![]() |
The result was delete. Nakon 02:06, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NMUSIC and the article generally lacks sufficient references. Chris Troutman ( talk) 23:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Merge. There were no calls to delete the article beyond the nominator and the consensus in this discussion supported a merger. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended ( talk) 01:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NFICT as it relies solely on references from the game's publisher, TSR. Chris Troutman ( talk) 23:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Merge. There were no calls for deletion beyond the nominator and the consensus of the discussion supported a merger to List of Greyhawk deities. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended ( talk) 01:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NFICT as it relies solely on works from the game's publisher, TSR. Chris Troutman ( talk) 23:34, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Speedy close as obvious hoax. czar 09:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Still unsourced article, subject fails WP:NSOFT. Chris Troutman ( talk) 23:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:07, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Not seeing sufficient coverage in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject (to pass WP:ORG). I had prodded it, but the article creator deprodded while packing it full of press releases. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Very few independent sources to verify notability. Most come from primary sources, i.e - YouTube WP:FAILN Kinda Stolen ( talk) 21:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Actor bio that pretty clearly fails WP:NACTOR. All roles so far have been guest roles, or two recent recurring roles. No mentions in the usual sources (e.g. Variety, EW, LA Times), and only the barest passing single mention in THR, so fails WP:GNG. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 20:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:10, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Not clear how this passes the WP:GNG Theroadislong ( talk) 20:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep for now: if you google "world swing dance council" you'll see that they apparently have developed some "point system" used for competitions that is cited/used by many, many dance sites/dance competition websites...I think this alone might make the council itself notable...but perhaps the content of its hall of fame should be merged into this article..?? 68.48.241.158 ( talk) 17:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
UTC)
The problem is that WSDC council caters to Swing dancing community, which is a very small pond, which tempests do not raise even to state level of noise, not no say national. All news and discussions are carried out in enthusiasts' websites and blogs (spanning the whole US of A, albeit in a very sparse net), which wikipedia do not qualify either as reliable or independent. I did spend yesterday a couple of hours hoping to rescue the article, but realized the futility. Major swing conventions gather thousands of dancers (and hundreds of competitors), but they don't hit the tabloids: nobody smokes pot, nobody hits 1,$$$,$$$ jackpot, nobody rapes teenagers... Exquisite dancers? Who cares. - üser:Altenmann >t 05:39, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Userfied to User:Rich Farmbrough/Frolic (cheese) Ricky81682 ( talk) 20:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
3 sources presented. One is in-depth coverage on a cheese-specialist site, but there's not enough to back it up. A scanty mention on the commercial site of its manufacturers and a passing mention in the NYT. I couldn't find more with Google searching. Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 19:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:10, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. I cannot find any coverage that would be considered in-depth or reliable. Article is currently without any references other than an external link to company website. CNMall41 ( talk) 19:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America 1000 17:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
One source, unlikely and promotional. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Notability and sources Fitindia ( talk) 19:30, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NALBUM. Unlike other UltraMix albums, this one didn't make it to any charts. CerealKillerYum ( talk) 03:55, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
A single event; Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Although there is of course coverage in the news media (more than are currently in the article—some have been removed), there is no indication that this will have any lasting effects making it an encyclopedic topic. It can easily be covered, and in fact is currently better covered, at 2016 Toronto Blue Jays season (see Blue Jays–Rangers brawl) and 2016 Texas Rangers season (expand "Blue Jays–Rangers brawl" to match). Yngvadottir ( talk) 18:29, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:13, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Female pro wrestler that fails to meet WP:GNG. Fight results and post-fight interviews are routine sports coverage and don't show notability. Mdtemp ( talk) 17:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 17:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN or WP:BIO. Randykitty ( talk) 17:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
This very small community has not been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources, as with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Djiboutian Americans and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Djiboutians in the United Kingdom. Cordless Larry ( talk) 17:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was closing this per no reason given for this AFD. With no deltion rastionale, editors do not know what might need to be addressed. Can be sent again to AFD as soon as a proper rational is given. Schmidt, Michael Q. 04:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Reason Changgogoi ( talk) 16:04, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 02:15, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Kleuske ( talk) 09:20, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Further sources showing the verificability of the article has been given and listed. The article should no long fail WP:GNG and should thus no longer be a subject for deletion. Any questions are welcome. ( User talk:Powerofvoice) 15:31, 17 April 2016 (WET)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:15, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Does not meet notability for organizations, as there is no evidence of significant coverage of the company in secondary sources. Delta13C ( talk) 14:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Bratz (2007 film). (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 23:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unreferenced since creation in 2014. Despite the claim that the album"garnered" critical acclaim, nothing to back up this (sole) claim to notability. TheLongTone ( talk) 14:29, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:16, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
As it is right now it has absolutely no encyclopedic value and is completely unsourced. I constantly see people add nonsense and fancruft to it. I've been trying to keep an eye on it but it's hard when not a single source exists to varify any of the information.
