![]() |
The result was Speedy keep This AFD nomination is so far from the mark that it can only have been made with the intention of disrupting WP. The nominator is the main contributor to the article in question and has very successfully established notability over the course of an entire year. To now claim that the band's significance is questionable is disingenuous. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 09:54, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
there are no reliable sources about the band's current activity, the significance of the band is questionnable Wikismasha ( talk) 21:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related page because [there are no reliable sources about the artist's current activity]:
:
Steph Honde (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views)
This page is totally fine, very well document, very detailed (this obvious when you read the page) and shouldn't be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by McDonaldhenry ( talk • contribs)
Apparently Wikimasha is the administrator of the page,so what would be the reason for that person to say that the sources on that page are not reliable and that the significance of the band is questionable? Maybe the wikimasha account has been hacked? There's obviously a lot of time spent on that page and it seems strange that the same person would want to delete what he has done for these reasons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by McDonaldhenry ( talk • contribs) 07:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
The Hollywood Monsters are currently recording a new album. — Preceding unsigned comment added by McDonaldhenry ( talk • contribs) 14:19, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
I can't find any reliable sources with significant coverage. The article does not cite any (one link is just a listing mentioning him, the other is not independent). Google News search returns no results for "Raghunath Singh Thakur" [1]. It does return a few for "R. S. Thakur" [2], but it seams that those are not about the same person. Google Books search returns few hits for "Raghunath Singh Thakur" [3], but it seams that those are about some prince. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. slakr\ talk / 02:47, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
This individual is not notable. The article appears to be self promotion. The edit history and users involved suggest a conflict of interest and non neutral point of view re Horison Community College. isfutile:P ( talk) 18:16, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
The article notes:
It’s billed as Yorkshire’s super school, but can a new building, even one costing £50m, really kick start the regeneration of Barnsley? Sarah Freeman reports.
Since he was appointed last March, Nick Bowen has spent much of his time on a building site. As the head of Barnsley’s new Horizon Community College, he’s been on first name terms with the workmen who have been transforming a 46-acre site into what will be the biggest school in the country.
...
Bowen stops short of promising HCC will be able to work miracles, but he does have form when it comes to blending the teaching of traditional education with entrepreneurial skills.
In his last headteacher post at St Benet Biscop in the North East, he won the Queen’s Award for Enterprise, normally reserved for business.
...
Bowen has been in teaching for almost 25 years and while his career choice may have been accidental, his designs on Barnsley’s education are anything but.
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Upcoming film, no suggestion that it meets WP:NFF. ("Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles.") The only sources I can find suggest that the film has only very recently been announced at all. McGeddon ( talk) 21:06, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep'. Can always be nominated in the future if the condition of the article doesn't improve. ( non-admin closure) Wikienglish123 ( talk) 14:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Not a notable writer. JDDJS ( talk) 20:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Editor was given plenty of chances at Draft:David Elmasllari to address WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK and warned repeated rapid submissions without improvements that meet policies may be seen as disruption. Editor chose to ignore those warnings. Mkdw talk 20:04, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The article in it's current state does not satisfy the notability guidelines according to WP:BLP. And the article under the same name has been rejected several times at Afc. So, taking it to Afd. Peppy Paneer ( talk) 19:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. Most(if not all) references are primary. -- Kethrus | talk to me 19:03, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines except a mention of reaching number one on "Grischa Charts", which isn't explained or sourced. Almost certainly isn't a national music chart. Fails WP:BAND. clpo13( talk) 18:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:46, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Lack of notability. Although some famous people gave their blessing to this association, it has not caused any mayor impact. The page appears that it was already deleted before. I don't know how much worse this version can be. Denidi ( talk) 18:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:46, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced design concept. No indication of notability. I can't even find any reliable sources on the concept at all. clpo13( talk) 18:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:47, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Completely non-notable college gymnast (no mention of any medals) per WP:NGYMNAST. clpo13( talk) 18:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 14:47, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
PROD removed without explanation. Original PROD reasoning still stands: No references to show that this is anything significant. Best I can find is small new development bearing this name, and a mention here [7] but no indication of the map [8] to say where it is or define its boundaries. Unless there is something more concrete I think this in nothing but a vague notion. I don't think the fact that there is a school and hiking trail with this name is particularly relevant. clpo13( talk) 18:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:47, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable department of a non-notable college of a notable university. Simply a listing of degrees offered. Wikipedia is not a directory. clpo13( talk) 18:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:48, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
I can not find any reference to this chain at all. It isn't listed at List of Philippine restaurant chains, which is odd given the article claims it is the largest there. I then thought it might be a parent company, but any and all searches have turned up nothing about this company. I'm happy to be proven wrong, but this appears to fail all notability guidelines or to be WP:MADEUP. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 17:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:48, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
We used to have frequent fun deleting articles on "something made up in school one afternoon". OK, this drink was made up in a bar or apartment instead, apparently by "MW and HF in 2007": the article was created by M888w on 4 June 2007 presumably staright after, and this user has made no further edits. Emeraude ( talk) 14:17, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:48, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
City level leader of Pakistani organization Jamaat e Islami. Only sources given are website of this organization. Some facebook links are also present. He is also a social worker but there is no indication that his social work is noticed by independent reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Human3015 TALK 13:15, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Biography of living person created by editor of same name. This person is blogger from India. There is no evidence of notability on google search. But there is claim of winning a tech award and some unreliable sources so nominated for AfD instead of speedy. Human3015 TALK 12:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Article was created on September 26 and speedily deleted on October 27 due to unclear notability (lack of independent sources). The article has just been recreated exactly as before, with no new sources. General Ization Talk 12:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Note: As even the creator of the article has now conceded that the subject is not yet sufficiently
notable to warrant an article, request speedy delete.
