The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
An autobiography that is not verifiable, of an aspirant politician who is not notable yet.I did not find any references reliable references other than local tabloids. Probably borderline A7, but as it is around already for a while, it is maybe better to discuss it. User:Elianamwiha ( talk)
The result was Procedural Close. Article speedy deleted. ( non-admin closure) ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 00:22, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
A search for her comes up with nothing. Fails WP:GNG. Also a potential hoax, I couldn't find anything discussing her as a neuroscientist. Also, the infobox calls her a rapper, when the article calls her a neuroscientist.... no idea what's going on there. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 23:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Could have been WP:PROD instead, but this will do I guess. Yamamoto Ichiro ( talk) 01:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. A search shows there to be no coverage of him in reliable sources. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 22:59, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 00:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Reliable sources could not be found on this subject to merit a standalone article. A redirect or merge to Lagos State University should be an option. — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 22:47, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Speedy keep Thanks for noticing that oluwa2chainz. Notable sources has been added now and non notable ones removed. This include some of Nigerians most circulating newspapers. The AfD you tagged was unnecessary just a ping to add more sources would have made it look the way it appears now. And as for notability I'm surprised you brought this up everyone in Lagos have heard LASUCOM. Mahveotm ( talk) 23:18, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Weak Keep. Per these additional sources : LASUCOM Students protest prolong programme, Recurrent Capital estimates on Lagos State Government and Lasu medical students protest non accreditation programmes. The article might need more information, reliable sources and editing to merit a stand alone article. If not found to be notable, then it should be merged to Lagos State University. Eruditescholar ( talk) 02:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro ( talk) 01:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Public Enemy Number Two doesn't appear to be a notable enough book as to merit a separate list. Clarityfiend ( talk) 22:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). Regards— ~ THE INFI NITE SPACE X 08:57, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No references. Regards— ~ THE INFI NITE SPACE X 22:07, 01 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. Regards— ~ THE INFI NITE SPACE X 08:34, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable actor. Has only been in B-list movies, and not as the main star. Could not find any sources on him. Natg 19 ( talk) 22:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:40, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable actor. Has only played bit roles. Natg 19 ( talk) 22:12, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:55, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable actor. Could not find reliable sources about him. Natg 19 ( talk) 22:05, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:23, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable actor. Natg 19 ( talk) 21:49, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Sikkim Gold Cup. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
The notability of these articles has been discussed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football in this current discussion at which editors agreed these season articles are not notable for a minor regional tournament. Qed237 (talk) 21:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages because they are all season articles for this tournament and recently created by same editor:
Qed237 (talk) 21:48, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. A redirect to Bomb disposal can be created at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to have significant coverage in reliable sources. Ratings and download totals from app stores aren't reliable indicators of notability. The app has good reviews from OneClickMac and Mac.AppStorm, but neither of those sites appears to be a reliable source. IagoQnsi ( talk) 20:30, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Three issues here:
Notability. First and foremost, the article meets WP:ORG per Forbes India, the Business Standard, and The Economic Times.
Paid editing. It's likely that the page creator is in violation of our paid editing policies. If the article is notable. though, we should still keep it.
Reliability of the sources. I respectfully disagree with User:SwisterTwister that "we cannot confide in India's publications, even if known and major, to not publish company advertising." It's not for us as Wikipedia editors to make that call. Our standard is verifiability, not truth, and so we should rely on the sources above even if we suspect they are advertising. Cerebellum ( talk) 01:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Purely promotional work by paid editor. Sourced to blogs and procedural coverage. Editing patterns consistent with paid PR editing, especially awards [1] [2] [3] and acquisitions [4] infodumps.
WP:OWNer Snkay9 accidentally revealed himself to be a paid PR editor in this edit where he attempted to link a Word document called "Revised Quick Heal Wikipedia Page.doc" by linking it from his Outlook inbox. -Jergling PC Load Letter 20:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
– A google search shows, Quick Heal was covered by forbes way back in 2012 [1]. This puts up a good case of showing its repute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.223.154.169 ( talk) 00:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Apart from the sources, Quick Heal is a well known provider of products and solutions in the Security software industry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Droopdead ( talk • contribs) 20:15, December 6, 2016 (UTC)
Again, Quick Heal is definitely a notable company
Comment The discussion is absolutely outrageous. To say that news sources from Indian publications is not trustworthy is autocratic and baseless. India has the largest number of publications int he world and TOI is the read english newspaper in the world. Yes. I do believe that the onus is on the guys to proove that Quick Heal is not notable company after giving references from multiple 'Known' Indian publications. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Droopdead ( talk • contribs) 14:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Have just tried to improve this article, renewed the ref needed banner, added ref needed tags, but have to wonder if this is an article that really meets WP:NOTABILITY and WP:BLP standards. Other than self-published sources and what appear to be totally unreliable sources per Wikipedia requirements for BLPs, I don't think this article is really appropriate on its own. Perhaps it could be merged into an article on the one co-authored best-seller itself? I don't necessarily want to see it nuked, but ... I just don't see how it can be redeemed. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 23:15, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:33, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Miller's only claim to fame is being Miss Kansas USA. This is not enough to establish notability. A search on google for additional sources only seems to bring up her Linkedin page, not a reliable indepdent source, that shows she has been working as an obtometry store manager. The previous discussion that resulted in keep was flawed on many levels. First off, someone claimed we have two international sources. One is literally a caption from a picture of her with 9 other teenagers who were finalists in Miss Teen USA. The other is not working, but appears to be another caption, probably with others. Neither is substantial coverage. The substantial coverage is either feel good stories from her college newspaper, not the stuff of reliable GNG passing, or local coverage related to her beauty pageant activities, not enough to establish permanent notability. Also, the first discussion had some attacking the deltion nomination because it tried to use the model guidelines. There was a discussion back in August on weather to make a formal set of notability guidelines for beauty pageant contestants. It closed with a statement that such should be attempted and then brought back to RfC. However the general majority opinion was that state beauty pageant winners are not default notable. There is nothing suggesting that Miller is notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 20:15, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Actor who has only appeared in a few short films. Doesn't appear to meet WP:NOTE. Justeditingtoday ( talk) 18:42, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 13:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Please read WP:LISTN; I can't see any evidence that this topic meets the notability criteria required for a stand-alone list. I am aware that other similar lists exist, however, this doesn't mean that they are considered to be notable. A lot of Albanian footballers are born in modern-day Kosovo but, again, is this worthy of an article? Spiderone 17:49, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable film. No indications of any coverage for this short film. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 11:57, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear (near unanimous) consensus to delete due to insufficient sources to meet our various notability criteria. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
This article has been around for ten years without anybody adding any real evidence of notability. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 15:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Business Growth Fund. Cerebellum ( talk) 01:29, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Apart from some brief churnalistic coverage when this investment fund was launched [33] [34] [35] I'm unable to find any substantial coverage. I've checked the full version of the Times article (which is also the only mainstream source) and it is only 200 words long. Coverage since then is extremely brief, only mentioning who they have invested in. Unless I'm missing sources, WP:CORP is not met as present. (As an aside, the parent company Business Growth Fund might well be notable e.g. [36].) SmartSE ( talk) 18:30, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
— 2A02:C7D:499:4200:A52B:158B:49FE:F35 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
*Keep valid company with significant UK media coverage as noted in the links.