If a list of ever single Bratz doll should exist I feel it should be started over by someone who's going to do it correctly. *Treker ( talk) 14:25, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:16, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable actor lacking non-trivial support. reddogsix ( talk) 15:29, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:17, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) It had no meaningful hits in a custom Google search of reliable music sources. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar 14:43, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 07:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Administrative relisting for proper inclusion in AFD, no comment on article. Nakon 05:24, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
The very notion that this article should exist is extremely dubious. If the revision history is viewed, it is clear to see that the page was created by the subject of this article for self promotion. Much that has been provided is content that is either only possibly known by the subject himself, or is so inflated that only someone with extreme self interest in the subject would write. The subject is not notable enough to warrant a Wikipedia page. Barely any of the 30 under 30 Forbes Honorees have Wikipedia pages, as being chosen for 30 under 30 itself does not make you notable. With the multiple categories, the subject was not even featured. The claim that he was the youngest VC is made by an article that did not show proof as to him actually being the youngest, and is unless otherwise proven, an unsubstantiated claim. GeraldoAbbson ( talk) 03:13, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep as per unanimous positive consensus and no calls for deletion beyond the nominator. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended ( talk) 01:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Subject has been in or a session musician in multiple bands but fails WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 04:58, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:17, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Cannot find anything to establish notability of this book-or indeed the author. Article is unreferenced & almost all plot summary, not that that is relevant. TheLongTone ( talk) 13:40, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:18, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
No sourcing or evidence of notability — swpb T 13:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. joe decker talk 00:51, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
I can't find enough independent coverage. - Arts Rescuer • Talk me 13:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL WP:GNG NextGenSam619 t@lk 13:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NMODEL. The sources provided consist of a mere mention in runway commentary, a promotional blurb and the web page of a company she owns. All I could find in searches are social media mentions and a bare mention about being an investor in a large building project. Jbh Talk 13:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Notability - Arts Rescuer • Talk me 12:34, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete A11 by Iridescent (non-admin closure by FrameDrag ( talk) 20:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC))
Article about a non-notable programming algorithm whose name returns no Google hits. Passengerpigeon ( talk) 12:30, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 14:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Notability, Autobiography - Arts Rescuer • Talk me 12:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge/redirect to Butuan Polysports Complex. Somebody boldly redirected it, and frankly, I think that works. — C.Fred ( talk) 00:33, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable stadium, larger sports complex which it is a part of is also up for deletion. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 11:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close considering this has actually been redirected to that other article and said other article is also nearing Keep (which I may close later myself), thus this current article has nothing available to AfD nominate. SwisterTwister talk 19:24, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
A baseball park that is clearly not notable, the larger sports complex which it is in is also up for deletion. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 11:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete, criterion G7. — C.Fred ( talk) 03:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Not notable, a stadium that only holds 4,000 people. Larger sports complex that it's in is also up for deletion. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 11:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG. I could find no evidence of a significant contribution or population of Icelandics in Brazil LibStar ( talk) 11:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:AUTHOR. jps ( talk) 10:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Withdraw to Keep as I see nothing better happening here (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 19:16, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Simply a local theatre for which my searches have only found pieces of expected local coverage, I haven't found nothing anything noticeably better to suggest better improvements for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Withdraw to Keep as I see nothing else different happening here (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 19:13, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
I nearly PRODed this too since my searches found nothing at all aside from two links at Books, both not solid enough to actually improve this, see Books. There's simply nothing convincing for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:26, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable actor. Only notable for his minor role in Office Space. Natg 19 ( talk) 06:56, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus following relisting. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
This is also actually applicable for PROD material as the article is not easily pinning the necessary notability and my searches simply found nothing better than one apparent mention for being the production company. Nothing at all convincing to keep and improve. SwisterTwister talk 05:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. North America 1000 17:10, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Three different events, none showing any evidence of having any lasting influence. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:EVENT. Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. Randykitty ( talk) 09:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 19:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
The single reference is not enough to pass WP:GNG. The article was previously deprodded by Schwilgue and tagged for notability by Bradv. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 18:19, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The single reference is not enough to pass WP:GNGis a sad disregard of due diligence and should remind taggers that notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article. Mentioning that it was previously PRODed and de-PRODed, as well as previously tagged by another user with {{ notability}}, does that serve anything but to testify a tripling up on lazy WP:DRIVEBY-tagging? Sam Sailor Talk! 07:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails
WP:NSONG. Should be merged deleted. If desired, the namespace could be redirected to the album
Useless Trinkets: B-Sides, Soundtracks, Rarities and Unreleased 1996–2006 or
Eels (band).