General Ization
Talk
14:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Subject of the article fails WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC. He is just doing his job. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 10:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable boxer - does not meet WP:NBOX. Last AfD contained too many additional nominations which resulted in No consensus. Peter Rehse ( talk) 10:50, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. While the nom had a valid point, the four cogent arguments made to keep the article are grounded in policy, and no other editor has supported deleting the article. Even though 3 of the 4 are weak keeps, the consensus is keep, albeit weakly. ( non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 22:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Biography of a modern artist that seems to fail WP:ARTIST. Lots of references/external links - and all seem to be to limited circulation, mostly offline catalogs, gallery pages selling his work, and other local/not-in-depth/unreliable sources. I couldn't find any in-depth coverage on him in GNews/GBooks; google gives social media/gallery sites... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:51, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Keep. Don't consider deleting until the following has been remedied: This is the formula for losing a promising new writer for Wikipedia. This is one of two articles submitted by the writer/editor and both are up for deletion in only a few days after creation, on the VERY FIRST ATTEMPTS AT WRITING ARTICLES. So far as I can see, no one has offered to talk to the writer to offer help, just slapped a delete tag on his/her works. There are news sources available on this subject, and if I can I will help. But I suggest that those slapping delete tags on works should start improving their own under-sourced and easy-to-label-as not-notable articles. Jacqke ( talk) 11:04, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Weak Keep He has an entry on imdb.com and is notable enough based on online searches. However I would be opposed to his article being a featured article TypingInTheSky ( talk) 03:11, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Thank you all for your comments!
What shall I do as far as images copyright? I really don't understand how that works. If the image is self-photographed, then what is the issue? Shall I get a letter from the artist's studio manager to verify that these images are acceptable to use in an encyclopedic context?
I would greatly appreciate any further advice you can give me to ameliorate the status of this article, and to remove all of those flags as soon as possible.
I am myself a dedicated Wikipedia user, referring to its information on many subjects and consider the article on this artist to be a great educational resource for those interested in video art and installations.
Thank you again everyone! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulinapaulina3030 ( talk • contribs) 00:18, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I can confirm I am not User:Butterbeanne, but know this editor and have also used their guidance. I don't know what I can provide as proof for my identity, except that I must have my own distinct ip address. Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulinapaulina3030 ( talk • contribs) 20:01, November 2, 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. L Faraone 04:07, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced non-notable annual event, nearly all university have a homecoming event of which none of them have an article covering the subject. I could see this article staying if it was solely covering last weekends tragedy at the parade but at a different title but even in that event I believe the subject is still not notable. Dcheagle • talk • contribs 09:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Furthermore, in my opinion the British editor's comment seems to be misinformed. One, university Homecoming is not just a "student" event, in fact it is primarily for the alumni and/or greater community. Two, of course in the US we take "little local" events seriously, do you think in a country with 300 million people and spanning from coast to coast there are really going to be nationally dominant universities like Oxford or Cambridge in the UK? Of course not. This university in particular is a major state university that serves not just its area but the whole state.
Here are some sources to perhaps establish or at least inform y'all of the notability of this particular Homecoming.
2602:30A:2EFE:F050:A1D2:FA71:366F:B03E ( talk) 19:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Delete Does not seem much different from any other homecoming other universities have. What makes this one so special? We are not going to have articles on every single event that every single major university has are we? The Legendary Ranger ( talk) 00:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:50, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Page about a non-notable trade association. Article was originally somewhat promotional, but was recently expanded by an anon editor into an attack page. Most of the stated "sources" were about the general subject of damp in buildings and may only have made passing mention of the specific subject of this page; many of them are now dead and I have not been able to retrieve archived versions of them. – Fayenatic L ondon 07:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Obvious Keep is obvious ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 22:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Unreferenced biography of a living person Rathfelder ( talk) 07:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 04:48, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Newly started PR stunt “award function” by a television production house with no notability. Fails WP:GNG. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 06:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. joe decker talk 19:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced article which seems to be just a hoax or a promotional piece. There seems to have been some discussion about deleting it in the past but even though a general consensus was to prod it, no one seems to have bothered. FreeatlastChitchat ( talk) 06:35, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was nomination withdrawn. No one seems to be on board with deletion anymore. Ricky81682 ( talk) 21:24, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Prodded under "Unsourced paragraph; insufficient material for a separated page when Mount Everest could easily absorb this" but removed. No evidence that this particular summit is independently notable and I don't think individual mountain summits are inherently notable on their own. Maybe move to draftspace. Ricky81682 ( talk) 05:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. joe decker talk 19:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
The best my searches found was this and this which all show Scottish news including this article and I was going to search more in-depth there but this seems obvious with no better improvement. It's worth noting "Abagail Grey" started this article in April 2012 so it's imaginable it was the band themselves. Pinging Titodutta and Missvain. SwisterTwister talk 22:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 07:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and improvable? company with my searches only finding this, this, this, this and this. Pinging W Nowicki, TJRC, Pol098, Peterl, Jimfbleak, Gillyweed and Lid (not sure who else there is to ping before it was speedy deleted but there's likely not active anyway). SwisterTwister talk 22:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:50, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't find any independent non-trivial sources for this person— the French Wikipedia had no article, Google Books turned up nothing. Only reference here is an external link to the artist's website. Can anyone find some bona fide sources to add to this article?? KDS4444 Talk 21:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The strongest argument is for WP:BLP1E slakr\ talk / 02:28, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