Misterpottery (
talk)
12:27, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. AfD heavily affected by socking and by low partecipation, no non-sock comments in over a month, WP:NPASR close. ( non-admin closure) Cavarrone 08:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Article with multiple issues. This article looks like an unconstructive article which is not yet to be on main space by the way source listed may not be reliable.
Music Boy50 (
talk) 15:10, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Blocked sock.
MER-C
04:42, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails on so many levels, scandal mongering, hearsay, on the level of fleeting news. Looks like gossip about some nobody to me. Or it could be a hoax. Libel is a concern too. Even if the refs are legit, who cares? Internet scandals and memes don't strike me as encyclopedia material, admittedly there could be exceptions Speedy delete The sources are pathetic and without distinction, not to be trusted. The lack of expansion possibilities is manifestly obvious in the content that is present, the articles existing informational parameters seem to preclude any hope of improvement, in my opinion. The subject matter isn't worth a spot on the bathroom wall. This article should be gone before I press "save."-- J. M. Pearson ( talk) 20:05, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
As a way of encouraging new Nigerian editors to remain on Wikipedia and the recent cleanup done to the article, I am changing from "strong delete" to neutral. Would have voted "weak keep", but I don't want to be one of the editors that will make this article remain on Wikipedia. Darreg ( talk) 10:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America 1000 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Lack of significant coverage by reliable third party sources. Mentions and primary sources don't make notability. Niteshift36 ( talk) 15:42, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- fails WP:CORP as there are no reliable secondary sources cited in the article. - Only refers to self published sources, own website, reeks of promotion has also been tagged but issues haven't ben addressed since 2013. ronaz Talk! 10:58, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Rocket Science Games#List of games made by Rocket Science. ( non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 00:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NVG. This article was previously redirected to Rocket Science Games#List of games made by Rocket Science by Czar, but then the creator undid the redirection. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 15:46, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to OpenBSD. MBisanz talk 13:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable initiative that never went anywhere and isn't even used by its parent project after ten years. Talk page discussion notes lack of good third-party sources, even at the time the project was launched. Even the project press page features mostly mentions on the OpenBSD news site and not anything third-party, let alone mainstream. The redirect was turned back into an article on the basis of existence, completely ignoring notability considerations (it has no independent notability). Suggest delete or redirect to OpenBSD (nailing the redirect in place). David Gerard ( talk) 19:19, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. It may be that the article would have been deleted for lack of notability anyway, but as it is the article was an unambiguous copyright infringement, and also unambiguously promotional, so it has been deleted already. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 20:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Written like an autobiography, not truly notable subject. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 18:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete as a copyright infringement. The article is a straight translation into Mongolian of the web page https://www.hackingloops.com/cowpatty/ (It is pretty well certain that the article would eventually have been deleted anyway, even without the copyright problem.) The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 20:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
This is a how to article to hack WIFI networks contrary to WP:NOTHOWTO Domdeparis ( talk) 18:23, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 22:48, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Appear to be a non notable band with just two single releases as anime tie-ins. As each member has a list of other credits, it seems safe to say they just worked together for a couple of songs. Even their web page only lists the two releases. [44] French and Japanese wiki pages are both identical in content to this one so no new information is apparent. SephyTheThird ( talk) 17:10, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was Closed as SNOW KEEP this disruptive, unwarranted and disrespectful AfD. This page gets thousands of pageviews these days, and all of them are greeted with the message that Wikipedia wants to delete this page now. The AfD goes against deletion policies in any case, as it is clearly a notable event; but to propose it now was very ill judged. Fram ( talk) 08:14, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Page is about two football matches that will never be contested. Why having a special page about the finals when there will no finals be contested? All notable content is also at 2016 Copa Sudamericana, the page of the competition. Other info (if there is any), could easily be merged. Sander.v.Ginkel ( Talk) 16:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
COMMENT A merge request was opened up immediately after the closure of this discussion, it can be found at Talk:2016 Copa Sudamericana#Merge discussion (2016) -- 65.94.171.217 ( talk) 02:39, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable compilation, spent one week at the lowest position on the chart. Only one review, no other third party sources. Previous AFD garnered no attention whatsoever after two relists. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 16:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
It seems only one of her roles was prominent. I couldn't verify that she meets WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Has been tagged for notability for 8 years now; hopefully we can get it resolved. Boleyn ( talk) 15:49, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. asserting that one is a self published author is not a valid assertion of significance. There can be exceptions, but they have to be demonstrated. DGG ( talk ) 08:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Declined speedy since there is a source, but nevertheless I dfon't think this character passes WP:GNG. One swallow does not a summer make. Incidentally, judging by the name of the creating editor, this is an autobiography. Rarely a good sign. TheLongTone ( talk) 13:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:45, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Would have changed this to a redirect, but article has been changed to a redirect twice, only to be reverted. No point in prodding it, so it falls here. While the group is notable, this individual member is not, at this time. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Currently, it's a blp with a lot of unsourced assertions. Onel5969 TT me 12:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:40, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
I simply cannot find any coverage about this language; in fact, I have no idea if the language itself existed or is a matter of fiction and a plot point of a book. The book mentioned in the article does not have a Wikipedia article, and searches for either the book or its author (who also does not have a Wikipedia article) result only in one profile in a Brazilian website. I have a feeling that the book mentioned might be self-published as a search for the ISBN number mentioned in the article came up empty. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 12:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