Binksternet (
talk)
04:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Closing this as keep because the nominator withdrew their nomination and general consensus was to keep with only one objection (I'm excluding one contribution due to WP:JUSTAVOTE). (non-admin closure) st170e talk 21:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Proposing WP:TNT. It may have some connection with this 2016 Bengali movie. but I feel the article needs to be rewritten. Tito Dutta ( talk) 18:34, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Hindu temple that is claimed to be "famous", but for which I found no evidence of notability in English. A Google search returns little except for Wikipedia mirrors for this article and for Manithara Sree Panorkavu Bhagavathy Temple, which is an older article on a different temple, which shares many of the same sourcing problems. Maybe there are better sources in Malayalam? -- Finngall talk 23:41, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 14:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
I don't think the sources cover the subject into enough depth. Delete. Mr. Guye ( talk) 02:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable actress with a series of minor roles. Fails WP:NACTOR. Lack of significant coverage by reliable sources. Niteshift36 ( talk) 00:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawing as Keep and I'm willing to add the reviews myself, likely later tonight (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 18:58, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Unfortunately this is still questionable at best and it's likely because it's from the pre-Internet boom so any sources are likely both archive and also Japanese. I have searched including with the Japanese-listed name Militia but I found nothing; the Japanese Wiki has extra information but nothing else convincing to help improve this (at least, from what I comprehend). The best my searches basically found was only this 2007 review. SwisterTwister talk 04:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
With this being still questionable for WP:CORP and WP:GNG, I nearly PRODed, my searches have found nothing better at all and there's simply nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister talk 04:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep. non-admin closure st170e talk 15:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
With the Japanese Wiki containing extra information but no actual other sources aside from 2 listed, my searches also found nothing better than this passing mention. IMDb also lists nothing else convincingly better. SwisterTwister talk 04:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 15:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
The article has nothing convincing for the applicable solid independent notability and its improvements, my searches have simply found nothing better at all. SwisterTwister talk 04:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Nothing at all convincing for the applicable notability and my searches found several links Books, News and Highbeam so far but there's nothing noticeably better. SwisterTwister talk 04:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
PROD removed. Not a notable actor per WP:NACTOR - only one significant role. Not a notable person per WP:GNG - no significant coverage beyond mere trivial mention in reliable sources. One popularity award nom, didn't win. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 04:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 16:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
I do not believe this article meets Notability standards. The article overall reads like an ad for the website. As well, I noticed someone in the article, User:Paulgovan, wrote up the article, which is a clear conflict of interest. GamerPro64 03:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Gordon Graydon Memorial Secondary School. Nakon 02:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Two PRODs both removed, Jbunley and my own, despite the article being questionable and both of our PROds explicitly explaining this. There's nothing at all convincing for basic notability. SwisterTwister talk 02:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails both PORNBIO and the GNG. Was previously nominated for deletion with a no consensus before PORNBIO became more restrictive. Wikiuser20102011 ( talk) 01:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable student conference, under constant promotional pressure from students involved in it. See article history and Talk page. Jytdog ( talk) 10:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Notable student conference, the oldest and largest of its kind in Canada. Has hosted a number of important keynote speakers (Dambisa Moyo, Stephen Lewis, David Frum) and received widespread media coverage in 2015 for hosting Edward Snowden and Glenn Greenwald as keynote speakers. See the sources provided on the page or Google it for more. NB – I am not involved with this conference.
RogerSheaffe
10:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete. This event fails WP:GNG. There's simply not enough coverage to show notability. What little coverage there is is centred around Edward Snowden, not around the conference itself. T.C.Haliburton talk nerdy to me 18:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) It had no meaningful hits in a custom Google search of reliable music sources. The label's founder didn't meet the notability guidelines either, so there are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar 13:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I'm closing this discussion because there is no clear consensus and there has not been any further involvement from other editors, even after being relisted twice. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 15:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable song from a non-notable album that lacks significant coverage in reliable sources — JJMC89 ( T· C) 14:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label. ... Any of the following factors suggest that a song or single may be notable, though a standalone article should still satisfy the aforementioned criteria.
1. Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts.
The result was keep. Consensus is that she is notable independently. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 05:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Subject does not appear to have been the subject of multiple non-trivial independent secondary sources. Current references are non-existent, one external link points to IMDb which is not independent. Has won no awards nor had any staring role in a major motion picture. Google search turns up IMDb, Spokeo, Facebook, Amazon, Pintrest, Barnes & Noble, etc. Being descended from Charlie Chaplin does not by itself confer notability (per WP:NOTINHERITED). KDS4444 ( talk) 16:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
I came to her page to see the actress Josephine Chaplin, so this must be Wikipedia perfoming the function it was meant to in providing information. The fact that she was actually in films that exist is a source of proof. I have seen the Jack The Ripper dvd with her on the front cover so at least there she had a notable role. Middle More Rider ( talk) 07:32, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Yes keep for me. If I can go into a retail store and buy this http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/414J3M771YL._SY445_.jpg what on earth has Charlie Chaplin got to do with it? I think it's rude to keep refering to people with the Chaplin surname as some sort of appendage to Charlie Chaplin and not just the person that they are. Middle More Rider ( talk) 00:13, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Quick reality check: WP:NACTOR states that in order to qualify under those criteria the person needs to have had significant roles [plural] in multiple notable films, etc. [also plural]. Having had a single significant role in a single "Pasolini film" whose name is not mentioned does not qualify a person as notable; being billed in other notable films does not qualify a person as notable; thinking it is rude to refer to a Chaplin as some sort of appendage is not an argument for notability; being credited with 26 different roles in movies and television does not qualify a person as notable; being able to go into a retail store and see a DVD with her on the cover is not evidence of notability. Everyone, please, for God's sake, read Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions and then come back here and have another look at your arguments to Keep this article. The ONLY one that holds any water is the one claiming to have added new sources. KDS4444 ( talk) 13:12, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Based on the writings of Geoffrey Chaucer, The Canterbury Tales (1971) was shot in England with an Italo-British cast. ... There were featured roles for Laura Betti and Franco Citti, and Hugh Griffith, Josephine Chaplin, Michael Balfour and ...
The only film from Franju's television period to receive any sort of foreign distribution was L'Homme sans Visage (1974), starring Jacques Champreux, Gayle Hunnicutt, Gert Frobe and Josephine Chaplin, a Fantomas-like thriller about a ...
... Après Maria Pacôme, il avait épousé Joséphine Chaplin, dont il avait eu un fils, Julien, le 16 octobre 1980. ...
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 14:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
References currently consist of a link to the subject's personal website and a link to IMDb which is not an independent source. Article requires multiple non-trivial independent references to justify retaining it. Subject appears to fail the notability guidelines. Notability is not inherited (per WP:NOTINHERITED). KDS4444 ( talk) 16:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. North America 1000 00:54, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP1E. Known only for being involved in the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior, and all content is about this. Should be covered there, if at all. Sandstein 20:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There is no clear consensus after being re-listed twice. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 21:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP1E. Known only for being involved in the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior, and all content is about this. Should be covered there, if at all. Sandstein 20:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There is no clear consensus, even after being relisted twice (where it failed to gain anymore discussion). I'm also disregarding one contribution because of WP:NOTAVOTE. I don't believe a third re-list would give this debate a clearer consensus so I'm therefore closing it. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 21:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP1E. Known only for being involved in the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior, and all content is about this. Should be covered there, if at all. Sandstein 20:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. This debate was re-listed twice and failed to gain anymore discussion after the second re-list - no consensus. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 21:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
WP:BIO1E. Known only for being involved in the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior, and all content is about this. Should be covered there, if at all. Sandstein 20:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 05:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP1E. Known only for being involved in the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior, and all content is about this. Should be covered there, if at all. Sandstein 20:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty ( talk) 22:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
It is indexed in the DOAJ which (since March 2014) is highly selective. Boocan ( talk) 07:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Sorry to say this but the statement libraries will add OA journals to their "holdings" very easily, as it doesn't cost them anything indicates that you are not really familiar with what you are talking about. There is not one library on the world that adds an OA journal to its holdings, because no one has to. Since an OA journal is "open access", you'll find it on the internet everywhere, so there is no need of a library to store it, whatsoever. Boocan ( talk) 14:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Nakon 02:06, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NMUSIC and the article generally lacks sufficient references. Chris Troutman ( talk) 23:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Merge. There were no calls to delete the article beyond the nominator and the consensus in this discussion supported a merger. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended ( talk) 01:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NFICT as it relies solely on references from the game's publisher, TSR. Chris Troutman ( talk) 23:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Merge. There were no calls for deletion beyond the nominator and the consensus of the discussion supported a merger to List of Greyhawk deities. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended ( talk) 01:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NFICT as it relies solely on works from the game's publisher, TSR. Chris Troutman ( talk) 23:34, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Speedy close as obvious hoax. czar 09:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Still unsourced article, subject fails WP:NSOFT. Chris Troutman ( talk) 23:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:07, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Not seeing sufficient coverage in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject (to pass WP:ORG). I had prodded it, but the article creator deprodded while packing it full of press releases. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Very few independent sources to verify notability. Most come from primary sources, i.e - YouTube WP:FAILN Kinda Stolen ( talk) 21:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Actor bio that pretty clearly fails WP:NACTOR. All roles so far have been guest roles, or two recent recurring roles. No mentions in the usual sources (e.g. Variety, EW, LA Times), and only the barest passing single mention in THR, so fails WP:GNG. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 20:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:10, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Not clear how this passes the WP:GNG Theroadislong ( talk) 20:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep for now: if you google "world swing dance council" you'll see that they apparently have developed some "point system" used for competitions that is cited/used by many, many dance sites/dance competition websites...I think this alone might make the council itself notable...but perhaps the content of its hall of fame should be merged into this article..?? 68.48.241.158 ( talk) 17:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
UTC)
The problem is that WSDC council caters to Swing dancing community, which is a very small pond, which tempests do not raise even to state level of noise, not no say national. All news and discussions are carried out in enthusiasts' websites and blogs (spanning the whole US of A, albeit in a very sparse net), which wikipedia do not qualify either as reliable or independent. I did spend yesterday a couple of hours hoping to rescue the article, but realized the futility. Major swing conventions gather thousands of dancers (and hundreds of competitors), but they don't hit the tabloids: nobody smokes pot, nobody hits 1,$$$,$$$ jackpot, nobody rapes teenagers... Exquisite dancers? Who cares. - üser:Altenmann >t 05:39, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Userfied to User:Rich Farmbrough/Frolic (cheese) Ricky81682 ( talk) 20:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
3 sources presented. One is in-depth coverage on a cheese-specialist site, but there's not enough to back it up. A scanty mention on the commercial site of its manufacturers and a passing mention in the NYT. I couldn't find more with Google searching. Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 19:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:10, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. I cannot find any coverage that would be considered in-depth or reliable. Article is currently without any references other than an external link to company website. CNMall41 ( talk) 19:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America 1000 17:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
One source, unlikely and promotional. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Notability and sources Fitindia ( talk) 19:30, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NALBUM. Unlike other UltraMix albums, this one didn't make it to any charts. CerealKillerYum ( talk) 03:55, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
A single event; Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Although there is of course coverage in the news media (more than are currently in the article—some have been removed), there is no indication that this will have any lasting effects making it an encyclopedic topic. It can easily be covered, and in fact is currently better covered, at 2016 Toronto Blue Jays season (see Blue Jays–Rangers brawl) and 2016 Texas Rangers season (expand "Blue Jays–Rangers brawl" to match). Yngvadottir ( talk) 18:29, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:13, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Female pro wrestler that fails to meet WP:GNG. Fight results and post-fight interviews are routine sports coverage and don't show notability. Mdtemp ( talk) 17:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 17:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN or WP:BIO. Randykitty ( talk) 17:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
This very small community has not been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources, as with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Djiboutian Americans and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Djiboutians in the United Kingdom. Cordless Larry ( talk) 17:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was closing this per no reason given for this AFD. With no deltion rastionale, editors do not know what might need to be addressed. Can be sent again to AFD as soon as a proper rational is given. Schmidt, Michael Q. 04:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Reason Changgogoi ( talk) 16:04, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 02:15, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Kleuske ( talk) 09:20, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Further sources showing the verificability of the article has been given and listed. The article should no long fail WP:GNG and should thus no longer be a subject for deletion. Any questions are welcome. ( User talk:Powerofvoice) 15:31, 17 April 2016 (WET)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:15, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Does not meet notability for organizations, as there is no evidence of significant coverage of the company in secondary sources. Delta13C ( talk) 14:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Bratz (2007 film). (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 23:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unreferenced since creation in 2014. Despite the claim that the album"garnered" critical acclaim, nothing to back up this (sole) claim to notability. TheLongTone ( talk) 14:29, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:16, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
As it is right now it has absolutely no encyclopedic value and is completely unsourced. I constantly see people add nonsense and fancruft to it. I've been trying to keep an eye on it but it's hard when not a single source exists to varify any of the information.
