article talk pages of the involved articles ~ GB fan 10:14, 28 March 2017 (UTC).
I could be mistaken about this nomination but I think this concept is another name for " dirty bomb". I see two claims here which suggest a distinction from "dirty bomb" - perhaps the manufacturing process includes some Salt (chemistry) ingredient that merits the name, and perhaps the bomb refers to " salting the earth". I do not see any sources cited about the chemistry of salting, so I think that is dubious. The "salting the earth" part might be correct, but a dirty bomb does that also, so that makes me think these are the same concept.
There are not many sources cited here, and not all of them talk about "salted bombs". Some sources do, and I agree that "salted bomb" is a term for describing something. I only disagree that it is a distinct concept from dirty bomb. The base concept is a bomb which is designed both to explode, and also to poison a region for years or centuries or longer with radioactive contamination.
I think all of the content here should be merged to dirty bomb but I thought that I would seek comments from others. Thoughts? Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close as keep. This AfD was out of process given that the nominator did not provide grounds for deleting the articles, and actually advocated keeping them all. The number of articles listed was also excessive: it would be difficult for editors to individually assess the notability of each shopping centre as part of this nomination, or for a closing admin to figure out what the consensus for each centre is. Discussions concerning the notability of these shopping centres can be conducted without going to AfD.. Nick-D ( talk) 22:15, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
This is an advisory batch nomination. I personally don't think any of these should be deleted, but I think I'm in the minority, based on the results at Westfield Mount Druitt -- 60,088 m², 240 stores, converted to a redirect December 2012 per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westfield Mount Druitt, reiterated 2017 per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westfield Mount Druitt (2nd nomination), and Westfield Penrith -- 91,701 m², 338 stores, converted to redirect December 2012 per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westfield Penrith.
So rather than picking at these one by one at random let's see if we can come up with some kind of rational decision on the class as a whole -- delete/merge/redirect 'em all, keep 'em all, or delete some and keep others (but by some non-random criteria).
Articles under consideration, chosen because they are listed in the template {{ Westfield Australia}} (and also in List of Westfield shopping centres in Australia), in ascending order of area:
(I just noted when I made this that per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westfield Innaloo, Westfield Innaloo (the smallest mall on this list) was kept in 2006. So if some are being redirected and some kept according to who's paying attention at the moment, which seems possible, all the more reason to sort this out and get this put to bed once and for here.) Herostratus ( talk) 17:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
(P.P.S: By coincidence Westfield Airport West is concurrently being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westfield Airport West.)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:17, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Nominating for an IP 2804:7F4:FB80:FB82:7C16:CAAB:4C6B:A ( talk · contribs), who left the following rationale on my talk page: "non-notable professional wrestler who hasn't competed in a major promotion (TNA, ROH, AAA, NJPW, Only developmental territory by WWE etc. etc.) and shows no evidence of passing WP:GNG. Only source Cagematch bio." Nikki♥ 311 17:04, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. And salt Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:19, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Primefac ( talk) 17:11, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Non-notable singer. Adam9007 ( talk) 16:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
References
The result was draftify. Sent to draft space for User:Alex at FCPEuro to work on. Since a version already existed at Draft:FCP Euro, I have named this draft Draft:FCP Euro/alt. The creator is invited to merge the versions. Bishonen | talk 03:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable company, does not meet WP:COMPANY. Purely WP:SOAPBOX and uses only WP:PRIMARY sources and company-penned press releases for sources. Edited by a company employee and an outside party assisting them. Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 16:25, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Changing my initial vote to draft, see below. -- Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 21:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Redirects may be created at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Article about a planned stadium that never materialised. Deserves brief coverage at Gateshead F.C.#Stadium (where it is already mentioned), but I can't see justification for an article on it. Number 5 7 15:51, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. And asking @ Calamondin12: whether the hoax nature is plausible. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:17, 3 April 2017 (UTC) Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:17, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Possible hoax. If he did in fact play for the Armenia national football team, he would be notable, but there is no evidence that he did, or indeed that he exists. None of the references check out, and I can't find anything else online. St Anselm ( talk) 15:33, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet
WP:NMODEL (although I may be missing some Korean or Taiwanese reliable sources).
Ahecht (
TALK
PAGE)
15:10, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete per G4. I looked at the previously created article, and it was in fact better developed than the current version. The creator is a sock as are the new accounts below. It's clear to me that many of the accounts involved in the repeated recreation of this article years ago were also socks, but I can't check because they are Stale. That's just some side information and is largely irrelevant to the delete result.
Bbb23 (
talk)
20:08, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
As per a previous discussion ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Kuzhinapurath) a similar article created by the same contributor got deleted after discussion. However the creator says that at the time of the earlier discussion, there weren't enough notable sources, thus claiming that the article now has proper notable sources. Omkar1234 talk 15:01, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Notability. If there was an article on the Witold Pilecki Center for Totalitarian Studies I'd argfue for a merge. But there ain't. As it stands this article risks becoming a POV fork. TheLongTone ( talk) 15:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was Deleted by DGG. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:39, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable businessperson. Only references I can find are the cited non-notable award from an industry group and several press releases from his company.
Ahecht (
TALK
PAGE)
14:51, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy redirect to House of Glory. (essentially WP:CSD#A10) -- Ed ( Edgar181) 15:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks reliable sources. ThatGirlTayler ( talk) 14:47, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 08:34, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable ecologist.TED lectures do not confer notability. Winged Blades Godric 14:05, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted under criterion G11. Seraphimblade Talk to me 15:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Suspected WP:COI. Kleuske ( talk) 13:36, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was moved to Draft:Talalima Mobley. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 17:58, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All the cites in the article are non- WP:RS (Twitter, blogs) or his own website (styleheirs.com). Moreover, it's an WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY. Maybe WP:TOOSOON, but i'm not convinced. Kleuske ( talk) 12:11, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
In response to
Kleuske argument for Article Deletion - Talalima Mobley.
Thank you kindly for your input, I'm fairly new to this realm of editing on Wikipedia, I would like to request that this page to be placed in my user space so that I can continue to make better improvements to the article in order to save it from complete deletion. In my defence, yes the cites used are from twitter or blogs, specifically my own website at StyleHeirs.com - however, the cites are meant to show proof that where I have been and the efforts I've put into building my own portfolio are legitimate. It's difficult to make a name for myself in this industry and I don't have adequate management to support my endeavours in this line of work. Please, I invite you to aid me in correcting this article and ensure that I follow each proper guideline in order to keep this article alive. The best way to contact me is at my email talamobley[at]styleheirs[dot]com if you're willing to supply any guidance for my career and to resolve the errors in this article.
Inherit Love, I AM, Talalima Mobley. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Talamobley ( talk • contribs) 13:05, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Further research...
WP:SELFSOURCE States the following:
Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, especially in articles about themselves, without the requirement that they be published experts in the field, so long as the following criteria are met:
The material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim. It does not involve claims about third parties (such as people, organizations, or other entities). It does not involve claims about events not directly related to the subject. There is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity. The article is not based primarily on such sources.
These requirements also apply to pages from social networking websites such as Twitter, Tumblr, and Facebook.
Which I know the criteria's are met with each citation, as each source definitely reflects no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity. The provided SELFSOURCE mainly give narratives not claims to certain people or organizations that have commissioned Talalima Mobley, myself, to write these articles about their on-stage performance or collections on my own website at StyleHeirs.com. The sources are not based on the Wikipedia article Talalima Mobley yet is only provided to give more background to the assignments Talalima Mobley has carried out by request from publicists that are employed by major record companies and design houses. The provided cites have no claims about events not directly related to the article Talalima Mobley. Lastly, the citations aren't in any way self-serving nor an exceptional claim because each review published on StyleHeirs.com has one sole purpose, to provide online content regarding specific events hosted by each artists/people or organizations.
In the WP:SELFSOURCE definition, there isn't specific verbiage that clarifies that all or each criteria should be met in order to be deemed worthy for citiaion use in an article hosted on Wikipedia. If again, I have misread or misinterpreted the WP:SELFSOURCE definition please bring that to my attention and clarify my understanding. Much apprciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Talamobley ( talk • contribs) 14:03, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Magpakailanman episodes#2013. ( non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 13:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
As per WP:SENSATION and WP:GNG. This person fails to satisfy notability. Her only claim to notability is being a participant of a sensationalist suicide incident. Mapagkailanman the drama biographical antology where the life of the subject has been featured has also featured the lives of several other private citizens. Hariboneagle927 ( talk) 12:04, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Delete agree with the nominator. Nickrds09 (Talk to me) 07:56, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm not sure what the notability guidelines for automobiles are, but I just can't find enough significant reliable coverage for this car: the best I could find are passing mentions or web forums. The company that made the car doesn't appear to have a Wikipedia article, so this can't be redirected. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 11:42, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete. under criterion WP:CSD#A7.Deleted by Anthony Bradbury (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:24, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Blatant self-advertising and promotion - may yet qualify for a speedy by A7. All sources are personal links and thus are not acceptable sources - the article could therefore fail to meet GNGs. GammaRadiator ( talk) 10:13, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
We can CSD under G5. GammaRadiator ( talk) 14:50, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as spam. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 11:13, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Fails to show importance (no sources) - page created by editor shows a blatant conflict of interest - look at page creator's name - could qualify for speedy by A7 (there was a A7/G11 tag, which was removed by the page creator). Has previously been speedied by A7 five times prior. GammaRadiator ( talk) 09:47, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy Delete WP:A7 and Salt. Exemplo347 ( talk) 10:35, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable actor fails to pass general notability guideline. GSS ( talk| c| em) 09:07, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
The article was tagged as maybe not meeting the notability for authors at the beginning of February but nothing has been added since to help prove his notability. I have found nothing myself. As it stands he fails WP:NAUTHOR. Domdeparis ( talk) 08:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) Rcsprinter123 (warn) 17:12, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Non notable organisation. Fails WP:NCORP Ajf773 ( talk) 09:04, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Delete both Christ Church Bal and Christ Church Tibber, no credible claims of significance. Bishonen | talk 03:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Makes no credible claim of significance for the church either as a building or as a religious community. DePRODed by author. TheDragonFire ( talk) 07:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following similar page by the same author ( Nehemiah Mattu):
TheDragonFire ( talk) 07:45, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) f eminist 11:02, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
No sources cited. Unknown Notability Alexf505 ( talk) 23:29, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:10, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:JOURNALIST, nothing in gnews. and only 2 articles link here. one of them, simply an alumni listing of a university she attended. LibStar ( talk) 06:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
WP:NOTDIC indiscriminate list, unsourced, as is, this is not useful for anything. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 05:41, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:08, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Indiscriminate unsourced list, this category of lists is not notable. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 05:12, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. The article currently avoids major
BLP concerns. Further, discussion
(in borderline cases) and/or revision deletion
(in outright violations); not deletion, is the way out, if they have occured in any version.Also, we don't delete random biographical articles simply per the wishes of the subject. (
non-admin closure)
Winged Blades
Godric
13:39, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:OTRS_noticeboard#Kola_Boof: Recreation of Kola Boof. Speedily deleted twice in 2007 with reason per BLP concerns from subject. Deletion was contested at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive20#Kola_Boof and the article remained deleted. As far as I could find, the subject objected against the content. Starting from nationality to every single aspect of the article. About 50 emails concerning legal threats. The current stub has the same problems, is unsourced and as such against WP:BLP. In its current form I think it should be deleted. I would like further feedback on what matter of course would be best, and would like to discuss the subject properly via a deletion discussion this time instead of a speedy deletion. - Sincerely, Taketa ( talk) 04:55, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:05, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable company with no significant coverage. SL93 ( talk) 04:56, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
This does not yet seem to exist, at least not in any medical journals or even regular reliable sources. Drmies ( talk) 04:34, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Latin American Xchange. ( non-admin closure) f eminist 11:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable wrestler, article is poorly written and poorly sourced. ThatGirlTayler ( talk) 03:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
This article seems to fail WP:SPORTSEVENT - no well-sourced prose to assert notability of this regular season game (emphasis added). The page primarily only consists of statistics, and does not give sourced information on significance or importance, like for example Heidi Game, Miracle at the Meadowlands, and 2012 Packers–Seahawks officiating controversy. A National Football League game merely played in blizzard conditions is not automatically notable because there have been several such matches played in December throughout the years. Zzyzx11 ( talk) 02:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. NeilN talk to me 13:49, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Recently launched TV channel. Unproven notability. Unreliable sources were used as references. XXN, 15:23, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. It appears WP:INHERIT and WP:PROMO also apply. John from Idegon ( talk) 12:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Bishonen | talk 23:27, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACADEMIC, WP:NPEOPLE and WP:GNG. Is an WP:AUTOBIO. Possibly consider deleting creator's userpage as it appears to be WP:FAKEARTICLE. DrStrauss talk 12:06, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: In response to the point above, please refer to the Works section and References list in the article in question for evidence demonstrating notable academic contributions through multiple published and reliable sources. Please also note that I edited the article in question and am not Christopher Clark. Status418 ( talk) 15:38, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Not huge evidence of notability, but I think it just makes it, and anyway the only possible alternative would be "no consensus", which would lead to the same end result. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 18:33, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
promotional article for very local organization. The Glamour and USA Today articles is just mention in a general article--Glamour 1 of 31, USAToday, 1 of 10. Huff Post is worthless for notability. That leaves only local sources for a local organization. DGG ( talk ) 04:54, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Wizardman 01:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Primary school with no indication of notability. Was successfully prodded back in 2015 see here, so can not be prodded again. Onel5969 TT me 02:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:17, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage for this musician. Fails WP:MUSIC. SL93 ( talk) 04:52, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Failed to meet WP:GNG. The article did not received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Richie Campbell ( talk) 12:42, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
The subject of this article fails WP:NTRACK. I don't think the SEC championship qualifies as a "competition at the highest level". Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 21:18, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Ultimate Warrior#Personal life. Sandstein 17:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Notability not inherited from her husband. Nikki♥ 311 22:19, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:15, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisting under AfD. The article relies on two self-published external links for sources, and there are no inline citations. It reads more like a résumé, and based on prior talk page interaction, there is potential conflict of interest here. As a BLP, it fails the 'verifiability' and 'no original research' core content policies. Wani ( talk) 00:36, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG, WP:BIO. Of all the sources given in the article, the only one that was unaffiliated, not behind a paywall, not a mention in passing, and not essentially commentary by him instead of about him is this one. A Google search turns up little else. Largoplazo ( talk) 00:16, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Agreed that deletion may make sense. Thedaytodaytomorrow ( talk) 15:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete . Materialscientist ( talk) 23:10, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that he played in the Israeli Premier League. This claim was based on an erroneous statement in the article, which said that he had played for Hapoel Ramat-Gan when he had actually played for Hakoah Ramat-Gan. Given that he has only ever played in the second divisions in Israel and Nigeria, this article does not meet WP:NSPORT Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
This article does not demonstrate the notability of Sanivarapupeta road. One of its two sources is about a building and mentions Sanivarapupeta road only once. The other source does not mention. Sanivarapupeta road. To be notable, the road should be "the subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable and independent ..." Eddie Blick ( talk) 23:35, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:15, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
No reliable sources showed up in my searches. Fails WP:N. SL93 ( talk) 21:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Reasons for contesting the WP:PROD do not seeem satisfactory reasons to support notability. TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:33, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 16:27, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
The subject of this promotional biography does not meet the "significant coverage" criteria as described in WP:BIO. Only acting role is in a movie that was released two days ago. References are brief puff pieces. Deli nk ( talk) 20:26, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Comment: I think Mrs. East Asia Erath and Mrs. Erath Photogenic can be consider for notability. Wikibaji ( talk) 09:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2006 in video gaming. Bishonen | talk 04:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm not even sure how it would be possible to show this was notable. Just a blog entry, surely.. WP:NOTBLOG JMWt ( talk) 20:14, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Keep #1 - Bluerasberry is only asking for the contents of this article to be merged not deleted and no one else has put forward a deletion reason. Merge discussions should take place on one of the article talk pages of the involved articles ~ GB fan 10:14, 28 March 2017 (UTC).
I could be mistaken about this nomination but I think this concept is another name for " dirty bomb". I see two claims here which suggest a distinction from "dirty bomb" - perhaps the manufacturing process includes some Salt (chemistry) ingredient that merits the name, and perhaps the bomb refers to " salting the earth". I do not see any sources cited about the chemistry of salting, so I think that is dubious. The "salting the earth" part might be correct, but a dirty bomb does that also, so that makes me think these are the same concept.
There are not many sources cited here, and not all of them talk about "salted bombs". Some sources do, and I agree that "salted bomb" is a term for describing something. I only disagree that it is a distinct concept from dirty bomb. The base concept is a bomb which is designed both to explode, and also to poison a region for years or centuries or longer with radioactive contamination.
I think all of the content here should be merged to dirty bomb but I thought that I would seek comments from others. Thoughts? Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close as keep. This AfD was out of process given that the nominator did not provide grounds for deleting the articles, and actually advocated keeping them all. The number of articles listed was also excessive: it would be difficult for editors to individually assess the notability of each shopping centre as part of this nomination, or for a closing admin to figure out what the consensus for each centre is. Discussions concerning the notability of these shopping centres can be conducted without going to AfD.. Nick-D ( talk) 22:15, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
This is an advisory batch nomination. I personally don't think any of these should be deleted, but I think I'm in the minority, based on the results at Westfield Mount Druitt -- 60,088 m², 240 stores, converted to a redirect December 2012 per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westfield Mount Druitt, reiterated 2017 per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westfield Mount Druitt (2nd nomination), and Westfield Penrith -- 91,701 m², 338 stores, converted to redirect December 2012 per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westfield Penrith.
So rather than picking at these one by one at random let's see if we can come up with some kind of rational decision on the class as a whole -- delete/merge/redirect 'em all, keep 'em all, or delete some and keep others (but by some non-random criteria).
Articles under consideration, chosen because they are listed in the template {{ Westfield Australia}} (and also in List of Westfield shopping centres in Australia), in ascending order of area:
(I just noted when I made this that per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westfield Innaloo, Westfield Innaloo (the smallest mall on this list) was kept in 2006. So if some are being redirected and some kept according to who's paying attention at the moment, which seems possible, all the more reason to sort this out and get this put to bed once and for here.) Herostratus ( talk) 17:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
(P.P.S: By coincidence Westfield Airport West is concurrently being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westfield Airport West.)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:17, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Nominating for an IP 2804:7F4:FB80:FB82:7C16:CAAB:4C6B:A ( talk · contribs), who left the following rationale on my talk page: "non-notable professional wrestler who hasn't competed in a major promotion (TNA, ROH, AAA, NJPW, Only developmental territory by WWE etc. etc.) and shows no evidence of passing WP:GNG. Only source Cagematch bio." Nikki♥ 311 17:04, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. And salt Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:19, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Primefac ( talk) 17:11, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Non-notable singer. Adam9007 ( talk) 16:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
References
The result was draftify. Sent to draft space for User:Alex at FCPEuro to work on. Since a version already existed at Draft:FCP Euro, I have named this draft Draft:FCP Euro/alt. The creator is invited to merge the versions. Bishonen | talk 03:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable company, does not meet WP:COMPANY. Purely WP:SOAPBOX and uses only WP:PRIMARY sources and company-penned press releases for sources. Edited by a company employee and an outside party assisting them. Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 16:25, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Changing my initial vote to draft, see below. -- Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 21:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Redirects may be created at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Article about a planned stadium that never materialised. Deserves brief coverage at Gateshead F.C.#Stadium (where it is already mentioned), but I can't see justification for an article on it. Number 5 7 15:51, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. And asking @ Calamondin12: whether the hoax nature is plausible. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:17, 3 April 2017 (UTC) Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:17, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Possible hoax. If he did in fact play for the Armenia national football team, he would be notable, but there is no evidence that he did, or indeed that he exists. None of the references check out, and I can't find anything else online. St Anselm ( talk) 15:33, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet
WP:NMODEL (although I may be missing some Korean or Taiwanese reliable sources).
Ahecht (
TALK
PAGE)
15:10, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete per G4. I looked at the previously created article, and it was in fact better developed than the current version. The creator is a sock as are the new accounts below. It's clear to me that many of the accounts involved in the repeated recreation of this article years ago were also socks, but I can't check because they are Stale. That's just some side information and is largely irrelevant to the delete result.
Bbb23 (
talk)
20:08, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
As per a previous discussion ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Kuzhinapurath) a similar article created by the same contributor got deleted after discussion. However the creator says that at the time of the earlier discussion, there weren't enough notable sources, thus claiming that the article now has proper notable sources. Omkar1234 talk 15:01, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Notability. If there was an article on the Witold Pilecki Center for Totalitarian Studies I'd argfue for a merge. But there ain't. As it stands this article risks becoming a POV fork. TheLongTone ( talk) 15:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was Deleted by DGG. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:39, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable businessperson. Only references I can find are the cited non-notable award from an industry group and several press releases from his company.
Ahecht (
TALK
PAGE)
14:51, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy redirect to House of Glory. (essentially WP:CSD#A10) -- Ed ( Edgar181) 15:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks reliable sources. ThatGirlTayler ( talk) 14:47, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 08:34, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable ecologist.TED lectures do not confer notability. Winged Blades Godric 14:05, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted under criterion G11. Seraphimblade Talk to me 15:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Suspected WP:COI. Kleuske ( talk) 13:36, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was moved to Draft:Talalima Mobley. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 17:58, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All the cites in the article are non- WP:RS (Twitter, blogs) or his own website (styleheirs.com). Moreover, it's an WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY. Maybe WP:TOOSOON, but i'm not convinced. Kleuske ( talk) 12:11, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
In response to
Kleuske argument for Article Deletion - Talalima Mobley.
Thank you kindly for your input, I'm fairly new to this realm of editing on Wikipedia, I would like to request that this page to be placed in my user space so that I can continue to make better improvements to the article in order to save it from complete deletion. In my defence, yes the cites used are from twitter or blogs, specifically my own website at StyleHeirs.com - however, the cites are meant to show proof that where I have been and the efforts I've put into building my own portfolio are legitimate. It's difficult to make a name for myself in this industry and I don't have adequate management to support my endeavours in this line of work. Please, I invite you to aid me in correcting this article and ensure that I follow each proper guideline in order to keep this article alive. The best way to contact me is at my email talamobley[at]styleheirs[dot]com if you're willing to supply any guidance for my career and to resolve the errors in this article.
Inherit Love, I AM, Talalima Mobley. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Talamobley ( talk • contribs) 13:05, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Further research...
WP:SELFSOURCE States the following:
Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, especially in articles about themselves, without the requirement that they be published experts in the field, so long as the following criteria are met:
The material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim. It does not involve claims about third parties (such as people, organizations, or other entities). It does not involve claims about events not directly related to the subject. There is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity. The article is not based primarily on such sources.
These requirements also apply to pages from social networking websites such as Twitter, Tumblr, and Facebook.
Which I know the criteria's are met with each citation, as each source definitely reflects no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity. The provided SELFSOURCE mainly give narratives not claims to certain people or organizations that have commissioned Talalima Mobley, myself, to write these articles about their on-stage performance or collections on my own website at StyleHeirs.com. The sources are not based on the Wikipedia article Talalima Mobley yet is only provided to give more background to the assignments Talalima Mobley has carried out by request from publicists that are employed by major record companies and design houses. The provided cites have no claims about events not directly related to the article Talalima Mobley. Lastly, the citations aren't in any way self-serving nor an exceptional claim because each review published on StyleHeirs.com has one sole purpose, to provide online content regarding specific events hosted by each artists/people or organizations.
In the WP:SELFSOURCE definition, there isn't specific verbiage that clarifies that all or each criteria should be met in order to be deemed worthy for citiaion use in an article hosted on Wikipedia. If again, I have misread or misinterpreted the WP:SELFSOURCE definition please bring that to my attention and clarify my understanding. Much apprciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Talamobley ( talk • contribs) 14:03, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Magpakailanman episodes#2013. ( non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 13:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
As per WP:SENSATION and WP:GNG. This person fails to satisfy notability. Her only claim to notability is being a participant of a sensationalist suicide incident. Mapagkailanman the drama biographical antology where the life of the subject has been featured has also featured the lives of several other private citizens. Hariboneagle927 ( talk) 12:04, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Delete agree with the nominator. Nickrds09 (Talk to me) 07:56, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm not sure what the notability guidelines for automobiles are, but I just can't find enough significant reliable coverage for this car: the best I could find are passing mentions or web forums. The company that made the car doesn't appear to have a Wikipedia article, so this can't be redirected. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 11:42, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete. under criterion WP:CSD#A7.Deleted by Anthony Bradbury (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:24, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Blatant self-advertising and promotion - may yet qualify for a speedy by A7. All sources are personal links and thus are not acceptable sources - the article could therefore fail to meet GNGs. GammaRadiator ( talk) 10:13, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
We can CSD under G5. GammaRadiator ( talk) 14:50, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as spam. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 11:13, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Fails to show importance (no sources) - page created by editor shows a blatant conflict of interest - look at page creator's name - could qualify for speedy by A7 (there was a A7/G11 tag, which was removed by the page creator). Has previously been speedied by A7 five times prior. GammaRadiator ( talk) 09:47, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy Delete WP:A7 and Salt. Exemplo347 ( talk) 10:35, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable actor fails to pass general notability guideline. GSS ( talk| c| em) 09:07, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
The article was tagged as maybe not meeting the notability for authors at the beginning of February but nothing has been added since to help prove his notability. I have found nothing myself. As it stands he fails WP:NAUTHOR. Domdeparis ( talk) 08:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) Rcsprinter123 (warn) 17:12, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Non notable organisation. Fails WP:NCORP Ajf773 ( talk) 09:04, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Delete both Christ Church Bal and Christ Church Tibber, no credible claims of significance. Bishonen | talk 03:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Makes no credible claim of significance for the church either as a building or as a religious community. DePRODed by author. TheDragonFire ( talk) 07:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following similar page by the same author ( Nehemiah Mattu):
TheDragonFire ( talk) 07:45, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) f eminist 11:02, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
No sources cited. Unknown Notability Alexf505 ( talk) 23:29, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:10, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:JOURNALIST, nothing in gnews. and only 2 articles link here. one of them, simply an alumni listing of a university she attended. LibStar ( talk) 06:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
WP:NOTDIC indiscriminate list, unsourced, as is, this is not useful for anything. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 05:41, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:08, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Indiscriminate unsourced list, this category of lists is not notable. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 05:12, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. The article currently avoids major
BLP concerns. Further, discussion
(in borderline cases) and/or revision deletion
(in outright violations); not deletion, is the way out, if they have occured in any version.Also, we don't delete random biographical articles simply per the wishes of the subject. (
non-admin closure)
Winged Blades
Godric
13:39, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:OTRS_noticeboard#Kola_Boof: Recreation of Kola Boof. Speedily deleted twice in 2007 with reason per BLP concerns from subject. Deletion was contested at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive20#Kola_Boof and the article remained deleted. As far as I could find, the subject objected against the content. Starting from nationality to every single aspect of the article. About 50 emails concerning legal threats. The current stub has the same problems, is unsourced and as such against WP:BLP. In its current form I think it should be deleted. I would like further feedback on what matter of course would be best, and would like to discuss the subject properly via a deletion discussion this time instead of a speedy deletion. - Sincerely, Taketa ( talk) 04:55, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:05, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable company with no significant coverage. SL93 ( talk) 04:56, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
This does not yet seem to exist, at least not in any medical journals or even regular reliable sources. Drmies ( talk) 04:34, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Latin American Xchange. ( non-admin closure) f eminist 11:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable wrestler, article is poorly written and poorly sourced. ThatGirlTayler ( talk) 03:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
This article seems to fail WP:SPORTSEVENT - no well-sourced prose to assert notability of this regular season game (emphasis added). The page primarily only consists of statistics, and does not give sourced information on significance or importance, like for example Heidi Game, Miracle at the Meadowlands, and 2012 Packers–Seahawks officiating controversy. A National Football League game merely played in blizzard conditions is not automatically notable because there have been several such matches played in December throughout the years. Zzyzx11 ( talk) 02:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. NeilN talk to me 13:49, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Recently launched TV channel. Unproven notability. Unreliable sources were used as references. XXN, 15:23, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. It appears WP:INHERIT and WP:PROMO also apply. John from Idegon ( talk) 12:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Bishonen | talk 23:27, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACADEMIC, WP:NPEOPLE and WP:GNG. Is an WP:AUTOBIO. Possibly consider deleting creator's userpage as it appears to be WP:FAKEARTICLE. DrStrauss talk 12:06, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: In response to the point above, please refer to the Works section and References list in the article in question for evidence demonstrating notable academic contributions through multiple published and reliable sources. Please also note that I edited the article in question and am not Christopher Clark. Status418 ( talk) 15:38, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Not huge evidence of notability, but I think it just makes it, and anyway the only possible alternative would be "no consensus", which would lead to the same end result. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 18:33, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
promotional article for very local organization. The Glamour and USA Today articles is just mention in a general article--Glamour 1 of 31, USAToday, 1 of 10. Huff Post is worthless for notability. That leaves only local sources for a local organization. DGG ( talk ) 04:54, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Wizardman 01:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Primary school with no indication of notability. Was successfully prodded back in 2015 see here, so can not be prodded again. Onel5969 TT me 02:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:17, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage for this musician. Fails WP:MUSIC. SL93 ( talk) 04:52, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Failed to meet WP:GNG. The article did not received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Richie Campbell ( talk) 12:42, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
The subject of this article fails WP:NTRACK. I don't think the SEC championship qualifies as a "competition at the highest level". Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 21:18, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Ultimate Warrior#Personal life. Sandstein 17:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Notability not inherited from her husband. Nikki♥ 311 22:19, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:15, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisting under AfD. The article relies on two self-published external links for sources, and there are no inline citations. It reads more like a résumé, and based on prior talk page interaction, there is potential conflict of interest here. As a BLP, it fails the 'verifiability' and 'no original research' core content policies. Wani ( talk) 00:36, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG, WP:BIO. Of all the sources given in the article, the only one that was unaffiliated, not behind a paywall, not a mention in passing, and not essentially commentary by him instead of about him is this one. A Google search turns up little else. Largoplazo ( talk) 00:16, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Agreed that deletion may make sense. Thedaytodaytomorrow ( talk) 15:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete . Materialscientist ( talk) 23:10, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that he played in the Israeli Premier League. This claim was based on an erroneous statement in the article, which said that he had played for Hapoel Ramat-Gan when he had actually played for Hakoah Ramat-Gan. Given that he has only ever played in the second divisions in Israel and Nigeria, this article does not meet WP:NSPORT Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)