BLP article about lawyer that fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Little in way of notability to ensure it lasts. Article was deleted by Prod several days but undeleted last night by SPA account at IP: 49.151.149.153 . Simply no encyclopedic knowledge whatsoever. scope_creep ( talk) 12:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete (G5) by Bbb23. ( non-admin closure) GSS ( talk) 16:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Smells of puffery. The only hits I could find are the references given in the article, neither of which are reliable; worse, one of the references appears to be a hoax given that this unremarkable band apparently received more votes than One Direction in a certain poll. The accolade received according to the article also appears to be false. I would have nominated this for A7, but the article is well-written enough, and there are claims to notability (claiming to be signed to a record label, which by the way does not have a Wikipedia article and does not appear to have any online presence whatsoever) that it probably escapes A7. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 12:15, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Two Descents is an article about a Pakistani band based in Karachi, it has useful information and useful sources and valid information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Designer86 ( talk • contribs) 15:25, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Two Descents is an article about a boy band which is based in Karachi. The band was formed in 2015 by school friends Ahmed Mujtuba, Harris Memon and Usman Memon. It is a useful article and it should not be deleted.-- The Designer86 ( talk) 11:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Note: There is a sockpuppet investigation undergoing against the creator of this article. GSS ( talk) 12:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:48, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable restaurant. Largoplazo ( talk) 12:03, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:48, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Actress is covered in two Times of India sources which are reliable. Overall doesn't pass WP:NACTOR. Marvellous Spider-Man 11:54, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedy deleted as Wikipedia:CSD#A7 by User:Espresso Addict. (non-admin closure of AfD) §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 05:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
No apparent relevance, unsourced, orphan, there is no reason to believe that this article should stay in Wikipedia. ★ Iñaki ★ (Talk page) ★ 11:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 15:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
No indication of notability. Only one of the references given is a reliable secondary source, and it mentions Hercolubus only in passing. Other than that it's original research, with a heavy dose of our editors' personal opinions. Even if this were a valid topic for an article, starting over from scratch would be more efficient than trying to salvage this page. Huon ( talk) 20:06, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Given that the topic can be argued to be an early Latin American model for an erratic solar system member that is finding its way into modern discussion among English-speaking scientists under a variety of equivalent names (a body answering the description of Hercolubus is making its approach known mathematically but is not officially photographed yet - hence no uniform name), it would seem encyclopedic to avoid complete omission of non-English terms that could be useful to readers pursuing further independent research. The biggest challenge, from my desk, is overcoming the concern about conflation via appropriate multi-linguistic citations, which may become a moot point as the approach becomes visible and observers in different cultures continue to name it according to the synonym(s) of their own ancient cultural records. ~L.G.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.36.223.40 ( talk) 23:22, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE due to low/no discussion. The article can be re-created by visiting REFUND. Joyous! | Talk 01:54, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
This article appears not to be notable. It is an orphan, with no sources outside of the company page, and its creator (who has been notified of the pending deletion), is a SPA editor and has been notified at @ Mishakohl: -- FuzzyGopher ( talk) 20:32, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
This is a well establish active not-for-profit Foundation since 1999 that can be consulted at Florida http://www.sunbiz.org/ to verify its status.
The result was keep. Mackensen (talk) 21:41, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
The article lacks any reliable sources. IMDb is not a reliable source. I tried to find something with a google source. Just searching "Ray Gray" gave me nothing. My search for where I added film just gave me lots of hits on 50 shades of Gray. I found him going through Category:American Latter Day Saints, so I looked for Ray Gray and added Mormon. I came up with another Gray who spoke at the Mormon Transhumanist association meeting, who lacks the first name Ray, but nothing on Ray Grey. There may be sources, but I could not find any, definately nothing to show Grey is notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 22:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 13:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Howell is an assistant college football coach. This is not enough to grant notabilioty. My search for coverage did not show up anything more substantial than the employer bios we have here. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 23:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable software engineer and consultant. References given are mentions; can't find coverage in reliable sources. G11 and a7 tags removed by subject (who interestingly created the article about the author). — teb728 t c 10:13, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. per previous discussion and the creator of this split Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jai Jai Jai Bajrang Bali episodes — Spaceman Spiff 10:51, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Strong delete-Wikipedia is not a repository of details of numerous episodes of any show.Also several instances of copyvio. Aru@baska ❯❯❯ Vanguard 10:12, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close. Deleted by CambridgeBayWeather. — Spaceman Spiff 03:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Strong delete-Wikipedia is not a repository of details of numerous episodes of any show. Aru@baska ❯❯❯ Vanguard 10:12, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was SPEEDY DELETE. Alexf (talk) 14:15, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Film to be released in 2021. Wikipedia:Too soon & non-notable. PROD contested. — teb728 t c 09:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Does not meet the WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR the sources are almost exclusively self-published articles and press releases. Vanity page and soapbox! Domdeparis ( talk) 09:11, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Non notable box set of albums that do not have their own pages. Does not meet criteria WP:NALBUMS Domdeparis ( talk) 08:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 15:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Seems to be a WP:synth article. There is no parent article (i.e. St Kilda–Fremantle AFL rivalries) so it is not a split and must meet the WP:GNG. So far there is only one article that discusses the topic of the article in depth [45]. This is a St Kilda website which I am not sure even meets our definition of a WP:RS. Everything else is just standard news that you would expect to find between any two clubs of any two sports.