If a list of ever single Bratz doll should exist I feel it should be started over by someone who's going to do it correctly. *Treker ( talk) 14:25, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:16, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable actor lacking non-trivial support. reddogsix ( talk) 15:29, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:17, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) It had no meaningful hits in a custom Google search of reliable music sources. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar 14:43, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 07:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Administrative relisting for proper inclusion in AFD, no comment on article. Nakon 05:24, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
The very notion that this article should exist is extremely dubious. If the revision history is viewed, it is clear to see that the page was created by the subject of this article for self promotion. Much that has been provided is content that is either only possibly known by the subject himself, or is so inflated that only someone with extreme self interest in the subject would write. The subject is not notable enough to warrant a Wikipedia page. Barely any of the 30 under 30 Forbes Honorees have Wikipedia pages, as being chosen for 30 under 30 itself does not make you notable. With the multiple categories, the subject was not even featured. The claim that he was the youngest VC is made by an article that did not show proof as to him actually being the youngest, and is unless otherwise proven, an unsubstantiated claim. GeraldoAbbson ( talk) 03:13, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep as per unanimous positive consensus and no calls for deletion beyond the nominator. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended ( talk) 01:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Subject has been in or a session musician in multiple bands but fails WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 04:58, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:17, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Cannot find anything to establish notability of this book-or indeed the author. Article is unreferenced & almost all plot summary, not that that is relevant. TheLongTone ( talk) 13:40, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:18, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
No sourcing or evidence of notability — swpb T 13:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. joe decker talk 00:51, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
I can't find enough independent coverage. - Arts Rescuer • Talk me 13:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL WP:GNG NextGenSam619 t@lk 13:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NMODEL. The sources provided consist of a mere mention in runway commentary, a promotional blurb and the web page of a company she owns. All I could find in searches are social media mentions and a bare mention about being an investor in a large building project. Jbh Talk 13:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Notability - Arts Rescuer • Talk me 12:34, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete A11 by Iridescent (non-admin closure by FrameDrag ( talk) 20:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC))
Article about a non-notable programming algorithm whose name returns no Google hits. Passengerpigeon ( talk) 12:30, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 14:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Notability, Autobiography - Arts Rescuer • Talk me 12:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge/redirect to Butuan Polysports Complex. Somebody boldly redirected it, and frankly, I think that works. — C.Fred ( talk) 00:33, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable stadium, larger sports complex which it is a part of is also up for deletion. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 11:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close considering this has actually been redirected to that other article and said other article is also nearing Keep (which I may close later myself), thus this current article has nothing available to AfD nominate. SwisterTwister talk 19:24, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
A baseball park that is clearly not notable, the larger sports complex which it is in is also up for deletion. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 11:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete, criterion G7. — C.Fred ( talk) 03:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Not notable, a stadium that only holds 4,000 people. Larger sports complex that it's in is also up for deletion. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 11:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG. I could find no evidence of a significant contribution or population of Icelandics in Brazil LibStar ( talk) 11:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:AUTHOR. jps ( talk) 10:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Withdraw to Keep as I see nothing better happening here (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 19:16, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Simply a local theatre for which my searches have only found pieces of expected local coverage, I haven't found nothing anything noticeably better to suggest better improvements for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Withdraw to Keep as I see nothing else different happening here (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 19:13, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
I nearly PRODed this too since my searches found nothing at all aside from two links at Books, both not solid enough to actually improve this, see Books. There's simply nothing convincing for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:26, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable actor. Only notable for his minor role in Office Space. Natg 19 ( talk) 06:56, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus following relisting. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
This is also actually applicable for PROD material as the article is not easily pinning the necessary notability and my searches simply found nothing better than one apparent mention for being the production company. Nothing at all convincing to keep and improve. SwisterTwister talk 05:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. North America 1000 17:10, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Three different events, none showing any evidence of having any lasting influence. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:EVENT. Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. Randykitty ( talk) 09:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 19:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
The single reference is not enough to pass WP:GNG. The article was previously deprodded by Schwilgue and tagged for notability by Bradv. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 18:19, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The single reference is not enough to pass WP:GNGis a sad disregard of due diligence and should remind taggers that notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article. Mentioning that it was previously PRODed and de-PRODed, as well as previously tagged by another user with {{ notability}}, does that serve anything but to testify a tripling up on lazy WP:DRIVEBY-tagging? Sam Sailor Talk! 07:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails
WP:NSONG. Should be merged deleted. If desired, the namespace could be redirected to the album
Useless Trinkets: B-Sides, Soundtracks, Rarities and Unreleased 1996–2006 or
Eels (band).