fails GNG, WP:NOTNEWS —Мандичка YO 😜 20:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Alas, as an unregistered user I cannot complete the AfD procedure. If I had that possibility, I would argue that the subject does not meet notability criteria. Four of the six linked sources are just rather random articles signed by the author himself, the remaining two are a one sentence mention of being one of several people leaving one company, and a single sentence about being hired by a public office, respectively. This does not really fulfill the criteria of having 'significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject'. Furthermore, although I am aware of the pitfalls or using cross-wiki content as an argument, CS wiki editors have arrived at the same consensus - https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedie:Diskuse_o_smaz%C3%A1n%C3%AD/Adam_Halmo%C5%A1i - (together with a rather nasty emotional outburst by Mr Halmosi himself) 89.176.87.169 ( talk) 12:21, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. Article has no third party references. Goodheart wrote what appear to be some obscure and mostly out of print technical course books. Amazon -- Wiki-psyc ( talk) 18:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to The Long Haul. There is already an extant hatnote at flight length pointing to The Long Haul dab page, so will make the necessary changes there. ( non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 13:21, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
There is only one accessible article linked to this disambiguation page Rob van vee 19:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. consensus to delete after relisting DGG ( talk ) 01:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Fails to meet notability guidelines. What little personal info there is is entirely unreferenced; most of the article looks like coatrack promotion of his employer. RichardOSmith ( talk) 19:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Plainfield, Indiana. Rounded to merge, as there's clearly consensus against outright keeping. How much to merge (if anything) is, as always, up to consensus at the target, and if nothing makes it, WP:RFD can deal with the redirect. slakr\ talk / 02:33, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
non notable shopping center; regs arethe usual local newws pieces. No encyclopedic information DGG ( talk ) 18:33, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. L Faraone 04:08, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:ORG, what coverage I can find seems fairly minimal and routine. Group itself seems to be defunct. Nsteffel ( talk) 18:03, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:52, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, not notable, only claims inherited notability, but notability is not inherited. References requested since December 2010, and identified as advertisement since January 2013. Clearly no hope of any improvements. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. L Faraone 04:08, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
The article about a person does not meet Wikipedia's standards for notability. Specifically, the subject of the page has not received "a well-known and significant award or honor," nor have they "made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field." Further, the subject of the page has not received "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources." Wilson1543 ( talk) 17:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. L Faraone 04:09, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Not notable, not neutral, article seems written by someone closely related Zebras234 ( talk) 13:03, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 15:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Not notable person. Some references are her personal bolg Zebras234 ( talk) 12:52, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Conelrad (band). slakr\ talk / 02:38, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Contested prod. Non-notable EP. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 04:50, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:53, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and improvable as it seems there's not much even much information about this show and the best links I found were these and with no improvement since February 2009 I'm not seeing any obvious signs of it happening. SwisterTwister talk 06:59, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 04:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and improvable as basically the best I found was this, this, this, this and this and this hasn't changed much since February 2008. Pinging Tewapack and Wisdom89. SwisterTwister talk 06:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:NGOLF. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. slakr\ talk / 02:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure what this article is about. A large water tank? A settlement that grew up around it? In any case, there are no references, and I haven't been able to find anything substantial about it. Clarityfiend ( talk) 00:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 03:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. Has got a little local interest coverage in Uppsala but nothing significant. Outside that she lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Article claims lot's of charting but none are good charts. Releases are not on "important" label. Akademia Music Awards are not major, they are a pay for play award farm. duffbeerforme ( talk) 03:53, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) sst✈ discuss 01:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
WP:TNT, This article created for a school project doesn't even define what the subject is - as has been noted on the talk page by two editors. Lots of close paraphrasing on the useless history section as well. The Dissident Aggressor 03:30, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. With WP:NPASR ( non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk 19:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Article lacks references altogether. Presumed notability under WP:NSPORT is a rebuttable presumption, and I have not been able to identify the necessary non-trivial coverage of this individual in multiple independent, reliable sources. Failing the appearance of these, it looks like the article should be deleted. KDS4444 Talk 18:24, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:53, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Actor who falls under too soon (and I'm pretty sure the 1983 film listed here is for a different Richard McWilliams, given that it is a pretty common name-that title does not even appear on the IMDB listing for him) Wgolf ( talk) 02:23, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lisa Moscatiello#Discography. For now. Noting that there is a potential for an article of a play with the same name. ( non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 00:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Well Kept Secrets, the result was redirect so this article probably isn't notable enough to belong in Wikipedia either. Blackbombchu ( talk) 22:55, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lisa Moscatiello#Discography. ( non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 00:21, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Well Kept Secrets, the result was redirect so this article probably isn't notable enough to belong in Wikipedia either. Blackbombchu ( talk) 22:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lisa Moscatiello. Other have been redirected so makes sense just to redirect this ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Well Kept Secrets, the result was redirect so this article probably isn't notable enough to belong in Wikipedia either. Blackbombchu ( talk) 22:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:NPASR KTC ( talk) 01:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Nothing substantial in a video game reliable sources custom Google search, though it might be worth redirecting to a mention at its dev's page: Mythic Entertainment. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ ping}} me. czar 20:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. With WP:NPASR. ( non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk 19:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
This event fails WP:GNG. Google News search returns just one hit [26], and that one just mentions the festival in passing. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:57, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Can always be nominated in the future if the condition of the article doesn't improve. ( non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 00:19, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Effectively unreferenced article about a company which does not meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP. Searches bring up nothing to support notability. McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 16:30, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
I do not see enough here to substantiate a notability claim. KDS4444 Talk 11:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Any redirects are an editorial decision. Sandstein 06:55, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Proposed public works project, fails WP:CRYSTAL with no secondary sources. Unclear whether this is a single proposed project for the area or one of many. Searching for the name of the space and the name of the architects returns no obvious secondary source coverage. McGeddon ( talk) 11:01, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Limited discussion, but this is a BLP article with no sources, which means that deletion is mandatory per WP:BLP. Sandstein 07:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
This person seams to fail WP:GNG. Google News search returns 4 hits, none of which are about this particular person [27]. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:24, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:56, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Individual is not notable. Non-notable acting career, jobs, and positions. Page seems more of a vanity entry with non-notable awards. Much of the page is unsourced and my attempts to locate sources mostly ineffective. Page was created and much of it edited by a SPA. Attempts to discuss issues with the article's creator have not gotten any response. Jim1138 ( talk) 07:13, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Normally, with no discussion, I would close this as WP:SOFTDELETE, but given the copyright issues and history of repeated deletion under minor variations on the title, I'm going to call this a full delete. I am going to stop short of salting the title, however. Should it get recreated and the new version still doesn't pass muster, salting can always be done later. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:14, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
This is at least the sixth time this article has been created, and the sixth time it consists of copyright-fringing text with no references to reliable sources. (Previous incarnations have been deleted and had their titles salted; see logs at [28] and [29]. The article at Parasparam now covers an unrelated film.) I had a go at finding reliable sources but wasn't successful. Unless someone more familiar with Malayalam TV can point to in-depth coverage on somewhere other than a blog or anonymous content farm, I think we need to delete and salt this version as well. Psychonaut ( talk) 06:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
This strikes me as a WP:BLP1E thing. He was arrested and jailed for some song. It got a little press at the time. Article overinflates the so called worldwide movement generated. He was mentioned as an example of a political prisoner in relation to a petition but this article overplays his significance in that event and overplays what was simply one (well signed) petition. duffbeerforme ( talk) 03:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSOFT. Lacks independent references and has since its creation. One independent source found with GNews mentions it in passing but doesn't support any claims made in the Wikipedia article. clpo13( talk) 02:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 02:45, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
No indication of notability WP:ORG and written like an advert or press release. Derek Andrews ( talk) 01:49, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I have made quite a bit of changes to the article. I was wondering if you could help me cite correctly and also get the images to show up? Thank you for the help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisdlink ( talk • contribs) 15:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Unreferenced, poorly formated, biased, uses some peacock terms, doesn't link to any other articles, etc. Without any sources there is no indication of notability. Andise1 ( talk) 01:44, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:11, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
No reason to have a listing of Acuvue products on a separate article. Fails WP:NOTCATALOGUE. clpo13( talk) 01:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus for deletion; non-notable subject per Wikipedia's standards. North America 1000 13:14, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable performer; lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources, failing WP:NACTOR / WP:GNG. References are only mentions or not independent of subject. clpo13( talk) 01:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Withdrawing means nothing when there's delete votes present, Anyway sources have been provided so obvious keep ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Lots of passing mentions and social media references but no actual reliable sources that show the subject passes WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. Maybe there is material in his national media but someone needs to cite it it can not be assumed. Jbh Talk 14:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. The "delete" reasons are in line with Wikipedia policies & guidelines, while the "keeps" (every one of which is from a single purpose account existing solely to oppose this deletion nomination) aren't: "I know this product very well", " Software with a huge history has a right to be in Wikipedia", etc, do nothing whatever to suggest notability by Wikipedia standards. Some of the comments (e.g. "it gives some actual information for clients") even seem to suggest that the purpose is to use Wikipedia for publicity purposes, which if anything strengthens the case for deletion, not for keeping. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 09:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Difficult to see notability here. Lots of refs but mostly within a very niche market and most seem to be re-publishing press releases or product evaluation. I can see nothing here that even meets WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 10:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:59, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSOFT, sourced entirely with related organizations' websites. clpo13( talk) 01:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
My researches couldn't find anything notable. Article also contains conflict of interest materials. — OluwaCurtis »» ( talk to me) 19:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was Speedy keep This AFD nomination is so far from the mark that it can only have been made with the intention of disrupting WP. The nominator is the main contributor to the article in question and has very successfully established notability over the course of an entire year. To now claim that the band's significance is questionable is disingenuous. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 09:54, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
there are no reliable sources about the band's current activity, the significance of the band is questionnable Wikismasha ( talk) 21:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related page because [there are no reliable sources about the artist's current activity]:
:
Steph Honde (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views)
This page is totally fine, very well document, very detailed (this obvious when you read the page) and shouldn't be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by McDonaldhenry ( talk • contribs)
Apparently Wikimasha is the administrator of the page,so what would be the reason for that person to say that the sources on that page are not reliable and that the significance of the band is questionable? Maybe the wikimasha account has been hacked? There's obviously a lot of time spent on that page and it seems strange that the same person would want to delete what he has done for these reasons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by McDonaldhenry ( talk • contribs) 07:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
The Hollywood Monsters are currently recording a new album. — Preceding unsigned comment added by McDonaldhenry ( talk • contribs) 14:19, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
I can't find any reliable sources with significant coverage. The article does not cite any (one link is just a listing mentioning him, the other is not independent). Google News search returns no results for "Raghunath Singh Thakur" [1]. It does return a few for "R. S. Thakur" [2], but it seams that those are not about the same person. Google Books search returns few hits for "Raghunath Singh Thakur" [3], but it seams that those are about some prince. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. slakr\ talk / 02:47, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
This individual is not notable. The article appears to be self promotion. The edit history and users involved suggest a conflict of interest and non neutral point of view re Horison Community College. isfutile:P ( talk) 18:16, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
The article notes:
It’s billed as Yorkshire’s super school, but can a new building, even one costing £50m, really kick start the regeneration of Barnsley? Sarah Freeman reports.
Since he was appointed last March, Nick Bowen has spent much of his time on a building site. As the head of Barnsley’s new Horizon Community College, he’s been on first name terms with the workmen who have been transforming a 46-acre site into what will be the biggest school in the country.
...
Bowen stops short of promising HCC will be able to work miracles, but he does have form when it comes to blending the teaching of traditional education with entrepreneurial skills.
In his last headteacher post at St Benet Biscop in the North East, he won the Queen’s Award for Enterprise, normally reserved for business.
...
Bowen has been in teaching for almost 25 years and while his career choice may have been accidental, his designs on Barnsley’s education are anything but.
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Upcoming film, no suggestion that it meets WP:NFF. ("Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles.") The only sources I can find suggest that the film has only very recently been announced at all. McGeddon ( talk) 21:06, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep'. Can always be nominated in the future if the condition of the article doesn't improve. ( non-admin closure) Wikienglish123 ( talk) 14:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Not a notable writer. JDDJS ( talk) 20:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Editor was given plenty of chances at Draft:David Elmasllari to address WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK and warned repeated rapid submissions without improvements that meet policies may be seen as disruption. Editor chose to ignore those warnings. Mkdw talk 20:04, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The article in it's current state does not satisfy the notability guidelines according to WP:BLP. And the article under the same name has been rejected several times at Afc. So, taking it to Afd. Peppy Paneer ( talk) 19:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. Most(if not all) references are primary. -- Kethrus | talk to me 19:03, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines except a mention of reaching number one on "Grischa Charts", which isn't explained or sourced. Almost certainly isn't a national music chart. Fails WP:BAND. clpo13( talk) 18:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:46, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Lack of notability. Although some famous people gave their blessing to this association, it has not caused any mayor impact. The page appears that it was already deleted before. I don't know how much worse this version can be. Denidi ( talk) 18:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:46, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced design concept. No indication of notability. I can't even find any reliable sources on the concept at all. clpo13( talk) 18:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:47, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Completely non-notable college gymnast (no mention of any medals) per WP:NGYMNAST. clpo13( talk) 18:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 14:47, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
PROD removed without explanation. Original PROD reasoning still stands: No references to show that this is anything significant. Best I can find is small new development bearing this name, and a mention here [7] but no indication of the map [8] to say where it is or define its boundaries. Unless there is something more concrete I think this in nothing but a vague notion. I don't think the fact that there is a school and hiking trail with this name is particularly relevant. clpo13( talk) 18:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:47, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable department of a non-notable college of a notable university. Simply a listing of degrees offered. Wikipedia is not a directory. clpo13( talk) 18:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:48, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
I can not find any reference to this chain at all. It isn't listed at List of Philippine restaurant chains, which is odd given the article claims it is the largest there. I then thought it might be a parent company, but any and all searches have turned up nothing about this company. I'm happy to be proven wrong, but this appears to fail all notability guidelines or to be WP:MADEUP. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 17:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:48, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
We used to have frequent fun deleting articles on "something made up in school one afternoon". OK, this drink was made up in a bar or apartment instead, apparently by "MW and HF in 2007": the article was created by M888w on 4 June 2007 presumably staright after, and this user has made no further edits. Emeraude ( talk) 14:17, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:48, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
City level leader of Pakistani organization Jamaat e Islami. Only sources given are website of this organization. Some facebook links are also present. He is also a social worker but there is no indication that his social work is noticed by independent reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Human3015 TALK 13:15, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Biography of living person created by editor of same name. This person is blogger from India. There is no evidence of notability on google search. But there is claim of winning a tech award and some unreliable sources so nominated for AfD instead of speedy. Human3015 TALK 12:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Article was created on September 26 and speedily deleted on October 27 due to unclear notability (lack of independent sources). The article has just been recreated exactly as before, with no new sources. General Ization Talk 12:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Note: As even the creator of the article has now conceded that the subject is not yet sufficiently
notable to warrant an article, request speedy delete.
General Ization
Talk
14:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Subject of the article fails WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC. He is just doing his job. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 10:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable boxer - does not meet WP:NBOX. Last AfD contained too many additional nominations which resulted in No consensus. Peter Rehse ( talk) 10:50, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. While the nom had a valid point, the four cogent arguments made to keep the article are grounded in policy, and no other editor has supported deleting the article. Even though 3 of the 4 are weak keeps, the consensus is keep, albeit weakly. ( non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 22:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Biography of a modern artist that seems to fail WP:ARTIST. Lots of references/external links - and all seem to be to limited circulation, mostly offline catalogs, gallery pages selling his work, and other local/not-in-depth/unreliable sources. I couldn't find any in-depth coverage on him in GNews/GBooks; google gives social media/gallery sites... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:51, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Keep. Don't consider deleting until the following has been remedied: This is the formula for losing a promising new writer for Wikipedia. This is one of two articles submitted by the writer/editor and both are up for deletion in only a few days after creation, on the VERY FIRST ATTEMPTS AT WRITING ARTICLES. So far as I can see, no one has offered to talk to the writer to offer help, just slapped a delete tag on his/her works. There are news sources available on this subject, and if I can I will help. But I suggest that those slapping delete tags on works should start improving their own under-sourced and easy-to-label-as not-notable articles. Jacqke ( talk) 11:04, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Weak Keep He has an entry on imdb.com and is notable enough based on online searches. However I would be opposed to his article being a featured article TypingInTheSky ( talk) 03:11, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Thank you all for your comments!
What shall I do as far as images copyright? I really don't understand how that works. If the image is self-photographed, then what is the issue? Shall I get a letter from the artist's studio manager to verify that these images are acceptable to use in an encyclopedic context?
I would greatly appreciate any further advice you can give me to ameliorate the status of this article, and to remove all of those flags as soon as possible.
I am myself a dedicated Wikipedia user, referring to its information on many subjects and consider the article on this artist to be a great educational resource for those interested in video art and installations.
Thank you again everyone! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulinapaulina3030 ( talk • contribs) 00:18, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I can confirm I am not User:Butterbeanne, but know this editor and have also used their guidance. I don't know what I can provide as proof for my identity, except that I must have my own distinct ip address. Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulinapaulina3030 ( talk • contribs) 20:01, November 2, 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. L Faraone 04:07, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced non-notable annual event, nearly all university have a homecoming event of which none of them have an article covering the subject. I could see this article staying if it was solely covering last weekends tragedy at the parade but at a different title but even in that event I believe the subject is still not notable. Dcheagle • talk • contribs 09:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Furthermore, in my opinion the British editor's comment seems to be misinformed. One, university Homecoming is not just a "student" event, in fact it is primarily for the alumni and/or greater community. Two, of course in the US we take "little local" events seriously, do you think in a country with 300 million people and spanning from coast to coast there are really going to be nationally dominant universities like Oxford or Cambridge in the UK? Of course not. This university in particular is a major state university that serves not just its area but the whole state.
Here are some sources to perhaps establish or at least inform y'all of the notability of this particular Homecoming.
2602:30A:2EFE:F050:A1D2:FA71:366F:B03E ( talk) 19:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Delete Does not seem much different from any other homecoming other universities have. What makes this one so special? We are not going to have articles on every single event that every single major university has are we? The Legendary Ranger ( talk) 00:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:50, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Page about a non-notable trade association. Article was originally somewhat promotional, but was recently expanded by an anon editor into an attack page. Most of the stated "sources" were about the general subject of damp in buildings and may only have made passing mention of the specific subject of this page; many of them are now dead and I have not been able to retrieve archived versions of them. – Fayenatic L ondon 07:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Obvious Keep is obvious ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 22:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Unreferenced biography of a living person Rathfelder ( talk) 07:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 04:48, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Newly started PR stunt “award function” by a television production house with no notability. Fails WP:GNG. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 06:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. joe decker talk 19:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced article which seems to be just a hoax or a promotional piece. There seems to have been some discussion about deleting it in the past but even though a general consensus was to prod it, no one seems to have bothered. FreeatlastChitchat ( talk) 06:35, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was nomination withdrawn. No one seems to be on board with deletion anymore. Ricky81682 ( talk) 21:24, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Prodded under "Unsourced paragraph; insufficient material for a separated page when Mount Everest could easily absorb this" but removed. No evidence that this particular summit is independently notable and I don't think individual mountain summits are inherently notable on their own. Maybe move to draftspace. Ricky81682 ( talk) 05:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. joe decker talk 19:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
The best my searches found was this and this which all show Scottish news including this article and I was going to search more in-depth there but this seems obvious with no better improvement. It's worth noting "Abagail Grey" started this article in April 2012 so it's imaginable it was the band themselves. Pinging Titodutta and Missvain. SwisterTwister talk 22:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 07:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and improvable? company with my searches only finding this, this, this, this and this. Pinging W Nowicki, TJRC, Pol098, Peterl, Jimfbleak, Gillyweed and Lid (not sure who else there is to ping before it was speedy deleted but there's likely not active anyway). SwisterTwister talk 22:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:50, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't find any independent non-trivial sources for this person— the French Wikipedia had no article, Google Books turned up nothing. Only reference here is an external link to the artist's website. Can anyone find some bona fide sources to add to this article?? KDS4444 Talk 21:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The strongest argument is for WP:BLP1E slakr\ talk / 02:28, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
fails GNG, WP:NOTNEWS —Мандичка YO 😜 20:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Alas, as an unregistered user I cannot complete the AfD procedure. If I had that possibility, I would argue that the subject does not meet notability criteria. Four of the six linked sources are just rather random articles signed by the author himself, the remaining two are a one sentence mention of being one of several people leaving one company, and a single sentence about being hired by a public office, respectively. This does not really fulfill the criteria of having 'significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject'. Furthermore, although I am aware of the pitfalls or using cross-wiki content as an argument, CS wiki editors have arrived at the same consensus - https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedie:Diskuse_o_smaz%C3%A1n%C3%AD/Adam_Halmo%C5%A1i - (together with a rather nasty emotional outburst by Mr Halmosi himself) 89.176.87.169 ( talk) 12:21, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. Article has no third party references. Goodheart wrote what appear to be some obscure and mostly out of print technical course books. Amazon -- Wiki-psyc ( talk) 18:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to The Long Haul. There is already an extant hatnote at flight length pointing to The Long Haul dab page, so will make the necessary changes there. ( non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 13:21, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
There is only one accessible article linked to this disambiguation page Rob van vee 19:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. consensus to delete after relisting DGG ( talk ) 01:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Fails to meet notability guidelines. What little personal info there is is entirely unreferenced; most of the article looks like coatrack promotion of his employer. RichardOSmith ( talk) 19:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Plainfield, Indiana. Rounded to merge, as there's clearly consensus against outright keeping. How much to merge (if anything) is, as always, up to consensus at the target, and if nothing makes it, WP:RFD can deal with the redirect. slakr\ talk / 02:33, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
non notable shopping center; regs arethe usual local newws pieces. No encyclopedic information DGG ( talk ) 18:33, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. L Faraone 04:08, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:ORG, what coverage I can find seems fairly minimal and routine. Group itself seems to be defunct. Nsteffel ( talk) 18:03, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:52, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, not notable, only claims inherited notability, but notability is not inherited. References requested since December 2010, and identified as advertisement since January 2013. Clearly no hope of any improvements. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. L Faraone 04:08, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
The article about a person does not meet Wikipedia's standards for notability. Specifically, the subject of the page has not received "a well-known and significant award or honor," nor have they "made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field." Further, the subject of the page has not received "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources." Wilson1543 ( talk) 17:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. L Faraone 04:09, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Not notable, not neutral, article seems written by someone closely related Zebras234 ( talk) 13:03, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 15:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Not notable person. Some references are her personal bolg Zebras234 ( talk) 12:52, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Conelrad (band). slakr\ talk / 02:38, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Contested prod. Non-notable EP. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 04:50, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:53, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and improvable as it seems there's not much even much information about this show and the best links I found were these and with no improvement since February 2009 I'm not seeing any obvious signs of it happening. SwisterTwister talk 06:59, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 04:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and improvable as basically the best I found was this, this, this, this and this and this hasn't changed much since February 2008. Pinging Tewapack and Wisdom89. SwisterTwister talk 06:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:NGOLF. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. slakr\ talk / 02:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure what this article is about. A large water tank? A settlement that grew up around it? In any case, there are no references, and I haven't been able to find anything substantial about it. Clarityfiend ( talk) 00:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 03:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. Has got a little local interest coverage in Uppsala but nothing significant. Outside that she lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Article claims lot's of charting but none are good charts. Releases are not on "important" label. Akademia Music Awards are not major, they are a pay for play award farm. duffbeerforme ( talk) 03:53, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) sst✈ discuss 01:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
WP:TNT, This article created for a school project doesn't even define what the subject is - as has been noted on the talk page by two editors. Lots of close paraphrasing on the useless history section as well. The Dissident Aggressor 03:30, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. With WP:NPASR ( non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk 19:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Article lacks references altogether. Presumed notability under WP:NSPORT is a rebuttable presumption, and I have not been able to identify the necessary non-trivial coverage of this individual in multiple independent, reliable sources. Failing the appearance of these, it looks like the article should be deleted. KDS4444 Talk 18:24, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:53, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Actor who falls under too soon (and I'm pretty sure the 1983 film listed here is for a different Richard McWilliams, given that it is a pretty common name-that title does not even appear on the IMDB listing for him) Wgolf ( talk) 02:23, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lisa Moscatiello#Discography. For now. Noting that there is a potential for an article of a play with the same name. ( non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 00:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Well Kept Secrets, the result was redirect so this article probably isn't notable enough to belong in Wikipedia either. Blackbombchu ( talk) 22:55, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lisa Moscatiello#Discography. ( non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 00:21, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Well Kept Secrets, the result was redirect so this article probably isn't notable enough to belong in Wikipedia either. Blackbombchu ( talk) 22:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lisa Moscatiello. Other have been redirected so makes sense just to redirect this ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Well Kept Secrets, the result was redirect so this article probably isn't notable enough to belong in Wikipedia either. Blackbombchu ( talk) 22:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:NPASR KTC ( talk) 01:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Nothing substantial in a video game reliable sources custom Google search, though it might be worth redirecting to a mention at its dev's page: Mythic Entertainment. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ ping}} me. czar 20:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. With WP:NPASR. ( non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk 19:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
This event fails WP:GNG. Google News search returns just one hit [26], and that one just mentions the festival in passing. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:57, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Can always be nominated in the future if the condition of the article doesn't improve. ( non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 00:19, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Effectively unreferenced article about a company which does not meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP. Searches bring up nothing to support notability. McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 16:30, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
I do not see enough here to substantiate a notability claim. KDS4444 Talk 11:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Any redirects are an editorial decision. Sandstein 06:55, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Proposed public works project, fails WP:CRYSTAL with no secondary sources. Unclear whether this is a single proposed project for the area or one of many. Searching for the name of the space and the name of the architects returns no obvious secondary source coverage. McGeddon ( talk) 11:01, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Limited discussion, but this is a BLP article with no sources, which means that deletion is mandatory per WP:BLP. Sandstein 07:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
This person seams to fail WP:GNG. Google News search returns 4 hits, none of which are about this particular person [27]. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:24, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:56, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Individual is not notable. Non-notable acting career, jobs, and positions. Page seems more of a vanity entry with non-notable awards. Much of the page is unsourced and my attempts to locate sources mostly ineffective. Page was created and much of it edited by a SPA. Attempts to discuss issues with the article's creator have not gotten any response. Jim1138 ( talk) 07:13, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Normally, with no discussion, I would close this as WP:SOFTDELETE, but given the copyright issues and history of repeated deletion under minor variations on the title, I'm going to call this a full delete. I am going to stop short of salting the title, however. Should it get recreated and the new version still doesn't pass muster, salting can always be done later. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:14, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
This is at least the sixth time this article has been created, and the sixth time it consists of copyright-fringing text with no references to reliable sources. (Previous incarnations have been deleted and had their titles salted; see logs at [28] and [29]. The article at Parasparam now covers an unrelated film.) I had a go at finding reliable sources but wasn't successful. Unless someone more familiar with Malayalam TV can point to in-depth coverage on somewhere other than a blog or anonymous content farm, I think we need to delete and salt this version as well. Psychonaut ( talk) 06:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
This strikes me as a WP:BLP1E thing. He was arrested and jailed for some song. It got a little press at the time. Article overinflates the so called worldwide movement generated. He was mentioned as an example of a political prisoner in relation to a petition but this article overplays his significance in that event and overplays what was simply one (well signed) petition. duffbeerforme ( talk) 03:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSOFT. Lacks independent references and has since its creation. One independent source found with GNews mentions it in passing but doesn't support any claims made in the Wikipedia article. clpo13( talk) 02:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 02:45, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
No indication of notability WP:ORG and written like an advert or press release. Derek Andrews ( talk) 01:49, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I have made quite a bit of changes to the article. I was wondering if you could help me cite correctly and also get the images to show up? Thank you for the help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisdlink ( talk • contribs) 15:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Unreferenced, poorly formated, biased, uses some peacock terms, doesn't link to any other articles, etc. Without any sources there is no indication of notability. Andise1 ( talk) 01:44, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:11, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
No reason to have a listing of Acuvue products on a separate article. Fails WP:NOTCATALOGUE. clpo13( talk) 01:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus for deletion; non-notable subject per Wikipedia's standards. North America 1000 13:14, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable performer; lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources, failing WP:NACTOR / WP:GNG. References are only mentions or not independent of subject. clpo13( talk) 01:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Withdrawing means nothing when there's delete votes present, Anyway sources have been provided so obvious keep ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Lots of passing mentions and social media references but no actual reliable sources that show the subject passes WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. Maybe there is material in his national media but someone needs to cite it it can not be assumed. Jbh Talk 14:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. The "delete" reasons are in line with Wikipedia policies & guidelines, while the "keeps" (every one of which is from a single purpose account existing solely to oppose this deletion nomination) aren't: "I know this product very well", " Software with a huge history has a right to be in Wikipedia", etc, do nothing whatever to suggest notability by Wikipedia standards. Some of the comments (e.g. "it gives some actual information for clients") even seem to suggest that the purpose is to use Wikipedia for publicity purposes, which if anything strengthens the case for deletion, not for keeping. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 09:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Difficult to see notability here. Lots of refs but mostly within a very niche market and most seem to be re-publishing press releases or product evaluation. I can see nothing here that even meets WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 10:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:59, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSOFT, sourced entirely with related organizations' websites. clpo13( talk) 01:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
My researches couldn't find anything notable. Article also contains conflict of interest materials. — OluwaCurtis »» ( talk to me) 19:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)