The lead itself is pure original research which just underlines the dubious nature of this article. This is just a laundry list for non-notable incidents. There are better articles for ones that are semi-notable (season articles and the like) and notable ones can always get there own one (e.g. AFL siren controversy). AIRcorn (talk) 07:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:59, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Delete and Salt please as this has been restarted twice now as clear advertising and none of this suggests better at all, as not only are the sources listed trivial and unconvincing, they are literally either interviewed quotes and "tips and event listings, none of which suggest why we should not apply WP:NOT, which is in fact applicable because it is policy against such blatancy here. SwisterTwister talk 06:30, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 12:10, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Only sources are a passing mention in an article about a product and a feature in a local newspaper. Appears to be an autobiography. Doesn't seem notable. CapitalSasha ~ talk 05:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC) New information now added for notability, review again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattsandyny ( talk • contribs) 05:47, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Not AutoBio. I'm biographer, same handle as page. Should not be marked for deletion. Notable/ references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattsandyny ( talk • contribs) 17:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 22:48, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
This article is verging on cruft. There is absolutely no need to have a separate article on every government body, when the content herein can easily be covered under the article on the relevant policy, or even in the main Narendra Modi article. Vanamonde ( talk) 04:31, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Adding News papers, links as evidence [47]- The Hindu [48]- Business Standard [49]-The Economic Times [50]-The Times of India. [51]-Financial Express. [52]-Business Standard. Junosoon ( talk) 04:33, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 12:11, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
While it exists, this topic about an unofficial list of Scottish goalkeepers, which is named after a Scottish footballer, has received no significant coverage in reliable sources. Does not meet WP:GNG. North America 1000 03:22, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
This page was added, similar to the 'Lev Yashin Club' which is for Russian goalkeepers. It is intended for the 'John Thomson Club', which is an unofficial list, to be discussed on the BBC "Off the Ball" radio programme. (Comment added by Donnie Maroot, who created the page and is brand new to Wikipedia, so apologies for any technical issues with the page. Any help/suggestions would be welcome.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donnie Maroot ( talk • contribs) 08:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi Chris, thanks for your comments. There would appear to be other non-official lists (for example the Serhiy Rebrov club) relating to sporting achievements which are permitted. The concept of the John Thomson Club has been discussed with the BBC, STV and other outlets to promote this further. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donnie Maroot ( talk • contribs) 19:00, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Non notable and blatant advertising. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 05:20, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Unremarkable fashion brand lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 02:55, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
References
The result was Speedy delete- the article has been speedy deleted under G7. This discussion is moot (NAC). Reyk YO! 08:18, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
I dig cyberpunk, I really do, but I cannot find any indication this art project has attracted attention from more than social media, blogs, and minor online zines that are little better than blogs. The article makes an unreferenced claim about one piece (?) being a part of an exhibition at a museum (Grand Rapids Art Museum) and possibly winning (?) something called Artprize, but the best I can find for the former is [ https://www.neondystopia.com/cyberpunk-art-photography/retech-cyberpunk-reclamation-art/, and for latter, well, nothing. I think it fails WP:GNG. If anyone can point out to a more reliable source covering this, please do. (On a related note, all the images are likely copyvios and I have started a Commons deletion discussion for them at Commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Diffman). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:52, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is that the company is notable, and overall, participants herein have not agreed with the nominator's view of the article being spam, the sources being public relations content, the article being a business listing, or the article violating WP:NOT. North America 1000 08:46, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Advertising for an article whose sources are literally only published and republished advertising, regardless of publication name or attention, because literally everything here actually goes into such specifics, only the company would ever say, such as the Fortune article itself now only goes to begin with its named investors and business partners then to its interviewed CEO quotes and finally with its named clients. My own searches have then found only PR, regardless of publication, so that alone seals the fate of this article, which is advertising to begin with. Note how literally every article listed always has the same consistency of supplying the same financials, and this isn't a coincidence when it's formatted so eloquently.
No genuine journalism would ever put that, unless it was company-supplied and with advertising motivations, and this article has everything to suggest this. Now, Shervin Pishevar may be notable, but the other, Scott Stanford, certainly seems to not be, and nor is this company since there's still such advertising blatancy. Even some of this, such as the listed NYT never actually mentions the company, but instead the founder, therefore not only is "Sherpa Capital has been known to seek out ideas" advertising, but it's simply shoehorning any attempts of ingenuity. Sure, we could consider merging this, but it would violate WP:SPAM and WP:NOT, because not only is Wikipedia not a business listing or company webhost, the contents here are exactly that, thus not mergeable. SwisterTwister talk 02:22, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Article has been improved/sourced since nomination and as none o that's been refuted I'm assuming the nominator is fine with it all, Anyway consensus is to keep ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Pilot's notability, if any, comes from the Northwest Airlines Humanitarian Award she received and being a board member of Women in Aviation International. Borderline qualification. Meatsgains ( talk) 00:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing that out, Oakshade! I fixed the tense of the article to match. Margalob ( talk) 15:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Folkman is a low level businessman with no actions or positions that rise to the level of notability. The sourcing is not enough to pass the general notability guidelines. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Love You Baba. ( non-admin closure) SST flyer 02:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Current world record holder as the youngest film director. See WP:BLP1E; all articles only point to this as reason for his notability. Notability is of course permanent, and his notability will vanish when someone seven years, 339 days old makes a movie someday. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 04:16, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Hanley founded a social media marketing firm that grew to about 50 employees and then was purchased by a bigger company. This is not the stuff of notability. Beyond this, the first 2 sources not only are not about Hanley, they do not even seem to mention him. The 3rd source is about Hanley, but it was created by Hanley as part of the "I'm a Mormon" campaign. In this campaign individuals create profiles of themselves. Even when things are a step up and there is filming of the person, the creation is not in any way indepdent of the subject. We have no sources that are indepdent, 3rd party and about the subject, so we have no choice but to delete. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 06:08, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Transparent attempt at vote-stacking noted and disregarded. Mackensen (talk) 14:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Non notable businessman. He lacks coverage about him in independent reliable sources. Quotes from him are not coverage about him. Sources from first afd are trivial mentions. Sources from the article are mostly primary. Other provide only quotes from him. duffbeerforme ( talk) 13:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
The article is conspicuously lacking in independent sources. We have a bunch of PR-type biographies, typically provided by entities with which the subject is associated. We have a concert announcement, a radio interview, and a couple of sale pages for her products. Rounding out this vanity page are a puff piece and book review, but nothing truly indicative of "multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician". - Biruitorul Talk 13:43, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm amazed that Imreh would be on the watch list for deletion. She certainly has a bevy of successful students and years of touring and solo work. She's been on a major label or two for years. Why does she not rate and other pianists who haven't even published works of their own persevere? Jamesmarcus ( talk) 14:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Gabriela Imreh is a successful recording (touring) artist, teacher, soloist, and author. I believe she has earned her place in the lexicon. There must be some measure to differentiate similar artists who are not being considered for deletion from this one. What is the dividing line?
Jsteeber ( talk) 14:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 12:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Delete and Alt given the history at Bimlesh Adhikari and this article is literally not any better. Note that this one current article has in fact been deleted once before in 2013. SwisterTwister talk 01:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Hopkinson is not a notable painter. The only source in the article is his personal website. A search on google came up with no reliable sources, and nothing coming even close to indicate meeting the notability requirements for artists. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:50, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 12:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:BAND, appears to not be notable. Evking22 ( talk) 17:13, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 12:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Cook is only really notable as a defeated candidate for governor of Utah. Candidates for governor are not default notable, and the coverage of him does not rise above routine coverage. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) SST flyer 02:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
This article really has no claim to significance. The single cited source also has no claim of significance and has very very little information. It would appear that most of it not all of the encyclopedic information is original, uncited research. bojo1498 talk 17:39, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
An autobiography that is not verifiable, of an aspirant politician who is not notable yet.I did not find any references reliable references other than local tabloids. Probably borderline A7, but as it is around already for a while, it is maybe better to discuss it. User:Elianamwiha ( talk)
The result was Procedural Close. Article speedy deleted. ( non-admin closure) ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 00:22, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
A search for her comes up with nothing. Fails WP:GNG. Also a potential hoax, I couldn't find anything discussing her as a neuroscientist. Also, the infobox calls her a rapper, when the article calls her a neuroscientist.... no idea what's going on there. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 23:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Could have been WP:PROD instead, but this will do I guess. Yamamoto Ichiro ( talk) 01:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. A search shows there to be no coverage of him in reliable sources. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 22:59, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 00:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Reliable sources could not be found on this subject to merit a standalone article. A redirect or merge to Lagos State University should be an option. — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 22:47, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Speedy keep Thanks for noticing that oluwa2chainz. Notable sources has been added now and non notable ones removed. This include some of Nigerians most circulating newspapers. The AfD you tagged was unnecessary just a ping to add more sources would have made it look the way it appears now. And as for notability I'm surprised you brought this up everyone in Lagos have heard LASUCOM. Mahveotm ( talk) 23:18, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Weak Keep. Per these additional sources : LASUCOM Students protest prolong programme, Recurrent Capital estimates on Lagos State Government and Lasu medical students protest non accreditation programmes. The article might need more information, reliable sources and editing to merit a stand alone article. If not found to be notable, then it should be merged to Lagos State University. Eruditescholar ( talk) 02:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro ( talk) 01:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Public Enemy Number Two doesn't appear to be a notable enough book as to merit a separate list. Clarityfiend ( talk) 22:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). Regards— ~ THE INFI NITE SPACE X 08:57, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No references. Regards— ~ THE INFI NITE SPACE X 22:07, 01 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. Regards— ~ THE INFI NITE SPACE X 08:34, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable actor. Has only been in B-list movies, and not as the main star. Could not find any sources on him. Natg 19 ( talk) 22:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:40, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable actor. Has only played bit roles. Natg 19 ( talk) 22:12, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:55, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable actor. Could not find reliable sources about him. Natg 19 ( talk) 22:05, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:23, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable actor. Natg 19 ( talk) 21:49, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Sikkim Gold Cup. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
The notability of these articles has been discussed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football in this current discussion at which editors agreed these season articles are not notable for a minor regional tournament. Qed237 (talk) 21:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages because they are all season articles for this tournament and recently created by same editor:
Qed237 (talk) 21:48, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. A redirect to Bomb disposal can be created at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to have significant coverage in reliable sources. Ratings and download totals from app stores aren't reliable indicators of notability. The app has good reviews from OneClickMac and Mac.AppStorm, but neither of those sites appears to be a reliable source. IagoQnsi ( talk) 20:30, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Three issues here:
Notability. First and foremost, the article meets WP:ORG per Forbes India, the Business Standard, and The Economic Times.
Paid editing. It's likely that the page creator is in violation of our paid editing policies. If the article is notable. though, we should still keep it.
Reliability of the sources. I respectfully disagree with User:SwisterTwister that "we cannot confide in India's publications, even if known and major, to not publish company advertising." It's not for us as Wikipedia editors to make that call. Our standard is verifiability, not truth, and so we should rely on the sources above even if we suspect they are advertising. Cerebellum ( talk) 01:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Purely promotional work by paid editor. Sourced to blogs and procedural coverage. Editing patterns consistent with paid PR editing, especially awards [1] [2] [3] and acquisitions [4] infodumps.
WP:OWNer Snkay9 accidentally revealed himself to be a paid PR editor in this edit where he attempted to link a Word document called "Revised Quick Heal Wikipedia Page.doc" by linking it from his Outlook inbox. -Jergling PC Load Letter 20:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
– A google search shows, Quick Heal was covered by forbes way back in 2012 [1]. This puts up a good case of showing its repute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.223.154.169 ( talk) 00:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Apart from the sources, Quick Heal is a well known provider of products and solutions in the Security software industry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Droopdead ( talk • contribs) 20:15, December 6, 2016 (UTC)
Again, Quick Heal is definitely a notable company
Comment The discussion is absolutely outrageous. To say that news sources from Indian publications is not trustworthy is autocratic and baseless. India has the largest number of publications int he world and TOI is the read english newspaper in the world. Yes. I do believe that the onus is on the guys to proove that Quick Heal is not notable company after giving references from multiple 'Known' Indian publications. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Droopdead ( talk • contribs) 14:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Have just tried to improve this article, renewed the ref needed banner, added ref needed tags, but have to wonder if this is an article that really meets WP:NOTABILITY and WP:BLP standards. Other than self-published sources and what appear to be totally unreliable sources per Wikipedia requirements for BLPs, I don't think this article is really appropriate on its own. Perhaps it could be merged into an article on the one co-authored best-seller itself? I don't necessarily want to see it nuked, but ... I just don't see how it can be redeemed. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 23:15, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:33, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Miller's only claim to fame is being Miss Kansas USA. This is not enough to establish notability. A search on google for additional sources only seems to bring up her Linkedin page, not a reliable indepdent source, that shows she has been working as an obtometry store manager. The previous discussion that resulted in keep was flawed on many levels. First off, someone claimed we have two international sources. One is literally a caption from a picture of her with 9 other teenagers who were finalists in Miss Teen USA. The other is not working, but appears to be another caption, probably with others. Neither is substantial coverage. The substantial coverage is either feel good stories from her college newspaper, not the stuff of reliable GNG passing, or local coverage related to her beauty pageant activities, not enough to establish permanent notability. Also, the first discussion had some attacking the deltion nomination because it tried to use the model guidelines. There was a discussion back in August on weather to make a formal set of notability guidelines for beauty pageant contestants. It closed with a statement that such should be attempted and then brought back to RfC. However the general majority opinion was that state beauty pageant winners are not default notable. There is nothing suggesting that Miller is notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 20:15, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Actor who has only appeared in a few short films. Doesn't appear to meet WP:NOTE. Justeditingtoday ( talk) 18:42, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 13:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Please read WP:LISTN; I can't see any evidence that this topic meets the notability criteria required for a stand-alone list. I am aware that other similar lists exist, however, this doesn't mean that they are considered to be notable. A lot of Albanian footballers are born in modern-day Kosovo but, again, is this worthy of an article? Spiderone 17:49, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable film. No indications of any coverage for this short film. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 11:57, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear (near unanimous) consensus to delete due to insufficient sources to meet our various notability criteria. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
This article has been around for ten years without anybody adding any real evidence of notability. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 15:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Business Growth Fund. Cerebellum ( talk) 01:29, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Apart from some brief churnalistic coverage when this investment fund was launched [33] [34] [35] I'm unable to find any substantial coverage. I've checked the full version of the Times article (which is also the only mainstream source) and it is only 200 words long. Coverage since then is extremely brief, only mentioning who they have invested in. Unless I'm missing sources, WP:CORP is not met as present. (As an aside, the parent company Business Growth Fund might well be notable e.g. [36].) SmartSE ( talk) 18:30, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
— 2A02:C7D:499:4200:A52B:158B:49FE:F35 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
*Keep valid company with significant UK media coverage as noted in the links.
Misterpottery (
talk)
12:27, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. AfD heavily affected by socking and by low partecipation, no non-sock comments in over a month, WP:NPASR close. ( non-admin closure) Cavarrone 08:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Article with multiple issues. This article looks like an unconstructive article which is not yet to be on main space by the way source listed may not be reliable.
Music Boy50 (
talk) 15:10, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Blocked sock.
MER-C
04:42, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails on so many levels, scandal mongering, hearsay, on the level of fleeting news. Looks like gossip about some nobody to me. Or it could be a hoax. Libel is a concern too. Even if the refs are legit, who cares? Internet scandals and memes don't strike me as encyclopedia material, admittedly there could be exceptions Speedy delete The sources are pathetic and without distinction, not to be trusted. The lack of expansion possibilities is manifestly obvious in the content that is present, the articles existing informational parameters seem to preclude any hope of improvement, in my opinion. The subject matter isn't worth a spot on the bathroom wall. This article should be gone before I press "save."-- J. M. Pearson ( talk) 20:05, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
As a way of encouraging new Nigerian editors to remain on Wikipedia and the recent cleanup done to the article, I am changing from "strong delete" to neutral. Would have voted "weak keep", but I don't want to be one of the editors that will make this article remain on Wikipedia. Darreg ( talk) 10:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America 1000 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Lack of significant coverage by reliable third party sources. Mentions and primary sources don't make notability. Niteshift36 ( talk) 15:42, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- fails WP:CORP as there are no reliable secondary sources cited in the article. - Only refers to self published sources, own website, reeks of promotion has also been tagged but issues haven't ben addressed since 2013. ronaz Talk! 10:58, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Rocket Science Games#List of games made by Rocket Science. ( non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 00:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NVG. This article was previously redirected to Rocket Science Games#List of games made by Rocket Science by Czar, but then the creator undid the redirection. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 15:46, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to OpenBSD. MBisanz talk 13:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable initiative that never went anywhere and isn't even used by its parent project after ten years. Talk page discussion notes lack of good third-party sources, even at the time the project was launched. Even the project press page features mostly mentions on the OpenBSD news site and not anything third-party, let alone mainstream. The redirect was turned back into an article on the basis of existence, completely ignoring notability considerations (it has no independent notability). Suggest delete or redirect to OpenBSD (nailing the redirect in place). David Gerard ( talk) 19:19, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. It may be that the article would have been deleted for lack of notability anyway, but as it is the article was an unambiguous copyright infringement, and also unambiguously promotional, so it has been deleted already. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 20:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Written like an autobiography, not truly notable subject. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 18:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete as a copyright infringement. The article is a straight translation into Mongolian of the web page https://www.hackingloops.com/cowpatty/ (It is pretty well certain that the article would eventually have been deleted anyway, even without the copyright problem.) The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 20:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
This is a how to article to hack WIFI networks contrary to WP:NOTHOWTO Domdeparis ( talk) 18:23, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 22:48, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Appear to be a non notable band with just two single releases as anime tie-ins. As each member has a list of other credits, it seems safe to say they just worked together for a couple of songs. Even their web page only lists the two releases. [44] French and Japanese wiki pages are both identical in content to this one so no new information is apparent. SephyTheThird ( talk) 17:10, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was Closed as SNOW KEEP this disruptive, unwarranted and disrespectful AfD. This page gets thousands of pageviews these days, and all of them are greeted with the message that Wikipedia wants to delete this page now. The AfD goes against deletion policies in any case, as it is clearly a notable event; but to propose it now was very ill judged. Fram ( talk) 08:14, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Page is about two football matches that will never be contested. Why having a special page about the finals when there will no finals be contested? All notable content is also at 2016 Copa Sudamericana, the page of the competition. Other info (if there is any), could easily be merged. Sander.v.Ginkel ( Talk) 16:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
COMMENT A merge request was opened up immediately after the closure of this discussion, it can be found at Talk:2016 Copa Sudamericana#Merge discussion (2016) -- 65.94.171.217 ( talk) 02:39, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable compilation, spent one week at the lowest position on the chart. Only one review, no other third party sources. Previous AFD garnered no attention whatsoever after two relists. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 16:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
It seems only one of her roles was prominent. I couldn't verify that she meets WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Has been tagged for notability for 8 years now; hopefully we can get it resolved. Boleyn ( talk) 15:49, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. asserting that one is a self published author is not a valid assertion of significance. There can be exceptions, but they have to be demonstrated. DGG ( talk ) 08:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Declined speedy since there is a source, but nevertheless I dfon't think this character passes WP:GNG. One swallow does not a summer make. Incidentally, judging by the name of the creating editor, this is an autobiography. Rarely a good sign. TheLongTone ( talk) 13:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:45, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Would have changed this to a redirect, but article has been changed to a redirect twice, only to be reverted. No point in prodding it, so it falls here. While the group is notable, this individual member is not, at this time. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Currently, it's a blp with a lot of unsourced assertions. Onel5969 TT me 12:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:40, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
I simply cannot find any coverage about this language; in fact, I have no idea if the language itself existed or is a matter of fiction and a plot point of a book. The book mentioned in the article does not have a Wikipedia article, and searches for either the book or its author (who also does not have a Wikipedia article) result only in one profile in a Brazilian website. I have a feeling that the book mentioned might be self-published as a search for the ISBN number mentioned in the article came up empty. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 12:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
BLP article about lawyer that fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Little in way of notability to ensure it lasts. Article was deleted by Prod several days but undeleted last night by SPA account at IP: 49.151.149.153 . Simply no encyclopedic knowledge whatsoever. scope_creep ( talk) 12:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete (G5) by Bbb23. ( non-admin closure) GSS ( talk) 16:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Smells of puffery. The only hits I could find are the references given in the article, neither of which are reliable; worse, one of the references appears to be a hoax given that this unremarkable band apparently received more votes than One Direction in a certain poll. The accolade received according to the article also appears to be false. I would have nominated this for A7, but the article is well-written enough, and there are claims to notability (claiming to be signed to a record label, which by the way does not have a Wikipedia article and does not appear to have any online presence whatsoever) that it probably escapes A7. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 12:15, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Two Descents is an article about a Pakistani band based in Karachi, it has useful information and useful sources and valid information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Designer86 ( talk • contribs) 15:25, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Two Descents is an article about a boy band which is based in Karachi. The band was formed in 2015 by school friends Ahmed Mujtuba, Harris Memon and Usman Memon. It is a useful article and it should not be deleted.-- The Designer86 ( talk) 11:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Note: There is a sockpuppet investigation undergoing against the creator of this article. GSS ( talk) 12:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:48, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable restaurant. Largoplazo ( talk) 12:03, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:48, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Actress is covered in two Times of India sources which are reliable. Overall doesn't pass WP:NACTOR. Marvellous Spider-Man 11:54, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedy deleted as Wikipedia:CSD#A7 by User:Espresso Addict. (non-admin closure of AfD) §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 05:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
No apparent relevance, unsourced, orphan, there is no reason to believe that this article should stay in Wikipedia. ★ Iñaki ★ (Talk page) ★ 11:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 15:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
No indication of notability. Only one of the references given is a reliable secondary source, and it mentions Hercolubus only in passing. Other than that it's original research, with a heavy dose of our editors' personal opinions. Even if this were a valid topic for an article, starting over from scratch would be more efficient than trying to salvage this page. Huon ( talk) 20:06, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Given that the topic can be argued to be an early Latin American model for an erratic solar system member that is finding its way into modern discussion among English-speaking scientists under a variety of equivalent names (a body answering the description of Hercolubus is making its approach known mathematically but is not officially photographed yet - hence no uniform name), it would seem encyclopedic to avoid complete omission of non-English terms that could be useful to readers pursuing further independent research. The biggest challenge, from my desk, is overcoming the concern about conflation via appropriate multi-linguistic citations, which may become a moot point as the approach becomes visible and observers in different cultures continue to name it according to the synonym(s) of their own ancient cultural records. ~L.G.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.36.223.40 ( talk) 23:22, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE due to low/no discussion. The article can be re-created by visiting REFUND. Joyous! | Talk 01:54, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
This article appears not to be notable. It is an orphan, with no sources outside of the company page, and its creator (who has been notified of the pending deletion), is a SPA editor and has been notified at @ Mishakohl: -- FuzzyGopher ( talk) 20:32, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
This is a well establish active not-for-profit Foundation since 1999 that can be consulted at Florida http://www.sunbiz.org/ to verify its status.
The result was keep. Mackensen (talk) 21:41, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
The article lacks any reliable sources. IMDb is not a reliable source. I tried to find something with a google source. Just searching "Ray Gray" gave me nothing. My search for where I added film just gave me lots of hits on 50 shades of Gray. I found him going through Category:American Latter Day Saints, so I looked for Ray Gray and added Mormon. I came up with another Gray who spoke at the Mormon Transhumanist association meeting, who lacks the first name Ray, but nothing on Ray Grey. There may be sources, but I could not find any, definately nothing to show Grey is notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 22:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 13:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Howell is an assistant college football coach. This is not enough to grant notabilioty. My search for coverage did not show up anything more substantial than the employer bios we have here. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 23:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable software engineer and consultant. References given are mentions; can't find coverage in reliable sources. G11 and a7 tags removed by subject (who interestingly created the article about the author). — teb728 t c 10:13, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. per previous discussion and the creator of this split Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jai Jai Jai Bajrang Bali episodes — Spaceman Spiff 10:51, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Strong delete-Wikipedia is not a repository of details of numerous episodes of any show.Also several instances of copyvio. Aru@baska ❯❯❯ Vanguard 10:12, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close. Deleted by CambridgeBayWeather. — Spaceman Spiff 03:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Strong delete-Wikipedia is not a repository of details of numerous episodes of any show. Aru@baska ❯❯❯ Vanguard 10:12, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was SPEEDY DELETE. Alexf (talk) 14:15, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Film to be released in 2021. Wikipedia:Too soon & non-notable. PROD contested. — teb728 t c 09:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Does not meet the WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR the sources are almost exclusively self-published articles and press releases. Vanity page and soapbox! Domdeparis ( talk) 09:11, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Non notable box set of albums that do not have their own pages. Does not meet criteria WP:NALBUMS Domdeparis ( talk) 08:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 15:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Seems to be a WP:synth article. There is no parent article (i.e. St Kilda–Fremantle AFL rivalries) so it is not a split and must meet the WP:GNG. So far there is only one article that discusses the topic of the article in depth [45]. This is a St Kilda website which I am not sure even meets our definition of a WP:RS. Everything else is just standard news that you would expect to find between any two clubs of any two sports.
The lead itself is pure original research which just underlines the dubious nature of this article. This is just a laundry list for non-notable incidents. There are better articles for ones that are semi-notable (season articles and the like) and notable ones can always get there own one (e.g. AFL siren controversy). AIRcorn (talk) 07:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:59, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Delete and Salt please as this has been restarted twice now as clear advertising and none of this suggests better at all, as not only are the sources listed trivial and unconvincing, they are literally either interviewed quotes and "tips and event listings, none of which suggest why we should not apply WP:NOT, which is in fact applicable because it is policy against such blatancy here. SwisterTwister talk 06:30, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 12:10, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Only sources are a passing mention in an article about a product and a feature in a local newspaper. Appears to be an autobiography. Doesn't seem notable. CapitalSasha ~ talk 05:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC) New information now added for notability, review again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattsandyny ( talk • contribs) 05:47, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Not AutoBio. I'm biographer, same handle as page. Should not be marked for deletion. Notable/ references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattsandyny ( talk • contribs) 17:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 22:48, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
This article is verging on cruft. There is absolutely no need to have a separate article on every government body, when the content herein can easily be covered under the article on the relevant policy, or even in the main Narendra Modi article. Vanamonde ( talk) 04:31, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Adding News papers, links as evidence [47]- The Hindu [48]- Business Standard [49]-The Economic Times [50]-The Times of India. [51]-Financial Express. [52]-Business Standard. Junosoon ( talk) 04:33, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 12:11, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
While it exists, this topic about an unofficial list of Scottish goalkeepers, which is named after a Scottish footballer, has received no significant coverage in reliable sources. Does not meet WP:GNG. North America 1000 03:22, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
This page was added, similar to the 'Lev Yashin Club' which is for Russian goalkeepers. It is intended for the 'John Thomson Club', which is an unofficial list, to be discussed on the BBC "Off the Ball" radio programme. (Comment added by Donnie Maroot, who created the page and is brand new to Wikipedia, so apologies for any technical issues with the page. Any help/suggestions would be welcome.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donnie Maroot ( talk • contribs) 08:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi Chris, thanks for your comments. There would appear to be other non-official lists (for example the Serhiy Rebrov club) relating to sporting achievements which are permitted. The concept of the John Thomson Club has been discussed with the BBC, STV and other outlets to promote this further. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donnie Maroot ( talk • contribs) 19:00, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Non notable and blatant advertising. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 05:20, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Unremarkable fashion brand lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 02:55, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
References
The result was Speedy delete- the article has been speedy deleted under G7. This discussion is moot (NAC). Reyk YO! 08:18, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
I dig cyberpunk, I really do, but I cannot find any indication this art project has attracted attention from more than social media, blogs, and minor online zines that are little better than blogs. The article makes an unreferenced claim about one piece (?) being a part of an exhibition at a museum (Grand Rapids Art Museum) and possibly winning (?) something called Artprize, but the best I can find for the former is [ https://www.neondystopia.com/cyberpunk-art-photography/retech-cyberpunk-reclamation-art/, and for latter, well, nothing. I think it fails WP:GNG. If anyone can point out to a more reliable source covering this, please do. (On a related note, all the images are likely copyvios and I have started a Commons deletion discussion for them at Commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Diffman). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:52, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is that the company is notable, and overall, participants herein have not agreed with the nominator's view of the article being spam, the sources being public relations content, the article being a business listing, or the article violating WP:NOT. North America 1000 08:46, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Advertising for an article whose sources are literally only published and republished advertising, regardless of publication name or attention, because literally everything here actually goes into such specifics, only the company would ever say, such as the Fortune article itself now only goes to begin with its named investors and business partners then to its interviewed CEO quotes and finally with its named clients. My own searches have then found only PR, regardless of publication, so that alone seals the fate of this article, which is advertising to begin with. Note how literally every article listed always has the same consistency of supplying the same financials, and this isn't a coincidence when it's formatted so eloquently.
No genuine journalism would ever put that, unless it was company-supplied and with advertising motivations, and this article has everything to suggest this. Now, Shervin Pishevar may be notable, but the other, Scott Stanford, certainly seems to not be, and nor is this company since there's still such advertising blatancy. Even some of this, such as the listed NYT never actually mentions the company, but instead the founder, therefore not only is "Sherpa Capital has been known to seek out ideas" advertising, but it's simply shoehorning any attempts of ingenuity. Sure, we could consider merging this, but it would violate WP:SPAM and WP:NOT, because not only is Wikipedia not a business listing or company webhost, the contents here are exactly that, thus not mergeable. SwisterTwister talk 02:22, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Article has been improved/sourced since nomination and as none o that's been refuted I'm assuming the nominator is fine with it all, Anyway consensus is to keep ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Pilot's notability, if any, comes from the Northwest Airlines Humanitarian Award she received and being a board member of Women in Aviation International. Borderline qualification. Meatsgains ( talk) 00:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing that out, Oakshade! I fixed the tense of the article to match. Margalob ( talk) 15:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Folkman is a low level businessman with no actions or positions that rise to the level of notability. The sourcing is not enough to pass the general notability guidelines. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Love You Baba. ( non-admin closure) SST flyer 02:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Current world record holder as the youngest film director. See WP:BLP1E; all articles only point to this as reason for his notability. Notability is of course permanent, and his notability will vanish when someone seven years, 339 days old makes a movie someday. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 04:16, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Hanley founded a social media marketing firm that grew to about 50 employees and then was purchased by a bigger company. This is not the stuff of notability. Beyond this, the first 2 sources not only are not about Hanley, they do not even seem to mention him. The 3rd source is about Hanley, but it was created by Hanley as part of the "I'm a Mormon" campaign. In this campaign individuals create profiles of themselves. Even when things are a step up and there is filming of the person, the creation is not in any way indepdent of the subject. We have no sources that are indepdent, 3rd party and about the subject, so we have no choice but to delete. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 06:08, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Transparent attempt at vote-stacking noted and disregarded. Mackensen (talk) 14:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Non notable businessman. He lacks coverage about him in independent reliable sources. Quotes from him are not coverage about him. Sources from first afd are trivial mentions. Sources from the article are mostly primary. Other provide only quotes from him. duffbeerforme ( talk) 13:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
The article is conspicuously lacking in independent sources. We have a bunch of PR-type biographies, typically provided by entities with which the subject is associated. We have a concert announcement, a radio interview, and a couple of sale pages for her products. Rounding out this vanity page are a puff piece and book review, but nothing truly indicative of "multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician". - Biruitorul Talk 13:43, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm amazed that Imreh would be on the watch list for deletion. She certainly has a bevy of successful students and years of touring and solo work. She's been on a major label or two for years. Why does she not rate and other pianists who haven't even published works of their own persevere? Jamesmarcus ( talk) 14:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Gabriela Imreh is a successful recording (touring) artist, teacher, soloist, and author. I believe she has earned her place in the lexicon. There must be some measure to differentiate similar artists who are not being considered for deletion from this one. What is the dividing line?
Jsteeber ( talk) 14:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 12:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Delete and Alt given the history at Bimlesh Adhikari and this article is literally not any better. Note that this one current article has in fact been deleted once before in 2013. SwisterTwister talk 01:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Hopkinson is not a notable painter. The only source in the article is his personal website. A search on google came up with no reliable sources, and nothing coming even close to indicate meeting the notability requirements for artists. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:50, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 12:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:BAND, appears to not be notable. Evking22 ( talk) 17:13, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 12:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Cook is only really notable as a defeated candidate for governor of Utah. Candidates for governor are not default notable, and the coverage of him does not rise above routine coverage. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) SST flyer 02:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
This article really has no claim to significance. The single cited source also has no claim of significance and has very very little information. It would appear that most of it not all of the encyclopedic information is original, uncited research. bojo1498 talk 17:39, 16 November 2016 (UTC)