Binksternet (
talk)
04:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Closing this as keep because the nominator withdrew their nomination and general consensus was to keep with only one objection (I'm excluding one contribution due to WP:JUSTAVOTE). (non-admin closure) st170e talk 21:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Proposing WP:TNT. It may have some connection with this 2016 Bengali movie. but I feel the article needs to be rewritten. Tito Dutta ( talk) 18:34, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Hindu temple that is claimed to be "famous", but for which I found no evidence of notability in English. A Google search returns little except for Wikipedia mirrors for this article and for Manithara Sree Panorkavu Bhagavathy Temple, which is an older article on a different temple, which shares many of the same sourcing problems. Maybe there are better sources in Malayalam? -- Finngall talk 23:41, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 14:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
I don't think the sources cover the subject into enough depth. Delete. Mr. Guye ( talk) 02:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable actress with a series of minor roles. Fails WP:NACTOR. Lack of significant coverage by reliable sources. Niteshift36 ( talk) 00:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawing as Keep and I'm willing to add the reviews myself, likely later tonight (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 18:58, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Unfortunately this is still questionable at best and it's likely because it's from the pre-Internet boom so any sources are likely both archive and also Japanese. I have searched including with the Japanese-listed name Militia but I found nothing; the Japanese Wiki has extra information but nothing else convincing to help improve this (at least, from what I comprehend). The best my searches basically found was only this 2007 review. SwisterTwister talk 04:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
With this being still questionable for WP:CORP and WP:GNG, I nearly PRODed, my searches have found nothing better at all and there's simply nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister talk 04:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep. non-admin closure st170e talk 15:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
With the Japanese Wiki containing extra information but no actual other sources aside from 2 listed, my searches also found nothing better than this passing mention. IMDb also lists nothing else convincingly better. SwisterTwister talk 04:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 15:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
The article has nothing convincing for the applicable solid independent notability and its improvements, my searches have simply found nothing better at all. SwisterTwister talk 04:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Nothing at all convincing for the applicable notability and my searches found several links Books, News and Highbeam so far but there's nothing noticeably better. SwisterTwister talk 04:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
PROD removed. Not a notable actor per WP:NACTOR - only one significant role. Not a notable person per WP:GNG - no significant coverage beyond mere trivial mention in reliable sources. One popularity award nom, didn't win. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 04:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 16:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
I do not believe this article meets Notability standards. The article overall reads like an ad for the website. As well, I noticed someone in the article, User:Paulgovan, wrote up the article, which is a clear conflict of interest. GamerPro64 03:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Gordon Graydon Memorial Secondary School. Nakon 02:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Two PRODs both removed, Jbunley and my own, despite the article being questionable and both of our PROds explicitly explaining this. There's nothing at all convincing for basic notability. SwisterTwister talk 02:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Fails both PORNBIO and the GNG. Was previously nominated for deletion with a no consensus before PORNBIO became more restrictive. Wikiuser20102011 ( talk) 01:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable student conference, under constant promotional pressure from students involved in it. See article history and Talk page. Jytdog ( talk) 10:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Notable student conference, the oldest and largest of its kind in Canada. Has hosted a number of important keynote speakers (Dambisa Moyo, Stephen Lewis, David Frum) and received widespread media coverage in 2015 for hosting Edward Snowden and Glenn Greenwald as keynote speakers. See the sources provided on the page or Google it for more. NB – I am not involved with this conference.
RogerSheaffe
10:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete. This event fails WP:GNG. There's simply not enough coverage to show notability. What little coverage there is is centred around Edward Snowden, not around the conference itself. T.C.Haliburton talk nerdy to me 18:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) It had no meaningful hits in a custom Google search of reliable music sources. The label's founder didn't meet the notability guidelines either, so there are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar 13:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I'm closing this discussion because there is no clear consensus and there has not been any further involvement from other editors, even after being relisted twice. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 15:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable song from a non-notable album that lacks significant coverage in reliable sources — JJMC89 ( T· C) 14:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label. ... Any of the following factors suggest that a song or single may be notable, though a standalone article should still satisfy the aforementioned criteria.
1. Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts.
The result was keep. Consensus is that she is notable independently. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 05:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Subject does not appear to have been the subject of multiple non-trivial independent secondary sources. Current references are non-existent, one external link points to IMDb which is not independent. Has won no awards nor had any staring role in a major motion picture. Google search turns up IMDb, Spokeo, Facebook, Amazon, Pintrest, Barnes & Noble, etc. Being descended from Charlie Chaplin does not by itself confer notability (per WP:NOTINHERITED). KDS4444 ( talk) 16:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
I came to her page to see the actress Josephine Chaplin, so this must be Wikipedia perfoming the function it was meant to in providing information. The fact that she was actually in films that exist is a source of proof. I have seen the Jack The Ripper dvd with her on the front cover so at least there she had a notable role. Middle More Rider ( talk) 07:32, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Yes keep for me. If I can go into a retail store and buy this http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/414J3M771YL._SY445_.jpg what on earth has Charlie Chaplin got to do with it? I think it's rude to keep refering to people with the Chaplin surname as some sort of appendage to Charlie Chaplin and not just the person that they are. Middle More Rider ( talk) 00:13, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Quick reality check: WP:NACTOR states that in order to qualify under those criteria the person needs to have had significant roles [plural] in multiple notable films, etc. [also plural]. Having had a single significant role in a single "Pasolini film" whose name is not mentioned does not qualify a person as notable; being billed in other notable films does not qualify a person as notable; thinking it is rude to refer to a Chaplin as some sort of appendage is not an argument for notability; being credited with 26 different roles in movies and television does not qualify a person as notable; being able to go into a retail store and see a DVD with her on the cover is not evidence of notability. Everyone, please, for God's sake, read Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions and then come back here and have another look at your arguments to Keep this article. The ONLY one that holds any water is the one claiming to have added new sources. KDS4444 ( talk) 13:12, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Based on the writings of Geoffrey Chaucer, The Canterbury Tales (1971) was shot in England with an Italo-British cast. ... There were featured roles for Laura Betti and Franco Citti, and Hugh Griffith, Josephine Chaplin, Michael Balfour and ...
The only film from Franju's television period to receive any sort of foreign distribution was L'Homme sans Visage (1974), starring Jacques Champreux, Gayle Hunnicutt, Gert Frobe and Josephine Chaplin, a Fantomas-like thriller about a ...
... Après Maria Pacôme, il avait épousé Joséphine Chaplin, dont il avait eu un fils, Julien, le 16 octobre 1980. ...
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 14:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
References currently consist of a link to the subject's personal website and a link to IMDb which is not an independent source. Article requires multiple non-trivial independent references to justify retaining it. Subject appears to fail the notability guidelines. Notability is not inherited (per WP:NOTINHERITED). KDS4444 ( talk) 16:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. North America 1000 00:54, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP1E. Known only for being involved in the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior, and all content is about this. Should be covered there, if at all. Sandstein 20:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There is no clear consensus after being re-listed twice. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 21:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP1E. Known only for being involved in the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior, and all content is about this. Should be covered there, if at all. Sandstein 20:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There is no clear consensus, even after being relisted twice (where it failed to gain anymore discussion). I'm also disregarding one contribution because of WP:NOTAVOTE. I don't believe a third re-list would give this debate a clearer consensus so I'm therefore closing it. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 21:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP1E. Known only for being involved in the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior, and all content is about this. Should be covered there, if at all. Sandstein 20:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. This debate was re-listed twice and failed to gain anymore discussion after the second re-list - no consensus. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 21:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
WP:BIO1E. Known only for being involved in the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior, and all content is about this. Should be covered there, if at all. Sandstein 20:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 05:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP1E. Known only for being involved in the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior, and all content is about this. Should be covered there, if at all. Sandstein 20:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 02:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty ( talk) 22:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
It is indexed in the DOAJ which (since March 2014) is highly selective. Boocan ( talk) 07:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Sorry to say this but the statement libraries will add OA journals to their "holdings" very easily, as it doesn't cost them anything indicates that you are not really familiar with what you are talking about. There is not one library on the world that adds an OA journal to its holdings, because no one has to. Since an OA journal is "open access", you'll find it on the internet everywhere, so there is no need of a library to store it, whatsoever. Boocan ( talk) 14:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC)